Augmented effect of short-term pulsatile versus continuous insulin delivery on lipid metabolism but similar effect on whole-body glucose metabolism in obese subjects

Hyperglycaemia is associated with impaired pulsatile insulin secretion: effect of basal insulin therapy

AIM

Postprandial insulin pulsatility is impaired in patients with type 2 diabetes, but the effects of exogenous insulin therapy on pulsatile insulin secretion are not known. We addressed, whether pulsatile insulin secretion is related to glycaemic control, whether basal insulin supplementation increases postprandial insulin secretion, and if so, is this accomplished by a specific improvement in pulsatile insulin secretion?

METHODS

Fourteen patients with type 2 diabetes underwent a mixed meal test before and after an 8-week treatment period with insulin glargine. Glucose, insulin and C-peptide levels were measured, and insulin pulsatility was determined by deconvolution analysis.

RESULTS

Insulin treatment lowered fasting glycaemia from 179.6 ± 7.5 mg/dl to 117.6 ± 6.5 mg/dl (p < 0.001). Postprandial insulin and C-peptide levels increased significantly after the treatment period (p < 0.0001). The total calculated insulin secretion rate increased with insulin treatment (p = 0.0039), with non-significant increases in both pulsatile and non-pulsatile insulin secretion. Insulin pulse frequency was unchanged by the intervention. There was an inverse relationship between fasting and postprandial glycaemia and insulin pulse mass (r(2) = 0.51 and 0.56, respectively), whereas non-pulsatile insulin secretion was unrelated to either fasting or postprandial glucose concentrations (r(2) = 0.0073 and 0.031).

CONCLUSIONS

Hyperglycaemia in type 2 diabetes is associated with a reduction in postprandial insulin secretion, specifically through a reduction in insulin pulsatility. Reducing chronic hyperglycaemia by basal insulin therapy enhances endogenous β-cell function in the postprandial state. These data support the use of basal insulin regimens in the pharmacotherapy of overtly hyperglycaemic patients with type 2 diabetes.

Pulsatile portal vein insulin delivery enhances hepatic insulin action and signaling

Insulin is secreted as discrete insulin secretory bursts at ~5-min intervals into the hepatic portal vein, these pulses being attenuated early in the development of type 1 and type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). Intraportal insulin infusions (pulsatile, constant, or reproducing that in T2DM) indicated that the pattern of pulsatile insulin secretion delivered via the portal vein is important for hepatic insulin action and, therefore, presumably for hepatic insulin signaling. To test this, we examined hepatic insulin signaling in rat livers exposed to the same three patterns of portal vein insulin delivery by use of sequential liver biopsies in anesthetized rats. Intraportal delivery of insulin in a constant versus pulsatile pattern led to delayed and impaired activation of hepatic insulin receptor substrate (IRS)-1 and IRS-2 signaling, impaired activation of downstream insulin signaling effector molecules AKT and Foxo1, and decreased expression of glucokinase (Gck). We further established that hepatic Gck expression is decreased in the HIP rat model of T2DM, a defect that correlated with a progressive defect of pulsatile insulin secretion. We conclude that the physiological pulsatile pattern of insulin delivery is important in hepatic insulin signaling and glycemic control. Hepatic insulin resistance in diabetes is likely in part due to impaired pulsatile insulin secretion.

Essential elements of the native glucoregulatory system, which, if appreciated, may help improve the function of glucose controllers in the intensive care unit setting

In 2001, Van den Berghe and colleagues were able to show that tight glucose control decreases morbidity and mortality rates in the intensive care unit (ICU) setting. Several large, prospective, randomized controlled trials have failed to confirm these results. All of these studies attempted tight glucose control using expert-designed algorithms to adjust the rate of intravenous insulin. Unfortunately, these studies each had high rates of hypoglycemia, a high percentage of glucose values outside of the target range, and increased glucose variability. These three measurements have been shown to increase mortality rates in ICU patients. In order to achieve a high rate of success with regards to tight glucose control, a closed-loop system will need to be created. The two main elements of such a system are a continuous glucose sensor and a recursive glucose control algorithm. This review highlights the important elements of the native glucoregulatory system, which, if utilized, may help create a successful glucose control algorithm for a closed-loop system.

On high-frequency insulin oscillations

Insulin is released in a pulsatile manner, which results in oscillatory concentrations in blood. The oscillatory secretion improves release control and enhances the hormonal action. Insulin oscillates with a slow ultradian periodicity (approximately 140 min) and a high-frequency periodicity (approximately 6-10 min). Only the latter is reviewed in this article. At least 75% of the insulin secretion is released in a pulsatile manner. Individuals prone to developing diabetes or with overt type 2 diabetes are characterized by irregular oscillations of plasma insulin. Many factors have impact on insulin pulsatility such as age, insulin resistance and glycemic level. In addition, tiny glucose oscillations are capable of entraining insulin oscillations in healthy people in contrast to type 2 diabetic individuals emphasizing a profound disruption of the beta-cells in type 2 diabetes to sense or respond to physiological glucose excursions. A crucial question is how approximately 1,000,000 islets, each containing from a few to several thousand beta-cells, can be coordinated to secrete insulin in a pulsatile manner. This is blatantly a very complex operation to control involving an intra-pancreatic neural network, an intra-islet communication and metabolic oscillations in the beta-cell itself. Overnight beta-cell rest, e.g. during somatostatin administration, improves the disordered pulsatile insulin secretion in type 2 diabetes. Acute as well as long-term administration of sulphonylureas (SU) leads to substantial amplification (approximately 50%) of the pulsatile insulin secretion in type 2 diabetes. This is probably cardinal in terms of governing the hepatic glucose release in type 2 diabetes. Whether sulfonylureas also improve the ability of the beta-cells to sense glucose fluctuations remains to be explored. Thiazolidinediones reduce the pulsatile insulin secretion without affecting regularity, but appear to improve the ability of the beta-cell to be entrained by small glucose excursions. Finally, similar to SUs, the incretin hormone GLP-1 also results in an augmented pulsatile burst mass in both healthy and diabetic individuals, in the latter group, however, without influencing the disorderliness of pulses. This review will briefly describe the high-frequency insulin pulsatility during physiologic and pathophysiologic conditions as well as the influence of some hypoglycemic compounds on the insulin oscillations.

Motivations and methods for analyzing pulsatile hormone secretion

Endocrine glands communicate with remote target cells via a mixture of continuous and intermittent signal exchange. Continuous signaling allows slowly varying control, whereas intermittency permits large rapid adjustments. The control systems that mediate such homeostatic corrections operate in a species-, gender-, age-, and context-selective fashion. Significant progress has been made in understanding mechanisms of adaptive interglandular signaling in vivo. Principal goals are to understand the physiological origins, significance, and mechanisms of pulsatile hormone secretion. Key analytical issues are: 1) to quantify the number, size, shape, and uniformity of pulses, nonpulsatile (basal) secretion, and elimination kinetics; 2) to evaluate regulation of the axis as a whole; and 3) to reconstruct dose-response interactions without disrupting hormone connections. This review will focus on the motivations driving and the methodologies used for such analyses.

Regulation of hepatic and peripheral glucose disposal

Precise regulation of hepatic and peripheral glucose uptake is essential to preserve glucose homeostasis. The liver extracts approximately 1/3 of an oral glucose load, skeletal muscle extracts approximately 1/3, and other tissues, particularly the central nervous system and the formed elements of the blood, take up the balance. The load of glucose reaching the liver, the insulin concentration, and the route of glucose delivery (the hepatic portal or a peripheral vein) are key determinants of the rate of net hepatic glucose uptake. Glucose uptake by muscle requires three steps: delivery of glucose from the blood to the muscle, transport of glucose across the muscle membrane, and phosphorylation of glucose, processes affected by glycaemia and insulinaemia. Exercise stimulates insulin-dependent and -independent muscle glucose uptake, as well as the liver's ability to take up glucose.

Loss of beta-cell mass leads to a reduction of pulse mass with normal periodicity, regularity and entrainment of pulsatile insulin secretion in Göttingen minipigs

AIMS/HYPOTHESIS

Type 2 diabetes is associated with impaired insulin action and secretion, including disturbed pulsatile release. Impaired pulsatility has been related to impaired insulin action, thus providing a possible link between release and action of insulin. Furthermore, progressive loss of beta-cell mass has been implicated in the pathogenesis of Type 2 diabetes. The aim of this study was to evaluate a possible link between loss of beta-cell mass and impaired pulsatile insulin secretion with special focus on glucose responsiveness of insulin secretion.

METHODS

The kinetic and dynamic profiles of insulin in Göttingen minipigs are favourable for studies on pulsatility and a model of diabetes with reduced beta-cell mass has recently been established. Pigs were studied before (n=14) and after (n=10) reduction of beta-cell mass by nicotinamide (67 mg/kg) and streptozotocin (125 mg/kg) from 17.7+/-4.7 (normal animals, n=5) to 6.1+/-2.0 mg/kg. Pulsatile insulin secretion was examined during basal (n=8 normal, n=6 beta-cell reduced) and glucose entrained (n=6 normal, n=4 beta-cell reduced) conditions. Insulin concentration time series were analysed by autocorrelation and spectral analyses for periodicities and regularity, and by deconvolution for pulse frequency, mass and amplitude.

RESULTS

Reduction of beta-cell mass and secondary hyperglycaemia resulted in correspondingly (r=0.7421, p=0.0275) reduced pulse mass (42% of normal during basal and 31% during entrained conditions) with normal periodicity (6.6+/-2.2 vs 5.8+/-2.4 min, p=0.50), regularity and entrainability of insulin secretion.

CONCLUSION/INTERPRETATION

Neither beta-cell loss, nor 2 weeks of slight hyperglycaemia, as seen in the beta-cell-reduced minipig, probably accounts for the disturbed insulin pulsatility observed in human Type 2 diabetes.

Human insulin release processes measured by intraportal sampling

Insulin is secreted as a series of punctuated secretory bursts superimposed on variable basal insulin release. The contribution of these secretory bursts to overall insulin secretion has been estimated on the basis of peripheral vein sampling in humans to encompass > or =75% of overall insulin release. A similar contribution of the pulsatile mode of release was inferred in a canine model by use of portal vein sampling. The primary regulation of insulin secretion is through perturbation of the mass and frequency of these secretory bursts. The mode of delivery of insulin into the circulation seems important for insulin action; therefore, physiological conditions that alter the pattern of insulin release may affect insulin action through this mechanism. Transhepatic intraportal shunt in humans may provide access to portal vein samples, thus potentially improving the sensitivity of detecting and quantitating the frequency, mass, and amplitude of secretory bursts along with basal release and the regularity of these variables. To establish the insulin-secretory mechanism in nondiabetic humans by the use of portal vein sampling, we here assessed the mass, frequency, amplitude, and overall contribution of pulsatile insulin secretion by deconvolution analysis of portal vein insulin profiles. We find that, in nondiabetic humans fasted overnight, the portal vein insulin concentration oscillates at a periodicity of 4.1 +/- 0.2 min/pulse and with secretory peak amplitudes averaging 660% of basal (interpulse) release. The frequency was confirmed by spectral and autocorrelation analyses. The punctuated insulin-secretory bursts partially overlap and are responsible for the majority (70 +/- 4%) of insulin release. After ingestion of a mixed meal, the insulin release was increased through amplification of the secretory burst mass (507 +/- 104 vs. 1,343 +/- 211 pmol x l(-1) x min(-1), P < 0.001), whereas frequency (4.4 +/- 0.2 vs. 4.3 +/- 0.2, P = 0.86) and basal secretion (62 +/- 14 vs. 91 +/- 22 pmol x l(-1) x min(-1), P = 0.33) were unaffected. One subject with diabetes and cirrhosis had a similar insulin-secretory pattern, whereas a subject with insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus and minimal insulin release had preserved pulsatile release. A single subject was entrained to show agreement between entrained frequency and portal vein insulin oscillations. We conclude that insulin release in the human portal vein occurs at a mean periodicity of 4.4 +/- 0.2 min with a high signal-to-noise ratio (pulse amplitude 660% of basal). The impact of noise on the detected high frequency cannot be excluded.

Pulsatile insulin secretion: detection, regulation, and role in diabetes

Insulin concentrations oscillate at a periodicity of 5-15 min per oscillation. These oscillations are due to coordinate insulin secretory bursts, from millions of islets. The generation of common secretory bursts requires strong within-islet and within-pancreas coordination to synchronize the secretory activity from the beta-cell population. The overall contribution of this pulsatile mechanism dominates and accounts for the majority of insulin release. This review discusses the methods involved in the detection and quantification of periodicities and individual secretory bursts. The mechanism by which overall insulin secretion is regulated through changes in the pulsatile component is discussed for nerves, metabolites, hormones, and drugs. The impaired pulsatile secretion of insulin in type 2 diabetes has resulted in much focus on the impact of the insulin delivery pattern on insulin action, and improved action from oscillatory insulin exposure is demonstrated on liver, muscle, and adipose tissues. Therefore, not only is the dominant regulation of insulin through changes in secretory burst mass and amplitude, but the changes may affect insulin action. Finally, the role of impaired pulsatile release in early type 2 diabetes suggests a predictive value of studies on insulin pulsatility in the development of this disease.

Effects of fasting on physiologically pulsatile insulin release in healthy humans

Insulin is released as secretory bursts superimposed on basal release. The overall contribution of secretory bursts was recently quantified as at least 75%, and the main regulation of insulin secretion is through perturbation of the amount of insulin released and the frequency of these secretory bursts. The mode of delivery of insulin into the circulation seems important for insulin action, and therefore physiological conditions that alter the pattern of insulin release may affect insulin action through this mechanism. To assess the mechanisms by which fasting changes the amount of insulin released and the frequency, amplitude, and overall contribution of pulsatile insulin secretion, we used a validated deconvolution model to examine pulsatile insulin secretion during 10 and 58 h of fasting in seven healthy subjects. The subjects were studied for 75 min before (0-75 min) and 75 min during (115-190 min) a glucose infusion (2.5 mg.kg(-1).min(-1)). We found that the pulsatile insulin release pattern was preserved and that, at fasting, overall insulin release is adjusted to needs by a reduced amount of insulin released (10.1 +/- 1.7 vs. 16.0 +/- 3.2 pmol/l/pulse, P < 0.05) but similar frequency (6.3 +/- 0.4 vs. 6.1 +/- 0.4 min/pulse) of the insulin secretory bursts. In both states, glucose infusion caused an increase (P < 0.05) in amount (100-200%) and frequency (approximately 20%). The impact of increased glucose concentration on pulse frequency seems distinct for in vivo versus in vitro pulsatile insulin secretion and may indicate the presence of a glucose-sensitive pacemaker, which initiates the coordinated secretory bursts. Increased insulin/C-peptide ratio at long-term fasting (6.0 vs. 9.1%, P < 0.01) indicates that the changes in insulin release patterns may be accompanied by changes in hepatic insulin extraction.

Acute and short-term administration of a sulfonylurea (gliclazide) increases pulsatile insulin secretion in type 2 diabetes

The high-frequency oscillatory pattern of insulin release is disturbed in type 2 diabetes. Although sulfonylurea drugs are widely used for the treatment of this disease, their effect on insulin release patterns is not well established. The aim of the present study was to assess the impact of acute treatment and 5 weeks of sulfonylurea (gliclazide) treatment on insulin secretory dynamics in type 2 diabetic patients. To this end, 10 patients with type 2 diabetes (age 53 +/- 2 years, BMI 27.5 +/- 1.1 kg/m(2), fasting plasma glucose 9.8 +/- 0.8 mmol/l, HbA(1c) 7.5 +/- 0.3%) were studied in a double-blind placebo-controlled prospective crossover design. Patients received 40-80 mg gliclazide/placebo twice daily for 5 weeks with a 6-week washout period intervening. Insulin pulsatility was assessed by 1-min interval blood sampling for 75 min 1) under baseline conditions (baseline), 2) 3 h after the first dose (80 mg) of gliclazide (acute) with the plasma glucose concentration clamped at the baseline value, 3) after 5 weeks of treatment (5 weeks), and 4) after 5 weeks of treatment with the plasma glucose concentration clamped during the sampling at the value of the baseline assessment (5 weeks-elevated). Serum insulin concentration time series were analyzed by deconvolution, approximate entropy (ApEn), and spectral and autocorrelation methods to quantitate pulsatility and regularity. The P values given are gliclazide versus placebo; results are means +/- SE. Fasting plasma glucose was reduced after gliclazide treatment (baseline vs. 5 weeks: gliclazide, 10.0 +/- 0.9 vs. 7.8 +/- 0.6 mmol/l; placebo, 10.0 +/- 0.8 vs. 11.0 +/- 0.9 mmol/l, P = 0.001). Insulin secretory burst mass was increased (baseline vs. acute: gliclazide, 43.0 +/- 12.0 vs. 61.0 +/- 17.0 pmol. l(-1). pulse(-1); placebo, 36.1 +/- 8.4 vs. 30.3 +/- 7.4 pmol. l(-1). pulse(-1), P = 0.047; 5 weeks-elevated: gliclazide vs. placebo, 49.7 +/- 13.3 vs. 37.1 +/- 9.5 pmol. l(-1). pulse(-1), P < 0.05) with a similar rise in burst amplitude. Basal (i.e., nonoscillatory) insulin secretion also increased (baseline vs. acute: gliclazide, 8.5 +/- 2.2 vs. 16.7 +/- 4.3 pmol. l(-1). pulse(-1); placebo, 5.9 +/- 0.9 vs. 7.2 +/- 0.9 pmol. l(-1). pulse(-1), P = 0.03; 5 weeks-elevated: gliclazide vs. placebo, 12.2 +/- 2.5 vs. 9.4 +/- 2.1 pmol. l(-1). pulse(-1), P = 0.016). The frequency and regularity of insulin pulses were not modified significantly by the antidiabetic therapy. There was, however, a correlation between individual values for the acute improvement of regularity, as measured by ApEn, and the decrease in fasting plasma glucose during short-term (5-week) gliclazide treatment (r = 0.74, P = 0.014, and r = 0.77, P = 0.009, for fine and coarse ApEn, respectively). In conclusion, the sulfonylurea agent gliclazide augments insulin secretion by concurrently increasing pulse mass and basal insulin secretion without changing secretory burst frequency or regularity. The data suggest a possible relationship between the improvement in short-term glycemic control and the acute improvement of regularity of the in vivo insulin release process.

Glucagon-like peptide 1 increases secretory burst mass of pulsatile insulin secretion in patients with type 2 diabetes and impaired glucose tolerance

The insulinotropic gut hormone glucagon-like peptide (GLP)-1 increases secretory burst mass and the amplitude of pulsatile insulin secretion in healthy volunteers without affecting burst frequency. Effects of GLP-1 on secretory mechanisms in type 2 diabetic patients and subjects with impaired glucose tolerance (IGT) known to have impaired pulsatile release of insulin have not yet been studied. Eight type 2 diabetic patients (64+/-9 years, BMI 28.9+/-7.2 kg/m2, HbA1c 7.7+/-1.3%) and eight subjects with IGT (63+/-10 years, BMI 31.7+/-6.4 kg/m2, HbA1c 5.7+/-0.4) were studied on separate occasions in the fasting state during the continued administration of exogenous GLP-1 (1.2 pmol x kg(-1) x min(-1), started at 10:00 P.M. the evening before) or placebo. For comparison, eight healthy volunteers (62+/-7 years, BMI 27.7+/-4.8 kg/m2, HbA1c 5.4+/-0.5) were studied only with placebo. Blood was sampled continuously over 60 min (roller-pump) in 1-min fractions for the measurement of plasma glucose and insulin. Pulsatile insulin secretion was characterized by deconvolution, autocorrelation, and spectral analysis and by estimating the degree of randomness (approximate entropy). In type 2 diabetic patients, exogenous GLP-1 at approximately 90 pmol/l improved plasma glucose concentrations (6.4+/-2.1 mmol/l vs. placebo 9.8+/-4.1 mmol/l, P = 0.0005) and significantly increased mean insulin burst mass (by 68%, P = 0.007) and amplitude (by 59%, P = 0.006; deconvolution analysis). In IGT subjects, burst mass was increased by 45% (P = 0.019) and amplitude by 38% (P = 0.02). By deconvolution analysis, insulin secretory burst frequency was not affected by GLP-1 in either type 2 diabetic patients (P = 0.15) or IGT subjects (P = 0.76). However, by both autocorrelation and spectral analysis, GLP-1 prolonged the period (lag time) between subsequent maxima of insulin concentrations significantly from approximately 9 to approximately 13 min in both type 2 diabetic patients and IGT subjects. Under placebo conditions, parameters of pulsatile insulin secretion were similar in normal subjects, type 2 diabetic patients, and IGT subjects based on all methodological approaches (P > 0.05). In conclusion, intravenous GLP-1 reduces plasma glucose in type 2 diabetic patients and improves the oscillatory secretion pattern by amplifying insulin secretory burst mass, whereas the oscillatory period determined by autocorrelation and spectral analysis is significantly prolonged. This was not the case for the interpulse interval determined by deconvolution. Together, these results suggest a normalization of the pulsatile pattern of insulin secretion by GLP-1, which supports the future therapeutic use of GLP-1-derived agents.

Pathophysiology of impaired pulsatile insulin release

Plasma insulin displays 5-10 min oscillations. In Type 2 diabetes the regularity of the oscillations disappears, which may lead to insulin receptor down-regulation and glucose intolerance and explain why pulsatile delivery of the hormone has a greater hypoglycemic effect than continuous delivery. The rhythm is intrinsic to the islet. Variations in metabolism, cytoplasmic Ca(2+) concentration ([Ca(2+)](i)), other hormones, neuronal signaling and possibly beta-cell insulin receptor expression have been implicated in the regulation of plasma insulin oscillations. Most of these factors are important for amplitude-regulation of the insulin pulses. Although evidence exists supporting a role of both metabolism and [Ca(2+)](i) as pacemakers of the pulses, metabolic oscillations probably have a primary role and [Ca(2+)](i) oscillations a permissive role. Results from islets from animal models of diabetes suggest that altered plasma insulin pattern could be due to lowering of pulse amplitude of insulin oscillations rather than alterations in their frequency. Supporting a role of metabolism, altered plasma insulin oscillations were found in MODY2, MIDD and glycogenosis Type VII, which are linked to alterations in glucokinase, mitochondrial tRNALeu(UUR) and phosphofructokinase. Plasma insulin oscillations require coordination of islet secretory activities in the pancreas. The intrapancreatic ganglia have been suggested as coordinators. The diabetes-associated neuropathy may contribute to the deranged pattern as indicated by glucose intolerance in chagasic patients. Continued investigation of the role and regulation of pulsatile insulin release will lead to better understanding of the pathophysiology of impaired pulsatile insulin release, which could lead to new approaches to restore normal plasma insulin oscillations in diabetes and related diseases.

Concordant induction of rapid in vivo pulsatile insulin secretion by recurrent punctuated glucose infusions

Insulin is largely secreted as serial secretory bursts superimposed on basal release, insulin secretion is regulated through changes of pulse mass and frequency, and the insulin release pattern affects insulin action. Coordinate insulin release is preserved in the isolated perfused pancreas, suggesting intrapancreatic coordination. However, occurrence of glucose concentration oscillations may influence the process in vivo, as it does for ultradian oscillations. To determine if rapid pulsatile insulin release may be induced by minimal glucose infusions and to define the necessary glucose quantity, we studied six healthy individuals during brief repetitive glucose infusions of 6 and 2 mg x kg(-1) x min(-1) for 1 min every 10 min. The higher dose completely synchronized pulsatile insulin release at modest plasma glucose changes ( approximately 0.3 mM = approximately 5%), with large ( approximately 100%) amplitude insulin pulses at every single glucose induction (n = 54) at a lag time of 2 min (P < 0.05), compared with small (10%) and rare (n = 3) uninduced insulin excursions. The smaller glucose dose induced insulin pulses at lower significance levels and with considerable breakthrough insulin release. Periodicity shift from either 7- to 12-min or from 12- to 7-min intervals between consecutive glucose (6 mg x kg(-1) x min(-1)) infusions in six volunteers revealed rapid frequency changes. The orderliness of insulin release as estimated by approximate entropy (1.459 +/- 0.009 vs. 1.549 +/- 0.027, P = 0.016) was significantly improved by glucose pulse induction (n = 6; 6 mg x kg(-1) x min(-1)) compared with unstimulated insulin profiles (n = 7). We conclude that rapid in vivo oscillations in glucose may be an important regulator of pulsatile insulin secretion in humans and that the use of an intermittent pulsed glucose induction to evoke defined and recurrent insulin secretory signals may be a useful tool to unveil more subtle defects in beta-cell glucose sensitivity.

Pulsatile intravenous insulin replacement in streptozotocin diabetic rats is more efficient than continuous delivery: effects on glycaemic control, insulin-mediated glucose metabolism and lipolysis

Short-term exposure of tissues to pulses of insulin generally leads to an enhancement of insulin action. We have investigated the possible beneficial effects of long-term near-physiological continuous vs pulsatile intravenous insulin treatment of insulin-deficient streptozotocin (70 mg/kg) diabetic rats on blood glucose control, in vivo insulin action and in vitro insulin action in isolated adipocytes. First, we determined the 24-h peripheral plasma insulin profiles in normal rats under precisely controlled mealfeeding conditions. Basal plasma insulin levels (40 +/- 9 microU/ml) oscillate with a periodicity of 11.9 +/- 0.9 min (p < 0.05), and an amplitude of 60 +/- 10%. Subsequently, the 24-h insulin profile was mimicked in diabetic (D) rats by a continuous (c) or pulsatile (p) (6-min double, 6-min off) insulin infusion rate for 2 weeks, using a programmable pumpswivel unit. Control (C) rats received vehicle treatment. In Cc, Dc, Cp and Dp daily urinary glucose loss and average plasma glucose levels were 0 +/- 0, 7.5 +/- 4.4, 0 +/- 0, 0.8 +/- 0.4 mmol and 6.7 +/- 0.2, 11.5 +/- 2.7, 6.6 +/- 0.1, 5.9 +/- 1.4 mmol/l, respectively. Hypoglycaemia (< 3 mmol/l) was observed in 10 and 20% of the blood samples collected from Dc and Dp rats, respectively. After 2 weeks of treatment, in vivo peripheral and hepatic insulin action was measured by the hyperinsulinaemic euglycaemic (6 mmol/l) clamp with [3-3H]-glucose infusion. Pre-clamp counter-regulatory hormone levels were similar among rats. Compared to Cc and Cp, Dc showed a reduction in insulin sensitivity and responsiveness for peripheral glucose uptake whereas Dp only showed a reduction in insulin sensitivity. Suppression of hepatic glucose production by insulin was similar among rats. After 2.5 weeks of treatment, epididymal adipocytes were isolated. Specific [125I]-insulin binding, basal and insulin-stimulated [U-14C]-glucose uptake and isoproterenol-stimulated glycerol output were comparable among rat adipocytes. The inhibition of glycerol output by insulin was identical in Cp and Dp (V(max) = 48.6 +/- 6.1 and 42.3 +/- 4.6%) but blunted in Dc vs Cc (V(max) = 8.2 +/- 4.6 vs 44.0 +/- 7.2%, p < 0.01) adipocytes, suggesting a post-binding defect in the antilipolytic action of insulin in Dc rats. In conclusion, long-term near-physiological pulsatile intravenous insulin replacement in insulin-deficient diabetic rats is more efficient than continuous delivery in reducing blood glucose, lowering glucosuria, increasing insulin sensitivity and inhibiting lipolysis.