The osteo-metabolic phenotype of COVID-19: an update

SARS-CoV-2 infection and vaccination in patients with pituitary diseases: the experience of a Brazilian reference center

PURPOSE

To evaluate the prevalence and characteristics of SARS-CoV-2 infection, and the prevalence, efficacy, and safety of anti-SARS-CoV-2 vaccination in patients with pituitary diseases.

METHODS

Observational, cross-sectional study of adult patients with pituitary diseases followed in a reference center. Clinical data were collected and a questionnaire about SARS-CoV-2 infection, vaccination and its possible adverse effects was applied. COVID-19 disease severity was defined as mild, moderate, and severe according to the WHO classification.

RESULTS

145 patients were studied (79 women; age 50 ± 15.8 years; duration of pituitary disease 16.8 ± 11.5 years), the cause of pituitary disease was tumoral in 74.5%, and 45.9% were on glucocorticoid replacement due to ACTH deficiency. SARS-CoV-2 infection was confirmed in 51 patients (35.2%; 32 women; age 53.8 ± 14.8 years, 22 before vaccination), with 28 (54.9%), 17 (33.3%) and 6 (11.8%) cases of mild, moderate, and severe disease, respectively, and hospitalization was indicated in 7 (14%) cases. One mild case presented pituitary apoplexy after SARS-CoV-2 infection. Advanced age was a risk factor for COVID-19. Patients with moderate and severe forms of COVID-19 had higher prevalence of dyslipidemia and duration of pituitary disease. All but one of the participants were vaccinated against COVID-19, and 60.4% had adverse events, the most common local pain (54.0%), fever (33.3%), and headache (18.4%), with one case of alopecia and two of persistent fatigue.

CONCLUSION

The prevalence of SARS-CoV-2 infection in our cohort was 35.2%, including 14% of moderate and severe cases requiring hospitalization. The vaccination was universal and safe.

Hypophysitis in COVID-19: a systematic review

PURPOSE

This systematic review aims to collect and examine recent research findings regarding hypophysitis in COVID-19 patients.

METHOD

We conducted a comprehensive literature review in English on the topic "Hypophysitis in COVID-19," using the MEDLINE (PubMed) database in July 2024. The selected articles were systematically tabulated and we have assessed in this review patient demographics, symptom presentation, imaging results, diagnosis, clinical management, and outcomes.

RESULTS

Seven reported cases of post-COVID-19 hypophysitis were identified, comprising 4 (57%) females and 3 (43%) males, with a median age of 37 years. The interval between COVID-19 infection symptoms and the onset of hypophysitis ranged from 2 to 3 weeks. Initial symptoms included frontal headache in 4 (57%) cases and polyuria and polydipsia in 3 (43%) cases. Anterior or posterior hypopituitarism was observed in 6 (85%) patients. Radiological findings varied: 2 (28.5%) cases showed panhypophysitis, 3 (43%) cases exhibited gland enlargement with homogeneous contrast enhancement on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), 1 case involved the loss of the posterior pituitary bright spot, and 1 case involved pituitary apoplexy/enlargement of the gland and infundibulum. No pituitary biopsies were performed. Four (57%) patients received glucocorticoid (GC) treatment. Long-term follow-up was documented in only one case, a 16-year-old female followed for 2 years reporting complete clinical and radiological resolution.

CONCLUSION

Although rare, hypophysitis related to COVID-19 is documented in the literature exhibiting distinct characteristics such as a homogeneous gender prevalence, an average age of onset around 35 years, and primary symptoms of headache, polyuria, and polydipsia which are indicative of angiotensin-vasopressin deficiency. This is in contrast with primary autoimmune hypophysitis characterized by a female prevalence and typical symptoms with headache and visual impairment. Longer-term follow-up of these patients is needed to better understand the potential lasting impact on pituitary function and radiological improvement. Future research should also explore the presence of anti-pituitary antibodies and the other possible pathophysiological mechanisms potentially involved in these cases.

Long COVID and pituitary dysfunctions: a bidirectional relationship?

Long COVID is a novel emerging syndrome known to affect multiple health areas in patients previously infected by SARS-CoV-2 markedly impairing their quality of life. The pathophysiology of Long COVID is still largely poorly understood and multiple mechanisms were proposed to underlie its occurrence, including alterations in the hormonal hypothalamic-pituitary axes. Aim of this review is to present and discuss the potential negative implications of these hormonal dysfunctions in promoting and influencing the Long COVID syndrome. To date, the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis is the mostly investigated and several studies have reported a prolonged impairment leading to mild and subclinical forms of central adrenal insufficiency. Few data are also available regarding central hypogonadism, central hypothyroidism and growth hormone (GH) deficiency. A high prevalence of central hypogonadism in COVID-19 survivors several months after recovery was consistently reported in different cohorts. Conversely, very few data are available on the hypothalamic-pituitary-thyroid axis function that was mainly shown to be preserved in COVID-19 survivors. Finally, a potential impairment of the hypothalamic-GH axis in Long COVID has also been reported. These data altogether may suggest a novel possible pituitary-centred pathophysiological view of Long COVID syndrome which if confirmed by large clinical studies may have relevant implication for the diagnostic and therapeutic approach at least in a subset of patients with the syndrome.

Exploring Micronutrient Dynamics in COVID-19 Severity and Mortality: Unraveling the Roles of Vitamin D, Calcium, Phosphorus, Magnesium and ALP

The COVID-19 pandemic has underscored the critical importance of understanding the intricate relationship between micronutrient levels and disease outcomes. This study explores the impact of Vitamin D, calcium, phosphorus, magnesium, and alkaline phosphatase (ALP) on COVID-19 severity and mortality. The study involves 200 participants (100 COVID-19 patients, 100 controls), we meticulously analyzed micronutrient dynamics. Calcium, phosphorus, magnesium and ALP was measured spectrophotometrically. Vitamin D was measured using Chemiluminescent method. The study reveals that diminished levels of calcium, phosphorus, magnesium, and with elevated ALP, are significantly associated with COVID-19 cases. Whereas the Vitamin D levels in severe group was increased when compared to mild cases but decreased than control group. Disease severity correlated with declining calcium (r = - 0.35, p < 0.01), phosphorus (r = - 0.26, p < 0.05), and magnesium (r = - 0.21, p < 0.05), and increased ALP (r = 0.42, p < 0.001). Post-discharge, calcium (p < 0.05) and phosphorus (p < 0.01) showed positive trends, while ALP (p < 0.001) decreased. Notably, calcium (OR = 0.63, p < 0.05) and ALP (OR = 1.87, p < 0.001) emerged as significant predictors of disease severity. The findings not only illuminate potential therapeutic avenues but also emphasize the need to optimize nutrient levels, including magnesium, for COVID-19 prevention and management. Given the complexities of these relationships, further rigorous exploration, including well-designed trials and understanding underlying mechanisms, is imperative to unravel the dynamics of these nutrient interactions in the context of COVID-19.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s12291-024-01225-9.

Novel protective circulating miRNA are associated with preserved vitamin D levels in patients with mild COVID-19 presentation at hospital admission not progressing into severe disease

PURPOSE

Low vitamin D levels were reported to negatively influence the outcomes of acute COVID-19, as well as other biochemical markers were linked to COVID-19, including microRNAs (miRNAs). This study aimed to prospectively evaluate miRNAs and vitamin D relationship in predicting COVID-19 outcomes.

METHODS

COVID-19 patients were part of a previously reported cohort and enrolled in a matched-ratio based on the presence/or not of severe disease at hospital admission. 25(OH) vitamin D levels and miRNAs expression were evaluated.

RESULTS

Patients affected by non-severe COVID-19 were characterized by a higher expression of miRNAs hsa-miR-3115 and hsa-miR-7151-3p, as compared to those affected by severe disease. In non-severe patients, these miRNAs were more frequently expressed in those who subsequently did not develop worsening outcomes. In addition, patients with miRNA-7151 expression and without worsening disease were characterized by higher 25(OH) vitamin D levels and lower prevalence of vitamin D deficiency.

CONCLUSIONS

The expression of two novel miRNAs was reported for the first-time to be associated with a less severe COVID-19 form and to prospectively predict the occurrence of disease outcome. Furthermore, the association observed between vitamin D deficiency and lack of miRNA-7151 expression in COVID-19 patients with worse outcomes may support the hypothesis that the co-existence of these two conditions may have a strong negative prognostic role.

New insights into the vitamin D/PTH axis in endocrine-driven metabolic bone diseases

BACKGROUND

Endocrine regulation of bone metabolisms is the focus of the "Skeletal Endocrinology" series of meetings.

AIMS

To report on the outcome of the discussion on the role of vitamin D/PTH axis in endocrine osteopathies held during the 10th Skeletal Endocrinology Meeting which took place in Stresa (Italy) in March 2023.

OUTCOMES

Vitamin D/PTH axis has relevant influence on several outcomes in the general population and in patients affected by endocrinopathies such as hypoparathyroidism and secreting pituitary adenomas.

CONCLUSIONS

Assessing the status of the vitamin D/PTH axis and using vitamin D and PTH as therapeutic agents is mandatory in several endocrine-related bone metabolic conditions.

Changes in arterial pH do not explain the reductions in ionised calcium observed during COVID-19 infection

BACKGROUND

Hypocalcaemia predicts coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) severity and mortality. We hypothesized an association between respiratory alkalosis secondary to hypoxia and low ionised calcium (iCa) concentration in patients with COVID-19.

METHODS

Arterial blood gas samples taken from January 2019 to March 2021 were retrospectively matched with infection status. Principal components regression was undertaken to determine the correlation between pH, partial pressure arterial oxygen (PaO2), partial pressure arterial carbon dioxide (PaCO2), and iCa.

RESULTS

We included 4056 patients (300 COVID-19 detected, 19 influenza detected), corresponding to 5960 arterial blood samples. The COVID-19 detected group had a statistically significantly lower iCa, PaO2 and PaCO2, and more alkalotic pH than infection-free groups. The influenza group had a lower iCa and PaCO2, higher PaO2, and a more alkalotic pH than infection-free groups, but these differences were non-significant. Principal components regression revealed that pH, PaCO2, and PaO2 explain just 2.72 % of the variance in iCa. An increase in pH by 1 unit was associated with an iCa reduction of 0.141 ​mmol/L (p ​< ​0.0001).

CONCLUSION

Reduction in iCa concentration in patients with COVID-19 is not associated with pH derangement. Influenza infection was associated with a minor reduction in iCa in our small sample, a hitherto unreported finding, although statistical significance was not demonstrated.

Lack of vitamin D predicts impaired long-term immune response to COVID-19 vaccination

PURPOSE

Low vitamin D levels were reported to negatively influence the outcome of acute COVID-19, as well as to be linked to Long-COVID. However, few studies have investigated, so far, its effects on humoral-response to anti-SARS-CoV-2 vaccination, reporting conflicting results. We aimed to evaluate the impact of baseline 25(OH)vitamin D (25(OH)D) levels on humoral-response to a two-dose cycle of Pfizer-BioNTech-vaccine up to 9-10 months after immunization.

METHODS

We retrospectively included 119 consecutive healthcare-workers (median age 53 years) without a previous history of acute COVID-19 or anti-SARS-CoV-2 immunoglobulins presence immunized with two doses of Comirnaty-vaccine from January to February 2021. 25(OH)D was measured at time of first-immunization. Immune response was evaluated at: time 0 (T0), before the first-dose; T1, time of second-dose (21 days after T0); T2, T3, T4 at 1, 5 and 9 months after T1, respectively.

RESULTS

Median 25(OH)D levels were 25.6 ng/mL, and vitamin D deficiency (25(OH)D <20 ng/mL) was observed in 29 subjects (24.8%). In those with vitamin D deficiency, we found a non-significant trend towards lower antibody-titers at T3, and significantly lower titers at T4 as compared to those not vitamin D-deficient, also observing a more pronounced antibody-titers negative drop from peak-T2 and T4 in those with vitamin D deficiency. A positive correlation between 25(OH)D levels and antibody-titers at T4 (p = 0.043) was found. In multiple linear-regression analysis, 25(OH)D deficiency and older-age resulted as negative independent factors associated with antibody titer at T4 (p = 0.026, p = 0.004; respectively).

CONCLUSION

In our relatively young cohort presenting low prevalence of hypovitaminosis D, the long-term humoral response to anti-SARS-CoV-2 vaccination was negatively influenced by low baseline 25(OH)D. Vitamin D supplementation could be tested as a strategy to optimize the vaccination campaigns to prevent severe COVID-19.

Exploring the Effects of Vitamin D and Vitamin A Levels on the Response to COVID-19 Vaccine

COVID-19 vaccines were developed at an unprecedented speed in history. The factors affecting the response to COVID-19 vaccines are not clear. Herein, the effects of vitamin D and vitamin A (retinol) levels on the response to the BNT162b2 vaccine were explored. A total of 124 vaccine recipients were recruited from the general population attending vaccination centers in Irbid, Jordan. Blood samples were collected immediately before receiving the first vaccine dose (D0) and three weeks later (D21). Baseline (D0) levels of 25-hydroxyvitamin D [25(OH)D], retinol, and SARS-CoV-2 S1 IgG antibodies were measured with ELISA. The response to the BNT162b2 vaccine was tested by measuring the levels and avidity of SARS-CoV-2 S1 IgG antibodies on D21. The participants were divided into two groups, unexposed and exposed, based on the D0 SARS-CoV-2 antibody results. No significant correlation was found between the levels of 25(OH)D or retinol and the levels, avidity, or fold increase of antibodies in both groups. Similarly, no significant difference in antibody response was found between 25(OH)D status groups, retinol status groups, or combined status groups. These findings show that the baseline vitamin D or vitamin A levels have no effect on the short-term response to a single dose of BNT162b2 vaccine.

Low Vitamin D Levels Are Associated With Long COVID Syndrome in COVID-19 Survivors

CONTEXT

Long COVID is an emerging syndrome affecting 50% to 70% of COVID-19 survivors that still lacks predicting factors.

OBJECTIVE

Due to the extraskeletal effects of vitamin D, we retrospectively assessed the association between 25(OH) vitamin D levels and long COVID in COVID-19 survivors 6 months after hospitalization.

METHODS

Long COVID was defined according to NICE guidelines. Fifty long COVID and 50 non-long-COVID subjects matched on a 1:1 basis were enrolled from an outpatient clinic post-COVID cohort seen from August to November 2020. Therapies/comorbidities affecting calcium/vitamin D/bone metabolism, and/or admission to the intensive care unit during hospitalization were exclusion criteria. 25(OH) Vitamin D was measured at hospital admission and 6 months after discharge.

RESULTS

We observed lower 25(OH) vitamin D levels, evaluated at follow-up, in subjects with long COVID than those without (20.1 vs 23.2 ng/mL, P = .03). Regarding the affected health areas evaluated in the entire cohort, we observed lower 25(OH) vitamin D levels in those with neurocognitive symptoms at follow-up (n = 7) than those without (n = 93) (14.6 vs 20.6 ng/mL, P = .042). In patients presenting vitamin D deficiency (<20 ng/mL), both at admission and at follow-up (n = 42), those affected by long COVID (n = 22) presented lower 25(OH) vitamin D levels at follow-up than those not affected (n = 20) (12.7 vs 15.2 ng/mL, P = .041). In multiple regression analyses, lower 25(OH) vitamin D levels at follow-up were the only variable significantly associated with long COVID in our cohort (P = .008, OR 1.09, CI 1.01-1.16).

CONCLUSION

COVID-19 survivors with long COVID have lower 25(OH) vitamin D levels than matched patients without long COVID. Our data suggest that vitamin D levels should be evaluated in COVID-19 patients after hospital discharge. The role of vitamin D supplementation as a preventive strategy of COVID-19 sequelae should be tested in randomized controlled trials.

Potential impacts of SARS-CoV-2 on parathyroid: current advances and trends

Severe acute respiratory syndrome-coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection affects several important organs including endocrine glands. Experimental studies demonstrated that the virus exploits the ACE2, a transmembrane glycoprotein on the cell surface as a receptor for cellular entry. This entry process is exclusively facilitated by other intracellular protein molecules such as TMPRSS2, furin, NRP1, and NRP2. Recent findings documented the involvement of the SARS-CoV-2 in inducing various parathyroid disorders including hypoparathyroidism and hypocalcemia, which received significant attention. This review extensively describes rapidly evolving knowledge on the potential part of SARS-CoV-2 in emerging various parathyroid disorders due to SARS-CoV-2 infection particularly parathyroid malfunction in COVID-19 cases, and post-COVID-19 conditions. Further, it presents the expression level of various molecules such as ACE2, TMPRSS2, furin, NRP1, and NRP2 in the parathyroid cells that facilitate the SARS-CoV-2 entry into the cell, and discusses the possible mechanism of parathyroid gland infection. Besides, it explores parathyroid malfunction in COVID-19 vaccine-administered cases. It also explains the possible long-COVID-19 effect on parathyroid and post-COVID-19 management of parathyroid. A complete understanding of the mechanisms of SARS-CoV-2-triggered pathogenesis in parathyroid dysfunctions may curtail treatment options and aid in the management of SARS-CoV-2-infected cases.

Low vitamin D levels predict outcomes of COVID-19 in patients with both severe and non-severe disease at hospitalization

PURPOSE

Low vitamin D in COVID-19 have been related to worse outcomes. However, most of the studies conducted so far were not-controlled and retrospective, including biases potentially influencing this association. We evaluated 25(OH)vitamin D levels of patients with both severe and non-severe disease at hospital-admission, and in a cohort of control subjects. Moreover, we evaluated sACE-2 levels to investigate the mechanisms underlying the association between vitamin D and COVID-19.

METHODS

COVID-19 patients were enrolled in a matched for age, sex and comorbidities 1:1-ratio based on the presence/or not of respiratory-distress/severe-disease at hospital-admission. Control matched subjects were enrolled from an outpatient-setting.

RESULTS

Seventy-three COVID-19 patients (36 severe and 37 non-severe) and 30 control subjects were included. We observed a higher vitamin D deficiency (<20 ng/mL) prevalence in COVID-19 patients than control subjects (75% vs 43%). No differences were found regarding 25(OH)vitamin D and sACE-2 levels between patients with and without severe-disease at study entry. During the disease-course, in the severe group a life-threatening disease occurred in 17 patients (47.2%), and, in the non-severe group, a worsening disease occurred in 10 (27%). 25(OH)vitamin D levels, at admission, were negatively correlated with sACE-2 levels, and were lower in patients whose disease worsened as compared to those in whom it did not, independently from the disease severity at admission. In multivariate-analysis, lower 25(OH)vitamin D resulted as an independent risk factor for disease worsening.

CONCLUSIONS

25(OH)vitamin D levels at hospital-admission strongly predicted the occurrence of worsening outcomes in COVID-19 independently of the disease severity at presentation.

Consensus and Controversial Aspects of Vitamin D and COVID-19

OBJECTIVES

This work aims to review and discuss controversial topics in the field of vitamin D, SARS-CoV-2 infection, and COVID-19.

PARTICIPANTS

The International Conferences "Controversies in Vitamin D" are a series of workshops that started in 2017 featuring international experts and leaders in vitamin D research and clinical practice. The 5th annual conference was held in Stresa, Italy, from 15 to 18 September 2021.

EVIDENCE

Before the event, participants reviewed available studies on their assigned topic, drafted a related abstract, and presented their findings at the time of the conference. Relevant literature that became available since was also discussed within the panel and updated accordingly.

CONSENSUS

Before the event, the drafted abstracts had been merged to prepare a preliminary document. After the conference presentations, in-depth discussions in open sessions led to consensus. The document was subsequently modified according to discussions and up-to-date literature inclusion.

CONCLUSIONS

There is quite consistent evidence for an association between low 25 OH vitamin D (25(OH)D) levels and poor COVID-19 outcomes, despite heterogeneous publications of variable quality. However, the low vitamin D status in COVID-19 patients might also reflect reverse causality. Vitamin D supplementation might have a positive role in COVID-19 prevention. The evidence supporting a beneficial effect of vitamin D treatment in decreasing the risk of COVID-19 complications is conflicting. Conclusive statement regarding the beneficial effect of vitamin D in this context await high-quality randomized controlled trials.