Prophylactic Anticonvulsants in Intracerebral Hemorrhage

Outcomes Associated With Levetiracetam Use After Spontaneous Intracerebral Hemorrhage

Background and Purpose

The purpose of this study was to assess the incidence of seizures in patients with spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) who received prophylactic levetiracetam.

Methods

This was a retrospective cohort study evaluating the use of levetiracetam in patients without a history of seizures who experienced a spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage. Patients were excluded if they were younger than 18 years of age, had a documented history of a seizure disorder, or had an antiseizure drug documented on their home medication list. Patients were based on their exposure to levetiracetam. The primary outcome was incidence of seizure during hospital admission. Secondary outcomes included occurrence of adverse events, intensive care unit (ICU) length of stay (LOS), and hospital LOS.

Results

Of the 229 patients included in the final analysis, 21 were in the levetiracetam group (LEV) and 208 were in the no levetiracetam group (no LEV). No statistical difference in seizure incidence was observed when comparing the LEV and no LEV groups (1 [4.8%] LEV vs 3 [1.4%] no LEV; P = .32). There was also no statistical difference in the median ICU LOS (2 days [1 day, 5 days] LEV vs 2 days [1 day, 3 days] no LEV; P = .27), median hospital LOS (6 days [2 days, 8 days] LEV vs 6 days [3 days, 9 days] no LEV; P = .27), or adverse events.

Conclusions

This study does not support the use of levetiracetam prophylaxis in patients who have experienced an ICH.

Modified CAVE score for predicting late seizures after intracerebral hemorrhage

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Seizures commonly occur in patients with intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH). Anticonvulsants are commonly used for preventing seizures in patients with ICH. Thus, patients with ICH at high risk of seizures must be identified. The study aims to elucidate whether double the score of cortex involvement in ICH patients can increase accuracy of CAVE score for predicting late seizures.

METHOD

This retrospective analysis of the medical records of surviving patients admitted between June 1, 2013, and December 31, 2019. Validated the CAVE score and modified it (CAVE2). The main outcome of patients with ICH was seizures. The first seizures occurring within 7 days after a stroke were defined as early seizures. Seizures occurring after 1 week of stroke onset, including patients who had experienced early seizures or patients who had not, were defined as late seizures. CAVE and CAVE2 scores were validated using the cohort. The accuracy and discrimination of those two scores were accessed by the area under the operating characteristic curve. Akaike information criterion, integrated discrimination improvement, and continuous net reclassification improvement were used to assess the performance of the CAVE and CAVE2 scores.

RESULTS

In the cohort showed that late seizures occurred in 12.7% (52/408) of patients with ICH. Male sex, age > 65 years, cortex involvement, and early seizures were associated with the occurrence of late seizures, with odds ratios of 2.09, 2.04, 4.12, and 3.78, respectively. The risk rate of late seizures was 6.66% (17/255), 14.8% (17/115), and 47.4% (18/38) for CAVE scores ≤ 1, 2, and ≥ 3, and 4.6% (12/258), 18.3% (13/71), and 54.4 (20/37) for CAVE2 scores ≤ 1, 2, and ≥ 3 respectively. The C-statistics for the CAVE and CAVE2 scores were 0.73 and 0.74 respectively.

CONCLUSION

The CAVE score can identify patients with ICH and high risk for late seizures. The CAVE can be modified by changing the score of cortex involvement to 2 points to improve accuracy in predicting late seizures in patients with ICH.

Does Initiation of Prophylactic Antiseizure Medication Improve Neurological Outcomes in Patients With Acute Intracerebral Hemorrhage?: A Critically Appraised Topic

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to critically assess current evidence regarding the role of prophylactic antiseizure medication in patients presenting with acute intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH).

METHODS

The objective was addressed through the development of a structured critically appraised topic. This included a clinical scenario with a clinical question, literature search strategy, critical appraisal, results, evidence summary, commentary, and bottom-line conclusions. Participants included resident neurologists, a medical librarian, and content experts in the fields of epilepsy, stroke neurology, neurohospitalist medicine, and neurocritical care.

RESULTS

A randomized clinical trial was selected for critical appraisal. The trial assessed whether prophylactic levetiracetam (LEV) use reduced the risk of acute seizures in patients with ICH, as defined by clinical or electrographic seizure, captured by continuous electroencephalogram 72 hours after enrollment. A total of 42 patients were included in the final analysis (19 in the LEV group and 23 in the placebo group). There was a significantly higher occurrence of seizures in the placebo versus LEV group (LEV 16% vs placebo 43%, P = 0.043). There were no differences in functional outcomes between the groups at 3, 6, or 12 months (P > 0.1).

CONCLUSIONS

The role of prophylactic treatment with antiseizure medication in ICH remains unclear.

Prophylactic antiseizure drugs for spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage: An updated systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

There is concern that recommendations on prophylactic antiseizure drugs (PASDs) for patients with spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage (sICH) are biased by studies using older drugs and no electrographic monitoring.

AIMS

We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to determine whether PASDs in patients with sICH reduced seizure occurrence and improved functional outcomes. We included analyses of newer trials, newer antiseizure drugs, and effectiveness in patients with consistent electrographic monitoring.

METHODS

Medline, Embase, and Cochrane were searched from inception until 12 August 2022, to identify studies with patients with sICH treated with PASDs, regardless of study design. The studied outcomes were functional status and occurrence of seizures.

RESULTS

Fourteen studies were included, including 6742 patients. Risk of bias was low overall. There was no effect of PASD on seizure occurrence overall (odds ratio (OR) 0.73, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.47-1.15), but they were associated with reduced occurrence in studies with electrographic monitoring (OR 0.36, 95% CI 0.18-0.70). There was no effect of PASDs on functional outcomes (OR 1.15; 95% CI 0.91-1.47) or mortality (OR 0.85, 95% CI 0.65-1.11).

CONCLUSION

Prophylactic antiseizure medications after sICH reduce seizures in studies with electroencephalogram monitoring in high-risk patients. However, this benefit did not reflect in the improvement of functional outcomes, even in studies with newer, less toxic, antiseizure drugs.

Impact of seizures and their prophylaxis with antiepileptic drugs on rehabilitation course of patients with traumatic or hemorrhagic brain injury

Objective

To determine whether, in patients undergoing rehabilitation after traumatic or hemorrhagic brain injury, seizures and the use of antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) negatively impact on functional outcome, and, in turn, whether prophylactic AED therapy can prevent the development of seizures.

Design

Observational retrospective study.

Setting

Highly specialized inpatient neurorehabilitation clinic.

Participants

Patients with traumatic brain injury (TBI), or hemorrhagic stroke (HS) consecutively admitted to our neurorehabilitation unit between January 1, 2009, and December 31, 2018.

Main measures and variables

Patients' demographic data, neurological status (Glasgow Coma Scale), and rehabilitation outcome (Functional Independence Measure scale), both assessed on admission and on discharge, associated neurosurgical procedures (craniectomy, or cranioplasty), AED use, early or late seizures occurrence, and death during hospitalization.

Results

Of 740 patients, 162 (21.9%) had seizures, and prophylactic AEDs were started in 192 (25.9%). Multivariate logistic regression identified severity of brain injury as a risk factor for acute symptomatic seizures (ASS) in HS (OR = 1.800, 95%CI = 1.133–1.859, p = 0.013), and for unprovoked seizures (US) in TBI (OR = 1.679, 95%CI = 1.062–2.655, p = 0.027). Prophylaxis with AEDs reduced ASS frequency, but, if protracted for months, was associated with US occurrence (HS, p < 0.0001; TBI, p = 0.0002; vs. untreated patients). Presence of US (β = −0.12; p < 0.0001) and prophylaxis with AEDs (β = −0.09; p = 0.002), were associated with poor functional outcome, regardless of age, severity of brain insult, and HS vs. TBI subtype.

Conclusions

Severity of brain injury and occurrence of seizures during neurorehabilitation are the main driver of poor outcome in both HS and TBI. The possible detrimental role on the epileptogenic and functional outcome played by seizures prophylaxis with AEDs, nonetheless useful to prevent ASS if administered over the first week after the brain injury, warrants further investigation.

Cerebral Hemorrhage: Pathophysiology, Treatment, and Future Directions

Intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) is a devastating form of stroke with high morbidity and mortality. This review article focuses on the epidemiology, cause, mechanisms of injury, current treatment strategies, and future research directions of ICH. Incidence of hemorrhagic stroke has increased worldwide over the past 40 years, with shifts in the cause over time as hypertension management has improved and anticoagulant use has increased. Preclinical and clinical trials have elucidated the underlying ICH cause and mechanisms of injury from ICH including the complex interaction between edema, inflammation, iron-induced injury, and oxidative stress. Several trials have investigated optimal medical and surgical management of ICH without clear improvement in survival and functional outcomes. Ongoing research into novel approaches for ICH management provide hope for reducing the devastating effect of this disease in the future. Areas of promise in ICH therapy include prognostic biomarkers and primary prevention based on disease pathobiology, ultra-early hemostatic therapy, minimally invasive surgery, and perihematomal protection against inflammatory brain injury.

Childhood stroke

Stroke is an important cause of neurological morbidity in children; most survivors have permanent neurological deficits that affect the remainder of their life. Stroke in childhood, the focus of this Primer, is distinguished from perinatal stroke, defined as stroke before 29 days of age, because of its unique pathogenesis reflecting the maternal-fetal unit. Although approximately 15% of strokes in adults are haemorrhagic, half of incident strokes in children are haemorrhagic and half are ischaemic. The causes of childhood stroke are distinct from those in adults. Urgent brain imaging is essential to confirm the stroke diagnosis and guide decisions about hyperacute therapies. Secondary stroke prevention strongly depends on the underlying aetiology. While the past decade has seen substantial advances in paediatric stroke research, the quality of evidence for interventions, such as the rapid reperfusion therapies that have revolutionized arterial ischaemic stroke care in adults, remains low. Substantial time delays in diagnosis and treatment continue to challenge best possible care. Effective primary stroke prevention strategies in children with sickle cell disease represent a major success, yet barriers to implementation persist. The multidisciplinary members of the International Pediatric Stroke Organization are coordinating global efforts to tackle these challenges and improve the outcomes in children with cerebrovascular disease.

Phenytoin prophylaxis and functional outcomes following spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage: A systematic review and meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION

Seizure activity following spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage (sICH) can worsen patients' comorbidity. However, data regarding whether seizure prophylaxis for sICH is associated with patients' poor functional outcome is inconclusive. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the relationship between phenytoin prophylaxis and poor functional outcome after sICH.

METHODS

We conducted our search on PubMed, Scopus, and EMBASE databases as of October 30, 2020 for studies that included information on seizure prophylaxis and functional outcome in patients with sICH. Primary outcome was poor functional outcome at the longest follow-up in patients receiving seizure prophylaxis. The secondary outcome was poor functional outcome at 90 days follow-up. We conducted random effects meta-analysis and moderator analyses to detect sources of heterogeneity for our outcomes.

RESULTS

We included eleven studies in the final analysis with a total of 4268 patients. A moderator analysis further showed prospective studies had lower heterogeneity. We did not find an association between seizure prophylaxis and poor functional outcome at time of longest follow-up (OR 1.2, 95%CI 0.9-1.6, p-value = 0.22, I² = 61%), nor at 90-day follow-up (OR 1.4, 95%CI 0.8-2.4, p-value = 0.24, I² = 78%).

CONCLUSION

Seizure prophylaxis following sICH was not associated with worse functional outcomes at longest follow-up or at 90 days. Neither levetiracetam nor phenytoin was associated with outcome in our exploratory meta-regression, though there is a trend towards better outcomes in populations where there was a higher percentage of patients who received levetiracetam. More randomized trials are needed to confirm this observation.

Patterns of prophylactic anticonvulsant use in spontaneous intracerebral and subarachnoid hemorrhage: results of a practitioner survey

BACKGROUND

The use of prophylactic anti-seizure medications (ASMs) in the management of patients with spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage (sICH) and aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH) is controversial.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this survey was to better characterize the current state of prophylactic ASM use in sICH and aSAH in North America.

METHODS

US and Canadian neurosurgeons, neurologists, and interventional neuroradiologists with an interest in or expertise in the management of neurovascular disease were surveyed using an electronic survey tool.

RESULTS

Seven hundred ninety-four survey requests were sent; responses were received from 103 (13%). The majority of respondents were neurosurgeons (84%). Thirty-eight percent of respondents self-identified as vascular neurosurgeons and 10% self-identified as neurocritical care specialists. Seventy-two percent were in academic practice. When asked their preference for ASM prophylaxis (aSAH, sICH, or both), the most common response was to use prophylaxis in both aSAH and sICH (43, 45%). Twenty-one (22%) did not use routine prophylaxis, while 22 (23%) used prophylaxis only in aSAH and 9 (9%) only in sICH. The majority of practitioners (35, 67%) who answered that they used ASM prophylaxis in sICH, used ASMs selectively. For aSAH, the vast majority (53, 82%) used prophylaxis for all patients. Respondents felt that they were more likely to use ASMs for sICH patients if the sICH was in a cortical location, supratentorial location, or was related to a structural abnormality (e.g., tumor, arteriovenous malformation) Levetiracetam (Keppra) was the most commonly used ASM (73, 99%). When asked whether the statement "Current AHA/ASA Guidelines recommend against the use of prophylactic anticonvulsants in spontaneous ICH" was true or false, 78 (83%) responded correctly that the recommendation is true. Only 24 respondents answered the question as to whether they would be willing to randomize sICH and/or aSAH patients to management with or without ASM prophylaxis. Of these, 13 (54%) said they would be willing to randomize sICH patients, while only 6 (25%) were willing to randomize aSAH patients. There were no statistically significant differences in responses to survey questions when analyzed by practice type (academic versus non-academic) or physician specialty (critical care versus non-critical care, or vascular neurology/neurosurgery versus other).

CONCLUSION

The use of ASMs for seizure prophylaxis after sICH and aSAH remains widespread despite the lack of any specific evidence-based guideline to support the practice. A large-scale randomized controlled trial is needed to add clarity to the practice of prophylactic ASM use in patients with spontaneous intracranial hemorrhage.

A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Antiepileptic Prophylaxis in Spontaneous Intracerebral Hemorrhage

BACKGROUND

Frequency of clinical seizures may be as high as 16% in patients with spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH). Current guidelines recommend against antiepileptic drug (AED) prophylaxis, but this recommendation is based on older trials, and the effect of newer AEDs is uncertain. The aim of this review was to study effects of AEDs on seizure occurrence and outcome in patients with spontaneous ICH.

METHODS

We searched key databases using combinations of the following terms: "levetiracetam," "prophylaxis," "ICH," "intracerebral hemorrhage," "intraparenchymal hemorrhage." Selected studies were reviewed for level of evidence and overall quality of data using Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluations criteria. A meta-analysis was performed to evaluate seizure prevention, functional outcome, and mortality in patients with seizure prophylaxis compared with no prophylaxis following spontaneous ICH.

RESULTS

Seven articles met inclusion criteria and were graded level III studies. Administration of AEDs was not associated with reduced seizure risk (odds ratio 1.14, 95% confidence interval 0.47-2.77, P = 0.77). There was an association between AED prophylaxis and poor functional outcome (odds ratio 1.65, 95% confidence interval 1.17-2.31, P = 0.004) but not mortality (odds ratio 1.04, 95% confidence interval 0.62-1.72, P = 0.89). The overall quality of evidence using Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluations criteria was low.

CONCLUSIONS

This systematic review and meta-analysis including recent studies focusing on newer AEDs supports the 2015 guidelines regarding AED use in spontaneous ICH. There are some important caveats, including a possible confounding association between AED use and higher ICH score and the overall poor quality of the available data. A randomized clinical trial may be helpful.

Early Seizures Are Predictive of Worse Health-Related Quality of Life at Follow-Up After Intracerebral Hemorrhage

OBJECTIVES

Early seizures are a common complication of intracerebral hemorrhage, occurring in ~10% of patients. However, the independent effect of early seizures on patient outcomes, particularly health-related quality of life, is unclear. Without a potential benefit to patient outcomes, the widespread use (~40%) of prophylactic seizure medications has no reasonable chance of improving patient outcomes. We tested the hypothesis that health-related quality of life at follow-up is different between patients with and without early seizures (and secondarily, with nonconvulsive status epilepticus) after intracerebral hemorrhage.

DESIGN

Patients with intracerebral hemorrhage were enrolled in an observational cohort study that prospectively collected clinical data and health-related quality of life at follow-up.

SETTING

Academic medical center.

PATIENTS

One-hundred thirty-three patients whose health-related quality of life was assessed 3 months after intracerebral hemorrhage onset.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Health-related quality of life was obtained at 3 months after intracerebral hemorrhage onset. T Scores of health-related quality of life were modeled with multivariable linear models accounting for severity with the intracerebral hemorrhage Score and hematoma location. Health-related quality of life was measured with National Institutes of Health Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System/Neuroquality of life, expressed in T Scores (U.S. normal 50 ± 10). The modified Rankin Scale (a global measure) was a secondary outcome. There were 12 patients (9%) with early seizures. T Scores of health-related quality of life at follow-up were lower (worse) in patients with early seizure compared with patients without an early seizure (44 [32.75-51.85] vs 30.25 [18.9-39.15]; p = 0.04); results for other domains of health-related quality of life were similar. The association persisted in multivariable models. There was no association between early seizures and prophylactic seizure medications (p = 0.4). Results for patients with nonconvulsive status epilepticus were similar. There was no association between early seizures and the modified Rankin Scale at 3 months.

CONCLUSIONS

Early seizures and nonconvulsive status epilepticus were associated with lower health-related quality of life at follow-up in survivors of intracerebral hemorrhage.

Seizures and epilepsy after intracerebral hemorrhage: an update

Seizures are common after intracerebral hemorrhage, occurring in 6-15% of the patients, mostly in the first 72 h. Their incidence reaches 30% when subclinical or non-convulsive seizures are diagnosed by continuous electroencephalogram. Several risk factors for seizures have been described including cortical location of intracerebral hemorrhage, presence of intraventricular hemorrhage, total hemorrhage volume, and history of alcohol abuse. Seizures after intracerebral hemorrhage may theoretically be harmful as they can lead to sudden blood pressure fluctuations, increased intracranial pressure, and neuronal injury due to increased metabolic demand. Some recent studies suggest that acute symptomatic seizures (occurring within 7 days of stroke) are associated with worse functional outcome and increased risk of death despite accounting for other known prognostic factors such as age and baseline hemorrhage volume. However, the impact of seizures on prognosis is still debated and it remains unclear if treating or preventing seizures might lead to improved clinical outcome. Thus, the currently available scientific evidence does not support the routine use of antiseizure medication as primary prevention among patients with intracerebral hemorrhage. Only prospective adequately powered randomized-controlled trials will be able to answer whether seizure prophylaxis in the acute or longer term settings is beneficial or not in patients with intracerebral hemorrhage.

Principles of Pharmacotherapy of Seizures and Status Epilepticus

Status epilepticus is a neurological emergency with an outcome that is highly associated with the initial pharmacotherapy management that must be administered in a timely fashion. Beyond first-line therapy of status epilepticus, treatment is not guided by robust evidence. Optimal pharmacotherapy selection for individual patients is essential in the management of seizures and status epilepticus with careful evaluation of pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic factors. With the addition of newer antiseizure agents to the market, understanding their role in the management of status epilepticus is critical. Etiology-guided therapy should be considered in certain patients with drug-induced seizures, alcohol withdrawal, or autoimmune encephalitis. Some patient populations warrant special consideration, such as pediatric, pregnant, elderly, and the critically ill. Seizure prophylaxis is indicated in select patients with acute neurological injury and should be limited to the acute postinjury period.

Antiepileptic Drugs to Prevent Seizures After Spontaneous Intracerebral Hemorrhage

Background and Purpose- We sought to evaluate the available literature to determine whether primary seizure prevention with antiepileptic drugs reduces the risk of poor outcomes and clinically relevant seizures among adult patients with spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage. Methods- Meta-analysis of observational studies and randomized controlled trials evaluating the use of any antiepileptic drug for primary seizure prevention among adult (≥18 years) patients with spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage. The primary end point was poor clinical outcome at the longest recorded follow-up, defined as either a high (>3) modified Rankin Scale score or all-cause mortality during follow-up if the modified Rankin Scale score was not recorded. Early and late seizures were secondary outcomes. A random mixed effects model was used to estimate the pooled odds ratio of outcomes and associated 95% CI. Results- We identified 7 studies with a total of 3241 patients for analysis of the primary outcome and 4 studies with a total of 1861 patients for analysis of the secondary outcomes. Overall, the use of antiepileptic drugs was not associated with a high Rankin Scale or all-cause mortality (odds ratio: 0.99; 95% CI, 0.66-1.49) or incident seizures (odds ratio: 0.89; 95% CI, 0.52-1.51) at the longest recorded follow-up time. Conclusions- The use of antiepileptic drugs as primary prevention among adult patients with spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage is not associated with improved neurological function during long-term follow-up. Future studies should focus on the preventive use of distinct antiepileptic agents among patients at high risk of both seizures and poor outcomes.

Prophylactic Anticonvulsants in Patients Undergoing Craniotomy: A Single-Center Experience

Background

There is no consensus on the efficacy of seizure prophylaxis in patients undergoing craniotomy. Some studies show that antiepileptic use decreases the risk of seizures, but other studies do not support this. The present study investigated the role of antiepileptic drugs in patient undergoing craniotomy due to various intracranial pathologies.

Material/Methods

A retrospective review was performed in adult patients undergoing craniotomy between January 2013 and June 2017. Results of 282 patients who did not have a history of seizures and had craniotomies for various reasons were included. In all patients with craniotomy planned, prophylactic AEDs were initiated pre-operatively.

Results

The incidence of postoperative seizures was 17.7% when all craniotomized patients were considered. The most commonly used anticonvulsant agent was phenytoin (75.2%). No serious antiepileptic drug reaction occurred requiring cessation of treatment.

Conclusions

Prophylactic antiepileptic treatment of patients undergoing craniotomy should not be continued beyond the first perioperative week if there is no serious brain injury. The intra- or extra-axial placement of the tumor affects the prophylaxis. Further randomized controlled studies are warranted in the future to investigate the efficacy of these medications.