Electrophysiologic effects of flecainide acetate in patients with sinus nodal dysfunction

[Historical development of diagnosis of bradyarrhythmias : The early years of clinical electrophysiology in Germany]

The introduction of His bundle electrography by Benjamin Scherlag (New York) in 1969, together with programmed stimulation of the heart by Philip Coumel (Paris) in 1967, and Hein Wellens (Amsterdam) in 1972, were decisive turning points on the way to invasive electrophysiology and the development of an independent, now distinctly interventional subspecialty of cardiology. The main topic of the 1970s was bradycardic arrhythmias, promoted by pacemaker therapy, which had been introduced just over 10 years earlier. The recording of the potentials of the bundle of His and other recording locations in the atria and ventricles allowed a differentiated assessment of the excitation process and the refractory periods. High-rate atrial stimulation to determine sinus node recovery time and premature stimulation to determine sinoatrial conduction time were developed to analyze sinoatrial node function. This article describes the introduction of His bundle electrography in a gradually increasing number of centers in Germany and their scientific contribution.

The Bradycardic Agent Ivabradine Acts as an Atypical Inhibitor of Voltage-Gated Sodium Channels

Background and purpose: Ivabradine is clinically administered to lower the heart rate, proposedly by inhibiting hyperpolarization-activated cyclic nucleotide-gated cation channels in the sinoatrial node. Recent evidence suggests that voltage-gated sodium channels (VGSC) are inhibited within the same concentration range. VGSCs are expressed within the sinoatrial node and throughout the conduction system of the heart. A block of these channels thus likely contributes to the established and newly raised clinical indications of ivabradine. We, therefore, investigated the pharmacological action of ivabradine on VGSCs in sufficient detail in order to gain a better understanding of the pro- and anti-arrhythmic effects associated with the administration of this drug.

Experimental Approach: Ivabradine was tested on VGSCs in native cardiomyocytes isolated from mouse ventricles and the His-Purkinje system and on human Na_v1.5 in a heterologous expression system. We investigated the mechanism of channel inhibition by determining its voltage-, frequency-, state-, and temperature-dependence, complemented by a molecular drug docking to the recent Na_v1.5 cryoEM structure. Automated patch-clamp experiments were used to investigate ivabradine-mediated changes in Na_v1.5 inactivation parameters and inhibition of different VGSC isoforms.

Key results: Ivabradine inhibited VGSCs in a voltage- and frequency-dependent manner, but did not alter voltage-dependence of activation and fast inactivation, nor recovery from fast inactivation. Cardiac (Na_v1.5), neuronal (Na_v1.2), and skeletal muscle (Na_v1.4) VGSC isoforms were inhibited by ivabradine within the same concentration range, as were sodium currents in native cardiomyocytes isolated from the ventricles and the His-Purkinje system. Molecular drug docking suggested an interaction of ivabradine with the classical local anesthetic binding site.

Conclusion and Implications: Ivabradine acts as an atypical inhibitor of VGSCs. Inhibition of VGSCs likely contributes to the heart rate lowering effect of ivabradine, in particular at higher stimulation frequencies and depolarized membrane potentials, and to the observed slowing of intra-cardiac conduction. Inhibition of VGSCs in native cardiomyocytes and across channel isoforms may provide a potential basis for the anti-arrhythmic potential as observed upon administration of ivabradine.

Use of Flecainide for the Treatment of Atrial Fibrillation

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common sustained arrhythmia and is associated with substantial morbidity and impairment of quality of life. Restoration and maintenance of normal sinus rhythm is a desirable goal for many patients with AF; however, this strategy is limited by the relatively small number of antiarrhythmic drugs (AADs) available for AF rhythm control. Although it is recommended in current medical guidelines as first-line therapy for patients without structural heart disease, the use of flecainide has been curtailed since the completion of the Cardiac Arrhythmia Suppression Trial. In clinical trials and real-world use, flecainide has proven to be more effective than other AADs for the acute termination of recent onset AF. Flecainide is also moderately effective and, with the exception of amiodarone, equivalent to other AADs for the chronic suppression of paroxysmal and persistent AF. In patients without structural heart disease, flecainide has been demonstrated to be safe and well tolerated relative to other AADs. Despite this favorable profile, flecainide is underutilized, likely due to a perceived risk of ventricular proarrhythmia, a concern that has not been borne out in patients without underlying structural heart disease. Guidelines for administration and use of flecainide are summarized in this review.

Impaired neuronal sodium channels cause intranodal conduction failure and reentrant arrhythmias in human sinoatrial node

Mechanisms for human sinoatrial node (SAN) dysfunction are poorly understood and whether human SAN excitability requires voltage-gated sodium channels (Nav) remains controversial. Here, we report that neuronal (n)Nav blockade and selective nNav1.6 blockade during high-resolution optical mapping in explanted human hearts depress intranodal SAN conduction, which worsens during autonomic stimulation and overdrive suppression to conduction failure. Partial cardiac (c)Nav blockade further impairs automaticity and intranodal conduction, leading to beat-to-beat variability and reentry. Multiple nNav transcripts are higher in SAN vs atria; heterogeneous alterations of several isoforms, specifically nNav1.6, are associated with heart failure and chronic alcohol consumption. In silico simulations of Nav distributions suggest that I_Na is essential for SAN conduction, especially in fibrotic failing hearts. Our results reveal that not only cNav but nNav are also integral for preventing disease-induced failure in human SAN intranodal conduction. Disease-impaired nNav may underlie patient-specific SAN dysfunctions and should be considered to treat arrhythmias.

The role of of voltage-gated sodium channels (Nav) in pacemaking and conduction of the human sinoatrial node is unclear. Here, the authors investigate existence and function of neuronal and cardiac Nav in human sinoatrial nodes, and demonstrate their alterations in explanted human diseased hearts.

An electrocardiographic series of flecainide toxicity

Anti-arrhythmic drugs (AADs) uniquely affect the various electrolyte channels in the heart and can slow conduction, increase refractoriness, and/or decrease automaticity with the goal of preventing tachyarrhythmias. Due to these properties, these same drugs are by nature pro-arrhythmic. Vaughan-Williams classification Ic AADs belong to a class of medications that inhibit sodium channels, leading to decreased conduction velocity of myocytes and Purkinje fibers as well as to decreased automaticity of pacemaker cells. When present in toxic amounts, this leads to classic changes on the electrocardiogram (ECG) that are harbingers of potentially lethal arrhythmias. Presented is a clinical series of ECGs that occurred in a patient who presented with flecainide toxicity.

Flecainide: Current status and perspectives in arrhythmia management

Flecainide acetate is a class IC antiarrhythmic agent and its clinical efficacy has been confirmed by the results of several clinical trials. Nowadays, flecainide is recommended as one of the first line therapies for pharmacological conversion as well as maintenance of sinus rhythm in patients with atrial fibrillation and/or supraventricular tachycardias. Based on the Cardiac Arrhythmia Suppression Trial study results, flecainide is not recommended in patients with structural heart disease due to high proarrhythmic risk. Recent data support the role of flecainide in preventing ventricular tachyarrhythmias in patients with catecholaminergic polymorphic ventricular tachycardia associated both with ryanodine receptor and calsequestrin mutations. We herein review the current clinical data related to flecainide use in clinical practice and some concerns about its role in the management of patients with coronary artery disease.

Twenty-five years in the making: flecainide is safe and effective for the management of atrial fibrillation

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common arrhythmia in clinical practise and its prevalence is increasing. Over the last 25 years, flecainide has been used extensively worldwide, and its capacity to reduce AF symptoms and provide long-term restoration of sinus rhythm (SR) has been well documented. The increased mortality seen in patients treated with flecainide in the Cardiac Arrhythmia Suppression Trial (CAST) study, published in 1991, still deters many clinicians from using flecainide, denying many new AF patients a valuable treatment option. There is now a body of evidence that clearly demonstrates that flecainide has a favourable safety profile in AF patients without significant left ventricular disease or coronary heart disease. As a result of this evidence, flecainide is now recommended as one of the first-line treatment options for restoring and maintaining SR in patients with AF under current treatment guidelines. The objective of this article is to review the literature pertaining to the pharmacological characteristics, safety and efficacy of flecainide, and to place this drug in the context of current therapeutic management strategies for AF.

Antiarrhythmic Drug Therapy of Supraventricular Tachycardia

Pharmacologic therapy is commonly used for the acute treatment and termination of paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia (SVT) and continues to be an important long-term option for some patients. Drug choice depends on the correct diagnosis of the arrhythmia and an understanding of its mechanism. Pharmacologic agents commonly used in the acute and chronic treatment of SVT are reviewed along with their effect on the various types of SVT. Drugs that are well tolerated with minimal side effects are preferred over agents with perhaps more efficacy but higher risk of toxicity.

Long-term efficacy of flecainide in paroxysmal atrial fibrillation

The efficacy and safety of flecainide for long-term prevention of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (AF) were studied in an open trial. Twenty patients with very frequent attacks (mean 13 per month) of paroxysmal AF for many years (mean 8 years) participated. Before inclusion, the patients had unsuccessfully been treated with an average of 3.3 antiarrhythmic drugs. Efficacy was jugded from a carefully kept diary in which the patients made daily notes of any AF attacks and possible side-effects from 1 month before treatment until the end of a follow-up period of 6 months. Twelve patients (60%) were completely free from AF and 11 of these are still successfully treated with flecainide after 11-38 months (mean 24 months). Flecainide plasma levels did not differ between responders and non-responders. Eleven patients (55%) had adverse effects but these were usually mild and well tolerated, necessitating withdrawal or dose reduction resulting in relapse of AF only in three patients (15%). No proarrhythmic events were seen.

Effects of flecainide on exercise hemodynamics and electrocardiography in patients without structural heart disease

Although exercise testing has been advocated to unmask proarrhythmic potentials in patients receiving flecainide acetate, the effects of this drug on exercise parameters in individuals without structural heart disease have not been reported. This study was undertaken to assess the effects of flecainide on hemodynamics and electrocardiographic changes during exercise testing in 24 patients with paroxysmal supraventricular tachyarrhythmias, who had normal cardiac structure and sinus node function. Paired treadmill exercise tests using the Bruce protocol were performed after 1 week of treatment with flecainide (200 mg/day) or placebo in a double-blind, randomized design. Exercise testing was terminated because of either fatigue or dyspnea in all subjects. Although resting heart rate was unaffected, flecainide reduced the exercise heart rate (expressed as a percentage of age-predicted maximum) compared with placebo (84 +/- 12% vs. 92 +/- 9%, p < 0.001). Neither resting and exercise systolic blood pressure nor exercise duration were affected. PR interval shortening with exercise was not affected by flecainide, whereas QRS was prolonged compared with placebo (20 +/- 9% vs. 0 +/- 8%, p < 0.01). Compared with placebo, flecainide significantly shortened QTc (-7 +/- 12% vs. 0 +/- 8%, p < 0.05) and JTc (-34 +/- 11% vs. -21 +/- 11%, p < 0.01) intervals during exercise. During exercise, flecainide produced significant depression in the sinus node automaticity and manifested use-dependent slowing of ventricular conduction and acceleration in ventricular repolarization.

Flecainide

Flecainide is a Class IC antiarrhythmic agent whose primary electrophysiologic effect is a slowing of conduction in a wide range of cardiac tissues. It is well absorbed and effective in suppressing isolated premature ventricular contractions (PVCs) or nonsustained ventricular arrhythmia but has only a modest efficacy when electrophysiologic testing is used as an endpoint. Its adverse effect on mortality in the CAST trial suggested a propensity to proarrhythmia--a phenomenon to which the Class IC agents appear particularly prone. Despite the applicability of the CAST study only to patients with a prior myocardial infarction, there has been a shift away from flecainide in ventricular arrhythmia, but the low noncardiac side effect profile of the agent allows for its continued use in a wide variety of supraventricular arrhythmias.

Mapping the conversion of atrial flutter to atrial fibrillation and atrial fibrillation to atrial flutter. Insights into mechanisms

It is not generally believed that there is a relation between atrial flutter, thought to be due to a single reentrant circuit, and atrial fibrillation, thought to be due to simultaneously circulating multiple-reentrant wave fronts. However, there are many reasons to suggest that these rhythms are more closely related than previously thought. To test the hypothesis that the length of an area of functional block in the right atrial free wall is critical to the conversion of atrial flutter to atrial fibrillation and of atrial fibrillation to atrial flutter, we studied spontaneous and ATP-induced conversion of stable atrial flutter to sustained atrial fibrillation and spontaneous conversion of sustained atrial fibrillation to stable atrial flutter. We studied 13 episodes of the conversion of stable atrial flutter to sustained atrial fibrillation and sustained atrial fibrillation to stable atrial flutter in seven dogs with sterile pericarditis. Six episodes were spontaneous and seven were ATP related. All episodes were studied by using a multisite mapping system to record 190 unipolar electrograms (converted in the software to 95 bipolar electrograms) from the right atrial free wall along with ECG lead II. Atrial flutter induction was attempted by atrial stimulation (S1S2 or S1S2S3) or by rapid atrial pacing for > or = 20 beats from selected sites at selected rates. For both the spontaneous and the ATP-related episodes, stable atrial flutter was defined as any episode of > or = 5 minutes, and sustained atrial fibrillation was any episode of > or = 1 minute. During all the episodes of stable atrial flutter, a line of functional block with a mean length of 24 +/- 4 mm was localized on the right atrial free wall. When the previously stable line of functional block decreased to a mean of 16 +/- 3 mm (P < .05), either spontaneously or after ATP administration (40 mg i.v.), the new line of functional block was not long enough to maintain stable atrial flutter, and conversion to atrial fibrillation resulted. This shortened line of functional block continued to change and migrate over the right atrial free wall throughout sustained atrial fibrillation. These observations were similar for both spontaneous and ATP-induced conversions. When sustained atrial fibrillation evolved to stable atrial flutter, there was reformation of a long line of functional block, long enough (> or = prior length) to create a stable reentrant circuit, which then captured the right atrial free wall and subsequently both atria.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

A randomized double-blind crossover study comparing the efficacy and tolerability of flecainide and quinidine in the control of patients with symptomatic paroxysmal atrial fibrillation

Patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (PAF) are prone to recurrence. We compared the efficacy and tolerability of flecainide acetate in the control of PAF by means of conventional treatment with quinidine in 19 patients without structural heart disease. A randomized, placebo-controlled, crossover protocol consisting of 8 weeks of treatment with either agent was used. The recurrence of PAF was documented in a symptom diary and confirmed by event ECG recording. Complete control of symptoms was achieved in 4 of 19 and 2 of 11 of patients with flecainide and quinidine, respectively. Both agents prolonged the time to the first recurrence and significantly reduced the total duration of PAF recurrence by 40% and 47%, respectively (p less than 0.05 compared with placebo). Compared with quinidine, flecainide significantly reduced the frequency of recurrence and the rate of PAF during a recurrent episode. However, treatment with flecainide was associated with a higher incidence of symptomatic sinus pauses and visual disturbances compared with a higher incidence of gastrointestinal side effects with quinidine. During a follow-up period of 32 months, satisfactory control was achieved in 74% of patients with the use of these two antiarrhythmic agents.

Flecainide in the Wolff-Parkinson-White syndrome

The effects of flecainide on electrophysiologic parameters and arrhythmias in the Wolff-Parkinson-White syndrome were reviewed. Acute administration of flecainide blocks conduction across the accessory pathway in the anterograde direction in 40% and in the retrograde direction in 50% of cases and markedly prolongs refractoriness in the remaining cases. Flecainide has a lesser effect on refractoriness of the His-Purkinje system, atrium, ventricle, and atrioventricular node. Flecainide terminates atrioventricular tachycardia in greater than 80% of cases when given intravenously, and oral therapy prevents clinical recurrences in greater than 60% of cases, but may occasionally result in incessant tachycardia. Long-term efficacy is predicted by abolition of conduction across the accessory pathway or prevention of tachycardia induction at acute electrophysiologic testing. Concomitant administration of a beta-adrenoreceptor blocker results in greater long-term efficacy. Administered during preexcited atrial fibrillation, flecainide consistently slows the ventricular response and converts the majority of cases to sinus rhythm. Serious ventricular proarrhythmia is seen almost exclusively in patients with structural cardiac disease. Flecainide is a useful drug for the acute and chronic control of tachycardia in Wolff-Parkinson-White syndrome.

Clinical electrophysiological effects of intravenous recainam: an antiarrhythmic drug under investigation for the treatment of ventricular and supraventricular arrhythmias

This open-label, multicenter study was designed to assess the electrophysiological properties of intravenous recainam, an investigational Class I antiarrhythmic agent. In 25 patients undergoing electrophysiological studies for the evaluation of arrhythmias, recainam was administered intravenously in a loading infusion (0.1 mg/kg/min) for 40 minutes, followed by a maintenance infusion (0.02 mg/kg/min) until the completion of the study. Electrophysiological measurements were obtained at baseline, 30 minutes after initiation of the loading infusion, and 30 minutes after termination of the infusion during washout. Conduction intervals, refractory periods, and sinus node recovery times were measured during sinus rhythm and during atrial or ventricular pacing. Vital signs were obtained and recorded before, during, and after recainam infusion. The results showed no change in mean arterial pressure, but heart rate increased slightly by 4 beats/min following recainam infusion. Recainam produced a generalized slowing of intracardiac conduction. The mean intraatrial conduction time, measured at an atrial paced cycle length of 600 msec, increased during recainam loading infusion by 44%, from 38.8% +/- 2.8 to 53.0 +/- 5.4 msec; intranodal conduction time increased by 10%, from 102.0 +/- 5.5 to 112.1 +/- 5.2 msec; and infranodal conduction time increased by 31% from 53.1 +/- 3.0 to 70.7 +/- 3.8 msec. Slowed conduction persisted during washout. The mean right atrial effective refractory period was significantly prolonged (+7% at 600 msec cycle length and +8% at 450 msec cycle length, P less than 0.05 and P less than 0.01, respectively) during recainam loading and remained so during washout.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Randomized comparison of flecainide and cibenzoline in the conversion of atrial fibrillation

The efficacy of oral cibenzoline (260 mg/day and 320 mg/day) and flecainide (200 mg/day and 300 mg/day) in the conversion of chronic atrial fibrillation to sinus rhythm were compared in 31 patients in a randomized order. If sinus rhythm was not restored on the 5th day of oral treatment with either cibenzoline or flecainide (phase of initial treatment) patients were switched to a second phase of treatment with the drug not given in the first phase after a washout phase of 3 days. Sinus rhythm was restored in 7/28 treatment trials with cibenzoline and in 7/23 treatment trials with flecainide (not significant). Trough levels of cibenzoline and flecainide in the plasma were not significantly different between patients in whom sinus rhythm was restored and patients with persisting atrial fibrillation. In patients successfully converted to sinus rhythm, long-term treatment was instituted with flecainide (n = 6) or cibenzoline (n = 6). Atrial fibrillation developed in 2 patients in each group of patients within 3 months. In all other patients, sinus rhythm was maintained during the follow-up period of 12 months. Non-cardiac side effects were observed in 2 patients during treatment with cibenzoline and flecainide respectively. With flecainide, one patient developed sinus arrest up to 5.6 seconds.

Prevention of symptomatic recurrences of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation in patients initially tolerating antiarrhythmic therapy. A multicenter, double-blind, crossover study of flecainide and placebo with transtelephonic monitoring. Flecainide Supraventricular Tachycardia Study Group

Paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (PAF) is a problematic clinical arrhythmia that is usually symptomatic. Unfortunately, few adequate trials and trial methods are available for assessment of the value of therapy, and traditional treatment has often been ineffective or associated with unacceptable side effects. Transtelephonic monitoring is a new method that allows evaluation of paroxysmal arrhythmias and arrhythmia-related symptoms in outpatients. We used a patient-initiated transtelephonic monitor system to evaluate the potential of flecainide, a class 1C antiarrhythmic, in prevention of symptomatic recurrences of PAF. Sixty-four patients qualified for the study (two or more PAF attacks documented within a 4-week baseline period) and entered a dose-finding phase to determine drug tolerance. Dose was incremented at weekly intervals from 200-300 and finally to 400 mg/day. The largest dose that was well tolerated was selected for the 4-month, double-blind, randomized, crossover comparison with placebo. Fifty-five patients entered and 53 received both treatments in the double-blind phase; 48 of these patients without protocol violations were evaluable for efficacy comparisons. Evaluable patients had undergone an average of 3.8 previous drug trials (range, 1-8); 30 were men, 18 had hypertension, and 14 had ischemic heart disease. The study demonstrated a highly significant correlation (p less than 0.0001) between perceived symptoms and documented PAF by transtelephonic monitoring. The rate of symptoms and PAF attacks was also significantly reduced by therapy (median dose, 300 mg/day). The first PAF attack occurred after a median of 3 days on placebo versus 14.5 days on flecainide (p less than 0.001) therapy. Similarly, the time interval between attacks was lengthened, from a median of 6.2 days on placebo to 27.0 days on flecainide (p less than 0.001) therapy. PAF was prevented in 15 patients (31%) during flecainide and four (9%) during placebo therapy (p = 0.013). However, during the study, 13 patients dropped out, seven because of adverse effects (five cardiac), five for other reasons, and one because of cardiac arrest/death. Adverse cardiac events occurred in a total of seven patients (11%) during flecainide therapy. Thus, transtelephonic monitoring is a useful method for documentation of the occurrence of paroxysmal arrhythmias such as PAF and its related symptoms during daily living and for assessment of new therapies in an outpatient setting.

A dual model for cardiac arrhythmias: coexistence of re-entry and abnormal automaticity and effects of antiarrhythmic agents

1. We have developed a dual model for arrhythmia anaesthetized dogs. The model consists of an inducible re-entrant atrial tachycardia and spontaneous ventricular ectopies in the same heart. 2. The model for re-entrant atrial tachycardia was created by crushing the right atrium longitudinally in the intercaval region and transversely in the front free wall parallel to the atrioventricular groove. Ventricular abnormal automaticity was produced by prior (20 approximately 24 h) left anterior descending coronary artery occlusion. The ventricular arrhythmia was partially suppressed during rapid pacing-induced atrial tachycardia and resumed after atrial re-entry was terminated. 3. Mapping experiments indicate that the atrial tachycardia was due to circus movement occurring in the tissue around the tricuspid ring. This re-entrant circuit was identical to that induced in the model created by the incision method. 4. Clofilium (0.75 mg kg-1, n = 5) increased the cycle length of atrial re-entry by 14 +/- 4% from 139 +/- 12 to 159 +/- 18 ms (P less than 0.05). Flecainide (1.8 +/- 0.9 mg kg-1, n = 5) prolonged the cycle length of the tachycardia by 114 +/- 57% from 158 +/- 11 to 332 +/- 66 ms (P less than 0.05). 5. Both drugs terminated the atrial arrhythmia, but re-entry could be reinduced only in flecainide-treated dogs. Flecainide reduced ventricular ectopies by 89 +/- 19%, whereas clofilium did not change ventricular abnormal automaticity or maximum pacing cycle length that is necessary to overdrive the ventricle fully. 6. These data indicate that the dual model provides coexisting arrhythmias of different mechanisms in the same heart and that Class I and Class III anti-arrhythmic drugs may be differentiated from each other by the distinct patterns of pharmacological activities produced in this test system.

Flecainide acetate in the treatment of supraventricular tachycardias: value of programmed electrical stimulation for long-term prognosis

Twenty patients with recurrent symptomatic supraventricular tachycardia were studied to estimate the efficacy of flecainide in the long-term treatment of these arrhythmias and to evaluate the prognostic value of programmed electrophysiologic stimulation. All patients had their arrhythmia inducible at baseline evaluation. Nine patients had a Wolff-Parkinson-White (WPW) syndrome, five had a concealed bypass tract, and two had dual atrioventricular (AV) nodal pathways. In the remaining patients there was an intraatrial reentry circuit. Previous medication was no to five antiarrhythmic drugs (mean 2.4 drugs). At baseline, a circus movement tachycardia was induced in 12, AV nodal tachycardia was induced in two, atrial tachycardia was induced in three, atrial fibrillation was induced in five, and a flutter was induced in two patients. After flecainide, 2 mg/kg intravenously in 10 minutes, six patients no longer had their arrhythmia inducible. In the WPW patients, atrial fibrillation was no more inducible. In 65% of the patients there was no recurrence during a follow-up period of 11 +/- 10 months. None of the six patients who no longer had their arrhythmia inducible had a recurrence of the tachycardia over a period of up to 3 years. Seven of the other 14 patients (who still had their arrhythmia inducible) had a recurrence of the tachycardia. Positive and negative predictive values are 50% and 100%, respectively. We conclude that flecainide prevents recurrences of supraventricular tachycardias in 65% of patients with inducible supraventricular tachycardias during a mean follow-up of 11 months. Programmed electrical stimulation has a high negative predictive value in this setting. Flecainide is especially effective in preventing atrial fibrillation in patients with WPW syndrome.

Electrophysiologic and clinical effects of flecainide for recurrent paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia

The antiarrhythmic effects of flecainide acetate were evaluated in 9 patients with paroxysmal atrioventricular (AV) nodal tachycardia and 17 patients with AV tachycardia. An electrophysiologic study was performed before and after intravenous flecainide acetate, 2 mg/kg body weight, was infused over 15 minutes and was followed by a maintenance infusion of 1.6 mg/kg given over 1 hour to 26 patients and during oral treatment to 15. Treatment with oral flecainide acetate was continued for 14 +/- 5 months. Intravenous flecainide acetate terminated AV nodal tachycardia by blocking the retrograde fast pathway conduction in 7 of 7 patients and AV tachycardia by blocking retrograde conduction in the extranodal pathway in 10 of 10 patients. AV nodal tachycardia and AV tachycardia were noninducible in 8 of 9 patients (90%, p less than 0.001) and 11 of 17 patients (65%, p less than 0.001), respectively. Long-term treatment with oral flecainide acetate suppressed AV nodal tachycardia and AV tachycardia in 8 of 9 patients (90%, p less than 0.001) and 11 of 17 patients (65%, p less than 0.001), respectively. A favorable outcome was associated with block in the accessory pathway after intravenous flecainide acetate and noninducibility during oral treatment. Recurrences preferentially occurred in the younger patients. Flecainide acetate is effective in the acute and long-term management of paroxysmal supraventricular reentry tachycardia by suppressing conduction through the retrograde fast limb of the tachycardia circuit. The clinical effect can be predicted by electrophysiologic testing.

Clinical electrophysiologic effects of flecainide acetate

Flecainide acetate depresses the rate of depolarization of action potential (Vmax), the so-called "membrane stabilizing action." In the intact heart it has a unique profile of substantial effect on conduction with modest effect on refractoriness. After intravenous administration, clinical electrophysiologic studies show that conduction through atrial myocardium, atrioventricular (AV) node, His-Purkinje system, and ventricular myocardium is depressed, the most prominent effect being on the His-Purkinje system. Refractorines of the normal atrial and AV nodal myocardium is not prolonged while that of the ventricular muscle is slightly increased. Atrial fibrillation (60% to 70%), atrial tachycardia (90% to 100%), and nodal and AV tachycardia (80% to 90%) are generally terminated, while flutter is usually slowed, but in a small proportion of patients (10% to 20%) might be terminated by the intravenous use of flecainide acetate. This drug has also been shown to be effective in terminating stable ventricular tachycardia (70%). However, it appears to be slightly less effective in suppressing inducibility of ventricular arrhythmias. Administered orally, flecainide is very effective in decreasing ventricular ectopic activity (80% to 95%) and nonsustained ventricular tachycardia. Thus, flecainide has a wide range of antiarrhythmic properties, making it a useful agent in the management of a variety of supraventricular and ventricular arrhythmias. In a small proportion of patients, however, its use can lead to apparent arrhythmogenic effects, the most dangerous being exacerbation of ventricular tachycardia.

New antiarrhythmic drugs

While controversy still exists as to the precise indications for the treatment of all forms of ventricular arrhythmia, advances in the number and, more importantly, type of antiarrhythmic drugs can provide the clinician with a rational basis for selecting antiarrhythmic drug therapy. A host of new agents with different pharmacokinetic and electrophysiological actions are now available, and can be compared or contrasted to conventional antiarrhythmic agents such as quinidine, procainamide, disopyramide, lignocaine (lidocaine) and bretylium. This review summarises the electrophysiological, haemodynamic, pharmacokinetic, and efficacy and safety data of mexiletine, tocainide, flecainide, encainide, propafenone, amiodarone, sotalol, pirmenol, cibenzoline (cifenline) and ethmozine (moracizine, moricizine), and aims to provide a basis on which clinicians can compare and contrast these agents and form an algorithm for selection of antiarrhythmic drug therapy in the treatment of patients with ventricular arrhythmias.

Overview of the clinical pharmacology of antiarrhythmic drugs

Antiarrhythmic drugs have been recognized to possess 1 or more classes of antiarrhythmic action. This classification scheme is useful, but has major limitations because the available drugs and their metabolites have multiple actions. This report presents an overview of the distinguishing features of the most frequently used agents having class I or III actions. Agents with class I actions are local anesthetic agents that depress the fast inward depolarizing sodium current and thereby slow the rate of the rise of the action potential (phase 0). This category is further divided into classes IA, IB, and IC according to the degree of potency as sodium channel inhibitors, and the individual effects of the drug on action potential, conduction velocity and repolarization. Included in the spectrum of agents with class I action are quinidine, procainamide, disopyramide, lidocaine, tocainide, mexiletine, flecainide, amiodarone, encainide and lorcainide. The antiarrhythmic drugs that exert class III action lengthen repolarization and refractoriness; included in this category are amiodarone, quinidine, bretylium and sotalol. Because of the broad range of effects that antiarrhythmic agents may exert, safe and effective therapy requires a thorough familiarity with the pharmacologic profile of each drug administered and a careful evaluation of the presenting condition and the patient history. In some cases, a multiple drug regimen may be most appropriate. Various combinations such as class IA and IB agents, have been shown to slow conduction synergistically and increase refractoriness while keeping adverse effects to a minimum.

Effect of flecainide on regional left ventricular wall motion after acute intravenous, acute oral and chronic oral administration late after coronary artery bypass grafting

Epicardial marker motion was measured in 14 patients before flecainide administration, immediately after an intravenous dose of 2 mg/kg over 15 minutes (maximum 150 mg) and 15 minutes thereafter. Platinum epicardial markers had been implanted more than 4 years earlier at the time of coronary artery bypass grafting. Maximal and minimal marker separation (Lmax and Lmin) during the cardiac cycle were measured and regional shortening fraction (Lmax - Lmin)/Lmax) was determined as a percentage. After intravenous flecainide, a significant increase in end-diastolic (immediately after 2.8%; after 15 minutes 2.1%) and end-systolic (3.6% and 3.2%) regional dimensions was observed, together with a decrease in regional myocardial shortening (9.3% and 9.0%). One week later, after a single oral dose of 200 mg of flecainide, Lmax and Lmin had increased 2.4% and 2.7%, while regional myocardial shortening did not differ significantly from baseline values. In 10 patients measurements were repeated after 6 weeks of chronic oral treatment with 300 mg/day. Despite plasma flecainide levels similar to those after intravenous administration, no significant changes in end-diastolic and end-systolic dimensions or regional shortening fraction were observed. Thus, acute intravenous or oral flecainide administration increases regional end-diastolic and end-systolic dimensions, but only intravenous administration decreases regional shortening fraction. Values during chronic administration indicate that regional myocardial function is more affected at the time of rising or acutely changing flecainide plasma levels than when stable plasma levels are achieved.

Flecainide versus quinidine for conversion of atrial fibrillation to sinus rhythm

The effectiveness and safety of flecainide and quinidine for conversion of atrial fibrillation (AF) to sinus rhythm were compared. Sixty consecutive patients were treated with either flecainide (up to 2 mg/kg intravenously and then orally) or quinidine (up to 1.2 g orally). There was no statistical difference in age, left atrial size, duration of the arrhythmia and underlying cardiac diseases between the 2 groups. The overall conversion rate to sinus rhythm was 63% (38 patients): AF was converted in 18 patients (60%) treated with quinidine and 20 (67%) with flecainide. If AF lasted less than 10 days, the conversion rate was 86% in the flecainide group and 80% in the quinidine group (difference not significant). When AF lasted more than 10 days the rate was 22% in the flecainide group and 40% in the quinidine group. Adverse effects were more frequent in the quinidine group (27%) (gastrointestinal disturbances) than in the flecainide group (7%) (conduction disturbances), but they were less severe in the quinidine group. Thus, flecainide given intravenously appeared to be as effective as quinidine given orally for conversion of AF of recent onset (within 10 days). However, quinidine should probably remain the preferred drug for conversion of AF of long duration (more than 10 days) to sinus rhythm. Adverse effects occurred less often with flecainide therapy, but they were more severe.

Basic and clinical cardiac electrophysiology of encainide

Encainide is a potent sodium channel antagonist. It dissociates slowly from blocked, repolarized channels (time constant of recovery greater than 20 seconds). It markedly slows myocardial and His Purkinje conduction in vitro, in animal models and in humans. In vitro the parent compound and its major metabolites, O-demethyl and 3-methoxy-O-demethyl encainide, have variable effects on action potential duration and refractoriness. In man the parent compound has relatively little effect on refractoriness and QT interval, but its metabolites may increase refractoriness moderately. Encainide has no significant effect on the normal sinoatrial node, and only its metabolites significantly depress atrioventricular nodal conduction and refractoriness. In models of ischemia, all of encainide's actions are more pronounced in ischemic than in normal tissue. Encainide is similar in its basic and clinical electrophysiologic profile to flecainide and lorcainide although its constellation of electrophysiologic properties is unique. It differs from quinidine, procainamide and disopyramide by slowing conduction more and affecting refractoriness less, and by absence of anticholinergic side effects.

Flecainide: a new antiarrhythmic drug

Flecainide acetate is a new class 1 c antiarrhythmic drug. It slows conduction in the working myocardium and the specialized conduction system and may depress sinus node activity in patients with pre-existing sinus node disease. Its hemodynamic effects are minimal. The drug is completely absorbed and shows a half-life of 7-22 hours. Elimination is mainly through the kidneys. Flecainide is highly effective in the treatment of ventricular arrhythmias, pre-excitation syndromes and AV reentry tachycardias. Side effects are mild and consist mostly of dizziness, visual disturbances, and nervousness. They rarely require discontinuation of therapy. Proarrhythmic effects have been reported. Caution is required in patients with congestive heart failure, AV block, and/or bundle-branch block or sinus node dysfunction.

Hemodynamic effects of intravenous flecainide in acute noncomplicated myocardial infarction

Hemodynamic and ECG effects of intravenous flecainide were assessed in 10 patients with acute myocardial infarction and no symptoms or signs of heart failure. The dose was 2 mg/kg injected over a 15-minute period. R-R interval did not change, but PR interval and QRS increased significantly, 28% (p less than 0.0005) and 20% (p less than 0.05), respectively. Duration of P wave also increased significantly, 15% (p less than 0.02). Pulmonary wedge pressure increased 29% (p less than 0.005) and cardiac index and left ventricular stroke work index decreased 9% (p less than 0.05) and 20% (p less than 0.05), respectively. No significant change in mean aortic pressure and systemic vascular resistance occurred. Thus, intravenous flecainide has a mild and transient negative inotropic effect in patients with noncomplicated acute myocardial infarction. It did not induce ventricular failure in this group of patients but should be administered cautiously to patients with overt heart failure or severe conduction defects.

The clinical electrophysiology of intravenous indecainide

The electrophysiologic effects of indecainide, a new class IC antiarrhythmic agent, were assessed in 10 patients with left ventricular dysfunction and inducible sustained ventricular tachycardia. Indecainide was administered intravenously in a dose of 60 to 90 mg/kg at a rate of 12.5 to 15 micrograms/kg/min. Indecainide had no effect on sinus node function or atrial and ventricular effective refractory periods. The AH (106 +/- 13 vs 130 +/- 24 msec, p less than 0.002) and HV (57 +/- 7 vs 73 +/- 19 msec, p less than 0.001) intervals were significantly increased. The QRS duration increased (102 +/- 9 vs 120 +/- 13 msec, p less than 0.001); however, the JT duration did not change. Induction of ventricular tachycardia was prevented in 1 of 10 patients. In the remaining nine patients, the ventricular tachycardia cycle length was significantly prolonged (248 +/- 47 vs 320 +/- 71 msec, p less than 0.001). Indecainide significantly depressed intracardiac conduction at several sites.

Flecainide: a new class Ic antidysrhythmic

Flecainide acetate is a new orally active antidysrhythmic agent classified in the Ic category. Flecainide is effective in suppressing 88 to 100 percent of abnormal cardiac rhythms in the form of complex ventricular dysrhythmias, including couplets, ventricular tachycardia, reentrant junctional tachycardia, and Wolff-Parkinson-White syndrome. Flecainide appears to have a greater effect on conduction than on repolarization and only minimal effects on hemodynamic parameters. Flecainide is rapidly and completely absorbed after oral administration and has a 13-hour elimination half-life, allowing for twice-daily dosing regimens. Flecainide is generally well tolerated, with dizziness, blurred vision, nausea, and headache the most common side effects. Flecainide has been shown to be superior to quinidine and disopyramide in suppressing ventricular ectopic activity and may be considered a first-line oral agent for this indication. It is believe that flecainide has enough therapeutic advantages to be added to drug formularies.

Flecainide: a new prototype antiarrhythmic agent

Flecainide acetate is the first class IC antiarrhythmic agent marketed in the United States. In vitro, animal and human studies have shown that the drug markedly prolongs conduction and has minimal effect on repolarization. Efficacy trials have shown flecainide to be effective in a wide range of ventricular and selected atrial arrhythmias. The drug is generally well tolerated, although minor adverse effects are common. These generally are related to the central nervous system and respond to a reduction in dosage. Like other antiarrhythmic agents, flecainide may demonstrate proarrhythmic effects. It is excreted in the urine as the parent compound and inactive metabolites. The elimination half-life ranges from 12-27 hours in patients with normal renal function, allowing convenient dosing regimens of 100-200 mg twice daily in most patients. Flecainide has the potential for widespread use.

Flecainide: electrophysiologic and antiarrhythmic properties in refractory ventricular tachycardia

Twenty-two patients with coronary artery disease and spontaneous ventricular tachycardia (VT) or ventricular fibrillation (VF) underwent intracardiac electrophysiologic evaluation and, when possible, ambulatory monitoring before and after therapy with flecainide (mean dose 418 +/- 87 mg [mean +/- standard deviation]). An average of 4 antiarrhythmic agents were used and were unsuccessful before therapy with flecainide was begun. During 64 +/- 16 hours of control Holter monitoring in 16 patients, all had 1 or more salvos of VT, as well as ventricular premature complexes (VPCs). Programmed stimulation during the control period induced VT in 17 of 22 patients. After flecainide therapy, Holter monitoring showed elimination of all forms of VT in all but 1 patient, as well as significant reduction of paired VPCs by 95% (p less than 0.03) and single VPCs by 70% (p less than 0.005). Electrophysiologic study during flecainide therapy showed significant increases in AH, HV, PR, QRS and QTc intervals, and the ventricular effective refractory period. Programmed stimulation in 17 patients taking flecainide, with a mean plasma level of 1,075 +/- 521 ng/ml, showed ablation of inducible VT in only 2 patients, a worsening in 5 and continued VT inducibility in 10. Adverse effects that required drug withdrawal were infrequent and encountered in patients who received higher drug levels: 1 patient with congestive heart failure and 1 with severe sinus bradycardia. Thus, although flecainide suppresses complex ventricular arrhythmias on Holter recordings, it rarely alters the response to programmed stimulation. Caution is recommended in its use for recurrent sustained VT or VF and in the interpretation of electrophysiologic studies until the predictive value of programmed stimulation with flecainide therapy is established.

Flecainide. A preliminary review of its pharmacodynamic properties and therapeutic efficacy

Flecainide is a Class I antiarrhythmic drug of the local anaesthetic type. It can be given either intravenously or orally and its pharmacokinetic properties allow relatively long (12 hours) dosing intervals with oral administration. In several open and a few controlled therapeutic trials, orally administered flecainide has brought about a greater than 90% suppression of ventricular ectopic beats in about 80% of patients. A similar percentage of patients (83%) experienced at least an 80% suppression of their ventricular tachycardia in these trials. A slightly greater response rate was reported with intravenous infusion of flecainide. Initial results in arrhythmias complicating the Wolff-Parkinson-White syndrome have been favourable. Comparative trials are few in number but flecainide has proved to be more effective than quinidine, and possibly more effective than disopyramide, mexiletine, tocainide and propafenone, in suppressing ventricular ectopic activity. The most commonly reported extracardiac adverse effects have been dizziness and visual disturbances. Proarrhythmic effects have been reported in 7 to 8% of patients, with a higher incidence in patients with serious ventricular tachycardia and reduced myocardial function. The moderate negative inotropic effects of flecainide can become clinically significant in patients with impaired ventricular function. Thus flecainide, with its convenient dose schedule and apparently low incidence of serious side effects, would appear to be a useful addition to the antiarrhythmic agents available. Further studies are needed though, to confirm its long term tolerability when used prophylactically.

Flecainide: long-term treatment using a reduced dosing schedule

Flecainide was initially prescribed at a dose of 200 mg twice daily, but after early toxicity in patients with ventricular tachycardia (VT), the dosage was reduced to 100 mg twice daily. The effects of flecainide were studied in 40 patients (29 men and 11 women, mean age 62 +/- 2 years, ejection fraction 45 +/- 3%) who underwent programmed electrical stimulation to determine the efficacy of flecainide in preventing VT chronically at the reduced dose. Sustained VT was induced in 21 patients and nonsustained VT in 19. Flecainide prevented VT induction in 26 patients (65%). At a mean dose of 1.5 +/- 0.1 mg/kg, prolongation occurred in the effective refractory period of the first (280 +/- 5 vs 249 +/- 5 ms) and second (254 +/- 6 vs 209 +/- 9 ms) extrastimuli (p less than 0.01). In the patients protected by flecainide, the effective refractory periods increased by a 17 +/- 2% and 21 +/- 3%, in contrast to only a 7 +/- 3% and 6 +/- 4% increase in the nonprotected group (p less than 0.05), despite a higher mean dose (1.9 +/- 0.1 vs 1.35 +/- 0.1 mg/kg). Twenty-one patients were discharged on flecainide therapy, 100 mg twice daily, and were followed for a mean of 11 months. Sixteen patients are alive and well, 1 died suddenly, 1 died from a noncardiac cause and 1 had a "breakthrough" arrhythmia. Two were switched to quinidine therapy by their referring physicians, but were without problems while receiving flecainide.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Therapy with investigational antiarrhythmic drugs

The investigational antiarrhythmic agents available for use in this country are predominantly class I drugs with local anesthetic membrane effects. These drugs are often used successfully to control arrhythmias refractory to treatment with the standard antiarrhythmic drugs. Side effects often limit their use, and particular attention needs to be paid to their cardiac side effects, such as exacerbation of arrhythmia or enhanced conduction defects.

Sinusoidal ventricular tachycardia associated with flecainide acetate

New pharmacologic agents have been developed which are highly effective in suppressing ventricular premature beats, but their chronic efficacy in patients with sustained ventricular arrhythmias remains uncertain. We observed the appearance of ventricular tachycardia with an unusual sinusoidal QRS complex in three of five such patients treated with flecainide acetate, 200 mg twice daily. Our experience suggests that the early reports of successful suppression of ventricular premature beats in stable patients may not be directly applicable to sicker patients with recurrent sustained ventricular arrhythmias. In these patients, life-threatening arrhythmias may appear as the first manifestation of drug toxicity.

Response of an abnormal sinus node to intravenous flecainide acetate

A patient with sinus node disease underwent provocative testing with flecainide, a new Vaughan Williams class IC antiarrhythmic agent. There were dramatic increases in sinus node recovery times and in sinoatrial conduction times, and the magnitude of the response could only be witnessed because of the emergence of a subsidiary junctional pacemaker without retrograde conduction to the atria.

Electrophysiologic properties of flecainide acetate

Preliminary clinical experience indicates that flecainide is a useful antiarrhythmic agent for the suppression of spontaneous ventricular arrhythmias. The drug also exerts marked effects on accessory atrioventricular (AV) pathway and retrograde fast AV nodal pathway refractoriness, and therefore may be effective in treatment and prevention of reentrant supraventricular tachycardias. Electrophysiologic studies indicate that flecainide slows atrial, AV nodal, His-Purkinje and intraventricular conduction and, to a far lesser degree, prolongs refractory periods in these tissues. The effect of the drug in slowing conduction within the His-Purkinje system is particularly marked and is commonly associated with prolongation of the HV interval beyond the normal range. Flecainide causes a small but significant increase in the QT interval duration, which results largely from prolongation of the QRS interval. Significant prolongation of the sinus node recovery time has been observed in patients with preexisting sinus node dysfunction. Available electrophysiologic data suggest that flecainide should not be administered to patients with advanced disease of the His-Purkinje system or sinus node. The safety of the drug in patients with mild to moderate abnormalities of His-Purkinje conduction or sinus node function awaits further study.

A double-blind, crossover comparison of flecainide acetate and disopyramide phosphate in the treatment of ventricular premature complexes

The efficacy and safety of flecainide, 200 mg twice daily, was compared with disopyramide, 150 mg 4 times daily, in a randomized, double-blind, crossover study in 25 patients (19 men and 6 women, aged 20 to 71 years, mean 52.5) with more than 1,000 ventricular premature complexes (VPCs) in a pretrial 24-hour Holter monitoring screen. Each 14-day active treatment period was preceded and followed by a 7-day placebo period. Ambulatory ECGs were recorded at the end of each study week and analyzed blindly. Average VPCs recorded during each of the 2 active periods were compared with average VPCs in the placebo periods. Twenty-two of 25 patients attained therapeutic plasma levels of both drugs. The occurrence of VPCs was significantly less during flecainide than during disopyramide treatment, 92 and 39%, respectively (p less than 0.01). Complex arrhythmic events were significantly more suppressed with flecainide than with disopyramide. No difference was observed between the 2 drugs in the incidence or severity of reported side effects. PQ, QRS and QT intervals increased beyond normal limits on both drugs in some patients, significantly more with flecainide than with disopyramide. The JT interval did not change or decrease; hence, all changes in the QT interval were attributable to a widening of the QRS complex. Neither drug showed any significant effect on blood pressure or heart rate. Flecainide may be a well-tolerated and valuable alternative to currently available antiarrhythmic agents.