Neoadjuvant and Adjuvant Therapy Approaches to Gastric Cancer

Cystatin SA attenuates gastric cancer cells growth and increases sensitivity to oxaliplatin via PI3K/AKT signaling pathway

PURPOSE

Cystatin SA (CST2) belongs to the superfamily of cysteine protease inhibitors. Emerging research indicates that CST2 is often dysregulated across various cancers. Its role and molecular mechanisms in gastric cancer remain underexplored. This study aims to explore the expression and function of CST2 in gastric cancer.

METHODS

CST2 expression was analyzed and validated through Western blot. CST2 overexpression was induced by lentivirus in GC cells, and the correlation between CST2 expression levels and downstream signaling pathways was assessed. In addition, multiple assays, including cell proliferation, colony formation, wound-healing, and transwell migration/invasion, were considered to ascertain the influence of CST2 overexpression on gastric cancer. The cell cycle and apoptosis were detected by flow cytometry.

RESULTS

CST2 expression at the protein level was decreased to be reduced in both gastric cancer tissues and cell lines, and CST2 expression attenuate gastric cancer growth, an effect restricted to gastric cancer cells and absent in gastric epithelial GES-1 cells. Furthermore, CST2 was demonstrated to improve chemosensitivity to Oxaliplatin in gastric cancer cells through the PI3K/AKT signaling pathway.

CONCLUSION

These findings indicate that CST2 is downregulated at the protein level in gastric cancer tissues and cell lines. Additionally, CST2 was found to attenuate the growth of gastric cancer cells and to enhance sensitivity to Oxaliplatin through the PI3K/AKT signaling pathway, specific to gastric cancer cell lines. CST2 may serve as a tumor suppressor gene increasing sensitivity to Oxaliplatin in gastric cancer.

Deep learning model for predicting postoperative survival of patients with gastric cancer

Background

Prognostic prediction for surgical treatment of gastric cancer remains valuable in clinical practice. This study aimed to develop survival models for postoperative gastric cancer patients.

Methods

Eleven thousand seventy-five patients from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database were included, and 122 patients from the Chinese database were used for external validation. The training cohort was created to create three separate models, including Cox regression, RSF, and DeepSurv, using data from the SEER database split into training and test cohorts with a 7:3 ratio. Test cohort was used to evaluate model performance using c-index, Brier scores, calibration, and the area under the curve (AUC). The new risk stratification based on the best model will be compared with the AJCC stage on the test and Chinese cohorts using decision curve analysis (DCA), the net reclassification index (NRI), and integrated discrimination improvement (IDI).

Results

It was discovered that the DeepSurv model predicted postoperative gastric cancer patients' overall survival (OS) with a c-index of 0.787; the area under the curve reached 0.781, 0.798, 0.868 at 1-, 3- and 5- years, respectively; the Brier score was below 0.25 at different time points; showing an advantage over the Cox and RSF models. The results are also validated in the China cohort. The calibration plots demonstrated good agreement between the DeepSurv model's forecast and actual results. The NRI values (test cohort: 0.399, 0.288, 0.267 for 1-, 3- and 5-year OS prediction; China cohort:0.399, 0.288 for 1- and 3-year OS prediction) and IDI (test cohort: 0.188, 0.169, 0.157 for 1-, 3- and 5-year OS prediction; China cohort: 0.189, 0.169 for 1- and 3-year OS prediction) indicated that the risk score stratification performed significantly better than the AJCC staging alone (P < 0.05). DCA showed that the risk score stratification was clinically useful and had better discriminative ability than the AJCC staging. Finally, an interactive native web-based prediction tool was constructed for the survival prediction of patients with postoperative gastric cancer.

Conclusion

In this study, a high-performance prediction model for the postoperative prognosis of gastric cancer was developed using DeepSurv, which offers essential benefits for risk stratification and prognosis prediction for each patient.

Diagnostic accuracy of radiomics-based machine learning for neoadjuvant chemotherapy response and survival prediction in gastric cancer patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

In recent years, researchers have explored the use of radiomics to predict neoadjuvant chemotherapy outcomes in gastric cancer (GC). Yet, a lingering debate persists regarding the accuracy of these predictions. Against this backdrop, this study was conducted to examine the accuracy of radiomics in predicting the response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in GC patients.

METHODS

An exhaustive search of relevant studies was conducted in PubMed, Cochrane, Embase, and Web of Science databases up to February 21, 2023. The radiomics quality scoring (RQS) tool was employed to assess study quality. Tumor response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy and survival outcomes were examined as outcome measures.

RESULTS

Fourteen studies involving 3,373 GC patients who had received neoadjuvant chemotherapy were incorporated in our meta-analysis. The mean RQS score across all studies was 36.3%, ranging between 0 and 63.9%. On the validation cohort, when the modeling variables were restricted to radiomic features alone, the predictive performance was characterized by a c-index of 0.750 (95% CI: 0.710-0.790), with a sensitivity of 0.67 (95% CI: 0.58-0.75) and a specificity of 0.77 (95% CI: 0.69-0.84) for the prediction of neoadjuvant chemotherapy response. When clinical data was integrated with radiomic features as modeling variables, the predictive performance improved, yielding a c-index of 0.814 (95% CI: 0.780-0.847), a sensitivity of 0.78 [95% CI: 0.70-0.84], and a specificity of 0.73 [95% CI: 0.67-0.79].

CONCLUSIONS

Radiomics holds promise to noninvasively predict neoadjuvant chemotherapy response and survival outcomes among patients with locally advanced GC. Additionally, we underscore the need for future multicenter studies and the development of imaging-sourced tools for risk stratification in this patient population.

Gastric Cancer: A Comprehensive Literature Review

Gastric cancer stands as a significant global health concern, particularly prevalent in Eastern Asia, with high mortality rates urging urgent attention and research efforts. This article comprehensively explores the epidemiology, anatomy, risk factors, pathophysiology, clinical presentation, diagnosis, staging, treatment modalities, prevention strategies, and survival rates associated with gastric cancer. Notably, Helicobacter pylori infection, dietary choices, and intricate stomach anatomy play pivotal roles in disease development. Early detection, utilizing staging, grading, and genetic testing for personalized treatment approaches is emphasized. Treatment modalities encompass surgery, chemotherapy, radiation therapy, targeted therapy, and immunotherapy. Prevention strategies involve lifestyle changes, screening, and genetic counseling. Survival rates vary by stage, highlighting the need for individualized care. In conclusion, a collaborative global effort is essential to address the impact of gastric cancer and improve outcomes.

The development of prognostic gene markers associated with disulfidptosis in gastric cancer and their application in predicting drug response

Background

Gastric cancer (GC) is a malignancy known for its high fatality rate. Disulfidptosis, a potentially innovative therapeutic strategy for cancer treatment, has been proposed. Nevertheless, the specific involvement of disulfidptosis in the context of GC remains uncertain.

Methods

The mRNA expression profiles were obtained from the TCGA and GEO databases. Univariate and LASSO Cox regression analyses were employed to identify differentially expressed genes and develop a risk model for disulfidptosis-related genes. The performance of the model was evaluated using Kaplan-Meier curve, ROC curve, and nomogram. Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses were conducted to determine if the risk model could serve as an independent prognostic factor. The biological function of the identified genes was assessed through GO, KEGG, and GSEA analyses. The prediction of drug response was conducted employing the package "pRRophetic". Furthermore, gene expression was determined using qRT-PCR.

Results

An eight-gene signature were identified and utilized to categorize patients into low- and high-risk groups. Survival, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, and Cox analyses provided clarification that these eight hub genes served as a favorable independent prognostic factor for patients with GC. A nomogram was constructed by integrating clinical parameters with the risk signatures, demonstrating high precision in predicting 1-, 3-, and 5-year survival rates. Additionally, drug sensitivity was different in the high-risk and low-risk groups, and the expression of three genes was verified by qRT-PCR.

Conclusion

The prognostic risk model developed in this study demonstrates the potential to accurately forecast the prognosis of patients with GC.

Efficacy and safety of camrelizumab combined with oxaliplatin and S-1 as neoadjuvant treatment in locally advanced gastric or gastroesophageal junction cancer: A phase II, single-arm study

PURPOSE

In the present study, we aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of camrelizumab combined with oxaliplatin plus S-1 in patients with resectable gastric or gastroesophageal junction cancer.

METHODS

In this single-arm, phase II clinical trial, patients with locally advanced gastric or gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma were enrolled to receive three cycles of neoadjuvant camrelizumab and oxaliplatin plus S-1 every 3 weeks, followed by surgical resection and adjuvant therapy with the same regimen. The primary endpoint was pathological complete response (pCR) (ypT0) rate and secondary endpoints were R0 resection rate, total pCR (tpCR, ypT0N0) rate, major pathological response (MPR) rate, downstaging, objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), event-free survival (EFS), overall survival (OS), and safety.

RESULTS

Between September, 2020 and January, 2022, a total of 29 patients were enrolled in the present study, all of whom completed neoadjuvant therapy and underwent surgery. Three (10.3%) (95% CI: 2.2-27.4) patients achieved pCR as well as tpCR, 20 (69.0%) patients had MPR and 28 (96.6%) patients achieved R0 resection. Treatment-emergent adverse events (AEs) of any grade were observed in 24 (82.8%) patients. Immune-related adverse events of any grade were reported in 13 (44.8%) patients, whereas no grade 3 or higher adverse events occurred.

CONCLUSION

The neoadjuvant therapy with camrelizumab in combination with oxaliplatin and S-1 showed a modest pCR rate, and favorable MPR rate and safety profile in patients with gastric or gastroesophageal junction cancer.

The impact of neoadjuvant chemotherapy on the clinical efficacy and serum tumor marker levels in patients undergoing radical surgery for gastric cancer

The objective of this article is to study the impact of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) on the clinical efficacy and serum tumor marker levels in patients undergoing radical surgery for gastric cancer (GC). Thirty patients who underwent routine radical surgery for GC in our hospital from January 2020 to June 2021 were included in the control group. Thirty patients who underwent radical surgery for GC after receiving NAC from July 2021 to December 2022 were included in the observation group. The treatment outcomes of the observation group were assessed and analyzed. The surgical indicators, tumor markers, Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS), and occurrence of adverse reactions were compared between the 2 groups. Comparisons were made between the 2 groups in terms of surgical duration, number of lymph node dissections, intraoperative blood loss, time to postoperative ambulation, length of hospital stay, and time to postoperative passage of flatus (P > .05). The observation group had a higher proportion of R0 resection at the surgical margin compared to the control group (P < .05). The serum tumor markers of the 2 groups were compared before treatment (P > .05). After treatment, the levels of serum carcinoembryonic antigen, alpha-fetoprotein, cancer antigen 125, and carbohydrate antigen 72-4 decreased in both groups, and the observation group showed a greater reduction in these tumor marker levels compared to the control group (P < .05). The KPS scores of the 2 groups were compared before treatment (P > .05). After treatment, the KPS scores increased in both groups, with the observation group showing a higher improvement compared to the control group (P < .05). The overall incidence of adverse reactions, including incision infection, pleural effusion, pulmonary infection, intestinal obstruction, and gastric emptying disorders, was lower in the observation group (6.67%) compared to the control group (26.67%) (P < .05). The combination of NAC with radical surgery for GC is safe and feasible. It can significantly increase the R0 resection rate, effectively improve the levels of serum tumor markers, enhance patient's quality of life, and result in fewer surgical adverse reactions.

Does total omentectomy prevent peritoneal seeding for advanced gastric cancer with serosal invasion?

BACKGROUND

Radical gastrectomy is composed of gastrectomy, lymph node dissection, and omentectomy. Total omentectomy (TO) is expected to reduce the incidence of peritoneal recurrence. We aimed to investigate the necessity of TO for advanced gastric cancer (AGC) with serosal invasion.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed 310 patients who underwent radical gastrectomy with TO and 93 patients who underwent partial omentectomy (PO) for gastric cancer with serosal invasion between August, 2005 and December, 2017. Finally, 91 patients in the PO group and 91 in the TO group were enrolled based on a 1:1 propensity-score matching analysis. We evaluated surgical and oncological outcomes, including 5-year overall and recurrence-free survival rates.

RESULTS

There was no statistically significant difference between the two groups in postoperative complications. Recurrence sites showed similar patterns in both groups, including peritoneal recurrence (PO vs. TO, 18.7% vs. 28.6%; p = 0.188). Five-year overall survival was better in the PO group (p = 0.018), while 5-year recurrence-free survival was similar in both groups (p = 0.066).

CONCLUSION

TO might not be an essential part of preventing peritoneal recurrence for AGC with serosal invasion. PO could be considered a radical gastrectomy for T4a gastric cancer.

Anxiety and depression during 3-year follow-up period in postoperative gastrointestinal cancer patients: prevalence, vertical change, risk factors, and prognostic value

BACKGROUND

Anxiety and depression are common issues in gastrointestinal cancer, bringing negative impacts on patients' quality of life and long-term prognosis. This study aimed to identify the prevalence, longitudinal variation, risk factors, and prognostic value of anxiety and depression in postoperative gastrointestinal cancer patients.

METHODS

A total of 320 gastrointestinal cancer patients after surgical resection (210 colorectal cancer (CRC) patients and 110 gastric cancer (GC) patients) were enrolled in this study. During the 3-year follow-up period, Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS)-anxiety (HADS-A) and HADS-depression (HADS-D) scores were determined at baseline, 12th month (M12), 24th month (M24), and 36th month (M36).

RESULTS

The prevalence of anxiety and depression at baseline was 39.7% and 33.4% in postoperative gastrointestinal cancer patients, respectively. Female (vs. male), single/divorced/widowed (vs. married), CRC (vs. GC), hypertension, higher TNM stage, neoadjuvant chemotherapy, and postoperative complications were independent risk factors of anxiety or depression in patients with gastrointestinal cancer (all P < 0.050). Furthermore, anxiety (P = 0.014) and depression (P < 0.001) were associated with shortened overall survival (OS); after further adjustment, depression was independently linked with shortened OS (P < 0.001), while anxiety was not. During the follow-up period, HADS-A score (from 7.78 ± 3.180 to 8.57 ± 2.854, P < 0.001), HADS-D score (from 7.23 ± 2.711 to 8.01 ± 2.786, P < 0.001), anxiety rate (from 39.7 to 49.2%, P = 0.019), and depression rate (from 33.4 to 42.6%, P = 0.023) were all gradually increased from baseline to M36.

CONCLUSION

Anxiety and depression gradually exacerbate and relate to poor survival in postoperative gastrointestinal cancer patients.

Prognostic factors of poor postoperative outcomes in gastrectomies

Background

Gastric cancer is one of the most common cancers worldwide and is the third most common cause of cancer related death. Improving postoperative results by understanding risk factors which impact outcomes is important. The current study aimed to compare immediate perioperative outcomes following gastrectomy.

Methods

302 patients following gastric resections over a 10-year period (January 2009-January 2020) were identified in a database and retrospectively analysed. Epidemiological as well as perioperative data was analysed, and a univariate and multivariate analysis performed to identify risk factors for in-hospital mortality.

Results

In general, gastrectomies were mainly performed electively (total vs. subtotal 95% vs. 85%, p = 0.004). Patients having subtotal gastrectomy needed significantly more PRBC transfusions compared to total gastrectomy (p = 0.039). Most emergency surgeries were performed for benign diseases, such as ulcer perforations or bleeding and gastric ischaemia. Only emergency surgery was significantly associated with poorer overall survival (HR 2.68, 95% CI 1.32-5.05, p = 0.003).

Conclusion

In-hospital mortality was comparable between total and subtotal gastrectomies. Only emergency interventions increased postoperative fatality risk.

Advancements and Obstacles of PARP Inhibitors in Gastric Cancer

Gastric cancer (GC) is a common and aggressive cancer of the digestive system, exhibiting high aggressiveness and significant heterogeneity. Despite advancements in improving survival rates over the past few decades, GC continues to carry a worrisome prognosis and notable mortality. As a result, there is an urgent need for novel therapeutic approaches to address GC. Recent targeted sequencing studies have revealed frequent mutations in DNA damage repair (DDR) pathway genes in many GC patients. These mutations lead to an increased reliance on poly (adenosine diphosphate-ribose) polymerase (PARP) for DNA repair, making PARP inhibitors (PARPi) a promising treatment option for GC. This article presents a comprehensive overview of the rationale and development of PARPi, highlighting its progress and challenges in both preclinical and clinical research for treating GC.

Sleep Duration and Stress Level in the Risk of Gastric Cancer: A Pooled Analysis of Case-Control Studies in the Stomach Cancer Pooling (StoP) Project

The association between sleep and stress and cancer is underinvestigated. We evaluated these factors in association with gastric cancer (GC). Five case-control studies from the Stomach Cancer Pooling (StoP) Project were included. We calculated the odds ratios (ORs) and the corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for sleep duration and stress level in association with GC through multiple logistic regression models adjusted for several lifestyle factors. The analysis included 1293 cases and 4439 controls, 215 cardia and 919 noncardia GC, and 353 diffuse and 619 intestinal types. Sleep duration of ≥9 h was associated with GC (OR =1.57, 95% CI = 1.23-2.00) compared to 8 h. This was confirmed when stratifying by subsite (noncardia OR = 1.59, 95% CI = 1.22-2.08, and cardia OR = 1.63, 95% CI = 0.97-2.72) and histological type (diffuse OR = 1.65, 95% CI = 1.14-2.40 and intestinal OR = 1.24, 95% CI = 0.91-1.67). Stress was associated with GC (OR = 1.33, 95% CI = 1.18-1.50, continuous). This relationship was selectively related to noncardia GC (OR = 1.28, 95% 1.12-1.46, continuous). The risk of diffuse (OR = 1.32, 95% CI = 1.11-1.58) and intestinal type (OR = 1.23, 95% CI = 1.07-1.42) were higher when stress was reported. Results for the association between increasing level of stress and GC were heterogeneous by smoking and socioeconomic status (p for heterogeneity = 0.02 and <0.001, respectively). In conclusion, long sleep duration (≥9 h) was associated with GC and its subtype categories. Stress linearly increased the risk of GC and was related to noncardia GC.

Extracellular vesicles in gastric cancer: role of exosomal lncRNA and microRNA as diagnostic and therapeutic targets

Extracellular vesicles (EVs), including exosomes, play a crucial role in intercellular communication and have emerged as important mediators in the development and progression of gastric cancer. This review discusses the current understanding of the role of EVs, particularly exosomal lncRNA and microRNA, in gastric cancer and their potential as diagnostic and therapeutic targets. Exosomes are small membrane-bound particles secreted by both cancer cells and stromal cells within the tumor microenvironment. They contain various ncRNA and biomolecules, which can be transferred to recipient cells to promote tumor growth and metastasis. In this review, we highlighted the importance of exosomal lncRNA and microRNA in gastric cancer. Exosomal lncRNAs have been shown to regulate gene expression by interacting with transcription factors or chromatin-modifying enzymes, which regulate gene expression by binding to target mRNAs. We also discuss the potential use of exosomal lncRNAs and microRNAs as diagnostic biomarkers for gastric cancer. Exosomes can be isolated from various bodily fluids, including blood, urine, and saliva. They contain specific molecules that reflect the molecular characteristics of the tumor, making them promising candidates for non-invasive diagnostic tests. Finally, the potential of targeting exosomal lncRNAs and microRNAs as a therapeutic strategy for gastric cancer were reviewed as wee. Inhibition of specific molecules within exosomes has been shown to suppress tumor growth and metastasis in preclinical models. In conclusion, this review article provides an overview of the current understanding of the role of exosomal lncRNA and microRNA in gastric cancer. We suggest that further research into these molecules could lead to new diagnostic tools and therapeutic strategies for this deadly disease.

Comparisons of perioperative and long-term outcomes of laparoscopic versus open gastrectomy for advanced gastric cancer after neoadjuvant therapy: an updated pooled analysis of eighteen studies

BACKGROUND

Outcomes of laparoscopic surgery in advanced gastric cancer patients who received neoadjuvant therapy represent a controversial issue. We performed an updated meta-analysis to evaluate the perioperative and long-term survival outcomes of laparoscopic gastrectomy (LG) versus conventional open gastrectomy (OG) in this subset of patients.

METHODS

Electronic databases including PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials and China National Knowledge Infrastructure were comprehensively searched up to May 2023. The short-term and long-term outcomes of LG versus OG in advanced gastric cancer patients undergoing neoadjuvant therapy were evaluated. Effect sizes with 95% confidence intervals were always assessed using random-effects model. The prospective protocol was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42022359126).

RESULTS

Eighteen studies (2 randomized controlled trials and 16 cohort studies) involving 2096 patients were included. In total, 933 patients were treated with LG and 1163 patients were treated with OG. In perioperative outcomes, LG was associated with less estimated blood loss (MD = - 65.15; P < 0.0001), faster time to flatus (MD = - 0.56; P < 0.0001) and liquid intake (MD = - 0.42; P = 0.02), reduced hospital stay (MD = - 2.26; P < 0.0001), lower overall complication rate (OR = 0.70; P = 0.002) and lower minor complication rate (OR = 0.69; P = 0.006), while longer operative time (MD = 25.98; P < 0.0001). There were no significant differences between the two groups in terms of proximal margin, distal margin, R1/R2 resection rate, retrieved lymph nodes, time to remove gastric tube and drainage tube, major complications and other specific complications. In survival outcomes, LG and OG were not significantly different in overall survival, disease-free survival and recurrence-free survival.

CONCLUSION

LG can be a safe and feasible technique for the treatment of advanced gastric cancer patients receiving neoadjuvant therapy. However, more high-quality randomized controlled trials are still needed to further validate the results of our study.

The role of EBV-encoded miRNA in EBV-associated gastric cancer

Epstein-Barr virus (human herpesvirus 4, EBV) is a linear double-stranded DNA virus that infects over 90% of the population worldwide. However, our understanding of EBV's contribution to tumorigenesis of EBV-associated GC (EBVaGC) remains incomplete. Recent advancements in EBVaGC research have highlighted that EBV-encoded microRNAs (miRNAs) play prominent roles in critical cellular processes such as migration, cell cycle, apoptosis, cell proliferation, immune response, and autophagy. Notably, the largest group of EBV-encoded miRNAs, known as BamHI-A rightward transcripts (BARTs), exhibit bidirectional effects in EBVaGC. For instance, they present both anti-apoptotic and pro-apoptotic functions and enhance chemosensitivity while also conferring resistance to 5-fluorouracil. Despite these findings, the comprehensive mechanisms through which miRNAs contribute to EBVaGC are yet to be fully elucidated. In this work, we summarize the current evidence of the roles of miRNA in EBVaGC, particularly with the application of multi-omic techniques. Additionally, we discuss the application of miRNA in EBVaGC in retrospective analyses and provide novel perspectives on the use of miRNA in EBVaGC in translational medicine.

Development and Experimental Validation of a Novel Prognostic Signature for Gastric Cancer

BACKGROUND

Gastric cancer is a malignant tumor with high morbidity and mortality. Therefore, the accurate recognition of prognostic molecular markers is the key to improving treatment efficacy and prognosis.

METHODS

In this study, we developed a stable and robust signature through a series of processes using machine-learning approaches. This PRGS was further experimentally validated in clinical samples and a gastric cancer cell line.

RESULTS

The PRGS is an independent risk factor for overall survival that performs reliably and has a robust utility. Notably, PRGS proteins promote cancer cell proliferation by regulating the cell cycle. Besides, the high-risk group displayed a lower tumor purity, higher immune cell infiltration, and lower oncogenic mutation than the low-PRGS group.

CONCLUSIONS

This PRGS could be a powerful and robust tool to improve clinical outcomes for individual gastric cancer patients.

Overview of Chemotherapy for Gastric Cancer

Gastric cancer (GC) is one of the most clinically challenging cancers worldwide. Over the past few years, new molecular-targeted agents and immunotherapy have markedly improved GC prognosis. Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) expression is a key biomarker in first-line chemotherapy for unresectable advanced GC. Further, the addition of trastuzumab to cytotoxic chemotherapy has extended the overall survival of patients with HER2-positive advanced GC. In HER2-negative GC, the combination of nivolumab, an immune checkpoint inhibitor, and a cytotoxic agent has been demonstrated to prolong the overall survival of GC patients. Ramucirumab and trifluridine/tipiracil, which are second- and third-line treatments for GC, and trastuzumab deruxtecan, an antibody-drug conjugate for HER2-positive GC, have been introduced in clinics. New promising molecular-targeted agents are also being developed, and combination therapy comprising immunotherapy and molecular-targeted agents is expected. As the number of available drugs increases, it is important to understand the target biomarkers and drug characteristics and select the optimal therapy for each patient. For resectable disease, differences in the extent of standard lymphadenectomy between Eastern and Western countries have led to different standard treatments: perioperative (neoadjuvant) and adjuvant therapy. This review aimed to summarize recent advances in chemotherapy for advanced GC.

Surgery Matters: Progress in Surgical Management of Gastric Cancer

OPINION STATEMENT

The surgical treatment of gastric carcinoma has progressed significantly in the past few decades. A major milestone was the establishment of multimodal therapies for locally advanced tumours. Improvements in the technique of endoscopic resection have supplanted surgery in the early stages of many cases of gastric cancer. In cases in which an endoscopic resection is not possible, surgical limited resection procedures for the early stages of carcinoma are an equal alternative to gastrectomy in the field of oncology. Proximal gastrectomy is extensively discussed in this context. Whether proximal gastrectomy leads to a better quality of life and better nutritional well-being than total gastrectomy depends on the reconstruction chosen. The outcome cannot be conclusively assessed at present. For locally advanced stages, total or subtotal gastrectomy with D2 lymphadenectomy is now the global standard. A subtotal gastrectomy requires sufficiently long tumour-free proximal resection margins. Recent data indicate that proximal margins of at least 3 cm for tumours with an expansive growth pattern and at least 5 cm for those with an infiltrative growth pattern are sufficient. The most frequently performed reconstruction worldwide following gastrectomy is the Roux-en-Y reconstruction. However, there is evidence that pouch reconstruction is superior in terms of quality of life and nutritional well-being. Oncological gastric surgery is increasingly being performed laparoscopically. The safety and oncological equivalency were first demonstrated for early carcinomas and then for locally advanced tumours, by cohort studies and RCTs. Some studies suggest that laparoscopic procedures may be advantageous in early postoperative recovery. Robotic gastrectomy is also increasing in use. Preliminary results suggest that robotic gastrectomy may have added value in lymphadenectomy and in the early postoperative course. However, further studies are needed to substantiate these results. There is an ongoing debate about the best treatment option for gastric cancer with oligometastatic disease. Preliminary results indicate that certain patient groups could benefit from resection of the primary tumour and metastases following chemotherapy. However, the exact conditions in which patients may benefit have yet to be confirmed by ongoing trials.

Investigations into the impact of non-coding RNA on the sensitivity of gastric cancer to radiotherapy

Non-coding RNAs (ncRNAs) are a newly discovered functional RNA different from messenger RNA, which can participate in regulating the occurrence and development of tumors. More and more research results show that ncRNAs can participate in the regulation of gastric cancer (GC) radiotherapy response, and its mechanism may be related to its effect on DNA damage repair, gastric cancer cell stemness, cell apoptosis, activation of epidermal growth factor receptor signaling pathway, etc. This article summarizes the relevant mechanisms of ncRNAs regulating the response to radiotherapy in gastric cancer, which will be directly important for the introduction of ncRNAs particularly microRNAs (miRNAs), long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs) and circular RNAs (circRNAs) into clinical medicine as biomarkers and therapeutic targets.

Gastrectomy with or without Complete Omentectomy for Advanced Gastric Cancer: A Meta-Analysis

Background and Objectives: Surgery remains the only possible curative treatment for advanced gastric cancer (AGC). Peritoneal metastases are estimated to occur in approximately 55–60% AGC patients. Greater omentum is the most common metastatic area in AGC. At present, omentectomy alone or bursectomy are usually carried out during gastric cancer surgery. We performed a meta-analysis in order to evaluate long-term and short-term outcomes among AGC patients, who have undergone radical gastrectomy with or without complete omentectomy (CO). Materials and Methods: We performed a systematic review following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Meta-analysis was performed by use of RevMan (Computer program) Version 5.4. Results: The eight included studies covered an approximately 20 years long study period (2000–2018). Almost all included studies were retrospective ones and originated from Asian countries. Meta-analysis indicated gastrectomy without CO as significantly associated with longer 3-year (RR: 0.94, 95% CI: 0.90–0.98, p = 0.005) and 5-year overall survivals (OS) (RR: 0.93, 95% CI: 0.88–0.98, p = 0.007). Moreover, we found longer operative time (MD: 24.00, 95% CI: −0.45–48.45, p = 0.05) and higher estimated blood loss (MD: 194.76, 95% CI: 96.40–293.13, p = 0.0001) in CO group. Conclusions: Non-complete omentectomy (NCO) group had a statistically greater rate in 3-year and 5-year OSs than the CO group, while the CO group had significantly longer operative time and higher estimated blood loss than the NCO group. Further randomized, possibly multi-center trials may turn out of paramount importance in confirming our results.