Apomorphine sensitization effects: evidence for environmentally contingent behavioral reorganization processes

Context evoked morphine conditioned effects can be equivalent to morphine induced drug effects in terms of behavioral response and ERK activation in reward associated subcortical brain structures

Conditioned drug cues can evoke brief drug-like responses. In this report we show that using brief test sessions, contextual cues can induce conditioned hyperlocomotion and ERK responses equivalent to morphine induced responses. To assess acute unconditioned effects, rats that received morphine (MOR-1) or vehicle (VEH-1), were immediately placed onto an arena for a 5-min locomotion recording session after which ERK was measured in the ventral tegmental area (VTA) and nucleus accumbens (NAc). There were no differences in locomotion between the groups. However, the MOR-1 group had strong ERK activation in VTA and NAc. To assess MOR-conditioned effects, a chronic phase was carried out according to a Pavlovian conditioning protocol. There were two MOR paired groups (MORP), one MOR unpaired (MOR-UP) group and two VEH groups. The treatments were administered over 5 daily five minute test sessions. The final conditioning test was on day 6, in which one of the MOR-P groups and one of the VEH groups received VEH (MOR-P/VEH-6 and VEH/VEH-6, respectively). The other MOR-P group and VEH group received MOR (MOR-P/MOR; VEH/MOR-6, respectively). The MOR-UP group received VEH (MOR-UP/VEH-6). Rats received the treatments immediately prior to a 5-min arena test, and after the session ERK was measured. No morphine induced locomotor stimulation was observed on day 1 but on days 2 to 5, hyperlocomotion in both MOR-P groups occurred. On test day 6, the MOR-P/VEH-6 and the MOR-P/MOR-6 groups had comparable locomotor stimulant responses and similar ERK activity in the VTA and NAc. The MOR-UP group did not differ from the VEH group. We suggest that ERK activation evoked by acute morphine served as a Pavlovian unconditioned stimulus to enable the contextual cues to acquire morphine conditioned stimulus properties and increase the incentive value of the contextual cues.

Reversal of apomorphine locomotor sensitization by a single post-conditioning trial treatment with a low autoreceptor dose of apomorphine: a memory re-consolidation approach

Sensitization is a common feature of psychostimulants and sensitization effects are generally considered to be linked to the addictive properties of these drugs. We used a conventional paired/unpaired Pavlovian protocol to induce a context specific sensitization to the locomotor stimulant effect of a high dose of apomorphine (2.0mg/kg). Two days following a 5 session sensitization induction phase, a brief 5min non-drug test for conditioning was conducted. Only the paired groups exhibited locomotor stimulant conditioned response effects. Immediately following this brief test for conditioning, the paired and the unpaired groups received injections of 0.05mg/kg apomorphine, 2.0mg/kg apomorphine or vehicle designed to differentially impact memory re-consolidation of the conditioning. Two days later, all groups received a sensitization challenge test with 2.0mg/kg apomorphine. The 2.0mg/kg apomorphine post-trial treatment potentiated sensitization while the 0.05mg/kg eliminated sensitization. These effects were only observed in the paired groups. The activation of dopaminergic systems by the high dose of apomorphine strengthened the drug/environment association whereas the inhibition of dopamine activity by the low auto-receptor dose eliminated this association. The results point to the importance of conditioning to context specific sensitization and targeting memory re-consolidation of conditioning as a paradigm to modify sensitization.

Apomorphine-induced context-specific behavioural sensitization is prevented by the D1 antagonist SCH-23390 but potentiated and uncoupled from contextual cues by the D2 antagonist sulpiride

RATIONALE

In the study of behavioural sensitization induced by dopamine agonists, D1 and D2 receptors have a critical, but a puzzling role.

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study is to examine the effects of the D1 antagonist SCH-23390 and the D2 antagonist sulpiride given repeatedly alone or in combination with apomorphine upon apomorphine conditioning and sensitization.

METHODS

Apomorphine-induced (2.0 mg/kg) conditioning and sensitization were assessed following five paired/unpaired treatments. Sulpiride (10, 30 and 100 mg/kg) and SCH-23390 (0.01, 0.02 and 0.05 mg/kg) were administered alone or in combination with apomorphine. In experiment 1, the effect of 5 days of sulpiride and SCH-23390 treatments given alone were assessed on apomorphine reactivity. In experiment 2, sulpiride and SCH-23390 were co-administered with apomorphine for 5 days and subsequently, conditioning and sensitization tests were performed. In experiment 3, following five apomorphine treatment sessions, sulpiride and SCH-23390 were administered prior to the conditioning and sensitization tests.

RESULTS

SCH-23390 and sulpiride induced hyper-reactivity to apomorphine. SCH-23390 when given after the induction of apomorphine sensitization, blocked the expression of apomorphine sensitization. When given in combination with apomorphine, SCH-23390 blocked the apomorphine conditioning and sensitization, whereas low-dose sulpiride permitted conditioning and enhanced apomorphine sensitization and high-dose sulpiride blocked conditioning but permitted apomorphine sensitization. Both sulpiride doses transformed apomorphine sensitization from context-specific to context-independent sensitization.

CONCLUSION

The SCH-23390 findings are supportive of a critical role for D1 receptors in apomorphine effects whereas the sulpiride effects diminish the importance of conditioning and dopamine autoreceptor subsensitivity mechanisms in the mediation of apomorphine sensitization.

Role of dopamine receptors on electroencephalographic changes produced by repetitive apomorphine treatments in rats

Repeated psychostimulants induce electroencephalographic (EEG) changes, which reflect adaptation of the neural substrate related to dopaminergic pathways. To study the role of dopamine receptors in EEG changes, we examined the effect of apomorphine, the dopamine D1 receptor antagonist, SCH-23390, and the D2 receptor antagonist, haloperidol, on EEG in rats. For single and repeated apomorphine treatment groups, the rats received saline or apomorphine for 4 days followed by a 3-day withdrawal period and then apomorphine (2.5 mg/kg, i.p.) challenge after pretreatment with saline, SCH-23390, or haloperidol on the day of the experiment. EEGs from the frontal and parietal cortices were recorded. On the frontal cortex, apomorphine decreased the power of all the frequency bands in the single treatment group, and increased the theta (4.5~8 Hz) and alpha (8~13 Hz) powers in the repeated treatment group. Changes in both groups were reversed to the control values by SCH-23390. On the parietal cortex, single apomorphine treatment decreased the power of some frequency bands, which were reversed by haloperidol but not by SCH-23390. Repeated apomorphine treatment did not produce significant changes in the power profile. These results show that adaptation of dopamine pathways by repeated apomorphine treatment could be identified with EEG changes such as increases in theta and alpha power of the frontal cortex, and this adaptation may occur through changes in the D1 receptor and/or the D2 receptor.

Behavioral sensitization produced by a single administration of apomorphine: Implications for the role of Pavlovian conditioning in the mediation of context-specific sensitization

The present study examined the minimal number of exposures to the D1/D2 agonist apomorphine capable of producing behavioral sensitization. Rats received one (experiment 1) or two administrations on two successive days (experiment 2) of apomorphine (0.5 and 2.0 mg/kg) paired or unpaired to an open-field environment. After 2 days of drug withdrawal, the rats received a challenge injection with the same dose of apomorphine (sensitization test) and locomotion, rearing and sniffing were measured. The results of the first experiment showed that locomotor sensitization occurred after a single acute exposure to apomorphine and that 0.5 and 2.0 mg/kg treatments were equally effective. This sensitization effect was context-specific and was limited to locomotion. The second experiment revealed a differential dose effect on the sensitization test. Two treatments with 2.0 mg/kg potentiated locomotor sensitization as compared with a single treatment but two treatments with 0.5 mg/kg did not increase the sensitization effect more than the single 0.5 mg/kg treatment. This result indicates an interaction between drug dose and frequency of drug treatment for the induction of apomorphine locomotor sensitization. In that the sensitization effects are considered to be a core contributor to psychostimulant addiction, the present findings are of importance to understanding addiction because they indicate that sensitization processes can be initiated with a single drug experience and amplified with exposure to higher drug dosage levels.

The 5-HT1A receptor and behavioral stimulation in the rat: effects of 8-OHDPAT on spontaneous and cocaine-induced behavior

RATIONALE

The contribution of the 5-HT(1A) somato-dendritic autoreceptor populations to spontaneous and cocaine-induced locomotion is unclear.

OBJECTIVES

To use a low dose range of +/-8-hydroxy-2-(di- n-propylamino)tetralin (8-OHDPAT) to preferentially stimulate 5-HT(1A) autoreceptors and a medium 8-OHDPAT dose range to stimulate both 5-HT(1A) autoreceptors and postsynaptic receptors as pretreatments prior to either saline or cocaine.

METHODS

In experiment 1, either a medium dose of 8-OHDPAT (0.4 mg/kg) or a low dose (0.05 mg/kg) was given as pretreatments 20 min before five separate 20-min open-field tests. In experiment 2, the pretreatments were changed to a low dose range of 8-OHDPAT (0.01-0.05 mg/kg), with or without WAY 100635 (0.01-0.05 mg/kg). In experiment 3, the 8-OHDPAT pretreatments (0.01, 0.025 or 0.05 mg/kg) were administered 20 min prior to saline or cocaine (10 mg/kg) tests. In experiment 4, a medium dose range (0.2-0.3 mg/kg) was given 20 min prior to saline or cocaine (10 mg/kg) tests.

RESULTS

Experiment 1 showed that 8-OHDPAT (0.4 mg/kg) tended to increase locomotor activity but that pretreatment with 0.05 mg/kg severely suppressed locomotor activity. In experiment 2, 8-OHDPAT in the low dose range inhibited locomotor activity and this effect was reversed by co-administration of WAY 100635. Experiment 3 showed that the low-dose 8-OHDPAT pretreatment reduced locomotor activity in saline but not cocaine tests. In experiment 4, 8-OHDPAT in the medium dose range enhanced locomotor activity in cocaine tests.

CONCLUSIONS

It is suggested that the facilitatory effect of 8-OHDPAT on cocaine-induced locomotor stimulation is mediated by inhibition of 5-HT(1A) somato-dendritic autoreceptors.

Repeated treatments with 7-OH-DPAT: context-independent behavioral sensitization and conditioned hyperactivity

The primary objective of this study was to determine whether the expression of behavioral sensitization to the putative dopamine D3 receptor agonist 7-OH-DPAT is context dependent. Three groups (n = 8 each) of male Wistar rats (250-350 g) were given nine injections (at 48-h intervals) of 7-OH-DPAT (1.0 mg/kg, SC) or vehicle 15 min before and after activity testing. The paired group received 7-OH-DPAT before activity testing and vehicle after testing. The unpaired group received vehicle before and 7-OH-DPAT after testing, and the vehicle control group received two vehicle injections. Locomotor activity was measured in photocell arenas for 2 h. After the first seven sessions, all rats were tested for activity following a vehicle injection to test for possible conditioning effects. Prior to the 11th session, all rats were given a challenge injection of 7-OH-DPAT (1.0 mg/kg, SC) to test for sensitization. Major findings were as follows: (a) the 7-OH-DPAT/paired group displayed a progressively greater increase in locomotor activity with repeated treatments; (b) the 7-OH-DPAT/paired group was significantly more active than either the vehicle control group or the 7-OH-DPAT/unpaired group during the vehicle test session; and (c) after the 7-OH-DPAT challenge injection, the paired and unpaired 7-OH-DPAT groups were significantly, and equally, more active than the vehicle control group. In contrast to previous findings with the D2-type dopamine agonists bromocriptine and quinpirole, these results suggest that the expression of behavioral sensitization to 7-OH-DPAT is not context dependent. Moreover, these results suggest that the apparent conditioned hyperactivity and context dependency often observed after repeated dopamine agonist treatments may not be related to the same associative and/or nonassociative mechanisms.

Anticipatory responding, exclusive drug-context pairing and conditioned effects in sensitization to apomorphine-induced climbing in mice

1. The conditioning aspects of contextual sensitization were examined in the case of apomorphine-induced wall-climbing in mice, measuring onset latencies of the pharmacological response and controlling differential habituation to the test context during drug treatment. 2. Sensitization was generated in male out-bred mice which received intermittent i.p. injections of 0.4 mg/kg apomorphine over 9 daily sessions. On day 10, they were tested for contextual sensitization (all mice under apomorphine). On day 14, after 3 sessions of reinstatement, mice were tested for conditioned climbing (all mice under saline). 3. It was found that simultaneous exposure to both apomorphine and the test context facilitated the expression of a full-blown contextual sensitization (some non-contextual sensitization emerging too); importantly, sensitization was accompanied by a progressive shortening of the latencies to climb (before injections); conditioned climbing appeared only in mice pairing the drug with the test context, that response being absent in mice treated outside the context or never exposed to the context. 4. It is likely that contextual sensitization to apomorphine-induced climbing relies on Pavlovian conditioning processes rather than on habituation-related processes.

Drug conditioning induced by intrastriatal apomorphine administration

The present study examined (1) whether the neostriatum is involved in a drug-induced conditioned locomotor response and; (2) whether this structure participates in the development of behavioral sensitization. Moreover, the present study addressed the question whether the development of behavioral sensitization is necessary for the induction of conditioning. Rats received injections of either apomorphine (2 microg) or vehicle (solution of 0.1% ascorbate/saline) into the dorsal neostriatum daily for 7 days. These treatments were performed immediately prior to (apomorphine-paired group and vehicle group) or 30 min following (apomorphine-unpaired group) 10-min placement in an open field which served as the test environment. After a 3-day drug withdrawal period, the animals were given a 10-min non-drug vehicle test trial in the test environment. Three days later, a drug test with apomorphine was administered to the animals of the paired and unpaired treatment groups; the vehicle group again received an injection of vehicle. The analysis of locomotor activity in the open field (measured as the distance traversed) revealed that locomotor activity in the apomorphine-paired group was higher than in the other groups. There were no indications for behavioral sensitization to intrastriatal apomorphine, since the locomotor response in the apomorphine-paired group did not increase, but rather decreased with daily repeated injections of apomorphine. Furthermore, only the apomorphine-paired animals showed a higher locomotor response when tested after an intrastriatal injection of vehicle in the previously apomorphine-paired environment, which is indicative of a conditioned drug effect. These results suggest that the neostriatum is directly involved in the development of drug-induced conditioning of locomotor behavior but not in the establishment of behavioral sensitization.

Cocaine conditioning and cocaine sensitization: what is the relationship?

With repeated cocaine use, cocaine conditioned behavior develops to associated stimuli, and in addition, sensitization can occur to the unconditioned stimulant effects of cocaine. To investigate the relationship between the conditioned and unconditioned behavioral effects of repeated cocaine use, two groups of rats (n = 7) were given five daily paired cocaine treatments (10 mg/kg i.p.) immediately before a 20-min placement in an open-field environment. Other groups received either saline before testing or cocaine unpaired which was administered 30 min after testing in the homecage. When tested in the open-field with saline for conditioned effects, the two cocaine paired groups selectively exhibited substantial and equivalent cocaine conditioned responses. One of these groups was subjected to an extinction procedure which was effective in eliminating the cocaine conditioned responses. Subsequently, all the rats which had received cocaine in the first phase of the experiment, paired and unpaired, along with a subset of saline animals were given a cocaine (10 mg/kg i.p.) challenge test. The paired cocaine animals exhibited an earlier onset of the cocaine induced behavioral response (sensitization) as compared with the saline and the unpaired cocaine animals. Critically, the sensitization effects were unaffected by extinction, and in addition, the conditioned response did not contribute to the sensitization effect. It is suggested that the cocaine drug response occludes the cocaine conditioned response. Subsequent to this sensitization test, the animals were retested for conditioning. In this test, the paired cocaine animals which had not been subjected to the extinction procedure still exhibited a conditioned cocaine response, whereas, the paired cocaine group subjected to extinction was indistinguishable from saline controls. Although the present results show that Pavlovian conditioned responses to exteroceptive contextual cues do not directly contribute to cocaine induced behavioral sensitization effects, the sensitization effects were context-specific, and therefore, were tied to associative processes. It is suggested that context specificity is mediated by a compound stimulus complex comprised of exteroceptive stimuli and interoceptive cocaine drug cues. Furthermore, these exteroceptive and interoceptive cues associated with cocaine effectively expedite the onset of cocaine effects, and thereby, facilitate the addictive potency of cocaine.

A simple and reliable method for the positive identification of pavlovian conditioned cocaine effects in open-field behavior

The identification of the Pavlovian conditioning of the behavioral effects of cocaine using open-field behavior is often confounded by the concurrent occurrence of behavioral habituation in control animals. Thus, differences in spontaneous activity between cocaine conditioned animals vs. control can be explained either by Pavlovian conditioning of the psychostimulant effects of cocaine or by anti-habituation effects of cocaine. In a series of experiments we demonstrate that location of the animal within the open-field permits a positive identification of cocaine conditioning independent from habituation factors. In three separate experiments, five daily paired 10 mg/kg cocaine treatments induced both increased locomotion as well as increased entries into the central zone in the open-field as compared with saline and cocaine unpaired control groups. Critically, in three experimental replications, animals which received the paired cocaine treatment exhibited statistically significant increases in central zone entries in non-drug tests for conditioning both with respect to the saline and cocaine unpaired groups as well as to pre-conditioning levels. In contrast, the spontaneous locomotor behavior in the cocaine paired group on the conditioning test did not reliably increase above pre-conditioning levels but rather was only increased when compared with the reduced habituated activity levels in the saline and cocaine unpaired groups. The conditioned increase in central zone entries induced by cocaine was equally robust at 4 and 9 days post-conditioning but yet could be extinguished with repeated non-cocaine exposures to the open-field environment.

The NMDA receptor and cocaine: evidence that MK-801 can induce behavioral sensitization effects

Antagonism of the NMDA receptor with MK-801 is considered to be an effective pharmacologic manipulation to prevent the development of sensitization effects to drugs such as cocaine. The present study investigated this issue by comparing the behavioral response of separate groups of rats to three treatment cycles of either saline, 0.1 mg/kg MK-801, 10 mg/kg cocaine, or combined MK-801-cocaine (0.1/10 mg/kg). The treatments were spaced 1 week apart and were preceded by two nondrug baseline tests. In the first test cycle, the four groups had equivalent activity levels in the two nondrug tests. In the first drug test only the MK-801-cocaine group exhibited hyperactivity. By the third drug test, the MK-801-cocaine group exhibited an enhanced hyperactivity and the MK-801 group became hyperactive. Thus, behavioral drug sensitization developed but only with groups treated with MK-801. Antagonism of the NMDA receptor under some circumstances can be a highly effective treatment for the induction of behavioral sensitization effects.

Evidence for N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor mediation of cocaine induced corticosterone release and cocaine conditioned stimulant effects

The role of the N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptors in cocaine conditioning and sensitization of locomotor activity was studied in four groups of Sprague-Dawley rats. A sub-motoric dose of the NMDA antagonist MK-801 (0.1 mg/kg, i.p.) was employed using a novel dual-compartment Pavlovian drug conditioning paradigm. The animals were placed sequentially in two different test environments in which locomotor activity was monitored. In the first compartment, the animals always received a non-drug test for 20 min. Upon completion of this test, the animals received either saline, cocaine (10 mg/kg i.p.), MK-801 or MK-801 plus cocaine depending on group assignment and were then placed immediately into the second compartment and again tested for 20 min. A total of six non-drug and six drug tests were conducted every other day over a 12-day period. Across all drug/saline treatment and post-treatment tests for conditioning, there were no statistical differences in locomotor activity among the saline and drug treatment groups in the non-drug test environment. In the drug/saline associated environment, however, cocaine had a reliable stimulant effect on locomotion when administered alone or in combination with MK-801. Following a 1-day and again after 21-days of withdrawal, all animals were administered a non-drug test for conditioning in which no injections were administered. On both tests, all groups had equivalent activity levels in the non-drug environment. In the drug/saline environment, only the cocaine group of the three drug treatment groups exhibited conditioned hyperlocomotion. Importantly, MK-801 blocked conditioned hyperlocomotion in the combined cocaine+MK-801 group. MK-801 did not alter serum or brain cocaine concentration or the cocaine effects on dopamine metabolism in limbic brain tissue. The co-administration of MK-801 with cocaine, however, blocked the corticosterone release effect of cocaine. Thus, the NMDA receptor site appears critical for cocaine induced conditioning and for corticosterone release.

A new method to quantify behavioral attention to a stimulus object in a modified open-field

A new method was developed to measure locomotion and attention to a stimulus object in a typical open-field environment using a video image-analyzer system. A computer-generated central zone (CZ) composing 1/9 of the open-field floor area was monitored independently from the rest of the area. Intermittently, a 4 x 4 x 2 cm object was placed in the CZ. In 10 min test sessions, the presence of the object repeatedly and consistently increased the animal's time spent in the CZ as compared with tests when the object was absent. The presence of the object, however, did not increase either the number of entries to the CZ or overall locomotor activity. The object reliably elicited an investigatory response when the animal enter the CZ but otherwise was behaviorally neutral. Thus, by incorporating a stimulus object in a conventional open-field test environment, the present methodology extends the open-field test beyond the measurement of overall spontaneous activity to include an assessment of behavioral processes linked to attention mechanisms.