Clinical pharmacology of the new beta-adrenergic blocking drugs. Part 4. Adverse effects. Choosing a beta-adrenoreceptor blocker

Pharmacokinetic variability of beta-adrenergic blocking agents used in cardiology

The aim of this study was to evaluate the pharmacokinetic variability of beta-adrenergic blocking agents used in cardiology by reviewing single-dose and steady-state pharmacokinetic studies from the literature. PubMed was searched for pharmacokinetic studies of beta-adrenergic blocking agents, both single-dose and steady-state studies. The studies included reported maximum plasma concentration (Cmax) and/or area under the concentration curve (AUC). The coefficient of variation (CV%) was calculated for all studies, and a CV% <40% was considered low or moderate variability, and a CV% >40% was considered high variability. The Cmax and AUC were reported a total of 672 times in 192 papers. Based on AUC, metoprolol, propranolol, carvedilol, and nebivolol showed high pharmacokinetic variability (highest first), whereas bisoprolol, atenolol, sotalol, labetalol, nadolol, and pindolol showed low to moderate variability (lowest first). We have shown a high interindividual pharmacokinetic variability that varies markedly in different beta-adrenergic blocking agents; the extreme being steady state ratios as high as 30 in metoprolol. A more personalized approach to the medical treatment of patients may be obtained by combining known pharmacokinetic information about variability, pharmaco-genetics and -dynamics, and patient characteristics, to avoid adverse events or lack of treatment effect.

Propranolol decreases cardiac work in a dose-dependent manner in severely burned children

BACKGROUND

Severe burn is followed by profound cardiac stress. Propranolol, a nonselective β(1,) β(2)-receptor antagonist, decreases cardiac stress, but little is known about the dose necessary to cause optimal effect. Thus, the aim of this study was to determine in a large, prospective, randomized, controlled trial the dose of propranolol that would decrease heart rate ≥15% of admission heart rate and improve cardiac function. Four-hundred six patients with burns >30% total body surface area were enrolled and randomized to receive standard care (controls; n = 235) or standard care plus propranolol (n = 171).

METHODS

Dose-response and drug kinetics of propranolol were performed. Heart rate and mean arterial pressure (MAP) were measured continuously. Cardiac output (CO), cardiac index, stroke volume, rate-pressure product, and cardiac work (CW) were determined at regular intervals. Statistical analysis was performed using analysis of variance with Tukey and Bonferroni corrections and the Student t test when applicable. Significance was accepted at P < .05.

RESULTS

Propranolol given initially at 1 mg/kg per day decreased heart rate by 15% compared with control patients, but was increased to 4 mg/kg per day within the first 10 days to sustain treatment benefits (P < .05). Propranolol decreased CO, rate-pressure product, and CW without deleterious effects on MAP. The effective plasma drug concentrations were achieved in 30 minutes, and the half-life was 4 hours.

CONCLUSION

The data suggest that propranolol is an efficacious modulator of the postburn cardiac response when given at a dose of 4 mg/kg per day, and decreases and sustains heart rate 15% below admission heart rate.

Melatonin secretion related to side-effects of beta-blockers from the central nervous system

In two studies of hypertensive patients the relationship between beta-blocker-induced CNS side-effects and the nightly urinary secretion of melatonin was analysed. In one group (n = 10) placebo, atenolol (mean dose 86 mg/day) or propranolol (mean dose 305 mg/day) were given in a double-blind, randomised design. In the other (n = 13) 100-400 mg metoprolol was given daily (mean dose 197 mg). After 4 weeks of treatment all beta-blockers reduced melatonin excretion, but the effect was significant only for metoprolol. Sleep disturbance records revealed more disturbed nights in the metoprolol group compared with the propranolol and the atenolol groups, even when the difference in age between the groups was controlled for. In the metoprolol group a significant relationship (p less than 0.05) was found between the fall in melatonin and the percentage of disturbed nights. Severe CNS side-effects, such as nightmares, occurred only in patients treated with metoprolol (21%), which in all cases were accompanied by low levels of melatonin. Our data suggest that the CNS side-effects during beta-blockade are related to a reduction of melatonin levels.

Under-use of beta-blockers in patients with ischaemic heart disease and concomitant chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

BACKGROUND

Beta-blockers (BB) improve morbidity and mortality in ischaemic heart disease. There is a general reluctance to use BB, especially in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), which is perceived as an absolute contraindication. As large numbers of patients are labelled with COPD without objective evidence, they may miss out on the benefit from these drugs.

AIM

To assess the use of BB in patients with COPD admitted with acute coronary syndrome (ACS), and to assess the supporting evidence for the diagnosis of COPD in these patients.

METHOD

Case-note review and retrospective analysis of 457 consecutive patients admitted with troponin-positive ACS between October 2002 and October 2003.

RESULTS

Of 457 ACS patients studied, 246 (54%) were discharged on a BB. Cardiologists prescribed BB in ACS patients more frequently than did general physicians, (70% vs. 30%, respectively). The reasons for withholding BB were: not documented 27%, COPD 33%, heart failure 24%, others 16%. Ninety-four patients (21%) had a diagnosis of COPD; only 58 (62%) of these had been reviewed by a chest physician or had previous pulmonary function tests. Of the 94 patients with COPD, only 15 (16%) were prescribed BB during the admission: 9 by cardiologists and 6 by non-cardiologists. BB were discontinued in two patients due to an increase in dyspnoea.

CONCLUSION

Many patients with a diagnosis of COPD have no objective evidence to support the diagnosis and are denied the prognostic benefits of BB when presenting with ACS. Before withholding beta-blockers, COPD and reversibility should be ascertained by pulmonary function testing. The overall use of beta-blockers remains sub-optimal and could be improved in this setting.

Vanidipinedilol: a vanilloid-based beta-adrenoceptor blocker displaying calcium entry blocking and vasorelaxant activities

Calcium channel and beta-adrenoceptor blockade have proved highly useful in antihypertensive therapy. Studies of the mechanisms of action of vanidipinedilol that combine these effects within a single molecule are described here. Intravenous injection of vanidipinedilol (0.1, 0.25, 0.5, 1.0, and 2.0 mg/kg) produced dose-dependent hypotensive and bradycardic responses, significantly different from nifedipine-induced (0.5 mg/kg, i.v.) hypotensive and reflex tachycardic effects in pentobarbital-anesthetized Wistar rats. A single oral administration of vanidipinedilol at doses of 10, 25, and 50 mg/kg dose-dependently reduced blood pressure with a decrease in heart rate in conscious spontaneously hypertensive rats (SHRs). In the isolated Wistar rat atrium, vanidipinedilol (10(-7), 10(-6), and 10(-5) M) competitively antagonized the (-)isoproterenol-induced positive chronotropic and inotropic effects and inhibited the increase in heart rate induced by Ca2+ (3.0-9.0 mM) in a concentration-dependent manner. The parallel shift to the right of the concentration-response curve of (-)isoproterenol and CaCl2 suggested that vanidipinedilol possessed beta-adrenoceptor-blocking and calcium entry-blocking activities. On tracheal strips of reserpinized guinea pig, cumulative doses of vanidipinedilol (10(-10) to 3x10(-6) M) produced dose-dependent relaxant responses. Preincubating the preparation with ICI 118,551 (10(-10), 10(-9), 10(-8) M), a beta2-adrenoceptor antagonist, shifted the vanidipinedilol concentration-relaxation curve significantly to a region of higher concentrations. These results implied that vanidipinedilol had a partial beta2-agonist activity. In the isolated thoracic aorta of rat, vanidipinedilol had a potent effect inhibiting high-K+-induced contractions. KCI-induced intracellular calcium changes of blood vessel smooth muscle cell (A7r5 cell lines) determined by laser cytometry also was decreased after administration of vanidipinedilol (10(-8), 10(-7), 10(-6) M). Furthermore, the binding characteristics of vanidipinedilol and various antagonists were evaluated in [3H]CGP-12177 binding to ventricle and lung and [3H]nitrendipine binding to cerebral cortex membranes in rats. The order of potency of beta1- and beta2-adrenoceptor antagonist activity against [3H]CGP-12177 binding was (-)propranolol (pKi, 8.59 for beta1 and 8.09 for beta2) > vanidipinedilol (pKi, 7.09 for beta1 and 6.64 for beta2) > atenolol (pKi, 6.58 for beta1 and 5.12 for beta2). The order of potency of calcium channel antagonist activity against [3H]nitrendipine binding was nifedipine (pKi, 9.36) > vanidipinedilol (pKi, 8.07). The ratio of beta1-adrenergic-blocking/calcium entry-blocking selectivity is 0.1 and indicated that vanidipinedilol revealed more in calcium entry-blocking than in beta-adrenergic-blocking activities. It has been suggested that vanidipinedilol-induced smooth muscle relaxation may involve decreased entry of Ca2+ and partial beta2-agonist activities. In conclusion, vanidipinedilol is a nonselective beta-adrenoceptor antagonist with calcium channel blocking and partial beta2-agonist associated vasorelaxant and tracheal relaxant activities. Particularly, the vasodilator effects of vanidipinedilol are attributed to a synergism of its calcium entry blocking and partial beta2-agonist activities in the blood vessel. A sustained bradycardic effect results from beta-adrenoceptor blocking and calcium entry blocking, which blunts the sympathetic activation-associated reflex tachycardia in the heart.

Esmolol. A review of its therapeutic efficacy and pharmacokinetic characteristics

Esmolol is an ultra short-acting intravenous cardioselective beta-antagonist. It has an extremely short elimination half-life (mean: 9 minutes; range: 4 to 16 minutes) and a total body clearance [285 ml/min/kg (17.1 L/h/kg)] approaching 3 times cardiac output and 14 times hepatic blood flow. The alpha-distribution half-life is approximately 2 minutes. When esmolol is administered as a bolus followed by a continuous infusion, onset of activity occurs within 2 minutes, with 90% of steady-state beta-blockade occurring within 5 minutes. Full recovery from beta-blockade is observed 18 to 30 minutes after terminating the infusion. Esmolol blood concentrations are undetectable 20 to 30 minutes postinfusion. The elimination of esmolol is independent of renal or hepatic function as it is metabolised by red blood cell cytosol esterases to an acid metabolite and methanol. The acid metabolite, which is renally eliminated, has 1500-fold less activity than esmolol. Methanol concentrations remain within the range of normal endogenous levels. Clinically, esmolol is used for the following: (i) situations where a brief duration of adrenergic blockade is required, such as tracheal intubation and stressful surgical stimuli; and (ii) critically ill or unstable patients in whom the dosage of esmolol is easily titrated to response and adverse effects are rapidly managed by termination of the infusion. In adults, bolus doses of 100 to 200mg are effective in attenuating the adrenergic responses associated with tracheal intubation and surgical stimuli. For the control of supraventricular arrhythmias, acute postoperative hypertension and acute ischaemic heart disease, doses of < 300 micrograms/kg/min, administered by continuous intravenous infusion, are used. The principal adverse effect of esmolol is hypotension (incidence of 0 to 50%), which is frequently accompanied with diaphoresis. The incidence of hypotension appears to increase with doses exceeding 150 micrograms/kg/min and in patients with low baseline blood pressure. Hypotension infrequently requires any intervention other than decreasing the dose or discontinuing the infusion. Symptoms generally resolve within 30 minutes after discontinuing the drug. In surgical and critical care settings where clinical conditions are rapidly changing, the pharmacokinetic profile of esmolol allows the drug to provide rapid pharmacological control and minimises the potential for serious adverse effects.

Absorption pharmacokinetics of atenolol in patients with the Marfan syndrome

The negative inotropic and chronotropic effects of beta-blocker therapy have been reported to reduce morbidity and mortality in patients with Marfan syndrome; however, little is known about the pharmacokinetics of atenolol after oral administration of multiple doses to patients with the Marfan syndrome. We studied the pharmacokinetics of atenolol in 13 such patients aged 18.7 +/- 2.9 years who were receiving 1.78 +/- 0.58 mg/kg/day (70.1 +/- 20.3 mg/m2/day) of atenolol for 6 weeks or longer. Mean +/- SD percentage change in baseline heart rate after the administration of atenolol was -18.03 +/- 16.59% and mean +/- SD percentage change in exercise heart rate after atenolol was -33.22 +/- 14.75% (P < .01). Six to 8 atenolol serum concentrations were collected in each patient during a 12-hour dosing interval and were determined by high-performance liquid chromatography with ultraviolet detection. Serum atenolol concentrations at 0 (123 +/- 70 micrograms/L) and 12 (116 +/- 66 micrograms/L) hours were within 20% of each other and were thus assumed to be at steady-state. A one-compartment, steady-state pharmacokinetic model with first-order absorption and elimination was fitted to the concentration-time data for each patient using nonlinear regression. Maximal concentration was 343 +/- 120 micrograms/L, and the mean half-life was 4.72 hours.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Soft drugs. XX. Design, synthesis, and evaluation of ultra-short acting beta-blockers

A new type of ultra-short acting beta-blocker which might prove advantageous in treating acute arrhythmias was designed, synthesized and investigated. Based on the soft drug "inactive metabolite approach," the inactive phenylacetic acid metabolite of both metoprolol and atenolol was reactivated by esterification with sulfur-containing aliphatic alcohols. Since the sulfur-containing moieties are labile to the ubiquitous esterases, the new compounds should be inactivated by a one step enzymatic cleavage back to the inactive phenylacetic acid derivative. Pharmacological and pharmacokinetic profiles of the new compounds were evaluated in rats and rabbits. Isoproterenol-induced tachycardia was inhibited with short-term infusion of each compound. This tachycardia blocking effect rapidly disappeared upon termination of infusion, while beta-blocking activity was 2-4-fold longer after comparable doses of the short-acting beta-blocker, esmolol. The rapid recovery from the beta-receptor blockade is believed due to fast hydrolysis of the soft drugs in the body. This is supported from in vitro results showing the t1/2 of esmolol is about 10-fold longer than the new soft drugs in rat, rabbit, dog and human blood. Hydrolysis studies in phosphate buffered solutions indicated that the esters are labile to base-catalyzed hydrolysis. However, the relative t1/2 values measured in biological media compared to phosphate buffered solution clearly support rapid enzymatic cleavage of the soft drugs. Interestingly, one of the soft beta-blockers, the sulfonyl ester derivative, showed a unique property of exhibiting good beta-receptor blocking activity without significant hypotensive action.

Sexual functioning post-myocardial infarction: effects of beta-blockers, psychological status and safety information

Impaired sexual functioning limits the quality of life of 34-75% of post-myocardial infarction (MI) patients. This study examined the effects of three factors: (a) beta-blocker intake, (b) psychological distress, and (c) information about safety of sexual activity, on post-MI decreased sexual functioning. Sixty-three male post-MI, post-cardiac rehabilitation patients and their spouses participated in the study. Analyses of partial variance were conducted to test for the effect of each factor on sexual functioning. Controlling for age, results revealed that patients' psychological distress explained uniquely 24% of the variance on decreased post-MI sexual activity (p < 0.002). Beta-blocker intake and message received with regard to sexual activity safety were not significant predictors of observed changes. Interdisciplinary assessments and interventions are recommended.

Receptor occupancy in lumbar CSF as a measure of the antagonist activity of atenolol, metoprolol and propranolol in the CNS

1. The antagonist activity of atenolol, metoprolol and propranolol in the CNS was estimated by determining the extent to which the drugs occupy animal beta 1- and beta 2-receptors in CSF ex vivo at the time of lumbar puncture. 2. Five CSF and plasma samples were obtained 4 h after drug intake from subjects treated for hypertension with atenolol, 100 mg once daily and five from subjects treated with metoprolol, 50 mg three times daily. Twenty-four samples were obtained 1, 2, 4 or 12 h after drug intake from subjects receiving a single 40 mg dose of propranolol. 3. The receptor occupancy in the samples was determined by adding beta 1-receptors of rabbit lung and beta 2-receptors of rat reticulocytes into the samples and labeling the receptors with a nonselective beta-adrenoceptor antagonist, (-)-[3H]-CGP-12177. 4. Atenolol and metoprolol occupied, as expected, larger fractions of beta 1- than beta 2-receptors in CSF and plasma samples. The receptor fraction occupied by atenolol in CSF was significantly (P < 0.05) lower than that occupied by metoprolol. The differences in occupancy between the drugs in plasma, however, were not statistically significant. 5. Propranolol occupied larger fractions of beta 2- than beta 1-receptors in the samples. Although propranolol concentrations in CSF were only 1/20-1/40 of those in plasma, the receptor occupancy of propranolol in CSF was similar to that in plasma.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Attenuation of myocardial ischemia during coronary occlusion by ultrashort-acting beta adrenergic blockade

To assess the effect of the ultrashort-acting beta blocker esmolol on ischemia induced by acute coronary occlusion, we studied 16 patients undergoing coronary angioplasty. Doppler echocardiography and ECG monitoring were performed continuously before, during, and after balloon occlusion in the drug-free state and during esmolol infusion. Fourteen of the 16 patients had ST segment elevation during balloon inflation. However, maximal ST segment elevation (2.1 +/- 1.5 mm vs 1.7 +/- 1.3 mm, p less than 0.001) and duration of ST segment elevation (68 +/- 20 seconds vs 54 +/- 19 seconds, p less than 0.05) were both significantly reduced during esmolol infusion. Furthermore, the decrease in ejection fraction seen during drug-free balloon occlusions was significantly blunted during esmolol infusion. In the baseline state ejection fraction decreased from 55% to 38% (p less than 0.05) during coronary occlusion compared with a decrease from 52% to 49% (p = NS) during esmolol infusion. In addition, esmolol appeared to delay the onset of segmental wall motion abnormalities after coronary occlusion, occurring at a mean of 40 seconds after balloon inflation versus a mean of 31 seconds in the absence of beta blockade (p less than 0.05). Thus the use of ultrashort-acting beta blockade appears to diminish the extent and delay the onset of myocardial ischemia during acute coronary occlusion.

Ultra short-acting intravenous beta-adrenergic blockade as add-on therapy in acute unstable angina

To assess the efficacy and safety of the ultra short-acting beta-blocking agent, esmolol, in acute unstable angina, we administered esmolol to 21 patients who had persistent angina despite conventional medical therapy. Following a baseline Doppler echocardiographic examination, esmolol was titrated to reduce the rate-pressure product by at least 20%. Once the patients had been receiving a maintenance dosage for 30 minutes, Doppler echocardiographic studies were repeated. Mean esmolol dose at target response was 17 +/- 16 mg/min, with the dosage range of 8 to 24 mg/min. Esmolol was effective in alleviating anginal chest pain in 18 of the 21 patients. Seven patients eventually underwent percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA) and eight had coronary bypass surgery. The remainder were discharged receiving medical therapy including oral beta-blockade. During esmolol therapy, heart rate and blood pressure decreased significantly (86 +/- 14 to 68 +/- 12 beats/min and 125 +/- 16 to 103 +/- 20 mm Hg, both p less than 0.001). Cardiac output decreased from 5.4 +/- 1.3 to 4.5 +/- 1.1 L/min (p less than 0.001) secondary to a decrease in heart rate as stroke volume remained unchanged. Left ventricular ejection fraction increased from 47 +/- 12 to 49 +/- 13 with esmolol therapy, although this change was not statistically significant. Both the one third filling fraction as well as E/A ratio (ratio of early-to-late diastolic filling velocities) increased with esmolol therapy (35 +/- 8% to 38 +/- 8% and 0.73 +/- 0.2 to 0.85 +/- 0.23, both p less than 0.005), indicating improvement in left ventricular diastolic function.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Clinical use of beta-adrenoceptor blockade in systemic hypertension

beta-Blockers are effective in reducing the blood pressure of many patients with systemic hypertension. They differ in terms of the presence or absence of intrinsic sympathomimetic activity, membrane-stabilising activity, beta 1-selectivity, alpha-blocking properties, and relative potency and duration of action. All beta-blockers appear to have blood pressure lowering effects. The choice of which beta-blocker to use in an individual patient is determined by the pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic differences between the drugs in conjunction with the patient's other medical condition(s). This review discusses the practical use of beta-blockers and provides rational suggestions for which drug(s) to use in selected patient groups (Black, elderly, postinfarction, diabetes, renal disease, obstructive lung disease, elevated lipid levels, coexisting angina, and left ventricular hypertrophy).

The treatment of alcohol withdrawal

Abrupt cessation of regular use of alcohol in a dependent person causes a withdrawal syndrome that may range from mild to extremely severe. Most patients require pharmacologic intervention, especially those with severe symptoms. Historically, the pharmacotherapy of alcohol withdrawal has involved a wide variety of agents. Benzodiazepines are currently preferred due to their consistently high degree of efficacy and laudable record of safety. In addition, beta blockers and clonidine are useful, as both effectively combat the hypertension and tachycardia commonly associated with withdrawal. They are ineffective as anticonvulsants; however. Opinions differ concerning the best treatment for withdrawal seizures. Prophylaxis with benzodiazepines may be all that is required, although some authors advocate the use of phenytoin for 5 days, especially in persons with a history of prior seizures during alcohol withdrawal. Once established, delirium tremens are difficult to treat. Benzodiazepines are most commonly used to provide sedation, and extremely large doses may be required. Careful clinical assessment is essential to the proper treatment of patients undergoing alcohol withdrawal since the coexistence of medical problems may complicate the condition.

Effect of metoprolol on serial measurements of exchangeable sodium, blood pressure, renin and pulse rate in spontaneously hypertensive rats

The cardioselective beta-blocker metoprolol was mixed with the diet (6 mg metoprolol/g food) and given to 9 spontaneously hypertensive rats (SHR) for four weeks, while 9 other SHR were given the plain diet only and served as controls. All rats were also given 0.5% drinking saline labeled with isotope 22Na (37 kBq/1) to drink. Measurements of total exchangeable sodium, blood pressure, pulse rate and weight were performed before and repeatedly during treatment. Plasma renin activity was measured at the end of the study. Before treatment exchangeable sodium, blood pressure, pulse rate and weight were no different between the groups. Metoprolol reduced the pulse rate and prevented the usual blood pressure increase in SHR. Both groups gained weight similarly. Exchangeable sodium increased similarly in both groups along with the weight increase. Plasma renin activity was not significantly different in the two groups. Thus, chronic metoprolol treatment of SHR reduced blood pressure and pulse rate in SHR but did not lower plasma renin or cause measurable sodium or fluid retention.

Safety and efficacy of esmolol for unstable angina pectoris

Esmolol is a rapidly metabolized cardioselective beta-adrenergic blocker that provides steady state beta-adrenergic blockade when administered by continuous intravenous infusion. To determine the efficacy of esmolol in the management of unstable angina, 23 patients with known coronary artery disease, who averaged 3.7 +/- 2.7 daily episodes of chest pain at rest, were randomized to receive either a continuous infusion of esmolol (n = 12) or oral propranolol (n = 11), as an adjunct to concomitant antianginal therapy. Patients with systolic blood pressure less than 110 mm Hg, heart rate less than 60 beats/min or known contraindications to beta blockade were excluded. Esmolol was titrated in a step-wise fashion from 2 to 24 mg/min at 5-minute intervals up to a 30% reduction in heart rate and systolic blood pressure double-product. The propranolol dose was increased every 6 hours by 50 to 100% to achieve a similar reduction in heart rate and blood pressure. When compared with their 24-hour baseline periods, both groups achieved a significant reduction in episodes of chest pain, from 4.6 +/- 3.3 to 1.4 +/- 1.5 in the esmolol group (p less than 0.02) and 2.6 +/- 1.4 to 1.0 +/- 1.5 in the propranolol group (p less than 0.02) during the subsequent study period. The cardiac event rate and incidence of drug side effects were similar between the 2 groups; however, side effects seen with esmolol did not require treatment after drug discontinuation. Thus, maximally tolerated beta blockade is an effective therapy for unstable angina.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Use of an ultrashort-acting beta-receptor blocker (esmolol) in patients with acute myocardial ischemia and relative contraindications to beta-blockade therapy

The hemodynamic responses to esmolol, an ultrashort-acting (t1/2 = 9 min) beta 1-adrenergic receptor antagonist, were examined in 16 patients with myocardial ischemia and compromised left ventricular function as evidenced by a mean pulmonary capillary wedge pressure of 15 to 25 mm Hg. Esmolol was infused intravenously to a maximal dose of 300 micrograms/kg body weight per min for less than or equal to 48 h in 16 patients: 9 with acute myocardial infarction, 6 with periinfarction angina and 1 with acute unstable angina. The sinus rate and systolic arterial pressure declined rapidly in all patients from baseline values of 99 +/- 12 beats/min and 126 +/- 19 mm Hg to 80 +/- 14 beats/min (p less than 0.05) and 107 +/- 20 mm Hg (p less than or equal to 0.05) during esmolol treatment. Rate-pressure product decreased by 33% and cardiac index by 14% during esmolol treatment, but pulmonary capillary wedge pressure was not significantly altered by drug infusion (19 +/- 3 mm Hg at baseline versus 19 +/- 5 during treatment, p = NS). In all patients there was a rapid return toward baseline hemodynamic measurements within 15 min of stopping administration of esmolol, and virtually complete resolution of drug effect was evident within approximately 30 min. During infusion of esmolol, four of nine patients receiving intravenous nitroglycerin required downward adjustment of nitroglycerin infusion rate to maintain systolic blood pressure greater than 90 mm Hg.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Preservation of the end-systolic pressure/end-systolic dimension relation following pindolol in congestive heart failure

Beta blockade may adversely affect inotropic state of the ventricle, resulting in exacerbation of congestive heart failure in subjects with reduced ventricular function. In normal subjects, ventricular contractility appears to be preserved following administration of beta blockers with intrinsic sympathomimetic activity (ISA). The inotropic state of the ventricle was assessed in seven subjects with congestive heart failure (mean ejection fraction = 23 +/- 5%) before and after administration of the ISA beta blocker, pindolol, with the use of the noninvasively derived end-systolic pressure/end-systolic dimension (ESP/ESD) relation. The mean slope of the ESP/ESD relation was 36.3 +/- 20.4 mm Hg/cm at baseline and increased to 45.0 +/- 25.2 mm Hg/cm following five consecutive 10 mg oral doses of pindolol (p = ns). Other simultaneously derived inotropic indices that included percent fractional shortening, mean delta P/delta T, velocity of circumferential fiber shortening, and preejection period-to-left ventricular ejection time ratio showed directionally similar changes toward a mild increase in contractility. These results indicate that the slope of the left ventricular ESP/ESD relation is not altered following repeated dosing with pindolol in subjects with congestive heart failure. This reflects a preservation of inotropic state following administration of this ISA beta blocker in a population with severely compromised ventricular function.

Beta-adrenergic receptor blockers. Adverse effects and drug interactions

Adverse effects of beta-adrenergic receptor blocking drugs can be divided into two categories: 1) those that result from known pharmacological consequences of beta-adrenergic receptor blockade; and 2) other reactions that do not appear to result from beta-adrenergic receptor blockade. Adverse effects of the first type include bronchospasm, heart failure, prolonged hypoglycemia, bradycardia, heart block, intermittent claudication, and Raynaud's phenomenon. Neurological reactions include depression, fatigue, and nightmares. It is not yet proven whether the beta 1-selective adrenergic blockers or those with partial agonist activity reduce the overall frequency of adverse reactions seen with propranolol. Patient age does not appear, in itself, to be associated with more beta-blocker side effects. Side effects of the second category are rare. They include an unusual oculomucocutaneous reaction and the possibility of oncogenesis. There are also many drugs that interact with beta-blockers, which may increase toxicity. Finally, there are specific patient characteristics where one beta-blocker may be more effective and safer than another.

Out-patient use of beta-blocking agents--prescribing preferences of physicians in training

Beta-blocking agents are among the most frequently prescribed medications. To investigate the factors that influence their use we analysed the practices of 25 medical residents who provided longitudinal care in the out-patient clinics of a teaching hospital. A computer-based audit identified the 349 patients treated with one of four beta-blocking agents during a 4-month period. The most frequently prescribed was atenolol (48%), followed by metoprolol (28%), propranolol (20%), and nadolol (4%). Ease of use and compliance and continuation of a beta-blocker prescribed by a previous physician emerged as the most influential factors. In contrast, cost of drugs, manufacturers' promotions and advertisements had no significant influence on beta-blocker selection.

The pharmacokinetics of lignocaine and beta-adrenoceptor antagonists in patients with acute myocardial infarction

Lignocaine (lidocaine) and beta-adrenoceptor antagonists are widely used after acute myocardial infarction. The therapeutic value of these agents depends on the achievement and maintenance of safe and effective plasma concentrations. Lignocaine pharmacokinetics after acute myocardial infarction (MI) are controlled by a number of variables. The single most important is left ventricular function, which affects both volume of distribution and plasma clearance. Other major factors include bodyweight, age, hepatic function, the presence of obesity, and concomitant drug therapy. Lignocaine is extensively bound to alpha 1-acid glycoprotein, a plasma protein which is also an acute phase reactant. Increases in alpha 1-acid glycoprotein concentration occur after an acute MI, decreasing the free fraction of lignocaine in the plasma and consequently decreasing total plasma lignocaine clearance without altering the clearance of non-protein-bound lignocaine. Complex changes in lignocaine disposition occur with long term infusions, and therefore early discontinuation of lignocaine infusions (within 24 hours) should be undertaken whenever possible. Because the risk of ventricular tachyarrhythmia declines rapidly after the onset of an acute MI, lignocaine therapy can be rationally discontinued within 24 hours in most patients. Lignocaine has a narrow toxic/therapeutic index, so that pharmacokinetic factors are critical in dose selection. In contrast, beta-adrenoceptor antagonists' adverse effects are more related to the presence of predisposing conditions (such as asthma, heart failure, bradyarrhythmias, etc.) than to plasma concentration. The pharmacokinetics of beta-adrenoceptor antagonists are important to help assure therapeutic efficacy, to provide information about the anticipated time course of drug action, and to predict the possible role of ancillary drug effects (such as direct membrane action) and loss of cardioselectivity. Lipid solubility is the main determinant of the pharmacokinetic properties of a beta-adrenoceptor antagonist. Lipid-soluble agents like propranolol and metoprolol are well absorbed orally, and undergo rapid hepatic metabolism, with important presystemic clearance and a short plasma half-life. Water-soluble drugs like sotalol, atenolol, and nadolol are less well absorbed, and are eliminated more slowly by renal excretion. Clinical assessment of beta-adrenoceptor antagonism is more valuable than plasma concentration determinations in evaluating the adequacy of the dose of a particular beta-adrenoceptor antagonist.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Clinical significance of beta 1-selectivity and intrinsic sympathomimetic activity in a beta-adrenergic blocking drug

Almost all beta-adrenergic blockers, regardless of their pharmacologic characteristics, appear to have blood pressure-lowering activity in hypertensive patients. Comparisons between nonselective beta-blocking agents, such as propranolol and nadolol, with beta 1-selective drugs, such as metoprolol, atenolol and acebutolol, have demonstrated close similarities in their antihypertensive effects in patients. Similarly, beta blockers with and without intrinsic sympathomimetic activity (ISA) have comparable antihypertensive effects. However, beta-selective agents may offer some advantages over conventional beta blockers in hypertensive patients with concurrent conditions such as chronic obstructive airways disease, peripheral vascular disease, diabetes and hyperlipidemia. Beta 1-selective drugs are also preferred in diabetic patients receiving hypoglycemic agents because they do not interfere with glycogenolysis. Agents lacking ISA, such as propranolol, acutely increase peripheral resistance. beta blockers with ISA usually lower resistance. ISA may also minimize the bradycardia frequently found in elderly patients. Agents with ISA may protect against the decrease in high density lipoprotein cholesterol and the modest increase in triglycerides noted with some beta blockers that do not have ISA. Thus, in a large number of clinical situations in which hypertension is found, the properties of beta 1 selectivity and ISA allow beta blockers to be used with greater safety. Therefore, agents possessing both of these properties may be particularly valuable.

Usefulness of bevantolol for chronic, stable angina pectoris

An objective assessment of the efficacy of bevantolol was performed in 21 patients with chronic, stable angina using computer-assisted exercise testing and ambulatory ST-segment monitoring. Given once daily, 200 mg of bevantolol was compared with 200 mg of bevantolol given twice daily and with placebo, using a double-blind crossover technique. The mean exercise time with placebo was 7.4 +/- 0.6 minutes; this increased to 10.6 +/- 0.9 minutes (p less than 0.001) with once-daily bevantolol and to 9.4 +/- 0.9 minutes (p less than 0.001) with twice-daily bevantolol. The mean heart rate at rest was 80 +/- 3 beats/min with placebo; it decreased to 63 +/- 2 beats/min (p less than 0.001) with once-daily bevantolol and to 66 +/- 2 beats/min (p less than 0.001) with twice-daily bevantolol. The maximum exercise heart rate of 118 +/- 6 beats/min with placebo was reduced to 99 +/- 4 beats/min (p less than 0.001) on once-daily and 101 +/- 4 beats/min (p less than 0.001) on twice-daily bevantolol. There was a corresponding decrease in the rate-pressure product. The corrected maximum ST-segment depression was reduced from 0.3 +/- 0.06 mm min-1 with placebo to 0.2 +/- 0.03 mm min-1 (p less than 0.02) with once-daily and 0.2 +/- 0.04 mm min-1 (p less than 0.05) with twice-daily bevantolol. The mean hourly ambulatory heart rate was significantly reduced for 21 hours with once-daily and 22 hours with twice-daily bevantolol. The lowest mean minimum heart rate was 55 beats/min during twice-daily treatment. The mean number of episodes of ST depression over 24 hours in lead CM5 was decreased from 6.89 +/- 1.7 with placebo to 2.50 +/- 0.6 (p less than 0.001) with once-daily and to 3.72 +/- 1.3 (p less than 0.001) with twice-daily bevantolol. Three patients were withdrawn during the once-daily bevantolol regimen due to adverse experiences, and another patient was admitted for coronary artery bypass surgery after 25 days.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Further studies on the tumor-initiating activity of the beta-blocker DL-ZAMI 1305

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the initiating activity of the hepatocarcinogen beta-blocker DL-1-(2-nitro-3-methyl-phenoxy)-3-tert-butylamino-propan-2-ol (DL-ZAMI 1305) by the initiation-promotion protocol of Pereira. Female Wistar rats were given a single dose 150 mg/kg of body weight of DL-ZAMI 1305 by gavage 24 hours before or 24 hours after partial hepatectomy. One week later rats were given phenobarbital (0.05%) in the diet for a period of 7 weeks. DL-ZAMI 1305-treatment resulted in the appearance of gamma-glutamyltranspeptidase foci and of other preneoplastic lesions in all animals. Preneoplastic lesions were also present in a fraction of DL-ZAMI 1305-treated animals not subjected to partial hepatectomy, whether given or not phenobarbital. Results obtained in a separate experiment demonstrated that DL-ZAMI 1305-treatment inhibits cell proliferation and induces DNA damage in the regenerating rat liver. The results of this study clearly demonstrated that the beta-blocker DL-ZAMI 1305 is an initiating carcinogen for the liver of female Wistar rats.

Effect of beta-adrenergic blockers on the peripheral circulation in patients with peripheral vascular disease

Beta-Adrenergic blockers have not been widely used in patients with peripheral vascular disease because these drugs have been reported to worsen the symptoms of intermittent claudication. To test this assumption we studied the effects of a beta 1-selective and a nonselective beta-adrenergic blocker on postexercise calf blood flow and symptoms of claudication in 19 patients with mild-to-moderate peripheral vascular disease. Subjects received placebo for 3 weeks, and then were randomized to 120 mg/day propranolol or 150 mg/day metoprolol with the use of a crossover design. Blood flow in the calf was measured by strain-gauge plethysmography at rest and immediately after exercise on a bicycle ergometer at a low and a high workload. The symptoms of claudication were monitored during bicycle exercise and by patient diaries maintained between visits. Maximal exercise heart rate was reduced an equivalent amount by metoprolol (19 beats/min) and propranolol (16 beats/min). Mean arterial pressure was reduced by propranolol at rest and by both drugs with exercise. Calf blood flow was not affected by either drug compared with placebo at rest or at either workload. In addition, the symptoms of claudication were not worsened by either drug. We conclude that despite evidence of beta 1-adrenergic blockade and a lowering of arterial pressure, neither beta-adrenergic blocker adversely affected the peripheral circulation.

Use of an ultra short-acting beta-blocker in patients with acute myocardial ischemia

Esmolol is a new ultra short-acting (half-life [t1/2] beta 9 min) beta 1-adrenergic-receptor antagonist reported to have no intrinsic sympathomimetic activity. The safety and efficacy of esmolol in lowering the ventricular rate and rate-pressure product in patients with acute myocardial infarction (n = 5), postmyocardial infarction angina (n = 10), or acute unstable angina (n = 4), and without cardiogenic shock were studied. After a 30 min observation period, esmolol was titrated to a maximum dose of 300 micrograms/kg/min and infused for up to 420 min. The ventricular rate fell from 92 +/- 11 (mean +/- SD) to 77 +/- 13 beats/min (p less than .01) and the systolic arterial pressure decreased from 120 +/- 13 to 97 +/- 11 mm Hg (p less than .01) during the initial 30 min titration period. There was no significant change during the maintenance phase, and both the ventricular rate and arterial pressure returned rapidly toward baseline values within 30 min of termination of the infusion. The cardiac index fell from 2.8 +/- 0.6 to 2.2 +/- 0.6 liters/min/m2 (p less than .01) during the same period, and also returned to the baseline level 30 min after termination of the infusion. There was no significant change in the pulmonary capillary wedge pressure, respiratory rate, or PR interval. Five patients required termination of infusion because of hypotension and all recovered uneventfully within 30 min of stopping the esmolol. One patient required a brief infusion of dopamine to restore hemodynamic stability.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Anion-channel blockade with alinidine: a specific bradycardic drug for coronary heart disease without negative inotropic activity?

In 14 patients undergoing cardiac catheterization for suspected coronary artery disease, alinidine, 0.6 mg/kg, was administered intravenously to determine its effects on left ventricular (LV) function, coronary blood flow and myocardial oxygen consumption. To assess effects independent of changes in heart rate (HR), measurements were made at spontaneous and matched pacing HRs. At spontaneous HR, alinidine decreased HR from 70 +/- 2 to 61 +/- 3 beats/min (p less than 10(-6]. Peak rate of LV pressure decreased from 1,652 +/- 92 to 1,371 +/- 80 mm Hg/s (p less than 10(-5] and Vmax decreased from 47 +/- 3 to 41 +/- 2 s-1 (p less than 10(-4]. Coronary sinus blood flow decreased from 109 +/- 9 to 89 +/- 7 ml/min (p less than 0.01) and myocardial oxygen consumption from 10.9 +/- 1.0 to 9.0 +/- 0.8 ml O2/min (p less than 0.05). At a matched pacing HR of 98 +/- 3 beats/min before and after alinidine administration, peak rate of LV pressure decreased from 1,984 +/- 124 to 1,793 +/- 106 mm Hg/s (p less than 10(-4] and Vmax from 60 +/- 5 to 56 +/- 4 s-1 (p less than 0.02). Coronary sinus blood flow and myocardial oxygen consumption were not significantly changed at matched pacing HRs. The time constant of the first 40 ms of LV isovolumic relaxation was prolonged by alinidine only during spontaneous HR. Thus, alinidine results in a bradycardia-dependent decrease in myocardial oxygen consumption. It has negative inotropic properties independent of changes in HR and so is not a pure bradycardia-specific agent.

Arrhythmias after coronary bypass surgery

Ninety patients undergoing coronary bypass surgery were studied prospectively by bedside and subsequent ambulatory electrocardiographic monitoring to investigate the incidence, possible causes, and prevention of atrial fibrillation. Patients with good left ventricular function were divided randomly into a control group or groups treated with digoxin or propranolol. In the control group the incidence of atrial fibrillation was 27% and of significant ventricular extrasystoles 3%. Propranolol reduced the incidence of atrial fibrillation (14.8%), whereas digoxin had no effect and increased the incidence of ventricular extrasystoles. Age, sex, severity of symptoms, cardiomegaly, heart failure, previous myocardial infarction, and number of grafts did not affect the result. The operative myocardial ischaemic time was related to the occurrence of atrial fibrillation. There was also a significant relation between atrial fibrillation and bundle branch block. Atrial fibrillation is common after coronary artery grafting; it may be due to diffuse myocardial ischaemia or hypothermic injury. The incidence may be reduced by beta blockade.

Optical isomers of the hepatocarcinogenic beta-blocker ZAMI 1305: influence on nucleic acids synthesis and DNA integrity

The influence on nucleic acids synthesis and DNA integrity of the D-isomer and of the DL-racemic form of the oncogenic beta-blocker 1-(2-nitro-3-methyl-phenoxy)-3-tert-butylamino-propan-2-ol (ZAMI 1305) and of the non-oncogenic beta-blocker propranolol was tested in vitro and in vivo. Both D- and DL-ZAMI 1305, when added in vitro to nuclei isolated from rat liver, cause inhibition of DNA and RNA synthesis and DNA fragmentation, as evaluated by alkaline sucrose gradient analysis, in a similar dose-dependent fashion. D- and DL-ZAMI 1305 also inhibit to a similar extent the activity of DNA polymerase alpha and beta from regenerating rat liver. When administered in vivo to female rats both D and DL-ZAMI 1305 cause a dose-dependent fragmentation of liver DNA. The D-isomer and DL-racemic form of the non-oncogenic beta-blocker propranolol inhibit DNA and RNA synthesis and cause DNA fragmentation when added in vitro to isolated liver nuclei, being instead without effect when administered in vivo.

Efficacy of once daily penbutolol in chronic stable angina. An objective comparison with long-acting propranolol

The effects of penbutolol (40 mg daily) and long-acting propranolol (160 mg daily) were assessed in 26 patients with chronic stable angina in a placebo-controlled randomised double-blind crossover study with 2-weekly treatment periods. In addition to conventional subjective assessment, serial multistage treadmill exercise was used to obtain objective data on drug efficacy and 24-hr ambulatory electrocardiography performed for diurnal heart rate analysis. The mean exercise time of 6.3 +/- 0.5 (SEM) min on placebo increased to 7.3 +/- 0.6 min on penbutolol (P less than 0.01) and to 7.9 +/- 0.5 min on propranolol (P less than 0.001). The pre-exercise resting heart rate was 73 +/- 2 beats/min on placebo and decreased to 63 +/- 2 beats/min on penbutolol (P less than 0.001) and 58 +/- 2 beats/min on propranolol (P less than 0.001). The maximum exercise heart rate was similarly reduced by both drugs and there was a corresponding reduction in peak exercise double product. The time-corrected maximum ST segment depression was reduced by both drugs and neither produced a delay in ST segment recovery. Both drugs effected significant reductions in ambulatory maximum hourly heart rates throughout 24 hr. The lowest observed heart rate on penbutolol was 40 beats/min and 34 beats/min on propranolol. Penbutolol is an effective antianginal agent with a profile of action similar to that of propranolol.

Serum sickness-like syndrome associated with propranolol therapy

A serum sickness-like syndrome developed in a 38-year-old woman with a history of drug allergy who had been taking propranolol hydrochloride (Inderal) for four days. The illness resolved after the drug was withdrawn and a course of prednisone therapy was given. We recommend caution to physicians in prescribing propranolol or other beta-adrenergic blocking agents for patients with a history of allergic reactions to drugs. Also, all patients using beta-blocking agents should be cautioned that although serum sickness-like syndrome is rare, it requires immediate medical attention.

Effect of some beta-adrenergic blocking agents on tissue guanylate cyclase and cyclic nucleotides in the rat

Pretreatment of rats with the beta-adrenergic blocking agents, atenolol, practolol, pronethalol and propranolol, at a dosage of 150 mg/kg/day for 5 days, produced marked increases in guanylate cyclase activity in the liver, gastric and intestinal mucosae, but with concomitant decreases in cyclic GMP levels. The ratios of cAMP/cGMP in each of the tissues were not changed significantly from control values after pretreatment with these drugs. These observations indicate that any oncogenicity seen with beta-blocking agents is not due to the common pharmacological action of beta-adrenoreceptor blockade.

Beta-adrenoceptor-blocking drugs: current status and the significance of partial agonist activity

There is some evidence that partial agonism is an important property of beta-blocking drugs, and this property may be exploited to produce a new range of positive inotropic drugs. With the established beta-adrenoceptor-blocking drugs, the level of partial agonist activity is weak and the dose-response curve for this property is shallow. However, its absence appears to increase the likelihood of inducing bronchospasm and bradycardia, and drugs that lack intrinsic sympathomimetic activity appear more likely to be associated with rebound cardiac arrhythmias on cessation of treatment. The idea of a small level of hormone activity--in this case, catecholamine activity--being necessary to maintain normal cardiac and perhaps bronchial function is not new. Minimal doses of steroids are essential to maintaining the inotropic action of cardiac muscle. There is now enough accumulated evidence to suggest that a minimal degree of beta-adrenoceptor stimulation is also important for normal bronchial and cardiac function, and its absence increases the incidence of bradycardia and the risks of bronchospasm and rebound arrhythmias.

In vitro inhibition of rat liver DNA polymerases α and β by β-blockers

The activity of DNA polymerases α and β, isolated from regenerating rat liver, is inhibited, in a dose-dependent fashion, by the oncogenic β-blocker DL-I-(2-nitro-3-methyl-phenoxy) - 3-tert-butylamino-propan-2-ol (ZAM[ 1305) and by non-oncogenic β-blockers DL-l-(2-nitro-5-methyl-phenoxy-3-tert-butylamino-propan-2-ol (ZAMI 1327) and DL-propranolol. The inhibition is due to a reversible interaction of the g-blockers with the two DNA polymerases. The interaction does not involve the template-DNA-binding site or the deoxynucleotide-binding site of the enzyme molecule. The degree of inhibition appears to be related to the hydrophobicity of the aromatic moiety and to the length and/or hydrophilicity of the aliphatic chain of the β-blocker molecule. These results may explain the transient in vivo inhibition of hepatic DNA synthesis observed in female rats treated with ZAMI 1305 or ZAMI 1327.

Pindolol and propranolol in patients with angina pectoris and normal or near-normal ventricular function. Lack of influence of intrinsic sympathomimetic activity on global and segmental left ventricular function assessed by radionuclide ventriculography

To investigate the role of intrinsic sympathomimetic activity on left ventricular (LV) function during antianginal therapy with beta-adrenoreceptor antagonists, 23 patients with chronic, exercise-induced angina pectoris and normal or near normal LV function underwent radionuclide ventriculography at rest and during exercise, during 3 randomly allocated periods: (a) treatment with oral propranolol, a drug without intrinsic sympathomimetic activity, 40 to 80 mg 4 times a day; (2) treatment with pindolol, a drug with marked intrinsic sympathomimetic activity, 5 to 10 mg 2 times a day; and (3) a control period. During the control period, the LV ejection fraction decreased from rest (58.9 +/- 8.2%) to exercise (54.3 +/- 10.7%), and the wall motion score decreased from 0.57 +/- 1.08 at rest to 2.39 +/- 2.10 during exercise, p less than 0.001. After propranolol, the ejection fraction did not change significantly at rest (57.2 +/- 8.1%) but improved during exercise (56.8 +/- 11.8%), compared with control values. After pindolol, the ejection fraction did not change at rest (57.9 +/- 8.6%) but improved during exercise (56.9 +/- 8.1%), compared with control values. Similarly, the wall motion score after administration of both agents did not change significantly at rest, but improved during exercise (p less than 0.001). The number of anginal episodes, nitroglycerin tablets consumed, and magnitude of S-T segment depression decreased significantly with both pindolol and propranolol. With both drugs, a similar improvement in exercise tolerance and a similar decrease in exercise heart rate and blood pressure were obtained. It is concluded that pindolol and propranolol, beta-adrenoreceptor antagonists with and without intrinsic sympathomimetic activity, respectively, have similar effects on global and regional LV function in patients with angina pectoris, at doses producing equal suppression of exercise heart rate and similar antianginal effect.

Antianginal efficacy and improved exercise performance with timolol. Twice-daily beta blockade in ischemic heart disease

Antianginal efficacy and improved exercise performance with timolol, a new beta-adrenergic blocking agent, was assessed in 23 patients with chronic stable angina pectoris in an 11-week double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Twenty-two of the 23 subjects completed the open-label phase of this investigation (weeks 0 to 6) while receiving 10 to 30 mg of timolol twice daily to optimize exercise capacity. Weekly anginal episodes and nitroglycerin consumption declined from 8.9 +/- 9.1 episodes/week and 8.1 +/- 10.6 tablets/week, respectively, with placebo to 2.7 +/- 5.2 episodes/week and 2.6 +/- 6.0 tablets/week with optimal timolol dose (p less than 0.05). Resting heart rate (HR) and systolic blood pressure (SBP) also decreased from 75.2 +/- 14.0 beats/min and 139.1 +/- 15.7 mm Hg with placebo to 55.1 +/- 8.9 beats/min and 130.5 +/- 15.9 mm Hg with timolol (p less than 0.05). Peak exercise HR, peak exercise SBP, and peak exercise double product (HR X SBP) were significantly (p less than 0.05) reduced when evaluated 12 to 13 hours after administration of timolol compared with placebo (101.5 +/- 21.1 beats/min verus 193.3 +/- 96.2 beats/min, 161.5 +/- 26.7 mm Hg versus 175.6 + 20.8 mm Hg, and 16.6 +/- 5.1 X 10(-3) versus 21.7 +/- 5.4 X 10(-3), respectively). Exercise duration was prolonged from 263.3 +/- 90.2 seconds to 330.3 +/- 73.9 seconds (p less than 0.05), while time to onset of 1 mm S-T segment depression was delayed in 15 patients from 231.8 +/- 86.4 seconds to 298.7 +/- 68.4 seconds (p less than 0.05). During the double-blind phase (weeks 7 to 10), 8 subjects received timolol and 11 patients received placebo. Nitroglycerin consumption at weeks 8 and 10 and anginal frequency at week 8 were unchanged compared with initial placebo treatment. Resting HR, peak exercise HR, and peak exercise double product were significantly attenuated at weeks 8 and 10 in timolol patients compared with their initial placebo exposure. However, these variables were unchanged in placebo subjects compared with their initial placebo therapy. Exercise duration was again prolonged at week 8 in timolol subjects compared with initial placebo results (315.1 +/- 61.2 seconds versus 261.3 +/- 68.8 seconds, p less than 0.05), but not at week 10. Placebo patients demonstrated no difference at week 8 or 10 in exercise performance compared with initial placebo treatment. Timolol twice daily, therefore, is potentially useful in some patients with angina pectoris. Other patients may, however, require a shorter dose interval for optimal angina control and maximal improvement in exercise capacity.

Beta-adrenoceptor blocking drugs: adverse reactions and drug interactions

Beta adrenoceptor blocking drugs are relatively well tolerated and adverse reactions to them are not common. The ones that do occur are reviewed in this paper under the following headings: Short term adverse reactions, drug interactions, long term adverse reactions, risks in pregnancy and hazards of abrupt withdrawal. Predictable short term effects may be caused either by the actions of these drugs on the beta 1- or beta 2-receptors. The beta 1 adverse effects are hypotension, bradycardia and cardiac failure; these are best avoided by not giving beta-adrenoceptor blocking drugs to susceptible patients with cardiac disease. The beta 2 adverse effects on the bronchi, the peripheral arteries and various metabolic functions may be reduced to some extent by using a relatively cardioselective drug. Unpredictable short term effects such as fatigue, sexual dysfunction and gastrointestinal symptoms may occur but are not common problems with this group of drugs. Similarly, serious drug interactions are infrequent. Under the heading of long term adverse effects the practolol problem and the risk of causing malignant disorders have been considered. There is no evidence that any of the currently available drugs will cause either a practolol syndrome or malignant disease in man. However, the need for careful appraisal by drug regulatory bodies and continued vigilance by all prescribers of beta-adrenoceptor blocking drugs remains. The possible adverse effects of treatment during pregnancy are also considered. It now appears that beta-adrenoceptor drugs can be used safely in pregnancy but since neonatal bradycardia and hypoglycemia may occur, care should be taken to look for these complications. A serious deterioration may occur when beta-adrenoceptor drugs, given to patients with significant ischemic heart disease, are suddenly stopped. This is a rare occurrence but prescribers should be aware of it.

Atenolol and metoprolol: comparison of effects on blood pressure and serum lipoproteins, and side effects

Several beta-blockers increase VLDL-TG and decrease HDL-cholesterol concentrations. The underlying mechanism is not yet clear. Some studies have suggested that the effect is less pronounced during treatment with selective beta-blockers. The effects of 2 such drugs, metoprolol 200 mg/day and atenolol 50 mg/day, have been compared in 50 hypertensive patients (WHO Stage I-II), mean age 47 years. Serum lipoproteins were determined in 20 patients before treatment and after treatment with either drug for 3 months. Both drugs were equally effective in reducing blood pressure. After atenolol the initial VLDL-cholesterol concentration of 1.04 mmol/l had not changed, but it rose to 1.29 mmol/l after metoprolol (p less than 0.05). The HDL-cholesterol concentration 1.42 mmol/l did not fall during atenolol treatment, but during metoprolol there was a small reduction to 1.31 mmol/l (p less than 0.05). Hyperlipoproteinaemia is common in hypertensive patients, 40% of the present group had hypertriglyceridaemia and 25% had hypercholesterolaemia. Thus, atenolol 50 mg was found not to affect lipoproteins, whereas metoprolol 200 mg increased the VLDL concentration in 75% of the patients.