Taste aversion to sugars by the gerbil

Cross-Generalization Profile to Orosensory Stimuli of Rats Conditioned to Avoid a High Fat/High Sugar Diet

The orosensory characteristics of a diet play a role in its acceptance and rejection. The current study was designed to investigate the gustatory components that contribute to the intake of a palatable, high-energy diet (HE; 45% calories from fat, 17% calories from sucrose). Here, rats were conditioned to avoid HE diet by pairings with i.p. injections of LiCl to induce visceral malaise. Subsequently, the degree of generalization was tested to an array of taste compounds using a brief-access lick procedure (10-s trials, 30-min sessions). Compared to NaCl-injected controls, LiCl-injected rats suppressed licking response to 100% linoleic acid and 20% intralipid, and to a lesser extent 17% sucrose. There was more variability in the lick responses to sucrose among the LiCl-injected rats. Rats that tended to suppress licking responses to sucrose generalized this response to glucose, fructose and Na-saccharin but not to Polycose. In contrast, LiCl-injected rats did not significantly suppress lick responses to water, NaCl, citric acid, or quinine compared to controls rats. The brief access feature of this procedure, allows for behavioral measures when postingestive factors are minimized. These findings support a role for gustatory cues in the detection of high fat/high sugar diets. Furthermore, it appears that the fat component is a more salient orosensory feature of the HE diet.

Glucose elicits cephalic-phase insulin release in mice by activating KATP channels in taste cells

The taste of sugar elicits cephalic-phase insulin release (CPIR), which limits the rise in blood glucose associated with meals. Little is known, however, about the gustatory mechanisms that trigger CPIR. We asked whether oral stimulation with any of the following taste stimuli elicited CPIR in mice: glucose, sucrose, maltose, fructose, Polycose, saccharin, sucralose, AceK, SC45647, or a nonmetabolizable sugar analog. The only taste stimuli that elicited CPIR were glucose and the glucose-containing saccharides (sucrose, maltose, Polycose). When we mixed an α-glucosidase inhibitor (acarbose) with the latter three saccharides, the mice no longer exhibited CPIR. This revealed that the carbohydrates were hydrolyzed in the mouth, and that the liberated glucose triggered CPIR. We also found that increasing the intensity or duration of oral glucose stimulation caused a corresponding increase in CPIR magnitude. To identify the components of the glucose-specific taste-signaling pathway, we examined the necessity of Calhm1, P2X2+P2X3, SGLT1, and Sur1. Among these proteins, only Sur1 was necessary for CPIR. Sur1 was not necessary, however, for taste-mediated attraction to sugars. Given that Sur1 is a subunit of the ATP-sensitive K⁺ channel (K_ATP) channel and that this channel functions as a part of a glucose-sensing pathway in pancreatic β-cells, we asked whether the K_ATP channel serves an analogous role in taste cells. We discovered that oral stimulation with drugs known to increase (glyburide) or decrease (diazoxide) K_ATP signaling produced corresponding changes in glucose-stimulated CPIR. We propose that the K_ATP channel is part of a novel signaling pathway in taste cells that mediates glucose-induced CPIR.

Flavor preference conditioning by different sugars in sweet ageusic Trpm5 knockout mice

Knockout (KO) mice missing the taste signaling protein Trpm5 have greatly attenuated sweetener preferences but develop strong preferences for glucose in 24-h tests, which is attributed to post-oral sugar conditioning. Trpm5 KO mice express mild preferences for galactose but no preferences for fructose in 24-h tests, which suggests that these sugars differ in their post-oral reinforcing effects. Here we investigated sugar-conditioned flavor preferences in Trpm5 KO and C57BL/6J wildtype (B6) mice. The mice were trained to consume a flavored (CS+, e.g. grape) 8% sugar solution and flavored (CS-, e.g., cherry) water on alternating days followed by two-bottle choice tests with CS+ vs. CS- flavors in water and with unflavored sugar vs. water. The KO mice displayed strong preferences (>80%) for the CS+ glucose and CS+ galactose but not for the CS+ fructose flavor. They also preferred glucose and galactose, but not fructose to water. In contrast, the B6 mice preferred all three CS+ flavors to the CS- flavor, and all three sugars to water. In tests with the non-metabolizable sugar α-methyl-d-glucopyranoside (MDG), the KO and B6 mice preferred 8% MDG to water but did not prefer the CS+ 8% MDG to CS-. However, they preferred a CS+ flavor mixed with 4% MDG over the CS- flavor. Trpm5 KO mice also preferred galactose and MDG to fructose in direct choice tests. The Trpm5 KO data indicate that glucose and, to a lesser extent, galactose and MDG have post-oral reinforcing actions that stimulate intake and preference while fructose has a much weaker effect. The CS+ flavor and sugar preferences of B6 mice may be mediated by the sweet taste and/or post-oral actions of the various sugars. Glucose, galactose, and MDG, but not fructose, are ligands for the sodium-glucose transporter 1 (SGLT1) which is implicated in post-oral sugar conditioning in B6 mice.

Post-oral appetite stimulation by sugars and nonmetabolizable sugar analogs

Post-oral sugar actions enhance the intake of and preference for sugar-rich foods, a process referred to as appetition. Here, we investigated the role of intestinal sodium glucose cotransporters (SGLTs) in sugar appetition in C57BL/6J mice using sugars and nonmetabolizable sugar analogs that differ in their affinity for SGLT1 and SGLT3. In experiments 1 and 2, food-restricted mice were trained (1 h/day) to consume a flavored saccharin solution [conditioned stimulus (CS-)] paired with intragastric (IG) self-infusions of water and a different flavored solution (CS+) paired with infusions of 8 or 12% sugars (glucose, fructose, and galactose) or sugar analogs (α-methyl-D-glucopyranoside, MDG; 3-O-methyl-D-glucopyranoside, OMG). Subsequent two-bottle CS+ vs. CS- choice tests were conducted without coinfusions. Infusions of the SGLT1 ligands glucose, galactose, MDG, and OMG stimulated CS+ licking above CS- levels. However, only glucose, MDG, and galactose conditioned significant CS+ preferences, with the SGLT3 ligands (glucose, MDG) producing the strongest preferences. Fructose, which is not a ligand for SGLTs, failed to stimulate CS+ intake or preference. Experiment 3 revealed that IG infusion of MDG+phloridzin (an SGLT1/3 antagonist) blocked MDG appetition, whereas phloridzin had minimal effects on glucose-induced appetition. However, adding phloretin (a GLUT2 antagonist) to the glucose+phloridzin infusion blocked glucose appetition. Taken together, these findings suggest that humoral signals generated by intestinal SGLT1 and SGLT3, and to a lesser degree, GLUT2, mediate post-oral sugar appetition in mice. The MDG results indicate that sugar metabolism is not essential for the post-oral intake-stimulating and preference-conditioning actions of sugars in mice.

Orosensory detection of sucrose, maltose, and glucose is severely impaired in mice lacking T1R2 or T1R3, but Polycose sensitivity remains relatively normal

Evidence in the literature supports the hypothesis that the T1R2+3 heterodimer binds to compounds that humans describe as sweet. Here, we assessed the necessity of the T1R2 and T1R3 subunits in the maintenance of normal taste sensitivity to carbohydrate stimuli. We trained and tested water-restricted T1R2 knockout (KO), T1R3 KO and their wild-type (WT) same-sex littermate controls in a two-response operant procedure to sample a fluid and differentially respond on the basis of whether the stimulus was water or a tastant. Correct responses were reinforced with water and incorrect responses were punished with a time-out. Testing was conducted with a modified descending method of limits procedure across daily 25-min sessions. Both KO groups displayed severely impaired performance and markedly decreased sensitivity when required to discriminate water from sucrose, glucose, or maltose. In contrast, when Polycose was tested, KO mice had normal EC(50) values for their psychometric functions, with some slight, but significant, impairment in performance. Sensitivity to NaCl did not differ between these mice and their WT controls. Our findings support the view that the T1R2+3 heterodimer is the principal receptor that mediates taste detection of natural sweeteners, but not of all carbohydrate stimuli. The combined presence of T1R2 and T1R3 appears unnecessary for the maintenance of relatively normal sensitivity to Polycose, at least in this task. Some detectability of sugars at high concentrations might be mediated by the putative polysaccharide taste receptor, the remaining T1R subunit forming either a homodimer or heteromer with another protein(s), or nontaste orosensory cues.

The functional role of the T1R family of receptors in sweet taste and feeding

The discovery of the T1R family of Class C G protein-coupled receptors in the peripheral gustatory system a decade ago has been a tremendous advance for taste research, and its conceptual reach has extended to other organ systems. There are three proteins in the family, T1R1, T1R2, and T1R3, encoded by their respective genes, Tas1r1, Tas1r2, and Tas1r3. T1R2 combines with T1R3 to form a heterodimer that binds with sugars and other sweeteners. T1R3 also combines with T1R1 to form a heterodimer that binds with l-amino acids. These proteins are expressed not only in taste bud cells, but one or more of these T1Rs have also been identified in the nasal epithelium, gut, pancreas, liver, kidney, testes and brain in various mammalian species. Here we review current perspectives regarding the functional role of these receptors, concentrating on sweet taste and feeding. We also discuss behavioral findings suggesting that a glucose polymer mixture, Polycose, which rodents avidly prefer, appears to activate a receptor that does not depend on the combined expression of T1R2 and T1R3. In addition, although the T1Rs have been implicated as playing a role in glucose sensing, T1R2 knock-out (KO) and T1R3 KO mice display normal chow and fluid intake as well as normal body weight compared with same-sex littermate wild type (WT) controls. Moreover, regardless of whether they are fasted or not, these KO mice do not differ from their WT counterparts in their Polycose intake across a broad range of concentrations in 30-minute intake tests. The functional implications of these results and those in the literature are considered.

T1R2 and T1R3 subunits are individually unnecessary for normal affective licking responses to Polycose: implications for saccharide taste receptors in mice

The T1R2 and T1R3 proteins are expressed in taste receptor cells and form a heterodimer binding with compounds described as sweet by humans. We examined whether Polycose taste might be mediated through this heterodimer by testing T1R2 knockout (KO) and T1R3 KO mice and their wild-type (WT) littermate controls in a series of brief-access taste tests (25-min sessions with 5-s trials). Sucrose, Na-saccharin, and Polycose were each tested for three consecutive sessions with order of presentation varied among subgroups in a Latin-Square manner. Both KO groups displayed blunted licking responses and initiated significantly fewer trials of sucrose and Na-saccharin across a range of concentrations. KO mice tested after Polycose exposure demonstrated some degree of concentration-dependent licking of sucrose, likely attributable to learning related to prior postingestive experience. These results are consistent with prior findings in the literature, implicating the T1R2+3 heterodimer as the principal taste receptor for sweet-tasting ligands, and also provide support for the potential of postingestive experience to influence responding in the KO mice. In contrast, T1R2 KO and T1R3 KO mice displayed concentration-dependent licking responses to Polycose that tracked those of their WT controls and in some cases licked midrange concentrations more; the number of Polycose trials initiated overall did not differ between KO and WT mice. Thus, the T1R2 and T1R3 proteins are individually unnecessary for normal concentration-dependent licking of Polycose to be expressed in a brief-access test. Whether at least one of these T1R protein subunits is necessary for normal Polycose responsiveness remains untested. Alternatively, there may be a novel taste receptor(s) that mediates polysaccharide taste.

Is fructose sweeter than glucose for rats?

Because it is generally thought that the intensity of the taste of fructose is greater than that of glucose for rats, it seemed surprising when sham-fed rats drank substantially less of a mixture of 6% fructose plus saccharin than of a mixture of 6% glucose plus saccharin. At least 3 different factors contribute to this effect. First, the taste of fructose is less attractive to rats than is the taste of glucose; sham-fed rats strongly preferred glucose over fructose (no saccharin was used in this experiment). The second factor is experience. Rats having substantial previous experience with glucose, but not with fructose, consistently preferred glucose over fructose. Conversely, rats having substantial previous experience with fructose, but not with glucose, initially showed no consistent preference but subsequently tended to prefer glucose. The third factor is an interaction between saccharin and the type of sugar. Rats given only one solution at a time drink approximately as much fructose as glucose when the solutions contain no saccharin. The addition of 0.25% saccharin to 6% glucose stimulated intake, whereas the addition of the same amount of saccharin to 6% fructose did not stimulate intake. As a result, rats ingested substantially more of a mixture of 0.25% saccharin plus 6% glucose than they did of a comparable mixture of saccharin and fructose, even though rats ingest similar amounts of fructose and glucose without saccharin in single-bottle tests. Because the differential effect of saccharin on intake appeared within 2 h in naive rats, and did not greatly change over a 3-day period, it is probably not attributable to conditioning. These results suggest that these sugars have qualitatively different tastes.

Sucrose and fructose have qualitatively different flavors to rats

Previous studies suggest that rats might be able to discriminate between sucrose and fructose, but no previous study has examined this possibility in much detail. Rats were conditioned to avoid either sucrose or fructose by injecting them with lithium chloride when they drank these substances. Control rats were given the same injections but were not exposed to either sugar during training. After training, the rats were given a choice of fructose vs. sucrose. Data from control rats provided information about the relative taste intensity of the sugars. If the sugars possess only a single gustatory quality, control rats should prefer the sweeter sugar; under this assumption, sucrose appears to be two-four times sweeter than fructose. The two sugars share a common taste because rats trained to avoid sucrose avoided fructose when the fructose concentration was much greater than the sucrose concentration. Nevertheless, the two sugars are discriminable because, when the apparent sweetness of the sugars was matched, rats showed a greater aversion to the sugar they were trained to avoid. Aversions to sucrose and fructose also generalized to maltodextrins, but sucrose may have a somewhat greater maltodextrin flavor than does fructose. It is proposed that the biological function of maltodextrin taste is to allow animals to sense the ratio of glucose to fructose in foods.

Antagonism of the gerbil's sweetener and Polycose gustatory responses by copper chloride

Antagonism of the gerbil's whole chorda tympani nerve taste responses by CuCl2 was studied. A 30 min pretreatment of 0.1 mM CuCl2 suppressed responses to single concentrations of the following sweeteners: L-alanine, L-proline, D-tryptophan, 6-chloro-D-tryptophan, L-valine, glycine, sucrose, maltose, lactose, tetrachloro-galacto-sucrose, glucose, fructose, methyl alpha-D-glucopyranoside, glycerol, sorbitol, sodium saccharin, L-4'-cyano-3'-(2-2-2-trifluoro acetamido)succinanilic acid, phenethyurea, and stevioside. The responses to L-serine and the starch hydrolysate, Polycose were depressed to a lesser degree. The responses to glycine HCl and NaCl were slightly suppressed by CuCl2. The 0.1 mM CuCl2 had no effect on the shape of the sucrose concentration-response curve or its 1/2 maximal response (CR50), but did suppress the maximum response (Rmax), characteristic of non-competitive antagonism. Our work suggests the presence of 2 separate receptor sites on the gerbil's taste receptor cell membrane, one of which interacts with sugar sweeteners and most other non-sugar sweeteners and the other with Polycose.

Modification of the gerbil's taste behavior by the sucrose taste antagonist p-nitrophenyl alpha-D-glucopyranoside

Since the gerbil's chorda tympani nerve response to sucrose is antagonized by p-nitrophenyl alpha-D-glucopyransoide (PNP-Glu), the present taste aversion behavioral experiments sought to determine whether the gerbil's behavioral gustatory responses could be modified by adding PNP-Glu to taste solutions. Results demonstrated that the gerbil's aversion to sucrose was affected by the addition of PNP-Glu, but that the avoidance was overcome by the addition of high enough concentrations of the antagonist. When mixtures of sucrose and quinine were tested, the gerbil's sucrose aversion was unaffected, nor was any change noted in the taste behavior of gerbils trained to avoid 0.1 M sodium chloride after the addition of PNP-Glu.

Behavioral discrimination between glutamate and the four basic taste substances in mice

1. Behavioural studies using the conditioned taste aversion (CTA) paradigm in mice showed that aversion conditioned to monosodium L-glutamate (MSG), which elicits a unique taste in humans, did not strongly generalize to any of the four basic taste stimuli, suggesting that mice could behaviourally discriminate between MSG and the four basic taste stimuli. 2. Denervation of bilateral glossopharyngeal nerve significantly increased behavioural similarities (the strength of generalization in the CTA paradigm) between MSG and sodium salts. This was not the case after destruction of the bilateral chorda tympani nerve. 3. These results suggest that taste information of glossopharyngeal nerve plays a more important role in the behavioural discrimination between MSG and the four basic tastes than does that of the chorda tympani nerve.

The organization of taste sensibilities in hamster chorda tympani nerve fibers

Electrophysiological measurements of nerve impulse frequencies were used to explore the organization of taste sensibilities in single fibers of the hamster chorda tympani nerve. Moderately intense taste solutions that are either very similar or easily discriminated were applied to the anterior lingual surface. 40 response profiles or 13 stimulus activation patterns were considered variables and examined with multivariate statistical techniques. Three kinds of response profiles were seen in fibers that varied in their overall sensitivity to taste solutions. One profile (S) showed selectivity for sweeteners, a second (N) showed selectivity for sodium salts, and a third (H) showed sensitivity to salts, acids, and other compounds. Hierarchical cluster analysis indicated that profiles fell into discrete classes. Responses to many pairs of effective stimuli were covariant across profiles within a class, but some acidic stimuli had more idiosyncratic effects. Factor analysis of profiles identified two common factors, accounting for 77% of the variance. A unipolar factor was identified with the N profile, and a bipolar factor was identified with the S profile and its opposite, the H profile. Three stimulus activation patterns were elicited by taste solutions that varied in intensity of effect. Hierarchical cluster analysis indicated that the patterns fell into discrete classes. Factor analysis of patterns identified three common unipolar factors accounting for 82% of the variance. Eight stimuli (MgSO4, NH4Cl, KCl, citric acid, acetic acid, urea, quinine HCl, HCl) selectively activated fibers with H profiles, three stimuli (fructose, Na saccharin, sucrose) selectively activated fibers with S profiles, and two stimuli (NaNO3, NaCl) activated fibers with N profiles more strongly than fibers with H profiles. Stimuli that evoke different patterns taste distinct to hamsters. Stimuli that evoke the same pattern taste more similar. It was concluded that the hundreds of peripheral taste neurons that innervate the anterior tongue play one of three functional roles, providing information about one of three features that are shared by different chemical solutions.

Qualitative differences in polysaccharide and sugar tastes in the rat: a two-carbohydrate taste model

A conditioned taste aversion paradigm was used to assess the qualitative similarities between the tastes of a polysaccharide (Polycose) solution and sugar solutions (sucrose, maltose, glucose, fructose). In Experiment I, three groups of female rats were water deprived and conditioned to avoid a 0.025 M Polycose, a 0.1 M sucrose, or a 0.1 M maltose solution by pairing solution consumption with a lithium chloride (LiCl) injection; in a control group water consumption was paired with the LiCl injection. The extent to which the experimental groups generalized their conditioned aversion to the other three solutions was then assessed. The Polycose-conditioned group avoided the maltose solution more than the sucrose solution, and the maltose-conditioned group avoided the Polycose solution more than the sucrose solution. The sucrose-conditioned group avoided the maltose and Polycose solutions to the same relatively low degree. In additional tests the three experimental groups showed similar aversions to a glucose solution, but only the sucrose-conditioned rats avoided a fructose solution. Rats in a second experiment also displayed relatively little cross-generalization between Polycose and sucrose aversions even though they were tested with different solution concentrations. Additional tests confirmed the results obtained in Experiment 1 with maltose, glucose, and fructose solutions, and also revealed that the sucrose-conditioned group, but not the Polycose-conditioned group avoided saccharin solutions. Neither Polycose- nor sucrose-conditioned groups avoided quinine, sodium chloride, or hydrochloric acid solutions. These results, along with other recent findings, suggest that rats have two types of "carbohydrate" taste receptors, one for polysaccharides and one for sucrose, which produce qualitatively distinct gustatory sensations.

Effects of gustatory deafferentation on Polycose and sucrose appetite in the rat

Recent studies have revealed that rats are strongly attracted to the taste of starch-derived polysaccharides, and suggest that the taste receptors involved differ from those that respond to sucrose. The present study examined the possibility that different gustatory nerves mediate the rat's taste and appetite for polysaccharides and sucrose. This was accomplished by measuring the effects of selective gustatory nerve transection on the intake of Polycose and sucrose solutions in nondeprived female rats. Bilateral transection of the chorda tympani nerve produced comparable reductions in Polycose and sucrose intake, but bilateral transection of the glossopharyngeal nerve selectively reduced the intake of Polycose. Bilateral transection of the greater superficial petrosal nerve, and to a lesser degree, the pharyngeal branch of the vagus nerve, increased sucrose intake without affecting Polycose intake. These results indicate that while no single gustatory nerve mediates sucrose or polysaccharide taste, there is some specialization of function within the peripheral gustatory system. Combined bilateral transections of all four gustatory nerves produced the greatest reduction in solution intake, and reduced Polycose and sucrose consumption to the same degree. The suppressive effect was only partial, however, which indicates that relatively few intact taste receptors are required to maintain the rat's appetite for sugar and polysaccharide solutions.

The gerbil: a unique model for research on aging

The Mongolian gerbil (Meriones unguicultatus) is suggested as a model for aging research because of its unique physiological attributes, ease of handling, and because of data previously collected. Factors that demonstrate the gerbils' suitability in fulfulling practical and scientific considerations important in determining a model for aging research are listed. Additionally, several unique physiological attributes of gerbils are described. Based on these attributes and on review of research in gerbils, it is suggested that gerbils can serve as animal models for behavioral and biological processes, and for normative and pathological aspects for aging.

Qualitative discrimination of gustatory stimuli in three different strains of mice

Qualitative similarities and differences among various taste stimuli were examined by comparing the generalization patterns of a conditioned aversion from single chemicals to other compounds in 3 different strains of mice (BALB, C3H and C57BL mice). It was observed as a common characteristic in all 3 strains of mice that generalization gradients among sugars and saccharin Na appeared in the order sucrose--saccharin Na--fructose--glucose--maltose, in which the closer stimuli generalized more strongly to each other. Strain differences were found in sensitivities to D-phenylalanine and L-proline, which generalized to sugars and saccharin Na in C57BL mice, but not in BALB and C3H mice. These strain differences correspond quite well to those previously observed in the responses of single chorda tympani fibers to these amino acids in the 3 strains of mice. A hierarchical cluster analysis and a multidimensional scaling analysis showed that 15 compounds including the 4 basic taste stimuli (sucrose, NaCl, HCl and quinine-HCl) were classified into 7 different groups according to their behavioral similarities and some amino acids were not grouped with any of the 4 basic taste stimuli in the 3 strains of mice. These results suggest the possibility that mice perceive tastes of these amino acids in a way different from human taste primaries.