Impact of a pharmacist driven anticoagulation reversal program at a large academic medical center

Fuzzy C-means clustering algorithm applied in computed tomography images of patients with intracranial hemorrhage

In recent years, intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) has garnered significant attention as a severe cerebrovascular disorder. To enhance the accuracy of ICH detection and segmentation, this study proposed an improved fuzzy C-means (FCM) algorithm and performed a comparative analysis with both traditional FCM and advanced convolutional neural network (CNN) algorithms. Experiments conducted on the publicly available CT-ICH dataset evaluated the performance of these three algorithms in predicting ICH volume. The results demonstrated that the improved FCM algorithm offered notable improvements in computational time and resource consumption compared to the traditional FCM algorithm, while also showing enhanced accuracy. However, it still lagged behind the CNN algorithm in areas such as feature extraction, model generalization, and the ability to handle complex image structures. The study concluded with a discussion of potential directions for further optimizing the FCM algorithm, aiming to bridge the performance gap with CNN algorithms and provide a reference for future research in medical image processing.

Time to oral anticoagulant reversal in intracranial hemorrhage with an emergency medicine pharmacist presence

PURPOSE

Intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) is associated with high morbidity and mortality, with mortality rates up to 65%. Oral anticoagulants (OAC) are a major risk factor for ICH. Since these patients are usually diagnosed in the emergency department (ED), emergency medicine (EM) pharmacists can help ensure appropriate selection and delivery of medications in urgent situations including reversal agents for OAC-associated bleeding. The purpose of this study was to determine the impact EM pharmacist presence has on time to OAC reversal in patients presenting with an ICH.

PROCEDURES

This was a retrospective, single-center cohort study evaluating time to reversal of OAC-associated ICH at a level one trauma center between November 2016 and September 2022. Patients 18 years or older who presented to the ED with an OAC-associated ICH and received at least one dose of an emergent reversal agent were included. Patients were excluded if their ICH was diagnosed at an outside facility, if they received emergent reversal agents for other indications, or if they had do not resuscitate orders upon admission. The primary outcome was time to administration of reversal agent with or without an EM pharmacist present, represented as median [interquartile range]. Secondary outcomes included hematoma expansion, hospital length of stay, intensive care unit LOS, and in-hospital mortality.

RESULTS

Of the 157 patients evaluated, 83 met criteria for inclusion. Majority of patients presented with warfarin-associated ICH (55%) and the most common indication for OAC was atrial fibrillation (66%). The most common type of ICH was intracerebral hemorrhage (35%). The median time to emergent reversal agent administration was significantly shorter in the EM pharmacist group (50 min [31-65] vs. 85 min [51-121], p < 0.01). No significant differences in secondary outcomes existed.

CONCLUSIONS

The presence of an EM pharmacist at the bedside of patients who present to the ED with ICH was associated with a decrease in the time to OAC reversal by 36 min. Presence of an EM pharmacist was not associated with improved clinical outcomes for ICH in our study. Larger trials are warranted to determine whether the presence of an EM pharmacist is associated with improved functional and clinical outcomes in patients with OAC-associated ICH and whether time to newer reversal agents, other than 4F-PCC, has an effect on outcomes.

Evaluating reduction in medical costs associated with pharmacists' presence in the emergency department using a novel cost avoidance framework

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the cost avoidance associated with emergency medicine pharmacist (EMP) presence in the emergency department (ED) using a novel cost avoidance framework.

SUMMARY

This single-center, retrospective, observational study examined EMP interventions from November 1, 2021, through March 31, 2022. EMPs prospectively selected up to 10 shifts in which to log interventions during the study period. Interventions were categorized into 25 cost avoidance categories, 10 of which incorporated recently proposed probability variables. All categories were organized into 4 broad cost avoidance domains, including resource utilization, individualization of patient care, adverse drug event prevention, and hands-on care. During the study period, 894 interventions were logged, which accounted for $143,132 in cost avoidance (lower probability value of $124,186, upper probability value of $168,858), with a median cost avoidance per shift of $1,671 (interquartile range, $1,025 to $2,451). On the basis of 240 shifts, the estimated annual total cost avoidance per pharmacist was extrapolated to be $401,040.

CONCLUSION

While the mean cost avoidance of $161.10 per intervention observed in our study was less than that in prior cost avoidance studies due to the conservative and potentially more realistic estimates used, implementation of this cost avoidance framework still showed substantial cost avoidance associated with EMP presence in the ED.

Quantifying Critical Care Pharmacist Interventions in COVID-19

Purpose/Background: Pharmacists have been shown to play an important role in the medication management of critically ill patients. Pharmacist interventions in the care of critically ill patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) have not been quantitatively described. Methodology: A single center, retrospective, observational study was conducted at Vanderbilt University Medical Center in Nashville, Tennessee. All adult patients admitted to the COVID-19 intensive care unit (ICU) or Medical ICU with a COVID-19 diagnosis between March 1, 2020, and June 30, 2021, were included. All interventions made by pharmacists were documented electronically, collected, categorized, and analyzed. The primary outcome of this study was the median number of interventions by pharmacists per patient. The secondary outcome was the number of different types of interventions performed. Results: A total of 768 patients were included in the analysis. The median age was 63 years old; 63% of patients were male and 71% were Caucasian. Median hospital length of stay (LOS) was 12 days (interquartile range (IQR) 7-21) and ICU LOS was 5 days (IQR 1-11). The median Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score was 4 (IQR 2-7) and Charlson Comorbidity Index was 3 (IQR 2-5). Mortality at 60 days occurred in 352 patients (46%). Pharmacists performed a total of 7027 interventions for 655 patients with a median number of pharmacist interventions per patient of 6 (IQR 3-14). The most common pharmacist interventions were medication discontinuation (24%), completion of components of the ICU liberation bundle (19%), medication dose adjustment (18%), therapeutic drug monitoring (15%), and medication initiation (10%). Conclusions: Pharmacists made multiple interventions related to medication use and management in critically ill patients with COVID-19. This study adds important information of the evolving role clinical pharmacists play in the care of critical illness, specifically during the COVID-19 pandemic.