1
|
Philis-Tsimikas A, Diego ERNS, Vincent L, Lohnes S, Singleton C. Are we Ready for Real-Time Continuous Glucose Monitoring in the Hospital Setting? Benefits, Challenges, and Practical Approaches for Implementation : Case Vignette: Remote Real-Time Continuous Glucose Monitoring for Hospitalized Care in Quincy Koala. Curr Diab Rep 2024; 24:217-226. [PMID: 39126617 DOI: 10.1007/s11892-024-01549-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 07/16/2024] [Indexed: 08/12/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW While preliminary evidence for use of real-time continuous glucose monitoring (rtCGM) in the hospital setting is encouraging, challenges with currently available devices and technology will need to be overcome as part of real-world integration. This paper reviews the current evidence and guidelines regarding use of rtCGM in the hospital and suggests a practical approach to implementation. RECENT FINDINGS There is now a considerable body of real-world evidence on the benefits of reducing dysglycemia in the hospital using both traditional point-of-care (POC) glucose testing and rtCGM. Benefits of rtCGM include decreased frequency of hypo- and hyperglycemia with reduced need of frequent POC checks and it is both feasible and well-accepted by nursing staff and providers. If expansion to additional sites is to be considered, practical solutions will need to be offered. Recommendations for an operational workflow and tools are described to guide implementation in the non-ICU setting. Further testing in randomized controlled trials and real-world dissemination and implementation designs is needed, together with industry and technology collaborations, to further streamline the integration into health systems.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Athena Philis-Tsimikas
- Scripps Whittier Diabetes Institute, 9834 Genesee Ave, Suite 300, La Jolla, CA, 92037, USA.
| | - Emily Rose N San Diego
- Scripps Whittier Diabetes Institute, 9834 Genesee Ave, Suite 300, La Jolla, CA, 92037, USA
- Scripps Research Translational Institute, La Jolla, CA, USA
| | - Lauren Vincent
- Scripps Whittier Diabetes Institute, 9834 Genesee Ave, Suite 300, La Jolla, CA, 92037, USA
- Scripps Health Inpatient Providers Medical Group, San Diego, CA, USA
| | - Suzanne Lohnes
- Scripps Whittier Diabetes Institute, 9834 Genesee Ave, Suite 300, La Jolla, CA, 92037, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
ElSayed NA, Aleppo G, Bannuru RR, Bruemmer D, Collins BS, Ekhlaspour L, Galindo RJ, Hilliard ME, Johnson EL, Khunti K, Lingvay I, Matfin G, McCoy RG, Perry ML, Pilla SJ, Polsky S, Prahalad P, Pratley RE, Segal AR, Seley JJ, Stanton RC, Gabbay RA. 16. Diabetes Care in the Hospital: Standards of Care in Diabetes-2024. Diabetes Care 2024; 47:S295-S306. [PMID: 38078585 PMCID: PMC10725815 DOI: 10.2337/dc24-s016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/18/2023]
Abstract
The American Diabetes Association (ADA) "Standards of Care in Diabetes" includes the ADA's current clinical practice recommendations and is intended to provide the components of diabetes care, general treatment goals and guidelines, and tools to evaluate quality of care. Members of the ADA Professional Practice Committee, an interprofessional expert committee, are responsible for updating the Standards of Care annually, or more frequently as warranted. For a detailed description of ADA standards, statements, and reports, as well as the evidence-grading system for ADA's clinical practice recommendations and a full list of Professional Practice Committee members, please refer to Introduction and Methodology. Readers who wish to comment on the Standards of Care are invited to do so at professional.diabetes.org/SOC.
Collapse
|
3
|
Mirmira RG, Kulkarni RN, Xu P, Drossos T, Varady K, Knutson KL, Reutrakul S, Martyn-Nemeth P, Sargis RM, Wallia A, Tuchman AM, Weissberg-Benchell J, Danielson KK, Oakes SA, Thomas CC, Layden BT, May SC, Burbea Hoffmann M, Gatta E, Solway J, Philipson LH. Stress and human health in diabetes: A report from the 19 th Chicago Biomedical Consortium symposium. J Clin Transl Sci 2023; 7:e263. [PMID: 38229904 PMCID: PMC10790105 DOI: 10.1017/cts.2023.646] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/28/2023] [Accepted: 10/01/2023] [Indexed: 01/18/2024] Open
Abstract
Stress and diabetes coexist in a vicious cycle. Different types of stress lead to diabetes, while diabetes itself is a major life stressor. This was the focus of the Chicago Biomedical Consortium's 19th annual symposium, "Stress and Human Health: Diabetes," in November 2022. There, researchers primarily from the Chicago area met to explore how different sources of stress - from the cells to the community - impact diabetes outcomes. Presenters discussed the consequences of stress arising from mutant proteins, obesity, sleep disturbances, environmental pollutants, COVID-19, and racial and socioeconomic disparities. This symposium showcased the latest diabetes research and highlighted promising new treatment approaches for mitigating stress in diabetes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Raghavendra G. Mirmira
- Department of Medicine, Kovler Diabetes Center, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Rohit N. Kulkarni
- Department of Medicine, Islet Cell and Regenerative Biology, Joslin Diabetes Center, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Stem Cell Institute, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Pingwen Xu
- Division of Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, Department of Medicine, University of Illinois Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Tina Drossos
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Neuroscience, Pritzker School of Medicine, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Krista Varady
- Department of Kinesiology and Nutrition, University of Illinois Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Kristen L. Knutson
- Department of Neurology, Center for Circadian and Sleep Medicine, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Sirimon Reutrakul
- Division of Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, Department of Medicine, University of Illinois Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Pamela Martyn-Nemeth
- Department of Biobehavioral Nursing Science, University of Illinois Chicago College of Nursing, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Robert M. Sargis
- Division of Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, Department of Medicine, University of Illinois Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA
- Department of Medicine, Section of Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, Jesse Brown VA Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Amisha Wallia
- Department of Medicine, Division of Endocrinology, Metabolism, and Molecular Medicine, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA
| | | | - Jill Weissberg-Benchell
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Ann & Robert H. Lurie Children’s Hospital of Chicago, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Kirstie K. Danielson
- Division of Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, Department of Medicine, University of Illinois Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Scott A. Oakes
- Department of Pathology, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Celeste C. Thomas
- Department of Medicine, Kovler Diabetes Center, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Brian T. Layden
- Section of Adult and Pediatric Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Sarah C. May
- Department of Medicine, Kovler Diabetes Center, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA
| | | | | | - Julian Solway
- Department of Medicine, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Louis H. Philipson
- Department of Medicine and Pediatrics, Section of Adult and Pediatric Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Irace C, Coluzzi S, Di Cianni G, Forte E, Landi F, Rizzo MR, Sesti G, Succurro E, Consoli A. Continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) in a non-Icu hospital setting: The patient's journey. Nutr Metab Cardiovasc Dis 2023; 33:2107-2118. [PMID: 37574433 DOI: 10.1016/j.numecd.2023.06.021] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/29/2023] [Accepted: 06/28/2023] [Indexed: 08/15/2023]
Abstract
AIMS Although consistent data support the outpatient use of continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) to improve glycemic control and reduce hypoglycemic burden, and clinical outcomes, there are limited data regarding its use in the hospital setting, particularly in the non-intensive care unit (non-ICU) setting. The emerging use of CGM in the non-critical care setting may be useful in increasing the efficiency of hospital care and reducing the length of stay for patients with diabetes while improving glycemic control. DATA SYNTHESIS The purpose of this Expert Opinion paper was to evaluate the state of the art and provide a practical model of how CGM can be implemented in the hospital. SETTING A patient's CGM journey from admission to the ward to the application of the sensor, from patient education on the device during hospitalization until discharge of the patient to maintain remote control. CONCLUSIONS This practical approach for the implementation and management of CGM in patients with diabetes admitted to non-ICUs could guide hospitals in their diabetes management initiatives using CGM, helping to identify patients most likely to benefit and suggesting how this technology can be implemented to maximize clinical benefits.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Concetta Irace
- Department of Health Science, University Magna Graecia of Catanzaro, Catanzaro, Italy.
| | - Sara Coluzzi
- Endocrinology and Metabolism Unit, ASL, Pescara, Italy
| | - Graziano Di Cianni
- ASL Tuscany Northwest, Diabetes and Metabolic Disease, Livorno Hospital, Livorno, Italy
| | | | - Francesco Landi
- Department of Geriatrics and Orthopedics, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario "Agostino Gemelli" IRCCS, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
| | - Maria Rosaria Rizzo
- Department of Advanced Medical and Surgical Sciences, University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", Naples, Italy
| | - Giorgio Sesti
- Department of Clinical and Molecular Medicine, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Elena Succurro
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, University Magna Graecia of Catanzaro, Catanzaro, Italy
| | - Agostino Consoli
- Endocrinology and Metabolism Unit, ASL, Pescara, Italy; Department of Medicine and Aging Sciences DMSI and Center for Advanced Studies and Technology CAST, "G. D'Annunzio" University of Chieti-Pescara, Chieti, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
ElSayed NA, Aleppo G, Aroda VR, Bannuru RR, Brown FM, Bruemmer D, Collins BS, Hilliard ME, Isaacs D, Johnson EL, Kahan S, Khunti K, Leon J, Lyons SK, Perry ML, Prahalad P, Pratley RE, Seley JJ, Stanton RC, Gabbay RA, on behalf of the American Diabetes Association. 16. Diabetes Care in the Hospital: Standards of Care in Diabetes-2023. Diabetes Care 2023; 46:S267-S278. [PMID: 36507644 PMCID: PMC9810470 DOI: 10.2337/dc23-s016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 89] [Impact Index Per Article: 89.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
The American Diabetes Association (ADA) "Standards of Care in Diabetes" includes the ADA's current clinical practice recommendations and is intended to provide the components of diabetes care, general treatment goals and guidelines, and tools to evaluate quality of care. Members of the ADA Professional Practice Committee, a multidisciplinary expert committee, are responsible for updating the Standards of Care annually, or more frequently as warranted. For a detailed description of ADA standards, statements, and reports, as well as the evidence-grading system for ADA's clinical practice recommendations and a full list of Professional Practice Committee members, please refer to Introduction and Methodology. Readers who wish to comment on the Standards of Care are invited to do so at professional.diabetes.org/SOC.
Collapse
|
6
|
Muacevic A, Adler JR. COVID-19 and Diabetes Mellitus: From Pathophysiology to Clinical Management. Cureus 2022; 14:e31895. [PMID: 36579192 PMCID: PMC9792302 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.31895] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/15/2022] [Accepted: 11/25/2022] [Indexed: 11/27/2022] Open
Abstract
An increase in the severity of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) was observed in patients infected with the acute severe metabolism syndrome coronavirus type 2 (SARS-CoV-2). Patients who have COVID-19 infection may also be more susceptible to hyperglycemia. When paired with other risk factors, hyperglycemia might alter immune and inflammatory responses, predisposing people to significant COVID-19 and perhaps deadly outcomes. Angiotensin-converting accelerator 2 (ACE2), a component of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS), is the principal entry receptor for SARS-CoV-2; nevertheless, dipeptidyl enzyme 4 (DPP4) may potentially serve as a binding target. However, preliminary data did not indicate a substantial effect on the susceptibility to SARS-CoV-2 using glucose-lowering DPP4 inhibitors. Because of their pharmacologic characteristics, salt-glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors should not be advised for COVID-19 patients because they may have adverse effects. Currently, taking a hypoglycemic drug should be the most efficient way to manage acute glycemia. The majority of market proof is said to categorize two diabetes mellitus (DM) and fails to distinguish between the two primary categories of DM due to its widespread use. For grouping one DM and COVID-19, there is now some constrained proof available. Most of those findings are just preliminary, so further research will undoubtedly be required to determine the best course of action for DM patients.
Collapse
|
7
|
Xu NY, Nguyen KT, DuBord AY, Klonoff DC, Goldman JM, Shah SN, Spanakis EK, Madlock-Brown C, Sarlati S, Rafiq A, Wirth A, Kerr D, Khanna R, Weinstein S, Espinoza J. The Launch of the iCoDE Standard Project. J Diabetes Sci Technol 2022; 16:887-895. [PMID: 35533135 PMCID: PMC9264445 DOI: 10.1177/19322968221093662] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The first meeting of the Integration of Continuous Glucose Monitor Data into the Electronic Health Record (iCoDE) project, organized by Diabetes Technology Society, took place virtually on January 27, 2022. METHODS Clinicians, government officials, data aggregators, attorneys, and standards experts spoke in panels and breakout groups. Three themes were covered: 1) why digital health data integration into the electronic health record (EHR) is needed, 2) what integrated continuously monitored glucose data will look like, and 3) how this process can be achieved in a way that will satisfy clinicians, healthcare organizations, and regulatory experts. RESULTS The meeting themes were addressed within eight sessions: 1) What Do Inpatient Clinicians Want to See With Integration of CGM Data into the EHR?, 2) What Do Outpatient Clinicians Want to See With Integration of CGM Data into the EHR?, 3) Why Are Data Standards and Guidances Useful?, 4) What Value Can Data Integration Services Add?, 5) What Are Examples of Successful Integration?, 6) Which Privacy, Security, and Regulatory Issues Must Be Addressed to Integrate CGM Data into the EHR?, 7) Breakout Group Discussions, and 8) Presentation of Breakout Group Ideas. CONCLUSIONS Creation of data standards and workflow guidance are necessary components of the Integration of Continuous Glucose Monitor Data into the Electronic Health Record (iCoDE) standard project. This meeting, which launched iCoDE, will be followed by a set of working group meetings intended to create the needed standard.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicole Y. Xu
- Diabetes Technology Society,
Burlingame, CA, USA
| | | | | | - David C. Klonoff
- University of California, San
Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
- Mills-Peninsula Medical Center, San
Mateo, CA, USA
| | | | | | - Elias K. Spanakis
- Baltimore VA Medical Center, Baltimore,
MD, USA
- University of Maryland, Baltimore, MD,
USA
| | | | - Siavash Sarlati
- University of California, San
Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
- Anthem, Inc, Indianapolis, IN,
USA
| | - Azhar Rafiq
- National Aeronautics and Space
Administration, Washington, DC, USA
| | | | | | - Raman Khanna
- University of California, San
Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | | | - Juan Espinoza
- Division of General Pediatrics,
Department of Pediatrics, Children’s Hospital Los Angeles, University of Southern
California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Yu J, Lee SH, Kim MK. Recent Updates to Clinical Practice Guidelines for Diabetes Mellitus. Endocrinol Metab (Seoul) 2022; 37:26-37. [PMID: 35255599 PMCID: PMC8901964 DOI: 10.3803/enm.2022.105] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/24/2022] [Accepted: 02/06/2022] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Guidelines for the management of patients with diabetes have become an important part of clinical practice that improve the quality of care and help establish evidence-based medicine in this field. With rapidly accumulating evidence on various aspects of diabetes care, including landmark clinical trials of treatment agents and newer technologies, timely updates of the guidelines capture the most current state of the field and present a consensus. As a leading academic society, the Korean Diabetes Association publishes practice guidelines biennially and the American Diabetes Association does so annually. In this review, we summarize the key changes suggested in the most recent guidelines. Some of the important updates include treatment algorithms emphasizing comorbid conditions such as atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease, heart failure, and chronic kidney disease in the selection of anti-diabetic agents; wider application of continuous glucose monitoring (CGM), insulin pump technologies and indices derived from CGM such as time in range; more active screening of subjects at high-risk of diabetes; and more detailed individualization in diabetes care. Although there are both similarities and differences among guidelines and some uncertainty remains, these updates provide a good approach for many clinical practitioners who are battling with diabetes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jin Yu
- Division of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul St. Mary’s Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul,
Korea
| | - Seung-Hwan Lee
- Division of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul St. Mary’s Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul,
Korea
- Department of Medical Informatics, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul,
Korea
| | - Mee Kyoung Kim
- Division of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Department of Internal Medicine, Yeouido St. Mary’s Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul,
Korea
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Abstract
The American Diabetes Association (ADA) "Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes" includes the ADA's current clinical practice recommendations and is intended to provide the components of diabetes care, general treatment goals and guidelines, and tools to evaluate quality of care. Members of the ADA Professional Practice Committee, a multidisciplinary expert committee (https://doi.org/10.2337/dc22-SPPC), are responsible for updating the Standards of Care annually, or more frequently as warranted. For a detailed description of ADA standards, statements, and reports, as well as the evidence-grading system for ADA's clinical practice recommendations, please refer to the Standards of Care Introduction (https://doi.org/10.2337/dc22-SINT). Readers who wish to comment on the Standards of Care are invited to do so at professional.diabetes.org/SOC.
Collapse
|
10
|
Robbins T, Hopper A, Brophy J, Pearson E, Suthantirakumar R, Vankad M, Igharo N, Baitule S, Clark CCT, Arvanitis TN, Sankar S, Kyrou I, Randeva H. Digitally enabled flash glucose monitoring for inpatients with COVID-19: Feasibility and pilot implementation in a teaching NHS Hospital in the UK. Digit Health 2022; 8:20552076211059350. [PMID: 35024157 PMCID: PMC8744149 DOI: 10.1177/20552076211059350] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/14/2021] [Accepted: 10/25/2021] [Indexed: 01/08/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND COVID-19 placed significant challenges on healthcare systems. People with diabetes are at high risk of severe COVID-19 with poor outcomes. We describe the first reported use of inpatient digital flash glucose monitoring devices in a UK NHS hospital to support management of people with diabetes hospitalized for COVID-19. METHODS Inpatients at University Hospitals Coventry & Warwickshire (UHCW) NHS Trust with COVID-19 and diabetes were considered for digitally enabled flash glucose monitoring during their hospitalization. Glucose monitoring data were analysed, and potential associations were explored between relevant parameters, including time in hypoglycaemia, hyperglycaemia, and in range, glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c), average glucose, body mass index (BMI), and length of stay. RESULTS During this pilot, digital flash glucose monitoring devices were offered to 25 inpatients, of whom 20 (type 2/type 1: 19/1; mean age: 70.6 years; mean HbA1c: 68.2 mmol/mol; mean BMI: 28.2 kg/m2) accepted and used these (80% uptake). In total, over 2788 h of flash glucose monitoring were recorded for these inpatients with COVID-19 and diabetes. Length of stay was not associated with any of the studied variables (all p-values >0.05). Percentage of time in hyperglycaemia exhibited significant associations with both percentage of time in hypoglycaemia and percentage of time in range, as well as with HbA1c (all p-values <0.05). The average glucose was significantly associated with percentage of time in hypoglycaemia, percentage of time in range, and HbA1c (all p-values <0.05). DISCUSSION We report the first pilot inpatient use of digital flash glucose monitors in an NHS hospital to support care of inpatients with diabetes and COVID-19. Overall, there are strong arguments for the inpatient use of these devices in the COVID-19 setting, and the findings of this pilot demonstrate feasibility of this digitally enabled approach and support wider use for inpatients with diabetes and COVID-19.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tim Robbins
- University Hospitals Coventry & Warwickshire NHS Trust,
Coventry, UK
- Institute of Digital Healthcare, WMG, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK
| | - Adam Hopper
- Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK
| | - Jack Brophy
- Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK
| | - Elle Pearson
- Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK
| | | | | | - Natalie Igharo
- Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK
| | - Sud Baitule
- University Hospitals Coventry & Warwickshire NHS Trust,
Coventry, UK
| | | | | | - Sailesh Sankar
- University Hospitals Coventry & Warwickshire NHS Trust,
Coventry, UK
- Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK
| | - Ioannis Kyrou
- University Hospitals Coventry & Warwickshire NHS Trust,
Coventry, UK
- Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK
- Coventry University, UK
- Aston Medical Research Institute, Aston Medical School, College of
Health and Life Sciences, Aston University, Birmingham, UK
- * Ioannis Kyrou and Harpal Randeva have contributed
equally to this work and are joint senior co-authors
| | - Harpal Randeva
- University Hospitals Coventry & Warwickshire NHS Trust,
Coventry, UK
- Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK
- Aston Medical Research Institute, Aston Medical School, College of
Health and Life Sciences, Aston University, Birmingham, UK
- * Ioannis Kyrou and Harpal Randeva have contributed
equally to this work and are joint senior co-authors
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Kumar B, Mittal M, Gopalakrishnan M, Garg MK, Misra S. Effect of plasma glucose at admission on COVID-19 mortality: experience from a tertiary hospital. Endocr Connect 2021; 10:589-598. [PMID: 33971617 PMCID: PMC8240722 DOI: 10.1530/ec-21-0086] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/13/2021] [Accepted: 05/06/2021] [Indexed: 01/08/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Plasma glucose has been correlated with in-hospital mortality among many diseases including infections. We aimed to study the plasma glucose at the admission of hospitalized patients with COVID-19 at a tertiary care referral hospital at Jodhpur, India and its relation with mortality. DESIGN A hospital-based clinical study of plasma glucose of COVID-19 patients conducted from May 15 to June 30, 2020 after ethical approval. MEASUREMENTS Random blood samples at admission were collected for plasma glucose, interleukin-6 (IL6) and high sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP) after written informed consent was obtained. Plasma glucose was analyzed by the automated analyzer, IL6 by chemiluminescent immunoassay and hsCRP by immune-turbidimetric assay. RESULTS A total of 386 patients were studied (female 39.6%); 11.1% had severe disease and 4.1% expired. There were 67 (17.4%) patients with known diabetes mellitus (DM). Patients with a history of DM had three times higher mortality (6/67, 9%) than those without DM (10/309, 3.1%). Patients with moderate and severe disease according to ICMR and WHO grading had higher plasma glucose than those with asymptomatic or mild disease (P < 0.0001). Plasma glucose levels at admission were significantly higher in non-survivors when compared to those who survived (297 ± 117 vs 131 ± 73; P < 0.0001). COVID-19 patients showed increased mortality with incremental plasma glucose levels. The hazard ratio for mortality was 1.128 (95% CI 0.86-14.860), 1.883 (95% CI 0.209-16.970), and 4.005 (95% CI 0.503-32.677) in random plasma glucose group of >100-200, >200-300 and >300 mg/dL, respectively, compared to those with random plasma glucose of <100 mg/dL at admission. Plasma glucose was strongly correlated with hsCRP (P < 0.001) and IL6 (P < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS Plasma glucose at admission in hospitalized COVID-19 patients is a strong predictor of mortality.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bharat Kumar
- All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Jodhpur, Rajasthan, India
| | - Madhukar Mittal
- All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Jodhpur, Rajasthan, India
- Correspondence should be addressed to M Mittal:
| | | | - Mahendra K Garg
- All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Jodhpur, Rajasthan, India
| | - Sanjeev Misra
- All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Jodhpur, Rajasthan, India
| |
Collapse
|