1
|
Ul Husnain MI, Hajizadeh M, Ahmad H, Khanam R. The Hidden Toll of Psychological Distress in Australian Adults and Its Impact on Health-Related Quality of Life Measured as Health State Utilities. APPLIED HEALTH ECONOMICS AND HEALTH POLICY 2024; 22:583-598. [PMID: 38530626 PMCID: PMC11178635 DOI: 10.1007/s40258-024-00879-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 03/11/2024] [Indexed: 03/28/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Psychological distress (PD) is a major health problem that affects all aspects of health-related quality of life including physical, mental and social health, leading to a substantial human and economic burden. Studies have revealed a concerning rise in the prevalence of PD and various mental health conditions among Australians, particularly in female individuals. There is a scarcity of studies that estimate health state utilities (HSUs), which reflect the overall health-related quality of life in individuals with PD. No such studies have been conducted in Australia thus far. OBJECTIVE We aimed to evaluate the age-specific, sex-specific and PD category-specific HSUs (disutilities) in Australian adults with PD to inform healthcare decision making in the management of PD. METHODS Data on age, sex, SF-36/SF6D responses, Kessler psychological distress (K10) scale scores and other characteristics of N = 15,139 participants (n = 8149 female individuals) aged >15 years were derived from the latest wave (21) of the nationally representative Household, Income and Labor Dynamics in Australia survey. Participants were grouped into the severity categories of no (K10 score: 10-19), mild (K10: 20-24), moderate (K10: 25-29) and severe PD (K10: 30-50). Both crude and adjusted HSUs were calculated from participants' SF-36 profiles, considering potential confounders such as smoking, marital status, remoteness, education and income levels. The calculations were based on the SF-6D algorithm and aligned with Australian population norms. Additionally, the HSUs were stratified by age, sex and PD categories. Disutilities of PD, representing the mean difference between HSUs of people with PD and those without, were also calculated for each group. RESULTS The average age of individuals was 46.130 years (46% male), and 31% experienced PD in the last 4 weeks. Overall, individuals with PD had significantly lower mean HSUs than those likely to be no PD, 0.637 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.636, 0.640) vs 0.776 (95% CI 0.775, 0.777) i.e. disutility: -0.139 [95% CI -0.139, -0.138]). Mean disutilities of -0.108 (95% CI -0.110, -0.104), -0.140 (95% CI -0.142, -0.138), and -0.188 (95% CI -0.190, -0.187) were observed for mild PD, moderate PD and severe PD, respectively. Disutilities of PD also differed by age and sex groups. For instance, female individuals had up to 0.049 points lower mean HSUs than male individuals across the three classifications of PD. There was a clear decline in health-related quality of life with increasing age, demonstrated by lower mean HSUs in older population age groups, that ranged from 0.818 (95% CI 0.817, 0.818) for the 15-24 years age group with no PD to 0.496 (95% CI 0.491, 0.500) for the 65+ years age group with severe PD). Across all ages and genders, respondents were more likely to report issues in certain dimensions, notably vitality, and these responses did not uniformly align with ageing. CONCLUSIONS The burden of PD in Australia is substantial, with a significant impact on female individuals and older individuals. Implementing age-specific and sex-specific healthcare interventions to address PD among Australian adults may greatly alleviate this burden. The PD state-specific HSUs calculated in our study can serve as valuable inputs for future health economic evaluations of PD in Australia and similar populations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Rasheda Khanam
- University of Southern Queensland, Toowomba, QLD, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Ghanbarian S, Wong GWK, Bunka M, Edwards L, Cressman S, Conte T, Peterson S, Vijh R, Price M, Schuetz C, Erickson D, Riches L, Landry G, McGrail K, Austin J, Bryan S. A Canadian Simulation Model for Major Depressive Disorder: Study Protocol. PHARMACOECONOMICS - OPEN 2024; 8:493-505. [PMID: 38528312 PMCID: PMC11058136 DOI: 10.1007/s41669-024-00481-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 02/25/2024] [Indexed: 03/27/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Major depressive disorder (MDD) is a common, often recurrent condition and a significant driver of healthcare costs. People with MDD often receive pharmacological therapy as the first-line treatment, but the majority of people require more than one medication trial to find one that relieves symptoms without causing intolerable side effects. There is an acute need for more effective interventions to improve patients' remission and quality of life and reduce the condition's economic burden on the healthcare system. Pharmacogenomic (PGx) testing could deliver these objectives, using genomic information to guide prescribing decisions. With an already complex and multifaceted care pathway for MDD, future evaluations of new treatment options require a flexible analytic infrastructure encompassing the entire care pathway. Individual-level simulation models are ideally suited for this purpose. We sought to develop an economic simulation model to assess the effectiveness and cost effectiveness of PGx testing for individuals with major depression. Additionally, the model serves as an analytic infrastructure, simulating the entire patient pathway for those with MDD. METHODS AND ANALYSIS Key stakeholders, including patient partners, clinical experts, researchers, and modelers, designed and developed a discrete-time microsimulation model of the clinical pathways of adults with MDD in British Columbia (BC), including all publicly-funded treatment options and multiple treatment steps. The Simulation Model of Major Depression (SiMMDep) was coded with a modular approach to enhance flexibility. The model was populated using multiple original data analyses conducted with BC administrative data, a systematic review, and an expert panel. The model accommodates newly diagnosed and prevalent adult patients with MDD in BC, with and without PGx-guided treatment. SiMMDep comprises over 1500 parameters in eight modules: entry cohort, demographics, disease progression, treatment, adverse events, hospitalization, costs and quality-adjusted life-years (payoff), and mortality. The model predicts health outcomes and estimates costs from a health system perspective. In addition, the model can incorporate interactive decision nodes to address different implementation strategies for PGx testing (or other interventions) along the clinical pathway. We conducted various forms of model validation (face, internal, and cross-validity) to ensure the correct functioning and expected results of SiMMDep. CONCLUSION SiMMDep is Canada's first medication-specific, discrete-time microsimulation model for the treatment of MDD. With patient partner collaboration guiding its development, it incorporates realistic care journeys. SiMMDep synthesizes existing information and incorporates provincially-specific data to predict the benefits and costs associated with PGx testing. These predictions estimate the effectiveness, cost-effectiveness, resource utilization, and health gains of PGx testing compared with the current standard of care. However, the flexible analytic infrastructure can be adapted to support other policy questions and facilitate the rapid synthesis of new data for a broader search for efficiency improvements in the clinical field of depression.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shahzad Ghanbarian
- School for Population and Public Health, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
- Centre for Clinical Epidemiology and Evaluation, Vancouver Coastal Health Research Institute, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
| | - Gavin W K Wong
- School for Population and Public Health, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
- Centre for Clinical Epidemiology and Evaluation, Vancouver Coastal Health Research Institute, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Mary Bunka
- School for Population and Public Health, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
- Centre for Clinical Epidemiology and Evaluation, Vancouver Coastal Health Research Institute, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Louisa Edwards
- School for Population and Public Health, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
- Centre for Clinical Epidemiology and Evaluation, Vancouver Coastal Health Research Institute, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Sonya Cressman
- Department of Emergency Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
- Faculty of Health Sciences, Simon Fraser University, Vancouver, Canada
| | - Tania Conte
- School for Population and Public Health, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Sandra Peterson
- Centre for Health Services and Policy Research, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Rohit Vijh
- School for Population and Public Health, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
- Department of Family Practice, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Morgan Price
- Department of Family Practice, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Christian Schuetz
- Department of Psychiatry, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - David Erickson
- Department of Psychiatry, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
- Psychology Department, Fraser Health, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | | | | | - Kim McGrail
- Centre for Health Services and Policy Research, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Jehannine Austin
- Department of Psychiatry, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
- Department of Medical Genetics, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
| | - Stirling Bryan
- School for Population and Public Health, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
- Centre for Clinical Epidemiology and Evaluation, Vancouver Coastal Health Research Institute, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Janssen NP, Hendriks GJ, Sens R, Lucassen P, Oude Voshaar RC, Ekers D, van Marwijk H, Spijker J, Bosmans JE. Cost-effectiveness of behavioral activation compared to treatment as usual for depressed older adults in primary care: A cluster randomized controlled trial. J Affect Disord 2024; 350:665-672. [PMID: 38244792 DOI: 10.1016/j.jad.2024.01.109] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/23/2023] [Revised: 12/23/2023] [Accepted: 01/09/2024] [Indexed: 01/22/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Depression in older adults is associated with decreased quality of life and increased utilization of healthcare services. Behavioral activation (BA) is an effective treatment for late-life depression, but the cost-effectiveness compared to treatment as usual (TAU) is unknown. METHODS An economic evaluation was performed alongside a cluster randomized controlled multicenter trial including 161 older adults (≥65 years) with moderate to severe depressive symptoms (PHQ-9 ≥ 10). Outcome measures were depression (response on the QIDS-SR), quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) and societal costs. Missing data were imputed using multiple imputation. Cost and effect differences were estimated using bivariate linear regression models, and statistical uncertainty was estimated with bootstrapping. Cost-effectiveness acceptability curves showed the probability of cost-effectiveness at different ceiling ratios. RESULTS Societal costs were statistically non-significantly lower in BA compared to TAU (mean difference (MD) -€485, 95 % CI -3861 to 2792). There were no significant differences in response on the QIDS-SR (MD 0.085, 95 % CI -0.015 to 0.19), and QALYs (MD 0.026, 95 % CI -0.0037 to 0.055). On average, BA was dominant over TAU (i.e., more effective and less expensive), although the probability of dominance was only 0.60 from the societal perspective and 0.85 from the health care perspective for both QIDS-SR response and QALYs. DISCUSSION Although the results suggest that BA is dominant over TAU, there was considerable uncertainty surrounding the cost-effectiveness estimates which precludes firm conclusions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Noortje P Janssen
- Behavioural Science Institute, Radboud University, 6525 XZ Nijmegen, the Netherlands; Department of Primary and Community Care, Research Institute of Health Sciences, Radboud University Medical Centre Nijmegen, 6525 EZ Nijmegen, the Netherlands; Institute for Integrated Mental Health Care Pro Persona, 6525 DX Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
| | - Gert-Jan Hendriks
- Behavioural Science Institute, Radboud University, 6525 XZ Nijmegen, the Netherlands; Institute for Integrated Mental Health Care Pro Persona, 6525 DX Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Renate Sens
- Department of Health Sciences, VU University, 1081 HV Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Peter Lucassen
- Department of Primary and Community Care, Research Institute of Health Sciences, Radboud University Medical Centre Nijmegen, 6525 EZ Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Richard C Oude Voshaar
- University of Groningen, Department of Psychiatry, University Medical Centre Groningen, 9713 GZ Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - David Ekers
- Mental Health and Addictions Research Group, Tees Esk and Wear Valleys NHS FT/University of York, TS60SZ York, UK
| | - Harm van Marwijk
- Department of Primary Care and Public Health, Brighton and Sussex Medical School, BN1 9PH Brighton, United Kingdom
| | - Jan Spijker
- Behavioural Science Institute, Radboud University, 6525 XZ Nijmegen, the Netherlands; Institute for Integrated Mental Health Care Pro Persona, 6525 DX Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Judith E Bosmans
- Department of Health Sciences, VU University, 1081 HV Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Gandjour A. Value-based pricing of cognitive behavioral therapy for depression in primary care: an economic evaluation. BMC Health Serv Res 2024; 24:317. [PMID: 38459545 PMCID: PMC10924317 DOI: 10.1186/s12913-024-10653-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/15/2023] [Accepted: 01/29/2024] [Indexed: 03/10/2024] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Value-based pricing (VBP) determines product prices based on their perceived benefits. In healthcare, VBP prices medical technologies considering health outcomes and other relevant factors. This study applies VBP using economic evaluation to provider-patient communication, taking cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) for adult primary care patients with depressive disorders as a case study. METHODS A 12-week decision-tree model was developed from the German social health insurance system's perspective, comparing CBT against the standard of care. The influence of an extended time horizon on VBP was assessed using a theoretical model and long-term data spanning 46 months. RESULTS Using a willingness-to-pay threshold of €88,000 per quality-adjusted life year gained, the base-case 50-minute compensation rate for CBT was €45. Assuming long-term effects of CBT significantly affected the value-based compensation, increasing it to €226. CONCLUSIONS This study showcases the potential of applying VBP to CBT. However, significant price variability is highlighted, contingent upon assumptions regarding CBT's long-term impacts.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Afschin Gandjour
- Frankfurt School of Finance & Management, Adickesallee 32-34, Frankfurt am Main, 60322, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Cortesi PA, Fornari C, Conti S, Pollio B, Boccalandro E, Buzzi A, Carulli C, Coppola A, De Cristofaro R, Di Minno MND, Dolan G, Ferri Grazzi E, Fornari A, Gualtierotti R, Hermans C, Jiménez-Juste V, Kenet G, Lupi A, Martinoli C, Mansueto MF, Nicolò G, Tagliaferri A, Gringeri A, Molinari AC, Mantovani LG, Castaman G. The value-based healthcare approach to haemophilia: Development of outcome measures for the evaluation of care of people with haemophilia. Haemophilia 2024; 30:437-448. [PMID: 38314918 DOI: 10.1111/hae.14943] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/30/2023] [Revised: 10/16/2023] [Accepted: 11/12/2023] [Indexed: 02/07/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Considering the advances in haemophilia management and treatment observed in the last decades, a new set of value-based outcome indicators is needed to assess the quality of care and the impact of these medical innovations. AIM The Value-Based Healthcare in Haemophilia project aimed to define a set of clinical outcome indicators (COIs) and patient-reported outcome indicators (PROIs) to assess quality of care in haemophilia in high-income countries with a value-based approach to inform and guide the decision-making process. METHODS A Value-based healthcare approach based on the available literature, current guidelines and the involvement of a multidisciplinary group of experts was applied to generate a set of indicators to assess the quality of care of haemophilia. RESULTS A final list of three COIs and five PROIs was created and validated. The identified COIs focus on two domains: musculoskeletal health and function, and safety. The identified PROIs cover five domains: bleeding frequency, pain, mobility and physical activities, Health-Related Quality of Life and satisfaction. Finally, two composite outcomes, one based on COIs, and one based on PROIs, were proposed as synthetic outcome indicators of quality of care. CONCLUSION The presented standard set of health outcome indicators provides the basis for harmonised longitudinal and cross-sectional monitoring and comparison. The implementation of this value-based approach would enable a more robust assessment of quality of care in haemophilia, within a framework of continuous treatment improvements with potential added value for patients. Moreover, proposed COIs and PROIs should be reviewed and updated routinely.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paolo Angelo Cortesi
- Research Centre on Public Health (CESP), University of Milano-Bicocca, Monza, Italy
| | - Carla Fornari
- Research Centre on Public Health (CESP), University of Milano-Bicocca, Monza, Italy
| | - Sara Conti
- Research Centre on Public Health (CESP), University of Milano-Bicocca, Monza, Italy
| | - Berardino Pollio
- Regional Reference Centre for Inherited Bleeding and Thrombotic Disorders, Transfusion Medicine, "Regina Margherita" Children Hospital, Turin, Italy
| | - Elena Boccalandro
- Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Angelo Bianchi Bonomi Hemophilia and Thrombosis Center, Milan, Italy
| | | | | | - Antonio Coppola
- Regional Reference Centre for Inherited Bleeding Disorders, University Hospital of Parma, Parma, Italy
| | - Raimondo De Cristofaro
- Haemorrhagic and Thrombotic Disease Service, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario "A. Gemelli" IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Matteo Nicola Dario Di Minno
- Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, Regional Reference Center for Coagulation Disorders, Federico II University, Naples, Italy
| | | | | | - Arianna Fornari
- Research Centre on Public Health (CESP), University of Milano-Bicocca, Monza, Italy
- Neurology, Public Health and Disability Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Neurologico Carlo Besta, Milan, Italy
| | - Roberta Gualtierotti
- Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Angelo Bianchi Bonomi Hemophilia and Thrombosis Center, Milan, Italy
- Università degli Studi di Milano, Department of Pathophysiology and Transplantation, Milan, Italy
| | - Cedric Hermans
- Haemostasis and Thrombosis Unit, Division of Haematology, Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc, Université Catholique de Louvain (UCLouvain), Brussels, Belgium
| | - Victor Jiménez-Juste
- Thrombosis and Haemostasis Unit - IdiPAZ, University Hospital La Paz, Madrid, Spain
| | - Gili Kenet
- National Hemophilia Center, Thrombosis Unit and Amalia Biron Research Institute of Thrombosis and Hemostasis, Sheba Medical Center, Tel Hashomer, Israel; Sackler School of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - Angelo Lupi
- Federation of Haemophilia Associations (FedEmo), Milan, Italy
| | - Carlo Martinoli
- Department of Health Science - DISSAL, University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy
- IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genoa, Italy
| | | | - Gabriella Nicolò
- Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico di Milano, Department of Healthcare Professions, Milan, Italy
| | - Annarita Tagliaferri
- Regional Reference Centre for Inherited Bleeding Disorders, University Hospital of Parma, Parma, Italy
| | | | - Angelo Claudio Molinari
- Regional Reference Centre for Haemorrhagic Diseases, IRCCS Istituto Giannina Gaslini, Genova, Italy
| | - Lorenzo Giovanni Mantovani
- Research Centre on Public Health (CESP), University of Milano-Bicocca, Monza, Italy
- CHARTA Foundation, Milan, Italy
- IRCCS Istituto Auxologico Italiano, Milan, Italy
| | - Giancarlo Castaman
- Department of Oncology, Centre for Bleeding Disorders and Coagulation, Careggi University Hospital, Florence, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Ghanbarian S, Wong GWK, Bunka M, Edwards L, Cressman S, Conte T, Price M, Schuetz C, Riches L, Landry G, Erickson D, McGrail K, Peterson S, Vijh R, Hoens AM, Austin J, Bryan S. Cost-effectiveness of pharmacogenomic-guided treatment for major depression. CMAJ 2023; 195:E1499-E1508. [PMID: 37963621 DOI: 10.1503/cmaj.221785] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 09/18/2023] [Indexed: 11/16/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Pharmacogenomic testing to identify variations in genes that influence metabolism of antidepressant medications can enhance efficacy and reduce adverse effects of pharmacotherapy for major depressive disorder. We sought to establish the cost-effectiveness of implementing pharmacogenomic testing to guide prescription of antidepressants. METHODS We developed a discrete-time microsimulation model of care pathways for major depressive disorder in British Columbia, Canada, to evaluate the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of pharmacogenomic testing from the public payer's perspective over 20 years. The model included unique patient characteristics (e.g., metabolizer phenotypes) and used estimates derived from systematic reviews, analyses of administrative data (2015-2020) and expert judgment. We estimated incremental costs, life-years and quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) for a representative cohort of patients with major depressive disorder in BC. RESULTS Pharmacogenomic testing, if implemented in BC for adult patients with moderate-severe major depressive disorder, was predicted to save the health system $956 million ($4926 per patient) and bring health gains of 0.064 life-years and 0.381 QALYs per patient (12 436 life-years and 74 023 QALYs overall over 20 yr). These savings were mainly driven by slowing or avoiding the transition to refractory (treatment-resistant) depression. Pharmacogenomic-guided care was associated with 37% fewer patients with refractory depression over 20 years. Sensitivity analyses estimated that costs of pharmacogenomic testing would be offset within about 2 years of implementation. INTERPRETATION Pharmacogenomic testing to guide antidepressant use was estimated to yield population health gains while substantially reducing health system costs. These findings suggest that pharmacogenomic testing offers health systems an opportunity for a major value-promoting investment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shahzad Ghanbarian
- The Centre for Clinical Epidemiology and Evaluation (Ghanbarian, Wong, Bunka, Edwards, Cressman, Conte, Bryan), Vancouver Coastal Health Research Institute, and The School of Public and Population Health (Ghanbarian, Wong, Bunka, Edwards, Conte, Vijh, Bryan), University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC; Faculty of Health Sciences (Cressman), Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, BC; Department of Family Practice (Price, Vijh), and Department of Physiatry (Schuetz), Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC; Patient partner (Riches), Prince George, BC; Patient partner (Landry), New Westminster, BC; Psychology Department (Erickson), Fraser Health, New Westminster, BC; Centre for Health Services and Policy Research (McGrail, Peterson), and Departments of Physical Therapy (Hoens) and Medical Genetics (Austin), University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC
| | - Gavin W K Wong
- The Centre for Clinical Epidemiology and Evaluation (Ghanbarian, Wong, Bunka, Edwards, Cressman, Conte, Bryan), Vancouver Coastal Health Research Institute, and The School of Public and Population Health (Ghanbarian, Wong, Bunka, Edwards, Conte, Vijh, Bryan), University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC; Faculty of Health Sciences (Cressman), Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, BC; Department of Family Practice (Price, Vijh), and Department of Physiatry (Schuetz), Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC; Patient partner (Riches), Prince George, BC; Patient partner (Landry), New Westminster, BC; Psychology Department (Erickson), Fraser Health, New Westminster, BC; Centre for Health Services and Policy Research (McGrail, Peterson), and Departments of Physical Therapy (Hoens) and Medical Genetics (Austin), University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC
| | - Mary Bunka
- The Centre for Clinical Epidemiology and Evaluation (Ghanbarian, Wong, Bunka, Edwards, Cressman, Conte, Bryan), Vancouver Coastal Health Research Institute, and The School of Public and Population Health (Ghanbarian, Wong, Bunka, Edwards, Conte, Vijh, Bryan), University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC; Faculty of Health Sciences (Cressman), Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, BC; Department of Family Practice (Price, Vijh), and Department of Physiatry (Schuetz), Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC; Patient partner (Riches), Prince George, BC; Patient partner (Landry), New Westminster, BC; Psychology Department (Erickson), Fraser Health, New Westminster, BC; Centre for Health Services and Policy Research (McGrail, Peterson), and Departments of Physical Therapy (Hoens) and Medical Genetics (Austin), University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC
| | - Louisa Edwards
- The Centre for Clinical Epidemiology and Evaluation (Ghanbarian, Wong, Bunka, Edwards, Cressman, Conte, Bryan), Vancouver Coastal Health Research Institute, and The School of Public and Population Health (Ghanbarian, Wong, Bunka, Edwards, Conte, Vijh, Bryan), University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC; Faculty of Health Sciences (Cressman), Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, BC; Department of Family Practice (Price, Vijh), and Department of Physiatry (Schuetz), Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC; Patient partner (Riches), Prince George, BC; Patient partner (Landry), New Westminster, BC; Psychology Department (Erickson), Fraser Health, New Westminster, BC; Centre for Health Services and Policy Research (McGrail, Peterson), and Departments of Physical Therapy (Hoens) and Medical Genetics (Austin), University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC
| | - Sonya Cressman
- The Centre for Clinical Epidemiology and Evaluation (Ghanbarian, Wong, Bunka, Edwards, Cressman, Conte, Bryan), Vancouver Coastal Health Research Institute, and The School of Public and Population Health (Ghanbarian, Wong, Bunka, Edwards, Conte, Vijh, Bryan), University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC; Faculty of Health Sciences (Cressman), Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, BC; Department of Family Practice (Price, Vijh), and Department of Physiatry (Schuetz), Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC; Patient partner (Riches), Prince George, BC; Patient partner (Landry), New Westminster, BC; Psychology Department (Erickson), Fraser Health, New Westminster, BC; Centre for Health Services and Policy Research (McGrail, Peterson), and Departments of Physical Therapy (Hoens) and Medical Genetics (Austin), University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC
| | - Tania Conte
- The Centre for Clinical Epidemiology and Evaluation (Ghanbarian, Wong, Bunka, Edwards, Cressman, Conte, Bryan), Vancouver Coastal Health Research Institute, and The School of Public and Population Health (Ghanbarian, Wong, Bunka, Edwards, Conte, Vijh, Bryan), University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC; Faculty of Health Sciences (Cressman), Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, BC; Department of Family Practice (Price, Vijh), and Department of Physiatry (Schuetz), Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC; Patient partner (Riches), Prince George, BC; Patient partner (Landry), New Westminster, BC; Psychology Department (Erickson), Fraser Health, New Westminster, BC; Centre for Health Services and Policy Research (McGrail, Peterson), and Departments of Physical Therapy (Hoens) and Medical Genetics (Austin), University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC
| | - Morgan Price
- The Centre for Clinical Epidemiology and Evaluation (Ghanbarian, Wong, Bunka, Edwards, Cressman, Conte, Bryan), Vancouver Coastal Health Research Institute, and The School of Public and Population Health (Ghanbarian, Wong, Bunka, Edwards, Conte, Vijh, Bryan), University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC; Faculty of Health Sciences (Cressman), Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, BC; Department of Family Practice (Price, Vijh), and Department of Physiatry (Schuetz), Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC; Patient partner (Riches), Prince George, BC; Patient partner (Landry), New Westminster, BC; Psychology Department (Erickson), Fraser Health, New Westminster, BC; Centre for Health Services and Policy Research (McGrail, Peterson), and Departments of Physical Therapy (Hoens) and Medical Genetics (Austin), University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC
| | - Christian Schuetz
- The Centre for Clinical Epidemiology and Evaluation (Ghanbarian, Wong, Bunka, Edwards, Cressman, Conte, Bryan), Vancouver Coastal Health Research Institute, and The School of Public and Population Health (Ghanbarian, Wong, Bunka, Edwards, Conte, Vijh, Bryan), University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC; Faculty of Health Sciences (Cressman), Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, BC; Department of Family Practice (Price, Vijh), and Department of Physiatry (Schuetz), Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC; Patient partner (Riches), Prince George, BC; Patient partner (Landry), New Westminster, BC; Psychology Department (Erickson), Fraser Health, New Westminster, BC; Centre for Health Services and Policy Research (McGrail, Peterson), and Departments of Physical Therapy (Hoens) and Medical Genetics (Austin), University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC
| | - Linda Riches
- The Centre for Clinical Epidemiology and Evaluation (Ghanbarian, Wong, Bunka, Edwards, Cressman, Conte, Bryan), Vancouver Coastal Health Research Institute, and The School of Public and Population Health (Ghanbarian, Wong, Bunka, Edwards, Conte, Vijh, Bryan), University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC; Faculty of Health Sciences (Cressman), Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, BC; Department of Family Practice (Price, Vijh), and Department of Physiatry (Schuetz), Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC; Patient partner (Riches), Prince George, BC; Patient partner (Landry), New Westminster, BC; Psychology Department (Erickson), Fraser Health, New Westminster, BC; Centre for Health Services and Policy Research (McGrail, Peterson), and Departments of Physical Therapy (Hoens) and Medical Genetics (Austin), University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC
| | - Ginny Landry
- The Centre for Clinical Epidemiology and Evaluation (Ghanbarian, Wong, Bunka, Edwards, Cressman, Conte, Bryan), Vancouver Coastal Health Research Institute, and The School of Public and Population Health (Ghanbarian, Wong, Bunka, Edwards, Conte, Vijh, Bryan), University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC; Faculty of Health Sciences (Cressman), Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, BC; Department of Family Practice (Price, Vijh), and Department of Physiatry (Schuetz), Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC; Patient partner (Riches), Prince George, BC; Patient partner (Landry), New Westminster, BC; Psychology Department (Erickson), Fraser Health, New Westminster, BC; Centre for Health Services and Policy Research (McGrail, Peterson), and Departments of Physical Therapy (Hoens) and Medical Genetics (Austin), University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC
| | - David Erickson
- The Centre for Clinical Epidemiology and Evaluation (Ghanbarian, Wong, Bunka, Edwards, Cressman, Conte, Bryan), Vancouver Coastal Health Research Institute, and The School of Public and Population Health (Ghanbarian, Wong, Bunka, Edwards, Conte, Vijh, Bryan), University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC; Faculty of Health Sciences (Cressman), Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, BC; Department of Family Practice (Price, Vijh), and Department of Physiatry (Schuetz), Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC; Patient partner (Riches), Prince George, BC; Patient partner (Landry), New Westminster, BC; Psychology Department (Erickson), Fraser Health, New Westminster, BC; Centre for Health Services and Policy Research (McGrail, Peterson), and Departments of Physical Therapy (Hoens) and Medical Genetics (Austin), University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC
| | - Kim McGrail
- The Centre for Clinical Epidemiology and Evaluation (Ghanbarian, Wong, Bunka, Edwards, Cressman, Conte, Bryan), Vancouver Coastal Health Research Institute, and The School of Public and Population Health (Ghanbarian, Wong, Bunka, Edwards, Conte, Vijh, Bryan), University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC; Faculty of Health Sciences (Cressman), Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, BC; Department of Family Practice (Price, Vijh), and Department of Physiatry (Schuetz), Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC; Patient partner (Riches), Prince George, BC; Patient partner (Landry), New Westminster, BC; Psychology Department (Erickson), Fraser Health, New Westminster, BC; Centre for Health Services and Policy Research (McGrail, Peterson), and Departments of Physical Therapy (Hoens) and Medical Genetics (Austin), University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC
| | - Sandra Peterson
- The Centre for Clinical Epidemiology and Evaluation (Ghanbarian, Wong, Bunka, Edwards, Cressman, Conte, Bryan), Vancouver Coastal Health Research Institute, and The School of Public and Population Health (Ghanbarian, Wong, Bunka, Edwards, Conte, Vijh, Bryan), University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC; Faculty of Health Sciences (Cressman), Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, BC; Department of Family Practice (Price, Vijh), and Department of Physiatry (Schuetz), Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC; Patient partner (Riches), Prince George, BC; Patient partner (Landry), New Westminster, BC; Psychology Department (Erickson), Fraser Health, New Westminster, BC; Centre for Health Services and Policy Research (McGrail, Peterson), and Departments of Physical Therapy (Hoens) and Medical Genetics (Austin), University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC
| | - Rohit Vijh
- The Centre for Clinical Epidemiology and Evaluation (Ghanbarian, Wong, Bunka, Edwards, Cressman, Conte, Bryan), Vancouver Coastal Health Research Institute, and The School of Public and Population Health (Ghanbarian, Wong, Bunka, Edwards, Conte, Vijh, Bryan), University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC; Faculty of Health Sciences (Cressman), Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, BC; Department of Family Practice (Price, Vijh), and Department of Physiatry (Schuetz), Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC; Patient partner (Riches), Prince George, BC; Patient partner (Landry), New Westminster, BC; Psychology Department (Erickson), Fraser Health, New Westminster, BC; Centre for Health Services and Policy Research (McGrail, Peterson), and Departments of Physical Therapy (Hoens) and Medical Genetics (Austin), University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC
| | - Alison M Hoens
- The Centre for Clinical Epidemiology and Evaluation (Ghanbarian, Wong, Bunka, Edwards, Cressman, Conte, Bryan), Vancouver Coastal Health Research Institute, and The School of Public and Population Health (Ghanbarian, Wong, Bunka, Edwards, Conte, Vijh, Bryan), University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC; Faculty of Health Sciences (Cressman), Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, BC; Department of Family Practice (Price, Vijh), and Department of Physiatry (Schuetz), Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC; Patient partner (Riches), Prince George, BC; Patient partner (Landry), New Westminster, BC; Psychology Department (Erickson), Fraser Health, New Westminster, BC; Centre for Health Services and Policy Research (McGrail, Peterson), and Departments of Physical Therapy (Hoens) and Medical Genetics (Austin), University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC
| | - Jehannine Austin
- The Centre for Clinical Epidemiology and Evaluation (Ghanbarian, Wong, Bunka, Edwards, Cressman, Conte, Bryan), Vancouver Coastal Health Research Institute, and The School of Public and Population Health (Ghanbarian, Wong, Bunka, Edwards, Conte, Vijh, Bryan), University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC; Faculty of Health Sciences (Cressman), Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, BC; Department of Family Practice (Price, Vijh), and Department of Physiatry (Schuetz), Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC; Patient partner (Riches), Prince George, BC; Patient partner (Landry), New Westminster, BC; Psychology Department (Erickson), Fraser Health, New Westminster, BC; Centre for Health Services and Policy Research (McGrail, Peterson), and Departments of Physical Therapy (Hoens) and Medical Genetics (Austin), University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC
| | - Stirling Bryan
- The Centre for Clinical Epidemiology and Evaluation (Ghanbarian, Wong, Bunka, Edwards, Cressman, Conte, Bryan), Vancouver Coastal Health Research Institute, and The School of Public and Population Health (Ghanbarian, Wong, Bunka, Edwards, Conte, Vijh, Bryan), University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC; Faculty of Health Sciences (Cressman), Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, BC; Department of Family Practice (Price, Vijh), and Department of Physiatry (Schuetz), Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC; Patient partner (Riches), Prince George, BC; Patient partner (Landry), New Westminster, BC; Psychology Department (Erickson), Fraser Health, New Westminster, BC; Centre for Health Services and Policy Research (McGrail, Peterson), and Departments of Physical Therapy (Hoens) and Medical Genetics (Austin), University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Ben ÂJ, van Dongen JM, Finch AP, Alili ME, Bosmans JE. To what extent does the use of crosswalks instead of EQ-5D value sets impact reimbursement decisions?: a simulation study. THE EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF HEALTH ECONOMICS : HEPAC : HEALTH ECONOMICS IN PREVENTION AND CARE 2023; 24:1253-1270. [PMID: 36371791 PMCID: PMC10533624 DOI: 10.1007/s10198-022-01539-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/02/2022] [Accepted: 10/05/2022] [Indexed: 06/16/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Inconsistent results have been found on the impact of using crosswalks versus EQ-5D value sets on reimbursement decisions. We sought to further investigate this issue in a simulation study. METHODS Trial-based economic evaluation data were simulated for different conditions (depression, low back pain, osteoarthritis, cancer), severity levels (mild, moderate, severe), and effect sizes (small, medium, large). For all 36 scenarios, utilities were calculated using 3L and 5L value sets and crosswalks (3L to 5L and 5L to 3L crosswalks) for the Netherlands, the United States, and Japan. Utilities, quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), incremental QALYs, incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs), and probabilities of cost-effectiveness (pCE) obtained from values sets and crosswalks were compared. RESULTS Differences between value sets and crosswalks ranged from -0.33 to 0.13 for utilities, from -0.18 to 0.13 for QALYs, and from -0.01 to 0.08 for incremental QALYs, resulting in different ICERs. For small effect sizes, at a willingness-to-pay of €20,000/QALY, the largest pCE difference was found for moderate cancer between the Japanese 5L value set and 5L to 3L crosswalk (difference = 0.63). For medium effect sizes, the largest difference was found for mild cancer between the Japanese 3L value set and 3L to 5L crosswalk (difference = 0.06). For large effect sizes, the largest difference was found for mild osteoarthritis between the Japanese 3L value set and 3L to 5L crosswalk (difference = 0.08). CONCLUSION The use of crosswalks instead of EQ-5D value sets can impact cost-utility outcomes to such an extent that this may influence reimbursement decisions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ângela Jornada Ben
- Department of Health Sciences, Faculty of Science, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Van der Boechorststraat 7, 1081 BT, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| | - Johanna M van Dongen
- Department of Health Sciences, Faculty of Science, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Van der Boechorststraat 7, 1081 BT, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Aureliano Paolo Finch
- EuroQol Office, EuroQol Research Foundation, Marten Meesweg 107, 3068 AV, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Mohamed El Alili
- Department of Health Sciences, Faculty of Science, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Van der Boechorststraat 7, 1081 BT, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Judith E Bosmans
- Department of Health Sciences, Faculty of Science, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Van der Boechorststraat 7, 1081 BT, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Bindra J, Chopra I, Hayes K, Niewoehner J, Panaccio M, Wan GJ. Cost-Effectiveness of Acthar Gel versus Standard of Care for the Treatment of Advanced Symptomatic Sarcoidosis. CLINICOECONOMICS AND OUTCOMES RESEARCH 2023; 15:739-752. [PMID: 37868649 PMCID: PMC10590138 DOI: 10.2147/ceor.s428466] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/01/2023] [Accepted: 09/27/2023] [Indexed: 10/24/2023] Open
Abstract
Introduction Sarcoidosis is a multisystem, inflammatory, systemic granulomatous disease with unknown etiology. Despite the current standard of care (SoC), there is an unmet need for the treatment of advanced symptomatic sarcoidosis. This study assessed the cost-effectiveness of Acthar® Gel (repository corticotropin injection) versus SoC in patients with advanced symptomatic sarcoidosis from the United States (US) payer and societal perspectives over 2 and 3 years. Methods A probabilistic cohort-level state-transition approach was used for this cost-effectiveness analysis. Patients were monitored at the end of a 3-month cycle for the attainment of partial or complete response. Patients in the partial, complete, or no-response state were allowed to transition in each of these states at each 3-month cycle. Following the attainment of response, patients could have a durable response or relapse to a no-response state. Patients in a no-response state received treatment and could transition into a response or no-response state based on the probability of treatment success with the respective treatment. Clinical parameters and health utility data were sourced from the Acthar Gel in Participants with Pulmonary Sarcoidosis (PULSAR) trial (NCT03320070) and healthcare utilization, costs, and disutilities were sourced from the published literature. Base case analysis considered a payer perspective over 2 years. Results From a payer perspective, Acthar Gel versus SoC results in an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of $134,796 per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) and $39,179 per QALY over 2 and 3 years, respectively. From a societal perspective, Acthar Gel versus SoC results in an ICER of $117,622 per QALY and $21,967 per QALY over 2 and 3 years, respectively. Sensitivity analysis findings were consistent with the base case. Conclusion The results from this cost-effectiveness analysis indicate that Acthar Gel is a cost-effective, value-based treatment option for advanced symptomatic sarcoidosis compared to the SoC from the US payer and societal perspectives.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jas Bindra
- Falcon Research Group, North Potomac, MD, USA
| | | | - Kyle Hayes
- Mallinckrodt Pharmaceuticals, Bridgewater, NJ, USA
| | | | | | - George J Wan
- Mallinckrodt Pharmaceuticals, Bridgewater, NJ, USA
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Bosmans JE, Bruijniks SJE, El Alili M, Hollon SD, Peeters FPML, Arntz A, Cuijpers P, Lemmens LHJM, Dingemanse P, Willems L, van Oppen P, van den Boogaard M, Spijker J, Twisk JWR, Huibers MJH. Cost-effectiveness of twice-weekly versus once-weekly sessions of cognitive-behavioural therapy and interpersonal psychotherapy for depression at 12 months after start of treatment: randomised controlled trial. BJPsych Open 2023; 9:e186. [PMID: 37830493 PMCID: PMC10594223 DOI: 10.1192/bjo.2023.548] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/11/2022] [Revised: 07/11/2023] [Accepted: 07/13/2023] [Indexed: 10/14/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Cost-effective treatments are needed to reduce the burden of depression. One way to improve the cost-effectiveness of psychotherapy might be to increase session frequency, but keep the total number of sessions constant. AIM To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of twice-weekly compared with once-weekly psychotherapy sessions after 12 months, from a societal perspective. METHOD An economic evaluation was conducted alongside a randomised controlled trial comparing twice-weekly versus once-weekly sessions of psychotherapy (cognitive-behavioural therapy or interpersonal psychotherapy) for depression. Missing data were handled by multiple imputation. Statistical uncertainty was estimated with bootstrapping and presented with cost-effectiveness acceptability curves. RESULTS Differences between the two groups in depressive symptoms, physical and social functioning, and quality-adjusted life-years (QALY) at 12-month follow-up were small and not statistically significant. Total societal costs in the twice-weekly session group were higher, albeit not statistically significantly so, than in the once-weekly session group (mean difference €2065, 95% CI -686 to 5146). The probability that twice-weekly sessions are cost-effective compared with once-weekly sessions was 0.40 at a ceiling ratio of €1000 per point improvement in Beck Depression Inventory-II score, 0.32 at a ceiling ratio of €50 000 per QALY gained, 0.23 at a ceiling ratio of €1000 per point improvement in physical functioning score and 0.62 at a ceiling ratio of €1000 per point improvement in social functioning score. CONCLUSIONS Based on the current results, twice-weekly sessions of psychotherapy for depression are not cost-effective over the long term compared with once-weekly sessions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Judith E. Bosmans
- Department of Health Sciences, Faculty of Science, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Sanne J. E. Bruijniks
- Department of Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, University of Freiburg, Germany; and Department of Clinical Psychology, Utrecht University, The Netherlands
| | - Mohamed El Alili
- Department of Health Sciences, Faculty of Science, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | - Frenk P. M. L. Peeters
- Department of Clinical Psychological Science, Faculty of Psychology and Neuroscience, Maastricht University, The Netherlands
| | - Arnoud Arntz
- Department of Clinical Psychology, University of Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Pim Cuijpers
- Department of Clinical Psychology, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Lotte H. J. M. Lemmens
- Department of Clinical Psychological Science, Faculty of Psychology and Neuroscience, Maastricht University, The Netherlands
| | - Pieter Dingemanse
- Division of Affective Disorders, Mental Health Care Altrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Linda Willems
- Department of Mood Disorders, GGZ Oost-Brabant, The Netherlands
| | - Patricia van Oppen
- Department of Research and Innovation, GGZ InGeest Specialized Mental Health Care, The Netherlands; and Department of Psychiatry, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | - Jan Spijker
- Depression Expertise Centre, Pro Persona Mental Health Care, The Netherlands; and Behavioral Science Institute, Radboud University, The Netherlands
| | - Jos W. R. Twisk
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Marcus J. H. Huibers
- Department of Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, University of Freiburg, Germany; and Department of Clinical Psychology, Utrecht University, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Jasemi SV, Zandieh Z, Zandieh N, Hemami MR, Darvishi A, Abdollahi Z, Heshmat R. Is vitamin D supplementation program in Iranian schools effective in reducing adolescent depressive symptoms? Cost effectiveness study. BMC Public Health 2023; 23:1393. [PMID: 37474906 PMCID: PMC10357593 DOI: 10.1186/s12889-023-16244-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/10/2022] [Accepted: 07/05/2023] [Indexed: 07/22/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE We aimed to assess the cost-effectiveness of the vitamin D supplementation program in Iranian adolescents reducing adolescent depressive Symptoms. METHODS In the current cost-effectiveness analysis, the viewpoint of Iran's Ministry of Health was selected. The target population was 1,519,762 Iranian high school students (733,657 girls and 786,105 boys). The total costs of the vitamin D supplementations program were based on the reports of the Nutrition Improvement Office of Iran's Ministry of Health and were adjusted to 2018. The variable of Quality-Adjusted Life Years (QALYs) was considered a suitable variable for estimating the effectiveness of vitamin D supplementation. We chose one year as the time horizon. A decision tree model was constructed in TreeAge Pro. The results of the cost-effectiveness analysis were reported in term of the Incremental Cost-Effectiveness Ratio (ICER). RESULTS The results of our study showed that the estimated cost per QALY gained of the vitamin D supplementation program is equal to 1528.6676 $, which indicates that vitamin D supplementation in adolescents(11-18Y) is a cost-effective and a dominant strategy in preventing depression through the cost-saving and QALYs increment compared to the no intervention. Sensitivity analysis showed that the possible variations in vitamin D supplement costs could not alter the results, and vitamin D supplementation may be a predominant and cost-effective strategy to prevent adulthood depression with a 100% probability. CONCLUSION The national program of vitamin D supplementation among Iranian adolescents was a cost-efficient strategy reducing adolescent depressive Symptoms through the cost-saving and QALYs increment compared to the no intervention.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Seyed Vahid Jasemi
- Clinical Research Development Unit, Imam Reza Hospital, Kermanshah University of Medical Sciences, Kermanshah, Iran
| | - Zhale Zandieh
- Aging Research Center, Department of Gerontology, Faculty of Rehabilitation, University of Welfare Sciences and Social Health, Tehran, Iran
| | - Narges Zandieh
- Clinical Research Development Unit, Imam Reza Hospital, Kermanshah University of Medical Sciences, Kermanshah, Iran
| | | | - Ali Darvishi
- Department of Management and Health Economics, School of Public Health, Tehran University of Medical Sciences (TUMS), Tehran, Iran
- Chronic Diseases Research Center, Endocrinology and Metabolism Population Sciences Institute, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, 1941933111, Iran
| | - Zahra Abdollahi
- Office of Community Nutrition, Deputy of Health, Iran Ministry of Health and Medical Education, Tehran, Iran
| | - Ramin Heshmat
- Chronic Diseases Research Center, Endocrinology and Metabolism Population Sciences Institute, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, 1941933111, Iran.
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Bunka M, Wong G, Kim D, Edwards L, Austin J, Doyle-Waters MM, Gaedigk A, Bryan S. Evaluating treatment outcomes in pharmacogenomic-guided care for major depression: A rapid review and meta-analysis. Psychiatry Res 2023; 321:115102. [PMID: 36780865 DOI: 10.1016/j.psychres.2023.115102] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/07/2022] [Revised: 01/13/2023] [Accepted: 02/06/2023] [Indexed: 02/10/2023]
Abstract
Pharmacogenomic (PGx) testing may increase the probability of remission and response in patients with major depressive disorder (MDD) undergoing pharmacotherapy. Given the potential implications of these outcomes and recent proliferation of PGx studies, we conducted a systematic review to evaluate the effectiveness of PGx testing on clinical outcomes in patients with MDD as compared to treatment as usual (TAU). MEDLINE, Embase, PsycInfo, and CENTRAL were searched for English-language articles from 2000 to 2021 for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing PGx-guided treatment vs. TAU in patients with MDD. Meta-analyses were conducted in R. Ten RCTs were included: eight reported remission and seven reported response. The best available evidence suggests that PGx-guided care for moderate-to-severe adult depression is more likely to result in remission and response than TAU (both risk ratios significant). However, there are limitations in the evidence base, including high risk of bias and inconsistency between trials. Despite the consequent very low certainty in the magnitude of effect, there is confidence in the direction. Though modest, the beneficial effects of PGx for adults with moderate-severe MDD could - as a result of the scope and scale of the condition and its impacts - have important ramifications for patients and the health system.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mary Bunka
- School of Population and Public Health, University of British Columbia (UBC), 828 West 10th Avenue, Research Pavilion, 7th Floor, Vancouver, BC V5Z 1M9, Canada; Centre for Clinical Epidemiology and Evaluation, Vancouver Coastal Health Research Institute, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Gavin Wong
- School of Population and Public Health, University of British Columbia (UBC), 828 West 10th Avenue, Research Pavilion, 7th Floor, Vancouver, BC V5Z 1M9, Canada; Centre for Clinical Epidemiology and Evaluation, Vancouver Coastal Health Research Institute, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
| | - Dan Kim
- School of Population and Public Health, University of British Columbia (UBC), 828 West 10th Avenue, Research Pavilion, 7th Floor, Vancouver, BC V5Z 1M9, Canada; Centre for Clinical Epidemiology and Evaluation, Vancouver Coastal Health Research Institute, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Louisa Edwards
- School of Population and Public Health, University of British Columbia (UBC), 828 West 10th Avenue, Research Pavilion, 7th Floor, Vancouver, BC V5Z 1M9, Canada; Centre for Clinical Epidemiology and Evaluation, Vancouver Coastal Health Research Institute, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Jehannine Austin
- BC Mental Health and Substance Use Services Research Institute, UBC, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Mary M Doyle-Waters
- Centre for Clinical Epidemiology and Evaluation, Vancouver Coastal Health Research Institute, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Andrea Gaedigk
- Division of Clinical Pharmacology, Toxicology & Therapeutic Innovation, Children's Mercy Kansas City, Kansas City, MO, USA; Department of Pediatrics, University of Missouri-Kansas City, Kansas City, MO, USA
| | - Stirling Bryan
- School of Population and Public Health, University of British Columbia (UBC), 828 West 10th Avenue, Research Pavilion, 7th Floor, Vancouver, BC V5Z 1M9, Canada; Centre for Clinical Epidemiology and Evaluation, Vancouver Coastal Health Research Institute, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Lazzaro C, Bergamaschi R, Zaffaroni M, Totaro R, Paolicelli D. Cost-utility analysis of teriflunomide in naïve vs. previously treated patients with relapsing–remitting multiple sclerosis in Italy. Neurol Sci 2022; 43:4933-4944. [PMID: 35420360 PMCID: PMC9349140 DOI: 10.1007/s10072-022-06022-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/04/2021] [Accepted: 03/16/2022] [Indexed: 12/03/2022]
Abstract
Background Multiple sclerosis (MS) accounts for 176 cases per 100,000 inhabitants (female/male ratio = 2:1) in Italy. For most of the patients (67%), the disease course is relapsing–remitting MS (RRMS). Objective To compare the costs and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) of teriflunomide in RRMS naïve patients vs. RRMS patients previously treated (experienced) with other disease-modifying therapies in Italy. Methods A four health states Markov model-supported cost-utility analysis (CUA) covering a 7-year timespan through annual cycles was developed, following the healthcare sector and the societal viewpoints. Part of the parameters that populated the Markov model was obtained from a questionnaire administered to four primary Italian MS centres. Costs of healthcare and non-healthcare resources, expressed in euro (€) 2019, and QALYs were discounted at 3% real social discount rate. One-way, scenario and probabilistic sensitivity analyses tested the uncertainty of the baseline findings. Results Baseline CUA shows that teriflunomide in RRMS naïve patients is strongly dominant vs. experienced patients (healthcare sector perspective: − €1042.68 and + 0.480 QALYs; societal perspective: − €6782.81 and + 0.480 QALYs). Sensitivity analyses confirmed the robustness of the baseline results. Conclusion Teriflunomide in RRMS naïve vs. experienced patients is cost-effective and possibly strongly dominant from both the healthcare sector and the society viewpoints in Italy. Our findings need further confirmation from real-world studies. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10072-022-06022-x.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carlo Lazzaro
- Studio di Economia Sanitaria, Via Stefanardo da Vimercate, 19, 20128, Milan, Italy.
| | | | - Mauro Zaffaroni
- Multiple Sclerosis Centre, Hospital of Gallarate, ASST Della Valle Olona, Gallarate, Italy
| | - Rocco Totaro
- Centro Malattie Demielinizzanti, Ospedale San Salvatore, L'Aquila, Italy
| | - Damiano Paolicelli
- Department of Basic Medical Sciences, Neuroscience and Sense Organs, University of Bari "Aldo Moro", Bari, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Martín-Fernández J, del Nido-Varo LP, Vázquez-de-la-Torre-Escalera P, Candela-Ramírez R, Ariza-Cardiel G, García-Pérez L, Ramos-García V, Retolaza A, Bilbao A. Health Related Quality of Life in Major Depressive Disorder: evolution in time and factors associated. ACTAS ESPANOLAS DE PSIQUIATRIA 2022; 50:15-26. [PMID: 35103294 PMCID: PMC10803845] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/01/2022] [Accepted: 01/01/2022] [Indexed: 06/14/2023]
Abstract
Major Depressive Disorder (MDD) is the most prevalent mental disorder. We aimed to analyze which factors were associated to their Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQoL) perception in patients diagnosed of MDD and how they evolved over six months.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jesús Martín-Fernández
- Unidad Docente Multiprofesional de Atención Familiar y Comunitaria Oeste. Gerencia Asistencial de Atención Primaria. Servicio Madrileño de Salud, Spain
- Facultad de Ciencias de la Salud. Universidad Rey Juan Carlos. Madrid, Spain
- Red de Investig ación en Servicios Sanitarios y Enfermedades Crónicas (REDISSEC), Spain
| | | | | | - Ruth Candela-Ramírez
- Unidad de Psiquiatría. Hospital Universitario de Fuenlabrada, Servicio Madrileño de Salud, Spain
| | - Gloria Ariza-Cardiel
- Unidad Docente Multiprofesional de Atención Familiar y Comunitaria Oeste. Gerencia Asistencial de Atención Primaria. Servicio Madrileño de Salud, Spain
- Red de Investig ación en Servicios Sanitarios y Enfermedades Crónicas (REDISSEC), Spain
| | - Lidia García-Pérez
- Red de Investig ación en Servicios Sanitarios y Enfermedades Crónicas (REDISSEC), Spain
- Fundación Canaria Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria de Canarias (FIISC), Spain
| | - Vanesa Ramos-García
- Fundación Canaria Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria de Canarias (FIISC), Spain
| | - Ander Retolaza
- Red de Investig ación en Servicios Sanitarios y Enfermedades Crónicas (REDISSEC), Spain
- Osakidetza, Red de Salud Mental de Bizkaia, Centro de Salud Mental de Basauri, Basauri, Spain
- Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Biocruces Bizkaia, Barakaldo, Spain
| | - Amaia Bilbao
- Red de Investig ación en Servicios Sanitarios y Enfermedades Crónicas (REDISSEC), Spain
- Osakidetza, Hospital Universitario Basurto, Unidad de Investigación, Spain
- Instituto de Investigación en Servicios de Salud Kronikgune, Barakaldo, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Tanaka T, Morishita S, Hashimoto M, Nakamichi T, Uchiyama Y, Hasegawa S, Domen K. Relationship Between Physical Function and Health Utility in Patients Undergoing Surgical Treatment for Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma. Integr Cancer Ther 2021; 20:15347354211043508. [PMID: 34472358 PMCID: PMC8419542 DOI: 10.1177/15347354211043508] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/21/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Health utility, which is a measure of patient-reported outcome (PRO), has recently been used in health-related quality of life for patients with various cancers. However, the relationship between health utility and the physical function and of patients undergoing pleurectomy/decortication (P/D) as surgical treatment for malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) has not been reported in the perioperative and convalescent phases. This study aimed to evaluate the perioperative and postoperative health utility of patients undergoing P/D for MPM at one year postoperatively and to examine the relationship with physical function. METHODS We included patients underwent P/D. Grip strength, knee extension strength, 6-minute walk distance (6MWD), forced vital capacity (FVC), and forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) were measured to assess physical function, and the Short-Form Six-Dimension (SF-6D) was completed to assess health utility. These assessments were performed preoperatively, postoperatively, and one year postoperatively. Statistical analysis was performed using one-way analysis of variance for comparison of pre and postoperative and one year mean values. RESULTS There were 24 subjects (23 males, 65.5±8.3 year). SF-6D, 6MWD, FVC, and FEV1 values one year operatively improved significantly compared with postoperative. Additionally, SF-6D was correlated with 6MWD. CONCLUSION Health utility were also correlated with exercise capacity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Takashi Tanaka
- Hyogo College of Medicine Hospital, Nishinomiya, Hyogo, Japan
| | - Shinichiro Morishita
- Fukushima Medical University, Sakaemachi, Fukushima, Japan.,Hyogo College of Medicine, Nishinomiya, Hyogo, Japan
| | | | | | - Yuki Uchiyama
- Hyogo College of Medicine, Nishinomiya, Hyogo, Japan
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
15
|
Zitko P, Bakolis I, Vitoratou S, Chua KC, Margozzini P, Markkula N, Araya R. Psychometric Evaluation of the Health State Description Questionnaire in Chile: A Proposal for a Latent Variable Approach for Valuating Health States. Value Health Reg Issues 2021; 26:142-149. [PMID: 34454395 DOI: 10.1016/j.vhri.2021.06.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/21/2020] [Revised: 05/13/2021] [Accepted: 06/26/2021] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND A few instruments that identify and valuate health states are based on the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health States of the World Health Organization. One of them is the Health State Description (HSD) questionnaire first used in the World Health Survey (WHS) initiative (HSD-WHS), whose psychometric properties have not been evaluated in Chile. Additionally, the use of latent variables for the valuation process of health states has been scarcely investigated in the context of population health metrics. We aim to evaluate the psychometric properties and factorial structure of the HSD-WHS for Chile and describe a latent variable method for valuating health states associated with diseases. METHODS We used data from the second Chilean National Health population-based survey from 2009 to 2010 (N = 5293). We explored the factorial structure of the HSD-WHS through exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses, the reliability, and the discriminant validity of the latent variable of disability. Disability weights for diseases were calculated using a linear regression model. RESULTS We found an adequate goodness of fit for a second-order model with 9 factors corresponding to disability domains (Tucker-Lewis index = 0.99, comparative fit index = 0.99, root mean square error of approximation = 0.060), and good reliability estimates (standardized α = 0.91). The rescaled (between 0 and 100) latent variable of disability showed significant difference according to the explored variables. We estimated disability weights for the following: (1) depressive episode, 13.6 (12.1-15.2), (2) hypertension, 1.6 (0.0-3.3), and (3) diabetes, 5.0 (2.5-7.4). CONCLUSIONS This study supports the use of the HSD-WHS questionnaire in the Chilean population and a latent variable approach for valuating health states associated with diseases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pedro Zitko
- Health Services and Population Research Department, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology, and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, England, UK; Departamento de Salud Pública, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago, Chile.
| | - Ioannis Bakolis
- Biostatistics and Health Informatics, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology, and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, England, UK; Centre for Implementation Science, Health Services and Population Research Department, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology, and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, England, UK
| | - Silia Vitoratou
- Biostatistics and Health Informatics, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology, and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, England, UK
| | - Kia-Chong Chua
- Centre for Implementation Science, Health Services and Population Research Department, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology, and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, England, UK
| | - Paula Margozzini
- Departamento de Salud Pública, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago, Chile
| | - Niina Markkula
- Department of Psychiatry, Helsinki University and Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Ricardo Araya
- Centre of Global Mental Health, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology, and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, England, UK
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Piera-Jiménez J, Etzelmueller A, Kolovos S, Folkvord F, Lupiáñez-Villanueva F. Guided Internet-Based Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Depression: Implementation Cost-Effectiveness Study. J Med Internet Res 2021; 23:e27410. [PMID: 33973857 PMCID: PMC8150403 DOI: 10.2196/27410] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/24/2021] [Revised: 02/18/2021] [Accepted: 04/11/2021] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Major depressive disorder is a chronic condition; its prevalence is expected to grow with the aging trend of high-income countries. Internet-based cognitive-behavioral therapy has proven efficacy in treating major depressive disorder. Objective The objective of this study was to assess the cost-effectiveness of implementing a community internet-based cognitive behavioral therapy intervention (Super@, the Spanish program for the MasterMind project) for treating major depressive disorder. Methods The cost-effectiveness of the Super@ program was assessed with the Monitoring and Assessment Framework for the European Innovation Partnership on Active and Healthy Ageing tool, using a 3-state Markov model. Data from the cost and effectiveness of the intervention were prospectively collected from the implementation of the program by a health care provider in Badalona, Spain; the corresponding data for usual care were gathered from the literature. The health states, transition probabilities, and utilities were computed using Patient Health Questionnaire–9 scores. Results The analysis was performed using data from 229 participants using the Super@ program. Results showed that the intervention was more costly than usual care; the discounted (3%) and nondiscounted incremental cost-effectiveness ratios were €29,367 and €26,484 per quality-adjusted life-year, respectively (approximately US $35,299 and $31,833, respectively). The intervention was cost-effective based on the €30,000 willingness-to-pay threshold typically applied in Spain (equivalent to approximately $36,060). According to the deterministic sensitivity analyses, the potential reduction of costs associated with intervention scale-up would reduce the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of the intervention, although it remained more costly than usual care. A discount in the incremental effects up to 5% exceeded the willingness-to-pay threshold of €30,000. Conclusions The Super@ program, an internet-based cognitive behavioral therapy intervention for treating major depressive disorder, cost more than treatment as usual. Nevertheless, its implementation in Spain would be cost-effective from health care and societal perspectives, given the willingness-to-pay threshold of €30,000 compared with treatment as usual.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jordi Piera-Jiménez
- Open Evidence Research Group, Universitat Oberta de Catalunya, Barcelona, Spain.,Servei Català de la Salut, Barcelona, Spain.,Digitalization for the Sustainability of the Healthcare System, Sistema de Salut de Catalunya, Barcelona, Spain
| | | | - Spyros Kolovos
- Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Frans Folkvord
- Open Evidence Research Group, Universitat Oberta de Catalunya, Barcelona, Spain.,Department of Communication and Cognition, Tilburg School of Humanities and Digital Sciences, Tilburg University, Tilburg, Netherlands
| | - Francisco Lupiáñez-Villanueva
- Open Evidence Research Group, Universitat Oberta de Catalunya, Barcelona, Spain.,Department of Information and Communication Sciences, Universitat Oberta de Catalunya, Barcelona, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Losina E, Leifer V, Millham L, Panella C, Hyle EP, Mohareb AM, Neilan AM, Ciaranello AL, Kazemian P, Freedberg KA. College Campuses and COVID-19 Mitigation: Clinical and Economic Value. Ann Intern Med 2021; 174:472-483. [PMID: 33347322 PMCID: PMC7755069 DOI: 10.7326/m20-6558] [Citation(s) in RCA: 44] [Impact Index Per Article: 14.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Colleges in the United States are determining how to operate safely amid the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. OBJECTIVE To examine the clinical outcomes, cost, and cost-effectiveness of COVID-19 mitigation strategies on college campuses. DESIGN The Clinical and Economic Analysis of COVID-19 interventions (CEACOV) model, a dynamic microsimulation model, was used to examine alternative mitigation strategies. The CEACOV model tracks infections accrued by students and faculty, accounting for community transmissions. DATA SOURCES Data from published literature were used to obtain parameters related to COVID-19 and contact-hours. TARGET POPULATION Undergraduate students and faculty at U.S. colleges. TIME HORIZON One semester (105 days). PERSPECTIVE Modified societal. INTERVENTION COVID-19 mitigation strategies, including social distancing, masks, and routine laboratory screening. OUTCOME MEASURES Infections among students and faculty per 5000 students and per 1000 faculty, isolation days, tests, costs, cost per infection prevented, and cost per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY). RESULTS OF BASE-CASE ANALYSIS Among students, mitigation strategies reduced COVID-19 cases from 3746 with no mitigation to 493 with extensive social distancing and masks, and further to 151 when laboratory testing was added among asymptomatic persons every 3 days. Among faculty, these values were 164, 28, and 25 cases, respectively. Costs ranged from about $0.4 million for minimal social distancing to about $0.9 million to $2.1 million for strategies involving laboratory testing ($10 per test), depending on testing frequency. Extensive social distancing with masks cost $170 per infection prevented ($49 200 per QALY) compared with masks alone. Adding routine laboratory testing increased cost per infection prevented to between $2010 and $17 210 (cost per QALY gained, $811 400 to $2 804 600). RESULTS OF SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS Results were most sensitive to test costs. LIMITATION Data are from multiple sources. CONCLUSION Extensive social distancing with a mandatory mask-wearing policy can prevent most COVID-19 cases on college campuses and is very cost-effective. Routine laboratory testing would prevent 96% of infections and require low-cost tests to be economically attractive. PRIMARY FUNDING SOURCE National Institutes of Health.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elena Losina
- Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, and Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts (E.L.)
| | - Valia Leifer
- Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts (V.L.)
| | - Lucia Millham
- Harvard Medical School and Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts (L.M.)
| | | | - Emily P Hyle
- Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts (E.P.H., A.M.N., A.L.C.)
| | - Amir M Mohareb
- Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts (C.P., A.M.M.)
| | - Anne M Neilan
- Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts (E.P.H., A.M.N., A.L.C.)
| | - Andrea L Ciaranello
- Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts (E.P.H., A.M.N., A.L.C.)
| | - Pooyan Kazemian
- Weatherhead School of Management, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio (P.K.)
| | - Kenneth A Freedberg
- Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, and Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts (K.A.F.)
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Ssegonja R, Sampaio F, Alaie I, Philipson A, Hagberg L, Murray K, Sarkadi A, Langenskiöld S, Jonsson U, Feldman I. Cost-effectiveness of an indicated preventive intervention for depression in adolescents: a model to support decision making. J Affect Disord 2020; 277:789-799. [PMID: 33065819 DOI: 10.1016/j.jad.2020.08.076] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/20/2020] [Revised: 06/07/2020] [Accepted: 08/24/2020] [Indexed: 10/23/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Adolescent depression has negative health and economic outcomes in the short- and long-term. Indicated preventive interventions, in particular group based cognitive behavioural therapy (GB-CBT), are effective in preventing depression in adolescents with subsyndromal depression. However, little is known about the cost-effectiveness of these interventions. METHODS A Markov cohort model was used to conduct cost-effectiveness analyses comparing a GB-CBT indicated preventive intervention for depression, to a no-intervention option in a Swedish setting. Taking a time horizon of 5- and 10 years, incremental differences in societal costs and health benefits expressed as differences in the proportion of cases of depression prevented, and as quality adjusted life years (QALYs) gained were estimated. Through univariate and probabilistic sensitivity analyses, the robustness of the results was explored. Costs, presented in 2018 USD, and effects were discounted at a yearly rate of 3%. RESULTS The base-case analysis showed that GB-CBT indicated preventive intervention incurred lower costs, prevented a larger proportion of cases of depression and generated higher QALYs compared to the no-intervention option for both time horizons. Offering the intervention was even a cost saving strategy and demonstrated a probability of being cost-effective of over 95%. In the sensitivity analyses, these results were robust to the modelling assumptions. LIMITATIONS The study considered a homogeneous cohort and assumed a constant annual decay rate of the relative treatment effect. CONCLUSIONS GB-CBT indicated preventive interventions for depression in adolescence can generate good value for money compared to leaving adolescents with subsyndromal depression untreated.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Richard Ssegonja
- Department of Public Health and Caring Sciences, Child Health and Parenting (CHAP), Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
| | - Filipa Sampaio
- Department of Public Health and Caring Sciences, Child Health and Parenting (CHAP), Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Iman Alaie
- Department of Neuroscience, Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Anna Philipson
- University Health Care Research Centre, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Örebro University, Örebro, Sweden
| | - Lars Hagberg
- University Health Care Research Centre, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Örebro University, Örebro, Sweden
| | - Krahn Murray
- Toronto Health Economics and Technology Assessment (THETA) Collaborative, Toronto, Canada
| | - Anna Sarkadi
- Department of Public Health and Caring Sciences, Child Health and Parenting (CHAP), Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden; Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Sophie Langenskiöld
- Department of Learning, Informatics, Management and Ethics (LIME), Karolinska Institutet, Sweden; Department of Medical Sciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Ulf Jonsson
- Department of Neuroscience, Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden; Center of Neurodevelopmental Disorders at Karolinska Institutet (KIND), Pediatric Neuropsychiatry Unit, Sweden; Centre for Psychiatry Research, Stockholm Health Care Services, Stockholm County Council, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Inna Feldman
- Department of Public Health and Caring Sciences, Child Health and Parenting (CHAP), Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Losina E, Leifer V, Millham L, Panella C, Hyle EP, Mohareb AM, Neilan AM, Ciaranello AL, Kazemian P, Freedberg KA. College campuses and COVID-19 mitigation: clinical and economic value. MEDRXIV : THE PREPRINT SERVER FOR HEALTH SCIENCES 2020. [PMID: 32908989 DOI: 10.1101/2020.09.03.20187062] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Decisions around US college and university operations will affect millions of students and faculty amidst the COVID-19 pandemic. We examined the clinical and economic value of different COVID-19 mitigation strategies on college campuses. METHODS We used the Clinical and Economic Analysis of COVID-19 interventions (CEACOV) model, a dynamic microsimulation that tracks infections accrued by students and faculty, accounting for community transmissions. Outcomes include infections, $/infection-prevented, and $/quality-adjusted-life-year ($/QALY). Strategies included extensive social distancing (ESD), masks, and routine laboratory tests (RLT). We report results per 5,000 students (1,000 faculty) over one semester (105 days). RESULTS Mitigation strategies reduced COVID-19 cases among students (faculty) from 3,746 (164) with no mitigation to 493 (28) with ESD and masks, and further to 151 (25) adding RLTq3 among asymptomatic students and faculty. ESD with masks cost $168/infection-prevented ($49,200/QALY) compared to masks alone. Adding RLTq3 ($10/test) cost $8,300/infection-prevented ($2,804,600/QALY). If tests cost $1, RLTq3 led to a favorable cost of $275/infection-prevented ($52,200/QALY). No strategies without masks were cost-effective. CONCLUSION Extensive social distancing with mandatory mask-wearing could prevent 87% of COVID-19 cases on college campuses and be very cost-effective. Routine laboratory testing would prevent 96% of infections and require low cost tests to be economically attractive.
Collapse
|
20
|
Kligerman MP, Devine EE, Bentzley JP, Megwalu UC. Cost-Effectiveness of Depression Screening for Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery Residents. Laryngoscope 2020; 131:502-508. [PMID: 32510589 DOI: 10.1002/lary.28780] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/31/2020] [Revised: 04/29/2020] [Accepted: 05/10/2020] [Indexed: 11/08/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES This study aims to determine the cost-effectiveness of screening and treating otolaryngology-head and neck surgery residents for depression. METHODS A Markov model was built using TreeAgePro, version 2019 (TreeAge Software Inc.; Williamstown, MA) to assess the cost-effectiveness of five potential treatment algorithms: 1) treat all residents with psychotherapy, 2) screen and treat depressed residents with psychotherapy, 3) screen and treat depressed residents with pharmacotherapy, 4) screen and treat depressed residents with combination psychotherapy/pharmacotherapy, and 5) no intervention. A Monte Carlo probabilistic sensitivity analysis (PSA), consisting of 1 thousand simulations over a cumulative 5-year period, was performed to evaluate both base case values and a range of values for model variables. RESULTS Screening residents for depression and treating with combination psychotherapy/pharmacotherapy was cost-effective and the optimal strategy at a willingness-to-pay threshold of $50 thousand per quality-adjusted life year (QALY). This option demonstrated an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of $27,578 per QALY for base case values. PSA confirmed these results and demonstrated that screening residents for depression and treating with either combination pharmacotherapy/psychotherapy, pharmacotherapy alone, or psychotherapy alone were cost-effective options in 94.9% of simulations. CONCLUSION Depression and burnout remain crucial issues among resident physicians. This study demonstrates that actively screening residents for depression is cost-effective. Based on these results, residency programs may consider trialing standardized depression screening protocols. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE I and II. Laryngoscope, 131:502-508, 2021.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maxwell P Kligerman
- Department of Otolaryngology, School of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA
| | - Erin E Devine
- Department of Otolaryngology, School of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA
| | - Jessica P Bentzley
- Department of Psychiatry, School of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, California, U.S.A
| | - Uchechukwu C Megwalu
- Department of Otolaryngology, School of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Kolovos S, Finch AP, van der Ploeg HP, van Nassau F, Broulikova HM, Baka A, Treweek S, Gray CM, Jelsma JGM, Bunn C, Roberts GC, Silva MN, Gill JMR, Røynesdal Ø, van Mechelen W, Andersen E, Hunt K, Wyke S, Bosmans JE. Five-year cost-effectiveness analysis of the European Fans in Training (EuroFIT) physical activity intervention for men versus no intervention. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act 2020; 17:30. [PMID: 32131849 PMCID: PMC7055048 DOI: 10.1186/s12966-020-00934-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/19/2019] [Accepted: 02/17/2020] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Objectives Increasing physical activity reduces the risk of chronic illness including Type 2 diabetes, cardiovascular disease and certain types of cancer. Lifestyle interventions can increase physical activity but few successfully engage men. This study aims to investigate the 5 year cost-effectiveness of EuroFIT, a program to improve physical activity tailored specifically for male football (soccer) fans compared to a no intervention comparison group. Methods We developed a Markov cohort model in which the impact of improving physical activity on five chronic health conditions (colorectal cancer, Type 2 diabetes, coronary heart disease, stroke and depression) and mortality was modelled. We estimated costs from a societal perspective and expressed benefits as quality adjusted life years (QALYs). We obtained data from a 4-country (England, Netherlands, Portugal and Norway) pragmatic randomised controlled trial evaluating EuroFIT, epidemiological and cohort studies, and meta-analyses. We performed deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses to assess the impact of uncertainty in the model’s parameter values on the cost-effectiveness results. We used Monte Carlo simulations to estimate uncertainty and presented this using cost-effectiveness acceptability curves (CEACs). We tested the robustness of the base case analysis using five scenario analyses. Results Average costs over 5 years per person receiving EuroFIT were €14,663 and per person receiving no intervention €14,598. Mean QALYs over 5 years were 4.05 per person for EuroFIT and 4.04 for no intervention. Thus, the average incremental cost per person receiving EuroFIT was €65 compared to no intervention, while the average QALY gain was 0.01. This resulted in an ICER of €5206 per QALY gained. CEACs show that the probability of EuroFIT being cost-effective compared to no intervention is 0.53, 0.56 and 0.58 at thresholds of €10,000, €22,000 and €34,000 per QALY gained, respectively. When using a time horizon of 10 years, the results suggest that EuroFIT is more effective and less expensive compared to (i.e. dominant over) no intervention with a probability of cost-effectiveness of 0.63 at a threshold of €22,000 per QALY gained. Conclusions We conclude the EuroFIT intervention is not cost-effective compared to no intervention over a period of 5 years from a societal perspective, but is more effective and less expensive (i.e. dominant) after 10 years. We thus suggest that EuroFIT can potentially improve public health in a cost-effective manner in the long term.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Spyros Kolovos
- Department of Health Sciences, Faculty of Science, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam Public Health research institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Aureliano P Finch
- Department of Health Sciences, Faculty of Science, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam Public Health research institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Hidde P van der Ploeg
- Amsterdam UMC, VU medical center, Department of Public and Occupational Health, Amsterdam Public Health research institute, Van der Boechorststraat 7, NL-1081 BT, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Femke van Nassau
- Amsterdam UMC, VU medical center, Department of Public and Occupational Health, Amsterdam Public Health research institute, Van der Boechorststraat 7, NL-1081 BT, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Hana M Broulikova
- Department of Health Sciences, Faculty of Science, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam Public Health research institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Agni Baka
- Department of Health Sciences, Faculty of Science, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam Public Health research institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Shaun Treweek
- Health Services Research Unit, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK
| | - Cindy M Gray
- Institute of Health and Wellbeing, College of Social Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK
| | - Judith G M Jelsma
- Amsterdam UMC, VU medical center, Department of Public and Occupational Health, Amsterdam Public Health research institute, Van der Boechorststraat 7, NL-1081 BT, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Christopher Bunn
- Institute of Health and Wellbeing, College of Social Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK
| | - Glyn C Roberts
- Department of coaching and psychology, Norwegian School of Sport Science, Oslo, Norway
| | - Marlene N Silva
- CIPER, Faculdade de Motricidade Humana, Universidade de Lisboa, Lisbon, Portugal.,Faculdade de Educação Física e Desporto, Universidade Lusófona de Humanidades e Tecnologias, Lisbon, Portugal
| | - Jason M R Gill
- Institute of Cardiovascular and Medical Sciences, College of Medical, Veterinary and Life Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK
| | - Øystein Røynesdal
- Department of coaching and psychology, Norwegian School of Sport Science, Oslo, Norway.,Department of Teacher Education, NLA University College, Bergen, Norway
| | - Willem van Mechelen
- Amsterdam UMC, VU medical center, Department of Public and Occupational Health, Amsterdam Public Health research institute, Van der Boechorststraat 7, NL-1081 BT, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Eivind Andersen
- Department of coaching and psychology, Norwegian School of Sport Science, Oslo, Norway
| | - Kate Hunt
- Institute for Social Marketing and Health, University of Stirling, Stirling, UK
| | - Sally Wyke
- Institute of Health and Wellbeing, College of Social Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK
| | - Judith E Bosmans
- Department of Health Sciences, Faculty of Science, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam Public Health research institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Household food insecurity is associated with depressive symptoms: results from a Mexican population-based survey. Food Secur 2020. [DOI: 10.1007/s12571-020-01014-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/25/2022]
Abstract
AbstractThe objective of this cross-sectional study was to assess the relationship between food insecurity and depression in the Mexican population. We used data from the 2012 health and nutrition survey (ENSANUT), which is representative of the Mexican population. Food insecurity was determined by the Latin American and Caribbean Food Security Scale (ELCSA). Depressive symptoms were evaluated using the Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale Short-Form (CES-D-SF). Adjusted logistic regression analyses and ANCOVA were used. Out of 33,011 participants, 5788 (18%) had high depressive symptoms and 24,098 (73%) experienced food insecurity. The adjusted logistic regression analysis showed that, participants with mild food insecurity, (OR = 1.47,95% CI = 1.27 to 1.71), moderate food insecurity (OR = 2.14,95% CI = 1.85 to 2.47) and severe food insecurity (OR = 3.01,95% CI = 2.51 to 3.60,) were more likely to have high depressive symptoms than food secure participants. Participants with moderate food insecurity (OR =1.45, 95% CI = 1.28 to 1.64) and severe food insecurity (OR =2.04, 95% CI = 1.76 to 2.37) were more likely to suffer from depression as compared to participants with mild food insecurity. Participants with severe food insecurity were more likely (OR=1.41, 95% CI = 1.21 to 1.65) to suffer from depression compared to participants with moderate food insecurity. This paper provides an overview of the complex problem of food insecurity and mental health. Despite the unknown causality, the analysis suggests a strong association between depression and food insecurity. This problem calls for much more attention from the scientific community. Given the high prevalence of depression and the high prevalence of household food insecurity in Mexico, the implementation of successful public health programs to improve food security is necessary.
Collapse
|
23
|
Kirchberger I, Maleckar B, Meisinger C, Linseisen J, Schmauss M, Baumgärtner J. Long-term outcomes in patients with severe depression after in-hospital treatment - study protocol of the depression long-term Augsburg (DELTA) study. BMJ Open 2019; 9:e032507. [PMID: 31874880 PMCID: PMC7008442 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-032507] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/21/2019] [Revised: 11/26/2019] [Accepted: 12/03/2019] [Indexed: 01/01/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Depressive disorders are very common diseases entailing a great burden on affected people. However, comprehensive information on long-term disease course in patients with severe depression is lacking so far. The objectives of the DELTA study are to examine long-term outcomes and their predicting factors, to assess clinical response of antidepressant pharmacotherapy by applying therapeutic drug monitoring, to identify predictors of therapeutic non-response, to describe the long-term healthcare utilisation and to investigate the role of biomarkers in disease course. METHODS AND ANALYSIS A cohort study including all adult hospitalised cases (age range 18 to 75 years) of severe major depression who are admitted to the Bezirkskrankenhaus Augsburg is established. It is planned to include 300 patients. During the hospital stay, information is gathered through personal interview, self-administered questionnaires, cognitive tests and chart review. Furthermore, biomaterials are collected. After hospital discharge, patients are repeatedly re-examined over time (3, 6, 12, 24 and 36 months) to collect information about mortality, relapse, depression severity, health-related quality of life (HRQOL), perceived stigma, cognitive functions, diet, physical activity, treatment and healthcare utilisation. Follow-up blood samples are collected to determine therapeutic drug levels. The primary study aim is to investigate long-term therapeutic response, survival, relapse, HRQOL and cognitive functions. Survival time and time to relapse or re-hospitalisation will be analysed using Cox regression models. Changes of HRQOL, depressive symptoms and cognitive functions over time will be examined using generalised linear regression models for repeated measures or mixed models. Correlates of the disease course will be modelled using suitable generalised linear, mixed, estimating equation and growth curve models. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION The study protocol was approved by the Ethics Committee of the Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München (date of approval: 23 October 2017, reference number: 17-625). Study results will be presented at scientific conferences and published in peer-reviewed scientific journals.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Inge Kirchberger
- Chair of Epidemiology at UNIKA-T, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Augsburg, Germany
| | - Barbara Maleckar
- Chair of Epidemiology at UNIKA-T, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Augsburg, Germany
- Department of Psychiatry, Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics of the University Augsburg, Bezirkskrankenhaus Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany
| | - Christine Meisinger
- Chair of Epidemiology at UNIKA-T, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Augsburg, Germany
| | - Jakob Linseisen
- Chair of Epidemiology at UNIKA-T, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Augsburg, Germany
- Independent Research Group Clinical Epidemiology, Helmholtz Zentrum München Deutsches Forschungszentrum für Umwelt und Gesundheit, Neuherberg, Germany
| | - Max Schmauss
- Department of Psychiatry, Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics of the University Augsburg, Bezirkskrankenhaus Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany
| | - Jessica Baumgärtner
- Department of Psychiatry, Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics of the University Augsburg, Bezirkskrankenhaus Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Cost-utility of screening for depression among asylum seekers: a modelling study in Germany. Health Policy 2019; 123:873-881. [PMID: 31151827 DOI: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2019.05.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/18/2018] [Revised: 04/30/2019] [Accepted: 05/09/2019] [Indexed: 11/20/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Asylum seekers have a high burden of mental illness owing to traumatic experiences before, during and after flight. Screening has been suggested to identify asylum seekers with psychosocial needs. However, little is known about the costs of screening relative to expected gains. We assessed the cost-utility of population-based screening for depression in German asylum reception centres compared to case-finding by self-referral. METHODS Explorative modelling study using a decision tree over 15 months to estimate the incremental cost per quality-adjusted life-year gained. Data points were taken from the published literature. Deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were used to address uncertainty around parameter estimates. Value of information analyses were performed to indicate the value of future research. RESULTS The model demonstrates a high probability (p = 83%) of the screening intervention being cost-effective at a Є 50,000/QALY threshold. Cost-utility depends on the process of care following screening: when acceptability and adherence parameters were decreased by 40%, the resulting ICER increased by 27-131%. Eliminating uncertainty was most valuable for the screening process and cost parameters, at Є 3·0 and Є 4·4 million respectively. CONCLUSIONS Screening asylum seekers for depression may be a cost-effective strategy to identify those in need of care. However, there is considerable value in conducting further research in this area, especially regarding resource requirements and the process of care following screening.
Collapse
|
25
|
Kolovos S, van Dongen JM, Riper H, Buntrock C, Cuijpers P, Ebert DD, Geraedts AS, Kenter RM, Nobis S, Smith A, Warmerdam L, Hayden JA, van Tulder MW, Bosmans JE. Cost effectiveness of guided Internet-based interventions for depression in comparison with control conditions: An individual-participant data meta-analysis. Depress Anxiety 2018; 35:209-219. [PMID: 29329486 PMCID: PMC5888145 DOI: 10.1002/da.22714] [Citation(s) in RCA: 33] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/14/2017] [Revised: 11/24/2017] [Accepted: 12/11/2017] [Indexed: 01/26/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND There is limited evidence on the cost effectiveness of Internet-based treatments for depression. The aim was to evaluate the cost effectiveness of guided Internet-based interventions for depression compared to controls. METHODS Individual-participant data from five randomized controlled trials (RCT), including 1,426 participants, were combined. Cost-effectiveness analyses were conducted at 8 weeks, 6 months, and 12 months follow-up. RESULTS The guided Internet-based interventions were more costly than the controls, but not statistically significant (12 months mean difference = €406, 95% CI: - 611 to 1,444). The mean differences in clinical effects were not statistically significant (12 months mean difference = 1.75, 95% CI: - .09 to 3.60 in Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale [CES-D] score, .06, 95% CI: - .02 to .13 in response rate, and .00, 95% CI: - .03 to .03 in quality-adjusted life-years [QALYs]). Cost-effectiveness acceptability curves indicated that high investments are needed to reach an acceptable probability that the intervention is cost effective compared to control for CES-D and response to treatment (e.g., at 12-month follow-up the probability of being cost effective was .95 at a ceiling ratio of 2,000 €/point of improvement in CES-D score). For QALYs, the intervention's probability of being cost effective compared to control was low at the commonly accepted willingness-to-pay threshold (e.g., at 12-month follow-up the probability was .29 and. 31 at a ceiling ratio of 24,000 and 35,000 €/QALY, respectively). CONCLUSIONS Based on the present findings, guided Internet-based interventions for depression are not considered cost effective compared to controls. However, only a minority of RCTs investigating the clinical effectiveness of guided Internet-based interventions also assessed cost effectiveness and were included in this individual-participant data meta-analysis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Spyros Kolovos
- Department of Health SciencesFaculty of Earth and Life Sciences, Amsterdam Public Health Research InstituteVU University AmsterdamAmsterdamThe Netherlands,Department of ClinicalNeuro and Developmental Psychology, Amsterdam Public Health Research InstituteVrije Universiteit AmsterdamAmsterdamThe Netherlands
| | - Johanna M. van Dongen
- Department of Health SciencesFaculty of Earth and Life Sciences, Amsterdam Public Health Research InstituteVU University AmsterdamAmsterdamThe Netherlands
| | - Heleen Riper
- Department of ClinicalNeuro and Developmental Psychology, Amsterdam Public Health Research InstituteVrije Universiteit AmsterdamAmsterdamThe Netherlands
| | - Claudia Buntrock
- Department of ClinicalNeuro and Developmental Psychology, Amsterdam Public Health Research InstituteVrije Universiteit AmsterdamAmsterdamThe Netherlands,Department of Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, Institute of PsychologyUniversity of Erlangen‐NürnbergNägelsbachstrErlangenGermany
| | - Pim Cuijpers
- Department of ClinicalNeuro and Developmental Psychology, Amsterdam Public Health Research InstituteVrije Universiteit AmsterdamAmsterdamThe Netherlands
| | - David D. Ebert
- Department of Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, Institute of PsychologyUniversity of Erlangen‐NürnbergNägelsbachstrErlangenGermany
| | | | - Robin M. Kenter
- Department of ClinicalNeuro and Developmental Psychology, Amsterdam Public Health Research InstituteVrije Universiteit AmsterdamAmsterdamThe Netherlands
| | - Stephanie Nobis
- Division of Online Health TrainingInnovation IncubatorLeuphana University LueneburgLueneburgGermany
| | - Andrea Smith
- Department of Community Health and EpidemiologyFaculty of MedicineDalhousie UniversityHalifaxNova ScotiaCanada
| | - Lisanne Warmerdam
- Stichting Benchmark GGZ (the Dutch Benchmark Foundation in Mental Health Care)BilthovenThe Netherlands
| | - Jill A. Hayden
- Department of Community Health and EpidemiologyFaculty of MedicineDalhousie UniversityHalifaxNova ScotiaCanada
| | - Maurits W. van Tulder
- Department of Health SciencesFaculty of Earth and Life Sciences, Amsterdam Public Health Research InstituteVU University AmsterdamAmsterdamThe Netherlands
| | - Judith E. Bosmans
- Department of Health SciencesFaculty of Earth and Life Sciences, Amsterdam Public Health Research InstituteVU University AmsterdamAmsterdamThe Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Saragoussi D, Christensen MC, Hammer-Helmich L, Rive B, Touya M, Haro JM. Long-term follow-up on health-related quality of life in major depressive disorder: a 2-year European cohort study. Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat 2018; 14:1339-1350. [PMID: 29872301 PMCID: PMC5973321 DOI: 10.2147/ndt.s159276] [Citation(s) in RCA: 53] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/08/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Major depressive disorder (MDD) is associated with significant impairments in health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and everyday functioning. This cohort study investigated the long-term development of HRQoL in patients with MDD and its association with patient characteristics, including depressive symptom severity and cognitive symptoms. METHODS The Prospective Epidemiological Research on Functioning Outcomes Related to Major depressive disorder (PERFORM) study was a longitudinal cohort study conducted in 1,159 outpatients aged 18-65 years with MDD in France, Germany, Spain, Sweden, and the UK. The patients were either initiating antidepressant monotherapy or undergoing their first switch of antidepressant. HRQoL was assessed using the Medical Outcomes Study Short-Form 12-item Health Survey (SF-12) up to month 12 and the EuroQol Five Dimensions questionnaire up to month 24 (UK only). Depressive symptom severity was assessed up to month 24 by the patient-reported Patient Health Questionnaire and cognitive symptoms by the Perceived Deficit Questionnaire. Multivariate analyses were performed to identify patient characteristics associated with HRQoL. RESULTS Mental HRQoL was severely impaired at baseline versus normative data (mean [SD] SF-12 mental component summary [MCS], 26.5 [9.2]); mean (SD) physical component summary (PCS) total score was 45.2 (12.1). SF-12 MCS improved over 12 months of follow-up (38.7 [11.6] at month 12), while SF-12 PCS remained stable (45.3 [11.1]). At each assessment time point, there was a clear pattern of lower SF-12 MCS and PCS total score in patients experiencing greater cognitive problems. The mean EuroQol Five Dimensions questionnaire utility index score generally decreased (i.e., worsened) with increasing severity of cognitive and depressive symptoms at all time points up to 24 months. Multivariate analyses identified both depression severity and cognitive symptoms as strongly and significantly associated with poor HRQoL. CONCLUSION These findings highlight the importance of recognizing and managing residual symptoms in patients with MDD, including the cognitive symptoms, to restore long-term psychosocial functioning.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Delphine Saragoussi
- Real-World Evidence and Epidemiology, Lundbeck SAS, Issy-les-Moulineaux, France
| | | | | | - Benoît Rive
- Global Analytics, Lundbeck SAS, Issy-les-Moulineaux, France
| | - Maëlys Touya
- Health Economics and Outcomes Research, Lundbeck, Deerfield, IL, USA
| | - Josep Maria Haro
- Research and Teaching Unit, Parc Sanitari Sant Joan de Deu, CIBERSAM, University of Barcelona, Sant Boi de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Turner D, Carter T, Sach T, Guo B, Callaghan P. Cost-effectiveness of a preferred intensity exercise programme for young people with depression compared with treatment as usual: an economic evaluation alongside a clinical trial in the UK. BMJ Open 2017; 7:e016211. [PMID: 29180592 PMCID: PMC5719311 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-016211] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/31/2017] [Revised: 08/01/2017] [Accepted: 09/05/2017] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To assess the cost-effectiveness of preferred intensity exercise programme for young people with depression compared with a treatment as usual control group. DESIGN A 'within trial' cost-effectiveness and cost-utility analysis conducted alongside a randomised controlled trial. The perspective of the analysis was the UK National Health Service and social services. SETTING The intervention was provided in a community leisure centre setting. PARTICIPANTS 86 young people aged 14-17 years attending Tier 2 and Tier 3 CAMHS (Child and Adolescent Mental Health Services) outpatient services presenting with depression. INTERVENTIONS The intervention comprised 12 separate sessions of circuit training over a 6-week period. Sessions were supervised by a qualified exercise therapist. Participants also received treatment as usual. The comparator group received treatment as usual. RESULTS We found improvements in the Children's Depression Inventory-2 (CDI-2) and estimated cost-effectiveness at £61 per point improvement in CDI-2 for the exercise group compared with control. We found no evidence that the exercise intervention led to differences in quality-adjusted life years (QALY). QALYs were estimated using the EQ-5D-5L (5-level version of EuroQol-5 dimension). CONCLUSIONS There is evidence that exercise can be an effective intervention for adolescents with depression and the current study shows that preferred intensity exercise could also represent a cost-effective intervention in terms of the CDI-2. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER NCT01474837.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David Turner
- Norwich Medical School, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK
| | - Tim Carter
- School of Health Sciences, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - Tracey Sach
- Norwich Medical School, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK
| | - Boliang Guo
- Division of Psychiatry and Applied Psychology, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | | |
Collapse
|