1
|
Powles T, Albiges L, Bex A, Comperat E, Grünwald V, Kanesvaran R, Kitamura H, McKay R, Porta C, Procopio G, Schmidinger M, Suarez C, Teoh J, de Velasco G, Young M, Gillessen S. Renal cell carcinoma: ESMO Clinical Practice Guideline for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann Oncol 2024; 35:692-706. [PMID: 38788900 DOI: 10.1016/j.annonc.2024.05.537] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/22/2024] [Revised: 05/03/2024] [Accepted: 05/13/2024] [Indexed: 05/26/2024] Open
Affiliation(s)
- T Powles
- Barts Cancer Institute, Department of Medical Oncology, Queen Mary University of London and Royal Free London NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - L Albiges
- Université Paris Saclay, Institut Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
| | - A Bex
- Specialist Centre for Kidney Cancer, Royal Free London NHS Foundation Trust, London; Division of Surgery and Interventional Science, University College London, London, UK; Department of Urology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - E Comperat
- Department of Pathology, Medical University of Vienna, General Hospital of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - V Grünwald
- Interdisciplinary Genitourinary Oncology, West German Cancer Center Clinic for Internal Medicine and Clinic for Urology, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - R Kanesvaran
- Division of Medical Oncology, National Cancer Centre, Singapore, Singapore
| | - H Kitamura
- Department of Urology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Toyama, Toyama, Japan
| | - R McKay
- Department of Medicine and Urology, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, USA
| | - C Porta
- Interdisciplinary Department of Medicine, University of Bari 'A. Moro', Bari; Division of Medical Oncology, A.O.U. Consorziale Policlinico di Bari, Bari
| | - G Procopio
- Department of Medical Oncology, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori di Milano, Milan, Italy
| | - M Schmidinger
- Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - C Suarez
- Medical Oncology, Vall d'Hebron Institute of Oncology (VHIO), Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron, Vall d'Hebron Barcelona Hospital Campus, Barcelona, Spain
| | - J Teoh
- S. H. Ho Urology Centre, Department of Surgery, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China
| | - G de Velasco
- Instituto de Investigación i+12 and Departamento de Oncología Médica, Hospital University 12 de Octubre, Madrid, Spain
| | - M Young
- Barts Cancer Institute, Department of Medical Oncology, Queen Mary University of London and Royal Free London NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK; Barts Cancer Institute, Department of Experimental Cancer Medicine, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
| | - S Gillessen
- Oncology Institute of Southern Switzerland (IOSI), Ente Ospedaliero Cantonale (EOC), Bellinzona; Università della Svizzera Italiana, Lugano, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Gross-Goupil M, Bodnar L, Campbell MT, Michael A, Venugopal B, Żołnierek J, Dutailly P, Procopio G, Albiges L. Cabozantinib in the Routine Management of Renal Cell Carcinoma: A Systematic Literature Review of Real-World Evidence. Clin Genitourin Cancer 2024; 22:84-97. [PMID: 38101983 DOI: 10.1016/j.clgc.2023.11.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/05/2023] [Revised: 11/01/2023] [Accepted: 11/02/2023] [Indexed: 12/17/2023]
Abstract
Real-world cabozantinib use has increased since its approval to treat patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC) in 2016. We reviewed cabozantinib use in real-world clinical practice and compared outcomes with pivotal cabozantinib randomized control trials (RCTs). This PRISMA-standard systematic literature review evaluated real-world effectiveness and tolerability of cabozantinib in patients with RCC (PROSPERO registration: CRD42021245854). Systematic MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane database searches were conducted on November 2, 2022. Eligible publications included ≥ 20 patients with RCC receiving cabozantinib. After double-screening for eligibility, standardized data were abstracted, qualitatively summarized, and assessed for risk of bias using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. Of 353 screened publications, 41 were included, representing approximately 11,000 real-world patients. Most publications reported cabozantinib monotherapy cohort studies (40/41) of retrospective (39/41) and multicenter (32/41) design; most included patients from North America and/or Europe (30/41). Baseline characteristics were demographically similar between real-world and pivotal RCT populations, but real-world populations showed greater variation in prevalence of prior nephrectomy, multiple-site/brain metastasis, and nonclear-cell RCC histology. Cabozantinib activity was reported across real-world treatment lines and tumor types. Overall survival, progression-free survival, and objective response rate values from pivotal RCTs were within the ranges reported for equivalent outcomes across real-world studies. Common real-world grade ≥ 3 adverse events were consistent with those in pivotal RCTs (fatigue, palmar-plantar erythrodysesthesia syndrome, diarrhea, hypertension), but less frequent. No new tolerability concerns were identified. Real-world RCC survival outcomes for cabozantinib monotherapy were broadly consistent with pivotal RCTs, despite greater heterogeneity in real-world populations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Lubomir Bodnar
- University of Natural Sciences and Humanities in Siedlce, Institute of Health Sciences, Siedlce, Poland
| | | | - Agnieszka Michael
- University of Surrey, School of Biosciences and Medicine, Guildford, UK
| | - Balaji Venugopal
- Beatson West of Scotland Cancer Centre and University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Lolli C, Verde A, Esposti LD, Acciai V, Brigido A, Proietti E, Scagliarini S. Cabozantinib use in second or subsequent line of treatment in renal cell carcinoma: an analysis of Italian administrative databases. GLOBAL & REGIONAL HEALTH TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT 2024; 11:154-160. [PMID: 38979548 PMCID: PMC11228513 DOI: 10.33393/grhta.2024.2892] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/13/2023] [Accepted: 06/05/2024] [Indexed: 07/10/2024] Open
Abstract
Background Cabozantinib use in everyday clinical practice for advanced or metastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is relatively recent, and real-world data on treatment persistence, adherence and sequencing are still limited. Methods We conducted an analysis based on an integrated administrative database, covering around 6.9 million health-assisted Italian individuals, to explore the use of cabozantinib for RCC. Patients with at least one prescription for cabozantinib during 2017-2020 were searched. These were characterized during all available period (i.e. from 2010 onwards) before the index date and were observed after inclusion. Results A total of 113 patients treated with cabozantinib in second or subsequent line were included, and their demographic, clinical and treatment characteristics were described. About half of these RCC patients were aged >65 years (47.8%). Sixty patients (53.1%) were highly adherent to cabozantinib therapy, and the median cabozantinib treatment duration of use was 8.7 months (95% confidence interval: 5.8-11.1). During the first year of follow-up, the average total cost per patient was €32,508. Conclusions We described second or subsequent line cabozantinib treatment for RCC in a real-world setting and the economic burden of disease in Italy, taking advantage of large, integrated administrative databases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cristian Lolli
- Department of Medical Oncology, IRCCS Istituto Romagnolo per lo Studio dei Tumori (IRST) "Dino Amadori", Meldola - Italy
| | - Antonio Verde
- Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, School of Medicine and Surgery, University of Naples Federico II, Naples - Italy
| | - Luca Degli Esposti
- Clicon S.r.l. Società Benefit, Health, Economics & Outcomes Research, Bologna - Italy
| | | | | | | | - Sarah Scagliarini
- Department of Medical Oncology, AORN "A. Cardarelli", Naples - Italy
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Albiges L, McGregor BA, Heng DYC, Procopio G, de Velasco G, Taguieva-Pioger N, Martín-Couce L, Tannir NM, Powles T. Vascular endothelial growth factor-targeted therapy in patients with renal cell carcinoma pretreated with immune checkpoint inhibitors: A systematic literature review. Cancer Treat Rev 2024; 122:102652. [PMID: 37980876 DOI: 10.1016/j.ctrv.2023.102652] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/18/2023] [Revised: 11/01/2023] [Accepted: 11/03/2023] [Indexed: 11/21/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION We conducted a systematic literature review to identify evidence for use of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF)-targeted (anti-VEGF) treatment in patients with renal cell carcinoma (RCC) following prior checkpoint inhibitor (CPI)-based therapy. METHODS This was a PRISMA-standard systematic literature review; registered with PROSPERO (CRD42021255568). Literature searches were conducted in MEDLINE®, Embase, and the Cochrane Library (January 28, 2021; updated September 13, 2022) to identify publications reporting efficacy/effectiveness and safety/tolerability evidence for anti-VEGF treatment in patients with RCC who had received prior CPI therapy. RESULTS Of 2,639 publications screened, 48 were eligible and featured 2,759 patients treated in trials and 2,209 in real-world studies (RWS). Most patients with available data were treated with anti-VEGF tyrosine kinase inhibitor-based regimens (trials: 93 %; RWS: 100 %), most commonly cabozantinib, which accounted for 46 % of trial and 62 % of RWS patients in publications with available data. Collectively, there was consistent evidence of anti-VEGF treatment activity after prior CPI therapy. Activity was reported for all anti-VEGF regimens and regardless of prior CPI-based regimen. No new safety signals were detected for subsequent anti-VEGF therapy; no studies suggested increased immune-related adverse events associated with prior CPI therapy. The results were limited by data quality; study heterogeneity prohibited meta-analyses. CONCLUSION Based on the available data (most commonly for cabozantinib), anti-VEGF therapy appears to be a rational treatment choice in patients with RCC who have progressed despite prior CPI-based therapy. Results from ongoing trials of combination anti-VEGF plus CPI regimen post prior CPI therapy trials will contribute more definitive evidence. PLAIN LANGUAGE SUMMARY Anticancer treatments that work by reducing levels of a substance in the body called Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor are known as anti-VEGF drugs. Reducing VEGF levels helps to reduce blood supply to tumors, which can slow the speed at which the cancer grows. Some other types of anticancer drugs that help the immune system to fight cancer cells are called checkpoint inhibitors. Here, we looked at published studies that investigated how anti-VEGF drugs work, and what side effects they cause, in people who have already been treated with checkpoint inhibitors for a type of kidney cancer called renal cell carcinoma. We aimed to summarize the available evidence to help doctors decide how best to use anti-VEGF drugs in these patients. We found 48 studies that included almost 5,000 patients. The results of the studies showed that anti-VEGF drugs have anticancer effects in people with renal cell carcinoma who had already been treated with checkpoint inhibitors. All of the VEGF-targeting drugs had anticancer effects, irrespective of what checkpoint inhibitor treatment people had received before. There were different amounts of evidence available for the different anti-VEGF drugs. The anti-VEGF cabozantinib had the largest amount of evidence. Importantly, previous checkpoint inhibitor treatment did not seem to affect the number or type of side-effects associated with anti-VEGF drugs. Results from ongoing, well-designed studies will be helpful to confirm these results. Our findings may be useful for doctors considering using anti-VEGF drugs in patients with renal cell carcinoma who have received checkpoint inhibitor treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laurence Albiges
- Medical Oncology, Gustave Roussy, Université Paris-Saclay, Villejuif, France.
| | | | - Daniel Y C Heng
- Division of Medical Oncology, Tom Baker Cancer Centre, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
| | - Giuseppe Procopio
- Genitourinary Medical Oncology, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | - Guillermo de Velasco
- University Hospital 12 de Octubre, Department of Medical Oncology, Madrid, Spain
| | | | | | - Nizar M Tannir
- Department of Genitourinary Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Thomas Powles
- Barts Cancer Institute, Cancer Research UK Experimental Cancer Medicine Centre, Queen Mary University of London, Department of Genitourinary Oncology, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Ishihara H, Nemoto Y, Tachibana H, Fukuda H, Yoshida K, Kobayashi H, Iizuka J, Hashimoto Y, Kondo T, Takagi T. Real-world efficacy and safety of cabozantinib following immune checkpoint inhibitor failure in Japanese patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma. Jpn J Clin Oncol 2023; 53:977-983. [PMID: 37519060 DOI: 10.1093/jjco/hyad087] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/14/2023] [Accepted: 07/11/2023] [Indexed: 08/01/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Real-world data of cabozantinib after failure of immune checkpoint inhibitors for advanced renal cell carcinoma in Japanese population are limited. Additionally, prognostic factors of cabozantinib in this setting are still unknown. METHODS We retrospectively evaluated data of 56 patients treated with cabozantinib subsequent to failed immune checkpoint inhibitors at four institutions. Regarding the efficacy profile, progression-free survival, overall survival and objective response rate were assessed. In terms of the safety profile, rate of adverse events, dose reduction and treatment interruption were assessed. Furthermore, risk factors of progression-free survival were analyzed. RESULTS Twenty-nine patients (52%) were treated with cabozantinib as second-line therapy. Most frequent prior immune checkpoint inhibitor treatment was nivolumab plus ipilimumab combination therapy as first-line therapy (n = 30, 54%). Median progression-free survival and overall survival were 9.76 and 25.5 months, respectively, and objective response rate was 34%. All patients experienced at least one adverse event, and grade ≥ 3 adverse events were observed in 31 patients (55%). Forty-four (79%) and 31 (55%) patients needed dose reduction and treatment interruption, respectively. Multivariate analysis showed that reduced initial dose (i.e. <60 mg) (hazard ratio: 2.50, P = 0.0355) and presence of lymph node metastasis (hazard ratio: 2.50, P = 0.0172) were independent factors of shorter progression-free survival. CONCLUSION Cabozantinib in Japanese patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma who failed immune checkpoint inhibitors was efficacious and had a manageable safety profile. These results appear to be similar to those of previous clinical trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hiroki Ishihara
- Department of Urology, Tokyo Women's Medical University, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Yuki Nemoto
- Department of Urology, Tokyo Women's Medical University, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo, Japan
- Department of Urology, Tokyo Women's Medical University, Adachi Medical Center, Adachi-ku, Tokyo, Japan
| | | | - Hironori Fukuda
- Department of Urology, Tokyo Women's Medical University, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Kazuhiko Yoshida
- Department of Urology, Tokyo Women's Medical University, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Hirohito Kobayashi
- Department of Urology, Tokyo Women's Medical University, Adachi Medical Center, Adachi-ku, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Junpei Iizuka
- Department of Urology, Tokyo Women's Medical University, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Yasunobu Hashimoto
- Department of Urology, Saiseikai Kawaguchi General Hospital, Kawaguchi, Saitama, Japan
| | - Tsunenori Kondo
- Department of Urology, Tokyo Women's Medical University, Adachi Medical Center, Adachi-ku, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Toshio Takagi
- Department of Urology, Tokyo Women's Medical University, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Guven DC, Yekeduz E, Erul E, Yazgan SC, Sahin TK, Karatas G, Aksoy S, Erman M, Yalcin S, Urun Y, Kilickap S. The benefit of treatment beyond progression with immune checkpoint inhibitors: a multi-center retrospective cohort study. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 2023; 149:3599-3606. [PMID: 35960374 DOI: 10.1007/s00432-022-04268-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/17/2022] [Accepted: 08/04/2022] [Indexed: 10/15/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Treatment beyond progression (TBP) with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) is an evolving field due to the limitations of conventional imaging in response evaluation. However, real-life data on the benefit of TBP is scarce, especially from the limited resource settings and patients treated in the later lines. Therefore, we aimed to investigate the survival benefit of TBP with ICIs in patients with advanced tumors from a limited resource setting. METHODS For this multi-center retrospective cohort study, we included 282 patients treated with ICIs and had radiological progression according to RECIST 1.1 criteria. We evaluated post-progression survival according to the use of TBP (TBP and non-TBP groups) with univariate and multivariate analyses. RESULTS The cohort's median age was 61, and 84.4% were treated in the second or later lines. 82 (29.1%) of 282 patients continued on ICIs following the initial progression. In multivariate analyses, patients in the TBP group had improved post-progression survival compared to non-TBP (13.18 vs. 4.63 months, HR: 0.500, 95% CI: 0.349-0.717, p < 0.001). The benefit of the TBP was independent of the tumor type, treatment line, and age. Furthermore, TBP with ICIs remained associated with improved post-progression survival (HR: 0.600, 95% CI: 0.380-0.947, p = 0.028) after excluding the patients with no further treatment after progression in the non-TBP arm. CONCLUSIONS In this study, we observed that patients receiving ICIs beyond progression had considerably longer survival. Continuation of ICIs after progression should be considered a reasonable management option for patients with advanced cancer, specifically for patients with limited alternative options.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Deniz Can Guven
- Department of Medical Oncology, Hacettepe University Cancer Institute, Sihhiye, 06100, Ankara, Turkey.
| | - Emre Yekeduz
- Department of Medical Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Ankara University, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Enes Erul
- Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Hacettepe University, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Sati Coskun Yazgan
- Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Ankara University, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Taha Koray Sahin
- Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Hacettepe University, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Gokturk Karatas
- Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Ankara University, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Sercan Aksoy
- Department of Medical Oncology, Hacettepe University Cancer Institute, Sihhiye, 06100, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Mustafa Erman
- Department of Medical Oncology, Hacettepe University Cancer Institute, Sihhiye, 06100, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Suayib Yalcin
- Department of Medical Oncology, Hacettepe University Cancer Institute, Sihhiye, 06100, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Yuksel Urun
- Department of Medical Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Ankara University, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Saadettin Kilickap
- Faculty of Medicine, Istinye University, Istanbul, Turkey
- Medical Oncology Unit, Liv Hospital Ankara, Ankara, Turkey
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Anghelone A, Strusi A, Scala A, Panebianco M, Ciccarese C, Iacovelli R. 2023 ASCO genitourinary cancers symposium: focus on renal cell carcinoma. Expert Rev Anticancer Ther 2023; 23:669-672. [PMID: 37246571 DOI: 10.1080/14737140.2023.2218091] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/04/2023] [Accepted: 05/22/2023] [Indexed: 05/30/2023]
Abstract
This article describes the main acquisitions of renal cell carcinoma (RCC) management presented during the 2023 American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) Genitourinary Cancers Symposium. In particular, the efficacy of adjuvant pembrolizumab in patients with resected renal cell carcinoma (RCC) at increased risk of recurrence was confirmed through a subgroup analysis. In the metastatic setting, the updated analysis of the CheckMate 9ER study confirmed the efficacy in terms of overall survival (OS) of the combination of nivolumab plus cabozantinib; of note, this survival advantage was clear in the subgroup of patients at poor IMDC prognosis, but not in favorable IMDC risk group patients. As concern the triplet therapy (i.e. nivolumab+ipilumumab+cabozantinib), the updated analysis of the COSMIC-313 study confirmed a significant PFS advantage in the subgroup of mRCC patients at intermediate IMDC risk, while the lack of benefit in the poor risk group supports the critical role of immunotherapy (but not of VEGFR-TKIs) in this poor prognosis subgroup of patients. Finally, the activity of cabozantinib as second-line therapy after progression to ICI-based combinations was prospectively assessed. This 2023 ASCO Genitourinary Cancer Symposium laid the foundations for further knowledge development necessary for an increasingly personalized management of mRCC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Alessandro Strusi
- Medical Oncology Unit, Università Cattolica Del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
| | - Alessandro Scala
- Medical Oncology Unit, Università Cattolica Del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
| | - Martina Panebianco
- Medical Oncology Unit, Università Cattolica Del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
| | - Chiara Ciccarese
- Medical Oncology Unit, Fondazione Policlinico A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Roberto Iacovelli
- Medical Oncology Unit, Fondazione Policlinico A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Procopio G, Claps M, Pircher C, Porcu L, Sepe P, Guadalupi V, De Giorgi U, Bimbatti D, Nolè F, Carrozza F, Buti S, Iacovelli R, Ciccarese C, Masini C, Baldessari C, Doni L, Cusmai A, Gernone A, Scagliarini S, Pignata S, de Braud F, Verzoni E. A multicenter phase 2 single arm study of cabozantinib in patients with advanced or unresectable renal cell carcinoma pre-treated with one immune-checkpoint inhibitor: The BREAKPOINT trial (Meet-Uro trial 03). TUMORI JOURNAL 2023; 109:129-137. [PMID: 36447337 PMCID: PMC9896529 DOI: 10.1177/03008916221138881] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 14.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/05/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND First-line therapies based on immune-checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) significantly improved survival of metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) patients. Cabozantinib was shown to target kinases involved in immune-escape and to prolong survival in patients pre-treated with tyrosine-kinase-inhibitors (TKIs). The impact of ICIs combinations in first line on subsequent therapies is still unclear. METHODS This is an open label, multicenter, single arm, phase II study designed to assess activity, safety and efficacy of cabozantinib in mRCC patients progressed after an adjuvant or first line anti-Programmed Death (PD)-1/PD-Ligand (PD-L) 1-based therapy. Primary endpoint was progression free survival (PFS), secondary endpoints were overall survival (OS), objective response rate (ORR) and safety. RESULTS 31 patients were included in the analysis. After a median (m) follow-up of 11.9 months, mPFS was 8.3 months (90%CI 3.9-17.4) and mOS was 13.8 months (95%CI 7.7-29.0). ORR was 37.9% with an additional 13 patients achieving disease stability. Grade 3-4 adverse events occurred in 47% of patients, including more frequently creatine phosphokinase (CPK) serum level elevation, neutropenia, hyponatremia, diarrhea, hand-food syndrome, oral mucositis and hypertension. CONCLUSIONS The BREAKPOINT trial met its primary endpoint showing that cabozantinib as second line therapy after ICIs was active in mRCC. Safety profile was manageable. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER NCT03463681 - A Study of CaBozantinib in Patients With Advanced or Unresectable Renal cEll cArcinoma (BREAKPOINT) - https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03463681.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Giuseppe Procopio
- Medical Oncology Unit, Fondazione IRCSS
Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori di Milano, Milan, Italy
| | - Mélanie Claps
- Medical Oncology Unit, Fondazione IRCSS
Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori di Milano, Milan, Italy,Mélanie Claps, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto
Nazionale dei Tumori di Milano, Via Giacomo Venezian 1, Milan, 20133, Italy.
| | - Chiara Pircher
- Medical Oncology Unit, Fondazione IRCSS
Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori di Milano, Milan, Italy
| | - Luca Porcu
- Methodology for Clinical Research
Laboratory, Oncology Department, Istituto di Ricerche Farmacologiche Mario Negri
IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Pierangela Sepe
- Medical Oncology Unit, Fondazione IRCSS
Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori di Milano, Milan, Italy
| | - Valentina Guadalupi
- Medical Oncology Unit, Fondazione IRCSS
Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori di Milano, Milan, Italy
| | - Ugo De Giorgi
- Department of Medical Oncology, IRCCS
Istituto Romagnolo per lo Studio dei Tumori (IRST) Dino Amadori, Meldola,
Italy
| | - Davide Bimbatti
- Department of Medical Oncology,
Istituto Oncologico Veneto IOV, IRCCS, Padova, Italy
| | - Franco Nolè
- Medical Oncology Division of Urogenital
and Head & Neck Tumours, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan
| | - Francesco Carrozza
- Department of Medical Oncology, AUSL
della Romagna, Ospedale Civile degli Infermi, Faenza, Italy
| | - Sebastiano Buti
- Medical Oncology Unit, University
Hospital of Parma, Parma, Italy,Department of Medicine and Surgery,
University of Parma, Parma, Italy
| | - Roberto Iacovelli
- Medical Oncology Unit, Comprehensive
Cancer Center, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome,
Italy
| | - Chiara Ciccarese
- Medical Oncology Unit, Comprehensive
Cancer Center, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome,
Italy
| | - Cristina Masini
- Department of Medical Oncology,
Arcispedale Santa Maria Nuova, AUSL-IRCCS di Reggio Emilia, Reggio Emilia,
Italy
| | - Cinzia Baldessari
- Medical Oncology, Department of
Oncology and Haematology, AOU Policlinico di Modena, Modena, Italy
| | - Laura Doni
- Department of Oncology, Oncology
Unit, University Hospital Careggi, Largo Brambilla, Firenze, Italy
| | - Antonio Cusmai
- Department of Oncology "Don Tonino
Bello", IRCCS "Giovanni Paolo II", Bari, Italy
| | - Angela Gernone
- University Department of Medical
Oncology, Azienda Ospedaliera Policlinico, Bari, Italy
| | | | - Sandro Pignata
- Department of Urology and Gynecology,
Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS Fondazione G. Pascale Napoli, Italy
| | - Filippo de Braud
- Medical Oncology Unit, Fondazione IRCSS
Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori di Milano, Milan, Italy,Department of Medical Oncology &
Hematology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Elena Verzoni
- Medical Oncology Unit, Fondazione IRCSS
Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori di Milano, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Obinata D, Funakoshi D, Sakurai F, Yoshizawa T, Mochida J, Yamaguchi K, Takahashi S. Real-world efficacy of sequential nivolumab for metastatic renal cancer after first-line molecular targeting therapy. Medicine (Baltimore) 2022; 101:e29510. [PMID: 35960101 PMCID: PMC9371577 DOI: 10.1097/md.0000000000029510] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/04/2023] Open
Abstract
This study aimed to clarify the real-world efficacy of sequential nivolumab for treating metastatic renal cancer after first-line molecular targeting therapy. Patients were divided into two groups (2014-2016 and 2017-2020) according to the year when they started primary treatment with molecular targeted drugs (MTDs). We compared the overall survival of patients and investigated a contributing factor for survival. The mean duration of overall survival was significantly longer in the 2017-2020 group (44.0 months) than in the 2014-2016 group (8.5 months). Univariate analysis showed that nivolumab treatment was a significant prognostic factor (P = .0021). Patients treated with nivolumab as second-line therapy had a significantly higher 5-year survival rate compared to that of other patients (70% vs 32%). In addition, the time from commencement of MTDs to switch to nivolumab was significantly shorter in the 2017-2020 group compared to the 2014-2016 group (8.94 vs 34.12 months, P = .03). In our study, cases with first-line MTDs had markedly prolonged outcomes after the 2017 guideline update, and sequential nivolumab with prompt switching to nivolumab was an important factor.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daisuke Obinata
- Department of Urology, Nihon University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Daigo Funakoshi
- Department of Urology, Nihon University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Fuminori Sakurai
- Department of Urology, Nihon University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Tsuyoshi Yoshizawa
- Department of Urology, Nihon University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Junichi Mochida
- Department of Urology, Nihon University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Kenya Yamaguchi
- Department of Urology, Nihon University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
- * Correspondence: Kenya Yamaguchi, Department of Urology, Nihon University School of Medicine, 30-1, Oyaguchikamicho, Itabashi-ku, Tokyo 173-8610, Japan (e-mail: )
| | - Satoru Takahashi
- Department of Urology, Nihon University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Graham J, Vogel A, Cheng AL, Bjarnason GA, Neal JW. Cabozantinib after prior checkpoint inhibitor therapy in patients with solid tumors: A systematic literature review. Cancer Treat Rev 2022; 110:102453. [PMID: 36037792 DOI: 10.1016/j.ctrv.2022.102453] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/29/2022] [Revised: 08/03/2022] [Accepted: 08/05/2022] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION We conducted a systematic literature review to identify evidence for cabozantinib activity in patients with solid tumors after prior checkpoint inhibitor (CPI) therapy. METHODS The review was conducted according to PRISMA guidelines and registered with PROSPERO (CRD42021259873). MEDLINE®, Embase, and the Cochrane Library were searched on 19 May 2021 to identify publications reporting the efficacy/effectiveness and safety/tolerability of cabozantinib in patients with solid tumors who had received prior CPI-based therapy. Publications were screened by one reviewer with uncertainties resolved by a second and/or the full author group. Risk of bias was assessed using Gradingof Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) for clinical trials and the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) for observational studies. RESULTS Of 669 publications screened, 21 were eligible: 18 reported data on renal cell carcinoma, and one each for hepatocellular carcinoma, metastatic urothelial carcinoma, and non-small cell lung cancer. Of six trial publications, three reported moderate-quality evidence and three low-quality evidence. Of 15 observational studies, NOS scores ranged from 3 to 6, suggesting a high potential for uncertainty. The studies consistently reported clinical activity for cabozantinib after CPI therapy, across treatment lines and tumor types, with no new safety signals. The findings were limited by the quality and quantity of available data. CONCLUSION Cabozantinib appears to have anti-tumor activity after prior CPI therapy in patients with solid tumors. Our results are driven largely by studies in renal cell carcinoma. Evidence from ongoing phase 3 trials is required to establish further the role of cabozantinib after CPI therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jeffrey Graham
- University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, Canada; CancerCare Manitoba Research Institute, CancerCare Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, Canada.
| | - Arndt Vogel
- Clinic for Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Endocrinology, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
| | | | - Georg A Bjarnason
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, Sunnybrook Odette Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Joel W Neal
- Division of Oncology, Department of Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA; Stanford Cancer Institute, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Kojima T, Kato R, Sazuka T, Yamamoto H, Fukuda S, Yamana K, Nakaigawa N, Sugino Y, Hamamoto S, Ito H, Murakami H, Obara W. Real-world effectiveness of nivolumab plus ipilimumab and second-line therapy in Japanese untreated patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma: 2-year analysis from a multicenter retrospective clinical study (J-cardinal study). Jpn J Clin Oncol 2022; 52:1345-1352. [PMID: 35920793 PMCID: PMC9631464 DOI: 10.1093/jjco/hyac124] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/04/2022] [Accepted: 07/14/2022] [Indexed: 11/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Nivolumab plus ipilimumab combination therapy is one of the standard therapies for untreated renal cell carcinoma patients with an International Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Database Consortium intermediate/poor risk. We have previously reported the 1-year analysis results of the effectiveness and safety of nivolumab plus ipilimumab combination therapy in the real-world setting in Japan. Here, we report the effectiveness of nivolumab plus ipilimumab combination therapy and of second-line therapy, using 2-year analysis. Methods This retrospective observational study enrolled Japanese patients with previously untreated metastatic renal cell carcinoma who initiated nivolumab plus ipilimumab combination therapy between August 2018 and January 2019. Data were collected from patients’ medical records at baseline and at 3 months, 1 year and 2 years after the last enrollment. Results Of the 45 patients enrolled, 10 patients (22.2%) each had non-clear cell renal cell carcinoma and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status ≥2 at baseline. Median follow-up period was 24.0 months; objective response rate was 41.5%, with 6 patients achieving complete response; median progression-free survival was 17.8 months and 24-month progression-free survival and overall survival rates were 41.6 and 59.1%, respectively. Second-line therapy achieved an objective response rate of 20%; median progression-free survival was 9.8 months. Median progression-free survival 2 was 26.4 months. Conclusions The effectiveness of nivolumab plus ipilimumab combination therapy at 2-year analysis in the real-world setting in Japan was comparable to that reported in CheckMate 214. The current analysis also demonstrated the effectiveness of second-line therapy after nivolumab plus ipilimumab combination therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Takahiro Kojima
- Department of Urology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Tsukuba, Ibaraki, Japan.,Department of Urology, Aichi Cancer Center Hospital, Aichi, Japan
| | - Renpei Kato
- Department of Urology, Iwate Medical University, Iwate, Japan
| | - Tomokazu Sazuka
- Department of Urology, Chiba University Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba, Japan
| | - Hayato Yamamoto
- Department of Urology, Hirosaki University Graduate School of Medicine, Aomori, Japan
| | - Shohei Fukuda
- Department of Urology, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Kazutoshi Yamana
- Department of Urology, Molecular Oncology, Graduate School of Medicine and Dental Sciences, Niigata University, Niigata, Japan
| | - Noboru Nakaigawa
- Department of Urology, Yokohama City University Graduate School of Medicine, Kanagawa, Japan
| | - Yusuke Sugino
- Department of Nephro-Urologic Surgery and Andrology, Mie University Graduate School of Medicine, Mie, Japan
| | - Shuzo Hamamoto
- Department of Nephro-urology, Nagoya City University Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Aichi, Japan
| | - Hiroaki Ito
- Oncology Medical, Bristol-Myers Squibb K.K., Tokyo, Japan
| | - Hiroshi Murakami
- Oncology Medical Affairs, Ono Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Tokyo, Japan
| | - Wataru Obara
- Department of Urology, Iwate Medical University, Iwate, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Maroto P, Porta C, Capdevila J, Apolo AB, Viteri S, Rodriguez-Antona C, Martin L, Castellano D. Cabozantinib for the treatment of solid tumors: a systematic review. Ther Adv Med Oncol 2022; 14:17588359221107112. [PMID: 35847482 PMCID: PMC9284205 DOI: 10.1177/17588359221107112] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/15/2021] [Accepted: 05/25/2022] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: Cabozantinib is approved, in various settings, for the treatment of renal
cell carcinoma, medullary thyroid cancer, and hepatocellular carcinoma, and
it has been investigated for the treatment of other cancers. With the
available evidence and the real-world performance of cabozantinib compared
with clinical trial data, we performed a systematic review of cabozantinib
monotherapy as treatment for solid tumors in adults. Methods: This study was designed in accordance with Preferred Reporting Items for
Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses and registered with PROSPERO
(CRD42020144680). We searched for clinical and observational studies of
cabozantinib monotherapy for solid tumors using Embase, MEDLINE, and
Cochrane databases (October 2020), and screened relevant congress abstracts.
Eligible studies reported clinical or safety outcomes, or biomarker data.
Small studies (n < 25) and studies of cabozantinib
combination therapies were excluded. Quality was assessed using National
Institute for Health and Care Excellence methodology, and study
characteristics were described qualitatively. Results: Of 2888 citations, 114 were included (52 randomized studies, 29 observational
studies, 32 nonrandomized phase I or II studies or pilot trials, and 1
analysis of data from a randomized study and a nonrandomized study). Beyond
approved indications, other tumors studied were castration-resistant
prostate cancer, urothelial carcinoma, Ewing sarcoma, osteosarcoma, uveal
melanoma, non-small-cell lung cancer, Merkel cell carcinoma, glioblastoma,
pheochromocytomas and paragangliomas, cholangiocarcinoma, gastrointestinal
stromal tumor, colorectal cancer, salivary gland cancer, carcinoid and
pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors, and breast, endometrial and ovarian
cancers. The most common adverse events were hypertension, diarrhea, and
fatigue. Conclusion: The identified evidence demonstrates the positive efficacy/effectiveness of
cabozantinib monotherapy in various solid tumor types, with safety findings
being consistent with those observed with other VEGFR-targeting tyrosine
kinase inhibitors. When available, real-world findings were consistent with
the data reported from clinical trials. A limitation of this review is the
high proportion of abstracts; however, this allowed us to capture the most
up-to-date findings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pablo Maroto
- Medical Oncology Services, Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau, Mas Casanovas, Barcelona, 08025, Spain
| | - Camillo Porta
- Interdisciplinary Department of Medicine, University of Bari "Aldo Moro," Bari, Italy
| | - Jaume Capdevila
- Department of Medical Oncology, Vall d'Hebron University Hospital, Vall d'Hebron Institute of Oncology (VHIO), Barcelona, Spain
| | - Andrea B Apolo
- Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Santiago Viteri
- UOMI Cancer Center, Clínica Mi Tres Torres, Barcelona, Spain
| | | | | | - Daniel Castellano
- Medical Oncology Department, University Hospital 12 de Octubre, Madrid, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Real-World Treatment with Nivolumab or Cabozantinib for Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma (mRCC) in the Veneto Region of Italy: Results of AMOUR Study. Target Oncol 2022; 17:467-474. [PMID: 35751733 PMCID: PMC9345814 DOI: 10.1007/s11523-022-00892-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 05/16/2022] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
Background Second- or third-line treatment options for metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) have dramatically changed in the last few years. There are no criteria for the choice between nivolumab and cabozantinib, which both demonstrated overall survival (OS) gain in pivotal trials. Objective We conducted an analysis of oncological outcomes in patients treated in the Veneto Region (Italy), studying different sequences of TKI-nivolumab-cabozantinib or TKI-cabozantinib-nivolumab in a publicly funded healthcare system. Patients and Methods We conducted a retrospective, real-world analysis of all consecutive patients with mRCC treated with nivolumab or cabozantinib in 2017–2018 at 19 Oncology Units in the Veneto Region. Results We identified 170 patients, 73 % males, median age 68.4 years. All patients started second-line treatment, 59 % received a third-line therapy. Patients with NLR > 3 had a shorter OS (p < 0.0001). In the second-line treatment, nivolumab was administered to 108 patients (63 %), cabozantinib to 29 (17 %); in the third-line treatment nivolumab was administered to 42 patients (25 %), cabozantinib to 49 (29 %). Median OS and PFS in second line treatment were 28.4 and 6.6 months for nivolumab, 16.8 and 6.6 months for cabozantinib. Median OS and PFS in third-line treatment were 27 and 5.2 months for nivolumab, 16.6 and 7.5 months for cabozantinib. Median OS for nivolumab>cabozantinib sequence versus cabozantinib > nivolumab was 28.8 versus 19.9 months (p = 0.2); median PFS for both the sequences were similar at 5.7 months. A cost effectiveness per month of survival of the two sequences analysis was performed: the cost per month for the nivolumab > cabozantinib sequence was 1738.60whereas the cost for the other one was €1624.80. Conclusions In our real-world cohort, most patients received nivolumab as second-line treatment. Outcomes of single drugs are superimposable with those in the published literature. Both the sequences of nivolumab and cabozantinib appear to be viable, effective strategies from an OS and cost-effective perspective.
Collapse
|
14
|
Rathmell WK, Rumble RB, Van Veldhuizen PJ, Al-Ahmadie H, Emamekhoo H, Hauke RJ, Louie AV, Milowsky MI, Molina AM, Rose TL, Siva S, Zaorsky NG, Zhang T, Qamar R, Kungel TM, Lewis B, Singer EA. Management of Metastatic Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma: ASCO Guideline. J Clin Oncol 2022; 40:2957-2995. [PMID: 35728020 DOI: 10.1200/jco.22.00868] [Citation(s) in RCA: 96] [Impact Index Per Article: 48.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/08/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To provide recommendations for the management of patients with metastatic clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC). METHODS An Expert Panel conducted a systematic literature review to obtain evidence to guide treatment recommendations. RESULTS The panel considered peer-reviewed reports published in English. RECOMMENDATIONS The diagnosis of metastatic ccRCC should be made using tissue biopsy of the primary tumor or a metastatic site with the inclusion of markers and/or stains to support the diagnosis. The International Metastatic RCC Database Consortium risk criteria should be used to inform treatment. Cytoreductive nephrectomy may be offered to select patients with kidney-in-place and favorable- or intermediate-risk disease. For those who have already had a nephrectomy, an initial period of active surveillance may be offered if they are asymptomatic with a low burden of disease. Patients with favorable-risk disease who need systemic therapy may be offered an immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) in combination with a vascular endothelial growth factor receptor (VEGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI); patients with intermediate or poor risk should be offered a doublet regimen (no recommendation was provided between ICIs or an ICI in combination with a VEGFR TKI). For select patients, monotherapy with either an ICI or a VEGFR TKI may be offered on the basis of comorbidities. Interleukin-2 remains an option, although selection criteria could not be identified. Recommendations are also provided for second- and subsequent-line therapy as well as the treatment of bone metastases, brain metastases, or the presence of sarcomatoid features. Participation in clinical trials is highly encouraged for patients with metastatic ccRCC.Additional information is available at www.asco.org/genitourinary-cancer-guidelines.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Alexander V Louie
- Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON.,American Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology Representative, Toronto, ON
| | | | | | - Tracy L Rose
- University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC
| | - Shankar Siva
- Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Nicholas G Zaorsky
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospitals Seidman Cancer Center, Case Western Reserve School of Medicine, Cleveland, OH.,American Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology Representative, Cleveland, OH
| | - Tian Zhang
- Harold C. Simmons Comprehensive Cancer Center, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX
| | | | | | - Bryan Lewis
- KidneyCan, Philadelphia, PA.,Patient Representative, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Eric A Singer
- Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Therapeutic sequencing in the era of first-line immune checkpoint inhibitor combinations, a novel challenge in patients with metastatic clear-cell renal cell carcinoma. Bull Cancer 2022; 109:2S31-2S38. [DOI: 10.1016/s0007-4551(22)00236-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
|
16
|
Results from the INMUNOSUN-SOGUG trial: a prospective phase II study of sunitinib as a second-line therapy in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma after immune checkpoint-based combination therapy. ESMO Open 2022; 7:100463. [PMID: 35405437 PMCID: PMC9058923 DOI: 10.1016/j.esmoop.2022.100463] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/04/2021] [Revised: 02/14/2022] [Accepted: 03/04/2022] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Patients and methods Results Conclusion ICI-based combinations have become the first-line treatment for mRCC. We evaluated sunitinib as a second-line treatment in patients with mRCC who progressed to first-line ICI-based treatment. OR was achieved by 4/21 patients (19.0%, 95% CI 2.3% to 35.8%). Median PFS was 5.6 months (95% CI 3.1-8.0 months). The toxicity profile of sunitinib was consistent with previously reported data. No new safety signals were detected. Sunitinib is active and can be safely used as second-line therapy in patients with mRCC who progress to ICI-based regimens.
Collapse
|
17
|
Sharma A, Elias R, Christie A, Williams NS, Pedrosa I, Bjarnason GA, Brugarolas J. Extended disease control with unconventional cabozantinib dose increase in metastatic renal cell carcinoma. KIDNEY CANCER 2022; 6:69-79. [PMID: 36743424 PMCID: PMC9894028 DOI: 10.3233/kca-210117] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/29/2021] [Accepted: 12/09/2021] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
Background Cabozantinib is among the most potent tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) FDA-approved for metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC). Effective treatments after progression on cabozantinib salvage therapy are limited. Dose escalation for other TKIs has been shown to afford added disease control. Objective We sought to evaluate whether dose escalation of cabozantinib (Cabometyx®) from conventional doses in select patients with limited treatment options offered additional disease control. We asked how cabozantinib dose increases may affect circulating drug levels. Methods We identified patients with mRCC at the University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center who were treated with cabozantinib dose escalation to 80 mg after progressing on conventional cabozantinib 60 mg. We then queried leading kidney cancer investigators across the world to identify additional patients. Finally, we reviewed pharmacokinetic (PK) data to assess how higher doses impacted circulating levels by comparison to other formulations (Cometriq® capsules). Results We report six patients treated at two different institutions with cabozantinib-responsive disease and good tolerability, where cabozantinib was dose escalated (typically to 80 mg, but as high as 120 mg) after progression on 60 mg, a strategy that resulted in added disease control (median duration, 14 months; 95% Confidence Interval [CI]: 8 - Not Estimable[NE]). Four patients (66.7%) had disease control lasting at least 1 year. No grade III/IV adverse events were identified in this small, select, cohort. A comparison of PK data to FDA-approved cabozantinib 140 mg capsules suggest that cabozantinib 80 mg tablets results in comparable exposures. Conclusions mRCC patients with cabozantinib responsive disease and reasonable tolerability may benefit from dose escalation at progression.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Akanksha Sharma
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
- Kidney Cancer Program, Simmons Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
| | - Roy Elias
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
- Kidney Cancer Program, Simmons Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
| | - Alana Christie
- Kidney Cancer Program, Simmons Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
- Division of Biostatistics, Department of Clinical Sciences, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
| | - Noelle S. Williams
- Department of Biochemistry, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
| | - Ivan Pedrosa
- Kidney Cancer Program, Simmons Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
- Deparment of Radiology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
| | | | - James Brugarolas
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
- Kidney Cancer Program, Simmons Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Iacovelli R, Ciccarese C, Procopio G, Astore S, Antonella Cannella M, Grazia Maratta M, Rizzo M, Verzoni E, Porta C, Tortora G. Current evidence for second-line treatment in metastatic renal cell carcinoma after progression to immune-based combinations. Cancer Treat Rev 2022; 105:102379. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ctrv.2022.102379] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/31/2021] [Revised: 03/07/2022] [Accepted: 03/08/2022] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
|
19
|
Santoni M, Aurilio G, Massari F, Grande E, Matrana MR, Rizzo M, De Giorgi U, Incorvaia L, Martignetti A, Molina-Cerrillo J, Zabalza IO, Mollica V, Rizzo A, Battelli N, Porta C. Nivolumab versus Cabozantinib as second-line therapy in patients with advanced Renal Cell Carcinoma: a real-world comparison. Clin Genitourin Cancer 2022; 20:285-295. [DOI: 10.1016/j.clgc.2022.02.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/15/2022] [Revised: 02/03/2022] [Accepted: 02/14/2022] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
|
20
|
Marchetti A, Rosellini M, Rizzo A, Mollica V, Battelli N, Massari F, Santoni M. An up-to-date evaluation of cabozantinib for the treatment of renal cell carcinoma. Expert Opin Pharmacother 2021; 22:2323-2336. [PMID: 34405738 DOI: 10.1080/14656566.2021.1959548] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
Abstract
Introduction: In the evolving treatment scenario of metastatic renal cell carcinoma, cabozantinib is gaining increasing attention, presenting as a cornerstone therapy, both as a monotherapy and in combination with immune-checkpoint inhibitors.Areas covered: In this review, the authors explore the role of cabozantinib in the treatment of metastatic clear cell and non-clear cell renal cell carcinoma, presenting data from the most recent clinical trials and investigating ongoing studies. They, furthermore, evaluate the pharmacokinetic, pharmacodynamic, and immunomodulatory effect of cabozantinib, as well as underlining the tolerability profile and patients' quality of life.Expert opinion: Cabozantinib's administration as a single agent is restricted to intermediate- and poor-risk patients (according to IMDC criteria). The further advent of anti-VEGF-receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors combined with immune checkpoint inhibitor regimens (such as pembrolizumab + axitinib) has allowed to expand the use of cabozantinib, leading to its combination with nivolumab. In the next few years, more information is required to look for the application of cabozantinib-based combinations as a later-line approach in metastatic RCC patients, beside their use in the first-line setting.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrea Marchetti
- Medical Oncology, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Di Bologna, Bologna, Italia
| | - Matteo Rosellini
- Medical Oncology, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Di Bologna, Bologna, Italia
| | - Alessandro Rizzo
- Medical Oncology, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Di Bologna, Bologna, Italia
| | - Veronica Mollica
- Medical Oncology, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Di Bologna, Bologna, Italia
| | | | - Francesco Massari
- Medical Oncology, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Di Bologna, Bologna, Italia
| | | |
Collapse
|
21
|
Tomita Y, Kimura G, Fukasawa S, Numakura K, Sugiyama Y, Yamana K, Naito S, Kaneko H, Tajima Y, Oya M. Subgroup analysis of the AFTER I-O study: a retrospective study on the efficacy and safety of subsequent molecular targeted therapy after immune-oncology therapy in Japanese patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma. Jpn J Clin Oncol 2021; 51:1656-1664. [PMID: 34350454 PMCID: PMC8558912 DOI: 10.1093/jjco/hyab114] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/24/2021] [Accepted: 07/05/2021] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Background We performed subgroup analyses of the AFTER I-O study to clarify the association of time-to-treatment failure (TTF) and discontinuation reason of prior immune-oncology (I-O) therapy, and molecular targeted therapy (TT) regimen with the outcomes of TT after I-O. Methods The data of Japanese metastatic renal cell carcinoma patients treated with TT after nivolumab (NIVO) (CheckMate 025) or NIVO + ipilimumab (IPI) (CheckMate 214) were retrospectively analyzed. The objective response rates (ORRs), progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) of TT after I-O were analyzed by subgroups: TTF (<6 or ≥6 months) and discontinuation reason of prior I-O (progression or adverse events), and TT regimen (sunitinib or axitinib). We also analyzed PFS2 of prior I-O and OS from first-line therapy. Results The ORR and median PFS of TT after NIVO and NIVO+IPI among the subgroups was 17–36% and 20–44%, and 7.1–11.6 months and 16.3-not reached (NR), respectively. The median OS of TT after NIVO was longer in patients with longer TTF of NIVO and treated with axitinib. Conversely, median OS of TT after NIVO+IPI was similar among subgroups. The median PFS2 of NIVO and NIVO+IPI was 36.7 and 32.0 months, respectively. The median OS from first-line therapy was 70.5 months for patients treated with NIVO and NR with NIVO+IPI. The safety profile of each TT after each I-O was similar to previous reports. Conclusions The efficacy of TT after NIVO or NIVO+IPI was favorable regardless of the TTF and discontinuation reason of prior I-O, and TT regimen.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yoshihiko Tomita
- Department of Urology, Molecular Oncology, Graduate School of Medicine and Dental Sciences, Niigata University, Niigata, Japan
| | - Go Kimura
- Department of Urology, Nippon Medical School Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Satoshi Fukasawa
- Prostate Center and Division of Urology, Chiba Cancer Center, Chiba, Japan
| | - Kazuyuki Numakura
- Department of Urology, Akita University Graduate School of Medicine, Akita, Japan
| | - Yutaka Sugiyama
- Department of Urology, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kumamoto University, Kumamoto, Japan
| | - Kazutoshi Yamana
- Department of Urology, Molecular Oncology, Graduate School of Medicine and Dental Sciences, Niigata University, Niigata, Japan
| | - Sei Naito
- Department of Urology, Yamagata University Faculty of Medicine, Yamagata, Japan
| | | | | | - Mototsugu Oya
- Department of Urology, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Parikh M, Powles T. Immune Checkpoint Inhibition in Advanced Bladder and Kidney Cancer: Responses and Further Management. Am Soc Clin Oncol Educ Book 2021; 41:e182-e189. [PMID: 34061558 DOI: 10.1200/edbk_323835] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022]
Abstract
Immune checkpoint inhibitors have an established role in the treatment of newly diagnosed metastatic kidney cancer. Treatment regimens combining nivolumab plus ipilimumab, pembrolizumab plus axitinib, nivolumab plus cabozantinib, and pembrolizumab plus lenvatinib have demonstrated superior overall survival compared with sunitinib in randomized studies. Response rates vary from 42% to 71.1% with these combinations. Atezolizumab and pembrolizumab have been approved for the treatment of cisplatin-ineligible patients with metastatic bladder cancer. These and other checkpoint inhibitors have been studied in metastatic bladder cancer and are routinely used after progression on platinum-based chemotherapy. Durable responses are observed in bladder and kidney cancer. Although some patients may experience immune-related adverse events requiring treatment discontinuation, a portion of these patients will continue to experience a response off-therapy. At the time of progression, patients with metastatic kidney cancer may be treated with antiangiogenesis agents, and there are data suggesting that they may also be treated with a rechallenge of immunotherapy. In patients with metastatic bladder cancer who have progression after immune checkpoint inhibition, there are considerable data supporting the use of enfortumab vedotin. Ongoing studies are evaluating novel combinations of immune checkpoint inhibitors with other agents; thus, the treatment landscape of metastatic bladder and kidney cancer is expected to continue to evolve rapidly.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mamta Parikh
- Division of Hematology Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, UC Davis School of Medicine, Sacramento, CA
| | - Thomas Powles
- Barts Health NHS Trust and the Royal Free NHS Foundation Trust, Barts Cancer Institute, and Queen Mary University of London, London, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
What is next in second- and later-line treatment of metastatic renal cell carcinoma? review of the recent literature. Curr Opin Urol 2021; 31:276-284. [PMID: 33742984 DOI: 10.1097/mou.0000000000000867] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW The current treatment landscape of metastatic renal cell carcinoma has changed dramatically from the dominance of single-agent tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) therapy to immune-checkpoint inhibitor (ICI)-based combinations in recent years. However, the optimal subsequent therapy remains ill-defined owing to the novelty of this approach. RECENT FINDINGS Treatment with TKIs after failure of single or dual ICI therapies may result in robust clinical efficacy. Nonetheless, there is a trend toward lower efficacy of TKIs after previous ICI-TKI combination therapy. Currently, tivozanib is the only drug whose third- and later-line use after failure of TKI and ICI is supported by evidence, with significantly longer progression-free survival and higher objective response rates than sorafenib. Data from retrospective studies highlight the safety and clinical activity of ICI rechallenge. SUMMARY Overall, the level of evidence remains low. Treatment after failure of dual ICI therapy is not well defined and may consist of any available TKI. Although first-line use of TKI is less common, strong evidence suggests cabozantinib or nivolumab as standard options in that setting. The recommendations after first-line TKI-ICI therapy failure mirror this recommendation, although the data are less robust.
Collapse
|
24
|
Roberto M, Botticelli A, Panebianco M, Aschelter AM, Gelibter A, Ciccarese C, Minelli M, Nuti M, Santini D, Laghi A, Tomao S, Marchetti P. Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Management: From Molecular Mechanism to Clinical Practice. Front Oncol 2021; 11:657639. [PMID: 33968762 PMCID: PMC8100507 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2021.657639] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/23/2021] [Accepted: 03/29/2021] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
The therapeutic sc"enario of metastatic renal cell cancer (mRCC) has noticeably increased, ranging from the most studied molecular target therapies to those most recently introduced, up to immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). The most recent clinical trials with an ICI-based combination of molecular targeted agents and ICI show how, by restoring an efficient immune response against cancer cells and by establishing an immunological memory, it is possible to obtain not only a better radiological response but also a longer progression-free and overall survival. However, the role of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) remains of fundamental importance, especially in patients who, for clinical characteristics, tumor burden and comorbidity, could have greater benefit from the use of TKIs in monotherapy rather than in combination with other therapies. However, to use these novel options in the best possible way, knowledge is required not only of the data from the large clinical trials but also of the biological mechanisms, molecular pathways, immunological mechanisms, and methodological issues related to both new response criteria and endpoints. In this complex scenario, we review the latest results of the latest clinical trials and provide guidance for overcoming the barriers to decision-making to offer a practical approach to the management of mRCC in daily clinical practice. Moreover, based on recent literature, we discuss the most innovative combination strategies that would allow us to achieve the best clinical therapeutic results.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michela Roberto
- Department of Clinical and Molecular Medicine, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
- Department of Medical-Surgical Sciences and Translational Medicine, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Andrea Botticelli
- Department of Clinical and Molecular Medicine, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
- Medical Oncology Unit, Policlinico Umberto I, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Martina Panebianco
- Department of Clinical and Molecular Medicine, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
- Medical Oncology Unit, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Sant’Andrea, Rome, Italy
| | - Anna Maria Aschelter
- Medical Oncology Unit, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Sant’Andrea, Rome, Italy
| | - Alain Gelibter
- Medical Oncology Unit, Policlinico Umberto I, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Chiara Ciccarese
- Department of Medical Oncology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Mauro Minelli
- Department of Medical Oncology, Azienda Ospedaliera San Giovanni Addolorata, Rome, Italy
| | - Marianna Nuti
- Department of Experimental Medicine, University of Rome Sapienza Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Daniele Santini
- Department of Medical Oncology, University Campus Bio-Medico, Rome, Italy
| | - Andrea Laghi
- Department of Medical-Surgical Sciences and Translational Medicine, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Silverio Tomao
- Department of Radiological, Oncological and Anatomo-Pathological Sciences, Policlinico Umberto I, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Paolo Marchetti
- Department of Clinical and Molecular Medicine, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
- Medical Oncology Unit, Policlinico Umberto I, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Nasso C, Sabbatini R, Baldessari C, Dominici M, Vitale MG. Long progression-free survival with cabozantinib in a heavily pretreated patient with metastatic renal cell carcinoma: a case report. TUMORI JOURNAL 2021; 107:NP33-NP36. [PMID: 33526000 DOI: 10.1177/0300891621990732] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
Renal cell carcinoma accounts for 3% of all tumors. Over the last decades, the prognosis of metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) has improved owing to the approval of several drugs such as tyrosine kinase inhibitors and immunotherapy. The median progression-free survival (PFS) does not exceed 8 months with the available drugs in pretreated patients with mRCC. We present a case of a patient with a long-term response to fourth-line treatment with cabozantinib. Our patient obtained a PFS of 33 months, which is much higher than that reported in literature.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cecilia Nasso
- Department of Oncology and Haematology, Modena University Hospital, Modena, Italy
| | - Roberto Sabbatini
- Department of Oncology and Haematology, Modena University Hospital, Modena, Italy
| | - Cinzia Baldessari
- Department of Oncology and Haematology, Modena University Hospital, Modena, Italy
| | - Massimo Dominici
- Department of Oncology and Haematology, Modena University Hospital, Modena, Italy
| | | |
Collapse
|
26
|
Gan CL, Dudani S, Wells JC, Donskov F, Pal SK, Dizman N, Rathi N, Beuselinck B, Yan F, Lalani AKA, Hansen A, Szabados B, de Velasco G, Tran B, Lee JL, Vaishampayan UN, Bjarnason GA, Subasri M, Choueiri TK, Heng DYC. Cabozantinib real-world effectiveness in the first-through fourth-line settings for the treatment of metastatic renal cell carcinoma: Results from the International Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Database Consortium. Cancer Med 2021; 10:1212-1221. [PMID: 33463028 PMCID: PMC7926018 DOI: 10.1002/cam4.3717] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/06/2020] [Revised: 12/21/2020] [Accepted: 12/26/2020] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Cabozantinib is approved for metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) based on the METEOR and CABOSUN trials. However, real‐world effectiveness and dosing patterns of cabozantinib are not well characterized. Methods Patients with mRCC treated with cabozantinib between 2011 and 2019 were identified and stratified using the International mRCC Database Consortium (IMDC) risk groups. First‐ (1L), second‐ (2L), third‐ (3L), and fourth‐line (4L) overall response rate (ORR), time to treatment failure (TTF), and overall survival (OS) were analyzed. Dose reduction rates and their association with TTF and OS were determined. Results A total of 413 patients were identified. The ORRs across 1L to 4L were 32%, 26%, 25%, and 29%, respectively, and the median TTF rates were 8.3, 7.3, 7.0, and 8.0 months, respectively. The median OS (mOS) rates in 1L to 4L were 30.7, 17.8, 12.6, and 14.9 months, respectively. For patients treated with 1L PD(L)1 combination agent (n = 31), 2L cabozantinib had ORR of 22%, median TTF of 5.4 months, and mOS of 17.4 months. About 50% (129/258) of patients required dose reductions. The TTF and mOS were significantly longer for patients who required dose reduction vs. patients who did not, with an adjusted hazard ratio of 0.37 (95% CI 0.202–0.672, p < 0.01) and 0.46 (95% CI 0.215–0.980, p = 0.04), respectively. Limitations include the retrospective study design and the lack of central radiology review. Conclusion The ORR and TTF of cabozantinib were maintained from the 1L to 4L settings. Dose reductions due to toxicity were associated with improved TTF and OS. Cabozantinib has clinical activity after 1L Immuno‐oncology combination agents.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chun Loo Gan
- Tom Baker Cancer Centre, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
| | - Shaan Dudani
- Tom Baker Cancer Centre, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
| | - J Connor Wells
- Tom Baker Cancer Centre, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
| | | | - Sumanta K Pal
- City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center, Duarte, CA, USA
| | - Nazli Dizman
- City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center, Duarte, CA, USA
| | - Nityam Rathi
- Huntsman Cancer Hospital, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | - Benoit Beuselinck
- University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven Cancer Institute, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Flora Yan
- University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
| | | | - Aaron Hansen
- Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | | | | | - Ben Tran
- Personalised Oncology Division, Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research, Parkville, Vic, Australia.,Peter MacCallum Cancer Center, Parkville, Vic, Australia
| | - Jae Lyun Lee
- Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | | | | | | | - Toni K Choueiri
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute/Brigham and Women's Hospital/Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Daniel Y C Heng
- Tom Baker Cancer Centre, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Bersanelli M, Buti S, Rizzo M. The need for new algorithms of treatment sequencing in clear-cell metastatic renal cell carcinoma. Expert Rev Anticancer Ther 2020; 21:401-412. [PMID: 33287612 DOI: 10.1080/14737140.2021.1861941] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
Abstract
Introduction: In recent years, the systemic treatment of patients with metastatic renal-cell carcinoma (mRCC) has undergone profound innovations, offering the availability of new drugs, and raising the bar of the survival expectation in this, previously, almost-always, incurable disease. The likeliness of reaching durable response and long-term survival is still closely linked to good clinical management and smart treatment sequencing, rather than to a single systemic treatment choice.Areas covered: We review all systemic therapeutic options currently available, describe the evidence behind the current options available for mRCC patient treatment, and provide our personal cues to support clinical decisions.Expert opinion: The IMDC classification is still the only widely validated tool for the choice of primary therapy. Other elements should then be considered for selecting patients who can still receive TKI monotherapy (good-risk patients) or who deserve an 'all-at-once' approach with TKI plus ICI (poor-risk patients with the high metastatic burden and poor-prognosis organ involvement, likely not able to achieve a second chance), identifying these two 'extreme' situations and setting all the other treatment choices on the basis of several nuances. In the second- and further-line settings, ad-hoc prospective trials are awaited.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Melissa Bersanelli
- Medicine and Surgery Department, University of Parma, Parma, Italy.,Medical Oncology Unit, University Hospital of Parma, Parma, Italy
| | - Sebastiano Buti
- Medical Oncology Unit, University Hospital of Parma, Parma, Italy
| | - Mimma Rizzo
- Traslational Oncology, Istituti Clinici Scientifici Maugeri IRCCS, Pavia, Italy
| |
Collapse
|