Peritoneal drainage under local anesthesia for perforations from necrotizing enterocolitis

Clinical Predictors of Spontaneous Intestinal Perforation vs Necrotizing Enterocolitis in Extremely and Very Low Birth Weight Neonates

PURPOSE

Spontaneous intestinal perforation (SIP) and necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) are distinct disease processes associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Initial treatment, laparotomy (LP) versus peritoneal drainage (PD), is disease specific however it can be difficult to distinguish these diagnoses preoperatively. We investigated clinical characteristics associated with each diagnosis and constructed a scoring algorithm for accurate preoperative diagnosis.

METHODS

A cohort of extreme and very low birth weight (<1500 g) neonates surgically treated for SIP or NEC between 07/2004-09/2022 were reviewed. Clinical characteristics included gestational age (GA), birth weight (BW), feeding history, physical exam, and laboratory/radiological findings. Intraoperative diagnosis was used to determine SIP vs NEC. Pre-drain diagnosis was used for patients treated with PD only.

RESULTS

338 neonates were managed for SIP (n = 269, 79.6%) vs NEC (n = 69, 20.4%). PD was definitive treatment in 146 (43.2%) patients and 75 (22.2%) patients were treated with upfront LP. Characteristics associated with SIP included younger GA, younger age at initial laparotomy or drainage (ALD), and history of trophic or no feeds. Multivariate logistic regression determined pneumatosis, abdominal wall erythema, higher ALD and history of feeds to be highly predictive of NEC. A 0-8-point scale was designed based on these characteristics with the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.819 (95% CI 0.756-0.882) for the diagnosis of NEC. A threshold score of 1.5 had a 95.2% specificity for NEC.

CONCLUSION

Utilizing clinical characteristics associated with SIP & NEC we developed a scoring system designed to assist surgeons accurately distinguish SIP vs NEC in neonates.

TYPE OF STUDY

Retrospective Chart Review.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III.

Is There Still a Role for Peritoneal Drains in Neonatal Pneumoperitoneum? A Single-Center Experience

INTRODUCTION

Although pneumoperitoneum from necrotizing enterocolitis or spontaneous intestinal perforation is a surgical emergency, risk stratification to determine which neonates benefit from initial peritoneal drainage (PD) is lacking.

METHODS

Using a single-center retrospective review of very low birth weight neonates under 1500 g who underwent PD for pneumoperitoneum (January 2015 to December 2023) from necrotizing enterocolitis or spontaneous intestinal perforation, two cohorts were created: drain "responders" (patients managed definitively with PD; includes placement of a second drain) and "nonresponders" (patients who underwent subsequent laparotomy or died after PD). Antenatal/postnatal characteristics, periprocedural clinical data, and hospital outcomes were compared between responders and nonresponders using Student's t-test, chi-squared test, or Kruskal-Wallis test as appropriate, with P < 0.05 considered significant.

RESULTS

Fifty-six neonates were included: 31 (55%) drain responders and 25 (45%) nonresponders. Birth weight, gestational age, sex, ethnicity, use of postnatal steroids, and enteral feeds were similar between the cohorts. Nonresponders had higher base deficits (-3.4 versus -5.0, P = 0.032) and FiO2 (0.25 versus 0.52, P = 0.001) after drain placement. Drain responders had significantly shorter lengths of stay (89 versus 148 days, P = 0.014) and lower mortality (6.4% versus 56%, P < 0.001). A subgroup analysis of the nonresponders showed no differences in birth weight, vasopressor requirement, FiO2, or postdrain base deficit between nonresponders who had a drain alone versus laparotomy following drain placement.

CONCLUSIONS

PD remains a viable initial therapy for pneumoperitoneum in premature very low birth weight neonates (< 1500 g), demonstrating clinical response in more than half. Ongoing clinical assessment and judgment is imperative after drain placement to ensure continued clinical improvement.

Evaluation of the management of intestinal perforation in very low birth infants, a 10-year review

AIM

The aim of this study was to assess outcomes of peritoneal drainage and laparotomy in the management of intestinal perforation secondary to necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) and spontaneous intestinal perforation.

METHODS

A retrospective review of all preterm infants (birthweight ≤1500 g) who underwent surgical intervention (peritoneal drainage and/or laparotomy) for intestinal perforation between March 2010 and March 2020.

RESULTS

A total of 43 infants who underwent surgical intervention for intestinal perforation were included [19 (44%) with NEC and 24 (56%) with spontaneous intestinal perforation]. Peritoneal drainage was more commonly placed as the initial surgical procedure for management of spontaneous intestinal perforation compared with surgical NEC [23 (96%) vs. 11 (58%), p = 0.003]. Mortality was greater for infants who were initially managed with peritoneal drainage [11 (32%)] compared with those who underwent primary laparotomy [2 (22%), p = 0.5].

CONCLUSION

Initial surgical management of intestinal perforation is more often according to underlying pathology. Our data support primary laparotomy for infants with perforated NEC.

Percutaneous Pigtail Catheter Drainage of Spontaneous Intestinal Perforation in Premature Infants

INTRODUCTION

Peritoneal drainage is an established management strategy for spontaneous intestinal perforation (SIP) in premature infants. We sought to evaluate the safety and efficacy of percutaneous pigtail catheter placement as an alternative to drain insertion via a lower quadrant incision.

METHODS

Patients less than 32 weeks gestational age who underwent peritoneal drain placement for SIP at two neonatal intensive care units between 2011 and 2022 were identified. Incisional drainage (ID) or percutaneous pigtail catheter drainage (PD) was used based upon the usual practices of the surgeons. ID (n = 19) was performed via a 5-mm right lower quadrant incision into which a one-fourth-inch Penrose or red rubber catheter was placed. PD (n = 18) was accomplished using a Seldinger technique by which a 6.0 or 8.5 F pigtail catheter was passed through the left lower quadrant. Demographics and physiological parameters at the time of drainage were recorded and short-term and long-term outcomes were evaluated.

RESULTS

Thirty seven infants were identified. There were no differences in demographics or physiological derangement between the groups. Patients who underwent ID had more frequent stool drainage, a greater transfusion requirement, and a longer time to full feedings (60.6 v 37.7 d, P = 0.04). Incisional hernias (n = 3, 16%) only developed after ID. The duration of drain placement, length of stay, and time to resolution of pneumoperitoneum were similar with ID and PD as was the incidence of premature drain dislodgement and subsequent laparotomy.

CONCLUSIONS

Percutaneous drain placement provided effective drainage in infants with SIP and was associated with more rapid feeding advancement and no incidence of incisional hernia.

Efficacy of peritoneal drainage in very-low-birth-weight neonates with Bell's stage II necrotizing enterocolitis: A single-center retrospective study

BACKGROUND

Currently, pediatric surgeons are challenged by a lack of consensus on the optimal management strategy (conservative or surgical) for children with Bell's stage II necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC).

AIM

To evaluate the clinical efficacy of peritoneal drainage in very-low-birth-weight (VLBW) neonates with modified Bell's stage II NEC.

METHODS

This was a retrospective analysis of 102 NEC (modified Bell's stage II) neonates born with VLBW who were treated at the Fujian Children's Hospital (Fujian Branch of Shanghai Children's Medical Center) between January 2017 and January 2020; these included 24 cases in the peritoneal drainage group, 36 cases in the exploratory laparotomy group, and 42 cases in the conservative treatment group.

RESULTS

The general characteristics were comparable in the three groups (P > 0.05). Compared with conservative treatment, peritoneal drainage was associated with significantly shorter fasting time, abdominal distension relief time, fecal occult blood (OB) negative conversion time, and reduced hospital length of stay (HLOS) (P < 0.05 for all). Despite some advantages of peritoneal drainage over conservative treatment in terms of cure, conversion to laparotomy, intestinal perforation, intestinal stenosis, and abdominal abscess rates, the differences were not statistically significant (P > 0.05). Compared to exploratory laparotomy, the fecal OB negative conversion time was significantly shorter in the peritoneal drainage group (P < 0.05); similarly, the exploratory laparotomy group showed longer fasting time, abdominal distension relief time, HLOS, and higher complication rate compared to peritoneal drainage group, but the between-group differences were not statistically significant (P > 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Peritoneal drainage, an easy-to-operate procedure, can improve the clinical symptoms of VLBW neonates with Bell's stage II NEC and help reduce the HLOS.

Laparotomy versus Peritoneal Drainage as Primary Treatment for Surgical Necrotizing Enterocolitis or Spontaneous Intestinal Perforation in Preterm Neonates: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

AIM

to systematically review and meta-analyze the impact on morbidity and mortality of peritoneal drainage (PD) compared to laparotomy (LAP) in preterm neonates with surgical NEC (sNEC) or spontaneous intestinal perforation (SIP).

METHODS

Medical databases were searched until June 2022 for studies comparing PD and LAP as primary surgical treatment of preterm neonates with sNEC or SIP. The primary outcome was survival during hospitalization; predefined secondary outcomes included need for parenteral nutrition at 90 days, time to reach full enteral feeds, need for subsequent laparotomy, duration of hospitalization and complications.

RESULTS

Three RCTs (N = 493) and 49 observational studies (N = 19,447) were included. No differences were found in the primary outcome for RCTs, but pooled observational data showed that, compared to LAP, infants with sNEC/SIP who underwent PD had lower survival [48 studies; N = 19,416; RR 0.85; 95% CI 0.79-0.90; GRADE: low]. Observational studies also showed that the subgroup of infants with sNEC had increased survival in the LAP group (30 studies; N = 9370; RR = 0.82; 95% CI 0.72-0.91; GRADE: low).

CONCLUSIONS

Compared to LAP, PD as primary surgical treatment for sNEC or SIP has similar survival rates when analyzing data from RCTs. PD was associated with lower survival rates in observational studies.

Early laparoscopic-assisted surgery is associated with decreased post-operative inflammation and intestinal strictures in infants with necrotizing enterocolitis

INTRODUCTION

In 2015, a protocol including early laparoscopy-assisted surgery in the treatment of necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) was implemented at our institution. Carbon dioxide insufflation during laparoscopy may have an anti-inflammatory effect. We aimed to compare post-operative outcome after early laparoscopy-assisted surgery and classical laparotomy for NEC.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Charts of premature infants undergoing surgery for NEC (2012-2021) were reviewed. Cases operated by early laparoscopy-assisted surgery (2015-2021) were compared to infants operated for NEC between 2012 and 2015 (laparotomy-NEC). Outcomes were post-operative CRP, need for reintervention, mortality, and the occurrence of post-NEC intestinal strictures. CRP was measured on the day of surgery (POD-0), 2 days (POD-2), and 7 days after surgery (POD-7). Data were compared using contingency tables for categorical variables and Student t-test or Mann-Whitney test for continuous variables.

RESULTS

Infants with NEC operated by early laparoscopy (n = 48) and laparotomy (n = 29) were similar in terms of perforation (60% vs 58%, p = 0.99) and POD-0 CRP (139 vs 124 mg/L, p = 0.94). Delay between first signs of NEC and surgery was shorter in the laparoscopy group (3 vs 6 days, p = 0.004). Early laparoscopy was associated with a lower CRP on POD-2 (108 vs 170, p = 0.005) and POD-7 (37 vs 68, p = 0.002), as well as a lower rate of post-operative intestinal stricture (34% vs 61%, p = 0.04).

CONCLUSIONS

In addition to being safe and feasible in premature infants, early laparoscopic-assisted surgery was associated with decreased NEC-related post-operative inflammation and strictures. A prospective, randomized study is needed in order to evaluate short and long-term effects of laparoscopy in infants with NEC.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III.

Updates and recommendations on the surgical management of NEC

Necrotizing enterocolitis is a severe gastrointestinal disease of the infant. It most commonly targets those that are born prematurely. NEC has been associated with initiation of feeds and in most cases, it can be managed with antibiotics and bowel rest. However, in up to half of the cases, intestinal perforation, peritonitis, and failure of medical treatment will require surgical intervention. The following review will discuss the surgical approach to managing NEC, based on an updated review of practice patterns and recently published literature.

Primary Peritoneal Drainage Versus Laparotomy for Perforated Necrotizing Enterocolitis in Very-Low-Birth-Weight Infants: A Retrospective Cohort Study at an Academic Center in Saudi Arabia

Background and objective Necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) is a detrimental complication of the gastrointestinal tract among preterm infants with very low birth weight (VLBW) and is associated with high morbidity and mortality. About one-third of these cases require surgical intervention due to intestinal perforation. The preferred method for the surgical management of perforated NEC is still a matter of controversy. In light of this, we aimed to compare the outcomes of treating perforated NEC in VLBW infants with primary peritoneal drainage (PPD) versus laparotomy. Method We conducted a retrospective chart review of VLBW infants with perforated NEC treated at King Abdulaziz University Hospital between January 1, 2015, and March 31, 2020. Results Twenty-seven infants with perforated NEC were identified; 12 were managed initially with PPD, and 15 underwent laparotomy. There was no difference between groups in terms of postoperative outcomes, length of hospital stay, or mortality before discharge. Among infants managed with PPD, 50% (5/10) underwent second drainage and survived, while 33% (4/12) underwent laparotomy. Conclusion We identified no difference in postoperative outcomes and mortality between managing perforated NEC in VLBW infants with either PPD or laparotomy. However, randomized clinical trials with larger sample sizes and defined outcome measures are needed for reaching definitive conclusions.

Special considerations in randomized trials investigating neonatal surgical treatments

Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) are challenging, but are the studies most likely to change practice and benefit patients. RCTs investigating neonatal surgical therapies are rare. The Necrotizing Enterocolitis Surgery Trial (NEST) was the first surgical RCT conducted by the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD) Neonatal Research Network (NRN), and multiple lessons were learned. NEST was conducted over a 7.25-year enrollment period and the primary outcome was death or neurodevelopmental impairment (NDI) at 18-22 months corrected age. Surgical investigators designing clinical trials involving neonatal surgical treatments have many considerations to include, including how to study eligible but non-randomized patients, heterogeneity of treatment effect, use of frequentist and Bayesian analyses, assessment of generalizability, and anticipating criticisms during peer review. Surgeons are encouraged to embrace these challenges and seek innovative methods to acquire evidence that will be used to improve patient outcomes.

Peter SD, Shanti CM, Pegoli W, Skarda D, Shilyansky J, Lemon DG, Mosquera RA, Peralta-Carcelen M, Goldstein RF, Vohr BR, Purdy IB, Hines AC, Maitre NL, Heyne RJ, DeMauro SB, McGowan EC, Yolton K, Kilbride HW, Natarajan G, Yost K, Winter S, Colaizy TT, Laughon MM, Lakshminrusimha S, Higgins RD, Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Neonatal Research Network. Initial Laparotomy Versus Peritoneal Drainage in Extremely Low Birthweight Infants With Surgical Necrotizing Enterocolitis or Isolated Intestinal Perforation: A Multicenter Randomized Clinical Trial

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to determine which initial surgical treatment results in the lowest rate of death or neurodevelopmental impairment (NDI) in premature infants with necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) or isolated intestinal perforation (IP).

SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA

The impact of initial laparotomy versus peritoneal drainage for NEC or IP on the rate of death or NDI in extremely low birth weight infants is unknown.

METHODS

We conducted the largest feasible randomized trial in 20 US centers, comparing initial laparotomy versus peritoneal drainage. The primary outcome was a composite of death or NDI at 18 to 22 months corrected age, analyzed using prespecified frequentist and Bayesian approaches.

RESULTS

Of 992 eligible infants, 310 were randomized and 96% had primary outcome assessed. Death or NDI occurred in 69% of infants in the laparotomy group versus 70% with drainage [adjusted relative risk (aRR) 1.0; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.87-1.14]. A preplanned analysis identified an interaction between preoperative diagnosis and treatment group (P = 0.03). With a preoperative diagnosis of NEC, death or NDI occurred in 69% after laparotomy versus 85% with drainage (aRR 0.81; 95% CI: 0.64-1.04). The Bayesian posterior probability that laparotomy was beneficial (risk difference <0) for a preoperative diagnosis of NEC was 97%. For preoperative diagnosis of IP, death or NDI occurred in 69% after laparotomy versus 63% with drainage (aRR, 1.11; 95% CI: 0.95-1.31); Bayesian probability of benefit with laparotomy = 18%.

CONCLUSIONS

There was no overall difference in death or NDI rates at 18 to 22 months corrected age between initial laparotomy versus drainage. However, the preoperative diagnosis of NEC or IP modified the impact of initial treatment.

Surgical Versus Medical Management of Necrotizing Enterocolitis With and Without Intestinal Perforation: A Retrospective Chart Review

Background

Necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) is a debilitating disease that predominantly afflicts premature neonates, although it can also affect term neonates. The clinical features of the ailment vary widely and range from transient feed intolerance to life-threatening complications such as septicemia and disseminated intravascular coagulation. While surgery is usually only reserved for severe cases, such as those presenting with intestinal perforation, the role of surgical management in cases of NEC without perforation remains elusive.

Methods

A retrospective chart review of patients, three years in duration, was conducted and studied confirmed cases of NEC. The clinical presentations studied included cases of NEC with pneumatosis intestinalis, fixed bowel loop, pneumoperitoneum, and abdominal wall erythema. The patients were divided with regards to their intestinal perforation status and with pertinence to the treatment modality employed (medical or surgical). The results in either group were eventually analyzed in terms of the overall survival rate.

Results

A total of 48 patients were included in the study, of which 79.16% presented without perforation and 20.83% with perforation. Of the study participants included, 26 were females and 22 were males. Pertinently, no gender predominance was appreciated. In patients without perforation, medical management was noted to boast a lower mortality rate when compared with surgical intervention (15.6% vs 50.0%, respectively). In patients with perforation, the overall mortality was noted to hover at 50.0%, which was higher than that encountered in the non-perforation group.

Conclusion

In patients with NEC without perforation, surgical treatment confers no comparative therapeutic advantage when compared with medical management alone. Conservative management with broad-spectrum antibiotics including metronidazole yields equally favorable outcomes in such cases.

Primary peritoneal drainage in neonates with necrotizing enterocolitis associated with congenital heart disease: a single experience in a Brazilian tertiary center

Necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) is a common condition in preterm infants. The risk factors that contribute to NEC include asphyxia, apnea, hypotension, sepsis, and congenital heart diseases (CHD). The objective of this study was to evaluate the association between the treatment (surgery or drainage) and unfavorable outcomes in neonates with NEC and congenital heart diseases (NEC+CHD). A 19-year retrospective cohort study was conducted (2000-2019). Inclusion criterion was NEC Bell II stage. Exclusion criteria were associated malformation or genetic syndrome and those who did not undergo echocardiography or had a Bell I diagnosis. We included 100 neonates: NEC (n=52) and NEC+CHD (n=48). The groups were subdivided into NEC patients undergoing surgery (NECS, n=31), NEC patients undergoing peritoneal drainage (NECD, n=19), NEC+CHD patients undergoing surgery (NECCAS, n=21), and NEC+CHD patients who were drained (NECCAD, n=29). Multivariate analysis was performed to estimate the relative risk of death and the length of stay. Covariates were birth weight and gestational age. The group characteristics were similar. The adjusted relative risk of death was higher in the drainage groups [NECD (Adj RR=2.70 (95%CI: 1.47; 4.97) and NECCAD (Adj RR=1.97 (95%CI: 1.08; 3.61)], and they had the shortest time to death: NECD=8.72 (95%CI: 3.10; 24.54) and NECCAD=5.32 (95%CI: 1.95; 14.44). We concluded that performing primary peritoneal drainage in neonates with or without CHD did not improve the number of days of life, did not decrease the risk of death, and was associated with a higher mortality in newborns with NEC and clinical instability.

Optimizing Nutritional Strategies to Prevent Necrotizing Enterocolitis and Growth Failure after Bowel Resection

Necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC), the first cause of short bowel syndrome (SBS) in the neonate, is a serious neonatal gastrointestinal disease with an incidence of up to 11% in preterm newborns less than 1500 g of birth weight. The rate of severe NEC requiring surgery remains high, and it is estimated between 20–50%. Newborns who develop SBS need prolonged parenteral nutrition (PN), experience nutrient deficiency, failure to thrive and are at risk of neurodevelopmental impairment. Prevention of NEC is therefore mandatory to avoid SBS and its associated morbidities. In this regard, nutritional practices seem to play a key role in early life. Individualized medical and surgical therapies, as well as intestinal rehabilitation programs, are fundamental in the achievement of enteral autonomy in infants with acquired SBS. In this descriptive review, we describe the most recent evidence on nutritional practices to prevent NEC, the available tools to early detect it, the surgical management to limit bowel resection and the best nutrition to sustain growth and intestinal function.

Neurodevelopmental impairment in necrotising enterocolitis survivors: systematic review and meta-analysis

AIM

To determine (1) the incidence of neurodevelopmental impairment (NDI) in necrotising enterocolitis (NEC), (2) the impact of NEC severity on NDI in these babies and (3) the cerebral lesions found in babies with NEC.

METHODS

Systematic review: three independent investigators searched for studies reporting infants with NDI and a history of NEC (PubMed, Medline, Cochrane Collaboration, Scopus). Meta-analysis: using RevMan V.5.3, we compared NDI incidence and type of cerebral lesions between NEC infants versus preterm infants and infants with medical vs surgical NEC.

RESULTS

Of 10 674 abstracts screened, 203 full-text articles were examined. In 31 studies (n=2403 infants with NEC), NDI incidence was 40% (IQR 28%-64%) and was higher in infants with surgically treated NEC (43%) compared with medically managed NEC (27%, p<0.00001). The most common NDI in NEC was cerebral palsy (18%). Cerebral lesions: intraventricular haemorrhage (IVH) was more common in NEC babies (26%) compared with preterm infants (18%; p<0.0001). There was no difference in IVH incidence between infants with surgical NEC (25%) and those treated medically (20%; p=0.4). The incidence of periventricular leukomalacia (PVL) was significantly increased in infants with NEC (11%) compared with preterm infants (5%; p<0.00001).

CONCLUSIONS

This study shows that a large proportion of NEC survivors has NDI. NEC babies are at higher risk of developing IVH and/or PVL than babies with prematurity alone. The degree of NDI seems to correlate to the severity of gut damage, with a worse status in infants with surgical NEC compared with those with medical NEC.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

CRD42019120522.

Multicenter retrospective comparison of spontaneous intestinal perforation outcomes between primary peritoneal drain and primary laparotomy

PURPOSE

The purpose of our study was to compare outcomes of infants with spontaneous intestinal perforation (SIP) treated with primary peritoneal drain versus primary laparotomy.

METHODS

We performed a multi-institution retrospective review of infants with diagnosis of SIP from 2012 to 2016. Clinical characteristics and outcomes were compared between infants treated with primary peritoneal drain vs infants treated with laparotomy.

RESULTS

We identified 171 patients treated for SIP (drain n = 110 vs. laparotomy n = 61). There were no differences in maternal or prenatal characteristics. There were no clinically significant differences in vital signs, white blood cell or platelet measures, up to 48 h after intervention. Patients who were treated primarily with a drain were more premature (24.9 vs. 27.2 weeks, p < 0.001) and had lower median birth weight (710 g vs. 896 g, p < 0.001). No significant differences were found in complications, time to full feeds, length of stay (LOS) or mortality between the groups. Primary laparotomy group had more procedures (median number 1 vs. 2, p = 0.002). There were 32 (29%) primary drain failures whereby a laparotomy was ultimately needed.

CONCLUSIONS

SIP treated with primary drain is successful in the majority of patients with no significant differences in outcomes when compared to laparotomy with stoma.

THE LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III.

Usefulness of peritoneal drainage in extremely low birth weight infants with intestinal perforation: a single-center experience

Purpose

Necrotizing enterocolitis and intestinal perforation are the most common surgical emergency in the neonatal intensive care unit. The purpose of this study is to evaluate if peritoneal drainage (PD) is beneficial in extremely low birth weight infants with intestinal perforation.

Methods

Retrospective cohort study of extremely low birth weight infants with a diagnosis of intestinal perforation. They were received primary PD (n = 23, PD group) or laparotomy (n = 13, LAP group). Laboratory and physiologic data were collected and organ failure scores calculated and compared between preprocedure and postprocedures. Data were analyzed using appropriated statistical tests.

Results

Between January 2005 and December 2015, 13 infants (male:female = 9:4) received laparotomy. Of 23 infants (male:female = 16:7) received PD, 20 infants received subsequent laparotomy. There were no demographic differences between PD and LAP groups. And there were no differences in total organ score in either group (PD, P = 0.486; LAP, P = 0.115). However, in LAP group, respiratory score was statistically improved between pre- and postprocedure organ failure score (P = 0.02). In physiologic parameter, PD group had a statistically worsening inotropics requirement (P = 0.025). On the other hand, LAP group had a improvement of PaO₂/FiO₂ ratio (P = 0.01).

Conclusion

PD does not improve clinical status in extremely low birth weight infants with intestinal perforation.

Outcomes of infants born at 23 and 24 weeks' gestation with gut perforation

PURPOSE

The provision of neonatal intensive care to infants born at 23 or 24 weeks' gestation poses medical, surgical and ethical challenges. Gastrointestinal perforation is a well-recognized complication of preterm birth, occurring most often as a result of necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) or spontaneous intestinal perforation (SIP). Given the risk of morbidity and mortality in these 'periviable' infants, this complication may prompt transition from active management to palliative care. In our institution, the surgical care of periviable infants with gut perforation has not been dictated by gestational age. This study reports our outcomes.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort analysis of integrated neonatal medical and surgical care of all infants born between 23⁺⁰ and 24⁺⁶ weeks' gestation admitted to a tertiary level neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) during a 16 year period (2002-2017).

RESULTS

A total of 198 periviable neonates (73 born at 23 weeks' gestation and 125 born at 24 weeks) were admitted during the 16-year period; most were inborn with only 26 retrieved from regional centers. Twenty-six of these infants developed gut perforation: 14 SIP, 8 NEC, 3 esophageal perforation and one after reduction of an incarcerated inguinal hernia. Twelve (46%) periviable infants with gut perforation survived to discharge home, seven of whom had no/mild disability at 2-3 years corrected gestational age. Of the 198 periviable infants admitted to NICU, 116 (58%) were alive at a corrected gestational age of 2-3 years and 29 of the 56 (51%) assessed had mild or no disability.

CONCLUSIONS

In the setting of combined medical and surgical care in a tertiary level NICU almost half of all periviable infants with a gut perforation survived, many with no/mild disability at 2-3 years corrected gestational age. Rigid protocols that rely on gestational age alone to guide treatment are not appropriate. These results support the contention that, when possible, extremely preterm infants should be born and cared for in units with combined medical and surgical expertise.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III cohort study.

Does Surgical Management Alter Outcome in Necrotizing Enterocolitis?

Necrotizing enterocolitis occurs in 14% of infants less than 1000 g. Preoperative management varies widely, and the only absolute indication for surgery is pneumoperitoneum. Multiple biomarkers and scoring systems are under investigation, but clinical practice is still largely driven by surgeon judgment. Outcomes in panintestinal disease are poor, and multiple creative approaches are used to preserve bowel length. Overall, recovery is complicated in the short and long term. Major sequelae are stricture, short gut syndrome, and neurodevelopmental impairment. Resolving controversies in surgical necrotizing enterocolitis care requires multicenter collaboration for centralized data and tissue repositories, benchmarking, and carrying out prospective randomized controlled trials.

New Nutritional and Therapeutical Strategies of NEC

Necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) is an acquired severe disease of the digestive system affecting mostly premature babies, possibly fatal and frequently associated to systemic complications. Because of the severity of this condition and the possible long-term consequences on the child's development, many studies have aimed at preventing the occurrence of the primary events at the level of the bowel wall (ischemia and necrosis followed by sepsis) by modifying or manipulating the diet (breast milk versus formula) and/or the feeding pattern (time for initiation after birth, continuous versus bolus feeding, modulation of intake according clinical events). Feeding have been investigated so far in order to prevent NEC. However, currently well-established and shared clinical nutritional practices are not available in preventing NEC. Nutritional and surgical treatments of NEC are instead well defined. In selected cases surgery is a therapeutic option of NEC, requiring sometimes partial intestinal resection responsible for short bowel syndrome. In this paper we will investigate the available options for treating NEC according to the Walsh and Kliegman classification, focusing on feeding practices in managing short bowel syndrome that can complicate NEC. We will also analyze the proposed ways of preventing NEC.

Surgical considerations for neonates with necrotizing enterocolitis

Necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) is a potentially devastating condition that preferentially affects premature and low birth weight infants, with approximately half requiring acute surgical intervention. Surgical consult should be considered early on, and deterioration despite maximal medical therapy or the finding of pneumoperitoneum are the strongest indications for emergent surgical intervention. There is no clear consensus on the optimal surgical approach between peritoneal drainage and laparotomy; the best course of action likely depends on the infant's comorbidities, hemodynamic status, size, disease involvement, and available resources. Patients who develop surgical NEC are at a significant risk for morbidity and mortality, with long-term complications including short bowel syndrome, growth failure, and neurodevelopmental impairment. Further research into strategies that optimize outcomes following surgery for NEC in the neonatal intensive care unit and long-term are paramount.

Peritoneal drainage in pneumoperitoneum in extremely low birth weight infants

The aim was to determine if peritoneal drainage (PD) is a suitable treatment for pneumoperitoneum in extremely low birth weight (ELBW) infants. A retrospective chart review of 42 ELBW infants with pneumoperitoneum at the University Hospital of Cologne between November 2014 and April 2017 was performed. Forty-two infants with a median birth weight of 645 g (interquartile range (IQR) 550, 806) and a median gestational age of 24.3 weeks (IQR 23.2, 25.6) were treated for pneumoperitoneum. Twenty-six (62%) received PD, and in ten (38%), the drain could be removed without further intervention. Infants in the PD group were of significantly lower birth weight (622g vs. 750 g), age (4.5 vs. 10.0 days), and weight at diagnosis (538 vs. 778 g). The mortality in the PD group was 15% at 90 days of life, but no patient deceased in the primary laparotomy group.

CONCLUSION

We suggest PD with close evaluation of drainage and clinical course as an alternative treatment for pneumoperitoneum in ELBW infants allowing bridging the vulnerable first days of life until these infants are in a more stable condition. Despite not reaching statistical significance in our series, PD showed the trend towards higher mortality. What is known: • Pneumoperitoneum is traditionally treated with laparotomy, but placement of peritoneal drainage (PD) is a valuable treatment option. • Previous randomized controlled trials have shown no significant differences in mortality for PD versus laparotomy. What is new: • In our cohort, 38% of the infants with PD could be saved from secondary laparotomy, but in the PD group there was a trend towards higher mortality. • PD allows bridging the vulnerable first days of life until ELBW infants are in a more stable condition for possible laparotomy.

The value of patient registries in advancing pediatric surgical care

Pediatric surgeons treat a variety of conditions that are distinguished by their low occurrence rate, complexity, and need for integrated multidisciplinary care. Although randomized controlled trials (RCTs) are considered the gold standard for generating evidence to inform best practice, they are poorly suited to rare diseases based on the variability of illness severity, unpredictability in clinical course, and the impact limitations of studying a single intervention at a time. An alternative to RCTs for comparative effectiveness research for rare diseases in pediatric surgery is the patient registry, which collects detailed and condition-specific patient level data related to illness severity, treatment, and outcome, and allows a large, disease-specific database to be created for the dual purposes of collaborative research and quality improvement across participating sites. This review discusses the various functions of a patient registry in fulfilling its mandate of evidence-based practice and outcome improvement using examples from a variety of existing pediatric surgical registries. The value proposition of patient registries as sources of knowledge, facilitators of practice standardization, and enablers of continuous quality improvement is discussed.

Morbidity and mortality among "big" babies who develop necrotizing enterocolitis: A prospective multicenter cohort analysis

BACKGROUND

Necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) is classically a disease of prematurity, with less reported regarding morbidity and mortality of this disease among other infants.

METHODS

Data were prospectively collected from 2009 to 2015 at 252 Vermont Oxford Network member centers on neonates with birth weight>2500g admitted to a participating NICU within 28days of birth.

RESULTS

Of 1629 neonates with NEC, gestational age was 37 (36, 39) weeks, and 45% had major congenital anomalies, most commonly gastrointestinal defects (20%), congenital heart defects (18%), and chromosomal anomalies (7%). For the 23% of infants who had surgery for NEC, mortality and length of stay were 23% and 63 (36, 94) days versus 8% and 34 (22, 61) days in medical NEC. Independent predictors of mortality were congenital heart defects (p<0.0001), chromosomal abnormalities (p<0.05), other congenital malformations (p<0.001), surgical NEC (p<0.0001), and sepsis (p<0.05). All of these in addition to gastrointestinal defects were independent predictors of increased length of stay. Nutritional morbidity at discharge included 6% receiving no enteral feeds and 27% who were <10th percentile weight-for-age.

CONCLUSIONS

Major congenital anomalies are present in nearly half of >2500g birth weight infants diagnosed with necrotizing enterocolitis. Morbidity and mortality increase with sepsis, surgical disease, and congenital anomalies.

TYPE OF STUDY

Prognosis Study.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level II.

Peritoneal drainage is associated with higher survival rates for necrotizing enterocolitis in premature, extremely low birth weight infants

BACKGROUND

To evaluate peritoneal drainage (PD) and laparotomy ± resection/ostomy (LAP) as initial approaches to the surgical management of necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) in premature, extremely low birth weight (ELBW) infants.

METHODS

Kids' Inpatient Database (2003-2012) was searched for cases of NEC (International Classification of Diseases, ninth revision, Clinical Modification [ICD-9-CM] 777.5x) in premature (<37 weeks), extremely low birth weight (<1000 g) infants. Infants were admitted at <28 days of life. Propensity score (PS)-matched analyses were performed, using end points of hospital mortality, length of stay (LOS), and cost of hospitalization. Cases were matched 1:1 on 48 confounding variables (demographic, clinical, and hospital characteristics and 39 comorbidities).

RESULTS

On PS-matched comparison, PD had higher survival versus LAP, P = 0.0009. LOS and cost were higher for PD versus LAP, P < 0.003. Survival rates did not differ between PD + LAP and PD-only treatments. LOS and cost were higher for PD + LAP versus PD-only, P < 0.02. PD + LAP infants had higher survival versus LAP, P = 0.0193. LOS and cost were higher for PD + LAP, P < 0.005.

CONCLUSIONS

A risk-adjusted PS-matched analysis of operative management in premature, ELBW infants with NEC found higher survival rates associated with PD placement versus LAP, whether PD was used as definitive treatment or with subsequent LAP even after controlling for potential contributors to selection bias (i.e., stability influencing management preference).

The surgical management of necrotising enterocolitis (NEC)

Necrotising enterocolitis (NEC) is a neonatal surgical emergency. At its early stages, the management of NEC is largely medical using broad-spectrum antibiotics, gut rest and total parental nutrition. The only absolute indication for surgery is an intra-abdominal perforation. There are several relative indications for surgery based on clinical, biochemical and radiological parameters. Once the decision to intervene is made, several approaches may be taken. Peritoneal lavage can be used as a salvage procedure or definitive management in some cases. The most common approach taken is bowel resection with enterostomy formation. There is a role for primary anastomosis of bowel in limited NEC. In severe, multi-focal NEC a high diverting jejunostomy or "clip and drop technique" can be used. Laparoscopy has a limited role and is not widespread. The surgical complications of NEC include stoma related morbidity, anastomotic leak/stricture and short-bowel syndrome. Long-term data on neurodevelopmental outcomes is sparse but the present literature is suggestive of a negative impact in cases of surgically managed NEC.

Intestinal perforation in premature neonates: The need for subsequent laparotomy after placement of peritoneal drains

AIM

In view of recent studies questioning the usefulness of peritoneal drainage (PD) in premature neonates with pneumoperitoneum, suggesting approximately 75% of those treated with PD needed delayed laparotomy, we reviewed the requirement for laparotomy after initial PD at our institution.

METHODS

Retrospective cohort of all premature infants with a diagnosis of intestinal perforation (ICD Code P78.0) from 1995 to 2012. Inclusion criteria were pneumoperitoneum on x-ray (isolated perforation or necrotising enterocolitis), birthweight <1800 g and gestational age <33 weeks.

RESULTS

Fifty patients met the criteria (38 PD, 12 primary laparotomy). Thirty-two per cent (95% CI 18-49%) received secondary laparotomy after initial PD. There was no significant difference when stratified according to isolated perforation (24%) versus necrotising enterocolitis (56%, P = 0.11). There was no significant difference between PD and primary laparotomy for time to full enteral nutrition, hazard ratio (HR) 0.99 (95% CI 0.48-2.04) or mortality, HR 2.15 (95% CI 0.48-9.63). The HR for mortality was partly confounded by birthweight, birthweight-adjusted HR 1.52 (95% CI 0.32-7.23).

CONCLUSIONS

Thirty-two per cent of neonates treated with primary PD received secondary laparotomy, with no significant difference in key outcomes. Primary PD still appears to be of benefit for those without features of necrotising enterocolitis.

Necrotizing enterocolitis: controversies and challenges

Necrotizing enterocolitis is a devastating intestinal disease that affects ~5% of preterm neonates. Despite advancements in neonatal care, mortality remains high (30–50%) and controversy still persists with regards to the most appropriate management of neonates with necrotizing enterocolitis. Herein, we review some controversial aspects regarding the epidemiology, imaging, medical and surgical management of necrotizing enterocolitis and we describe new emerging strategies for prevention and treatment.

Definitive peritoneal drainage in the extremely low birth weight infant with spontaneous intestinal perforation: predictors and hospital outcomes

OBJECTIVE

To identify characteristics associated with definitive peritoneal drainage (PD) in the extremely low birth weight infant diagnosed with spontaneous intestinal perforation (SIP). We also sought to determine whether patients requiring a second operation (salvage laparotomy) following PD are at increased risk of adverse hospital outcomes, including increased times to full enteral feedings and decreased 30-day survival.

STUDY DESIGN

We performed a retrospective chart review of infants with a birth weight <1000 g who underwent PD for SIP at a single tertiary neonatal unit from 2003 to 2012. Infants with signs of necrotizing enterocolitis on abdominal plain films, including pneumatosis intestinalis, portal venous gas or fixed, dilated small loops of bowel were excluded from the study. Perinatal and perioperative data and short-term neonatal outcomes prior to hospital discharge were collected. Comparison was made between two groups: infants treated with definitive PD vs infants requiring salvage laparotomy. Data were analyzed using independent samples t-test and Cochrane-Mantel-Haenszel.

RESULT

Eighty-nine infants who fit all inclusion criteria were identified during the study period. PD was definitive in 67 (75.3%) patients. Patients who had definitive PD vs those who required salvage laparotomy were significantly more likely to present at a later day of life (9.6±5.3 vs 5.6±2.7, P<0.0001) and to have a lower birth weight (724.6 g±132.5 vs 809.2 g±143.1, P=0.02). The administration of indomethacin or ibuprofen prior to the diagnosis of SIP was also associated with definitive PD (74.6% vs 50%, P=0.03). Comparison of feeding outcomes revealed that the time to achieve full enteral feeds was significantly longer for those who underwent a salvage laparotomy (95.9±30.2 vs 60.4±30.4 days, P<0.005). Short-term survival (>30 days) was not significantly different between the two groups.

CONCLUSION

PD was definitive therapy for the majority of neonates included in this study who were referred for surgical evaluation of SIP. Our data point to trends in being able to identify infants with SIP who are at risk for salvage laparotomy following PD, and thus, adverse nutritional outcomes. Larger, prospective studies are needed to further evaluate this specific patient population and identify those patients who are likely to succeed with PD following the diagnosis of SIP.

Outcomes and costs of surgical treatments of necrotizing enterocolitis

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Despite previous studies demonstrating no difference in mortality or morbidity, the various surgical approaches for necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) in infants have not been evaluated economically. Our goal was to compare total in-hospital cost and mortality by using propensity score-matched infants treated with peritoneal drainage alone, peritoneal drainage followed by laparotomy, or laparotomy alone for surgical NEC.

METHODS

Utilizing the California OSHPD Linked Birth File Dataset, 1375 infants with surgical NEC between 1999 and 2007 were retrospectively propensity score matched according to intervention type. Total in-hospital costs were converted from longitudinal patient charges. A multivariate mixed effects model compared adjusted costs and mortality between groups.

RESULTS

Successful propensity score matching was performed with 699 infants (peritoneal drainage, n = 101; peritoneal drainage followed by laparotomy, n = 172; and laparotomy, n = 426). Average adjusted cost for peritoneal drainage followed by laparotomy was $398,173 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 287,784-550,907), which was more than for peritoneal drainage ($276,076 [95% CI: 196,238-388,394]; P = .004) and similar to laparotomy ($341,911 [95% CI: 251,304-465,186]; P = .08). Adjusted mortality was highest after peritoneal drainage (56% [95% CI: 34-75]) versus peritoneal drainage followed by laparotomy (35% [95% CI: 19-56]; P = .01) and laparotomy (29% [95% CI: 19-56]; P < .001). Mortality for peritoneal drainage was similar to laparotomy.

CONCLUSIONS

Propensity score-matched analysis of surgical NEC treatment found that peritoneal drainage followed by laparotomy was associated with decreased mortality compared with peritoneal drainage alone but at significantly increased costs.

Peritoneal Drainage as the Initial Management of Intestinal Perforation in Premature Infants

Complicated necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) and spontaneous intestinal perforation (SIP) are major causes of mortality. We hypothesized that peritoneal drainage (PD) is more efficacious in SIP. Newborn infants with intestinal perforation treated with PD at our institution between 2007 and 2012 were divided into two groups: Group 1, infants with complicated NEC (n = 19), and Group 2, infants with SIP (n = 15). In Group 1, median birth weight was 705 g; median gestational age was 25.9 weeks. Median age at PD was 24 days. Six required laparotomy. Median time from PD to enteral feeds was 22.5 days. In Group 2, median birth weight was 685 g; median gestational age was 25.3 weeks. Median age at PD was 5 days. Two required laparotomy. Median time from PD to enteral feeds was 16 days. In Group 1, eight patients survived to discharge; median length of hospital stay (LOS) was 104.5 days. In Group 2, eight survived; median LOS was 109.5 days. Neither outcome was statistically significant ( P = 0.73 and 0.878, respectively). Management of premature infants with intestinal perforation remains challenging. Mortality is high. Between our cohorts, there were no differences in regard to PD as definitive therapy, survival, and LOS.

Mortality associated with laparotomy-confirmed neonatal spontaneous intestinal perforation: a prospective 5-year multicenter analysis

BACKGROUND

Spontaneous intestinal perforation (SIP) has been recognized as a distinct disease entity. This study sought to quantify mortality associated with laparotomy-confirmed SIP and to compare it to mortality of laparotomy-confirmed necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC).

METHODS

Data were prospectively collected on 177,618 very-low-birth-weight (VLBW, 401-1500g) neonates born between January 2006 and December 2010 admitted to US hospitals participating in the Vermont Oxford Network (VON). SIP was defined at laparotomy as a focal perforation of the intestine without features suggestive of NEC or other intestinal abnormalities. The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality.

RESULTS

At laparotomy, 2036 (1.1%) neonates were diagnosed with SIP and 4076 (2.3%) with NEC. Neonates with laparotomy-confirmed SIP had higher mortality (19%) than infants without NEC or SIP (5%, P=0.003). However, laparotomy-confirmed SIP patients had significantly lower mortality than those with confirmed NEC (38%, P<0.0001). Mortality in both NEC and SIP groups decreased with increasing birth weight and mortality was significantly higher for NEC than SIP in each birth weight category. Indomethacin and steroid exposure were more frequent in the SIP cohort than the other two groups (P<0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

In VLBW infants, the presence of laparotomy-confirmed SIP increases mortality significantly. However, laparotomy-confirmed NEC mortality was double that of SIP. This relationship is evident regardless of birth weight. The variant mortality of laparotomy-confirmed SIP versus laparotomy-confirmed NEC highlights the importance of differentiating between these two diseases both for clinical and research purposes.

Current concepts in the surgical approach to necrotizing enterocolitis

Necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) is the most common surgical emergency occurring in neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) patients. Among patients with NEC, those that require surgery experience the poorest outcomes and highest mortality. Surgical intervention, while attempting to address the intestinal injury and ongoing mulitfactorial physiologic insults in NEC is associated with its own stresses that may compound the ongoing physiologic derangement. Surgery is thus reserved for those patients with clear indication for intervention such as pneumoperitoneum, confirmed stool or pus in the peritoneal cavity, or worsening clinical status. The purpose of this review is to briefly describe the physiologic stress induced by surgical intervention in the preterm, low birth weight patient with NEC and to provide a contemporary overview of available surgical management options for NEC. The optimal surgical plan employed is strongly influenced by clinical judgment and theoretical benefits in terms of minimizing physiologic stressors while providing temporary and/or definitive treatment in a timely fashion. While the choice of operation has not been shown to have a significant effect on any clinically important outcomes, ongoing investigations continue to study both short and long-term outcomes in patients with NEC.

Mortality and management of surgical necrotizing enterocolitis in very low birth weight neonates: a prospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

Necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) is a leading cause of death in very low birth weight (VLBW) neonates. The overall mortality of NEC is well documented. However, those requiring surgery appear to have increased mortality compared with those managed medically. The objective of this study was to establish national birth-weight-based benchmarks for the mortality of surgical NEC and describe the use and mortality of laparotomy vs peritoneal drainage.

STUDY DESIGN

There were 655 US centers that prospectively evaluated 188,703 VLBW neonates (401 to 1,500 g) between 2006 and 2010. Survival was defined as living in-hospital at 1-year or hospital discharge.

RESULTS

There were 17,159 (9%) patients who had NEC, with mortality of 28%; 8,224 patients did not receive operations (medical NEC, mortality 21%) and 8,935 were operated on (mortality 35%). On multivariable regression, lower birth weight, laparotomy, and peritoneal drainage were independent predictors of mortality (p < 0.0001). In surgical NEC, a plateau mortality of around 30% persisted despite birth weights >750 g; medical NEC mortality fell consistently with increasing birth weight. For example, in neonates weighing 1,251 to 1,500 g, mortality was 27% in surgical vs 6% in medical NEC (odds ratio [OR] 6.10, 95% CI 4.58 to 8.12). Of those treated surgically, 6,131 (69%) underwent laparotomy only (mortality 31%), 1,283 received peritoneal drainage and a laparotomy (mortality 34%), and 1,521 had peritoneal drainage alone (mortality 50%).

CONCLUSIONS

Fifty-two percent of VLBW neonates with NEC underwent surgery, which was accompanied by a substantial increase in mortality. Regardless of birth weight, surgical NEC showed a plateau in mortality at approximately 30%. Laparotomy was the more frequent method of treatment (69%) and of those managed by drainage, 46% also had a laparotomy. The laparotomy alone and drainage with laparotomy groups had similar mortalities, while the drainage alone treatment cohort was associated with the highest mortality.

Sonographic and radiographic imaging features of the neonate with necrotizing enterocolitis: correlating findings with outcomes

BACKGROUND

Abdominal radiography is the reference standard in imaging neonates with necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC); however, ultrasound of the abdomen including bowel may be of value in this setting.

OBJECTIVE

To correlate sonographic and radiographic findings with patient outcomes in NEC.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We reviewed sonographic and radiographic exams, as well as clinical, pathological and laboratory records. Ultrasound images were reviewed for free intraperitoneal gas, peritoneal fluid, pneumatosis intestinalis, portal gas, bowel vascularity, bowel wall thickness and echogenicity, peristalsis and the presence of dilated bowel with anechoic contents. Contemporaneously acquired radiographs were reviewed for intraperitoneal gas, pneumatosis intestinalis, portal gas, the sentinel loop sign and gas pattern. Patients were categorized into two groups based on clinical outcome.

RESULTS

Forty-four neonates receiving 55 sonograms were included. Focal fluid collections, echogenic free fluid, increased bowel wall echogenicity and increased bowel wall thickness were statistically significant in predicting an unfavorable outcome. Other features approached significance in predicting poor outcomes: free peritoneal gas, pneumatosis intestinalis, aperistalsis, bowel wall thinning and absent bowel perfusion. Anechoic free peritoneal fluid predicted a good outcome. The sentinel loop sign on radiographs predicted an unfavorable outcome.

CONCLUSIONS

Abdominal sonography and radiography in patients with NEC can help prognosticate the outcome.

Evidence-based prevention and surgical treatment of necrotizing enterocolitis-a review of randomized controlled trials

Necrotizing enterocolitis remains a common cause of morbidity and mortality in the neonatal period. Despite many advances in the management of the critically ill neonate, the exact etiology, attempts at prevention and determining best treatment for NEC have been elusive. Unfortunately, the overall survival for this poorly understood and complex condition has not improved. NEC is a condition that can and should be studied with randomized prospective trials (RCTs). This chapter reviews the current evidence-based trials for this condition thus far performed.

The surgical management of necrotizing enterocolitis

Necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC), a common cause of neonatal morbidity and mortality, is strongly associated with prematurity and typically occurs following initiation of enteral feeds. Mild NEC is adequately treated by cessation of enteral feeding, empiric antibiotics, and supportive care. Approximately 50% of affected infants will develop progressive intestinal necrosis requiring urgent operation. Several surgical techniques have been described, but there is no clear survival benefit for any single operative approach. While debate continues regarding the optimal surgical management for infants with severe NEC, future progress will likely depend on the development of improved diagnostic tools and preventive therapies.

Treatment of necrotizing enterocolitis: an American Pediatric Surgical Association Outcomes and Clinical Trials Committee systematic review

OBJECTIVE

The optimal treatment of necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) is a common challenge for pediatric surgeons. Although many studies have evaluated prevention and medical therapy for NEC, few guidelines for surgical care exist. The aim of this systematic review is to review and evaluate the currently available evidence for the surgical care of patients with NEC.

METHODS

Data were compiled from a search of PubMed, OVID, the Cochrane Library database, and Web of Science from January 1985 until December 2011. Publications were screened, and their references were hand-searched to identify additional studies. Clinicaltrials.gov was also searched to identify ongoing or unpublished trials. The American Pediatric Surgical Association Outcomes and Clinical Trials Committee proposed six questions deemed pertinent to the surgical treatment of NEC. Recent Cochrane Reviews examined three of these topics; a literature review was performed to address the additional three specific questions.

RESULTS

The Cochrane Reviews support the use of prophylactic probiotics in preterm infants less than 2500 grams to reduce the incidence of NEC, as well as the use of human breast milk rather than formula when possible. There is no clear evidence to support delayed initiation or slow advancement of feeds. For surgical treatment of NEC with perforation, there is no clear support of peritoneal drainage versus laparotomy. Similarly, there is a lack of evidence comparing enterostomy versus primary anastomosis after resection at laparotomy. There are little data to determine the length of treatment with antibiotics to prevent recurrence of NEC.

CONCLUSION

Based on available evidence, probiotics are advised to decrease the incidence of NEC, and human milk should be used when possible. The other reviewed questions are clinically relevant, but there is a lack of evidence-based data to support definitive recommendations. These areas of NEC treatment would benefit from future investigation.

Case report: delayed perforation after definitive treatment of focal intestinal perforation with a peritoneal drain

Focal intestinal perforation (FIP) has long been described in the pediatric literature. Peritoneal drainage (PD) is widely used as treatment for focal intestinal perforation. Here we report a premature infant that underwent PD on day of life 9 for a FIP. The infant recovered well from this episode and was discharged home without known sequelae. Subsequently, the same patient presented 16 months later with peritonitis. A perforation was discovered at laparotomy without evidence of surrounding necrosis. Given this finding, we believe this second episode of perforation was at the same site as the initial episode of FIP. The finding of FIP has been described without findings of surrounding necrosis. However, we believe this to be the first report of delayed perforation greater than 1 year from initial presentation after FIP treated definitively with peritoneal drain.

Necrotizing enterocolitis

Necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) is the most common acquired gastrointestinal disease of premature neonates and is a serious cause of morbidity and mortality. NEC is one of the leading causes of death in neonatal intensive care units. Surgical treatment is necessary in patients whose disease progresses despite medical therapy. Surgical options include peritoneal drainage and laparotomy, with studies showing no difference in outcome related to approach. Survivors, particularly those requiring surgery, face serious sequelae.

Could clinical scores guide the surgical treatment of necrotizing enterocolitis?

PURPOSE

Test the diagnostic reliability of the score for neonatal acute physiology-perinatal extension-II (SNAPPE-II) and the metabolic derangement acuity score (MDAS) as predictors of surgery in patients with necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC).

METHODS

The SNAPPE-II and the MDAS were applied to 99 patients with NEC. Both the scores were calculated at the moment of diagnosis (T(0)) and when surgical assessment was required (T(1)). The main outcome was the need of surgical revision. Comparison between models was made through their receiver operator characteristics (ROC) curves.

RESULTS

Thirty-five patients required surgical treatment (group A) and 64 responded to medical therapy (group B). Median SNAPPE-II was 22 versus 5 for group A (U test 621, p = 0.002) at T(0); and 22 versus 10 for group A (U test 487, p = 0.01) at T(1). Measuring the value of the SNAPPE-II as a predictor of surgery, the ROC curve was 0.69 (CI 95%, 0.57-0.80) at T(0) and 0.67 (CI 95%, 0.55-0.80) at T(1). Median MDAS were 2 for both groups A and B at T(0) (U test 890.5, p = 0.113) and 2 versus 1.5 for group A at T(1) (U test 570, p = 0.043). The ROC curve for MDAS was 0.59 (CI 95%, 0.47-0.71) at T(0) and 0.64 (CI 95%, 0.52-0.77) at T(1).

CONCLUSIONS

The diagnostic performance of the SNAPPE-II offers mild results in the moment of the diagnosis of NEC, and at T(1). The MDAS is non significant at T(0) and obtains moderate results at T(1). These results do not encourage using the SNAPPE-II and the MDAS as definite tools to decide for surgical treatment of the patients affected by NEC.

Peritoneal drainage versus laparotomy for perforated necrotising enterocolitis or spontaneous intestinal perforation: a retrospective cohort study

AIM

Perforated necrotising enterocolitis (NEC) and spontaneous intestinal perforation (SIP) in preterm infants are associated with high morbidity and mortality. The optimum surgical management during the acute stage remains unclear. The aim of the study was to compare the outcomes of preterm infants (gestational age at birth <30 weeks) with perforated NEC or SIP undergoing primary peritoneal drainage (PD) versus laparotomy.

METHODS

This was a retrospective cohort study (January 2004 to February 2010). Initial search of hospital database followed by a review of the medical records was performed to identify eligible infants. Thirty-nine infants were included in the study. Information regarding the baseline characteristics and outcomes of interest were recorded using the medical charts, radiology and laboratory databases. NEC was differentiated from SIP based on radiological, operative and clinical findings retrospectively for this study.

RESULTS

Among 39 infants, 19 underwent primary PD while 20 had primary laparotomy. Gestational age and birthweight were similar between the two groups. The composite outcome of mortality before discharge or hospital stay longer than 3 months post-term was significantly worse in PD group (74% vs. 40%, P= 0.038).

CONCLUSIONS

Preterm infants undergoing PD for NEC/SIP appeared to have increased risk of adverse outcome compared with laparotomy. More randomised controlled trials are necessary to confirm these findings.