Population characteristics of hepatic dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase activity, a key metabolic enzyme in 5-fluorouracil chemotherapy

Severe Gastrointestinal Disorder Due to Capecitabine Associated with Dihydropyrimidine Dehydrogenase Deficiency: A Case Report and Literature Review

Dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD) deficiency induces severe adverse events in patients receiving fluoropyrimidines. We encountered a 64-year-old DPD-deficient man with a severe capecitabine-related gastrointestinal disorder. He received capecitabine-containing chemotherapy after rectal cancer resection. During the first course of chemotherapy, he developed severe diarrhea, a fever, and hematochezia. Endoscopy revealed mucosal shedding with bleeding throughout the gastrointestinal tract. DPD deficiency was suspected because he developed many severe adverse events of capecitabine early and was finally confirmed based on the finding of a low DPD activity level in peripheral blood mononuclear cells. After one month of intensive care, hemostasis and mucosal healing were noted, although his gastrointestinal function did not improve, and he had persistent nutritional management issues.

DPYD Exome, mRNA Expression and Uracil Levels in Early Severe Toxicity to Fluoropyrimidines: An Extreme Phenotype Approach

Dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase deficiency is a major cause of severe fluoropyrimidine-induced toxicity and could lead to interruption of chemotherapy or life-threatening adverse reactions. This study aimed to characterize the DPYD exon sequence, mRNA expression and in vivo DPD activity by plasma uracil concentration. It was carried out in two groups of patients with extreme phenotypes (toxicity versus control) newly treated with a fluoropyrimidine, during the first three cycles of treatment. A novel nonsense gene variant (c.2197insA) was most likely responsible for fluoropyrimidine-induced toxicity in one patient, while neither DPYD mRNA expression nor plasma uracil concentration was globally associated with early toxicity. Our present work may help improve pharmacogenetic testing to avoid severe and undesirable adverse reactions to fluoropyrimidine treatment and it also supports the idea of looking beyond DPYD.

Therapeutic Dilemma in personalized medicine

The practice of medicine depends over a long time on identifying therapies that target an entire population. The increase in scientific knowledge over the years has led to the gradual change towards individualization and personalization of drug therapy. The hope of this change is to achieve a better clinical response to given medications and reduction of their adverse effects. Tailoring of medicine on the road of personalized medicine considers molecular and genetic mapping of the individual. However, many factors still impede the smooth application of personalized medicine and represent challenges or limitations in its achievement. In this article, we put some clinical examples that show dilemmas in the application of personalized medicine such as opioids in pain control, fluoropyrimidines in malignancy, clopidogrel as antiplatelet therapy and oral hypoglycemic drugs in Type2 diabetes in adults. Shaping the future of medicine through the application of personalized medicine for a particular patient needs to put into consideration many factors such as patient's genetic makeup and life style, pathology of the disease and dynamic changes in its course as well as interactions between administered drugs and their effects on metabolizing enzymes. We hope in the coming years, the personalized medicine will foster changes in health care system in the way not only to treat patients but also to prevent diseases.

Drug-metabolizing enzymes: role in drug resistance in cancer

Although continuous researches are going on for the discovery of new chemotherapeutic agents, resistance to these anticancer agents has made it really difficult to reach the fruitful results. There are many causes for this resistance that are being studied by the researchers across the world, but still, success is far because there are several factors that are going along unattended or have been studied less. Drug-metabolizing enzymes (DMEs) are one of these factors, on which less study has been conducted. DMEs include Phase I and Phase II enzymes. Cytochrome P450s (CYPs) are major Phase I enzymes while glutathione-S-transferases (GSTs), UDP-glucuronosyltransferases (UGTs), dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenases are the major enzymes belonging to the Phase II enzymes. These enzymes play an important role in detoxification of the xenobiotics as well as the metabolism of drugs, depending upon the tissue in which they are expressed. When present in tumorous tissues, they cause resistance by metabolizing the drugs and rendering them inactive. In this review, the role of these various enzymes in anticancer drug metabolism and the possibilities for overcoming the resistance have been discussed.

DPYD and Fluorouracil-Based Chemotherapy: Mini Review and Case Report

5-Fluorouracil remains a foundational component of chemotherapy for solid tumour malignancies. While considered a generally safe and effective chemotherapeutic, 5-fluorouracil has demonstrated severe adverse event rates of up to 30%. Understanding the pharmacokinetics of 5-fluorouracil can improve the precision medicine approaches to this therapy. A single enzyme, dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD), mediates 80% of 5-fluorouracil elimination, through hepatic metabolism. Importantly, it has been known for over 30-years that adverse events during 5-fluorouracil therapy are linked to high systemic exposure, and to those patients who exhibit DPD deficiency. To date, pre-treatment screening for DPD deficiency in patients with planned 5-fluorouracil-based therapy is not a standard of care. Here we provide a focused review of 5-fluorouracil metabolism, and the efforts to improve predictive dosing through screening for DPD deficiency. We also outline the history of key discoveries relating to DPD deficiency and include relevant information on the potential benefit of therapeutic drug monitoring of 5-fluorouracil. Finally, we present a brief case report that highlights a limitation of pharmacogenetics, where we carried out therapeutic drug monitoring of 5-fluorouracil in an orthotopic liver transplant recipient. This case supports the development of robust multimodality precision medicine services, capable of accommodating complex clinical dilemmas.

Therapeutic drug monitoring as a tool to optimize 5-FU-based chemotherapy in gastrointestinal cancer patients older than 75 years

AIMS

Most clinical trials exclude elderly people, leading to a limited understanding of the benefit-to-risk ratio in this population. Despite existing data regarding the oncological management of elderly receiving fluorouracil (5-FU)-based regimen, our objective was to investigate 5-FU exposure/toxicity relationship in patients ≥75 years and compare the effectiveness of 5-FU therapeutic drug monitoring between elderly and younger patients.

METHODS

Hundred fifty-four patients (31 of whom are older than 75 years) with gastrointestinal cancers, who were to receive 5-FU-based regimens, were included in our study. At cycle 1 (C1), the 5-FU dose was calculated using patient's body surface area, then a blood sample was drawn to measure 5-FU concentration and 5-FU dose was adjusted at the subsequent cycles based on C1 concentration. Assessments of toxicity were performed at the beginning of every cycle.

RESULTS

Seventy-one percent of elderly patients required dose adjustments after C1, compared with 50% for younger patients. Percentages of patients within 5-FU area under the curve range at cycle 2 were 64% and 68%, respectively, for elderly and younger patients. The proportion of elderly patients experiencing severe toxicities fell from 15% at C1 to only 5% at cycle 3.

CONCLUSION

Pharmacokinetic-guided 5-FU-dosing algorithm, leading to an improved tolerability while remaining within therapeutic concentration range, is even more valuable for patients older than 75 years than in younger patients.

Evolution of Dihydropyrimidine Dehydrogenase Diagnostic Testing in a Single Center during an 8-Year Period of Time

Objective

Fluoropyrimidine treatment can be optimized based on dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD) activity. DPD dysfunction leads to increased exposure to active metabolites, which can result in severe or even fatal toxicity.

Methods

We provide an overview of 8 years of DPD diagnostic testing (n = 1194).

Results

Within the study period, our diagnostic test evolved from a single-enzyme measurement using first a radiochemical and then a nonradiochemical assay by ultra HPLC-MS in peripheral blood mononuclear cells with uracil, to a combined enzymatic and genetic test (ie, polymerase chain reaction) followed by Sanger sequence analysis of 4 variants of the DPYD gene (ie, DPYD*2A, DPYD*13, c.2846A>T, and 1129-5923C>G; allele frequencies 0.58%, 0.03%, 0.29%, and 1.35%, respectively). Patients who have 1 of the 4 variants tested (n = 814) have lower enzyme activity than the overall patient group. The majority of patients with the DPYD*2A variant (83%) consistently showed decreased enzyme activity. Only 24 (25.3%) of 95 patients (tested for 4 variants) with low enzyme activity carried a variant. Complete DPYD sequencing in a subgroup with low enzyme activity and without DPYD*2A variant (n = 47) revealed 10 genetic variants, of which 4 have not been described previously. We did not observe a strong link between DPYD genotype and enzyme activity.

Conclusions

Previous studies have shown that DPD status should be determined before treatment with fluoropyrimidine agents to prevent unnecessary side effects with possible fatal consequences. Our study in combination with literature shows that there is a discrepancy between the DPD enzyme activity and the presence of clinically relevant single nucleotide polymorphisms. At this moment, a combination of a genetic and enzyme test is preferable for diagnostic testing. (Curr Ther Res Clin Exp. 2018; 79:XXX–XXX).

Phenotypic and clinical implications of variants in the dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase gene

Dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD) is the initial and rate-limiting enzyme in the catabolism of the pyrimidine bases uracil, thymine and the antineoplastic agent 5-fluorouracil. Genetic variations in the gene encoding DPD (DPYD) have emerged as predictive risk alleles for 5FU-associated toxicity. Here we report an in-depth analysis of genetic variants in DPYD and their consequences for DPD activity and pyrimidine metabolites in 100 Dutch healthy volunteers. 34 SNPs were detected in DPYD and 15 SNPs were associated with altered plasma concentrations of pyrimidine metabolites. DPD activity was significantly associated with the plasma concentrations of uracil, the presence of a specific DPYD mutation (c.1905+1G>A) and the combined presence of three risk variants in DPYD (c.1905+1G>A, c.1129-5923C>G, c.2846A>T), but not with an altered uracil/dihydrouracil (U/UH2) ratio. Various haplotypes were associated with different DPD activities (haplotype D3, a decreased DPD activity; haplotype F2, an increased DPD activity). Functional analysis of eight recombinant mutant DPD enzymes showed a reduced DPD activity, ranging from 35% to 84% of the wild-type enzyme. Analysis of a DPD homology model indicated that the structural effect of the novel p.G401R mutation is most likely minor. The clinical relevance of the p.D949V mutation was demonstrated in a cancer patient heterozygous for the c.2846A>T mutation and a novel nonsense mutation c.1681C>T (p.R561X), experiencing severe grade IV toxicity. Our studies showed that the endogenous levels of uracil and the U/UH2 ratio are poor predictors of an impaired DPD activity. Loading studies with uracil to identify patients with a DPD deficiency warrants further investigation.

Influence of metastatic disease on the usefulness of uracil pharmacokinetics as a screening tool for DPD activity in colorectal cancer patients

PURPOSE

Dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD) deficiency can lead to severe toxicity in patients treated with a standard dose of a fluoropyrimidine such as 5-fluorouracil or capecitabine (CAP). Administration of oral uracil and subsequent measurement of uracil and dihydrouracil (DHU) plasma concentrations has been used to identify patients with DPD deficiency. Liver metastasis might influence systemic DPD activity. The aim of the study was to investigate the effect of metastatic disease on the pharmacokinetics of uracil and DHU after oral administration of uracil.

METHODS

500 mg/m(2) uracil was administered orally to 12 subjects with stages II-III colorectal cancer (CRC) who were treated in the adjuvant setting and to 12 subjects with stage IV metastasized CRC, all treated with CAP containing therapy. All subjects had a normal DPD activity defined as >6 nmol/mg/h determined in peripheral blood mononuclear cells.

RESULTS

The mean uracil clearance [CL 51.7 (SD 6.4) vs. 46.7 (SD 13.0) l/h], area under the curve [AUC0-220min 20.6 (SD 6.4) vs. 21.0 (SD 5.7) h mg/l], elimination half-life [t 1/2 21 (SD 7) vs. 21 (SD 8) min], maximum concentration time [T max 27 (SD 9) vs. 25 (SD 9) min], volume of distribution [V 26.58 (SD 10.11) vs. 21.10 (SD 8.48) l] and the elimination constant [k el 2.01 (SD 0.56) vs. 2.41 (SD 0.72) h(-1)] did not differ significantly (p > 0.05) non-metastatic CRD versus metastatic CRC.

CONCLUSIONS

Metastasis does not alter uracil pharmacokinetics and is similar in CRC patients with and without metastasis. Therefore, the uracil test dose could be used as a DPD phenotype test in both adjuvantly treated and metastatic CRC patients using similar cutoff criteria to identify patients with DPD deficiency.

Potential of dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase genotypes in personalizing 5-fluorouracil therapy among colorectal cancer patients

BACKGROUND

Dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD) is a pyrimidine catabolic enzyme involved in the initial and rate-limiting step of the catabolic pathway of toxic metabolites of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU). Several studies have reported that deficiency of DPD and polymorphisms of its gene are related to 5-FU toxicities and death. Association between serum concentration of 5-FU and its related toxicity has also been previously demonstrated. Hence, this study aims to understand the role of DPYD variants in serum level of 5-FU and the risk of developing toxicity to prevent adverse reactions and maximize therapy outcome for personalized medicine.

METHODS

A total of 26 patients comprising 3 different ethnic groups (Malay, Chinese, and Indian) diagnosed with colorectal cancer and treated with 5-FU chemotherapy regimen from local hospital were recruited. Polymerase chain reaction and denaturing high-performance liquid chromatography methods were developed to screen polymorphisms of DPYD gene. High-performance liquid chromatography-based quantification assay was developed to measure the serum concentration of 5-FU among these patients.

RESULTS

Patients with DPYD genotypes of deficient enzyme activity had higher median serum levels of 5-FU compared with normal DPD group (median, 11.51 mcg/mL; 95% confidence interval, 10.18-16.11 versus median, 0.83 mcg/mL; 95% confidence interval, 0.55-5.90, Mann-Whitney U test; P = 0.010). Patients with neutropenia (n = 11) had significantly higher serum concentrations of 5-FU as compared with those with normal white blood cell count (n = 15) (Mann-Whitney U test, P = 0.031). Combined regression analysis showed that the predictive power of DPYD*5 (rs1801159) and 1896 T>C (rs17376848) for serum concentrations of 5-FU in the studied group was 36.6% (P = 0.04). Similarly, DPYD*5 and 1896 T>C accounted for 29.9% of the occurrences of neutropenia (analysis of variance, P = 0.017).

CONCLUSIONS

This study revealed that DPYD*5 (rs1801159) and 1896 T>C (rs17376848) are potentially useful predictive markers of patients' responses to 5-FU chemotherapy. Pharmacogenotyping is therefore recommended to guide dosing of 5-FU and prevent neutropenia.

Cadmium modifies the cell cycle and apoptotic profiles of human breast cancer cells treated with 5-fluorouracil

Industrialisation, the proximity of factories to cities, and human work activities have led to a disproportionate use of substances containing heavy metals, such as cadmium (Cd), which may have deleterious effects on human health. Carcinogenic effects of Cd and its relationship with breast cancer, among other tumours, have been reported. 5-Fluorouracil (5-FU) is a fluoropyrimidine anticancer drug used to treat solid tumours of the colon, breast, stomach, liver, and pancreas. The purpose of this work was to study the effects of Cd on cell cycle, apoptosis, and gene and protein expression in MCF-7 breast cancer cells treated with 5-FU. Cd altered the cell cycle profile, and its effects were greater when used either alone or in combination with 5-FU compared with 5-FU alone. Cd significantly suppressed apoptosis of MCF-7 cells pre-treated with 5-FU. Regarding gene and protein expression, bcl2 expression was mainly upregulated by all treatments involving Cd. The expression of caspase 8 and caspase 9 was decreased by most of the treatments and at all times evaluated. C-myc expression was increased by all treatments involving Cd, especially 5-FU plus Cd at the half time of treatment. Cd plus 5-FU decreased cyclin D1 and increased cyclin A1 expression. In conclusion, our results indicate that exposure to Cd blocks the anticancer effects of 5-FU in MCF-7 cells. These results could have important clinical implications in patients treated with 5-FU-based therapies and who are exposed to high levels of Cd.

Clinical significance of the thymidylate synthase, dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase, and thymidine phosphorylase mRNA expressions in hepatocellular carcinoma patients receiving 5-fluorouracil-based transarterial chemoembolization treatment

Purpose

To determine whether 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) sensitivity is associated with the mRNA expressions of thymidylate synthase (TS), dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD), and thymidine phosphorylase (TP) in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) treated with 5-FU-based transarterial chemoembolization (TACE).

Methods

Formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tumor specimens from 40 patients treated with 5-FU-based TACE were selected for the examination of TS, DPD, and TP expression level by a quantitative real-time reverse transcription- polymerase chain reaction (PCR) technique. Patients were categorized into high and low expression groups according to the median expression level of each enzyme. Associations between the mRNA expression levels of TS, DPD, and TP and clinical parameters including treatment efficacies, clinicopathological factors, and prognosis were assessed.

Results

High DPD expression was associated with worse treatment outcome, including intrahepatic disease progression rate (hazard ratio [HR] for high DPD versus low DPD, 2.212; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.030–4.753; P = 0.042), extrahepatic disease progression rate (HR for high versus low DPD, 3.171; 95% CI, 1.003–10.023; P = 0.049), and progression-free survival (HR for high versus low DPD, 2.308; 95% CI, 1.102–4.836; P = 0.027). No correlation was found between the mRNA expression of TS/TP and treatment outcome.

Conclusion

DPD mRNA expression level was negatively correlated with the clinical outcomes of HCC patients treated with 5-FU-based TACE. These results provide indirect evidence that high DPD mRNA expression is a predictive marker of treatment resistance for 5-FU.

A DPYD variant (Y186C) in individuals of african ancestry is associated with reduced DPD enzyme activity

5-fluorouracil (5-FU) is used to treat many aggressive cancers, such as those of the colon, breast, and head & neck. The responses to 5-FU, both toxicity and efficacy, vary between racial groups, potentially due to variability in enzyme activity of dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD, encoded by DPYD). In the present study, the genetic associations between DPYD variations and circulating mononuclear cell DPD enzyme activity were evaluated in 94 African American and 81 European American volunteers. The DPYD-Y186C variant was unique to individuals of African ancestry, and DPD activity was 46% reduced in carriers compared to non-carriers (279±35 compared to 514±168 pmol 5-FU min⁻¹ mg⁻¹; P=0.00029). 26% of the African Americans with reduced DPD activity in this study carried Y186C. In the African American cohort, following exclusion of Y186C carriers, homozygous carriers of C29R showed 27% higher DPD activity compared to non-carriers (609±152 and 480±152 pmol 5-FU min⁻¹ mg⁻¹, respectively; P=0.013).

LC-MS/MS method for simultaneous analysis of uracil, 5,6-dihydrouracil, 5-fluorouracil and 5-fluoro-5,6-dihydrouracil in human plasma for therapeutic drug monitoring and toxicity prediction in cancer patients

The chemotherapeutic drug 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) is widely used for treating solid tumors. Response to 5-FU treatment is variable with 10-30% of patients experiencing serious toxicity partly explained by reduced activity of dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD). DPD converts endogenous uracil (U) into 5,6-dihydrouracil (UH(2) ), and analogously, 5-FU into 5-fluoro-5,6-dihydrouracil (5-FUH(2) ). Combined quantification of U and UH(2) with 5-FU and 5-FUH(2) may provide a pre-therapeutic assessment of DPD activity and further guide drug dosing during therapy. Here, we report the development of a liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry assay for simultaneous quantification of U, UH(2) , 5-FU and 5-FUH(2) in human plasma. Samples were prepared by liquid-liquid extraction with 10:1 ethyl acetate-2-propanol (v/v). The evaporated samples were reconstituted in 0.1% formic acid and 10 μL aliquots were injected into the HPLC system. Analyte separation was achieved on an Atlantis dC(18) column with a mobile phase consisting of 1.0 mm ammonium acetate, 0.5 mm formic acid and 3.3% methanol. Positively ionized analytes were detected by multiple reaction monitoring. The analytical response was linear in the range 0.01-10 μm for U, 0.1-10 μm for UH(2) , 0.1-75 μm for 5-FU and 0.75-75 μm for 5-FUH(2) , covering the expected concentration ranges in plasma. The method was validated following the FDA guidelines and applied to clinical samples obtained from ten 5-FU-treated colorectal cancer patients. The present method merges the analysis of 5-FU pharmacokinetics and DPD activity into a single assay representing a valuable tool to improve the efficacy and safety of 5-FU-based chemotherapy.

5-Fluorouracil derivatives: a patent review

INTRODUCTION

The fluorinated analog of uracil 5-FU is an antimetabolite, active against a wide range of solid tumors. The main mechanism of action consists in interfering with DNA synthesis and mRNA translation. However, patients treated with 5-FU display several side effects, a result of its nonspecific cytotoxicity for tumor cells. Numerous modifications of the 5-FU structure have been performed in order to overcome these disadvantages.

AREAS COVERED

In this review, the metabolic pathways, pharmacokinetics and clinical pharmacology of 5-FU are briefly introduced. Moreover, several derivatives developed and patented, including oral 5-FU prodrugs and combinations with other active compounds, are presented. Finally, new innovative methods for administration and vehiculization of 5-FU and its derivatives are described.

EXPERT OPINION

The search for less toxic 5-FU derivatives, which diminish or circumvent some of its disadvantages, has allowed the development of selective antitumor prodrugs and novel methods for tissue-specific drug delivery. Although some of these oral prodrugs are being used clinically, either alone or in combination therapy with other anticancer agents, it seems that the potential of personalized medicine, including pharmacogenomics and targeted therapy with novel 5-FU derivatives, will improve the management and clinical responses of patients treated with 5-FU-based therapy.

The Value of Dihydrouracil/Uracil Plasma Ratios in Predicting 5-Fluorouracil-Related Toxicity in Colorectal Cancer Patients

This study investigated the relationship between the dihydrouracil/uracil (UH2/U) plasma ratio, a surrogate marker of dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD) activity, and 5-fluorouracil (5-FU)-related early toxicity. Plasma UH2/U ratios were determined in 68 colorectal cancer patients and 100 healthy controls. A cutoff value indicative of DPD deficiency was calculated using receiver operator characteristics. Patients experiencing toxicity were screened for the DPD G-to-A point mutation within the 5′-splicing donor site of intron 14 (IVS14+1G>A). Overall, 24/68 patients (35%) experienced toxicity (all grades) and abnormal UH2/U ratios were demonstrated in 21/24 (87.5%) patients. Drug concentrations up to 130 times the recommended level were found in 13/24 (54%) patients experiencing toxicity. One patient experiencing toxicity was a heterozygous carrier of the IVS14+1G>A mutation. A low UH2/U plasma ratio had a sensitivity of 0.87 and specificity of 0.93 for predicting 5-FU-induced toxicity. Systematic detection of DPD-deficient patients using the UH2/U ratio could optimize 5-FU-based chemotherapy and minimize life-threatening toxicity.

Profiling dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase deficiency in patients with cancer undergoing 5-fluorouracil/capecitabine therapy

Fluoropyrimidine drugs such as 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and capecitabine are a mainstay in the treatment of numerous solid tumors, including colorectal cancers, alone or as part of combination therapies. Cytotoxic drugs such as 5-FU and oral capecitabine display narrow therapeutic indexes combined with high interpatient pharmacokinetic variability. As a result, severe toxicities often limit or delay the administration of successive, optimal chemotherapeutic courses, leading to unfavorable clinical outcome in patients with cancer. Catabolism and deactivation of fluoropyrimidine drugs depend on a single and exclusive enzymatic step driven by dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD). Dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase is prone to marked circadian rhythms, drug-drug interactions, and genetic polymorphisms; influence of its erratic activity on 5-FU pharmacokinetics and toxicity profile has been extensively investigated, and it is now well known that DPD deficiency leads to severe toxicities with 5-FU or possibly capecitabine exposure. With the ever-increasing number of patients with cancer likely to be treated with fluoropyrimidines, predicting and preventing the occurrence of such toxicities is now a major issue in clinical oncology. Early determination of DPD status in patients with cancer would allow identification of those at risk and help in subsequent dose adjustment or selection of other treatment modalities. Numerous methods, either genotypic or phenotypic, have been proposed to achieve this goal. This review covers a wide range of techniques available to establish DPD status in patients with cancer.

Pharmacogenetics and diseases of the colon

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The deciphering of the human genome sequence has enabled the identification of genetic polymorphisms that are responsible for inter-individual variation in the response to drug therapy. This field is referred to as pharmacogenetics. We review the impact of pharmacogenetics on therapy in diseases of the colon using three common variant enzyme systems as examples.

RECENT FINDINGS

Many enzyme systems impact the treatment of diseases of the colon. Examples include thiopurine S-methyltransferase, dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase and flavin monooxygenase 3. They affect the management of inflammatory bowel disease, colorectal cancer and the chemoprevention of colorectal adenoma by influencing the metabolism of their respective substrates, azathioprine/6-mercaptopurine, 5-fluorouracil and sulindac. Recent studies have implicated the significance of genetic polymorphisms in each of the three drug-metabolizing enzymes, which impacts on the therapeutic outcome of the stated diseases. These studies highlight the potential role of pharmacogenetics in the design of a therapeutic plan which would increase efficacy and limit toxicity.

SUMMARY

Pharmacogenetics of drug-metabolizing systems continues to gain significance in the drug therapy of a variety of disease states including those of the gastrointestinal tract.

Use of Capecitabine to Prevent Acute Renal Allograft Rejection in Dog Erythrocyte Antigen-Mismatched Mongrel Dogs

OBJECTIVE

To assess efficacy and toxicity of a capecitabine (CAP)-based regimen for preventing rejection of renal allografts in dog erythrocyte antigen (DEA)-mismatched mongrel dogs.

STUDY DESIGN

Prospective, pilot study.

ANIMALS

Eight healthy, unrelated, DEA mismatched, adult mongrel dogs.

METHODS

All dogs received CAP, starting at 50 mg/m2 PO b.i.d. 4 days preoperatively, increasing to 200 mg/m2 PO b.i.d. by the day of surgery. All dogs received cyclosporine-A (CsA) and prednisolone starting 2 days preoperatively. Standard heterotopic renal transplantation with native nephrectomy was performed. After 90 days, surviving dogs were euthanatized and histopathologic examination was performed.

RESULTS

Two of 8 dogs developed acute neurotoxicity leading to death or euthanasia within 5 days of surgery. For the 6 remaining dogs, there were no statistically significant changes in complete blood count or serum biochemical values. No opportunistic infections developed during the study period. Five of 6 dogs had no to minimal evidence of graft rejection. Two of 6 dogs developed superficial and pigmentary keratitis. Significant histopathologic findings in all dogs included mild lymphoplasmacytic gastroenteritis, steroid hepatopathy, and corneal epithelial thinning. One dog had moderate interstitial nephritis and pyelitis.

CONCLUSIONS

In this experimental model, a CAP-CsA-prednisolone immunosuppressive regimen was effective in preventing rejection of allografts in DEA-mismatched dogs. Severe, unpredictable neurotoxicity and variable ocular toxicity significantly limit clinical applications at this time.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

A CAP-CsA-prednisolone protocol is an effective, oral immunosuppressive regimen for prevention of allograft rejection in DEA-mismatched mongrel dogs. For clinical application, identification of patients susceptible to toxic side effects would be necessary.

Increased prevalence of dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase deficiency in African-Americans compared with Caucasians

PURPOSE

African-American patients with colorectal cancer were observed to have increased 5-fluorouracil (5-FU)-associated toxicity (leukopenia and anemia) and decreased overall survival compared with Caucasian patients. One potential source for this disparity may be differences in 5-FU metabolism. Dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD), the initial and rate-limiting enzyme of 5-FU catabolism, has previously been shown to have significant interpatient variability in activity. Several studies have linked reduced DPD activity to the development of 5-FU toxicity. Although the distribution of DPD enzyme activity and the frequency of DPD deficiency have been well characterized in the Caucasian population, the distribution of DPD enzyme activity and the frequency of DPD deficiency in the African-American population are unknown.

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

Healthy African-American (n=149) and Caucasian (n=109) volunteers were evaluated for DPD deficiency using both the [2-(13)C]uracil breath test and peripheral blood mononuclear cell DPD radioassay.

RESULTS

African-Americans showed significantly reduced peripheral blood mononuclear cell DPD enzyme activity compared with Caucasians (0.26+/-0.07 and 0.29+/-0.07 nmol/min/mg, respectively; P=0.002). The prevalence of DPD deficiency was 3-fold higher in African-Americans compared with Caucasians (8.0% and 2.8%, respectively; P=0.07). African-American women showed the highest prevalence of DPD deficiency compared with African-American men, Caucasian women, and Caucasian men (12.3%, 4.0%, 3.5%, and 1.9%, respectively).

CONCLUSION

These results indicate that African-Americans, particularly African-American women, have significantly reduced DPD enzyme activity compared with Caucasians, which may predispose this population to more 5-FU toxicity.

Pharmacogenetics, drug-metabolizing enzymes, and clinical practice

The application of pharmacogenetics holds great promise for individualized therapy. However, it has little clinical reality at present, despite many claims. The main problem is that the evidence base supporting genetic testing before therapy is weak. The pharmacology of the drugs subject to inherited variability in metabolism is often complex. Few have simple or single pathways of elimination. Some have active metabolites or enantiomers with different activities and pathways of elimination. Drug dosing is likely to be influenced only if the aggregate molar activity of all active moieties at the site of action is predictably affected by genotype or phenotype. Variation in drug concentration must be significant enough to provide "signal" over and above normal variation, and there must be a genuine concentration-effect relationship. The therapeutic index of the drug will also influence test utility. After considering all of these factors, the benefits of prospective testing need to be weighed against the costs and against other endpoints of effect. It is not surprising that few drugs satisfy these requirements. Drugs (and enzymes) for which there is a reasonable evidence base supporting genotyping or phenotyping include suxamethonium/mivacurium (butyrylcholinesterase), and azathioprine/6-mercaptopurine (thiopurine methyltransferase). Drugs for which there is a potential case for prospective testing include warfarin (CYP2C9), perhexiline (CYP2D6), and perhaps the proton pump inhibitors (CYP2C19). No other drugs have an evidence base that is sufficient to justify prospective testing at present, although some warrant further evaluation. In this review we summarize the current evidence base for pharmacogenetics in relation to drug-metabolizing enzymes.

How may anticancer chemotherapy with fluorouracil be individualised?

Fluorouracil is used clinically against various solid tumours. Both fluorouracil toxicity and pharmacokinetics vary highly within and between individuals. The reasons why doses are not individualised routinely are difficulties in defining, predicting and achieving an optimal fluorouracil exposure or dose because of a narrow therapeutic index, nonlinear pharmacokinetics, variabilities in administration rates and metabolism, and in targets like thymidylate synthase. To individualise fluorouracil administration before the first dose, assessment of the individual dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD) activity may be useful, because this genetically highly polymorphic enzyme controls approximately 80% of fluorouracil elimination. A complete or partial loss of DPD activity in 0.1 and 3-5% of Caucasians, respectively, leads to increased fluorouracil exposure and toxicity. Several methods to assess DPD activity in patients have been proposed (genotyping, various phenotyping methods), but each of them has limitations, as has the fluorouracil test dose approach. To adapt exposure towards fluorouracil a priori, a combination of genotyping and phenotyping may yield better prediction of toxicity than one method alone. A prerequisite for dose adaptation is the definition of fluorouracil exposure ranges with sufficient therapeutic activity, but without serious toxicity. While an increased risk of leukopenia, diarrhoea, stomatitis, and hand-foot syndrome during continuous 5-day infusions was related to fluorouracil exposures above an area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC) threshold of 25-30 mg.h/L, tumour response was higher when an AUC of approximately 30 mg.h/L was achieved, illustrating the extremely narrow therapeutic window of fluorouracil. Pharmacokinetic target values are less clear for other regimens, including chronomodulated regimens, which yielded a superior clinically efficacy and tolerability in several trials. However, the monitoring of fluorouracil plasma concentrations seems principally useful for individual a posteriori dose adjustment. Whether an adaptation of the fluorouracil starting dose to the results of two DPD activity tests before fluorouracil administration a priori, and the adaptation of doses to fluorouracil exposure a posteriori is a reasonable approach to better prevent toxicity and increase efficacy, remains to be evaluated in randomised clinical studies comparing these strategies to routine clinical safety monitoring.

Pharmacokinetic and demographic markers of 5-fluorouracil toxicity in 181 patients on adjuvant therapy for colorectal cancer

BACKGROUND

The relationship between 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) pharmacokinetics and toxicity following i.v. bolus administration has not been extensively studied.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

One hundred and eighty-one patients on adjuvant therapy with 5-FU plus leucovorin for colorectal cancer were the study population. 5-FU pharmacokinetics was determined on day 2 of the first, third, and fifth cycles; type and the grade of adverse reactions were recorded on the next cycle.

RESULTS

The 5-FU area under the curve (AUC) measured at the first cycle ranged between 146 and 1236 mg x min/l and was significantly correlated with drug dose, patients' body weight (BW) and gender, females having higher AUCs. These covariates explained only 23% of AUC variability. AUC and age were the only covariates which discriminated between toxic (grade > or =2) and nontoxic cycles (grade <2), with an optimal AUC cut-off value of 596 mg x min/l. Such a correlation was lost during the next cycles following dose reduction because of toxicity in 80 patients.

CONCLUSIONS

A method for calculating the initial 5-FU dose is proposed which takes into account patient BW, gender and a target AUC of 596 mg x min/l. Nevertheless, it appears that a substantial part of 5-FU toxicity is not linked to pharmacokinetic factors and dose adjustments must still be on the basis of careful clinical surveillance.

High-performance liquid chromatographic assay with UV detection for measurement of dihydrouracil/uracil ratio in plasma

A rapid, robust and sensitive HPLC method for analysis of uracil (U) and dihydrouracil (UH2) in plasma was developed using solid phase extraction and ultraviolet detection. Separation was achieved with a SymmetryShield RP18 column and an Atlantis dC18 column using a 10 mM potassium phosphate buffer as mobile phase. Compounds were eluted within 15 min without interference. Recovery was 80.4 and 80.6% for U and UH2. Calibration curves were linear from 2.5 to 80 ng/mL for U and 6.75 to 200 ng/mL for UH2. The LLQ was, respectively, 2.5 ng/mL for U, and 6.75 ng/mL for UH2. Within-run and between-run precision were less than 5.94% and inaccuracy did not exceed 7.80%. The overall procedure has been applied to correlate UH2/U ratio with dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase activity in 165 cancer patients.

Dihydropyrimidine Dehydrogenase Activity in 150 Healthy Japanese Volunteers and Identification of Novel Mutations

PURPOSE

Dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD) is the initial and rate-limiting enzyme catalyzing the metabolic degradation of the anticancer drug 5-fluorouracil (5-FU). Population studies of DPD activity in peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) were reported in healthy volunteers and cancer patients. Although these studies were done in mainly Caucasian and African American populations, only a little information is available for a Japanese population.

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

One hundred fifty healthy Japanese volunteers were screened for a population distribution of PBMC-DPD activity. Genetic analysis of a volunteer with very low DPD activity was carried out by reverse transcriptase-PCR and genomic sequencing. Bacterially expressed recombinant mutant DPD proteins were purified and characterized.

RESULTS

Mean and median values of PBMC-DPD activity for 5-FU reduction in the study population were 0.173 and 0.166 nmol/min/mg protein, respectively. A 57-year-old female volunteer (proband in this study) had very low DPD activity (0.014 nmol/min/mg protein) with a very low level of expression of DPD protein. Two novel nucleotide substitutions, at nucleotide positions 1097 (1097G > C) and 2303 (2303C > A), resulting in amino acid substitutions at positions 366 (G366A) and 768 (T768K), respectively, were identified. The G366A mutation caused not only a marked decrease in the affinity of the enzyme to cofactor NADPH but also reduced Vmax for 5-FU-reducing activity to approximately 0.5. T768K mutant lost its activity much faster than did wild DPD.

CONCLUSIONS

We found one healthy volunteer (0.7% of the population) with very low PBMC-DPD activity due to heterozygosity for a mutant allele of the DPYD gene in a population of 150 Japanese.

Prospective clinical trials using a pharmacogenetic/pharmacogenomic approach

The antitumor activity of most anticancer agents is limited by a number of different factors, such as their cellular targets and activating enzymes, while constitutive genetic polymorphisms may limit drug bioavailability and influence either antitumor efficacy or toxic side effects. An example of a drug for which clear predictive parameters have been identified is 5-fluorouracil (5FU): its antitumor activity is limited by either a high activity of the target enzyme thymidylate synthase (TS) and/or a high activity of its degrading enzyme, dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD). Retrospective studies showed a clear correlation between a high expression of TS and a poor response, which was stronger when DPD was included in the evaluation (high DPD, poor response). Therefore we initiated a clinical prospective study in which we treated previously untreated patients with advanced colorectal cancer with tailored chemotherapy: at a low TS-mRNA and low DPD-mRNA patients were stratified to receive a standard weekly 5FU-leucovorin regimen. At a high TS and/or DPD, patients were stratified to receive a combination of oxaliplatin and irinotecan. Up to now this proof-of-principle study demonstrated that selection of patients is possible and can clearly improve the clinical outcome. The next step is to develop algorithms to select patients for combination chemotherapy with 5FU-leucovorin and new compounds, such as oxaliplatin or irinotecan, or novel targeted agents such as bevacizumab or cetuximab. For these combination schedules the optimal combination of predictive factors has to be explored.

Dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase and thymidylate synthase polymorphisms and their association with 5-fluorouracil/leucovorin chemotherapy in colorectal cancer

The causes of interpatient variation in severe toxicity resulting from treatment with weekly 5-fluorouracil (5-FU)/ leucovorin (LV) are poorly understood. This study was undertaken to examine the contribution of commonly occurring polymorphisms in the dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPYD) gene to interpatient variability in 5-FU pharmacokinetics and toxicity. Patients with stage III/IV colorectal cancer were treated by bolus intravenous (I.V.) injection with 500 mg/m2 doses of 5-FU and LV once every week. The pharmacokinetics of 5-FU was determined on weeks 1 and 4. Genotyping assays were developed for 8 polymorphisms in the DPYD gene. A well-characterized functional polymorphism in the 5' untranslated region of the thymidylate synthase (TS) gene was also analyzed. A cohort of 22 patients (15 male, 7 female) with a median age of 61 years was evaluated. Although there was no relationship between the area under the plasma concentration time curve (AUC) for the first dose of 5-FU and worst-grade toxicity during the first cycle of therapy, 3 of the 4 patients in whom the AUC on week 4 was more than equal to 5 microgram/h/mL greater than the value for the first dose experienced grade 3/4 toxicity during subsequent treatment. Among the 8 polymorphisms in the DPYD gene, 7 were found to vary in the study population but none were significantly associated with the AUC of 5-FU. There was no relationship between the DPYD and TS genotypes examined and 5-FU toxicity. Extensive polymorphism in the DPYD gene was observed; however, no conclusive correlations existed between the DPYD and TS genotype and 5-FU pharmacokinetics or toxicity. Decreases in 5-FU clearance in certain patients may provide insight into the increased toxicity following repetitive cycles of treatment with weekly I.V. bolus 5-FU. The present study offers useful themes for undertaking larger prospective pharmacogenetic studies in the future.

Comparison of the pharmacokinetics of S-1, an oral anticancer agent, in Western and Japanese patients

OBJECTIVE

S-1 is an oral anticancer agent combining tegafur (FT), a prodrug of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), with potassium oxonate (oteracil) and gimeracil (CDHP) respectively to mitigate gastrointestinal toxicity and increase the half-life of 5-FU. This article presents a population pharmacokinetic analysis of these four compounds in Western cancer patients. The second objective was to compare the pharmacokinetics of S-1 in Western and Japanese patients.

METHODS

A single dose (25-45 mg/m2) of S-1 was administered to 60 patients. In each patient, 6 concentrations of FT, 5-FU, oteracil and CDHP were measured over 24 hr. Using NONMEM, oteracil and CDHP were analyzed separately, and the individual estimates of CDHP parameters were included in the joint analysis of FT and 5-FU. We used validation techniques to assess differences between the two populations, and finally we compared the exposures in Western and Japanese patients using simulations.

RESULTS

A compartmental model describing the PK of the 4 compounds was developed. The influence of CDHP on the elimination of 5-FU was well described by an enzymatic inhibition model. The model provided a good fit for all compounds. The pharmacokinetics for 5-FU and oteracil were similar between Western and Japanese patients, but apparent differences in exposure to 5-FU resulted from different total doses due to different body sizes.

Quantitation of dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD) mRNA expression levels in normal colon and colorectal cancer tumor paraffin-embedded tissue specimens

5-Fluorouracil (5-FU) has been used for more than 40 years in the treatment of neoplastic disease, and remains the standard first-line treatment for colorectal cancer in combination with irinotecan and leucovorin. Previous studies indicated that measurement of dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD) gene expression before treatment was valuable in determining the potential benefit of and toxicity to 5-FU treatment. In this study, we investigated the association between intratumoral DPD gene expression and the adjacent normal tissue DPD gene expression and DPD mRNA expression level in non-paired colon tumor and normal colon tissue specimens. In addition, we have compared the difference of DPD gene expression at three different RNA concentrations from the same specimen (180, 100 and 5 ng/reaction, respectively). DPD expression was measured by quantitative RT-PCR using a LightCycler instrument in a total of 31 specimens. Gene expression values were expressed as a ratio of target gene (DPD) to the internal reference gene (G6PDH). Our study revealed no statistically significant difference (p=0.23) between tumor tissues and matched normal tissue in DPD expression. In contrast, the data on DPD mRNA expression in non-paired colon tumor and normal tissue specimens revealed a significant difference (p=0.0004) between the tumor group and the normal group. In the three RNA concentration groups, there was no significant difference (p=0.55) in gene expression at the different RNA concentrations from the same donor. These results demonstrate that intratumoral gene expression levels of DPD do not correlate with tumor cell percentage or with RNA concentration. Thus, DPD mRNA expression appears to be a valid sensitivity test for 5-FU in spite of a varying density of tumor cells and RNA yield in specimens submitted for analysis.

Biological and environmental monitoring of hospital personnel exposed to antineoplastic agents: a review of analytical methods

In order to assess occupational exposure of hospital personnel involved in the preparation and administration of antineoplastic drugs, biological and environmental monitoring are essential to identify the main exposure routes and to quantify potential health risks. If workplace contamination cannot be completely avoided, it is of utmost importance to reduce exposure to the lowest possible levels. To this aim, not only do education and training of the exposed subjects play an important role, but accurate standardized sampling techniques and analytical methods are also required. A critical overview of the most significant methods available in the literature is presented and their value is discussed, especially with respect to their sensitivity and specificity. In addition, attention is given to validation procedures and, consequently, to their reliability. The results from the most important surveys carried out at hospital departments are also discussed, with a view to improving both monitoring strategies and moreover working conditions.

The influence of sex on pharmacokinetics

Biologic differences exist between men and women that can result in differences in responses to drugs. Both pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic differences between the sexes exist, with more data on pharmacokinetic differences. On average, men are larger than women. Body size differences results in larger distribution volumes and faster total clearance of most medications in men compared to women. Greater body fat in women (until older ages) may increase distribution volumes for lipophilic drugs in women. Total drug absorption does not appear to be significantly affected by sex although absorption rates may be slightly slower in women. Bioavailability after oral drug dosing, for CYP3A substrates in particular, may be somewhat higher in women compared to men. Bioavailability after transdermal drug administration does not appear to be significantly affected by gender; nor does protein binding. Renal processes of glomerular filtration, tubular secretion, and tubular reabsorption appear to be faster in men compared to women whether considered on a mg/kg basis or total body weight basis. Algorithms to estimate glomerular filtration rate incorporate sex as a factor; some also include weight. For hepatic processes, drugs metabolized by Phase I metabolism (oxidation, reduction, and hydrolysis via cytochrome P450's 1A, 2D6, 2E1), Phase II conjugative metabolism (glucuronidation, conjugation, glucuronyltransferases, methyltransferases, dehydrogenases) and by combined oxidative and conjugation processes are usually cleared faster in men compared to women (mg/kg basis). Metabolism by CYP2C9, CYP2C19, and N-acetyltransferase, appear to be similar in men and women (mg/kg). Clearance of p-glycoprotein substrates appear to be similar in men and women. In contrast, total clearance of a number of CYP3A substrates appear to be mildly or moderately faster (mg/kg) in women compared to men. The clinical significance of reported differences warrants consideration. Clearance reported on a per kg basis directly addresses organ or enzyme clearance. The difference in size between men and women means translating these results to clinical dosage rates should include an adjustment for body size. Unfortunately, this is not standard. Reports of sex differences that persist after considering weight may warrant further dosage adjustments. In addition, investigations are often performed in healthy fasting individuals yet medications are prescribed to patients with confounding influences of disease, co-medications, diet, and social habits. The relative role of sex on pharmacokinetics as compared to genetics, age, disease, social habits and their potential interactions in the clinical setting is not yet fully known but should be routinely considered and further studied.

The effect of dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase deficiency on outcomes with fluorouracil

The use of fluorouracil has been complicated by unpredictable pharmacokinetics, low response rates and seemingly random toxicity. The variable pharmacology is largely due to inherited differences in expression of the metabolising enzyme dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD). This converts fluorouracil to inactive metabolites (catabolic pathway) and ultimately dictates the amount of fluorouracil that is available to be metabolised to cytotoxic nucleotides (anabolic pathway). Absolute and partial DPD deficiency affect around 0.1 and 3% of the Caucasian population, respectively. Administration of conventional doses of fluorouracil to these individuals has resulted in profound bone marrow and gastrointestinal toxicity, especially in those with absolute DPD deficiency. Other forms of toxicity such as myocardial ischaemia have been difficult to attribute directly to DPD deficiency. Efforts to improve outcomes with fluorouracil have included monitoring of fluorouracil concentrations and modifying fluorouracil administration techniques (e.g. from bolus injections to protracted intravenous infusions). In general, these moves have met with limited therapeutic advancement. The recognition that DPD deficiency increases toxicity has lead to the suggestion that genotypic or phenotypic assessment of DPD status prior to initiating fluorouracil may help predict outcomes. The gene that encodes for DPD expression is called DPYD. Approximately 1% of Caucasians are heterozygotes for the DPYD*2A mutation which is the variant allele that is most frequently implicated in DPD deficiency. Screening for this mutation may identify around 60% of individuals with absolute DPD deficiency who are at the greatest risk of toxicity. Another approach is to determine DPD activity in peripheral blood mononuclear cells, with low activity suggesting an increased risk of toxicity. Intratumoral DPD activity may also be assessed with high activity suggesting a poorer response to fluorouracil. Recently, drugs that inhibit DPD (e.g. eniluracil) have become available. These remove much of the variability in fluorouracil pharmacokinetics and may make assessment of DPD activity redundant. Despite the considerable inroads that have been made, further study is needed before the best means of optimising fluorouracil treatment is determined.

Chemotherapy for colorectal cancer

With effective chemotherapy as adjuvant treatment, the survival benefit is clearly achieved for certain (stage III) colorectal cancer patients, though there still exist many unsettled issues including the controversies in the treatment of stage II disease. Advances in the development of a new generation of cytotoxic agents in the past several years have allowed us to move forward from the "fluorouracil-only era" in the treatment of advanced/metastatic colorectal cancer. It is still not very clear how best to minimize toxicity without compromising efficacy of the combination therapy with newer agents, or how to maximize the benefit of chemotherapy (concurrent versus sequential). There are many current ongoing clinical trials designed to address these issues. With better understanding of the signal transduction and molecular biology characteristics of colorectal cancer, and the development of biologic and molecular target agents, the outcomes of patients with colorectal cancer will be improved further. Future clinical trials should be focused on optimizing and individualizing therapy for patients based on their molecular profiles to achieve maximal clinical benefit.

[Molecular toxicological mechanism of the lethal interactions of the new antiviral drug, sorivudine, with 5-fluorouracil prodrugs and genetic deficiency of dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase]

In 1993, there were 18 acute deaths in Japanese patients who had the viral disease herpes zoster and were treated with the new antiviral drug sorivudine (SRV, 1-beta-D-arabinofuranosyl-(E)-5-(2-bromovinyl)uracil). All the dead patients had received a 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) prodrug as anticancer chemotherapy concomitant with SRV administration. Studies on toxicokinetics in rats and on hepatic dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD), a rate-limiting enzyme for 5-FU catabolism in rats and humans, strongly suggested that in the patients who received both SRV and the 5-FU prodrug, tissue levels of highly toxic 5-FU markedly increased as a result of irreversible inactivation of DPD in the presence of NADPH by 5-(2-bromovinyl)uracil (BVU), a metabolite formed from SRV by gut flora in rats and humans. Recombinant human (h) DPD was also irreversibly inactivated by [14C] BVU in the presence of NADPH. MALDI-TOF MS analysis of radioactive tryptic fragments from the radiolabeled and inactivated hDPD demonstrated that a Cys residue located at position 671 in the pyrimidine-binding domain of hDPD was modified with an allyl bromide type of reactive metabolite, dihydro-BVU. Thus artificial DPD deficiency caused by BVU from SRV led to patient deaths when coadministered with the 5-FU prodrug. Human population studies using healthy volunteers have demonstrated that there are poor and extensive 5-FU metabolizers who have very low and high DPD activities, respectively. Administration of a clinical dose of 5-FU or its prodrug to poor 5-FU metabolizers may cause death unless DPD activity is determined using their peripheral blood mononuclear cells prior to the administration of the anticancer drug.

Relationships between body composition parameters and fluorouracil pharmacokinetics

AIMS

To verify whether fluorouracil (FU) clearance (CL) and volume of distribution (V(ss)) are better correlated with specific body compartments, such as body cell mass (BCM), total body water (TBW) or fat free mass (FFM), rather than with body surface area (BSA) or total body weight (BW).

METHODS

Thirty-four patients (13 females and 21 males) affected by colorectal cancer and receiving FU as adjuvant therapy entered the study. CL and Vss were determined after a 2 min i.v. injection of FU (425 mg m(-2)) and leucovorin (20 mg m(-2)). Body composition, in terms of BCM, TBW and FFM, was evaluated non-invasively by bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA).

RESULTS

Significant but poor correlations were found between CL or V(ss) and most anthropometric parameters, including BIA-derived measures (r2 range=0.10-0.21). However, when multiple regression analysis was performed with sex, TBW and FFM as independent variables, the correlations improved greatly. The best correlation was obtained between CL and sex (r2=0.44) and between V(ss) and sex (r2=0.36). FFM-normalized CL was significantly higher in women than in men (0.030+/-0.008 vs 0.022+/-0.005 l min(-1) kg)(-1); 95% CI of difference 0.012, 0.003; P=0.003), suggesting that FU metabolism is more rapid in females. Surprisingly, V(ss) was highly correlated with CL (r2=0.67; CL=0.52+V(ss) x 0.040). This finding may either be explained by extensive drug metabolism in extra-hepatic organs or by variable inactivation on first-pass through the lung. Both these hypotheses need experimental validation.

CONCLUSIONS

The pharmacokinetics of FU are better predicted by FFM and TBW than by standard anthropometric parameters and predictions are sex-dependent. The use of BIA may lead to improved dosing with FU.

How important are gender differences in pharmacokinetics?

Gender-related differences in pharmacokinetics have frequently been considered as potentially important determinants for the clinical effectiveness of drug therapy. The mechanistic processes underlying gender-specific pharmacokinetics can be divided into molecular and physiological factors. Major molecular factors involved in drug disposition include drug transporters and drug-metabolising enzymes. Men seem to have a higher activity relative to women for the cytochrome P450 (CYP) isoenzymes CYP1A2 and potentially CYP2E1, for the drug efflux transporter P-glycoprotein, and for some isoforms of glucuronosyltransferases and sulfotransferases. Women were suggested to have a higher CYP2D6 activity. No major gender-specific differences seem to exist for CYP2C19 and CYP3A. The often-described higher hepatic clearance in women compared with men for substrates of CYP3A and P-glycoprotein, such as erythromycin and verapamil, may be explained by increased intrahepatocellular substrate availability due to lower hepatic P-glycoprotein activity in women relative to men. Physiological factors resulting in gender-related pharmacokinetic differences include the generally lower bodyweight and organ size, higher percentage of body fat, lower glomerular filtration rate and different gastric motility in women compared with men. Although gender disparity in pharmacokinetics has been identified for numerous drugs, differences are generally only subtle. For a few drugs, e.g. verapamil, beta-blockers and selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors, gender-related differences in pharmacokinetics have been shown to result in different pharmacological responses, but their clinical relevance remains unproven. In contrast, gender differences of clinical importance have clearly been identified for pharmacodynamic processes such as QTc prolongation, and intensive future research efforts are needed to assess the full scope and impact of pharmacodynamic gender disparity on applied pharmacotherapy.

Reduced 5-FU clearance in a patient with low DPD activity due to heterozygosity for a mutant allele of the DPYD gene

5-fluorouracil pharmacokinetics, dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase-activity and DNA sequence analysis were compared between a patient with extreme 5-fluorouracil induced toxicity and six control patients with normal 5-fluorouracil related symptoms. Patients were treated for colorectal cancer and received chemotherapy consisting of leucovorin 20 mg m(-2) plus 5-fluorouracil 425 mg m(-2). Blood sampling was carried out on day 1 of the first cycle. The 5-fluorouracil area under the curve(0-->3h) in the index patient was 24.1 mg h l(-1) compared to 9.8+/-3.6 (range 5.4-15.3) mg h l(-1) in control patients. The 5-fluorouracil clearance was 520 ml min(-1) vs 1293+/-302 (range 980-1780) ml min(-1) in controls. The activity of dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase in mononuclear cells was lower in the index patient (5.5 nmol mg h(-1)) compared to the six controls (10.3+/-1.6, range 8.0-11.7 nmol mg h(-1)). Sequence analysis of the dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase gene revealed that the index patient was heterozygous for a IVS14+1G>A point mutation. Our results indicate that the inactivation of one dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase allele can result in a strong reduction in 5-fluorouracil clearance, causing severe 5-fluorouracil induced toxicity.

Taxanes and capecitabine in combination: rationale and clinical results

The clinical utility of capecitabine as a single agent in metastatic breast cancer has been demonstrated with significant responses seen in women already treated with anthracyclines and taxanes. A phase II study in older women with metastatic breast cancer demonstrated capecitabine to be an effective front-line therapeutic agent. Clinical trials of capecitabine in combination with the taxanes, paclitaxel and docetaxel, have been based on the observed upregulation of thymidine phosphorylase (TP) in preclinical studies. This taxane-mediated upregulation is synergistic, time dependent, and persists for up to 10 days. Studies of taxanes administered every 3 weeks with capecitabine have shown favorable antitumor responses and the combination of a taxane with capecitabine was favored over a taxane alone. The day-to-day administration of taxanes and capecitabine led to toxicity concerns, which have hindered their daily use. The administration of taxanes on a weekly schedule has demonstrated a more favorable toxicity profile (i.e., less myelosuppression), and initial studies in combination with capecitabine have demonstrated their utility in various solid tumors. Schedule optimization based on the upregulation of TP may result in a greater therapeutic index, thus allowing for the determination of the most advantageous way of combining these agents.

Oral fluoropyrimidine treatment of colorectal cancer

5-Fluorouracil (5-FU) has been utilized as part of standard chemotherapy for treatment of early-stage and metastatic colorectal cancer for more than 4 decades. The oral fluoropyrimidines have been studied extensively as an alternative to intravenous 5-FU. The goal of such an approach is to simplify drug administration and to improve the toxicity profile while maintaining efficacy that is at least equivalent to intravenous therapy. The goal of this article is to review the features of the main oral 5-FU prodrugs, which include capecitabine, uracil and tegafur (UFT)/leucovorin, S-1, and BOF-A2 and to describe their potential efficacy in treating colorectal cancer.

A phase II trial of oral eniluracil/5-fluorouracil in patients with inoperable hepatocellular carcinoma

Only a minority of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) may benefit from curative treatments, whereas there is no standard therapy for the remaining patients. The objective of this multicentre, open label phase II study was to estimate the objective tumour response rate of a 28-day regimen of oral eniluracil/5-fluorouracil (5-FU) in patients with chemotherapy-naïve, or anthracycline-refractory, inoperable HCC. 45 patients received courses of twice daily oral 5-FU (1.0 mg/m(2)) and eniluracil (10 mg/m(2)) for the first 28 days of each 5-week course. Patients were assessed at regular intervals to determine the tumour response and to evaluate toxicity. Patients were followed-up for a minimum of 6 months. No patient showed a partial or complete tumour response, and 18 patients (40%) had a best response of stable disease (95% confidence interval (CI) 25%, 55%). The median duration of progression-free survival (PFS) was 13.7 weeks (95% CI 10.0-20.0 weeks), and the median duration of overall survival (OS) was 50.3 weeks (range 1.1-64.1+ weeks). The combination of eniluracil/5-FU was well tolerated and had an acceptable safety profile. Only 7 patients (16%) reported at least one adverse event (AE) of grade 3 or 4 intensity considered reasonably attributable to the study medication. In conclusion, oral eniluracil/5-FU had minimal, if any, activity in patients with inoperable HCC, but the safety profile was acceptable.

Lack of interaction between bropirimine and 5-fluorouracil on human dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase

1. Bropirimine (2-amino-5-bromo-6-phenyl-4-pyrimidinone) is a member of a class of antineoplastic agents that are administered concomitantly or sequentially with anticancer 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) prodrugs in clinical patients. Interactions between bropirimine and 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) were investigated on dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD) activity, the rate-limiting enzyme of 5-FU metabolism, in human liver cytosol. Apparent DPD activity was determined by measuring the recovery of [14C]5-FU by HPLC. 2. The apparent activity of 5-FU metabolism (2.1-100 microM) showed a linear relationship in the Eadie-Hofstee plot in the pooled cytosol, suggesting that a single enzyme is responsible for apparent 5-FU metabolism. Km and Vmax were estimated to be 23 microM and 0.32 nmol min(-1) mg(-1) protein, respectively. Apparent DPD activity for 5-FU (25 microM) in the cytosol from 12 individual donors ranged from 0.017 to 0.39 (0.16 +/- 0.12) nmol min(-1) mg(-1) protein, indicating a large intersubject variance. 3. The suicidal inactivators of the DPD enzyme, (E)-5-(2-bromovinyl)uracil and 5-bromouracil (6.3-50 microM), illustrated concentration-dependent inhibition on DPD activity. Isocytosine (6.3-100 microM), used as a negative control, did not affect DPD activity. Bropirimine (6.3-100 microM) also did not show any inhibition of DPD activity. Therefore, bropirimine is unlikely to cause increases in 5-FU levels in clinical patients after co-administration of bropirimine with 5-FU prodrugs.

Pharmacogenetics: a tool for individualizing antineoplastic therapy

This article reviews the clinical relevance of pharmacogenetics in cancer chemotherapy, with emphasis on drugs for which genetic differences in enzyme metabolism have been demonstrated to affect patient outcome. About 10% of children with leukaemia are intolerant to mercaptopurine (6-mercaptopurine) because of genetic defects in mercaptopurine inactivation by thiopurine S-methyltransferase. However, mercaptopurine dose intensity, a critical factor for outcome in patients deficient in thiopurine S-methyltransferase, can be maintained by means of thiopurine S-methyltransferase phenotyping or genotyping. Patients with reduced fluorouracil (5-fluorouracil) catabolism are more likely to be exposed to severe toxicity. The measurement of dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase activity in patients cannot be considered fully predictive, and the role of dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase gene variants in this syndrome has yet to be clarified. With regard to irinotecan, patients with Gilbert's syndrome phenotype have reduced inactivation of the active topoisomerase I inhibitor 7-ethyl-10-hydroxycamptothecin (SN-38) caused by a mutation in the UDP-glucuronosyltransferase 1A1 gene promoter. This subset of patients is more likely to be exposed to irinotecan toxicity and could be identified by genotyping for gene promoter variants. Finally, the experience with amonafide represents a model for dose individualization approaches that use simple phenotypic probes.

5-Fluorouracil: forty-plus and still ticking. A review of its preclinical and clinical development

5-Fluorouracil (5-FU) and 5-fluoro-2'-deoxyuridine (FdUrd) are pyrimidine analogs that have been part of the therapeutic armamentarium for a variety of solid tumors for over forty years. 5-FU has customarily required intravenous administration due to poor and erratic oral bioavailability, while FdUrd has generally been employed for regional administration to the liver or the peritoneal cavity. A great deal of knowledge has been gained concerning the cellular pharmacology and mechanism of action of 5-FU since it was first synthesized in the late 1950's. A more thorough understanding of the factors influencing the metabolic activation of 5-FU and its cellular effects has generated considerable interest in combining it with both modulatory agents such as leucovorin and methotrexate that enhance its metabolism or cytotoxic effects. In addition, 5-FU has also been employed to enhance the therapeutic activity of other antineoplastic agents or modalities such as cisplatin and ionizing radiation with which it can synergize. Appreciation of the clinical pharmacology of 5-FU and FdUrd have led to a variety of schedules that are clinically useful. The preclinical and clinical pharmacology of 5-FU is reviewed to provide a basis for exploring the novel approaches to permit oral administration of 5-FU or its prodrugs that will be described in other articles in this issue.

Evaluation of dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase activity in South-west Asian, Kenyan and Ghanaian populations

AIMS

Dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD) reduces endogenous pyrimidines and therapeutic analogues such as the anticancer agent 5-fluorouracil (5FU). Among Caucasian populations DPD activity is highly variable and subject to polymorphic regulation. To evaluate interethnic influence, DPD activity was assessed in South-west Asian, Kenyan and Ghanaian populations.

METHODS

DPD activity was determined in peripheral mononuclear cells using[14C]-5-fluorouracil and h.p.l.c. analysis.

RESULTS

A high degree of variation in DPD activity was observed within each population (range CV = 34-48%). Median DPD activity also varied between these populations. South-west Asian and Kenyan subjects exhibited almost identical median values (192 and 193.5 pmol min(-1) mg(-1), respectively), which were similar to Caucasians (median 215 pmol min(-1) mg(-1). A significantly lower median DPD activity (119 pmol min(-1) mg(-1)) was observed in the Ghanaian population.

CONCLUSIONS

The similarity in DPD activity between Caucasian, Kenyan and South-west Asian populations suggests that the incidence of 5FU-related toxicity may be comparable in these groups. The pharmacokinetic implications of lower activity amongst Ghanaians needs to be evaluated.