A Standardized Multimodal Analgesia Protocol Reduces Perioperative Opioid Use in Minimally Invasive Colorectal Surgery

Postoperative pain management using high-dose oral acetaminophen for enhanced recovery after colorectal cancer surgery

PURPOSE

Postoperative pain management is important for enhanced recovery. High-dose oral acetaminophen is effective; however, the safety of its long-term use has not been established in gastrointestinal surgeries. This study aimed to investigate drug-induced liver injury (DILI) in patients with colorectal cancer using high-dose acetaminophen.

METHODS

One hundred sixty-eight consecutive colorectal cancer using high-dose oral acetaminophen (3600 mg/day between postoperative day 1 and 7) were enrolled.

RESULTS

One hundred forty-nine patients (88.7%) completed the administration of high-dose oral acetaminophen. DILI occurred in 58 patients (34.5%), and the cumulative incidence rates were 20.4% and 37.9% on postoperative 6 and 7, respectively. The severity of liver injury was grade 1 in all cases and returned to normal without treatment. Patients with DILI had a higher frequency of dyslipidemia (44.8% vs. 23.6%, P = 0.0047) and M1 staging (10.3% vs. 1.0%, P = 0.0036). A multivariate analysis showed that the presence of dyslipidemia (OR 2.61, P = 0.0067) and M1 stage (OR 12.4, P = 0.0053) were independent risk factors for DILI.

CONCLUSION

The long-term use of high-dose oral acetaminophen in colorectal cancer patients enrolled in enhanced recovery protocols is feasible. Moreover, the presence of dyslipidemia and M status are risk factors for DILI.

The efficacy of preemptive multimodal analgesia in elderly patients undergoing laparoscopic colorectal surgery: a randomized controlled trial

Objective To evaluate the effectiveness of preemptive multimodal analgesiain elderly patients undergoing laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Methods A prospective randomized controlled study was conducted in the Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery of the Second Hospital of Hebei Medical University from January 2022 to December 2022. A total of 133 patients were included according to the criteria and randomly divided into preemptive analgesia (PRA) group (test group, 67patients) and postoperative analgesia (POA) group (control group, 66patients). Results The Visual Analog Scale (VAS)scores of PRA group 24 h, 48 h, and 72 h after operation were lower than those of POA group, and the difference was statistically significant, P < 0.001.The incidences of postoperative gastrointestinal dysfunction (POGD) and postoperative delirium (POD)in PRA group were 13.43% and 8.98%, respectively, which were significantly lower than those in POA group (31.82% and 24.24%), P < 0.05. The levels of IL-6 and IL-10 in PRA group after the operation were 17.54 ± 2.13 ng/L and 15.57 ± 1.71 ng/L respectively, which were lower than those in POA group (25.45 ± 2.95 ng/L and 23.45 ± 1.88 ng/L), P < 0.05. The level of acetylcholinesterase(AchE) was 56.34 ± 5.62 nmol/L in the POA group, which was significantly higher than that in the POA group (49.59 ± 5.52 nmol/L), P < 0.001. Conclusion Preemptive multimodal analgesia can reduce the incidence of POGD and POD in elderly patients undergoing laparoscopic gastrocolic surgery, improve the recovery process of postoperative gastrointestinal function, increase the concentrations of propionic acid and butyric acid in short chain fatty acids (SCFAs) and the number of beneficial intestinal bacteria.

Two-stage laparoscopic transversus abdominis plane block as an equivalent alternative to thoracic epidural anaesthesia in bowel resection-an explorative cohort study

PURPOSE

We evaluated the effect of the two-stage laparoscopic transversus abdominis plane block (TS-L-TAPB) in comparison to thoracic epidural anaesthesia (TEA) and a one-stage L-TAPB (OS-L-TAPB) in patients who underwent elective laparoscopic bowel resection.

METHODS

We compared a TS-L-TAPB (266 mg bupivacaine), which was performed bilaterally at the beginning and end of surgery, with two retrospective cohorts. These were patients who had undergone a TEA (ropivacaine/sufentanil) or an OS-L-TAPB (200 mg ropivacaine) at the beginning of surgery. Oral and i.v. opiate requirements were documented over the first 3 postoperative days (POD).

RESULTS

Patients were divided into three groups TEA (n = 23), OS-L-TAPB (n = 75), and TS-L-TAPB (n = 49). By the evening of the third POD, patients with a TEA had a higher cumulative opiate requirement with a median of 45.625 mg [0; 202.5] than patients in the OS-L-TAPB group at 10 mg [0; 245.625] and the TS-L-TAPB group at 5.625 mg [0; 215.625] (p = 0.1438). One hour after arrival in the recovery room, significantly more patients in the TEA group (100%) did not need oral and i.v. opioids than in the TS-L-TAPB (78%) and OS-L-TAPB groups (68%) (p = 0.0067).This was without clinical relevance however as the median in all groups was 0 mg. On the third POD, patients in the TEA group had a significantly higher median oral and i.v. opioid dose at 40 mg [0; 80] than the TS-L-TAPB and OS-L-TAPB groups, both at 0 mg [0; 80] (p = 0.0009).

CONCLUSION

The TS-L-TAP showed statistically significant and clinically meaningful benefits over TEA and OS-L-TAP in reducing postoperative opiate requirements.

Prospective Randomized Trial of Immediate Postoperative Use of Regular Diet Versus Clear Liquid Diet in Major Colorectal Surgery

BACKGROUND

Enhanced recovery protocols are becoming standard practice after major colorectal surgery. An increasing body of evidence suggests that early feeding should be encouraged; however, whether a clear liquid diet or solid diet should be given immediately after surgery is undetermined.

OBJECTIVE

Evaluate whether regular diet was superior to clear liquid diet beginning on postoperative day 0 after major colorectal surgery.

DESIGN

Superiority trial design.

SETTING

Urban tertiary center.

PATIENTS

Consecutive patients undergoing abdominal colorectal surgery from September 2017 to June 2018.

INTERVENTIONS

Eligible patients received either 1) clear liquid diet on postoperative day 0 with advancement to regular diet on postoperative day 1 or 2) regular diet on postoperative day 0 and continuing for the duration of patients' recovery.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The primary end point was diet tolerance, defined by the absence of vomiting by postoperative day 2.

RESULTS

A total of 105 patients were randomly assigned with 53 in the clear liquid diet group and 52 in the regular diet group. All randomly assigned patients were included in the analysis. The rate of diet tolerance by postoperative day 2 was similar between groups. Rates of ileus, antiemetic usage, narcotic usage, time to return of bowel function, and pain/nausea/bloating scores were similar between the 2 groups. Significantly more patients in the clear liquid diet group (91%) tolerated their diet than did the regular diet group (71%) on postoperative day 0 ( p = 0.01).

LIMITATIONS

Diet tolerance was only monitored during inpatient stay. The rate of postoperative ileus was difficult to capture as its clinical definition encompassed a wide range of symptoms.

CONCLUSIONS

Regular diet immediately after abdominal colorectal surgery was not superior to a clear liquid diet with respect to diet tolerance by postoperative day 2. Furthermore, starting regular diet on postoperative day 0 was not associated with any outcome benefits compared to clear liquid diet.

ENSAYO PROSPECTIVO ALEATORIZADO SOBRE EL USO POSTOPERATORIO INMEDIATO DE UNA DIETA NORMAL VERSUS UNA DIETA DE LQUIDOS CLAROS EN CIRUGAS MAYORES COLORRECTALES

ANTECEDENTES:Los protocolos de recuperación mejorada se están convirtiendo en una práctica estandarizada tras una cirugía mayor colorrectal. La creciente evidencia sugiere la alimentación temprana debe ser estimulada, sin embargo, no se ha determinado si se debe administrar una dieta de líquidos claros o una dieta sólida inmediatamente después de la cirugía.OBJETIVO:Evaluar si la dieta regular fue superior a la dieta de líquidos claros a partir del día cero del postoperatorio tras una cirugía mayor colorrectal.DISEÑO:Diseño de prueba de superioridad.AJUSTE:Centro terciario urbano.PACIENTES:Pacientes consecutivos sometidos a cirugía abdominal colorrectal desde septiembre de 2017 hasta junio de 2018INTERVENCIONES:Los pacientes elegibles recibieron ya sea 1) dieta de líquidos claros en el día 0 del postoperatorio con avance a la dieta regular en el día 1 del postoperatorio o 2) dieta regular en el día 0 del postoperatorio y continuaron durante la recuperación de los pacientes.PRINCIPALES MEDIDAS DE RESULTADO:El criterio principal de valoración fue la tolerancia a la dieta, definida por la ausencia de vómitos en el segundo día posoperatorio.RESULTADOS:Un total de 105 pacientes fueron aleatorizados con 53 en el grupo de dieta de líquidos claros y 52 en el grupo de dieta regular. Todos los pacientes aleatorizados fueron incluidos en el análisis. La tasa de tolerancia a la dieta en el segundo día postoperatorio fue similar entre los grupos. Las tasas de íleo, del uso de antieméticos, del uso de narcóticos, del tiempo de recuperación de la función intestinal y puntajes de dolor/náuseas/distensión abdominal fueron similares entre los dos grupos. Significativamente más pacientes en el grupo de dieta de líquidos claros (91%) toleraron su dieta comparada al grupo de dieta regular (71%) en el día postoperatorio 0 ( p = 0,01).LIMITACIONES:La tolerancia a la dieta solo fue monitorizada durante la estadía hospitalaria. La tasa de íleo postoperatorio fue difícil de registrar debido a que su definición clínica abarcaba una amplia variedad de síntomas.CONCLUSIONES:La dieta regular inmediatamente después de la cirugía abdominal colorrectal no fue superior a una dieta de líquidos claros con respecto a la tolerancia de la dieta en el día 2 del postoperatorio. Además, comenzar una dieta regular el día cero del postoperatorio no se asoció con ningún beneficio en los resultados en comparación con la dieta de líquidos claros. (Traducción-Dr. Osvaldo Gauto ).

Process, structural, and outcome quality indicators to support perioperative opioid stewardship: a rapid review

Opioids are effective analgesics but can cause harm. Opioid stewardship is key to ensuring that opioids are used effectively and safely. There is no agreed set of quality indicators relating to the use of opioids perioperatively. This work is part of the Yorkshire Cancer Research Bowel Cancer Quality Improvement programme and aims to develop useful quality indicators for the improvement of care and patient outcomes at all stages of the perioperative journey.A rapid review was performed to identify original research and reviews in which quality indicators for perioperative opioid use are described. A data tool was developed to enable reliable and reproducible extraction of opioid quality indicators.A review of 628 abstracts and 118 full-text publications was undertaken. Opioid quality indicators were identified from 47 full-text publications. In total, 128 structure, process and outcome quality indicators were extracted. Duplicates were merged, with the final extraction of 24 discrete indicators. These indicators are based on five topics: patient education, clinician education, pre-operative optimization, procedure, and patient-specific prescribing and de-prescribing and opioid-related adverse drug events.The quality indicators are presented as a toolkit to contribute to practical opioid stewardship. Process indicators were most commonly identified and contribute most to quality improvement. Fewer quality indicators relating to intraoperative and immediate recovery stages of the patient journey were identified. An expert clinician panel will be convened to agree which of the quality indicators identified will be most valuable in our region for the management of patients undergoing surgery for bowel cancer.

Comparative analysis of opioid use between robotic and open pancreatoduodenectomy

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE

Risk-stratified pancreatectomy clinical pathways using regional anesthesia and multimodality analgesia have decreased overall opioid use, but the additional benefits of robotic surgery in opioid reduction for pancreatoduodenectomy (PD) are unknown. We compared the inpatient opioid use between robotic PD and open PD.

METHODS

Patients undergoing open PD within a protocol evaluating preincisional regional anesthetic block bundles were compared to consecutively-treated patients undergoing robotic PD identified from a prospectively maintained single-institutional database. Clinical characteristics, operative outcomes, pain scores and inpatient oral morphine equivalent (OME) use were compared between patients treated with robotic or open PD. Patients with a history of continuous-release opioid dependence were excluded.

RESULTS

Of 114 total patients, 25 underwent robotic PD and 89 underwent open PD. Intraoperative opioid use was not different (P = .87), nor were cumulative pain scores. Robotic PD patients used significantly fewer OMEs per day on postoperative days 1-4 (P = .039), used fewer total OMEs during hospitalization (robotic: median = 79, IQR 42.5-141; open: median = 126, IQR 61.3-203.8; P = .0036) and were discharged with fewer OMEs (robotic: median = 0, IQR 0-43.8; open: median = 25, IQR 0-75; P = .009) despite a shorter length of stay (robotic: median = 4, open: median = 5, P = .002).

CONCLUSIONS

Robotic PD patients required fewer inpatient OMEs than open PD while maintaining similar pain scores. A higher percentage of robotic PD patients tapered off of opioids prior to discharge than open surgery patients treated with a standardized opioid reduction protocol despite a shorter length of stay. These results provide a rationale for choosing robotic PD when feasible to minimize opioid use.

Developing Opioid Prescription Guidelines After Anorectal Surgery: Do Patient-Reported Outcomes and Risk Factors Influence Consumption?

BACKGROUND

Opioids prescribed to address postoperative pain drive opioid-related deaths in the United States. Prescribing guidelines have been developed for many general surgical procedures, which have decreased opioid prescription and consumption. The literature on opioids after anorectal surgery is lacking.

OBJECTIVE

We analyzed our data on opioid prescription and consumption to create opioid-prescribing guidelines for anorectal procedures.

DESIGN

We designed a prospectively collected postoperative survey given to consecutive patients undergoing anorectal surgery by colorectal surgeons.

SETTINGS

Patients had surgery at 2 academic, university-affiliated hospitals.

PATIENTS

Patients undergoing anorectal surgery from May 3, 2018, to December 18, 2019, were included in the study. Patients were excluded if they were <18 years of age, had a concurrent abdominopelvic surgery, consumed opioids in the week before their operation, or were without follow-up at 3 months postoperatively.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The primary outcome of this study was the number of opioid pills needed to fulfill consumption of 80% of patients. Secondary outcome measures were patient, operative, and postoperative factors associated with increasing pill consumption.

RESULTS

Eighteen 5-mg oxycodone tablets were needed to fulfill the needs of 80% of patients. An overall median of 8 pills was consumed. Pill prescription was independently predictive of increased consumption. The only patient factor associated with increased consumption was race; no other patient or operative factors were predictive of consumption.

LIMITATIONS

Limitations of this study include its partially retrospective nature, use of self-reported data, and lack of racial diversity among our cohort.

CONCLUSIONS

Without any clinical factors predictive of increased consumption, prescription guidelines can be standardized to ≤18 5-mg oxycodone tablets across anorectal surgery patients. As prescription is correlated with consumption, further work is needed to determine whether lesser quantities of opioids prescribed offer similar postoperative pain relief for patients undergoing anorectal surgery. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/B821 .DESARROLLO DE PAUTAS PARA LA PRESCRIPCIÓN DE OPIOIDES DESPUÉS DE CIRUGÍA ANORRECTAL: ¿INFLUYEN EN EL CONSUMO LOS RESULTADOS INFORMADOS POR EL PACIENTE Y LOS FACTORES DE RIESGO?

ANTECEDENTES

Los opioides recetados para tratar el dolor posoperatorio provocan muertes relacionadas con los opioides en los Estados Unidos. Se han desarrollado pautas de prescripción para muchos procedimientos quirúrgicos generales y estas han conducido a una disminución de la prescripción y el consumo de opioides. Hay una carencia de literatura sobre el uso de opioides después de cirugía anorrectal.

OBJETIVO

Analizamos nuestros datos sobre prescripción y consumo de opioides para crear pautas de prescripción de opioides para procedimientos anorrectales.

DISEO

Diseñamos una encuesta postoperatoria recopilada prospectivamente que se administró a pacientes consecutivos sometidos a cirugía anorrectal por cirujanos colorrectales.

AJUSTES

Los pacientes fueron operados en dos hospitales académicos afiliados a la universidad.

PACIENTES

Se incluyeron en el estudio pacientes sometidos a cirugía anorrectal desde el 3/05/2018 hasta el 18/12/2019. Se excluyó a los pacientes que tenían menos de 18 años, a los que se sometieron a cirugía abdominopélvica concurrente, a los que consumieron opioides en la semana anterior a la operación, o si no tenían seguimiento a los 3 meses del postoperatorio.

PRINCIPALES MEDIDAS DE DESENLACE

El desenlace principal de este estudio fue el número de píldoras de opioides necesarias para satisfacer el consumo del 80% de los pacientes. Las medidas de desenlace secundarias fueron los factores del paciente, operatorios y posoperatorios asociados con el aumento del consumo de píldoras.

RESULTADOS

Fueron necesarios dieciocho comprimidos de oxicodona de 5 mg para cubrir las necesidades del 80% de los pacientes. Se consumió una mediana general de 8 píldoras. La prescripción de la píldora fue un predictor independiente de un mayor consumo. El único factor del paciente asociado con un mayor consumo fue la raza; ningún otro paciente o factores operativos fueron predictivos del consumo.

LIMITACIONES

Las limitaciones de este estudio incluyen su naturaleza parcialmente retrospectiva, el uso de datos autoinformados y la falta de diversidad racial entre nuestra cohorte.

CONCLUSIONES

Sin ningún factor clínico que prediga un aumento del consumo, las pautas de prescripción se pueden estandarizar a dieciocho o menos comprimidos de oxicodona de 5 mg en pacientes sometidos a cirugía anorrectal. Como la prescripción se correlaciona con el consumo, se necesita más trabajo para determinar si cantidades menores de opioides prescritos ofrecen un alivio del dolor posoperatorio similar para los pacientes sometidos a cirugía anorrectal. Consulte Video Resumen en http://links.lww.com/DCR/B821 . (Traducción-Juan Carlos Reyes ).

Positive Patient Postoperative Outcomes with Pharmacotherapy: A Narrative Review including Perioperative-Specialty Pharmacist Interviews

The influence of pharmacotherapy regimens on surgical patient outcomes is increasingly appreciated in the era of enhanced recovery protocols and institutional focus on reducing postoperative complications. Specifics related to medication selection, dosing, frequency of administration, and duration of therapy are evolving to optimize pharmacotherapeutic regimens for many enhanced recovery protocolized elements. This review provides a summary of recent pharmacotherapeutic strategies, including those configured within electronic health record (EHR) applications and functionalities, that are associated with the minimization of the frequency and severity of postoperative complications (POCs), shortened hospital length of stay (LOS), reduced readmission rates, and cost or revenue impacts. Further, it will highlight preventive pharmacotherapy regimens that are correlated with improved patient preparation, especially those related to surgical site infection (SSI), venous thromboembolism (VTE), nausea and vomiting (PONV), postoperative ileus (POI), and emergence delirium (PoD) as well as less commonly encountered POCs such as acute kidney injury (AKI) and atrial fibrillation (AF). The importance of interprofessional collaboration in all periprocedural phases, focusing on medication management through shared responsibilities for drug therapy outcomes, will be emphasized. Finally, examples of collaborative care through shared mental models of drug stewardship and non-medical practice agreements to improve operative throughput, reduce operative stress, and increase patient satisfaction are illustrated.

Transversus Abdominis Plane Block Reduces Intraoperative Opioid Consumption in Patients Undergoing Periacetabular Osteotomy

Background: Administering intraoperative analgesia in patients undergoing periacetabular osteotomy (PAO) is challenging due to both the relevant surgical approach and osteotomies, which are associated with pain. The aim of this study was to assess the effect of the transversus abdominis plane block (TAPb) on intraoperative opioid consumption and circulation parameters in PAO patients. Patients and Methods: We conducted a two-group randomized-controlled trial involving 42 consecutive patients undergoing PAO for symptomatic developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) in our department. Patients assigned to the study group received an ultrasound-guided TAPb with 0.75% ropivacaine before the beginning of the surgery and after general anesthesia induction. Patients assigned to the control group did not receive a TAPb. General anesthesia was conducted according to a defined study protocol. The primary endpoint of the study was the intraoperative opioid consumption, measured in morphine equivalent dose (MED). Secondary endpoints were the assessment of intraoperative heart rate, mean arterial pressure (MAP), need for hypotension treatment, and length of hospital stay (LOHS). A total of 41 patients (n = 21 TAPb group, n = 20 control group) completed the study; of these, 33 were women (88.5%) and 8 were men (19.5%). The mean age at the time of surgery was 28 years (18–43, SD ± 7.4). All operations were performed by a single high-volume surgeon and all TAPb procedures were performed by a single experienced senior anesthesiologist. Results: We observed a significantly lower intraoperative opioid consumption in the TAPb group compared to the control group (930 vs. 1186 MED per kg bodyweight; p = 0.016). No significant differences were observed in the secondary outcome parameters. We observed no perioperative complications. Conclusion: Ultrasound-guided TAPb significantly reduces intraoperative opioid consumption in patients undergoing PAO.

Efficacy and safety of intravenous acetaminophen (2 g/day) for reducing opioid consumption in Chinese adults after elective orthopedic surgery: A multicenter randomized controlled trial

Background: Acetaminophen is an important component of a multimodal analgesia strategy to reduce opioid consumption and pain intensity after an orthopedic surgery. The opioid-sparing efficacy of intravenous acetaminophen has been established at a daily dose of 4 g. However, it is still unclear for the daily dose of 2 g of acetaminophen, which is recommended by the China Food and Drug Administration Center for Drug Evaluation, in terms of its efficacy and safety.

Objectives: This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of intravenous acetaminophen at a daily dose of 2 g for reducing opioid consumption and pain intensity after orthopedic surgery.

Methods: In this multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase III trial, 235 patients who underwent orthopedic surgery were randomly assigned to receive intravenous acetaminophen 500 mg every 6 h or placebo. Postoperative morphine consumption, pain intensity at rest and during movement, and adverse events were analysed.

Results: For the mean (standard deviation) morphine consumption within 24 h after surgery, intravenous acetaminophen was superior to placebo both in the modified intention-to-treat analysis [8.7 (7.7) mg vs. 11.2 (9.2) mg] in the acetaminophen group and the placebo group, respectively. Difference in means: 2.5 mg; 95% confidence interval, 0.25 to 4.61; p = 0.030), and in the per-protocol analysis (8.3 (7.0) mg and 11.7 (9.9) mg in the acetaminophen group and the placebo group, respectively. Difference in means: 3.4 mg; 95% confidence interval: 1.05 to 5.77; p = 0.005). The two groups did not differ significantly in terms of pain intensity and adverse events.

Conclusion: Our results suggest that intravenous acetaminophen at a daily dose of 2 g can reduce morphine consumption by Chinese adults within the first 24 h after orthopedic surgery, but the extent of reduction is not clinically relevant.

Clinical Trial Registration: [ClinicalTrials.gov], identifier [NCT02811991].

Nonopioid perioperative analgesia in head and neck cancer surgery: A systematic review

Objective

Management of postoperative pain after head and neck cancer surgery is a complex issue, requiring a careful balance of analgesic properties and side effects. The objective of this review is to discuss the efficacy and safety of multimodal analgesia (MMA) for these patients.

Methods

Pubmed, Cochrane, Embase, Scopus, and clinicaltrials.gov were systematically searched for all comparative studies of patients receiving MMA (nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), acetaminophen, anticonvulsants, local anesthetics, and corticosteroids) for head and neck cancer surgeries. The primary outcome was additional postoperative opioid usage, and secondary outcomes included subjective pain scores, complications, adverse effects, and 30-day outcomes.

Results

A total of five studies representing 592 patients (MMA, n = 275; non-MMA, n = 317) met inclusion criteria. The most commonly used agents were gabapentin, NSAIDs, and acetaminophen (n = 221), NSAIDs (n = 221), followed by corticosteroids (n = 35), dextromethorphan (n = 40), and local nerve block (n = 19). Four studies described a significant decrease in overall postoperative narcotic usage with two studies reporting a significant decrease in hospital time. Subjective pain scores widely varied with two studies reporting reduced pain at postoperative day 3. There were no differences in surgical outcomes, medical complications, adverse effects, or 30-day mortality and readmission rates.

Conclusion

MMA is an increasingly popular strategy that may reduce dependence on opioids for the treatment of postoperative pain. A variety of regimens and protocols are available for providers to utilize in the appropriate head and neck cancer patient.

The Intraoperative Adherence to Multimodal Analgesia of Anesthesiologists: A Retrospective Study

Introduction

Multimodal analgesia (MMA) is a critical component of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS). However, little research revealed its intraoperative implementation by anesthesiologists, who are on the front line defending against surgical pain. Therefore, the objective of our study is to assess the adherence of anesthesiologists to MMA comprehensively.

Methods

A retrospective study was conducted involving patients undergoing lung resection, knee arthroplasty, and radical mastectomy from pre/post-implementation year of MMA (Jan 1, 2013, to Dec 31, 2013, vs. 2019). Intraoperative analgesia regimens (analgesic mode) and hourly rated morphine milligram equivalents (MME) were compared. In addition, patient characteristics associated with continued opioid use after surgery, surgical types, and position level of anesthesiologists (attending-junior; above attending-senior) were also analyzed.

Results

After MMA initiation, the rate of multimodal analgesic regimen (mode ≥ 2) was significantly increased (post- vs. pre-implementation, 31.57 vs. 21.50%, p < 0.05). However, MME did not show significant difference (post- vs. pre-implementation, 0.402 vs. 0.456, p > 0.05). Patient-level predictors of persistent opioid use after surgery were not related to increased analgesic mode. Lung resection [coefficient, − 0.538; 95% confidence interval (CI), − 0.695 to − 0.383, p < 0.001] and knee arthroplasty (coefficient, − 1.143; 95% CI, − 1.366 to − 0.925, p < 0.001) discouraged multiple analgesic mode, while senior anesthesiologists (coefficient, 0.674; 95% CI 0.548–0.800, p < 0.001) promoted it.

Conclusions

Although anesthesiologists used more analgesics after promoting MMA, the “opioid-sparing” principle was not followed properly. The analgesic mode was not instructed by patients’ characteristics appropriately. In addition, surgeries with cumbersome preparation/process impeded the use of multiple analgesic modes, while senior anesthesiologists preferred multiple analgesic modes.

Utilization and evolving prescribing practice of opioid and non-opioid analgesics in patients undergoing lymphadenectomy for cutaneous malignancy

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Opioids are commonly prescribed following surgery and can lead to persistent opioid use. We assessed changes in prescribing practices following an opioid education initiative for patients undergoing lymphadenectomy for cutaneous malignancy.

METHODS

A single-institution retrospective study of all eligible patients (3/2016-3/2020) was performed.

RESULTS

Indications for lymphadenectomy in 328 patients were metastatic melanoma (84%), squamous cell carcinoma (10%), and Merkel cell carcinoma (5%). At discharge, non-opioid analgesics were increasingly utilized over the 4-year study period, with dramatic increases after education initiatives (32%, 42%, 59%, and 79% of pts, respectively each year; p < 0.001). Median oral morphine equivalents (OMEs) prescribed also decreased dramatically starting in year 3 (250, 238, 150, and 100 mg, respectively; p < 0.001). Patients discharged with 200 mg OMEs were less likely to also be discharged with non-opioid analgesics (40% vs. 64%. respectively, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Analgesic prescribing practices following lymphadenectomy for cutaneous malignancy improved significantly over a 4-year period, with use of non-opioids more than doubling and a 60% reduction in median OME. Opportunities exist to further increase non-opioid use and decrease opioid dissemination after lymphadenectomy for cutaneous malignancy.

Comparison of continuous preperitoneal infiltration versus patient controlled analgesia for pain control in elective colorectal surgery

Background:

Post-operative analgesia is crucial in enhanced recovery after surgery and to minimize post-operative complications. There remains data paucity on the efficacy of preperitoneal analgesia (PPA) compared to patient-controlled analgesia (PCA). This study aims to examine the efficacy of preperitoneal infusion as analgesia following elective colorectal surgery.

Methods:

This is a prospective cross-sectional study of all patients which underwent elective colorectal surgeries, performed in a tertiary surgical referral center with dedicated colorectal unit. Patients from May 2017 to April 2021 who underwent elective colorectal surgery were included in this study. Pain scores were reviewed and analyzed at regular intervals post-operatively for comparison.

Results:

Amongst the 200 patients included, there were 174 patients in the PPA arm and 26 patients using PCA. Patients in the PPA group were older age (63.29 vs 56.00, P = 0.003). A total of 118 patients in PPA cohort (67.8%) and 21 from PCA cohort (80.8%) underwent open surgery and the remaining 82 patients underwent laparoscopic surgeries. Although postoperative pain scores were consistently below 5 and reduced in trend from 2 hours to 96 hours postoperatively in both groups, the pain scores on coughing markedly reduced in the PPA group when compared PCA alone. The total dosage of opioid required in PPA cohort was also significantly lower when compared to PCA group at the first 24 hours postoperatively 12.21 (±13.0) vs 20.0 (±14.43), P = 0.048.

Conclusions:

PPA is a comparable modality for analgesia after elective colorectal surgery that reduces the opioid requirement postoperatively giving adequate pain relief. PPA should be considered as an alternative modality for multi-modal analgesia.

Day-of-Surgery Gabapentinoids and Prolonged Opioid Use: A Retrospective Cohort Study of Medicare Patients Using Electronic Health Records

BACKGROUND

While preoperative gabapentinoids are commonly used in surgical multimodal analgesia protocols, little is known regarding the effects this therapy has on prolonged postsurgical opioid use. In this observational study, we used data from a large integrated health care system to estimate the association between preoperative day-of-surgery gabapentinoids and the risk of prolonged postsurgical opioid use.

METHODS

We identified adults age ≥65 years undergoing major therapeutic surgical procedures from a large integrated health care system from 2016 to 2019. Exposure to preoperative gabapentinoids on the day of surgery was measured using inpatient medication administration records, and the outcome of prolonged opioid use was measured using outpatient medication orders. We used stabilized inverse probability of treatment-weighted log-binomial regression to estimate risk ratios and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) of prolonged opioid use, comparing patients who received preoperative gabapentinoids to those who did not and adjusting for relevant clinical factors. The main analysis was conducted in the overall surgical population, and a secondary analysis was conducted among procedures where at least 30% of all patients received a preoperative gabapentinoid.

RESULTS

Overall, 13,958 surgical patients met inclusion criteria, of whom 21.0% received preoperative gabapentinoids. The observed 90-day risk of prolonged opioid use following surgery was 0.91% (95% CI, 0.77-1.08). Preoperative gabapentinoid administration was not associated with a reduced risk of prolonged opioid use in the main analysis conducted in a broad surgical population (adjusted risk ratio [adjRR], 1.19 [95% CI, 0.67-2.12]) or in the secondary analysis conducted in patients undergoing colorectal resection, hip arthroplasty, knee arthroplasty, or hysterectomy (adjRR, 1.01 [95% CI, 0.30-3.33]).

CONCLUSIONS

In a large integrated health system, we did not find evidence that preoperative gabapentinoids were associated with reduced risk of prolonged opioid use in patients undergoing a broad range of surgeries.

Effect of Ultrasound-Guided Quadratus Lumborum Block Preemptive Analgesia on Postoperative Recovery of Patients with Open Radical Colon Cancer Surgery: A Retrospective Study

Purpose

To evaluate the effect of ultrasound-guided quadratus lumborum block (QLB) preemptive analgesia on recovery in colon cancer patients undergoing open radical surgery and provide reference for its clinical application.

Methods

From July 2019 to June 2020, according to the anesthesia method, 56 patients who received open radical colon surgery were divided into two groups: Group Q (n=27), which received QLB combined general anesthesia, and Group C (n=29), which received general anesthesia only. Both groups were given self-controlled intravenous analgesia pump after surgery. The primary outcome is a series of parameters representing postoperative recovery. The secondary outcome was VAS scores and opioid consumption.

Results

The first time of getting up, flatus, taking semi-liquid diet and the postoperative hospital stay in Group Q were significantly reduced (P<0.01). The rest and active VAS scores were significantly lower in Group Q (P<0.01). The opioids consumption was significantly decreased in Group Q (P<0.05).

Conclusion

The application of ultrasound-guided QLB preemptive analgesia in open radical colon cancer surgery can significantly enhance the postoperative analgesia effect, reduce opioid consumption, and accelerate the postoperative recovery of the patients.

Clinical Trial Registration Number

The Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (ChiCTR-2000034824).

A Prospective Randomized Trial of Surgeon-Administered Intraoperative Transversus Abdominis Plane Block With Bupivacaine Against Liposomal Bupivacaine: The TINGLE Trial

BACKGROUND

Transversus abdominis plane blocks are increasingly used to achieve opioid-sparing analgesia after colorectal surgery. Traditionally, bupivacaine was the long-acting analgesic of choice, but the addition of dexamethasone and/or epinephrine to bupivacaine may extend block duration. Liposomal bupivacaine has also been suggested to achieve an extended analgesia duration of 72 hours but is significantly more expensive.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to compare pain control between laparoscopic transversus abdominis plane blocks using liposomal bupivacaine versus bupivacaine with epinephrine and dexamethasone.

DESIGN

This was a parallel-group, single-institution, randomized clinical trial.

SETTINGS

The study was conducted at a single tertiary medical center.

PATIENTS

Consecutive patients between October 2018 to October 2019, ages 18 to 90 years, undergoing minimally invasive colorectal surgery with multimodal analgesia were included.

INTERVENTIONS

Patients were randomly assigned 1:1 to receive a laparoscopic transversus abdominis plane block with liposomal bupivacaine or bupivacaine with epinephrine and dexamethasone.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The primary outcome was total oral morphine equivalents administered in the first 48 hours postoperatively. Secondary outcomes included pain scores, time to ambulation and solid diet, hospital length of stay, and complications.

RESULTS

A total of 102 patients (50 men) with a median age of 42 years (interquartile range, 29-60 y) consented and were randomly assigned. The primary end point, total oral morphine equivalents administered in the first 48 hours, was not significantly different between the liposomal bupivacaine group (median = 69 mg) and the bupivacaine with epinephrine and dexamethasone group (median = 47 mg; difference in medians = 22 mg, (95% CI, -17 to 49 mg); p = 0.60). There were no significant differences in pain scores, time to ambulation, time to diet tolerance, time to bowel movement, length of stay, overall complications, or readmission rate between groups. There were no treatment-related adverse outcomes.

LIMITATIONS

This study was not placebo controlled or blinded.

CONCLUSIONS

This first randomized trial comparing laparoscopic transversus abdominis plane block with liposomal bupivacaine or bupivacaine with epinephrine and dexamethasone showed that a liposomal bupivacaine block does not provide superior or extended analgesia in the era of standardized multimodal analgesia protocols.See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/B533.

ESTUDIO PROSPECTIVO Y RANDOMIZADO DE BLOQUEO DEL PLANO MUSCULAR TRANSVERSO DEL ABDOMEN REALIZADO POR EL CIRUJANO CON BUPIVACANA VERSUS BUPIVACANA LIPOSOMAL ESTUDIO TINGLE

ANTECEDENTES:El bloqueo anestésico del plano muscular transverso del abdomen se utiliza cada vez más para lograr una analgesia con menos consumo de opioides después de cirugía colorrectal. Tradicionalmente, la Bupivacaína era el analgésico de acción prolongada de elección, pero al agregarse Dexametasona y/o Adrenalina a la Bupivacaína se puede prolongar la duración del bloqueo. También se ha propuesto que la Bupivacaína liposomal logra una duración prolongada de la analgesia de 72 horas, pero es significativamente más cara.OBJETIVO:Comparar el control del dolor entre bloqueo laparoscópico del plano de los transversos del abdomen usando Bupivacaína liposomal versus Bupivacaína con Adrenalina y Dexametasona.DISEÑO:Estudio clínico prospectivo y randomizado de una sola institución en grupos paralelos.AJUSTE:Centro médico terciario único.PACIENTES:Todos aquellos pacientes entre 18 y 90 años sometidos a cirugía colorrectal mínimamente invasiva con analgesia multimodal, entre octubre de 2018 a octubre de 2019 incluidos de manera consecutiva.INTERVENCIONES:Los pacientes fueron seleccionados aleatoriamente 1:1 para recibir un bloqueo laparoscópico del plano de los transversos del abdomen con Bupivacaína liposomal o Bupivacaína con Adrenalina y Dexametasona.PRINCIPALES MEDIDAS DE RESULTADO:El resultado primario fue el total de equivalentes de morfina oral administradas en las primeras 48 horas después de la operación. Los resultados secundarios incluyeron puntuaciones de dolor, inicio de dieta sólida, tiempo de inicio a la deambulación, la estadía hospitalaria y las complicaciones.RESULTADOS:Un total de 102 pacientes (50 hombres) con una mediana de edad de 42 años (IQR 29-60) fueron incluidos aleatoriamente. El criterio de valoración principal, equivalentes de morfina oral total administrada en las primeras 48 horas, no fue significativamente diferente entre el grupo de Bupivacaína liposomal (mediana = 69 mg) y el grupo de Bupivacaína con Adrenalina y Dexametasona (mediana = 47 mg; diferencia en medianas = 22 mg, IC del 95% [-17] - 49 mg, p = 0,60). No hubo diferencias significativas en las puntuaciones de dolor, tiempo de inicio a la deambulación, el tiempo de tolerancia a la dieta sólida, el tiempo hasta el primer evacuado intestinal, la duración de la estadía hospitalaria, las complicaciones generales o la tasa de readmisión entre los grupos. No hubo resultados adversos relacionados con el tratamiento.LIMITACIONES:Este estudio no fue controlado con placebo ni de manera cegada.CONCLUSIONES:Este primer estudio prospectivo y randomizado que comparó el bloqueo del plano de los músculos transversos del abdomen por vía laparoscópica, utilizando Bupivacaína liposomal o Bupivacaína con Adrenalina y Dexametasona, demostró que el bloqueo de Bupivacaína liposomal no proporciona ni mejor analgesia ni un efecto mas prolongado.Consulte Video Resumen en http://links.lww.com/DCR/B533.

Comparison of treatment to improve gastrointestinal functions after colorectal surgery within enhanced recovery programmes: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Despite a significant improvement with enhanced recovery programmes (ERP), gastro-intestinal (GI) functions that are impaired after colorectal resection and postoperative ileus (POI) remain a significant issue. In the literature, there is little evidence of the distinction between the treatment assessed within or outside ERP. The purpose was to evaluate the efficiency of treatments to reduce POI and improve GI function recovery within ERP. A search was performed in PubMed and Scopus on 20 September 2019. The studies were included if they compared the effect of the administration of a treatment aiming to treat or prevent POI or improve the early functional outcomes of colorectal surgery within an ERP. The main outcome measures were the occurrence of postoperative ileus, time to first flatus and time to first bowel movement. Treatments that were assessed at least three times were included in a meta-analysis. Among the analysed studies, 28 met the eligibility criteria. Six of them focused on chewing-gum and were only randomized controlled trials (RCT) and 8 of them focused on Alvimopan but none of them were RCT. The other measures were assessed in less than 3 studies over RCTs (n = 11) or retrospective studies (n = 2). In the meta-analysis, chewing gum had no significant effect on the endpoints and Alvimopan allowed a significant reduction of the occurrence of POI. Chewing-gum was not effective on GI function recovery in ERP but Alvimopan and the other measures were not sufficiently studies to draw conclusion. Randomised controlled trials are needed.Systematic review registration number CRD42020167339.

Transversus abdominis Plane Block for Improved Early Postoperative Pain Management after Periacetabular Osteotomy: A Randomized Clinical Trial

Background: Patients undergoing periacetabular osteotomy (PAO) may experience significant postoperative pain due to the extensive approach and multiple osteotomies. The aim of this study was to assess the efficacy of the transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block on reducing opioid consumption and improving clinical outcome in PAO patients. Patients and Methods: We conducted a two-group randomized-controlled trial in 42 consecutive patients undergoing a PAO for symptomatic developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH). The study group received an ultrasound-guided TAP block with 20 mL of 0.75% ropivacaine prior to surgery. The control group did not receive a TAP block. All patients received a multimodal analgesia with nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAID) (etoricoxib and metamizole) and an intravenous patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) with piritramide (1.5 mg bolus, 10 min lockout-time). The primary endpoint was opioid consumption within 48 h after surgery. Secondary endpoints were pain scores, assessment of postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV), measurement of the quality of recovery using patient-reported outcome measure and length of hospital stay. Forty-one patients (n = 21 TAP block group, n = 20 control group) completed the study, per protocol. One patient was lost to follow-up. Thirty-three were women (88.5%) and eight men (19.5%). The mean age at the time of surgery was 28 years (18-43, SD ± 7.4). All TAP blocks were performed by an experienced senior anaesthesiologist and all operations were performed by a single, high volume surgeon. Results: The opioid consumption in the TAP block group was significantly lower compared to the control group at 6 (3 mg ± 2.8 vs. 10.8 mg ± 5.6, p < 0.0001), 24 (18.4 ± 16.2 vs. 30.8 ± 16.4, p = 0.01) and 48 h (29.1 mg ± 30.7 vs. 54.7 ± 29.6, p = 0.04) after surgery. Pain scores were significantly reduced in the TAP block group at 24 h after surgery. There were no other differences in secondary outcome parameters. No perioperative complication occurred in either group. Conclusion: Ultrasound-guided TAP block significantly reduces the perioperative opioid consumption in patients undergoing PAO.

A specific enhanced recovery protocol decreases opioid use after thyroid and parathyroid surgery

BACKGROUND

Enhanced recovery protocols have not been investigated previously for cervical endocrine surgery. The study aim was to determine whether systematic implementation of an enhanced recovery protocol specific for thyroid/parathyroid surgery can improve postoperative outcomes.

METHODS

A customized enhanced recovery protocol for thyroid/parathyroid surgery was designed and utilized systematically for all patients who underwent parathyroidectomy, thyroid lobectomy, or total thyroidectomy. Outcomes were assessed 12 months before enhanced recovery protocol implementation (n = 464 patients) and after enhanced recovery protocol implementation (n = 654 patients).

RESULTS

Enhanced recovery protocol implementation was associated with a 72% decrease in mean oral morphine equivalents utilized in-house (before 82 ± 64 versus after 23 ± 28; P < .0001) and many enhanced recovery protocol patients were entirely opioid-free (0.2% vs 21%, P < .0001). When used, the enhanced recovery protocol was associated with a lesser mean amount of ondansetron to treat postoperative nausea and vomiting (5.5 mg ± 3 vs 4.5 ± 2: P < .0001). Duration of stay was short before implementation of the enhanced recovery protocol and did not change substantially after implementation (1.1 days ± 0.7 vs 1.1 ± 0.7; P = .26).

CONCLUSION

The systematic use of a simple, cervical, endocrine surgery-specific enhanced recovery protocol decreased perioperative opioid use by ~70%, with significantly less postoperative nausea and vomiting. Implementation of a multidisciplinary enhanced recovery protocol may be an important initial step toward limiting opioid overuse during common operative procedures.