The influence of apolipoprotein E phenotype on the response to lovastatin therapy in patients with heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia

Role of rs3846662 and HMGCR alternative splicing in statin efficacy and baseline lipid levels in familial hypercholesterolemia

OBJECTIVES

To assess the contribution of the rs3846662 polymorphism of HMGCR on serum lipid levels and statin efficacy, we measured in vivo HMGCR mRNA and lipid levels in French Canadian individuals affected by heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia due to the deletion of more than 15 kb of the LDLR gene.

RESULTS

Men and women carrying the AA genotype at rs3846662, and no APOE4 allele, had higher levels of total cholesterol (5.43 vs. 4.58 mmol/l, P<0.05) and LDL-cholesterol (5.20 vs. 4.39 mmol/l, P<0.05) at baseline. However, with regard to statin efficacy, the penetrance of the AA genotype was sex dependent. Indeed, the percentage reduction in LDL-cholesterol upon statin treatment was significantly decreased in women with the AA genotype compared with women without it (38.4 vs. 46.2%, P<0.05), whereas this was not observed in men. Although both men and women bearing the AA genotype showed a higher ratio of full-length HMGCR mRNA/total HMGCR mRNA compared with individuals without it (n=37, P<0.05), overall transcription of HMGCR was decreased and increased in men and women carrying this genotype, respectively (n=37, P<0.01 and P<0.05). Finally, in our familial hypercholesterolemia cohort, HMGCR alternative splicing explained between 22 and 55% of the variance in statin response.

CONCLUSION

rs3846662 polymorphism and the alternative splicing of HMGCR mRNA significantly impact women's response to statin therapy.

The potential applications of Apolipoprotein E in personalized medicine

Personalized medicine uses various individual characteristics to guide medical decisions. Apolipoprotein (ApoE), the most studied polymorphism in humans, has been associated with several diseases. The purpose of this review is to elucidate the potential role of ApoE polymorphisms in personalized medicine, with a specific focus on neurodegenerative diseases, by giving an overview of its influence on disease risk assessment, diagnosis, prognosis, and therapy. This review is not a systematic inventory of the literature, but rather a summary and discussion of novel, influential and promising works in the field of ApoE research that could be valuable for personalized medicine. Empirical evidence suggests that ApoE genotype informs pre-symptomatic risk for a wide variety of diseases, is valuable for the diagnosis of type III dysbetalipoproteinemia, increases risk of dementia in neurodegenerative diseases, and is associated with a poor prognosis following acute brain damage. ApoE status appears to influence the efficacy of certain drugs, outcome of clinical trials, and might also give insight into disease prevention. Assessing ApoE genotype might therefore help to guide medical decisions in clinical practice.

Effect of apolipoprotein E polymorphism on statin-induced decreases in plasma lipids and cardiovascular events

Hypercholesterolemia or dyslipidemia is an independent risk factor for cardiovascular disease and statins (inhibitors of a key enzyme of cholesterol synthesis, 3-hydroxymethyl glutaryl coenzyme A reductase) are the drugs of choice for decreasing plasma cholesterol. It has been estimated that genetic factors can explain 40%-60% of final cholesterol concentrations and approximately 70% of the efficacy of statin treatment. The gene most often analyzed in the context of statin efficacy is the gene for apolipoprotein E (APOE). This review summarizes evidence of the association between variations in the APOE gene locus and the response of plasma lipids to statin therapy. Although the results are not consistent, carriers of the APOE4 allele seems to be less responsive to statins than carriers of APOE2 and APOE3 alleles. This effect is partially context-dependent (gene-gender interactions; gene-nutrition and gene-smoking interactions have not yet been studied) and the absolute differences vary between different population groups.

Improvement of myocardial blood flow by lipid‐lowering therapy with pravastatin is modulated by apolipoprotein E genotype

OBJECTIVE

Apolipoprotein E (apoE) polymorphism affects the risk of advanced coronary artery disease, but its role in early atherosclerosis remains unknown. We used positron emission tomography (PET) to study whether coronary reactivity or its response to pravastatin is related to the apoE genotype.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Samples from 44 mildly hypercholesterolaemic men (aged 35 +/- 4 years) of an earlier trial were re-analysed according to apoE genotype. Subjects were randomized to receive either 40 mg/day pravastatin or placebo for 6 months. To assess coronary reactivity, myocardial blood flow was measured by PET at rest and during adenosine infusion. PET studies and lipid analyses were done at baseline and after 6 months of therapy.

RESULTS

There were no differences between apoE epsilon3/3 and epsilon4/3 genotypes in basal or adenosine-stimulated flow or in coronary flow reserve (CFR) at baseline. There was a significant apoE genotype-by-treatment group interaction regarding the change in adenosine-stimulated flow (ANCOVA; p = 0.018) and CFR (p = 0.020) at the end of the study. In the pravastatin group, the adenosine-stimulated flow increased by 32.5 % in subjects with epsilon3/3 (n = 9), but decreased non-significantly (-14.4 %) in subjects with epsilon4/3 (n = 9) (p = 0.0009). The corresponding changes in CFR were +17.8 % for epsilon3/3 and (-11.9 % for epsilon4/3 (p = 0.05). There were no significant changes from the baseline values in placebo recipients. After pravastatin treatment, both genotype groups showed a similar decrease in serum total and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (p<0.0001 for both).

CONCLUSIONS

Coronary function improves by 6 months of pravastatin in subjects with the apoE epsilon3/3 genotype, but not in those with the epsilon4/3.

APOE gene polymorphisms and response to statin therapy

Published studies investigating the role of APOE gene on lipid response (total cholesterol (TC), low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) and triglycerides) to statin treatment have reported inconsistent results. A meta-analysis was conducted to estimate the lipid response to statin treatment among APOE genetic variants (e2 carriers, e3e3 homozygotes and e4 carriers). Twenty-four studies were included in the meta-analyses. The pooled mean reduction (Delta mu) in TC from baseline was significant for all variants (e2 carriers: Delta mu=-27.7% (-32.5 to -22.8%), e3e3: Delta mu=-25.3% (-28.0 to -22.6%) and e4 carriers: Delta mu=-25.1% (-29.3 to -21.0%)). Significant changes in LDL-C, HDL-C and triglyceride levels were also noted for all genotypes, although these changes did not differ significantly among genotypic groups. There was significant heterogeneity among the studies. Given these non-significant effects of APOE genotypes on lipid responses, there is little reason to consider the use of APOE genetic testing for guiding treatment with statins.

Pharmacogenetics of apolipoprotein E gene during lipid-lowering therapy: lipid levels and prevention of coronary heart disease

A non-optimal plasma concentration of lipids is among the major modifiable risk factors of atherosclerosis. Therefore, the prevention of cardiovascular disease by means of lipid-lowering therapy with statins and other agents is of great importance for patient groups where a lifestyle change, for example, diet modification, does not lead to adequately reduced lipid levels. The response of low-density-lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels to statin therapy is highly variable. This is partly attributed to hereditary variation in genes involved in pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics and lipid metabolism. The pharmacogenetics of lipid-lowering therapy have been investigated for more than 40 different genes. The gene for apolipoprotein E (APOE) has been the most frequently studied, particularly regarding the epsilon2/epsilon3/epsilon4 polymorphism. Those with the epsilon4 allele seem to have the poorest and those with the epsilon2 allele the strongest response to statins with regards to LDL-C levels. In addition, the epsilon2 carriers may reach the LDL-C treatment goals more frequently than epsilon4 carriers. Few studies have investigated the interaction of the APOE epsilon2/epsilon3/epsilon4 polymorphism and lipid-lowering therapy in relation to the course of coronary heart disease; the results are contradictory and so far inconclusive. This review summarizes the pharmacogenetic findings related to the influence of APOE gene variation on lipid responses and the prevention of coronary heart disease during lipid-lowering therapy.

The effect of apolipoprotein E polymorphism on the response to lipid-lowering treatment with atorvastatin or fenofibrate

Although the effect of apolipoprotein E gene polymorphism on the response to treatment with statins has been studied, the results are conflicting. Moreover, little is known about the possible effect of apolipoprotein E alleles on the response to treatment with fibrates. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of apolipoprotein E polymorphism on lipid-lowering response to treatment with atorvastatin and fenofibrate in patients with different types of dyslipidemia. The study population included 136 patients with heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia (type IIA dyslipidemia) treated with atorvastatin (20 mg/day) and 136 patients with either primary hypertriglyceridemia (type IV dyslipidemia) or mixed hyperlipidemia (type IIB dyslipidemia) treated with micronized fenofibrate (200 mg/day). Overall, no significant associations were detected between apolipoprotein E genotype and response to treatment with atorvastatin. In patients treated with fenofibrate, significant associations were noted between apolipoprotein E genotype and changes in apolipoprotein B, apolipoprotein E and triglyceride levels. Specifically, in apolipoprotein E2, apolipoprotein E3, and apolipoprotein E4 individuals, apolipoprotein B reductions were 22%, 17%, and 8%, respectively (P = .003); apolipoprotein E reductions were 45%, 20%, and 15%, respectively (P = .006); whereas triglyceride reductions reached 53%, 36%, and 33%, respectively (P = .033). In conclusion, apolipoprotein E genotype had no significant effect on the response to treatment with atorvastatin in patients with heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia, but in patients with primary hypertriglyceridemia or mixed hyperlipidemia, there was a clear association between apolipoprotein E genotype and response to treatment with fenofibrate.

Genetic and environmental factors affecting the response to statin therapy in patients with molecularly defined familial hypercholesterolaemia

Familial hypercholesterolaemia (FH) is the most common inherited metabolic disease characterized by elevated serum levels of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) and ischaemic heart disease early in life. Early diagnosis and treatment are essential to prevent premature atherosclerosis in FH patients. The aim of our study was the evaluation of the effects of genetic [class of the LDL receptor (LDLR) gene mutation, apolipoprotein (apo)E, apoA-IV and cholesterol ester transfer protein gene polymorphisms] and environmental factors (age, sex, smoking habit and body mass index) on the lipid-lowering response to statin therapy in patients with molecularly defined FH. Atorvastatin 20 mg/day was prescribed in 49 patients with heterozygous FH. The lipid profile was examined before and after 12 weeks of therapy. Statin therapy resulted in a decrease of 37% and 36% in LDL-C and apoB levels, respectively. The study population was then divided into 2 groups according to the class of the LDLR mutation [patients sharing a class V mutation (the G1775A mutation, n=21) and patients sharing class II mutations (the G1646A and the C858A mutations, n=28)]. In both groups, the percentage decrement in LDL-C and apoB levels were correlated with the initial LDL-C and apoB levels, respectively. The class of the LDLR mutation affected the LDL-C and apoB-lowering response of heterozygous FH patients to statin therapy. In detail, heterozygotes sharing a class V mutation of the LDLR showed a higher percentage decrement in LDL-C and apoB levels after atorvastatin administration compared to patients sharing class II mutations (49+/-9% versus 34+/-9%, P=0.001 for LDL-C and 42+/-16% versus 35+/-20%, P=0.001 for apoB). The influence of the classes of the LDLR gene mutations on the change of LDL-C and apoB levels to atorvastatin was still significant in a multivariate analysis. None of the other genetic and environmental factors studied affected the lipid-lowering response to atorvastatin therapy in patients with heterozygous FH in a multivariate analysis. Our data indicate that the class of the LDLR gene mutation affects the LDL-C and apoB-lowering response of heterozygous FH patients to statin therapy. Specifically, patients with a class V mutation exhibit higher percentage decrease in LDL-C and apoB levels after statin therapy compared to patients sharing class II mutations.

Pharmacogenetics of HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors: exploring the potential for genotype-based individualization of coronary heart disease management

Despite the benefit of statin therapy in the prevention of coronary heart disease, a considerable inter-individual variation exists in its response. It is well recognized that genetic variation can contribute to differences in drug disposition and, consequently, clinical efficacy at the population level. Pharmacogenetics, exploring genetic polymorphisms that influence response to drug therapy, may one day allow the clinician to customize treatment strategies for patients in order to improve the success rate of drug therapies. To date, 41 studies have investigated the relationships between common genetic variants and response to statin therapy in terms of lipid effects and clinical outcomes; 16 candidate genes involved in lipoprotein metabolism and 3 in pharmacokinetics. APOE is the most extensively studied locus, and absolute difference in LDL cholesterol reduction across genotypes remained 3-6%. Moreover, none of the associations was striking enough to justify genetic analysis in clinical practice. Reported data have suggested that larger studies (>1000 participants) or combination analyses with >2 different polymorphisms would enable us to find clinically or biologically meaningful difference, which could be assumed as >10% absolute difference, and that genes influencing cholesterol biosynthesis in the liver, such as ABCG5/G8, CYP7A1, HMGCR, would be good candidates for future studies.

Pharmacogenetics of lipid diseases

The genetic basis for most of the rare lipid monogenic disorders have been elucidated, but the challenge remains in determining the combination of genes that contribute to the genetic variability in lipid levels in the general population; this has been estimated to be in the range of 40-60 per cent of the total variability. Therefore, the effect of common polymorphisms on lipid phenotypes will be greatly modulated by gene-gene and gene-environment interactions. This approach can also be used to characterise the individuality of the response to lipid-lowering therapies, whether using drugs (pharmacogenetics) or dietary interventions (nutrigenetics). In this regard, multiple studies have already described significant interactions between candidate genes for lipid and drug metabolism that modulate therapeutic response--although the outcomes of these studies have been controversial and call for more rigorous experimental design and analytical approaches. Once solid evidence about the predictive value of genetic panels is obtained, risk and therapeutic algorithms can begin to be generated that should provide an accurate measure of genetic predisposition, as well as targeted behavioural modifications or drugs of choice and personalised dosages of these drugs.

Benefits and risks of simvastatin in patients with familial hypercholesterolaemia

Familial hypercholesterolaemia is a frequent, inherited, monogenic disorder, associated with accelerated development of atherosclerotic disease leading to coronary artery disease. Life expectancy of patients with familial hypercholesterolaemia is reduced by 15-30 years unless they are adequately treated with lipid-lowering therapy. Given the chronic nature of this disease, the selection of a therapeutic approach should be strongly based on its long-term safety and tolerability. The introduction of HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors has revolutionised the treatment of familial hypercholesterolaemia. Simvastatin 40-80 mg/day effectively reduces serum low density lipoprotein (LDL)-cholesterol levels. Furthermore, simvastatin reduces triglycerides and mildly raises high density lipoprotein-cholesterol levels. In addition to the hypolipidaemic effect, other potentially important effects, such as improvement of endothelial function and reduction of LDL oxidation and vascular inflammation, have been associated with HMG-CoA reductase inhibitor therapy. Simvastatin has also been shown to abolish the progression, and even facilitate the regression, of existing human atherosclerotic lesions. The good safety and tolerability profile of simvastatin is clearly highlighted by the low rate of therapy discontinuation observed in several population-based clinical trials. The most common adverse events leading to the discontinuation of therapy are gastrointestinal upset and headache. Asymptomatic elevations in liver transaminase levels and myopathy are uncommon. The overwhelming clinical evidence regarding the long-term use of HMG-CoA reductase inhibitor therapy in patients with familial hypercholesterolaemia together with the long-term safety data (particularly relating to simvastatin) provide support for the use of this drug as a first-line agent when pharmacological treatment is indicated. Early intervention with simvastatin treatment can be successfully implemented with favourable economic benefits.

Association of apolipoprotein E polymorphism with blood lipids and maximal oxygen uptake in the sedentary state and after exercise training in the HERITAGE family study

The relationship of apolipoprotein E (apo E) genotypes to plasma lipid and maximal oxygen uptake (Vo(2max)) was studied in the sedentary state and after a supervised exercise training program in black and white men and women. At baseline, the apo E 2/3 genotype was associated with the lowest, and apo E 3/4 and E4/4 with the highest low-density liporpotein (LDL) cholesterol and apo B levels in men and women of both races, while female (not male) carriers of apo E3 had higher high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol levels than carriers of other genotypes. Very-low-density lipoprotein (VLDL) cholesterol and triglyceride levels were significantly higher in carriers of both apo E2 and apo E4 in white men only. Racial and sex differences were noted in lipid responses to exercise training across genotypes with a significantly greater increase in HDL cholesterol observed only in white female carriers of apo E 2/3 and E3/3, as compared to apo E4/4. Apo E polymorphism was not found to be associated with Vo(2max) levels either in the sedentary state nor the Vo(2max) response to exercise training, contrary to previous reports.

Time-dependent lipid response on fluvastatin therapy of patients with hypercholesterolemia sensitive to apoE phenotype

Sixty-seven male patients with hypercholesterolemia, divided into three groups according to apolipoprotein E phenotype (33 with apoE3/ 3 phenotype, E3 group; 23 with 2/2 or 2/3, E2+ group; 11 with 4/4 or 4/3, E4+ group), received daily 20-40 mg of fluvastatin for 12 weeks. The levels of triglyceride (TG), cholesterol (Chol), low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) were measured after 0, 4, 8 and 12 weeks on fluvastatin and after 4 weeks washout period. Lipid percentage changes (delta) were not associated with apoE phenotype for any treatment time. Cholesterol decreased by 14% after 12 weeks and HDL-C increased by 14-16% after 12 weeks for three phenotype groups. deltaTG, deltaChol, deltaLDL-C were associated positively, while negatively for deltaHDL-C, with the corresponding basal lipid values for the three groups. The positive deltaTG values occurred at a low basal TG0 level and became negative at TG0 > 1.6-1.9 mM. For E3 and E4+ groups, only a single parameter contributed significantly into a variation of lipid percentage changes. For the E2+ group, TG0 and Chol0 contributed in a reciprocal manner into deltaTG12/0, both positively into deltaChol8/0; Chol0 and HDL-C0 both negatively contributed into deltaHDL-C12/0. HDL-C0 contributed reciprocally into LDL-C variability for E2+ and E4+ groups. Three effects seem to contribute differently into lipid response among patients with different apoE phenotype: the inhibition of hepatic and lipoprotein lipase activities, the competition between TG-rich and low-density lipoproteins for LDL-receptor and the accumulation of intermediate-density lipoproteins in patients bearing E2 isoform.

DNA testing for familial hypercholesterolemia: improving disease recognition and patient care

Cardiovascular disease is the leading cause of death worldwide and, like most chronic diseases, it has major genetic and environmental components. Among patients with coronary heart disease onset before the age of 55, about 5% of cases are attributable to heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia (FH), a disease following autosomal dominant inheritance. About 50% of individuals with FH die before the age of 60 due to myocardial infarction. The frequency of FH is estimated to be 1 : 500. FH is related to mutations in the low-density lipoprotein (LDL)-cholesterol LDL-receptor gene and apolipoprotein B (apoB) gene. The identification of individuals with FH has been based on lipid levels and segregation of lipid levels within the family. However, phenotypes are overlapping and family history is not always informative. Therefore, a DNA-based genetic test for FH appears to offer the best alternative. The DNA test gives a simple yes/no answer. The FH test is a definitive tool for the identification of affected family members. The approach of targeted family genetic screening to find new patients is faster and more reliable compared with a biochemical form of screening. Early identification and efficient treatment of such patients is important and highly cost effective. There is evidence to suggest that the nature of the LDL-receptor (LDLR) mutation influences the degree of cholesterol lowering achieved by HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors (statins). The observed differences in the LDL-cholesterol (LDL-C) responses to these drugs among the various LDLR gene mutations are not yet completely understood. The relationships shown between LDLR mutation types and lipid levels, and the response of lipid levels to HMG-CoA reductase inhibitor treatment, will have to be investigated within the framework of pharmacogenetic studies. The variables, which are important in determining the overall atherosclerosis risk, are the result of combined activity in a dynamic network of numerous genes and environment. Candidate genes for atherosclerosis need to be further tested and validated. Future research should be directed at determining the significance of such targets, which patients with FH are at particularly high risk of premature cardiovascular disease, and which environmental factors are effective in modulating this risk. Genetics-based diagnostics will complement identification of FH while improving cardiovascular risk prediction, prevention of disease and treatment efficacy.

Pharmacogenomics of drugs affecting the cardiovascular system

The variability in drug response originates partly from genetics, with possible consequences for drug efficacy, adverse effects, and toxicity. Until now, pharmacogenetics mainly indicated the best known source of variability, that is, the variability caused by drug metabolism. However, simultaneous progress in the knowledge of biochemical targets of drugs and of the human genome, together with the development of new technologies, revealed many new sources of human genetic variation, e.g., in receptors or transporters. Drugs are metabolized by various polymorphic phase I enzymes, including cytochromes P450 (CYP). Among them, the most relevant for the metabolism of cardiovascular drugs are CYP3A4, CYP2C9 or CYP2C19, and CYP2D6. The role of phase II enzymes is limited with regard to cardiovascular drugs biotransformation, but some polymorphisms (glutathion-S-transferase; GSH-T) are linked to cardiovascular risk. Phase III proteins or transporters, especially from the ABC family, must also be considered, as their polymorphisms affect cholesterol and other sterols transport. Among pharmacological targets, some proteins were identified as involved in interindividual variations in the response to cardiovascular drugs. Some examples are apolipoprotein E, angiotensin-converting enzyme, and the beta-adrenergic receptor. From the risk concept emphasizing impaired metabolism and adverse effects, we now moved to an approach, which is a personalized, genotype-dependent adaptation of therapy.

Adherence to and dosing of beta-hydroxy-beta-methylglutaryl coenzyme A reductase inhibitors in the general population differs according to apolipoprotein E-genotypes

Discontinuation and poor adherence to therapy are major problems during long-term treatment, particularly with cholesterol lowering drugs. Several studies have indicated that the cholesterol lowering effect of statins differs according to apolipoprotein (apo)E genotypes. Low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol lowering capacity appears to be smaller in subjects with the epsilon(4) allele. To assess whether the use of statins in daily practice differs according to apoE genotypes, we used data from the Rotterdam Study, a population-based prospective cohort study in the Netherlands, which started in 1990 and included 7983 subjects aged 55 years or more. During follow-up, there were 798 subjects who started to use statins. We used a Cox proportional hazard model to determine the rate of discontinuation in the first 3 years of statin use. Subjects on statin therapy with epsilon(2)epsilon(2) and epsilon(4)epsilon(4) genotypes showed a trend towards higher dosages than subjects with the other genotypes. Relative to subjects with the epsilon(2)epsilon(3) genotype, those with the epsilon(4)epsilon(4) genotype had a risk of 2.28 [95% confidence interval (CI) 1.02-5.12] to discontinue statins within 3 years. In women, this relative risk was 1.70 (CI 0.53-5.42) versus 3.18 (CI 1.01-10.03) in men. The apoE genotype is associated with discontinuation of statins. This suggests that subjects who are genetically prone to develop hypercholesterolemia show the highest risk of discontinuation of treatment.

The effectiveness of hydroxy-methylglutaryl coenzyme A reductase inhibitors (statins) in the elderly is not influenced by apolipoprotein E genotype

We aimed to assess whether the effectiveness of statins in the prevention of myocardial infarction, stroke and total mortality is influenced by apolipoprotein E (apoE) genotype in an elderly population. We used data from the Rotterdam Study, a prospective population-based cohort study in the Netherlands which started in 1990 and included 7983 subjects aged 55 years and older. Subjects who were treated with cholesterol lowering drugs at baseline or with a serum total cholesterol > or = 6.5 mmol/l at baseline were included. We compared the incidence of myocardial infarction, stroke and total mortality in subjects who received > or = 2 years of statin treatment with that in subjects who had been treated for less than 2 years, and in untreated subjects, using a Cox proportional hazard model with cumulative statin use defined as time-dependent covariates. The adjusted relative risk of all-cause mortality was 0.79 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.51-1.22] and of myocardial infarction and stroke 0.50 (95% CI 0.28-0.91) for subjects treated with statins for > or = 2 years compared to untreated subjects. The adjusted relative risks for subjects with the epsilon4 allele were 0.91 (95% CI 0.45-1.84) for all-cause mortality and 0.63 (95% CI 0.23-1.78) for myocardial infarction and stroke. In subjects without the epsilon4 allele, adjusted relative risks were 0.71 (95% CI 0.41-1.24) for all-cause mortality and 0.46 (95% CI 0.22-0.95) for myocardial infarction and stroke. We found a protective effect of statins on the risk of myocardial infarction and stroke that was independent of apoE genotype. The protective effect of statins on total mortality was not statistically significant, but did not seem to differ between subjects with different apoE genotypes.

Genetic polymorphisms: importance for response to HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors

Coronary artery disease is among the leading causes of death worldwide. Clinical trials show a protective effect of statins against the sequelae of coronary artery disease. The mean risk reductions for subjects using statins compared with placebo found in these trials is about 30%. These are average reductions for all patients included in the trials. Important factors in interpreting the variability in the outcome of drug therapy include the patient's health profile, prognosis, disease severity, quality of drug prescribing, compliance with prescribed pharmacotherapy and the genetic profile of the patient. This review aims to give an overview of the known polymorphisms (Cholesteryl Ester Transfer Protein polymorphism, Stromelysin-1 polymorphism, -455G/A and TaqI polymorphisms of the beta-fibrinogen gene, apoE4, Asp(9)Asn mutation in the lipoprotein lipase gene, the -514 CT polymorphism in the hepatic lipase gene and the ACE deletion type gene) that have an influence on the effects of statins in the general population. The expectation is that in the future a subject's genotype may determine whether he will be treated with statins or not. Determining the genotype will not deny therapy to a subject, but will help in deciding the therapy that will suit the patient best.

Effect of apoE genotype on the hypolipidaemic response to pravastatin in an outpatient setting

BACKGROUND

Considerable variability exists in the plasma lipid and lipoprotein response to statin treatment due, in part, to genetic factors. The gene for apolipoprotein E (ApoE) is polymorphic and the different genotypes modulate baseline lipid levels. The objective of the present study was to evaluate the effect of the apoE genotype on the lipoprotein response to pravastatin treatment in an outpatient population followed-up in several different clinics across Spain. Subjects and methods. Subjects (n=401; 56% female; mean age 57 years), who were hypercholesterolaemic despite a diet poor in saturated fat and cholesterol, were treated according to NCEP-ATP II guidelines. Plasma lipids and lipoproteins were measured centrally before and after 16 weeks of treatment with 20 mg day-1 of pravastatin.

RESULTS

ApoE genotype distributions were 3.2% with varepsilon2/3, 73.1% with varepsilon3/3 and 22.4% with varepsilon3/4 or varepsilon4/4. ApoE genotype did not have any effect on baseline lipid levels except on triglycerides such that the carriers of the varepsilon2 allele had concentrations significantly greater than those subjects with varepsilon3/3 genotype and carriers of the varepsilon4 allele after adjustment for age, gender and body mass index (BMI) (P < 0.001). Once adjusted for age, gender, BMI and baseline lipid levels, the apoE polymorphism did not significantly influence the plasma lipid and lipoprotein response to pravastatin.

CONCLUSION

ApoE genotype appears not to influence the hypolipidaemic effect of pravastatin in patients monitored in a general outpatient setting.

Allelic polymorphism -491A/T in apo E gene modulates the lipid-lowering response in combined hyperlipidemia treatment

BACKGROUND

Combined hyperlipidemia (CHL) is one of the dyslipidemias more frequently found in clinical practice, and lipid-lowering drugs are often necessary in its management. Some genetic loci have been associated with CHL expression, and some studies have shown modulation of drugs efficiency in the treatment of dyslipidemias by genetic polymorphisms. We have investigated whether common polymorphisms and mutations in the apolipoprotein (apo) E, lipoprotein lipase (LPL), and apo CIII genes influence atorvastatin or bezafibrate responses in patients with CHL.

DESIGN

One hundred and sixteen subjects participating in the ATOMIX study (Atorvastatin in Mixed dyslipidemia) were randomized to treatment with either atorvastatin or bezafibrate. Apolipoprotein E genotype and common -491A/T and -219T/G polymorphisms in the apo E gene promoter region, Sst I polymorphism in the apo CIII gene (3238C/G), and D9N and N291S common mutations in the LPL gene were determined by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and restriction enzyme digestion.

RESULTS

Statistical analysis showed the influence of the -491A/T polymorphism in atorvastatin and bezafibrate treatments. Subjects carrying the -491T allele showed an increased LDL-cholesterol-lowering effect with atorvastatin compared with -491T allele noncarriers (-35% vs. -27%, P = 0.037). Subjects carrying the -491T allele, when on bezafibrate treatment, showed a lower triglyceride reduction compared with -491T allele noncarriers (-23% vs. -39%, P = 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

In our study, the -491A/T polymorphism in the apo E gene promoter region modulated the lipid-lowering efficiency of atorvastatin and bezafibrate in CHL patients. Such influence might explain some of the interindividual response variabilities observed for the two drugs, and could help in CHL management.

Influence of LDL receptor gene mutation and apo E polymorphism on lipoprotein response to simvastatin treatment among adolescents with heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia

The efficacy of the inhibitors of HMG CoA reductase shows considerable interindividual variation and intense research has focused in the recent years to identify the genetic loci and environmental factors responsible for this variability. A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial with simvastatin, an HMG CoA reductase inhibitor, was conducted in 63 adolescents (47 treated versus 17 controls) with heterozygous FH. The patients were grouped according to known low-density lipoprotein (LDL) receptor gene mutation class. After 6 weeks of treatment with 20 mg/d of simvastatin, the mean reduction in plasma LDL-cholesterol in patients with a receptor-negative mutation (n=33) was 39% whereas, in the receptor-defective mutation group (n=14), it was 31% (P=0.01). Multiple regression analyses showed that there was a significant association between the apo E polymorphism and LDL-cholesterol response to simvastatin only among heterozygotes for a receptor-negative mutation. In subjects carrying a receptor-defective mutation, however, we observed that 51% of the variability in LDL-cholesterol response was explained by variations in the dosage of simvastatin expressed in mg/kg/day (P=0.0028). There was no significant association between LDL-cholesterol response and the dosage of simvastatin among heterozygotes for a receptor-negative mutation. The results of the present study have shown that the contribution of apo E polymorphism and the dosage of simvastatin to the LDL-cholesterol responsiveness is influenced by the nature of the LDL receptor gene mutation.

Genetic diagnosis of familial hypercholesterolemia in a South European outbreed population: influence of low-density lipoprotein (LDL) receptor gene mutations on treatment response to simvastatin in total, LDL, and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol

The aims of this study were to examine the presence of mutations in the low-density lipoprotein receptor gene among subjects clinically diagnosed with familial hypercholesterolemia and to analyze whether the molecular diagnosis helps to predict the response to simvastatin treatment in our familial hypercholesterolemia population. Fifty-five probands and 128 related subjects with familial hypercholesterolemia were studied. Genetic diagnosis was carried out following a three-step protocol based on Southern blot and PCR-single strand conformational polymorphism analysis. A randomized clinical trial with simvastatin was conducted in 42 genetically diagnosed subjects with familial hypercholesterolemia classified as carriers of null mutations (n = 22) and of defective mutations (n = 20). A mutation-causing familial hypercholesterolemia was identified in 46 probands (84%). In 41 of them (89%), a total of 28 point mutations were detected, 13 of which have not been previously described. The remaining five probands (11%) were carriers of large rearrangements. Familial hypercholesterolemia with null mutations showed a poor response to simvastatin treatment. The mean percentage reduction of plasma total and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels in these subjects were significantly lower (24.8 +/- 10.3 vs. 34.8 +/- 10.9, P = 0.04 and 30.0 +/- 39.8 vs. 46.1 +/- 18.2, P = 0.02, respectively) than in subjects with defective mutations. Baseline and posttreatment high-density lipoprotein cholesterol plasma values were significantly lower in subjects with familial hypercholesterolemia with null mutations (P < 0.001). In an outbreed Caucasian population, a three-step protocol for genetic screening detected a mutation in the low-density lipoprotein receptor gene in a high percentage (84%) of subjects with familial hypercholesterolemia. Subjects with familial hypercholesterolemia with null mutations (class I) showed lower plasma high-density lipoprotein cholesterol values and a poor low-density lipoprotein cholesterol response to simvastatin treatment.

Effects of low-dose pravastatin on plasma levels of lipids and apolipoproteins in Japanese type II hyperlipoproteinemic subjects with apolipoprotein E phenotype E3/2, E3/3, and E4/3

Effects of 12 weeks of treatment with pravastatin at a dose of 20 mg/day were compared in subjects with type II hyperlipoproteinemia with apo+(lipoprotein) E phenotype E3/2, E3/3, and E4/3. There were no differences in age, body mass index, smoking status, complications, or plasma levels of lipids and apoproteins, except the higher levels of apo E in E3/2 subjects (n = 11) than in E3/3 subjects (n = 84) and E4/3 subjects (n = 28). Plasma levels of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) were reduced by 47% +/- 8% (mean +/- SD) in E3/2 subjects, 36% +/- 10% in E3/3 subjects, and 26% +/- 12% in E4/3 subjects after 12 weeks of treatment with pravastatin (all p < 0.0001). Plasma levels of apo B were decreased by 40% +/- 12% in E3/2 subjects, 27% +/- 10% in E3/3 subjects, and 18% +/- 14% in E4/3 subjects after 12 weeks of treatment with pravastatin (all p < 0.0001). The reduction in plasma levels of LDL-C and apo B was most marked in E3/2 subjects, next in E3/3 subjects, and smallest in E4/3 subjects. The authors conclude that treatment with pravastatin at a dose of 20 mg/day in Japanese subjects is equally effective as 40 mg/day in Western subjects, and apo Epolymorphism is a factor to determine the efficacy of pravastatin in Japanese subjects.

Apolipoprotein E genotype affects plasma lipid response to atorvastatin in a gender specific manner

The response to therapy with hypolipidemic agents shows considerable individual variation. These differences may be due to the interaction of environmental and genetic factors that affect drug bioavailability, receptor function or ligand structure. Our objective was to assess the effect of apolipoprotein (apo) E genotype and gender on lipid-lowering response to the HMG CoA reductase inhibitor, atorvastatin. Genotyping was carried out on DNA from 328 male and female subjects who participated in a multicentric, double-blind clinical trial, and received 10 mg/day of atorvastatin. Our data demonstrate no significant gender differences for LDL cholesterol levels at baseline. Moreover, mean LDL-C lowering was similar in men (-36.2%, range -2.7 to -57.8%) and in women (-38.1%, range -9.5 to -58.5%) as compared to baseline. However, men carrying the epsilon2 allele had a significantly higher mean LDL-C response (-44%) than epsilon3 homozygotes (-37%) and epsilon4 carriers (-34%); P=0.01 for apoE group by treatment interaction. No such gene/treatment interactions were noted in women, with those carrying the epsilon2 allele showing a similar mean response (-34%) as epsilon3 homozygotes (-39%) and epsilon4 carriers (-34%). Mean plasma triglyceride lowering with atorvastatin was 17%. A significant apoE group by treatment interaction (P=0.010) was also observed in men, with epsilon2 carriers being more responsive (-27%) than epsilon3/3 (-13%) and epsilon4 (-22%). This interaction was not observed in women. In summary, atorvastatin treatment had similar effects on plasma lipid levels in both men and women; however, the apoE gene locus was a significant predictor of LDL-C and TG responses to atorvastatin therapy in men, but not in women.

Determinants of lipid level variability in French-Canadian children with familial hypercholesterolemia

The wide variability in the biochemical expression of familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) is only partly explained by mutational heterogeneity in the low density lipoprotein receptor (LDLR) gene. In the current study, we measured this biochemical variability in a group of children heterozygous for the >15-kb LDLR gene deletion (n=67) and examined the contribution of apolipoprotein (apo) E and B allelic variations to this phenotypic variability. Variances of total cholesterol (TC), LDL-C, and apoB concentrations and of the ratio of TC to high density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) were increased in FH subjects compared with controls. However, after taking the means into account, the coefficients of variation showed that the variability of LDL-C and apoB concentrations was smaller for FH than for controls and that the variability of TC and of the ratio TC to HDL-C was similar between both groups. The epsilon2/3 genotype was associated with lower mean TC, LDL-C, and apoB concentrations in FH. The magnitude of this effect was smaller in controls than in FH. Indeed, the percentages of total variance of TC, LDL-C, and apoB attributable to the apoE locus were 19.9%, 18.1%, and 11.8%, respectively, in FH cases and 5.9%, 7.4%, and 6.0%, respectively, in controls. We did not detect any effect of the apoB insertion/deletion polymorphism on lipid traits in FH children. However, in controls, we observed a strong interaction between apoE and apoB genotypes on apoB concentrations and on TC to HDL-C ratios. Our study reemphasizes the important role of apoE in lipid metabolism and illustrates that the effects of allelic variations on lipid traits are context dependent.

Phenotype of apolipoprotein E influences the lipid metabolic response of postmenopausal women to hormone replacement therapy

OBJECTIVES

We investigated whether the phenotype of apolipoprotein E (apo E) would influence the response of postmenopausal Japanese women to hormone replacement therapy (HRT).

METHODS

We measured the plasma levels of lipoprotein and apolipoprotein in 242 postmenopausal women at baseline and again after 12 months of HRT. Patients were divided into three groups according to apo E phenotype: E2+ (E2/2 and E2/3, n=21), E3/3 (n=176), E4+ (E3/4 and E4/4, n=45).

RESULTS

We found that the E4+ group had the highest levels of total and low density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol and apolipoprotein B, being significantly higher than in the E2+ group at baseline. The plasma levels of total and LDL cholesterol showed a significant decrease only in the E2+ and E3/3 groups after 12 months of HRT (E2+ group, total cholesterol -8.9% and LDL cholesterol -21.5%; E3/3 group, total cholesterol -2.9% and LDL cholesterol -9.5%). No significant difference in the reduction of total and LDL cholesterol was found in the E4+ group. Other lipid parameters did not differ in the three groups.

CONCLUSIONS

These data show that the apo E phenotype influenced the response of lipid metabolism in postmenopausal women to HRT, especially in the reduction of LDL cholesterol. Therefore, apo E phenotyping may be important in predicting the cholesterol-lowering effect of HRT.

Determinants of Variable Response to Statin Treatment in Patients With Refractory Familial Hypercholesterolemia

Abstract —Interindividual variability in low density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol (LDL-C) response during treatment with statins is well documented but poorly understood. To investigate potential metabolic and genetic determinants of statin responsiveness, 19 patients with refractory heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia were sequentially treated with placebo, atorvastatin (10 mg/d), bile acid sequestrant, and the 2 combined, each for 4 weeks. Levels of LDL-C, mevalonic acid (MVA), 7-α-OH-4-cholesten-3-one, and leukocyte LDL receptor and hydroxymethylglutaryl coenzyme A reductase mRNA were determined after each treatment period. Atorvastatin (10 mg/d) reduced LDL-C by an overall mean of 32.5%. Above-average responders (ΔLDL-C −39.5%) had higher basal MVA levels (34.4±6.1 μmol/L) than did below-average responders (ΔLDL-C −23.6%, P <0.02; basal MVA 26.3±6.1 μmol/L, P <0.01). Fewer good responders compared with the poor responders had an apolipoprotein E4 allele (3 of 11 versus 6 of 8, respectively; P <0.05). There were no baseline differences between them in 7-α-OH-4-cholesten-3-one, hydroxymethylglutaryl coenzyme A reductase mRNA, or LDL receptor mRNA, but the latter increased in the good responders on combination therapy ( P <0.05). Severe mutations were not more common in poor than in good responders. We conclude that poor responders to statins have a low basal rate of cholesterol synthesis that may be secondary to a genetically determined increase in cholesterol absorption, possibly mediated by apolipoprotein E4. If so, statin responsiveness could be enhanced by reducing dietary cholesterol intake or inhibiting absorption.

The significance of genetic polymorphisms in modulating the response to lipid-lowering drugs

The response to lipid-lowering drugs is modified by a number of factors like age, gender, concomitant disease and genetic determinants. Even within homogenous groups of patients, individual responses vary greatly. Until now, no clinical or biochemical parameter exists which predicts whether a subject will respond well to a particular lipid-lowering drug or, in the extreme case, will develop adverse, life-threatening effects (e.g., myositis or rhabdomyolysis). The recent advances in the human genome project promises to have a great impact on our understanding of lipid and lipoprotein metabolism and of the individual response to lipid-lowering drugs. Monogenetic disorders of the lipid metabolism produce severe clinical phenotypes, such as Tangier disease, but have a minor role in the evaluation of cardiovascular risk in the general population. On the other hand, several polymorphisms in genes involved in lipoprotein metabolism (e.g., apolipoprotein E) are associated with the plasma levels of lipoproteins, explaining a substantial fraction of the variance of LDL or HDL concentrations. In combination, the knowledge of these polymorphisms, further variants yet to be discovered and variants within the genes involved in the metabolism of lipid-lowering drugs will in the future allow these drugs to be selected according to the patients needs and thus increase both efficacy and cost-effectiveness of lipid-lowering regimes.

Recent origin and spread of a common Lithuanian mutation, G197del LDLR, causing familial hypercholesterolemia: positive selection is not always necessary to account for disease incidence among Ashkenazi Jews

G197del is the most prevalent LDL receptor (LDLR) mutation causing familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) in Ashkenazi Jew (AJ) individuals. The purpose of this study was to determine the origin, age, and population distribution of G197del, as well as to explore environmental and genetic effects on disease expression. Index cases from Israel (n=46), South Africa (n=24), Russia (n=7), The Netherlands (n=1), and the United States (n=1) were enlisted. All trace their ancestry to Lithuania. A highly conserved haplotype (D19S221:104-D19S865:208-D19S413:74) was identified in G197del chromosomes, suggesting the occurrence of a common founder. When two methods were used for analysis of linkage disequilibrium (LD) between flanking polymorphic markers and the disease locus and for the study of the decay of LD over time, the estimated age of the deletion was found to be 20 +/- 7 generations (the 95% confidence interval is 15-26 generations), so that the most recent common ancestor of the mutation-bearing chromosomes would date to the 14th century. This corresponds with the founding of the Jewish community of Lithuania (1338 a.d.), as well as with the great demographic expansion of AJ individuals in eastern Europe, which followed this settlement. The penetrance of mutation-linked severe hypercholesterolemia is high (94% of heterozygotes have a baseline concentration of LDL cholesterol (LDL-C) that is >160 mg/dl), and no significant differences in the mean baseline lipid level of G197del carriers from different countries were found. Polymorphisms of apolipoprotein E and of scavenger-receptor class B type I were observed to have minor effects on the plasma lipid profile. With respect to determinative genetic influences on the biochemical phenotype, there is no evidence that could support the possibility of a selective evolutionary metabolic advantage. Therefore, the founder effect in a rapidly expanding population from a limited number of families remains a simple, parsimonious hypothesis explaining the spread of G197del-LDLR-linked FH in AJ individuals.

Fh-Souassi: a founder frameshift mutation in exon 10 of the LDL-receptor gene, associated with a mild phenotype in Tunisian families

Familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) has a higher prevalence in central Tunisia together with a milder clinical expression than in western countries. The molecular basis of FH in Tunisia remains unknown. Our aim was to identify FH-causing mutations in three unrelated families (21 subjects) from the area of Souassi (central Tunisia). In probands with a presentation of homozygous FH, the promoter and 18 exons of the low density lipoprotein (LDL)-receptor gene were sequenced in both orientations. A novel complex frameshift mutation was identified in exon 10, nucleotides 1477-1479 (TCT) at Serine 472 were replaced by an insertion of seven nucleotides (AGAGACA), producing a premature termination codon 43 amino acids downstream. Binding of 125I-labelled LDL at 4 degrees C to cultured fibroblasts from two probands showed <2% normal LDL-receptor activity. AvaII digestion of PCR amplified genomic DNA identified this unique mutation in all families; homozygotes n=11, heterozygotes n=10. All mutation carriers shared the same haplotype (7 RFLPs), suggesting that they had a common ancestor. Despite high plasma LDL levels (m=16.0+/-3.0 mmol/l) and extravascular cholesterol deposits, most homozygotes were diagnosed after puberty and had a delayed onset of cardiovascular complications. Moreover, most heterozygotes were free of clinical signs and had plasma LDL cholesterol in the normal range (4.7+/-1.3 mmol/l) without taking any lipid-lowering medication. This mild clinical phenotype which contrasted with the severity of the mutation, could not be explained by specific apolipoprotein E or lipoprotein lipase alleles.

[Influence of FH Valencia 1 and 2 mutations of the LDL receptor gene on the response to simvastatin in subjects with molecularly defined heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia in Spain]

BACKGROUND

To analyse whether the molecular diagnosis in FH patients is useful to predict the response to treatment with simvastatin in a south European population.

SUBJECTS AND METHOD

A randomised clinical trial with no control group, with 20 mg/day of simvastatin was conducted in 27 genetically diagnosed FH subjects (11 male) from 8 FH families, randomly selected from 30 FH families with a molecular diagnosis. Clinical features and lipid parameters at baseline and after simvastatin treatment were compared between subjects classified as null mutations (FH Valencia 1 and 2; n = 11) and defective mutations (n = 16).

RESULTS

FH with null mutations (FH Valencia 1 and 2) have a poor response to simvastatin treatment. The mean reduction of plasma LDLc levels in subjects with null mutations were significantly lower (32.6% [9.5] vs 42.8% [12.2]; p = 0.03) than in subjects with defective mutations. Baseline and after treatment plasma HDLc values were also significantly lower in FH group with null mutations. No statistically significant differences were found at baseline, after treatment and in the response to treatment between males and females.

CONCLUSIONS

FH subjects with null alleles (FH Valencia 1 and 2) showed a poor response to simvastatin treatment. The type of LDL receptor gene mutation could predict the response to simvastatin in our south European FH population.

Elevated baseline triglyceride levels modulate effects of HMGCoA reductase inhibitors on plasma lipoproteins

BACKGROUND

The response in levels of very-low-density (VLDL) and low-density (LDL) lipoproteins varies substantially among hyperlipidemic patients during treatment with HMGCoA reductase inhibitors. Apolipoprotein E genotype and gender are known to contribute to the regulation of steady state levels of plasma lipoproteins. This study explores the effect of these and other potential determinants of the response of VLDL and LDL to treatment with reductase inhibitors.

METHODS

Using mixed linear statistical models, the response of lipoprotein lipid values was studied in 142 hyperlipidemic individuals who were treated with reductase inhibitors. Patients received one or more of the following drugs individually for a total of 623 treatment observations: lovastatin, pravastatin, simvastatin, or atorvastatin. For evaluation of the effects of treatment in the aggregate, actual doses were expressed as equivalent doses of atorvastatin, using factors based on random assignment comparisons in 16 reported studies. The analysis factors considered were apolipoprotein E genotype, baseline average triglycerides >170 mg/dL (vs less), and gender.

RESULTS

Presence of an apo epsilon4 allele was associated with a trend toward greater reduction of triglyceride levels and a diminished ability of the reductase inhibitors to reduce LDL cholesterol levels. Gender had only minimal effect on the response of either LDL cholesterol or triglycerides. However, the effect of elevated baseline triglycerides on the response of both triglycerides and LDL cholesterol was striking and was exerted in opposite directions. The triglyceride-lowering effect of reductase inhibitors was greater in patients with initial triglyceride levels above 170 mg/dL (P=0.0001). The effect was even greater in patients with initial triglyceride levels over 250 mg/dL (P=0.015). Conversely, for LDL cholesterol levels, elevated baseline triglycerides were associated with a significantly decreased response to the drugs (P=0.0015).

CONCLUSIONS

These findings indicate that baseline triglyceride levels are an important predictor of response of plasma lipoproteins to HMGCoA reductase inhibitors, perhaps reflecting fundamental differences in mechanism underlying the hyperlipidemic phenotype.

APO E gene and gene-environment effects on plasma lipoprotein-lipid levels

Apolipoprotein E (apo E) is important in plasma lipid metabolism and is a component of several plasma lipoprotein-lipid particles. Three major apo E isoforms are encoded by three common alleles at the APO E locus. The E2 allele is associated with lower and the E4 allele with higher total plasma cholesterol and LDL cholesterol levels compared with the E3 allele. Available data generally indicate that APO E2, and possibly E3, genotype individuals reduce plasma total and low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol levels more than APO E4 individuals with statin therapy. Some evidence also indicates that APO E2 individuals are more likely to respond favorably to gemfibrozil and cholestyramine. On the other hand, it appears that with probucol, APO E4 genotype individuals may improve plasma lipoprotein-lipid profiles more than APO E3 individuals. APO E2 and E3 genotype perimenopausal women appear to improve plasma lipoprotein-lipid profiles more with hormone replacement therapy than APO E4 women. On the other hand, low-fat diet interventions tend to reduce plasma LDL cholesterol and, perhaps, plasma total cholesterol levels more in APO E4 than in APO E2 or E3 individuals. Both cross-sectional and longitudinal studies generally indicate that APO E2 and E3 individuals improve plasma lipoprotein-lipid profiles more with exercise training than APO E4 individuals. Although these data are hardly definitive, they lend strong support for the possibility that in the near future individuals will be directed to what might be their optimal therapy for improving plasma lipoprotein-lipid profiles and cardiovascular disease risk based partially on APO E genotype.

Apolipoprotein E genotypes and response of plasma lipids and progression-regression of coronary atherosclerosis to lipid-lowering drug therapy

OBJECTIVES

We sought to examine the association of apolipoprotein (apo) E genotypes with baseline plasma lipid levels and severity of coronary artery disease (CAD), as well as the response to treatment with fluvastatin in the Lipoprotein and Coronary Atherosclerosis Study (LCAS).

BACKGROUND

Apo E genotypes have been associated with plasma lipid levels and CAD. However, the influence of apo E genotypes on the response of plasma lipids and CAD progression or regression to statin treatment in patients with mildly to moderately elevated cholesterol remains unknown.

METHODS

Apo E genotypes were determined by polymerase chain reaction and restriction mapping. Plasma lipids were measured at baseline and 12 weeks after therapy with fluvastatin or placebo in 320 subjects. In 287 subjects, quantitative coronary angiography was performed at baseline and after 2.5 years of treatment.

RESULTS

Subjects with the 3/3 genotype had greater reductions in total cholesterol (20.4% vs. 15.4%, p = 0.01) and low density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol (28.8% vs. 22.7%, p = 0.03) than did the subjects with the 3/4 or 4/4 genotype. In contrast, subjects with the 2/3 genotype (n = 10) had a greater increase in high density lipoprotein cholesterol (19.1%) than did the subjects with the 3/3 genotype (4.3%, p = 0.002) and those with the 3/4 or 4/4 genotype (7.0%, p = 0.02). Subjects with the 3/4 or 4/4 genotype had an increased frequency of previous angioplasty, but other measures of baseline CAD severity and baseline lipids did not differ significantly among the genotypes, nor did CAD progression or clinical events.

CONCLUSIONS

Although subjects with the epsilon4 allele had less reduction in LDL cholesterol with fluvastatin, they had similar benefit in terms of CAD progression.

Apolipoprotein E polymorphisms and concentration in chronic diseases and drug responses

Apolipoprotein (apo) E is an important circulating and tissue protein involved in cholesterol homeostasis and many other functions. The common polymorphism in the coding region of the gene, four polymorphisms in the promoter region, other additional single nucleotide polymorphisms, as well as several apo E variants have been identified. The common coding polymorphism strongly influences the lipid metabolism and the circulating concentration of apo E itself. This polymorphism is at the origin of the implication of apo E in cardiovascular and neurodegenerative diseases, but also of the relation of apo E with longevity. Probably due to its many metabolic and functional consequences, apo E polymorphism has been shown to influence the responses of patients to several drugs (fibrates, statins, hormone replacement therapy, anti-Alzheimer drugs) or environmental interventions (black tea, alcohol, diet). Apo E genotyping may be clinically helpful in defining the risk of patients and their responses to therapeutics. Finally, circulating apo E concentration appears to be altered in diseases and can be modulated by some of the drugs cited above. This parameter can thus also give interesting clinical information and could be a therapeutic target, providing it is validated. At the present time, we cannot exclude that apo E concentration may be the most prominent apo E parameter to be considered in health and disease, while apo E polymorphisms would represent only secondary parameters influencing apo E concentration.

A functional polymorphism in the promoter region of the microsomal triglyceride transfer protein (MTP -493G/T) influences lipoprotein phenotype in familial hypercholesterolemia

The microsomal triglyceride transfer protein (MTP) has a key function in intracellular apolipoprotein (apo) B lipidation and secretion of very low density lipoprotein (VLDL). A recently discovered functional polymorphism in the promoter of the MTP gene (-493G/T) affects the plasma concentration of low density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol and the VLDL distribution between large and small particle species in healthy men. This phenotype is likely to be explained by an effect on VLDL synthesis. Against this background, we studied the effect of the MTP-493G/T polymorphism in a large cohort (217 men and 211 women) with heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia (FH). A 40% to 50% lower serum triglyceride level was observed in homozygous carriers of the MTP-493 T allele (T/T, 0.93+/-0.34; G/T, 1.54+/-1.40; and G/G, 1.56+/-1.24 mmol/L; T/T vs G/T P=0.04, T/T vs G/G P=0.02). In contrast to the situation in healthy subjects, the MTP promoter polymorphism did not have a significant effect on the LDL cholesterol levels in FH subjects, although the same trend was observed (T/T, 7.31+/-1.87; G/T, 7. 80+/-2.12; and G/G, 7.91+/-2.31 mmol/L, NS). Adjustment for the apo E gene polymorphism by inclusion of subjects homozygous for the apo E3 allele only revealed a reciprocal high density lipoprotein cholesterol-elevating effect (T/T, 1.41+/-0.73; G/T, 1.18+/-0.27; and G/G, 1.16+/-0.29 mmol/L; T/T vs G/T P=0.06, T/T vs G/G P=0.04). This effect seemed to be sex-specific because it was accounted for by the female patients. In conclusion, the LDL cholesterol-lowering effect of the rare MTP gene promoter variant (MTP-493T) present in healthy subjects is shifted to a triglyceride-lowering effect in FH. These data suggest that the MTP gene has a role in modulating the clinical phenotype of FH.

Treatment of dyslipidemia: genetic interactions with diet and drug therapy

Coronary heart disease (CHD) is multifactorial, and its manifestation is determined by multiple gene loci and their interaction with a cohort of environmental factors. Variation at several candidate gene loci has already been shown to have a significant effect over the spectrum of plasma lipid levels observed in the population. Moreover, some variants are known to influence the interindividual variability in response to dietary and pharmacologic interventions aimed to reduce atherogenic lipoproteins. The continuous progress in this area of research is getting us closer to the development of genetic screening panels that will allow a more precise assessment of individual CHD risk and response to therapeutic interventions.

The type of mutation in the low density lipoprotein receptor gene influences the cholesterol-lowering response of the HMG-CoA reductase inhibitor simvastatin in patients with heterozygous familial hypercholesterolaemia

In a genetically heterogeneous group of 109 patients with a clinical diagnosis of heterozygous familial hypercholesterolaemia (FH), the influence of gender, apolipoprotein (apo) E genotype and the type of molecular defect in the LDL-receptor (LDLR) gene on the reduction of plasma LDL-cholesterol levels to treatment with a HMG-CoA reductase inhibitor (simvastatin) were studied. Response was determined as the percentage fall in LDL-cholesterol from untreated levels and as the proportion of patients where levels fell below 4.9 or 4.1 mmol/l. Of the patients, 86 individuals had tendon xanthomata (TX+) and a diagnosis of 'definite' FH and these individuals presented with a significantly higher untreated LDL-cholesterol compared to the 23 individuals who did not have xanthomas (TX-) and a diagnosis of 'probable' FH (8.14+/-0.19 vs. 6.81+/-0.25, P= 0.001). Overall, HMG-CoA reductase inhibitor doses of 10, 20 or 40 mg/day resulted in a significant fall of LDL-cholesterol levels of 29, 39 and 49%, but at all doses those with TX had significantly higher levels than those without, and significantly fewer TX + patients achieved LDL-cholesterol levels below 4.9 or 4.1 mmol/l than the TX - group (P < 0.05 at each dose). In the TX+ group the response to treatment was of similar magnitude in men and women and in patients with different apoE genotype. In the 'probable' FH probands only three mutations were identified (detection rate 13%), one in the LDLR gene and two in the APOB gene, a detection rate significantly lower (P= 0.02) than in the 'definite' FH probands where 28 mutations were detected (detection rate 37%). In the TX + patients where no mutation was detected, treatment resulted in a greater proportion achieving LDL-cholesterol levels below 4.9 and 4.1 mmol/l compared to those with any LDLR mutation, this difference was close to statistical significance at the 4.9 mmol/l threshold at 10 mg/day (41 vs. 13%, P = 0.058). For the 14 patients with an LDLR mutation that was predicted to be 'severe', fewer achieved LDL-cholesterol levels below 4.9 or 4.1 mmol/l at each dosage compared to the 16 individuals with 'mild' mutations, and this difference was statistically significant at the maximal dosage of 40 mg/day (P = 0.018). Thus although characterisation of the molecular defect in FH patients may not be relevant to their immediate clinical management, those with a particular mutation may need more aggressive lipid-lowering treatment to reach LDL-cholesterol levels recommended to reduce the risk of coronary heart disease (CHD).

Association of specific LDL receptor gene mutations with differential plasma lipoprotein response to simvastatin in young French Canadians with heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia

In familial hypercholesterolemia (FH), the efficacy of the inhibitors of 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A (HMG-CoA) reductase shows considerable interindividual variation, and several genetic and environmental factors can contribute to explaining this variability. A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial with simvastatin, an HMG-CoA reductase inhibitor, was conducted in 63 children and adolescents with heterozygous FH. The patients were grouped according to known LDL receptor genotype. After 6 weeks of treatment with 20 mg/d simvastatin, the mean reduction in plasma LDL cholesterol in patients with the W66G mutation (n=14) was 31%, whereas in the deletion>15 kb (n=23) and the C646Y mutation groups (n=10), it was 38% and 42%, respectively (P<0.05). After treatment with simvastatin, HDL cholesterol levels were increased in all groups, and triglyceride concentrations were significantly reduced. Multiple regression analyses suggested that 42% of the variation of the LDL cholesterol response to simvastatin can be attributed to variation in the mutant LDL receptor locus, apolipoprotein E genotype, and body mass index, while 35% of the variation in HDL cholesterol response was explained by sex and baseline HDL cholesterol. These results show that simvastatin was an effective and well-tolerated therapy for FH in the pediatric population for all LDL receptor gene mutations. Moreover, the nature of LDL receptor gene mutations and other genetic and constitutional factors play a significant role in predicting the efficacy of simvastatin in the treatment of FH in children and adolescents.

Lack of interaction of apolipoprotein E phenotype with the lipoprotein response to lovastatin or gemfibrozil in patients with primary hypercholesterolemia

The magnitude of serum lipid changes in response to hypolipidemic drugs varies considerably between individuals. These differences may be due to interactions between genetic and environmental factors that effect drug bioavailability or the capacity of the lipid-regulating enzyme and receptor targets to be affected. The apolipoprotein E (apoE) gene locus has been examined in this regard, but reports are conflicting on the effect of its variability on the response to hypolipidemic drugs. We investigated the effect of apoE polymorphism on the serum lipid response to the hepatic hydroxymethyl glutaryl coenzyme A (HMG CoA) reductase inhibitor lovastatin and the fibric acid derivative gemfibrozil. Lipoprotein changes were assessed after 12 weeks of therapy in 106 patients with primary hypercholesterolemia and combined hyperlipidemia treated with lovastastin and in 63 given gemfibrozil therapy. No significant effect of the apoE phenotypes E3/2, E3/3, or E4/3 on the heterogeneity of lipid responses to either drug was found.

Serum lipids and apolipoprotein E phenotypes in identical twins reared apart

Lipid and lipoprotein metabolism is controlled by genes, the environment and the gene environment interaction. We studied monozygotic twin pairs reared apart (MZA) and an age sex matched group of twins reared together (MZT) to evaluate the effects of the genotype and the rearing environment on lipids. The intraclass correlations for low density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol were 0.21 and 0.50 for the MZA and MZT groups, respectively, suggesting that the rearing environment possibly had an impact on the variability in LDL cholesterol later in life. The intraclass correlations for total cholesterol (0.26 and 0.47 for the MZA and MZT groups, respectively) reflected those for LDL cholesterol. The intraclass correlations for high density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol did not show any difference between the twin groups, suggesting that the rearing environment does not have major long-term effects on the variability of HDL levels. The intrapair differences for LDL cholesterol were smallest in the twins heterozygous for the apolipoprotein E allele epsilon2 (E2/3 and E2/4 phenotypes), intermediate in the pairs with the common E3/3 phenotype and enhanced in the pairs with E4/3 phenotype. To conclude, these data suggest that the rearing environment may play a role in the variability of LDL cholesterol levels, although variance difference between MZAs and MZTs, and the small number of available monozygotic twins reared apart limits the generalizability of the results.

Apolipoprotein E genotype and cholesterogenesis in polygenic hypercholesterolemia

We studied 22 normal-weight patients with polygenic hypercholesterolemia (PH), of which 11 (two males and nine females) had the apolipoprotein (apo) E3/4 genotype and 11 (one male and 10 females) the E3/3 genotype. The two groups were comparable for age, body mass index, total and low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol levels. The diagnosis of PH was made on the basis of clinical assessment, the criteria being type IIa hypercholesterolemia without tendon xanthomas and/or family history and clinical criteria indicative of familial hypercholesterolemia and/or familial combined hyperlipidemia. To avoid the influence of the habitual individual diet on cholesterogenesis, daily urinary mevalonic acid (MVA) excretion, an index of whole-body cholesterol synthesis, was evaluated in the steady-state condition while patients were on a low-fat, low-cholesterol diet for at least 3 months. Urinary MVA excretion rates were 2.52 +/- 0.8 micromol/24 h in E3/4 patients, significantly higher (P < .001) than in E3/3 patients (1.38 +/- 0.6 micromol/24 h). This is the first evidence of a higher rate of cholesterogenesis in PH patients carrying the epsilon4 allele versus the epsilon3 allele under a standardized lipid-lowering diet. We conclude that the higher rate of cholesterogenesis in PH patients with the epsilon4 allele might partly explain the interindividual differences in response to treatment with cholesterol synthesis inhibitors such as statins.

Phenotypic presentation of the FH-Cincinnati type 5 low density lipoprotein receptor mutation

Familial hypercholesterolaemia (FH) is an autosomal dominant hereditary disease of lipid metabolism that in most families is caused by mutations in the low density lipoprotein receptor (LDLR) gene. Though more than 150 mutations are known, the clinical picture associated with most of these is not known. Genetic FH diagnosis may soon become routine in the setting of genetic counselling, and therefore thorough information on the phenotype-genotype relationship of different mutations is now important. In this study, index patients from each of 14 Danish FH families were screened for mutations in exon 2 of the LDLR gene using a denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis (DGGE)-based mutation screening assay. A deviating DGGE pattern identified two index patients, where subsequent sequencing revealed heterozygosity for the FH Cincinnati type 5 Trp23-to-Stop LDLR mutation. Data from three generations of the families allowed the first clinical and biochemical description of this mutation. Evidence that genetic analysis adds independent diagnostic information compared to traditional clinical/biochemical FH diagnosis was documented by demonstrating the presence of the FH Cincinnati mutation in a family member with a completely normal lipid profile. By comparison to non-FH family members, it was documented that carrier status for the FH Cincinnati mutation is associated with a significant risk of cardiovascular disease. Thus, genetic analysis may improve diagnostic precision and help to define more precisely which of the members of FH families are in need of preventive interventions and may aid in establishing phenotype-genotype relationships allowing more refined genetic counselling in FH.

Plasma mevalonic acid, an index of cholesterol synthesis in vivo, and responsiveness to HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors in familial hypercholesterolaemia

Fasting plasma mevalonic acid (MVA), an indicator of in vivo cholesterol synthesis, was measured in 35 patients with familial hypercholesterolaemia (FH) of whom 7 were treated with pravastatin 10-40 mg/day, 7 with simvastatin 10-40 mg/day and 21 with atorvastatin 80 mg/day. Reductions in low density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol and MVA on maximal dose therapy differed significantly between the three drugs: 34.7%, 42.9% and 54.0% (P = 0.0001), and 31.6%, 48.9% and 58.8% (P = 0.004), respectively. Patients on atorvastatin were subdivided according to whether their reduction in LDL cholesterol on treatment was above or below the mean percentage change for the whole group. Basal values of LDL cholesterol did not differ significantly, but above average responders had a significantly higher mean pre-treatment level of MVA (6.2 +/- 0.60 vs. 4.3 +/- 0.61 ng/ml, P < 0.05) than below average responders. When all three drug groups were pooled above average responders showed a significantly greater absolute decrease in MVA on treatment than below average responders (3.85 +/- 0.48 vs. 2.33 +/- 0.40 ng/ml, P < 0.05). However, there was no significant correlation between the magnitude of the decreases in LDL cholesterol and MVA. These findings suggest that FH patients who responded well to statins had a higher basal level of plasma MVA, i.e. a higher rate of cholesterol synthesis, which was more susceptible to pharmacological inhibition. The more marked cholesterol lowering effect of atorvastatin 80 mg/day presumably reflects, at least in part, its ability to inhibit HMG-CoA reductase to a greater extent than maximal recommended doses of pravastatin and simvastatin of 40 mg/day.

Is responsiveness to lovastatin in familial hypercholesterolaemia heterozygotes influenced by the specific mutation in the low-density lipoprotein receptor gene?

Lovastatin is one of the most commonly used lipid-lowering drugs in familial hypercholesterolaemia (FH) heterozygotes. In order to study whether the response to lovastatin is influenced by the underlying mutation in the low-density lipoprotein (LDL) receptor gene, the authors compared the response in 24 heterozygotes in whom the mutation has been classified and in 34 heterozygotes in whom the mutation has not been classified. Those possessing a classified mutation had significantly higher pre-trial values of LDL-cholesterol than those possessing an unclassified mutation. However, no difference was found in the response to lovastatin. Nor were there any differences in the response between subjects possessing one of the three different classified mutations. Furthermore, irrespective of whether or not the mutation had been classified, no difference in the response was found between subjects in the upper and lower quartile with respect to pre-trial values of LDL-cholesterol. The authors conclude that the response to lovastatin is independent of both the specific mutation in the LDL receptor gene and the actual cholesterol level in FH heterozygotes.

Effect of apolipoprotein E and A-IV phenotypes on the low density lipoprotein response to HMG CoA reductase inhibitor therapy

Our purpose was to assess the effect of apolipoprotein (apo) E and apo A-IV isoform variation on low density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol lowering response to the HMG CoA reductase inhibitor, pravastatin. Plasma samples were obtained from participants (apo E, n = 97; apo A-IV, n = 144) in the PLAC-I (Pravastatin Limitation of Atherosclerosis in Coronary Arteries Study-1). The mean LDL cholesterol reduction in these subjects who were randomized to pravastatin 40 mg/day was 28%. Subjects with the APOE*2 allele (n = 12) had significantly (P = 0.04) greater reductions at 36% than subjects homozygous for the APOE*3 allele (n = 66, 27%) or those with the APOE*4 allele (n = 19, 26%). No significant effect of apo A-IV phenotype on LDL cholesterol lowering in response to pravastatin was noted. A meta-analysis utilizing published data from 4 previously published studies as well as our own data with a total sample size of 625 subjects was carried out. This analysis indicates that the presence of the APOE*2 allele was associated with a significantly greater (P < 0.05) LDL-cholesterol lowering response at 37% than those subjects homozygous for the APOE*3 allele at 35%, while those with the APOE*4 allele had a significantly lower response (P < 0.05), at 33%. These data are consistent with the concept that apo E phenotype modulates the LDL cholesterol lowering response observed with the use of HMG CoA reductase inhibitors.

Treatment of patients with familial defective apolipoprotein B-100 with pravastatin and gemfibrozil: a two-period cross-over study

Thirty patients with familial defective apolipoprotein B-100 were treated in a two-period (8 weeks each) cross-over study with pravastatin and gemfibrozil. Cholesterol, LDL cholesterol, and apo B were reduced by 20-25% (P < 10(-4)) by pravastatin and by 4-6% by gemfibrozil (pravastatin vs. gemfibrozil: P < 10(-4)). Response to pravastatin was variable and not correlated to gender, age, or apo E genotype. Gemfibrozil lowered triglycerides by 25% (P < 10(-4)) and raised HDL cholesterol by 11%. The effects of pravastatin on these two interrelated variables were significantly smaller. Both drugs increased Lp(a) significantly by about 10%. The LDL cholesterol lowering effect of pravastatin in patients with FDB is similar to that observed in patients with familial hypercholesterolemia.

Effect of insulin resistance, apoE2 allele, and smoking on combined hyperlipidemia

Combined hyperlipidemia may result from the interaction of several metabolic and environmental factors. We explored to what extent fasting insulin concentration, apolipoprotein (apo) E2 frequency, and cigarette smoking explained the serum levels of triglyceride and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) in patients with combined hyperlipidemia. Forty-nine untreated patients with combined hyperlipidemia were compared with 49 hypercholesterolemic patients who were matched for gender, age, and body mass index. All laboratory values were obtained after 9 weeks of standardized dietary intake and after an overnight fast. The patients with combined hyperlipidemia had a significantly higher (33 pmol/L, 50%) mean insulin concentration than matched hypercholesterolemic control subjects, indicating that the combined hyperlipidemic patients were more insulin resistant. However, the differences in the fasting insulin and triglyceride concentrations within the pairs were only slightly correlated (adjusted r = .29). The combined hyperlipidemic patients were also characterized by a higher frequency of apoE2 alleles (25% versus 6%) and smokers (41% versus 16%). In a matched multiple linear regression model, the differences in insulin concentration, apoE2 allele frequency, and smoking explained 12%, 8%, and 9%, respectively, of the mean paired difference in triglyceride concentration. The differences in insulin concentration or apoE2 allele frequency did not significantly explain the mean paired difference in HDL-C concentration, whereas smoking explained 17% of the difference. In conclusion, fasting insulin concentration, the presence of the apoE2 allele, and smoking may explain 30% of the hypertriglyceridemia and the low levels of HDL-C in nonobese patients with combined hyperlipidemia.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)