1
|
Pang PCI, Munsie M, Chang S, Tanner C, Walker C. Participatory Design and Evaluation of the "Stem Cells Australia" Website for Delivering Complex Health Knowledge: Mixed Methods Study. J Med Internet Res 2023; 25:e44733. [PMID: 37471121 PMCID: PMC10401697 DOI: 10.2196/44733] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/30/2022] [Revised: 03/20/2023] [Accepted: 06/17/2023] [Indexed: 07/21/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The internet has become a commonly used information source for people seeking to understand their health care options. However, inconsistent representation about what stem cell treatments are available and from whom, coupled with the lack of transparency about what has been shown to work or is even safe, can distract and mislead users. Given these challenges, there is a need to develop effective evidence-based tools for delivering information about health care options involving stem cells. OBJECTIVE A need to redesign an existing website in Australia was identified to provide trustworthy information about stem cell research and to counter misinformation. Using a participatory design approach to generate an understanding of what information users need for stem cell treatments, the Stem Cells Australia website serves as a case study for the development and evaluation of websites delivering complex messages about science and health. METHODS This study comprised 3 steps. First, a focus group and several one-on-one interviews with a purposive sample of users (n=12) were conducted to identify their needs and requirements. Second, we designed a new version of the website based on findings from the focus group and interviews. Finally, for evaluating the participatory design process, we collected 180 days of Google Analytics data for both the original and redesigned versions (90 days for each) and compared their differences using 2-sample z tests. RESULTS The feedback from participants was grouped into 3 themes-needed and unwanted information, how and where to obtain information, and their information preferences. These were translated into requirements for rebuilding the website. The redesigned version reached users in other continents, despite the daily numbers of users (-61.2%; P<.001) and sessions (-61.7%; P<.001) decreasing. The redesigned version also showed substantial decrease in daily bounce rate (-97.2%; P<.001), significant increase in the daily average of page reads per session (+110.8%; P<.001), and long daily average for session duration (+22.9%; P=.045). Navigation flow analysis showed more traffic toward web pages related to health conditions in the redesigned version. CONCLUSIONS Websites about stem cell research need to provide content for vulnerable global audiences. Participatory design that addresses knowledge gaps and information needs can produce better performance and engagement, which can be evaluated using Google Analytics, a common web analytics tool used by many websites. Learnings for improving the metrics regarding website identity, research updates, and clinical trials are concluded, which can inform the future design of websites seeking to engage users and provide reliable and accessible science and health information including but not limited to stem cell research and therapies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Megan Munsie
- Melbourne Medical School, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia
- Stem Cell Ethics and Policy Group, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Shanton Chang
- School of Computing and Information Systems, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia
| | - Claire Tanner
- School of Social Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Christine Walker
- Melbourne Medical School, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Macpherson K, Aiyegbusi OL, Elston L, Myles S, Washington J, Sungum N, Briggs M, Newsome P, Calvert M. A scoping review of patient and public perspectives on cell and gene therapies. Regen Med 2021; 16:1005-1017. [PMID: 34553606 DOI: 10.2217/rme-2020-0181] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Aim: The development and introduction of cell and gene therapies presents complex social and economic issues. Fully addressing these challenges requires engagement with patients and the public. Materials & methods: A systematically conducted scoping review was undertaken to gauge current patient and public knowledge and perspectives, and as such inform requirements for future research, education and engagement activities. Results: A heterogeneous collection of 35 studies were identified. Levels of knowledge among patients and the public were extremely variable. Studies indicated general acceptance of therapies. Conclusion: The review identified the need for tailored educational activities, and in particular the importance of addressing misconceptions. There is also a need for robust qualitative research considering perspectives on current and forthcoming licensed therapies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Olalekan Lee Aiyegbusi
- Centre for Patient Reported Outcome Research, Institute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, B15 2TT, UK.,National Institute for Health Research, Birmingham Biomedical Research Centre, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, B15 2TT, UK.,National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Applied Research Centre West Midlands, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, B15 2TT, UK
| | | | - Susan Myles
- Health Technology Wales, Cardiff, CF10 4PL, UK
| | | | - Nisha Sungum
- University Hospital Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, B15 2GW, UK
| | - Mark Briggs
- Velindre University NHS Trust, Nantgarw, Cardiff, CF15 7QZ, UK
| | - Philip Newsome
- National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Applied Research Centre West Midlands, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, B15 2TT, UK.,University Hospital Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, B15 2GW, UK
| | - Melanie Calvert
- Centre for Patient Reported Outcome Research, Institute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, B15 2TT, UK.,National Institute for Health Research, Birmingham Biomedical Research Centre, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, B15 2TT, UK.,National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Applied Research Centre West Midlands, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, B15 2TT, UK.,National Institute for Health Research Surgical Reconstruction & Microbiology Research Centre, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, B15 2TT, UK
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Lyons S, Salgaonkar S, Flaherty GT. International stem cell tourism: a critical literature review and evidence-based recommendations. Int Health 2021; 14:132-141. [PMID: 34415026 PMCID: PMC8890798 DOI: 10.1093/inthealth/ihab050] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/16/2021] [Revised: 07/21/2021] [Accepted: 07/27/2021] [Indexed: 01/08/2023] Open
Abstract
Stem cell tourism is an emerging area of medical tourism activity. Frustrated by the slow translation of stem cell research into clinical practice, patients with debilitating conditions often seek therapeutic options that are not appropriately regulated. This review summarises recent developments in the field of stem cell tourism and provides clinicians with the information necessary to provide basic pretravel health advice to stem cell tourists. PubMed and Scopus databases were consulted for relevant publications, using combinations of the terms 'stem cell', 'tourism', 'regenerative medicine', 'international', 'travel medicine' and 'environmental health'. The leading countries in the international stem cell tourism market are the USA, China, India, Thailand and Mexico. As the majority of clinics offering stem cell therapies are based in low- and-middle-income countries, stem cell tourists place themselves at risk of receiving an unproven treatment, coupled with the risk of travel-related illnesses. These clinics do not generally provide even basic travel health information on their websites. In addition to often being ineffective, stem cell therapies are associated with complications such as infection, rejection and tumorigenesis. Physicians, researchers, regulatory bodies, advocacy groups and medical educators are encouraged to work together to improve patient and physician education and address current legislative deficiencies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Samantha Lyons
- School of Medicine, National University of Ireland Galway, Galway H91 TK33, Ireland.,Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Shival Salgaonkar
- School of Medicine, National University of Ireland Galway, Galway H91 TK33, Ireland
| | - Gerard T Flaherty
- School of Medicine, National University of Ireland Galway, Galway H91 TK33, Ireland.,School of Medicine, International Medical University, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Aiyegbusi OL, Macpherson K, Elston L, Myles S, Washington J, Sungum N, Briggs M, Newsome PN, Calvert MJ. Patient and public perspectives on cell and gene therapies: a systematic review. Nat Commun 2020; 11:6265. [PMID: 33293538 PMCID: PMC7722871 DOI: 10.1038/s41467-020-20096-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 37] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/01/2020] [Accepted: 11/11/2020] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Cell and gene therapies offer opportunities for treating disease with potential to restore function, and cure disease. However, they are not without risk and pose complex logistical, economic, ethical and social challenges for health systems. Here we report our systematic review of the current evidence on patient and public knowledge and perspectives of cell and gene therapies, to inform future research, education and awareness raising activities. We screened 10,735 titles and abstracts, and evaluated the full texts of 151 publications. The final selection was 35 publications. Four themes were generated from the narrative synthesis of the study findings namely: (1) Knowledge and understanding of cell and gene therapies, (2) Acceptance of cell and gene therapies (3) Understanding of risk and benefits of therapy, and (4) Information needs and current sources of information. As potential funders or future recipients, it is important that the public and patients are aware of these therapies, understand the issues involved, and can contribute to the debate. This review highlights the need for appropriate patient and public education on the various aspects of cell and gene therapies. High quality studies exploring patient and public opinions and experiences of cell and gene therapy are required. Patient and public perceptions of these therapies, alongside evidence of clinical and cost-effectiveness, will be central to their uptake and use.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Olalekan Lee Aiyegbusi
- Centre for Patient Reported Outcomes Research, Institute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
- National Institute for Health Research Birmingham Biomedical Research Centre, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
- National Institute for Health Research Applied Research Centre West Midlands, and National Institute for Health Research Surgical Reconstruction and Microbiology Research Centre, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
- Birmingham Health Partners Centre for Regulatory Science and Innovation, Birmingham, UK.
| | | | | | | | | | - Nisha Sungum
- Birmingham Health Partners Centre for Regulatory Science and Innovation, Birmingham, UK
- Midlands-Wales Advanced Therapy Treatment Centre, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK
| | - Mark Briggs
- Welsh Blood Service, Velindre University NHS Trust, Cardiff, UK
| | - Philip N Newsome
- National Institute for Health Research Birmingham Biomedical Research Centre, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
- National Institute for Health Research Applied Research Centre West Midlands, and National Institute for Health Research Surgical Reconstruction and Microbiology Research Centre, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
- Birmingham Health Partners Centre for Regulatory Science and Innovation, Birmingham, UK
- Centre for Liver and Gastrointestinal Research, Institute of Immunology and Immunotherapy, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
- Liver Unit, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK
| | - Melanie J Calvert
- Centre for Patient Reported Outcomes Research, Institute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
- National Institute for Health Research Birmingham Biomedical Research Centre, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
- National Institute for Health Research Applied Research Centre West Midlands, and National Institute for Health Research Surgical Reconstruction and Microbiology Research Centre, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
- Birmingham Health Partners Centre for Regulatory Science and Innovation, Birmingham, UK
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The spread of misinformation has accompanied the coronavirus pandemic, including topics such as immune boosting to prevent COVID-19. This study explores how immune boosting is portrayed on the internet during the COVID-19 pandemic. DESIGN Content analysis. METHODS We compiled a dataset of 227 webpages from Google searches in Canada and the USA using the phrase 'boost immunity' AND 'coronavirus' on 1 April 2020. We coded webpages for typology and portrayal of immune boosting and supplements. We recorded mentions of microbiome, whether the webpage was selling or advertising an immune boosting product or service, and suggested strategies for boosting immunity. RESULTS No significant differences were found between webpages that appeared in the searches in Canada and the USA. The most common types of webpages were from news (40.5%) and commercial (24.7%) websites. The concept of immune boosting was portrayed as beneficial for avoiding COVID-19 in 85.5% of webpages and supplements were portrayed as beneficial in 40% of the webpages, but commercial sites were more likely to have these portrayals. The top immune boosting strategies were vitamin C (34.8%), diet (34.4%), sleep (34.4%), exercise (30.8%) and zinc (26.9%). Less than 10% of the webpages provide any critique of the concept of immune boosting. CONCLUSIONS Pairing evidence-based advice for maintaining one's health (eg, healthy diet, exercise, sleep) with the phrase immune boosting and strategies lacking in evidence may inadvertently help to legitimise the concept, making it a powerful marketing tool. Results demonstrate how the spread of misinformation is complex and often more subtle than blatant fraudulent claims.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christen Rachul
- Rady Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
| | | | - Benjamin Collins
- Rady Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
- Department of Anthropology, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
| | - Timothy Caulfield
- Health Law Institute, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
- Faculty of Law, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Mah N, Seltmann S, Aran B, Steeg R, Dewender J, Bultjer N, Veiga A, Stacey GN, Kurtz A. Access to stem cell data and registration of pluripotent cell lines: The Human Pluripotent Stem Cell Registry (hPSCreg). Stem Cell Res 2020; 47:101887. [PMID: 32707486 DOI: 10.1016/j.scr.2020.101887] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/27/2019] [Accepted: 06/19/2020] [Indexed: 01/15/2023] Open
Abstract
The value of human pluripotent stem cells (hPSC) in regenerative medicine has yet to reach its full potential. The road from basic research tool to clinically validated PSC-derived cell therapy products is a long and winding one, leading researchers, clinicians, industry and regulators alike into undiscovered territory. All stakeholders must work together to ensure the development of safe and effective cell therapies. Similarly, utilization of hPSC in meaningful and controlled disease modeling and drug screening applications requires information on the quality and suitability of the applied cell lines. Central to these common goals is the complete documentation of hPSC data, including the ethical provenance of the source material, the hPSC line derivation, culture conditions and genetic constitution of the lines. Data surrounding hPSC is scattered amongst diverse sources, including publications, supplemental data, researcher lab books, accredited lab reports, certificates of analyses and public data repositories. Not all of these data sources are publicly accessible nor associated with metadata nor stored in a standard manner, such that data can be easily found and retrieved. The Human Pluripotent Stem Cell Registry (hPSCreg; https://hpscreg.eu/) was started in 2007 to impart provenance and transparency towards hPSC research by registering and collecting standard properties of hPSC lines. In this chapter, we present a short primer on the history of stem cell-based products, summarize the ethical and regulatory issues introduced in the course of working with hPSC-derived products and their associated data, and finally present the Human Pluripotent Stem Cell Registry as a valuable resource for all stakeholders in therapies and disease modeling based on hPSC-derived cells.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nancy Mah
- Berlin-Brandenburger Centrum für Regenerative Therapien (BCRT), Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
| | - Stefanie Seltmann
- Berlin-Brandenburger Centrum für Regenerative Therapien (BCRT), Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Begoña Aran
- Stem Cell Bank, Regenerative Medicine Program, Institut d'Investigació Biomèdica de Bellvitge (IDIBELL), Barcelona, Spain
| | - Rachel Steeg
- Fraunhofer UK Research Ltd, Technology and Innovation Centre, Glasgow, UK
| | - Johannes Dewender
- Berlin-Brandenburger Centrum für Regenerative Therapien (BCRT), Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Nils Bultjer
- Berlin-Brandenburger Centrum für Regenerative Therapien (BCRT), Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Anna Veiga
- Stem Cell Bank, Regenerative Medicine Program, Institut d'Investigació Biomèdica de Bellvitge (IDIBELL), Barcelona, Spain
| | - Glyn N Stacey
- ISCBI, Barley, UKSSCBio Ltd, Barley, UK; National Stem Cell Resource Centre, Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China; Innovation Academy for Stem Cell and Regeneration, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China
| | - Andreas Kurtz
- Berlin-Brandenburger Centrum für Regenerative Therapien (BCRT), Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Marcon AR, Allan D, Barber M, Murdoch B, Caulfield T. Portrayal of umbilical cord blood research in the North American popular press: promise or hype? Regen Med 2020; 15:1228-1237. [PMID: 32101099 DOI: 10.2217/rme-2019-0149] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/08/2023] Open
Abstract
Aim: This study examined how umbilical cord blood (UCB) use was portrayed in the English language North American popular press. Methods: Directed content analysis was conducted on 400 articles from 2007 to 2017 containing 'cord blood,' published by the most read Canadian and American news sources. Results: A total of 86.3% of the articles detailed UCB treatments and therapies, the majority of which align with clinical evidence. Some articles portrayed speculative/experimental therapies as efficacious. Public and private banking initiatives received substantial attention, and were portrayed diversely. Promotional narrative messaging was evident around private banking. Conclusion: Findings demonstrate the need for continual monitoring of the media portrayals of UCB as stem cell and transplantation research develops and as clinics continue to operate.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alessandro R Marcon
- Health Law Institute, Faculty of Law, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada, T6G 2H5
| | - David Allan
- Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Canadian Blood Services, University of Ottawa, Ottawa ON, Canada, K1Y 4E9
| | - Morgan Barber
- University of Alberta, Faculty of Law, Edmonton, AB, Canada, T6G 2H5
| | - Blake Murdoch
- Health Law Institute, Faculty of Law, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada, T6G 2H5
| | - Timothy Caulfield
- Health Law Institute, Faculty of Law, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada, T6G 2H5
- School of Public Health, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada, T6G 1C9
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Frow EK, Brafman DA, Muldoon A, Krum L, Williams P, Becker B, Nelson JP, Pritchett A. Characterizing Direct-to-Consumer Stem Cell Businesses in the Southwest United States. Stem Cell Reports 2019; 13:247-253. [PMID: 31378670 PMCID: PMC6700498 DOI: 10.1016/j.stemcr.2019.07.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/15/2019] [Revised: 06/28/2019] [Accepted: 07/01/2019] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
There are currently hundreds of businesses across the United States offering direct-to-consumer stem cell treatments that have not been through regulatory approval by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA). Here, we provide a detailed characterization of nearly 170 stem cell businesses operating in the Southwest United States. We draw specific attention to two as-yet understudied facets of these businesses. First, we identify differences in the degree to which a given business focuses their practice on stem cell treatments. Second, we compare the stated expertise of the care providers in stem cell businesses with the range of conditions they purport to treat. These findings deepen our knowledge of the growing industry around unapproved stem cell treatments, and are used here to offer suggestions for how the FDA might target its resources with respect to regulatory oversight. We characterize 169 direct-to-consumer stem cell businesses in the southwest US We show differences in degree of clinic focus on providing stem cell treatments We compare care provider expertise with the stem cell-based interventions they offer We offer suggestions for regulatory oversight of direct-to-consumer stem cell businesses
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emma K Frow
- School for the Future of Innovation in Society, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ 85287, USA; School of Biological & Health Systems Engineering, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ 85287, USA.
| | - David A Brafman
- School of Biological & Health Systems Engineering, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ 85287, USA.
| | - Anna Muldoon
- School for the Future of Innovation in Society, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ 85287, USA
| | - Logan Krum
- School of Life Sciences, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ 85287, USA
| | - Paige Williams
- School of Human Evolution and Social Change, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ 85287, USA
| | - Bryson Becker
- School of Life Sciences, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ 85287, USA
| | - John P Nelson
- School for the Future of Innovation in Society, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ 85287, USA
| | - Ashley Pritchett
- College of Health Solutions, Arizona State University, Phoenix, AZ 85004, USA
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Chisholm J, Ruff C, Viswanathan S. Current state of Health Canada regulation for cellular and gene therapy products: potential cures on the horizon. Cytotherapy 2019; 21:686-698. [PMID: 31196821 DOI: 10.1016/j.jcyt.2019.03.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/23/2018] [Revised: 02/13/2019] [Accepted: 03/13/2019] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
We provide an overview of the regulatory framework, pathways and underlying regulatory authority for cell, gene and tissue-engineered therapies in Canada. Canada's regulatory approach uses three sets of regulations, namely, the Cells, Tissues and Organs Regulations, the Food and Drug Regulations and the Medical Devices Regulations. We provide an overview of each these sets of regulations as they apply to clinical investigation to post-market product lifecycle stages. Information is provided on the current sources of relevant Health Canada guidance documents. We highlight several regional success stories including Prochymal, a cell therapy product that achieved Canadian regulatory approval using the conditional marketing approval system. We also examine the perceived gaps in the Canadian regulations and how those gaps are being addressed by interactions between the government, stakeholders and international bodies. We conclude that the risk-benefit approach used by Health Canada for regulatory approval processes is sufficiently flexible to enable to development of novel cell and gene therapy products in Canada, yet stringent enough to protect patient safety.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jolene Chisholm
- Cell Therapy Program, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Arthritis Program, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Crystal Ruff
- International Society for Cellular Therapy North American Legal and Regulatory Affairs Committee (NA LRA), Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada; Illumina Cambridge Ltd., Cambridge, UK; DRI Biotechnologies, London, UK
| | - Sowmya Viswanathan
- Cell Therapy Program, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Arthritis Program, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; International Society for Cellular Therapy North American Legal and Regulatory Affairs Committee (NA LRA), Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada; Institute of Biomaterials & Biomedical Engineering, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Marcon AR, Murdoch B, Caulfield T. Fake news portrayals of stem cells and stem cell research. Regen Med 2017; 12:765-775. [PMID: 29115183 DOI: 10.2217/rme-2017-0060] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
Abstract
AIM This study examines how stem cells and stem cell research are portrayed on websites deemed to be purveyors of distorted and dubious information. METHODS Content analysis was conducted on 224 articles from 2015 to 2016, compiled by searching with the keywords 'stem cell(s)' on a list of websites flagged for containing either 'fake' or 'junk science' news. RESULTS Articles contained various exaggerated positive and negative claims about stem cells and stem cell science, health and science related conspiracy theories, and statements promoting fear and mistrust of conventional medicine. CONCLUSION Findings demonstrate the existence of organized misinformation networks, which may lead the public away from accurate information and facilitate a polarization of public discourse.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alessandro R Marcon
- Health Law Institute, Office 468, Faculty of Law, University of Alberta, 111 89 Avenue, Edmonton, Alberta T6G 2H5, Canada
| | - Blake Murdoch
- Health Law Institute, Office 468, Faculty of Law, University of Alberta, 111 89 Avenue, Edmonton, Alberta T6G 2H5, Canada
| | - Timothy Caulfield
- Health Law Institute, Office 468, Faculty of Law, University of Alberta, 111 89 Avenue, Edmonton, Alberta T6G 2H5, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Best TM, Caplan A, Coleman M, Goodrich L, Hurd J, Kaplan LD, Noonan B, Schoettle P, Scott C, Stiene H, Huard J. Not Missing the Future. Curr Sports Med Rep 2017; 16:202-210. [DOI: 10.1249/jsr.0000000000000357] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
|
12
|
Du L, Rachul C, Guo Z, Caulfield T. Gordie Howe's "Miraculous Treatment": Case Study of Twitter Users' Reactions to a Sport Celebrity's Stem Cell Treatment. JMIR Public Health Surveill 2016; 2:e8. [PMID: 27227162 PMCID: PMC4869214 DOI: 10.2196/publichealth.5264] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/22/2015] [Revised: 12/20/2015] [Accepted: 01/04/2016] [Indexed: 01/24/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Former Detroit Red Wing Gordie Howe received stem cell (SC) treatment in Mexico in December 2014 for a stroke he suffered in October 2014. The news about his positive response to the SC treatment prompted discussion on social networks like Twitter. Objective This study aims to provide information about discussions that took place on Twitter regarding Howe’s SC treatment and SC treatment in general. In particular, this study examines whether tweets portrayed a positive or negative attitude towards Howe’s SC treatment, whether or not tweets mention that the treatment is unproven, and whether the tweets mention risks associated with the SC treatment. Methods This is an infodemiology study, harnessing big data published on the Internet for public health research and analysis of public engagement. A corpus of 2783 tweets about Howe’s SC treatment was compiled using a program that collected English-language tweets from December 19, 2014 at 00:00 to February 7, 2015 at 00:00. A content analysis of the corpus was conducted using a coding framework developed through a two-stage process. Results 78.87% (2195/2783) of tweets mentioned improvements to Howe’s health. Only one tweet explicitly mentioned that Howe’s SC treatment was unproven, and 3 tweets warned that direct-to-consumer SC treatments lacked scientific evidence. In addition, 10.31% (287/2783) of tweets mentioned challenges with SC treatment that have been raised by scientists and researchers, and 3.70% (103/2783) of tweets either defined Howe as a “stem cell tourist” or claimed that his treatment was part of “stem cell tourism”. In general, 71.79% (1998/2783) of tweets portrayed a positive attitude towards Howe’s SC treatment. Conclusions Our study found the responses to Howe’s treatment on Twitter to be overwhelmingly positive. There was far less attention paid to the lack of scientific evidence regarding the efficacy of the treatment. Unbalanced and uncritical discussion on Twitter regarding SC treatments is another example of inaccurate representations of SC treatments that may create unrealistic expectations that will facilitate the market for unproven stem cell therapies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Li Du
- Health Law Institute Faculty of Law University of Alberta Edmonton, AB Canada
| | - Christen Rachul
- School of Linguistics and Language Studies Carleton University Ottawa, ON Canada
| | - Zhaochen Guo
- Department of Computing Science University of Alberta Edmonton, AB Canada
| | - Timothy Caulfield
- Health Law Institute, Law Centre, University of Alberta Edmonton, AB Canada
| |
Collapse
|