Effect of Bempedoic Acid vs Placebo Added to Maximally Tolerated Statins on Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol in Patients at High Risk for Cardiovascular Disease: The CLEAR Wisdom Randomized Clinical Trial

IMPORTANCE

Additional treatment options are needed for patients who do not achieve sufficient reduction in low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) level with available lipid-lowering therapies.

OBJECTIVE

To assess the efficacy of bempedoic acid vs placebo in patients at high cardiovascular risk receiving maximally tolerated lipid-lowering therapy.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

Phase 3, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial conducted at 91 clinical sites in North America and Europe from November 2016 to September 2018, with a final date of follow-up of September 22, 2018. A total of 779 patients with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease, heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia, or both met randomization criteria, which included LDL-C level 70 mg/dL (1.8 mmol/L) or greater while receiving maximally tolerated lipid-lowering therapy.

INTERVENTIONS

Patients were randomized 2:1 to treatment with bempedoic acid (180 mg) (n = 522) or placebo (n = 257) once daily for 52 weeks.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

The primary end point was percent change from baseline in LDL-C level at week 12. Secondary measures included changes in levels of lipids, lipoproteins, and biomarkers.

RESULTS

Among 779 randomized patients (mean age, 64.3 years; 283 women [36.3%]), 740 (95.0%) completed the trial. At baseline, mean LDL-C level was 120.4 (SD, 37.9) mg/dL. Bempedoic acid lowered LDL-C levels significantly more than placebo at week 12 (-15.1% vs 2.4%, respectively; difference, -17.4% [95% CI, -21.0% to -13.9%]; P < .001). Significant reductions with bempedoic acid vs placebo were observed at week 12 for non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (-10.8% vs 2.3%; difference, -13.0% [95% CI, -16.3% to -9.8%]; P < .001), total cholesterol (-9.9% vs 1.3%; difference, -11.2% [95% CI, -13.6% to -8.8%]; P < .001), apolipoprotein B (-9.3% vs 3.7%; difference, -13.0% [95% CI, -16.1% to -9.9%]; P < .001), and high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (median, -18.7% vs -9.4%; difference, -8.7% [asymptotic confidence limits, -17.2% to -0.4%]; P = .04). Common adverse events included nasopharyngitis (5.2% vs 5.1% with bempedoic acid and placebo, respectively), urinary tract infection (5.0% vs 1.9%), and hyperuricemia (4.2% vs 1.9%).

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

Among patients at high risk for cardiovascular disease receiving maximally tolerated statins, the addition of bempedoic acid compared with placebo resulted in a significant lowering of LDL-C level over 12 weeks. Further research is needed to assess the durability and clinical effect as well as long-term safety.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02991118.

Treatment of a high cardiovascular risk patient with McArdle's disease with PCSK9 inhibitors

A 60-year-old male with familial combined hyperlipidemia, ischemic heart disease and type 2 diabetes. Since childhood, intolerance to intense exercise. The patient was diagnosed of McArdle's disease after an episode of rhabdomyolysis associated with statins as treatment after a myocardial infarction. Since then, he had been treated with diet, fibrates and ezetimibe with good tolerance, despite this, LDL cholesterol (cLDL) remained >180mg/dl. He started to be treated with alirocumab 150mg/sc every 14 days, with excellent clinical response and a decrease in cLDL to 15mg/dl. Our case shows that PCSK9 inhibitors are effective and safe in patients with muscle diseases who have statin contraindication, and they are a good therapeutic tool for these patients.

[LDL-cholesterol control in patients with genetic dyslipidemia followed up by Lipid and Vascular Risk Units of the Spanish Society of Arteriosclerosis]

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol (LDLc) achieved in patients with genetic dyslipidemia treated during one year in Lipid and Vascular Risk Units (LVRU) of the Spanish Society of Arteriosclerosis (SSA).

DESIGN

Observational, longitudinal, retrospective, multicenter national study that included consecutive patients of both sexes over 18 years of age referred due to dyslipidemia to LVRU of the SSA. Information was collected from medical records corresponding to two visits in the lipid unit.

RESULTS

A total of 527 patients (mean age 48 years, 60.0% men) diagnosed with genetic dyslipidemia (241 with heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia, and 286 with familial combined hyperlipidemia) were included. The mean follow-up was 12.9 months. In the last visit, 94% were taking statins, one third combined with ezetimibe, although only 41% were taking a high-intensity hypolipidemic treatment. Overall, 28.5% of patients attained an LDLc level<100 mg/dL, 35.8% decreased their LDLc by >50%, and 53.8% achieved one of the two. Predictors of target LDLc levels in the multivariate analysis were age, smoking habit and the presence of vascular disease.

CONCLUSION

Over half of the patients with genetic dyslipidemia followed up by LVRU of SSA achieve LDLc objectives after one year of follow-up. The use of high-intensity hypolipidemic treatment could improve these results.

Rosuvastatin: a highly potent statin for the prevention and management of coronary artery disease

Since the identification of a fungal metabolite that inhibits HMG-CoA reductase in 1976, statins have emerged rapidly as the global leader in pharmacotherapeutics designed to lower low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C). In conjunction, practice guidelines have recommended increasingly aggressive measures to improve coronary heart disease (CHD) outcomes by lowering LDL-C. By virtue of unique chemical characteristics, enhanced binding thermodynamics and limited cytochrome P450 3A4 metabolism, rosuvastatin calcium has a safety profile in line with currently marketed statins, but a different efficacy profile. Mirroring this chemical profile, the GALAXY program represents a comprehensive evaluation of the efficacy, safety and cost-effectiveness of rosuvastatin in individuals representing various clinical diagnoses, pathophysiological states and ethnicities. Also results from the Justification for the Use of statins in Primary prevention: an Intervention Trial Evaluating Rosuvastatin (JUPITER) study could provide further evidence for the use of rosuvastatin in individuals with traditional and emerging CHD risk factors, such as an elevated high sensitivity C-reactive protein level. This review will provide a comprehensive evaluation of the chemistry, clinical efficacy, safety and tolerability of rosuvastatin, and discuss the future role in the management of CHD and atherosclerosis.

[Dyslipidemia - when are lipid lowering medications useful in clinical practice?]

Dyslipidemia is one of the main modifiable cardiovascular risk factors. There is strong evidence for the efficacy of lipid-lowering drugs in secondary prevention, as well as in primary prevention for patients at high cardiovascular risk. In primary prevention, indication for lipid-lowering interventions should be based on an individual assessment of the cardiovascular risk and on the LDL cholesterol level, despite less strong evidence for the efficacy of drug-based interventions in low risk patients. Treatment consists of statins, as well as lifestyle modifications such as body weight control and increased physical exercise. The latter constitute the primary intervention in patients at low cardiovascular risk. Secondary dyslipidemias due to an underlying medical condition and familial dyslipidemias such as Familial Hypercholesterolemia and Familial Combined Hyperlipidemia should be identified and treated accordingly, taking into account that the risk scoring systems are not appropriate in these situations.

Increased appearance rate of 27-hydroxycholesterol in vivo in hypercholesterolemia: a possible compensatory mechanism

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

The first step in the alternative pathway of bile acid biosynthesis is the 27-hydroxylation of cholesterol, which takes place both in liver and extrahepatic tissues. This pathway is believed to play a role in peripheral cholesterol degradation. Aim of this study was to investigate the impact of hyperlipidemia on 27-hydroxycholesterol appearance rate, and to assess the effects induced by treatment with statins.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Seven patients with familial hypercholesterolemia and eight patients with familial combined hyperlipidemia underwent determination of 27-hydroxylation rates in vivo by i.v. infusion of deuterated 27-hydroxycholesterol. Isotope enrichment was assayed by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry, allowing to calculate 27-hydroxycholesterol appearance rates. Six normocholesterolemic subjects were regarded as controls. In some hypercholesterolemic patients the infusions were repeated during treatment with atorvastatin or rosuvastatin. Hydroxylation rates were higher in hypercholesterolemic patients (8.7 ± 2.5 mg/h; controls, 3.4 ± 2.0 mg/h; combined hyperlipidemia, 4.4 ± 1.6 mg/h; mean ± SD, P < 0.01 vs both). After statin treatment, both plasma cholesterol levels and hydroxylation rates dropped by nearly 50%. No difference was detectable between the two statins. A linear correlation was shown between plasma cholesterol and 27-hydroxylation rates.

CONCLUSION

Hypercholesterolemia associates with increased 27-hydroxycholesterol appearance rates, which decrease during hypocholesterolemic treatment. The correlation with cholesterol levels supports the view that 27-hydroxylation may act as a compensatory mechanism in a condition of larger plasma cholesterol pool. A regulatory role for hepatic and extrahepatic nuclear receptors seems reasonable. These data prompt novel pharmacological approaches for the management of hypercholesterolemia and the prevention of atherosclerosis.

[Dyslipidemia: news in diagnosis and drug therapy]

Plasma lipid levels are to a large extent determined by genetic factors. In its more extreme forms this is manifested as familial hyperlipidemias, which are an important cause of premature coronary heart disease. It has been demonstrated that rigorous treatment of familial forms reduces the burden of ischemic heart disease. Statins are among the most studied drugs in cardiovascular prevention; a number of large-scale clinical trials have demonstrated that statins substantially reduce cardiovascular morbidity and mortality in both primary and secondary prevention. The currently available evidence suggests that the clinical benefit is largely independent of the type of statin, but depends on the extent of LDL-C lowering. When the most potent statins are insufficient, LDL-C apheresis should be used.

Novel drugs in familial combined hyperlipidemia: lessons from type 2 diabetes mellitus

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Familial combined hyperlipidemia (FCHL) and type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) are prevalent entities that share many features of the metabolic syndrome. Recent findings suggest that FCHL and T2DM are less distinct than initially anticipated, which could offer new insights for their therapeutic approach.

RECENT FINDINGS

Genetic association studies have provided evidence for a common genetic background (upstream transcription factor 1, activating transcription factor 6, transcription factor 7-like 2 and hepatocyte nuclear factor 4 alpha) between FCHL and T2DM. The metabolic overlap can be illustrated by the presence of ectopic fat accumulation and insulin resistance (muscle, adipose tissue and liver). We have shown that FCHL patients are at increased risk to develop T2DM. This indicates that both entities are not static, but instead the former is able to migrate to the latter as insulin resistance progresses. Given these new findings, it can be anticipated that FCHL patients could also benefit from insulin-sensitizing therapy such as pioglitazone and metformin. Indeed, pilot studies have demonstrated that pioglitazone might be advantageous in FCHL patients.

SUMMARY

Recent studies suggest that FCHL patients have an increased risk to develop T2DM, which has important clinical implications. Further studies are necessary to evaluate whether FCHL patients can be protected from new-onset T2DM and premature cardiovascular events with insulin-sensitizing therapy.

Serum adiponectin is decreased in patients with familial combined hyperlipidemia and normolipaemic relatives and is influenced by lipid-lowering treatment

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Hypoadiponectinemia has been reported in patients with familial combined hyperlipidemia (FCHL) presenting increased waist circumference and insulin resistance. However, no studies have evaluated this association in non-obese FCHL patients. Moreover, it is unclear whether correction of lipoprotein abnormalities may influence adiponectin levels in FCHL.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We have compared serum levels of adiponectin in 199 non-obese FCHL patients (BMI 25.96+/-3.7), 116 normolipaemic (NL) non-affected relatives (BMI 24.4+/-4.0) and 192 controls (BMI 28.0+/-7.4). In a subgroup of FCHL patients, changes in adiponectin levels after treatment with atorvastatin (n=22) or fenofibrate (n=26) were also evaluated. FCHL patients as well as their NL relatives showed lower serum adiponectin levels compared to controls (9.7+/-5.4 microg/mL, 10.7+/-5.3 microg/mL and 17.3+/-13.7microg/mL, respectively; p<0.0001 for all comparisons). After controlling for confounders, the strongest association with hypoadiponectinemia was observed with family history of FCHL, followed by HDL-C (negatively) and age (positively). These variables jointly explained 15% of the total variance of serum adiponectin levels. After 24-week of treatment, adiponectin was increased by 12.5% (p<0.05) by atorvastatin and was reduced by 10% by fenofibrate, resulting in a treatment difference of 22.5% in favor of atorvastatin (p<0.017).

CONCLUSIONS

FCHL patients showed lower serum adiponectin levels compared to controls. Also normolipaemic relatives of FCHL patients presented decreased levels of adiponectin, suggesting a possible common background in the determination of this abnormality. Overall, these observations indicate that hypoadiponectinemia may be an inherent characteristic of the FCHL phenotype. In FCHL patients hypoadiponectinemia may be partially corrected by atorvastatin but not by fenofibrate treatment.

The Effect of Ciprofibrate on Flow-Mediated Dilation and Inflammatory Markers in Patients with Combined Hyperlipidemia

Impairment of flow-mediated dilation (FMD) has been shown to be associated with hypercholesterolemia and hypertriglyceridemia and reduction of cholesterol and/or triglyceride levels can improve FMD. In hyperlipidemia the role of inflammatory substances on endothelial function requires further clarification. In patients with combined hyperlipidemia (n = 29), the capacity of FMD was weaker whereas the levels of interleukin (IL)-lalpha, tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNFalpha), soluble intercellular adhesion molecule (sICAM), and fibrinogen were higher compared to normolipemic controls with normal FMD adjusted for age and sex. Patients were randomized to a diet-only or to a ciprofibrate treatment group. After 8 weeks FMD levels rose significantly both in the diet-only (10.2%) and the ciprofibrate treatment (79.4%) groups. In the diet-only group improvement of FMD was significantly associated with the reduction of triglyceride (by 15.9%) and cholesterol (6.9%) levels. The much larger improvement of FMD due to ciprofibrate therapy was accompanied by significant reductions of cholesterol (by 14.4%), fibrinogen, IL-1alpha, and sICAM levels and by significant increase of high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol concentration, but the change in FMD correlated only with the reduction of the cholesterol level. In line with previous data the authors emphasize that improvement of FMD in patients with combined hyperlipidemia treated with diet and/or ciprofibrate is linked directly to the reduction of cholesterol and triglyceride concentrations rather than to changes in the level of the investigated inflammatory markers.

Ezetimibe treatment of pediatric patients with hypercholesterolemia

OBJECTIVE

To review the efficacy of ezetimibe monotherapy for treatment of hypercholesterolemia in pediatric patients.

STUDY DESIGN

This is a retrospective review of all pediatric patients who received ezetimibe monotherapy as treatment for hypercholesterolemia and for whom follow-up clinical and lipid results were available. Of 36 identified patients, 26 had lipoprotein profiles suggestive of familial hypercholesterolemia (FH), and 10 had profiles suggestive of familial combined hyperlipidemia (FCHL).

RESULTS

After a mean 105 days of treatment with ezetimibe (range, 32-175 days), total cholesterol (TC) levels decreased from 7.3 +/- 1.0 mmol/L to 5.7 +/- 1.0 mmol/L (P < .0001), and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels decreased from 5.3 +/- 0.9 mmol/L to 3.9 +/- 0.8 (P < .0001) in patients with FH. In patients with FCHL, TC levels decreased from 6.4 +/- 2.0 mmol/L to 5.6 +/- 0.4 mmol/L (P < or = .002), and LDL-C levels decreased from 4.7 +/- 1.0 mmol/L to 3.8 +/- 0.6 mmol/L (P < or = .005). For all patients, the mean decrease in individual LDL-C values was 1.5 +/- 0.9 mmol/L or 28%. There was no significant change in triglyceride or high-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels with ezetimibe. Patients were maintained on ezetimibe with no adverse effects attributable to the medication for as long as 3.5 years. At a mean of 13.6 months (range, 1-44 months) after the initiation of ezetimibe, LDL-C levels remained decreased at 4.0 +/- 0.6 mmol/L.

CONCLUSIONS

In this small retrospective series of children and adolescents with hypercholesterolemia, ezetimibe was safe and effective in lowering LDL-C levels.

Atorvastatin monotherapy vs. combination therapy in the management of patients with combined hyperlipidemia

BACKGROUND

Mixed hyperlipidemia is a common disorder characterized by elevated VLDL and LDL levels. Patients with this syndrome usually are in need of combination therapy, comprising a fibric acid derivate with a statin drug in order to achieve LDL and triglyceride target values. Atorvastatin is a hydroxymethylglutaryl coenzyme A (HMG-CoA) reductase inhibitor demonstrated to be effective in reducing both cholesterol (CHOL) and triglyceride (TG) levels in humans. We examined the efficacy of atorvastatin as monotherapy in achieving a better or the same lipid profile in patients with mixed hyperlipidemia treated with combination therapy.

DESIGN

We compared atorvastatin with a combination of a fibric acid derivate and a statin drug (other than atorvastatin) in a 24-week, prospective randomized, open-label study of 27 patients with mixed hyperlipidemia.

METHODS

All 27 patients had been treated with statin-fibrate therapy in different regimens for at least a year. Atorvastatin at a daily dose of 20 mg was substituted for statin-fibrate therapy. Lipid and safety profiles were assessed.

RESULTS

Atorvastatin significantly reduced total cholesterol, LDL-C, and HDL-C compared to statin-fibrate therapy. In contrast, TG and glucose levels were significantly elevated with atorvastatin. Target LDL-C and TG was achieved in 10 patients with the single therapy of atorvastatin vs. 6 patients under statin-fibrate. In 16 patients, atorvastatin was at least as effective as, or better than, the combination therapy, and was recommended for continuation of treatment.

CONCLUSION

Atorvastatin is an adequate monotherapy for many mixed hyperlipidemia patients. We recommend atorvastatin be considered for every patient suffering from mixed hyperlipidemia.

Vascular and metabolic effects of treatment of combined hyperlipidemia: focus on statins and fibrates

Combined hyperlipidemia results from overproduction of hepatically synthesized apolipoprotein B in very low-density lipoproteins in association with reduced lipoprotein lipase activity. Thus, this condition is typically characterized by concurrent elevations in total cholesterol and triglycerides with decreased high-density lipoprotein cholesterol. High levels of apolipoprotein B-containing lipoproteins, most prominently carried by low-density lipoprotein (LDL) particles, are an important risk factor for coronary heart disease. Statin therapy is highly effective at lowering LDL cholesterol. Despite the benefits of statin treatment for lowering total and LDL cholesterol, many statin-treated patients still have initial or recurrent coronary heart disease events. In this regard, combined therapy with statins and fibrates is more effective in controlling atherogenic dyslipidemia in patients with combined hyperlipidemia than either drug alone. Furthermore, statins and fibrates activate PPARalpha in a synergistic manner providing a molecular rationale for combination treatment in coronary heart disease. Endothelial dysfunction associated with cardiovascular diseases may contribute to insulin resistance so that there may also be additional beneficial metabolic effects of combined statin/fibrates therapy. However, there has been little published evidence that combined therapy is synergistic or even better than monotherapy alone in clinical studies. Therefore, there is a great need to study the effects of combination therapy in patients. When statins are combined with gemfibrozil therapy, this is more likely to be accompanied by myopathy. However, this limitation is not observed when fenofibrate, bezafibrate, or ciprofibrate are used in combination therapy.

Designs of RADIANCE 1 and 2: carotid ultrasound studies comparing the effects of torcetrapib/atorvastatin with atorvastatin alone on atherosclerosis

OBJECTIVE

The RADIANCE studies were designed to assess the effects of torcetrapib/atorvastatin (T/A) compared with atorvastatin alone on slowing atherosclerotic progression in patients with heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia (RADIANCE 1) or mixed hyperlipidemia (RADIANCE 2), as measured by change in carotid intima-media thickness (CIMT).

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

RADIANCE 1 and 2 were randomized, double-blind, controlled trials with a duration of 2 years. In both studies, eligible subjects began treatment with atorvastatin during a run-in period and were titrated to target LDL-C levels defined by NCEP ATP III guidelines. Subjects then proceeded to a double-blind randomized treatment period where they received one of two regimens: (i) fixed combination T/A (torcetrapib dose, 60 mg), or (ii) atorvastatin alone. In both regimens, the dose of atorvastatin was established during the run-in period (20-80 mg, RADIANCE 1; 10-80 mg RADIANCE 2). B-mode ultrasonography was performed in duplicate at baseline and at end of study, and every 6 months in between.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The primary efficacy measure in both studies was the annualized rate of change in maximum CIMT of 12 pre-defined carotid segments. Further outcome measures included lipid and safety assessments.

CURRENT STATUS

The number of subjects randomized was 904 in RADIANCE 1 and 752 in RADIANCE 2. Results are anticipated in 2007.

A Caucasian male with very low blood cholesterol and low apoA-II without evidence of atherosclerosis

BACKGROUND

It is well known that a high level of apolipoprotein (apo) A-II can be associated with familial combined hyperlipidaemia, and that high apolipoprotein profiles can contribute to the development of atherosclerosis. The serum lipoprotein/apolipoprotein profile of a Caucasian patient who had unusually low serum total cholesterol (83 mg dL(-1)) and triglyceride (28 mg dL(-1)) levels despite a high body mass index (33.5 kg m(-2)), is the subject of this report.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Each lipoprotein was isolated from serum by sequential ultracentrifugation, and serum and lipoprotein lipids and proteins were determined. The cholesteryl ester (CE) conversion ability of lecithin:cholesterol acyltransferase and CE transfer activity of CE transfer protein were assayed, and the composition of apolipoprotein and lipoprotein(-1) was analyzed by electrophoresis and Western blot analysis.

RESULTS

Electrophoresis and immunodetection analyses revealed a 60% decrease in the apoA-II band intensity compared to normal reference serum. The decreased apoA-II was associated with reduced very low density lipoprotein-cholesterol and protein content, as well as a greater high-density lipoprotein (HDL)(2) size with high cholesterol content. The CE conversion activity and CE transfer activity of HDL(3) were almost totally lacking in the hypolipidaemic serum, although the expression level of lecithin:cholesterol acyltransferase was normal. Electron microscopy revealed that the obese patient had larger HDL(2) and HDL(3) particle sizes than those of reference serum.

CONCLUSION

These results suggest that a decreased apoA-II protein in serum and increased HDL-cholesterol and particle size might protect against hyperlipidaemia and the atherosclerotic process, even in a patient with severe obesity.

Increased plasma levels of oxysterols, in vivo markers of oxidative stress, in patients with familial combined hyperlipidemia: reduction during atorvastatin and fenofibrate therapy

Familial combined hyperlipidemia (FCHL), the most common inherited disorder of lipid metabolism, is associated with an increased risk of atherosclerosis that is not fully explained by the metabolic disturbances of these patients. Oxidative damage to lipid components accumulating in the plasma of FCHL patients might contribute to explaining this lack of evidence. Cholesterol is one of the preferential targets of oxidation in LDL and this may contribute to setting a proatherogenetic phenotype in FCHL. We investigated plasma oxysterols (7-ketocholesterol and 7beta-hydroxycholesterol) and alpha-tocopherol as in vivo hallmarks of lipid-related oxidative stress. Oxidative stress hallmarks were measured in 45 FCHL patients and 54 sex- and age-matched healthy controls; in FCHL patients, oxidative stress and lipid profile parameters were also assessed in response to lipid-lowering drugs in a 24-week randomized, open-label trial with atorvastatin or fenofibrate. FCHL patients showed markedly increased levels of oxysterols (p < 0.001) and reduced alpha-tocopherol/total lipids (p < 0.001) compared to controls. These differences were independent of the presence of clinical atherosclerosis and persisted after correction for hyperlipidemia. Atorvastatin and fenofibrate significantly improved the lipid profile and caused a comparable decrease in plasma oxysterols, with the normalization of 7-ketocholesterol and a significant reduction of 7beta-hydroxycholesterol (p < 0.001). These drugs also decreased the ratio of alpha-tocopherol/total lipids by more than 30% (p < 0.001). In conclusion, FCHL patients showed increased hallmarks of cholesterol oxidation and decreased levels of alpha-tocopherol/total lipids. Atorvastatin and fenofibrate displayed comparable efficiency in decreasing oxysterols, but they further decreased lipid-corrected alpha-tocopherol levels in plasma. More research work is needed to understand the clinical meaning of these findings, which may help to understand the role of oxidative stress in FCHL and lipid-lowering therapy.

The effect of apolipoprotein E polymorphism on the response to lipid-lowering treatment with atorvastatin or fenofibrate

Although the effect of apolipoprotein E gene polymorphism on the response to treatment with statins has been studied, the results are conflicting. Moreover, little is known about the possible effect of apolipoprotein E alleles on the response to treatment with fibrates. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of apolipoprotein E polymorphism on lipid-lowering response to treatment with atorvastatin and fenofibrate in patients with different types of dyslipidemia. The study population included 136 patients with heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia (type IIA dyslipidemia) treated with atorvastatin (20 mg/day) and 136 patients with either primary hypertriglyceridemia (type IV dyslipidemia) or mixed hyperlipidemia (type IIB dyslipidemia) treated with micronized fenofibrate (200 mg/day). Overall, no significant associations were detected between apolipoprotein E genotype and response to treatment with atorvastatin. In patients treated with fenofibrate, significant associations were noted between apolipoprotein E genotype and changes in apolipoprotein B, apolipoprotein E and triglyceride levels. Specifically, in apolipoprotein E2, apolipoprotein E3, and apolipoprotein E4 individuals, apolipoprotein B reductions were 22%, 17%, and 8%, respectively (P = .003); apolipoprotein E reductions were 45%, 20%, and 15%, respectively (P = .006); whereas triglyceride reductions reached 53%, 36%, and 33%, respectively (P = .033). In conclusion, apolipoprotein E genotype had no significant effect on the response to treatment with atorvastatin in patients with heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia, but in patients with primary hypertriglyceridemia or mixed hyperlipidemia, there was a clear association between apolipoprotein E genotype and response to treatment with fenofibrate.

Safety and Efficacy of Long-Term Co-Administration of Fenofibrate and Ezetimibe in Patients With Mixed Hyperlipidemia

OBJECTIVES

This study sought to determine the long-term safety and efficacy of co-administered fenofibrate (FENO) and ezetimibe (EZE) in patients with mixed hyperlipidemia.

BACKGROUND

Both EZE and FENO offer complementary benefits to the lipid profile of patients with mixed hyperlipidemia.

METHODS

After completing the 12-week randomized, double-blind base study that compared EZE 10 mg, FENO 160 mg, FENO 160 mg plus EZE 10 mg, and placebo in patients with mixed hyperlipidemia, patients continued into a double-blind, 48-week extension phase. Those patients in the FENO plus EZE and FENO groups continued on their respective base study treatment, and patients in the EZE and placebo groups were switched to FENO plus EZE and FENO, respectively.

RESULTS

Of the 587 patients who completed the base study, 576 continued into the extension study (n = 340 in FENO plus EZE and n = 236 in FENO). The FENO plus EZE produced significantly greater reductions in low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol compared with FENO (-22% vs. -9%, respectively; p < 0.001). There were also significantly greater improvements in triglycerides, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C), total cholesterol, non-HDL-C, and apolipoprotein B with FENO plus EZE compared with FENO. Changes in apolipoprotein A-I and high-sensitivity C-reactive protein were similar between groups. Overall, FENO plus EZE was well tolerated during the extension study. The proportion of patients with consecutive elevations of alanine aminotransferase/aspartate aminotransferase > or =3 times upper limit of normal were similar between the FENO plus EZE (1.2%) and FENO (1.7%) groups. No cases of creatine phosphokinase elevations > or =10 times upper limit of normal or myopathy were observed in either group.

CONCLUSIONS

Long-term, 48-week co-administration of FENO plus EZE was well tolerated and more efficacious than FENO in patients with mixed hyperlipidemia.

Colesevelam HCl and ezetimibe combination therapy provides effective lipid-lowering in difficult-to-treat patients with hypercholesterolemia

This study investigated the effects of colesevelam hydrochloride (WelChol; Sankyo Pharma, Parsippany, NJ) and ezetimibe (Zetia; Merck/Schering Plough Pharmaceuticals, North Wales, PA), alone and in combination, for the treatment of hypercholesterolemia in patients who were intolerant to, or refused, HMG-Co-A reductase inhibitor (statin) therapy. Combination therapy with colesevelam HCl/ezetimibe resulted in an additional reduction in low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) and non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) levels of approximately 20% (P < 0.005) and 16% (P < 0.01), respectively, compared with monotherapy with either agent. Total cholesterol, LDL-C, and non-HDL-C levels were within National Cholesterol Education Program Adult Treatment Panel III target ranges at the end of the combination therapy regimen in 10 of 12 patients. In conclusion, colesevelam HCl/ezetimibe combination therapy appears to be an efficacious and well-tolerated alternative for patients with hypercholesterolemia.

Effects of pioglitazone in familial combined hyperlipidaemia

OBJECTIVES

Familial combined hyperlipidaemia (FCH) is associated with insulin resistance. We hypothesized that pioglitazone treatment of FCH patients might increase insulin sensitivity, but may also improve serum lipid levels, body fat distribution, intramyocellular lipids (IMCL) and endothelial function.

DESIGN

Double blind, randomized, cross-over study.

SUBJECTS

Seventeen FCH patients.

INTERVENTIONS

Sixteen weeks of pioglitazone treatment (30 mg) compared with 16 weeks of placebo.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS

Insulin sensitivity was measured using the hyperinsulinaemic euglycaemic clamp procedure, body fat distribution and IMCL using magnetic resonance techniques and endothelial function using flow-mediated vasodilatation.

RESULTS

Pioglitazone improved insulin sensitivity (M value 37.7 +/- 3.6 micromol min(-1) kg(-1) vs. 33.0 +/- 3.3 micromol min(-1) kg(-1) during placebo, P < 0.05) and LDL composition by increasing the K value (-0.11 +/- 0.06 vs. -0.20 +/- 0.06 during placebo, P < 0.05). However, pioglitazone did not affect other serum lipid levels. Endothelial function, body fat distribution and IMCL were also not affected. In addition, pioglitazone was associated with a decrease in liver enzymes (alkaline phosphatase).

CONCLUSION

Pioglitazone treatment of FCH patients without type 2 diabetes mellitus increases insulin sensitivity, decreases liver enzymes and improves LDL composition but has a neutral effect on total serum lipid levels. The change in insulin sensitivity might be too small to induce changes in endothelial function, body fat distribution and IMCL.

Paradoxical exacerbation of combined hyperlipidemia in human apolipoprotein A-II transgenic mice treated with fenofibrate

Apolipoprotein (apo) A-II has been biochemically and genetically linked to familial combined hyperlipidemia. Human ApoA-II transgenic mice and peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor alpha (PPARalpha)-deficient mice share some similar phenotypic characteristics. The aim of this study was to determine whether a fibrate-induced PPARalpha activation corrects the combined hyperlipidemia present in human apoA-II transgenic mice. ApoA-II transgenic mice were treated with fenofibrate (250 mg/kg) for 13 days. After this period, they presented a remarkable 8-fold increase in plasma triglycerides. This was concomitant with a 4-fold increase in non-high-density lipoprotein (non-HDL) cholesterol, a quantitatively similar decrease in HDL cholesterol and a severe reduction in mouse plasma apoA-I and apoA-II. Fenofibrate stimulated liver fatty acid beta-oxidation, increased the transcriptional expression of carnitine palmitoyltransferase 1 and phospholipid transfer protein, and decreased expression of apoA-I and apoC-III. However, very-low-density lipoprotein (VLDL)-triglyceride production and lipoprotein lipase (LPL) activities and the expression of other PPARalpha target genes were similar in mice treated with vehicle and fenofibrate. Further, fenofibrate-treated mice presented decreased in vivo [3H]VLDL catabolism and decreased VLDL-triglyceride hydrolysis by exogenous LPL. Therefore, the paradoxical enhancement of hyperlipidemia in fenofibrate-treated apoA-II transgenic mice is mainly due to decreased VLDL catabolism and, also, to a partial impairment in PPARalpha-signaling.

Effects of rosuvastatin on endothelial function in patients with familial combined hyperlipidaemia (FCH)

OBJECTIVE

Although several studies have reported a positive effect of statins on endothelial vasoreactivity, most studies performed in subjects with type 2 diabetes mellitus report no effect at all. This lack of effect may be related to the existence of insulin resistance, or to insufficient lowering of atherogenic (apo)lipoproteins. Therefore, we tested in this study whether treatment of insulin resistant familial combined hyperlipidaemia (FCH) patients with a high dose (40 mg/day) of the potent rosuvastatin was able to improve endothelial function, without necessarily improving insulin sensitivity.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

In a double-blind randomised crossover study, 18 subjects with FCH (without evident cardiovascular disease, mean [standard deviation] age 54 [7] years) underwent a 4-week run-in period after which they were randomised to treatment with placebo once daily for 12 weeks, followed by rosuvastatin 40 mg/day for 12 weeks or vice versa. Endothelial function was determined after 8 and 12 weeks of both treatment periods, respectively, by measurement of flow-mediated vasodilation (FMD) using high-resolution ultrasound and by measurement of vasodilator response to intrabrachial acetylcholine (Ach) by venous occlusion plethysmography (forearm blood flow [FBF]).

RESULTS

Plasma levels of lipids, (apo)lipoproteins and high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP) improved significantly after rosuvastatin therapy compared to placebo. However, rosuvastatin had no effect on homeostasis model assessment (HOMA)-indices or on vasodilator responses to intra-brachial acetylcholine-infusion (FBF-ratio increased from a mean of 1.28 [SD: 0.46] to 5.82 [3.44] after rosuvastatin and from 1.33 [0.67] to 5.99 [3.89] after placebo, p = 0.35). Endothelium-dependent FMD was also unchanged (1.6% [3.1%] vs. 3.2% [3.5]%, p = 0.56 rosuvastatin vs. placebo, respectively).

CONCLUSION

In patients with FCH, a 12-week treatment of rosuvastatin 40 mg/day did not improve endothelial function (either in large conduit vessels or in resistance vessels), despite significant improvements in plasma lipids, (apo)lipoproteins. and low-grade inflammation.

Effect of rosuvastatin on insulin sensitivity in patients with familial combined hyperlipidaemia

BACKGROUND

By influencing the mevalonate pathway, statins may have multiple effects besides lipid lowering. This study was designed to evaluate the effect of rosuvastatin on serum lipids and insulin sensitivity in nondiabetic subjects with familial combined hyperlipidaemia (FCH), a population characterized by decreased insulin sensitivity.

METHODS

In a double-blind randomized crossover study, 18 subjects with FCH (without evident cardiovascular disease, mean age 54 +/- 7 years) were randomized to rosuvastatin 40 mg day(-1) or placebo for 12 weeks. Blood samples were taken at baseline and after 4, 8 and 12 weeks of both treatment periods. Insulin sensitivity was determined with euglycaemic-hyperinsulinaemic clamp after 12 weeks of both treatment periods.

RESULTS

Serum lipids and lipoproteins improved significantly. Mean total cholesterol after the rosuvastatin treatment period was 44% lower compared to the placebo treatment period (triglycerides -28%; LDL-c -50%; VLDL-c -56%, VLDL-TG -39%) and both parameters of low-grade inflammation (as measured by hsCRP, -16%) and oxidative stress (as measured by plasma-oxLDL, -55%) decreased markedly after rosuvastatin therapy as compared to placebo. However, the insulin sensitivity index was unchanged (41.7 +/- 17.4 vs. 40.6 +/- 11.1 L kg(-1) min(-1), placebo vs. rosuvastatin, P = 0.71).

CONCLUSION

Despite marked improvements in lipid and lipoprotein values, low-grade inflammation and oxidative stress, a relatively high dose of rosuvastatin did not change insulin sensitivity in subjects with FCH.

Additive beneficial effects of fenofibrate combined with atorvastatin in the treatment of combined hyperlipidemia

OBJECTIVES

We compared vascular and metabolic responses (and adverse responses) to statin and fibrate therapies alone or in combination in patients with combined hyperlipidemia.

BACKGROUND

The mechanisms of action for statins and fibrates are distinct.

METHODS

Fifty-six patients were given atorvastatin 10 mg and placebo, atorvastatin 10 mg and fenofibrate 200 mg, or fenofibrate 200 mg and placebo daily during each two-month treatment period of a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled crossover trial with two washout periods of two months' each.

RESULTS

Lipoproteins were changed to a greater extent with combined therapy when compared with atorvastatin or fenofibrate alone. Flow-mediated dilator response to hyperemia and plasma high-sensitivity C-reactive protein and fibrinogen levels were changed to a greater extent with combined therapy when compared with atorvastatin or fenofibrate alone (p < 0.001, p = 0.182, and p = 0.015 by analysis of variance [ANOVA], respectively). The effects of combined therapy or fenofibrate alone on plasma adiponectin levels and insulin sensitivity (determined by the Quantitative Insulin-Sensitivity Check Index [QUICKI]) were significantly greater than those of atorvastatin alone (p = 0.022 for adiponectin and p = 0.049 for QUICKI by ANOVA). No patients were withdrawn from the study as the result of serious adverse effects.

CONCLUSIONS

Combination therapy is safe and has beneficial additive effects on endothelial function in patients with combined hyperlipidemia.

The effect of fenofibrate on serum paraoxonase activity and inflammatory markers in patients with combined hyperlipidemia

BACKGROUND

Lipid lowering therapy with statins is beneficial because of improvement in lipoprotein concentrations and additional pleiotropic effects. However, less is known about the pleotropic effect of fibrates.

AIM

To investigate the effects of fenofibrate therapy on inflammatory markers and serum paraoxonase activity in patients with combined hyperlipidemia in addition to their lipid lowering effects.

METHODS

Fifty patients (18 women, 32 men, mean age 50+/-8.7 years) with a history of combined hyperlipidemia and coronary artery disease were enrolled into the study. Serum lipids, inflammatory markers (high sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP) and fibrinogen levels) and paraoxonase levels were determined before and after two months of 250 mg per day of fenofibrate treatment.

RESULTS

Fenofibrate decreased plasma fibrinogen level by 41% (from 3.9+/-0.9 mg/dl to 2.3+/-0.48 mg/dl, p<0.0001) and hs-CRP level by 71% (from 1.28 mg/dl to 0.36 mg/dl; p<0.0001). Changes in hs-CRP levels were not correlated with the changes in lipid levels. Compared with baseline, serum paraoxonase level was significantly increased after fenofibrate treatment (from 200+/-77U/L to 232+/-82U/L; p<0.001). We found a significant correlation between changes in HDL cholesterol and paraoxonase activity after two months of treatment (r=0.46, p=0.018).

CONCLUSION

This study demonstrates that beyond improving lipids and lipoprotein levels, fenofibrate treatment increases paraoxonase activity and decreases inflammatory markers in patients with combined hyperlipidemia.

Effect of docosahexaenoic acid on lipoprotein subclasses in hyperlipidemic children (the EARLY study)

To test the hypothesis that a dietary omega-3 fatty acid, docosahexaenoic acid, improves the lipoprotein subclass profile of children who have hyperlipidemia, we conducted a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Children who had hyperlipidemia (n = 20) were stabilized on a low-fat diet for 6 weeks and then randomized to receive 1.2 g/day of docosahexaenoic acid for 6 weeks or placebo. Supplementation with docosahexaenoic acid significantly increased low-density lipoprotein subclass 1 and high-density lipoprotein subclass 2 (large and buoyant; less atherogenic particles) by 91% and 14%, respectively, compared with the placebo phase. Low-density lipoprotein subclass 3 (small and dense; more atherogenic particles) decreased by 48%.

Ezetimibe-induced hyperlipidaemia

Ezetimibe is intestinally active cholesterol absorption inhibitor used to reduce low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol levels. This case report describes a novel side effect with this agent: ezetimibe-induced hyperlipidaemia in a patient with statin intolerance and familial combined hyperlipidaemia. Ezetimibe therapy induced an asymptomatic 770% increase in triglycerides (TGs) (3.51-27.1 mmol/l) and a 190% increase in total cholesterol (9.8-18.5 mmol/ 1) secondary to an increase (4.6-25.9 micromol/l; 560%) in hepatic cholesterol (lathosterol) synthesis. This lipid profile resolved 9 months after cessation of ezetimibe therapy. This report shows that ezetimibe may have long-lasting effects in man far exceeding its plasma half-life and that ezetimibe monotherapy can induce a large increase in hepatocyte very-low-density lipoprotein synthesis in rare individuals with a consequent mixed hyperlipidaemia or possibly hypercholesterolaemia depending on the metabolism and clearance of TG-rich lipoproteins.

Combined hyperlipidemia in a single subject with tetraplegia: ineffective risk reduction after atorvastatin monotherapy

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVE

Effects of atorvastatin (Lipitor) drug monotherapy (10 mg daily) on fasting blood lipid profiles and cardiovascular disease (CVD) risks were examined for a single subject with C5-C6 tetraplegia. Routine fasting lipid profiles were analyzed by standard biochemistry techniques for total cholesterol (TC), triglycerides (TG), low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol (LDL-C), and high-density lipoprotein-cholesterol (HDL-C). Lipid profiles were analyzed on 3 occasions before drug therapy was initiated and 3 months after therapy commenced. The TC:HDL and LDL:HDL ratios were computed for all sampling times and used to assess pretreatment and post-treatment CVD risk.

RESULTS

Fasting TC, TG, and LDL-C were all significantly reduced by therapy. The pretreatment HDL-C of 35 mg/dL was lowered to 21 mg/dL. As a result, the TC:HDL risk ratio was only marginally reduced from 6.6 to 6.4, whereas the LDL:HDL risk ratio remained unchanged by treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

In this man with tetraplegia, atorvastatin drug monotherapy rapidly lowered TC, TG, LDL-C, and HDL-C. However, the TC:HDL ratio, considered the best predictor of CVD risk, was unchanged.

Efficacy of ezetimibe in patients with statin-resistant and statin-intolerant familial hyperlipidaemias

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the efficacy of the cholesterol absorption inhibitor ezetimibe in patients with refractory familial hyperlipidaemia or intolerant to statin therapy.

METHODS

This prospective study assessed the safety and efficacy of ezetimibe in 200 patients with refractory familial hyperlipidaemias not achieving a low-density-lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol < 3 cholesterol < 3 mmol/L (116 mg/dL) including 22% intolerant to all statin therapy, many consuming intolerant to all statin therapy, many consuming sterol-containing products.

RESULTS

Ezetimibe monotherapy resulted in 7% and 11% reductions in LDL-cholesterol and apolipoprotein B respectively. Ezetimibe-statin combination therapy reduced LDL-cholesterol by an additional 11 +/- 27% and apolipoprotein B by 11 (+79 to -18)%. There was a similar response between various sub-groups but a wide variation within groups with the greatest effect seen in patients groups with the greatest effect seen in patients under-responding to statins. The number of patients achieving the LDL-C target of 3 mmol/L rose from 5.5% to 18%. Non-significant effects included a 5 (+78 to -470)% reduction in triglycerides, 8 +/- 36% increment in HDL-cholesterol, 21 (+35 to -82)% reduction in C-reactive protein and a 1 (+20 to -50)% increase in alanine transaminase. No effects were seen on creatinine, creatine kinase, or insulin resistance. Fourteen patients (7%) discontinued ezetimibe: seven due to gastrointestinal side-effects, one patient developed an ezetimibe-induced hypercholesterolaemia (x 1.5), one developed ezetimibe-induced hypertriglyceridaemia (x 7) and five discontinued for other reasons.

CONCLUSION

Ezetimibe is a useful addition to statins in patients with familial hyperlipidaemias but shows a highly variable response profile.

Effectiveness and tolerability of simvastatin plus fenofibrate for combined hyperlipidemia (the SAFARI trial)

Patients with combined hyperlipidemia (elevated triglyceride [TG] levels, elevated low-density lipoprotein [LDL] cholesterol, and multiple lipoprotein abnormalities) are at increased risk for coronary heart disease. We conducted a multicenter (in the United States), randomized, double-blind, active-controlled, 18-week study to determine if combination therapy with simvastatin plus fenofibrate is more effective in reducing elevated TG levels, thus improving the lipoprotein pattern in patients with combined hyperlipidemia compared with simvastatin monotherapy, and to evaluate safety and tolerability. Patients (aged 21 to 68 years) with a diagnosis of combined hyperlipidemia (fasting TG levels >/=150 and </=500 mg/dl, and LDL cholesterol >130 mg/dl) received simvastatin monotherapy (20 mg/day, n = 207) or simvastatin 20 mg plus fenofibrate (160 mg/day) combination therapy (n = 411) for 12 weeks following a 6-week diet and placebo run-in period. From baseline to week 12, median TG levels decreased 43.0% (combination therapy) and 20.1% (simvastatin monotherapy [treatment difference -23.6%, p <0.001]). Mean LDL cholesterol levels decreased 31.2% and 25.8% (treatment difference -5.4%, p <0.001), and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels increased 18.6% and 9.7% (treatment difference 8.8%, p <0.001) in the combination therapy versus monotherapy groups, respectively. No drug-related serious adverse experiences were observed. No patient experienced clinical myopathy or severe abnormalities in liver function. Combination therapy with simvastatin 20 mg and fenofibrate 160 mg in patients with combined hyperlipidemia resulted in additional improvement in all lipoprotein parameters measured compared with simvastatin 20 mg monotherapy and was well tolerated. Thus, this combination therapy is a beneficial therapeutic option for managing combined hyperlipidemia.

Effect of statins on LDL particle size in patients with familial combined hyperlipidemia: a comparison between atorvastatin and pravastatin

BACKGROUND AND AIM

Elevation of plasma cholesterol and/or triglycerides, and the prevalence of small dense low density lipoproteins (LDL) particles remarkably increase the risk in patients with familial combined hyperlipidemia (FCHL). There are, at present, inconsistent data on the effects of different treatments on size and density of LDL particles in FCHL patients.

METHODS AND RESULTS

A multicenter, randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, parallel group study was designed to evaluate the effect of 3 months' treatment with atorvastatin (10mg/day) or pravastatin (20mg/day) on the lipid/lipoprotein profile and LDL size in a total of 86 FCHL patients. Both statins significantly lowered plasma total and LDL cholesterol, with a significantly higher hypocholesterolemic effect observed with atorvastatin (-26.8+/-11.1% and -35.9+/-11.1%, respectively) compared to pravastatin (-17.6+/-11.1% and -24.5+/-10.2%). The percent decrease in plasma triglycerides was highly variable, but more pronounced with atorvastatin (-19.8+/-29.2%) than with pravastatin (-5.3+/-48.6%). Opposite changes in LDL size were seen with the 2 treatments, with increased mean LDL particle diameter with atorvastatin, and decreased diameter with pravastatin, and significant between treatment difference in terms of percent modification vs baseline (+0.5+/-1.6% with atorvastatin vs -0.3+/-1.8% with pravastatin).

CONCLUSIONS

The present results support the evidence indicative of a greater hypocholesterolemic effect of atorvastatin compared to pravastatin, and in addition show a raising effect of atorvastatin on the size of LDL particles in FCHL patients.

Docosahexaenoic acid restores endothelial function in children with hyperlipidemia: results from the EARLY study

OBJECTIVE

The primary objective of this study was to determine whether the National Cholesterol Education Program Step II (NCEP-II) diet or supplementation with docosahexaenoic acid (DHA) with the diet, affects endothelial function in children with familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) or the phenotype of familial combined hyperlipidemia (FCH). As secondary endpoints, the influence of diet and DHA supplementation on lipid profiles as well as biomarkers for oxidative stress and inflammation, and asymmetric dimethylarginine (ADMA), an endogenous inhibitor of nitric oxide synthase, were all evaluated.

METHODS

In a double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized, crossover study design, 20 children (ages 9-19 years) with FH (n = 12) and FCH (n = 8) received nutritional counseling based on the National Cholesterol Education Program Step II (NCEP-II) and food guide pyramid dietary guidelines for 6 weeks. They were then randomly assigned to supplementation with docosahexaenoic acid (DHA 1.2 g/d) or placebo for 6 weeks, followed by a washout phase of 6 weeks and crossover phase of 6 weeks while continuing the NCEP-II diet. Endothelium-dependent flow-mediated dilation (FMD) of the brachial artery was determined by high-resolution ultrasound. Plasma levels of total cholesterol, triglycerides and lipoprotein classes (LDL, HDL, VLDL) were measured by ultracentrifugation and enzymatic methods, plasma F2 isoprostanes by gas chromatography/mass spectrometry, urinary 8-OH-2' deoxyguanosine by liquid chromatography, high sensitivity C-reactive protein by immunonephelometry and ADMA by liquid chromatography.

RESULTS

FMD increased significantly after DHA supplementation compared to baseline (p < 0.001), diet alone (p < 0.002), placebo (p < 0.012) and washout (p < 0.001) phases of the study without affecting biomarkers for oxidative stress, inflammation or ADMA. DHA supplementation was associated with increased levels of total cholesterol (p < 0.01), LDL- and HDL cholesterol concentrations (p < 0.001) compared to the NCEP-II diet.

CONCLUSION

This study demonstrates that DHA supplementation restores endothelial-dependent FMD in hyperlipidemic children. The endothelium may thus be a therapeutic target for DHA. This is consistent with a hypothesis of increasing NO bioavailability, with the potential for preventing the progression of early coronary heart disease in high-risk children.

Effects of atorvastatin on the clearance of triglyceride-rich lipoproteins in familial combined hyperlipidemia

Familial combined hyperlipidemia (FCHL) patients have an impaired catabolism of postprandial triglyceride (TG)-rich lipoproteins (TRLs). We investigated whether atorvastatin corrects the delayed clearance of large TRLs in FCHL by evaluating the acute clearance of Intralipid (10%) and TRLs after oral fat-loading tests. Sixteen matched controls were included. Atorvastatin reduced fasting plasma TG (from 3.6 +/- 0.4 to 2.5 +/- 0.3 mM; mean +/- SEM) without major effects on fasting apolipoprotein B48 (apoB48) and apoB100 in large TRLs. Atorvastatin significantly reduced fasting intermediate density lipoprotein (Svedberg flotation, 12-20)-apoB100 concentrations. After Intralipid, TG in plasma and TRL showed similar kinetics in FCHL before and after atorvastatin treatment, although compared with controls, the clearance of large TRLs was only significantly slower in untreated FCHL, suggesting an improvement by atorvastatin. Investigated with oral fat-loading tests, the clearance of very low density lipoprotein (Sf20-60)-apoB100 improved by 24%, without major changes in the other fractions. The most striking effects of atorvastatin on postprandial lipemia in FCHL were on hepatic TRL, without major improvements on intestinal TRLs. Fasting plasma TG should be reduced more aggressively in FCHL to overcome the lipolytic disturbance causing delayed clearance of postprandial TRLs.

Effects of atorvastatin on fasting plasma and marginated apolipoproteins B48 and B100 in large, triglyceride-rich lipoproteins in familial combined hyperlipidemia

Large triglyceride (TG)-rich lipoproteins (TRLs) circulate in the blood, but they may also be present in a marginated pool, probably attached to the endothelium. It is unknown whether statins can influence this marginated pool in vivo in humans. Intravenous fat tests were performed in familial combined hyperlipidemia (FCHL) subjects before and after atorvastatin treatment and in controls to investigate whether acute increases in apoB in TRL fractions would occur, potentially reflecting the release of this TRL from a marginated pool. After a 12-h fast, a bolus injection of 10% Intralipid was given to 12 FCHL patients before and after 16-wk treatment with atorvastatin. Twelve carefully matched controls were included. For 60 min postinjection, apoB48, apoB100, and lipids were measured in TRLs. Fasting apoB100 in all TRL fractions were 2- to 3-fold higher in untreated FCHL compared with controls. ApoB48 concentrations in chylomicron fractions increased significantly within 10 min in FCHL before and after treatment, but not in controls. ApoB100 increased significantly in the chylomicron fractions in untreated FCHL and in controls, but not in FCHL after treatment. In very low density lipoprotein 1, apoB100 increased only in untreated FCHL. In very low density lipoprotein 2, apoB100 did not change in any group. These data show that increasing the number of circulating TRLs by chylomicron-like particles, results in increased plasma apoB-TRLs, probably by acute release from a marginated pool. This is a physiological process occurring in FCHL and in healthy normolipidemic subjects, but it is more pronounced in the former. Decreased marginated TRL particles in FCHL is a novel antiatherogenic property of atorvastatin.

Treatment of type IIb familial combined hyperlipidemia with the combination pravastatin-piperazine sultosilate

The risk of coronary heart disease is increased for any given low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol level in patients with high levels of triglycerides because some triglyceride-rich lipoproteins are atherogenic. This paper reports the results of a pilot clinical trial aimed to evaluate a novel triglyceride-lowering drug in combination with pravastatin to treat combined hyperlipidemia. Twenty-six patients with type 2b hyperlipoproteinemia were randomized to receive pravastatin 40 mg/day or pravastatin 40 mg/day plus piperazine-sultosilate 1000 mg/day for 12 weeks if their cholesterol levels, but not triglyceride levels, had responded to therapeutic lifestyle changes and treatment with 40 mg/day of pravastatin. Concentrations of triglycerides, cholesterol and apolipoproteins A and B were measured in duplicate before and after the intervention. There were no significant differences between groups in the change from baseline in the concentration of serum triglycerides. Conversely, significant differences were found for LDL cholesterol, which increased slightly with pravastatin alone but decreased with the combination (12.605+/-22.777% vs. -6.396+/-13.157%, respectively; p=0.022). Apolipoprotein-B levels increased with pravastatin alone but remained stable with the combined treatment (10.464+/-8.446% vs. 0.767+/-12.335%; P=0.028). The increase in the pravastatin group was significant. Although sultosilate was not efficacious in reducing triglycerides, it helped to decrease the concentration of small, dense, atherogenic LDL particles that are less receptor-sensitive and which could accumulate during long-term statin therapy in patients with high levels of triglycerides.

Decreased circulating Fas ligand in patients with familial combined hyperlipidemia or carotid atherosclerosis: normalization by atorvastatin

OBJECTIVES

We sought to study whether patients with familial combined hyperlipidemia (FCH) or carotid atherosclerosis have modified circulating solubilized Fas ligand (sFasL) levels, as well as the potential modifications by atorvastatin. We also examined the effect of atorvastatin on FasL expression and sFasL release in cytokine-stimulated cultured human endothelial cells (ECs).

BACKGROUND

In normal situations, FasL is expressed in most cells, including ECs. Proinflammatory stimuli can downregulate its expression in ECs and facilitate the vascular infiltration of inflammatory cells.

METHODS

We have measured sFasL plasma levels (by ELISA) in 58 patients with FCH, 14 normocholesterolemic patients with carotid atherosclerosis, and 15 healthy volunteers. We analyzed FasL expression (by Western blot analysis) and sFasL release in cultured ECs stimulated with tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-alpha.

RESULTS

Solubilized FasL levels were decreased in hyperlipidemic patients (49 pg/ml), as compared with healthy volunteers (123 pg/ml, p < 0.0001). Patients were randomized to atorvastatin (n = 28) or bezafibrate (n = 30) during 12 months. Atorvastatin treatment increased sFasL concentrations (111 pg/ml, p < 0.0001), reaching normal values. However, treatment with bezafibrate only marginally affected sFasL (85 pg/ml, p < 0.05). Solubilized FasL was also diminished in patients with carotid atherosclerosis (39 pg/ml), and intensive treatment with atorvastatin normalized sFasL levels (90 pg/ml, p = 0.02). Finally, atorvastatin prevented the diminution of FasL expression and sFasL release elicited by TNF-alpha in cultured ECs.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with FCH or carotid atherosclerosis have decreased circulating sFasL levels, probably indicating endothelial dysfunction, but treatment with atorvastatin restored normal blood levels. These data provide a novel effect of atorvastatin and add support for the well-known anti-inflammatory properties of statins.

Drug treatment of combined hyperlipidemia

Combined hyperlipidemia is increasing in frequency and is the most common lipid disorder associated with obesity, insulin resistance and diabetes mellitus. It is associated with other features of the metabolic syndrome including hypertension, hyperuricemia, hyperinsulinemia and highly atherogenic subfractions of lipoprotein remnant particles including small dense low density lipoprotein-cholesterol. This review examines the mechanisms by which combined hyperlipidemia arises and the various drugs including fibric acid derivatives, hydroxymethylglutaryl coenzyme A (HMG-CoA) reductase inhibitors, and nicotinic acid which can be used either as monotherapy or in combination to manage it and to improve prognosis from atherosclerotic disease in diabetes mellitus, insulin resistant states and primary combined hyperlipidemia. The therapeutic approach to combined hyperlipidemia involves determination of whether the cause is hepatocyte damage or metabolic derangements. Combined hyperlipidemia due to hepatocyte damage should be treated by attention to the primary cause. In the case of metabolic dysfunction because of imbalance in glucose and fat metabolism, therapy of diabetes mellitus and obesity should be optimised prior to commencement of lipid lowering drugs. Both fibric acid derivatives and HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors can be used in the treatment of combined hyperlipidemia with fibric acid derivatives having greater effects on triglycerides and HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors on LDL-C though both have effects on the other cardiovascular risk factors. There is some evidence of benefit with both interventions in mild combined hyperlipidemias and large scale trials are underway. Fibric acid derivatives and HMG-CoA reductase inhibitor therapy can be combined with care, provided that gemfibrozil is avoided, fibric acid derivatives are given in the mornings and shorter half -life HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors are used at night. Combined hyperlipidemia emergencies occur with predominant hypertriglyceridemia in pregnancy or as a cause of pancreatitis. Therapy in the former should aim to reduce chylomicron production by a low fat diet and intervention to suppress VLDL-C secretion using omega-3 fatty acids. In the latter case, fluid therapy alone and medium chain plasma triglyceride infusions usually reduce levels satisfactorily though apheresis may be required. Blood glucose levels also need aggressive management in these conditions. Combined hyperlipidemia is likely to become an increasing problem with the increase in the prevalence of obesity and diabetes mellitus and needs aggressive management to reduce cardiovascular risk.

Chylomicron remnants of various sizes are lowered more effectively by fenofibrate than by atorvastatin in patients with combined hyperlipidemia

Both atorvastatin and fenofibrate are known to lower postprandial chylomicrons and chylomicron remnants. However, until now it has not been investigated which of the two drugs is more effective in one and the same patient and, secondly, whether these drugs exert different effects on chylomicron remnants of different sizes. To this end 12 patients with mixed hyperlipidemia were treated in a crossover study with 40 mg atorvastatin or with 200 mg micronized fenofibrate once daily for 6 weeks. Oral fat loading was given before and after each treatment. Chylomicron remnants of various sizes were determined by fluorometric determinations of retinyl palmitate after lipoprotein separation by size-exclusion chromatography. As expected, atorvastatin was more effective than fenofibrate on total and LDL-cholesterol (P < 0.05). Fenofibrate, in contrast, was more effective on all triglyceride-rich lipoproteins in both the fasting and the postprandial state. The stronger effect of fenofibrate affected not only chylomicrons and VLDL but also chylomicron remnants. It reduced large chylomicron remnants by 66% at 6h and by 74% at 8 h. The action of atorvastatin was less pronounced, with corresponding reductions of 42 and 65% (P < 0.05 only after 8 h). Fenofibrate was even more effective on small chylomicron remnants, yielding reductions of 47, 74, and 66% at 4, 6, and 8 h. Atorvastatin, in contrast, gave reductions of 30 and 26% after 6 and 8 h, the effect reaching statistical significance only after 6h. Fenofibrate is therefore more effective than atorvastatin in lowering all triglyceride-rich lipoproteins, including large and small chylomicron remnants.

Efficacy of fenofibrate and simvastatin on endothelial function and inflammatory markers in patients with combined hyperlipidemia: relations with baseline lipid profiles

Given that combination therapy with statin plus fibrate confers a risk of myopathy, it is worthwhile to determine whether statin or fibrate monotherapy is associated with greater clinical benefit in individuals with combined hyperlipidemia. In this randomized double-blind study, we compared the efficacy of simvastatin and fenofibrate on indexes of endothelial function (flow-mediated dilation (FMD) of the brachial artery) and inflammatory markers (plasma high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (CRP), interleukin-1 beta (IL-1 beta), soluble CD40, and soluble CD40 ligand (sCD40L) levels), as surrogate indicators of future coronary heart disease (CHD), in patients with combined hyperlipidemia. A total of 70 patients with plasma triglyceride levels between 200 and 500 mg/dl and total cholesterol levels of >200 mg/dl were randomly assigned to receive either simvastatin (20 mg/day) (n=35) or micronized fenofibrate (200 mg/day) (n=35) for 8 weeks. Treatment with simvastatin was associated with significantly greater reduction of total cholesterol and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), while the decrease in triglycerides was significantly greater in patients receiving fenofibrate. Both fenofibrate and simvastatin markedly reduced plasma levels of high-sensitivity CRP, IL-1 beta, and sCD40L, and improved endothelium-dependent FMD without mutual differences. The changes in plasma inflammatory markers did not correlate with baseline clinical characteristics in both groups. However, the improvement in FMD with fenofibrate treatment correlated inversely with baseline high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) levels, whereas the improvement in FMD with simvastatin treatment was positively related to HDL-C levels. Accordingly, in the subgroup with a baseline HDL-C of < or =40 mg/dl, only fenofibrate significantly improved the endothelium-dependent FMD. On the other hand, in the subgroup with HDL-C >40 mg/dl, only treatment with simvastatin achieved significant improvement in FMD. The data here indicate that in patients with combined hyperlipidemia, both fenofibrate and simvastatin have comparative beneficial effects on various inflammatory markers and differential beneficial effects on endothelial function according to baseline HDL-C levels. These findings should be validated by additional prospective studies, in which patients are stratified by baseline HDL-C prior to randomization.

Effect of atorvastatin and fenofibrate on autonomic tone in subjects with combined hyperlipidemia

This randomized open-label trial investigated whether autonomic cardiovascular control is altered in middle-aged men with combined hyperlipidemia and whether such alterations are affected by short-term, lipid-lowering therapy with atorvastatin and/or fenofibrate. Compared with normolipidemic subjects, untreated subjects with combined hyperlipidemia had several abnormalities of autonomic tone, indicating increased sympathetic tone and decreased baroreflex sensitivity. The alterations in autonomic cardiovascular control were partially reversible by each of the lipid-lowering drugs.

Atorvastatin and omega-3 fatty acids protect against activation of the coagulation system in patients with combined hyperlipemia

Activation of factor (F)VII by tissue factor may represent a critical event during plaque rupture in acute coronary syndromes. Patients with combined hyperlipemia are at high risk for developing coronary heart disease and their tendency to thrombosis may be accelerated during postprandial hyperlipemia. In the present double-blind, placebo-controlled parallel study, 42 patients with combined hyperlipemia and serum triglycerides between 2.0 and 15.0 mmol L(-1 )and serum cholesterol >5.3 mmol L-1 at the end of a 3-month dietary run-in period were treated with atorvastatin at 10 mg day-1 for at least 10 weeks. During the last 5 weeks the patients were randomized into two groups receiving 1.68 g day(-1) omega-3 fatty acids (omega-3 FA) or placebo (corn oil). The fasting levels of FVII antigen (FVII-Ag) and FVII coagulant activity (FVII:C) were high compared with healthy males. The fasting levels of activated FVII (FVIIa) and FVII-Ag correlated both to serum triglycerides and apolipoprotein A1 (apoA1). FVIIa and FVII:C increased during postprandial hyperlipemia. This increase of FVIIa correlated to the fasting triglyceride and apoA1 levels, but not to the degree of postprandial hypertriglyceridemia. The concentrations of fasting FVIIa in these patients were reduced in parallel with a reduction of fasting triglycerides by treatment with atorvastatin + placebo. This treatment also reduced the postprandial level of FVIIa. omega-3 FA in addition to atorvastatin further reduced FVIIa concentrations, fasting and postprandially, and also significantly reduced FVII:C and FVII-Ag during postprandial hyperlipemia. Prothrombin fragment 1 + 2 (F1 + 2) increased during postprandial hyperlipemia. This increase was significantly reduced after treatment with atorvastatin plus omega-3 FA. The increase of F1 + 2 measured as incremental area under the curve (iAUC) during postprandial hyperlipemia correlated to the fasting levels of FVIIa, FVII:C and FVII-Ag and also to the levels of these factors during postprandial lipemia. In conclusion, patients with combined hyperlipemia are at risk for activation of the coagulation system, particularly during postprandial lipemia. This activation may be significantly reduced by statins and omega-3 FA.

Normal lipid metabolism, familial hyperlipidaemia, lipid intervention and their benefits

Some recent developments in lipoprotein metabolism, familial hyperlipidaemias and lipid lowering therapies with reference to coronary artery disease (CAD) are reviewed. LDL-cholesterol (LDL-C) level and particle subclass are important determinants of the extent of cholesterol delivery to the peripheral tissues and thereby of atherogenesis and CAD. LDL modifications (eg, oxidation, adduct formation, desialylation, glycation, etc) enhance the above process. HDL particles bring cholesterol from peripheral tissues to liver (reverse cholesterol transport, RCT). ApoA1, LCAT enzyme, ABCA1 and cholesterol ester transfer protein are involved in RCT. Paraoxonase of HDL prevents oxidation of other lipoproteins and probably hinders atherogenesis. Lp(a) particles are like LDL except the presence of apo(a) that inhibits fibrinolysis and are epidemiologicaly linked to the development of CAD. Indians have high Lp(a), in comparison to whites. Familial hyperlipidaemias are due to altered metabolism of lipoproteins affecting plasma lipid profile. Majority of such patients are prone to atherosclerosis and CAD. LDL-C is the primary target of lipid lowering therapy. Statins inhibit HMG-CoA reductase and are mainly used alone or with other drugs for lowering blood lipids. 'National Cholesterol Education Program' now recommends a stringent LDL-C control ( < 100 mg/dl) for CAD and CAD risk equivalents. Therapeutic lifestyle changes and drug therapy are the main modalities to reduce blood lipids, aiming at total reduction of short-and long-term coronary risk for all (primary prevention), and of coronary mortality and morbidity in patients with CAD (secondary prevention).

Combination therapy for combined dyslipidemia

Patients with combined dyslipidemia are at high risk for coronary artery disease and often require combination drug therapy to achieve lipid levels recommended by the US National Cholesterol Education Program's third Adult Treatment Panel (ATP III). In addition to recommendations for low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol and triglyceride levels, ATP III established non-high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol goals for individuals with triglycerides >or=2.26 mmol/L (>or=200 mg/dL). It also introduced certain criteria for the diagnosis of the metabolic syndrome, a clustering of risk factors (abdominal obesity, elevated triglycerides, low HDL cholesterol, elevated blood pressure, impaired fasting glucose) that increases cardiovascular risk and is common in patients with combined dyslipidemia. Statin monotherapy has been shown to benefit these patients, and additional benefit may be obtained by combination therapy that provides greater reductions in both LDL cholesterol and triglycerides as well as greater increases in HDL cholesterol. However, combining a statin with either niacin or a fibrate may increase the risk for myopathy and therefore requires careful monitoring and evaluation of the risk-benefit ratio for each patient. Moreover, combination therapy may be associated with increased drug costs and decreased patient compliance. Recently developed agents that may improve the effectiveness of combination therapy include ezetimibe-a cholesterol absorption inhibitor-and a formulation that combines extended-release niacin and lovastatin in a single pill. Clinical trials are needed to determine the optimal treatment in patients with combined dyslipidemia.

Comparison of the effects of atorvastatin or fenofibrate on nonlipid biochemical risk factors and the LDL particle size in subjects with combined hyperlipidemia

BACKGROUND

Combined hyperlipidemia (CH) is an increasingly prevalent risk factor for premature heart disease, and its treatment is troublesome. The aim of this study was to compare the effects of atorvastatin and fenofibrate on nonlipid biochemical risk factors and the low-density lipoprotein (LDL) particle size in subjects with CH.

METHODS

Twenty-nine middle-aged men with CH were randomly assigned to open-label therapy with atorvastatin (10 mg daily) or micronized fenofibrate (200 mg daily); they were sequentially treated with both drugs, with crossover of medication after 10 weeks.

RESULTS

Atorvastatin was more efficient in the reduction of total cholesterol, whereas fenofibrate was more efficient in the reduction of triglycerides. Only atorvastatin led to a significant reduction of LDL cholesterol and apolipoprotein B. Only fenofibrate increased high-density lipoprotein cholesterol. Neither drug influenced lipoprotein(a). Mean LDL particle size increased both after fenofibrate (3.08%) and atorvastatin (1.77%). Fenofibrate increased serum homocysteine (HCY) by 36.5%. Atorvastatin had no effect on HCY. Only atorvastatin increased fibrinogen by 17.4%. Only fenofibrate reduced C-reactive protein by 51.7%. Neither drug influenced HOMA (homeostasis model assessment) index of insulin resistance. The plasma level of thiobarbituric acid reactive substances, an index of oxidative stress, decreased after both treatments.

CONCLUSIONS

Both atorvastatin and fenofibrate had similar beneficial effects on LDL particle size and on oxidative stress. The effects of both drugs on other parameters such as triglycerides, total and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, fibrinogen, or HCY differed significantly. These differences, together with the risk profile of a patient, should be considered during selection of a particular lipid-lowering modality.

Genetic factors play an important role in the pathogenesis of hyperlipidemia post-transplantation

BACKGROUND

Our purpose was to identify factors associated with hyperlipidemia post-transplantation in a Hispanic population.

METHODS

From 1985 to 1999, a kidney graft survival longer than 3 months occurred in 293 cases at the Instituto Nacional de la Nutrición. Most of the patients living in Mexico City were included (n = 83). The evaluation included a questionnaire, blood samples, and assessment of body composition and dietary habits. As many as possible first-degree relatives were studied.

RESULTS

Women had higher values of cholesterol (236 +/- 51 versus 215 +/-41; P < 0.05), low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (147 +/- 42 versus 131 +/- 34; P = 0.05), high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (57.3 +/- 14 versus 47.9 +/- 14; P = 0.002) and high-density lipoprotein-2 cholesterol. Isolated hypercholesterolemia was the most common lipid abnormality (40.9%), followed by mixed hyperlipidemia. Lipoprotein (a) greater than 30 mg/dL was found in 13 cases. Familial combined hyperlipidemia (FCHL) in the patient's relatives was a marker for dyslipidemia (odds ratio, 7.04; 95% confidence interval, 1.2 to 59.7). These cases had a worse lipid profile. Cyclosporine-treated FCHL patients had higher lipid levels compared with the non-FCHL, cyclosporine-treated patients. The effects of cyclosporine on the lipid levels were lower, but significant, after the exclusion of the FCHL cases.

CONCLUSION

Post-transplant dyslipidemia is determined by genetic and environmental factors. FCHL in the patient's relatives was associated with post-transplant hyperlipidemia; an additive effect with cyclosporine was found. The evaluation of the lipid profile of relatives may be useful for the assessment of the risk of post-transplant dyslipidemia.

Allelic polymorphism -491A/T in apo E gene modulates the lipid-lowering response in combined hyperlipidemia treatment

BACKGROUND

Combined hyperlipidemia (CHL) is one of the dyslipidemias more frequently found in clinical practice, and lipid-lowering drugs are often necessary in its management. Some genetic loci have been associated with CHL expression, and some studies have shown modulation of drugs efficiency in the treatment of dyslipidemias by genetic polymorphisms. We have investigated whether common polymorphisms and mutations in the apolipoprotein (apo) E, lipoprotein lipase (LPL), and apo CIII genes influence atorvastatin or bezafibrate responses in patients with CHL.

DESIGN

One hundred and sixteen subjects participating in the ATOMIX study (Atorvastatin in Mixed dyslipidemia) were randomized to treatment with either atorvastatin or bezafibrate. Apolipoprotein E genotype and common -491A/T and -219T/G polymorphisms in the apo E gene promoter region, Sst I polymorphism in the apo CIII gene (3238C/G), and D9N and N291S common mutations in the LPL gene were determined by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and restriction enzyme digestion.

RESULTS

Statistical analysis showed the influence of the -491A/T polymorphism in atorvastatin and bezafibrate treatments. Subjects carrying the -491T allele showed an increased LDL-cholesterol-lowering effect with atorvastatin compared with -491T allele noncarriers (-35% vs. -27%, P = 0.037). Subjects carrying the -491T allele, when on bezafibrate treatment, showed a lower triglyceride reduction compared with -491T allele noncarriers (-23% vs. -39%, P = 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

In our study, the -491A/T polymorphism in the apo E gene promoter region modulated the lipid-lowering efficiency of atorvastatin and bezafibrate in CHL patients. Such influence might explain some of the interindividual response variabilities observed for the two drugs, and could help in CHL management.

Effects of atorvastatin on postprandial plasma lipoproteins in postinfarction patients with combined hyperlipidaemia

Enhanced and prolonged postprandial lipaemia is implicated in coronary and carotid artery disease. This study assessed the effects of atorvastatin, a 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-CoA reductase inhibitor, on postprandial plasma concentrations of triglyceride-rich lipoproteins (TRLs). Sixteen middle-aged men with combined hyperlipidaemia (baseline low density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol and plasma triglyceride concentrations (median (interquartile range) of 4.54 (4.17-5.26)) and 2.66 (2.04-3.20) mmol/l, respectively) and previous myocardial infarction were randomised to atorvastatin 40 mg or placebo once daily for 8 weeks in a double-blind, cross-over design. The apolipoprotein (apo) B-48 and B-100 contents were determined in subfractions of TRLs as a measure of chylomicron remnant and very low density lipoprotein (VLDL) particle concentrations (expressed as mg apo B-48 or apo B-100 per litre of plasma), in the fasting state and after intake of a mixed meal. Atorvastatin treatment reduced significantly the fasting plasma concentrations of VLDL cholesterol, LDL cholesterol and VLDL triglycerides (median% change) by 29, 44 and 27%, respectively, and increased high density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol by 19%, compared with baseline. The postprandial plasma concentrations of large (Svedberg flotation rate (Sf) 60-400) and small (Sf 20-60) VLDLs and chylomicron remnants were almost halved compared with baseline (mean 0-6 h plasma concentrations were reduced by 48% for Sf 60-400 apo B-100, by 46% for Sf 60-400 apo B-48, by 46% for Sf 20-60 apo B-100 and by 27% for Sf 20-60 apo B-48), and the postprandial triglyceridaemia was reduced by 23% during active treatment. In conclusion, atorvastatin 40 mg once daily causes profound reductions of postprandial plasma concentrations of all TRLs in combined hyperlipidaemic patients with premature coronary artery disease.