1
|
El Hage Chehade N, Ghoneim S, Shah S, Chahine A, Issak A, Choi AY, Moosvi Z, Chang KJ, Samarasena JB. Combination Topical Epinephrine and Non-steroidal Inflammatory Drugs in the Prevention of Post-ERCP Pancreatitis: A Systematic Review. Dig Dis Sci 2023; 68:957-968. [PMID: 35695971 DOI: 10.1007/s10620-022-07518-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/26/2022] [Accepted: 04/07/2022] [Indexed: 12/09/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The utility of combination rectal NSAID and topical epinephrine (EI) or rectal NSAID and normal saline (SI) sprayed on duodenal papilla in the prevention of post-ERCP pancreatitis (PEP) has been studied but results have been conflicting. AIMS To evaluate the benefit of using combination prophylaxis in preventing PEP. METHODS A literature search was performed using Scopus, PubMed/MEDLINE, and Cochrane databases in May 2021. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) involving adults patients who underwent ERCP and received EI versus SI were eligible for inclusion. The pooled effect was expressed as odds ratio (OR) to assess the rate of PEP, severity of PEP, and specific adverse events. The results were pooled using Reviewer Manager 5.4 software. RESULTS Six RCTs involving 4016 patients were included in the final analysis. The EI group did not demonstrate any significant benefit over SI group in preventing PEP (OR = 1.00, 95% CI [0.68, 1.45], P = 0.98), irrespective of gender or the epinephrine concentration used. The tests for subgroup differences were not statistically significant with P-values of 0.66 and 0.28, respectively. The addition of topical epinephrine to rectal NSAID did not improve the rate of moderate to severe PEP (OR = 0.94, P = 0.86) or PEP in high-risk patients (OR = 1.14, 95%, P = 0.73). The rates of infection, including cholangitis and sepsis (OR = 0.63, P = 0.07), gastrointestinal bleeding (OR = 1.25, P = 0.56) and procedure-related death (OR = 0.71, P = 0.59) were similar between both groups. CONCLUSION The addition of topical epinephrine did not demonstrate any benefit over rectal NSAID alone in preventing PEP or reducing other procedure-related adverse events.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nabil El Hage Chehade
- Department of Internal Medicine, MetroHealth Medical Center, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Sara Ghoneim
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE, USA
| | - Sagar Shah
- Department of Internal Medicine, Ronald Reagan Medical Center, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Anastasia Chahine
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, H. H. Chao Comprehensive Digestive Center, University of California Irvine Medical Center, 101 The City Drive S, Orange, CA, 92868, USA
| | - Abdulfatah Issak
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, MetroHealth Medical Center, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Alyssa Y Choi
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, H. H. Chao Comprehensive Digestive Center, University of California Irvine Medical Center, 101 The City Drive S, Orange, CA, 92868, USA
| | - Zain Moosvi
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Kenneth J Chang
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, H. H. Chao Comprehensive Digestive Center, University of California Irvine Medical Center, 101 The City Drive S, Orange, CA, 92868, USA
| | - Jason B Samarasena
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, H. H. Chao Comprehensive Digestive Center, University of California Irvine Medical Center, 101 The City Drive S, Orange, CA, 92868, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Luo H, Wang X, Zhang R, Liang S, Kang X, Zhang X, Lou Q, Xiong K, Yang J, Si L, Liu W, Liu Y, Zhou Y, Wang S, Yang M, Chen W, Han Y, Shang G, Yang X, He Y, Zou Q, Guo W, Dai Y, Zeng W, Zhu X, Gong R, Li X, Nie Z, Wang Q, Wang L, Pan Y, Guo X, Fan D. Rectal Indomethacin and Spraying of Duodenal Papilla With Epinephrine Increases Risk of Pancreatitis Following Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2019; 17:1597-1606.e5. [PMID: 30391434 DOI: 10.1016/j.cgh.2018.10.043] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/21/2018] [Revised: 10/24/2018] [Accepted: 10/26/2018] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND & AIMS Rectal indomethacin and spraying of the duodenal papilla with epinephrine might reduce the incidence of pancreatitis after endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP). We performed a randomized trial to compare the effects of the combination of indomethacin and epinephrine (IE) vs indomethacin plus saline (IS) in prophylaxis of post-ERCP pancreatitis (PEP). METHODS We performed a double-blind trial at 10 centers in China, from February 2017 to October 2017, of 1158 patients with native papilla undergoing ERCP. The patients were assigned randomly to groups given IE (n = 576) or IS (n = 582). All patients received a single dose of rectal indomethacin within 30 minutes before ERCP; 20 mL of dilute epinephrine (IE group) or saline (IS group) then was sprayed on the duodenal papilla at the end of ERCP. The primary outcome was the incidence of overall PEP. Data were analyzed on an intention-to-treat principle. RESULTS The study was terminated at the interim analysis for safety concerns and futility. The groups had similar baseline characteristics. PEP developed in 49 patients in the IE group (8.5%) and in 31 patients in the IS group (5.3%) (relative risk, 1.60, 95% CI, 1.03-2.47; P = .033). There were no significant differences between groups in proportions of patients with postsphincterotomy bleeding (2.1% in the IE group and 1.5% in the IS group) and biliary infection (1.2% in the IE group and 2.2% in the IS group). CONCLUSIONS In a randomized trial, we found the combination of rectal indomethacin with papillary epinephrine spraying increased the risk of PEP compared with indomethacin alone. Spray epinephrine should not be used with rectal indomethacin for prevention of post-ERCP pancreatitis. ClincialTrials.gov no: NCT03057769.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hui Luo
- State Key Laboratory of Cancer Biology, National Clinical Research Center for Digestive Diseases, Xijing Hospital of Digestive Diseases, Fourth Military Medical University, Xi'an, Shaanxi, China
| | - Xiangping Wang
- State Key Laboratory of Cancer Biology, National Clinical Research Center for Digestive Diseases, Xijing Hospital of Digestive Diseases, Fourth Military Medical University, Xi'an, Shaanxi, China
| | - Rongchun Zhang
- State Key Laboratory of Cancer Biology, National Clinical Research Center for Digestive Diseases, Xijing Hospital of Digestive Diseases, Fourth Military Medical University, Xi'an, Shaanxi, China
| | - Shuhui Liang
- State Key Laboratory of Cancer Biology, National Clinical Research Center for Digestive Diseases, Xijing Hospital of Digestive Diseases, Fourth Military Medical University, Xi'an, Shaanxi, China
| | - Xiaoyu Kang
- State Key Laboratory of Cancer Biology, National Clinical Research Center for Digestive Diseases, Xijing Hospital of Digestive Diseases, Fourth Military Medical University, Xi'an, Shaanxi, China
| | - Xiaofeng Zhang
- Department of Gastroenterology, Affiliated Hangzhou First People's Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China
| | - Qifeng Lou
- Department of Gastroenterology, Affiliated Hangzhou First People's Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China
| | - Kangwei Xiong
- Department of Gastroenterology, Affiliated Hangzhou First People's Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China
| | - Jing Yang
- Department of Gastroenterology, Affiliated Hangzhou First People's Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China
| | - Lijuan Si
- Department of Gastroenterology, Zhongshan Hospital of Xiamen University, Xiamen, China
| | - Wenming Liu
- Department of Gastroenterology, Zhongshan Hospital of Xiamen University, Xiamen, China
| | - Yunpeng Liu
- Department of Gastroenterology, Zhongshan Hospital of Xiamen University, Xiamen, China
| | - Yi Zhou
- Department of Gastroenterology, No 451 Military Hospital, Xi'an, China
| | - Suli Wang
- Department of Gastroenterology, No 451 Military Hospital, Xi'an, China
| | - Mei Yang
- Department of Gastroenterology, No 451 Military Hospital, Xi'an, China
| | - Wei Chen
- Department of Gastroenterology, The First Affiliated Hospital of the Medical College, Shihezi University, Shihezi, China
| | - Yanzhi Han
- Department of Gastroenterology, The First Affiliated Hospital of the Medical College, Shihezi University, Shihezi, China
| | - Guochen Shang
- Department of Gastroenterology, The First Affiliated Hospital of the Medical College, Shihezi University, Shihezi, China
| | - Xiaocui Yang
- Endoscopy Center, Ankang Central Hospital, Ankang, China
| | - Yongfeng He
- Endoscopy Center, Ankang Central Hospital, Ankang, China
| | - Qiang Zou
- Endoscopy Center, Ankang Central Hospital, Ankang, China
| | - Wenwei Guo
- Endoscopy Center, Ankang Central Hospital, Ankang, China
| | - Yichen Dai
- Department of Gastroenterology, Chenggong Hospital of Xiamen University, Xiamen, China
| | - Wei Zeng
- Department of Gastroenterology, Chenggong Hospital of Xiamen University, Xiamen, China
| | - Xiaosan Zhu
- Department of Gastroenterology, Chenggong Hospital of Xiamen University, Xiamen, China
| | - Rongqing Gong
- Department of Gastroenterology, Chenggong Hospital of Xiamen University, Xiamen, China
| | - Xun Li
- The Second Department of General Surgery, The First Hospital of Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China
| | - Zhanguo Nie
- Department of Gastroenterology, Urumqi General Hospital of Lanzhou Military Region, Urumqi, China
| | - Qi Wang
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, General Hospital of Ningxia Medical University, Yinchuan, China
| | - Ling Wang
- Department of Health Statistics, Fourth Military Medical University, Xi'an, Shaanxi, China
| | - Yanglin Pan
- State Key Laboratory of Cancer Biology, National Clinical Research Center for Digestive Diseases, Xijing Hospital of Digestive Diseases, Fourth Military Medical University, Xi'an, Shaanxi, China.
| | - Xuegang Guo
- State Key Laboratory of Cancer Biology, National Clinical Research Center for Digestive Diseases, Xijing Hospital of Digestive Diseases, Fourth Military Medical University, Xi'an, Shaanxi, China.
| | - Daiming Fan
- State Key Laboratory of Cancer Biology, National Clinical Research Center for Digestive Diseases, Xijing Hospital of Digestive Diseases, Fourth Military Medical University, Xi'an, Shaanxi, China
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Thibonnier M, Bayer AL, Simonson MS, Douglas JG. Effects of amiloride analogues on AVP binding and activation of V1-receptor-expressing cells. THE AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PHYSIOLOGY 1992; 262:E76-86. [PMID: 1733254 DOI: 10.1152/ajpendo.1992.262.1.e76] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/28/2022]
Abstract
We tested the interactions between amiloride analogues and V1 vascular arginine vasopressin (AVP) receptors of human platelets, rat glomerular mesangial cells, and A7r5 smooth muscle cells by using radioligand binding techniques, intracellular calcium monitoring, platelet aggregation, and cell contraction techniques. Amiloride analogues were competitive inhibitors of both the agonist [3H]AVP and the tritiated V1 antagonist [1-(beta-mercapto-beta,beta-cyclopentamethylenepropionic acid), 2-O-methyl)tyrosine]AVP ([3H]d(CH2)5Tyr(Me)AVP) binding to V1 AVP receptors in the three different cell types used. The order of potency was ethylisopropyl amiloride (EIPA) greater than Benzamil greater than amiloride. AVP mobilization of intracellular calcium was blocked by the V1 antagonist d(CH2)5Tyr(Me)AVP and was reduced by EIPA in a dose-dependent manner. Moreover, EIPA also inhibited prostaglandin F2 alpha mobilization of intracellular calcium. Alkalinization of the intracellular pH with ammonium chloride reversed the inhibitory effect of EIPA but not that of the V1 antagonist on AVP-induced calcium mobilization. Both amiloride and EIPA blocked AVP-induced aggregation of human platelets and contraction of mesangial cells and glomeruli preparations independently of receptor site antagonism. In conclusion, amiloride analogues interfere with activation of V1 vascular receptors by AVP at different levels including binding to the receptor site, mobilization of intracellular calcium, cell contraction or aggregation, and presumably alteration of intracellular ion transports.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M Thibonnier
- Department of Medicine, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, Ohio
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|