Evolving Concepts in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Blood-Based Biomarkers

An Update on Outcomes for COPD Pharmacological Trials: A COPD Investigators Report - Reassessment of the 2008 American Thoracic Society/European Respiratory Society Statement on Outcomes for COPD Pharmacological Trials

Background: In 2008, a dedicated American Thoracic Society/European Respiratory Society task force published a paper on the possible use and limitations of clinical outcomes and biomarkers to evaluate the impact of pharmacological therapy in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Since then, our scientific understanding of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease has increased considerably; there has been a progressive shift from a one-size-fits-all diagnostic and therapeutic approach to a personalized approach; and many new treatments currently in development will require new endpoints to evaluate their efficacy adequately. Objectives: The emergence of several new relevant outcome measures motivated the authors to review advances in the field and highlight the need to update the content of the original report. Methods: The authors separately created search strategies for the literature, primarily based on their opinions and assessments supported by carefully chosen references. No centralized examination of the literature or uniform criteria for including or excluding evidence were used. Measurements and Main Results: Endpoints, outcomes, and biomarkers have been revisited. The limitations of some of those reported in the American Thoracic Society/European Respiratory Society task force document have been highlighted. In addition, new tools that may be useful, especially in evaluating personalized therapy, have been described. Conclusions: Because the "label-free" treatable traits approach is becoming an important step toward precision medicine, future clinical trials should focus on highly prevalent treatable traits, and this will influence the choice of outcomes and markers to be considered. The use of the new tools, particularly combination endpoints, could help better identify the right patients to be treated with the new drugs.

Revisiting asthma pharmacotherapy: where do we stand and where do we want to go?

Several current guidelines/strategies outline a treatment approach to asthma, which primarily consider the goals of improving lung function and quality of life and reducing symptoms and exacerbations. They suggest a strategy of stepping up or down treatment, depending on the patient's overall current asthma symptom control and future risk of exacerbation. While this stepwise approach is undeniably practical for daily practice, it does not always address the underlying mechanisms of this heterogeneous disease. In the last decade, there have been attempts to improve the treatment of severe asthma, such as the addition of a long-acting antimuscarinic agent to the traditional inhaled corticosteroid/long-acting β2-agonist treatment and the introduction of therapies targeting key cytokines. However, despite such strategies several unmet needs in this population remain, motivating research to identify novel targets and develop improved therapeutic and/or preventative asthma treatments. Pending the availability of such therapies, it is essential to re-evaluate the current conventional "one-size-fits-all" approach to a more precise asthma management. Although challenging, identifying "treatable traits" that contribute to respiratory symptoms in individual patients with asthma may allow a more pragmatic approach to establish more personalised therapeutic goals.

Sensitive methods for assessment of lung health in welders and controls

BACKGROUND

Welders are exposed to gas and particle emissions that can cause severe lung disease, such as chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), a leading cause of mortality and morbidity worldwide. It is hard to detect COPD early and therefore mitigating measures may be delayed. The aim of this study was to investigate lung health in welders and evaluate new sensitive methods with potential to assess early onset pulmonary changes in occupational settings.

METHODS

This study assessed the lung health and symptoms in active welders (n = 28) and controls (n = 17). Lung measurements were performed with standard spirometry and new methods: airspace dimension assessment (AiDA), oscillometry, blood serum biomarkers (club cell secretory protein 16, surfactant protein D, matrix metalloproteinases, fibroblast, hepatocyte growth factor, interleukins), and one urine biomarker (desmosine).

RESULTS

According to spirometry measurements, all participants had normal lung function. However, prevalence of cough was significantly higher among welders compared with controls and lung changes were found in welders with the novel methods. Welders had significantly higher respiratory system resistance assessed with oscillometry, serum levels of metalloproteinases 9 and hepatocyte growth factor, compared with controls. Airspace dimensions were on average higher among welders compared with controls, but the difference was not significant. The number of welding years correlated with decreased respiratory system reactance and increased serum levels of matrix metalloproteinases 9, interleukin 6, and hepatocyte growth factor. Airspace dimension assessment indices significantly correlated with increasing levels of inflammatory markers and matrix metalloproteinases.

CONCLUSIONS

This study indicated the potential to use new and more sensitive methods for identification of changes in lungs when standard spirometry failed to do so.

Biologic therapies for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

INTRODUCTION

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a disorder characterized by a complicated chronic inflammatory response that is resistant to corticosteroid therapy. As a result, there is a critical need for effective anti-inflammatory medications to treat people with COPD. Using monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) to inhibit cytokines and chemokines or their receptors could be a potential approach to treating the inflammatory component of COPD.

AREAS COVERED

The therapeutic potential that some of these mAbs might have in COPD is reviewed.

EXPERT OPINION

No mAb directed against cytokines or chemokines has shown any therapeutic impact in COPD patients, apart from mAbs targeting the IL-5 pathway that appear to have statistically significant, albeit weak, effect in patients with eosinophilic COPD. This may reflect the complexity of COPD, in which no single cytokine or chemokine has a dominant role. Because the umbrella term COPD encompasses several endotypes with diverse underlying processes, mAbs targeting specific cytokines or chemokines should most likely be evaluated in limited and focused populations.

Advances in inhaled corticosteroids for the treatment of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: what is their value today?

INTRODUCTION

As of today, there is still a need to determine which COPD patients may benefit from ICS therapy, whether ICSs are useful in COPD patients without chronic bronchitis, and whether long-acting bronchodilators can reduce the risk of exacerbations in frequent exacerbators even if ICSs are not used, and whether combination therapy including ICSs is helpful in infrequent exacerbators to optimise the use of ICSs in COPD. Nevertheless, in recent years, a fair amount of evidence has been produced that, at least in part, can help define the role of ICSs in COPD better.

AREAS COVERED

Herein, the authors provide an overview of current use of ICS in COPD and discuss their value to the current treatment armamentarium. The article includes discussion of which patients will benefit best from the use of ICSs, their potential uses and adverse effects.

EXPERT OPINION

There is growing agreement on why, in whom, and when ICS therapy can be used in COPD, although the consensus is still lacking because of the heterogeneity of COPD. The use of blood eosinophil counts (BECs) is only helpful in T2 inflammation, while there is a lack of biomarkers indicating the presence of T1 and T17 immunity, which is poorly responsive to ICS. Identifying ICS-sensitive endotypes using specific biomarkers that have yet to be identified and validated is likely to demonstrate that ICSs can influence the natural course of COPD in at least a subset of patients.

A single inhaler triple therapy fluticasone furoate/umeclidinium/vilanterol for the treatment of COPD

INTRODUCTION

: Single inhaler triple therapy (SITT) with an inhaled corticosteroid, a long-acting β₂-agonist, and a long-acting muscarinic antagonist is an effective and attractive therapeutic option codified in the recommendations of guidelines and treatment strategies for the management of COPD.

AREAS COVERED

: The preclinical and clinical development in COPD of fluticasone furoate (FF)/umeclidinium (UMEC)/vilanterol (VI) SITT and its use in the real world.

EXPERT OPINION

: Findings from phase III/IV trials and the use of FF/UMEC/VI in the real-world setting support the view that it may be a useful, safe, and cost-effective option for the maintenance treatment of COPD, especially when dealing with patients who are not adequately controlled with dual ICS/LABA or LAMA/LABA therapy. Only direct head-to-head comparisons will be able to establish whether FF/UMEC/VI may be preferable to the other SITTs approved for COPD due to its pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic characteristics and especially the fact that it is the only one that can be taken once-daily. In addition, there is a need for further studies, especially in the real world, to optimize the positioning of FF/UMEC/VI in the treatment of COPD, also considering the availability of FF/VI and UMEC/VI and the need for better differentiation between the three treatments.

Plasma sRAGE levels strongly associate with centrilobular emphysema assessed by HRCT scans

Background

There is a strong need for biomarkers to better characterize individuals with COPD and to take into account the heterogeneity of COPD. The blood protein sRAGE has been put forward as promising biomarker for COPD in general and emphysema in particular. Here, we measured plasma sRAGE levels using quantitative LC–MS and assessed whether the plasma sRAGE levels associate with (changes in) lung function, radiological emphysema parameters, and radiological subtypes of emphysema.

Methods

Three hundred and twenty-four COPD patients (mean FEV₁: 63%predicted) and 185 healthy controls from the COPDGene study were selected. Plasma sRAGE was measured by immunoprecipitation in 96-well plate methodology to enrich sRAGE, followed by targeted quantitative liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry. Spirometry and HRCT scans (inspiration and expiration) with a 5-year follow-up were used; both subjected to high quality control standards.

Results

Lower sRAGE values significantly associated with the presence of COPD, the severity of airflow obstruction, the severity of emphysema on HRCT, the heterogeneous distribution of emphysema, centrilobular emphysema, and 5-year progression of emphysema. However, sRAGE values did not associate with airway wall thickness or paraseptal emphysema.

Conclusions

Rather than being a general COPD biomarker, sRAGE is especially a promising biomarker for centrilobular emphysema. Follow-up studies should elucidate whether sRAGE can be used as a biomarker for other COPD phenotypes as well.

Beyond Dual Bronchodilation – Triple Therapy, When and Why

Although pharmacological treatment of COPD is codified in different guidelines and strategy documents, there is abundant evidence of discrepancy between what they suggest and what health professionals prescribe, especially in low-risk groups where there is widespread overprescription of triple therapy. It is therefore necessary to clarify when the use of triple therapy is indicated in COPD patients and when it is preferable to maintain treatment with dual bronchodilation. In this article, we discuss our views based on our experience and what is reported in the literature and try to give answers to these two questions. The evidence generated by pivotal RCTs supports the use of triple therapy in patients who present for the first time and have severe airway obstruction, are symptomatic, have had frequent moderate or severe exacerbations in the previous year, and have peripheral eosinophilia. However, it is difficult to determine whether step-up is useful in all other cases because the available data are quite conflicting. It is likely that the inconsistency in the information generated by the various available studies may explain the prescribing behaviour of many physicians who do not adhere to recommendations of guidelines and strategies. However, it is necessary to establish whether and when the addition of an ICS to the LAMA/LABA combination is effective, to determine whether triple therapy can induce an additional clinical benefit over dual bronchodilation, irrespective of a preventive effect on COPD exacerbations, to establish its value, and to examine whether cost differences can support the use of triple therapy over combined LAMA/LABA therapy in real life.

Inflammatory parameters and pulmonary biomarkers in smokers with and without chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD)

Background

We organized this study in order to investigate differences in serum inflammatory profiles and circulating serum pneumoproteins between smokers with and without chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).

Methods

Patients aged 35–70 years with COPD and a smoking history ≥10 pack-years (cases, n=38) and 38 participants with the same smoking history without COPD (controls) were included in a comparative study conducted as part of a population-based cross-sectional study with 2,388 individuals in northwestern Russia. Cases and controls were matched for age and smoking history. Airflow obstruction (AO) was defined using forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1)/forced vital capacity (FVC) <0.70 and/or FEV1/FVC < lower limit of the normal cut-off values. Patients at risk for COPD were reassessed using a standardized diagnostic work-up protocol. Several parameters, among which four inflammatory biomarkers [the high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP), interleukin (IL)-6, IL-8, and tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) levels] and two pneumoproteins [surfactant protein D (SP-D) and Clara cell secretory protein 16 (CC16)], were measured in the peripheral blood. Systemic inflammation was defined as at least 2 or more elevated biomarker levels.

Results

Out of all smokers, 57.9% with normal spirometry and 36.8% with COPD did not have systemic inflammation, whereas 44.7% of the patients with COPD and 5.3% of the patients without AO demonstrated at least two elevated biomarker levels. No difference in age, gender, and smoking history, environmental and occupational exposure was found between the non-inflamed and the inflamed smokers. Of all risk factors studied, only COPD was associated with systemic inflammation [odds ratio (OR) 11.42, 95% confidence interval (CI): 2.13–58.84].

Conclusions

Our study describes the systemic inflammatory network pattern associated with COPD and how it differs from the pattern in smokers with normal lung function. Systemic inflammation is not present in all smokers with COPD; in contrast, some non-obstructed smokers are characterized by systemic inflammation. From this perspective, smoking itself could be seen as a disease and studied accordingly.

Trial Registration

NCT02307799.

Single-nucleotide polymorphism rs2070600 regulates AGER splicing and the sputum levels of the COPD biomarker soluble receptor for advanced glycation end-products

The COPD susceptibility SNP rs2070600 affects the levels of the COPD biomarker sRAGE in sputum as well as splicing of AGER. Moreover, @PouwelsScience et al. demonstrate large differences in sRAGE levels between serum and sputum. https://bit.ly/3t0pJtK.

Chronic lung diseases: prospects for regeneration and repair

COPD and idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) together represent a considerable unmet medical need, and advances in their treatment lag well behind those of other chronic conditions. Both diseases involve maladaptive repair mechanisms leading to progressive and irreversible damage. However, our understanding of the complex underlying disease mechanisms is incomplete; with current diagnostic approaches, COPD and IPF are often discovered at an advanced stage and existing definitions of COPD and IPF can be misleading. To halt or reverse disease progression and achieve lung regeneration, there is a need for earlier identification and treatment of these diseases. A precision medicine approach to treatment is also important, involving the recognition of disease subtypes, or endotypes, according to underlying disease mechanisms, rather than the current “one-size-fits-all” approach. This review is based on discussions at a meeting involving 38 leading global experts in chronic lung disease mechanisms, and describes advances in the understanding of the pathology and molecular mechanisms of COPD and IPF to identify potential targets for reversing disease degeneration and promoting tissue repair and lung regeneration. We also discuss limitations of existing disease measures, technical advances in understanding disease pathology, and novel methods for targeted drug delivery.

Treatment outcomes with COPD and IPF are suboptimal. Better understanding of the diseases, such as targetable repair mechanisms, may generate novel therapies, and earlier diagnosis and treatment is needed to stop or even reverse disease progression.https://bit.ly/2Ga8J1g

The role of increased red cell distribution width as a negative prognostic marker in patients with COPD

INTRODUCTION

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) remains a major burden with no clinically applicable biomarkers.

AIM

To investigate the association of Red cell Distribution Width (RDW) values on admission with previous hospitalizations, need of non-invasive mechanical ventilation (NIMV) and long term oxygen therapy (LTOT) in patients with COPD.

METHODS

Patients with AECOPD admitted to our department during 2018 were included in the study.

RESULTS

One hundred sixty patients were enrolled (M/F 95/65, median age 71.00 years, mean FEV₁± SD = 46.6 ± 28.9). Median RDW was significantly higher for patients in need of NIMV (14.8, 95% CI: 14.2 to 15.6) than patients not in need of NIMV (13.5, 95% CI: 13.2 to 13.8) (p < 0.001). Median RDW was significantly higher for patients in need of LTOT (14.2, 95% CI: 13.7 to 14.6) compared to patients not receiving LTOT (13.2, 95% CI: 12.5 to 13.6) (p = 0.001). Patients with hospitalization during the last 12 months had increased RDW values compared to patients with no hospitalizations [median RDW 14.3, (95% CI: 13.5 to 14.9) versus median RDW 13.5, (95% CI: 13.1 to 13.9)](p = 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Patients with COPD in need of LTOT, NIMV or patients with previous hospitalizations presented with increased RDW values. Increased RDW values could serve as a negative prognostic marker in patients with COPD.