1
|
Leslie WD, Lix LM, Binkley N. Treatment reclassification in Canada from the Osteoporosis Canada 2023 clinical practice guidelines: the Manitoba BMD Registry. Arch Osteoporos 2024; 19:86. [PMID: 39244521 DOI: 10.1007/s11657-024-01445-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/20/2024] [Accepted: 08/29/2024] [Indexed: 09/09/2024]
Abstract
Osteoporosis Canada 2023 clinical practice guidelines increase the number of individuals recommended or suggested for anti-osteoporosis pharmacotherapy by refining treatment guidance for those who fell within the 2010 guidelines' moderate-risk category. PURPOSE In 2023, Osteoporosis Canada updated its 2010 clinical practice guidelines based upon consideration of fracture history, 10-year major osteoporotic fracture (MOF) risk, and BMD T-score in conjunction with age. The 2023 guidelines eliminated risk categories, including the moderate-risk group that did not provide clear treatment guidance. The current study was performed to appreciate the implications of the shift from 2010 risk categories to 2023 treatment guidance. METHODS The study population consisted of 79,654 individuals age ≥ 50 years undergoing baseline DXA testing from January 1996 to March 2018. Each individual was assigned to mutually exclusive categories based on 2010 and 2023 guideline recommendations. Treatment qualification, 10-year predicted and 10-year observed MOF risk were compared. RESULTS Treatment reclassification under the 2023 guidelines only affected 33.8% of individuals in the 2010 moderate-risk group, with 13.0% assigned to no treatment, 14.4% to suggest treatment, and 6.4% to recommend treatment. During the mean follow-up of 7.2 years, 6364 (8.0%) individuals experienced one or more incidents of MOF. The observed 10-year cumulative incidence of MOF in the study population was 10.5% versus the predicted 10.7% (observed to predicted mean calibration ratio 0.98, 95% CI 0.96-1.00). Individuals reclassified from 2010 moderate risk to 2023 recommend treatment were at greater MOF risk than those in the 2010 moderate-risk group assigned to 2023 suggest treatment or no treatment, but at lower risk than those in the 2010 high-risk group. CONCLUSIONS Osteoporosis Canada 2023 clinical practice guidelines affect individuals within the 2010 moderate-risk category, increasing the number for whom anti-osteoporosis pharmacotherapy is recommended or suggested. Increased treatment could reduce the population burden of osteoporotic fractures, though moderate-risk individuals now qualifying for treatment have a lower predicted and observed fracture risk than high-risk individuals recommended for treatment under the 2010 guidelines.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- William D Leslie
- Max Rady College of Medicine, University of Manitoba, C5121-409 Tache Avenue, Winnipeg, MB, R2H 2A6, Canada.
| | - Lisa M Lix
- Max Rady College of Medicine, University of Manitoba, C5121-409 Tache Avenue, Winnipeg, MB, R2H 2A6, Canada
| | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Leslie WD, Binkley N, Schousboe JT, Silva BC, Hans D. Effect of abdominal tissue thickness on trabecular bone score and fracture risk in adults with diabetes: the Manitoba BMD registry. J Bone Miner Res 2024; 39:877-884. [PMID: 38738768 DOI: 10.1093/jbmr/zjae073] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/18/2023] [Revised: 04/16/2024] [Accepted: 05/08/2024] [Indexed: 05/14/2024]
Abstract
Individuals with type 2 diabetes have lower trabecular bone score (TBS) and increased fracture risk despite higher bone mineral density. However, measures of trabecular microarchitecture from high-resolution peripheral computed tomography are not lower in type 2 diabetes. We hypothesized that confounding effects of abdominal tissue thickness may explain this discrepancy, since central obesity is a risk factor for diabetes and also artifactually lowers TBS. This hypothesis was tested in individuals aged 40 years and older from a large DXA registry, stratified by sex and diabetes status. When DXA-measured abdominal tissue thickness was not included as a covariate, men without diabetes had lower TBS than women without diabetes (mean difference -0.074, P < .001). TBS was lower in women with versus without diabetes (mean difference -0.037, P < .001), and men with versus without diabetes (mean difference -0.007, P = .042). When adjusted for tissue thickness these findings reversed, TBS became greater in men versus women without diabetes (mean difference +0.053, P < .001), in women with versus without diabetes (mean difference +0.008, P < .001), and in men with versus without diabetes (mean difference +0.014, P < .001). During mean 8.7 years observation, incident major osteoporotic fractures were seen in 7048 (9.6%). Adjusted for multiple covariates except tissue thickness, TBS predicted fracture in all subgroups with no significant diabetes interaction. When further adjusted for tissue thickness, HR per SD lower TBS remained significant and even increased slightly. In conclusion, TBS predicts fractures independent of other clinical risk factors in both women and men, with and without diabetes. Excess abdominal tissue thickness in men and individuals with type 2 diabetes may artifactually lower TBS using the current algorithm, which reverses after accounting for tissue thickness. This supports ongoing efforts to update the TBS algorithm to directly account for the effects of abdominal tissue thickness for improved fracture risk prediction.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- William D Leslie
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB R2H 2A6, Canada
| | - Neil Binkley
- Osteoporosis Clinical Research Program, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI 53705 United States
| | - John T Schousboe
- HealthPartners Institute and Division of Health Policy and Management, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis MN 55455 United States
| | - Barbara C Silva
- Medical School, Centro Universitario de Belo Horizonte (UniBH), Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil
| | - Didier Hans
- Bone and Joint Department, Lausanne University Hospital, Lausanne, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Shah VN, Leslie WD, Lautatzis ME, Liu K, Prior HJ, Wicklow B. Maternal diabetes and fracture risk in offspring: a population-based analysis. J Bone Miner Res 2024; 39:683-687. [PMID: 38547399 DOI: 10.1093/jbmr/zjae052] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/14/2023] [Revised: 01/20/2024] [Accepted: 03/25/2024] [Indexed: 04/04/2024]
Abstract
Factors affecting intrauterine environment exerts influence on skeletal health and fracture risk in later life. Diabetes during pregnancy is known to influence birth weight and is associated with fetal overgrowth. However, the effects of maternal diabetes on fracture risk in offspring is unknown. This study was aimed to evaluate the association between maternal diabetes and fracture risk in offspring. Using population-based administrative health data for Manitoba, Canada, we identified deliveries complicated by gestational diabetes and type 2 diabetes between April 1, 1980, and March 31, 2020. The cohort was followed for a median of 15.8 yr. The primary outcome was any incident fracture in offspring. Secondary outcomes were long bone upper extremity fracture, long bone lower extremity fracture, vertebral fracture, and any non-trauma fractures. Cox proportional hazard regression models were used to estimate fracture risk in offspring by maternal diabetes status adjusted for relevant covariates. Of the 585 176 deliveries, 26 397 offspring were born to women with diabetes (3.0% gestational diabetes and 1.5% type 2 diabetes), and 558 779 were born to women without diabetes. The adjusted risk for any fracture was 7% (hazard ratio, 1.07; 95% CI, 2.7-11.5%) higher in the offspring of mothers with diabetes than offspring of mothers without diabetes. Types of fractures were similar between the 2 groups with a predominance of long bone upper extremity fractures. In conclusion, maternal diabetes was associated with a modest increase in fracture risk in offspring. Longitudinal prospective studies are needed to understand intrauterine and postnatal factors that may influence fracture risk in the offspring of mothers with diabetes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Viral N Shah
- Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN 46202, United States
| | - William D Leslie
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, R2H 2A6, Canada
| | - Maria-Elena Lautatzis
- Department of Pediatrics and Child Health, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, MB R3A 1S1, Canada
| | - Kun Liu
- Manitoba Centre for Health Policy, Manitoba, R3E 3P5, Canada
| | - Heather J Prior
- Manitoba Centre for Health Policy, Manitoba, R3E 3P5, Canada
| | - Brandy Wicklow
- Department of Pediatrics and Child Health, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, MB R3A 1S1, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Zarzour F, Leslie WD. Fracture Risk Associated with Different Numbers and Combinations of Lumbar Vertebrae: The Manitoba BMD Registry. J Clin Densitom 2024; 27:101502. [PMID: 38723458 DOI: 10.1016/j.jocd.2024.101502] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/14/2024] [Revised: 04/27/2024] [Accepted: 04/30/2024] [Indexed: 08/02/2024]
Abstract
Bone mineral density (BMD) is widely used for assessment of fracture risk. For the lumbar spine, BMD is typically measured from L1-L4 as it provides the largest area for assessment with the best measurement precision. Structural artifact often confounds spine BMD in clinical practice, and the International Society for Clinical Densitometry (ISCD) recommends removing vertebrae with artifact when reporting spine BMD. In its most recent position statements, the ISCD recommended against the use of a single vertebra when reporting spine BMD but stated that further studies should be done. The current analysis was performed to compare the performance of BMD from different numbers and combination of vertebral levels on fracture prediction in a large clinical registry of DXA tests for the Province of Manitoba, Canada. The study population comprised 39,727 individuals aged 40 years and older (mean age 62.7 years, 91.0 % female) with baseline DXA after excluding those with evidence of structural artifact. Mean follow-up for ascertaining fracture outcomes was 8.7 years. Area under the curve (AUC) for incident fracture risk stratification was statistically significant regardless of the BMD measurement site or fracture outcome. AUC differences with the various numbers and combinations of vertebral levels including a single vertebral body were small (less than or equal to 0.01). More substantial AUC differences were seen for femoral neck and total hip BMD versus L1-L4 BMD, approaching 0.1 for hip fracture stratification. In summary, we found that using combinations of fewer than 4 vertebrae including individual lumbar vertebrae predicted incident fractures. Importantly, differences between these different combinations were small when compared with L1-L4. Spine BMD was a better predictor of incident spine fracture compared to the hip, whereas the hip was better for hip fracture and overall fracture prediction.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fatima Zarzour
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
| | - William D Leslie
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Larose G, Al-Azazi S, Lix LM, Bohm E, Leslie WD. Introduction of an order set after hip fracture improves osteoporosis medication initiation and persistence: a population-based before-after analysis. Osteoporos Int 2024:10.1007/s00198-024-07131-3. [PMID: 38836945 DOI: 10.1007/s00198-024-07131-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/23/2024] [Accepted: 05/14/2024] [Indexed: 06/06/2024]
Abstract
We found that a standardized order set after hip fracture increased initiation of anti-osteoporosis medication and increased persistence at 1 year, but did not reduce secondary fractures. BACKGROUND A treatment gap exists after osteoporosis-related fractures. Introducing standardized care can improve treatment. We evaluated the impact of a hip fracture order set (OS) on anti-osteoporosis medication (AOM) initiation, persistence, and secondary fracture prevention. METHODS In 2015, one hospital in Manitoba, Canada, introduced a hip fracture OS including recommendations for the initiation of AOM (OS group). A control group was identified from the other hospitals in the same region. A retrospective cohort study was conducted using linked administrative health data. All individuals 50 + years with surgical treatment for low-energy hip fracture between 2010 and 2019 were included and followed for AOM initiation, medication persistence at 1 year, and secondary fractures. Between-group differences for each year were assessed using chi-square tests. Logistic regression models tested the impact of socio-demographic and clinical factors on initiation, persistence of AOM. Cox regression tested the risk of secondary fracture. RESULTS No baseline differences between OS group (813 patients) and control group (2150 patients) were observed in demographics, socioeconomic factors, or comorbidities. An increase in post-fracture AOM initiation was seen with OS introduction (OS group year before 16.7% versus year after 48.6%, p < 0.001). No change was seen in the control group. Persistence on AOM also increased (OS group year before 17.7% versus year after 28.4%, p < 0.001). No difference in secondary fractures was observed (OS group 19.8% versus control group 18.8%, p = 0.38). CONCLUSION Introduction of a hip fracture OS significantly increased AOM initiation and persistence at 1-year post-fracture. There was no significant difference in secondary fractures.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Lisa M Lix
- University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, Canada
| | - Eric Bohm
- University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, Canada
| | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Ye C, Schousboe JT, Morin SN, Lix LM, McCloskey EV, Johansson H, Harvey NC, Kanis JA, Leslie WD. FRAX predicts cardiovascular risk in women undergoing osteoporosis screening: the Manitoba bone mineral density registry. J Bone Miner Res 2024; 39:30-38. [PMID: 38630880 PMCID: PMC11207923 DOI: 10.1093/jbmr/zjad010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/18/2023] [Revised: 10/31/2023] [Accepted: 11/14/2023] [Indexed: 04/19/2024]
Abstract
Osteoporosis and cardiovascular disease (CVD) are highly prevalent in older women, with increasing evidence for shared risk factors and pathogenesis. Although FRAX was developed for the assessment of fracture risk, we hypothesized that it might also provide information on CVD risk. To test the ability of the FRAX tool and FRAX-defined risk factors to predict incident CVD in women undergoing osteoporosis screening with DXA, we performed a retrospective prognostic cohort study which included women aged 50 yr or older with a baseline DXA scan in the Manitoba Bone Mineral Density Registry between March 31, 1999 and March 31, 2018. FRAX scores for major osteoporotic fracture (MOF) were calculated on all participants. Incident MOF and major adverse CV events (MACE; hospitalized acute myocardial infarction [AMI], hospitalized non-hemorrhagic cerebrovascular disease [CVA], or all-cause death) were ascertained from linkage to population-based healthcare data. The study population comprised 59 696 women (mean age 65.7 ± 9.4 yr). Over mean 8.7 yr of observation, 6021 (10.1%) had MOF, 12 277 women (20.6%) had MACE, 2274 (3.8%) had AMI, 2061 (3.5%) had CVA, and 10 253 (17.2%) died. MACE rates per 1000 person-years by FRAX risk categories low (10-yr predicted MOF <10%), moderate (10%-19.9%) and high (≥20%) were 13.5, 34.0, and 64.6, respectively. Although weaker than the association with incident MOF, increasing FRAX quintile was associated with increasing risk for MACE (all P-trend <.001), even after excluding prior CVD and adjusting for age. HR for MACE per SD increase in FRAX was 1.99 (95%CI, 1.96-2.02). All FRAX-defined risk factors (except parental hip fracture and lower BMI) were independently associated with higher non-death CV events. Although FRAX is intended for fracture risk prediction, it has predictive value for cardiovascular risk.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carrie Ye
- Division of Rheumatology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB T6G 2G3, Canada
| | - John T Schousboe
- Park Nicollet Clinic and HealthPartners Institute, Bloomington, MN 55425, United States
- Division of Health Policy and Management, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455, United States
| | - Suzanne N Morin
- Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, McGill University, Montreal, QC, H3G 2M1, Canada
| | - Lisa M Lix
- Department of Community Health Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, R3E 0T6, Canada
| | - Eugene V McCloskey
- MRC Versus Arthritis Centre for Integrated Research in Musculoskeletal Ageing, Mellanby Centre for Musculoskeletal Research,Division of Clinical Medicine, School of Medicine and Population Health, University of Sheffield. Sheffield, SYK, S10 2TN, United Kingdom
- Department of Oncology & Metabolism, MRC Versus Arthritis Centre for Integrated Research in Musculoskeletal Ageing, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, SYK, S10 2TN, United Kingdom
| | - Helena Johansson
- MRC Versus Arthritis Centre for Integrated Research in Musculoskeletal Ageing, Mellanby Centre for Musculoskeletal Research,Division of Clinical Medicine, School of Medicine and Population Health, University of Sheffield. Sheffield, SYK, S10 2TN, United Kingdom
- Faculty of Health Sciences, Mary McKillop Institute for Health Research, Australian Catholic University, Melbourne, VIC 3000, Australia
| | - Nicholas C Harvey
- MRC Lifecourse Epidemiology Centre, University of Southampton, Southampton, Hampshire, SO16 6YD, United Kingdom
- NIHR Southampton Biomedical Research Centre, University of Southampton and University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, Hampshire, SO16 6YD, United Kingdom
| | - John A Kanis
- MRC Versus Arthritis Centre for Integrated Research in Musculoskeletal Ageing, Mellanby Centre for Musculoskeletal Research,Division of Clinical Medicine, School of Medicine and Population Health, University of Sheffield. Sheffield, SYK, S10 2TN, United Kingdom
- Faculty of Health Sciences, Mary McKillop Institute for Health Research, Australian Catholic University, Melbourne, VIC 3000, Australia
| | - William D Leslie
- Department of Oncology & Metabolism, MRC Versus Arthritis Centre for Integrated Research in Musculoskeletal Ageing, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, SYK, S10 2TN, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Leslie WD, Binkley N, Schousboe JT, McCloskey EV, Johansson H, Harvey NC, Kanis JA. Effect of BMI-Discordant Abdominal Tissue Thickness on Fracture Probability: A Registry-Based Study. J Bone Miner Res 2023; 38:1749-1756. [PMID: 37776220 DOI: 10.1002/jbmr.4919] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/04/2023] [Revised: 09/19/2023] [Accepted: 09/25/2023] [Indexed: 10/02/2023]
Abstract
FRAX, which is used to assess fracture probability, considers body mass index (BMI), but BMI may not reflect individual variation in body composition and distribution. We examined the effect of BMI-discordant abdominal thickness on FRAX-derived fracture probability for major osteoporotic fracture (MOF) and hip fracture. We studied 73,105 individuals, mean age 64.2 years. During mean 8.7 years, 7048 (9.6%) individuals sustained incident MOF, including 2155 (3.0%) hip fractures. We defined abdominal thickness index (ATI) as the difference between abdominal thickness measured by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) and thickness predicted by BMI using sex-stratified regression. ATI was categorized from lower (<-2 cm, -2 to -1 cm) to higher (1-2 cm, >+2 cm) with referent around zero (-1 to +1 cm). Adjusted for FRAX probability, increasing ATI was associated with incident MOF and hip fracture (p < 0.001). For the highest ATI category, MOF risk was increased (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.23, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.12-1.35) independent of FRAX probability. Similar findings were noted for hip fracture probability (HR = 1.28, 95% CI 1.09-1.51). There was significant age-interaction with much larger effects before age 65 years (HR = 1.44, 95% CI 1.23-1.69 for MOF; 2.29, 95% CI 1.65-3.18 for hip fracture). In contrast, for the subset of individuals with diabetes, there was also increased risk for those in the lowest ATI category (HR = 1.73, 95% CI 1.12-2.65 for MOF; 2.81, 95% CI 1.59-4.97 for hip fracture). Calibration plots across ATI categories demonstrated deviation from the line of identity in women (calibration slope 2.26 for MOF, 2.83 for hip fracture). An effect of ATI was not found in men, but this was inconclusive as the sex-interaction terms did not show significant effect modification. In conclusion, these data support the need to investigate increased abdominal thickness beyond that predicted by BMI and sex as a FRAX-independent risk factor for fracture. © 2023 The Authors. Journal of Bone and Mineral Research published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American Society for Bone and Mineral Research (ASBMR).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- William D Leslie
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Canada
| | - Neil Binkley
- Division of Medicine, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI, USA
| | - John T Schousboe
- Division of Health Policy and Management, HealthPartners Institute and the University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA
| | - Eugene V McCloskey
- Centre for Metabolic Bone Diseases, University of Sheffield Medical School, Sheffield, UK
| | - Helena Johansson
- Centre for Metabolic Bone Diseases, University of Sheffield Medical School, Sheffield, UK
- Mary McKillop Institute for Health Research, Australian Catholic University, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Nicholas C Harvey
- MRC Lifecourse Epidemiology Centre, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
- NIHR Southampton Biomedical Research Centre, University of Southampton and University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK
| | - John A Kanis
- Centre for Metabolic Bone Diseases, University of Sheffield Medical School, Sheffield, UK
- Mary McKillop Institute for Health Research, Australian Catholic University, Melbourne, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Leslie WD, Binkley N, Goel H, Hans D, McCloskey EV. Adjusting Trabecular Bone Score (TBS) for Level-Specific Differences Reduces FRAX®-Based Treatment Reclassification in Patients with Vertebral Exclusions: The Manitoba BMD Registry. J Clin Densitom 2023; 26:101429. [PMID: 37742612 DOI: 10.1016/j.jocd.2023.101429] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/03/2023] [Accepted: 09/06/2023] [Indexed: 09/26/2023]
Abstract
Trabecular bone score (TBS) is a FRAX®-independent risk factor for fracture prediction. TBS values increase from cranial to caudal, with the following mean differences between TBSL1-L4 and individual lumbar vertebrae: L1 -0.093, L2 -0.008, L3 +0.055 and L4 +0.046. Excluding vertebral levels can affect FRAX-based treatment recommendations close to the intervention threshold. We examined the effect of adjusting for level-specific TBS differences in individuals with vertebral exclusions due to structural artifact on TBS-adjusted FRAX-based treatment recommendations. We identified 71,209 individuals aged ≥40 years with TBS and FRAX calculations through the Manitoba Bone Density Program. In the 24,428 individuals with vertebral exclusions, adjusting TBS using these level-specific factors agreed with TBSL1-L4 (mean difference -0.001). We compared FRAX-based treatment recommendations for TBSL1-L4 and for non-excluded vertebral levels before and after adjusting for level-specific TBS differences. Among those with baseline major osteoporotic fracture risk ≥15 %, TBS with vertebral exclusions reclassified FRAX-based treatment in 10.6 % of individuals compared with TBSL1-L4, and was reduced to 7.2 % after adjusting for level-specific differences. In 11,131 patients where L1-L2 was used for BMD reporting (the most common exclusion pattern with the largest TBS effect), treatment reclassification was reduced from 13.9 % to 2.4 %, respectively. Among individuals with baseline hip fracture risk ≥2 %, TBS vertebral exclusions reclassified 7.1 % compared with TBSL1-L4, but only 4.5 % after adjusting for level-specific differences. When L1-L2 was used for BMD reporting, treatment reclassification from hip fracture risk was reduced from 9.2 % to 5.2 %. In conclusion, TBS and TBS-adjusted FRAX-based treatment recommendations are affected by vertebral level exclusions for structural artifact. Adjusting for level-specific differences in TBS reduces reclassification in FRAX-based treatment recommendations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- William D Leslie
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada.
| | - Neil Binkley
- University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI, USA
| | | | - Didier Hans
- Bone and Joint Department, Lausanne University Hospital, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Eugene V McCloskey
- Centre for Metabolic Bone Diseases, University of Sheffield Medical School, Sheffield, UK
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Leslie WD, Binkley N, Goel H, McCloskey EV, Hans D. FRAX® Adjustment Using Renormalized Trabecular Bone Score (TBS) from L1 Alone may be Optimal for Fracture Prediction: The Manitoba BMD Registry. J Clin Densitom 2023; 26:101430. [PMID: 37748431 DOI: 10.1016/j.jocd.2023.101430] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/07/2023] [Accepted: 09/11/2023] [Indexed: 09/27/2023]
Abstract
Lumbar spine trabecular bone score (TBS) used in conjunction with FRAX® improves 10-year fracture prediction. The derived FRAX risk adjustment is based upon TBS measured from L1-L4, designated TBSL1-L4-FRAX. In prior studies, TBS measurements that include L1 and exclude L4 give better fracture stratification than L1-L4. We compared risk stratification from TBS-adjusted FRAX using TBS derived from different combinations of upper lumbar vertebral levels renormalized for level-specific differences in individuals from the Manitoba Bone Density Program aged >40 years with baseline assessment of TBS and FRAX. TBS measurements for L1-L3, L1-L2 and L1 alone were calculated after renormalization for level-specific differences. Corresponding TBS-adjusted FRAX scores designated TBSL1-L3-FRAX, TBSL1-L2-FRAX and TBSL1-FRAX were compared with TBSL1-L4-FRAX for fracture risk stratification. Incident major osteoporotic fractures (MOF) and hip fractures were assessed. The primary outcome was incremental change in area under the curve (ΔAUC). The study population included 71,209 individuals (mean age 64 years, 89.8% female). Before renormalization, mean TBS for L1-3, L1-L2 and L1 was significantly lower and TBS-adjusted FRAX significantly higher than from using TBSL1-L4. These differences were largely eliminated when TBS was renormalized for level-specific differences. During mean follow-up of 8.7 years 6745 individuals sustained incident MOF and 2039 sustained incident hip fractures. Compared with TBSL1-L4-FRAX, use of FRAX without TBS was associated with lower stratification (ΔAUC = -0.009, p < 0.001). There was progressive improvement in MOF stratification using TBSL1-L3-FRAX (ΔAUC = +0.001, p < 0.001), TBSL1-L2-FRAX (ΔAUC = +0.004, p < 0.001) and TBSL1-FRAX (ΔAUC = +0.005, p < 0.001). TBSL1-FRAX was significantly better than all other combinations for MOF prediction (p < 0.001). Incremental improvement in AUC for hip fracture prediction showed a similar but smaller trend. In conclusion, this single large cohort study found that TBS-adjusted FRAX performance for fracture prediction was improved when limited to the upper lumbar vertebral levels and was best using L1 alone.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- William D Leslie
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada.
| | - Neil Binkley
- University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI, USA
| | | | - Eugene V McCloskey
- Centre for Metabolic Bone Diseases, University of Sheffield Medical School, Sheffield, UK
| | - Didier Hans
- Bone and Joint Department, Lausanne University Hospital, Lausanne, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Leslie WD, Binkley N, Hans D. Effects of Severe Lumbar Spine Structural Artifact on Trabecular Bone Score (TBS): The Manitoba BMD Registry. J Clin Densitom 2023; 26:101433. [PMID: 37862745 DOI: 10.1016/j.jocd.2023.101433] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/02/2023] [Accepted: 10/05/2023] [Indexed: 10/22/2023]
Abstract
Trabecular bone score (TBS) is a bone mineral density (BMD)-independent risk factor for fracture. During DXA analysis and BMD reporting, it is standard practice to exclude lumbar vertebral levels affected by structural artifact. Although TBS is relatively insensitive to degenerative artifact, it is uncertain whether TBS is still useful in the presence extreme structural artifact that precludes reliable spine BMD measurement even after vertebral exclusions. Among individuals aged 40 years and older undergoing baseline DXA assessment from September 2012 to March 2018 we identified three mutually exclusive groups: spine BMD reporting performed without exclusions (Group 1, N=12,865), spine BMD reporting performed with vertebral exclusions (Group 2, N=4867), and spine BMD reporting not performed due to severe structural artifact (Group 3, N=1541). No significant TBS difference was seen for Group 2 versus Group 1 (referent), whereas TBS was significantly greater in Group 3 (+0.041 partially adjusted, +0.043 fully adjusted). When analyzed by the reason for vertebral exclusion, multilevel degenerative changes significantly increased TBS (+0.041 partially adjusted, +0.042 fully adjusted), while instrumentation significantly reduced TBS (-0.059 partially adjusted, -0.051 fully adjusted). Similar results were seen when analyses were restricted to those in Group 3 with a single reason for vertebral exclusions, and when follow up scans were also included. During mean follow-up of 2.5 years there were 802 (4.2 %) individuals with one or more incident fractures. L1-L4 TBS showed significant fracture risk stratification in all groups including Group 3 (P-interaction >0.4). In conclusion, lumbar spine TBS can be reliably measured in the majority of lumbar spine DXA scans, including those with artifact affecting up to two vertebral levels. However, TBS is significantly affected by the presence of extreme structural artifact in the lumbar spine, especially those with multilevel degenerative disc changes and/or instrumentation that precludes reliable BMD reporting.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- William D Leslie
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada.
| | - Neil Binkley
- University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI, USA
| | - Didier Hans
- Bone and Joint Department, Lausanne University Hospital, Lausanne, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Leslie WD, Binkley N, McCloskey EV, Johansson H, Harvey NC, Lorentzon M, Kanis JA, Hans D. FRAX Adjustment by Trabecular Bone Score with or Without Bone Mineral Density: The Manitoba BMD Registry. J Clin Densitom 2023; 26:101378. [PMID: 37137791 DOI: 10.1016/j.jocd.2023.101378] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/14/2023] [Revised: 04/16/2023] [Accepted: 04/24/2023] [Indexed: 05/05/2023]
Abstract
Trabecular bone score (TBS), a texture measure derived from spine dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) images, is a FRAX®-independent risk factor for fracture. The TBS adjustment to FRAX assumes the presence of femoral neck BMD in the calculation. However, there are many individuals in whom hip DXA cannot be acquired. Whether the TBS-adjustment would apply to FRAX probabilities calculated without BMD has not been studied. The current analysis was performed to evaluate major osteoporotic fracture (MOF) and hip fracture risk adjusted for FRAX with and without femoral neck BMD. The study cohort consisted of 71,209 individuals (89.8% female, mean age 64.0 years). During mean follow-up 8.7 years, 6743 (9.5%) individuals sustained one or more incident MOF, of which 2037 (2.9%) sustained a hip fracture. Lower TBS was significantly associated with increased fracture risk when adjusted for FRAX probabilities, with a slightly larger effect when BMD was not included. Inclusion of TBS in the risk calculation gave a small but significant increase in stratification for fracture probabilities estimated with and without BMD. Calibration plots showed very minor deviations from the line of identity, indicating overall good calibration. In conclusion, the existing equations for incorporating TBS in FRAX estimates of fracture probability work similarly when femoral neck BMD is not used in the calculation. This potentially extends the range of situations where TBS can be used clinically to those individuals in whom lumbar spine TBS is available but femoral neck BMD is not available.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- William D Leslie
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada.
| | - Neil Binkley
- University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI, USA
| | - Eugene V McCloskey
- Centre for Metabolic Bone Diseases, University of Sheffield Medical School, UK; MRC Versus Arthritis Centre for Integrated Research in Musculoskeletal Ageing, Department of Oncology & Metabolism, University of Sheffield, UK
| | - Helena Johansson
- Centre for Metabolic Bone Diseases, University of Sheffield Medical School, UK; Mary McKillop Institute for Health Research, Australian Catholic University, Melbourne
| | - Nicholas C Harvey
- MRC Lifecourse Epidemiology Centre, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK; NIHR Southampton Biomedical Research Centre, University of Southampton and University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK
| | - Mattias Lorentzon
- Mary McKillop Institute for Health Research, Australian Catholic University, Melbourne; Sahlgrenska Osteoporosis Centre, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden; Region Västra Götaland, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Mölndal, Sweden
| | - John A Kanis
- Centre for Metabolic Bone Diseases, University of Sheffield Medical School, UK; MRC Versus Arthritis Centre for Integrated Research in Musculoskeletal Ageing, Department of Oncology & Metabolism, University of Sheffield, UK
| | - Didier Hans
- Bone and Joint Department, Lausanne University Hospital, Lausanne, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Leslie WD, Binkley N, Hans D, McCloskey EV. Vertebral Level Variations in Trabecular Bone Score and Effect on Fracture Prediction: The Manitoba BMD Registry. J Clin Densitom 2023; 26:101366. [PMID: 37037769 DOI: 10.1016/j.jocd.2023.03.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/22/2023] [Revised: 03/11/2023] [Accepted: 03/13/2023] [Indexed: 03/19/2023]
Abstract
Trabecular bone score (TBS), a texture measure derived from spine dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) images, is a bone mineral density (BMD)-independent risk factor for fracture. TBS is reportedly insensitive to degenerative changes, and it is uncertain whether the same rules for excluding lumbar vertebral levels from BMD measurement should be applied to TBS. The current analysis was performed to explore inter-vertebral variation in TBS measurements from L1 to L4, how this relates to clinically identified structural artifact resulting in vertebral level exclusion from BMD reporting, and area under the curve (AUC) for incident fracture. The study population comprised 70,762 individuals aged 40 years and older at the time of baseline spine DXA assessment (mean age 64.1 years, 89.7% female), among whom 24,289 (34.3%) had one or more vertebral exclusions. Both TBS and BMD showed a similar cranial/caudal inter-vertebral gradient. Compared with L1-4, TBS from L1 alone was lower (mean difference -0.096; -7.6%) while TBS from L4 alone was 0.046 (3.6%) greater, similar in those without and with visual structural artifact. During mean follow-up of 8.7 years, 6744 (9.5%) individuals sustained incident major osteoporotic fractures. TBS from L1 alone gave significantly higher AUC for incident fracture than L1-4, which was in turn significantly higher than L2, L3 and L4 alone, seen in those without and with visual structural artifact. In contrast, AUCs for BMD showed minimal variation from L1 to L4, and was higher for L1-4 than for any individual lumbar vertebral level. In summary, we found inter-vertebral TBS variations within the lumbar spine are overall similar to BMD but are relatively unaffected by visual structural artifact. Fracture outcomes showed the strongest association with TBS measured from L1 alone. Further investigation is need to understand the cause and clinical application of these differences.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- William D Leslie
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Manitoba, 409 Tache Avenue, Winnipeg, Manitoba R2H 2A6, Canada.
| | - Neil Binkley
- University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI, United States
| | - Didier Hans
- Bone and Joint Department, Lausanne University Hospital, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Eugene V McCloskey
- Centre for Metabolic Bone Diseases, University of Sheffield Medical School, Sheffield, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Goel H, Binkley N, Hans D, Leslie WD. Bone density and trabecular bone score to predict fractures in adults aged 20-39 years: a registry-based study. Osteoporos Int 2023; 34:1085-1091. [PMID: 37000209 DOI: 10.1007/s00198-023-06722-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/27/2022] [Accepted: 03/06/2023] [Indexed: 04/01/2023]
Abstract
Trabecular bone score (TBS) enhances fracture risk assessment in older adults; whether this is true in younger people is uncertain. In this registry-based study of adults aged 20-39 years, low BMD, but not low TBS, predicted fracture. PURPOSE Trabecular bone score (TBS), a bone texture measurement, is associated with fracture risk independent of bone mineral density (BMD) in older adults. In adults aged 20-40 years, TBS remains stable and its role in fracture risk assessment is unclear. We utilized the Manitoba Bone Density Registry to explore the relationship of fracture risk with BMD and TBS in younger adults. METHODS Women and men aged 20-39 years referred for DXA testing were studied. Incident major and any fractures were captured from health records. Categories based on WHO BMD T-score classification and TBS tertile were considered using Cox regression models to estimate covariate-adjusted (including sex) hazard ratios (aHR, 95%CI) for incident fracture by category, and each SD decrement in BMD and TBS. RESULTS The study included 2799 individuals (77% female, mean age 32 years). Mean (SD) minimum T-score was - 0.9 (1.1) and TBS 1.355 (0.114); 7% had osteoporosis and 13% were in the lowest TBS tertile. Incident major osteoporotic fracture (MOF) and any fracture risk was elevated in those with osteopenia (aHRs 1.20/1.45) and osteoporosis (aHRs 4.60/5.16). Fracture risk was unrelated to TBS tertile. Each SD decrement in BMD was associated with increased MOF risk (aHR 1.64) and any fracture (aHR 1.71); lower TBS was unrelated to fractures. CONCLUSION In young adults, low BMD, but not low TBS, was predictive of MOF and any fracture. Routine clinical TBS measurement is not recommended for young adults. Further study is indicated to evaluate whether TBS is beneficial in subsets of younger adults.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Heenam Goel
- CentraCare, 1900 CentraCare Circle, St. Cloud, MN, 56303, USA.
| | | | - Didier Hans
- Bone and Joint Department, Lausanne University Hospital, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | | |
Collapse
|
14
|
Kline GA, Morin SN, Lix LM, McCloskey EV, Johansson H, Harvey NC, Kanis JA, Leslie WD. General Comorbidity Indicators Contribute to Fracture Risk Independent of FRAX: Registry-Based Cohort Study. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2023; 108:745-754. [PMID: 36201517 DOI: 10.1210/clinem/dgac582] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/06/2022] [Revised: 09/28/2022] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
Abstract
CONTEXT FRAX® estimates 10-year fracture probability from osteoporosis-specific risk factors. Medical comorbidity indicators are associated with fracture risk but whether these are independent from those in FRAX is uncertain. OBJECTIVE We hypothesized Johns Hopkins Aggregated Diagnosis Groups (ADG®) score or recent hospitalization number may be independently associated with increased risk for fractures. METHODS This retrospective cohort study included women and men age ≥ 40 in the Manitoba BMD Registry (1996-2016) with at least 3 years prior health care data and used linked administrative databases to construct ADG scores along with number of hospitalizations for each individual. Incident Major Osteoporotic Fracture and Hip Fracture was ascertained during average follow-up of 9 years; Cox regression analysis determined the association between increasing ADG score or number of hospitalizations and fractures. RESULTS Separately, hospitalizations and ADG score independently increased the hazard ratio for fracture at all levels of comorbidity (hazard range 1.2-1.8, all P < 0.05), irrespective of adjustment for FRAX, BMD, and competing mortality. Taken together, there was still a higher than predicted rate of fracture at all levels of increased comorbidity, independent of FRAX and BMD but attenuated by competing mortality. Using an intervention threshold of major fracture risk >20%, application of the comorbidity hazard ratio multiplier to the patient population FRAX scores would increase the number of treatment candidates from 8.6% to 14.4%. CONCLUSION Both complex and simple measures of medical comorbidity may be used to modify FRAX-based risk estimates to capture the increased fracture risk associated with multiple comorbid conditions in older patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gregory A Kline
- Department of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary T2N 2T9, Canada
| | - Suzanne N Morin
- Department of Medicine, McGill University, Montreal H3A 1G1, Canada
| | - Lisa M Lix
- Department of Community Health Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg R3E 0W2, Canada
| | - Eugene V McCloskey
- Centre for Metabolic Bone Diseases, University of Sheffield Medical School, Melbourne S5 7AU, UK
| | - Helena Johansson
- Centre for Metabolic Bone Diseases, University of Sheffield Medical School, Melbourne S5 7AU, UK
- Mary McKillop Institute for Health Research, Australian Catholic University, Melbourne 3000, Australia
| | - Nicholas C Harvey
- MRC Lifecourse Epidemiology Unit, Southampton SO17 1BJ, UK
- NIHR Southampton Biomedical Research Center, University of Southampton, Southampton SO16 6YD, UK
| | - John A Kanis
- Centre for Metabolic Bone Diseases, University of Sheffield Medical School, Melbourne S5 7AU, UK
- Mary McKillop Institute for Health Research, Australian Catholic University, Melbourne 3000, Australia
| | - William D Leslie
- Department of Community Health Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg R3E 0W2, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Leslie WD, Binkley N, Hans D. Ethnicity and Fracture Risk Stratification from Trabecular Bone Score in Canadian Women: The Manitoba BMD Registry. J Clin Densitom 2023; 26:83-89. [PMID: 36509619 DOI: 10.1016/j.jocd.2022.12.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/16/2022] [Accepted: 12/01/2022] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
Lumbar spine Trabecular Bone Score (TBS), a grey-level texture measure derived from spine dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) images, is a bone mineral density (BMD)-independent risk factor for fracture. An unresolved and controversial question is whether there are ethnic differences that affect the utility of TBS for fracture risk assessment. The current analysis examined whether self-identified ethnicity (White, Asian, Black) in women age 40 years and older referred for DXA testing affected fracture risk stratification from TBS using a large clinical registry. The study population comprised 63,078 White women, 1,915 Asian women and 329 Black women (n=329) with mean follow up 9.0±5.2 years. There were between group differences in BMI (Black>White>Asian), lumbar spine fat percentage (Asian>White>Black) and lumbar spine tissue thickness (Black>White>Asian). Despite this, lumbar spine TBS was not significantly different between the subgroups, though there was a significant difference in lumbar spine and total hip BMD (Black >White>Asian). TBS provided significant stratification for MOF and any fracture for all ethnicity subgroups, and for hip fracture in White and Asian subgroups (insufficient numbers for analysis in Black women). No significant difference in White vs. Asian or White vs. Black women were identified using a Bonferroni adjusted p-value. In summary, we found that lumbar spine TBS measurements were similar among White, Asian and Black women referred for DXA assessment in Manitoba, Canada. TBS and BMD measurements significantly stratified fracture risk in all three populations without a meaningful difference between groups. This suggests that TBS does not need to be used differently in White vs. non-White populations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- William D Leslie
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada..
| | - Neil Binkley
- University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI, USA
| | - Didier Hans
- Bone and Joint Department, Lausanne University Hospital, Lausanne, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Agarwal A, Baleanu F, Moreau M, Charles A, Iconaru L, Surquin M, Benoit F, Paesmans M, Karmali R, Bergmann P, Body JJ, Leslie WD. External validation of FRISBEE 5-year fracture prediction models: a registry-based cohort study. Arch Osteoporos 2022; 18:13. [PMID: 36564674 DOI: 10.1007/s11657-022-01205-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/29/2022] [Accepted: 12/18/2022] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
Five-year fracture risk prediction from the Fracture Risk Brussels Epidemiological Enquiry (FRISBEE) models was externally tested in 9716 Canadian women and demonstrated good discrimination but consistently overestimated risk. INTRODUCTION Five-year risk prediction models for all fractures, major osteoporotic fractures (MOFs) and central fractures (proximal to forearm and ankle) from the FRISBEE cohort demonstrated good performance in the original derivation cohort. Our aim was to externally validate the FRISBEE-based 5-year prediction models in routine practice. METHODS Using the population-based Manitoba Bone Mineral Density (BMD) registry, we identified women aged 60-85 years undergoing baseline BMD assessment from September 1, 2012 to March 31, 2018. Five-year probabilities of all fractures, MOFs and central fractures were calculated using the FRISBEE prediction models. We identified incident non-traumatic fractures up to 5 years from population-based healthcare data sources. Performance characteristics included area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC), gradient of risk (hazard ratio [HR] per SD increase and across risk tertiles) from Cox regression analysis, and calibration (ratio 5-year observed cumulative incidence to predicted fracture probability). RESULTS We included 9716 women (mean age 70.7 + / - SD 5.3 years). During a mean observation time of 2.5 years, all fractures, MOFs and central fractures were identified in 377 (3.9%), 264 (2.7%) and 259 (2.7%) of the women. AUROC showed significant fracture risk stratification with the FRISBEE models (all fractures 0.69 [95%CI 0.67-0.72], MOFs 0.71 [95%CI 0.68-0.74], central fractures 0.72 [95%CI 0.69-0.75]). There was a strong gradient of risk for predicting fracture outcomes per SD increase (HRs from 1.98 to 2.26) and across risk tertiles (HRs for middle vs lowest from 2.25 to 2.41, HRs for highest vs lowest from 4.70 to 6.50). However, risk was overestimated for all fractures (calibration-in-the-large 0.63, calibration slope 0.63), MOF (calibration-in-the-large 0.51, calibration slope 0.57) and central fractures (calibration-in-the-large 0.55, calibration slope 0.60). CONCLUSIONS FRISBEE 5-year prediction models were externally validated to stratify fracture risk similar to the derivation cohort, but would need recalibration for Canada as risk was overestimated.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Arnav Agarwal
- Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
- Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | - Felicia Baleanu
- Department of Endocrinology, CHU Brugmann, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium
- Department of Medicine, CHU Brugmann, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Michel Moreau
- Data Centre, Inst. J. Bordet, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Alexia Charles
- Department of Medicine, CHU Brugmann, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Laura Iconaru
- Department of Endocrinology, CHU Brugmann, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium
- Department of Medicine, CHU Brugmann, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Murielle Surquin
- Department of Medicine, CHU Brugmann, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Florence Benoit
- Department of Medicine, CHU Brugmann, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Marianne Paesmans
- Data Centre, Inst. J. Bordet, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Rafik Karmali
- Department of Endocrinology, CHU Brugmann, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Pierre Bergmann
- Laboratoire de Recherche Translationnelle, CHU Brugmann, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, CHU Brugmann, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Jean-Jacques Body
- Department of Endocrinology, CHU Brugmann, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium
- Department of Medicine, CHU Brugmann, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium
- Laboratoire de Recherche Translationnelle, CHU Brugmann, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium
| | - William D Leslie
- Department of Medicine (C5121), University of Manitoba, 409 Tache Avenue, Winnipeg, MB, R2H 2A6, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Kline GA, Lix LM, Morin SN, Leslie WD. Fracture risk in Asian-Canadian women is significantly over-estimated by the Canadian Association of Radiologists-Osteoporosis Canada risk prediction tool: retrospective cohort study. Arch Osteoporos 2022; 17:133. [PMID: 36201065 DOI: 10.1007/s11657-022-01173-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/02/2022] [Accepted: 09/28/2022] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]
Abstract
Fracture risk calculators may not be accurate for all ethnicity groups. The Manitoba bone density registry was used to test the Canadian CAROC tool for predicting fracture risk in Asian-Canadian women. The tool significantly over-estimated fracture risk, suggesting that it may not be ideal for Asian-Canadian patients. PURPOSE Health risk prediction tools based on largely White populations may lead to treatment inequity when applied to non-White populations where outcome rates differ. We examined the calibration of the Canadian Association of Radiologists-Osteoporosis Canada (CAROC) fracture risk prediction tool in self-identified Asian-Canadian women. METHODS Retrospective cohort study of women over age 50 using the Manitoba BMD Registry. At first BMD, the intake questionnaire collected self-identification of ethnicity and fracture risk factors. 10-year fracture risk was estimated using CAROC and categorized into low, medium, or high fracture risk. Linked administrative databases identified incident osteoporotic fractures. Observed fracture rates were compared between White and Asian-Canadians and compared to the original CAROC risk stratification. RESULTS There were 63,632 and 1703 women who self-identified as White-Canadian or Asian-Canadian, respectively, covering approximately 600,000 patient-years follow-up. There were 6588 incident fractures; a similar percentage of patients were assigned to each risk stratum at baseline by CAROC. A progressive rise in 10-year observed fracture rates occurred for each CAROC stratum in the White-Canadian population but much lower fracture rates than predicted in Asian-Canadian patients (p < 0.001). Fracture incidence rate ratios were 1.9-2.6 fold higher in White- vs Asian-Canadian patients for all strata (p < 0.001). In the CAROC moderate and high-risk categories, observed fracture rates in Asian-Canadian patients were typically lower than predicted, indicating poor model calibration. CONCLUSION In Asian-Canadian women, observed osteoporosis fracture rates are lower than predicted when using the CAROC tool. Over-estimation of fracture risk may influence shared decision-making discussions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gregory A Kline
- Department of Medicine, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, 1820 Richmond Rd SW, Calgary, AB, T2T 5C7, Canada.
| | - Lisa M Lix
- Department of Community Health Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Canada
| | - Suzanne N Morin
- Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, McGill University, Montreal, Canada
| | - William D Leslie
- Departments of Internal Medicine and Radiology, Rady College of Medicine, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Leslie WD, Morin SN, Lix LM, McCloskey EV, Johansson H, Harvey NC, Kanis JA. Effect of Discordant Hip Bone Density on Incident Fracture Risk: A Registry-Based Cohort Study. J Bone Miner Res 2022; 37:2018-2024. [PMID: 36069122 DOI: 10.1002/jbmr.4672] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/16/2022] [Revised: 07/26/2022] [Accepted: 08/07/2022] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
Abstract
The Fracture Risk Assessment Tool (FRAX®) combines clinical risk factors and optionally femoral neck bone density to estimate major osteoporotic fracture (MOF) and hip fracture probability. Hip dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) simultaneously measures the trochanter and total hip, but these regions are not considered by FRAX. Our aim was to determine whether discordance in trochanter and total hip bone density (defined as ≥1 T-score difference from the femoral neck) affects fracture risk adjusted for fracture probability. Using the Manitoba bone density registry, we identified 84,773 women and men age 40 years or older undergoing baseline hip DXA. The outcomes were incident MOF and hip fracture. Cox regression hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) adjusted for baseline fracture probability were used to test the association between hip T-score discordance and incident fractures. Hip T-score discordance affected more than one in five subjects (trochanter lower in 3.9%, higher in 14.2%; total hip lower in 0.3%, higher in 14.9%). After mean 8.8 years there were 8444 incident MOF including 2664 hip fractures. Discordantly lower trochanter and lower total hip T-score (≥1 below femoral neck) was associated with increased risk for MOF (adjusted HRs 1.47 and 1.60) and hip fracture (HRs 1.85 and 2.12), while discordantly higher trochanter and total hip T-score (≥1 above femoral neck) was associated with lower risk for MOF (HRs 0.83 and 0.71) and hip fracture (HRs 0.79 and 0.68). In models that examined the trochanter and total hip simultaneously, discordantly lower trochanter T-score was associated with increased incident MOF and hip fracture risk (HRs 1.43 and 1.79) whereas discordantly higher total hip T-score was associated with lower risk (HRs 0.73 and 0.75). In conclusion, trochanter and total hip regions frequently show T-scores that are discordant with the femoral neck. This information strongly affects incident fracture risk independent of fracture probability scores computed with femoral neck bone density. © 2022 American Society for Bone and Mineral Research (ASBMR).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- William D Leslie
- Max Rady College of Medicine, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
| | - Suzanne N Morin
- Division of General Internal Medicine, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Lisa M Lix
- Max Rady College of Medicine, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
| | - Eugene V McCloskey
- Centre for Metabolic Bone Diseases, University of Sheffield Medical School, Sheffield, UK
| | - Helena Johansson
- Centre for Metabolic Bone Diseases, University of Sheffield Medical School, Sheffield, UK
- Mary McKillop Institute for Health Research, Australian Catholic University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Nicholas C Harvey
- Medical Research Council (MRC) Lifecourse Epidemiology Centre, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
- National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Southampton Biomedical Research Centre, University of Southampton and University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK
| | - John A Kanis
- Centre for Metabolic Bone Diseases, University of Sheffield Medical School, Sheffield, UK
- Mary McKillop Institute for Health Research, Australian Catholic University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Leslie WD, Möller S, Skjødt MK, Yan L, Abrahamsen B, Lix LM, McCloskey EV, Johansson H, Harvey NC, Kanis JA, Rubin KH. FREM predicts 10-year incident fracture risk independent of FRAX® probability: a registry-based cohort study. Osteoporos Int 2022; 33:1457-1463. [PMID: 35175395 DOI: 10.1007/s00198-022-06349-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/12/2021] [Accepted: 02/13/2022] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
Abstract
The Danish Fracture Risk Evaluation Model (FREM) was found to predict fracture risk independent of 10-year fracture probability derived with the FRAX® tool including bone mineral density from DXA. INTRODUCTION FREM was developed from Danish public health registers without DXA information to identify high imminent risk of major osteoporotic fracture (MOF) and hip fracture (HF), while FRAX® estimates 10-year fracture probability from clinical risk factors and femoral neck bone mineral density (BMD) from DXA. The FREM algorithm showed significant 1- and 2-year fracture risk stratification when applied to a clinical population from Manitoba, Canada. We examined whether FREM predicts 10-year fracture risk independent of 10-year FRAX probability computed with BMD. METHODS Using the Manitoba BMD Program registry, we identified women and men aged ≥ 45 years undergoing baseline BMD assessment. We calculated FREM and FRAX scores, and identified incident fractures over 10 years. Hazard ratios (HRs) for incident fracture were estimated according to FREM quintile, adjusted for FRAX probability. We compared predicted with observed 10-year cumulative fracture probability estimated with competing mortality. RESULTS The study population comprised 74,446 women, mean age 65.2 years; 7945 men, mean age 67.5 years. There were 7957 and 646 incident MOF and 2554 and 294 incident HF in women and men, respectively. Higher FREM scores were associated with increased risk for MOF (highest vs middle quintile HRs 1.49 women, 2.06 men) and HF (highest vs middle quintile HRs 2.15 women, 2.20 men) even when adjusted for FRAX. Greater mortality with higher FREM scores attenuated its effect on 10-year fracture probability. In the highest FREM quintile, observed slightly exceeded predicted 10-year probability for MOF (ratios 1.05 in women, 1.49 in men) and HF (ratios 1.29 in women, 1.34 in men). CONCLUSIONS Higher FREM scores identified women and men at increased fracture risk even when adjusted for FRAX probability that included BMD; hence, FREM provides additional predictive information to FRAX. FRAX slightly underestimated 10-year fracture probability in those falling within the highest FREM quintile.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- William D Leslie
- Department of Medicine, University of Manitoba, 409 Tache Avenue, Winnipeg, MB, R2H 2A6, Canada.
| | - Sören Möller
- Research Unit OPEN, Department of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
- OPEN-Open Patient Data Explorative Network, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark
| | - Michael K Skjødt
- Research Unit OPEN, Department of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
- Department of Medicine, Holbæk Hospital, Holbæk, Denmark
| | - Lin Yan
- Department of Medicine, University of Manitoba, 409 Tache Avenue, Winnipeg, MB, R2H 2A6, Canada
| | - Bo Abrahamsen
- Research Unit OPEN, Department of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
- Department of Medicine, Holbæk Hospital, Holbæk, Denmark
| | - Lisa M Lix
- Department of Community Health Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Canada
| | - Eugene V McCloskey
- Centre for Metabolic Bone Diseases, University of Sheffield Medical School, Sheffield, UK
| | - Helena Johansson
- Centre for Metabolic Bone Diseases, University of Sheffield Medical School, Sheffield, UK
- Mary McKillop Institute for Health Research, Australian Catholic University, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Nicholas C Harvey
- MRC Lifecourse Epidemiology Centre, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
- NIHR Southampton Biomedical Research Centre, University of Southampton and University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK
| | - John A Kanis
- Centre for Metabolic Bone Diseases, University of Sheffield Medical School, Sheffield, UK
- Mary McKillop Institute for Health Research, Australian Catholic University, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Katrine Hass Rubin
- Research Unit OPEN, Department of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
- OPEN-Open Patient Data Explorative Network, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Xiao J, Xin Z, Fu X, Huang J, Zhang B, Yu H. Treatment of Fracture of the Calcaneus via Bone Axial X-Ray Image-Based Minimally Invasive Approach. COMPUTATIONAL AND MATHEMATICAL METHODS IN MEDICINE 2022; 2022:3012589. [PMID: 35813425 PMCID: PMC9270132 DOI: 10.1155/2022/3012589] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/24/2022] [Revised: 06/09/2022] [Accepted: 06/13/2022] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
To discuss the values of two bone axial X-ray image-based minimally invasive approach surgeries in the diagnosis and treatment of fracture of the calcaneus, 80 patients diagnosed with fracture of the calcaneus by bone axial X-ray examination were selected and divided equally into the minimally invasive longitudinal approach (MILA) group (40 cases) and the sinus tarsal approach (STA) group (40 cases). Besides, the duration of operation, the incidence of complications, the time-to-start weight training, and the American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) foot function scoring system between the patients in the two groups were compared. The results showed that the duration of operation and incidence of complications among the patients in the MILA group (42.87 ± 5.12 minutes, 20%) were both superior to those among the patients in the STA group (60.43 ± 7.31 minutes, 32.5%). The time-to-start weight training in the MILA group was 5.2 weeks, which was obviously shorter than that in the STA group (5.7 weeks). The difference in AOFAS scores between the two groups was not significant. The walking pavement score in the MILA group (4.2 ± 0.37 points) was slightly higher than that in the STA group (3.3 ± 0.45 points), and the differences demonstrated statistical meaning (P < 0.05). To sum up, the bone axial X-ray image is an essential examination method of diagnosing fracture of the calcaneus. The two minimally invasive methods both showed good clinical therapeutic effects. The operation of MILA was relatively shorter with fewer complications and is worthy of being promoted as an effective treatment method of fracture of the calcaneus.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jie Xiao
- Department of Orthopedics, The Second Affiliated Hospital (Jiande Branch), Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Jiande, Hangzhou, 311600 Zhejiang, China
| | - Zengfeng Xin
- Department of Orthopedics, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, 311000 Zhejiang, China
| | - Xiaojun Fu
- Department of Orthopedics, The Second Affiliated Hospital (Jiande Branch), Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Jiande, Hangzhou, 311600 Zhejiang, China
| | - Jiaqi Huang
- Department of Orthopedics, The Second Affiliated Hospital (Jiande Branch), Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Jiande, Hangzhou, 311600 Zhejiang, China
| | - Bi Zhang
- Department of Orthopedics, The Second Affiliated Hospital (Jiande Branch), Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Jiande, Hangzhou, 311600 Zhejiang, China
| | - Haiping Yu
- Department of Orthopedics, The Second Affiliated Hospital (Jiande Branch), Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Jiande, Hangzhou, 311600 Zhejiang, China
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Agarwal A, Leslie WD, Nguyen TV, Morin SN, Lix LM, Eisman JA. Performance of the Garvan Fracture Risk Calculator in Individuals with Diabetes: A Registry-Based Cohort Study. Calcif Tissue Int 2022; 110:658-665. [PMID: 34994831 DOI: 10.1007/s00223-021-00941-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/23/2021] [Accepted: 12/27/2021] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
Diabetes increases fracture and falls risks. We evaluated the performance of the Garvan fracture risk calculator (FRC) in individuals with versus without diabetes. Using the population-based Manitoba bone mineral density (BMD) registry, we identified individuals aged 50-95 years undergoing baseline BMD assessment from 1 September 2012, onwards with diabetes and self-reported falls in the prior 12 months. Five-year Garvan FRC predictions were generated from clinical risk factors, with and without femoral neck BMD. We identified non-traumatic osteoporotic fractures (OF) and hip fractures (HF) from population-based data to 31 March 2018. Fracture risk stratification was assessed from area under the receiver operating characteristic curves (AUROC). Cox regression analysis was performed to examine the effect of diabetes on fractures, adjusted for Garvan FRC predictions. The study population consisted of 2618 women with and 14,064 without diabetes, and 636 and 2201 men with and without the same, respectively. The Garvan FRC provided significant OF and HF risk stratification in women with diabetes, similar to those without diabetes. Analyses of OF in men were limited by smaller numbers; no significant difference was evident by diabetes status. Cox regression showed that OF risk was 23% greater in women with diabetes adjusted for Garvan FRC including BMD (hazard ratio [HR] 1.23, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.01-1.49), suggesting it slightly underestimated risk; a non-significant increase in diabetes-related HF risk was noted (HR 1.37, 95% CI 0.88-2.15). Garvan FRC shows similar fracture risk stratification in individuals with versus without diabetes, but may underestimate this risk.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Arnav Agarwal
- Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | - William D Leslie
- Department of Medicine (C5121), University of Manitoba, 409 Tache Avenue, Winnipeg, MB, R2H 2A6, Canada.
| | - Tuan V Nguyen
- University of Technology Sydney, Ultimo, Australia
- School of Population Health, UNSW Medicine, UNSW Sydney, Kensington, Australia
| | | | - Lisa M Lix
- Department of Medicine (C5121), University of Manitoba, 409 Tache Avenue, Winnipeg, MB, R2H 2A6, Canada
| | - John A Eisman
- Garvan Institute of Medical Research, Sydney, Australia
- University of New South Wales Sydney, Sydney, Australia
- St Vincent's Hospital and School of Medicine Sydney, University of Notre Dame, Sydney, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Leslie WD, Morin SN, Lix LM, McCloskey EV, Johansson H, Harvey NC, Kanis JA. The Effect of Fracture Recency on Observed 10-Year Fracture Probability: A Registry-Based Cohort Study. J Bone Miner Res 2022; 37:848-855. [PMID: 35147245 DOI: 10.1002/jbmr.4526] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/16/2021] [Revised: 01/26/2022] [Accepted: 02/04/2022] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
FRAX estimates 10-year fracture major osteoporotic fracture (MOF) and hip fracture probability from multiple risk factors. FRAX does not consider prior fracture site or time since fracture. Fracture risk is greater in the initial 2-year post-fracture period (imminent risk), implying that FRAX may underestimate risk in this setting. We used the population-based Manitoba Bone Mineral Density (BMD) Program registry to examine the effect of fracture recency and site on incident fracture risk predictions using FRAX. We identified women aged 40 years or older with baseline BMD and FRAX scores. Observed fracture outcomes to 10 years were compared with predicted 10-year fracture probability stratified by prior fracture status: none, recent (<2 years [median 0.3 years]), and remote (≥2 years [median 10.6 years]). For women with recent fractures, we also examined proposed multipliers to adjust FRAX for the effect of fracture recency and site. The cohort comprised 33,465 women aged 40 to 64 years (1897 recent fracture, 2120 remote fracture) and 33,806 women aged ≥65 years (2365 fracture, 4135 remote fracture). Observed fracture probability was consistent with predicted probability in most analyses. In women aged 40 to 64 years, there was a significant effect of recent vertebral and humerus fracture on MOF (observed to predicted 1.61 and 1.48, respectively), but these effects were still lower than the proposed multipliers (2.32 and 1.67, respectively). No significant effect of fracture recency was found after hip or forearm fracture in either age group. Our findings contribute to accumulating evidence of the importance of recent fracture. The effect of fracture recency was not consistent across fracture sites and with a lower magnitude than previously reported. Further quantification of effect size and specificity in additional independent cohorts is warranted to validate and refine recent-fracture multipliers in fracture risk assessment. © 2022 American Society for Bone and Mineral Research (ASBMR).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Lisa M Lix
- University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Canada
| | - Eugene V McCloskey
- Centre for Metabolic Bone Diseases, University of Sheffield Medical School, Sheffield, UK
| | - Helena Johansson
- Centre for Metabolic Bone Diseases, University of Sheffield Medical School, Sheffield, UK
- Mary McKillop Institute for Health Research, Australian Catholic University, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Nicholas C Harvey
- MRC Lifecourse Epidemiology Centre, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
- NIHR Southampton Biomedical Research Centre, University of Southampton and University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK
| | - John A Kanis
- Centre for Metabolic Bone Diseases, University of Sheffield Medical School, Sheffield, UK
- Mary McKillop Institute for Health Research, Australian Catholic University, Melbourne, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Agarwal A, Leslie WD, Nguyen TV, Morin SN, Lix LM, Eisman JA. Predictive performance of the Garvan Fracture Risk Calculator: a registry-based cohort study. Osteoporos Int 2022; 33:541-548. [PMID: 34839377 DOI: 10.1007/s00198-021-06252-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/08/2021] [Accepted: 11/23/2021] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
UNLABELLED The G arvan Fracture Risk Calculator predicts risk of osteoporotic fractures. We evaluated its predictive performance in 16,682 women and 2839 men from Manitoba, Canada, and found significant risk stratification, with a strong gradient across scores. The tool outperformed clinical risk factors and bone mineral density for fracture risk stratification. INTRODUCTION The optimal model for fracture risk estimation to guide treatment decision-making remains controversial. Our objective was to evaluate the predictive performance of the Garvan Fracture Risk Calculator (FRC) in a large clinical registry from Manitoba, Canada. METHODS Using the population-based Manitoba Bone Mineral Density (BMD) registry, we identified women and men aged 50-95 years undergoing baseline BMD assessment from September 1, 2012, onwards. Five-year Garvan FRC predictions were generated from clinical risk factors (CRFs) with and without femoral neck BMD. We identified incident non-traumatic osteoporotic fractures (OFs) and hip fractures (HFs) from population-based healthcare data sources to March 31, 2018. Fracture risk was assessed from area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC). Cox regression analysis and calibration ratios (5-year observed/predicted) were assessed for risk quintiles. All analyses were sex stratified. RESULTS We included 16,682 women (mean age 66.6 + / - SD 8.7 years) and 2839 men (mean age 68.7 + / - SD 10.2 years). During a mean observation time of 2.6 years, incident OFs were identified in 681 women and 140 men and HFs in 199 women and 22 men. AUROC showed significant fracture risk stratification with the Garvan FRC. Tool predictions without BMD were better than from age or decreasing weight, and the tool with BMD performed better than BMD alone. Garvan FRC with BMD performed better than without BMD, especially for HF prediction (AUROC 0.86 in women, 0.82 in men). There was a strong gradient of increasing risk across Garvan FRC quintiles (highest versus lowest, hazard ratios women 5.75 and men 3.43 for any OF; women 101.6 for HF). Calibration differences were noted, with both over- and underestimation in risk. CONCLUSIONS Garvan FRC outperformed CRFs and BMD alone for fracture risk stratification, particularly for HF, but may require recalibration for accurate predictions in this population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Agarwal
- Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | - W D Leslie
- Department of Medicine (C5121), University of Manitoba, 409 Tache Avenue, Winnipeg, MB, R2H 2A6, Canada.
| | - T V Nguyen
- University of Technology Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | | | - L M Lix
- Department Community Healkth Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Canada
| | - J A Eisman
- Garvan Institute of Medical Research, Sydney, Australia
| |
Collapse
|