Macrolide immunomodulation of chronic respiratory diseases

Treatment Strategy of Uncontrolled Chronic Rhinosinusitis with Nasal Polyps: A Review of Recent Evidence

Chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) is recognized as a heterogeneous disease with a wide range of clinical features, resulting in significant morbidity and cost to the healthcare system. While the phenotypic classification is determined by the presence or absence of nasal polyps and comorbidities, the endotype classification has been established based on molecular biomarkers or specific mechanisms. Research on CRS has now developed based on information based on three major endotypes: types 1, 2, and 3. Recently, biological therapies targeting type 2 inflammation have been clinically expanded and may be applied to other inflammatory endotypes in the future. The purpose of this review is to discuss the treatment options according to the type of CRS and summarize recent studies on new therapeutic approaches for patients with uncontrolled CRS with nasal polyps.

"The effect of 48-weeks azithromycin therapy on levels of soluble biomarkers associated with HIV-associated chronic lung disease"

OBJECTIVES

HIV-associated immune activation contributes to chronic lung disease (CLD) in children and adolescents living with HIV. Azithromycin has immunomodulatory and anti-microbial properties that may be useful for treating HIV-associated CLD (HCLD). This study describes the effect of azithromycin on expression of plasma soluble biomarkers in children and adolescents with HCLD.

METHODS

This study was nested within a multi-site double-blind, placebo controlled, randomised controlled trial (RCT) of azithromycin in individuals aged 6-19 years with HCLD (defined as FEV1 z-score < -1) in Malawi and Zimbabwe (BREATHE (NCT02426112)). Participants were randomized 1:1 to once-weekly oral azithromycin with weight-based dosing, for 48 weeks, or placebo. Twenty-six plasma soluble biomarkers were measured on a MagPix Luminex instrument at enrolment, after 48-weeks of treatment and 24-weeks after treatment cessation. Mixed effects models were constructed to compare biomarker expression across treatment and placebo groups.

RESULTS

Weekly azithromycin was associated with reduced levels of C-Reactive Protein (CRP), E-Selectin, Matrix metalloproteinase 10 (MMP-10). Treatment effects for all soluble biomarkers were not sustained 24-weeks after treatment cessation with biomarker expression returning to pre-treatment levels.

CONCLUSIONS

We observed real-world effects of azithromycin on acute inflammation, neutrophil accumulation, and extracellular matrix degradation, that were not sustained after treatment cessation. These results are pertinent when using azithromycin for its immunomodulatory properties, or targeting pathways represented by the soluble biomarkers in this study.

Administration of macrolide antibiotics increases cardiovascular risk

Background

The increased risk of cardiovascular events in patients prescribed macrolides has been subject to debate for decades.

Methods

Medline, EMBASE databases and ClinicalTrials.gov were searched from inception until August 31, 2022 for studies investigating the link between macrolides and cardiovascular risk. A meta-analysis was performed using a random-effects model.

Results

A total of 80 studies involving 39,374,874 patients were included. No association was found between macrolides and all-cause death. However, compared with the non-macrolide group, macrolides were associated with a significantly increased risk of ventricular arrhythmia or sudden cardiac death (VA or SCD) (azithromycin, relative ratio [RR]: 1.53; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.19 to 1.97; clarithromycin, RR: 1.52; 95% CI: 1.07 to 2.16). Besides, administration of macrolides was associated with a higher risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD) death (azithromycin, RR: 1.63; 95% CI: 1.17 to 2.27) and a slightly increased risk of myocardial infarction (MI) (azithromycin, RR: 1.08; 95% CI: 1.02 to 1.15). Interestingly, no association was observed between roxithromycin and adverse cardiac outcomes. Increased risk of VA or SCD was observed for recent or current use of macrolides, MI for former use, and CVD death for current use.

Conclusion

Administration of macrolide antibiotics and timing of macrolide use are associated with increased risk for SCD or VTA and cardiovascular death, but not all-cause death.

Current evaluation and management of patients with chronic rhinosinusitis and nasal polyps

INTRODUCTION

A clear understanding of the pathophysiology of chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP) and its close association with other airway pathologies, especially asthma, helps to comprehend the concept of the united airway and the importance of a multidisciplinary approach and the actual roll of biologic therapy.

AREAS COVERED

This expert review is the synthesis of a working group on the current state of the art of the evaluation and management of CRSwNP. A thorough analysis of the literature has been conducted for the latest studies and results, specially the European (EPOS 2020) and American (ICAR-RS 2021) guidelines.

EXPERT OPINION

The roles of optimal medical treatment and indications for surgery are becoming clearer, but much research is still needed regarding the extent and radicality when surgery is indicated. The main objectives of this review were to provide a clear and updated description of treatments, their indication, follow-up, and response criteria. These steps are considering the broad spectrum of inflammation endophenotypes and the biologic therapy available. Understanding the role and limitations of each specialty is key for providing greatest benefit to the patient.

Azithromycin use prior to ICU admission is associated with a lower short-term mortality for critically ill acute exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patients: A retrospective cohort study

Azithromycin was thought to prevent acute exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (AECOPDs) by anti-microbial and anti-inflammatory effects. However, it's value in the treatment of critically ill patients with AECOPD before ICU admission remains unclear. Our study aimed to find whether azithromycin use prior to ICU admission leads to better clinical outcomes for those individuals. 533 critically ill patients with AECOPD from the MIMIC-IV database were included. Univariate followed multivariate logistic regression was used to select risk factors for short-term mortality. The multivariable logistic regression models were implemented to investigate the association between azithromycin use before ICU admission and short-term mortality. Lower short-term mortality was observed in the azithromycin group (p = .021), independent of differences in demographic data and other clinical outcomes (p>.05). Azithromycin use before ICU admission was proved to have a decreased short-term mortality by multivariable logistic regression (p<.05). The results remained consistent after being stratified by age, SOFA scores, pH, and cancer diagnosis. Azithromycin use prior to ICU admission was associated with lower short-term mortality for critically ill AECOPD patients.

Endotypes of chronic rhinosinusitis: Relationships to disease phenotypes, pathogenesis, clinical findings, and treatment approaches

Chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) is a common clinical syndrome that produces significant morbidity and costs to our health system. The study of CRS has progressed from an era focused on phenotype to include endotype-based information. Phenotypic classification has identified clinical heterogeneity in CRS based on endoscopically observed features such as presence of nasal polyps, presence of comorbid or systemic diseases, and timing of disease onset. More recently, laboratory-based findings have established CRS endotype based upon specific mechanisms or molecular biomarkers. Understanding the basis of widespread heterogeneity in the manifestations of CRS is advanced by findings that the three main endotypes, Type 1, 2, and 3, orchestrate the expression of three distinct large sets of genes. The development and use of improved methods of endotyping disease in the clinic are ushering in an expansion of the use of biological therapies targeting Type 2 inflammation now and perhaps other inflammatory endotypes in the near future. The purpose of this review is to discuss the phenotypic and endotypic heterogeneity of CRS from the perspective of advancing the understanding of the pathogenesis and improvement of treatment approaches and outcomes.

Efficacy and safety of azithromycin in Covid-19 patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials

Azithromycin (AZM) is commonly used in Covid‐19 patients based on low‐quality evidence, increasing the risk of developing adverse events and antimicrobial resistance. The current systematic review and meta‐analysis investigated the safety and efficacy of AZM in treating Covid‐19 patients using published randomized controlled trials. Google Scholar, PubMed, Scopus, Cochrane Library, Clinical Trials.gov, MEDLINE, bioRxiv and medRxiv were searched for relevant studies. The random‐effects model was used to pool estimates using the Paule–Mandel estimate for heterogeneity. The odds ratio and raw difference in medians were used for dichotomous and continuous outcomes, respectively. The analysis included seven studies with 8822 patients (median age, 55.8 years; 61% males). The risk of bias was assessed as ‘low’ for five of the seven mortality results and as ‘some concerns’ and ‘high’ in one trial each. There were 657/3100 (21.2%) and 1244/5654 (22%) deaths among patients randomized to AZM and standard of care, respectively. The use of AZM was not associated with mortality in Covid‐19 patients (OR = 0.96, 95% CI 0.88–1.05, p = 0.317 based on the random‐effect meta‐analysis). The use of AZM was not associated with need for invasive mechanical ventilation (OR = 0.96, 95% CI 0.49–1.87, p = 0.85) and length of stay (Δ = 1.11, 95% CI −2.08 to 4.31, p = 0.49). The results show that using AZM as routine therapy in Covid‐19 patients is not justified due to lack of efficacy and potential risk of bacterial resistance that is not met by an increased clinical benefit.

Azithromycin plus β-lactam versus levofloxacin plus β-lactam for severe community-acquired pneumonia: A retrospective nationwide database analysis

Previous studies showed potential benefits of macrolide combined with β-lactam for severe community-acquired pneumonia (CAP). However, it remains inconclusive whether macrolide plus β-lactam is superior to respiratory fluoroquinolone plus β-lactam for patients with severe CAP. Using a nationwide inpatient database in Japan, we performed propensity score matching and inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) to compare 28-day mortality and in-hospital mortality between azithromycin plus β-lactam and levofloxacin plus β-lactam for severe CAP patients admitted to hospital between July 2010 and March 2015. We identified 1,999 patients with severe pneumonia who received azithromycin plus β-lactam (n = 840) or levofloxacin plus β-lactam (n = 1,159) within 2 days after admission. Five-hundred sixty propensity score-matched pairs showed no significant differences between azithromycin plus β-lactam and levofloxacin plus β-lactam in 28-day mortality and in-hospital mortality (19.3% vs. 20.7%, p = 0.601 and 24.8% vs. 26.8%, p = 0.495, respectively). IPTW analysis also showed no significant differences between azithromycin plus β-lactam and levofloxacin plus β-lactam in 28-day mortality (risk difference, -3.5% [95% confidence interval, -8.8% to 1.7%] and in-hospital mortality (risk difference, -3.6%; 95% confidence interval, -9.4% to 2.1%). In conclusion, there were no significant differences in 28-day mortality and in-hospital mortality between azithromycin plus β-lactam and levofloxacin plus β-lactam for severe CAP patients.

Association of macrolides with overall mortality and cardiac death among patients with various infections: A meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

A large body of evidences suggested that macrolide therapy could improve the survival of patients with various infections. While in the same time, macrolides are known to increase fatal arrhythmogenic risks and cause cardiac death. To assess the risks and benefits of macrolide therapy, we systematically reviewed all studies of macrolide use, cardiac death and mortality among patients with various infections.

METHODS

We searched Pubmed, Embase and Cochrane library and reviewed reference lists from 1980 through April 2015. Studies were included if they compared macrolides to other antibiotics in adults with various infections. The outcome measures were the overall mortality and the risk of cardiac death.

RESULTS

Overall, macrolide use was associated with a statistically significant mortality reduction compared with nonmacrolide use (OR: 0.65, 95% CI: 0.46-0.92). There was no difference in the risk of cardiac death between macrolide and nonmacrolide regimes (OR: 1.43, 95% CI: 0.86-2.40). In subgroup analyses, macrolide use was found to be associated with the decreased risk of mortality in a population of older individuals (age>48 years, OR: 0.69; 95% CI: 0.66-0.72). While in a general population of young and middle-aged adults, the use of macrolide-based regimens could not decrease the risk of death from any cause (age<48 years, OR: 0.42; 95% CI: 0.02-11.01). As for cardiac death, macrolide use was found to be associated with increased risk of cardiac death in a population of older individuals (age>48 years, OR: 1.99; 95% CI: 1.53-2.59).

CONCLUSION

Despite the potential cardiotoxic effects, there is a net benefit associated with macrolide use in older patients with various infections and macrolide use except roxithromycin was found to be associated with increased risk of cardiac death in a population of adults aged > 48 years.

Azithromycin use and outcomes in severe sepsis patients with and without pneumonia

PURPOSE

Studies investigating the association between macrolides and outcomes in both pulmonary and nonpulmonary critically ill patients are limited. We aimed to examine the association between azithromycin use and clinical outcomes in severe sepsis patients with and without pneumonia receiving mechanical ventilation.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A retrospective cohort of 105 patients admitted to an adult intensive care unit (ICU) with severe sepsis in an urban university hospital were included in the study. Multivariable linear regression was performed to assess the relationship between azithromycin use and the following outcomes: 28-day ICU-free days and 28-day ventilator-free days.

RESULTS

In univariate analysis, patients receiving azithromycin had nearly 6 more ICU-free days on average than did patients not receiving azithromycin (P = .005). The increased ICU-free days remained in multivariable analysis adjusting for age, sex, race, ICU type, and presence of shock (P = .005). In stratified analysis examining the association of azithromycin use in severe sepsis patients without pneumonia (n = 74), the results were similar to the full cohort.

CONCLUSION

Azithromycin was associated with more ICU-free days in severe sepsis patients with and without pneumonia. Further investigations are warranted to better elicit the association of macrolide use on clinical outcomes in severe sepsis patients, especially those without pneumonia.

Evaluation of macrolides for possible use against multidrug-resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis

Multidrug-resistant tuberculosis (MDR-TB) is a major global health problem. The loss of susceptibility to an increasing number of drugs behoves us to consider the evaluation of non-traditional anti-tuberculosis drugs.

Clarithromycin, a macrolide antibiotic, is defined as a group 5 anti-tuberculosis drug by the World Health Organization; however, its role or efficacy in the treatment of MDR-TB is unclear. A systematic review of the literature was conducted to summarise the evidence for the activity of macrolides against MDR-TB, by evaluating in vitro, in vivo and clinical studies. PubMed and Embase were searched for English language articles up to May 2014.

Even though high minimum inhibitory concentration values are usually found, suggesting low activity against Mycobacterium tuberculosis, the potential benefits of macrolides are their accumulation in the relevant compartments and cells in the lungs, their immunomodulatory effects and their synergistic activity with other anti-TB drugs.

A future perspective may be use of more potent macrolide analogues to enhance the activity of the treatment regimen.

Ruling out Legionella in community-acquired pneumonia

BACKGROUND

Assessing the likelihood for Legionella sp. in community-acquired pneumonia is important because of differences in treatment regimens. Currently used antigen tests and culture have limited sensitivity with important time delays, making empirical broad-spectrum coverage necessary. Therefore, a score with 6 variables recently has been proposed. We sought to validate these parameters in an independent cohort.

METHODS

We analyzed adult patients with community-acquired pneumonia from a large multinational database (Community Acquired Pneumonia Organization) who were treated between 2001 and 2012 with more than 4 of the 6 prespecified clinical variables available. Association and discrimination were assessed using logistic regression analysis and area under the curve (AUC).

RESULTS

Of 1939 included patients, the infectious cause was known in 594 (28.9%), including Streptococcus pneumoniae in 264 (13.6%) and Legionella sp. in 37 (1.9%). The proposed clinical predictors fever, cough, hyponatremia, lactate dehydrogenase, C-reactive protein, and platelet count were all associated or tended to be associated with Legionella cause. A logistic regression analysis including all these predictors showed excellent discrimination with an AUC of 0.91 (95% confidence interval, 0.87-0.94). The original dichotomized score showed good discrimination (AUC, 0.73; 95% confidence interval, 0.65-0.81) and a high negative predictive value of 99% for patients with less than 2 parameters present.

CONCLUSIONS

With the use of a large independent patient sample from an international database, this analysis validates previously proposed clinical variables to accurately rule out Legionella sp., which may help to optimize initial empiric therapy.

Macrolides and mortality in critically ill patients with community-acquired pneumonia: a systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

Some studies suggest better outcomes with macrolide therapy for critically ill patients with community-acquired pneumonia. To further explore this, we performed a systematic review of studies with mortality endpoints that compared macrolide therapy with other regimens in critically ill patients with community-acquired pneumonia.

DATA SOURCES

Studies were identified via electronic databases, grey literature, and conference proceedings through May 2013.

STUDY SELECTION

Using prespecified criteria, two reviewers selected studies; studies of outpatients and hospitalized noncritically ill patients were excluded.

DATA EXTRACTION

Two reviewers extracted data and evaluated bias using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. Random effects models were used to generate pooled risk ratios and evaluate heterogeneity (I).

DATA SYNTHESIS

Twenty-eight observational studies (no randomized control trials) were included. Average age ranged from 58 to 78 years and 14-49% were women. In our primary analysis of 9,850 patients, macrolide use was associated with statistically significant lower mortality compared with nonmacrolides (21% [846 of 4,036 patients] vs 24% [1,369 of 5,814]; risk ratio, 0.82; 95% CI, 0.70-0.97; p = 0.02; I = 63%). When macrolide monotherapy was excluded, the macrolide mortality benefit was maintained (21% [737 of 3,447 patients] vs 23% [1,245 of 5,425]; risk ratio, 0.84; 95% CI, 0.71-1.00; p = 0.05; I = 60%). When broadly guideline-concordant regimens were compared, there was a trend to improved mortality and heterogeneity was reduced (20% [511 of 2,561 patients] mortality with beta-lactam/macrolide therapy vs 23% [386 of 1,680] with beta-lactam/fluoroquinolone; risk ratio, 0.83; 95% CI, 0.67-1.03; p = 0.09; I = 25%). When adjusted risk estimates were pooled from eight studies, macrolide therapy was still associated with a significant reduction in mortality (risk ratio, 0.75; 95% CI, 0.58-0.96; p = 0.02; I = 57%).

CONCLUSIONS

In observational studies of almost 10,000 critically ill patients with community-acquired pneumonia, macrolide use was associated with a significant 18% relative (3% absolute) reduction in mortality compared with nonmacrolide therapies. After pooling data from studies that provided adjusted risk estimates, an even larger mortality reduction was observed. These results suggest that macrolides be considered first-line combination treatment in critically ill patients with community-acquired pneumonia and support current guidelines.

The challenge of chronic lung disease in HIV-infected children and adolescents

Until recently, little attention has been given to chronic lung disease (CLD) in HIV-infected children. As the HIV epidemic matures in sub-Saharan Africa, adolescents who acquired HIV by vertical transmission are presenting to health services with chronic diseases. The most common is CLD, which is often debilitating. This review summarizes the limited data available on the epidemiology, pathophysiology, clinical picture, special investigations and management of CLD in HIV-infected adolescents. A number of associated conditions: lymphocytic interstitial pneumonitis, tuberculosis and bronchiectasis are well described. Other pathologies such as HIV-associated bronchiolitis obliterans resulting in non-reversible airway obstruction, has only recently been described. In this field, there are many areas of uncertainty needing urgent research. These areas include the definition of CLD, pathophysiological mechanisms and common pathologies responsible. Very limited data are available to formulate an effective plan of investigation and management.

Macrolide-based regimens in absence of bacterial co-infection in critically ill H1N1 patients with primary viral pneumonia

PURPOSE

To determine whether macrolide-based treatment is associated with mortality in critically ill H1N1 patients with primary viral pneumonia.

METHODS

Secondary analysis of a prospective, observational, multicenter study conducted across 148 Intensive Care Units (ICU) in Spain.

RESULTS

Primary viral pneumonia was present in 733 ICU patients with pandemic influenza A (H1N1) virus infection with severe respiratory failure. Macrolide-based treatment was administered to 190 (25.9 %) patients. Patients who received macrolides had chronic obstructive pulmonary disease more often, lower severity on admission (APACHE II score on ICU admission (13.1 ± 6.8 vs. 14.4 ± 7.4 points, p < 0.05), and multiple organ dysfunction syndrome less often (23.4 vs. 30.1 %, p < 0.05). Length of ICU stay in survivors was not significantly different in patients who received macrolides compared to patients who did not (10 (IQR 4-20) vs. 10 (IQR 5-20), p = 0.9). ICU mortality was 24.1 % (n = 177). Patients with macrolide-based treatment had lower ICU mortality in the univariate analysis (19.2 vs. 28.1 %, p = 0.02); however, a propensity score analysis showed no effect of macrolide-based treatment on ICU mortality (OR = 0.87; 95 % CI 0.55-1.37, p = 0.5). Moreover, the sensitivity analysis revealed very similar results (OR = 0.91; 95 % CI 0.58-1.44, p = 0.7). A separate analysis of patients under mechanical ventilation yielded similar results (OR = 0.77; 95 % CI 0.44-1.35, p = 0.4).

CONCLUSION

Our results suggest that macrolide-based treatment was not associated with improved survival in critically ill H1N1 patients with primary viral pneumonia.

Macrolides in chronic inflammatory skin disorders

Long-term therapy with the macrolide antibiotic erythromycin was shown to alter the clinical course of diffuse panbronchiolitis in the late 1980s. Since that time, macrolides have been found to have a large number of anti-inflammatory properties in addition to being antimicrobials. These observations provided the rationale for many studies performed to assess the usefulness of macrolides in other inflammatory diseases including skin and hair disorders, such as rosacea, psoriasis, pityriasis rosea, alopecia areata, bullous pemphigoid, and pityriasis lichenoides. This paper summarizes a collection of clinical studies and case reports dealing with the potential benefits of macrolides antibiotics in the treatment of selected dermatoses which have primarily been classified as noninfectious and demonstrating their potential for being disease-modifying agents.

Guideline adherence and macrolides reduced mortality in outpatients with pneumonia

BACKGROUND

For outpatients with pneumonia, guidelines recommend empiric antibiotics and some suggest macrolides are preferred agents. We hypothesized that both guideline-concordant antibiotics and macrolides would be associated with reduced mortality.

METHODS

All outpatients with pneumonia assessed at 7 Emergency Departments in Edmonton, Alberta, Canada were enrolled in a population-based registry that included clinical-radiographic data, Pneumonia Severity Index (PSI) and treatments. Guideline-concordant regimens included macrolides and respiratory fluoroquinolones; other regimens were "discordant". Main outcome was 30-day all-cause mortality.

RESULTS

The study included 2973 outpatients; mean age 51 years, 47% female, most had mild pneumonia (73% PSI Class I-II). Over 30-days, 38 (1%) patients died, 228 (8%) were hospitalized, and 253 (9%) reached the endpoint of death or hospitalization. Most (2845 [96%]) patients received guideline-concordant antibiotics. Compared to patients receiving discordant antibiotics, those receiving guideline-concordant antibiotics were less likely to die within 30-days (8 [6%] versus 30 [1%], adjusted OR 0.23, 95% CI 0.09-0.59, p = 0.002). Within the guideline-concordant subgroup, compared to the 947 (33%) patients treated with fluoroquinolones, those receiving macrolides [1847 (64%)] were less likely to die (25 [3%] versus 4 [0.2%], adjusted OR 0.28, 95% CI 0.09-0.86, p = 0.03).

CONCLUSIONS

In outpatients with pneumonia, treatment with guideline-concordant antibiotics and macrolides were both associated with mortality reduction.

Macrolides: from in vitro anti-inflammatory and immunomodulatory properties to clinical practice in respiratory diseases

BACKGROUND

Macrolides have long been recognised to exert immunomodulary and anti-inflammatory actions. They are able to suppress the "cytokine storm" of inflammation and to confer an additional clinical benefit through their immunomodulatory properties.

METHODS

A search of electronic journal articles was performed using combinations of the following keywords: macrolides, COPD, asthma, bronchitis, bronchiolitis obliterans, cystic fibrosis, immunomodulation, anti-inflammatory effect, diabetes, side effects and systemic diseases.

RESULTS

Macrolide effects are time- and dose-dependent, and the mechanisms underlying these effects remain incompletely understood. Both in vitro and in vivo studies have provided ample evidence of their immunomodulary and anti-inflammatory actions. Importantly, this class of antibiotics is efficacious with respect to controlling exacerbations of underlying respiratory problems, such as cystic fibrosis, asthma, bronchiectasis, panbrochiolitis and cryptogenic organising pneumonia. Macrolides have also been reported to reduce airway hyper-responsiveness and improve pulmonary function.

CONCLUSION

This review provides an overview on the properties of macrolides (erythromycin, clarithromycin, roxithromycin, azithromycin), their efficacy in various respiratory diseases and their adverse effects.

The role of macrolides in noncystic fibrosis bronchiectasis

Objective. The present study aims at reviewing the main publications on the use of macrolides as immunomodulators in patients with noncystic fibrosis bronchiectasis. Source of Data. The Medline database was our source of data for this research carried out until June 2011, using the key words: macrolides and bronchiectasis, while searching for original articles and reviews. Summary of Data. Seven clinical studies that evaluated the action of the macrolides in patients with bronchiectasis were found. There was the sputum volume, reduction in pulmonary exacerbation frequency, and in the use of antimicrobial treatment, in addition to pulmonary function improvement. Conclusions. Anti-inflammatory action and immunomodulatory effects can be attributed to macrolides when administered in low doses and on the long term. This use has been well established both in diffuse panbronchiolitis and in cystic fibrosis. Evidence indicates possible benefits in bronchiectasis. Future studies are needed, though, to establish the ideal dose and treatment duration and to understand the implications in the generation of microbial resistance."When patients have bacteria that are resistant to all antibiotics, prescribe erythromycin, leave them on it for a long time, and they will do much better"Dr. Harry Shwachman, 1950.

Antimicrobial therapy of sepsis and septic shock--when are two drugs better than one?

In clinical practice, physicians frequently use combination therapy despite the conflicting evidence for its effectiveness. The results of recent studies have contributed to our understanding of this important issue. In this article, we examine the evidence for, or against, the use of combination drug therapy compared with monotherapy in the management of serious infections, sepsis, and septic shock.

Acute lung injury in preterm newborn infants: mechanisms and management

Respiratory morbidity and mortality remain common in preterm infants. The immature preterm lung is especially prone to injury. This process often starts in-utero due to maternal chorioamnionitis, priming the lung for further injury in response to post-natal ventilation, oxygen and nosocomial infection. Pulmonary inflammation has been strongly implicated in the pathway leading to lung injury in this population of infants. Several therapeutic approaches have been attempted to prevent acute lung injury or to limit its progress. The mechanisms of acute lung injury in preterm infants; their clinical correlates and available therapeutic approaches are reviewed here.

Beneficial and Harmful Interactions of Antibiotics with Microbial Pathogens and the Host Innate Immune System

In general antibiotics interact cooperatively with host defences, weakening and decreasing the virulence of microbial pathogens, thereby increasing vulnerability to phagocytosis and eradication by the intrinsic antimicrobial systems of the host. Antibiotics, however, also interact with host defences by several other mechanisms, some harmful, others beneficial. Harmful activities include exacerbation of potentially damaging inflammatory responses, a property of cell-wall targeted agents, which promotes the release of pro-inflammatory microbial cytotoxins and cell-wall components. On the other hand, inhibitors of bacterial protein synthesis, especially macrolides, possess beneficial anti-inflammatory/cytoprotective activities, which result from interference with the production of microbial virulence factors/cytotoxins. In addition to these pathogen-directed, anti-inflammatory activities, some classes of antimicrobial agent possess secondary anti-inflammatory properties, unrelated to their conventional antimicrobial activities, which target cells of the innate immune system, particularly neutrophils. This is a relatively uncommon, potentially beneficial property of antibiotics, which has been described for macrolides, imidazole anti-mycotics, fluoroquinolones, and tetracyclines. Although of largely unproven significance in the clinical setting, increasing awareness of the pro-inflammatory and anti-inflammatory properties of antibiotics may contribute to a more discerning and effective use of these agents.

Does Ureaplasma spp. cause chronic lung disease of prematurity: ask the audience?

Ureaplasma has long been implicated in the pathogenesis of both preterm labour and neonatal morbidity, particularly chronic lung disease of prematurity (CLD), but despite numerous studies, reviews and meta-analyses, its exact role remains unclear. Many papers call for a definitive randomised control trial to determine if eradication of pulmonary Ureaplasma decreases the rates of CLD but few address in detail the obstacles to an adequately powered clinical trial. We review the evidence for Ureaplasma as a causative agent in CLD, asking why a randomised control trial has not been performed. We surveyed the opinions of senior neonatologists in the UK on whether they felt that there was sufficient evidence for Ureaplasma either causing or not causing CLD and whether a definitive trial was needed, as well as their views on the design of such a trial. Additionally, we ascertained current practice with respect to Ureaplasma detection in preterm neonates in the UK. There is clear support for an adequately powered randomised controlled clinical trial by senior neonatologists in the UK. There are no reasons why a definitive trial cannot be conducted especially as the appropriate samples, and methods to culture or identify the organism by PCR are already available.

Therapy for pneumococcal bacteremia: monotherapy or combination therapy?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The issue of whether the outcome of bacteremic pneumococcal infections is improved with the use of combination antibiotic therapy versus monotherapy is still not resolved. This review highlights recent studies that have addressed this issue.

RECENT FINDINGS

Some studies have indicated benefit of combination antibiotic therapy in severely ill patients with community-acquired pneumonia of all-cause. Conversely, in less severely ill hospitalized patients, fluoroquinolone monotherapy was as effective as fluoroquinolone combination regimens and a propensity analysis failed to show benefit of beta-lactam/macrolide combination over beta-lactam monotherapy. Studies across the world have shown a more favorable outcome in patients with community-acquired pneumonia treated with guideline-compliant therapy, mostly beta-lactam/macrolide combination regimens. The only recent study of patients with bacteremic pneumococcal pneumonia failed, however, to show benefit of combination therapy. A large number of investigations have yielded observations that address possible mechanisms by which combination therapy may have benefit, investigating issues such as cover for atypical pathogens, attenuation of pneumococcal virulence factors, and anti-inflammatory activity of the macrolide group of antibiotics.

SUMMARY

Despite a number of recent studies, the definitive decision regarding the need for combination antibiotic therapy for the effective management of bacteremic pneumococcal infections has not yet been formally resolved.