Effects of lesions of various medial forebrain bundle components on lateral hypothalamic self-stimulation

Opposite effects of ibotenic acid and 6-hydroxydopamine lesions of the lateral hypothalamus on intracranial self-stimulation and stimulation-induced locomotion

The purpose of the present study was to test the respective roles of the intrinsic neurons and of the catecholaminergic fibers in two behaviors elicited by electrical stimulation of the lateral hypothalamus, intracranial self-stimulation and the increase in locomotor activity produced by noncontingent stimulation. One group of rats was unilaterally injected in the middle lateral hypothalamus with a dose of ibotenic acid known to significantly decrease self-stimulation (4 micrograms/0.5 microliter). Two other groups received, in the same area, an injection of a small dose of 6-hydroxydopamine (2 micrograms/0.5 microliter). The rats of one of these groups were pre-treated with desmethylimipramine. Two other groups of rats were respectively injected with the vehicle of each neurotoxin. Eight days later all rats were bilaterally implanted with stimulation electrodes, one in the lesioned area, the other in the contralateral region. Each electrode of each animal was tested first for self-stimulation, then for locomotor activation measured in the open field produced by non-contingent stimulation. Whatever the lesion or the behavior tested, the response of the lateral hypothalamus contralateral to the lesioned area was normal. Self-stimulation was disturbed only with stimulation of the lateral hypothalamus lesioned by ibotenic acid. Self-stimulation in the lateral hypothalamus lesioned by 6-hydroxydopamine was normal. However, a significant loss of noradrenaline in the hippocampus and of dopamine in the striatum was observed. Furthermore, the brains of two rats unilaterally injected with the usual dose of 6-hydroxydopamine were processed for tyrosine hydroxylase immunocytochemistry.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Basal forebrain knife cuts and medial forebrain bundle self-stimulation

Current autoradiographic and electrophysiological data suggest that fibers coursing from the diagonal band/medial septum and lateral preoptic area through the medial forebrain bundle (MFB) to the midbrain may carry the reward signals generated by lateral hypothalamic stimulation. To test this hypothesis, 40 rats were given a unilateral lateral hypothalamic stimulating electrode and an ipsilateral guide cannula for knife cut transection. In baseline self-stimulation testing, both the animal's capacity to respond for the stimulation and the reward efficacy of the stimulation were measured. A coronal plane knife cut transection was given following stabilization of baseline behavior, and any changes in response capacity and stimulation reward efficacy were observed for up to two weeks, beginning 24 h after transection. Cuts to the diagonal band/medial septal region or the outflow therefrom did not permanently or significantly alter stimulation reward effectiveness. Cuts in the lateral preoptic area or in the MFB just anterior to the stimulating electrode decreased stimulation reward effects only if considerable concomitant rostrocaudal tissue damage was apparent around the knife cut. Even in these cases, reward degradation was rarely permanent. These results suggest that the majority of reward-relevant fibers probably do not arise in forebrain nuclei rostral to the stimulating electrode. A possible role of neurons endemic to the lateral hypothalamus in stimulation reward effects is discussed.

The effect of operant and electrode placement on self-stimulation train duration response functions

Multiple operants have been used to assess the effects of drugs on self-stimulation. It has typically been assumed that changing the operant used to obtain brain stimulation represents a simple performance manipulation. However, the validity of this assumption has been challenged by several research findings. The present study sought to clarify the role of response topography and slight differences in electrode placement on operant-induced shifts in self-stimulation thresholds and response rates. Thresholds and rates were determined for three operants (leverpressing, nosepoking and omnidirectional leverpressing) using two bilaterally placed electrodes. In addition, the response topographies used to perform each operant were evaluated. It was found that the relationship between the thresholds and rates produced by the operants was more dependent on the electrode placement than operant or subject-specific factors. The results of this experiment suggest that the characteristics of the stimulation site determine the relationship among different operants. This finding may be due to differences in the reward substrate or stimulation-induced behaviors activated at various brain loci.

The role of intrinsic neurons in lateral hypothalamic self-stimulation

In this brief review, we summarize some of our recent work concerning the effect of a specific lesion of the intrinsic neurons located in the middle part of the lateral hypothalamus on electrical self-stimulation of this structure by electrodes implanted along the medial forebrain bundle. In a first experiment the neurons of the lateral hypothalamus were destroyed unilaterally by local injection of ibotenic acid (4 micrograms in 0.5 microliter). The contralateral side served as the sham-lesion control. Between 10 and 20 days later, electrodes were bilaterally implanted, one in the lesioned area, the other in the contralateral hypothalamus. Intracranial self-stimulation (ICSS) was obtained separately for each electrode, at various current intensities, using a nose-poke response. ICSS from electrodes implanted in the lesioned area was decreased in all cases, whereas ICSS of the sham-lesioned side was normal. In a second experiment, two groups of rats lesioned and implanted as above, received two additional electrodes either in the anterior hypothalamus or in the posterior hypothalamus. In rats with electrodes in the anterior hypothalamus, the lesion produced a large deficit in self-stimulation when stimulation was applied to the anterior electrode ipsilateral to the lesion. Only 3 of 6 rats showed a decrease in ICSS with stimulation of the posterior hypothalamic electrode ipsilateral to the lesion. These results suggest that ICSS in the anterior part of the medial forebrain bundle is sustained by long fibers originating in the middle part of the lateral hypothalamus, while ICSS in the posterior part of the lateral hypothalamus may not depend on the neurons located in the lesioned area.

Electrical self-stimulation deficits in the anterior and posterior parts of the medial forebrain bundle after ibotenic acid lesion of the middle lateral hypothalamus

The aim of the present study was to analyse the involvement of the intrinsic neurons located in the middle lateral hypothalamus in electrical self-stimulation measured with electrodes in the anterior and posterior parts of the medial forebrain bundle. In rats without hypothalamic lesions, self-stimulation rates from both anterior and posterior electrodes were similar on either side of the brain. For all rats with ibotenic acid-induced lesions in the lateral hypothalamus, self-stimulation rates were lower with electrodes in the area of the lesion, while self-stimulation on the contralateral side was normal. In rats with electrodes in the anterior hypothalamus, the lesion produced a large deficit when stimulation was applied to the anterior electrode ipsilateral to the lesion. Only three rats showed a decrease in self-stimulation with stimulation of the posterior hypothalamic electrode ipsilateral to the lesion; self-stimulation of the other three rats was normal. These results suggest that self-stimulation in the anterior part of the medial forebrain bundle is supported by long fibers originating in the middle part of the lateral hypothalamus, while self-stimulation in the posterior part of the lateral hypothalamus can be influenced by another system not involved in reward processes observed in the rostral part of the medial forebrain bundle.

Intrinsic neurons are involved in lateral hypothalamic self-stimulation

The recent technique of using ibotenic acid to lesion selectively local neurons while sparing fibers of passage permitted us to answer a long-standing question: is lateral hypothalamic self-stimulation supported by fibers of passage or are the intrinsic hypothalamic neurons involved? Three groups of adult male Sprague-Dawley rats were used. In a normal group, electrodes were bilaterally implanted in the lateral hypothalamus and self-stimulation (ICSS) was obtained separately with the right and left electrodes, at various current intensities, using a nose-poke response. In the experimental group, the intrinsic neurons of the lateral hypothalamus were destroyed unilaterally by local injection of ibotenic acid (4 or 6 micrograms in 0.5 microliter); the other side served as the sham-lesion control. Ten days later ICSS electrodes were implanted bilaterally, one in the lesioned area, the other in the contralateral hypothalamus. As in the case of the normal animals, the rate of nose-poking (ICSS) was then determined separately for each electrode. In the normal rats, ICSS rates were the same with stimulation on either side and the increase in ICSS rate as a function of the increase in current intensity was the same on each side. In the experimental rats, ICSS of the lesioned side was decreased in all cases; moreover, after lesion with the 6 micrograms dose, ICSS was totally suppressed. Self-stimulation of the sham-lesioned side was not significantly different from that observed in the normal rats. In 6 rats sampled from the lesioned groups as well as in 3 additional unimplanted animals, biochemical assays compared dopamine and serotonin contents of the two striata and noradrenaline and serotonin contents of the two hippocampi. No difference was observed for these two structures between the side ipsilateral to the lesion and the contralateral side. Moreover, none of these monoamine levels differed from those seen in the unimplanted rats. These results, taken together, suggest that intrinsic lateral hypothalamic neurons are involved in ICSS.

Discriminating between reward and performance: a critical review of intracranial self-stimulation methodology

Despite numerous pharmacological investigations of intracranial self-stimulation (ICSS), the substrates of this behavior have yet to be completely understood. In view of the likelihood that inadequate methodology has hindered the quest for these substrates, the present review was undertaken. Criteria for ICSS methodology should include not only the ability to discriminate reward from gross performance deficit, but also adequate capacity (ability to generate experimental data at a reasonable rate). For numerous reasons, bar-pressing on a continuous reinforcement schedule fails the first criterion despite its ease and rapidity. The use of partial reinforcement schedules may alleviate some of these shortcomings. Analysis of drug-induced response decrement patterns can discriminate gross motoric incapacity from other variables, although the question of subtle response maintenance deficits remains to be answered. Measurements of response rates using alternative operants do not differentiate reward and performance adequately. More promising, "rate-free" measures using locomotion as an operant include the two-platform method of Valenstein and the "locus of rise" method. Comparison of drug effects on ICSS with those on alternate tasks are fraught with pitfalls including the problems of assuring equivalent rates and patterns of responding. The use of differential electrode placements is ideally suited for neurochemically well-characterized drugs, particularly if "double dissociations" can be established during studies of multiple placements. Presentation of different current intensities or frequencies permits the compilation of rate-intensity functions, and drug-induced shifts in these functions have considerable analytical power. Self-regulation of current intensity constitutes a powerful tool that has yet to realize its full potential in the pharmacological study of ICSS. Extensive studies involving self-regulation of stimulation duration ("shuttlebox" studies) suggest that this method may be highly versatile despite several practical difficulties. It is concluded that at least six of these methods appear to do a reasonable job of excluding gross performance deficit. However, the possible influences of other factors, such as subtle response maintenance deficit, incentive or arousal, remain to be resolved in view of the multifactorial nature of ICSS. Multiple tests for ICSS drug or lesion studies are advocated whenever feasible, as no single test appears capable of resolving all theoretical complexities.

The medial forebrain bundle of the rat. I. General introduction

This paper is the first of a projected series of studies on the structure and composition of the medial forebrain bundle (MFB) of the rat and the relations of this fiber system to its bed nucleus, the lateral hypothalamic area. The first part of the paper comprises an extensive review of literature on the MFB from its discovery by Ganser in 1882 to the present. This review serves as the basis for an evaluation of our present-day knowledge of the organization of the MFB, which is presented in the second part of this paper. Despite the wealth of information available on the origins and sites of termination of the axons that constitute the MFB, surprisingly little attention has been given to the bundle itself, to its topographic boundaries, its fiber composition, or to the spatial arrangement of its constituent components. These features of the MFB as it extends through the lateral preoptic and lateral hypothalamic areas have been analyzed in normal Klüver-Barrera- and Bodian-stained material. From this analysis, a detailed atlas of the MFB and some of the surrounding structures has been prepared. This atlas, which forms the third section of this paper, illustrates the appearance and organization of the MFB at ten equidistant levels through the lateral preoptic and lateral hypothalamic continuum.

The dorsal diencephalic conduction system: a review of the anatomy and functions of the habenular complex

The first part of this paper is an attempt to sketch an outline of the anatomy of the dorsal diencephalic conduction system by reviewing experimental evidence establishing the afferent and efferent connections of the habenular complex. This system provides an alternative to the descending medial forebrain bundle for the conduction of information from the limbic forebrain to limbic midbrain areas. The second part is a critical examination of experiments using ablation or electrical and chemical stimulation techniques which are concerned with the behavioural functions of the habenular complex. The habenula has been shown to play an important role in a diverse set of behavioural systems, which include olfaction, ingestion, mating, endocrine function, aversive motivation, and brain stimulation. Anatomical and behavioural support is presented for the view that the dorsal diencephalic conduction system provides an opportunity for interaction of activity in motivational systems with movement systems in the striatum and midbrain.

Differential effects of drug treatments on nose-poke and bar-press self-stimulation

To assess the possibility of dissociating drug-induced gross performance deficits from effects on brain stimulation reward, the nose-poke and bar-press operants were systematically compared. Pentobarbital and methocarbamol (a muscle relaxant) reduced bar-pressing more strongly than nose-poking. In contrast, clonidine and haloperidol, which disrupt noradrenergic and dopaminergic neurotransmission respectively, had no differential effect on these operants. The nose-poke operant appears less vulnerable to drug-induced gross motor impairment and may be more suitable for pharmacological studies of self-stimulation.

Response artifact in the measurement of neuroleptic-induced anhedonia

Systemic administration of the neuroleptic drug alpha-flupenthixol attenuated lever-pressing behavior in rats responding for rewarding brain stimulation. The magnitude of this attenuation was dose-dependent and resembled the effects of reward reduction and termination. However, when the operant response requirements of the same rats were changed to nose poking, identical drug treatments produced relatively little attenuation in performance. These data do not support the belief that neuroleptics produce a general state of anhedonia. Rather, the apparent suppression of reinforced behaviors depends at least in part on the kinetic requirements of the response.

Rewarding effects of hypothalamic self-stimulation altered by unilateral lesions of superior colliculus in rats

The effects of unilateral lesions of the superior colliculus were determined on self-stimulation of the medial forebrain bundle. It was found that the lesions had different effects depending upon the precise location of the stimulating electrode: self-stimulation on far-laterally located electrodes was abolished while on more medially placed electrodes this behaviour was enhanced. These data are inconsistent with explanations of intracranial self-stimulation which treat it as a unitary phenomenon.

Effects of catecholamine manipulations on three different self-stimulation behaviors

Rats with self-stimulation electrodes in the medial part of lateral hypothalamus (LH) or in the lateral part of LH were trained to bar press, to run in a continuous, square-shaped runway, and to move their tails from side to side while otherwise restrained, all using LH stimulation on an FI 2 sec schedule as the reinforcement. At low doses of pimozide (a dopaminergic blocker) or of FLA-57 (a dopamine beta-hydroxylase inhibitor) different effects on rates of responding were observed on each of the three tasks at the two electrode placements, indicating that the rate reductions were not the results of specific performance effects of the drugs. The patterns of rate changes suggested that the effects of LH stimulation on behavior in the runway were primarily, but not exclusively mediated by a dopaminergic system; that the effects of LH stimulation on tail movement were primarily, but not exclusively mediated by a noradrenergic system; and that the effect of LH stimulation on bar pressing was mediated by both, or either of these substrates. These results suggest that the reinforcement of behavior by LH stimulation is flexibly mediated by at least two different neural systems.

Effects of catecholamine manipulations on three different self-stimulation behaviors

Rats with self-stimulation electrodes in the medial part of lateral hypothalamus (LH) or in the lateral part of LH were trained to bar press, to run in a continuous, square-shaped runway, and to move their tails from side to side while otherwise restrained, all using LH stimulation on an FI 2 sec schedule as the reinforcement. At low doses of pimozide (a dopaminergic blocker) or of FLA-57 (a dopamine beta-hydroxylase inhibitor) different effects on rates of responding were observed on each of the 3 tasks at the 2 electrode placements, indicating that the rate reductions were not the results of specific performance effects of the drugs. The patterns of rate changes suggested that the effects of LH stimulation on behavior in the runway were primarily, but not exclusively mediated by a dopaminergic system; that the effects of LH stimulation on tail movement were primarily, but not exclusively mediated by a noradrenergic system; and that the effect of LH stimulation on bar pressing was mediated by both, or either of these substrates. These results suggest that the reinforcement of behavior by LH stimulation is flexibly mediated by at least 2 different neural systems.