Effects of amphetamine and phenylpropanolamine on latency to feed and cumulative liquid diet intake in rats

Wake-promoting agents with different mechanisms of action: comparison of effects of modafinil and amphetamine on food intake and cardiovascular activity

Despite efforts to achieve a desirable weight, two-thirds of the population has an elevated body weight. Medications are useful in supporting weight loss, but produce adverse effects. This study compared the effects of amphetamine and modafinil on food intake and cardiovascular activity in healthy men and women. Participants (n = 11) completed 11 sessions. In random order, participants received placebo on five separate sessions and single oral doses of modafinil (1.75, 3.5, or 7.0 mg/kg) and amphetamine (0.035, 0.07, 0.14 mg/kg). Free time between hourly performance testing intervals gave participants the opportunity to eat. Like amphetamine, modafinil reduced the amount of food consumed and decreased energy intake, without altering the proportion of macronutrients consumed. Although both medications significantly increase heart rate and blood pressure at higher doses, the dose of modafinil that was efficacious in decreasing food intake did not significantly increase heart rate. Modafinil may be well suited for the treatment of obesity, although further studies with repeated dosing in overweight populations are warranted. Modafinil may have less adverse health consequences than some anorectic agents and greater treatment efficacy.

Effect of central acute administration of cadmium on drinking behavior

The effect of acute third ventricle cadmium administration on the drinking behavior of adult male rats under different situations was studied. Injections of cadmium chloride (0.07, 0.7,and 7.0 ng/rat) significantly attenuated water intake in dehydrated rats. Drinking behavior induced by acute intracerebroventricular injections of carbachol (2 micrograms/rat) or angiotensin II (5 ng/rat) was also inhibited by central cadmium injections. Cadmium-induced blockade in water intake in dehydrated animals was reverted by the previous administration of a 5-HT2 antagonist (RP62203) in different doses (5 and 10 micrograms/rat). The data clearly reveal that cadmium elicits very fast actions on the central nervous system. It is suggested that cadmium-induced attenuation of water intake may rely on at least three different mechanisms: impairment of cholinergic and angiotensinergic systems in the brain and stimulation of a central serotonergic drive acting on 5-HT2 receptors. The study of cadmium neurotoxicity by observation of drinking behavior, a behavioral parameter easy to be recorded and measured, is proposed.

Differential effects of serotonergic and catecholaminergic drugs on ingestive behavior

The serotonergic agonists fenfluramine and fluoxetine and the catecholaminergic agonists amphetamine and phenylpropanolamine are well known to cause a reduction in intake in rats. In the studies reported here we investigated the effects of these drugs on the microstructure of licking behavior of the rat ingesting 0.4 M sucrose. The purpose was to examine the similarities in the behavioral effects within and between these two classes of anorectic agents. The serotonergic agonists fenfluramine and fluoxetine caused a reduction in intake primarily by reducing the size of bursts and clusters of licking within the test meal without affecting the duration of the meal, suggesting a reduction in the palatability of the test solution. The catecholamine agonists amphetamine and phenylpropanolamine reduced intake primarily by reducing the number of bursts and clusters without affecting their size, suggesting a fractionation in the organization of the normal pattern of ingestion. The differences between the two serotonin and the two catecholamine agonists on the microstructure of the licking behavior suggest a different effect of the two neurotransmitters on the motor system that controls ingestive behavior. The similarities between the two different agonists within each class suggests a common neurotransmitter mechanism responsible for these two different effects on the behavior of the animals.

A review of the physiological bases of the anorexic action of phenylpropanolamine (d,1-norephedrine)

Phenylpropanolamine (PPA) is a phenethylamine that induces a variety of effects including anorexia and weight loss. The present review compares the acute anorexic effects of PPA with those of amphetamine in animals and humans, describes the persistent chronic effects of PPA on feeding as well as differences in anorexic potency between the norephedrine enantiomers (d-norephedrine less than 1-norephedrine) and summarizes the generality of PPA anorexia. The review also describes the putative mechanisms by which PPA is thought to reduce feeding behavior including alteration of gastric emptying and interaction with central nervous system neurons.

Effects of haloperidol on anorexia induced by l-norephedrine and d-amphetamine in adult rats

Although amphetamine anorexia has been linked to activation of dopaminergic receptors within the lateral aspects of the hypothalamus, the receptor type by which phenylpropanolamine (PPA: the racemic mixture of d- and l-norephedrine) induces anorexia has not been identified. In the present experiment, separate groups of adult male rats were pretreated (IP) with either 0.9% saline or haloperidol (either 0.4 or 0.8 mg/kg) 45 minutes prior to treatment (IP) with either saline or 20 mg/kg l-NEP (the active enantiomer of PPA) and were then allowed 180 minutes access to food and water. Treatment with 20 mg/kg l-NEP induced comparable reductions in food intake of approximately 30% in rats pretreated with either dose of haloperidol or saline. In a sub-experiment, it was demonstrated that 1.0 mg/kg d-amphetamine sulfate reduced food intake by 25%, but this anorexic action was completely attenuated by 0.8 mg/kg haloperidol given 45 minutes prior to feeding. These results add to a growing body of literature that documents important differences between the mechanisms by which amphetamine and PPA produce their anorexic actions.

Effects of perifornical hypothalamic microinjections of phenylpropanolamine and amphetamine on latency to feed and mash intake in rats

To determine whether phenylpropanolamine (PPA) and amphetamine act on a common satiety mechanism, the present experiment compared the effect of unilateral microinjections (40, 80, and 160 nmol) of phenylpropanolamine hydrochloride (PPA: d,1-norephedrine) and of d-amphetamine sulfate within the perifornical hypothalamus (PFH) on consumption of a palatable sweetened-mash diet in adult male rats. Microinjection of d-amphetamine (40-160 nmol) within the PFH induced dose-dependent anorexia, whereas PPA microinjections were without effect on feeding. These results document that amphetamine and PPA do not act at a common CNS site, such as the PFH, to induce anorexia.

Phenylpropanolamine and amphetamine disrupt postprandial satiety in rats

Two tests of the behavioral specificity of the anorectic effects of amphetamine (AM) and phenylpropanolamine (PPA) were done. Intraperitoneal injections of each drug reduced the size of condensed milk test meals in 30-min pellet-deprived rats. The dose-response relations in semi-log coordinates were linear and parallel, but AM (ED50, 2.0 +/- 0.1 mumol/kg) was about ten times more potent than PPA (ED50, 24.6 +/- 0.1 mumol/kg). Periprandial behaviors were observed using a time-sampling technique. Both AM and PPA disrupted the normal behavioral sequence of postprandial satiety throughout their anorectic ranges, but they did so differently. AM increased postprandial exploratory behavior, decreased or eliminated resting, and, at larger doses, elicited stereotypy. In contrast, PPA inhibited both grooming and exploration, and increased resting. The drugs' effects on water intake were tested in 17-hr water-deprived rats. AM's adipsic effect (ED50, 2.3 +/- 0.1 mumol/kg) was similar to its anorectic effect. PPA also inhibited drinking, although slightly less potently (ED50, 56.6 +/- 0.1 mumol/kg) than it did feeding. Thus, under conditions maximizing the anorectic potencies of systemically administered AM and PPA in rats, both drugs inhibited feeding nonspecifically rather than by eliciting normal postprandial satiety.