Signal detection analysis of ethanol effects on a complex conditional discrimination

A Signal Detection Analysis of the Effects of Alcohol on Visual Contrast Sensitivity

Numerous studies have shown that acute ethanol consumption can reduce visual contrast sensitivity when measured using traditional psychophysical methods. However, no consideration has been given to whether nonsensory factors may also play a role. The present study used both traditional techniques and signal detection procedures to evaluate this possibility. In three within-subject experiments, 41 observers (19 Females and 22 Males) were presented with faint, contrast-modulated, visual patterns and asked to say if they had seen them. In Experiment 1, contrast thresholds were measured using a randomly interleaved staircase procedure, and the data confirmed an increase in threshold following alcohol. In Experiment 2, using similar stimuli, but applying a signal detection analysis, we found that sensitivity, as reflected in d', did not change following alcohol. However, participants became more conservative in their response criterion. The third experiment was designed to allow thresholds to be measured directly with a conventional psychophysical procedure while permitting a signal detection analysis to be performed on the same data. The conventional psychophysical task showed an increase in contrast threshold, while the signal detection analysis showed no change in sensitivity, but a shift to a more conservative criterion. These data highlight the importance of taking into account alcohol's effects on cognitive processes, even when assessing basic sensory function.

Acute ethanol reduces reversal cost in discrimination learning by reducing perseverance in adolescent rhesus macaques

BACKGROUND

Acute alcohol exposure produces cognitive deficits in adults but less is known about the acute cognitive effects of alcohol in adolescents. The cognitive impact of acute alcohol exposure includes deficits in discrimination and reversal learning, but traditional experimental approaches make it difficult to distinguish the effect of alcohol on discrimination learning from the effect of alcohol on reversal learning. Young rhesus macaques can be used to model some aspects of human adolescence because of their anatomical, neurophysiological, and cognitive similarities with humans.

METHODS

Adolescent male rhesus monkeys (n = 10) were trained to respond to visual stimuli on touch-sensitive LCD panels controlled by the nonhuman primate version of CANTAB software. Discrimination and reversal learning tasks were subsequently assessed after monkeys were allowed to consume varying amounts of ethanol (EtOH) in a flavored vehicle (vehicle only, up to 0.5 g/kg EtOH, up to 1.0 g/kg EtOH, and up to 1.5 g/kg EtOH).

RESULTS

Acute exposure to EtOH reduced perseverance, increased response accuracy, and reduced errors during reversal learning when the task was completed within 90 minutes of EtOH consumption. No reduction in reversal errors was observed when EtOH was consumed 3 or 24 hours prior to reversal learning. EtOH only impaired discrimination learning when monkeys had very little previous EtOH exposure.

CONCLUSIONS

The temporal relationship between EtOH consumption and reversal learning was consistent with selective EtOH-induced impairment of retrieval, but not storage, processes. This was evidenced by diminished perseverance on the previously correct stimulus leading to decreased errors to criterion.

The acute impact of ethanol on cognitive performance in rhesus macaques

Decreased cognitive control over prepotent responses has been hypothesized to contribute to ethanol-induced behavioral disinhibition. However, the effects of ethanol on specific cognitive domains associated with decision making have not been extensively studied. We examined the impact of acute ethanol administration on cognitive performance of nonhuman primates. Studies were conducted using 0.2, 0.5, and 1 g/kg intravenous ethanol in rhesus macaques performing touch screen-based tasks examining stimulus discrimination, stimulus reversal, and stimulus response performance. The impact on attentional processing was also evaluated. Ethanol reduced the accuracy of reversal performance marginally at 0.2 g/kg and significantly at 0.5 g/kg. This effect was selective given an absence of impairment on the stimulus discrimination and stimulus response tasks at these doses. Performance on stimulus discrimination was impaired at 1.0 g/kg, which prevented determination of reversal performance. Analysis of post-error response times demonstrated that error processing was impaired at both 0.2 and 0.5 g/kg. Ethanol also increased the number of omissions and delayed responses on an attentional task, suggesting more frequent attentional lapses. These data demonstrate that cognitive function mediated by specific prefrontal cortical brain regions is particularly sensitive to ethanol and suggest specific cognitive mechanisms that may underlie harmful decisions made at low doses of ethanol.

Acute ethanol has biphasic effects on short- and long-term memory in both foreground and background contextual fear conditioning in C57BL/6 mice

BACKGROUND

Ethanol is a frequently abused, addictive drug that impairs cognitive function. Ethanol may disrupt cognitive processes by altering attention, short-term memory, and/or long-term memory. Interestingly, some research suggests that ethanol may enhance cognitive processes at lower doses. The current research examined the dose-dependent effects of ethanol on contextual and cued fear conditioning. In addition, the present studies assessed the importance of stimulus salience in the effects of ethanol and directly compared the effects of ethanol on short-term and long-term memory.

METHODS

This study employed both foreground and background fear conditioning, which differ in the salience of contextual stimuli, and tested conditioning at 4 hours, 24 hours, and 1 week in order to assess the effects of ethanol on short-term and long-term memory. Foreground conditioning consisted of 2 presentations of a foot shock unconditioned stimulus (US) (2 seconds, 0.57 mA). Background conditioning consisted of 2 auditory conditioned stimulus (30 seconds, 85 dB white noise)-foot shock (US; 2 seconds, 0.57 mA) pairings.

RESULTS

For both foreground and background conditioning, ethanol enhanced short-term and long-term memory for contextual and cued conditioning at a low dose (0.25 g/kg) and impaired short-term and long-term memory for contextual and cued conditioning at a high dose (1.0 g/kg).

CONCLUSIONS

These results suggest that ethanol has long-lasting, biphasic effects on short-term and long-term memory for contextual and cued conditioning. Furthermore, the effects of ethanol on contextual fear conditioning are independent of the salience of the context.

Effects of D-amphetamine and ethanol on variable and repetitive key-peck sequences in pigeons

This experiment assessed the effects of d-amphetamine and ethanol on reinforced variable and repetitive key-peck sequences in pigeons. Pigeons responded on two keys under a multiple schedule of Repeat and Vary components. In the Repeat component, completion of a target sequence of right, right, left, left resulted in food. In the Vary component, 4-peck sequences differing from the previous 10 produced food. d-Amphetamine (0.1-3.0 mg/kg, i.m.) was administered in two separate phases, separated by ethanol administration (1.0-2.0 g/kg, i.g.). Under control conditions, measures of variability were high in the Vary component, and lower in the Repeat component. Following administration of the highest dose of d-amphetamine, but not ethanol, response rates decreased in both components. d-Amphetamine and ethanol tended to increase overall sequence variability in the Repeat component, and had less of an effect in the Vary component. Performance in the Repeat component during Phase 2 of d-amphetamine administration was more disrupted than during Phase 1. Measures of variability and repetition based on shifts in the relative frequency distributions of the 16 possible keypeck sequences differed from those based on the overall measure of variability, highlighting the importance of considering both molar and molecular measures when assessing the effects of drugs on reinforced variability and repetition. In addition, the shifts in the relative frequency distribution of response sequences suggest that d-amphetamine produced decrements in repeat performance by decreasing discriminative control within response sequences, whereas ethanol decreased repeat performance by decreasing discriminability between components as well as discriminative control within response sequences.

Nicotine enhances contextual fear conditioning and ameliorates ethanol-induced deficits in contextual fear conditioning

Nicotine and ethanol are 2 commonly used and abused drugs that have divergent effects on learning. The present study examined the effects of acute nicotine (0.25 mg/kg), ethanol (1.0 g/kg), and ethanol-nicotine coadministration on fear conditioning in C57BL/6 mice. Mice were assessed for contextual and cued fear conditioning at 1 day and 1 week posttraining. Ethanol disrupted acquisition but not consolidation of contextual fear conditioning; nicotine enhanced contextual fear conditioning and ameliorated ethanol-associated deficits in contextual fear conditioning. Mecamylamine antagonized this effect. Fear conditioning was reassessed 1 week after initial testing with no drug administered. At the 1-week retest, mice previously treated with nicotine continued to show enhanced contextual fear, and mice previously treated with ethanol continued to show contextual fear deficits. Thus, nicotine both produces a long-lasting enhancement of contextual fear conditioning and protects against ethanol-associated deficits.

Advances in nonhuman primate alcohol abuse and alcoholism research

Advances in our understanding of the biological basis of alcohol abuse and alcoholism and the development of prevention and therapeutic intervention require appropriate animal models. Nonhuman primates are important to the study of complex biomedical disease processes. Genetic, anatomical, physiological, and behavioral similarities to humans offer unique opportunities for translational research along with the advantage of a degree of experimental control that is not possible in human studies. The purpose of this review is to outline the approaches taken with nonhuman primates as subjects in alcohol research and to highlight our current understanding of data on organismal variables that can be uniquely studied in these complex organisms. We review literature on alcohol self-administration to provide an integrative framework for discussion of progress in 2 important areas of research. Designs that incorporate self-administration provide a context for studying excessive alcohol consumption, including the organismal and environmental factors that influence risk for heavy drinking. We then review the use of monkeys to identify aspects of adverse biomedical consequences that follow excessive alcohol consumption. One of the primary conclusions to be drawn from this review is that nonhuman primates are a central part of the translational bridge in alcohol research, providing powerful and unique opportunities for experimental work that can address the biomedical complexities of alcohol abuse and alcoholism.

Ethanol disrupts fear conditioning in C57BL/6 mice

Ethanol has been demonstrated to disrupt numerous forms of learning. For example, ethanol disrupts fear conditioning in rats. Surprisingly, the opposite result was reported for mice. Because of the importance of mouse models in ethanol research and the predominance of transgenic mice generated on a C57BL/6 background, the present study examined the effects of acute ethanol administration on fear conditioning in C57BL/6 mice. Fear conditioning was chosen because of the apparent contradiction in results between mice and rats, because of its popularity in assessing forebrain-dependent learning and because the task examines two types of learning: (i) the hippocampus-dependent contextual learning and (ii) the hippocampus-independent conditioned stimulus-unconditioned stimulus learning. Dose-response curves were generated for ethanol (0.5, 1.0 and 1.5 g/kg) given on either training day, testing day, or both days. Ethanol, in a dose-dependent manner, disrupted fear conditioning when given on training day or given on both training and testing days. Ethanol given on testing day only did not disrupt fear conditioning. The present results demonstrate that ethanol disrupts fear conditioning in C57BL/6 mice.

Septohippocampal pathway as a site for the memory-impairing effects of ethanol

Ethanol affects behavior by interacting with synaptic sites at many levels of the nervous system. However, it targets most readily and at the lowest concentrations those sites mediating higher cognitive functions such as attention and memory. The memory-impairing effects of ethanol are thought to involve the hippocampus, a structure particularly vulnerable to the effects ethanol at low concentrations and early in the rising phase of the blood ethanol concentration curve. One of the early, low-dose effects of ethanol is an interruption of the normal physiological regulation of the hippocampus by the ascending septohippocampal pathway originating in the medial septal area (MSA). Ethanol enhances GABAergic transmission in the MSA, thereby reducing the regularity and vigor with which rhythmically bursting neurons of the MSA drive the hippocampal theta rhythm. Disruption of septohippocampal activity also has consequences on the response of the hippocampus to cortical inputs. Ethanol produces a loss of hippocampal responsivity that reduces the ability of the hippocampus to encode and retrieve relevant stimulus information necessary for accurate memory. This paper examines the behavioral and neural evidence for hippocampal vulnerability to ethanol and explores the hypothesis that these effects are due to ethanol disrupting septohippocampal modulation of the hippocampus, resulting in impairments of memory.

Discriminative stimulus effects of ethanol: neuropharmacological characterization

Generally, compounds discriminated by animals possess psychotropic effects in animals and humans. As with many other drugs of abuse, strength of the ethanol discriminative stimulus is dose related. The majority of studies show that doses close to 1.0 g/kg are close to the minimum at which the discrimination can be learned easily. Substitution studies suggest that anxiolytic, sedative, atactic, and myorelaxant effects of ethanol all play an important role in the formation of its intercoeptive stimulus. Low doses of ethanol produce more excitatory cues, similar to amphetamine-like subjective stimuli, whereas higher doses produce rather sedative/hypnotic stimuli similar to those elicited by barbiturates. Substitution studies have shown that the complete substitution for ethanol may be exerted by certain GABA-mimetic drugs acting through different sites within the GABA(A)-benzodiazepine receptor complex (e.g., diazepam, pentobarbital, certain neurosteroids), gamma-hydroxybutyrate, and antagonists of the glutamate NMDA receptor. Among the NMDA receptor antagonists both noncompetitive (e.g., dizocilpine) and competitive antagonists (e.g., CGP 40116) are capable of substituting for ethanol. Further, some antagonists of strychnine-insensitive glycine modulatory sites among the NMDA receptor complex (e.g., L-701,324) dose-dependently substitute for the ethanol discriminative stimulus. On the other hand, neither GABA-benzodiazepine antagonists nor NMDA receptor agonists produce contradictory effects (i.e., reduce the ethanol discriminative stimulus). There is influence of a particular training dose of ethanol on the substitution pattern of different compounds. For example, 5-HT(1B/2C) agonists substitute for intermediate (1.0 g/kg) but not higher (2.0 g/kg) ethanol training doses. Discrimination studies with ethanol and drugs acting on NMDA and GABA receptors consistently indicate asymmetrical generalization. For example, ethanol is able to generalize to barbiturates and benzodiazepines, but neither the benzodiazepine nor barbiturate response generalizes to ethanol. Only a few drugs are able to antagonize, at least to some extent, the discriminative stimulus of ethanol (e.g., partial inverse GABA-benzodiazepine receptor antagonist Ro 15-4513 and the opioid antagonist naloxone). The ethanol stimulus effect may be increased (i.e., stronger recognition) by N-cholinergic drugs (nicotine), dopaminergic drugs (apomorphine), and 5-HT3 receptor agonists (m-chlorophenylbiguanide). Thus, the ethanol stimulus is composed of the several components, with the NMDA receptor and GABA(A) receptor complex being of particular importance. This suggests that a drug mixture may be more capable of substituting for ethanol (or block its stimulus) than a single compound. The ability of drugs to substitute for the ethanol discriminative stimulus is frequently, although not preclusively, associated with the reduction of voluntary ethanol consumption. The examples of positive correlation are gamma-hydroxybutyrate, possibly memantine and certain serotonergic drugs such as fluoxetine. However, it remains uncertain to what extent the discriminative stimulus of ethanol can be seen as relevant in the understanding of the complex mechanisms of dependence.

Hippocampal-dependent learning and experience-dependent activation of the hippocampus are preferentially disrupted by ethanol

A classical fear conditioning paradigm was used to examine the effect of acute ethanol on the acquisition of context conditioning, a hippocampal-dependent associative task, and tone conditioning, a hippocampal-independent task. Administration of ethanol before the presentation of seven tone-shock pairings severely disrupted the acquisition of context conditioning, but had only a slight effect on tone conditioning, when conditioned fear was measured 48 h later. This effect was dose dependent: a dose of 0.5 g/kg had no effect on either context or tone conditioning, while doses of 1.0 and 1.5 g/kg disrupted context conditioning by 78-86%, and tone conditioning by 9-17%. Subsequent experiments indicated that ethanol's preferential effect on context conditioning could not be attributed to the fact that context conditioning is weaker than tone conditioning, ethanol-induced changes in motivational state or state-dependent learning. The effect of ethanol on stimulus-induced increases in hippocampal and neocortical expression of c-fos mRNA, a marker for changes in metabolic neuronal activity, was also examined. Ethanol completely blocked the induction of hippocampal c-fos mRNA by exposure to the conditioning context alone or seven tone-shock pairings, but only attenuated neocortical responses to these stimuli. Together, these results suggest that ethanol disrupts hippocampal-dependent learning by preferentially impairing stimulus processing at the level of the hippocampus.

Context and tone conditioning are selectively impaired by ethanol in the preweanling rat: effects of dose and time of administration

Depending on dose and task requirements, ethanol can have either a facilitative or an impairing influence on learning. Some explanations for this dichotomy have considered ethanol's suppression of behavioral variability and processing of incidental stimuli (e.g., context). The present study examined the effect of ethanol on context and conditioned stimulus (CS) learning in the preweanling rat. To assess state-dependent effects, a drug dissociation design was used. Learning to both context and CS were analyzed within each dose of ethanol (0, 1.2, 1.6, or 2.0 g/kg) and a trend analysis was conducted to determine dose-response relationships as a function of train-test state. The 1.2 g/kg dose of ethanol did not affect conditioning to either the context or the CS. A 1.6 g/kg dose tended to disrupt context, but not CS, conditioning. The influence of 2.0 g/kg ethanol depended on train-test conditions. Ethanol administration prior to training resulted in the stronger impairment of CS learning while context conditioning was most disrupted if ethanol was given only prior to testing. The results suggest that ethanol selectively attenuates processing of stimuli, possibly dependent on relative saliency at the time of testing.

Triazolam and ethanol effects on human matching-to-sample performance vary as a function of pattern size and discriminability

The effects of placebo, triazolam (2.0, 4.0 and 8.0 micrograms/kg) and ethanol (0.25, 0.5, 1.0 g/kg) on perceptual-motor performance were examined using a visual pattern matching-to-sample procedure in which pattern size and comparison stimulus discriminability were systematically varied. Baseline response rates and accuracy increased as the discriminability of the comparison stimuli increased. At the highest dose, both drugs decreased response accuracy. This disruption of accuracy was attenuated by increasing the discriminability of non-matching stimuli. Triazolam produced dose-related decreases in response rate while ethanol produced only slight decreases at the highest baseline rates of responding. Thus, triazolam produced response rate slowing at relatively lower doses than ethanol.

Delta 9-tetrahydrocannabinol interactions with phencyclidine and ethanol: effects on accuracy and rate of responding

The effects of delta 9-tetrahydrocannabinol (delta 9-THC) in combination with phencyclidine (PCP) or ethanol were examined in rats responding under a fixed-consecutive-number schedule of food presentation. Under this schedule, a minimum of 13 consecutive responses on one lever followed by one response on another lever produced food. When administered alone, PCP (0.1-10.0 mg/kg) and delta 9-THC (0.1-5.6 mg/kg), but not ethanol (0.3-1.7 g/kg), decreased accuracy. PCP, delta 9-THC, and ethanol alone all produced dose-dependent decreases in rate of responding. A dose-effect curve for PCP or ethanol was then redetermined in combination with selected doses of delta 9-THC (0.125-1.75 mg/kg) and the data were analyzed according to the effect-addition and dose-addition models of additivity. When administered in combination, delta 9-THC produced dose-dependent leftward shifts in the PCP dose-effect curves for both accuracy and rate of responding. The interactions for PCP + delta 9-THC combinations were effect-additive for accuracy. In contrast, the type of interaction obtained for PCP + delta 9-THC combinations on rate of responding depended upon the particular doses combined, as well as on the model used to analyze the interactions. According to the effect-addition model, these interactions were additive at low doses of delta 9-THC and supraadditive at the highest dose. However, according to the dose-addition model the interactions at the higher doses of delta 9-THC were infraadditive. Delta 9-THC also shifted the ethanol dose-effect curve for rate of responding to the left but did not alter the ethanol dose-effect curve for accuracy. The interactions for ethanol + delta 9-THC combinations were effect-additive for accuracy and both effect- and dose-additive for rate of responding. The present investigation clearly illustrates the importance of examining an extensive range of dose combinations on different behavioral measures, as well as the use of appropriate analyses in studies designed to evaluate the interactions between drugs.