Measles Vaccination is Best for Children: The Argument for Relying on Herd Immunity Fails

Inequalities in measles immunization coverage among two-year-olds in Sierra Leone, 2008-2019

BACKGROUND

Measles, a highly contagious and potentially fatal disease, remains a significant public health concern, particularly in low- and middle-income countries. Vaccination is the most effective way to prevent measles and achieving high immunization coverage is crucial for protecting children and communities. This study investigated the trends and inequalities in measles immunization coverage among two-year-olds in Sierra Leone between 2008 and 2019.

METHODS

The study utilized data from the Sierra Leone Demographic Health Surveys conducted in 2008, 2013, and 2019. The World Health Organisation Health Equity Assessment Toolkit was used to calculate various inequality measures, including Difference (D), Ratio (R), Population Attributable Risk (PAR), and Population Attributable Fraction (PAF). An inequality assessment was conducted for six stratifiers: age, economic status, level of education, place of residence, sex of the child, and sub-national province.

RESULTS

In Sierra Leone, measles immunization coverage increased between 2008 and 2013 and decreased slightly in 2019. In 2008, 66.2% of two-year-olds were immunized, which increased to 86.2% in 2013 and then fell slightly to 82.2% in 2019. There was a decrease in inequality for age from 4.2 percentage points in 2008 to 3.0 percentage points in 2019 (D = 4.2 in 2008 and 3.0 in 2019). Economic-related inequality decreased from 8.1 percentage points in 2008 to 7.5 percentage points in 2019 (D = 8.1 in 2008 and 7.5 in 2019). Inequality in education decreased from 10.3 percentage points in 2008 to 7.4 percentage points in 2019 based on results from the inequality measure D. For place of residence, inequality decreased from 6.0 percentage points in 2008 to 4.0 percentage points in 2019. For the child's sex, the inequality increased from 1.9 percentage points in 2008 to 4.5 percentage points in 2019. The PAF revealed that the setting average could have been 1.4% higher in 2008 and 2.7% higher in 2019 without the child's sex inequality. Provincial inequality decreased from 19.4 percentage points in 2008 to 16.9 percentage points in 2019 (D = 19.4 in 2008 and 16.9 in 2019).

CONCLUSION

The observed fluctuations in national measles immunization coverage for children under two underscore the need for sustained efforts in vaccination programs. While improvements in access based on age, socioeconomic status, education level, and place of residence suggest progress in reducing inequalities, the persistent provincial disparities, with a significant gap in 2019, highlight ongoing challenges that must be addressed to ensure equitable health outcomes. Additionally, the increase in inequalities based on the child's sex during the study period raises concerns about targeted interventions that may inadvertently neglect specific groups. These findings imply that policymakers must prioritize strategies that maintain high vaccination rates and focus on closing the geographical and sex-based gaps, particularly in underserved provinces and among vulnerable populations.

What does the best interests principle of the convention on the rights of the child mean for paediatric healthcare?

The present review analyses the implications of the best interests of the child principle, which is one of the most widely discussed principles of medical ethics and human rights, for paediatric healthcare. As a starting point, it presents the interpretation of the best interests principle by the United Nations Committee on the Rights of the Child. On this basis, it points out possible fields of application of the best interests principle with regard to paediatric healthcare and discusses the potential difficulties in the application of the best interests principle. Based on this, it illustrates the implications of the best interests principle for paediatric healthcare through four case studies, which look at ethical dilemmas in paediatric gynaecology, end-of-life care, HIV care and genetic testing.   Conclusion: The best interests principle requires action, inter alia, by health policymakers, professional associations, hospital managers and medical teams to ensure children receive the best possible healthcare. Whilst the best interests principle does not provide a conclusive solution to all ethical dilemmas in paediatric healthcare (as illustrated by the case studies), it provides children, medical teams, parents and families, and clinical ethicists with an indispensable framework for health care centred on the rights of the child. What is Known: • The best interests principle is one of the most widely discussed principles of medical ethics and human rights and one of the four general principles of the Convention on the Rights of the Child. What is New: • The present review discusses possible fields of application and potential difficulties of the best interests principle with regard to paediatric healthcare. • Based on this, it illustrates the implications of the best interests principle for paediatric healthcare through four case studies, which look at ethical dilemmas in paediatric gynaecology, end-of-life care, HIV care and genetic testing.

Qualitative assessment of caregiver experiences when navigating childhood immunisation in urban communities in Sierra Leone

OBJECTIVE

To gain in-depth understanding of the caregiver experience when navigating urban immunisation services for their children.

DESIGN

An exploratory qualitative assessment comprising 16 in-depth interviews using an interpretative phenomenology approach.

SETTING

Caregivers were purposively recruited from slums (n=8) and other urban communities (n=8) in the capital city of Sierra Leone.

PARTICIPANTS

Caregivers of children ages 6-36 months old who were fully vaccinated (n=8) or undervaccinated (n=8).

RESULTS

Emotional enablers of vaccination were evident in caregivers' sense of parental obligation to their children while also anticipating reciprocal benefits in children's ability to take care of their parents later in life. Practical enablers were found in the diversity of immunisation reminders, information access, information trust, getting fathers more involved, positive experiences with health workers and postvaccination information sharing in the community. Underlying barriers to childhood vaccination were due to practical constraints such as overcrowding and long waiting times at the clinic, feeling disrespected by health workers, expecting to give money to health workers for free services and fear of serious vaccine side effects. To improve vaccination outcomes, caregivers desired more convenient and positive clinic experiences and deeper community engagement.

CONCLUSIONS

Health system interventions, community engagement and vaccination outreach need to be tailored for urban settings. Vaccine communication efforts may resonate more strongly with caregivers when vaccination is framed both around parental responsibilities to do the right thing for the child and the future benefits to the parent.

Vaccination and Immunity toward Measles: A Serosurvey in Future Healthcare Workers

Measles is a very contagious infectious disease, and vaccination is the only medical aid to counter the spread of the infection. The aim of this study was to evaluate the influence of vaccination schedule and type of vaccine, number of doses, and sex on the immune response. In a population of Italian medical students (8497 individuals born after 1980 with certificate of vaccination and quantitative measurement of antibodies against measles), the prevalence of positive antibodies to measles and antibody titer was measured. Vaccination schedule such as number of doses and vaccine type (measles alone or combined as measles, mumps and rubella (MMR)) and sex were the variables considered to influence the immune response. The vaccination schedule depends on the year of birth: students born before 1990 were prevalently vaccinated once and with measles vaccine alone (not as MMR). One dose of vaccine induces a significantly (p < 0.0001) higher positive response and antibody titer than two doses, in particular when measles alone is used (p < 0.0001). Females have a significantly higher percentage of positive response (p = 0.0001) than males but only when the MMR formulation was used. Multiple linear regression confirms that sex significantly influences antibody titer when only MMR is used, after one (p = 0.0002) or two (p = 0.0060) doses. In conclusion, vaccination schedule and, partially, sex influence immune response to measles vaccination. Most notably, the measles vaccine alone (one dose) is more effective than one and two doses of MMR.

Vaccination Policies: Between Best and Basic Interests of the Child, between Precaution and Proportionality

How should liberal-democratic governments deal with emerging vaccination hesitancy when that leads to the resurgence of diseases that for decades were under control? This article argues that vaccination policies should be justified in terms of a proper weighing of the rights of children to be protected against vaccine-preventable diseases and the rights of parents to raise their children in ways that they see fit. The argument starts from the concept of the ‘best interests of the child involved’. The concept is elaborated for this context into the dual regime structure in which parents have fiduciary authority over what they consider to be best for their child, and the state has fiduciary authority over a child’s basic interests. This argument leads to conditional mandatory vaccination programs that should be informed by a correct balancing of the two legal principles of proportionality and precaution. This results in contextual childhood vaccination policies of upscaling interference: a three-tiered approach of increased intrusion, from voluntary program when possible and mandatory or even compulsory programs when necessary to protect the child’s basic interests.

Pox Parties for Grannies? Chickenpox, Exogenous Boosting, and Harmful Injustices

Some societies tolerate or encourage high levels of chickenpox infection among children to reduce rates of shingles among older adults. This tradeoff is unethical. The varicella zoster virus (VZV) causes both chickenpox and shingles. After people recover from chickenpox, VZV remains in their nerve cells. If their immune systems become unable to suppress the virus, they develop shingles. According to the Exogenous Boosting Hypothesis (EBH), a person's ability to keep VZV suppressed can be 'boosted' through exposure to active chickenpox infections. We argue that even if this hypothesis were true, immunization policies that discourage routine childhood varicella vaccination in order to prevent shingles for other people are unethical. Such policies harm children and treat them as mere means for the benefit of others, and are inconsistent with how parents should treat their children and physicians should treat their patients. These policies also seem incompatible with institutional transparency.

Interacting with parents in Sweden who hesitate or refrain from vaccinating their child

The purpose of this study was to explore nurses' experiences of encountering parents who are hesitant about or refrain from vaccinating their child. A qualitative approach was chosen and data collected through individual, semi-structured interviews with 12 nurses. The text was analyzed using thematic analysis. Three themes emerged from the interviews: giving room and time for acknowledging parents' insecurity concerning vaccination, striving to approach the parents' position with tact, and a struggle between feelings of failure and respect for the parents' view. The findings indicate that it was crucial to give time, be tactful when meeting parents, as well as to appear credible and up-to-date. The nurses wanted to be open and respect the parents' views on vaccination but found it difficult and frustrating to be unable to reach out with their message because their quest was to protect the child.

Will We Have a Cohort of Healthcare Workers Full Vaccinated against Measles, Mumps, and Rubella?

Healthcare workers are a population exposed to several infectious diseases, and an immunization programme is essential for the maintenance of good vaccination coverage to protect workers and patients. A population of 10,653 students attending degree courses at Padua Medical School (medicine and surgery, dentistry and health professions) was screened for vaccination coverage and antibody titres against rubella, mumps, and measles. The students were subdivided into five age classes according to their date of birth: those born before 1980, between 1980 and 1985, between 1986 and 1990, between 1991 and 1995, and after 1995. Vaccination coverage was very low in students born before 1980, but the rate of positive antibody titre was high due to infection in infancy. Increasing date of birth showed increased vaccination coverage. In contrast, immune coverage was high for rubella (more than 90%) but not for mumps and measles (approximately 80%). An "anomaly" was observed for mumps and measles in the cohort born between 1991 and 1995, probably due to the trivalent vaccine formulation. Students born after 1990 showed vaccination coverage that exceeded 90%. It is therefore very likely that we will have a future generation of healthcare workers with optimal vaccination coverage.

The Harm Principle Cannot Replace the Best Interest Standard: Problems With Using the Harm Principle for Medical Decision Making for Children

For many years the prevailing paradigm for medical decision making for children has been the best interest standard. Recently, some authors have proposed that Mill's "harm principle" should be used to mediate or to replace the best interest standard. This article critically examines the harm principle movement and identifies serious defects within the project of using Mill's harm principle for medical decision making for children. While the harm principle proponents successfully highlight some difficulties in present-day use of the best interest standard, the use of the harm principle suffers substantial normative and conceptual problems. A medical decision-making framework for children is suggested, grounded in the four principles. It draws on the best interest standard, incorporates concepts of harm, and provides two questions that can act as guide and limit in medical decision making for children.