1
|
Karegar-Niavol R, Ghaffari F, Saravi A, Fotokian Z, Kheirkhah F. Translation and validation of a lifestyle questionnaire related to prostate cancer. Prostate 2024; 84:959-966. [PMID: 38644626 DOI: 10.1002/pros.24713] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/10/2024] [Revised: 03/26/2024] [Accepted: 04/08/2024] [Indexed: 04/23/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Valid and reliable instruments are needed to measure prostate cancer-related lifestyle changes, plan evidence-based interventions to modify lifestyle, and improve treatment outcomes. Due to the lack of appropriate instruments, this study was conducted to translate the Effects of Prostate Cancer upon Lifestyle Questionnaire (EPCLQ) into Persian and examine its psychometric properties in a sample of Iranian older adults with prostate cancer. METHODS This methodological study was carried out between 2021 and 2022. Initially, the EPCLQ, comprising 36 items, was translated into Persian through a meticulous translation and back-translation procedure. Subsequent steps involved the assessment of face validity, qualitative content validity, content validity index, content validity ratio, construct validity via confirmatory factor analysis, and reliability testing of the Persian version of the EPCLQ. RESULTS The psychometric evaluation led to the exclusion of 4 items from the EPCLQ. The refined model demonstrated satisfactory fit indices (PCFI = 0.732, PNFI = 0.696, CMIN/DF = 2.29, RMSEA = 0.072, IFI = 0.920, CFI = 0.919, and GFI = 0.971), indicating an appropriate fit of the final model. The internal consistency, as measured by Cronbach's alpha, was 0.67, and the intraclass correlation coefficient for the questionnaire was 0.938, reflecting high reliability. CONCLUSIONS The Persian version of the EPCLQ, now consisting of 32 items, has been validated and is reliable for assessing the impact of prostate cancer on lifestyle among older adults. Its simplicity and the clarity of the items make it suitable for use in clinical settings or during home visits for follow-up assessments.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Reyhane Karegar-Niavol
- Student Research Committee, Nursing Care Research Center, Health Research Institute, Babol University of Medical Sciences, Babol, Iran
| | - Fatemeh Ghaffari
- Nursing Care Research Center, Health Research Institute, Babol University of Medical Sciences, Babol, Iran
| | - Ali Saravi
- General Practitioner, I.R.I Police HQ, Tehran, Iran
| | - Zahra Fotokian
- Nursing Care Research Center, Health Research Institute, Babol University of Medical Sciences, Babol, Iran
| | - Farzan Kheirkhah
- Social Determinants of Health Research Center, Health Research Institute, Babol University of Medical Sciences, Babol, Iran
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Gesztesi L, Kocsis ZS, Jorgo K, Fröhlich G, Polgár C, Ágoston P. Alterations of Sexual and Erectile Functions after Brachytherapy for Prostate Cancer Based on Patient-Reported Questionnaires. Prostate Cancer 2024; 2024:5729185. [PMID: 38312318 PMCID: PMC10834089 DOI: 10.1155/2024/5729185] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/15/2023] [Revised: 11/16/2023] [Accepted: 01/08/2024] [Indexed: 02/06/2024] Open
Abstract
The aim of the study was to compare the side effects of high-dose-rate brachytherapy (HDRBT) and low-dose-rate brachytherapy (LDRBT), with a particular focus on the effects on sexual functions and sexual well-being (PROMOBRA study, NCT02258087). Localized low-risk and low-intermediate-risk prostate cancer patients were treated with mono LDR (N = 123, 145 Gy dose) or mono HDR brachytherapy (N = 117, 19/21 Gy). Prior to the treatment and during follow-up (at 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, and 24 months after treatment, and then annually after two years), patients completed patient-reported outcome measurement (PROM) questionnaires EORTC QLQ-PR-25, International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF), and IIEF-5 (SHIM). We compared the patients in different group breakdowns (HDR vs. LDR, hormone naïve and hormone-receiving HDR vs. LDR, hormone naïve and hormone-receiving patients in general, and 19 Gy HDR vs. 21 Gy HDR). In the hormone-naive LDR group, erectile function, orgasm function, sexual desire, satisfaction with intercourse, and overall satisfaction functions significantly decreased compared to baseline throughout the whole follow-up period. However, there were significant decreases in function at a maximum of three time points after HDR therapy without hormone therapy. In hormone-receiving patients, the orgasm function was significantly better in the HDR group at multiple time points compared to the baseline, and sexual desire improved at four time points. According to our results, both LDRBT and HDRBT can be safely administered to patients with localized prostate cancer. In hormone-naive patients, the HDR group showed only recovering decreases in sexual functions, while the LDR group showed a lasting decline in multiple areas. Thus, HDR appears to be more advantageous to hormone-naive patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- László Gesztesi
- National Institute of Oncology, Centre of Radiotherapy, Budapest, Hungary
| | - Zsuzsa S. Kocsis
- National Institute of Oncology, Centre of Radiotherapy, Department of Radiobiology and Diagnostic Onco-Cytogenetics and National Tumorbiology Laboratory, Budapest, Hungary
| | - Kliton Jorgo
- National Institute of Oncology, Centre of Radiotherapy, Budapest, Hungary
- Semmelweis University, Department of Oncology, Budapest, Hungary
| | - Georgina Fröhlich
- National Institute of Oncology, Centre of Radiotherapy, Budapest, Hungary
| | - Csaba Polgár
- National Institute of Oncology, Centre of Radiotherapy, Budapest, Hungary
- Semmelweis University, Department of Oncology, Budapest, Hungary
| | - Péter Ágoston
- National Institute of Oncology, Centre of Radiotherapy, Budapest, Hungary
- Semmelweis University, Department of Oncology, Budapest, Hungary
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Achard V, Zilli T, Lamanna G, Jorcano S, Bral S, Rubio C, Oliveira A, Bottero M, Bruynzeel AME, Ibrahimov R, Minn H, Symon Z, Constantin G, Miralbell R. Urethra-Sparing Prostate Cancer Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy: Sexual Function and Radiation Dose to the Penile Bulb, the Crura, and the Internal Pudendal Arteries From a Randomized Phase 2 Trial. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2023:S0360-3016(23)08307-4. [PMID: 38160915 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2023.12.037] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/17/2023] [Revised: 12/17/2023] [Accepted: 12/23/2023] [Indexed: 01/03/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE Erectile dysfunction (ED) is a common side effect after prostate cancer stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT). We aimed to assess the correlation between the dose to the penile bulb (PB), internal pudendal arteries (IPA), and crura with the development of ED after ultrahypofractionation as part of a phase 2 clinical trial of urethra-sparing prostate SBRT. METHODS AND MATERIALS Among the 170 patients with localized prostate cancer from 9 centers included in the trial, 90 men with Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 4.03 grade 0 to 1 ED (ED-) at baseline treated with 36.25 Gy in 5 fractions were selected for the present analysis. Doses delivered to the PB, crura, and IPA were analyzed and correlated with grade 2 to 3 ED (ED+) development. The effect on quality of life, assessed by the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC QLQ-PR25) questionnaire, was reported. RESULTS After a median follow-up of 6.5 years, 43% (n = 39) of the patients developed ED+, and 57% (n = 51) remained ED-. The dose delivered to the crura was significantly higher in ED+ patients than in ED- patients (7.7 vs 3.6 Gy [P = .014] for the Dmean and 18.5 vs 7.2 Gy [P = .015] for the D2%, respectively). No statistically significant difference between ED+ and ED- patients was observed for the dose delivered to the PB and IPA. The median ED+-free survival was worse in patients receiving a crura Dmean ≥ 4.7 versus < 4.7 Gy (51.5% vs 71.7%, P = .005) and a crura D2% > 12 versus ≤ 12 Gy (54.9% vs 68.9%, P = .015). No ED+-free survival differences were observed for doses delivered to the PB and IPA. Decline in EORTC QLQ-PR25 sexual functioning was significantly more pronounced in patients with higher doses to the crura. CONCLUSIONS By keeping a Dmean and D2% to crura below 4.7 and 12 Gy, respectively, the risk of developing ED+ after prostate SBRT may be significantly reduced.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vérane Achard
- Radiation Oncology, Geneva University Hospital, Geneva, Switzerland; Radiation Oncology, HFR Fribourg, Villars-sur-Glâne, Switzerland; Faculty of Medicine, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Thomas Zilli
- Radiation Oncology, Geneva University Hospital, Geneva, Switzerland; Faculty of Medicine, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland; Radiation Oncology, Oncology Institute of Southern Switzerland (IOSI), Bellinzona, Switzerland; Faculty of Medicine, Università della Svizzera Italiana, Lugano, Switzerland.
| | - Giorgio Lamanna
- Radiation Oncology, Geneva University Hospital, Geneva, Switzerland; Radiation Oncology, HFR Fribourg, Villars-sur-Glâne, Switzerland
| | - Sandra Jorcano
- Radiation Oncology, Teknon Oncologic Institute, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Samuel Bral
- Radiation Oncology, Onze-Lieve-Vrouwziekenhuis, Aalst, Belgium
| | - Carmen Rubio
- Radiation Oncology, Hospital Universitario Sanchinarro, Madrid, Spain
| | - Angelo Oliveira
- Radiation Oncology, Portuguese Institut of Oncology, Porto, Portugal
| | - Marta Bottero
- Radiation Oncology, Geneva University Hospital, Geneva, Switzerland; Radiation Oncology, IRCCS Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy
| | - Anna M E Bruynzeel
- Radiation Oncology, Amsterdam UMC, Location Vrije Universteit, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Roman Ibrahimov
- Radiation Oncology, Neolife Medical Center, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Heikki Minn
- Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Turku, Turku, Finland
| | - Zvi Symon
- Radiation Oncology, Sheba Medical Center, Ramat Gan, Israel; Sackler School of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | | | - Raymond Miralbell
- Radiation Oncology, Geneva University Hospital, Geneva, Switzerland; Faculty of Medicine, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland; Radiation Oncology, Teknon Oncologic Institute, Barcelona, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Holze S, Lemaire E, Mende M, Neuhaus P, Arthanareeswaran VKA, Truss MC, Minh Do H, Dietel A, Teber D, Stützel KD, Hohenfellner M, Rabenalt R, Albers P, Stolzenburg JU. Quality of life after robotic-assisted and laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: Results of a multicenter randomized controlled trial (LAP-01). Prostate 2022; 82:894-903. [PMID: 35254665 DOI: 10.1002/pros.24332] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/28/2021] [Revised: 02/15/2022] [Accepted: 02/18/2022] [Indexed: 11/12/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND To explore cross-sectional and longitudinal differences in general health-related and prostate cancer-specific quality of life (QoL) after robotic-assisted (RARP) and laparoscopic (LRP) radical prostatectomy and to analyze predictive variables for QoL outcomes. METHODS In this multicenter, randomized controlled trial, prostate cancer patients were randomly assigned 3:1 to undergo either RARP or LRP. Patient-reported outcomes were prospectively collected before and 1, 3, 6, 12 months after radical prostatectomy and included QoL as a secondary outcome. Validated questionnaires were used to assess general health-related (EORTC QLQ-C30) and prostate cancer-specific (QLQ-PR25) QoL. Cross-sectional and longitudinal contrasts were analyzed through linear mixed models. Predictive variables for QoL outcomes were identified by general linear modeling. RESULTS Of 782 randomized patients, QoL was evaluable in 681 patients. In terms of general QoL, the cross-sectional analysis showed only small differences between study arms, whereas longitudinal comparison indicated an advantage of RARP on recovery: RARP patients reported an earlier return to baseline in global health status (3 vs. 6 months) and social functioning (6 vs. 12 months). In role functioning, only the RARP arm regained baseline scores. Regarding prostate-specific QoL, LRP patients experienced more urinary symptoms and reported 3.2 points (95% confidence interval 0.4-6, p = 0.024) higher mean scores at 1-month follow-up and in mean 2.9 points (0.1-5, p = 0.042) higher urinary symptoms scores at 3-month follow-up than RARP patients. There were no other significant differences between treatment groups. Urinary symptoms, sexual activity, and sexual function remained significantly worse compared with baseline at all time points in both arms. CONCLUSIONS Compared with LRP, the robotic approach led to an earlier return to baseline in several domains of general health-related QoL and better short-term recovery of urinary symptoms. Predictive variables such as the scale-specific baseline status and bilateral nerve-sparing were confirmed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sigrun Holze
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Emilie Lemaire
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Meinhard Mende
- Clinical Trial Center Leipzig, Leipzig University, Leipzig, Germany
- Institute for Medical Informatics, Statistics and Epidemiology, Leipzig University, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Petra Neuhaus
- Clinical Trial Center Leipzig, Leipzig University, Leipzig, Germany
| | | | | | - Hoang Minh Do
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany
- Department of Urology, Sana Hospital Borna, Borna, Germany
| | - Anja Dietel
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Dogu Teber
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
- Department of Urology, Staedtisches Klinikum Karlsruhe, Karlsruhe, Germany
| | | | | | - Robert Rabenalt
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Duesseldorf, Duesseldorf, Germany
- Department of Urology, Marien Hospital Duesseldorf, Duesseldorf, Germany
| | - Peter Albers
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Duesseldorf, Duesseldorf, Germany
| | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
Ratti MM, Gandaglia G, Alleva E, Leardini L, Sisca ES, Derevianko A, Furnari F, Mazzoleni Ferracini S, Beyer K, Moss C, Pellegrino F, Sorce G, Barletta F, Scuderi S, Omar MI, MacLennan S, Williamson PR, Zong J, MacLennan SJ, Mottet N, Cornford P, Aiyegbusi OL, Van Hemelrijck M, N'Dow J, Briganti A. Standardising the Assessment of Patient-reported Outcome Measures in Localised Prostate Cancer. A Systematic Review. Eur Urol Oncol 2021; 5:153-163. [PMID: 34785188 DOI: 10.1016/j.euo.2021.10.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/18/2021] [Revised: 09/30/2021] [Accepted: 10/15/2021] [Indexed: 01/27/2023]
Abstract
CONTEXT Prostate cancer (PCa) is the second most common cancer among men worldwide. Urinary, bowel, and sexual function, as well as hormonal symptoms and health-related quality of life (HRQoL), were prioritised by patients and professionals as part of a core outcome set for localised PCa regardless of treatment type. OBJECTIVE To systematically review the measurement properties of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) used in localised PCa and recommend PROMs for use in routine practice and research settings. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION The psychometric properties of PROMs measuring functional and HRQoL domains used in randomised controlled trials including patients with localised PCa were assessed according to the Consensus-based Standards for the Selection of Health Measurement Instruments (COSMIN) methodology. MEDLINE and Embase were searched to identify publications evaluating psychometric properties of the PROMs. The characteristics and methodological quality of the studies included were extracted, tabulated, and assessed according to the COSMIN criteria. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS Overall, 27 studies evaluating psychometric properties of the Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite (EPIC), University of California-Los Angeles Prostate Cancer Index (UCLA-PCI), European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) quality of life core 30 (QLQ-C30) and prostate cancer 25 (QLQ-PR25) modules, International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF), and the 36-item (SF-36) and 12-item Short-Form health survey (SF-12) PROMs were identified and included in the systematic review. EPIC and EORTC QLQ-C30, a general module that assesses patients' physical, psychological, and social functions, were characterised by high internal consistency (Cronbach's α 0.46-0.96 and 0.68-0.94 respectively) but low content validity. EORTC QLQ-PR25, which is primarily designed to assess PCa-specific HRQoL, had moderate content validity and internal consistency (Cronbach's α 0.39-0.87). UCLA-PCI was characterised by moderate content validity and high internal consistency (Cronbach's α 0.21-0.94). However, it does not directly assess hormonal symptoms, whereas EORTC QLQ-PR25 does. CONCLUSION The tools with the best evidence for psychometric properties and feasibility for use in routine practice and research settings to assess PROMs in patients with localised PCa were EORTC QLQ-C30 and QLQ-PR25. Since EORTC QLQ-C30 is a general module that does not directly assess PCa-specific issues, it should be adopted in conjunction with the QLQ-PR25 module. PATIENT SUMMARY We reviewed and appraised the measurement properties of patient-reported outcome measure questionnaires used for patients with localised prostate cancer. We found good evidence to suggest that two questionnaires (EORTC QLQ-C30 and QLQ-PR25) can be used to measure urinary, bowel, and sexual functions and health-related quality of life.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maria Monica Ratti
- Department of Medicine and Surgery, Vita Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy; Department of Clinical and Health Psychology, IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital, Milan, Italy
| | - Giorgio Gandaglia
- Unit of Urology/Division of Oncology, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital, Milan, Italy.
| | - Eugenia Alleva
- Department of Medicine and Surgery, Vita Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Luca Leardini
- Department of Clinical and Health Psychology, IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital, Milan, Italy
| | - Elena Silvia Sisca
- Department of Clinical and Health Psychology, IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital, Milan, Italy
| | - Alexandra Derevianko
- Department of Clinical and Health Psychology, IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital, Milan, Italy
| | - Federica Furnari
- Department of Clinical and Health Psychology, IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital, Milan, Italy
| | | | - Katharina Beyer
- Translational and Oncology Research, Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Charlotte Moss
- Translational and Oncology Research, Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Francesco Pellegrino
- Unit of Urology/Division of Oncology, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital, Milan, Italy
| | - Gabriele Sorce
- Unit of Urology/Division of Oncology, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital, Milan, Italy
| | - Francesco Barletta
- Unit of Urology/Division of Oncology, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital, Milan, Italy
| | - Simone Scuderi
- Unit of Urology/Division of Oncology, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital, Milan, Italy
| | | | | | - Paula R Williamson
- MRC North West Hub for Trials Methodology Research, University of Liverpool, Liverpool Health Partners, Liverpool, UK
| | - Jihong Zong
- Global Epidemiology, Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals Inc., Whippany, NJ, USA
| | | | - Nicolas Mottet
- Department of Urology, University Hospital, St. Etienne, France
| | | | - Olalekan Lee Aiyegbusi
- Centre for Patient-Reported Outcomes Research, College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Mieke Van Hemelrijck
- Translational and Oncology Research, Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, King's College London, London, UK
| | - James N'Dow
- Academic Urology Unit, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK
| | - Alberto Briganti
- Unit of Urology/Division of Oncology, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital, Milan, Italy
| | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Lindenberg MMA, Retèl VVP, Kieffer JJM, Wijburg CC, Fossion LLMCL, van der Poel HHG, van Harten WWH. Long-term functional outcomes after robot-assisted prostatectomy compared to laparoscopic prostatectomy: Results from a national retrospective cluster study. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY 2021; 47:2658-2666. [PMID: 34140189 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2021.06.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/20/2021] [Revised: 05/19/2021] [Accepted: 06/03/2021] [Indexed: 12/01/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Despite multiple studies evaluating the effectiveness of Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy (RARP), there is no definitive conclusion about the added value of RARP. A retrospective cluster study was conducted to evaluate long-term sexual and urinary functioning after RARP and Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy (LRP) based on real-world data from 12 Dutch hospitals. METHODS Data was collected from patients who underwent surgery between 2010 and 2012. A mixed effect model was used to evaluate differences between groups on urinary and sexual functioning (EPIC-26). Additionally, a regression analysis was conducted to evaluate the relationship between these functional outcomes and, among others, hospital volume. RESULTS 1370 (65.1%) patients participated, 907 underwent RARP and 463 LRP, with a median follow-up time of 7.08 years (SD = 0.98). The RARP group showed a statistically and clinically significant better urinary functioning compared to the LRP group (p = 0.002). RARP showed also a shorter procedure time (p=<0.001), reduced blood loss (p=<0.001), and a higher chance of neurovascular bundle preservation (39.8% vs 29.1%; p=<0.01). CONCLUSION RARP resulted in better long-term urinary function compared to LRP. Based on the results from this study, guidelines concerning the preferred surgery type and the position on reimbursement may change, especially when RARP proves to be cost-effective.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Melanie M A Lindenberg
- Division of Psychosocial Research and Epidemiology - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Department of Health Technology and Services Research - University of Twente, Enschede, the Netherlands
| | - Valesca V P Retèl
- Division of Psychosocial Research and Epidemiology - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Department of Health Technology and Services Research - University of Twente, Enschede, the Netherlands
| | - Jacobien J M Kieffer
- Division of Psychosocial Research and Epidemiology - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Carl C Wijburg
- Department of Urology - Rijnstate Hospital, Arnhem, the Netherlands
| | | | | | - Wim W H van Harten
- Division of Psychosocial Research and Epidemiology - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Department of Health Technology and Services Research - University of Twente, Enschede, the Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Feng YS, Kohlmann T, Janssen MF, Buchholz I. Psychometric properties of the EQ-5D-5L: a systematic review of the literature. Qual Life Res 2020; 30:647-673. [PMID: 33284428 PMCID: PMC7952346 DOI: 10.1007/s11136-020-02688-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 260] [Impact Index Per Article: 65.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 10/26/2020] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Although the EQ-5D has a long history of use in a wide range of populations, the newer five-level version (EQ-5D-5L) has not yet had such extensive experience. This systematic review summarizes the available published scientific evidence on the psychometric properties of the EQ-5D-5L. METHODS Pre-determined key words and exclusion criteria were used to systematically search publications from 2011 to 2019. Information on study characteristics and psychometric properties were extracted: specifically, EQ-5D-5L distribution (including ceiling and floor), missing values, reliability (test-retest), validity (convergent, known-groups, discriminate) and responsiveness (distribution, anchor-based). EQ-5D-5L index value means, ceiling and correlation coefficients (convergent validity) were pooled across the studies using random-effects models. RESULTS Of the 889 identified publications, 99 were included for review, representing 32 countries. Musculoskeletal/orthopedic problems and cancer (n = 8 each) were most often studied. Most papers found missing values (17 of 17 papers) and floor effects (43 of 48 papers) to be unproblematic. While the index was found to be reliable (9 of 9 papers), individual dimensions exhibited instability over time. Index values and dimensions demonstrated moderate to strong correlations with global health measures, other multi-attribute utility instruments, physical/functional health, pain, activities of daily living, and clinical/biological measures. The instrument was not correlated with life satisfaction and cognition/communication measures. Responsiveness was addressed by 15 studies, finding moderate effect sizes when confined to studied subgroups with improvements in health. CONCLUSIONS The EQ-5D-5L exhibits excellent psychometric properties across a broad range of populations, conditions and settings. Rigorous exploration of its responsiveness is needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- You-Shan Feng
- Institute for Community Medicine, Medical University Greifswald, Greifswald, Germany. .,Institute for Clinical Epidemiology and Applied Biometrics, Medical University of Tübingen, Silcherstraße 5, 72076, Tübingen, Germany.
| | - Thomas Kohlmann
- Institute for Community Medicine, Medical University Greifswald, Greifswald, Germany
| | - Mathieu F Janssen
- Section Medical Psychology and Psychotherapy, Department of Psychiatry, Erasmus MC, Erasmus University, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Ines Buchholz
- Institute for Community Medicine, Medical University Greifswald, Greifswald, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Odeo S, Degu A. Factors affecting health-related quality of life among prostate cancer patients: A systematic review. J Oncol Pharm Pract 2020; 26:1997-2010. [PMID: 32972301 DOI: 10.1177/1078155220959414] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Prostate cancer is recognized as the leading cause of malignancy-related incidence and mortality in the male population. The treatment regimens have long-term effects detrimental to the patient's quality of life. Hence, this review was aimed to determine the overall HRQOL and its associated among prostate cancer patients. METHODS The review was performed according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. The databases searched were PubMed, Embase, Google Scholar and Cumulative Index to the Nursing and Allied Literature (CINAHL), which provided articles that were critically examined, yielding 52 studies that met the inclusion criteria for the systematic review. RESULTS Out of 52 studies, 30 studies reported poor overall HRQOL in various domains after prostate cancer treatment. Contrastingly, 15 studies reported good overall quality of life after treatment. Among the various domains, sexual function was the most grossly affected functional score by the treatment modalities of prostate cancer. Nonetheless, seven studies showed that the absence of a significant change in the overall quality of life after treatment. According to the studies, older age, comorbidities, higher clinical stage, higher Gleason score, greater cancer severity, African American race, impaired mental health, neoadjuvant hormonal therapy and lower level of education were the major poor predictors of HRQOL among prostate cancer patients. CONCLUSION The overall HRQOL in prostate cancer patients was generally poor in various functional domains after treatment. Among the various domains, sexual function was the most grossly affected functional score by the treatment modalities of prostate cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sharon Odeo
- School of Pharmacy and Health Sciences, United States International University-Africa, Nairobi, Kenya
| | - Amsalu Degu
- School of Pharmacy and Health Sciences, United States International University-Africa, Nairobi, Kenya
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Tetar SU, Bruynzeel AME, Oei SS, Senan S, Fraikin T, Slotman BJ, Moorselaar RJAV, Lagerwaard FJ. Magnetic Resonance-guided Stereotactic Radiotherapy for Localized Prostate Cancer: Final Results on Patient-reported Outcomes of a Prospective Phase 2 Study. Eur Urol Oncol 2020; 4:628-634. [PMID: 32536573 DOI: 10.1016/j.euo.2020.05.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 39] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/17/2020] [Revised: 05/07/2020] [Accepted: 05/15/2020] [Indexed: 11/12/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The recent introduction of magnetic resonance-guided radiation therapy (MRgRT) has allowed improved treatment planning and delivery of stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) in prostate cancer (PC). The health-related quality of life (HRQoL) outcomes using this novel approach are important in shared decision making for patients. OBJECTIVE To report HRQoL using both patient- and clinician-reported outcomes at 1 yr following stereotactic MRgRT for patients with localized PC. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS A prospective phase 2 trial included 101 patients with localized PC. INTERVENTION All patients received 36.25Gy in five fractions of MRgRT delivered within 2 wk. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS HRQoL was prospectively assessed at baseline, at the last fraction, at 6 wk, and at 3, 6, 9, and 12 mo after treatment, by patient-reported outcome measures using European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer QLQ-C30 and QLQ-PR25 questionnaires, and International Prostate Symptom Score. At the same time points, clinicians reported on symptomatic adverse events (AEs). Effect sizes for changes in HRQoL were calculated with repeated measures analysis of variance. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS Availability of HRQoL data exceeded 95% at all study time points. From both questionnaires and the recorded AEs, the largest treatment effects on urinary and bowel symptoms were recorded in the first 6 wk of follow-up. Thereafter, all symptoms decreased and returned to baseline values at 12 mo. No grade ≥3 toxicity was reported. No patient reported any relevant limitation due to urinary symptoms, and only 2.2% of patients reported a relevant impact on daily activities due to bowel problems at 1 yr. The majority of patients had intermediate- or high-risk PC for which androgen deprivation therapy (83.2%) was prescribed, thereby precluding study of MRgRT on sexual function. Longer follow-up is awaited in order to evaluate the oncological outcome. CONCLUSIONS Delivery of MRgRT for SBRT resulted in low toxicity at 1 yr. PATIENT SUMMARY All patients completed magnetic resonance-guided radiation therapy, which was well tolerated with only transient early urinary and bowel symptoms, which resolved 1 yr after treatment, as confirmed by patient-reported outcome measures.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shyama U Tetar
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Amsterdam UMC, location VUmc, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Anna M E Bruynzeel
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Amsterdam UMC, location VUmc, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Swie S Oei
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Amsterdam UMC, location VUmc, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Suresh Senan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Amsterdam UMC, location VUmc, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Tamara Fraikin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Amsterdam UMC, location VUmc, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Berend J Slotman
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Amsterdam UMC, location VUmc, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | - Frank J Lagerwaard
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Amsterdam UMC, location VUmc, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Ernstmann N, Herden J, Weissbach L, Karger A, Hower K, Ansmann L. Prostate-specific health-related quality of life and patient-physician communication - A 3.5-year follow-up. PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING 2019; 102:2114-2121. [PMID: 31399225 DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2019.07.030] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/22/2019] [Revised: 07/15/2019] [Accepted: 07/23/2019] [Indexed: 06/10/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The aim of this study is to examine associations between prostate-specific health-related quality of life (HRQOL) and aspects of patient-physician communication in localized prostate cancer treatment. METHODS Data of patients with localized prostate cancer were collected at 6-month intervals over a 3.5-year period within a prospective, observational study (HAROW). Data collection comprised D'Amico risk categories, the Charlson Comorbidity Index, patient-physician communication (information, shared decision making, support, devotion), and prostate-specific HRQOL (incontinence aid, urinary symptoms, bowel symptoms, hormonal treatment-related symptoms, sexual functioning, sexual activity). Data of N = 1722 patients undergoing radical prostatectomy were analyzed by longitudinal multilevel analysis. RESULTS The mean patient age was 65 years; 31% had a low risk and 38% an intermediate risk of cancer growth and spread; 73% had a Charlson Comorbidity Index of 0. Significant associations were found between prostate-specific HRQOL and shared decision making, support and devotion. Patient information was not significantly associated with aspects of prostate-specific HRQOL. CONCLUSION Patient reported long term outcomes are associated with aspects of patient-physician communication in prostate cancer patients. Patients feeling involved by their urologists experience less side effects of (surgical) treatment. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS Special communication training programmes should be developed and implemented for urologists.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicole Ernstmann
- Department of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany; Center for Integrated Oncology Bonn (CIO), Bonn, Germany.
| | - Jan Herden
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
| | | | - André Karger
- Clinical Institute of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, Heinrich-Heine-University Duesseldorf, Duesseldorf, Germany.
| | - Kira Hower
- Institute for Medical Sociology, Health Services Research, and Rehabilitation Science (IMVR), University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
| | - Lena Ansmann
- Department of Health Services Research, Carl von Ossietzky University Oldenburg, Oldenburg, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Maguire R, Drummond FJ, Hanly P, Gavin A, Sharp L. Problems sleeping with prostate cancer: exploring possible risk factors for sleep disturbance in a population-based sample of survivors. Support Care Cancer 2019; 27:3365-3373. [PMID: 30627919 DOI: 10.1007/s00520-018-4633-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/14/2018] [Accepted: 12/27/2018] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE This study aimed to investigate the prevalence of sleeping problems in prostate cancer survivors and to explore the role of predisposing, precipitating and perpetuating factors in this process. METHODS Using a cross-sectional design, 3348 prostate cancer survivors between 2 and 18 years post diagnosis reported experiences of insomnia using the QLQC30, along with their sociodemographic characteristics, health status and treatment(s) received. The EQ5D-5L and QLQPR25 assessed survivors' overall and prostate cancer-specific health-related quality of life. A hierarchical multiple regression analysis was constructed with three blocks: (1) predisposing (e.g. demographics at diagnosis), (2) precipitating (e.g. disease extent, treatment) and (3) perpetuating factors (e.g. side effects). RESULTS Nineteen percent of survivors reported significant problems sleeping. The final model accounted for 31% of the variance in insomnia scores (p < .001). In order of magnitude, associates of sleep disturbance were urinary symptoms (β = 0.22; p < .001), experiencing symptoms of depression/anxiety (β = 0.18; p < .001), hormone treatment-related symptoms (β = 0.12; p = .001), pain (β = 0.10; p < .001) and bowel symptoms (β = 0.06; p = .005). Having a lower education and more comorbidities at diagnosis also predicted sleep problems. CONCLUSION Results suggest that it is the ongoing adverse effects of prostate cancer and its treatment (e.g. urinary symptoms) that put survivors most at risk of sleep problems. Strong associations with symptoms of depression/anxiety were also observed. Findings highlight the need for health care practitioners to treat and manage adverse effects of prostate cancer treatment in order to mitigate sleep disturbance in survivors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rebecca Maguire
- Department of Psychology, Maynooth University, Maynooth, Co. Kildare, Ireland.
| | | | - Paul Hanly
- National College of Ireland, Mayor Street, Dublin 1, Ireland
| | | | - Linda Sharp
- Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Ding X, Huang T, Gao Y, Lu S, Tao H, Xu J, Xu Y, Wang F, Zhou Y, Zhou G, Luan Y. Permanent
125
I prostate brachytherapy for castration‐resistant prostate cancer. Int J Urol 2018; 26:278-283. [DOI: 10.1111/iju.13866] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/20/2018] [Accepted: 10/28/2018] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Xue‐Fei Ding
- Department of Urology Clinical Medical College Yangzhou University Yangzhou Jiangsu China
| | - Tian‐Bao Huang
- Department of Urology Clinical Medical College Yangzhou University Yangzhou Jiangsu China
| | - Ying Gao
- Department of Urology Clinical Medical College Yangzhou University Yangzhou Jiangsu China
| | - Sheng‐Ming Lu
- Department of Urology Clinical Medical College Yangzhou University Yangzhou Jiangsu China
| | - Hua‐Zhi Tao
- Department of Urology Clinical Medical College Yangzhou University Yangzhou Jiangsu China
| | - Jia‐Nan Xu
- Department of Urology Clinical Medical College Yangzhou University Yangzhou Jiangsu China
| | - Yao‐Zong Xu
- Department of Urology Clinical Medical College Yangzhou University Yangzhou Jiangsu China
| | - Fei Wang
- Department of Urology Clinical Medical College Yangzhou University Yangzhou Jiangsu China
| | - Yu‐Quan Zhou
- Department of Urology Clinical Medical College Yangzhou University Yangzhou Jiangsu China
| | - Guang‐Chen Zhou
- Department of Urology Clinical Medical College Yangzhou University Yangzhou Jiangsu China
| | - Yang Luan
- Department of Urology Clinical Medical College Yangzhou University Yangzhou Jiangsu China
- Department of Urology Taihe County People's Hospital Fuyang Anhui China
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
van Leeuwen M, Kieffer JM, Efficace F, Fosså SD, Bolla M, Collette L, Colombel M, De Giorgi U, Holzner B, van de Poll-Franse LV, van Poppel H, White J, de Wit R, Osanto S, Aaronson NK. International evaluation of the psychometrics of health-related quality of life questionnaires for use among long-term survivors of testicular and prostate cancer. Health Qual Life Outcomes 2017; 15:97. [PMID: 28490338 PMCID: PMC5426020 DOI: 10.1186/s12955-017-0670-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/13/2016] [Accepted: 04/28/2017] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Understanding of the physical, functional and psychosocial health problems and needs of cancer survivors requires cross-national and cross-cultural standardization of health-related quality of life (HRQoL) questionnaires that capture the full range of issues relevant to cancer survivors. To our knowledge, only one study has investigated in a comprehensive way whether a questionnaire used to evaluate HRQoL in cancer patients under active treatment is also reliable and valid when used among (long-term) cancer survivors. In this study we evaluated, in an international context, the psychometrics of HRQoL questionnaires for use among long-term, disease-free, survivors of testicular and prostate cancer. Methods In this cross-sectional study, we recruited long-term survivors of testicular and prostate cancer from Northern and Southern Europe and from the United Kingdom who had participated in two phase III EORTC clinical trials. Participants completed the SF-36 Health Survey, the EORTC QLQ-C30 questionnaire, the QLQ-PR25 (for prostate cancer) or the QLQ-TC26 (for testicular cancer) questionnaires, and the Impact of Cancer questionnaire. Testicular cancer survivors also completed subscales from the Nordic Questionnaire for Monitoring the Age Diverse Workforce. Results Two hundred forty-two men (66% response rate) were recruited into the study. The average time since treatment was more than 10 years. Overall, there were few missing questionnaire data, although scales related to sexuality, satisfaction with care and relationship concerns of men without partners were missing in more than 10% of cases. Debriefing showed that in general the questionnaires were accepted well. Many of the survivors scored at the upper extremes of the questionnaires, resulting in floor and ceiling effects in 64% of the scales. All of the questionnaires investigated met the threshold of 0.70 for group level reliability, with the exception of the QLQ-TC26 (mean reliability .64) and the QLQ-PR25 (mean reliability .69). The questionnaires were able to discriminate clearly between patients with and without comorbid conditions. Conclusions The currently available HRQoL questionnaires exhibit acceptable psychometric properties and were well received by patients, but additional efforts are needed to ensure that the full range of survivor-specific issues is assessed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marieke van Leeuwen
- Division of Psychosocial Research and Epidemiology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Plesmanlaan 121, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Jacobien M Kieffer
- Division of Psychosocial Research and Epidemiology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Plesmanlaan 121, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Fabio Efficace
- Unit, Italian Group for Adult Hematologic Diseases (GIMEMA) Data Center, Via Benevento 6, Rome, Italy
| | - Sophie D Fosså
- Oslo University Hospital, Radiumhospital, National Advisory Unit on Late Effects after Cancer Treatment, Oslo, Norway
| | - Michel Bolla
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire A Michallon, BP217, 38043, Grenoble cedex 09, France
| | | | - Marc Colombel
- Department of General Urology and Oncology, Hôpital Édouard Herriot, 5 Place d'Arsonval, Lyon, France
| | - Ugo De Giorgi
- Department of Medical Oncology, Istituto Scientifico Romagnolo per lo Studio e la Cura dei Tumori (IRST) - IRCCS, Meldola, Italy
| | - Bernhard Holzner
- Department of Psychiatry, Innsbruck University Hospital, Sternwartestraße 15, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Lonneke V van de Poll-Franse
- Division of Psychosocial Research and Epidemiology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Plesmanlaan 121, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Comprehensive Cancer Organisation Netherlands (CCCS), Netherlands Cancer Registry, Zernikestraat 29, Eindhoven, The Netherlands.,Department of Medical Psychology, Tilburg University, Tilburg, The Netherlands
| | - Hendrik van Poppel
- Department of Urology, University Hospital, K.U. Leuven, Herestraat 49, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Jeff White
- The Beatson West of Scotland Cancer Center, Glasgow, Scotland
| | - Ronald de Wit
- Department of Medical Oncology, Rotterdam Cancer Institute (Dr Daniel den Hoed Kliniek) and Erasmus University Medical Center, 's-Gravendijkwal 230, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Susanne Osanto
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center, Albinusdreef 2, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Neil K Aaronson
- Division of Psychosocial Research and Epidemiology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Plesmanlaan 121, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
14
|
Klein J, Lüdecke D, Hofreuter-Gätgens K, Fisch M, Graefen M, von dem Knesebeck O. Income and health-related quality of life among prostate cancer patients over a one-year period after radical prostatectomy: a linear mixed model analysis. Qual Life Res 2017; 26:2363-2373. [PMID: 28444552 DOI: 10.1007/s11136-017-1582-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 04/19/2017] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To examine income-related disparities in health-related quality of life (HRQOL) over a one-year period after surgery (radical prostatectomy) and its contributory factors in a longitudinal perspective. Evidence of associations between income and HRQOL among patients with prostate cancer (PCa) is sparse and their explanations still remain unclear. METHODS 246 males of two German hospitals filled out a questionnaire at the time of acute treatment, 6 and 12 months later. Age, partnership status, baseline disease and treatment factors, physical and psychological comorbidities, as well as treatment factors and adverse effects at follow-up were additionally included in the analyses to explain potential disparities. HRQOL was assessed with the EORTC (European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer) QLQ-C30 core questionnaire and the prostate-specific QLQ-PR25. A linear mixed model for repeated measures was calculated. RESULTS The fixed effects showed highly significant income-related inequalities regarding the majority of HRQOL scales. Less affluent PCa patients reported lower HRQOL in terms of global quality of life, all functional scales and urinary symptoms. After introducing relevant covariates, some associations became insignificant (physical, cognitive and sexual function), while others only showed reduced estimates (global quality of life, urinary symptoms, role, emotional and social function). In particular, mental disorders/psychological comorbidity played a relevant role in the explanation of income-related disparities. CONCLUSIONS One year after surgery, income-related disparities in various dimensions of HRQOL persist. With respect to economically disadvantaged PCa patients, the findings emphasize the importance of continuous psychosocial screening and tailored interventions, of patients' empowerment and improved access to supportive care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jens Klein
- Department of Medical Sociology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistraße 52, 20246, Hamburg, Germany.
| | - Daniel Lüdecke
- Department of Medical Sociology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistraße 52, 20246, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Kerstin Hofreuter-Gätgens
- Department of Medical Sociology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistraße 52, 20246, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Margit Fisch
- Department of Urology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistraße 52, 20246, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Markus Graefen
- Martini-Clinic, Prostate Cancer Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistraße 52, 20246, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Olaf von dem Knesebeck
- Department of Medical Sociology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistraße 52, 20246, Hamburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Downing A, Wright P, Wagland R, Watson E, Kearney T, Mottram R, Allen M, Cairnduff V, McSorley O, Butcher H, Hounsome L, Donnelly C, Selby P, Kind P, Cross W, Catto JWH, Huws D, Brewster DH, McNair E, Matheson L, Rivas C, Nayoan J, Horton M, Corner J, Verne J, Gavin A, Glaser AW. Life after prostate cancer diagnosis: protocol for a UK-wide patient-reported outcomes study. BMJ Open 2016; 6:e013555. [PMID: 27927667 PMCID: PMC5168696 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-013555] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Prostate cancer and its treatment may impact physically, psychologically and socially; affecting the health-related quality of life of men and their partners/spouses. The Life After Prostate Cancer Diagnosis (LAPCD) study is a UK-wide patient-reported outcomes study which will generate information to improve the health and well-being of men with prostate cancer. METHODS AND ANALYSIS Postal surveys will be sent to prostate cancer survivors (18-42 months postdiagnosis) in all 4 UK countries (n=∼70 000). Eligible men will be identified and/or verified through cancer registration systems. Men will be surveyed twice, 12 months apart, to explore changes in outcomes over time. Second, separate cohorts will be surveyed once and the design will include evaluation of the acceptability of online survey tools. A comprehensive patient-reported outcome measure has been developed using generic and specific instruments with proven psychometric properties and relevance in national and international studies. The outcome data will be linked with administrative health data (eg, treatment information from hospital data). To ensure detailed understanding of issues of importance, qualitative interviews will be undertaken with a sample of men who complete the survey across the UK (n=∼150) along with a small number of partners/spouses (n=∼30). ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION The study has received the following approvals: Newcastle and North Tyneside 1 Research Ethics Committee (15/NE/0036), Health Research Authority Confidentiality Advisory Group (15/CAG/0110), NHS Scotland Public Benefit and Privacy Panel (0516-0364), Office of Research Ethics Northern Ireland (16/NI/0073) and NHS R&D approval from Wales, Scotland and Northern Ireland. Using traditional and innovative methods, the results will be made available to men and their partners/spouses, the funders, the NHS, social care, voluntary sector organisations and other researchers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amy Downing
- Leeds Institute of Cancer and Pathology, St James's University Hospital, Leeds, UK
| | - Penny Wright
- Leeds Institute of Cancer and Pathology, St James's University Hospital, Leeds, UK
| | - Richard Wagland
- Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
| | - Eila Watson
- Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, Department of Applied Health and Professional Development, Oxford Brookes University, Oxford, UK
| | - Therese Kearney
- Northern Ireland Cancer Registry, Queens University Belfast, Royal Victoria Hospital, Belfast, UK
| | - Rebecca Mottram
- Leeds Institute of Cancer and Pathology, St James's University Hospital, Leeds, UK
| | - Majorie Allen
- Leeds Institute of Cancer and Pathology, St James's University Hospital, Leeds, UK
| | - Victoria Cairnduff
- Northern Ireland Cancer Registry, Queens University Belfast, Royal Victoria Hospital, Belfast, UK
| | - Oonagh McSorley
- Northern Ireland Cancer Registry, Queens University Belfast, Royal Victoria Hospital, Belfast, UK
| | - Hugh Butcher
- Leeds Institute of Cancer and Pathology, St James's University Hospital, Leeds, UK
- Yorkshire Cancer Patient Forum, c/o Strategic Clinical Network and Senate, Yorkshire and The Humber, Harrogate, UK
| | - Luke Hounsome
- National Cancer Registration and Analysis Service, Public Health England, Bristol, UK
| | - Conan Donnelly
- Northern Ireland Cancer Registry, Queens University Belfast, Royal Victoria Hospital, Belfast, UK
| | - Peter Selby
- Leeds Institute of Cancer and Pathology, St James's University Hospital, Leeds, UK
| | - Paul Kind
- Academic Unit of Health Economics, Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - William Cross
- Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, St James's University Hospital, Leeds, UK
| | - James W H Catto
- Academic Urology Unit, University of Sheffield, Medical School, Sheffield, UK
| | - Dyfed Huws
- Welsh Cancer Intelligence and Surveillance Unit, Cardiff, UK
| | - David H Brewster
- Public Health and Intelligence (NHS National Services Scotland), Edinburgh, UK
| | - Emma McNair
- Public Health and Intelligence (NHS National Services Scotland), Edinburgh, UK
| | - Lauren Matheson
- Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, Department of Applied Health and Professional Development, Oxford Brookes University, Oxford, UK
| | - Carol Rivas
- Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
| | - Johana Nayoan
- Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
| | - Mike Horton
- Leeds Institute of Cancer and Pathology, St James's University Hospital, Leeds, UK
| | - Jessica Corner
- Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
| | - Julia Verne
- Knowledge and Intelligence Directorate, Public Health England, Bristol, UK
| | - Anna Gavin
- Northern Ireland Cancer Registry, Queens University Belfast, Royal Victoria Hospital, Belfast, UK
| | - Adam W Glaser
- Leeds Institute of Cancer and Pathology, St James's University Hospital, Leeds, UK
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Hatzichristou D, Kirana PS, Banner L, Althof SE, Lonnee-Hoffmann RA, Dennerstein L, Rosen RC. Diagnosing Sexual Dysfunction in Men and Women: Sexual History Taking and the Role of Symptom Scales and Questionnaires. J Sex Med 2016; 13:1166-82. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jsxm.2016.05.017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 71] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/29/2016] [Revised: 05/13/2016] [Accepted: 05/13/2016] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
|