Blocking type TSH receptor antibodies

Graves disease: latest understanding of pathogenesis and treatment options

Graves disease is the most common cause of hyperthyroidism in iodine-sufficient areas. The main responsible mechanism is related to autoantibodies that bind and activate the thyrotropin receptor (TSHR). Although Graves hyperthyroidism is relatively common, no causal treatment options are available. Established treatment modalities are antithyroid drugs, which reduce thyroid hormone synthesis, radioactive iodine and surgery. However, emerging drugs that target the main autoantigen (monoclonal antibodies, small molecules, peptides) or block the immune pathway have been recently tested in clinical trials. Graves disease can involve the thyroid exclusively or it can be associated with extrathyroidal manifestations, among which Graves orbitopathy is the most common. The presence of Graves orbitopathy can change the management of the disease. An established treatment for moderate-to-severe Graves orbitopathy is intravenous glucocorticoids. However, recent advances in understanding the pathogenesis of Graves orbitopathy have allowed the development of new target-based therapies by blocking pro-inflammatory cytokine receptors, lymphocytic infiltration or the insulin-like growth factor 1 receptor (IGF1R), with several clinical trials providing promising results. This article reviews the new discoveries in the pathogenesis of Graves hyperthyroidism and Graves orbitopathy that offer several important tools in disease management.

US-based, Prospective, Blinded Study of Thyrotropin Receptor Antibody in Autoimmune Thyroid Disease

CONTEXT

Bioassays provide information on the functionality of thyrotropin receptor antibodies (TSH-R-Ab) and thus may offer more clinical utility than binding assays.

OBJECTIVE

In this prospective, blinded, US-based study, the clinical performance of several TSH-R-Ab assays was compared.

SETTING

US endocrinology clinic.

SUBJECTS

One hundred sixty-two unselected, consecutive, well-documented patients with various thyroid diseases and healthy controls.

INTERVENTION(S)

Blinded TSH-R-Ab measurements.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S)

Sensitivity and specificity of 4 TSH-R-Ab assays.

RESULTS

The 4 TSH-R-Ab assays were negative in all 42 patients without autoimmune thyroid disease (AITD). In 104 patients with Graves' disease (GD), irrespective of the disease duration, TSH-R-Ab positivity was present in 65 (63%), 67 (65%), and 87 (84%) for the Cobas and Immulite binding assays and stimulatory TSH-R-Ab [thyroid-stimulating immunoglobin (TSI)] bioassay, respectively (TSI vs Immulite P < .0025, TSI vs Cobas P < .0009). Fifteen newly diagnosed GD patients were all positive in the TSI bioassay, but only 11 (73%) were positive in the Cobas and Immulite binding assays. Nine GD patients with biochemical subclinical hyperthyroidism were TSI-positive but Immulite- and Cobas-negative. Two GD patients were blocking TSH-R-Ab [thyroid-blocking immunoglobin (TBI)]-positive and TSI-negative, and the Immulite and Cobas were positive in both. Additional serum samples from AITD patients that consisted of 30 TBI-positive and 10 TSI-positive samples were blindly tested in the binding assays. Only 6 of the 10 TSI-positive samples were positive in both binding assays, and 30 and 28 of the TBI-positive samples were positive in the Cobas and Immulite assays, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Binding TSH-R-Ab assays are less sensitive than TSI bioassays and are not specific for stimulating antibodies. Measuring the function of TSH-R-Ab in a bioassay can provide useful information to clinicians.

Understanding the clinical and molecular basis of thyroid orbitopathy: a review of recent evidence

Thyroid eye disease (TED) is an autoimmune orbital inflammatory disease which ranges from mild to severe. Tissue remodeling, fibrosis and fat proliferation cause changes in the orbital tissues which can affect esthetics and visual function. In its severe form, it is sight threatening, debilitating, and disfiguring and may lead to social stigma, the embarrassment about which has an impact on the quality of life of those affected and the family members. The pathogenesis of TED, which is influenced by genetic, immunological, and environmental factors, is complex and not fully elucidated. However, it remains unknown what factors determine the severity of the disease. Recent research has revealed a number of diagnostic and prognostic biomarkers of this disease. In this overview of TED, we focus on new insights and perspectives regarding biological agents that may provide a basis for new treatment modalities.

Receptor modulators associated with the hypothalamus -pituitary-thyroid axis

The hypothalamus-pituitary-thyroid (HPT) axis maintains normal metabolic balance and homeostasis in the human body through positive and negative feedback regulation. Its main regulatory mode is the secretion of thyrotropin (TSH), thyroid hormones (TH), and thyrotropin-releasing hormone (TRH). By binding to their corresponding receptors, they are involved in the development and progression of several systemic diseases, including digestive, cardiovascular, and central nervous system diseases. The HPT axis-related receptors include thyrotropin receptor (TSHR), thyroid hormone receptor (TR), and thyrotropin-releasing hormone receptor (TRHR). Recently, research on regulators has become popular in the field of biology. Several HPT axis-related receptor modulators have been used for clinical treatment. This study reviews the developments and recent findings on HPT axis-related receptor modulators. This will provide a theoretical basis for the development and utilisation of new modulators of the HPT axis receptors.

Comparison of two different TSH-receptor antibody assays: A clinical practice study

Background

Graves' disease (GD) is caused by the production of TSH-receptor (TSHR) stimulating auto-antibodies. Over the years various TSHR-antibody (TRAb) detection assays have been developed. Most clinical laboratories use competitive TSH-binding inhibitory immunoglobulin (TBII) assays, which measure the total amount of stimulating and blocking auto-antibodies. Selective detection of TSHR stimulating auto-antibodies (TSI) was previously only possible with functional cell-based bioassays. However, more recently an automated bridge-based binding assay to more specifically measure TSI has become available. The aim of our study was to compare the third-generation automated competitive immunoassay (TBII) with the automated bridge immunoassay (TSI) in clinical practice in an academic thyroid expert center.

Methods

A retrospective study in 356 patients with Graves' disease, Graves orbitopathy (GO), and other (thyroid) disease treated in an academic thyroid center was performed. All samples were analyzed for TBII and TSI. For both assays, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PVV), negative predictive value (NPV) and diagnostic odds ratios were calculated using different cut-offs for negativity.

Results

Using the provided cut-off, the overall sensitivity appeared similar between TBII and TSI, but TSI showed higher overall specificity, PPV, NPV and diagnostic odds ratio. Using two or three times the cut-off for negativity resulted in a decrease in sensitivity, but an increase in specificity and PPV, which was most pronounced for the TBII-assay. Analysis in a subgroup of newly diagnosed treatment naïve GD/GO patients also revealed overall favorable results for the TSI-assay. Increasing the cut-off for negativity resulted in increased specificity for both assays, with similar results using two or three times the cut-off. Most patients with concordant positive results for TBII and TSI suffered from GD or GD + GO (n = 110, 95.6 %), while patients negative for both TBII and TSI mostly suffered from other (thyroid) disease (n = 143, 77.3 %). From patients with positive TBII but negative TSI only 42.1 % had GD/GO (n = 16), whereas 57.9 % (n = 22) had other (thyroid) disease. In contrast, 88.9 % of patients with positive TSI but negative TBII had GD/GO (n = 16), whereas 11.1 % (n = 2) had other (thyroid) disease.

Conclusion

In our academic thyroid center, the diagnostic performance of the TSI-assay outperformed the TBII-assay. Using a higher cut-off value for negativity can be helpful in assessing clinical relevance.

Influence of Thyroid Peroxidase Antibodies Serum Levels in Graves' Disease: A Retrospective Cohort Study

Purpose Graves' disease (GD) is an autoimmune disorder caused by the presence of antibodies to the thyroid stimulating hormone (TSH) receptor (TRAbs), usually presenting with clinical signs of hyperthyroidism. Previous evidence suggests that higher serum levels of thyroid peroxidase antibodies (TPOAbs) may lead to more sustained remission of hyperthyroidism after treatment with antithyroid drugs (AT). However, doubts about the influence of TPOAbs in Graves' disease outcomes still remain. Methods A retrospective, unicenter cohort study was performed. All patients with GD (TRAbs > 1.58U/L), biochemical primary hyperthyroidism (TSH < 0.4 µUI/mL), and TPOAbs measurement at diagnosis, treated with AT between January 2008 and January 2021, were included for analysis. Results One hundred and forty-two patients (113 women) with a mean age of 52 ± 15 years old were included. They were followed up for 65.4 ± 43.8 months. TPOAbs positivity was present in 71.10% (n=101) of those patients. Patients were treated with AT for a median of 18 (IQR (12; 24)) months. Remission occurred in 47.2% of patients. Patients with remission presented with lower TRAbs and free thyroxine (FT4) levels at the diagnosis. (p-value <0.001, p-value 0.003, respectively). No association was found in the median TPOAbs serum levels of patients who remitted and those who maintained biochemical hyperthyroidism after the first course of AT. Relapse of hyperthyroidism occurred in 54 patients (57.4%). No difference was found in TPOAbs serum levels regarding the patient's relapse. Moreover, a time-based analysis revealed no differences in the relapse rate after 18 months of AT therapy between patients with and without TPOAbs positivity at the diagnosis (p-value 0.176). It was found a weak positive correlation (r=0.295; p-value <0.05) between TRAbs and TPOAbs titters at the moment of Graves' diagnosis. Conclusion In this study, a correlation between TRAbs measurements and TPOAbs titter was described, although no significant association was found between the presence of TPOAbs and the outcomes of patients with GD treated with AT. These results do not support the use of TPOAbs as a useful biomarker to predict remission or relapse of hyperthyroidism in GD patients.

Allosteric Regulation of G-Protein-Coupled Receptors: From Diversity of Molecular Mechanisms to Multiple Allosteric Sites and Their Ligands

Allosteric regulation is critical for the functioning of G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) and their signaling pathways. Endogenous allosteric regulators of GPCRs are simple ions, various biomolecules, and protein components of GPCR signaling (G proteins and β-arrestins). The stability and functional activity of GPCR complexes is also due to multicenter allosteric interactions between protomers. The complexity of allosteric effects caused by numerous regulators differing in structure, availability, and mechanisms of action predetermines the multiplicity and different topology of allosteric sites in GPCRs. These sites can be localized in extracellular loops; inside the transmembrane tunnel and in its upper and lower vestibules; in cytoplasmic loops; and on the outer, membrane-contacting surface of the transmembrane domain. They are involved in the regulation of basal and orthosteric agonist-stimulated receptor activity, biased agonism, GPCR-complex formation, and endocytosis. They are targets for a large number of synthetic allosteric regulators and modulators, including those constructed using molecular docking. The review is devoted to the principles and mechanisms of GPCRs allosteric regulation, the multiplicity of allosteric sites and their topology, and the endogenous and synthetic allosteric regulators, including autoantibodies and pepducins. The allosteric regulation of chemokine receptors, proteinase-activated receptors, thyroid-stimulating and luteinizing hormone receptors, and beta-adrenergic receptors are described in more detail.

TSAb/TRAb ratio as a sensitive screening test for active Graves' orbitopathy

OBJECTIVE

Graves' orbitopathy (GO), an extrathyroidal manifestation of Graves' disease, can seriously threaten the patient's quality of life. Given that immunosuppressive treatment during the early active phase of GO has been found to reduce both disease activity and severity, sensitive screening tests are needed.

METHODS

The present study included 86 patients with GO, in whom serum levels of thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH), free T3, free T4, thyroid-stimulating antibody, TSH receptor antibody, thyroid peroxidase antibody, thyroglobulin, and thyroglobulin antibody were measured within 2 months before magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)for orbit assessment.

RESULTS

The thyroid-stimulating antibody/TSH receptor antibody ratio was able to distinguish MRI results with a correct classification rate of 81%. When focusing on patients without T3 predominant Graves' diseases, the ratio distinguished MRI results at a rate of 92%. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis revealed a cutoff antibody ratio of 87, which yielded a sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio, and negative likelihood ratio of 91%, 95%, 18.2, and 0.0957, respectively, for distinguished MRI results.

CONCLUSIONS

The thyroid-stimulating antibody/TSH receptor antibody ratio is a highly sensitive and specific indicator for active GO, especially in patients without T3 predominance, and serves as a good screening test for active GO in primary care settings.

TSH-receptor autoantibodies in patients with chronic thyroiditis and hypothyroidism

OBJECTIVES

The reported prevalence of TSH-receptor (TSHR) autoantibodies (TRAb) in patients with chronic thyroiditis (CT) range from 0 to 48%. The objective was to study the prevalence of TRAb in patients with CT and hypothyroidism and to correlate it with gender, age, thyroid dimensions, TSH levels, and autoimmune diseases.

METHODS

The study comprised 245 patients with CT and hypothyroidism (median age 42 years, 193 females, 52 males) and 123 Italian healthy subjects matched for sex and age as controls. TRAb were tested with ELISA using a >2.5 IU/L cut off for positivity. TSHR blocking (TBAb) and TSHR stimulating autoantibodies (TSAb) were measured in 12 TRAb-positive patients using bioassays with Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cells expressing wild-type or R255D-mutated TSHR.

RESULTS

TRAb positivity was found in 32/245 (13.1%) patients and significantly correlated (p<0.05) with TSH levels. TRAb positivity was significantly higher in males vs. females (p=0.034), in females 16-45 years of age vs. >45 years of age (p<0.05) and in patients with reduced vs. normal/increased thyroid dimensions (p<0.05). Linear regression analysis showed a correlation between TRAb concentrations with age (p<0.05) and TRAb concentrations with TSH (p<0.01). In bioassay with TSHR-R255D all 12 patients tested were TBAb-positive while 33% were also TSAb-positive suggesting the presence of a mixture of TRAbs with different biological activities in some patients.

CONCLUSIONS

TRAb have been found in patients with CT and hypothyroidism. A mixture of TBAb and TSAb was found in some patients and this may contribute to the pathogenesis of thyroid dysfunction during the course of the disease.

Characterization of apparently paradoxical thyrotropin binding inhibitory immunoglobulins with neutral bioactivity

Context

The thyrotropin (TSH) receptor (TSH-R) autoantibody activity is clinically measured by inhibition of labeled ligand (TSH or M22) binding to the TSH-R (TSH-binding inhibitory immunoglobulin [TBII]) or by stimulation (TSH-R stimulating antibody [TSAb]) or inhibition (TSH-R blocking antibody [TSBAb]) of 3′,5′-cyclic adenosine 5′-monophosphate (cAMP) production in isolated cells.

Objective

We experienced a patient with hypothyroid Graves disease (GD) having strong positive TBII but with almost neutral bioactivities on the TSH-R. The aim of this study is the characterization of this apparently paradoxical TBII (serum sample S).

Methods

We first compared the TBII, TSAb, and TSBAb activities of serum sample S with mixtures of stimulating (S-mAb) and blocking monoclonal Ab (B-mAb). Next, we serially measured cAMPs stimulated by various serum samples in the presence or absence of TSH.

Results

Mixtures of S-mAb and B-mAb did not reproduce the characteristics of serum sample S. Instead, serum sample S had a unique feature that blocked the TSH-stimulated cAMP initially but disappeared the blocking activity thereafter to reach the control level.

Conclusion

We present here the TBIIs with neutral bioactivities found in the patient with autoimmune thyroid disease, which strongly inhibit TSH binding to the TSH-R but exerts neither TSAb nor TSBAb activity. Differences in the methods of detecting TRAb between TBII in vitro and bioassay may cause the discrepancy. Although serum sample S may be an extreme example, a variety of TRAb that not only stimulates or blocks but also interferes with TSH-R binding for only a short time may exist in the serum samples of GD patients.

Inhibition of TSH/IGF-1 Receptor Crosstalk by Teprotumumab as a Treatment Modality of Thyroid Eye Disease

CONTEXT

We previously presented evidence that TSH receptor (TSHR)-stimulating autoantibodies (TSAbs) bind to and activate TSHRs but do not bind to IGF1 receptors (IGF1Rs). Nevertheless, we showed that IGF1Rs were involved in thyroid eye disease (TED) pathogenesis because TSAbs activated crosstalk between TSHR and IGF1R. Teprotumumab, originally generated to inhibit IGF1 binding to IGF1R, was recently approved for the treatment of TED (Tepezza).

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the role of TSHR/IGF1R crosstalk in teprotumumab treatment of TED.

DESIGN

We used orbital fibroblasts from patients with TED (TEDOFs) and measured stimulated hyaluronan (HA) secretion as a measure of orbital fibroblast activation by TED immunoglobulins (TED-Igs) and monoclonal TSAb M22. We previously showed that M22, which does not bind to IGF1R, stimulated HA in a biphasic dose-response with the higher potency phase dependent on TSHR/IGF1R crosstalk and the lower potency phase independent of IGF1R. Stimulation by TED-Igs and M22 was measured in the absence or presence of teprotumumab biosimilar (Tepro) or K1-70, an antibody that inhibits TSHR.

RESULTS

We show: (1) Tepro dose-dependently inhibits stimulation by TED-Igs; (2) Tepro does not bind to TSHRs; (3) Tepro inhibits IGF1R-dependent M22-induced HA production, which is mediated by TSHR/IGF1R crosstalk, but not IGF1R-independent M22 stimulation; and (4) β-arrestin 1 knockdown, which blocks TSHR/IGF1R crosstalk and prevents Tepro inhibition of HA production by M22 and by a pool of TED-Igs.

CONCLUSION

We conclude that Tepro inhibits HA production by TEDOFs by inhibiting TSHR/IGF1R crosstalk and suggest that inhibition of TSHR/IGF1R crosstalk is the mechanism of its action in treating TED.

CAR-T Cells Targeting TSHR Demonstrate Safety and Potent Preclinical Activity Against Differentiated Thyroid Cancer

BACKGROUND

Chimeric antigen receptor T cells (CAR-Ts) have demonstrated remarkable efficacy in hematological cancers but have not yet translated in treating solid tumors. The significant hurdles limiting CAR-T therapy were from a paucity of differentially expressed cell surface molecules on solid tumors that can be safely targeted. Here, we present TSH receptor (TSHR) as a putative target for CAR-T therapy of differentiated thyroid cancer (DTC).

METHODS

We undertook a large-scale screen on thyroid cancer tissues and multiple internal organs through bioinformatical analysis and immunohistochemistry to date TSHR expression. Using 3 previously described monoclonal antibodies, we generated 3 third-generation CAR-Ts. We tested anti-TSHR CAR-T in vitro activity by T-cell function and killing assay. Then we tested preclinical therapeutical efficacy in a xenograft mouse model of DTC and analyzed mice's physical conditions and histological abnormalities to evaluate anti-TSHR CAR-T's safety.

RESULTS

TSHR is highly and homogeneously expressed on 90.8% (138/152) of papillary thyroid cancer, 89.2% (33/37) of follicular thyroid cancer, 78.2% (18/23) of cervical lymph node metastases, and 86.7% of radioactive iodine resistance diseases. We developed 3 novel anti-TSHR CAR-Ts from monoclonal antibodies M22, K1-18, and K1-70; all 3 CAR-Ts mediate significant antitumor activity in vitro. Among these, we demonstrate that K1-70 CAR-T can have therapeutical efficacy in vivo, and no apparent toxicity has been observed.

CONCLUSION

TSHR is a latent target antigen of CAR-T therapy for DTC. Anti-TSHR CAR-T could represent a therapeutic option for patients with locoregional relapsed or distant metastases of thyroid cancer and should be tested in carefully designed clinical trials.

Thyroid eye disease: From pathogenesis to targeted therapies

Thyroid eye disease (TED) is the most common extrathyroidal manifestation of autoimmune Graves’ hyperthyroidism. TED is a debilitating and potentially blinding disease with unclear pathogenesis. Autoreactive inflammatory reactions targeting orbital fibroblasts (OFs) lead to the expansion of orbital adipose tissues and extraocular muscle swelling within the fixed bony orbit. There are many recent advances in the understating of molecular pathogenesis of TED. The production of autoantibodies to cross-linked thyroid-stimulating hormone receptor and insulin-like growth factor-1 receptor (IGF-1R) activates OFs to produce significant cytokines and chemokines and hyaluronan production and to induce adipocyte differentiation. In moderately severe active TED patients, multicenter clinical trials showed that inhibition of IGF-1R with teprotumumab was unprecedentedly effective with minimal side effects. The emergence of novel biologics resulted in a paradigm shift in the treatment of TED. We here review the literature on advances of pathogenesis of TED and promising therapeutic targets and drugs.

A rapid homogenous bioassay for detection of thyroid-stimulating antibodies based on a luminescent cyclic AMP biosensor

Graves' disease (GD) is an autoimmune disease caused by antibodies to the thyroid stimulating hormone receptor (TSHR). The FDA-cleared Thyretain™ TSI bioassay is a highly specific method to detect thyroid stimulating antibodies (TSAb/TSI) in the blood of patients with autoimmune thyroid disease (AITD), particularly GD. To simplify the workflow of this bioassay and to support a semi-quantitative result, we have generated a stable CHO-K1 cell line expressing both a chimeric TSH receptor (TSHR-Mc4) and a luciferase-based homogeneous cAMP biosensor (GS luciferase). Here, we describe a rapid, real-time, homogenous bioassay (Turbo™ TSI Bioassay) to directly assess the functional activity of TSI and produce results in International Units of IU/L. The Turbo™ TSI bioassay works by measuring changes in the intracellular cAMP level induced by a G-protein coupled receptor (G-PCR) signaling cascade which is triggered by the binding of TSI to the TSHR. Upon binding to cAMP, the GS luciferase reporter is activated through conformational changes and generates light that can be measured in intact cells with a luminometer. The LoD and LoQ of the assay were determined to be 0.016 IU/L and 0.03 IU/L, respectively and the preliminary assay cutoff was determined to be 0.024 IU/L by ROC analysis using the Thyretain™ TSI bioassay results as reference. The analytical performance of the Turbo™ TSI bioassay is comparable to the Thyretain™ TSI bioassay as evidenced by similar EC₅₀ values for a TSHR stimulating monoclonal antibody (M22). The specificity of the Turbo™ TSI bioassay was demonstrated by showing no response to a high concentration of a human monoclonal TSHR blocking antibody (K1-70). The precision of the assay was excellent with an overall within-laboratory precision <15% CV. When testing 198 clinical samples, the positive and negative percent agreement between the Turbo™ TSI and the Thyretain™ TSI bioassays were 98.7% and 93.5%, respectively. While both bioassays yield equivalent analytical and clinical performances, the Turbo™ TSI bioassay is much simpler to perform. It does not require cell culture, sample dilution, washing or cell lysis steps, resulting in a dramatically reduced turnaround time from about 21 h to 60 min. In addition, the same cell line showed its capability of detecting thyroid blocking antibodies (TBAb/TBI) in a competitive format. The Turbo™ TSI bioassay is user-friendly and is a very promising advancement to aid the diagnosis of autoimmune thyroid disease (AITD).

Management of Graves Thyroidal and Extrathyroidal Disease: An Update

CONTEXT

Invited update on the management of systemic autoimmune Graves disease (GD) and associated Graves orbitopathy (GO).

EVIDENCE ACQUISITION

Guidelines, pertinent original articles, systemic reviews, and meta-analyses.

EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS

Thyrotropin receptor antibodies (TSH-R-Abs), foremost the stimulatory TSH-R-Abs, are a specific biomarker for GD. Their measurement assists in the differential diagnosis of hyperthyroidism and offers accurate and rapid diagnosis of GD. Thyroid ultrasound is a sensitive imaging tool for GD. Worldwide, thionamides are the favored treatment (12-18 months) of newly diagnosed GD, with methimazole (MMI) as the preferred drug. Patients with persistently high TSH-R-Abs and/or persistent hyperthyroidism at 18 months, or with a relapse after completing a course of MMI, can opt for a definitive therapy with radioactive iodine (RAI) or total thyroidectomy (TX). Continued long-term, low-dose MMI administration is a valuable and safe alternative. Patient choice, both at initial presentation of GD and at recurrence, should be emphasized. Propylthiouracil is preferred to MMI during the first trimester of pregnancy. TX is best performed by a high-volume thyroid surgeon. RAI should be avoided in GD patients with active GO, especially in smokers. Recently, a promising therapy with an anti-insulin-like growth factor-1 monoclonal antibody for patients with active/severe GO was approved by the Food and Drug Administration. COVID-19 infection is a risk factor for poorly controlled hyperthyroidism, which contributes to the infection-related mortality risk. If GO is not severe, systemic steroid treatment should be postponed during COVID-19 while local treatment and preventive measures are offered.

CONCLUSIONS

A clear trend towards serological diagnosis and medical treatment of GD has emerged.

Targeting TSH and IGF-1 Receptors to Treat Thyroid Eye Disease

Graves' disease (GD) is an autoimmune disease caused in part by thyroid-stimulating antibodies (TSAbs) that activate the thyroid-stimulating hormone receptor (TSHR). In Graves' hyperthyroidism (GH), TSAbs cause persistent stimulation of thyroid cells leading to continuous thyroid hormone synthesis and secretion. Thyroid eye disease (TED), also called Graves' orbitopathy, is an orbital manifestation of GD. We review the important roles of the TSHR and the insulin-like growth factor 1 receptor (IGF-1R) in the pathogenesis of TED and discuss a model of TSHR/IGF-1R crosstalk that considers two pathways initiated by TSAb activation of TSHR in the eye, an IGF-1R-independent and an IGF-1R-dependent signaling pathway leading to hyaluronan (HA) secretion in orbital fibroblasts. We discuss current and future therapeutic approaches targeting the IGF-1R and TSHR. Teprotumumab, a human monoclonal anti-IGF-1R-blocking antibody, has been approved as an effective treatment in patients with TED. However, as the TSHR seems to be the primary target for TSAbs in patients with GD, future therapeutic interventions directly targeting the TSHR, e.g. blocking antibodies and small molecule antagonists, are being developed and have the advantage to inhibit the IGF-1R-independent as well as the IGF-1R-dependent component of TSAb-induced HA secretion. Antigen-specific immunotherapies using TSHR peptides to reduce serum TSHR antibodies are being developed also. These TSHR-targeted strategies also have the potential to treat both GH and TED with the same drug. We propose that combination therapy targeting TSHR and IGF-1R may be an effective and better tolerated treatment strategy for TED.

Epstein-Barr Virus Reactivation-Induced Immunoglobulin Production: Significance on Autoimmunity

Epstein–Barr virus (EBV) mainly persists in B cells, which differentiate into antibody-producing cells, and thus, EBV has been implicated in autoimmune diseases. We aimed to describe the EBV reactivation and its relevance to autoimmune disease, focusing on Graves’ disease, which is an autoimmune hyperthyroidism caused by thyrotropin receptor antibodies. Circulating autoreactive B cells that have evaded from the selection have difficulties differentiating to produce antibodies. However, once EBV infects such B cells and reactivates, the B cells may become plasma cells and produce autoantibody. We herein proposed an EBV reactivation-induced Ig production system, which is a distinct pathway from the antibody production system through germinal centers and bone marrow and has the following characteristics: 1. IgM dominance, 2. ubiquitous Ig production, and 3. the rescue of autoreactive B cells, which skews Ig production toward autoantigens. IgM autoantibodies induced by EBV reactivation may activate the classical complement pathway and injure healthy tissue, which supply autoantigens for the production of affinity-matured IgG autoantibodies. Antibodies induced by EBV reactivation may play important roles in the development and exacerbation of autoimmune diseases.

Is There Evidence for IGF1R-Stimulating Abs in Graves' Orbitopathy Pathogenesis?

In this review, we summarize the evidence against direct stimulation of insulin-like growth factor 1 receptors (IGF1Rs) by autoantibodies in Graves' orbitopathy (GO) pathogenesis. We describe a model of thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH) receptor (TSHR)/IGF1R crosstalk and present evidence that observations indicating IGF1R's role in GO could be explained by this mechanism. We evaluate the evidence for and against IGF1R as a direct target of stimulating IGF1R antibodies (IGF1RAbs) and conclude that GO pathogenesis does not involve directly stimulating IGF1RAbs. We further conclude that the preponderance of evidence supports TSHR as the direct and only target of stimulating autoantibodies in GO and maintain that the TSHR should remain a major target for further development of a medical therapy for GO in concert with drugs that target TSHR/IGF1R crosstalk.

Graves' disease

Graves' disease (GD) is an autoimmune disease that primarily affects the thyroid gland. It is the most common cause of hyperthyroidism and occurs at all ages but especially in women of reproductive age. Graves' hyperthyroidism is caused by autoantibodies to the thyroid-stimulating hormone receptor (TSHR) that act as agonists and induce excessive thyroid hormone secretion, releasing the thyroid gland from pituitary control. TSHR autoantibodies also underlie Graves' orbitopathy (GO) and pretibial myxoedema. Additionally, the pathophysiology of GO (and likely pretibial myxoedema) involves the synergism of insulin-like growth factor 1 receptor (IGF1R) with TSHR autoantibodies, causing retro-orbital tissue expansion and inflammation. Although the aetiology of GD remains unknown, evidence indicates a strong genetic component combined with random potential environmental insults in an immunologically susceptible individual. The treatment of GD has not changed substantially for many years and remains a choice between antithyroid drugs, radioiodine or surgery. However, antithyroid drug use can cause drug-induced embryopathy in pregnancy, radioiodine therapy can exacerbate GO and surgery can result in hypoparathyroidism or laryngeal nerve damage. Therefore, future studies should focus on improved drug management, and a number of important advances are on the horizon.

Preclinical studies on the toxicology, pharmacokinetics and safety of K1-70TM a human monoclonal autoantibody to the TSH receptor with TSH antagonist activity

Background

The human monoclonal autoantibody K1-70™ binds to the TSH receptor (TSHR) with high affinity and blocks TSHR cyclic AMP stimulation by TSH and thyroid stimulating autoantibodies.

Methods

The preclinical toxicology assessment following weekly intravenous (IV) or intramuscular (IM) administration of K1-70™ in rats and cynomolgus monkeys for 29 days was carried out. An assessment of delayed onset toxicity and/or reversibility of toxicity was made during a further 4 week treatment free period. The pharmacokinetic parameters of K1-70™ and the effects of different doses of K1-70™ on serum thyroid hormone levels in the study animals were determined in rats and primates after IV and IM administration.

Results

Low serum levels of T3 and T4 associated with markedly elevated levels of TSH were observed in the study animals following IV and IM administration of K1-70™. The toxicological findings were attributed to the pharmacology of K1-70™ and were consistent with the hypothyroid state. The no observable adverse effect level (NOAEL) could not be established in the rat study while in the primate study it was 100 mg/kg/dose for both males and females.

Conclusions

The toxicology, pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic data in this preclinical study were helpful in designing the first in human study with K1-70™ administered to subjects with Graves’ disease.

Crystal structure of a ligand-free stable TSH receptor leucine-rich repeat domain

The crystal structures of the thyroid-stimulating hormone receptor (TSHR) leucine-rich repeat domain (amino acids 22-260; TSHR260) in complex with a stimulating human monoclonal autoantibody (M22TM) and in complex with a blocking human autoantibody (K1-70™) have been solved. However, attempts to purify and crystallise free TSHR260, that is not bound to an autoantibody, have been unsuccessful due to the poor stability of free TSHR260. We now describe a TSHR260 mutant that has been stabilised by the introduction of six mutations (H63C, R112P, D143P, D151E, V169R and I253R) to form TSHR260-JMG55TM, which is approximately 900 times more thermostable than wild-type TSHR260. These six mutations did not affect the binding of human TSHR monoclonal autoantibodies or patient serum TSHR autoantibodies to the TSHR260. Furthermore, the response of full-length TSHR to stimulation by TSH or human TSHR monoclonal autoantibodies was not affected by the six mutations. Thermostable TSHR260-JMG55TM has been purified and crystallised without ligand and the structure solved at 2.83 Å resolution. This is the first reported structure of a glycoprotein hormone receptor crystallised without ligand. The unbound TSHR260-JMG55TM structure and the M22 and K1-70 bound TSHR260 structures are remarkably similar except for small changes in side chain conformations. This suggests that neither the mutations nor the binding of M22TM or K1-70TM change the rigid leucine-rich repeat domain structure of TSHR260. The solved TSHR260-JMG55TM structure provides a rationale as to why the six mutations have a thermostabilising effect and provides helpful guidelines for thermostabilisation strategies of other soluble protein domains.

Potential Roles of CD34+ Fibrocytes Masquerading as Orbital Fibroblasts in Thyroid-Associated Ophthalmopathy

CONTEXT

Orbital tissues in thyroid-associated ophthalmopathy exhibit particular reactivity and undergo characteristic remodeling. Mechanisms underlying these changes have remained largely unexplained. Studies have characterized orbital connective tissues and derivative fibroblasts to gain insights into local manifestations of a systemic autoimmune syndrome.

EVIDENCE ACQUISITION

A systematic search of PubMed was undertaken for studies related to thyroid-associated ophthalmopathy (TAO), orbital fibroblasts, and fibrocytes involved in pathogenesis.

EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS

Orbital tissues display marked cellular heterogeneity. Fibroblast subsets, putatively derived from multiple precursors, inhabit the orbit in TAO. Among them are cells displaying the CD34+CXC chemokine receptor 4+collagen I+ phenotype, identifying them as fibrocytes, derived from the monocyte lineage. Their unique presence in the TAO orbit helps explain the tissue reactivity and characteristic remodeling that occurs in the disease. Their unanticipated expression of several proteins traditionally thought to be thyroid gland specific, including the TSH receptor and thyroglobulin, may underlie orbital involvement in Graves disease. Although no currently available information unambiguously establishes that CD34+ orbital fibroblasts originate from circulating fibrocytes, inferences from animal models of lung disease suggest that they derive from bone marrow. Further studies are necessary to determine whether fibrocyte abundance and activity in the orbit determine the clinical behavior of TAO.

CONCLUSION

Evidence supports a role for fibrocytes in the pathogenesis of TAO. Recognition of their presence in the orbit now allows development of therapies specifically targeting these cells that ultimately could allow the restoration of immune tolerance within the orbit and perhaps systemically.

Thyrotropin Receptor Blocking Antibodies

Autoantibodies (Ab) against the thyroid-stimulating hormone receptor (TSHR) are frequently found in autoimmune thyroid disease (AITD). Autoantibodies to the TSHR (anti-TSHR-Ab) may mimic or block the action of TSH or be functionally neutral. Measurement of anti-TSHR-Ab can be done either via competitive-binding immunoassays or with functional cell-based bioassays. Antibody-binding assays do not assess anti-TSHR-Ab functionality, but rather measure the concentration of total anti-TSHR binding activity. In contrast, functional cell-based bioassays indicate whether anti-TSHR-Ab have stimulatory or blocking activity. Historically bioassays for anti-TSHR-Ab were research tools and were used to study the pathophysiology of Graves' disease and Hashimoto's thyroiditis. In the past, bioassays for anti-TSHR-Abs were laborious and time-consuming and varied widely in performance from laboratory to laboratory. Recent advances in the development of cell-based assays, including the application of molecular engineering, have led to significant improvements that have enabled bioassays to be employed routinely in clinical laboratories. The prevalence and functional significance of TSHR blocking autoantibodies (TBAb) in autoimmune hypothyroidism has been less well investigated compared to TSHR stimulating Ab. There is an increasing body of data, however, that demonstrate the clinical utility and relevance of TBAb, and thus the importance of TBAb bioassays, in the diagnosis and management of patients with AITD. In the present review, we summarize the different methods used to measure TBAb, and discuss their prevalence and clinical relevance.

ANNIVERSARY REVIEW: Antithyroid drug therapy: 70 years later

The thionamide antithyroid drugs were discovered in large part following serendipitous observations by a number of investigators in the 1940s who found that sulfhydryl-containing compounds were goitrogenic in animals. This prompted Prof. Edwin B Astwood to pioneer the use of these compounds to treat hyperthyroidism in the early 1940s and to develop the more potent and less toxic drugs that are used today. Despite their simple molecular structure and ease of use, many uncertainties remain, including their mechanism(s) of action, clinical role, optimal use in pregnancy and the prediction and prevention of rare but potentially life-threatening adverse reactions. In this review, we summarize the history of the development of these drugs and outline their current role in the clinical management of patients with hyperthyroidism.

Nonthionamide Drugs for the Treatment of Hyperthyroidism: From Present to Future

Hyperthyroidism is a common endocrine disease. Although thionamide antithyroid drugs are the cornerstone of hyperthyroidism treatment, some patients cannot tolerate this drug class because of its serious side effects including agranulocytosis, hepatotoxicity, and vasculitis. Therefore, nonthionamide antithyroid drugs (NTADs) still have an important role in controlling hyperthyroidism in clinical practice. Furthermore, some situations such as thyroid storm or preoperative preparation require a rapid decrease in thyroid hormone by combination treatment with multiple classes of antithyroid drugs. NTADs include iodine-containing compounds, lithium carbonate, perchlorate, glucocorticoid, and cholestyramine. In this narrative review, we summarize the mechanisms of action, indications, dosages, and side effects of currently used NTADs for the treatment of hyperthyroidism. In addition, we also describe the state-of-the-art in future drugs under development including rituximab, small-molecule ligands (SMLs), and monoclonal antibodies with a thyroid-stimulating hormone receptor (TSHR) antagonist effect.

Thyroid Autoantibodies Display both "Original Antigenic Sin" and Epitope Spreading

Evidence for original antigenic sin in spontaneous thyroid autoimmunity is revealed by autoantibody interactions with immunodominant regions on thyroid autoantigens, thyroglobulin (Tg), thyroid peroxidase (TPO), and the thyrotropin receptor (TSHR) A-subunit. In contrast, antibodies induced by immunization of rabbits or mice recognize diverse epitopes. Recognition of immunodominant regions persists despite fluctuations in autoantibody levels following treatment or over time. The enhancement of spontaneously arising pathogenic TSHR antibodies in transgenic human thyrotropin receptor/NOD.H2^h4 mice by injecting a non-pathogenic form of TSHR A-subunit protein also provides evidence for original antigenic sin. From other studies, antigen presentation by B cells, not dendritic cells, is likely responsible for original antigenic sin. Recognition of restricted epitopes on the large glycosylated thyroid autoantigens (60-kDa A-subunit, 100-kDa TPO, and 600-kDa Tg) facilitates exploring the amino acid locations in the immunodominant regions. Epitope spreading has also been revealed by autoantibodies in thyroid autoimmunity. In humans, and in mice that spontaneously develop autoimmunity to all three thyroid autoantigens, autoantibodies develop first to Tg and later to TPO and the TSHR A-subunit. The pattern of intermolecular epitope spreading is related in part to the thyroidal content of Tg, TPO and TSHR A-subunit and to the molecular sizes of these proteins. Importantly, the epitope spreading pattern provides a rationale for future antigen-specific manipulation to block the development of all thyroid autoantibodies by inducing tolerance to Tg, first in the autoantigen cascade. Because of its abundance, Tg may be the autoantigen of choice to explore antigen-specific treatment, preventing the development of pathogenic TSHR antibodies.

Thyroid Autoimmunity: Role of Anti-thyroid Antibodies in Thyroid and Extra-Thyroidal Diseases

Autoimmune diseases have a high prevalence in the population, and autoimmune thyroid disease (AITD) is one of the most common representatives. Thyroid autoantibodies are not only frequently detected in patients with AITD but also in subjects without manifest thyroid dysfunction. The high prevalence raises questions regarding a potential role in extra-thyroidal diseases. This review summarizes the etiology and mechanism of AITD and addresses prevalence of antibodies against thyroid peroxidase, thyroid-stimulating hormone receptor (TSHR), and anti-thyroglobulin and their action outside the thyroid. The main issues limiting the reliability of the conclusions drawn here include problems with different specificities and sensitivities of the antibody detection assays employed, as well as potential confounding effects of altered thyroid hormone levels, and lack of prospective studies. In addition to the well-known effects of TSHR antibodies on fibroblasts in Graves' disease (GD), studies speculate on a role of anti-thyroid antibodies in cancer. All antibodies may have a tumor-promoting role in breast cancer carcinogenesis despite anti-thyroid peroxidase antibodies having a positive prognostic effect in patients with overt disease. Cross-reactivity with lactoperoxidase leading to induction of chronic inflammation might promote breast cancer, while anti-thyroid antibodies in manifest breast cancer might be an indication for a more active immune system. A better general health condition in older women with anti-thyroid peroxidase antibodies might support this hypothesis. The different actions of the anti-thyroid antibodies correspond to differences in cellular location of the antigens, titers of the circulating antibodies, duration of antibody exposure, and immunological mechanisms in GD and Hashimoto's thyroiditis.

TSHR as a therapeutic target in Graves' disease

INTRODUCTION

Graves' disease (GD) and thyroid-associated ophthalmopathy (TAO) are thought to result from actions of pathogenic antibodies mediated through the thyrotropin receptor (TSHR). This leads to the unregulated consequences of the antibody-mediated receptor activity in the thyroid and connective tissues of the orbit. Recent studies reveal antibodies that appear to be directed against the insulin-like growth factor-I receptor (IGF-IR). Areas covered: In this brief article, I attempt to review the fundamental characteristics of the TSHR, its role in GD and TAO, and its relationship to IGF-IR. Strong evidence supports the concept that the two receptors form a physical and functional complex and that IGF-IR activity is required for some of the down-stream signaling initiated through TSHR. Recently developed small molecules and monoclonal antibodies that block TSHR and IGF-IR signaling are also reviewed in the narrow context of their potential utility as therapeutics in GD and TAO. The Pubmed database was searched from its inception for relevant publications. Expert opinion: Those agents that can interrupt the TSHR and IGF-IR pathways possess the potential for offering more specific and better tolerated treatments of both hyperthyroidism and TAO. This would spare patients exposure to toxic drugs, ionizing radiation and potentially hazardous surgeries.

Glycosylation pattern analysis of glycoprotein hormones and their receptors

We have studied glycosylation patterns in glycoprotein hormones (GPHs) and glycoprotein hormone receptor (GPHR) extracellular domains (ECD) from different species to identify areas not glycosylated that could be involved in intermolecular or intramolecular interactions. Comparative models of the structure of the TSHR ECD in complex with TSH and in complex with TSHR autoantibodies (M22, stimulating and K1-70, blocking) were obtained based on the crystal structures of the FSH-FSHR ECD, M22-TSHR leucine-rich repeat domain (LRD) and K1-70-TSHR LRD complexes. The glycosylation sites of the GPHRs and GPHs from all species studied were mapped on the model of the human TSH TSHR ECD complex. The areas on the surfaces of GPHs that are known to interact with their receptors are not glycosylated and two areas free from glycosylation, not involved in currently known interactions, have been identified. The concave faces of GPHRs leucine-rich repeats 3-7 are free from glycosylation, consistent with known interactions with the hormones. In addition, four other non-glycosylated areas have been identified, two located on the receptors' convex surfaces, one in the long loop of the hinge regions and one at the C-terminus of the extracellular domains. Experimental evidence suggests that the non-glycosylated areas identified on the hormones and receptors are likely to be involved in forming intramolecular or intermolecular interactions.

Critical Differences between Induced and Spontaneous Mouse Models of Graves' Disease with Implications for Antigen-Specific Immunotherapy in Humans

Graves' hyperthyroidism, a common autoimmune disease caused by pathogenic autoantibodies to the thyrotropin (TSH) receptor (TSHR), can be treated but not cured. This single autoantigenic target makes Graves' disease a prime candidate for Ag-specific immunotherapy. Previously, in an induced mouse model, injecting TSHR A-subunit protein attenuated hyperthyroidism by diverting pathogenic TSHR Abs to a nonfunctional variety. In this study, we explored the possibility of a similar diversion in a mouse model that spontaneously develops pathogenic TSHR autoantibodies, NOD.H2^h4 mice with the human (h) TSHR (hTSHR) A-subunit transgene expressed in the thyroid and (shown in this article) the thymus. We hypothesized that such diversion would occur after injection of "inactive" hTSHR A-subunit protein recognized only by nonpathogenic (not pathogenic) TSHR Abs. Surprisingly, rather than attenuating the pre-existing pathogenic TSHR level, in TSHR/NOD.H2^h4 mice inactive hTSHR Ag injected without adjuvant enhanced the levels of pathogenic TSH-binding inhibition and thyroid-stimulating Abs, as well as nonpathogenic Abs detected by ELISA. This effect was TSHR specific because spontaneously occurring autoantibodies to thyroglobulin and thyroid peroxidase were unaffected. As controls, nontransgenic NOD.H2^h4 mice similarly injected with inactive hTSHR A-subunit protein unexpectedly developed TSHR Abs, but only of the nonpathogenic variety detected by ELISA. Our observations highlight critical differences between induced and spontaneous mouse models of Graves' disease with implications for potential immunotherapy in humans. In hTSHR/NOD.H2^h4 mice with ongoing disease, injecting inactive hTSHR A-subunit protein fails to divert the autoantibody response to a nonpathogenic form. Indeed, such therapy is likely to enhance pathogenic Ab production and exacerbate Graves' disease in humans.

Analytical Performance and Validation of a Bioassay for Thyroid-Blocking Antibodies

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

A cell-based bioassay for the measurement of thyroid blocking autoantibodies (TBAb) has been recently reported. The analytical performance and validation of this bioassay is assessed and described.

METHODS

Chinese hamster ovary cells expressing a chimeric thyrotropin receptor were treated with bovine (b) TSH and different concentrations of an immunoglobulin G (IgG) monoclonal human TBAb (K1-70). TBAb was measured as a function of luciferase activity relative to bTSH alone and expressed as percent inhibition. Results obtained in the chimeric cell line were compared with those of a wild-type cell line. Analytical performance studies were subsequently performed with the chimeric cell line only.

RESULTS

Immunodepletion of K1-70 IgG by using a protein G-Sepharose column showed that positive percent inhibition in the TBAb bioassay was detectable from K1-70 IgG only. The limit of blank was determined to be 12.2%. The limit of detection was 14% inhibition, equivalent to 0.4 ng/mL K1-70, while the limit of quantitation was 22% (coefficient of variation [CV] 12%) equivalent to 0.625 ng/mL K1-70. The dynamic range was between 14 ± 3.7 (mean % inhibition ± standard deviation) and 101 ± 2.6, equivalent to 0.4-10 ng/mL K1-70. The linear range was between 22 ± 2.6 and 93 ± 0.6 inhibition, equivalent to 0.625-5 ng/mL K1-70. The upper limit of the 99th percent reference range was 34% inhibition. In two laboratories, CV values for the intra- and inter-assay precisions for K1-70 ranged from 2% to 12% and from 1.7% to 14.5%, respectively. For patient sera, the CV values for the intra- and inter-assay precisions ranged from 3% to 9% and from 3% to 11%, respectively. No interference was found when follicle-stimulating hormone, luteinizing hormone, and human chorionic gonadotrophin were tested in the TBAb bioassay. The median of % inhibition values in 40 TBAb positive sera from patients with autoimmune thyroid disease were 93.5 (range 25-103) and 92 (range 64-107) for the wild type and chimeric cell lines, respectively. Further, all 40 samples of patients with various non-thyroidal autoimmune diseases were TBAb negative.

CONCLUSIONS

This TBAb bioassay exhibits excellent analytical performance and high level of reproducibility.

Mechanisms of Action of TSHR Autoantibodies

The availability of human monoclonal antibodies (MAbs) to the TSHR has enabled major advances in our understanding of how TSHR autoantibodies interact with the receptor. These advances include determination of the crystal structures of the TSHR LRD in complex with a stimulating autoantibody (M22) and with a blocking type autoantibody (K1-70). The high affinity of MAbs for the TSHR makes them particularly suitable for use as ligands in assays for patient serum TSHR autoantibodies. Also, M22 and K1-70 are effective at low concentrations in vivo as TSHR agonists and antagonists respectively. K1-70 has important potential in the treatment of the hyperthyroidism of Graves' disease and Graves' ophthalmopathy. Small molecule TSHR antagonists described to date do not appear to have the potency and/or specificity shown by K1-70. New models of the TSHR ECD in complex with various ligands have been built. These models suggest that initial binding of TSH to the TSHR causes a conformational change in the hormone. This opens a positively charged pocket in receptor-bound TSH which attracts the negatively charged sulphated tyrosine 385 on the hinge region of the receptor. The ensuing movement of the receptor's hinge region may then cause activation. Similar activation mechanisms seem to take place in the case of FSH and the FSHR and LH and the LHR. However, stimulating TSHR autoantibodies do not appear to activate the TSHR in the same way as TSH.