1
|
Salvadori M, Rosso G. Update on the reciprocal interference between immunosuppressive therapy and gut microbiota after kidney transplantation. World J Transplant 2024; 14:90194. [PMID: 38576749 PMCID: PMC10989467 DOI: 10.5500/wjt.v14.i1.90194] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/26/2023] [Revised: 12/22/2023] [Accepted: 12/29/2023] [Indexed: 03/15/2024] Open
Abstract
Gut microbiota is often modified after kidney transplantation. This principally happens in the first period after transplantation. Antibiotics and, most of all, immunosuppressive drugs are the main responsible. The relationship between immunosuppressive drugs and the gut microbiota is bilateral. From one side immunosuppressive drugs modify the gut microbiota, often generating dysbiosis; from the other side microbiota may interfere with the immunosuppressant pharmacokinetics, producing products more or less active with respect to the original drug. These phenomena have influence over the graft outcomes and clinical consequences as rejections, infections, diarrhea may be caused by the dysbiotic condition. Corticosteroids, calcineurin inhibitors such as tacrolimus and cyclosporine, mycophenolate mofetil and mTOR inhibitors are the immunosuppressive drugs whose effect on the gut microbiota is better known. In contrast is well known how the gut microbiota may interfere with glucocorticoids, which may be transformed into androgens. Tacrolimus may be transformed by micro biota into a product called M1 that is 15-fold less active with respect to tacrolimus. The pro-drug mycophenolate mofetil is normally transformed in mycophenolic acid that according the presence or not of microbes producing the enzyme glu curonidase, may be transformed into the inactive product.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maurizio Salvadori
- Department of Renal Transplantation, Careggi University Hospital, Florence 50139, Tuscany, Italy
| | - Giuseppina Rosso
- Division of Nephrology, San Giovanni di Dio Hospital, Florence 50143, Toscana, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Sucu S, Basarir KE, Mihaylov P, Balik E, Lee JTC, Fridell JA, Emamaullee JA, Ekser B. Impact of gut microbiota on liver transplantation. Am J Transplant 2023; 23:1485-1495. [PMID: 37277064 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajt.2023.05.030] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/24/2023] [Revised: 04/26/2023] [Accepted: 05/24/2023] [Indexed: 06/07/2023]
Abstract
The gut microbiota has been gaining attention due to its interactions with the human body and its role in pathophysiological processes. One of the main interactions is the "gut-liver axis," in which disruption of the gut mucosal barrier seen in portal hypertension and liver disease can influence liver allograft function over time. For example, in patients who are undergoing liver transplantation, preexisting dysbiosis, perioperative antibiotic use, surgical stress, and immunosuppressive use have each been associated with alterations in gut microbiota, potentially impacting overall morbidity and mortality. In this review, studies exploring gut microbiota changes in patients undergoing liver transplantation are reviewed, including both human and experimental animal studies. Common themes include an increase in Enterobacteriaceae and Enterococcaceae species and a decrease in Faecalibacterium prausnitzii and Bacteriodes, while a decrease in the overall diversity of gut microbiota after liver transplantation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Serkan Sucu
- Division of Transplant Surgery, Department of Surgery, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA; Department of Surgery, Koc University School of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Kerem E Basarir
- Division of Transplant Surgery, Department of Surgery, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA
| | - Plamen Mihaylov
- Division of Transplant Surgery, Department of Surgery, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA
| | - Emre Balik
- Department of Surgery, Koc University School of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Jason T C Lee
- Division of Transplant Surgery, Department of Surgery, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA; Division of Abdominal Organ Transplantation and Hepatobiliary Surgery, Department of Surgery, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Jonathan A Fridell
- Division of Transplant Surgery, Department of Surgery, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA
| | - Juliet A Emamaullee
- Division of Abdominal Organ Transplantation and Hepatobiliary Surgery, Department of Surgery, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Burcin Ekser
- Division of Transplant Surgery, Department of Surgery, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Manes A, Di Renzo T, Dodani L, Reale A, Gautiero C, Di Lauro M, Nasti G, Manco F, Muscariello E, Guida B, Tarantino G, Cataldi M. Pharmacomicrobiomics of Classical Immunosuppressant Drugs: A Systematic Review. Biomedicines 2023; 11:2562. [PMID: 37761003 PMCID: PMC10526314 DOI: 10.3390/biomedicines11092562] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/29/2023] [Revised: 09/13/2023] [Accepted: 09/14/2023] [Indexed: 09/29/2023] Open
Abstract
The clinical response to classical immunosuppressant drugs (cIMDs) is highly variable among individuals. We performed a systematic review of published evidence supporting the hypothesis that gut microorganisms may contribute to this variability by affecting cIMD pharmacokinetics, efficacy or tolerability. The evidence that these drugs affect the composition of intestinal microbiota was also reviewed. The PubMed and Scopus databases were searched using specific keywords without limits of species (human or animal) or time from publication. One thousand and fifty five published papers were retrieved in the initial database search. After screening, 50 papers were selected to be reviewed. Potential effects on cIMD pharmacokinetics, efficacy or tolerability were observed in 17/20 papers evaluating this issue, in particular with tacrolimus, cyclosporine, mycophenolic acid and corticosteroids, whereas evidence was missing for everolimus and sirolimus. Only one of the papers investigating the effect of cIMDs on the gut microbiota reported negative results while all the others showed significant changes in the relative abundance of specific intestinal bacteria. However, no unique pattern of microbiota modification was observed across the different studies. In conclusion, the available evidence supports the hypothesis that intestinal microbiota could contribute to the variability in the response to some cIMDs, whereas data are still missing for others.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Annalaura Manes
- Section of Pharmacology, Department of Neuroscience, Reproductive Sciences and Dentistry, Federico II University of Naples, 80131 Naples, Italy; (A.M.); (L.D.); (F.M.)
| | - Tiziana Di Renzo
- Institute of Food Sciences, National Research Council, 83100 Avellino, Italy; (T.D.R.); (A.R.)
| | - Loreta Dodani
- Section of Pharmacology, Department of Neuroscience, Reproductive Sciences and Dentistry, Federico II University of Naples, 80131 Naples, Italy; (A.M.); (L.D.); (F.M.)
| | - Anna Reale
- Institute of Food Sciences, National Research Council, 83100 Avellino, Italy; (T.D.R.); (A.R.)
| | - Claudia Gautiero
- Physiology Nutrition Unit, Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, Federico II University of Naples, 80131 Naples, Italy; (C.G.); (M.D.L.); (G.N.); (B.G.)
| | - Mariastella Di Lauro
- Physiology Nutrition Unit, Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, Federico II University of Naples, 80131 Naples, Italy; (C.G.); (M.D.L.); (G.N.); (B.G.)
| | - Gilda Nasti
- Physiology Nutrition Unit, Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, Federico II University of Naples, 80131 Naples, Italy; (C.G.); (M.D.L.); (G.N.); (B.G.)
| | - Federica Manco
- Section of Pharmacology, Department of Neuroscience, Reproductive Sciences and Dentistry, Federico II University of Naples, 80131 Naples, Italy; (A.M.); (L.D.); (F.M.)
| | - Espedita Muscariello
- Nutrition Unit, Department of Prevention, Local Health Authority Napoli 3 Sud, 80059 Naples, Italy;
| | - Bruna Guida
- Physiology Nutrition Unit, Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, Federico II University of Naples, 80131 Naples, Italy; (C.G.); (M.D.L.); (G.N.); (B.G.)
| | - Giovanni Tarantino
- Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, Federico II University of Naples, 80131 Naples, Italy;
| | - Mauro Cataldi
- Section of Pharmacology, Department of Neuroscience, Reproductive Sciences and Dentistry, Federico II University of Naples, 80131 Naples, Italy; (A.M.); (L.D.); (F.M.)
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Olek K, Kuczaj AA, Warwas S, Hrapkowicz T, Przybyłowski P, Tanasiewicz M. Gut Microbiome in Patients after Heart Transplantation-Current State of Knowledge. Biomedicines 2023; 11:1588. [PMID: 37371683 DOI: 10.3390/biomedicines11061588] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/31/2023] [Revised: 05/13/2023] [Accepted: 05/27/2023] [Indexed: 06/29/2023] Open
Abstract
The human gut microbiota include over 10 trillion microorganisms, such as bacteria, fungi, viruses, archaea, and protozoa. Many reports indicate the strong correlation between dysbiosis and the severity of cardiovascular diseases. Microbiota seem to interact with the host's alloimmunity and may have an immunomodulatory role in graft rejection processes. In our study, we present the current state of the knowledge of microbiota in heart transplant recipients. We present up-to-date microbiota diagnostic methods, interactions between microbiota and immunosuppressive drugs, the immunomodulatory effects of dysbiosis, and the available strategies (experimental and clinical strategies) to modulate host microbiota.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Katarzyna Olek
- Department of Dental Propedeutics, Faculty of Medical Sciences in Zabrze, Medical University of Silesia, 41-800 Zabrze, Poland
| | - Agnieszka Anna Kuczaj
- Department of Cardiac Surgery, Transplantology, Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Faculty of Medical Sciences in Zabrze, Medical University of Silesia in Katowice, M.C. Sklodowskiej 9, 41-800 Zabrze, Poland
| | - Szymon Warwas
- Students' Scientific Association Affiliated with the Department of Cardiac, Vascular and Endovascular Surgery and Transplantology, Faculty of Medical Sciences in Zabrze, Medical University of Silesia, 41-808 Zabrze, Poland
| | - Tomasz Hrapkowicz
- Department of Cardiac Surgery, Transplantology, Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Faculty of Medical Sciences in Zabrze, Medical University of Silesia in Katowice, M.C. Sklodowskiej 9, 41-800 Zabrze, Poland
| | - Piotr Przybyłowski
- Department of Cardiac Surgery, Transplantology, Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Faculty of Medical Sciences in Zabrze, Medical University of Silesia in Katowice, M.C. Sklodowskiej 9, 41-800 Zabrze, Poland
| | - Marta Tanasiewicz
- Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Faculty of Medical Sciences in Zabrze, Medical University of Silesia, 41-800 Zabrze, Poland
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Jing W, Bi C, Fang Z, Qian C, Chen J, Yu J, Tian G, Ye M, Liu Z. Neuropsychiatric sequelae after liver transplantation and their possible mechanism via the microbiota-gut-liver-brain axis. Biomed Pharmacother 2023; 163:114855. [PMID: 37163780 DOI: 10.1016/j.biopha.2023.114855] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/04/2023] [Revised: 05/04/2023] [Accepted: 05/04/2023] [Indexed: 05/12/2023] Open
Abstract
Patients after liver transplantation are often impacted by mental and even neuropsychiatric disorders, including depression, sleep disorders, anxiety, and post-traumatic stress disorder. Neuropsychiatric sequelae have an adverse impact on rehabilitation and can even incapacitate people, reducing their quality of life. Despite screening tools and effective treatments, neuropsychiatric sequelae after liver transplantation (NSALT) have not been fully diagnosed and treated. Current research suggests that NSALT may be partly related to intestinal microbial variation, but the detailed mechanism remains unclear. In this review, we describe the clinical and diagnostic features, prevalence, prediction, clinical course and outcome, management, and treatment of NSALT; we also summarize their mechanisms through the microbiota-gut-liver-brain axis. Finally, we propose to improve NSALT on the basis of adjusting the gastrointestinal flora, immune inflammation or vagus nerve (VN), providing a novel strategy for clinical prevention and treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wenhao Jing
- Department of Psychiatry, Shaoxing seventh people's hospital, Mental Health Center, School of Medicine, Shaoxing University, Shaoxing 312000, Zhejiang, China; Department of Pharmacology, School of Medicine, Shaoxing University, Shaoxing, Zhejiang 312000, China; Department of Clinical Medicine, School of Medicine, Shaoxing University, Shaoxing, Zhejiang 312000, China
| | - Chenchen Bi
- Department of Clinical Medicine, School of Medicine, Shaoxing University, Shaoxing, Zhejiang 312000, China
| | - Zhou Fang
- Department of General Practice, Lizhu Branch, Shaoxing Second Hospital, Shaoxing 312000, Zhejiang, China
| | - Chao Qian
- Department of Psychiatry, Shaoxing seventh people's hospital, Mental Health Center, School of Medicine, Shaoxing University, Shaoxing 312000, Zhejiang, China
| | - Jiaqi Chen
- Department of Pharmacology, School of Medicine, Shaoxing University, Shaoxing, Zhejiang 312000, China; Department of Emergency Medicine, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital, Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences, Guangzhou 510080, Guangdong, China
| | - Jingru Yu
- Department of Clinical Medicine, School of Medicine, Shaoxing University, Shaoxing, Zhejiang 312000, China
| | - Guoqiang Tian
- Department of Psychiatry, Shaoxing seventh people's hospital, Mental Health Center, School of Medicine, Shaoxing University, Shaoxing 312000, Zhejiang, China
| | - Mengfei Ye
- Department of Psychiatry, Shaoxing seventh people's hospital, Mental Health Center, School of Medicine, Shaoxing University, Shaoxing 312000, Zhejiang, China.
| | - Zheng Liu
- Department of Pharmacology, School of Medicine, Shaoxing University, Shaoxing, Zhejiang 312000, China.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Becker HEF, Demers K, Derijks LJJ, Jonkers DMAE, Penders J. Current evidence and clinical relevance of drug-microbiota interactions in inflammatory bowel disease. Front Microbiol 2023; 14:1107976. [PMID: 36910207 PMCID: PMC9996055 DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2023.1107976] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/25/2022] [Accepted: 02/06/2023] [Indexed: 02/25/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is a chronic relapsing-remitting disease. An adverse immune reaction toward the intestinal microbiota is involved in the pathophysiology and microbial perturbations are associated with IBD in general and with flares specifically. Although medical drugs are the cornerstone of current treatment, responses vary widely between patients and drugs. The intestinal microbiota can metabolize medical drugs, which may influence IBD drug (non-)response and side effects. Conversely, several drugs can impact the intestinal microbiota and thereby host effects. This review provides a comprehensive overview of current evidence on bidirectional interactions between the microbiota and relevant IBD drugs (pharmacomicrobiomics). Methods Electronic literature searches were conducted in PubMed, Web of Science and Cochrane databases to identify relevant publications. Studies reporting on microbiota composition and/or drug metabolism were included. Results The intestinal microbiota can both enzymatically activate IBD pro-drugs (e.g., in case of thiopurines), but also inactivate certain drugs (e.g., mesalazine by acetylation via N-acetyltransferase 1 and infliximab via IgG-degrading enzymes). Aminosalicylates, corticosteroids, thiopurines, calcineurin inhibitors, anti-tumor necrosis factor biologicals and tofacitinib were all reported to alter the intestinal microbiota composition, including changes in microbial diversity and/or relative abundances of various microbial taxa. Conclusion Various lines of evidence have shown the ability of the intestinal microbiota to interfere with IBD drugs and vice versa. These interactions can influence treatment response, but well-designed clinical studies and combined in vivo and ex vivo models are needed to achieve consistent findings and evaluate clinical relevance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Heike E F Becker
- Division Gastroenterology-Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine, NUTRIM School of Translational Research in Metabolism, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, Maastricht, Netherlands.,Department of Medical Microbiology, Infectious Diseases and Infection Prevention, NUTRIM School of Translational Research in Metabolism, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, Maastricht, Netherlands
| | - Karlijn Demers
- Division Gastroenterology-Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine, NUTRIM School of Translational Research in Metabolism, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, Maastricht, Netherlands
| | - Luc J J Derijks
- Department of Clinical Pharmacy and Pharmacology, Máxima Medical Center, Veldhoven, Netherlands.,Department of Clinical Pharmacy and Toxicology, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, Maastricht, Netherlands
| | - Daisy M A E Jonkers
- Division Gastroenterology-Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine, NUTRIM School of Translational Research in Metabolism, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, Maastricht, Netherlands
| | - John Penders
- Department of Medical Microbiology, Infectious Diseases and Infection Prevention, NUTRIM School of Translational Research in Metabolism, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, Maastricht, Netherlands.,Department of Medical Microbiology, Infectious Diseases and Infection Prevention, CAPHRI School of Public Health and Primary Care, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, Maastricht, Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Pharmacomicrobiomics in Pediatric Oncology: The Complex Interplay between Commonly Used Drugs and Gut Microbiome. Int J Mol Sci 2022; 23:ijms232315387. [PMID: 36499714 PMCID: PMC9740824 DOI: 10.3390/ijms232315387] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/23/2022] [Revised: 11/27/2022] [Accepted: 12/01/2022] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
The gut microbiome (GM) has emerged in the last few years as a main character in several diseases. In pediatric oncological patients, GM has a role in promoting the disease, modulating the effectiveness of therapies, and determining the clinical outcomes. The therapeutic course for most pediatric cancer influences the GM due to dietary modifications and several administrated drugs, including chemotherapies, antibiotics and immunosuppressants. Interestingly, increasing evidence is uncovering a role of the GM on drug pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics, defining a bidirectional relationship. Indeed, the pediatric setting presents some contrasts with respect to the adult, since the GM undergoes a constant multifactorial evolution during childhood following external stimuli (such as diet modification during weaning). In this review, we aim to summarize the available evidence of pharmacomicrobiomics in pediatric oncology.
Collapse
|
8
|
Xu Z, Jiang N, Xiao Y, Yuan K, Wang Z. The role of gut microbiota in liver regeneration. Front Immunol 2022; 13:1003376. [PMID: 36389782 PMCID: PMC9647006 DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2022.1003376] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/26/2022] [Accepted: 10/12/2022] [Indexed: 12/02/2022] Open
Abstract
The liver has unique regeneration potential, which ensures the continuous dependence of the human body on hepatic functions. As the composition and function of gut microbiota has been gradually elucidated, the vital role of gut microbiota in liver regeneration through gut-liver axis has recently been accepted. In the process of liver regeneration, gut microbiota composition is changed. Moreover, gut microbiota can contribute to the regulation of the liver immune microenvironment, thereby modulating the release of inflammatory factors including IL-6, TNF-α, HGF, IFN-γ and TGF-β, which involve in different phases of liver regeneration. And previous research have demonstrated that through enterohepatic circulation, bile acids (BAs), lipopolysaccharide, short-chain fatty acids and other metabolites of gut microbiota associate with liver and may promote liver regeneration through various pathways. In this perspective, by summarizing gut microbiota-derived signaling pathways that promote liver regeneration, we unveil the role of gut microbiota in liver regeneration and provide feasible strategies to promote liver regeneration by altering gut microbiota composition.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zhe Xu
- Department of Liver Surgery, State Key Laboratory of Biotherapy and Cancer Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University and Collaborative Innovation Center of Biotherapy, Chengdu, China
- Laboratory of Liver Surgery, State Key Laboratory of Biotherapy and Cancer Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University and Collaborative Innovation Center of Biotherapy, Chengdu, China
| | - Nan Jiang
- Department of Liver Surgery, State Key Laboratory of Biotherapy and Cancer Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University and Collaborative Innovation Center of Biotherapy, Chengdu, China
- Laboratory of Liver Surgery, State Key Laboratory of Biotherapy and Cancer Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University and Collaborative Innovation Center of Biotherapy, Chengdu, China
| | - Yuanyuan Xiao
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, West China Second Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
- Key Laboratory of Birth Defects and Related Diseases of Women and Children, Sichuan University, Ministry of Education, Chengdu, China
- *Correspondence: Zhen Wang, ; Kefei Yuan, ; Yuanyuan Xiao,
| | - Kefei Yuan
- Department of Liver Surgery, State Key Laboratory of Biotherapy and Cancer Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University and Collaborative Innovation Center of Biotherapy, Chengdu, China
- Laboratory of Liver Surgery, State Key Laboratory of Biotherapy and Cancer Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University and Collaborative Innovation Center of Biotherapy, Chengdu, China
- *Correspondence: Zhen Wang, ; Kefei Yuan, ; Yuanyuan Xiao,
| | - Zhen Wang
- Department of Liver Surgery, State Key Laboratory of Biotherapy and Cancer Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University and Collaborative Innovation Center of Biotherapy, Chengdu, China
- Laboratory of Liver Surgery, State Key Laboratory of Biotherapy and Cancer Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University and Collaborative Innovation Center of Biotherapy, Chengdu, China
- *Correspondence: Zhen Wang, ; Kefei Yuan, ; Yuanyuan Xiao,
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Gabarre P, Loens C, Tamzali Y, Barrou B, Jaisser F, Tourret J. Immunosuppressive therapy after solid organ transplantation and the gut microbiota: Bidirectional interactions with clinical consequences. Am J Transplant 2022; 22:1014-1030. [PMID: 34510717 DOI: 10.1111/ajt.16836] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/20/2021] [Revised: 08/23/2021] [Accepted: 09/02/2021] [Indexed: 01/25/2023]
Abstract
Our understanding of the involvement of the gut microbiota (GM) in human health has expanded exponentially over the last few decades, particularly in the fields of metabolism, inflammation, and immunology. Immunosuppressive treatment (IST) prescribed to solid organ transplant (SOT) recipients produces GM changes that affect these different processes. This review aims at describing the current knowledge of how IST changes the GM. Overall, SOT followed by IST results in persistent changes in the GM, with a consistent increase in proteobacteria including opportunistic pathobionts. In mice, Tacrolimus induces dysbiosis and metabolic disorders, and alters the intestinal barrier. The transfer of the GM from Tacrolimus-treated hosts confers immunosuppressive properties, suggesting a contributory role for the GM in this drug's efficacy. Steroids induce dysbiosis and intestinal barrier alterations, and also seem to depend partly on the GM for their immunosuppressive and metabolic effects. Mycophenolate Mofetil, frequently responsible for digestive side effects such as diarrhea and colitis, is associated with pro-inflammatory dysbiosis and increased endotoxemia. Alemtuzumab, m-TOR inhibitors, and belatacept have shown more marginal impact on the GM. Most of these observations are descriptive. Future studies should explore the underlying mechanism of IST-induced dysbiosis in order to better understand their efficacy and safety characteristics.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paul Gabarre
- Centre de Recherche des Cordeliers, Team "Diabetes, metabolic diseases and comorbidities", Sorbonne Université, Université de Paris, INSERM, Paris, France
| | - Christopher Loens
- Centre de Recherche des Cordeliers, Team "Diabetes, metabolic diseases and comorbidities", Sorbonne Université, Université de Paris, INSERM, Paris, France
| | - Yanis Tamzali
- Centre de Recherche des Cordeliers, Team "Diabetes, metabolic diseases and comorbidities", Sorbonne Université, Université de Paris, INSERM, Paris, France
| | - Benoit Barrou
- Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux Paris APHP, Medical and Surgical Unit of Kidney Transplantation Unit, Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital, Sorbonne Université, Paris, France
| | - Frédéric Jaisser
- Centre de Recherche des Cordeliers, Team "Diabetes, metabolic diseases and comorbidities", Sorbonne Université, Université de Paris, INSERM, Paris, France
| | - Jérôme Tourret
- Centre de Recherche des Cordeliers, Team "Diabetes, metabolic diseases and comorbidities", Sorbonne Université, Université de Paris, INSERM, Paris, France.,Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux Paris APHP, Medical and Surgical Unit of Kidney Transplantation Unit, Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital, Sorbonne Université, Paris, France
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Pirozzolo I, Li Z, Sepulveda M, Alegre ML. Influence of the microbiome on solid organ transplant survival. J Heart Lung Transplant 2021; 40:745-753. [PMID: 34030971 DOI: 10.1016/j.healun.2021.04.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/03/2021] [Revised: 04/06/2021] [Accepted: 04/11/2021] [Indexed: 10/21/2022] Open
Abstract
The microbiome is an environmental factor in intricate symbiotic relationship with its hosts' immune system, potentially shaping anticancer immunity, autoimmunity, and transplant responses. The focus of this review is to discuss recent findings tying the microbiota to transplant outcomes and alloimmunity. The microbiota changes dynamically following transplantation, but whether these changes affect transplant outcomes can be difficult to parse out. New data reveal effects of the microbiota locally, as well as systemically, depending on the mucosal/epithelial surface colonized, the specific commensal communities present and the nature of microbial-derived molecules produced. These complex interactions result in the microbiota potentially impacting transplantation at different levels, including modulation of donor and/or recipient cells, alterations in the priming and/or effector phases of the alloimmune response, availability or metabolism of immunosuppressive drugs, transplant fate or post-transplant complications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Isabella Pirozzolo
- Section of Rheumatology, Department of Medicine, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Zhipeng Li
- Section of Rheumatology, Department of Medicine, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Martin Sepulveda
- Section of Rheumatology, Department of Medicine, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Maria-Luisa Alegre
- Section of Rheumatology, Department of Medicine, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois.
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Zhou Z, Shang T, Li X, Zhu H, Qi YB, Zhao X, Chen X, Shi ZX, Pan G, Wang YF, Fan G, Gao X, Zhu Y, Feng Y. Protecting Intestinal Microenvironment Alleviates Acute Graft-Versus-Host Disease. Front Physiol 2021; 11:608279. [PMID: 33643058 PMCID: PMC7907526 DOI: 10.3389/fphys.2020.608279] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/22/2020] [Accepted: 12/21/2020] [Indexed: 12/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Acute gut graft-versus-host disease (aGVHD) is a leading threat to the survival of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) recipients. Abnormal gut microbiota is correlated with poor prognosis in allo-HSCT recipients. A disrupted intestinal microenvironment exacerbates dysbiosis in GVHD patients. We hypothesized that maintaining the integrity of the intestinal barrier may protect gut microbiota and attenuate aGVHD. This hypothesis was tested in a murine aGVHD model and an in vitro intestinal epithelial culture. Millipore cytokine array was utilized to determine the expression of proinflammatory cytokines in the serum. The 16S rRNA sequencing was used to determine the abundance and diversity of gut microbiota. Combining Xuebijing injection (XBJ) with a reduced dose of cyclosporine A (CsA) is superior to CsA alone in improving the survival of aGVHD mice and delayed aGVHD progression. This regimen also reduced interleukin 6 (IL-6) and IL-12 levels in the peripheral blood. 16S rRNA analysis revealed the combination treatment protected gut microbiota in aGVHD mice by reversing the dysbiosis at the phylum, genus, and species level. It inhibited enterococcal expansion, a hallmark of GVHD progression. It inhibited enterococcal expansion, a hallmark of GVHD progression. Furthermore, Escherichia coli expansion was inhibited by this regimen. Pathology analysis revealed that the combination treatment improved the integrity of the intestinal tissue of aGVHD mice. It also reduced the intestinal permeability in aGVHD mice. Besides, XBJ ameliorated doxorubicin-induced intestinal epithelial death in CCK-8 assay. Overall, combining XBJ with CsA protected the intestinal microenvironment to prevent aGVHD. Our findings suggested that protecting the intestinal microenvironment could be a novel strategy to manage aGVHD. Combining XBJ with CsA may reduce the side effects of current aGVHD prevention regimens and improve the quality of life of allo-HSCT recipients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zhengcan Zhou
- State Key Laboratory of Component-based Chinese Medicine, Tianjin University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Tianjin, China.,Research and Development Center of TCM, Tianjin International Joint Academy of Biotechnology and Medicine, Tianjin, China
| | - Ting Shang
- State Key Laboratory of Component-based Chinese Medicine, Tianjin University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Tianjin, China.,Research and Development Center of TCM, Tianjin International Joint Academy of Biotechnology and Medicine, Tianjin, China
| | - Xiurong Li
- State Key Laboratory of Experimental Hematology, Institute of Hematology & Blood Diseases Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Tianjin, China
| | - Hongyan Zhu
- State Key Laboratory of Component-based Chinese Medicine, Tianjin University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Tianjin, China.,Research and Development Center of TCM, Tianjin International Joint Academy of Biotechnology and Medicine, Tianjin, China
| | - Yu-Bo Qi
- First Teaching Hospital of Tianjin University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Tianjin, China
| | - Xin Zhao
- State Key Laboratory of Component-based Chinese Medicine, Tianjin University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Tianjin, China
| | - Xi Chen
- State Key Laboratory of Component-based Chinese Medicine, Tianjin University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Tianjin, China
| | - Zhe-Xin Shi
- First Teaching Hospital of Tianjin University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Tianjin, China
| | - Guixiang Pan
- State Key Laboratory of Component-based Chinese Medicine, Tianjin University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Tianjin, China.,Research and Development Center of TCM, Tianjin International Joint Academy of Biotechnology and Medicine, Tianjin, China
| | - Yue-Fei Wang
- State Key Laboratory of Component-based Chinese Medicine, Tianjin University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Tianjin, China.,Research and Development Center of TCM, Tianjin International Joint Academy of Biotechnology and Medicine, Tianjin, China
| | - Guanwei Fan
- First Teaching Hospital of Tianjin University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Tianjin, China
| | - Xiumei Gao
- State Key Laboratory of Component-based Chinese Medicine, Tianjin University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Tianjin, China
| | - Yan Zhu
- State Key Laboratory of Component-based Chinese Medicine, Tianjin University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Tianjin, China.,Research and Development Center of TCM, Tianjin International Joint Academy of Biotechnology and Medicine, Tianjin, China
| | - Yuxin Feng
- State Key Laboratory of Component-based Chinese Medicine, Tianjin University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Tianjin, China.,Research and Development Center of TCM, Tianjin International Joint Academy of Biotechnology and Medicine, Tianjin, China
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Effects of Gut Metabolites and Microbiota in Healthy and Marginal Livers Submitted to Surgery. Int J Mol Sci 2020; 22:ijms22010044. [PMID: 33375200 PMCID: PMC7793124 DOI: 10.3390/ijms22010044] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/13/2020] [Revised: 12/18/2020] [Accepted: 12/20/2020] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Microbiota is defined as the collection of microorganisms within the gastrointestinal ecosystem. These microbes are strongly implicated in the stimulation of immune responses. An unbalanced microbiota, termed dysbiosis, is related to the development of several liver diseases. The bidirectional relationship between the gut, its microbiota and the liver is referred to as the gut–liver axis. The translocation of bacterial products from the intestine to the liver induces inflammation in different cell types such as Kupffer cells, and a fibrotic response in hepatic stellate cells, resulting in deleterious effects on hepatocytes. Moreover, ischemia-reperfusion injury, a consequence of liver surgery, alters the microbiota profile, affecting inflammation, the immune response and even liver regeneration. Microbiota also seems to play an important role in post-operative outcomes (i.e., liver transplantation or liver resection). Nonetheless, studies to determine changes in the gut microbial populations produced during and after surgery, and affecting liver function and regeneration are scarce. In the present review we analyze and discuss the preclinical and clinical studies reported in the literature focused on the evaluation of alterations in microbiota and its products as well as their effects on post-operative outcomes in hepatic surgery.
Collapse
|
13
|
Baghai Arassi M, Zeller G, Karcher N, Zimmermann M, Toenshoff B. The gut microbiome in solid organ transplantation. Pediatr Transplant 2020; 24:e13866. [PMID: 32997434 DOI: 10.1111/petr.13866] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/11/2020] [Revised: 08/06/2020] [Accepted: 09/02/2020] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
Despite ground-breaking advances in allogeneic transplantation, allograft rejection and immunosuppressant-specific complications remain a major challenge in transplant medicine. Growing evidence suggests the human gut microbiome as a potential contributor to transplant outcome and patient health. After breakthrough findings in haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT), the relevance of the microbiome in solid organ transplantation (SOT) is becoming increasingly clear. Here, we review the role of the microbiome in SOT focusing on its significance for transplant-associated complications such as allograft rejection and infections, and highlight its potential impact on immunosuppressive treatment. Moreover, we shed light on the emerging role of the microbiome as a diagnostic biomarker and therapeutic target and discuss current microbial intervention strategies. In addition, this review includes some practical considerations in designing clinical microbiome trials and offers some advice for the interpretation of the resulting data. Further investigation of the gut microbiome harbours countless clinical application possibilities and holds great promise of having a lasting impact on transplant medicine.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maral Baghai Arassi
- Department of Paediatrics I, University Children's Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.,Structural and Computational Biology Unit, European Molecular Biology Laboratory, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Georg Zeller
- Structural and Computational Biology Unit, European Molecular Biology Laboratory, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Nicolai Karcher
- Structural and Computational Biology Unit, European Molecular Biology Laboratory, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Michael Zimmermann
- Structural and Computational Biology Unit, European Molecular Biology Laboratory, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Burkhard Toenshoff
- Department of Paediatrics I, University Children's Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Sepulveda M, Pirozzolo I, Alegre ML. Impact of the microbiota on solid organ transplant rejection. Curr Opin Organ Transplant 2020; 24:679-686. [PMID: 31577594 DOI: 10.1097/mot.0000000000000702] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW The microbiota in mammalian hosts can affect maturation and function of the immune system and has been associated with health and disease. We will review new findings on how this dynamic environmental factor impacts alloimmunity and therapy in transplant hosts. RECENT FINDINGS The microbiota changes after transplantation and immunosuppressive therapy. New data indicate that different microbial community structures have distinct impact on graft outcome, from promoting, to inhibiting or being neutral to transplant survival. In addition, we will address reciprocal interactions between the microbiota and immunosuppressive drugs, as well as the suitability of the microbiota as a predictive biomarker and its utility as adjunct therapy in transplantation. SUMMARY Advances in microbiome sequencing and wider availability of gnotobiotic facilities are enabling mechanistic investigations into the commensal communities and pathways that modulate allograft outcome, responsiveness to immunosuppression and side effects of drugs. A better understanding of the functions of the microbiota may help mitigate drug toxicity, predict drug dosage and dampen alloimmunity in transplant patients.
Collapse
|
15
|
Cornide-Petronio ME, Álvarez-Mercado AI, Jiménez-Castro MB, Peralta C. Current Knowledge about the Effect of Nutritional Status, Supplemented Nutrition Diet, and Gut Microbiota on Hepatic Ischemia-Reperfusion and Regeneration in Liver Surgery. Nutrients 2020; 12:E284. [PMID: 31973190 PMCID: PMC7071361 DOI: 10.3390/nu12020284] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/19/2019] [Revised: 01/13/2020] [Accepted: 01/15/2020] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Ischemia-reperfusion (I/R) injury is an unresolved problem in liver resection and transplantation. The preexisting nutritional status related to the gut microbial profile might contribute to primary non-function after surgery. Clinical studies evaluating artificial nutrition in liver resection are limited. The optimal nutritional regimen to support regeneration has not yet been exactly defined. However, overnutrition and specific diet factors are crucial for the nonalcoholic or nonalcoholic steatohepatitis liver diseases. Gut-derived microbial products and the activation of innate immunity system and inflammatory response, leading to exacerbation of I/R injury or impaired regeneration after resection. This review summarizes the role of starvation, supplemented nutrition diet, nutritional status, and alterations in microbiota on hepatic I/R and regeneration. We discuss the most updated effects of nutritional interventions, their ability to alter microbiota, some of the controversies, and the suitability of these interventions as potential therapeutic strategies in hepatic resection and transplantation, overall highlighting the relevance of considering the extended criteria liver grafts in the translational liver surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Ana Isabel Álvarez-Mercado
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology II, School of Pharmacy, University of Granada, 18071 Granada, Spain;
- Institute of Nutrition and Food Technology “José Mataix,” Center of Biomedical Research, University of Granada, Avda. del Conocimiento s/n, 18016 Armilla, Granada, Spain
- Instituto de Investigación Biosanitaria ibs, GRANADA, Complejo Hospitalario Universitario de Granada, 18014 Granada, Spain
| | - Mónica B. Jiménez-Castro
- Institut d’Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi I Sunyer (IDIBAPS), 08036 Barcelona, Spain; (M.E.C.-P.); (M.B.J.-C.)
| | - Carmen Peralta
- Institut d’Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi I Sunyer (IDIBAPS), 08036 Barcelona, Spain; (M.E.C.-P.); (M.B.J.-C.)
- Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Enfermedades Hepáticas y Digestivas (CIBERehd), 08036 Barcelona, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Young BA, Hanson KE, Gomez CA. Molecular Diagnostic Advances in Transplant Infectious Diseases. Curr Infect Dis Rep 2019; 21:52. [PMID: 31773290 DOI: 10.1007/s11908-019-0704-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW The infectious complications of transplantation can have devastating consequences for patients. Early and accurate diagnosis is essential to good outcomes. This review describes recent advances in pathogen-directed diagnostic testing and discusses the role of new methods for transplant infectious diseases. RECENT FINDINGS Several molecular assays have been introduced into clinical practice in recent years. When the results of rapid testing are linked to patient-specific interventions, improved outcomes can be realized. Syndromic testing along with metagenomic next-generation sequencing (mNGS) represents novel approaches to infection diagnosis. However, the optimal use of these tests for transplant patients along with an overall assessment of cost-effectiveness demands further study. Molecular diagnostics are revolutionizing transplant care. Clinicians need to be aware of the current diagnostic landscape and have a working knowledge of the nuances related to test performance, result interpretation, and cost.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Brittany A Young
- Department of Pathology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.,Associated Regional and University Pathologists Laboratories (ARUP), Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | - Kimberly E Hanson
- Department of Pathology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.,Associated Regional and University Pathologists Laboratories (ARUP), Salt Lake City, UT, USA.,Department of Medicine, Division of Infectious Diseases, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | - Carlos A Gomez
- Department of Medicine, Division of Infectious Diseases, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA. .,University of Utah School of Medicine, 30 North 1900 East, Room 4B319, Salt Lake City, UT, 84132, USA.
| |
Collapse
|