1
|
Weiner JD, Leff B, Ritchie CS. A Scoping Review of Dementia Interventions in Home-Based Primary Care. J Am Med Dir Assoc 2024; 25:105001. [PMID: 38663452 DOI: 10.1016/j.jamda.2024.03.112] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/04/2023] [Revised: 02/29/2024] [Accepted: 03/18/2024] [Indexed: 07/01/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Home-based primary care (HBPC) provides interdisciplinary, longitudinal, comprehensive care at home to homebound older adults. The prevalence of dementia among HBPC recipients is approximately 50%. To date, little research has been performed to determine whether dementia-specific interventions have been conducted in HBPC or their efficacy. We performed a scoping review to assess the landscape of dementia interventions in HBPC. DESIGN Systematic scoping review. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS Care delivery programs for patients or caregivers of patients with dementia for the purpose of improving the management of dementia in the setting of HBPC. METHODS The PRISMA-ScR protocol was followed. Literature searches were performed using PubMed, Embase, and Scopus for articles on dementia-focused interventions implemented in HBPC. Articles were excluded if they consisted of abstracts only, were not in English, or were not dementia interventions in HBPC. RESULTS A total of 1657 unique titles and abstracts were screened. Overall, 1584 titles and abstracts were excluded, resulting in 73 full-text studies to assess for eligibility. Of these 73 full-text studies, 1 study met criteria for inclusion, an observational study assessing the implementation of the Resources for Enhancing Alzheimer's Caregiver Health (REACH) intervention in Veterans Affairs HBPC. That study found the intervention to be effective in reducing caregiver burden, with a decrease of 2 hours on duty per day, trending toward significance. Among the excluded 72 full-text studies, some studies included potentially relevant interventions that could be translated into HBPC care, including dementia interventions that targeted long-term services and supports, office-based primary care and other nonhome settings such as nursing homes, and home-based palliative care. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS Despite high prevalence of dementia among homebound older adults receiving HBPC, there are a dearth of studies on HBPC-specific dementia interventions. Future studies should consider adapting and testing interventions found to be effective in other settings to HBPC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jeffrey D Weiner
- Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
| | - Bruce Leff
- Division of Geriatric Medicine, Center for Transformative Geriatric Research, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Christine S Ritchie
- Division of Palliative Care and Geriatric Medicine, Mongan Institute Center for Aging and Serious Illness, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Suglo JN, Winkley K, Sturt J. Improving foot self-care in people with diabetes in Ghana: A development and feasibility randomised trial of a context appropriate, family-orientated diabetic footcare intervention. PLoS One 2024; 19:e0302385. [PMID: 38718093 PMCID: PMC11078378 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0302385] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/12/2023] [Accepted: 03/29/2024] [Indexed: 05/12/2024] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Africa presents a higher diabetic foot ulcer prevalence estimate of 7.2% against global figures of 6.3%. Engaging family members in self-care education interventions has been shown to be effective at preventing diabetes-related foot ulcers. This study culturally adapted and tested the feasibility and acceptability of an evidence-based footcare family intervention in Ghana. METHODS The initial phase of the study involved stakeholder engagement, comprising Patient Public Involvement activities and interviews with key informant nurses and people with diabetes (N = 15). In the second phase, adults at risk of diabetes-related foot ulcers and nominated caregivers (N = 50 dyads) participated in an individually randomised feasibility trial of the adapted intervention (N = 25) compared to usual care (N = 25). The study aimed to assess feasibility outcomes and to identify efficacy signals on clinical outcomes at 12 weeks post randomisation. Patient reported outcomes were foot care behaviour, foot self-care efficacy, diabetes knowledge and caregiver diabetes distress. RESULTS Adjustments were made to the evidence-based intervention to reflect the literacy, information needs and preferences of stakeholders and to develop a context appropriate diabetic foot self-care intervention. A feasibility trial was then conducted which met all recruitment, retention, data quality and randomisation progression criteria. At 12 weeks post randomisation, efficacy signals favoured the intervention group on improved footcare behaviour, foot self-care efficacy, diabetes knowledge and reduced diabetes distress. Future implementation issues to consider include the staff resources needed to deliver the intervention, family members availability to attend in-person sessions and consideration of remote intervention delivery. CONCLUSION A contextual family-oriented foot self-care education intervention is feasible, acceptable, and may improve knowledge and self-care with the potential to decrease diabetes-related complications. The education intervention is a strategic approach to improving diabetes care and prevention of foot disease, especially in settings with limited diabetes care resources. Future research will investigate the possibility of remote delivery to better meet patient and staff needs. TRIAL REGISTRATION Pan African Clinical Trials Registry (PACTR) - PACTR202201708421484: https://pactr.samrc.ac.za/TrialDisplay.aspx?TrialID=19363 or pactr.samrc.ac.za/Search.aspx.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joseph Ngmenesegre Suglo
- Florence Nightingale Faculty of Nursing, Midwifery and Palliative Care, King’s College London, London, United Kingdom
- Department of Nursing and Midwifery, Presbyterian University, Agogo, Ghana
| | - Kirsty Winkley
- Florence Nightingale Faculty of Nursing, Midwifery and Palliative Care, King’s College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Jackie Sturt
- Florence Nightingale Faculty of Nursing, Midwifery and Palliative Care, King’s College London, London, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Cronin CJ, Lieber EMJ. The demand for skills training among Medicaid home-based caregivers. JOURNAL OF HEALTH ECONOMICS 2024; 95:102877. [PMID: 38581749 DOI: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2024.102877] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/08/2023] [Revised: 12/30/2023] [Accepted: 03/15/2024] [Indexed: 04/08/2024]
Abstract
Medicaid spends nearly 100 billion dollars annually on home and community-based care for the disabled. Much of this care is provided by personal care aides, few of whom have received training related to the services they provide. We conducted a randomized controlled trial to estimate their demand for training. We find that 13 percent of these caregivers complete training without an incentive. Paying the caregivers four times their hourly wage increases training completion by roughly nine percentage points. Additional experimental variation suggests that among individuals confirmed to be aware of the training, the financial incentive increases completion from 35 to 58 percent. Demand curves based on these results suggest that while many caregivers value the opportunity to train, policies aimed at universal take up require large financial incentives.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Ethan M J Lieber
- University of Notre Dame, United States of America; NBER, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Van Houtven CH, Smith VA, Miller KEM, Berkowitz TSZ, Shepherd-Banigan M, Hein T, Penney LS, Allen KD, Kabat M, Jobin T, Hastings SN. Comprehensive Caregiver Supports and Ascertainment and Treatment of Veteran Pain. Med Care Res Rev 2024; 81:107-121. [PMID: 38062735 DOI: 10.1177/10775587231210026] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/09/2024]
Abstract
Disabled Veterans commonly experience pain. The Program of Comprehensive Assistance for Family Caregivers (PCAFC) provides training, a stipend, and services to family caregivers of eligible Veterans to support their caregiving role. We compared ascertainment of veteran pain and pain treatment through health care encounters and medications (pain indicators) of participants (treated group) and non-participants (comparison group) using inverse probability treatment weights. Modeled results show that the proportion of Veterans with a pain indicator in the first year post-application was higher than that pre-application for both groups. However, the proportion of Veterans with a pain indicator was substantially higher in the treatment group: 76.1% versus 63.9% in the comparison group (p < .001). Over time, the proportion of Veterans with any pain indicator fell and group differences lessened. However, differences persisted through 8 years post-application (p < .001). PCAFC caregivers appear to help Veterans engage in pain treatment at higher rates than caregivers not in PCAFC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Courtney H Van Houtven
- Durham Center of Innovation to Accelerate Discovery and Practice Transformation, Durham VA Health Care System
- Department of Population Health Sciences, Duke University School of Medicine
- Duke Margolis Center for Health Policy, Duke University
| | - Valerie A Smith
- Durham Center of Innovation to Accelerate Discovery and Practice Transformation, Durham VA Health Care System
- Department of Population Health Sciences, Duke University School of Medicine
- Department of General Internal Medicine, Duke University
| | - Katherine E M Miller
- Durham Center of Innovation to Accelerate Discovery and Practice Transformation, Durham VA Health Care System
- Department of Medical Ethics and Health Policy, University of Pennsylvania
- Leonard Davis Institute of Health Economics, University of Pennsylvania
| | - Theodore S Z Berkowitz
- Durham Center of Innovation to Accelerate Discovery and Practice Transformation, Durham VA Health Care System
| | - Megan Shepherd-Banigan
- Durham Center of Innovation to Accelerate Discovery and Practice Transformation, Durham VA Health Care System
- Department of Population Health Sciences, Duke University School of Medicine
| | - Tyler Hein
- Office of Mental Health and Suicide Prevention, Department of Veterans Affairs
| | - Lauren S Penney
- The Elizabeth Dole Center of Excellence for Veteran and Caregiver Research, South Texas Veterans Health Care System
- Department of Medicine, Division of Hospital Medicine, University of Texas Health San Antonio
| | - Kelli D Allen
- Durham Center of Innovation to Accelerate Discovery and Practice Transformation, Durham VA Health Care System
- Department of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
| | - Margaret Kabat
- Office of the Secretary US Department of Veterans Affairs
| | - Timothy Jobin
- Caregiver Support Program, Veterans Health Administration, US Department of Veterans Affairs
| | - S Nicole Hastings
- Durham Center of Innovation to Accelerate Discovery and Practice Transformation, Durham VA Health Care System
- Department of Population Health Sciences, Duke University School of Medicine
- Department of Medicine, Division of Geriatrics, Duke University School of Medicine
- Center for the Study of Aging and Human Development, Duke University School of Medicine
- Geriatrics Research, Education and Clinical Center, Durham VA Health Care System
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Spiers G, Tan MMC, Astbury JL, Hall A, Ahmed N, Lanyi K, Williams O, Beyer F, Craig D, Hanratty B. What works to support carers of older people and older carers? an international evidence map of interventions and outcomes. BMC Geriatr 2024; 24:301. [PMID: 38553679 PMCID: PMC10979610 DOI: 10.1186/s12877-024-04897-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/19/2023] [Accepted: 03/15/2024] [Indexed: 04/02/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Unpaid carers of older people, and older unpaid carers, experience a range of adverse outcomes. Supporting carers should therefore be a public health priority. Our understanding of what works to support carers could be enhanced if future evaluations prioritise under-researched interventions and outcomes. To support this, we aimed to: map evidence about interventions to support carers, and the outcomes evaluated; and identify key gaps in current evidence. METHODS Evidence gap map review methods were used. Searches were carried out in three bibliographic databases for quantitative evaluations of carer interventions published in OECD high-income countries between 2013 and 2023. Interventions were eligible if they supported older carers (50 + years) of any aged recipient, or any aged carers of older people (50 + years). FINDINGS 205 studies reported across 208 publications were included in the evidence map. The majority evaluated the impact of therapeutic and educational interventions on carer burden and carers' mental health. Some studies reported evidence about physical exercise interventions and befriending and peer support for carers, but these considered a limited range of outcomes. Few studies evaluated interventions that focused on delivering financial information and advice, pain management, and physical skills training for carers. Evaluations rarely considered the impact of interventions on carers' physical health, quality of life, and social and financial wellbeing. Very few studies considered whether interventions delivered equitable outcomes. CONCLUSION Evidence on what works best to support carers is extensive but limited in scope. A disproportionate focus on mental health and burden outcomes neglects other important areas where carers may need support. Given the impact of caring on carers' physical health, financial and social wellbeing, future research could evaluate interventions that aim to support these outcomes. Appraisal of whether interventions deliver equitable outcomes across diverse carer populations is critical.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gemma Spiers
- Population Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
| | - Michelle M C Tan
- Population Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Jayne L Astbury
- School of Health Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Alex Hall
- School of Health Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Nisar Ahmed
- School of Health Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Kate Lanyi
- Population Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Oleta Williams
- Population Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Fiona Beyer
- Population Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Dawn Craig
- Population Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Barbara Hanratty
- Population Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Decosimo K, Drake C, Coffman CJ, Sperber NR, Tucker M, Hughes JM, Zullig LL, Chadduck T, Christensen L, Kaufman B, Allen KD, Hastings SN, Van Houtven CH. Implementation intensification to disseminate a skills-based caregiver training program: protocol for a type III effectiveness-implementation hybrid trial. Implement Sci Commun 2023; 4:97. [PMID: 37587517 PMCID: PMC10428549 DOI: 10.1186/s43058-023-00475-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/28/2023] [Accepted: 07/24/2023] [Indexed: 08/18/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Family caregiver training decreases caregiver psychological burden and improves caregiver depressive symptoms and health-related quality of life. Caregivers FIRST is an evidence-based group skills training curriculum for family caregivers and was announced for national dissemination in partnership with the Veterans Health Administration (VHA) National Caregiver Support Program (CSP). Previous evaluations of Caregivers FIRST implementation highlighted that varying support was needed to successfully implement the program, ranging from minimal technical assistance to intensive assistance and support. However, we do not know the optimal level of support needed to inform cost-effective national scaling of the program. We describe a protocol for randomizing 24 non-adopting VA medical centers 1:1 to a tailored, high-touch implementation support or a standard, low-touch implementation support to test the primary hypothesis that high-touch support increases Caregivers FIRST penetration, fidelity, and adoption. Additionally, we describe the methods for evaluating the effect of Caregivers FIRST participation on Veteran outcomes using a quasi-experimental design and the methods for a business case analysis to examine cost of delivery differences among sites assigned to a low or high-touch implementation support. METHODS We use a type III hybrid implementation-effectiveness study design enrolling VA medical centers that do not meet Caregivers FIRST adoption benchmarks following the announcement of the program as mandated within the CSP. Eligible medical centers will be randomized to receive a standard low-touch implementation support based on Replicating Effective Programs (REP) only or to an enhanced REP (high-touch) implementation support consisting of facilitation and tailored technical assistance. Implementation outcomes include penetration (primary), fidelity, and adoption at 12 months. Mixed methods will explore sites' perceptions and experiences of the high-touch intensification strategy. Additional analyses will include a patient-level effectiveness outcome (Veteran days at home and not in an institution) and a business case analysis using staffing and labor cost data. DISCUSSION This pragmatic trial will lead to the development and refinement of implementation tools to support VA in spreading and sustaining Caregivers FIRST in the most efficient means possible. TRIAL REGISTRATION This study was registered on April 8, 2022, at ClinicalTrials.gov (identifier NCT05319535).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kasey Decosimo
- Center of Innovation to Accelerate Discovery and Practice Transformation, Durham VA Health Care System, Durham, NC, 27705, USA.
| | - Connor Drake
- Center of Innovation to Accelerate Discovery and Practice Transformation, Durham VA Health Care System, Durham, NC, 27705, USA
- Department of Population Health Sciences, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Cynthia J Coffman
- Center of Innovation to Accelerate Discovery and Practice Transformation, Durham VA Health Care System, Durham, NC, 27705, USA
- Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Nina R Sperber
- Center of Innovation to Accelerate Discovery and Practice Transformation, Durham VA Health Care System, Durham, NC, 27705, USA
- Department of Population Health Sciences, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Matthew Tucker
- Center of Innovation to Accelerate Discovery and Practice Transformation, Durham VA Health Care System, Durham, NC, 27705, USA
| | - Jaime M Hughes
- Center of Innovation to Accelerate Discovery and Practice Transformation, Durham VA Health Care System, Durham, NC, 27705, USA
- Department of Implementation Science, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC, USA
- Section On Gerontology and Geriatric Medicine, Division of Internal Medicine, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC, USA
| | - Leah L Zullig
- Center of Innovation to Accelerate Discovery and Practice Transformation, Durham VA Health Care System, Durham, NC, 27705, USA
- Department of Population Health Sciences, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Trisha Chadduck
- Veteran's Health Administration Central Office, Washington, DC, USA
| | - Leah Christensen
- Veteran's Health Administration Central Office, Washington, DC, USA
| | - Brystana Kaufman
- Center of Innovation to Accelerate Discovery and Practice Transformation, Durham VA Health Care System, Durham, NC, 27705, USA
- Department of Population Health Sciences, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
- Duke-Margolis Center for Health Policy, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Kelli D Allen
- Center of Innovation to Accelerate Discovery and Practice Transformation, Durham VA Health Care System, Durham, NC, 27705, USA
- Department of Medicine & Thurston Arthritis Research Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - S Nicole Hastings
- Center of Innovation to Accelerate Discovery and Practice Transformation, Durham VA Health Care System, Durham, NC, 27705, USA
- Department of Population Health Sciences, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
- Center for the Study of Aging and Human Development, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA
- Geriatric Research, Education, and Clinical Center, Durham VA Health Care System, Durham, NC, USA
- Division of Geriatrics, Department of Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Courtney H Van Houtven
- Center of Innovation to Accelerate Discovery and Practice Transformation, Durham VA Health Care System, Durham, NC, 27705, USA
- Department of Population Health Sciences, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
- Duke-Margolis Center for Health Policy, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Van Houtven CH, Drake C, Malo TL, Decosimo K, Tucker M, Sullivan C, D'Adolf J, Hughes JM, Christensen L, Grubber JM, Coffman CJ, Sperber NR, Wang V, Allen KD, Hastings SN, Shea CM, Zullig LL. Ready, set, go! The role of organizational readiness to predict adoption of a family caregiver training program using the Rogers' diffusion of innovation theory. Implement Sci Commun 2023; 4:69. [PMID: 37337208 DOI: 10.1186/s43058-023-00447-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/28/2022] [Accepted: 05/30/2023] [Indexed: 06/21/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Caregivers FIRST is an evidence-based program addressing gaps in caregivers' skills. In 2020, the Veterans Health Administration Caregiver Support Program (CSP) nationally endorsed Caregivers FIRST, offering credit in leadership performance plans to encourage all VA medical centers (VAMCs) to implement locally. This study examines the association of organizational readiness with VAMC adoption of Caregivers FIRST. METHODS In a cohort observational study, we surveyed CSP managers about their facilities' readiness to implement using the Organizational Readiness for Implementing Change (ORIC) instrument and compared change commitment and change efficacy domains among VAMCs "adopters" defined as delivering Caregivers FIRST within 1 year of the national announcement to those that did not ("non-adopters"). Within "adopters," we categorized time to adoption based on Rogers' diffusion of innovation theory including "innovators," "early adopters," "early majority," "late adopters," and "laggards." Organizational readiness and site characteristics (facility complexity, staffing levels, volume of applications for caregiver assistance services) were compared between "adopters," "non-adopters," and between time to adoption subcategories. Separate logistic regression models were used to assess whether ORIC and site characteristics were associated with early adoption among "adopters." RESULTS Fifty-one of 63 (81%) VAMCs with CSP manager survey respondents adopted Caregivers FIRST during the first year. ORIC change commitment and efficacy were similar for "adopters" and "non-adopters." However, sites that adopted earlier (innovators and early adopters) had higher ORIC change commitment and efficacy scores than the rest of the "adopters." Logistic regression results indicated that higher ORIC change commitment (odds ratio [OR] = 2.57; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.11-5.95) and ORIC change efficacy (OR = 2.60; 95% CI, 1.12-6.03) scores were associated with increased odds that a VAMC was an early adopter (categorized as an "innovator," "early adopter", or "early majority"). Site-level characteristics were not associated with Caregivers FIRST early adoption. CONCLUSIONS To our knowledge, this study is the first to prospectively assess organizational readiness and the timing of subsequent program adoption. Early adoption was associated with higher ORIC change commitment and change efficacy and not site-level characteristics. These findings yield insights into the role of organizational readiness to accelerate program adoption. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03474380. Registered on March 22, 2018.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Courtney H Van Houtven
- Center of Innovation to Accelerate Discovery and Practice Transformation, Durham VA Health Care System (152), 508 Fulton Street, Durham, NC, 27705, USA
- Department of Population Health Sciences, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
- Duke-Margolis Center for Health Policy, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Connor Drake
- Center of Innovation to Accelerate Discovery and Practice Transformation, Durham VA Health Care System (152), 508 Fulton Street, Durham, NC, 27705, USA
- Department of Population Health Sciences, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Teri L Malo
- Center of Innovation to Accelerate Discovery and Practice Transformation, Durham VA Health Care System (152), 508 Fulton Street, Durham, NC, 27705, USA
| | - Kasey Decosimo
- Center of Innovation to Accelerate Discovery and Practice Transformation, Durham VA Health Care System (152), 508 Fulton Street, Durham, NC, 27705, USA.
| | - Matthew Tucker
- Center of Innovation to Accelerate Discovery and Practice Transformation, Durham VA Health Care System (152), 508 Fulton Street, Durham, NC, 27705, USA
| | - Caitlin Sullivan
- Center of Innovation to Accelerate Discovery and Practice Transformation, Durham VA Health Care System (152), 508 Fulton Street, Durham, NC, 27705, USA
| | - Josh D'Adolf
- Center of Innovation to Accelerate Discovery and Practice Transformation, Durham VA Health Care System (152), 508 Fulton Street, Durham, NC, 27705, USA
| | - Jaime M Hughes
- Center of Innovation to Accelerate Discovery and Practice Transformation, Durham VA Health Care System (152), 508 Fulton Street, Durham, NC, 27705, USA
- Department of Implementation Science, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC, USA
- Section on Gerontology and Geriatric Medicine, Division of Internal Medicine, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC, USA
| | - Leah Christensen
- Veteran's Health Administration Central Office, Washington, DC, USA
| | - Janet M Grubber
- Center of Innovation to Accelerate Discovery and Practice Transformation, Durham VA Health Care System (152), 508 Fulton Street, Durham, NC, 27705, USA
- Cooperative Studies Program Coordinating Center, Veterans Affairs Boston Healthcare System, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Cynthia J Coffman
- Center of Innovation to Accelerate Discovery and Practice Transformation, Durham VA Health Care System (152), 508 Fulton Street, Durham, NC, 27705, USA
- Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Nina R Sperber
- Center of Innovation to Accelerate Discovery and Practice Transformation, Durham VA Health Care System (152), 508 Fulton Street, Durham, NC, 27705, USA
- Department of Population Health Sciences, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Virginia Wang
- Center of Innovation to Accelerate Discovery and Practice Transformation, Durham VA Health Care System (152), 508 Fulton Street, Durham, NC, 27705, USA
- Department of Population Health Sciences, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
- Duke-Margolis Center for Health Policy, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Kelli D Allen
- Center of Innovation to Accelerate Discovery and Practice Transformation, Durham VA Health Care System (152), 508 Fulton Street, Durham, NC, 27705, USA
- Department of Medicine & Thurston Arthritis Research Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - S Nicole Hastings
- Center of Innovation to Accelerate Discovery and Practice Transformation, Durham VA Health Care System (152), 508 Fulton Street, Durham, NC, 27705, USA
- Department of Population Health Sciences, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
- Center for the Study of Aging and Human Development, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA
- Geriatric Research, Education, and Clinical Center, Durham VA Health Care System, Durham, NC, USA
- Division of Geriatrics, Department of Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Christopher M Shea
- Department of Health Policy and Management, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Leah L Zullig
- Center of Innovation to Accelerate Discovery and Practice Transformation, Durham VA Health Care System (152), 508 Fulton Street, Durham, NC, 27705, USA
- Department of Population Health Sciences, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Hughes JM, Zullig LL, Choate AL, Decosimo KP, Wang V, Van Houtven CH, Allen KD, Nicole Hastings S. Intensification of Implementation Strategies: Developing a Model of Foundational and Enhanced Implementation Approaches to Support National Adoption and Scale-up. THE GERONTOLOGIST 2023; 63:604-613. [PMID: 36029028 PMCID: PMC10461172 DOI: 10.1093/geront/gnac130] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/05/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Implementation strategies are activities to support integration of evidence-based programs (EBPs) into routine care. Comprised of 170+ facilities, the Veterans Affairs Healthcare System is conducive to evaluating feasibility and scalability of implementation strategies on a national level. In previous work evaluating implementation of three EBPs for older Veterans (hospital-based walking, caregiver skills training, group physical therapy), we found facilities varied in their need for implementation support, with some needing minimal guidance and others requiring intensive support. Committed to national scalability, our team developed an implementation intensification model consisting of foundational (low-touch) and enhanced (high-touch) implementation support. This Forum article describes our multilevel and multistep process to develop and evaluate implementation intensification. Steps included (a) review completed trial data; (b) conduct listening sessions; (c) review literature; (d) draft foundational and enhanced implementation support packages; (e) iteratively refine packages; and (7) devise an evaluation plan. Our model of implementation intensification may be relevant to other health care systems seeking strategies that can adapt to diverse delivery settings, optimize resources, help build capacity, and ultimately enhance implementation outcomes. As more health care systems focus on spread of EBPs into routine care, identifying scalable and effective implementation strategies will be critical.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jaime M Hughes
- Department of Implementation Science, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina, USA
- Center of Innovation to Accelerate Discovery and Practice Transformation, Durham VA Health Care System, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Leah L Zullig
- Center of Innovation to Accelerate Discovery and Practice Transformation, Durham VA Health Care System, Durham, North Carolina, USA
- Department of Population Health Sciences, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Ashley L Choate
- Center of Innovation to Accelerate Discovery and Practice Transformation, Durham VA Health Care System, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Kasey P Decosimo
- Center of Innovation to Accelerate Discovery and Practice Transformation, Durham VA Health Care System, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Virginia Wang
- Center of Innovation to Accelerate Discovery and Practice Transformation, Durham VA Health Care System, Durham, North Carolina, USA
- Department of Population Health Sciences, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Courtney H Van Houtven
- Center of Innovation to Accelerate Discovery and Practice Transformation, Durham VA Health Care System, Durham, North Carolina, USA
- Department of Population Health Sciences, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Kelli D Allen
- Center of Innovation to Accelerate Discovery and Practice Transformation, Durham VA Health Care System, Durham, North Carolina, USA
- Department of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill School of Medicine , Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | - S Nicole Hastings
- Center of Innovation to Accelerate Discovery and Practice Transformation, Durham VA Health Care System, Durham, North Carolina, USA
- Department of Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Sperber NR, Boucher N, Hughes JM, Bruening R, Zullig LL, Decosimo K, Tucker M, Christensen LA, Allen KD, Hastings SN, Van Houtven CH. Mandated Caregiver Training in the Veterans Health Administration: Caregiver Inquiry Informs National Dissemination. THE GERONTOLOGIST 2023; 63:534-544. [PMID: 36327120 PMCID: PMC10461180 DOI: 10.1093/geront/gnac162] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/15/2022] [Indexed: 11/05/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES A minority of family caregivers receive training, with implications for their own and their recipient's outcomes. Federal policy has supported the implementation and expansion of caregiver training and support. The Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) has developed a national Caregiver Support Program and collaborated with VA health services researchers to explore caregivers' acceptance of an evidence-based training program in preparation for system-wide dissemination. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS This approach entailed a convergent mixed-methods design, which involved separate analyses of quantitative and qualitative data. Survey questions based on the Kirkpatrick model for training evaluation measured caregivers' reaction and learning, and interview questions elicited caregivers' reports about the value of the program for them. RESULTS Most caregivers reported satisfaction with the training when responding to survey questions, although qualitative interviews revealed caveats suggesting need to hone the best timing and specific group of caregivers for maximal benefit. DISCUSSION AND IMPLICATIONS Our findings indicate that understanding program-user fit may be particularly critical when implementing training for caregivers as they come to the program at different points along their caregiving journey, needing differing types and intensities of support. While a general program may appeal to policymakers aiming to scale caregiver training within a large, heterogeneous system, there may be shortcomings in terms of end-user acceptance and subsequent downstream outcomes such as reach and ultimately program effectiveness. Good, iterative communication flow between program developers and policymakers facilitates this understanding and, in turn, decisions about scaling.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nina R Sperber
- Center of Innovation to Accelerate Discovery and Practice Transformation, Durham VA Health Care System, Durham, North Carolina, USA
- Department of Population Health Sciences, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Nathan Boucher
- Center of Innovation to Accelerate Discovery and Practice Transformation, Durham VA Health Care System, Durham, North Carolina, USA
- Sanford School of Public Policy, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Jaime M Hughes
- Center of Innovation to Accelerate Discovery and Practice Transformation, Durham VA Health Care System, Durham, North Carolina, USA
- Department of Implementation Science, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina, USA
| | - Rebecca Bruening
- Center of Innovation to Accelerate Discovery and Practice Transformation, Durham VA Health Care System, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Leah L Zullig
- Center of Innovation to Accelerate Discovery and Practice Transformation, Durham VA Health Care System, Durham, North Carolina, USA
- Department of Population Health Sciences, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Kasey Decosimo
- Center of Innovation to Accelerate Discovery and Practice Transformation, Durham VA Health Care System, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Matthew Tucker
- Center of Innovation to Accelerate Discovery and Practice Transformation, Durham VA Health Care System, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Leah A Christensen
- Veteran's Health Administration Central Office, Washington, District of Columbia, USA
| | - Kelli D Allen
- Center of Innovation to Accelerate Discovery and Practice Transformation, Durham VA Health Care System, Durham, North Carolina, USA
- Thurston Arthritis Research Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | - Susan N Hastings
- Center of Innovation to Accelerate Discovery and Practice Transformation, Durham VA Health Care System, Durham, North Carolina, USA
- Division of Geriatrics, Department of Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Courtney H Van Houtven
- Center of Innovation to Accelerate Discovery and Practice Transformation, Durham VA Health Care System, Durham, North Carolina, USA
- Department of Population Health Sciences, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Kokorelias KM, Singh H, Posa S, Hitzig SL. Understanding the Goals of Older Adults with Complex Care Needs, Their Family Caregivers and Their Care Providers Enrolled in a Patient Navigation Program. J Appl Gerontol 2022; 42:862-870. [PMID: 36503293 DOI: 10.1177/07334648221144999] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Patient navigation models of care are being used to support hospital-to-home transitions. The present paper aimed to explore the goals important to older adults, their caregivers, and care providers as they transition from hospital-to-home and how, if at all, patient navigation can enable goals of care. Data were comprised of 94 interviews with 16 older adults, 5 family caregivers and 48 healthcare providers. Data were analyzed thematically and similarities and differences in goals were identified. Shared goals included having someone to count on and easy access to services. Older adults expressed the goal of independence, whereas family caregivers and healthcare providers noted safety. Caregivers noted goals of developing skills. While patient navigation was viewed as meeting goals of care by participants, future research is required to determine how patient navigation can support goal setting as a standard clinical practice and the long-term patient outcomes of meeting goals.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kristina M. Kokorelias
- St John’s Rehab Research Program, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Sunnybrook Research Institute, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Hardeep Singh
- Temerty Faculty of Medicine, Department of Occupational Science & Occupational Therapy, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Stephanie Posa
- St John’s Rehab Research Program, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Sunnybrook Research Institute, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Sander L. Hitzig
- St John’s Rehab Research Program, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Sunnybrook Research Institute, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Temerty Faculty of Medicine, Department of Occupational Science & Occupational Therapy, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Temerty Faculty of Medicine, Rehabilitation Sciences Institute, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Chou A, Lutz BJ, Beach SR, Freburger JK. Informal caregiver training to address functional mobility limitations of stroke survivors: a scoping review. Top Stroke Rehabil 2022:1-14. [PMID: 36403145 DOI: 10.1080/10749357.2022.2145761] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES Informal caregivers of stroke survivors often report the need for training on how to care for a loved one with functional mobility limitations. Evidence on training interventions to help informal caregivers with issues related to mobility is varied. The objective of this scoping review was to examine the literature including skill-based training interventions that educate caregivers on functional mobility for stroke survivors. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS We extracted studies from OVID Medline, Cochrane, ISI Web of Knowledge, and Embase published between 1990 and 2021. At every stage of assessment, data extraction forms were used to reach consensus among at least three out of four authors. We followed PRISMA-ScR guidelines and Arskey and O'Malley's framework to chart information into several tables based on research questions and summarized with descriptive statistics. RESULTS Most studies were conducted outside the US focused on training in mobility and activities of daily living. The stroke survivor, on average, was an older individual (mean age 64.8 [SD = 5.3] years). The informal caregiver was predominately a younger female spouse (mean age 54.2 [SD = 6.3]). More than a third of the studies reported improvement in the stroke survivors' physical function post-intervention, with a mean follow-up time of 4.4 months. Effective studies tended to include stroke survivors with less cognitive and functional mobility limitations at higher training dosages. DISCUSSION AND IMPLICATIONS Gaps in our understanding of informal caregiver training for those caring for stroke survivors are identified, and recommendations are provided for future research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aileen Chou
- Department of Physical Therapy, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Barbara J. Lutz
- School of Nursing, University of North Carolina-Wilmington, Wilmington, NC, USA
| | - Scott R. Beach
- University Center for Social and Urban Research, University of Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Janet K. Freburger
- Department of Physical Therapy, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Family-Centered Interventions and Quality of Life of Clients with Ostomy. Nurs Res Pract 2022; 2022:9426560. [PMID: 36072914 PMCID: PMC9444473 DOI: 10.1155/2022/9426560] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/03/2022] [Revised: 07/23/2022] [Accepted: 08/10/2022] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Background. Family-centered intervention can be used as a therapeutic intervention to improve the quality of life (QOL) in clients with ostomy. This study aimed to determine the effects of family-centered intervention on the QOL in ostomy clients. Methods. A quasi-experimental study was carried out with participation of 70 clients with colostomy and 70 caregivers (family members). The participants were selected through convenient sampling and randomly allocated into the experimental and control groups. The experimental group received family-centered education. The education program included four sessions, 50–60 min each, that were implemented in two weeks at hospital wards or clients’ houses for the clients’ companions. Afterwards, the caregivers implemented the care at home for one month. The subjects in the control group received routine care before being discharged. The QOL of the clients in both groups was measured using the city of hope-QOL-ostomy questionnaire before and one month after the intervention. Results. The mean scores of the QOL after family-centered intervention in the experimental and control groups increased from 197.97 to 207.49 and from 195.2 to 199.03, respectively. The paired t-test showed a significant change in the experimental and control groups after the intervention at a confidence level of 95% (
;
). In addition, after the intervention, however, there was a significant difference between the two groups in all these areas except for social aspects (
). Conclusion. Family-centered intervention can be used as a therapeutic intervention to improve the QOL in clients with ostomy. The intervention was effective in the physical, spiritual, psychological, and social health of these clients.
Collapse
|
13
|
King HA, Shepherd-Banigan M, Chapman JG, Bruening R, Decosimo KP, Van Houtven CH. Use of motivational techniques to enhance unpaid caregiver engagement in a tailored skills training intervention. Aging Ment Health 2022; 26:337-344. [PMID: 33325259 PMCID: PMC10424086 DOI: 10.1080/13607863.2020.1855103] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/06/2019] [Accepted: 11/16/2020] [Indexed: 10/22/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES The Helping Invested Families Improve Veterans' Experiences Study (HI-FIVES) evaluated a skills training program to support family caregivers of cognitively or functionally impaired persons. HI-FIVES demonstrated sustained improvements in caregivers' and patients' experiences of VA care. The aim of this distinct, secondary qualitative study was to explore the potential processes related to the individual tailored skills-based telephone training underpinning HI-FIVES intervention effects. We explored topics caregivers selected, characteristics of action items created, patterns of action or inaction, and barriers to action item completion across topics. METHODS Qualitative data was analysed from 118 dyads randomized into the HI-FIVES intervention which included three weekly facilitated training calls covering five education topics and action items developed by caregivers for each topic. Qualitative analysis of text responses to questions from the training calls was used. RESULTS Three of the top four most selected topics were caregiver-oriented and caregivers created an action item most often for self-care topics. Caregiver-oriented topics also had the highest action item completion rates. The majority of action items created met SMART guidelines for goal setting and simple structure. With regard to barriers to action item completion, caregivers commonly reported still contemplating/pending. CONCLUSION Our findings identify motivational interviewing as an effective technique to identify critical intervention content and address barriers to achieving caregiving goals. We suggest that caregivers felt more empowered to create and complete an action item when they had more control over completing the action item, such as in topics related to their own self-care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Heather A. King
- Center of Innovation to Accelerate Discovery and Practice Transformation (ADAPT), Durham Veterans Affairs Health Care System, Durham, NC, USA
- Department of Population Health Sciences, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA
- Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Megan Shepherd-Banigan
- Center of Innovation to Accelerate Discovery and Practice Transformation (ADAPT), Durham Veterans Affairs Health Care System, Durham, NC, USA
- Department of Population Health Sciences, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA
- Duke-Margolis Center for Health Policy, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
| | | | - Rebecca Bruening
- Center of Innovation to Accelerate Discovery and Practice Transformation (ADAPT), Durham Veterans Affairs Health Care System, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Kasey P. Decosimo
- Center of Innovation to Accelerate Discovery and Practice Transformation (ADAPT), Durham Veterans Affairs Health Care System, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Courtney H. Van Houtven
- Center of Innovation to Accelerate Discovery and Practice Transformation (ADAPT), Durham Veterans Affairs Health Care System, Durham, NC, USA
- Department of Population Health Sciences, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA
- Duke-Margolis Center for Health Policy, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Burgdorf JG, Arbaje AI, Chase JA, Wolff JL. Current practices of family caregiver training during home health care: A qualitative study. J Am Geriatr Soc 2022; 70:218-227. [PMID: 34618918 PMCID: PMC8742751 DOI: 10.1111/jgs.17492] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/20/2021] [Revised: 08/31/2021] [Accepted: 09/05/2021] [Indexed: 01/03/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Home health clinicians report a need for family caregiver assistance during the majority of skilled home health care episodes. Since 2018, the Medicare Conditions of Participation has required home health agencies to provide training to family caregivers. However, little is known regarding current practices of family caregiver assessment and training during home health care. METHODS Qualitative research relying on semistructured key informant interviews with registered nurses and physical therapists (n = 19), hereafter "clinicians," from four home health agencies. Interviews were recorded and transcribed, then analyzed using directed content analysis to identify relevant themes and concepts. RESULTS Three agencies were not-for-profit and one was for-profit; three were urban and one was rural; two operated on a local scale, one on a regional scale, and one on a national scale. Key informants had an average of 9.3 years of experience in home health care and an average age of 45.0 years. Clinicians described a cyclic process of family caregiver training including four major phases: initial assessment, education, reassessment, and adjustment. Initial assessment was informal and holistic; education was delivered via demonstration and teach-back; reassessment was used to evaluate caregiver progress and inform adjustments to the care plan. Clinicians noted that their perceptions regarding the success of family caregiver training efforts influenced decisions relating to clinical practice, including the number of visits provided and whether to discharge the patient. CONCLUSIONS Caregiver training is currently integrated into clinician workflows in home health care and helps determine visit intensity and discharge timing, but clinicians face a lack of structured assessment instruments or training materials. Efforts by policymakers and home health agencies to facilitate clinicians' training efforts could positively affect the cost and quality of Medicare-funded home health care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Julia G. Burgdorf
- Department of Health Policy & Management, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health
| | - Alicia I. Arbaje
- Division of Geriatric Medicine and Gerontology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine
| | - Jo-Ana Chase
- Sinclair School of Nursing, University of Missouri
| | - Jennifer L. Wolff
- Department of Health Policy & Management, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health,Division of Geriatric Medicine and Gerontology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Ma JE, Grubber J, Coffman CJ, Wang V, Hastings SN, Allen KD, Shepherd-Banigan M, Decosimo K, Dadolf J, Sullivan C, Sperber NR, Van Houtven CH. Identifying family and unpaid caregivers in the electronic health record: A descriptive analysis (Preprint). JMIR Form Res 2021; 6:e35623. [PMID: 35849430 PMCID: PMC9345058 DOI: 10.2196/35623] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/10/2021] [Revised: 03/08/2022] [Accepted: 04/22/2022] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Most efforts to identify caregivers for research use passive approaches such as self-nomination. We describe an approach in which electronic health records (EHRs) can help identify, recruit, and increase diverse representations of family and other unpaid caregivers. Objective Few health systems have implemented systematic processes for identifying caregivers. This study aimed to develop and evaluate an EHR-driven process for identifying veterans likely to have unpaid caregivers in a caregiver survey study. We additionally examined whether there were EHR-derived veteran characteristics associated with veterans having unpaid caregivers. Methods We selected EHR home- and community-based referrals suggestive of veterans’ need for supportive care from friends or family. We identified veterans with these referrals across the 8 US Department of Veteran Affairs medical centers enrolled in our study. Phone calls to a subset of these veterans confirmed whether they had a caregiver, specifically an unpaid caregiver. We calculated the screening contact rate for unpaid caregivers of veterans using attempted phone screening and for those who completed phone screening. The veteran characteristics from the EHR were compared across referral and screening groups using descriptive statistics, and logistic regression was used to compare the likelihood of having an unpaid caregiver among veterans who completed phone screening. Results During the study period, our EHR-driven process identified 12,212 veterans with home- and community-based referrals; 2134 (17.47%) veteran households were called for phone screening. Among the 2134 veterans called, 1367 (64.06%) answered the call, and 813 (38.1%) veterans had a caregiver based on self-report of the veteran, their caregiver, or another person in the household. The unpaid caregiver identification rate was 38.1% and 59.5% among those with an attempted phone screening and completed phone screening, respectively. Veterans had increased odds of having an unpaid caregiver if they were married (adjusted odds ratio [OR] 2.69, 95% CI 1.68-4.34), had respite care (adjusted OR 2.17, 95% CI 1.41-3.41), or had adult day health care (adjusted OR 3.69, 95% CI 1.60-10.00). Veterans with a dementia diagnosis (adjusted OR 1.37, 95% CI 1.00-1.89) or veteran-directed care referral (adjusted OR 1.95, 95% CI 0.97-4.20) were also suggestive of an association with having an unpaid caregiver. Conclusions The EHR-driven process to identify veterans likely to have unpaid caregivers is systematic and resource intensive. Approximately 60% (813/1367) of veterans who were successfully screened had unpaid caregivers. In the absence of discrete fields in the EHR, our EHR-driven process can be used to identify unpaid caregivers; however, incorporating caregiver identification fields into the EHR would support a more efficient and systematic identification of caregivers. Trial Registration ClincalTrials.gov NCT03474380; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03474380
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jessica E Ma
- Geriatric Research, Education, and Clinical Center, Durham Veterans Affairs Health Care System, Durham, NC, United States
- Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, United States
| | - Janet Grubber
- Center of Innovation to Accelerate Discovery and Practice Transformation, Durham Veterans Affairs Health Care System, Durham, NC, United States
| | - Cynthia J Coffman
- Center of Innovation to Accelerate Discovery and Practice Transformation, Durham Veterans Affairs Health Care System, Durham, NC, United States
- Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, United States
| | - Virginia Wang
- Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, United States
- Center of Innovation to Accelerate Discovery and Practice Transformation, Durham Veterans Affairs Health Care System, Durham, NC, United States
- Department of Population Health Sciences, Duke University, Durham, NC, United States
- Duke-Margolis Center for Health Policy, Duke University, Durham, NC, United States
| | - S Nicole Hastings
- Geriatric Research, Education, and Clinical Center, Durham Veterans Affairs Health Care System, Durham, NC, United States
- Center of Innovation to Accelerate Discovery and Practice Transformation, Durham Veterans Affairs Health Care System, Durham, NC, United States
- Department of Population Health Sciences, Duke University, Durham, NC, United States
- Center for the Study of Aging, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, United States
- Division of Geriatrics, Department of Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, United States
| | - Kelli D Allen
- Center of Innovation to Accelerate Discovery and Practice Transformation, Durham Veterans Affairs Health Care System, Durham, NC, United States
- Department of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, United States
- Thurston Arthritis Research Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, United States
| | - Megan Shepherd-Banigan
- Center of Innovation to Accelerate Discovery and Practice Transformation, Durham Veterans Affairs Health Care System, Durham, NC, United States
- Department of Population Health Sciences, Duke University, Durham, NC, United States
| | - Kasey Decosimo
- Center of Innovation to Accelerate Discovery and Practice Transformation, Durham Veterans Affairs Health Care System, Durham, NC, United States
| | - Joshua Dadolf
- Center of Innovation to Accelerate Discovery and Practice Transformation, Durham Veterans Affairs Health Care System, Durham, NC, United States
| | - Caitlin Sullivan
- Center of Innovation to Accelerate Discovery and Practice Transformation, Durham Veterans Affairs Health Care System, Durham, NC, United States
| | - Nina R Sperber
- Center of Innovation to Accelerate Discovery and Practice Transformation, Durham Veterans Affairs Health Care System, Durham, NC, United States
- Department of Population Health Sciences, Duke University, Durham, NC, United States
| | - Courtney H Van Houtven
- Center of Innovation to Accelerate Discovery and Practice Transformation, Durham Veterans Affairs Health Care System, Durham, NC, United States
- Department of Population Health Sciences, Duke University, Durham, NC, United States
- Duke-Margolis Center for Health Policy, Duke University, Durham, NC, United States
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Sperber NR, Shapiro A, Boucher NA, Decosimo KP, Shepherd-Banigan M, Whitfield C, Hastings SN, Van Houtven CH. Developing a person-centered, population based measure of "home time": Perspectives of older patients and unpaid caregivers. HEALTHCARE (AMSTERDAM, NETHERLANDS) 2021; 9:100591. [PMID: 34688200 PMCID: PMC10442891 DOI: 10.1016/j.hjdsi.2021.100591] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/03/2021] [Revised: 09/27/2021] [Accepted: 10/03/2021] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Abstract
Measuring "home time," number of days not in facility-based care, with medical claims is a promising approach to assess person-centered outcomes on a population level. Generally, spending more time at home matches long-term care preferences and improves quality of life. However, existing "home time" measures have not incorporated key stakeholder perspectives. We sought to understand how patients and family caregivers value time spent in diverse facility-based health care settings (Emergency Department, Nursing Home, Post-Acute Care/Skilled Nursing, Inpatient Hospital) to help determine whether various settings have different effects on quality of life and thus merit different weighting in a "home time" measure. We conducted three focus groups among patients and family caregivers within the U.S. Veterans Health Care System. We identified themes pertaining to patients' quality of life in each of the four facility-based care settings. Discussions about both emergency department and post-acute/skilled nursing care reflected loss of personal control, counterbalanced by temporary stay. Inpatient hospital care evoked discussion about greater loss of personal control due to the intensity of care. Nursing homes ultimately signified decline. These findings illuminate differences in quality of life across health-care settings and help justify the need for different weights in a measure of "home time."
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nina R Sperber
- Center of Innovation to Accelerate Discovery and Practice Transformation (ADAPT), Durham VA Health Care System; 508 Fulton Street (152), Durham, NC, 27705, USA; Duke University School of Medicine, Department of Population Health Sciences, Durham, NC, USA.
| | - Abigail Shapiro
- Center of Innovation to Accelerate Discovery and Practice Transformation (ADAPT), Durham VA Health Care System; 508 Fulton Street (152), Durham, NC, 27705, USA
| | - Nathan A Boucher
- Center of Innovation to Accelerate Discovery and Practice Transformation (ADAPT), Durham VA Health Care System; 508 Fulton Street (152), Durham, NC, 27705, USA; Duke University School of Medicine, Department of Population Health Sciences, Durham, NC, USA; Duke University, Sanford School of Public Policy, Durham, NC, USA; Duke University, Margolis Center for Health Policy, Durham, NC, USA; Duke University School of Medicine, Center for the Study of Aging, Durham, NC, USA; Duke University School of Medicine, Department of Medicine, Division of Geriatrics, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Kasey P Decosimo
- Center of Innovation to Accelerate Discovery and Practice Transformation (ADAPT), Durham VA Health Care System; 508 Fulton Street (152), Durham, NC, 27705, USA
| | - Megan Shepherd-Banigan
- Center of Innovation to Accelerate Discovery and Practice Transformation (ADAPT), Durham VA Health Care System; 508 Fulton Street (152), Durham, NC, 27705, USA; Duke University School of Medicine, Department of Population Health Sciences, Durham, NC, USA; Duke University, Margolis Center for Health Policy, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Chelsea Whitfield
- Center of Innovation to Accelerate Discovery and Practice Transformation (ADAPT), Durham VA Health Care System; 508 Fulton Street (152), Durham, NC, 27705, USA
| | - Susan N Hastings
- Center of Innovation to Accelerate Discovery and Practice Transformation (ADAPT), Durham VA Health Care System; 508 Fulton Street (152), Durham, NC, 27705, USA; Duke University School of Medicine, Department of Population Health Sciences, Durham, NC, USA; Duke University School of Medicine, Center for the Study of Aging, Durham, NC, USA; Duke University School of Medicine, Department of Medicine, Division of Geriatrics, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Courtney H Van Houtven
- Center of Innovation to Accelerate Discovery and Practice Transformation (ADAPT), Durham VA Health Care System; 508 Fulton Street (152), Durham, NC, 27705, USA; Duke University School of Medicine, Department of Population Health Sciences, Durham, NC, USA; Duke University, Margolis Center for Health Policy, Durham, NC, USA
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Biderman A, Carmel S, Amar S, Bachner YG. Care for caregivers- a mission for primary care. BMC FAMILY PRACTICE 2021; 22:227. [PMID: 34784890 PMCID: PMC8593856 DOI: 10.1186/s12875-021-01579-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/04/2021] [Accepted: 10/13/2021] [Indexed: 12/02/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The number of elderly people living in the community who are limited in daily activities is increasing worldwide. This generates prolonged care, which usually falls on one family member, the family caregiver. Caregivers are prone to develop psychosocial and physical symptoms. As a result, the World Health Organization (WHO) issued a clear directive to assess and support these caregivers. The main goals of this study were to assess primary care physicians' (PCP) awareness to caregivers' health risks and the extent that they recommended preventive measures to maintain the health of the caregivers. As no suitable instrument existed, a secondary goal was to develop a scale to measure physicians' awareness to caregivers' health and preventive treatment and test it's psychometric properties. METHODS Data were collected from a convenience sample of 201 PCP interviewed with structured questionnaires. RESULTS The participants' mean age was 48.5 ± 11.2 years and 53.5% were female. Only 48.5% were Israel medical graduates and 72% were board-certified family physicians. Nearly 34% had been primary caregivers of family members. Most physicians (83.6%) were aware of the primary caregiver's high-risk for morbidity and mortality, and recommended preventive care. On a multivariate regression, PCP's higher level of risk awareness, their country of medical school and board certification were significant for explaining recommendations for preventive care. However, being a primary caregiver for a sick family member neither contributed significantly to the physicians' awareness to caregiving risks nor to their preventive care. CONCLUSION Although a high percentage of physicians were aware and concerned about caregivers' health, their preventive care activities were relatively passive. PCPs should take a more active and preventive role for maintaining caregivers' health.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aya Biderman
- Department of Family Medicine and Siaal Research Center for Family Medicine and Primary Care, Faculty of Health Sciences, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, POB 653, 84105, Beer-Sheva, Israel.
- Clalit Health Services, Southern district, Beer-Sheva, Israel.
| | - Sara Carmel
- Department of public health, Faculty of Health Sciences, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Beer-Sheva, Israel
- Center for Multidisciplinary Research in Aging, Faculty of Health Sciences, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Beer-Sheva, Israel
| | - Shimon Amar
- Department of Family Medicine and Siaal Research Center for Family Medicine and Primary Care, Faculty of Health Sciences, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, POB 653, 84105, Beer-Sheva, Israel
- Clalit Health Services, Southern district, Beer-Sheva, Israel
| | - Yaacov G Bachner
- Department of public health, Faculty of Health Sciences, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Beer-Sheva, Israel
- Center for Multidisciplinary Research in Aging, Faculty of Health Sciences, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Beer-Sheva, Israel
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Boucher NA, Zullig LL, Shepherd-Banigan M, Decosimo KP, Dadolf J, Choate A, Mahanna EP, Sperber NR, Wang V, Allen KA, Hastings SN, Van Houtven CH. Replicating an effective VA program to train and support family caregivers: a hybrid type III effectiveness-implementation design. BMC Health Serv Res 2021; 21:430. [PMID: 33952263 PMCID: PMC8099701 DOI: 10.1186/s12913-021-06448-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/20/2020] [Accepted: 04/27/2021] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Caring for a growing aging population using existing long-term care resources while simultaneously supporting and educating family caregivers, is a public health challenge. We describe the application of the Replicating Effective Programs (REP) framework, developed by the Centers for Disease Control Prevention and used in public health program implementation, to scale up an evidence-based family caregiver training intervention in the Veterans Affairs (VA) healthcare system. METHODS From 2018 to 2020, clinicians at eight VA medical centers received REP-guided implementation including facilitation, technical assistance, and implementation tools to deliver the training program. The project team used the REP framework to develop activities across four distinct phases - (1) pre-conditions, (2) pre-implementation, (3) implementation, and (4) maintenance and evolution - and systematically tracked implementation facilitators, barriers, and adaptations. RESULTS Within the REP framework, results describe how each medical center adapted implementation approaches to fit local needs. We highlight examples of how sites balanced adaptations and intervention fidelity. CONCLUSIONS The REP framework shows promise for national expansion of the caregiver training intervention, including to non-VA systems of care, because it allows sites to adapt while maintaining intervention fidelity. TRIAL REGISTRATION NCT03474380 . Date registered: March 22, 2018.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- N A Boucher
- Center of Innovation to Accelerate Discovery and Practice Transformation (ADAPT), Durham Veterans Affairs Health Care System, 508 Fulton Street (Mailcode 152), Durham, NC, 27705, USA.
- Department of Population Health Sciences, School of Medicine, Duke University, 215 Morris Street, Durham, NC, 27701, USA.
- Sanford School of Public Policy, Duke University, Durham, NC, 27710, USA.
- Duke-Margolis Center for Health Policy, Duke University, Durham, NC, 27710, USA.
- Center for the Study of Aging and Human Development, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, 27710, USA.
| | - L L Zullig
- Center of Innovation to Accelerate Discovery and Practice Transformation (ADAPT), Durham Veterans Affairs Health Care System, 508 Fulton Street (Mailcode 152), Durham, NC, 27705, USA
- Department of Population Health Sciences, School of Medicine, Duke University, 215 Morris Street, Durham, NC, 27701, USA
| | - M Shepherd-Banigan
- Center of Innovation to Accelerate Discovery and Practice Transformation (ADAPT), Durham Veterans Affairs Health Care System, 508 Fulton Street (Mailcode 152), Durham, NC, 27705, USA
- Department of Population Health Sciences, School of Medicine, Duke University, 215 Morris Street, Durham, NC, 27701, USA
| | - K P Decosimo
- Center of Innovation to Accelerate Discovery and Practice Transformation (ADAPT), Durham Veterans Affairs Health Care System, 508 Fulton Street (Mailcode 152), Durham, NC, 27705, USA
| | - J Dadolf
- Center of Innovation to Accelerate Discovery and Practice Transformation (ADAPT), Durham Veterans Affairs Health Care System, 508 Fulton Street (Mailcode 152), Durham, NC, 27705, USA
| | - A Choate
- Center of Innovation to Accelerate Discovery and Practice Transformation (ADAPT), Durham Veterans Affairs Health Care System, 508 Fulton Street (Mailcode 152), Durham, NC, 27705, USA
| | - E P Mahanna
- Center of Innovation to Accelerate Discovery and Practice Transformation (ADAPT), Durham Veterans Affairs Health Care System, 508 Fulton Street (Mailcode 152), Durham, NC, 27705, USA
| | - N R Sperber
- Center of Innovation to Accelerate Discovery and Practice Transformation (ADAPT), Durham Veterans Affairs Health Care System, 508 Fulton Street (Mailcode 152), Durham, NC, 27705, USA
- Department of Population Health Sciences, School of Medicine, Duke University, 215 Morris Street, Durham, NC, 27701, USA
| | - V Wang
- Center of Innovation to Accelerate Discovery and Practice Transformation (ADAPT), Durham Veterans Affairs Health Care System, 508 Fulton Street (Mailcode 152), Durham, NC, 27705, USA
- Department of Population Health Sciences, School of Medicine, Duke University, 215 Morris Street, Durham, NC, 27701, USA
- Department of Medicine, Duke University Medical Center, 300 Morris Street, Durham, NC, 27701, USA
| | - K A Allen
- Center of Innovation to Accelerate Discovery and Practice Transformation (ADAPT), Durham Veterans Affairs Health Care System, 508 Fulton Street (Mailcode 152), Durham, NC, 27705, USA
- Department of Medicine & Thurston Arthritis Research Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599, USA
| | - S N Hastings
- Center of Innovation to Accelerate Discovery and Practice Transformation (ADAPT), Durham Veterans Affairs Health Care System, 508 Fulton Street (Mailcode 152), Durham, NC, 27705, USA
- Center for the Study of Aging and Human Development, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, 27710, USA
- Department of Medicine, Duke University Medical Center, 300 Morris Street, Durham, NC, 27701, USA
- Geriatrics Research, Education, and Clinical Center, Durham VA Health Care System, Durham, NC, 27705, USA
| | - C H Van Houtven
- Center of Innovation to Accelerate Discovery and Practice Transformation (ADAPT), Durham Veterans Affairs Health Care System, 508 Fulton Street (Mailcode 152), Durham, NC, 27705, USA
- Department of Population Health Sciences, School of Medicine, Duke University, 215 Morris Street, Durham, NC, 27701, USA
- Duke-Margolis Center for Health Policy, Duke University, Durham, NC, 27710, USA
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Burgdorf JG, Stuart EA, Arbaje AI, Wolff JL. Family Caregiver Training Needs and Medicare Home Health Visit Utilization. Med Care 2021; 59:341-347. [PMID: 33480658 PMCID: PMC7954883 DOI: 10.1097/mlr.0000000000001487] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Medicare home health providers are now required to deliver family caregiver training, but potential consequences for service intensity are unknown. OBJECTIVE The objective of this study was to assess how family caregiver training needs affect the number and type of home health visits received. DESIGN Observational study using linked National Health and Aging Trends Study (NHATS), Outcomes and Assessment Information Set (OASIS), and Medicare claims data. Propensity score adjusted, multivariable logistic, and negative binomial regressions model the relationship between caregivers' training needs and number/type of home health visits. SUBJECTS A total of 1217 (weighted n=5,870,905) National Health and Aging Trends Study participants receiving Medicare-funded home health between 2011 and 2016. MEASURES Number and type of home health visits, from Medicare claims. Family caregivers' training needs, from home health clinician reports. RESULTS Receipt of nursing visits was more likely when family caregivers had medication management [adjusted odds ratio (aOR): 3.03; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.06, 8.68] or household chore training needs (aOR: 3.38; 95% CI: 1.33, 8.59). Receipt of therapy visits was more likely when caregivers had self-care training needs (aOR: 1.70; 95% CI: 1.01, 2.86). Receipt of aide visits was more likely when caregivers had household chore (aOR: 3.54; 95% CI: 1.82, 6.92) or self-care training needs (aOR: 2.12; 95% CI: 1.11, 4.05). Medication management training needs were associated with receiving an additional 1.06 (95% CI: 0.11, 2.01) nursing visits, and household chores training needs were associated with an additional 3.24 total (95% CI: 0.21, 6.28) and 1.32 aide visits (95% CI: 0.36, 2.27). CONCLUSION Family caregivers' activity-specific training needs may affect home health visit utilization.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Alicia I Arbaje
- Division of Geriatric Medicine and Gerontology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | | |
Collapse
|
20
|
Burgdorf JG, Arbaje AI, Stuart EA, Wolff JL. Unmet family caregiver training needs associated with acute care utilization during home health care. J Am Geriatr Soc 2021; 69:1887-1895. [PMID: 33772759 DOI: 10.1111/jgs.17138] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/11/2021] [Revised: 02/24/2021] [Accepted: 03/06/2021] [Indexed: 01/08/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES Medicare-certified home health agencies are required to offer family caregiver training, but little is known regarding the potential impact of this training on outcomes during home health care. We estimate the proportion of family caregivers assisting Medicare home health patients who have unmet training needs and examine whether these unmet training needs are associated with older adults' risk of acute care utilization during home health care. DESIGN Observational, nationally representative cohort study. SETTING Linked National Health and Aging Trends Study, Outcome and Assessment Information Set (OASIS), Medicare Provider of Services file, and Medicare claims data from 2011 to 2016. PARTICIPANTS Thousand two hundred seventeen (weighted n = 5,870,905) community-living Medicare beneficiaries who received home health care between 2011 and 2016. MEASUREMENTS Family caregivers' unmet training needs measured from OASIS and Medicare claims; home health patients' acute care utilization (including emergency department use and hospitalization) measured from OASIS. RESULTS Rates of unmet need for training varied by activity, from 8.2% of family caregivers assisting with household chores to 16.0% assisting with self-care tasks. After controlling for older adult and home health provider characteristics, older adults whose family caregivers had an unmet need for training with any caregiving activity were twice as likely to incur acute care utilization during their home health episode (adjusted odds ratio [aOR]: 2.01, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.20-3.38). This relationship held across specific caregiving activities including household chores (aOR: 1.98; 95% CI: 1.13-3.46), medication management (aOR: 2.50; 95% CI: 1.46-4.26), patient supervision (aOR: 2.92; 95% CI: 1.36-6.24), and self-care tasks (aOR: 3.11; 95% CI: 1.62-6.00). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE Unmet training needs among family caregivers are associated with greater likelihood of acute care utilization among Medicare beneficiaries receiving home health care. Identifying and addressing family caregivers' training needs may reduce older adults' risk of acute care utilization during home health care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Julia G Burgdorf
- Department of Health Policy & Management, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Alicia I Arbaje
- Division of Geriatric Medicine and Gerontology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Elizabeth A Stuart
- Department of Biostatistics, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Jennifer L Wolff
- Department of Health Policy & Management, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Burgdorf JG, Fabius CD, Riffin C, Wolff JL. Receipt of Posthospitalization Care Training Among Medicare Beneficiaries' Family Caregivers. JAMA Netw Open 2021; 4:e211806. [PMID: 33724393 PMCID: PMC7967076 DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.1806] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/16/2020] [Accepted: 01/23/2021] [Indexed: 01/25/2023] Open
Abstract
Importance Medicare conditions of participation require hospitals to provide training to family and unpaid caregivers when their support is necessary to enact the postdischarge care plan. However, caregivers often report feeling unprepared for this role. Objective To describe the characteristics of caregivers who assist with posthospitalization care transitions and assess the prevalence of and factors associated with receipt of adequate transitional care training. Design, Setting, and Participants This cross-sectional study analyzed data from the 2017 National Health and Aging Trends Study and its linked National Study of Caregiving, surveys of Medicare beneficiaries and their family and unpaid caregivers. The present study included family caregivers for community-living Medicare beneficiaries 65 years or older with disabilities. Data analysis was performed from June to September 2020. Main Outcomes and Measures Characteristics of family caregivers by whether they assisted during a posthospitalization care transition in the year preceding the survey interview. Unweighted frequencies and weighted percentages, as well as the results of weighted Pearson and Wald tests for differences between groups, are reported. Receipt of the training needed to manage the older adult's posthospitalization care transition (hereafter referred to as adequate transitional care training) as a function of individual caregiver characteristics was modeled using multivariable, weighted logistic regression. Results Of 1905 family caregivers, 618 (58.9%) were 60 years or older, 1288 (63.8%) were female, and 796 (41.7%) assisted with a posthospitalization care transition. Those who assisted with a posthospitalization care transition were more likely to report experiencing financial (154 [18.3%] vs 123 [10.1%]; P < .001), emotional (344 [41.3%] vs 342 [31.1%]; P < .001), and physical (200 [22.2%] vs 170 [14.6%]; P = .001) difficulty associated with caregiving. Among caregivers who assisted during a posthospitalization care transition, 490 (59.1%) reported receiving adequate transitional care training. Caregivers were less likely to report receiving adequate training if they assisted an older adult who was female (316 [62.3%] vs 227 [73.2%]; P = .02), Black (163 [14.0%] vs 121 [19.8%]; P = .02), or enrolled in Medicaid (127 [21.2%] vs 90 [31.9%]; P = .01). After adjusting for older adult characteristics, caregivers were half as likely to report receiving adequate training if they were Black (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 0.52; 95% CI, 0.31-0.89) or experienced financial difficulty (aOR, 0.50; 95% CI, 0.31-0.81). Caregivers were more than twice as likely to report receiving adequate training if they were female (aOR, 2.44; 95% CI, 1.65-3.61) or spoke with the older adult's clinician about his or her care in the past year sometimes or often vs never (aOR, 1.93; 95% CI, 1.19-3.12). Conclusions and Relevance In this cross-sectional study, caregivers were less likely to receive adequate transitional care training if they were Black; experienced financial difficulty; or cared for a Black, female, or Medicaid-enrolled older adult. These findings suggest that changes to the discharge process, such as using standardized caregiver assessments, may be necessary to ensure equitable support of family caregivers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Julia G. Burgdorf
- Department of Health Policy & Management, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Chanee D. Fabius
- Department of Health Policy & Management, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Catherine Riffin
- Department of Internal Medicine, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York
| | - Jennifer L. Wolff
- Department of Health Policy & Management, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Coe NB, Konetzka RT, Berkowitz M, Blecker E, Van Houtven CH. The Effects of Home Care Provider Mix on the Care Recipient: An International, Systematic Review of Articles from 2000 to 2020. Annu Rev Public Health 2021; 42:483-503. [PMID: 33395544 DOI: 10.1146/annurev-publhealth-090419-102354] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
Abstract
In this systematic review, we examine the literature from 2000 to 2020 to ascertain whether we can make strong conclusions about the relative benefit of adding informal care or formal care providers to the care mix among individuals receiving care in the home, specifically focusing on care recipient outcomes. We evaluate how informal care and formal care affect (or are associated with) health care use of care recipients, health care costs of care recipients, and health outcomes of care recipients. The literature to date suggests that informal care, either alone or in concert with formal care, delivers improvements in the health and well-being of older adults receiving care. The conclusions one can draw about the effects of formal care are less clear.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Norma B Coe
- Department of Medical Ethics and Health Policy, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104-4884, USA; , ,
| | - R Tamara Konetzka
- Department of Public Health Sciences, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois 60637-1447, USA;
| | - Melissa Berkowitz
- Department of Medical Ethics and Health Policy, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104-4884, USA; , ,
| | - Emily Blecker
- Department of Medical Ethics and Health Policy, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104-4884, USA; , ,
| | - Courtney H Van Houtven
- Department of Population Health Sciences, Duke-Margolis Center for Health Policy, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina 27708, USA; .,Center of Innovation to Accelerate Discovery and Practice Transformation (ADAPT), Durham Veterans Affairs Health Care System, Durham, North Carolina 27705, USA
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Van Houtven CH, Smith VA, Sperber NR, Coffman CJ, Hastings SN. Advancing the science of population-based measures of home-time. HEALTHCARE-THE JOURNAL OF DELIVERY SCIENCE AND INNOVATION 2020; 8:100463. [PMID: 32992111 DOI: 10.1016/j.hjdsi.2020.100463] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/02/2020] [Revised: 07/22/2020] [Accepted: 08/06/2020] [Indexed: 10/23/2022]
Abstract
The "home time" measure is gaining appeal in evaluating outcomes for multiple patient populations including post-surgery or intervention and the last 6 months of life. Advancing the science of home time measures will require obtaining the perspectives of patients and caregivers to arrive at a population-based measure of quality of life. Additionally, measure development requires considerations of what care settings denote time away from home, observation period, and thresholds that are clinically significant. We explore examples and challenges from current research and our own experience. Being able to advance such measures could also inform payment models and policy design.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Courtney Harold Van Houtven
- Durham VA Health Care System, Durham, NC; 508 Fulton Street (152), Durham, NC, 27705, USA; Duke University School of Medicine, Department of Population Health Sciences, Durham, NC, USA; Duke University, Margolis Center for Health Policy, Durham, NC, USA.
| | - Valerie A Smith
- Durham VA Health Care System, Durham, NC; 508 Fulton Street (152), Durham, NC, 27705, USA; Duke University School of Medicine, Department of Population Health Sciences, Durham, NC, USA; Duke University School of Medicine, Department of Medicine, Division of General Internal Medicine, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Nina R Sperber
- Durham VA Health Care System, Durham, NC; 508 Fulton Street (152), Durham, NC, 27705, USA; Duke University School of Medicine, Department of Population Health Sciences, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Cynthia J Coffman
- Durham VA Health Care System, Durham, NC; 508 Fulton Street (152), Durham, NC, 27705, USA; Duke University School of Medicine, Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Susan Nicole Hastings
- Durham VA Health Care System, Durham, NC; 508 Fulton Street (152), Durham, NC, 27705, USA; Duke University School of Medicine, Department of Population Health Sciences, Durham, NC, USA; Duke University School of Medicine, Department of Medicine, Division of Geriatrics, Durham, NC, USA; Duke University School of Medicine, Center for the Study of Aging, Durham, NC, USA
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Burgdorf JG, Arbaje AI, Wolff JL. Training Needs Among Family Caregivers Assisting During Home Health, as Identified by Home Health Clinicians. J Am Med Dir Assoc 2020; 21:1914-1919. [PMID: 32641271 DOI: 10.1016/j.jamda.2020.05.032] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/06/2020] [Revised: 05/14/2020] [Accepted: 05/15/2020] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To estimate the proportion of family caregivers assisting older adults during Medicare home health who have an identified need for activity-specific training and identify characteristics associated with caregiver training needs. DESIGN Nationally representative retrospective cohort study. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS 1758 (weighted n = 8,477,990) Medicare beneficiaries who participated in the National Health and Aging Trends Study (NHATS) and received Medicare-funded home health care between 2011 and 2016. MEASURES Older adult and caregiving network characteristics before home health (sociodemographic factors, caregiver assistance, older adult health and function) were drawn from NHATS; characteristics during home health (family caregiver training needs, older adult health and function) were drawn from home health patient assessments. Weighted proportions of family caregivers with an identified need for activity-specific training were estimated. Weighted, multivariable logistic regressions modeled associations between older adult/caregiving network characteristics and family caregivers' identified activity-specific training needs during home health. RESULTS More than 1 in 3 (35.7%) family caregivers assisting older adults during Medicare home health had an identified training need with at least 1 caregiving activity. Rates of need for training varied widely, from 8.6% among caregivers helping with advocacy to 48.2% among caregivers helping with medical procedures. In weighted analyses that adjusted for older adults' health and function, family caregivers were less likely to have identified training needs when assisting older adults with ongoing disability or who received caregiver assistance before home health admission. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS Findings highlight the pervasiveness of family caregivers' training needs, particularly with medically oriented activities, and indicate that escalations in older adults' care needs are linked to caregiver training needs. Therefore, transitions of care may present critical opportunities to connect family caregivers with training resources.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Julia G Burgdorf
- Department of Health Policy and Management, Johns Hopkins University Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA.
| | - Alicia I Arbaje
- Department of Health Policy and Management, Johns Hopkins University Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA; Division of Geriatric Medicine and Gerontology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA; Armstrong Institute Center for Health Care Human Factors, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Jennifer L Wolff
- Department of Health Policy and Management, Johns Hopkins University Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Check DK, Kaufman BG, Kamal AH, Casarett DJ. Top Ten Tips Palliative Care Clinicians Should Know About Integrating Population Health Principles into Practice. J Palliat Med 2020; 23:568-572. [DOI: 10.1089/jpm.2020.0100] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Devon K. Check
- Department of Population Health Sciences, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina
- Duke Cancer Institute, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina
| | | | - Arif H. Kamal
- Department of Medicine, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina
- Duke Cancer Institute, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina
| | - David J. Casarett
- Department of Medicine, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina
- Duke Cancer Institute, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Shepherd-Banigan M, Smith VA, Lindquist JH, Cary MP, Miller KEM, Chapman JG, Van Houtven CH. Identifying treatment effects of an informal caregiver education intervention to increase days in the community and decrease caregiver distress: a machine-learning secondary analysis of subgroup effects in the HI-FIVES randomized clinical trial. Trials 2020; 21:189. [PMID: 32059687 PMCID: PMC7023677 DOI: 10.1186/s13063-020-4113-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/18/2019] [Accepted: 01/28/2020] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Informal caregivers report substantial burden and depressive symptoms which predict higher rates of patient institutionalization. While caregiver education interventions may reduce caregiver distress and decrease the use of long-term institutional care, evidence is mixed. Inconsistent findings across studies may be the result of reporting average treatment effects which do not account for how effects differ by participant characteristics. We apply a machine-learning approach to randomized clinical trial (RCT) data of the Helping Invested Family Members Improve Veteran's Experiences Study (HI-FIVES) intervention to explore how intervention effects vary by caregiver and patient characteristics. METHODS We used model-based recursive partitioning models. Caregivers of community-residing older adult US veterans with functional or cognitive impairment at a single VA Medical Center site were randomized to receive HI-FIVES (n = 118) vs. usual care (n = 123). The outcomes included cumulative days not in the community and caregiver depressive symptoms assessed at 12 months post intervention. Potential moderating characteristics were: veteran age, caregiver age, caregiver ethnicity and race, relationship satisfaction, caregiver burden, perceived financial strain, caregiver depressive symptoms, and patient risk score. RESULTS The effect of HI-FIVES on days not at home was moderated by caregiver burden (p < 0.001); treatment effects were higher for caregivers with a Zarit Burden Scale score ≤ 28. Caregivers with lower baseline Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (CESD-10) scores (≤ 8) had slightly lower CESD-10 scores at follow-up (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS Family caregiver education interventions may be less beneficial for highly burdened and distressed caregivers; these caregivers may require a more tailored approach that involves assessing caregiver needs and developing personalized approaches. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov, ID:NCT01777490. Registered on 28 January 2013.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Megan Shepherd-Banigan
- Durham VA HSR&D ADAPT, Durham VA Health Care System, 508 Fulton Street, Durham, NC, 27705, USA.
- Department of Population Health Sciences, Duke School of Medicine, 215 Morris Street, Durham, NC, 27701, USA.
| | - Valerie A Smith
- Durham VA HSR&D ADAPT, Durham VA Health Care System, 508 Fulton Street, Durham, NC, 27705, USA
- Department of Population Health Sciences, Duke School of Medicine, 215 Morris Street, Durham, NC, 27701, USA
- Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine, 300 Morris Street, Durham, NC, 27701, USA
| | - Jennifer H Lindquist
- Durham VA HSR&D ADAPT, Durham VA Health Care System, 508 Fulton Street, Durham, NC, 27705, USA
| | - Michael Paul Cary
- School of Nursing, Duke University, 307 Trent Drive, Durham, NC, 27710, USA
| | - Katherine E M Miller
- Durham VA HSR&D ADAPT, Durham VA Health Care System, 508 Fulton Street, Durham, NC, 27705, USA
- Department of Health Policy and Management, University of North Carolina-Chapel Hill, 135 Dauer Drive, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599-7400, USA
| | - Jennifer G Chapman
- Durham VA HSR&D ADAPT, Durham VA Health Care System, 508 Fulton Street, Durham, NC, 27705, USA
| | - Courtney H Van Houtven
- Durham VA HSR&D ADAPT, Durham VA Health Care System, 508 Fulton Street, Durham, NC, 27705, USA
- Department of Population Health Sciences, Duke School of Medicine, 215 Morris Street, Durham, NC, 27701, USA
- Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine, 300 Morris Street, Durham, NC, 27701, USA
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Shepherd-Banigan M, Kaufman BG, Decosimo K, Dadolf J, Boucher NA, Mahanna EP, Bruening R, Sullivan C, Wang V, Hastings SN, Allen KD, Sperber N, Coffman CJ, Van Houtven CH. Adaptation and Implementation of a Family Caregiver Skills Training Program: From Single Site RCT to Multisite Pragmatic Intervention. J Nurs Scholarsh 2019; 52:23-33. [PMID: 31497935 DOI: 10.1111/jnu.12511] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 06/17/2019] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE We describe an approach to rapidly adapt and implement an education and skills improvement intervention to address the needs of family caregivers of functionally impaired veterans-Helping Invested Families Improve Veterans' Experience Study (HI-FIVES). DESIGN Prior to implementation in eight sites, a multidisciplinary study team made systematic adaptations to the curriculum content and delivery process using input from the original randomized controlled trial (RCT); a stakeholder advisory board comprised of national experts in caregiver education, nursing, and implementation; and a veteran/caregiver engagement panel. To address site-specific implementation barriers in diverse settings, we applied the Replicating Effective Programs implementation framework. FINDINGS Adaptations to HI-FIVES content and delivery included identifying core/noncore curriculum components, reducing instruction time, and simplifying caregiver recruitment for clinical settings. To enhance curriculum flexibility and potential uptake, site personnel were able to choose which staff would deliver the intervention and whether to offer class sessions in person or remotely. Curriculum materials were standardized and packaged to reduce the time required for implementation and to promote fidelity to the intervention. CONCLUSIONS The emphasis on flexible intervention delivery and standardized materials has been identified as strengths of the adaptation process. Two key challenges have been identifying feasible impact measures and reaching eligible caregivers for intervention recruitment. CLINICAL RELEVANCE This systematic implementation process can be used to rapidly adapt an intervention to diverse clinical sites and contexts. Nursing professionals play a significant role in educating and supporting caregivers and care recipients and can take a leading role to implement interventions that address skills and unmet needs for caregivers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Megan Shepherd-Banigan
- Research Health Scientist, Durham VA Health Care System, and Assistant Professor, Department of Population Health Sciences, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Brystana G Kaufman
- Postdoctoral Research Fellow, Margolis Center for Health Policy, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Kasey Decosimo
- Research Health Scientist Specialist, Durham VA Health Care System, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Joshua Dadolf
- Clinical Social Worker/Intervention Specialist, Durham VA Health Care System, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Nathan A Boucher
- Research Health Scientist, Durham VA Health Care System, and Assistant Research Professor, Sanford School of Public Policy, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.,Core Faculty, Margolis Center for Health Policy, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Elizabeth P Mahanna
- Research Health Scientist Specialist, Durham VA Health Care System, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Rebecca Bruening
- Research Health Scientist Specialist, Durham VA Health Care System, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Caitlin Sullivan
- Research Health Scientist Specialist, Durham VA Health Care System, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Virginia Wang
- Research Health Scientist, Durham VA Health Care System, and Associate Professor, Department of Population Health Sciences, Duke University, and Associate Professor, Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
| | - S Nicole Hastings
- Research Health Scientist, Durham VA Health Care System, and Associate Professor, Division of Geriatrics, Department of Medicine, Duke University, and Associate Professor, Department of Population Health Sciences, Duke University, and Senior Fellow, Center for the Study of Aging, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Kelli D Allen
- Research Health Scientist, Durham VA Health Care System, Durham, NC, and Professor, Division of Rheumatology, Allergy, and Immunology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Nina Sperber
- Research Health Scientist, Durham VA Health Care System, and Assistant Professor, Department of Population Health Sciences, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Cynthia J Coffman
- Research Health Scientist, Durham VA Health Care System, and Associate Professor, Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Courtney H Van Houtven
- Core Faculty, Margolis Center for Health Policy, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.,Research Health Scientist, Durham VA Health Care System, and Professor, Department of Population Health Sciences, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Burgdorf J, Mulcahy J, Amjad H, Kasper JD, Covinsky K, Wolff JL. Family Caregiver Factors Associated With Emergency Department Utilization Among Community-Living Older Adults With Disabilities. J Prim Care Community Health 2019; 10:2150132719875636. [PMID: 31550971 PMCID: PMC6764037 DOI: 10.1177/2150132719875636] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: Older adults with disability are frequent users of the emergency department (ED) and often rely on family caregiver support. We identify whether and which caregiver characteristics are associated with older adults' ED use. Methods: We use Cox proportional hazards regression to model the likelihood of all-cause ED use (defined as 1 or more visits within 12 months of survey) as a function of caregiver characteristics after adjusting for older adult sociodemographic and health characteristics. We draw from linked older adult and caregiver surveys and administrative claims, creating a sample of 2521 community-living older adults with mobility/self-care disability receiving care from a family or unpaid caregiver. Results: About half (52.5%) of older adults receiving mobility or self-care help incurred 1 or more ED visits within 12 months of interview. Adjusting for year of data collection, sociodemographic characteristics, and health status, these older adults were at greater risk of all-cause ED use if their primary caregiver provided greater than 40 hours of care per week (hazard ratio [HR] 1.22, 95% CI 1.04-1.43; P = .02), helped with health care tasks (HR 1.26; 95% CI 1.08-1.46; P < .01), or experienced physical strain (HR 1.18; 95% CI 1.03-1.36; P = .02). Conclusion: Caregiver strain, helping with health care tasks, and greater hours of help per week are associated with heightened risk of ED use among older adults receiving mobility or self-care help. Study findings suggest the potential benefit of caregiver assessment and support.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Julia Burgdorf
- Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public
Health, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - John Mulcahy
- Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public
Health, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Halima Amjad
- Johns Hopkins University School of
Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Judith D. Kasper
- Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public
Health, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Kenneth Covinsky
- University of California San Francisco
School of Medicine, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|