1
|
Danne TP, Joubert M, Hartvig NV, Kaas A, Knudsen NN, Mader JK. Association Between Treatment Adherence and Continuous Glucose Monitoring Outcomes in People With Diabetes Using Smart Insulin Pens in a Real-World Setting. Diabetes Care 2024; 47:995-1003. [PMID: 38569055 PMCID: PMC11116913 DOI: 10.2337/dc23-2176] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/14/2023] [Accepted: 03/05/2024] [Indexed: 04/05/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To evaluate the association of insulin injection adherence, smart insulin pen engagement, and glycemic control using real-world data from 16 countries from adults self-administering basal insulin degludec and bolus insulin with a smart insulin pen (NovoPen 6 or NovoPen Echo Plus) alongside continuous glucose monitoring (CGM). RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS Data were aggregated over 14-day periods. Treatment adherence was defined according to the number of missed basal and missed bolus insulin doses and smart pen engagement according to the number of days with data uploads. RESULTS Data from 3,945 adults, including 25,157 14-day periods with ≥70% CGM coverage, were analyzed. On average, 0.2 basal and 6.0 bolus insulin doses were missed over 14 days. The estimated probability of missing at least one basal insulin dose over a 14-day period was 17.6% (95% CI 16.5, 18.7). Missing one basal or bolus insulin dose per 14 days was associated with a significant decrease in percentage of time with glucose levels in range (TIR) (3.9-10.0 mmol/L), of -2.8% (95% CI -3.7, -1.8) and -1.7% (-1.8, -1.6), respectively; therefore, missing two basal or four bolus doses would decrease TIR by >5%. Smart pen engagement was associated positively with glycemic outcomes. CONCLUSIONS This combined analysis of real-world smart pen and CGM data showed that missing two basal or four bolus insulin doses over a 14-day period would be associated with a clinically relevant decrease in TIR. Smart insulin pens provide valuable insights into treatment injection behaviors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thomas P.A. Danne
- Diabetes Centre for Children and Adolescents, Children’s and Youth Hospital Auf der Bult, Hanover Medical School, Hanover, Germany
| | - Michael Joubert
- Diabetes Care Unit, Caen University Hospital, University of Caen Normandy, Caen, France
| | | | | | | | - Julia K. Mader
- Division of Endocrinology and Diabetology, Department of Internal Medicine, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Chan K, Hansen K, Muratov S, Khoudigian S, Lamotte M. Smart connected insulin dose monitoring technologies versus standard of care: a Canadian cost-effectiveness analysis. J Comp Eff Res 2024; 13:e230124. [PMID: 38205726 PMCID: PMC10945415 DOI: 10.57264/cer-2023-0124] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/19/2023] [Accepted: 12/19/2023] [Indexed: 01/12/2024] Open
Abstract
Aim: There is growing interest in novel insulin management systems that improve glycemic control. This study aimed to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of smart connected insulin re-usable pens or caps for disposable insulin pens versus pens without connected capabilities in the management of adult patients with Type 1 diabetes (T1DM) from a Canadian societal perspective. Materials & methods: The IQVIA Core Diabetes Model was utilized to conduct the analyses. Applying data from a non-interventional study, the connected insulin device arm was assumed to result in greater reductions (-0.67%) in glycated hemoglobin from baseline and fewer non-severe hypoglycemic events (-32.87 events/patient annually). Macro- and micro-vascular risks were predicted using the Epidemiology of Diabetes Interventions and Complications study data. Direct and indirect costs and utilities were sourced from literature. Key model outcomes included life years and quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs). Both costs and effects were annually discounted at 1.5% over a 60-year time horizon. Uncertainty was explored in scenario and probabilistic sensitivity analyses (PSA). Results: The connected insulin pen device was associated with lower mean discounted total costs (CAD221,943 vs 266,199; -CAD44,256), improvement in mean life expectancy (25.78 vs 24.29; +1.49 years) and gains in QALYs (18.48 vs 16.74; +1.75 QALYs) over the patient's lifetime. Most scenario analyses confirmed the base case results. The PSA showed dominance in 99.5% of cases. Conclusion: For adults with T1DM in Canada, a connected insulin pen device is likely to be a cost-effective treatment option associated with greater clinical benefits and lower costs relative to a standard re-usable or disposable pen.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Katalina Chan
- Novo Nordisk Canada, Inc., Patient Access, Mississauga, Ontario, L5N 6M1, Canada
| | - Kåre Hansen
- Novo Nordisk A/S, Global Market Access, Novo Allé 1, 2880, Bagsværd, Denmark
| | - Sergey Muratov
- IQVIA, Real World Solutions (RWS), Mississauga, Ontario, L4W 5N9, Canada
- Department of Health Research Methods, McMaster University, Evidence, and Impact (HEI), Hamilton, Ontario, L8S 4L8, Canada
| | - Shoghag Khoudigian
- IQVIA, Real World Solutions (RWS), Mississauga, Ontario, L4W 5N9, Canada
| | - Mark Lamotte
- Th(is)2Modeling bv, Hogeweg, 91730, Asse, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Hellman J, Hartvig NV, Kaas A, Møller JB, Sørensen MR, Jendle J. Associations of bolus insulin injection frequency and smart pen engagement with glycaemic control in people living with type 1 diabetes. Diabetes Obes Metab 2024; 26:301-310. [PMID: 37926903 DOI: 10.1111/dom.15316] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/21/2023] [Revised: 09/11/2023] [Accepted: 09/21/2023] [Indexed: 11/07/2023]
Abstract
AIM To evaluate whether both bolus insulin injection frequency and smart pen engagement were associated with changes in glycaemic control, using real-world data from adults with type 1 diabetes (T1D). MATERIALS AND METHODS Adults using a smart pen (NovoPen 6) to administer bolus insulin (fast-acting insulin aspart or insulin aspart) alongside continuous glucose monitoring were eligible for inclusion. Smart pen engagement was characterized by number of days with pen data uploads over the previous 14 days. Glycaemic control was evaluated by analysing glucose metrics. RESULTS Overall, data from 1194 individuals were analysed. The number of daily bolus injections was significantly associated with time in range (TIR; 3.9-10.0 mmol/L [70-180 mg/dL]; P < 0.0001). Individuals administering, on average, three daily bolus insulin injections had an estimated 11% chance of achieving >70% TIR. The probability of achieving >70% TIR increased with the mean number of daily bolus injections. However, the percentage of TIR was lower on days when individuals administered higher-than-average numbers of injections. The observed mean number of daily bolus injections administered across the study population was lower than the optimal number required to reach glycaemic targets (4.8 injections vs. 6-8 injections). Smart pen engagement was significantly associated with improved TIR. CONCLUSIONS Glycaemic control was associated with daily bolus insulin injection frequency and smart pen engagement. A treatment regimen combining an optimal bolus injection strategy, and effective smart pen engagement, may improve glycaemic control among adults with T1D.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jarl Hellman
- Department of Medical Sciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| | | | | | | | | | - Johan Jendle
- School of Medical Science, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Örebro University, Örebro, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Ekberg NR, Hartvig NV, Kaas A, Møller JB, Adolfsson P. Smart Pen Exposes Missed Basal Insulin Injections and Reveals the Impact on Glycemic Control in Adults With Type 1 Diabetes. J Diabetes Sci Technol 2024; 18:66-73. [PMID: 35775735 PMCID: PMC10899845 DOI: 10.1177/19322968221104142] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Adherence to basal insulin injections and the effects of missed basal insulin injections in adults with type 1 diabetes (T1D) were investigated using data from continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) and smart insulin pen devices in a real-world study. METHODS This was a post hoc analysis of a prospective, real-world study conducted in Sweden. Adults with T1D who were using CGM received a smart insulin pen device (NovoPen 6) for insulin injections. Missed basal insulin doses (≥40 hours between doses) were evaluated over 14-day periods, and the probability of missing basal insulin doses was estimated. Associations between missed basal insulin doses and glycemic outcomes were also explored. RESULTS Thirty-two patients with 4410 acceptable CGM days (315 14-day periods) were included. The number of missed basal insulin doses ranged from 0 to 4 over 315 14-day periods. The estimated probability of missing at least one basal insulin dose over any given 14-day period was 22% (95% confidence interval: 10%-40%). Missed basal insulin doses were significantly associated with higher mean glycemic levels, higher glucose management indicator, and lower time in range (70-180 mg/dL [3.9-10.0 mmol/L]). Similar results were observed when adjusted for missed bolus insulin doses; age and sex had no statistically significant effect on any glycemic parameter. CONCLUSIONS This is the first study, based on accurate real-world injection data, to demonstrate the challenge of adherence to basal insulin injections in patients with T1D, and document that just one missed basal injection per week can result in clinically significant changes in glycemic control.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Neda Rajamand Ekberg
- Center for Diabetes, Academic Specialist Center, Stockholm, Sweden
- Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | | | | | | | - Peter Adolfsson
- Department of Pediatrics, The Hospital of Halland, Kungsbacka, Sweden
- Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy at University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Kaplan A, Boivin M, Bouchard J, Kim J, Hayes S, Licskai C. The emerging role of digital health in the management of asthma. Ther Adv Chronic Dis 2023; 14:20406223231209329. [PMID: 38028951 PMCID: PMC10657529 DOI: 10.1177/20406223231209329] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/16/2023] [Accepted: 09/25/2023] [Indexed: 12/01/2023] Open
Abstract
The most common reasons seen for lack of asthma control include misconceptions about disease control, low controller treatment adherence, poor inhaler technique, and the resulting underuse of controllers and overuse of short-acting beta2 agonists (SABAs). Narrowing these care gaps may be achieved through well-designed patient education that considers the patient's motivation, beliefs, and capabilities regarding their asthma and its management and empowers the patient to become an active participant in treatment decisions. Digital health technologies (DHTs) and digital therapeutic (DT) devices provide new opportunities to monitor treatment behaviors, improve communication between healthcare providers and patients, and generate data that inform educational interactions. DHT and DT have been proven effective in enhancing patient self-management in other chronic conditions, particularly diabetes. Accelerated integration of DHT and DT into the management of asthma patients is facilitated by the use of digital inhalers that employ sensor technology ("smart" inhalers). These devices efficiently provide real-time feedback on controller adherence, SABA use, and inhaler technique that have the strong potential to optimize asthma control.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alan Kaplan
- Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of Toronto, 14872 Yonge Street, Aurora, Toronto, ON L4G 1N2, Canada
- Family Physician Airways Group of Canada, Markham, ON, Canada
| | | | | | - James Kim
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
| | | | - Christopher Licskai
- Division of Respirology, Department of Medicine, Western University, London, ON, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Lingen K, Pikounis T, Bellini N, Isaacs D. Advantages and disadvantages of connected insulin pens in diabetes management. Endocr Connect 2023; 12:e230108. [PMID: 37610002 PMCID: PMC10563601 DOI: 10.1530/ec-23-0108] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/26/2023] [Accepted: 08/22/2023] [Indexed: 08/24/2023]
Abstract
Insulin administration remains vital to the treatment of diabetes and although there have been advances in insulin delivery, evidence suggests that many people with diabetes on insulin therapy have suboptimal glycemic management. Recent advancements in insulin administration techniques include connected insulin devices, such as connected insulin pens and pen caps. In this review, we provide an overview of the literature on the use of connected insulin pens and pen caps to further elucidate the clinical benefits and drawbacks of these devices. We discuss the development of these devices, outlining the characteristics of insulin pens and pen caps with regulatory approvals. These devices have different features that can ease the burden of diabetes management, including automatic recording of insulin dose information, tracking of insulin-on-board, bolus calculators, and missed dose alerts. Despite the advantages of connected pens and pen caps, a small percentage of insulin users are currently using these devices, due to many factors, including lack of health-care professional awareness, initial training for prescribers, and setup of the device. Overcoming these barriers and publishing more data demonstrating the glycemic outcomes associated with these systems could improve diabetes management for people living with diabetes. As health-care systems become increasingly digital, connected insulin pens have the potential to allow a data-driven approach to diabetes management for people who are not interested in, cannot afford, or do not have intensive insulin regimens that might warrant use of insulin pumps or automated insulin delivery systems.
Collapse
|
7
|
Huang J, Yeung AM, DuBord AY, Wolpert H, Jacobs PG, Lee WA, Drincic A, Spanakis EK, Sherr JL, Prahalad P, Fleming A, Hsiao VC, Kompala T, Lal RA, Fayfman M, Ginsberg BH, Galindo RJ, Stuhr A, Chase JG, Najafi B, Masharani U, Seley JJ, Klonoff DC. Diabetes Technology Meeting 2022. J Diabetes Sci Technol 2023; 17:1085-1120. [PMID: 36704821 PMCID: PMC10347991 DOI: 10.1177/19322968221148743] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/28/2023]
Abstract
Diabetes Technology Society hosted its annual Diabetes Technology Meeting from November 3 to November 5, 2022. Meeting topics included (1) the measurement of glucose, insulin, and ketones; (2) virtual diabetes care; (3) metrics for managing diabetes and predicting outcomes; (4) integration of continuous glucose monitor data into the electronic health record; (5) regulation of diabetes technology; (6) digital health to nudge behavior; (7) estimating carbohydrates; (8) fully automated insulin delivery systems; (9) hypoglycemia; (10) novel insulins; (11) insulin delivery; (12) on-body sensors; (13) continuous glucose monitoring; (14) diabetic foot ulcers; (15) the environmental impact of diabetes technology; and (16) spinal cord stimulation for painful diabetic neuropathy. A live demonstration of a device that can allow for the recycling of used insulin pens was also presented.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | - Peter G. Jacobs
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA
| | - Wei-An Lee
- Los Angeles County+University of Southern California Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | | | - Elias K. Spanakis
- Baltimore Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Baltimore, MD, USA
- Division of Endocrinology, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | | | | | | | | | - Tejaswi Kompala
- University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
- Teladoc Health, Purchase, NY, USA
| | | | - Maya Fayfman
- Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Umesh Masharani
- University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | | | - David C. Klonoff
- Diabetes Technology Society, Burlingame, CA, USA
- Diabetes Research Institute, Mills-Peninsula Medical Center, San Mateo, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Heinemann L, Jendle J. Language Matters: Connected Pens, Smart Pens, Connected Smart Pens, or Just Digital Pens? J Diabetes Sci Technol 2023; 17:875-877. [PMID: 36602039 PMCID: PMC10347989 DOI: 10.1177/19322968221148508] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/06/2023]
Affiliation(s)
| | - Johan Jendle
- School of Medical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Örebro University, Örebro, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Moreno-Fernandez J, Díaz-Soto G, Girbes J, Arroyo FJ. Current Perspective on the Potential Benefits of Smart Insulin Pens on Glycemic Control in Patients With Diabetes: Spanish Delphi Consensus. J Diabetes Sci Technol 2023:19322968231178022. [PMID: 37264627 DOI: 10.1177/19322968231178022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/03/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Diabetes mellitus (DM) is a chronic disease with high morbidity and mortality, and glycemic control is key to avoiding complications. Technological innovations have led to the development of new tools to help patients with DM manage their condition. OBJECTIVE This consensus assesses the current perspective of physicians on the potential benefits of using smart insulin pens in the glycemic control of patients with type 1 diabetes (DM1) in Spain. METHODS The Delphi technique was used by 110 physicians who were experts in managing patients with DM1. The questionnaire consisted of 94 questions. RESULTS The consensus obtained was 95.74%. The experts recommended using the ambulatory glucose profile report and the different time-in-range (TIR) metrics to assess poor glycemic control. Between 31% and 65% of patients had TIR values less than 70% and were diagnosed based on glycosylated hemoglobin values. They believed that less than 10% of patients needed to remember to administer the basal insulin dose and between 10% and 30% needed to remember the prandial insulin dose. CONCLUSIONS The perception of physicians in their usual practice leads them to recommend the use of ambulatory glucose profile and time in range for glycemic control. Forgetting to administer insulin is a very common problem and the actual occurrence rate does not correspond with clinicians' perceptions. Technological improvements and the use of smart insulin pens can increase treatment adherence, strengthen the doctor-patient relationship, and help improve patients' education and quality of life.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jesús Moreno-Fernandez
- Endocrinology and Nutrition Department, Ciudad Real General University Hospital, Ciudad Real School of Medicine, University of Castilla-La Mancha, Ciudad Real, Spain
| | - Gonzalo Díaz-Soto
- Endocrinology and Nutrition Service, University Clinical Hospital of Valladolid, School of Medicine, University of Valladolid, Valladolid, Spain
| | - Juan Girbes
- Endocrinology Service, Hospital Arnau de Vilanova, Valencia, Spain
| | | |
Collapse
|
10
|
Tejera-Pérez C, Chico A, Azriel-Mira S, Lardiés-Sánchez B, Gomez-Peralta F. Connected Insulin Pens and Caps: An Expert's Recommendation from the Area of Diabetes of the Spanish Endocrinology and Nutrition Society (SEEN). Diabetes Ther 2023:10.1007/s13300-023-01417-1. [PMID: 37188930 DOI: 10.1007/s13300-023-01417-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/25/2023] [Accepted: 04/24/2023] [Indexed: 05/17/2023] Open
Abstract
Undoubtedly, technological advances have revolutionised diabetes management in recent years. The development of advanced closed hybrid loop insulin pumps or continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) systems, among others, have increased the quality of life and improved glycaemic control of people with diabetes. However, only some patients have access to such technology, and only some want to use it. CGM has become much more widespread, but in terms of insulin delivery, most people with type 1 diabetes (T1D) and almost all people with type 2 diabetes (T2D) on insulin therapy are treated with multiple-dose insulin injections (MDI) rather than an insulin pump. For these patients, using connected insulin pens or caps has shown benefits in reducing missed insulin injections and promoting correct administration over time. In addition, using these devices improves the quality of life and user satisfaction. The integration of insulin injection and CGM data facilitates both users and the healthcare team to analyse glucose control and implement appropriate therapeutic changes, reducing therapeutic inertia. This expert's recommendation reviews the characteristics of the devices marketed or in the process of being marketed and their available scientific evidence. Finally, it suggests the profile of users and professionals who would benefit most, the barriers to its generalisation and the changes in the care model that implementing these devices can bring with it.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cristina Tejera-Pérez
- Servicio Endocrinología y Nutriciós, Complejo Hospitalario Universitario de Ferrol, A Coruña, Spain
| | - Ana Chico
- Servicio Endocrinología y Nutrición, Hospital Santa Creu i Sant Pau, Barcelona, Spain
- CIBER-OBN, Barcelona, Spain
- Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Sharona Azriel-Mira
- Servicio de Endocrinología y Nutrición, Hospital Universitario Infanta Sofia, Madrid, Spain
| | | | - Fernando Gomez-Peralta
- Endocrinology and Nutrition Unit, Hospital General de Segovia, Unidad de Endocrinología y Nutrición, Luis Erik Clavería Neurólogo S.N street, 40002, Segovia, Spain.
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Biskupiak JE, Ramos M, Levy CJ, Forlenza G, Hopley C, Boyd J, Swift D, Lamotte M, Brixner DI. Cost-effectiveness of the tubeless automated insulin delivery system vs standard of care in the management of type 1 diabetes in the United States. J Manag Care Spec Pharm 2023:1-11. [PMID: 37133431 PMCID: PMC10394185 DOI: 10.18553/jmcp.2023.22331] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/04/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND: A tubeless, on-body automated insulin delivery (AID) system (Omnipod 5 Automated Insulin Delivery System) demonstrated improved glycated hemoglobin A1c levels and increased time in range (70 mg/dL to 180 mg/dL) for both adults and children with type 1 diabetes in a 13-week multicenter, single-arm study. OBJECTIVE: To assess the cost-effectiveness of the tubeless AID system compared with standard of care (SoC) in the management of type 1 diabetes (T1D) in the United States. METHODS: Cost-effectiveness analyses were conducted from a US payer's perspective, using the IQVIA Core Diabetes Model (version 9.5), with a time horizon of 60 years and an annual discount of 3.0% on both costs and effects. Simulated patients received either tubeless AID or SoC, the latter being defined as either continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (86% of patients) or multiple daily injections. Two cohorts (children: <18 years; adults: ≥18 years) of patients with T1D and 2 thresholds for nonsevere hypoglycemia (nonsevere hypoglycemia event [NSHE] <54 mg/dL and <70 mg/dL) were considered. Baseline cohort characteristics and treatment effects of different risk factors for tubeless AID were sourced from the clinical trial. Utilities and cost of diabetes-related complications were obtained from published sources. Treatment costs were derived from US national database sources. Scenario analyses and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were performed to test the robustness of the results. RESULTS: Treating children with T1D with tubeless AID, considering an NSHE threshold of less than 54 mg/dL, brings incremental life-years (1.375) and quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) (1.521) at an incremental cost of $15,099 compared with SoC, resulting in an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of $9,927 per QALY gained. Similar results were obtained for adults with T1D assuming an NSHE threshold of less than 54 mg/dL (incremental cost-effectiveness ratio = $10,310 per QALY gained). Furthermore, tubeless AID is a dominant treatment option for children and adults with T1D assuming an NSHE threshold of less than 70 mg/dL compared with SoC. The probabilistic sensitivity analyses results showed that compared with SoC, in both children and adults with T1D, tubeless AID was cost-effective in more than 90% of simulations, assuming a willingness-to-pay threshold of $100,000 per QALY gained. The key drivers of the model were the cost of ketoacidosis, duration of treatment effect, threshold of NSHE, and definition of severe hypoglycemia. CONCLUSIONS: The current analyses suggest that the tubeless AID system can be considered a cost-effective treatment compared with SoC in people with T1D from a US payer's perspective. DISCLOSURES: This research was funded by Insulet. Mr Hopley, Ms Boyd, and Mr Swift are full-time Insulet employees and own stock in Insulet Corporation. IQVIA, the employer of Ms Ramos and Dr Lamotte, received consulting fees for this work. Dr Biskupiak is receiving research support and consulting fees from Insulet. Dr Brixner has received consulting fees from Insulet. The University of Utah has received research funding from Insulet. Dr Levy is a consultant with Dexcom and Eli Lilly and has received grant/research support from Insulet, Tandem, Dexcom, and Abbott Diabetes. Dr Forlenza conducted research sponsored by Medtronic, Dexcom, Abbott, Tandem, Insulet, Beta Bionics, and Lilly. He has been speaker/consultant/advisory board member for Medtronic, Dexcom, Abbott, Tandem, Insulet, Beta Bionics, and Lilly.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Carol J Levy
- Ichan School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York City, NY
| | - Greg Forlenza
- Children's Hospital, University of Colorado Denver, Aurora
| | | | | | | | | | - Diana I Brixner
- Department of Pharmacotherapy, University of Utah, Salt Lake City
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Cranston I, Jamdade V, Liao B, Newson RS. Clinical, Economic, and Patient-Reported Benefits of Connected Insulin Pen Systems: A Systematic Literature Review. Adv Ther 2023; 40:2015-2037. [PMID: 36928495 PMCID: PMC10130105 DOI: 10.1007/s12325-023-02478-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/08/2022] [Accepted: 02/21/2023] [Indexed: 03/18/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The objective of this systematic literature review was to evaluate the available literature concerning the clinical, economic, and patient-reported benefits of insulin pen platforms, including connected insulin pens/caps/sleeves and insulin platforms, as well as mobile apps capable of receiving near real-time insulin dosing information. METHODS Medline and Embase databases and the Cochrane Library were searched for published literature between January 2015 and May 2021, and manual searches for conference abstracts from 2018 to May 2021 were performed. These searches were supplemented by internet searches for relevant literature and clinical trials. Study selection involved the population, intervention, comparator, outcomes, time frame, and study design outline. Included studies investigated connected insulin systems or connected caps/sleeves enabling pens to be connected, or apps able to connect to these systems, in individuals of all ages with type 1 or type 2 diabetes mellitus. RESULTS Searches identified a total of 26 publications (mostly observational studies and conference abstracts) for inclusion, representing ten unique, predominantly small studies. Evidence in this field is still in its early stages, and only two randomized controlled trials met our inclusion criteria. Available results showed that connected insulin pens and their systems potentially helped reduce suboptimal insulin use and may therefore improve glycemic control. Satisfaction of people with diabetes with the technologies used was high, and economic benefits were noted. Features of effective connected insulin pen devices include simplicity of use and data upload/sharing, useful "point-of-care" alerts, and simple and understandable data presentation to facilitate more effective consultations. CONCLUSIONS Connected insulin pen systems could be increasingly considered as part of routine clinical care for insulin-treated persons with diabetes who must manage the complexity of their daily insulin routine. Future research focusing on the way data obtained from these devices can be most effectively used alongside other information is urgently needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Iain Cranston
- Academic Department of Endocrinology and Diabetes, Portsmouth Hospitals University NHS Trust, Portsmouth, UK
| | | | | | - Rachel S Newson
- Eli Lilly and Company, 60 Margaret Street, Sydney, NSW, 2000, Australia.
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Consoli A, Formoso G. Patient perceptions of insulin therapy in diabetes self-management with insulin injection devices. Acta Diabetol 2023; 60:705-710. [PMID: 36828942 PMCID: PMC10063495 DOI: 10.1007/s00592-023-02054-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/22/2022] [Accepted: 02/13/2023] [Indexed: 02/26/2023]
Abstract
AIMS Several insulin delivery systems are available to control glycemia in patients with diabetes. Recently introduced devices feature connectivity enabling data transfer to smartphone applications to provide decision support and reduce errors in dosing and timing, while reducing the cognitive burden. METHODS We conducted an online survey in Italian patients with a self-reported diagnosis of diabetes to assess patient perceptions of insulin therapy management, and their impressions of connection-enabled insulin pens compared to standard insulin pens. The Morisky Medication Adherence Scale-8 was used to assess adherence to insulin therapy. RESULTS Among 223 respondents (108 with type 1 diabetes; 115 with type 2 diabetes), the most prominent unmet need was the necessity to overcome the cognitive burden of care associated with measuring, calculating, timing, and recording therapy. Only 25% of respondents had high adherence; 28% had low adherence. CONCLUSIONS When asked to compare the attributes of a non-connected insulin pen with those of a new connected device, 71% of patients rated the new proposal "very useful". The cognitive burden associated with self-management of diabetes therapy may influence preferences for advanced insulin delivery systems.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Agostino Consoli
- Department of Medicine and Aging Sciences, Center for Advanced Studies and Technology (CAST, Ex CeSIMet) G. d'Annunzio University Chieti-Pescara, CAST building, Room 315, G. d'Annunzio University Campus, Via Luigi Polacchi, 11-13, 66100, Chieti, Italy.
- Endocrinology and Metabolism Unit, Pescara Health Service, Pescara, Italy.
| | - Gloria Formoso
- Department of Medicine and Aging Sciences, Center for Advanced Studies and Technology (CAST, Ex CeSIMet) G. d'Annunzio University Chieti-Pescara, CAST building, Room 315, G. d'Annunzio University Campus, Via Luigi Polacchi, 11-13, 66100, Chieti, Italy
- Endocrinology and Metabolism Unit, Pescara Health Service, Pescara, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Zahid M, Dowlatshahi S, Kansara AH, Sadhu AR. The Evolution of Diabetes Technology - Options Towards Personalized Care. Endocr Pract 2023:S1530-891X(23)00387-7. [PMID: 37100350 DOI: 10.1016/j.eprac.2023.04.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/01/2022] [Revised: 04/12/2023] [Accepted: 04/18/2023] [Indexed: 04/28/2023]
Abstract
Advances in diabetes technology, especially in the last few decades, have transformed our ability to deliver care to persons with diabetes (PWD). Developments in glucose monitoring, especially continuous glucose monitoring systems (CGM), have revolutionized diabetes care and empowered our patients to manage their disease. CGM has also played an integral role in advancing automated insulin delivery systems. Currently available and upcoming advanced hybrid-closed loop systems aim to decrease patient involvement and are approaching the functionality of a fully automated artificial pancreas. Other advances, such as smart insulin pens and daily patch pumps, offer more options for patients and require less complicated and costly technology. Evidence to support the role of diabetes technology is growing, and PWD and clinicians must choose the right type of technology with a personalized strategy to manage diabetes effectively. Here, we review currently available diabetes technologies, summarize their individual features and highlight key patient factors to consider when creating a personalized treatment plan. We also address current challenges and barriers to the adoption of diabetes technologies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maleeha Zahid
- Fellow, Division of Endocrinology, Diabetes & Metabolism, Department of Medicine, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, Texas
| | - Samaneh Dowlatshahi
- Division of Endocrinology, Diabetes & Metabolism, Assistant Clinical Professor, Weill Cornell Medical College, Assistant Professor of Clinical Medicine, Houston Methodist Academic Institute, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, Texas
| | - Abhishek H Kansara
- Division of Endocrinology, Diabetes & Metabolism, Assistant Professor of Clinical Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, Assistant Professor of Clinical Medicine, Houston Methodist Academic Institute, Adjunct Assistant Professor, Texas A&M University College of Medicine, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, Texas
| | - Archana R Sadhu
- System Director, Diabetes Program at Houston Methodist, Medical Director, Pancreas Transplantation and Transplant Endocrinology, Houston Methodist J.C. Walter Jr. Transplant Center, Assistant Clinical Professor, Weill Cornell Medical College, Adjunct Assistant Professor, Texas A&M Health Sciences.
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Messer LH, Vigers T, Akturk HK, Forlenza GP, Huss KB, Karami AJ, Malecha E, Oser SM, Polsky S, Pyle L, Shah VN, Wadwa RP, Oser TK. Increasing Use of Diabetes Devices: What Do Health Care Professionals Need? Clin Diabetes 2023; 41:386-398. [PMID: 37456091 PMCID: PMC10338282 DOI: 10.2337/cd22-0092] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/17/2023]
Abstract
Despite evidence of improved diabetes outcomes with diabetes technology such as continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) systems, insulin pumps, and hybrid closed-loop (HCL) insulin delivery systems, these devices are underutilized in clinical practice for the management of insulin-requiring diabetes. This low uptake may be the result of health care providers' (HCPs') lack of confidence or time to prescribe and manage devices for people with diabetes. We administered a survey to HCPs in primary care, pediatric endocrinology, and adult endocrinology practices in the United States. Responding HCPs expressed a need for device-related insurance coverage tools and online data platforms with integration to electronic health record systems to improve diabetes technology uptake in these practice settings across the United States.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laurel H. Messer
- University of Colorado School of Medicine, Barbara Davis Center for Diabetes, Aurora, CO
| | - Tim Vigers
- University of Colorado School of Public Health, Department of Biostatistics and Informatics, Aurora, CO
- University of Colorado School of Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, Aurora, CO
| | - Halis K. Akturk
- University of Colorado School of Medicine, Barbara Davis Center for Diabetes, Aurora, CO
| | - Gregory P. Forlenza
- University of Colorado School of Medicine, Barbara Davis Center for Diabetes, Aurora, CO
| | - Kelsey B. Huss
- University of Colorado School of Medicine, Department of Family Medicine, Aurora, CO
| | - Angela J. Karami
- University of Colorado School of Medicine, Barbara Davis Center for Diabetes, Aurora, CO
| | - Emily Malecha
- University of Colorado School of Medicine, Barbara Davis Center for Diabetes, Aurora, CO
| | - Sean M. Oser
- University of Colorado School of Medicine, Department of Family Medicine, Aurora, CO
| | - Sarit Polsky
- University of Colorado School of Medicine, Barbara Davis Center for Diabetes, Aurora, CO
| | - Laura Pyle
- University of Colorado School of Public Health, Department of Biostatistics and Informatics, Aurora, CO
| | - Viral N. Shah
- University of Colorado School of Medicine, Barbara Davis Center for Diabetes, Aurora, CO
| | - R. Paul Wadwa
- University of Colorado School of Medicine, Barbara Davis Center for Diabetes, Aurora, CO
| | - Tamara K. Oser
- University of Colorado School of Medicine, Department of Family Medicine, Aurora, CO
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
MacLeod J, Vigersky RA. A Review of Precision Insulin Management With Smart Insulin Pens: Opening Up the Digital Door to People on Insulin Injection Therapy. J Diabetes Sci Technol 2023; 17:283-289. [PMID: 36326233 PMCID: PMC10012386 DOI: 10.1177/19322968221134546] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
Although advances in insulin therapy and delivery have been made, global evidence indicates sub-optimal glycemic management in people on insulin therapy with either type 1 diabetes (T1D) or type 2 diabetes (T2D). In this review, we discuss connected insulin pens that include tracking insulin pens (TIPs) and smart insulin pens (SIPs) and caps, as approaches to improving mean glucose or time in range while minimizing exposure to hypoglycemia or time below range (TBR) in people with diabetes (PwD) on multiple daily injection (MDI) therapy. We discuss various factors offered by SIPs that can facilitate precision insulin management, that is, delivering the right dose at the right time. These factors include the automatic recording of insulin dose size and delivery time; differentiating prime from therapy doses; active insulin tracking; dose calculators that provide individualized dosing recommendations; alerts for missed doses (ie, rapid-acting or long-acting insulin), insulin temperature, and insulin age monitoring; and integrated data reports for the clinical care team. A data-driven approach to care is critical to precision insulin management and includes helping PwD make informed choices regarding their preferred method of insulin delivery and ensuring insulin delivery technology tools are configured for their personal therapy plan. The data-driven approach involves developing a plan for ongoing collaborative use of the resulting data with their care team that may include adjusting insulin regimen and optimizing the care plan on a timely basis. We conclude with a list of practice protocols that are needed to support data-driven precision insulin management. This review includes a summary of research including various stages of connected insulin pens and caps.
Collapse
|
17
|
Sparre T, Hammershøy L, Steensgaard DB, Sturis J, Vikkelsøe P, Azzarello A. Factors Affecting Performance of Insulin Pen Injector Technology: A Narrative Review. J Diabetes Sci Technol 2023; 17:290-301. [PMID: 36540004 PMCID: PMC10012375 DOI: 10.1177/19322968221145201] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Insulin treatment is an essential hormone replacement therapy for the survival of people with type 1 diabetes and is often used for treatment in type 2 diabetes, particularly as the disease progresses. Advances in insulin therapy have been made since its discovery, including production of human insulin and development of insulin analogs with improved efficacy and safety profiles. The different types of available insulin formulations allow health care professionals to personalize treatment to an individual's needs. Generally, insulin requires parenteral administration via subcutaneous injection owing to very low oral bioavailability. METHODS This article reviews the human, technological, economical, and regulatory factors affecting the performance of insulin pens and the relationship between them. Opportunities and challenges that insulin pen injections may encounter in the future are also considered. RESULTS Insulin delivery devices, together with other factors, influence dose accuracy, convenience, and quality of life, contributing to easier medication administration with high efficacy and safety. For patients, ease of use, fast and accurate drug delivery, and painless injection are the most valuable features of an insulin injection device. For manufacturers, technological feasibility and economic viability also need to be considered when developing injection devices. CONCLUSION Insulin pen injectors are generally preferred over vial and syringe, although access may be limited in some health care systems. Insulin pen injectors can adapt to different insulin regimens and formulations and have the potential to acquire dosing data in real time.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thomas Sparre
- Novo Nordisk A/S, Søborg, Denmark
- Thomas Sparre, MD, PhD, Novo Nordisk A/S,
Vandtårnsvej 112, Søborg 2860, Denmark.
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
18
|
Naïditch N, Mauchant C, Benabbad I, Hehn C, Joubert M, Thébaut JF, Rosilio M. STYLCONNECT Study: An Assessment of Automatic Data Collection Devices by People Living with Diabetes and Using an Insulin Pen. Diabetes Ther 2023; 14:303-318. [PMID: 36422803 PMCID: PMC9944131 DOI: 10.1007/s13300-022-01337-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/23/2022] [Accepted: 11/02/2022] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The use of devices to connect insulin pens could facilitate management and improve glycaemic control in people with type 1 (PwT1D) and type 2 diabetes (PwT2D). However, their acceptance seems little studied. We conducted an online survey with the main objective of assessing the level of interest among insulin-treated people with diabetes (PwD) in a device connected to a disposable pen and secondary objectives of assessing the perceived benefits and important features expected of a connected device and identifying factors associated with interest scores. METHODS An ad-hoc questionnaire, validated by PwD, was used. Responses from 1798 PwD (975 PwT1D and 823 PwT2D) were analysed. RESULTS The mean interest rating was 7.4/10 (PwT1D: 7.2 vs PwT2D: 7.7; p < 0.001). PwD perceived that the device would make it easier to record their diabetes-related information (7.7/10) and keep all insulin and diabetes data in a single location (7.7/10). It was particularly important for PwD that this type of device could integrate data from glucose-measuring devices (7.8/10) and could set an alarm when all insulin in the body had been metabolised (7.7/10). CONCLUSION Our study highlighted PwD's strong interest in automating the collection of their insulin therapy data, with significantly more interest among PwT2D than PwT1D, and the importance of interoperability between glucose measurement devices and interchangeability between the different brands of insulin. More generally, for the first time and on a large scale, our study provided a greater understanding of the expectations of PwD regarding these devices.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicolas Naïditch
- Fédération Française des Diabétiques [French Federation of Diabetics - FFD], Diabète LAB., 88 Rue de la Roquette, 75011, Paris, France.
| | | | | | - Coline Hehn
- Fédération Française des Diabétiques [French Federation of Diabetics - FFD], Diabète LAB., 88 Rue de la Roquette, 75011, Paris, France
- Université de Lorraine, APEMAC, 57000, Metz, France
| | - Michael Joubert
- Service d'endocrinologie-Diabétologie [Endocrinology/Diabetes Unit], Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Caen, Caen, France
| | - Jean-François Thébaut
- Fédération Française des Diabétiques [French Federation of Diabetics - FFD], Diabète LAB., 88 Rue de la Roquette, 75011, Paris, France
| | | |
Collapse
|
19
|
Conget I, Artime E, Duque N, Díaz-Cerezo S, Rubio-de Santos M. Connected insulin systems in diabetes patients in Spain: Present and future perspectives. ENDOCRINOL DIAB NUTR 2023; 70:155-157. [PMID: 36925231 DOI: 10.1016/j.endien.2022.10.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/21/2022] [Accepted: 10/29/2022] [Indexed: 03/15/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Ignacio Conget
- Diabetes Unit, Department of Endocrinology and Nutrition, Hospital Clínic i Universitari, Barcelona, Spain; CIBERDEM, Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Diabetes y Enfermedades Metabólicas [Biomedical Research Network Centre for Diabetes and Metabolic Diseases], Madrid, Spain; IDIBAPS, Institut d'Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer [August Pi i Sunyer Biomedical Research Institute], Barcelona, Spain
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
20
|
Connected insulin systems in diabetes patients in Spain: Present and future perspectives. ENDOCRINOL DIAB NUTR 2022. [DOI: 10.1016/j.endinu.2022.10.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
|
21
|
Domingo-Lopez DA, Lattanzi G, H. J. Schreiber L, Wallace EJ, Wylie R, O'Sullivan J, Dolan EB, Duffy GP. Medical devices, smart drug delivery, wearables and technology for the treatment of Diabetes Mellitus. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 2022; 185:114280. [PMID: 35405298 DOI: 10.1016/j.addr.2022.114280] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/06/2021] [Revised: 02/21/2022] [Accepted: 04/05/2022] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
Diabetes mellitus refers to a group of metabolic disorders which affect how the body uses glucose impacting approximately 9% of the population worldwide. This review covers the most recent technological advances envisioned to control and/or reverse Type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM), many of which will also prove effective in treating the other forms of diabetes mellitus. Current standard therapy for T1DM involves multiple daily glucose measurements and insulin injections. Advances in glucose monitors, hormone delivery systems, and control algorithms generate more autonomous and personalised treatments through hybrid and fully automated closed-loop systems, which significantly reduce hypo- and hyperglycaemic episodes and their subsequent complications. Bi-hormonal systems that co-deliver glucagon or amylin with insulin aim to reduce hypoglycaemic events or increase time spent in target glycaemic range, respectively. Stimuli responsive materials for the controlled delivery of insulin or glucagon are a promising alternative to glucose monitors and insulin pumps. By their self-regulated mechanism, these "smart" drugs modulate their potency, pharmacokinetics and dosing depending on patients' glucose levels. Islet transplantation is a potential cure for T1DM as it restores endogenous insulin and glucagon production, but its use is not yet widespread due to limited islet sources and risks of chronic immunosuppression. New encapsulation strategies that promote angiogenesis and oxygen delivery while protecting islets from recipients' immune response may overcome current limiting factors.
Collapse
|
22
|
Ilkowitz J, Wissing V, Gallagher MP. Pediatric Smart Insulin Pen Use: The Next Best Thing. J Diabetes Sci Technol 2022; 16:635-640. [PMID: 34474591 PMCID: PMC9294571 DOI: 10.1177/19322968211041362] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
In the pediatric population, insulin pump therapy, or CSII, is often considered the gold standard for intensive diabetes management. Insulin pump technology offers families and caregivers many beneficial features including a calculator for insulin dosing and the ability to review diabetes management data to provide data-driven diabetes management. However, for those who find CSII challenging or choose to use multiple daily injections (MDI) there is an option that offers similar features called the Smart Insulin Pen (SIP). Even though SIP technology provides a safe and data-driven diabetes self-management tool for the pediatric population using MDI, there is limited pediatric specific literature. This article will describe current options, data-driven diabetes management, benefits, challenges and clinical use of SIP technology in the pediatric population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jeniece Ilkowitz
- The NYU Pediatric Diabetes Center,
Hassenfeld Childrens’ Hospital at NYU Langone, New York, NY, USA
- Jeniece Ilkowitz, RN, MA, CDCES, The NYU
Pediatric Diabetes Center, Hassenfeld Childrens’ Hospital at NYU Langone, 135
East 31st street, Floor 2, New York, NY 10016, USA.
| | - Vanessa Wissing
- The NYU Pediatric Diabetes Center,
Hassenfeld Childrens’ Hospital at NYU Langone, New York, NY, USA
| | - Mary Pat Gallagher
- The NYU Pediatric Diabetes Center,
Hassenfeld Childrens’ Hospital at NYU Langone, New York, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Jendle J. Analysis of " Glycemic Outcomes During Real-World Hybrid Closed-Loop System Use by Individuals With Type 1 Diabetes in the United States". J Diabetes Sci Technol 2022:19322968221091842. [PMID: 35466724 DOI: 10.1177/19322968221091842] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
In an article in the Journal of Diabetes Science and Technology, Arunachalum et al retrospectively analyzed glycemic outcomes, regarding the use of hybrid closed-loop (HCL) systems in individuals with type-1 diabetes (T1D) in the United States in a real-world evidence (RWE) setting. In clinical trials, diabetes technology has shown to improve time in range (TIR) as well as other glucose metrics. In the light of increasing the use of diabetes technology in the T1D population, why do we not see improvement in clinical outcomes? Is it cost-effective to increase the use diabetes technology? Does access to diabetes technology vary in the United States? There is a need for additional clinical studies evaluating the effectiveness of diabetes technology in T1D including health economic aspects.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Johan Jendle
- Institute of Medical Sciences, Örebro University, Örebro, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Affiliation(s)
- Mark A Sperling
- From the Department of Pediatrics, Division of Endocrinology and Diabetes, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York (M.A.S.); and the Pediatric, Adolescent, and Young Adult Section, Joslin Diabetes Center, and Harvard Medical School - both in Boston (L.M.L.)
| | - Lori M Laffel
- From the Department of Pediatrics, Division of Endocrinology and Diabetes, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York (M.A.S.); and the Pediatric, Adolescent, and Young Adult Section, Joslin Diabetes Center, and Harvard Medical School - both in Boston (L.M.L.)
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Anderson S, Atkins P, Bäckman P, Cipolla D, Clark A, Daviskas E, Disse B, Entcheva-Dimitrov P, Fuller R, Gonda I, Lundbäck H, Olsson B, Weers J. Inhaled Medicines: Past, Present, and Future. Pharmacol Rev 2022; 74:48-118. [PMID: 34987088 DOI: 10.1124/pharmrev.120.000108] [Citation(s) in RCA: 43] [Impact Index Per Article: 21.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/18/2020] [Accepted: 08/06/2021] [Indexed: 12/21/2022] Open
Abstract
The purpose of this review is to summarize essential pharmacological, pharmaceutical, and clinical aspects in the field of orally inhaled therapies that may help scientists seeking to develop new products. After general comments on the rationale for inhaled therapies for respiratory disease, the focus is on products approved approximately over the last half a century. The organization of these sections reflects the key pharmacological categories. Products for asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease include β -2 receptor agonists, muscarinic acetylcholine receptor antagonists, glucocorticosteroids, and cromones as well as their combinations. The antiviral and antibacterial inhaled products to treat respiratory tract infections are then presented. Two "mucoactive" products-dornase α and mannitol, which are both approved for patients with cystic fibrosis-are reviewed. These are followed by sections on inhaled prostacyclins for pulmonary arterial hypertension and the challenging field of aerosol surfactant inhalation delivery, especially for prematurely born infants on ventilation support. The approved products for systemic delivery via the lungs for diseases of the central nervous system and insulin for diabetes are also discussed. New technologies for drug delivery by inhalation are analyzed, with the emphasis on those that would likely yield significant improvements over the technologies in current use or would expand the range of drugs and diseases treatable by this route of administration. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: This review of the key aspects of approved orally inhaled drug products for a variety of respiratory diseases and for systemic administration should be helpful in making judicious decisions about the development of new or improved inhaled drugs. These aspects include the choices of the active ingredients, formulations, delivery systems suitable for the target patient populations, and, to some extent, meaningful safety and efficacy endpoints in clinical trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sandra Anderson
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia (S.A.); Inhaled Delivery Solutions LLC, Durham, North Carolina (P.A.); Emmace Consulting AB Medicon Village, Lund, Sweden (P.B., H.L., B.O.); Insmed Inc., Bridgewater, New Jersey (D.C.); Aerogen Pharma Corporation, San Mateo, California (A.C.); Woolcock Institute of Medical Research, Glebe, New South Wales, Australia (E.D.); Drug Development, Pharmacology and Clinical Pharmacology Consulting, Mainz, Germany (B.D.); Preferred Regulatory Consulting, San Mateo, California (P.E-.D.); Clayton, CA (R.F.); Respidex LLC, Dennis, Massachusetts (I.G.); and cystetic Medicines, Inc., Burlingame, California (J.W.)
| | - Paul Atkins
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia (S.A.); Inhaled Delivery Solutions LLC, Durham, North Carolina (P.A.); Emmace Consulting AB Medicon Village, Lund, Sweden (P.B., H.L., B.O.); Insmed Inc., Bridgewater, New Jersey (D.C.); Aerogen Pharma Corporation, San Mateo, California (A.C.); Woolcock Institute of Medical Research, Glebe, New South Wales, Australia (E.D.); Drug Development, Pharmacology and Clinical Pharmacology Consulting, Mainz, Germany (B.D.); Preferred Regulatory Consulting, San Mateo, California (P.E-.D.); Clayton, CA (R.F.); Respidex LLC, Dennis, Massachusetts (I.G.); and cystetic Medicines, Inc., Burlingame, California (J.W.)
| | - Per Bäckman
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia (S.A.); Inhaled Delivery Solutions LLC, Durham, North Carolina (P.A.); Emmace Consulting AB Medicon Village, Lund, Sweden (P.B., H.L., B.O.); Insmed Inc., Bridgewater, New Jersey (D.C.); Aerogen Pharma Corporation, San Mateo, California (A.C.); Woolcock Institute of Medical Research, Glebe, New South Wales, Australia (E.D.); Drug Development, Pharmacology and Clinical Pharmacology Consulting, Mainz, Germany (B.D.); Preferred Regulatory Consulting, San Mateo, California (P.E-.D.); Clayton, CA (R.F.); Respidex LLC, Dennis, Massachusetts (I.G.); and cystetic Medicines, Inc., Burlingame, California (J.W.)
| | - David Cipolla
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia (S.A.); Inhaled Delivery Solutions LLC, Durham, North Carolina (P.A.); Emmace Consulting AB Medicon Village, Lund, Sweden (P.B., H.L., B.O.); Insmed Inc., Bridgewater, New Jersey (D.C.); Aerogen Pharma Corporation, San Mateo, California (A.C.); Woolcock Institute of Medical Research, Glebe, New South Wales, Australia (E.D.); Drug Development, Pharmacology and Clinical Pharmacology Consulting, Mainz, Germany (B.D.); Preferred Regulatory Consulting, San Mateo, California (P.E-.D.); Clayton, CA (R.F.); Respidex LLC, Dennis, Massachusetts (I.G.); and cystetic Medicines, Inc., Burlingame, California (J.W.)
| | - Andrew Clark
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia (S.A.); Inhaled Delivery Solutions LLC, Durham, North Carolina (P.A.); Emmace Consulting AB Medicon Village, Lund, Sweden (P.B., H.L., B.O.); Insmed Inc., Bridgewater, New Jersey (D.C.); Aerogen Pharma Corporation, San Mateo, California (A.C.); Woolcock Institute of Medical Research, Glebe, New South Wales, Australia (E.D.); Drug Development, Pharmacology and Clinical Pharmacology Consulting, Mainz, Germany (B.D.); Preferred Regulatory Consulting, San Mateo, California (P.E-.D.); Clayton, CA (R.F.); Respidex LLC, Dennis, Massachusetts (I.G.); and cystetic Medicines, Inc., Burlingame, California (J.W.)
| | - Evangelia Daviskas
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia (S.A.); Inhaled Delivery Solutions LLC, Durham, North Carolina (P.A.); Emmace Consulting AB Medicon Village, Lund, Sweden (P.B., H.L., B.O.); Insmed Inc., Bridgewater, New Jersey (D.C.); Aerogen Pharma Corporation, San Mateo, California (A.C.); Woolcock Institute of Medical Research, Glebe, New South Wales, Australia (E.D.); Drug Development, Pharmacology and Clinical Pharmacology Consulting, Mainz, Germany (B.D.); Preferred Regulatory Consulting, San Mateo, California (P.E-.D.); Clayton, CA (R.F.); Respidex LLC, Dennis, Massachusetts (I.G.); and cystetic Medicines, Inc., Burlingame, California (J.W.)
| | - Bernd Disse
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia (S.A.); Inhaled Delivery Solutions LLC, Durham, North Carolina (P.A.); Emmace Consulting AB Medicon Village, Lund, Sweden (P.B., H.L., B.O.); Insmed Inc., Bridgewater, New Jersey (D.C.); Aerogen Pharma Corporation, San Mateo, California (A.C.); Woolcock Institute of Medical Research, Glebe, New South Wales, Australia (E.D.); Drug Development, Pharmacology and Clinical Pharmacology Consulting, Mainz, Germany (B.D.); Preferred Regulatory Consulting, San Mateo, California (P.E-.D.); Clayton, CA (R.F.); Respidex LLC, Dennis, Massachusetts (I.G.); and cystetic Medicines, Inc., Burlingame, California (J.W.)
| | - Plamena Entcheva-Dimitrov
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia (S.A.); Inhaled Delivery Solutions LLC, Durham, North Carolina (P.A.); Emmace Consulting AB Medicon Village, Lund, Sweden (P.B., H.L., B.O.); Insmed Inc., Bridgewater, New Jersey (D.C.); Aerogen Pharma Corporation, San Mateo, California (A.C.); Woolcock Institute of Medical Research, Glebe, New South Wales, Australia (E.D.); Drug Development, Pharmacology and Clinical Pharmacology Consulting, Mainz, Germany (B.D.); Preferred Regulatory Consulting, San Mateo, California (P.E-.D.); Clayton, CA (R.F.); Respidex LLC, Dennis, Massachusetts (I.G.); and cystetic Medicines, Inc., Burlingame, California (J.W.)
| | - Rick Fuller
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia (S.A.); Inhaled Delivery Solutions LLC, Durham, North Carolina (P.A.); Emmace Consulting AB Medicon Village, Lund, Sweden (P.B., H.L., B.O.); Insmed Inc., Bridgewater, New Jersey (D.C.); Aerogen Pharma Corporation, San Mateo, California (A.C.); Woolcock Institute of Medical Research, Glebe, New South Wales, Australia (E.D.); Drug Development, Pharmacology and Clinical Pharmacology Consulting, Mainz, Germany (B.D.); Preferred Regulatory Consulting, San Mateo, California (P.E-.D.); Clayton, CA (R.F.); Respidex LLC, Dennis, Massachusetts (I.G.); and cystetic Medicines, Inc., Burlingame, California (J.W.)
| | - Igor Gonda
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia (S.A.); Inhaled Delivery Solutions LLC, Durham, North Carolina (P.A.); Emmace Consulting AB Medicon Village, Lund, Sweden (P.B., H.L., B.O.); Insmed Inc., Bridgewater, New Jersey (D.C.); Aerogen Pharma Corporation, San Mateo, California (A.C.); Woolcock Institute of Medical Research, Glebe, New South Wales, Australia (E.D.); Drug Development, Pharmacology and Clinical Pharmacology Consulting, Mainz, Germany (B.D.); Preferred Regulatory Consulting, San Mateo, California (P.E-.D.); Clayton, CA (R.F.); Respidex LLC, Dennis, Massachusetts (I.G.); and cystetic Medicines, Inc., Burlingame, California (J.W.)
| | - Hans Lundbäck
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia (S.A.); Inhaled Delivery Solutions LLC, Durham, North Carolina (P.A.); Emmace Consulting AB Medicon Village, Lund, Sweden (P.B., H.L., B.O.); Insmed Inc., Bridgewater, New Jersey (D.C.); Aerogen Pharma Corporation, San Mateo, California (A.C.); Woolcock Institute of Medical Research, Glebe, New South Wales, Australia (E.D.); Drug Development, Pharmacology and Clinical Pharmacology Consulting, Mainz, Germany (B.D.); Preferred Regulatory Consulting, San Mateo, California (P.E-.D.); Clayton, CA (R.F.); Respidex LLC, Dennis, Massachusetts (I.G.); and cystetic Medicines, Inc., Burlingame, California (J.W.)
| | - Bo Olsson
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia (S.A.); Inhaled Delivery Solutions LLC, Durham, North Carolina (P.A.); Emmace Consulting AB Medicon Village, Lund, Sweden (P.B., H.L., B.O.); Insmed Inc., Bridgewater, New Jersey (D.C.); Aerogen Pharma Corporation, San Mateo, California (A.C.); Woolcock Institute of Medical Research, Glebe, New South Wales, Australia (E.D.); Drug Development, Pharmacology and Clinical Pharmacology Consulting, Mainz, Germany (B.D.); Preferred Regulatory Consulting, San Mateo, California (P.E-.D.); Clayton, CA (R.F.); Respidex LLC, Dennis, Massachusetts (I.G.); and cystetic Medicines, Inc., Burlingame, California (J.W.)
| | - Jeffry Weers
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia (S.A.); Inhaled Delivery Solutions LLC, Durham, North Carolina (P.A.); Emmace Consulting AB Medicon Village, Lund, Sweden (P.B., H.L., B.O.); Insmed Inc., Bridgewater, New Jersey (D.C.); Aerogen Pharma Corporation, San Mateo, California (A.C.); Woolcock Institute of Medical Research, Glebe, New South Wales, Australia (E.D.); Drug Development, Pharmacology and Clinical Pharmacology Consulting, Mainz, Germany (B.D.); Preferred Regulatory Consulting, San Mateo, California (P.E-.D.); Clayton, CA (R.F.); Respidex LLC, Dennis, Massachusetts (I.G.); and cystetic Medicines, Inc., Burlingame, California (J.W.)
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Newman C, Ero A, Dunne FP. Glycaemic control and novel technology management strategies in pregestational diabetes mellitus. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne) 2022; 13:1109825. [PMID: 36714590 PMCID: PMC9877346 DOI: 10.3389/fendo.2022.1109825] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/28/2022] [Accepted: 12/21/2022] [Indexed: 01/15/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Pregestational diabetes (PGDM) is an increasingly common and complex condition that infers risk to both mother and infant. To prevent serious morbidity, strict glycaemic control is essential. The aim of this review is to review the glucose sensing and insulin delivering technologies currently available for women with PGDM. METHODS We reviewed online databases for articles relating to technology use in pregnancy using a combination of keywords and MeSH headings. Relevant articles are included below. RESULTS A number of technological advancements have improved care and outcomes for women with PGDM. Real time continuous glucose monitoring (rtCGM) offers clear advantages in terms of infants size and neonatal intensive care unit admissions; and further benefits are seen when combined with continuous subcutaneous insulin delivery (insulin pump) and algorithms which continuously adjust insulin levels to glucose targets (hybrid closed loop). Other advancements including flash or intermittent scanning CGM (isCGM) and stand-alone insulin pumps do not confer as many advantages for women and their infants, however they are increasingly used outside of pregnancy and many women enter pregnancy already using these devices. DISCUSSION This article offers a discussion of the most commonly used technologies in pregnancy and evaluates their current and future roles.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christine Newman
- School of Medicine, College of Medicine, Nursing and Health Science, University of Galway, Galway, Ireland
- Department of Diabetes and Endocrinology, Galway University Hospital, Galway, Ireland
- Diabetes Collaborative Clinical Trials Network, University of Galway, Galway, Ireland
- *Correspondence: Christine Newman,
| | - Adesuwa Ero
- Department of Diabetes and Endocrinology, Galway University Hospital, Galway, Ireland
| | - Fidelma P. Dunne
- School of Medicine, College of Medicine, Nursing and Health Science, University of Galway, Galway, Ireland
- Department of Diabetes and Endocrinology, Galway University Hospital, Galway, Ireland
- Diabetes Collaborative Clinical Trials Network, University of Galway, Galway, Ireland
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Masierek M, Nabrdalik K, Janota O, Kwiendacz H, Macherski M, Gumprecht J. The Review of Insulin Pens-Past, Present, and Look to the Future. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne) 2022; 13:827484. [PMID: 35355552 PMCID: PMC8959107 DOI: 10.3389/fendo.2022.827484] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/02/2021] [Accepted: 02/02/2022] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Currently, there are about 150-200 million diabetic patients treated with insulin globally. The year 2021 is special because the 100th anniversary of the insulin discovery is being celebrated. It is a good occasion to sum up the insulin pen technology invention and improvement which are nowadays the leading mode of an insulin delivery. Even though so many years have passed, insulin is still administered subcutaneously, that is why devices to deliver it are of great importance. Insulin pens have evolved only through the last decades (the reusable, durable pens, and the disposable, prefilled pens) and modern smart insulin pens have been developed in the last few years, and both types of the devices compared to traditional syringes and vials are more convenient, discrete in use, have better dosing accuracy, and improve adherence. In this review, we will focus on the history of insulin pens and their improvement over the previous decades.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Małgorzata Masierek
- Department of Internal Medicine, Diabetology and Nephrology, Faculty of Medical Sciences in Zabrze, Medical University of Silesia, Katowice, Poland
| | - Katarzyna Nabrdalik
- Department of Internal Medicine, Diabetology and Nephrology, Faculty of Medical Sciences in Zabrze, Medical University of Silesia, Katowice, Poland
- *Correspondence: Katarzyna Nabrdalik,
| | - Oliwia Janota
- Students’ Scientific Association by the Department of Internal Medicine, Diabetology and Nephrology, Faculty of Medical Sciences in Zabrze, Medical University of Silesia, Katowice, Poland
| | - Hanna Kwiendacz
- Department of Internal Medicine, Diabetology and Nephrology, Faculty of Medical Sciences in Zabrze, Medical University of Silesia, Katowice, Poland
| | - Maksymilian Macherski
- Students’ Scientific Association by the Department of Internal Medicine, Diabetology and Nephrology, Faculty of Medical Sciences in Zabrze, Medical University of Silesia, Katowice, Poland
| | - Janusz Gumprecht
- Department of Internal Medicine, Diabetology and Nephrology, Faculty of Medical Sciences in Zabrze, Medical University of Silesia, Katowice, Poland
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Ospelt E, Noor N, Sanchez J, Nelson G, Rioles N, Malik FS, Basina M, Indyk J, Vendrame F, Schmitt J, Scott ML, Ebekozien O. Facilitators and Barriers to Smart Insulin Pen Use: A Mixed-Method Study of Multidisciplinary Stakeholders From Diabetes Teams in the United States. Clin Diabetes 2022; 41:56-67. [PMID: 36714258 PMCID: PMC9845084 DOI: 10.2337/cd22-0068] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/01/2023]
Abstract
This study sought to identify barriers and facilitators to successful smart insulin pen (SIP) use and gauge prescribing practices and integration into clinical practice by assessing provider and care team perspectives at participating endocrinology clinics within the T1D Exchange Quality Improvement Collaborative. The identified provider-related, patient-related, and clinic- and operational-level barriers and facilitators varied based on clinic knowledge, capacity, and resources. High-impact barriers included insurance coverage and prescribing processes; high-impact facilitators included improved diabetes clinic visit quality and use of SIPs as an alternative to insulin pump therapy. Findings indicated the need for provider and care team education and training on proper SIP features, use, and prescribing.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emma Ospelt
- T1D Exchange, Boston, MA
- Corresponding author: Emma Ospelt,
| | | | - Janine Sanchez
- University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Osagie Ebekozien
- T1D Exchange, Boston, MA
- University of Mississippi School of Population Health, Jackson, MS
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Abstract
Advances in glucose monitoring and insulin delivery technologies have led to the development of innovative self-management tools, such as continuous glucose monitoring, automated insulin delivery systems, and smart connected insulin pens. Although the clinical advantages of today's emerging diabetes technologies are well documented, the cost of integrating these tools into clinical practice must be considered to sustain the financial viability of both public and private insurers. Most clinicians are unfamiliar with the process the commercial insurers follow when making these decisions. This article reviews the key factors the insurers consider when determining eligibility criteria.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tim Nolan
- TEN Healthcare Strategies, Newtown, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Marie Frazzitta
- Abbott Diabetes Care, Department of Medical Affairs, Alameda, California, USA
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Shah NA, Levy CJ. Emerging technologies for the management of type 2 diabetes mellitus. J Diabetes 2021; 13:713-724. [PMID: 33909352 DOI: 10.1111/1753-0407.13188] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/21/2021] [Revised: 04/19/2021] [Accepted: 04/25/2021] [Indexed: 01/02/2023] Open
Abstract
Diabetes mellitus is a global health problem affecting 422 million people worldwide, of which 34.2 million live in the United States alone. Complications due to diabetes can lead to considerable morbidity and mortality related to both microvascular and macrovascular disease. While glycosylated hemoglobin testing is the standard test utilized to evaluate glycemic control, emerging targets like "time in range" and "glycemic variability" often provide more accurate assessments of glycemic fluctuations and have implications for diabetes complications and quality of life. Patients with diabetes face considerable burdens of self-care including frequent glucose monitoring, multiple insulin injections, dietary management, and the need to track daily activities, all of which lead to reduced adherence and psychological burnout. From the provider perspective, limited patient data and access to self-management tools lead to treatment inertia and a reduced ability to help patients achieve and maintain their glycemic goals. In the past few decades, there have been considerable advances in treatment-based technology and technological applications designed to help reduce patient burden and provide tools for better self-management. These advances make real-time clinical data available for clinicians to make necessary changes in treatment regimens. In this review, we discuss the latest emerging technologies available for the management of people with type 2 diabetes mellitus.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nirali A Shah
- Division of Endocrinology, Diabetes and Bone Metabolism, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA
| | - Carol J Levy
- Division of Endocrinology, Diabetes and Bone Metabolism, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Perkins BA, Sherr JL, Mathieu C. Type 1 diabetes glycemic management: Insulin therapy, glucose monitoring, and automation. Science 2021; 373:522-527. [PMID: 34326234 DOI: 10.1126/science.abg4502] [Citation(s) in RCA: 32] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
Abstract
Despite innovations in insulin therapy since its discovery, most patients living with type 1 diabetes do not achieve sufficient glycemic control to prevent complications, and they experience hypoglycemia, weight gain, and major self-care burden. Promising pharmacological advances in insulin therapy include the refinement of extremely rapid insulin analogs, alternate insulin-delivery routes, liver-selective insulins, add-on drugs that enhance insulin effect, and glucose-responsive insulin molecules. The greatest future impact will come from combining these pharmacological solutions with existing automated insulin delivery methods that integrate insulin pumps and glucose sensors. These systems will use algorithms enhanced by machine learning, supplemented by technologies that include activity monitors and sensors for other key metabolites such as ketones. The future challenges facing clinicians and researchers will be those of access and broad clinical implementation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bruce A Perkins
- Division of Endocrinology, Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
| | - Jennifer L Sherr
- Department of Pediatrics (Endocrinology), Yale School of Medicine, Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Chantal Mathieu
- Department of Endocrinology, UZ Gasthuisberg, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven (KULeuven), Leuven, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|