Primary Care Physicians' Knowledge of the Cardiovascular Effects of Diabetes Medications: Findings from an Online Survey

Knowledge and prescribing behaviour of Flemish general practitioners regarding novel glucose-lowering medications: Online cross-sectional survey

AIMS

To determine the knowledge and prescribing behaviour regarding new type 2 diabetes medication in general practice. Physicians in Belgium are bound by the prescription criteria which do not always correspond to the international guidelines.

DESIGN & METHOD

A mixed methods study with an online questionnaire was conducted in Flanders to collect data on demographic characteristics, theoretical knowledge, and prescribing behaviour, using ten theoretical questions and six clinical cases, based on the American Diabetes Association/European Association for the Study of Diabetes (ADA/EASD) guidelines and the Belgian reimbursement criteria.

RESULTS

201 GPs and GPs in training were included in this study with a median age of 30 years and 68 % female participants. On the knowledge questionnaire, the mean test result was 7.15/15 (= 48 %) with a median of 8. Further analysis showed that 90 % of the respondents correctly recommended a sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 (sglt2) inhibitor when the clinical case showed a comorbidity of heart failure, whereas only 42 % suggested correctly a glucagon-like peptide 1 (GLP-1) agonist if presence of cardiovascular disease. Subgroup analysis showed no statistically significant demographic differences in obtained test results. Regarding prescription behaviour, 23 % of the respondents would prescribe medication that did not match the reimbursement criteria in at least one of the 6 proposed clinical cases.

CONCLUSION

This study highlights the need for enhanced knowledge and updated prescribing practices among Flemish GPs and Trainee GPs to effectively manage patients with T2DM.

Pharmacist impact on evidence-based prescribing of diabetes medications in patients with clinical atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease

BACKGROUND

Including pharmacists on care teams of patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D) has been shown to promote guideline-based prescribing and improve glycemic control, lowering risks of adverse cardiovascular outcomes. Evidence is lacking regarding whether including pharmacists on the care team is associated with the prescribing of GLP-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RA) and SGLT-2 inhibitors (SGLT-2i) recommended for use in patients with T2D and atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD).

OBJECTIVE

To assess the association between having a pharmacist on the primary care team of patients with T2D and ASCVD and being prescribed a guideline-recommended GLP-1 RA or SGLT-2i.

METHODS

A cross-sectional analysis of patients with T2D and ASCVD seen by primary care providers at an academic medical center between June 2019 and May 2020 was completed. Patients with prescriptions for GLP-1 RA or SGLT-2i with evidence of cardiovascular benefit were identified and compared between those with pharmacist care vs usual care using multivariable log-binominal regression analyses.

RESULTS

Of 1,497 included patients, 1,283 (85.7%) were in the usual care group (mean age 68.9 years, hemoglobin A1c 7.6%) and 214 (14.3%) in the pharmacist care group (mean age 64.5 years, A1c 9.0%). Of the pharmacist care group, 50.5% were prescribed a GLP-1 RA or SGLT-2i with cardiovascular benefit vs 17.9% in the usual care group (P < 0.001). In multivariable analyses controlling for A1c and other potential confounders, those in the pharmacist care group were 2.15 times as likely to have been prescribed a GLP-1 RA or SGLT-2i than those in the usual care group (adjusted risk ratio 2.15, 95% CI = 1.83-2.52; P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

These data provide preliminary evidence that integrating pharmacists into patient care teams is associated with increased prescribing of guideline-recommended treatment with GLP-1 RA and SGLT-2i in patients with T2D and ASCVD, yet there is room for improvement in prescribing these agents to patients with T2D and ASCVD.

Cardiovascular disease management in Australian adults with type 2 diabetes: insights from the CAPTURE study

BACKGROUND

Type 2 diabetes (T2D) is a well-recognised cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk factor, and recent guidelines for the management of T2D include consideration of CVD risk.

AIM

To assess whether contemporary clinical management of Australians with T2D is in accord with recent national and international guidelines.

METHODS

This Australia-specific analysis of the CAPTURE study, a non-interventional, cross-sectional study included adults diagnosed with T2D ≥180 days prior to providing informed consent and visiting primary or specialist care. Main outcome measures were the use of blood glucose-lowering medications (BGLMs), BGLMs with proven cardiovascular benefits and other CVD medications, stratified by CVD status and care setting.

RESULTS

Of 824 Australian participants in the CAPTURE sample, 332 (40.3%) had CVD. Oral BGLMs were used by 83.9% of all participants, most commonly metformin (76.0%), dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors (28.8%), sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT2is; 21.8%) and sulfonylureas (21.7%). Insulin was used by 29.2% of participants. BGLMs with proven CV benefit were used by 22.6%; glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RAs) were less commonly used than SGLT2is in all CVD groups, but these drug classes were more often prescribed in specialist than primary care (SGLT2is 25.4 vs 20.7%, GLP-1 RAs 3.2 vs 0.8% respectively). Use of non-BGLMs for CVD risk reduction appeared consistent with guidelines.

CONCLUSIONS

Use of BGLMs with CVD benefits appears low in Australia, irrespective of CVD status. This likely reflects the delay in translation of clinical evidence into contemporary care and prescribing restrictions.

Impact of a clinical pharmacist on provider prescribing patterns in a primary care clinic

BACKGROUND

Sodium-glucose transporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors and glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) agonists have demonstrated beneficial outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes at high cardiovascular risk. Unfortunately, these agents are still underutilized in primary care practice. A clinical pharmacist was embedded at a primary care clinic to provide diabetes and hypertension management under a collaborative practice agreement with a supervising physician.

OBJECTIVES

This study will evaluate whether the presence of an embedded pharmacist in a primary care clinic affects prescribing patterns of novel, evidence-based diabetes therapies.

METHODS

We abstracted information on SGLT2 inhibitor and GLP-1 agonist prescribing patterns from 3 primary care clinics across 2 time periods as a single-center, retrospective cohort study. We used a difference-in-difference analysis to compare prescription rates and assess the impact of embedding the pharmacist into clinical practice. Prescriptions written by the pharmacist were excluded.

RESULTS

Across all 3 clinics, 1309 and 1489 patients were included in the pre-intervention and postintervention periods, respectively. The percentage of patients prescribed either an SGLT2 inhibitor or GLP-1 agonist, similar between both groups at baseline, rose to 11.6% in the nonintervention clinics and 15.0% in the intervention clinic. There was a statistically significant increase in SGLT2 inhibitor and GLP-1 agonist prescribing in the intervention clinic compared with nonintervention clinics (P = 0.034). This change in prescribing patterns appeared even greater when excluding prescribers who were not present during both pre-intervention and postintervention periods (P = 0.009).

CONCLUSION

The presence of a pharmacist is associated with increased SGLT2 inhibitor and GLP-1 agonist prescribing within a clinic, even in patients not seen directly by the pharmacist. These results suggest that an on-site clinical pharmacist providing care for patients with diabetes may indirectly influence the prescribing behavior of co-located primary care providers, increasing the adoption of novel noninsulin diabetic medications.

Prescribing of SGLT2 inhibitors in primary care: A qualitative study of General Practitioners and Endocrinologists

AIMS

To explore: 1) General Practitioners' (GPs') perspectives regarding initiating SGLT2 inhibitors and the resources that inform their pharmacotherapy choices; and 2) The support provided to GPs by Endocrinologists in relation to the prescription of type 2 diabetes medications.

METHODS

Semi-structured interviews with 15 GPs and 12 Endocrinologists working in diverse areas in New South Wales, Australia. Interviews were recorded, transcribed, and emergent themes were identified using a general inductive approach.

RESULTS

Under-appreciation of the cardio-renal benefits of SGLT2 inhibitors, a preference for an Endocrinologist to initiate therapy, and patients' experiences with adverse effects were identified as reasons for low rates of initiating SGLT2 inhibitors by some GPs. GPs reported that they would like to receive education about this topic from Endocrinologists, ideally via case-based discussions. A perceived challenge faced by Endocrinologists in providing GP education included potential constraints on talk content imposed by industry at sponsored events. Endocrinologists indicated that interactive sessions were most useful to GPs.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite the evidence for the cardio-renal benefits of SGLT2 inhibitors, there are barriers to GPs prescribing these agents. Case-based discussions between GPs and Endocrinologists about type 2 diabetes treatment including the role of SGLT2 inhibitors could overcome some of these barriers.