1
|
Cheshire J, Chu J, Boivin J, Dugdale G, Harper J, Balen A. The Fertility Education Initiative: responding to the need for enhanced fertility and reproductive health awareness amongst young people in the United Kingdom. HUM FERTIL 2024; 27:2417940. [PMID: 39463264 DOI: 10.1080/14647273.2024.2417940] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/09/2024] [Accepted: 10/09/2024] [Indexed: 10/29/2024]
Abstract
The need for fertility education arises from changing patterns of family formation in recent times. Young people feel unprepared for how best to plan their career and family and have little idea of the various factors that may influence their fertility later in their life. Research shows young people would like to know more and need the information to be conveyed in a way that is engaging and helps them to integrate it at their current life stage. The Fertility Education Initiative (FEI) was founded in 2016 to address the need for improved fertility and reproductive health awareness and ensure young people are equipped with the relevant information to meet their reproductive and family building needs. This paper serves as a historical record of the genesis of the FEI and its impact to date.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- James Cheshire
- Birmingham Women's and Children's NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham. UK
| | - Justin Chu
- Birmingham Women's and Children's NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham. UK
- TFP Oxford Fertility, Oxford, UK
- Institute of Metabolism and Systems Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Jacky Boivin
- School of Psychology, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK
| | | | - Joyce Harper
- EGA Institute for Women's Health, University College London, London, UK
| | - Adam Balen
- Leeds Centre for Reproductive Medicine, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, UK
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Svenšek A, Lorber M, Gosak L, Verbert K, Klemenc-Ketis Z, Stiglic G. The Role of Visualization in Estimating Cardiovascular Disease Risk: Scoping Review. JMIR Public Health Surveill 2024; 10:e60128. [PMID: 39401079 PMCID: PMC11519570 DOI: 10.2196/60128] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/02/2024] [Revised: 09/11/2024] [Accepted: 09/16/2024] [Indexed: 10/15/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Supporting and understanding the health of patients with chronic diseases and cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk is often a major challenge. Health data are often used in providing feedback to patients, and visualization plays an important role in facilitating the interpretation and understanding of data and, thus, influencing patients' behavior. Visual analytics enable efficient analysis and understanding of large datasets in real time. Digital health technologies can promote healthy lifestyle choices and assist in estimating CVD risk. OBJECTIVE This review aims to present the most-used visualization techniques to estimate CVD risk. METHODS In this scoping review, we followed the Joanna Briggs Institute PRISMA-ScR (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews) guidelines. The search strategy involved searching databases, including PubMed, CINAHL Ultimate, MEDLINE, and Web of Science, and gray literature from Google Scholar. This review included English-language articles on digital health, mobile health, mobile apps, images, charts, and decision support systems for estimating CVD risk, as well as empirical studies, excluding irrelevant studies and commentaries, editorials, and systematic reviews. RESULTS We found 774 articles and screened them against the inclusion and exclusion criteria. The final scoping review included 17 studies that used different methodologies, including descriptive, quantitative, and population-based studies. Some prognostic models, such as the Framingham Risk Profile, World Health Organization and International Society of Hypertension risk prediction charts, Cardiovascular Risk Score, and a simplified Persian atherosclerotic CVD risk stratification, were simpler and did not require laboratory tests, whereas others, including the Joint British Societies recommendations on the prevention of CVD, Systematic Coronary Risk Evaluation, and Framingham-Registre Gironí del COR, were more complex and required laboratory testing-related results. The most frequently used prognostic risk factors were age, sex, and blood pressure (16/17, 94% of the studies); smoking status (14/17, 82%); diabetes status (11/17, 65%); family history (10/17, 59%); high-density lipoprotein and total cholesterol (9/17, 53%); and triglycerides and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (6/17, 35%). The most frequently used visualization techniques in the studies were visual cues (10/17, 59%), followed by bar charts (5/17, 29%) and graphs (4/17, 24%). CONCLUSIONS On the basis of the scoping review, we found that visualization is very rarely included in the prognostic models themselves even though technology-based interventions improve health care worker performance, knowledge, motivation, and compliance by integrating machine learning and visual analytics into applications to identify and respond to estimation of CVD risk. Visualization aids in understanding risk factors and disease outcomes, improving bioinformatics and biomedicine. However, evidence on mobile health's effectiveness in improving CVD outcomes is limited.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Adrijana Svenšek
- Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Maribor, Maribor, Slovenia
| | - Mateja Lorber
- Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Maribor, Maribor, Slovenia
| | - Lucija Gosak
- Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Maribor, Maribor, Slovenia
| | - Katrien Verbert
- Department of Computer Science, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Zalika Klemenc-Ketis
- Primary Healthcare Research and Development Institute, Community Health Centre Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia
- Department of Family Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Maribor, Maribor, Slovenia
- Department of Family Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia
| | - Gregor Stiglic
- Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Maribor, Maribor, Slovenia
- Faculty of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, University of Maribor, Maribor, Slovenia
- Usher Institute, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Griffiths S, McMillan B, Bartlett YK, French D. Cardiovascular disease risk communication alone is not enough: why a recent review may be misleading. Eur Heart J 2024; 45:4239-4240. [PMID: 39271135 DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehae529] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 09/15/2024] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Sophie Griffiths
- Manchester Centre for Health Psychology, University of Manchester, Coupland 1 Building, Manchester M15 6FH, UK
| | - Brian McMillan
- Centre for Primary Care and Health Services Research, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Y Kiera Bartlett
- Manchester Centre for Health Psychology, University of Manchester, Coupland 1 Building, Manchester M15 6FH, UK
| | - David French
- Manchester Centre for Health Psychology, University of Manchester, Coupland 1 Building, Manchester M15 6FH, UK
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Vrints C, Andreotti F, Koskinas KC, Rossello X, Adamo M, Ainslie J, Banning AP, Budaj A, Buechel RR, Chiariello GA, Chieffo A, Christodorescu RM, Deaton C, Doenst T, Jones HW, Kunadian V, Mehilli J, Milojevic M, Piek JJ, Pugliese F, Rubboli A, Semb AG, Senior R, Ten Berg JM, Van Belle E, Van Craenenbroeck EM, Vidal-Perez R, Winther S. 2024 ESC Guidelines for the management of chronic coronary syndromes. Eur Heart J 2024; 45:3415-3537. [PMID: 39210710 DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehae177] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 09/04/2024] Open
|
5
|
Dennison RA, Clune RJ, Morris S, Thomas C, Usher‐Smith JA. Understanding the Preferences and Considerations of the Public Towards Risk-Stratified Screening for Colorectal Cancer: Insights From Think-Aloud Interviews Based on a Discrete Choice Experiment. Health Expect 2024; 27:e14153. [PMID: 39030943 PMCID: PMC11258464 DOI: 10.1111/hex.14153] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/26/2024] [Revised: 07/02/2024] [Accepted: 07/08/2024] [Indexed: 07/22/2024] Open
Abstract
CONTEXT Risk stratification has been suggested as a strategy for improving cancer screening. Any changes to existing programmes must be acceptable to the public. OBJECTIVE This study aimed to explore the preferences and considerations of individuals relating to the introduction of different risk-based strategies to determine eligibility for colorectal cancer (CRC) screening. STUDY DESIGN Participants completed a discrete choice experiment (DCE) within online interviews. Nine conjoint-analysis tasks were created, each with two potential CRC screening programmes. The attributes included personal risk of CRC, screening invitation strategy and impact. Participants chose between programmes while thinking aloud and sharing their thoughts. Transcripts were analysed using codebook thematic analysis. PARTICIPANTS Twenty participants based in England aged 40-79 years without previous cancer history or medical expertise. RESULTS When choosing between programmes, participants first and primarily looked to prioritise saving lives. The harms associated with screening were viewed as a surprise but also felt by most to be inevitable; the benefits frequently outweighed, therefore, harms were considered less important. Risk stratification using individual characteristics was considered a nuanced approach to healthcare, which tended to be preferred over the age-alone model. Detailed personal risk information could be taken more seriously than non-personalised information to motivate behaviour change. Although it had minimal impact on decision-making, not diverting resources for screening from elsewhere was valued. Individuals who chose not to provide health information were considered irresponsible, while it was important that those with no information to provide should not lose out. CONCLUSION Risk-stratified CRC screening is generally aligned with public preferences, with decisions between possible stratification strategies dominated by saving lives. Even if attributes including risk factors, risk stratification strategy and risk communication contributed less to the overall decision to select certain programmes, some levels more clearly fulfilled public values; therefore, all these factors should be taken into consideration when redesigning and communicating CRC screening programmes. PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION The primary data source for this study is interviews with 20 members of the public (current, past or future CRC screening invitees). Two public representatives contributed to planning this study, particularly the DCE.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rebecca A. Dennison
- Primary Care Unit, Department of Public Health and Primary CareUniversity of CambridgeCambridgeUK
| | - Reanna J. Clune
- Primary Care Unit, Department of Public Health and Primary CareUniversity of CambridgeCambridgeUK
| | - Stephen Morris
- Primary Care Unit, Department of Public Health and Primary CareUniversity of CambridgeCambridgeUK
| | - Chloe Thomas
- Sheffield Centre for Health and Related Research, School of Medicine and Population HealthUniversity of SheffieldSheffieldUK
| | - Juliet A. Usher‐Smith
- Primary Care Unit, Department of Public Health and Primary CareUniversity of CambridgeCambridgeUK
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Saito I, Yamagishi K, Kokubo Y, Yatsuya H, Muraki I, Iso H, Inoue M, Tsugane S, Sawada N. Lifetime Risk of Incident Coronary Heart Disease, Stroke, and Cardiovascular Disease: The Japan Public Health Center-Based Prospective Study. J Atheroscler Thromb 2024:64934. [PMID: 38972723 DOI: 10.5551/jat.64934] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 07/09/2024] Open
Abstract
AIM The constellation of cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk factors greatly impacts the lifetime risk (LTR) of incident CVD, but the LTR has not been thoroughly evaluated in the Japanese population. METHODS We conducted a prospective study involving a total of 25,896 individuals 40-69 years old without a history of CVD in 1995 (Cohort I) and 1993-1994 (Cohort II) in Japan. CVD risk factors (blood pressure, non-high-density lipoprotein [HDL] cholesterol levels, smoking status, and glucose concentrations) were used to stratify them by risk. The sex-specific LTR of incident coronary heart disease, stroke, atherosclerotic CVD, and total CVD were estimated for participants 45 years old in the 4 risk categories with the cumulative incidence rate, adjusting for the competing risk of death. RESULTS We found apparent differences in the LTR of total CVD according to the risk stratification. Individuals with ≥ 2 of the risk factors of blood pressure ≥ 140/90 mmHg or treated, non-HDL cholesterol level ≥ 170 mg/dL or treated, current smoker, and diabetes had substantially higher adjusted LTRs of CVD than those in other groups, with a LTR of 26.5% (95% confidence interval, 24.0%-29.0%) for men and 15.3% (13.1%-17.5%) for women at 45 years. The LTR of incident stroke was the highest among CVDs, and the presence of hypertension and diabetes mellitus strongly influenced the LTR of total CVD. CONCLUSION The impact of risk accumulation on LTR of CVD was greater in men, and 1 in 4 men with ≥ 2 major risk factors at 45 years of age developed CVD in their lifetime.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Isao Saito
- Department of Public Health and Epidemiology, Faculty of Medicine, Oita University
| | - Kazumasa Yamagishi
- Department of Public Health Medicine, Institute of Medicine, and Health Services Research and Development Center, University of Tsukuba
| | - Yoshihiro Kokubo
- Department of Preventive Cardiology, National Cerebral and Cardiovascular Center
| | - Hiroshi Yatsuya
- Department of Public Health and Health Systems, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine
| | - Isao Muraki
- Public Health, Department of Social and Environmental Medicine, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka University
| | - Hiroyasu Iso
- Public Health, Department of Social and Environmental Medicine, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka University
- The Institute for Global Health Policy, National Center for Global Health and Medicine
| | - Manami Inoue
- Division of Cohort Research, National Cancer Center Institute for Cancer Control
- Division of Prevention, National Cancer Center Institute for Cancer Control
| | - Shoichiro Tsugane
- Division of Cohort Research, National Cancer Center Institute for Cancer Control
- International University of Health and Welfare Graduate School of Public Health
| | - Norie Sawada
- Division of Cohort Research, National Cancer Center Institute for Cancer Control
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Austin JD, James E, Perez RL, Mazza GL, Kling JM, Fraker J, Mina L, Banerjee I, Sharpe R, Patel BK. Factors influencing U.S. women's interest and preferences for breast cancer risk communication: a cross-sectional study from a large tertiary care breast imaging center. BMC Womens Health 2024; 24:359. [PMID: 38907193 PMCID: PMC11191185 DOI: 10.1186/s12905-024-03197-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/17/2024] [Accepted: 06/10/2024] [Indexed: 06/23/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Breast imaging clinics in the United States (U.S.) are increasingly implementing breast cancer risk assessment (BCRA) to align with evolving guideline recommendations but with limited uptake of risk-reduction care. Effectively communicating risk information to women is central to implementation efforts, but remains understudied in the U.S. This study aims to characterize, and identify factors associated with women's interest in and preferences for breast cancer risk communication. METHODS This is a cross-sectional survey study of U.S. women presenting for a mammogram between January and March of 2021 at a large, tertiary breast imaging clinic. Survey items assessed women's interest in knowing their risk and preferences for risk communication if considered to be at high risk in hypothetical situations. Multivariable logistic regression modeling assessed factors associated with women's interest in knowing their personal risk and preferences for details around exact risk estimates. RESULTS Among 1119 women, 72.7% were interested in knowing their breast cancer risk. If at high risk, 77% preferred to receive their exact risk estimate and preferred verbal (52.9% phone/47% in-person) vs. written (26.5% online/19.5% letter) communications. Adjusted regression analyses found that those with a primary family history of breast cancer were significantly more interested in knowing their risk (OR 1.5, 95% CI 1.0, 2.1, p = 0.04), while those categorized as "more than one race or other" were significantly less interested in knowing their risk (OR 0.4, 95% CI 0.2, 0.9, p = 0.02). Women 60 + years of age were significantly less likely to prefer exact estimates of their risk (OR 0.6, 95% CI 0.5, 0.98, p < 0.01), while women with greater than a high school education were significantly more likely to prefer exact risk estimates (OR 2.5, 95% CI 1.5, 4.2, p < 0.001). CONCLUSION U.S. women in this study expressed strong interest in knowing their risk and preferred to receive exact risk estimates verbally if found to be at high risk. Sociodemographic and family history influenced women's interest and preferences for risk communication. Breast imaging centers implementing risk assessment should consider strategies tailored to women's preferences to increase interest in risk estimates and improve risk communication.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jessica D Austin
- Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Division of Epidemiology, Mayo Clinic, 13400 E. Shea Blvd, Scottsdale, AZ, 85259, USA.
| | - Emily James
- Mayo Clinic College of Medicine of Medicine and Science, Mayo Clinic, 5777 E Mayo Blvd, Phoenix, AZ, 85054, USA
| | - Rachel L Perez
- Mayo Clinic College of Medicine of Medicine and Science, Mayo Clinic, 5777 E Mayo Blvd, Phoenix, AZ, 85054, USA
| | - Gina L Mazza
- Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Division of Clinical Trials and Biostatistics, Mayo Clinic, 13400 E. Shea Blvd, Scottsdale, AZ, 85259, USA
| | - Juliana M Kling
- Women's Health Internal Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, 13400 E. Shea Blvd, Scottsdale, AZ, 85259, USA
| | - Jessica Fraker
- Women's Health Internal Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, 13400 E. Shea Blvd, Scottsdale, AZ, 85259, USA
| | - Lida Mina
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Medical Oncology, Mayo Clinic, 5777 E Mayo Blvd, Phoenix, AZ, 85054, USA
| | - Imon Banerjee
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Mayo Clinic, 5777 E Mayo Blvd, Phoenix, AZ, 85054, USA
| | - Richard Sharpe
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Mayo Clinic, 5777 E Mayo Blvd, Phoenix, AZ, 85054, USA
| | - Bhavika K Patel
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Mayo Clinic, 5777 E Mayo Blvd, Phoenix, AZ, 85054, USA
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Dannhauser FC, Taylor LC, Tung JSL, Usher-Smith JA. The acceptability and clinical impact of using polygenic scores for risk-estimation of common cancers in primary care: a systematic review. J Community Genet 2024; 15:217-234. [PMID: 38769249 PMCID: PMC11217210 DOI: 10.1007/s12687-024-00709-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/11/2023] [Accepted: 05/02/2024] [Indexed: 05/22/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Polygenic scores (PGS) have been developed for cancer risk-estimation and show potential as tools to prompt earlier referral for high-risk individuals and aid risk-stratification within cancer screening programmes. This review explores the potential for using PGS to identify individuals at risk of the most common cancers seen in primary care. METHODS Two electronic databases were searched up until November 2023 to identify quantitative, qualitative, and mixed methods studies that reported on the acceptability and clinical impact of using PGS to identify individuals at highest risk of breast, prostate, colorectal and lung cancer in primary care. The Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool (MMAT) was used to assess the quality of included studies and a narrative synthesis was used to analyse data. RESULTS A total of 190 papers were identified, 18 of which were eligible for inclusion. A cancer risk-assessment tool incorporating PGS was acceptable to the general practice population and their healthcare providers but major challenges to implementation were identified, including lack of evidence for PGS in non-European ancestry and a need for healthcare provider education in genomic medicine. A PGS cancer risk-assessment had relatively limited impact on psychosocial outcomes and health behaviours. However, for prostate cancer, potential applications for its use in primary care were shown. CONCLUSIONS Cancer risk assessment incorporating PGS in primary care is acceptable to patients and healthcare providers but there is a paucity of research exploring clinical impact. Few studies were identified, and more research is required before clinical implementation of PGS can be recommended.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Lily C Taylor
- Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, England
| | - Joanna S L Tung
- Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, England
| | - Juliet A Usher-Smith
- Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, England.
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Shinn EH, Garden AS, Peterson SK, Leupi DJ, Chen M, Blau R, Becerra L, Rafeedi T, Ramirez J, Rodriquez D, VanFossen F, Zehner S, Mercier PP, Wang J, Hutcheson K, Hanna E, Lipomi DJ. Iterative Patient Testing of a Stimuli-Responsive Swallowing Activity Sensor to Promote Extended User Engagement During the First Year After Radiation: Multiphase Remote and In-Person Observational Cohort Study. JMIR Cancer 2024; 10:e47359. [PMID: 38416544 PMCID: PMC10938225 DOI: 10.2196/47359] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/28/2023] [Revised: 09/14/2023] [Accepted: 09/26/2023] [Indexed: 02/29/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Frequent sensor-assisted monitoring of changes in swallowing function may help improve detection of radiation-associated dysphagia before it becomes permanent. While our group has prototyped an epidermal strain/surface electromyography sensor that can detect minute changes in swallowing muscle movement, it is unknown whether patients with head and neck cancer would be willing to wear such a device at home after radiation for several months. OBJECTIVE We iteratively assessed patients' design preferences and perceived barriers to long-term use of the prototype sensor. METHODS In study 1 (questionnaire only), survivors of pharyngeal cancer who were 3-5 years post treatment and part of a larger prospective study were asked their design preferences for a hypothetical throat sensor and rated their willingness to use the sensor at home during the first year after radiation. In studies 2 and 3 (iterative user testing), patients with and survivors of head and neck cancer attending visits at MD Anderson's Head and Neck Cancer Center were recruited for two rounds of on-throat testing with prototype sensors while completing a series of swallowing tasks. Afterward, participants were asked about their willingness to use the sensor during the first year post radiation. In study 2, patients also rated the sensor's ease of use and comfort, whereas in study 3, preferences were elicited regarding haptic feedback. RESULTS The majority of respondents in study 1 (116/138, 84%) were willing to wear the sensor 9 months after radiation, and participant willingness rates were similar in studies 2 (10/14, 71.4%) and 3 (12/14, 85.7%). The most prevalent reasons for participants' unwillingness to wear the sensor were 9 months being excessive, unwanted increase in responsibility, and feeling self-conscious. Across all three studies, the sensor's ability to detect developing dysphagia increased willingness the most compared to its appearance and ability to increase adherence to preventive speech pathology exercises. Direct haptic signaling was also rated highly, especially to indicate correct sensor placement and swallowing exercise performance. CONCLUSIONS Patients and survivors were receptive to the idea of wearing a personalized risk sensor for an extended period during the first year after radiation, although this may have been limited to well-educated non-Hispanic participants. A significant minority of patients expressed concern with various aspects of the sensor's burden and its appearance. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03010150; https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT03010150.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eileen H Shinn
- Department of Behavioral Science, University of Texas, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Adam S Garden
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Susan K Peterson
- Department of Behavioral Science, University of Texas, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Dylan J Leupi
- Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, College of Science, University of Notre Dame, South Bend, IN, United States
| | - Minxing Chen
- Department of Biostatistics, University of Texas, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Rachel Blau
- Department of Nano and Chemical Engineering, University of California, San Diego, CA, United States
| | - Laura Becerra
- Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of California, San Diego, CA, United States
| | - Tarek Rafeedi
- Department of Nano and Chemical Engineering, University of California, San Diego, CA, United States
| | - Julian Ramirez
- Department of Nano and Chemical Engineering, University of California, San Diego, CA, United States
| | - Daniel Rodriquez
- Department of Nano and Chemical Engineering, University of California, San Diego, CA, United States
| | - Finley VanFossen
- Department of Behavioral Science, University of Texas, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Sydney Zehner
- Department of Behavioral Science, University of Texas, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Patrick P Mercier
- Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of California, San Diego, CA, United States
| | - Joseph Wang
- Department of Nano and Chemical Engineering, University of California, San Diego, CA, United States
| | - Kate Hutcheson
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States
- Department of Head and Neck Surgery, University of Texas, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Ehab Hanna
- Department of Head and Neck Surgery, University of Texas, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Darren J Lipomi
- Department of Nano and Chemical Engineering, University of California, San Diego, CA, United States
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Andersson EM, Lindvall K, Wennberg P, Johansson H, Nordin S. From risk communication about asymptomatic atherosclerosis to cognitive and emotional reactions and lifestyle modification. BMC Psychol 2024; 12:47. [PMID: 38268015 PMCID: PMC10809670 DOI: 10.1186/s40359-023-01467-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/17/2023] [Accepted: 11/27/2023] [Indexed: 01/26/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Non-adherence in the general population to preventive guidelines on cardiovascular disease calls for an interdisciplinary approach acknowledging psychological factors of relevance for risk communication and lifestyle modification. Evidence is building up regarding the advantage of sharing arterial imaging evidence of subclinical atherosclerosis with asymptomatic individuals, but there is limited understanding of how this relates to mechanisms of importance for behavioural change. Longitudinal studies on associations between patients' reactions and lifestyle modification are missing. The population-based randomized controlled trial VIPVIZA investigates the impact of pictorial information about subclinical atherosclerosis, added to traditional risk factor-based communication. The intervention includes a personalized, colour-coded and age-related risk communication strategy and a motivational conversation, and has been shown to reduce cardiovascular disease risk. METHODS In the present study we assessed cognitive and emotional reactions to the intervention, and how these reactions are associated to lifestyle modification. The participants' evaluation of the risk communication was assessed in the intervention group (n = 1749). Lifestyle modification was assessed with a lifestyle index based on physical activity, diet, smoking and alcohol consumption at baseline and after 3 years. Associations between cognitive and emotional response and lifestyle modification were tested with analyses of covariance in a subset of participants (n = 714-857). RESULTS The intervention increased understanding of personal CVD risk, the possibility to influence the risk, and how to influence the risk. Severity of atherosclerosis was associated with emotional reactions, but emotions of strong negative valence were uncommon. Cognitive response and emotional arousal evoked by the intervention were positively associated with lifestyle modification, whereas negative emotions in isolation were not. High level of cognitive response in combination with high level of emotional arousal was found to be most beneficial for lifestyle modification. CONCLUSIONS The results demonstrate the potential of communicating asymptomatic atherosclerosis with a pictorial, colour-coded and age-related strategy, also including a motivational conversation. Furthermore, the results show the importance of CVD risk communication evoking engagement, and that an interaction between cognitive and emotional reactions might be central for sustained lifestyle modification. Our results also indicate that, in an asymptomatic population, atherosclerosis screening may strengthen disease prevention and health promotion. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01849575. Registration date 08/05/2013.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elin M Andersson
- Department of Psychology, Umeå University, S-901 87, Umeå, Sweden.
| | - Kristina Lindvall
- Department of Epidemiology and Global Health, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden
| | - Patrik Wennberg
- Department of Public Health and Clinical Medicine, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden
| | - Helene Johansson
- Department of Epidemiology and Global Health, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden
| | - Steven Nordin
- Department of Psychology, Umeå University, S-901 87, Umeå, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Siette J, Dodds L, Deckers K, Köhler S, Heger I, Strutt P, Johnco C, Wuthrich V, Armitage CJ. A Pilot Study of BRAIN BOOTCAMP, a Low-Intensity Intervention on Diet, Exercise, Cognitive Activity, and Social Interaction to Improve Older Adults' Dementia Risk Scores. J Prev Alzheimers Dis 2024; 11:1500-1512. [PMID: 39350397 PMCID: PMC11436435 DOI: 10.14283/jpad.2024.104] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/29/2024] [Accepted: 05/19/2024] [Indexed: 10/04/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Little is known about the impact of short, low-intensity multidomain dementia risk reduction interventions in older adults. OBJECTIVES To examine the effectiveness and feasibility of a low-intensity multidomain lifestyle intervention on dementia risk and dementia literacy in Australian older adults. DESIGN Single-group pre-post design. SETTING Community-dwelling. PARTICIPANTS A total of 853 older Australians (Mean age=73.3 years, SD=6.1) recruited from the community. INTERVENTION A 3-month dementia risk reduction program, BRAIN BOOTCAMP, including education, personalised risk information, physical cues for healthier choices and goal setting and planning to target four modifiable risk factors of diet, exercise, cognitive activity and social interaction in older adults. MEASUREMENTS The 'LIfestyle for BRAin health' (LIBRA) index was used to assess participants' modifiable dementia risk based on 12 factors, with higher scores indicating greater risk. Dementia literacy was measured using a modified questionnaire derived from Dutch and British surveys, encompassing knowledge, risk reduction, and awareness aspects. Paired t-tests were used to compare dementia risk scores and dementia literacy before and after the program. Multivariate regressions were performed to identify sociodemographic and psychological factors associated with change in the LIBRA index. RESULTS Program attrition was high (58.3%). Participants who completed the program had decreased dementia risk scores (Cohen's d=0.59, p<0.001), increased dementia literacy and awareness (Cohen's d=0.64, p<0.001) and increased motivation to change lifestyle behaviors (Cohen's d=0.25-0.52, p<0.016). Participants with higher motivational beliefs had greater dementia risk reduction. CONCLUSIONS Improving older adults' motivation and knowledge may help modify lifestyle behaviors to reduce dementia risk. However, program attrition remains a challenge, suggesting the need for strategies to enhance participant engagement and retention in such interventions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J Siette
- Dr Joyce Siette, Level 6, 160 Hawkesbury Rd, Westmead, NSW, 2109, Australia,
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
12
|
Dennison RA, Thomas CV, Morris S, Usher-Smith JA. A discrete choice experiment to understand public preferences and priorities for risk-stratified bowel cancer screening programmes in the UK. Prev Med 2023; 177:107786. [PMID: 37984646 DOI: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2023.107786] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/22/2023] [Revised: 11/10/2023] [Accepted: 11/14/2023] [Indexed: 11/22/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Public acceptability of bowel cancer screening programmes must be maintained, including if risk stratification is introduced. We aimed to describe and quantify preferences for different attributes of risk-stratified screening programmes amongst the UK population, focussing on who to invite for bowel screening. METHODS We conducted a discrete choice experiment (DCE) including the following attributes: risk factors used to estimate bowel cancer risk (age plus/minus sex, lifestyle factors and genetics); personalisation of risk feedback; risk stratification strategy plus resource implications; default screening in the case of no risk information; number of deaths prevented by screening; and number experiencing physical harm from screening. We used the results of conditional logit regression models to estimate the importance of each attribute, willingness to trade-off between the attributes, and preferences for different programmes using contemporary risk scores and models. RESULTS 1196 respondents completed the survey, generating 21,528 DCE observations. Deaths prevented was the most influential attribute on respondents' decision-making (contributing to 58.8% of the choice), followed by harms experienced (15.9%). For every three additional deaths prevented, respondents were willing to accept an additional screening harm per 100,000 people. Risk factors and risk stratification strategy contributed to just 11.1% and 3.6% of the choice, respectively. Although the influence on decision-making was small, respondents favoured more personalised feedback. CONCLUSIONS Bowel cancer screening programmes that improve cancer outcomes, particularly by preventing more deaths amongst those screened, are most preferred by the public. Optimising risk prediction models, developing public communication, and readying infrastructure should be prioritised for implementation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rebecca A Dennison
- Primary Care Unit, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 0SR, UK.
| | - Chloe V Thomas
- School of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield S1 4DA, UK
| | - Stephen Morris
- Primary Care Unit, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 0SR, UK
| | - Juliet A Usher-Smith
- Primary Care Unit, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 0SR, UK
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Al-abri K, Edge D, Armitage CJ. Prevalence and correlates of perinatal depression. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol 2023; 58:1581-1590. [PMID: 36646936 PMCID: PMC9842219 DOI: 10.1007/s00127-022-02386-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 15.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/21/2022] [Accepted: 11/14/2022] [Indexed: 01/17/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE This systematic review of systematic reviews aims to provide the first global picture of the prevalence and correlates of perinatal depression, and to explore the commonalities and discrepancies of the literature. METHODS Seven databases were searched from inception until April 2022. Full-text screening and data extraction were performed independently by two researchers and the AMSTAR tool was used to assess the methodological quality. RESULTS 128 systematic reviews were included in the analysis. Mean overall prevalence of perinatal depression, antenatal depression and postnatal depression was 26.3%, 28.5% and 27.6%, respectively. Mean prevalence was significantly higher (27.4%; SD = 12.6) in studies using self-reported measures compared with structured interviews (17.0%, SD = 4.5; d = 1.0) and among potentially vulnerable populations (32.5%; SD = 16.7, e.g. HIV-infected African women) compared to the general population (24.5%; SD = 8.1; d = 0.6). Personal history of mental illness, experiencing stressful life events, lack of social support, lifetime history of abuse, marital conflicts, maternity blues, child care stress, chronic physical health conditions, preeclampsia, gestational diabetes mellitus, being exposed to second-hand smoke and sleep disturbance were among the major correlates of perinatal depression. CONCLUSION Although the included systematic reviews were all of medium-high quality, improvements in the quality of primary research in this area should be encouraged. The standardisation of perinatal depression assessment, diagnosis and measurement, the implementation of longitudinal designs in studies, inclusions of samples that better represent the population and better control of potentially confounding variables are encouraged.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Khalood Al-abri
- Division of Psychology and Mental Health, University of Manchester, G35 Coupland 1 Building, Manchester, UK
- Department of Community and Mental Health, College of Nursing, Sultan Qaboos University, Muscat, Oman
| | - Dawn Edge
- Division of Psychology and Mental Health, University of Manchester, G35 Coupland 1 Building, Manchester, UK
- Equality, Diversity and Inclusion Research Unit, Greater Manchester Mental Health NHS Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - Christopher J. Armitage
- Division of Psychology and Mental Health, University of Manchester, G35 Coupland 1 Building, Manchester, UK
- Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, UK
- NIHR Greater Manchester Patient Safety Translational Research Centre, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
King A, Graham CAM, Glaister M, Da Silva Anastacio V, Pilic L, Mavrommatis Y. The efficacy of genotype-based dietary or physical activity advice in changing behavior to reduce the risk of cardiovascular disease, type II diabetes mellitus or obesity: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Nutr Rev 2023; 81:1235-1253. [PMID: 36779907 DOI: 10.1093/nutrit/nuad001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/14/2023] Open
Abstract
CONTEXT Despite clear evidence that adherence to dietary and physical activity advice can reduce the risk of cardiometabolic disease, a significant proportion of the population do not follow recommendations. Personalized advice based on genetic variation has been proposed for motivating behavior change, although research on its benefits to date has been contradictory. OBJECTIVE To evaluate the efficacy of genotype-based dietary or physical activity advice in changing behavior in the general population and in individuals who are at risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD) or type II diabetes mellitus (T2DM). DATA SOURCES MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsycInfo, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) were searched up to January 7, 2022. Randomized controlled trials of a genotype-based dietary and/or physical activity advice intervention that aimed to change dietary and/or physical activity behavior were included. DATA EXTRACTION Abstracts of 7899 records were screened, and 14 reports from 11 studies met the inclusion criteria. DATA ANALYSIS Genotype-based dietary or physical activity advice was found to have no effect on dietary behavior in any of the studies (standardized mean difference [SMD] .00 [-.11 to .11], P = .98), even when analyzed by subgroup: "at risk" (SMD .00 [-.16 to .16, P = .99]; general population (SMD .01 [-.14 to .16], P = .87). The physical activity behavior findings were similar for all studies (SMD -.01 [-.10 to .08], P = .88), even when analyzed by subgroup: "at risk" (SMD .07 [-.18 to .31], P = .59); general population (SMD -.02 [-.13 to .10], P = .77). The quality of the evidence for the dietary behavior outcome was low; for the physical activity behavior outcome it was moderate. CONCLUSIONS Genotype-based advice does not affect dietary or physical activity behavior more than general advice or advice based on lifestyle or phenotypic measures. This was consistent in studies that recruited participants from the general population as well as in studies that had recruited participants from populations at risk of CVD or T2DM. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION PROSPERO registration no. CRD42021231147.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexandra King
- Faculty of Sport, Allied Health and Performance Science, St Marys University, London, UK
| | - Catherine A-M Graham
- cereneo Foundation, Center for Interdisciplinary Research (CEFIR), Seestrasse 18, 6354 Vitznau, Switzerland
- Lake Lucerne Institute, Seestrasse 18, 6354 Vitznau, Switzerland
| | - Mark Glaister
- Faculty of Sport, Allied Health and Performance Science, St Marys University, London, UK
| | | | - Leta Pilic
- Faculty of Sport, Allied Health and Performance Science, St Marys University, London, UK
| | - Yiannis Mavrommatis
- Faculty of Sport, Allied Health and Performance Science, St Marys University, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Ballard LM, Band R, Lucassen AM. Interventions to support patients with sharing genetic test results with at-risk relatives: a synthesis without meta-analysis (SWiM). Eur J Hum Genet 2023; 31:988-1002. [PMID: 37344572 PMCID: PMC10474271 DOI: 10.1038/s41431-023-01400-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/19/2022] [Revised: 04/22/2023] [Accepted: 05/22/2023] [Indexed: 06/23/2023] Open
Abstract
Whilst the finding of heritable susceptibility to disease was once relatively rare, mainstreaming of genetic testing has resulted in a steady increase. Patients are often encouraged to share their genetic test results with relevant relatives, but relatives may not receive this information, leaving them without knowledge of their own risk. Therefore, strategies to help communicate such information are important. This review aimed to explore the efficacy of existing interventions to improve the sharing of genetic test results. A synthesis without meta-analysis design was used. A systematic search of Medline, CINAHL, PsychINFO, and AMED was conducted, and five studies were identified worldwide. Data were extracted for each study regarding study aim, participant characteristics, condition, intervention details, comparison, study duration, outcome measures, theory and behaviour change techniques used. Limited efficacy and application of theory was found. Knowledge, motivation and self-efficacy were not increased in any intervention. No gender differences in communication behaviour were encountered in interventions that recruited men and women. Two studies reported an evaluation of acceptability, which showed that the interventions were well received by patients and health professionals. No study reported the involvement of the target population in any phase of intervention development. Given the lack of health psychology-informed interventions in this area of clinical genetics, we recommend genetic health professionals, health psychologists and patients collaborate on all stages of future interventions that involve the cascading of genetic health information within families. We also provide guidance regarding use of theory and intervention elements for future intervention development.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lisa Marie Ballard
- Clinical Ethics, Law and Society (CELS), Primary Care, Population Sciences and Medical Education, University of Southampton, Southampton General Hospital, South Academic Block, Tremona Road, Southampton, SO16 6YD, UK.
- NIHR Southampton Biomedical Research Centre, University of Southampton and University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK.
| | - Rebecca Band
- Health Sciences, Highfield Campus, University Road, Southampton, SO17 1BJ, UK
| | - Anneke M Lucassen
- Clinical Ethics, Law and Society (CELS), Primary Care, Population Sciences and Medical Education, University of Southampton, Southampton General Hospital, South Academic Block, Tremona Road, Southampton, SO16 6YD, UK
- NIHR Southampton Biomedical Research Centre, University of Southampton and University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK
- Clinical ethics, law and society (CELS), Wellcome Trust Centre for Human Genetics, University of Oxford, Oxford, OX3 7BN, UK
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Fontana M, Eckert G, Katz B, Keels M, Levy B, Levy S, Kemper A, Yanca E, Jackson R, Warren J, Kolker J, Daly J, Kelly S, Talbert J, McKnight P. Predicting Dental Caries in Young Children in Primary Health Care Settings. J Dent Res 2023; 102:988-998. [PMID: 37329133 PMCID: PMC10477774 DOI: 10.1177/00220345231173585] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/18/2023] Open
Abstract
Young children need increased access to dental prevention and care. Targeting high caries risk children first helps meet this need. The objective of this study was to develop a parent-completed, easy-to-score, short, accurate caries risk tool for screening in primary health care settings to identify children at increased risk for cavities. A longitudinal, prospective, multisite, cohort study enrolled (primarily through primary health care settings) and followed 985 (out of 1,326) 1-y-old children and their primary caregivers (PCGs) until age 4. The PCG completed a 52-item self-administered questionnaire, and children were examined using the International Caries Detection and Assessment Criteria (ICDAS) at 12 ± 3 mo (baseline), 30 ± 3 mo (80% retention), and 48 ± 3 mo of age (74% retention). Cavitated caries lesion (dmfs = decayed, missing, and filled surfaces; d = ICDAS ≥3) experience at 4 y of age was assessed and tested for associations with questionnaire items using generalized estimating equation models applied to logistic regression. Multivariable analysis used backward model selection, with a limit of 10 items. At age 4, 24% of children had cavitated-level caries experience; 49% were female; 14% were Hispanic, 41% were White, 33% were Black, 2% were other, and 10% were multiracial; 58% enrolled in Medicaid; and 95% lived in urban communities. The age 4 multivariable prediction model, using age 1 responses (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve = 0.73), included the following significant (P < 0.001) variables (odds ratios): child participating in public assistance programs such as Medicaid (1.74), being non-White (1.80-1.96), born premature (1.48), not born by caesarean section (1.28), snacking on sugary snacks (3 or more/d, 2.22; 1-2/d or weekly, 1.55), PCG cleaning the pacifier with juice/soda/honey or sweet drink (2.17), PCG daily sharing/tasting food with child using same spoon/fork/glass (1.32), PCG brushing their teeth less than daily (2.72), PCG's gums bleeding daily when brushing or PCG having no teeth (1.83-2.00), and PCG having cavities/fillings/extractions in past 2 y (1.55). A 10-item caries risk tool at age 1 shows good agreement with cavitated-level caries experience by age 4.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M. Fontana
- University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | | | | | | | - B.T. Levy
- University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA
| | - S.M. Levy
- University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA
| | - A.R. Kemper
- Division of Primary Care Pediatrics, Nationwide Children’s Hospital, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - E. Yanca
- University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - R. Jackson
- Indiana University, Indianapolis, IN, USA
| | - J. Warren
- University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA
| | | | - J.M. Daly
- University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA
| | - S. Kelly
- Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
17
|
Sheeran P, Suls J, Bryan A, Cameron L, Ferrer RA, Klein WMP, Rothman AJ. Activation Versus Change as a Principle Underlying Intervention Strategies to Promote Health Behaviors. Ann Behav Med 2023; 57:205-215. [PMID: 36082928 PMCID: PMC10305802 DOI: 10.1093/abm/kaac045] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE Interventions are effective in promoting health behavior change to the extent that (a) intervention strategies modify targets (i.e., mechanisms of action), and (b) modifying targets leads to changes in behavior. To complement taxonomies that characterize the variety of strategies used in behavioral interventions, we outline a new principle that specifies how strategies modify targets and thereby promote behavior change. We distinguish two dimensions of targets-value (positive vs. negative) and accessibility (activation level)-and show that intervention strategies operate either by altering the value of what people think, feel, or want (target change) or by heightening the accessibility of behavior-related thoughts, feelings, and goals (target activation). METHODS AND RESULTS We review strategies designed to promote target activation and find that nudges, cue-reminders, goal priming, the question-behavior effect, and if-then planning are each effective in generating health behavior change, and that their effectiveness accrues from heightened accessibility of relevant targets. We also identify several other strategies that may operate, at least in part, via target activation (e.g., self-monitoring, message framing, anticipated regret inductions, and habits). CONCLUSIONS The Activation Vs. Change Principle (AVCP) offers a theoretically grounded and parsimonious means of distinguishing among intervention strategies. By focusing on how strategies modify targets, the AVCP can aid interventionists in deciding which intervention strategies to deploy and how to combine different strategies in behavioral trials. We outline a research agenda that could serve to further enhance the design and delivery of interventions to promote target activation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paschal Sheeran
- Department of Psychology and Neuroscience, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, USA
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Jerry Suls
- Center for Personalized Health, Institute of Health System Science, Feinstein Institutes for Medical Research, Northwell Health, New York, NY, USA
| | - Angela Bryan
- Department of Psychology and Neuroscience, University of Colorado Boulder, Boulder, CO, USA
| | - Linda Cameron
- Psychological Sciences, School of Social Sciences, University of California, Merced, Merced CA, USA
| | - Rebecca A Ferrer
- Behavioral Research Program, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - William M P Klein
- Behavioral Research Program, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
18
|
Driver MN, Kuo SIC, Dron JS, Austin J, Dick DM. The impact of receiving polygenic risk scores for alcohol use disorder on psychological distress, risk perception, and intentions to reduce drinking. Am J Med Genet B Neuropsychiatr Genet 2023. [PMID: 36856135 DOI: 10.1002/ajmg.b.32933] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/15/2022] [Accepted: 01/29/2023] [Indexed: 03/02/2023]
Abstract
For the return of polygenic risk scores to become an acceptable clinical practice in psychiatry, receipt of polygenic risk scores must be associated with minimal harm and changes in behavior that decrease one's risk for developing a psychiatric outcome. Data from a randomized controlled trial was used to assess the impact of different levels of hypothetical polygenic risk scores for alcohol use disorder on psychological distress, risk perception, and intentions to change drinking behaviors. The analytic sample consisted of 325 participants recruited from an urban, public university. Results demonstrated that there were significant increases in psychological distress as the level of genetic risk for alcohol use disorder increased. In addition, the perceived chance of developing alcohol use disorder significantly increased as the level of genetic risk increased. Promisingly, a greater proportion of participants indicated that they would intend to engage in follow-up behaviors, such as seeking additional information, talking to a healthcare provider about risk, and reducing drinking behaviors, as the level of genetic risk increased. Returning polygenic risk scores for alcohol use disorder in a clinical setting has the potential to promote risk-reducing behavior change, especially with increasing levels of genetic risk. The study was registered on ClinicalTrials.gov (Identifier: NCT05143073).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Morgan N Driver
- Department of Human and Molecular Genetics, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Virginia, USA
| | - Sally I-Chun Kuo
- Department of Psychiatry, Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, Rutgers University, Piscataway, New Jersey, USA
| | - Jacqueline S Dron
- Center for Genomic Medicine, Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Jehannine Austin
- Department of Psychiatry, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.,Department of Medical Genetics, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Danielle M Dick
- Department of Psychiatry, Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, Rutgers University, Piscataway, New Jersey, USA.,Rutgers Addiction Research Center, Brain Health Institute, Rutgers University, Piscataway, New Jersey, USA
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Ullrich G, Dönmez A, Mahabadi AA, Bäuerle A, Knuschke R, Paldán K, Schnaubert L, Rammos C, Rassaf T, Julia Lortz. Effect of visual presentation of atherosclerotic carotid plaque on adherence to secondary preventive therapy using mHealth technologies ( PreventiPlaque app): Study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Heliyon 2023; 9:e14052. [PMID: 36915490 PMCID: PMC10006680 DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e14052] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/16/2022] [Revised: 02/03/2023] [Accepted: 02/21/2023] [Indexed: 03/03/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Cardiovascular disease is the major cause of death worldwide. Although knowledge regarding diagnosing and treating cardiovascular disease has increased dramatically, secondary prevention remains insufficiently implemented due to failure among affected individuals to adhere to guideline recommendations. This has continued to lead to high morbidity and mortality rates. Involving patients in their healthcare and facilitating their active roles in their chronic disease management is an opportunity to meet the needs of the increasing number of cardiovascular patients. However, simple recall of advice regarding a more preventive lifestyle does not affect sustainable behavioral lifestyle changes. We investigate the effect of plaque visualization combined with low-threshold daily lifestyle tasks using the smartphone app PreventiPlaque to evaluate change in cardiovascular risk profile. Methods and study design: This randomized, controlled clinical trial includes 240 participants with ultrasound evidence of atherosclerotic plaque in one or both carotid arteries, defined as focal thickening of the vessel wall measuring 50% more than the regular vessel wall. A criterion for participation is access to a smartphone suitable for app usage. The participants are randomly assigned to an intervention or a control group. While both groups receive the standard of care, the intervention group has additional access to the PreventiPlaque app during the 12-month follow-up. The app includes daily tasks that promote a healthier lifestyle in the areas of smoking cessation, medication adherence, physical activity, and diet. The impact of plaque visualization and app use on the change in cardiovascular risk profile is assessed by SCORE2. Feasibility and effectiveness of the PreventiPlaque app are evaluated using standardized and validated measures for patient feedback. Ethics and dissemination This clinical trial is approved by the ethics committee of the University of Duisburg-Essen (Germany). Study results will be disseminated at conferences and in peer-reviewed journals. Information regarding the PreventiPlaque app is available via print media, social media channels, and on the authors' websites.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Greta Ullrich
- Department of Cardiology and Vascular Medicine, West-German Heart and Vascular Center Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, Hufelandstr. 55, 45147 Essen, Germany
| | - Alina Dönmez
- Department of Cardiology and Vascular Medicine, West-German Heart and Vascular Center Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, Hufelandstr. 55, 45147 Essen, Germany
| | - Amir A. Mahabadi
- Department of Cardiology and Vascular Medicine, West-German Heart and Vascular Center Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, Hufelandstr. 55, 45147 Essen, Germany
| | - Alexander Bäuerle
- Clinic for Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, LVR, University Essen, Hufelandstr. 55, 45147 Essen, Germany
| | - Ramtin Knuschke
- Department of Cardiology and Vascular Medicine, West-German Heart and Vascular Center Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, Hufelandstr. 55, 45147 Essen, Germany
| | - Katrin Paldán
- UCT Research, Vorarlberg University of Applied Science, Hochschulstraße 1, 6850 Dornbirn, Austria
| | - Lenka Schnaubert
- Research Methods in Psychology – Media-based Knowledge Construction, Faculty of Engineering, University of Duisburg-Essen, Campus Duisburg, Lotharstraße 65, 47057 Duisburg, Germany
| | - Christos Rammos
- Department of Cardiology and Vascular Medicine, West-German Heart and Vascular Center Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, Hufelandstr. 55, 45147 Essen, Germany
| | - Tienush Rassaf
- Department of Cardiology and Vascular Medicine, West-German Heart and Vascular Center Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, Hufelandstr. 55, 45147 Essen, Germany
| | - Julia Lortz
- Department of Cardiology and Vascular Medicine, West-German Heart and Vascular Center Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, Hufelandstr. 55, 45147 Essen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Andersson EM, Johansson H, Nordin S, Lindvall K. Cognitive and emotional reactions to pictorial-based risk communication on subclinical atherosclerosis: a qualitative study within the VIPVIZA trial. Scand J Prim Health Care 2023; 41:69-80. [PMID: 36855328 PMCID: PMC10088925 DOI: 10.1080/02813432.2023.2178850] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/02/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES, SETTING AND SUBJECTS Atherosclerosis screening with ultrasound is non-invasive and can be used as part of risk communication. The potential of personalised and pictorial-based risk communication is assessed in VIPVIZA, a population-based randomised controlled trial that aims at optimising cardiovascular disease (CVD) prevention by investigating the impact of visualisation of subclinical atherosclerosis. The present aim was to explore cognitive and emotional reactions evoked by the intervention as well as attitudes to any implemented life style changes in VIPVIZA participants in the intervention group with improved health status and furthermore to study possible interactions between these factors. Understanding mechanisms of action was central since non-adherence to preventive guidelines are often faced in clinical practice. DESIGN In-depth interviews with 14 individuals were analysed with qualitative content analysis. RESULTS Cognitive and emotional processes were highly interlinked and described by the main theme Cognitive and emotional reactions in strong interplay for orchestration of health oriented behavioural change. The informants' descriptions revealed two distinctly different psychological processes which constituted the two subthemes, Problem-focused coping and Encouragement-driven process. CONCLUSIONS The results highlight that an interaction between emotional reactions and efficacy beliefs is important in facilitating behavioural change. Furthermore, the results underscore the importance of the risk message being perceived as clear, accurate, reliable and also emotionally engaging and thereby show why atherosclerosis screening and pictorial-based risk communication have the potential to contribute to effective CVD prevention strategies and shared decision making in primary care. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01849575, registration 8 May 2013.Key pointsAtherosclerosis screening and pictorial-based risk communication have the potential to contribute to more effective CVD prevention strategies.Risk messages on atherosclerosis status were perceived as clear, accurate, reliable and emotionally engaging.An interplay between efficacy beliefs and emotional reactions facilitated behavioural change.Patients' understanding of CVD risk is important for shared decision-making and of relevance for non-adherence to preventive guidelines.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Helene Johansson
- Department of Epidemiology and Global Health, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden
| | - Steven Nordin
- Department of Psychology, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden
| | - Kristina Lindvall
- Department of Epidemiology and Global Health, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Driver MN, Kuo SIC, Dick DM. Returning complex genetic risk information to promote better health-related behaviors: a commentary of the literature and suggested next steps. Transl Behav Med 2023; 13:115-119. [PMID: 36125098 PMCID: PMC9972341 DOI: 10.1093/tbm/ibac071] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Genome-wide association studies aim to identify genetic variants that are associated with a disease phenotype in order to enhance precision medicine efforts. Despite the excitement surrounding the promise of precision medicine and interest among the public in accessing personalized genetic information, there has been little effort dedicated to understanding how complex genetic risk information could be incorporated into clinical practice to inform prevention, screening, and treatment. In this article, we briefly summarize the literature on the impact of receiving genetic risk information on health-related behavior, discuss the limitations of these studies, and outline the challenges that will need to be overcome, along with suggested next steps for future studies, to understand the true promise of precision medicine. The current literature demonstrates that there is no consistent or strong evidence that receiving complex genetic risk information, such as polygenic risk scores, has an impact on behavior; however, there are a number of limitations that may impact the failure to find significant effects associated with receiving genetic feedback. Behavior change is a complex process and simply providing genetic risk information without incorporating a theoretical perspective on behavior change diminishes the potential impact of receiving genetic risk information on actual behavior change. Future studies and interventions which return genetic feedback should be designed using theoretical frameworks of behavior change models to improve the impact of receiving personalized genetic information.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Morgan N Driver
- Department of Human and Molecular Genetics, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, USA
| | - Sally I-Chun Kuo
- Department of Psychiatry, Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, Rutgers University, Piscataway, NJ, USA
| | - Danielle M Dick
- Department of Human and Molecular Genetics, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, USA
- Department of Psychology, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Lake AJ, Williams A, Neven ACH, Boyle JA, Dunbar JA, Hendrieckx C, Morrison M, O’Reilly SL, Teede H, Speight J. Barriers to and enablers of type 2 diabetes screening among women with prior gestational diabetes: A qualitative study applying the Theoretical Domains Framework. FRONTIERS IN CLINICAL DIABETES AND HEALTHCARE 2023; 4:1086186. [PMID: 36993822 PMCID: PMC10012118 DOI: 10.3389/fcdhc.2023.1086186] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/01/2022] [Accepted: 01/12/2023] [Indexed: 03/02/2023]
Abstract
Introduction Women with previous gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) are at increased risk of type 2 diabetes (T2D). Guidelines recommend postnatal diabetes screening (oral glucose tolerance test or HbA1c) typically 6-12 weeks after birth, with screening maintained at regular intervals thereafter. Despite this, around half of women are not screened, representing a critical missed opportunity for early identification of prediabetes or type 2 diabetes. While policy and practice-level recommendations are comprehensive, those at the personal-level primarily focus on increasing screening knowledge and risk perception, potentially missing other influential behavioral determinants. We aimed to identify modifiable, personal-level factors impacting postpartum type 2 diabetes screening among Australian women with prior gestational diabetes and recommend intervention functions and behavior change techniques to underpin intervention content. Research design and methods Semi-structured interviews with participants recruited via Australia's National Gestational Diabetes Register, using a guide based on the Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF). Using an inductive-deductive approach, we coded data to TDF domains. We used established criteria to identify 'important' domains which we then mapped to the Capability, Opportunity, Motivation-Behavior (COM-B) model. Results Nineteen women participated: 34 ± 4 years, 19 ± 4 months postpartum, 63% Australian-born, 90% metropolitan, 58% screened for T2D according to guidelines. Eight TDF domains were identified: 'knowledge', 'memory, attention, and decision-making processes', 'environmental context and resources', 'social influences', 'emotion', 'beliefs about consequences', 'social role and identity', and 'beliefs about capabilities'. Study strengths include a methodologically rigorous design; limitations include low recruitment and homogenous sample. Conclusions This study identified numerous modifiable barriers and enablers to postpartum T2D screening for women with prior GDM. By mapping to the COM-B, we identified intervention functions and behavior change techniques to underpin intervention content. These findings provide a valuable evidence base for developing messaging and interventions that target the behavioral determinants most likely to optimize T2D screening uptake among women with prior GDM. .
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amelia J. Lake
- School of Psychology, Deakin University, Geelong, VIC, Australia
- The Australian Centre for Behavioral Research in Diabetes, Diabetes Victoria, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Amelia Williams
- School of Psychology, Deakin University, Geelong, VIC, Australia
- The Australian Centre for Behavioral Research in Diabetes, Diabetes Victoria, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Adriana C. H. Neven
- Monash Centre for Health Research and Implementation, Monash Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Clayton, VIC, Australia
| | - Jacqueline A. Boyle
- Monash Centre for Health Research and Implementation, Monash Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Clayton, VIC, Australia
- Monash Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Monash Health, Clayton, VIC, Australia
| | - James A. Dunbar
- Deakin Rural Health, School of Medicine, Deakin University, Warrnambool, VIC, Australia
| | - Christel Hendrieckx
- School of Psychology, Deakin University, Geelong, VIC, Australia
- The Australian Centre for Behavioral Research in Diabetes, Diabetes Victoria, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | | | - Sharleen L. O’Reilly
- School of Exercise & Nutrition Science, Deakin University, Burwood, VIC, Australia
- UCD Institute of Food and Health, College of Health and Agricultural Sciences, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Helena Teede
- Monash Centre for Health Research and Implementation, Monash Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Clayton, VIC, Australia
| | - Jane Speight
- School of Psychology, Deakin University, Geelong, VIC, Australia
- The Australian Centre for Behavioral Research in Diabetes, Diabetes Victoria, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
French DP, McWilliams L, Bowers S, Woof VG, Harrison F, Ruane H, Hendy A, Evans DG. Psychological impact of risk-stratified screening as part of the NHS Breast Screening Programme: multi-site non-randomised comparison of BC-Predict versus usual screening (NCT04359420). Br J Cancer 2023; 128:1548-1558. [PMID: 36774447 PMCID: PMC9922101 DOI: 10.1038/s41416-023-02156-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/25/2022] [Revised: 01/08/2023] [Accepted: 01/11/2023] [Indexed: 02/13/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Adding risk stratification to standard screening via the NHS Breast Screening Programme (NHSBSP) allows women at higher risk to be offered additional prevention and screening options. It may, however, introduce new harms such as increasing cancer worry. The present study aimed to assess whether there were differences in self-reported harms and benefits between women offered risk stratification (BC-Predict) compared to women offered standard NHSBSP, controlling for baseline values. METHODS As part of the larger PROCAS2 study (NCT04359420), 5901 women were offered standard NHSBSP or BC-Predict at the invitation to NHSBSP. Women who took up BC-Predict received 10-year risk estimates: "high" (≥8%), "above average (moderate)" (5-7.99%), "average" (2-4.99%) or "below average (low)" (<2%) risk. A subset of 662 women completed questionnaires at baseline and at 3 months (n = 511) and 6 months (n = 473). RESULTS State anxiety and cancer worry scores were low with no differences between women offered BC-Predict or NHSBSP. Women offered BC-Predict and informed of being at higher risk reported higher risk perceptions and cancer worry than other women, but without reaching clinical levels. CONCLUSIONS Concerns that risk-stratified screening will produce harm due to increases in general anxiety or cancer worry are unfounded, even for women informed that they are at high risk.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David P. French
- grid.5379.80000000121662407Manchester Centre of Health Psychology, Division of Psychology and Mental Health, School of Health Sciences, University of Manchester, Coupland Street, Manchester, M13 9PL England ,grid.498924.a0000 0004 0430 9101NIHR Manchester Biomedical Research Centre, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Central Manchester University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, England ,grid.5379.80000000121662407Manchester Breast Centre, Manchester Cancer Research Centre, University of Manchester, 555 Wilmslow Rd, Manchester, M20 4GJ England
| | - Lorna McWilliams
- grid.5379.80000000121662407Manchester Centre of Health Psychology, Division of Psychology and Mental Health, School of Health Sciences, University of Manchester, Coupland Street, Manchester, M13 9PL England ,grid.498924.a0000 0004 0430 9101NIHR Manchester Biomedical Research Centre, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Central Manchester University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, England
| | - Sarah Bowers
- grid.498924.a0000 0004 0430 9101The Nightingale and Prevent Breast Cancer Centre, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, M23 9LT England
| | - Victoria G. Woof
- grid.5379.80000000121662407Manchester Centre of Health Psychology, Division of Psychology and Mental Health, School of Health Sciences, University of Manchester, Coupland Street, Manchester, M13 9PL England
| | | | - Helen Ruane
- grid.498924.a0000 0004 0430 9101The Nightingale and Prevent Breast Cancer Centre, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, M23 9LT England
| | - Alice Hendy
- grid.498924.a0000 0004 0430 9101The Nightingale and Prevent Breast Cancer Centre, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, M23 9LT England
| | - D. Gareth Evans
- grid.498924.a0000 0004 0430 9101NIHR Manchester Biomedical Research Centre, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Central Manchester University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, England ,grid.5379.80000000121662407Manchester Breast Centre, Manchester Cancer Research Centre, University of Manchester, 555 Wilmslow Rd, Manchester, M20 4GJ England ,grid.498924.a0000 0004 0430 9101The Nightingale and Prevent Breast Cancer Centre, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, M23 9LT England ,grid.5379.80000000121662407Genomic Medicine, Division of Evolution and Genomic Sciences, The University of Manchester, St Mary’s Hospital, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, M13 9WL England
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Usher-Smith JA, Hindmarch S, French DP, Tischkowitz M, Moorthie S, Walter FM, Dennison RA, Stutzin Donoso F, Archer S, Taylor L, Emery J, Morris S, Easton DF, Antoniou AC. Proactive breast cancer risk assessment in primary care: a review based on the principles of screening. Br J Cancer 2023; 128:1636-1646. [PMID: 36737659 PMCID: PMC9897164 DOI: 10.1038/s41416-023-02145-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/07/2022] [Revised: 01/05/2023] [Accepted: 01/06/2023] [Indexed: 02/05/2023] Open
Abstract
In the UK, the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) recommends that women at moderate or high risk of breast cancer be offered risk-reducing medication and enhanced breast screening/surveillance. In June 2022, NICE withdrew a statement recommending assessment of risk in primary care only when women present with concerns. This shift to the proactive assessment of risk substantially changes the role of primary care, in effect paving the way for a primary care-based screening programme to identify those at moderate or high risk of breast cancer. In this article, we review the literature surrounding proactive breast cancer risk assessment within primary care against the consolidated framework for screening. We find that risk assessment for women under 50 years currently satisfies many of the standard principles for screening. Most notably, there are large numbers of women at moderate or high risk currently unidentified, risk models exist that can identify those women with reasonable accuracy, and management options offer the opportunity to reduce breast cancer incidence and mortality in that group. However, there remain a number of uncertainties and research gaps, particularly around the programme/system requirements, that need to be addressed before these benefits can be realised.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Juliet A. Usher-Smith
- grid.5335.00000000121885934The Primary Care Unit, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Sarah Hindmarch
- grid.5379.80000000121662407Manchester Centre for Health Psychology, Division of Psychology and Mental Health, School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - David P. French
- grid.5379.80000000121662407Manchester Centre for Health Psychology, Division of Psychology and Mental Health, School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Marc Tischkowitz
- grid.5335.00000000121885934Department of Medical Genetics, National Institute for Health Research Cambridge Biomedical Research Centre, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Sowmiya Moorthie
- grid.5335.00000000121885934PHG Foundation, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Fiona M. Walter
- grid.5335.00000000121885934The Primary Care Unit, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK ,grid.4868.20000 0001 2171 1133Wolfson Institute of Population Health, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
| | - Rebecca A. Dennison
- grid.5335.00000000121885934The Primary Care Unit, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Francisca Stutzin Donoso
- grid.5335.00000000121885934The Primary Care Unit, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Stephanie Archer
- grid.5335.00000000121885934The Primary Care Unit, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK ,grid.5335.00000000121885934Department of Psychology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Lily Taylor
- grid.5335.00000000121885934The Primary Care Unit, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Jon Emery
- grid.1008.90000 0001 2179 088XCentre for Cancer Research and Department of General Practice, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC Australia
| | - Stephen Morris
- grid.5335.00000000121885934The Primary Care Unit, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Douglas F. Easton
- grid.5335.00000000121885934Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Antonis C. Antoniou
- grid.5335.00000000121885934Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Analysis of types of and language used in online information available to patients with periodontitis. Br Dent J 2023; 234:253-258. [PMID: 36829019 DOI: 10.1038/s41415-023-5525-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/11/2022] [Revised: 11/04/2022] [Accepted: 11/08/2022] [Indexed: 02/26/2023]
Abstract
Introduction This research investigates framing in online patient information for those newly diagnosed with periodontitis.Methods This study is a cross-sectional analysis of websites using corpus linguistic techniques. A Google search was conducted with the term 'gum disease.' Ten pages of search results were reviewed and information available was separated into types of resource: retail, healthcare, and dental practice websites. The dataset was analysed in terms of word frequency, collocation and keyness as compared to the British National Corpus Written Sampler. Differences between sources were assessed.Results Across combined data sources, there was a tendency for the most advanced symptoms of periodontitis to be given prominence. There was also a negative skew towards avoidance of negative outcomes of treatment rather than achieving positive ones. When comparing types of resource, retail websites tended to be more positive, with a focus on improving 'milder' stages of disease.Conclusions Negative framing could potentially induce engagement with treatment and self-care by the process of 'fear-appeal'; however, there is a risk that negativity demotivates an already anxious patient. Further research is required to evaluate patient perceptions of the information and to investigate effects this could have on behaviour change.
Collapse
|
26
|
Driver MN, Kuo SIC, Austin J, Dick DM. Integrating Theory with Education about Genetic Risk for Alcohol Use Disorder: The Effects of a Brief Online Educational Tool on Elements of the Health Belief Model. Complex Psychiatry 2023; 9:89-99. [PMID: 37404871 PMCID: PMC10315003 DOI: 10.1159/000530222] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/18/2022] [Accepted: 03/14/2023] [Indexed: 10/01/2023] Open
Abstract
Introduction The utility of genetic risk information relies on the assumption that individuals will use the information to change behavior to reduce risk of developing health problems. Educational interventions designed to target elements of the Health Belief Model have shown to be effective in promoting behaviors for positive outcomes. Methods A randomized controlled trial (RCT) was conducted in 325 college students to assess whether a brief, online educational intervention altered elements of the Health Belief Model that are known to be associated with motivations and intentions to change behavior. The RCT included a control condition, an intervention condition that received information about alcohol use disorder (AUD), and an intervention condition that received information about polygenic risk scores and AUD. We used t tests and ANOVA methods to compare differences in beliefs related to the Health Belief Model across study conditions and demographic characteristics. Results Providing educational information did not impact worry about developing AUD, perceived susceptibility and severity of developing alcohol problems, or perceived benefits and barriers of risk-reducing actions. Individuals in the condition that received educational information about polygenic risk scores and AUD reported higher perceived chance of developing AUD than individuals in the control condition (adj. p < 0.01). Sex, race/ethnicity, family history, and drinking status were associated with several components of the Health Belief Model. Conclusion Findings from this study demonstrate the need to better design and refine the educational information intended to accompany the return of genetic feedback for AUD to better promote risk-reducing behaviors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Morgan N. Driver
- Department of Human and Molecular Genetics, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, USA
| | - Sally I-Chun Kuo
- Department of Psychiatry, Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, Rutgers University, Piscataway, NJ, USA
| | - Jehannine Austin
- Department of Psychiatry, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
- Department of Medical Genetics, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Danielle M. Dick
- Department of Psychiatry, Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, Rutgers University, Piscataway, NJ, USA
- Rutgers Addiction Research Center, Brain Health Institute, Rutgers University, Piscataway, NJ, USA
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Quinn-Scoggins HD, Murray RL, Quaife SL, Smith P, Brain KE, Callister MEJ, Baldwin DR, Britton J, Crosbie PAJ, Thorley R, McCutchan GM. Co-development of an evidence-based personalised smoking cessation intervention for use in a lung cancer screening context. BMC Pulm Med 2022; 22:478. [PMID: 36522781 PMCID: PMC9756588 DOI: 10.1186/s12890-022-02263-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/25/2022] [Accepted: 11/24/2022] [Indexed: 12/23/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Optimising smoking cessation services within a low radiation-dose computed tomography (LDCT) lung cancer screening programme has the potential to improve cost-effectiveness and overall efficacy of the programme. However, evidence on the optimal design and integration of cessation services is limited. We co-developed a personalised cessation and relapse prevention intervention incorporating medical imaging collected during lung cancer screening. The intervention is designed to initiate and support quit attempts among smokers attending screening as part of the Yorkshire Enhanced Stop Smoking study (YESS: ISRCTN63825779). Patients and public were involved in the development of an intervention designed to meet the needs of the target population. METHODS An iterative co-development approach was used. Eight members of the public with a history of smoking completed an online survey to inform the visual presentation of risk information in subsequent focus groups for acceptability testing. Three focus groups (n = 13) were conducted in deprived areas of Yorkshire and South Wales with members of the public who were current smokers or recent quitters (within the last year). Exemplar images of the heart and lungs acquired by LDCT, absolute and relative lung cancer risk, and lung age were shown. Data were analysed thematically, and discussed in stakeholder workshops. Draft versions of the intervention were developed, underpinned by the Extended Parallel Processing Model to increase self-efficacy and response-efficacy. The intervention was further refined in a second stakeholder workshop with a patient panel. RESULTS Individual LDCT scan images of the lungs and heart, in conjunction with artistic impressions to facilitate interpretation, were considered by public participants to be most impactful in prompting cessation. Public participants thought it important to have a trained practitioner guiding them through the intervention and emphasising the short-term benefits of quitting. Presentation of absolute and relative risk of lung cancer and lung age were considered highly demotivating due to reinforcement of fatalistic beliefs. CONCLUSION An acceptable personalised intervention booklet utilising LDCT scan images has been developed for delivery by a trained smoking cessation practitioner. Our findings highlight the benefit of co-development during intervention development and the need for further evaluation of effectiveness.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Harriet D Quinn-Scoggins
- Division of Population Medicine, School of Medicine, Cardiff University, 8th Floor Neuadd Meirionnydd, Heath Park, Cardiff, CF14 4YS, UK.
| | - Rachael L Murray
- Academic Unit of Lifespan and Population Health, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - Samantha L Quaife
- Wolfson Institute of Population Health, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
| | - Pamela Smith
- Division of Population Medicine, School of Medicine, Cardiff University, 8th Floor Neuadd Meirionnydd, Heath Park, Cardiff, CF14 4YS, UK
| | - Kate E Brain
- Division of Population Medicine, School of Medicine, Cardiff University, 8th Floor Neuadd Meirionnydd, Heath Park, Cardiff, CF14 4YS, UK
| | - Matthew E J Callister
- Department of Respiratory Medicine, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, St James's University Hospital, Leeds, UK
| | - David R Baldwin
- Department of Respiratory Medicine, Nottingham University Hospital, Nottingham, UK
| | - John Britton
- Academic Unit of Lifespan and Population Health, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - Philip A J Crosbie
- Division of Infection, Immunity and Respiratory Medicine, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Rebecca Thorley
- Academic Unit of Lifespan and Population Health, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - Grace M McCutchan
- Division of Population Medicine, School of Medicine, Cardiff University, 8th Floor Neuadd Meirionnydd, Heath Park, Cardiff, CF14 4YS, UK
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Gorman LS, Ruane H, Woof VG, Southworth J, Ulph F, Evans DG, French DP. The co-development of personalised 10-year breast cancer risk communications: a 'think-aloud' study. BMC Cancer 2022; 22:1264. [PMID: 36471302 PMCID: PMC9721070 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-022-10347-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/30/2022] [Accepted: 11/21/2022] [Indexed: 12/09/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Risk stratified breast cancer screening is being considered as a means of improving the balance of benefits and harms of mammography. Stratified screening requires the communication of risk estimates. We aimed to co-develop personalised 10-year breast cancer risk communications for women attending routine mammography. METHODS We conducted think-aloud interviews on prototype breast cancer risk letters and accompanying information leaflets with women receiving breast screening through the UK National Breast Screening Programme. Risk information was redesigned following feedback from 55 women in three iterations. A deductive thematic analysis of participants' speech is presented. RESULTS Overall, participants appreciated receiving their breast cancer risk. Their comments focused on positive framing and presentation of the risk estimate, a desire for detail on the contribution of individual risk factors to overall risk and effective risk management strategies, and clearly signposted support pathways. CONCLUSION Provision of breast cancer risk information should strive to be personal, understandable and meaningful. Risk information should be continually refined to reflect developments in risk management. Receipt of risk via letter is welcomed but concerns remain around the acceptability of informing women at higher risk in this way, highlighting a need for co-development of risk dissemination and support pathways.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Louise S. Gorman
- grid.498924.a0000 0004 0430 9101The Nightingale Centre and Prevent Breast Cancer Centre Research Unit, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Southmoor Road, Manchester, M23 9LT UK
| | - Helen Ruane
- grid.498924.a0000 0004 0430 9101The Nightingale Centre and Prevent Breast Cancer Centre Research Unit, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Southmoor Road, Manchester, M23 9LT UK
| | - Victoria G. Woof
- grid.5379.80000000121662407Manchester Centre for Health Psychology, Division of Psychology & Mental Health, School of Health Sciences, The University of Manchester, MAHSC, Oxford Road, Manchester, M13 9PL UK
| | - Jake Southworth
- grid.498924.a0000 0004 0430 9101The Nightingale Centre and Prevent Breast Cancer Centre Research Unit, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Southmoor Road, Manchester, M23 9LT UK
| | - Fiona Ulph
- grid.5379.80000000121662407Manchester Centre for Health Psychology, Division of Psychology & Mental Health, School of Health Sciences, The University of Manchester, MAHSC, Oxford Road, Manchester, M13 9PL UK
| | - D. Gareth Evans
- grid.498924.a0000 0004 0430 9101The Nightingale Centre and Prevent Breast Cancer Centre Research Unit, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Southmoor Road, Manchester, M23 9LT UK ,grid.498924.a0000 0004 0430 9101Department of Genomic Medicine, Division of Evolution and Genomic Science, MAHSC, University of Manchester, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford Road, M13 9WL, Manchester, UK ,grid.498924.a0000 0004 0430 9101NIHR Manchester Biomedical Research Centre, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Central Manchester University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, England UK
| | - David P. French
- grid.5379.80000000121662407Manchester Centre for Health Psychology, Division of Psychology & Mental Health, School of Health Sciences, The University of Manchester, MAHSC, Oxford Road, Manchester, M13 9PL UK ,grid.498924.a0000 0004 0430 9101NIHR Manchester Biomedical Research Centre, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Central Manchester University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, England UK
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Parsons J, Grimley C, Newby K. Effectiveness of a Digital Intervention in Increasing Flu Vaccination-Related Risk Appraisal, Intention to Vaccinate and Vaccination Behaviour Among Pregnant Women. HEALTH EDUCATION & BEHAVIOR 2022; 49:1033-1041. [PMID: 35255730 PMCID: PMC9574896 DOI: 10.1177/10901981221077935] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Pregnant women are at increased risk of complications from flu, but uptake of flu vaccination is below 75% targets. Evidence suggests that changing illness risk appraisals may increase vaccination behaviour. In 2018-2019, researchers, public health specialists, and pregnant women co-designed a short animation targeting (unhelpful) beliefs underlying pregnant women's flu risk appraisals aiming to promote vaccination uptake. AIMS This study aimed to examine effectiveness of a digital intervention (animation) in increasing flu vaccination among pregnant women through changing illness risk appraisals. METHOD A prospective study design was used, involving convenience sampling of unvaccinated pregnant women recruited via a Qualtrics Online Panel. Participants received small payments via the panel for survey completion. Risk appraisals and intention to vaccinate were measured at baseline and immediately after intervention presentation (follow-up one). Six months later, a further survey (follow-up two) was administered measuring vaccination behaviour. RESULTS Baseline and first follow-up surveys were completed by 411 participants. Watching the animation led to increased appraisals of likelihood of getting flu while pregnant and severity of flu during pregnancy, and increased intentions to accept flu vaccination during pregnancy. Of the 67 respondents who completed follow-up survey two, 38 reported having the vaccination while pregnant. CONCLUSIONS This study provides evidence supporting the promise of the intervention. Randomized controlled trials are required to produce definitive efficacy evidence. Should such a study prove intervention effectiveness, it could be readily embedded within existing campaigns at national and local levels by public health organizations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Katie Newby
- University of Hertfordshire, Hatfield,
Hertfordshire, UK
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Burnell M, Gaba F, Sobocan M, Desai R, Sanderson S, Loggenberg K, Gessler S, Side L, Brady AF, Dorkins H, Wallis Y, Jacobs C, Legood R, Beller U, Tomlinson I, Wardle J, Menon U, Jacobs I, Manchanda R. Randomised trial of population-based BRCA testing in Ashkenazi Jews: long-term secondary lifestyle behavioural outcomes. BJOG 2022; 129:1970-1980. [PMID: 35781768 PMCID: PMC9796935 DOI: 10.1111/1471-0528.17253] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/22/2021] [Revised: 04/22/2022] [Accepted: 05/16/2022] [Indexed: 01/07/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Ashkenazi-Jewish (AJ) population-based BRCA testing is acceptable, cost-effective and amplifies primary prevention for breast & ovarian cancer. However, data describing lifestyle impact are lacking. We report long-term results of population-based BRCA testing on lifestyle behaviour and cancer risk perception. DESIGN Two-arm randomised controlled trials (ISRCTN73338115, GCaPPS): (a) population-screening (PS); (b) family history (FH)/clinical criteria testing. SETTING North London AJ-population. POPULATION/SAMPLE AJ women/men >18 years. EXCLUSIONS prior BRCA testing or first-degree relatives of BRCA-carriers. METHODS Participants were recruited through self-referral. All participants received informed pre-test genetic counselling. The intervention included genetic testing for three AJ BRCA-mutations: 185delAG(c.68_69delAG), 5382insC(c.5266dupC) and 6174delT(c.5946delT). This was undertaken for all participants in the PS arm and participants fulfilling FH/clinical criteria in the FH arm. Patients filled out customised/validated questionnaires at baseline/1-year/2-year/3-year follow-ups. Generalised linear-mixed models adjusted for covariates and appropriate contrast tests were used for between-group/within-group analysis of lifestyle and behavioural outcomes along with evaluating factors associated with these outcomes. Outcomes are adjusted for multiple testing (Bonferroni method), with P < 0.0039 considered significant. OUTCOME MEASURES Lifestyle/behavioural outcomes at baseline/1-year/2-year/3-year follow-ups. RESULTS 1034 participants were randomised to PS (n = 530) or FH (n = 504) arms. No significant difference was identified between PS- and FH-based BRCA testing approaches in terms of dietary fruit/vegetable/meat consumption, vitamin intake, alcohol quantity/ frequency, smoking behaviour (frequency/cessation), physical activity/exercise or routine breast mammogram screening behaviour, with outcomes not affected by BRCA test result. Cancer risk perception decreased with time following BRCA testing, with no difference between FH/PS approaches, and the perception of risk was lowest in BRCA-negative participants. Men consumed fewer fruits/vegetables/vitamins and more meat/alcohol than women (P < 0.001). CONCLUSION Population-based and FH-based AJ BRCA testing have similar long-term lifestyle impacts on smoking, alcohol, dietary fruit/vegetable/meat/vitamin, exercise, breast screening participation and reduced cancer risk perception.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matthew Burnell
- MRC Clinical Trials Unit at UCL, Institute of Clinical Trials and MethodologyUniversity College LondonLondonUK
| | - Faiza Gaba
- Wolfson Institute of Population Health, Barts CRUK Cancer CentreQueen Mary University of LondonLondonUK,Department of Gynaecological OncologyBarts Health NH TrustLondonUK
| | - Monika Sobocan
- Wolfson Institute of Population Health, Barts CRUK Cancer CentreQueen Mary University of LondonLondonUK,Department of Gynaecological OncologyBarts Health NH TrustLondonUK
| | - Rakshit Desai
- Department of Gynaecological OncologyBarts Health NH TrustLondonUK
| | - Saskia Sanderson
- Behavioural Sciences UnitDepartment Epidemiology and Public HealthUniversity College LondonLondonUK
| | - Kelly Loggenberg
- Department Clinical GeneticsNorth East Thames Regional Genetics UnitGreat Ormond Street HospitalLondonUK
| | - Sue Gessler
- Department of Gynaecological OncologyInstitute for Women's HealthUniversity College LondonLondonUK
| | - Lucy Side
- University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation TrustSouthamptonUK
| | - Angela F. Brady
- Department Clinical GeneticsNorth West Thames Regional Genetics UnitNorthwick Park HospitalLondonUK
| | - Huw Dorkins
- St Peter's CollegeUniversity of OxfordOxfordUK
| | - Yvonne Wallis
- West Midlands Regional Genetics LaboratoryBirmingham Women's NHS Foundation TrustBirminghamUK,Depatment Clinical GeneticsWest Midlands Regional Genetics ServiceBirmingham Women's NHS Foundation TrustBirminghamUK
| | - Chris Jacobs
- Depatment Clinical GeneticsGuy's HospitalLondonUK,University of Technology SydneySydneyNew South WalesAustralia
| | - Rosa Legood
- Department of Health Services Research and PolicyLondon School of Hygiene & Tropical MedicineLondonUK
| | - Uziel Beller
- Department of GynaecologyShaare Zedek Medical CenterJerusalemIsrael
| | - Ian Tomlinson
- Institute of Cancer and Genomic SciencesUniversity of BirminghamBirminghamUK
| | - Jane Wardle
- Behavioural Sciences UnitDepartment Epidemiology and Public HealthUniversity College LondonLondonUK
| | - Usha Menon
- Department of Gynaecological OncologyBarts Health NH TrustLondonUK
| | - Ian Jacobs
- University of New South WalesSydneyNew South WalesAustralia
| | - Ranjit Manchanda
- MRC Clinical Trials Unit at UCL, Institute of Clinical Trials and MethodologyUniversity College LondonLondonUK,Wolfson Institute of Population Health, Barts CRUK Cancer CentreQueen Mary University of LondonLondonUK,Department of Gynaecological OncologyBarts Health NH TrustLondonUK,Department of Health Services Research and PolicyLondon School of Hygiene & Tropical MedicineLondonUK,Department of GynaecologyAll India Institute of Medical SciencesNew DelhiIndia
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Wang J, Eccles H, Nannarone M, Schmitz N, Patten S, Lashewicz B. Does providing personalized depression risk information lead to increased psychological distress and functional impairment? Results from a mixed-methods randomized controlled trial. Psychol Med 2022; 52:2071-2079. [PMID: 33143794 DOI: 10.1017/s0033291720003955] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Multivariable risk algorithms (MVRP) predicting the personal risk of depression will form an important component of personalized preventive interventions. However, it is unknown whether providing personalized depression risk will lead to unintended psychological harms. The objectives of this study were to evaluate the impact of providing personalized depression risk on non-specific psychological distress and functional impairment over 12 months. METHODS A mixed-methods randomized controlled trial was conducted in 358 males and 354 females who were at high risk of having a major depressive episode according to sex-specific MVRPs, and who were randomly recruited across Canada. Participants were assessed at baseline, 6 and 12 months. RESULTS Over 93% of participants were interested in knowing their depression risk. The intervention group had a greater reduction in K10 score over 12 months than the control group; complete-case analysis found a significant between-group difference in mean K10 change score (d = 1.17, 95% CI 0.12-2.23) at 12 months. Participants in the intervention group also reported significantly less functional impairment in the domains of home and work/school activities, than did those in the control group. A majority of the qualitative interviewees commented that personalized depression risk information does not have a negative impact on physical and mental health. CONCLUSIONS This study found no evidence that providing personalized depression risk information will lead to worsening psychological distress, functional impairment, and absenteeism. Provision of personalized depression risk information may have positive impacts on non-specific psychological distress and functioning. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02943876.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- JianLi Wang
- Institute of Mental Health Research, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada
- Shandong Key Laboratory of Behavioral Medicine, School of Mental Health, Jining Medical University, Jining, China
- Faculty of Medicine, School of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada
- Department of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada
| | - Heidi Eccles
- Institute of Mental Health Research, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada
| | - Molly Nannarone
- Institute of Mental Health Research, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada
| | - Norbert Schmitz
- Douglas Mental Health Research Institute, McGill University, Montreal, Canada
- Department of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, McGill University, Montreal, Canada
| | - Scott Patten
- Department of Psychiatry, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada
- Department of Community Health Sciences, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada
| | - Bonnie Lashewicz
- Department of Community Health Sciences, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Madziva R, Nachipo B, Musuka G, Chitungo I, Murewanhema G, Phiri B, Dzinamarira T. The role of social media during the COVID-19 pandemic: Salvaging its 'power' for positive social behaviour change in Africa. Health Promot Perspect 2022; 12:22-27. [PMID: 35854855 PMCID: PMC9277293 DOI: 10.34172/hpp.2022.03] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/06/2022] [Accepted: 03/10/2022] [Indexed: 11/09/2022] Open
Abstract
The ongoing coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic remains a significant global public health crisis. The unique evolution of the COVID-19 pandemic has seen social media emerging and growing into an important vehicle for rapid information dissemination. This has in turn given rise to multiple sources of information, leading to what has come to be known as ‘infodemic’, associated with the plethora of misinformation and conspiracy theories. In this perspective, we explore the growth of the social media industry and the impact it has had during the ongoing COVID-19 crisis. We argue that while the multiple information pieces circulating on social media cause misinformation and panic, this might not necessarily and in all the cases influence sustained behaviours in the target population groups. We offer suggestions on how the power of social media can be harnessed and integrated into social and public health for a better digital balance for communication for development.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Roda Madziva
- School of Sociology and Social Policy, University of Nottingham, United Kingdom
| | | | | | - Itai Chitungo
- Chemical Pathology Unit, Department of Laboratory Diagnostic and Investigative and Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Zimbabwe, Harare, Zimbabwe
| | - Grant Murewanhema
- Unit of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Department of Primary Health Care Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Zimbabwe, Zimbabwe
| | - Bright Phiri
- ICAP at Columbia University, Pretoria, South Africa
| | - Tafadzwa Dzinamarira
- ICAP at Columbia University, Pretoria, South Africa.,School of Health Sciences & Public Health, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, 002, South Africa
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Rouyard T, Leal J, Salvi D, Baskerville R, Velardo C, Gray A. An Intuitive Risk Communication Tool to Enhance Patient-Provider Partnership in Diabetes Consultation. J Diabetes Sci Technol 2022; 16:988-994. [PMID: 33655766 PMCID: PMC9264433 DOI: 10.1177/1932296821995800] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION This technology report introduces an innovative risk communication tool developed to support providers in communicating diabetes-related risks more intuitively to people with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). METHODS The development process involved three main steps: (1) selecting the content and format of the risk message; (2) developing a digital interface; and (3) assessing the usability and usefulness of the tool with clinicians through validated questionnaires. RESULTS The tool calculates personalized risk information based on a validated simulation model (United Kingdom Prospective Diabetes Study Outcomes Model 2) and delivers it using more intuitive risk formats, such as "effective heart age" to convey cardiovascular risks. Clinicians reported high scores for the usability and usefulness of the tool, making its adoption in routine care promising. CONCLUSIONS Despite increased use of risk calculators in clinical care, this is the first time that such a tool has been developed in the diabetes area. Further studies are needed to confirm the benefits of using this tool on behavioral and health outcomes in T2DM populations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thomas Rouyard
- Nuffield Department of Population
Health, Health Economics Research Centre, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
- Research Center for Health Policy and
Economics, Hitotsubashi University, Tokyo, Japan
- Thomas Rouyard, DPhil, Adjunct Assistant
Professor, Research Center for Health Policy and Economics, Hitotsubashi
University, 2-1 Naka, Kunitachi, Tokyo, 186-8601, Japan.
| | - José Leal
- Nuffield Department of Population
Health, Health Economics Research Centre, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Dario Salvi
- Department of Engineering Science,
Institute of Biomedical Engineering, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
- School of Arts, Culture and
Communication, Malmö University, Malmö, Sweden
| | - Richard Baskerville
- Nuffield Department of Primary Care
Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Carmelo Velardo
- Department of Engineering Science,
Institute of Biomedical Engineering, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Alastair Gray
- Nuffield Department of Population
Health, Health Economics Research Centre, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Verma KP, Marwick TH, Duarte C, Meikle P, Inouye M, Carrington MJ. Use of coronary computed tomography or polygenic risk scores to prompt action to reduce coronary artery disease risk: the CAPAR-CAD trial. Am Heart J 2022; 248:97-107. [PMID: 35218726 DOI: 10.1016/j.ahj.2022.02.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/21/2021] [Revised: 01/27/2022] [Accepted: 02/19/2022] [Indexed: 11/01/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The traditional primary prevention paradigm for coronary artery disease (CAD) centers on population-based algorithms to classify individual risk. However, this approach often misclassifies individuals and leaves many in the 'intermediate' category, for whom there is no clear preferred prevention strategy. Coronary artery calcium (CAC) and polygenic risk scoring (PRS) are 2 contemporary tools for risk prediction to enhance the impact of effective management. AIMS To determine how these CAC and PRS impact adherence to pharmacotherapy and lifestyle measures in asymptomatic individuals with subclinical atherosclerosis. METHODS The CAPAR-CAD study is a multicenter, open, randomized controlled trial in Victoria, Australia. Participants are self-selected individuals aged 40 to 70 years with no prior history of cardiovascular disease (CVD), intermediate 10-year risk for CAD as determined by the pooled cohort equation (PCE), and CAC scores >0. All participants will have a health assessment, a full CT coronary angiogram (CTCA), and PRS calculation. They will then be randomized to receive their risk presented either as PCE and CAC, or PCE and PRS. The intervention includes e-Health coaching focused on risk factor management, health education and pharmacotherapy, and follow-up to augment adherence to a statin medication. The primary endpoint is a change in low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) from baseline to 12 months. The secondary endpoint is between-group differences in behavior modification and adherence to statin pharmacotherapy. RESULTS As of July 31, 2021, we have screened 1,903 individuals. We present the results of the 574 participants deemed eligible after baseline assessment.
Collapse
|
35
|
Moorthie S, Babb de Villiers C, Burton H, Kroese M, Antoniou AC, Bhattacharjee P, Garcia-Closas M, Hall P, Schmidt MK. Towards implementation of comprehensive breast cancer risk prediction tools in health care for personalised prevention. Prev Med 2022; 159:107075. [PMID: 35526672 DOI: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2022.107075] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/07/2021] [Revised: 04/05/2022] [Accepted: 05/02/2022] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
Advances in knowledge about breast cancer risk factors have led to the development of more comprehensive risk models. These integrate information on a variety of risk factors such as lifestyle, genetics, family history, and breast density. These risk models have the potential to deliver more personalised breast cancer prevention. This is through improving accuracy of risk estimates, enabling more effective targeting of preventive options and creating novel prevention pathways through enabling risk estimation in a wider variety of populations than currently possible. The systematic use of risk tools as part of population screening programmes is one such example. A clear understanding of how such tools can contribute to the goal of personalised prevention can aid in understanding and addressing barriers to implementation. In this paper we describe how emerging models, and their associated tools can contribute to the goal of personalised healthcare for breast cancer through health promotion, early disease detection (screening) and improved management of women at higher risk of disease. We outline how addressing specific challenges on the level of communication, evidence, evaluation, regulation, and acceptance, can facilitate implementation and uptake.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sowmiya Moorthie
- PHG Foundation, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK; Cambridge Public Health, University of Cambridge School of Clinical Medicine, Forvie Site, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, Cambridge CB2 0SR, United Kingdom.
| | | | - Hilary Burton
- PHG Foundation, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Mark Kroese
- PHG Foundation, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Antonis C Antoniou
- Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Proteeti Bhattacharjee
- Division of Molecular Pathology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Montserrat Garcia-Closas
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health (NIH), Bethesda, USA
| | - Per Hall
- Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden; Department of Oncology, Södersjukhuset, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Marjanka K Schmidt
- Division of Molecular Pathology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Department of Clinical Genetics, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Adamson A, Portas L, Accordini S, Marcon A, Jarvis D, Baio G, Minelli C. Communication of personalised disease risk by general practitioners to motivate smoking cessation in England: a cost-effectiveness and research prioritisation study. Addiction 2022; 117:1438-1449. [PMID: 34859521 DOI: 10.1111/add.15773] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/11/2021] [Accepted: 11/03/2021] [Indexed: 12/01/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS Communication of personalised disease risk can motivate smoking cessation. We assessed whether routine implementation of this intervention by general practitioners (GPs) in England is cost-effective or whether we need further research to better establish its effectiveness. DESIGN Cost-effectiveness analysis (CEA) with value of information (VoI) analysis from the UK National Health Service perspective, using GP communication of personalised disease risk on smoking cessation versus usual care. SETTING GP practices in England. STUDY POPULATION Healthy smokers aged 35-60 years attending the GP practice. MEASUREMENTS Effectiveness of GP communication of personalised disease risk on smoking cessation was estimated through systematic review and meta-analysis. A Bayesian CEA was then performed using a lifetime Markov model on smokers aged 35-60 years that measured lifetime costs and quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) assigned to the four diseases contributing the most to smoking-related morbidity, mortality and costs: chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, lung cancer, myocardial infarction and stroke. Costs and QALYs for each disease state were obtained from the literature. VoI analysis identified sources of uncertainty in the CEA and assessed how much would be worth investing in further research to reduce this uncertainty. FINDINGS The meta-analysis odds ratio for the effectiveness estimate of GP communication of personalised disease risk was 1.48 (95% credibility interval, 0.91-2.26), an absolute increase in smoking cessation rates of 3.84%. The probability of cost-effectiveness ranged 89-94% depending on sex and age. VoI analysis indicated that: (i) uncertainty in the effectiveness of the intervention was the driver of the overall uncertainty in the CEA; and (ii) a research investment to reduce this uncertainty is justified if lower than £27.6 million (£7 per smoker). CONCLUSIONS Evidence to date shows that, in England, incorporating disease risk communication into general practitioners' practices to motivate smoking cessation is likely to be cost-effective compared with usual care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexander Adamson
- National Heart & Lung Institute, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Laura Portas
- National Heart & Lung Institute, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Simone Accordini
- Unit of Epidemiology and Medical Statistics, Department of Diagnostics and Public Health, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Alessandro Marcon
- Unit of Epidemiology and Medical Statistics, Department of Diagnostics and Public Health, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Deborah Jarvis
- National Heart & Lung Institute, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Gianluca Baio
- Department of Statistical Science, University College London, London, UK
| | - Cosetta Minelli
- National Heart & Lung Institute, Imperial College London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Bandovas JP, Leal B, Reis-de-Carvalho C, Sousa DC, Araújo JC, Peixoto P, Henriques SO, Vaz Carneiro A. Broadening risk factor or disease definition as a driver for overdiagnosis: A narrative review. J Intern Med 2022; 291:426-437. [PMID: 35253285 PMCID: PMC9314822 DOI: 10.1111/joim.13465] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
Medical overuse-defined as the provision of health services for which potential harms exceed potential benefits-constitutes a paradigm of low-value care and is seen as a threat to the quality of care. Value in healthcare implies a precise definition of disease. However, defining a disease may not be straightforward since clinical data do not show discrete boundaries, calling for some clinical judgment. And, if in time a redefinition of disease is needed, it is important to recognize that it can induce overdiagnosis, the identification of medical conditions that would, otherwise, never cause any significant symptoms or lead to clinical harm. A classic example is the impact of recommendations from professional societies in the late 1990s, lowering the threshold for abnormal total cholesterol from 240 mg/dl to 200 mg/dl. Due to these changes in risk factor definition, literally overnight there were 42 million new cases eligible for treatment in the United States. The same happened with hypertension-using either the 2019 NICE guidelines or the 2018 ESC/ECC guidelines criteria for arterial hypertension, the proportion of people overdiagnosed with hypertension was calculated to be between 14% and 33%. In this review, we will start by discussing resource overuse. We then present the basis for disease definition and its conceptual problems. Finally, we will discuss the impact of changing risk factor/disease definitions in the prevalence of disease and its consequences in overdiagnosis and overtreatment (a problem particularly relevant when definitions are widened to include earlier or milder disease).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- João Pedro Bandovas
- Department of General Surgery, Centro Hospitalar Universitário de Lisboa Central, Lisboa, Portugal
| | - Beatriz Leal
- Department of Anesthestics, Instituto Português de Oncologia de Lisboa Francisco Gentil, Lisboa, Portugal
| | - Catarina Reis-de-Carvalho
- Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Medicine, Centro Hospitalar Universitário Lisboa Norte, Lisboa, Portugal
| | - David Cordeiro Sousa
- Vision Sciences Study Center, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de Lisboa, Lisboa, Portugal.,Vitreoretinal Unit, Royal Victorian Eye and Ear Hospital, Melbourne, Australia
| | - João Cruz Araújo
- Family Medicine Department, Unidade de Saúde Familiar Gualtar, Braga, Portugal
| | - Pedro Peixoto
- Department of Family Medicine, Unidade de Saúde Familiar do Mar, Póvoa de Varzim, Portugal
| | | | - António Vaz Carneiro
- Institute for Evidence Based Healthcare, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de Lisboa, Lisboa, Portugal
| | | |
Collapse
|
38
|
Williams SL, To Q, Vandelanotte C. What is the effectiveness of a personalised video story after an online diabetes risk assessment? A Randomised Controlled Trial. PLoS One 2022; 17:e0264749. [PMID: 35239723 PMCID: PMC8893700 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0264749] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/22/2021] [Accepted: 02/09/2022] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Online risk assessment tools for type 2 diabetes communicate risk information to motivate individuals to take actions and reduce their risk if needed. The impact of these tools on follow-up behaviours (e.g., General Practitioner (GP) visits, improvement in health behaviours) is unknown. This study examined effectiveness of a personalised video story and text-based message on GP and health professional visitations and health behaviours, of individuals assessed as ‘high risk’ following completion of the online Australian Type 2 Diabetes Risk Assessment Tool (AUSDRISK). Methods A Randomised Controlled Trial (conducted between October 2018 and April 2019) included 477 participants with a high score (≥12). The control group received a text-based message (TM) and the intervention group received both the text-based message and a personalised video story (TM+VS) encouraging them to take follow-up action. Participants reported follow-up actions (one- and three months), and physical activity (PA), dietary behaviours and body weight (baseline, one and three months). Generalized Linear Mixed Models and chi-squared tests were used to test differences in outcomes between groups over time. Results The intervention was not more effective for the TM+VS group compared to the TM only group (p-values>0.05 for all outcomes). More participants in the TM only group (49.8% compared to 40.0% in the VS+TM group) visited either a GP or health professional (p = 0.18). During the 3-month follow-up: 44.9% of all participants visited a GP (36.7%) and/or other health professional (31.0%). Significant improvements were found between baseline and three months, in both groups for weekly physical activity, daily fruit and vegetable intake and weight status. Conclusions Messages provided with online diabetes risk assessment tools to those with high-risk, positively influence GP and health professional visitations and promote short-term improvements in health behaviours that may contribute to an overall reduction in the development of type 2 diabetes. Trial registration Australia New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry; ACTRN12619000809134.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Susan L. Williams
- Central Queensland University, School of Health Medical and Applied Sciences, Physical Activity Research Group, Appleton Institute, Queensland, Australia
- * E-mail:
| | - Quyen To
- Central Queensland University, School of Health Medical and Applied Sciences, Physical Activity Research Group, Appleton Institute, Queensland, Australia
| | - Corneel Vandelanotte
- Central Queensland University, School of Health Medical and Applied Sciences, Physical Activity Research Group, Appleton Institute, Queensland, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Western MJ, Standage M, Peacock OJ, Nightingale T, Thompson D. Supporting Behavior Change in Sedentary Adults via Real-time Multidimensional Physical Activity Feedback: Mixed Methods Randomized Controlled Trial. JMIR Form Res 2022; 6:e26525. [PMID: 35234658 PMCID: PMC8928046 DOI: 10.2196/26525] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/15/2020] [Revised: 03/18/2021] [Accepted: 11/30/2021] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Increasing physical activity (PA) behavior remains a public health priority, and wearable technology is increasingly being used to support behavior change efforts. Using wearables to capture and provide comprehensive, visually persuasive, multidimensional feedback with real-time support may be a promising way of increasing PA in inactive individuals. OBJECTIVE This study aims to explore whether a 6-week self-monitoring intervention using composite web-based multidimensional PA feedback with real-time daily feedback supports increased PA in adults. METHODS A 6-week, mixed methods, 2-armed exploratory randomized controlled trial with 6-week follow-up was used, whereby low to moderately active (PA level [PAL] <2.0) adults (mean age 51.3 years, SD 8.4 years; women 28/51, 55%) were randomly assigned to receive the self-monitoring intervention (36/51, 71%) or waiting list control (15/51, 29%). Assessment of PA across multiple health-harnessing PA dimensions (eg, PAL, weekly moderate to vigorous intensity PA, sedentary time, and steps), psychosocial cognitions (eg, behavioral regulation, barrier self-efficacy, and habit strength), and health were made at the prerandomization baseline at 6 and 12 weeks. An exploratory analysis of the mean difference and CIs was conducted using the analysis of covariance model. After the 12-week assessment, intervention participants were interviewed to explore their views on the program. RESULTS There were no notable differences in any PA outcome immediately after the intervention; however, at 12 weeks, moderate-to-large effects were observed with a mean difference in PAL of 0.09 (95% CI 0.02-0.15; effect size [Hedges g] 0.8), daily moderate-intensity PA of 24 (95% CI 0-45; Hedges g=0.6) minutes, weekly moderate-to-vigorous intensity PA of 195 (95% CI 58-331; Hedges g=0.8) minutes, and steps of 1545 (95% CI 581-2553; Hedges g=0.7). Descriptive analyses suggested that the differences in PA at 12 weeks were more pronounced in women and participants with lower baseline PA levels. Immediately after the intervention, there were favorable differences in autonomous motivation, controlled motivation, perceived competence for PA, and barrier self-efficacy, with the latter sustained at follow-up. Qualitative data implied that the intervention was highly informative for participants and that the real-time feedback element was particularly useful in providing tangible, day-to-day behavioral support. CONCLUSIONS Using wearable trackers to capture and present sophisticated multidimensional PA feedback combined with discrete real-time support may be a useful way of facilitating changes in behavior. Further investigation into the ways of optimizing the use of wearables in inactive participants and testing the efficacy of this approach via a robust study design is warranted. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02432924; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02432924.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Martyn Standage
- Department for Health, University of Bath, Bath, United Kingdom
| | | | - Tom Nightingale
- School of Sport, Exercise and Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | - Dylan Thompson
- Department for Health, University of Bath, Bath, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Hollands GJ, Usher-Smith JA, Hasan R, Alexander F, Clarke N, Griffin SJ. Visualising health risks with medical imaging for changing recipients' health behaviours and risk factors: Systematic review with meta-analysis. PLoS Med 2022; 19:e1003920. [PMID: 35239659 PMCID: PMC8893626 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1003920] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/08/2021] [Accepted: 01/19/2022] [Indexed: 01/08/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND There is ongoing clinical and research interest in determining whether providing personalised risk information could motivate risk-reducing health behaviours. We aimed to assess the impact on behaviours and risk factors of feeding back to individuals' images of their bodies generated via medical imaging technologies in assessing their current disease status or risk. METHODS AND FINDINGS A systematic review with meta-analysis was conducted using Cochrane methods. MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO, CINAHL, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) were searched up to July 28, 2021, with backward and forward citation searches up to July 29, 2021. Eligible studies were randomised controlled trials including adults who underwent medical imaging procedures assessing current health status or risk of disease, for which personal risk may be reduced by modifying behaviour. Trials included an intervention group that received the imaging procedure plus feedback of visualised results and assessed subsequent risk-reducing health behaviour. We examined 12,620 abstracts and included 21 studies, involving 9,248 randomised participants. Studies reported on 10 risk-reducing behaviours, with most data for smoking (8 studies; n = 4,308), medication use (6 studies; n = 4,539), and physical activity (4 studies; n = 1,877). Meta-analysis revealed beneficial effects of feedback of visualised medical imaging results on reduced smoking (risk ratio 1.11, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.01 to 1.23, p = 0.04), healthier diet (standardised mean difference [SMD] 0.30, 95% CI 0.11 to 0.50, p = 0.003), increased physical activity (SMD 0.11, 95% CI 0.003 to 0.21, p = 0.04), and increased oral hygiene behaviours (SMD 0.35, 95% CI 0.13 to 0.57, p = 0.002). In addition, single studies reported increased skin self-examination and increased foot care. For other behavioural outcomes (medication use, sun protection, tanning booth use, and blood glucose testing) estimates favoured the intervention but were not statistically significant. Regarding secondary risk factor outcomes, there was clear evidence for reduced systolic blood pressure, waist circumference, and improved oral health, and some indication of reduced Framingham risk score. There was no evidence of any adverse effects, including anxiety, depression, or stress, although these were rarely assessed. A key limitation is that there were some concerns about risk of bias for all studies, with evidence for most outcomes being of low certainty. In particular, valid and precise measures of behaviour were rarely used, and there were few instances of preregistered protocols and analysis plans, increasing the likelihood of selective outcome reporting. CONCLUSIONS In this study, we observed that feedback of medical images to individuals has the potential to motivate risk-reducing behaviours and reduce risk factors. Should this promise be corroborated through further adequately powered trials that better mitigate against risk of bias, such interventions could usefully capitalise upon the widespread and growing use of medical imaging technologies in healthcare.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gareth J. Hollands
- Behaviour and Health Research Unit, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, School of Clinical Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
- EPPI-Centre, UCL Social Research Institute, University College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Juliet A. Usher-Smith
- Department of Public Health and Primary Care, School of Clinical Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Rana Hasan
- Department of Public Health and Primary Care, School of Clinical Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Florence Alexander
- Department of Public Health and Primary Care, School of Clinical Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Natasha Clarke
- Behaviour and Health Research Unit, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, School of Clinical Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Simon J. Griffin
- Department of Public Health and Primary Care, School of Clinical Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
- MRC Epidemiology Unit, Institute of Metabolic Science, School of Clinical Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Rainey L, van der Waal D, Donnelly LS, Southworth J, French DP, Evans DG, Broeders MJM. Women's health behaviour change after receiving breast cancer risk estimates with tailored screening and prevention recommendations. BMC Cancer 2022; 22:69. [PMID: 35033023 PMCID: PMC8761310 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-022-09174-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/12/2021] [Accepted: 01/04/2022] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
Abstract
Background The Predicting Risk of Cancer at Screening (PROCAS) study provided women who were eligible for breast cancer screening in Greater Manchester (United Kingdom) with their 10-year risk of breast cancer, i.e., low (≤1.5%), average (1.5–4.99%), moderate (5.-7.99%) or high (≥8%). The aim of this study is to explore which factors were associated with women’s uptake of screening and prevention recommendations. Additionally, we evaluated women’s organisational preferences regarding tailored screening. Methods A total of 325 women with a self-reported low (n = 60), average (n = 125), moderate (n = 80), or high (n = 60) risk completed a two-part web-based survey. The first part contained questions about personal characteristics. For the second part women were asked about uptake of early detection and preventive behaviours after breast cancer risk communication. Additional questions were posed to explore preferences regarding the organisation of risk-stratified screening and prevention. We performed exploratory univariable and multivariable regression analyses to assess which factors were associated with uptake of primary and secondary breast cancer preventive behaviours, stratified by breast cancer risk. Organisational preferences are presented using descriptive statistics. Results Self-reported breast cancer risk predicted uptake of (a) supplemental screening and breast self-examination, (b) risk-reducing medication and (c) preventive lifestyle behaviours. Further predictors were (a) having a first degree relative with breast cancer, (b) higher age, and (c) higher body mass index (BMI). Women’s organisational preferences for tailored screening emphasised a desire for more intensive screening for women at increased risk by further shortening the screening interval and moving the starting age forward. Conclusions Breast cancer risk communication predicts the uptake of key tailored primary and secondary preventive behaviours. Effective communication of breast cancer risk information is essential to optimise the population-wide impact of tailored screening. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12885-022-09174-3.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Linda Rainey
- Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboud University Medical Center, PO Box 9101, 6500 HB, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
| | | | - Louise S Donnelly
- Centre for Mental Health and Safety, University of Manchester, Manchester, M13 9PL, England
| | - Jake Southworth
- Prevent Breast Cancer Research Unit, The Nightingale Centre, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Southmoor Road, Manchester, M23 9LT, UK
| | - David P French
- Manchester Centre for Health Psychology, School of Health Sciences, University of Manchester, Coupland Street, Manchester, M13 9PL, UK
| | - D Gareth Evans
- Prevent Breast Cancer Research Unit, The Nightingale Centre, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Southmoor Road, Manchester, M23 9LT, UK.,Genomic Medicine, Division of Evolution and Genomic Sciences, Manchester Academic Health Sciences Centre, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, M13 9WL, UK.,The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Withington, Manchester, M20 4BX, UK
| | - Mireille J M Broeders
- Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboud University Medical Center, PO Box 9101, 6500 HB, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.,Dutch Expert Centre for Screening, PO Box 6873, 6503 GJ, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Riedinger C, Campbell J, Klein WMP, Ferrer RA, Usher-Smith JA. Analysis of the components of cancer risk perception and links with intention and behaviour: A UK-based study. PLoS One 2022; 17:e0262197. [PMID: 35025940 PMCID: PMC8757986 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0262197] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/14/2021] [Accepted: 11/30/2021] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Risk perception refers to how individuals interpret their susceptibility to threats, and has been hypothesised as an important predictor of intentions and behaviour in many theories of health behaviour change. However, its components, optimal measurement, and effects are not yet fully understood. The TRIRISK model, developed in the US, conceptualises risk perception as deliberative, affective and experiential components. In this study, we aimed to assess the replicability of the TRIRISK model in a UK sample by confirmatory factor analysis (CFA), explore the inherent factor structure of risk perception in the UK sample by exploratory factor analysis (EFA), and assess the associations of EFA-based factors with intentions to change behaviour and subsequent behaviour change. Data were derived from an online randomised controlled trial assessing cancer risk perception using the TRIRISK instrument and intention and lifestyle measures before and after communication of cancer risk. In the CFA analysis, the TRIRISK model of risk perception did not provide a good fit for the UK data. A revised model developed using EFA consisted of two separate "numerical" and "self-reflective" factors of deliberative risk perception, and a third factor combining affective with a subset of experiential items. This model provided a better fit to the data when cross-validated. Using multivariable regression analysis, we found that the self-reflective and affective-experiential factors of the model identified in this study were reliable predictors of intentions to prevent cancer. There were no associations of any of the risk perception factors with behaviour change. This study confirms that risk perception is clearly a multidimensional construct, having identified self-reflective risk perception as a new distinct component with predictive validity for intention. Furthermore, we highlight the practical implications of our findings for the design of interventions incorporating risk perception aimed at behaviour change in the context of cancer prevention.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christiane Riedinger
- Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Prevention Group, Primary Care Unit, University of Cambridge Clinical School, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Jackie Campbell
- Faculty of Health, Education and Society, University of Northampton, Northampton, United Kingdom
| | - William M. P. Klein
- Behavioral Research Program, National Cancer Institute, Rockville, Maryland, United States of America
| | - Rebecca A. Ferrer
- Behavioral Research Program, National Cancer Institute, Rockville, Maryland, United States of America
| | - Juliet A. Usher-Smith
- Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Prevention Group, Primary Care Unit, University of Cambridge Clinical School, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Gupta S, Panchal P, Sadatsafavi M, Ghanouni P, Sin D, Pakhale S, To T, Zafari Z, Nimmon L. A personalized biomedical risk assessment infographic for people who smoke with COPD: a qualitative study. Addict Sci Clin Pract 2022; 17:1. [PMID: 34991699 PMCID: PMC8734321 DOI: 10.1186/s13722-021-00283-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/29/2021] [Accepted: 12/03/2021] [Indexed: 01/24/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) causes 3 million deaths each year, yet 38% of COPD patients continue to smoke. Despite proof of effectiveness and universal guideline recommendations, smoking cessation interventions are underused in practice. We sought to develop an infographic featuring personalized biomedical risk assessment through future lung function decline prediction (with vs without ongoing smoking) to both prompt and enhance clinician delivery of smoking cessation advice and pharmacotherapy, and augment patient motivation to quit. METHODS We recruited patients with COPD and pulmonologists from a quaternary care center in Toronto, Canada. Infographic prototype content and design was based on best evidence. After face validation, the prototype was optimized through rapid-cycle design. Each cycle consisted of: (1) infographic testing in a moderated focus group and a clinician interview (recorded/transcribed) (with questionnaire completion); (2) review of transcripts for emergent/critical findings; and (3) infographic modifications to address findings (until no new critical findings emerged). We performed iterative transcript analysis after each cycle and a summative qualitative transcript analysis with quantitative (descriptive) questionnaire analysis. RESULTS Stopping criteria were met after 4 cycles, involving 20 patients (58% male) and 4 pulmonologists (50% male). The following qualitative themes emerged: Tool content (infographic content preferences); Tool Design (infographic design preferences); Advantages of Infographic Messaging (benefits of an infographic over other approaches); Impact of Tool on Determinants of Smoking Cessation Advice Delivery (impact on barriers and enablers to delivery of smoking cessation advice in practice); and Barriers and Enablers to Quitting (impact on barriers and enablers to quitting). Patient Likert scale ratings of infographic content and format/usability were highly positive, with improvements in scores for 20/21 questions through the design process. Providers scored the infographic at 77.8% ("superior") on the Suitability Assessment of Materials questionnaire. CONCLUSIONS We developed a user preference-based personalized biomedical risk assessment infographic to drive smoking cessation in patients with COPD. Our findings suggest that this tool could impact behavioural determinants of provider smoking-cessation advice delivery, while increasing patient quit motivation. Impacts of the tool on provider care, patient motivation to quit, and smoking cessation success should now be evaluated in real-world settings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Samir Gupta
- Keenan Research Center, Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St. Michael's Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
- Division of Respirology, Department of Medicine, St. Michael's Hospital, Suite 6044, Bond Wing, 30 Bond St, Toronto, ON, M5B 1W8, Canada.
| | - Puru Panchal
- Michael G. DeGroote School of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | - Mohsen Sadatsafavi
- Respiratory Evaluation Sciences Program, Collaboration for Outcomes Research and Evaluation, Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
- UBC Centre for Heart Lung Innovation, St Paul's Hospital, Providence Building, Vancouver, BC, Canada
- Division of Respiratory Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Parisa Ghanouni
- Faculty of Health, School of Occupational Therapy, Halifax, NS, Canada
| | - Don Sin
- UBC Centre for Heart Lung Innovation, St Paul's Hospital, Providence Building, Vancouver, BC, Canada
- Division of Respiratory Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Smita Pakhale
- Division of Respiratory Medicine, The Ottawa Hospital, Ottawa, ON, Canada
| | - Teresa To
- Child Health Evaluative Sciences, Research Institute, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Zafar Zafari
- Department of Pharmaceutical Health Services Research, University of Maryland School of Pharmacy, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Laura Nimmon
- Department of Occupational Science and Occupational Therapy, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
- Centre for Health Education Scholarship, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Chan SL, Thumboo J, Boivin J, Saffari SE, Yin S, Yeo SR, Chan JKY, Ng KC, Chua KH, Yu SL. Effect of fertility health awareness strategies on fertility knowledge and childbearing in young married couples (FertStart): study protocol for an effectiveness-implementation hybrid type I multicentre three-arm parallel group open-label randomised clinical trial. BMJ Open 2022; 12:e051710. [PMID: 34980614 PMCID: PMC8724708 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-051710] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Birth rates have been declining in many advanced societies including Singapore. We designed two interventions with vastly different resource requirements, which include fertility education, personalised fertility information and a behavioural change component targeting modifiable psychological constructs to modify fertility awareness and childbearing intentions. We aim to evaluate the effect of these two interventions on knowledge, attitudes and practice around childbearing compared with a control group among young married couples in Singapore and understand the implementation factors in the setting of an effectiveness-implementation hybrid type 1 three-arm randomised trial. METHODS AND ANALYSIS We will randomise 1200 young married couples to no intervention (control), Fertility Health Screening group (FHS) or Fertility Awareness Tools (FAT) in a 7:5:5 ratio. Couples in FHS will undergo an anti-Mullerian hormone test and semen analysis, a doctor's consultation to explain the results and standardised reproductive counselling by a trained nurse. Couples in FAT will watch a standardised video, complete an adapted fertility status awareness (FertiSTAT) tool and receive an educational brochure. The attitudes, fertility knowledge and efforts to achieve pregnancy of all couples will be assessed at baseline and 6 months post-randomisation. Birth statistics will be tracked using administrative records at 2 and 3 years. The primary outcome is the change in the woman's self-reported intended age at first birth between baseline and 6 months post-randomisation. In addition, implementation outcomes and cost-effectiveness of the two interventions will be assessed. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION This study has been reviewed and approved by the Centralized Institutional Review Board of SingHealth (2019/2095). Study results will be reported to the study funder and there are plans to disseminate them in scientific conferences and publications, where authorship will be determined by the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors guidelines. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER NCT04647136; ClinicalTrails.gov Identifier.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sze Ling Chan
- Health Services Research Centre, Singhealth, Singapore
| | - Julian Thumboo
- Department of Rheumatology & Immunology, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore
| | - Jacky Boivin
- School of Psychology, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK
| | | | - Shanqing Yin
- Chairman Medical Board Office, KK Women's and Children's Hospital, Singapore
| | - Samantha Rachel Yeo
- Division of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, KK Women's and Children's Hospital, Singapore
| | - Jerry Kok Yen Chan
- Department of Reproductive Medicine, KK Women's and Children's Hospital, Singapore
| | - Kee Chong Ng
- Chairman Medical Board Office, KK Women's and Children's Hospital, Singapore
| | - Ka-Hee Chua
- Department of Reproductive Medicine, KK Women's and Children's Hospital, Singapore
| | - Su Ling Yu
- Department of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Varriano B, Porplycia D, Friedman SM. Unhelmeted Injured Cyclists in a Canadian Emergency Department: Cycling Behavior and Attitudes Towards Helmet Use. INQUIRY: THE JOURNAL OF HEALTH CARE ORGANIZATION, PROVISION, AND FINANCING 2022; 59:469580221083276. [PMID: 35357244 PMCID: PMC8977697 DOI: 10.1177/00469580221083276] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Introduction We seek to characterize unhelmeted injured cyclists presenting to the
emergency department: demographics, cycling behavior, and attitudes towards
cycling safety and helmet use. Methods This was a prospective case series in a downtown teaching hospital. Injured
cyclists presenting to the emergency department were recruited for a
standardized survey if not wearing a helmet at time of injury and over age
18. Exclusion criteria included inability to consent (language barrier,
cognitive impairment) or admission to hospital. Results We surveyed 72 UICs (unhelmeted injured cyclists) with mean age of 34.3 years
(range 18–68, median 30, IQR 15.8 years). Most UICs cycled daily or most
days per week in non-winter months (88.9%, n = 64). Most regarded cycling in
Toronto as somewhat dangerous (44.4%, n = 32) or very dangerous (5.9%, n =
4). Almost all (98.6%, n = 71) had planned to cycle when departing home that
day. UICs reported rarely (11.1%, n = 8) or never (65.3%, n = 47) wearing a
helmet. Reported factors discouraging helmet use included inconvenience
(31.9%, n = 23) and lack of ownership (33.3%, n = 24), but few characterized
helmets as unnecessary (11.1%, n = 7) or ineffective (1.4%, n = 1). Conclusions Unhelmeted injured cyclists were frequent commuter cyclists who generally do
not regard cycling as safe yet choose not to wear helmets for reasons
largely related to convenience and comfort. Initiatives to increase helmet
use should address these perceived barriers, and further explore cyclist
perception regarding risk of injury and death.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Brenda Varriano
- Department of Emergency Medicine, University Health Network, Ontario, Canada
- College of Medicine, Central Michigan University, Mount Pleasant, MI, USA
| | - Danielle Porplycia
- Department of Emergency Medicine, University Health Network, Ontario, Canada
- Faculty of Medicine, London Health Sciences Centre, Ontario, Canada
| | - Steven Marc Friedman
- Department of Emergency Medicine, University Health Network, Ontario, Canada
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Harvie M, French DP, Pegington M, Cooper G, Howell A, McDiarmid S, Lombardelli C, Donnelly L, Ruane H, Sellers K, Barrett E, Armitage CJ, Evans DG. Testing a breast cancer prevention and a multiple disease prevention weight loss programme amongst women within the UK NHS breast screening programme-a randomised feasibility study. Pilot Feasibility Stud 2021; 7:220. [PMID: 34930478 PMCID: PMC8690875 DOI: 10.1186/s40814-021-00947-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/10/2020] [Accepted: 11/04/2021] [Indexed: 12/03/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Excess weight and unhealthy behaviours (e.g. sedentariness, high alcohol) are common amongst women including those attending breast screening. These factors increase the risk of breast cancer and other diseases. We tested the feasibility and acceptability of a weight loss/behaviour change programme framed to reduce breast cancer risk (breast cancer prevention programme, BCPP) compared to one framed to reduce risk of breast cancer, cardiovascular disease (CVD) and diabetes (T2D) (multiple disease prevention programme, MDPP). Methods Women aged 47-73 years with overweight or obesity (n = 1356) in the NHS Breast Screening Programme (NHSBSP) were randomised (1:2) to be invited to join a BCPP or a MDPP. The BCPP included personalised information on breast cancer risk and a web and phone weight loss/behaviour change intervention. The MDPP also included an NHS Health Check (lipids, blood pressure, HbA1c and personalised feedback for risk of CVD [QRISK2] and T2D [QDiabetes and HbA1c]). Primary outcomes were uptake and retention and other feasibility outcomes which include intervention fidelity and prevalence of high CVD and T2D risk. Secondary outcomes included change in weight. Results The BCPP and MDPP had comparable rates of uptake: 45/508 (9%) vs. 81/848 (10%) and 12-month retention; 33/45 (73%) vs. 53/81 (65%). Both programmes had a high fidelity of delivery with receipt of mean (95% CI) 90 (88-98% of scheduled calls, 91 (86-95%) of scheduled e-mails and 89 (76-102) website entries per woman over the 12-month period. The MDPP identified 15% of women with a previously unknown 10-year CVD QRISK2 of ≥ 10% and 56% with 10-year Qdiabetes risk of ≥ 10%. Both groups experienced good comparable weight loss: BCPP 26/45 (58%) and MDPP 46/81 (57%) with greater than 5% weight loss at 12 months using baseline observation carried forward imputation. Conclusions Both programmes appeared feasible. The MDPP identified previously unknown CVD and T2D risk factors but does not appear to increase engagement with behaviour change beyond a standard BCPP amongst women attending breast screening. A future definitive effectiveness trial of BCPP is supported by acceptable uptake and retention, and good weight loss. Trial registration ISRCTN91372184, registered 28 September 2014. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s40814-021-00947-4.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michelle Harvie
- The Prevent Breast Cancer Research Unit, The Nightingale Centre, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, M23 9LT, UK. .,Manchester Breast Centre, Oglesby Cancer Research Centre, The Christie, University of Manchester, 555 Wilmslow Rd., Manchester, M20 4GJ, UK.
| | - David P French
- Manchester Breast Centre, Oglesby Cancer Research Centre, The Christie, University of Manchester, 555 Wilmslow Rd., Manchester, M20 4GJ, UK.,Manchester Centre for Health Psychology, School of Health Sciences, University of Manchester, Coupland Street, Manchester, M13 9PL, UK
| | - Mary Pegington
- The Prevent Breast Cancer Research Unit, The Nightingale Centre, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, M23 9LT, UK.,Division of Cancer Sciences, The University of Manchester, Wilmslow Road, Manchester, M20 4BX, UK
| | - Grace Cooper
- The Prevent Breast Cancer Research Unit, The Nightingale Centre, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, M23 9LT, UK
| | - Anthony Howell
- The Prevent Breast Cancer Research Unit, The Nightingale Centre, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, M23 9LT, UK.,Manchester Breast Centre, Oglesby Cancer Research Centre, The Christie, University of Manchester, 555 Wilmslow Rd., Manchester, M20 4GJ, UK.,Division of Cancer Sciences, The University of Manchester, Wilmslow Road, Manchester, M20 4BX, UK.,Department of Medical Oncology, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Wilmslow Rd., Manchester, M20 4BX, UK
| | - Sarah McDiarmid
- The Prevent Breast Cancer Research Unit, The Nightingale Centre, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, M23 9LT, UK
| | - Cheryl Lombardelli
- The Prevent Breast Cancer Research Unit, The Nightingale Centre, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, M23 9LT, UK
| | - Louise Donnelly
- The Prevent Breast Cancer Research Unit, The Nightingale Centre, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, M23 9LT, UK
| | - Helen Ruane
- The Prevent Breast Cancer Research Unit, The Nightingale Centre, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, M23 9LT, UK
| | - Katharine Sellers
- The Prevent Breast Cancer Research Unit, The Nightingale Centre, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, M23 9LT, UK
| | - Emma Barrett
- Department of Medical Statistics, Education and Research Centre, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, M23 9LT, Manchester, UK
| | - Christopher J Armitage
- Manchester Centre for Health Psychology, School of Health Sciences, University of Manchester, Coupland Street, Manchester, M13 9PL, UK
| | - D Gareth Evans
- The Prevent Breast Cancer Research Unit, The Nightingale Centre, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, M23 9LT, UK.,Manchester Breast Centre, Oglesby Cancer Research Centre, The Christie, University of Manchester, 555 Wilmslow Rd., Manchester, M20 4GJ, UK.,Genomic Medicine, Division of Evolution and Genomic Sciences, The University of Manchester, St Mary's Hospital, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford Road, Manchester, M13 9WL, UK
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Bunnik EM, Bolt IL. Exploring the Ethics of Implementation of Epigenomics Technologies in Cancer Screening: A Focus Group Study. Epigenet Insights 2021; 14:25168657211063618. [PMID: 34917888 PMCID: PMC8669112 DOI: 10.1177/25168657211063618] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/15/2021] [Accepted: 11/06/2021] [Indexed: 12/04/2022] Open
Abstract
New epigenomics technologies are being developed and used for the detection and prediction of various types of cancer. By allowing for timely intervention or preventive measures, epigenomics technologies show promise for public health, notably in population screening. In order to assess whether implementation of epigenomics technologies in population screening may be morally acceptable, it is important to understand – in an early stage of development – ethical and societal issues that may arise. We held 3 focus groups with experts in science and technology studies (STS) (n = 13) in the Netherlands, on 3 potential future applications of epigenomic technologies in screening programmes of increasing scope: cervical cancer, female cancers and ‘global’ cancer. On the basis of these discussions, this paper identifies ethical issues pertinent to epigenomics-based population screening, such as risk communication, trust and public acceptance; personal responsibility, stigmatisation and societal pressure, and data protection and data governance. It also points out how features of epigenomics (eg, modifiability) and changing concepts (eg, of cancer) may challenge the existing evaluative framework for screening programmes. This paper aims to anticipate and prepare for future ethical challenges when epigenomics technologies can be tested and introduced in public health settings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eline M Bunnik
- Department of Medical Ethics, Philosophy and History of Medicine, Erasmus MC, University Medical Centre Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Ineke Lle Bolt
- Department of Medical Ethics, Philosophy and History of Medicine, Erasmus MC, University Medical Centre Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Goh MCW, Kelly PJ, Deane FP. Enhancing Type 2 diabetes risk communication with message framing and tailored risk feedback: an online randomised controlled trial. AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGY 2021. [DOI: 10.1080/00049530.2021.1997554] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Melvin C. W. Goh
- School of Psychology, Faculty of Social Sciences, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, Australia
- Illawarra Health and Medical Research Institute, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, Australia
| | - Peter J. Kelly
- School of Psychology, Faculty of Social Sciences, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, Australia
- Illawarra Health and Medical Research Institute, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, Australia
| | - Frank P. Deane
- School of Psychology, Faculty of Social Sciences, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, Australia
- Illawarra Health and Medical Research Institute, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Patient and practitioner views on cancer risk discussions in primary care: a qualitative study. BJGP Open 2021; 6:BJGPO.2021.0108. [PMID: 34645652 PMCID: PMC8958738 DOI: 10.3399/bjgpo.2021.0108] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/19/2021] [Accepted: 10/07/2021] [Indexed: 12/04/2022] Open
Abstract
Background It is estimated that nearly 600 000 cancer cases in the UK could have been avoided in the past 5 years if people had healthier lifestyles, with the principle modifiable risk factors being smoking, obesity, alcohol consumption, and inactivity. There is growing interest in the use of cancer risk information in general practice to encourage lifestyle modification. Aim To explore the views and experiences of patients and practitioners in relation to cancer prevention and cancer risk discussions in general practice. Design & setting Qualitative study among patients and practitioners in general practices in Glasgow, UK. Method Semi-structured interviews were conducted with nine practitioners (five GPs and four practice nurses, recruited purposively from practices based on list size and deprivation status), and 13 patients (aged 30–60 years, with two or more specified comorbidities). Results Currently, cancer risk discussions focus on smoking and cancer, with links between alcohol and/or obesity and cancer rarely made. There was support for the use of the personalised cancer risk tool as an additional resource in primary care. Practitioners felt practice nurses were best placed to use it. Use in planned appointments (for example, chronic disease reviews) was preferred over opportunistic use. Concerns were expressed, however, about generating anxiety, time constraints, and widening inequalities. Conclusion Health behaviour change is complex and the provision of information alone is unlikely to have significant effects. Personalised risk tools may have a role, but important concerns about their use remain, particularly in areas of socioeconomic disadvantage.
Collapse
|
50
|
Milne R, Altomare D, Ribaldi F, Molinuevo JL, Frisoni GB, Brayne C. Societal and equity challenges for Brain Health Services. A user manual for Brain Health Services-part 6 of 6. Alzheimers Res Ther 2021; 13:173. [PMID: 34635173 PMCID: PMC8507368 DOI: 10.1186/s13195-021-00885-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/29/2021] [Accepted: 08/04/2021] [Indexed: 11/10/2022]
Abstract
Brain Health Services are a novel approach to the personalized prevention of dementia. In this paper, we consider how such services can best reflect their social, cultural, and economic context and, in doing so, deliver fair and equitable access to risk reduction. We present specific areas of challenge associated with the social context for dementia prevention. The first concentrates on how Brain Health Services engage with the "at-risk" individual, recognizing the range of factors that shape an individual's risk of dementia and the efficacy of risk reduction measures. The second emphasizes the social context of Brain Health Services themselves and their ability to provide equitable access to risk reduction. We then elaborate proposals for meeting or mitigating these challenges. We suggest that considering these challenges will enable Brain Health Services to address two fundamental questions: the balance between an individualized "high-risk" and population focus for public health prevention and the ability of services to meet ethical standards of justice and health equity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Richard Milne
- Society and Ethics Research Group, Wellcome Connecting Science, Hinxton, UK.
- Cambridge Public Health, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
| | - Daniele Altomare
- Laboratory of Neuroimaging of Aging (LANVIE), University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland
- Memory Clinic, Geneva University Hospitals, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Federica Ribaldi
- Laboratory of Neuroimaging of Aging (LANVIE), University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland
- Memory Clinic, Geneva University Hospitals, Geneva, Switzerland
- Laboratory of Alzheimer's Neuroimaging and Epidemiology (LANE), Saint John of God Clinical Research Centre, Brescia, Italy
- Department of Molecular and Translational Medicine, University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy
| | - José Luis Molinuevo
- Barcelonaβeta Brain Research Center, Pasqual Maragall Foundation, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Giovanni B Frisoni
- Laboratory of Neuroimaging of Aging (LANVIE), University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland
- Memory Clinic, Geneva University Hospitals, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Carol Brayne
- Cambridge Public Health, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| |
Collapse
|