Lp(a) lipoprotein: an overview

Real-world impact of transitioning from one lipoprotein(a) assay to another in a clinical setting

Background and aims

Different lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] assays may affect risk stratification of individuals and thus clinical decision-making. We aimed to investigate how transitioning between Lp(a) assays at a large central laboratory affected the proportion of individuals with Lp(a) result above clinical thresholds.

Methods

We studied nationwide clinical laboratory data including 185,493 unique individuals (47.7 % women) aged 18-50 years with 272,463 Lp(a) measurements using Roche (2000-2009) and Siemens Lp(a) assay (2009-2019).

Results

While the majority of individuals (66-75 %) had low levels of Lp(a) (<30 mg/dL) independent of the assay used, the Roche assay detected 20 % more individuals with Lp(a) >50 mg/dL, 40 % more individuals with Lp(a) >100 mg/dL and 80 % more individuals with Lp(a) > 180 mg/dL than the currently used Siemens assay, likely due to calibration differences.

Conclusion

Transitioning from one Lp(a) immunoassay to another had significant impact on Lp(a) results, particularly in individuals approaching clinically relevant Lp(a) thresholds.

Lipoprotein (a)-Related Inflammatory Imbalance: A Novel Horizon for the Development of Atherosclerosis

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The primary objective of this review is to explore the pathophysiological roles and clinical implications of lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] in the context of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD). We seek to understand how Lp(a) contributes to inflammation and arteriosclerosis, aiming to provide new insights into the mechanisms of ASCVD progression.

RECENT FINDINGS

Recent research highlights Lp(a) as an independent risk factor for ASCVD. Studies show that Lp(a) not only promotes the inflammatory processes but also interacts with various cellular components, leading to endothelial dysfunction and smooth muscle cell proliferation. The dual role of Lp(a) in both instigating and, under certain conditions, mitigating inflammation is particularly noteworthy. This review finds that Lp(a) plays a complex role in the development of ASCVD through its involvement in inflammatory pathways. The interplay between Lp(a) levels and inflammatory responses highlights its potential as a target for therapeutic intervention. These insights could pave the way for novel approaches in managing and preventing ASCVD, urging further investigation into Lp(a) as a therapeutic target.

Analysis of rare genetic variation underlying cardiometabolic diseases and traits among 200,000 individuals in the UK Biobank

Cardiometabolic diseases are the leading cause of death worldwide. Despite a known genetic component, our understanding of these diseases remains incomplete. Here, we analyzed the contribution of rare variants to 57 diseases and 26 cardiometabolic traits, using data from 200,337 UK Biobank participants with whole-exome sequencing. We identified 57 gene-based associations, with broad replication of novel signals in Geisinger MyCode. There was a striking risk associated with mutations in known Mendelian disease genes, including MYBPC3, LDLR, GCK, PKD1 and TTN. Many genes showed independent convergence of rare and common variant evidence, including an association between GIGYF1 and type 2 diabetes. We identified several large effect associations for height and 18 unique genes associated with blood lipid or glucose levels. Finally, we found that between 1.0% and 2.4% of participants carried rare potentially pathogenic variants for cardiometabolic disorders. These findings may facilitate studies aimed at therapeutics and screening of these common disorders.

Performance evaluation of five lipoprotein(a) immunoassays on the Roche cobas c501 chemistry analyzer

Objectives

Measurement of lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] is used in risk assessment of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD). The aim of the current study was to evaluate performance characteristic of five different Lp(a) assays using the cobas c501 (Roche Diagnostics) analyzer.

Design and methods

Lp(a) was measured using five Lp(a) assays (Diazyme, Kamiya, MedTest, Randox, and Roche) configured to mg/dL units. Assays from Diazyme and Kamiya were also configured using nmol/L units in separate experiments. Studies included sensitivity, imprecision, linearity, method comparison, and evaluation of healthy subjects. Imprecision (intra-day, 20 replicates; inter-day, duplicates twice daily for five days) and linearity were evaluated using patient pools. Linearity assessed a minimum of five patient splits spanning the analytical measurement range (AMR). Method comparison used 80 residual serum samples. Specimens from 120 self-reported healthy subjects (61 females / 59 males) were also tested. Method comparison for two assays in nmol/L units was conducted using 96 residual serum samples.

Results

Assay sensitivities met all manufacturer claims. Imprecision studies demonstrated %CVs ranging from 2.5 to 5.2% for the low pool (average concentration from 7.3 to 12.4 ​mg/dL); high pool %CVs ranged from 0.8 to 3.0% (average concentrations from 31.5–50.2 ​mg/dL). Linearity was confirmed for all assays. Variation in accuracy was observed when comparing results to an all method average. Lp(a) results were higher in females versus males in self-reported healthy subjects.

Conclusions

All assays performed according to manufacturer described performance characteristics, although differences were observed across Lp(a) assays tested when compared to an all method average.

•

Five automated assays for Lp(a) measurement (mg/dL units) were compared.

•

Differences in accuracy were observed across the methods investigated.

•

Two assays were also compared using nmol/L units.

•

More Lp(a) assay traceability to the international reference material is needed.

The current status of lipoprotein (a) in pregnancy: a literature review

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Lipoprotein (Lp) (a) is a neglected element of the blood lipid profile. It is now recognized as a determinant of coronary heart disease progression and its role in atherosclerosis and its ability to induce thrombosis make it potentially important in the course of normal and complicated pregnancies. Pregnancy involves a major transformation of metabolism to sustain fetal growth. Multiple studies have been conducted on Lp(a) in pregnancy, and it is timely to synthesize and evaluate this evidence.

METHODS AND SUBJECTS

We reviewed the MEDLINE database for all articles published concerning "lipoprotein a" and "pregnancy" from May 2003 to May 2012. A previous comprehensive review assessed the literature up to May 2003.

RESULTS

We critically analyzed 14 studies detailing the effect of complications in pregnancy on Lp(a) profile, and subsequent pregnancy outcomes where available. Studies evaluating the normal metabolic response to pregnancy, pregnancies complicated by pre-eclampsia and intra-uterine growth restriction were reviewed.

CONCLUSIONS

A substantial mass of data has accumulated describing Lp(a) changes in pregnancy. The diversity of study design limits the ability to draw broad-ranging conclusions, but brings into focus the important questions remaining, which we discuss.

Changes of plasma lipoprotein(a) during and after normal pregnancy in Caucasians

OBJECTIVE

Elevated plasma concentrations of lipoprotein(a) are associated with an increased risk for development of atherosclerosis. High lipoprotein(a) concentrations may also be associated with pregnancy-induced hypertension and pre-eclampsia, but reference data on the course of lipoprotein(a) during uneventful pregnancies are limited and questionable.

METHODS

We studied plasma lipoprotein(a) concentrations in 19 healthy nulliparous Caucasian women during and after uncomplicated pregnancy. Blood was sampled every 4 weeks during pregnancy from 9 weeks onwards, during labor and at 2-4 weeks and 3-5 months after delivery. An apolipoprotein(a) (apo(a)) isoform-independent enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) was used to measure lipoprotein(a). Multilevel analysis was used to describe the data.

RESULTS

Lipoprotein(a) increased until 35 weeks, subsequently decreased slightly until delivery, and fell to values below early pregnancy concentrations thereafter. The curve is defined by the formula lipoprotein(a) (mg/l) = exp [4.789 + (0.05215 x GA) + (-0.0007371 x GA2)] where GA = gestational age in weeks.

CONCLUSIONS

We constructed a curve for plasma lipoprotein(a) which may serve as the standard reference for changes in pregnancy. Its formula is helpful in predicting changes of gestational age-dependent changes of lipoprotein(a) in normal pregnancy.

Lipoprotein(a) is related to the extent of lesions in the coronary vasculature and to unstable coronary syndromes

BACKGROUND

Lp(a) is a highly atherogenic particle with a prothrombotic effect. Until now its relation to the extent and severity of the atheromatic lesions had not been established by standard procedures.

HYPOTHESIS

This study examined the correlation of Lp(a) to the extent and severity of coronary artery disease (CAD) and its relation to unstable clinical events (not including sudden death).

METHODS

In 202 patients undergoing coronary angiography, plasma lipids were measured with the usual procedures and Lp(a) with the enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. The extent of CAD was expressed in the number of diseased vessels and its severity in terms of the severity coefficient and the obstruction coefficient.

RESULTS

A very strong relationship between LP(a) and the number of diseased vessels (p = 0.0007) signifying diffuse atherosclerosis, but no relation with the severity of the lesions. was found. However, it was the only lipid that correlated significantly with the number of totally occluded vessels (p = 0.0003). The thrombogenic ability of Lp(a) was manifested by increased incidence of myocardial infarction and unstable angina episodes in patients with elevated Lp(a) (p = 0.0157).

CONCLUSION

Elevated Lp(a) predisposes to the extent of CAD and total occlusions but not to the severity of lesions. Patients with increased Lp(a) levels and unstable angina are at increased danger of suffering myocardial infarction. Thus, Lp(a) may predispose to plaque destabilization and thrombosis of noncritical lesions.

Association of gene variants with incident myocardial infarction in the Cardiovascular Health Study

OBJECTIVE

We asked whether single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) that had been nominally associated with cardiovascular disease in antecedent studies were also associated with cardiovascular disease in a population-based prospective study of 4522 individuals aged 65 or older.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Based on antecedent studies, we prespecified a risk allele and an inheritance model for each of 74 SNPs. We then tested the association of these SNPs with myocardial infarction (MI) in the Cardiovascular Health Study (CHS). The prespecified risk alleles of 8 SNPs were nominally associated (1-sided P<0.05) with increased risk of MI in White CHS participants. The false discovery rate for these 8 was 0.43, suggesting that about 4 of these 8 are likely to be true positives. The 4 of these 8 SNPs that had the strongest evidence for association with cardiovascular disease before testing in CHS (association in 3 antecedent studies) were in KIF6 (CHS HR=1.29; 90%CI 1.1 to 1.52), VAMP8 (HR=1.2; 90%CI 1.02 to 1.41), TAS2R50 (HR=1.13; 90%CI 1 to 1.27), and LPA (HR=1.62; 90%CI 1.09 to 2.42).

CONCLUSIONS

Although most of the SNPs investigated were not associated with MI in CHS, evidence from this investigation combined with previous studies suggests that 4 of these SNPs are likely associated with MI.

Beta-Thalassemia, Hyperlipoproteinemia(a), And Metabolic Syndrome: Its Low-Cost Holistic Therapy

Metabolic syndrome (MS) is an emerging global health problem. Although studies highlighting its genetic, lipid, and cardiometabolic associations have been described in detail, the exact cause for these associations is not clear. The authors describe, in this study, the case of a patient who, along with his family members, had clinical evidence of MS. In addition, this patient also exhibited beta-thalassemia minor and hyperlipoproteinemia(a). Lipoprotein [Lp(a)] levels diminished significantly following therapy with bark-stem powder of Terminalia arjuna, an ancient remedy recommended for angina pectoris. The co-existence of these conditions, reflecting both a genetic link and a significant reduction in Lp(a) levels amounting to 24.71% following the administration of T. arjuna, prompted the authors to report on this case.

Serum lipoprotein(a) level and clinical coronary stenosis progression in patients with myocardial infarction: re-revascularization rate is high in patients with high-Lp(a)

BACKGROUND

High serum lipoprotein(a) (Lp(a)) levels are associated with coronary artery disease.

METHODS AND RESULTS

The serum Lp(a) levels of 130 patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) who underwent direct percutaneous coronary intervention were investigated. On the basis of Lp(a) level at 1 month after the onset of AMI, the patients were classified into 2 groups (high-Lp(a) (> or =30 mg/dl) and low-Lp(a) (< 30 mg/dl)) for evaluation of the clinical coronary stenosis progression (CCSP) rate. CCSP is defined as either target lesion revascularization (TLR) or new lesion revascularization (NLR). The CCSP rate was significantly higher in the high-Lp(a) group than in the low-Lp(a) group (65.8% vs 29.3%, p<0.01). In patients who had coronary stents in the acute phase (n=79), the CCSP and NLR rates were significantly higher in the high-Lp(a) group than in the low-Lp(a) group (45.0% vs 20.3%, p<0.05; 35.0% vs 6.8%, p<0.01), but there was no significant difference in TLR rate between the 2 groups (10.0% vs 13.6%, p=0.858).

CONCLUSIONS

High serum Lp(a) level is a significant risk factor for CCSP, but does not influence restenosis after stenting.

Lipoprotein (a) in pregnancy: a critical review of the literature

In this article the literature on lipoprotein (a) during normal pregnancy and pregnancy complicated by preeclampsia or intrauterine growth restriction is reviewed. MEDLINE, from January 1966 to May 2003, was searched to locate relevant articles in English. Additional publications were identified by reviewing references in selected articles. Studies were reviewed by predefined and strict criteria. It appeared that methodology and results of studies on lipoprotein (a) during normal and complicated pregnancy were very diverse. Lipoprotein (a) increased with advancing gestation or remained unaltered during normal pregnancy. Women with preeclampsia had higher, unaltered or lower lipoprotein (a) concentrations as compared to normal pregnant controls. Only few studies were in agreement with most of the review criteria. In conclusion, published studies on lipoprotein (a) in pregnancy differ substantially in the used methods to measure lipoprotein (a), sample size, study design and ethnicity of the study population. Therefore, these studies yielded conflicting results and no unequivocal view on the role of lipoprotein (a) in normal and complicated pregnancy. Recommendations for future studies are amongst others: the use of an apo(a) independent method for measuring Lp(a), inclusion of sufficient numbers of patients, the use of a longitudinal study design when the objective is to study the changes of Lp(a) during pregnancy and selection of a study population that is ethnically representative for the general population.

Lipoprotein(a) levels in women with pre-eclampsia and in normotensive pregnant women

AIM

To determine if plasma lipoprotein(a) levels are elevated in pre-eclampsia and if so, their association with the severity of the disease.

METHODS

Ninety-one pre-eclamptic (48 mild, 43 severe) and 40 healthy normotensive pregnant women at more than 32 gestational weeks were recruited into study. Plasma levels of lipoprotein(a), lipids, total protein, albumin and fibrinogen were measured in all subjects.

RESULTS

All groups were comparable with respect to maternal age, maternal weight, gravidity and parity. Platelet count, total serum protein and albumin levels were significantly decreased, whereas fibrinogen levels significantly increased in the pre-eclamptic group. There was no difference between the groups with respect to total cholesterol and low-density lipoprotein levels. In the pre-eclampsic group, triglyceride and very-low-density lipoprotein concentrations were significantly higher, whereas high-density lipoprotein levels were significantly lower. No difference in serum lipoprotein(a) levels was found between the three groups.

CONCLUSIONS

No statistically significant difference existed between normotensive pregnant, and pre-eclamptic women, with regard to plasma lipoprotein(a) levels. It is improbable that high serum lipoprotein(a) levels are risk factors for the development of pre-eclampsia; however, elevated triglyceride-rich lipoproteins might cause endothelial damage leading to pre-eclampsia.

The role of lipoprotein (a) in pregnancies complicated by pre-eclampsia

Endothelial cell dysfunction is a key feature of the pathogenesis of pre-eclampsia. The cause of the endothelial cell injury is probably multifactorial, but poor placenta perfusion plays a major role. In pre-eclampsia, characteristic pathological lesions in the placenta are fibrin deposits, acute atherosis and thrombosis. The similarity between the lesions of pre-eclampsia and atherosclerosis has led to speculations of a common pathophysiological pathway. An abnormal lipid profile is known to be strongly associated with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease and has a direct effect on endothelial function. Abnormal lipid metabolism seems important in the pathogenesis of pre-eclampsia too. An elevated plasma lipoprotein (a) concentration is a known risk factor for atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. In this paper, we discuss three hypotheses about the mechanisms by which lipoprotein (a) may be associated with pre-eclampsia: 1. Lp(a), as an acute-phase reactant, transporting cholesterol to sites of endothelial damage for reparation, temporarily increases during pregnancy and increases more during a pregnancy complicated by mild to moderate pre-eclampsia as compared to an uncomplicated pregnancy, in response to a greater extend of endothelial injury in pre-eclampsia. After delivery, pre-eclampsia subsides and Lp(a) concentrations return to baseline levels. 2. In cases of severe pre-eclampsia, there is even more extensive endothelial damage and consequently a higher consumption of Lp(a) in reparation of this vascular damage. These women will have lower concentrations of Lp(a). 3. High baseline concentrations of Lp(a), which are genetically determined, may induce or contribute to the development of pre-eclampsia by promoting endothelial dysfunction. In this line of reasoning one would expect to find higher concentrations of Lp(a) in women at risk for developing pre-eclampsia in a future pregnancy or with a history of pre-eclampsia. As discussed above, these women are also at increased risk for future cardiovascular disease as compared to women with a history of normal pregnancy. The pathophysiologic changes associated with cardiovascular disease may also be responsible for the increased incidence of pre-eclampsia in these women.

Electrophoretic measurement of lipoprotein(a) cholesterol in plasma with and without ultracentrifugation: comparison with an immunoturbidimetric lipoprotein(a) method

OBJECTIVES

Elevated plasma lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] is a significant risk factor for vascular disease. Standardization of Lp(a) mass measurement is complicated by the heterogeneity of apolipoprotein(a) [apo(a)]. We investigated whether Lp(a) cholesterol measurement, which is not influenced by apo(a) size, is a viable alternative to measuring Lp(a) mass.

DESIGN AND METHODS

Plasma Lp(a) cholesterol was measured electrophoretically, with and without ultracentrifugation, and results were compared to each other and to immunoturbidimetrically measured Lp(a) mass in 470 subjects.

RESULTS

Ultracentrifuged and whole plasma Lp(a) cholesterol levels demonstrated high correlation (R = 0.964). All samples with detectable (>/=2.0 mg/dl) Lp(a) cholesterol had Lp(a) mass >30 mg/dl (the clinically relevant cutpoint), while 59 samples with Lp(a) mass >30 mg/dl did not have detectable Lp(a) cholesterol.

CONCLUSIONS

Lp(a) cholesterol can be measured in whole plasma without interference from VLDL lipoproteins. The relative clinical merits of measuring Lp(a) cholesterol vs. Lp(a) mass or both in combination deserves investigation.

Study of apo(a) length polymorphism and lipoprotein(a) concentrations in subjects with single or double apo(a) isoforms

Cardiovascular risk is associated with high lipoprotein(a) (Lp(a)) concentrations and low molecular weight apolipoprotein(a) (apo(a)) isoforms. We studied the relationship between these two biological parameters, particularly in subjects expressing two apo(a) isoforms. Plasma Lp(a) was measured by immunonephelometry in 530 unrelated Caucasian patients at high cardiovascular risk, and apo(a) size determined by immunoblotting using a recombinant standard. Two, one, or no apo(a) isoforms were detected in 258, 270, and 2 subjects, respectively. Lp(a) concentrations showed a non-Gaussian distribution, being higher in the 'double band' than in the 'single band' group (median 0.42 vs. 0.11 g/l, p < 0.0005). Apo(a) size distribution was bimodal, with two frequency peaks at 18 kringles (K) and 27 K. Small size apo(a) isoforms were more frequently found in the 'double band' group, where major isoforms were of lower size than minor isoforms (median 20 vs. 27 K). Regression analysis showed that apo(a) gene length accounted for 33% of Lp(a) variation, with a threshold effect at 20 K, no correlation being found over this value. The minor apo(a) isoform did not significantly influence Lp(a) concentration. These data confirm the relationship between apo(a) size and Lp(a) concentration and suggest that the assessment of cardiovascular risk should take into account the threshold effect at 20 K and the absence of influence of the minor apo(a) isoform.

Functional approach to investigate Lp(a) in ischaemic heart and cerebral diseases

BACKGROUND

Lp(a), a major cardiovascular risk factor, contains a specific apolipoprotein, apo(a), which by virtue of structural homology with plasminogen inhibits the formation of plasmin, the fibrinolytic enzyme. A number of clinical reports support the role of Lp(a) as a cardiovascular or cerebral risk factor, and experimental data suggest that it may contribute to atherothrombosis by inhibiting fibrinolysis.

DESIGN

A well-characterized model of a fibrin surface and an apo(a)-specific monoclonal antibody were used to develop a functional approach to detect pathogenic Lp(a). The assay is based on the competitive binding of Lp(a) and plasminogen for fibrin, and quantifies fibrin-bound Lp(a). High Lp(a) binding to fibrin is correlated with decreased plasmin formation. In a transversal case-control study we studied 248 individuals: 105 had a history of ischaemic cardiopathy (IC), 52 had cerebro-vascular disease (CVD) of thrombotic origin, and 91 were controls.

RESULTS

The remarkably high apo(a) fibrin-binding in CVD (0.268 +/- 0.15 nmol L-1) compared with IC (0.155 +/- 0.12 nmol L-1) suggests the existence of peculiar and poorly understood differences in pro- or anti-thrombotic mechanisms in either cerebral and/or coronary arteries.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results demonstrated that Lp(a) fibrin-binding and small Apo(a) isoforms are associated with athero-thrombotic disease.

The role of lipoprotein(a) in the pathogenesis of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease and its utility as predictor of coronary heart disease events

Lipoprotein(a), is a highly heterogeneous lipoprotein, due to variations in the size of apolipoprotein(a), and the density of the apoB100-containing particles to which apo(a) is linked. Although high plasma levels of Lp(a) have been associated with an increased risk for atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease, the mechanism underlying this association is still largely undetermined, as is the potential role played by the particle's heterogeneity. Lp(a) pathogenicity may also be influenced by the action of environmental factors and post-translational events relating to oxidative processes, and the action of lipolytic and proteolytic enzymes. Complicating the study of Lp(a) are the competing methods for its quantification due to its complex structure, and the lack of standardized methodologies. The recognition that Lp(a) particles may not all be alike in atherogenic potential should encourage studies to identify genetic and nongenetic factors underlying its heterogeneity, in order to reach a better understanding of its actual impact on atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease.

Prevention of a first myocardial infarction

Coronary heart disease is the leading cause of morbidity and mortality in men and women in the Western world. We now have significant evidence that prevention of the first coronary event using lifestyle and pharmacologic therapies is paramount. Events are caused by inflamed arteries leading to rupture of atherosclerotic plaques that induce potentially occlusive thrombi. Analysis of event reduction trials has revealed that LDL-C lowering is only one part of the therapy needed to stabilize plaque. HMG-Co-A-reductase inhibitors, fibrates, and statins all have differing mechanisms of action that provide not only lipid but also inflammatory, rheologic, and coagulation benefits. Concentration and sizes of lipoprotein subfractions have emerged as important new tools with small dense LDL particles having more atherogenicity, which has led to an increasing use of aggressive combination therapy for prevention of first myocardial infarction. Proper use of lipid-lowering therapies requires knowledge of drug metabolism drug-drug interactions.

Glycation amplifies lipoprotein(a)-induced alterations in the generation of fibrinolytic regulators from human vascular endothelial cells

Increased lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] in plasma is an independent risk factor for premature cardiovascular diseases. The levels of glycated Lp(a) are elevated in diabetic patients. The present study demonstrated that glycation enhanced Lp(a)-induced production of plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 (PAI-1), and further decreased the generation of tissue-type plasminogen activator (t-PA) from human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVEC) and human coronary artery EC. The levels of PAI-1 mRNA and its antigen in the media of HUVEC were significantly increased following treatments with 5 microgram/ml of glycated Lp(a) compared to equal amounts of native Lp(a). The secretion and de novo synthesis of t-PA, but not its mRNA level, in EC were reduced by glycated Lp(a) compared to native Lp(a). Treatment with aminoguanidine, an inhibitor for the formation of advanced glycation end products (AGEs), during glycation normalized the generation of PAI-1 and t-PA induced by glycated Lp(a). Butylated hydroxytoluene, a potent antioxidant, inhibited native and glycated Lp(a)-induced changes in PAI-1 and t-PA generation in EC. The results indicate that glycation amplifies Lp(a)-induced changes in the generation of PAI-1 and t-PA from venous and arterial EC. This may attenuate fibrinolytic activity in blood circulation and potentially contributes to the increased incidence of cardiovascular complications in diabetic patients with hyperlipoprotein(a). EC-mediated oxidative modification and the formation of AGEs may be implicated in glycated Lp(a)-induced alterations in the generation of fibrinolytic regulators from vascular EC.

Protein kinase C-beta mediates lipoprotein-induced generation of PAI-1 from vascular endothelial cells

Elevated levels of low-density lipoproteins (LDL) and lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] have been considered strong risk factors for atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. Increased production of plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 (PAI-1) has been implicated in the development of thrombosis and atherosclerosis. Previous studies by our group and others demonstrated that oxidation enhances LDL- and Lp(a)-induced production of PAI-1 in human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVEC). The present study examined the involvement of protein kinase C (PKC) and its isoform in vascular endothelial cells (EC) induced by native or oxidized LDL and Lp(a). Treatment with Lp(a) or LDL transiently increased PKC activity at 15 min and 5.5 h after the start of lipoprotein treatment in EC. Copper-oxidized LDL and Lp(a) induced greater PKC activation in EC compared with comparable forms of those lipoproteins. Additions of 1 microM calphostin C, a PKC-specific inhibitor, at the beginning or > or =5 h, but not > or = 9 h, after the initiation of lipoprotein treatment, blocked native and oxidized LDL- or Lp(a)-induced increases in PKC activity and PAI-1 production. Treatment of LDL, Lp(a), or their oxidized forms was induced in translocation of PKC-beta1 from cytosol to membrane in HUVEC. Treatments with 60 nM 379196, a PKC-beta-specific inhibitor, effectively prevented PAI-1 production induced by LDL, Lp(a), or their oxidized forms in HUVEC and human coronary artery EC. The results suggest that activation of PKC-beta may mediate the production of PAI-1 in cultured arterial and venous EC induced by LDL, Lp(a), or their oxidized forms.

Contribution of apolipoprotein(a) size, pentanucleotide TTTTA repeat and C/T(+93) polymorphisms of the apo(a) gene to regulation of lipoprotein(a) plasma levels in a population of young European Caucasians

Several studies indicate that the inter-individual variation in plasma concentrations of lipoprotein(a) (Lp(a)) is mainly under genetic control. To define the effect of three DNA polymorphisms on apolipoprotein(a) (apo(a)) expression, we have determined plasma Lp(a) concentrations, apo(a) isoform size, KpnI allele size, the TTTTA pentanucleotide repeat number in the 5' control region of the apo(a) gene and the +93 C/T polymorphism in a European Caucasian population. The simultaneous determination of the kringle 4 (K4) number by genotyping and by phenotyping revealed that the size distribution of non-expressed apo(a) alleles was markedly skewed towards alleles with greater than 25 K4 repeats. This is consistent with the inverse relationship frequently described between the kringle 4 number and the plasma Lp(a) level. Apportioning the Lp(a) concentration from the surface of the peaks on apo(a) phenotyping blots, we have observed that the Lp(a) plasma concentration associated with alleles having more than 25 K4 units does not exceed 400 mg/l, whereas the range of Lp(a) concentrations associated with smaller alleles was broad, from 0 to more than 1000 mg/l. It can thus be concluded that the number of K4 repeats is the main determinant of Lp(a) concentration when this number is more than 25, whereas other polymorphisms may be involved in the alleles with fewer than 26 K4. Analyses of the TTTTA repeat number and of the +93 C/T polymorphism were performed in subjects with KpnI alleles of the same length: low Lp(a) concentrations were shown to be preferentially associated with the presence of apo(a) alleles with more than eight pentanucleotide repeats while no association was revealed between Lp(a) plasma levels and the C/T polymorphism. These results demonstrate that the (TTTTA)(n) polymorphism affects the Lp(a) expression independently of apo(a) size polymorphism.

Effects of exercise on lipoprotein(a)

Lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] is a unique lipoprotein complex in the blood. At high levels (> 30 mg/dl), Lp(a) is considered an independent risk factor for cardiovascular diseases. Serum Lp(a) levels are largely genetically determined, remain relatively constant within a given individual, and do not appear to be altered by factors known to influence other lipoproteins (e.g. lipid-lowering drugs, dietary modification and change in body mass). Since regular exercise is associated with favourable changes in lipoproteins in the blood, recent attention has focused on whether serum Lp(a) levels are also influenced by physical activity. Population and cross-sectional studies consistently show a lack of association between serum Lp(a) levels and regular moderate physical activity. Moreover, exercise intervention studies extending from 12 weeks to 4 years indicate that serum Lp(a) levels do not change in response to moderate exercise training, despite improvements in fitness level and other lipoprotein levels in the blood. However, recent studies suggest the possibility that serum Lp(a) levels may increase in response to intense load-bearing exercise training, such as distance running or weight lifting, over several months to years. Cross-sectional studies have reported abnormally high serum Lp(a) levels in experienced distance runners and body builders who train for 2 to 3 hours each day. However, the possible confounding influence of racial or ethnic factors in these studies cannot be discounted. Recent intervention studies also suggest that 9 to 12 months of intense exercise training may elevate serum Lp(a) levels. However, these changes are generally modest (10 to 15%) and, in most individuals, serum Lp(a) levels remain within the recommended range. It is unclear whether increased serum Lp(a) levels after intense exercise training are of clinical relevance, and whether certain Lp(a) isoforms are more sensitive to the effects of exercise training. Since elevation of both low density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) and Lp(a) levels in the blood exerts a synergistic effect on cardiovascular disease risk, attention should focus on changing lifestyle factors to decrease LDL-C (e.g. dietary intervention) and increase high density lipoprotein cholesterol (e.g. exercise) levels in the blood.

Long-term variability of serum lipoprotein(a) concentrations in healthy fertile women

Lipoprotein(a) is a unique lipoprotein with atherothrombogenic properties. Although its blood concentration is mainly genetically determined, various factors exist which may cause variability. These may influence the clinical use of the results. We studied lipoprotein(a) biological variation by a rate nephelometric assay over a period of two years in a population of healthy fertile women. The study was performed in 12 volunteers, healthy subjects with various lipoprotein(a) concentrations, by monthly determinations during one year and a single determination one year later, together with measurements of total, high density lipoprotein and high density lipoprotein2 cholesterol, triglycerides and apolipoproteins A1 and B. The intra-individual variability of lipoprotein(a) ranged between 4 to 20%, with three subjects showing a coefficient of biological variation higher than 15%. In absolute terms, the difference between two determinations could represent 0.44 g/l or 50% of the mean value. This study suggests that physiological lipoprotein(a) variations should be taken into account for clinical purposes, especially in patients in need of thorough risk evaluation.

Plasma concentrations of Lp(a) lipoprotein and TGF-beta1 are altered in preeclampsia

This study was performed to investigate the possible association between preeclampsia and the plasma concentrations of Lp(a) lipoprotein and TGF-beta1 in a large series of patients. Additionally, correlation between the concentrations of these molecules and the severity of preeclampsia or fetal growth retardation was evaluated. Following clinical examination and biochemical analyses, both electroimmunoassay and RIA technique were used for quantitative determinations of plasma Lp(a) lipoprotein. ELISA technique was used to measure the active form of TGF-beta1 in plasma of pregnant normotensive and preeclamptic women. We examined 154 women with preeclampsia (preeclampsia group) and 76 healthy, pregnant normotensive women (control group). The preeclampsia group was further divided into the following subgroups: mild preeclampsia, severe preeclampsia and preeclampsia with fetal growth retardation. Plasma levels of Lp(a) lipoprotein were lower in the total preeclampsia group as well as in all preeclampsia subgroups (5.45+/-7.41, 5.58+/-8.02, 5.08+/-5.38, and 4.32+/-5.28 mg/dl in the total preeclampsia group, and in subgroups with mild preeclampsia, severe preeclampsia, and preeclampsia with fetal growth retardation, respectively) than in the control group (7.84+/-9.26 mg/dl) as determined by quantitative electroimmunoassay. Corresponding results were obtained with a radioimmunoassay (166.03+/-200.2 U/l in the total preeclampsia group vs. 229.18+/-257.7 U/l in controls). There was good correlation between the two methods used for Lp(a) lipoprotein measurement. The differences between controls and the total preeclampsia group as well as each preeclampsia subgroup were statistically significant by a non-parametric test (one-way Kruskal-Wallis test). Plasma concentrations of the active form of TGF-beta1 were increased in all preeclampsia subgroups as well as in the total group (5.63+/-1.68 ng/ml) compared to controls (4.67+/-1.33 ng/ml). This increase in TGF-beta1 was statistically highly significant. Plasma concentrations of Lp(a) lipoprotein and the active form of TGF-beta1 did not differ significantly between the preeclampsia subgroups. The outcome of this study may suggest involvement of both parameters in the pathophysiology of preeclampsia and may substantiate the notion of a multifactorial etiology of the disease.

Evaluation of the genotyping and phenotyping approaches in the investigation of apolipoprotein (a) size polymorphism

Apoprotein (a) size polymorphism was evaluated at the genotypic and phenotypic level in 110 individuals. Both methods were well correlated with respect to size (r = 0.971), providing that the protein size was expressed as a number of kringle 4 repeats. Despite the fact that the immunoblotting method used was sensitive enough to detect less than 1 ng of lipoprotein (a), 62 samples had single-band phenotypes and one sample had no detectable band, whereas only seven samples had single-band genotypes. The mean size of the alleles coding for the undetected isoforms was significantly larger (141 kb) than for the detected isoforms (123 kb), corroborating the earlier finding of an inverse relationship between the size and the plasma expression level of apoprotein (a). Furthermore, increasing detectability was achieved by loading the gel with different amounts of plasma for each sample. Our results indicate that genotyping is more resolving and more sensitive, but requires a more specialized technology. Phenotyping was carried out using commercially available reagents.

Evaluation of serum glycated lipoprotein(a) levels in noninsulin-dependent diabetic patients

OBJECTIVE

Serum Lp(a) levels are generally considered unaffected by non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (NIDDM). However, high Lp(a) concentrations as well as an increased rate of nonenzymatic glycation of proteins may be involved in degenerative diabetic complications.

DESIGN AND METHODS

We measured serum glycated Lp(a) levels in 17 NIDDM patients, as compared to 14 normoglycaemic controls. Glycated proteins were separated from nonglycated ones by boronate affinity chromatography, and specific proteins assayed by immunonephelometric methods in both fractions.

RESULTS

The percentage of glycated Lp(a) was 1.5 +/- 0.4% (mean +/- SD) in the control group, and was significantly higher in NIDDM patients: 4.3 +/- 1.5% (p < 0.01). The basal level of Lp(a) glycation was lower than that of other proteins, particularly apo B (4.0 +/- 0.7%). By contrast, the variations of glycated Lp(a) levels were of greater amplitude (+ 187%) than those of glycated apo B (+ 67%). Glycated Lp(a) values were significantly elevated in patients with micro and macrovascular complications in comparison with uncomplicated patients.

CONCLUSIONS

These results suggest that glycated Lp(a) may be considered a potentially interesting parameter in the pathophysiology of diabetic vascular complications.

Oxidative modification enhances lipoprotein(a)-induced overproduction of plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 in cultured vascular endothelial cells

Elevated levels of plasma lipoprotein (a) [Lp(a)] have been considered as a strong risk factor for premature cardiovascular diseases. Plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 (PAI-1) is the major physiological inhibitor of plasminogen activators (PA). Increases in PAI-1 levels with or without a reduction in PA levels have been frequently found in coronary artery disease patients. The present paper examined the effects of oxidized Lp(a) on the production of PAI-1 in cultured human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVEC). Lp(a) and Lp(a)-free, low density lipoprotein (LDL) were prepared using lysine-Sepharose 4B affinity chromatography. Incubations with 10(-8) M levels of native Lp(a) moderately increased the levels of biologically active PAI-1 in post-culture medium of HUVEC compared to that with equimolar concentrations of native Lp(a)-free LDL. The release of PAI-1 induced by Lp(a) was enhanced by oxidative modification with copper ion. The stimulation of oxidized Lp(a) on PAI-1 production reached plateau in EC treated with 10-20 nM oxidized Lp(a) modified by microM CuSO4. Treatment with 0.2 micrograms/ml of actinomycin D significantly reduced native and oxidized Lp(a)-induced PAI-1 overproduction in EC. Increases in the steady state levels of PAI-1 mRNA were detected in native or oxidized Lp(a)-treated EC. The effect of Lp(a)-free oxidized LDL on PAI-1 production was significantly weaker than the equimolar amount of oxidized Lp(a) but stronger than that of native LDL. Treatments with oxidized Lp(a) increased cell-associated PAI-1 to a similar extent as that in native Lp(a)-treated EC. The results of the present paper demonstrate that oxidative modification enhances Lp(a)-induced PAI-1 production in vascular endothelial cells at RNA transcription level, which suggests that oxidization potentially amplifies the anti-fibrinolytic and thrombotic effect of Lp(a).

Clinical pharmacokinetics of 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-coenzyme A reductase inhibitors

3-Hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-coenzyme A (HMG-CoA) reductase is the key enzyme of cholesterol synthesis. HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors are potent reversible inhibitors of this enzyme, which act by competing for the substrate HMG-CoA. This review is mainly devoted to the 4 main HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors used today: lovastatin, simvastatin, pravastatin and fluvastatin. Depending upon the dosage, these drugs are able to reduce plasma cholesterol levels by more than 40%. After absorption, each undergoes extensive hepatic first-pass metabolism. Up to 5 primary metabolites are formed, some of which are active inhibitors. The elimination half-lives vary from 0.5 to 3.5 hours and excretion is mainly via the faeces. A limited number of drug interactions has been reported. Increases in liver enzymes and muscle creatine kinase activity are among the most severe adverse effects. These powerful drugs should be reserved for patients with high plasma cholesterol levels and/or those with cardiovascular disease. New therapeutic approaches to atherosclerosis are currently under investigation. HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors are the cornerstone of this research.

The heritability of human longevity: a population-based study of 2872 Danish twin pairs born 1870-1900

The aim of this study was to explore, in a large and non-censored twin cohort, the nature (i.e., additive versus non-additive) and magnitude (i.e., heritability) of genetic influences on inter-individual differences in human longevity. The sample comprised all identified and traced non-emigrant like-sex twin pairs born in Denmark during the period 1870-1900 with a zygosity diagnosis and both members of the pairs surviving the age of 15 years. A total of 2872 pairs were included. Age at death was obtained from the Danish Central Person Register, the Danish Cause-of-Death Register and various other registers. The sample was almost non-censored on the date of the last follow-up (May 1, 1994), all but 0.6% had died, leaving a total of 2872 pairs for analysis. Proportions of variance attributable to genetic and environmental factors were assessed from variance-covariance matrices using the structural equation model approach. The most parsimonious explanation of the data was provided by a model that included genetic dominance (non-additive genetic effects caused by interaction within gene loci) and non-shared environmental factors (environmental factors that are individual-specific and not shared in a family). The heritability of longevity was estimated to be 0.26 for males and 0.23 for females. The small sex-difference was caused by a greater impact of non-shared environmental factors in the females. Heritability was found to be constant over the three 10-year birth cohorts included. Thus, longevity seems to be only moderately heritable. The nature of genetic influences on longevity is probably non-additive and environmental influences non-shared. There is no evidence for an impact of shared (family) environment.

Lipoprotein(a): levels in a Swedish population in relation to other lipid parameters and in comparison with a male Sri Lankan population

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate differences in Lipoprotein (a) [Lp(a)] concentrations between a Swedish and Sri Lankan population.

METHODS

The distribution of Lp(a) and its relation to other lipid parameters, measured with an automated turbidimetric method, in 4646 Swedes (1944 females and 2702 males) undergoing health screening and 757 randomly selected Sri Lankan males (667 non-CHD and 80 CHD subjects) was evaluated.

RESULTS

The distribution was highly skewed towards low values in both the Swedish population and the Sri Lankan male population. The Swedish population had a median of 0.16 g/L (reported as total mass) whereas the Sri Lankan population median of 0.06 g/L was much lower. For the Swedes, there was a small significant difference of 0.03 g/L between the sexes (F < M; p < 0.001) and Lp(a) was significantly higher in subjects > 50 years of age in both sexes (p < 0.002(F); p < 0.02(M)). 29% had Lp(a) values > 0.30 g/L. In the Sri Lankan males population Lp(a) was also significantly higher in subjects > 50 years of age (p < 0.009) but only 7% had an Lp(a) concentration of > 0.30 g/L. In the CHD subgroup, though not significant, subjects > 50 years of age had a lower Lp(a) concentration, indicating that Lp(a) may be a more significant risk factor in younger subjects. Both the Swedish female and male hypercholesterolemic subgroups had significantly higher Lp(a) concentrations than normolipemic subgroups and the male hypertriglyceridemic subgroups significantly lower Lp(a) concentrations than normolipemic. Great differences in Lp(a) levels are thus found between the two populations. The differences are similar in normolipemic subjects and probably they reflect mainly genetic differences. Lipid/lipoprotein concentrations were also found to differ. It is being investigated if this reflects differences in CHD prevalence.

CONCLUSION

Our data support the importance of including Lp(a) measurements when assessing the risk profile for premature development of CHD in the individual patient.

Confounding results of Lp(a) lipoprotein measurements with some test kits

A small number of recent studies have reportedly failed to detect the well-established association between a high Lp(a) lipoprotein level and coronary heart disease (CHD). This has made some workers question the importance of a high Lp(a) lipoprotein level as a CHD risk factor. However, serious problems with some of the commercially available test kits, inadequate test techniques or failure to consider the lability of the Lp(a) lipoprotein particle are more plausible explanations of the confounding results. The problems with some of the commercially available test kits include lack of standardization and validation; risk of cross-reactivity with plasminogen or other serum proteins; failure to consider potential problems when measuring samples with varying length of the Lp(a) polypeptide chain (i.e. failure to cope with the isoform variation); non-divulgence of contents of test reagents; and pretreatments of samples that drastically change the Lp(a) lipoprotein particles from their native state. Any test system should be validated at the scientific level before it is assumed to provide correct measurements of Lp(a) lipoprotein level in serum. New test kits should be safely anchored in validation in one of the research laboratories active in the area, before they are put on the market. As new batches are produced, the quality of every new batch of test kits should be monitored on a long-term basis in collaboration with a research laboratory.

High Lp(a) lipoprotein level in maternal serum may interfere with placental circulation and cause fetal growth retardation

We report on a woman with an Lp(a) lipoprotein level above the 99th centile of the population distribution of concentrations, who at the age of 43 had had deep vein thrombosis causing a pulmonary embolus and whose brother, who also had a very high level, had suffered a cerebral infarction at the age of 43. She had given birth to three children, all with very low birth weight, one of whom died when 3 months old. The placentas had been small and ischemic. The concurrence of a very high Lp(a) lipoprotein level, familial thromboembolic disease and recurrent placental ischemia with delivery of children with low birth weight suggests the possibility that a very high Lp(a) lipoprotein concentration may predispose to placental insufficiency, presumably arising from pathological changes in maternal uterine vessels in the placental bed. If confirmed, a very high Lp(a) lipoprotein level may be a factor to consider in women who have repeated pregnancies with placental insufficiency and who give birth to children with low birth weight.