Examining Wellness in Children and Youth with Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities: a Scoping Review

Wellness in children's rehabilitation - what does it mean?

PURPOSE

Rehabilitation research on wellness promotion for children and youth with disabilities is limited and tends to narrowly focus on physical aspects of health. An overarching sense of wellness includes multiple, overlapping dimensions (e.g., physical, social, emotional, occupational). This study's main objectives were to explore what wellness means for young people with disabilities, and what contributes to their sense of wellness.

METHODS

A qualitative design involving World Café-style focus groups was used to explore the perspectives of youth with disabilities (14-25 years old, n = 3), parents (n = 6) and healthcare providers (n = 10) on how wellness is understood and addressed at a Canadian children's rehabilitation hospital. Themes were identified through an inductive analysis of focus group transcripts and notes written by participants and research team members.

RESULTS

Having a variety of relationships and social connections, meaningful activity opportunities, becoming as independent as possible, and having stable medical health contributed to wellness for young people with disabilities.

CONCLUSIONS

Rehabilitation care can promote wellness by co-creating personalized care pathways across multiple wellness dimensions with young people with disabilities and their families, focusing on strengths rather than deficits, and improving access to a variety of activities and communities.IMPLICATIONS FOR REHABILITATIONRehabilitation professionals in children's rehabilitation have unique, ongoing opportunities to promote and support wellness with young people with disabilities and their families.Rehabilitation professionals can embed personalized, strengths-focused wellness pathways across multiple dimensions into the care of children with disabilities.Helping children and families address barriers to meaningful activities and promoting social connections can foster an overarching sense of wellness.

Exploring the psychometric properties of self-report instruments used to measure health-related quality of life and subjective wellbeing of adolescents with intellectual disabilities: A Consensus-based Standards for the Selection of Health Measurement Instruments (COSMIN) systematic review

BACKGROUND

Studies that have systematically reviewed the psychometric properties of health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and subjective wellbeing instruments for adolescents with intellectual disabilities narrowly focus on disease or health-specific conditions. This review aimed to critically appraise the psychometric properties of self-report instruments used to measure HRQoL and subjective wellbeing of adolescents with intellectual disabilities.

METHOD

A systematic search was undertaken in four databases. The quality of the included studies and their psychometric properties was assessed according to the COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement Instruments Risk of Bias checklist.

RESULTS

Seven studies reported psychometric properties of five different instruments. Only one instrument identified as having potential to be recommended for use but requires further validation research to assess its quality for this population.

CONCLUSIONS

There is insufficient evidence to support the recommendation of a self-report instrument to assess HRQoL and subjective wellbeing of adolescents with intellectual disabilities.

Involving adolescents with intellectual disability in the adaptation of self-reported subjective well-being measures: participatory research and methodological considerations

BACKGROUND

The measurement of subjective well-being is challenging with samples of adolescents with intellectual disability (ID) given the cognitive and linguistic difficulties they face in comprehending standardised measures, and as such is primarily based on proxy reports. The lack of appropriate tools needs to be addressed so that adolescents with ID can self-report on their own well-being. The current study reports on the use of participatory research methods to adapt and modify two standardised self-report measures of subjective well-being suitable for completion by adolescents with ID.

METHOD

Two special schools were recruited for this study. At each school, staff (n = 15) and pupils aged 11-17 years (n = 35) participated. A series of co-design workshops were conducted to adapt two standardised subjective well-being measures: Kidscreen-10 and short-form Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Well-being Scale.

RESULTS

Specific aspects for measure adaption were identified: simplifying the item wording and phrasing; inclusion of pictorial communication symbols and visual prompts to represent the meaning of items; changing of tense of questions from past to present; asking questions rather than statements; reducing 5-point Likert scales to 3-point or dichotomous; presenting one item at a time during administration; and developing alternate formats of the survey to ensure inclusivity.

CONCLUSIONS

This paper illustrates the value of using participatory research methods when working alongside adolescents with ID and offers methodological, as well as practical, guidance in the context of adapting subjective self-report measures for this target group, serving as a guide to fellow researchers and clinicians interested in modifying or developing self-report measures for adolescents with ID.

Multi-stakeholder perspectives on perceived wellness of Special Olympics athletes

BACKGROUND

Research to date with children and youth with intellectual and developmental disabilities (IDD) has previously focused upon specific aspects of health (e.g., physical activity, nutrition). A broader focus on 'wellness' takes a positive approach to health by addressing how individuals can lead meaningful lives by focusing on their unique strengths and resources across multiple wellness dimensions, rather than focusing on deficits.

OBJECTIVE

This study, conducted in partnership with Special Olympics (SO), aimed to understand the state of perceived wellness and wellness-promoting behaviours of children and youth with IDD from multi-stakeholder perspectives (i.e., SO athletes, caregivers, and coaches).

METHODS

A cross-sectional Likert survey methodology was employed to generate data on the perceptions of multiple stakeholders on different wellness dimensions identified through a literature review and consultations with SO stakeholders.

RESULTS

Athletes, caregivers and coaches generally agreed rather than disagreed with wellness statements, with the exception of coaches' responses regarding healthy nutrition. Athletes agreed more than caregivers and coaches that they engaged in some wellness promoting behaviours (i.e., calming oneself down, participating in their communities). Athletes and coaches were more likely to agree than caregivers about athletes' positive outlook.

CONCLUSION

Athletes' perceptions of their own wellness are unique from those of caregivers and coaches. Focusing on wellness can broaden understandings of how to support young people with IDD by drawing on their strengths and resources to foster optimal health and a sense of wellness in ways that are meaningful and relevant to them.