The plasma dexamethasone window: evidence supporting its usefulness to validate dexamethasone suppression test results

Time-dependent effects of dexamethasone plasma concentrations on glucocorticoid receptor challenge tests

Glucocorticoid challenge tests such as the dexamethasone suppression test (DST) and the combined dexamethasone/corticotropin-releasing hormone (dex-CRH) test are considered to be able to sensitively measure hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis activity in stress-related psychiatric and endocrine disorders. We used mass-spectrometry to assess the relationship of plasma dexamethasone concentrations and the outcome of these tests in two independent cohorts. Dexamethasone concentrations were measured after oral ingestion of 1.5mg dexamethasone in two cohorts that underwent a standard (dexamethasone at 23:00h) as well as modified (18:00h) DST and dex-CRH test. The first study population was a case/control cohort of 105 depressed patients and 133 controls in which peripheral blood mRNA expression was also measured. The second was a cohort of 261 depressed patients that underwent a standard dex-CRH test at baseline and after 12 weeks' treatment with cognitive-behavioral therapy or antidepressants. Dexamethasone concentrations explained significant proportions of the variance in the DST in both the first (24.6%) and the second (5.2%) cohort. Dexamethasone concentrations explained a higher proportion of the variance in the dex-CRH test readouts, with 41.9% of the cortisol area under the curve (AUC) in the first sample and 24.7% in the second sample. In contrast to these strong effects at later time points, dexamethasone concentrations did not impact cortisol or ACTH concentrations or mRNA expression 3hours after ingestion. In the second sample, dexamethasone concentrations at baseline and week 12 were highly correlated, independent of treatment type and response status. Importantly, a case/control effect in the Dex-CRH test was only apparent when controlling for dexamethasone concentrations. Our results suggest that the incorporation of plasma dexamethasone concentration or measures of earlier endocrine read-outs may help to improve the assessment of endocrine dysfunction in depression.

Abnormalities of the HPA axis in affective disorders: clinical subtypes and potential treatments

BACKGROUND

New evidence is emerging regarding abnormalities of hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis function in subtypes of affective disorders. Adverse effects of HPA axis dysregulation may include dysfunction of monoaminergic transmitter systems, cognitive impairment and peripheral effects. Newer treatments specifically targeting the HPA axis are being developed.

OBJECTIVE

To review these developments focusing particularly on the glucocorticoid receptor (GR) antagonist mifepristone.

METHOD

A selective review of the literature.

RESULTS

The function of GRs is increasingly being defined. The role of corticotrophin-releasing hormone (CRH) and dehydroepiandrosterone (DHEA) in the brain is also increasingly understood. HPA axis function is particularly likely to be abnormal in psychotic depression and bipolar disorder, and it is in these conditions that trials of the GR antagonist mifepristone are being focused. CRH antagonists and DHEA are also being investigated as potential treatments.

CONCLUSION

Initial studies of mifepristone and other HPA-axis-targeting agents in psychotic depression and bipolar disorder are encouraging and confirmatory studies are awaited.

Cortisol, DHEAS and aging: resistance to cortisol suppression in frail institutionalized elderly

Convincing evidences has linked the hypothalamus-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis to aging patterns. F excess is implicated in the development of frailty characteristics whereas DHEAS is positively correlated to successful aging. We compared serum F and DHEAS levels of independent community-living (successful group, 19 M and 28 F, 69 to 87 yr) with those of institutionalized elderly (frail group, 20 M and 30 F, 65 to 95 yr). Serum F was determined at 1) baseline (08:00 h, 16:00 h and 23:00 h), 2) after 2 overnight dexamethasone (DEX) suppression tests (DST, using 0.25 and 1.0 mg doses), and 3) 60 min after ACTH stimulation (250 microg i.v. bolus); serum DHEAS was determined at 08:00 h. Basal serum F at 08:00 h, 16:00 h and 23:00 h and serum DHEAS levels were similar in both groups; however F: DHEAS ratio at 08:00 h was higher in the frail, compared to the successful group (mean +/- SD: 0.55 +/- 0.53 and 0.35 +/- 0.41, respectively; p = 0.04). In response to DST, F suppression was less effective in frail elderly after either 0.25 or 1.0 mg doses (9.0 +/- 6.0 and 2.0 +/- 0.9 microg/dl), as compared to the successful group (5.8 +/- 4.4 and 1.5 +/- 0.5 microg/dl) (p = 0.01). In addition, a significant correlation was observed between post-DEX F levels (both doses) and parameters of cognitive and physical frailty. Normal and similar F levels were observed after ACTH stimulation in both groups. Our data suggest a deficient feedback regulation of the HPA axis in frail institutionalized elderly, as demonstrated by a higher set point for F suppression. This augmented HPA tonus enforces the hypothesis that even milder F excess may be related to characteristics of frailty in the elderly.

Dexamethasone suppression test using saliva cortisol measurement in bulimia nervosa

The assessment of cortisol in saliva has been proven a valid and reliable reflection of the respective unbound hormone in blood. In the present study, a standard dexamethasone suppression test (DST) with measures of salivary cortisol levels was performed in bulimic women without depression (DSM-IV; N=48) and healthy controls (N=24) matched for age. Feedback sensitivity was assessed using the standard DST with pre- and post-measures of salivary cortisol. Subjects were divided into suppressors and nonsuppressors according to their post-DST levels. Bulimic suppressors and nonsuppressors were compared for their basal cortisol levels, body weight (body mass index, BMI), previous episodes of anorexia nervosa, and their results in psychometric tests. A total of 16 (33.3%) out of 48 women with bulimia nervosa (BN) failed to suppress in the DST. Basal salivary cortisol levels were elevated in bulimic nonsuppressors. Significant differences between suppressors and nonsuppressors were found for body weight and previous episodes of anorexia nervosa. The results are in accordance with recent findings. They support the hypothesized association between low body weight and DST nonsuppression. Using saliva cortisol in the standard DST could be advantageous for studying bulimic patients. Furthermore, the results show the importance of determining HPA reagibility when measuring cortisol in bulimic patients.

Dexamethasone suppression of corticosteroid secretion: evaluation of the site of action by receptor measures and functional studies

A dose of dexamethasone was determined in rats (50 micrograms/kg s.c.) that suppressed the corticosterone response to restraint stress by 80%. Corticosteroid receptor occupancy estimates found that the 50 micrograms/kg s.c. dose of dexamethasone had no significant effect on available glucocorticoid receptor (GR) or mineralocorticoid receptor (MR) binding in brain regions (hypothalamus, hippocampus and cortex); on the other hand dexamethasone produced a selective and significant decrease in available GR in peripheral tissues (pituitary and spleen). Functional studies showed that the 50 micrograms/kg s.c. dose of dexamethasone completely blocked the effects of corticotropin-releasing hormone (CRH; 0.3-3.0 micrograms/kg i.p.) on corticosterone secretion, but did not inhibit the corticosterone response to an adrenocorticotropin hormone (ACTH; 2.5 I.U./kg i.p.) challenge. These studies indicate that this dose of dexamethasone exerts its inhibitory effects on the HPA axis primarily by acting at GR in the pituitary. The plasma dexamethasone levels produced by this dose of dexamethasone are similar to those present in humans the afternoon after an oral dexamethasone suppression test (DST), a time at which many depressed patients escape from dexamethasone suppression. These results support and extend other studies which suggest that the DST provides a direct test of the effects of increased GR activation in the pituitary on ACTH and cortisol secretion.

The lower limits of dexamethasone window in Chinese depressives

BACKGROUND

Previous studies have shown wide variation in plasma dexamethasone (DEX) concentrations following a standard 1-mg dexamethasone suppression test (DST), and significantly lower DEX concentrations in DST nonsuppressors compared with suppressors, suggesting that DEX pharmacokinetics/bioavailability is an important variable associated with DST nonsuppression.

METHODS

To determine the effect of plasma DEX levels on the DST in Chinese depressives, we measured plasma DEX and post-DEX cortisol levels at 4:00 PM in a group of 50 depressed outpatients, 28 anxiety outpatients, and 33 normal subjects during the course of 1-mg oral overnight DST.

RESULTS

We found a significant difference in the plasma DEX levels between DST nonsuppressors and suppressors in the depression group and overall subject population, and a significant negative correlation between the plasma DEX and cortisol levels in the depression, anxiety, and total groups. Within a DEX "window", the DST performance was enhanced, whereas the relationships between plasma DEX and post-DEX cortisol levels remained equally strong.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings support a relationship between plasma DEX and post-DEX cortisol levels, a relationship that might be superimposed on the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis. Comparing our "window" range with those of previous studies, we suggest that Chinese depressives may have lower limits of plasma DEX window, and that ethnicity may be an intervening variable in both DST response and pharmacokinetics of DEX.

Plasma dexamethasone concentration and cortisol response during manic episodes

BACKGROUND

Despite the widespread study of the dexamethasone suppression test (DST) in patients diagnosed with major depression, it has been less well studied during manic and mixed states of bipolar disorder.

METHODS

Cortisol response to the administration of 1 mg of dexamethasone was studied in 44 patients diagnosed bipolar disorder, manic (n = 37) or mixed (n = 7). Dexamethasone levels and cortisol responses were compared between these groups. Four patients initially meeting criteria for bipolar disorder, mixed, and 7 patients initially meeting criteria for bipolar disorder, manic, all of whom were characterized as DST nonsuppressors, were retested after remission.

RESULTS

Dexamethasone levels were lower and cortisol levels higher in those patients diagnosed bipolar disorder, mixed. An inverse correlation was found between log-transformed dexamethasone levels and log-transformed cortisol levels at 3 PM (r = -.619, p < or = .001) and 10 PM (r = -.501, p < or = .001). In those subjects retested after remission, dexamethasone levels were higher and cortisol levels lower than during the manic and mixed states.

CONCLUSIONS

Disturbances in the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis are observed frequently during mixed states of bipolar disorder, but are also not uncommon in purely manic episodes. These changes appear to be state dependent and revert with treatment.

The dexamethasone suppression test and treatment outcome in elderly depressed patients participating in a placebo-controlled multicenter trial involving moclobemide and nortriptyline

The dexamethasone suppression test (DST) was conducted in 95 elderly DSM-III-R depressed patients randomized for treatment with moclobemide (MOC; 400 mg daily), nortriptyline (NT; 75 mg daily), or placebo (PBO) in a 7-week double-blind multicenter study. Patients were assessed weekly using various clinical scales, including the 17-item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale. The DST was administered at baseline and at the end of treatment. At baseline, no relationship was found between DST status and the various clinical scales used. At the end of treatment, suppressors (DST-) had significantly improved clinical ratings compared to nonsuppressors (DST+), and were mostly found among those treated with NT (71%) as compared to MOC (41%) or PBO (33%) (p < .03). On the other hand, baseline DST measures influenced treatment outcome; DST+ patients had a greater number of treatment responders to NT (48%) than MOC (19%) or PBO (20%) (p < .07). For DST- patients, the situation was reversed: NT, 7%; MOC, 31%. Postdexamethasone cortisol levels were lower in MOC responders (p < .07). An interaction was found between DST and drug-specific response. The DST may be a useful adjunct for predicting and evaluating the outcome of antidepressant therapy.

Pharmacokinetics of dexamethasone and its relationship to dexamethasone suppression test outcome in depressed patients and healthy control subjects

The pharmacokinetics of dexamethasone (DEX) were studied in 9 drug-free melancholically depressed patients and 10 healthy control subjects matched by sex and age. Each subject received 1 mg of DEX administered orally and by the (i.v.) route at 11:00 PM and serial blood samples were collected over the next 17 hours until 4:00 PM. There were no significant differences between the diagnostic groups and DEX bioavailability, peak plasma level, time to maximum concentration, or in elimination half-life after oral administration. Bioavailability estimates indicated that DEX absorption was incomplete and variable mean = 61%, SD = 14) in controls as well as depressed patients. In both groups there was a wide interindividual variability in plasma DEX levels following both oral and i.v. routes of administration. This variability could not be reliably predicted by differences in age, sex, or weight between subjects. The factors that accounted for most the variability in 4:00 PM plasma DEX levels after oral administration were clearance, bioavailability, and time to reach maximum concentration. Plasma DEX levels were lower in 3 depressed nonsuppressors compared to 3 matched controls who suppressed. No single pharmacokinetic factor was shown to be responsible for the lower DEX levels in the depressed nonsuppressors. These results indicate that plasma DEX levels need to be measured in each individual during the DST procedure so that this information may be taken into consideration when interpreting DST results.

State specificity of DST abnormalities in geriatric depression

Pre-treatment and posttreatment dexamethasone suppression test (DST) results in physically healthy elderly major depressives without dementia demonstrated an association between treatment and DST normalization. Sixty percent of subjects were nonsuppressors at baseline compared to 17% after intensive treatment. DST results normalized in 75% of initial nonsuppressors; none of the initial suppressors converted to nonsuppression. A strong correlation between clinical improvement and decreases in afternoon cortisol levels was identified. Initial suppression status did not influence this association. There was a nonsignificant trend for very high (> 15 micrograms/dl) afternoon cortisol levels to be associated with delusional depression. The advantage of using continuous rather than categorical measures to assess the relationship between reversal of depression and DST results is discussed.

Inhibition of the pituitary-adrenal axis with dexamethasone and cortisol in depressed patients and healthy subjects: a dose-response study

Different doses dexamethasone (0.25, 0.5, and 1 mg) or cortisol (30, 60, and 120 mg) were administered PO at 2230h to 39 depressed patients and 20 healthy subjects on nonsuccessive days. The inhibiting capacity of the two steroids on hypothalamo-pituitary axis (HPA) function was evaluated by measuring the plasma levels of cortisol, ACTH, and beta-endorphin at 0900h and 1530h each day following treatment. Baseline levels of the hormones were measured before starting treatment. A dose-dependent suppressive effect of both steroids on the plasma levels of cortisol, ACTH, and beta-endorphin was found both in patients and controls, except for the 0900h levels of cortisol after cortisol treatment. The effects were most profound in the morning. Differences between patients and controls were observed after cortisol treatment, but not dexamethasone, with respect to cortisol, ACTH, and beta-endorphin plasma levels in the morning. Cortisol treatment discriminated dexamethasone nonsuppressors from suppressors (patients and controls) and patients categorized as dexamethasone suppressors from controls in a way that dexamethasone treatment could not. The data favour the idea of impaired corticosteroid feedback beyond the pituitary level as part of HPA dysfunction.

Effect of high plasma dexamethasone levels on DST sensitivity: dose-response study in depressed patients and controls

The aim of this study was to examine cortisol dynamics over a range of plasma dexamethasone (DEX) levels using a two-dose dexamethasone suppression test (DST). Two doses of DEX (0.5 and 1.5 mg) were administered in a randomized crossover design to 29 inpatients with major depression and 26 controls to identify the upper range of plasma DEX levels that would allow reliable interpretation of DST results. It was hypothesized that due to inappropriately high plasma DEX levels following 1.5 mg, several depressed patients would switch from suppressors after the 1.5 mg dose to nonsuppressors after 0.5 mg. In contrast, the nondepressed controls with high DEX levels following 1.5 mg would remain suppressors after the lower dose. Fourteen patients were identified as having high 4 p.m. DEX levels (greater than 4 nmol/l) after the 1.5 mg DST. Cortisol was suppressed in all of the subjects with high DEX levels. After 0.5 mg, five of the eight depressed patients with high DEX levels switched to nonsuppressors. In contrast, all six controls with high DEX levels remained suppressors. These results indicate that patients with high DEX levels after a 1 mg DST should be retested with a lower dose. This strategy enhances the sensitivity of the DST without loss of specificity.

Do serum dexamethasone levels improve the DST?

Some investigators have reported that dexamethasone suppression test (DST) accuracy might be improved by incorporating dexamethasone concentrations ([dex]) into test results. Using receiver operating characteristic methods, we evaluated data from four studies in which cortisol and dexamethasone levels were measured simultaneously at one or more times after drug ingestion. We compared DST accuracy using cortisol alone with various diagnostic indices incorporating [dex]. In none of the 21 comparisons did the [dex] factor enhance diagnostic performance.

Neuroendocrine aspects of primary endogenous depression: IX. Receiver operating characteristic analysis of the dexamethasone suppression index vs. the dexamethasone suppression test in patients and controls

The dexamethasone suppression index (DSI), which is the product of the postdexamethasone (DEX) serum DEX concentration and the post-DEX serum cortisol concentration, has been suggested to be a more sensitive discriminative test for depression than the standard DEX suppression test (DST). We used receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis to examine the DSI, calculated in several ways, versus the standard DST in a sample of 40 endogenous major depressives and 40 matched normal control subjects. The ROC analysis indicated that the DSI offers no advantage over the standard DST, regardless of which criterion values are used to define cortisol nonsuppression. Serum DEX determinations appear to have value primarily as an indicator of the minimum DEX concentration necessary for an accurate DST.

The effect of age on cortisol and plasma dexamethasone concentrations in depressed patients and controls

The aim of this study was to identify any relationships between various patient factors such as age, gender and concurrent medication that may affect plasma cortisol or dexamethasone (DEX) concentrations. Multiple regression analysis was used to formulate an equation to predict plasma DEX levels to identify factors that may influence DEX bioavailability. Pre- and post-DST cortisol levels did not increase with age, but DEX levels were higher in elderly depressed patients. Neither gender nor psychotropic medication affected plasma cortisol or DEX levels. There was no indication that pre-DST cortisol levels influenced plasma DEX levels to account for the lower DEX values in non-suppressors. Age was the only significant factor found in this study to influence DEX levels and it could be argued that the dose of DEX should be lowered when administering the DST to elderly patients to reduce plasma DEX variability.