The clinical relevance of basophil releasability

The Normal Range of Baseline Tryptase Should Be 1 to 15 ng/mL and Covers Healthy Individuals With HαT

Physiological levels of basal serum tryptase vary among healthy individuals, depending on the numbers of mast cells, basal secretion rate, copy numbers of the TPSAB1 gene encoding alpha tryptase, and renal function. Recently, there has been a growing debate about the normal range of tryptase because individuals with the hereditary alpha tryptasemia (HαT) trait may or may not be symptomatic, and if symptomatic, uncertainty exists as to whether this trait directly causes clinical phenotypes or aggravates certain conditions. In fact, most HαT-positive cases are regarded as asymptomatic concerning mast cell activation. To address this point, experts of the European Competence Network on Mastocytosis (ECNM) and the American Initiative in Mast Cell Diseases met at the 2022 Annual ECNM meeting and discussed the physiological tryptase range. Based on this discussion, our faculty concluded that the normal serum tryptase range should be defined in asymptomatic controls, inclusive of individuals with HαT, and based on 2 SDs covering the 95% confidence interval. By applying this definition in a literature screen, the normal basal tryptase in asymptomatic controls (HαT-positive persons included) ranges between 1 and 15 ng/mL. This definition should avoid overinterpretation, unnecessary referrals, and unnecessary anxiety or anticipatory fear of illness in healthy individuals.

Expression and regulation of Siglec-6 (CD327) on human mast cells and basophils

BACKGROUND

Mast cells (MC) and basophils are effector cells of allergic reactions and display a number of activation-linked cell surface antigens. Of these antigens, however, only a few are functionally relevant and specifically expressed in these cells.

OBJECTIVE

We sought to identify MC- and basophil-specific surface molecules and to study their cellular distribution and regulation during cytokine-induced and IgE-dependent activation.

METHODS

Multicolor flow cytometry was performed to recognize surface antigens and to determine changes in antigen expression upon activation.

RESULTS

We identified Siglec-6 (CD327) as a differentially regulated surface antigen on human MC and basophils. In the bone marrow, Siglec-6 was expressed abundantly on MC in patients with mastocytosis and in reactive states, but it was not detected on other myeloid cells, with the exception of basophils and monocytes. In healthy individuals, allergic patients, and patients with chronic myeloid leukemia (CML), Siglec-6 was identified on CD203c⁺ blood basophils, a subset of CD19⁺ B lymphocytes, and few CD14⁺ monocytes, but not on other blood leukocytes. CML basophils expressed higher levels of Siglec-6 than normal basophils. IL-3 promoted Siglec-6 expression on normal and CML basophils, and stem cell factor increased the expression of Siglec-6 on tissue MC. Unexpectedly, IgE-dependent activation resulted in downregulation of Siglec-6 in IL-3-primed basophils, whereas in MC, IgE-dependent activation augmented stem cell factor-induced upregulation of Siglec-6.

CONCLUSIONS

Siglec-6 is a dynamically regulated marker of MC and basophils. Activated MC and basophils exhibit unique Siglec-6 responses, including cytokine-dependent upregulation and unique, cell-specific, responses to IgE-receptor cross-linking.

Diagnosis, Classification and Management of Mast Cell Activation Syndromes (MCAS) in the Era of Personalized Medicine

Mast cell activation (MCA) is seen in a variety of clinical contexts and pathologies, including IgE-dependent allergic inflammation, other immunologic and inflammatory reactions, primary mast cell (MC) disorders, and hereditary alpha tryptasemia (HAT). MCA-related symptoms range from mild to severe to life-threatening. The severity of MCA-related symptoms depends on a number of factors, including genetic predisposition, the number and releasability of MCs, organs affected, and the type and consequences of comorbid conditions. In severe systemic reactions, MCA is demonstrable by a substantial increase of basal serum tryptase levels above the individual’s baseline. When, in addition, the symptoms are recurrent, involve more than one organ system, and are responsive to therapy with MC-stabilizing or mediator-targeting drugs, the consensus criteria for the diagnosis of MCA syndrome (MCAS) are met. Based on the etiology of MCA, patients can further be classified as having i) primary MCAS where KIT-mutated, clonal, MCs are detected; ii) secondary MCAS where an underlying IgE-dependent allergy or other reactive MCA-triggering pathology is found; or iii) idiopathic MCAS, where neither a triggering reactive state nor KIT-mutated MCs are identified. Most severe MCA events occur in combined forms of MCAS, where KIT-mutated MCs, IgE-dependent allergies and sometimes HAT are detected. These patients may suffer from life-threatening anaphylaxis and are candidates for combined treatment with various types of drugs, including IgE-blocking antibodies, anti-mediator-type drugs and MC-targeting therapy. In conclusion, detailed knowledge about the etiology, underlying pathologies and co-morbidities is important to establish the diagnosis and develop an optimal management plan for MCAS, following the principles of personalized medicine.

Basophil degranulation in response to IgE ligation is controlled by a distinctive circadian clock in asthma

BACKGROUND

Several factors may contribute to the circadian variability of clinical manifestations in asthma and allergy. Basophils play a pivotal role in allergic inflammation. However, evidence for a functional clock governing the effector function of these cells is sparse and contradictory. We have systematically sampled the 24-hour response of basophils to IgE- and non-IgE-dependent ligands in asthma to understand their possible contribution to the diurnal variations of allergic symptoms.

METHODS

Leukocytes were collected every 4 hours for 24 hours from 10 patients with moderate, persistent asthma and 10 matched, nonallergic controls, and then incubated with concentrations of anti-IgE, formyl-methionyl-leucylphenylalanine (fMLP), or the Ca²⁺ ionophore, A23187. Histamine release (HR) was tested for time-of-day- or disease-related variability by conventional statistics and for 24-hour rhythmicity by the cosinor method.

RESULTS

HR induced by anti-IgE was significantly increased at 08:00 vs. 20:00 in basophils from asthmatics but not controls. No significant differences were seen at any time in the response to A23187, while the response to fMLP was significantly higher at 08:00 vs. 20:00 in controls but not asthmatics. The basophil response to anti-IgE, but not fMLP or A23187, varied significantly across the 24 hours in asthma, and its amplitude, percent rhythm, and acrophase were comparable to those of peak expiratory flow or serum cortisol.

CONCLUSION

Using an integrated statistical approach, we show that basophil responsiveness undergoes significant circadian variability and that distinct patterns of rhythmicity can be recognized depending on the signal delivered, the activation parameters assessed, and the disease status.

Proposed Diagnostic Algorithm for Patients with Suspected Mast Cell Activation Syndrome

Mast cell activation (MCA) accompanies diverse physiologic and pathologic processes and is one of the more frequently encountered conditions in medicine. MCA-related symptoms are usually mild and often transient. In such cases, histamine receptor blockers and other mediator-targeting drugs can usually control MCA. In severe cases, an MCA syndrome (MCAS) may be diagnosed. However, overt MCAS is an unusual condition, and many patients referred because of suspected MCAS are diagnosed with other diseases (autoimmune, neoplastic, or infectious) unrelated to MCA or suffer from MCA-related (eg, allergic) disorders and/or comorbidities without fulfilling criteria of an overt MCAS. These considerations are important as more and more patients are informed that they may have MCA or even MCAS without completing a thorough medical evaluation. In fact, in several instances, symptoms are misinterpreted as MCA/MCAS, and other clinically relevant conditions are not thoroughly pursued. The number of such referrals is increasing. To avoid such unnecessary referrals and to prevent misdiagnoses, we here propose a diagnostic algorithm through which a clinically relevant (systemic) MCA can be suspected and MCAS can subsequently be documented or excluded. In addition, the algorithm proposed should help guide the investigating care providers to consider the 2 principal diagnoses that may underlie MCAS, namely, severe allergy and systemic mastocytosis accompanied by severe MCA. Although validation is required, we anticipate that this algorithm will facilitate the management of patients with suspected MCAS.

BTK inhibition is a potent approach to block IgE-mediated histamine release in human basophils

Background

Recent data suggest that Bruton's tyrosine kinase (BTK) is an emerging therapeutic target in IgE receptor (IgER)‐cross‐linked basophils.

Methods

We examined the effects of four BTK inhibitors (ibrutinib, dasatinib, AVL‐292, and CNX‐774) on IgE‐dependent activation and histamine release in blood basophils obtained from allergic patients (n=11) and nonallergic donors (n=5). In addition, we examined the effects of these drugs on the growth of the human basophil cell line KU812 and the human mast cell line HMC‐1.

Results

All four BTK blockers were found to inhibit anti‐IgE‐induced histamine release from basophils in nonallergic subjects and allergen‐induced histamine liberation from basophils in allergic donors. Drug effects on allergen‐induced histamine release were dose dependent, with IC₅₀ values ranging between 0.001 and 0.5 μmol/L, and the following rank order of potency: ibrutinib>AVL‐292>dasatinib>CNX‐774. The basophil‐targeting effect of ibrutinib was confirmed by demonstrating that IgE‐dependent histamine release in ex vivo blood basophils is largely suppressed in a leukemia patient treated with ibrutinib. Dasatinib and ibrutinib were also found to counteract anti‐IgE‐induced and allergen‐induced upregulation of CD13, CD63, CD164, and CD203c on basophils, whereas AVL‐292 and CNX‐774 showed no significant effects. Whereas dasatinib and CNX‐774 were found to inhibit the growth of HMC‐1 cells and KU812 cells, no substantial effects were seen with ibrutinib or AVL‐292.

Conclusions

BTK‐targeting drugs are potent inhibitors of IgE‐dependent histamine release in human basophils. The clinical value of BTK inhibition in the context of allergic diseases remains to be determined.

Basophil markers for identification and activation in the indirect basophil activation test by flow cytometry for diagnosis of autoimmune urticaria

Background

The indirect basophil activation test using flow cytometry is a promising tool for autoimmune urticaria diagnosis. We aimed to identify better donor basophils (from atopic vs. non-atopic donors and interleukin-3 primed vs. unprimed basophils) and improve basophil identification and activation markers (eotaxin CC chemokine receptor-3 [CCR3] vs. CD123 and CD63 vs. CD203c).

Methods

Donor basophils were obtained from non-atopic and atopic group O donors. Positive control sera were artificially prepared to simulate autoimmune urticaria patients' sera. Patient sera were obtained from nine children with chronic urticaria. Assay sensitivity was compared among each variation by using positive control sera (n=21), applying cutoff values defined from negative control sera (n=20).

Results

For basophil identification, a combination of CCR3 and CD123 markers revealed a higher correlation with automated complete blood count (r=0.530) compared with that observed using CD123 (r=0.498) or CCR3 alone (r=0.195). Three activation markers on the atopic donor basophils attained 100% assay sensitivity: CD203c on unprimed basophils, CD63+CD203+ or CD63 alone on primed basophils; however, these markers on the non-atopic donor basophils attained lower assay sensitivity.

Conclusions

For basophil identification markers, a combination of CD123 and CCR3 is recommended, while CD123 alone may be used as an alternative. Donor basophils should be obtained from an atopic donor. For basophil activation markers, either CD203c alone on unprimed basophils or CD203c and CD63 on primed basophils are recommended, while CD63 alone on primed basophils may be used as an alternative.

Mast cell activation syndromes: definition and classification

Mast cell activation (MCA) occurs in a number of different clinical conditions, including IgE-dependent allergies, other inflammatory reactions, and mastocytosis. MCA-related symptoms may be mild, moderate, severe, or even life-threatening. The severity of MCA depends on a number of different factors, including genetic predisposition, the number and releasability of mast cells involved in the reaction, the type of allergen, presence of specific IgE, and presence of certain comorbidities. In severe reactions, MCA can be documented by a substantial increase in the serum tryptase level above baseline. When symptoms are recurrent, are accompanied by an increase in mast cell-derived mediators in biological fluids, and are responsive to treatment with mast cell-stabilizing or mediator-targeting drugs, the diagnosis of mast cell activation syndrome (MCAS) is appropriate. Based on the underlying condition, these patients can further be classified into i) primary MCAS where KIT-mutated, clonal mast cells are detected, ii) secondary MCAS where an underlying inflammatory disease, often in the form of an IgE-dependent allergy, but no KIT-mutated mast cells, is found, and iii) idiopathic MCAS, where neither an allergy or other underlying disease, nor KIT-mutated mast cells are detectable. It is important to note that in many patients with MCAS, several different factors act together to lead to severe or even life-threatening anaphylaxis. Detailed knowledge about the pathogenesis and complexity of MCAS, and thus establishing the exact final diagnosis, may greatly help in the management and therapy of these patients.

The PI3-kinase/mTOR-targeting drug NVP-BEZ235 inhibits growth and IgE-dependent activation of human mast cells and basophils

The phosphoinositide 3-kinase (PI3-kinase) and the mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) are two major signaling molecules involved in growth and activation of mast cells (MC) and basophils (BA). We examined the effects of the dual PI3-kinase/mTOR blocker NVP-BEZ235 on growth of normal and neoplastic BA and MC as well as immunoglobulin E (IgE)-dependent cell activation. Growth of MC and BA were determined by measuring ³H-thymidine uptake and apoptosis. Cell activation was determined in histamine release experiments and by measuring upregulation of CD63 and CD203c after challenging with IgE plus anti-IgE or allergen. We found that NVP-BEZ235 exerts profound inhibitory effects on growth of primary and cloned neoplastic MC. In the MC leukemia cell line HMC-1, NVP-BEZ235 showed similar IC₅₀ values in the HMC-1.1 subclone lacking KIT D816V (0.025 µM) and the HMC-1.2 subclone expressing KIT D816V (0.005 µM). Moreover, NVP-BEZ235 was found to exert strong growth-inhibitory effects on neoplastic MC in a xenotransplant-mouse model employing NMR1-Foxn1^nu mice. NVP-BEZ235 also exerted inhibitory effects on cytokine-dependent differentiation of normal BA and MC, but did not induce growth inhibition or apoptosis in mature MC or normal bone marrow cells. Finally, NVP-BEZ235 was found to inhibit IgE-dependent histamine release in BA and MC (IC₅₀ 0.5–1 µM) as well as anti-IgE-induced upregulation of CD203c in BA and IgE-dependent upregulation of CD63 in MC. In summary, NVP-BEZ235 produces growth-inhibitory effects in immature neoplastic MC and inhibits IgE-dependent activation of mature BA and MC. Whether these potentially beneficial drug effects have clinical implications is currently under investigation.

Cellular immune response parameters that influence IgE sensitization

In vitro basophil responses have long been used in mechanistic studies to help assess the human allergic diathesis, particularly during therapeutic intervention. Recent evidence points to the use of dendritic cells (DCs) in also being valuable in evaluating therapies aimed at lessening disease through immunomodulation. This review article therefore takes a look at some of the recent advances in old and new assays employing both basophils and DCs, with the added perception that the responses mediated by two cell types are insightful towards understanding immune cell mechanisms underlying allergic disease.

Role of interleukins in the regulation of basophil development and secretion

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

It is well appreciated that differentiation, growth, and function of basophils are regulated by a network of cytokines, and that these cells express a unique composition of surface receptors including interleukin-binding sites. In the current article, most recent discoveries around cytokine regulation of basophils are discussed and compared with previous data.

RECENT FINDINGS

Confirming previous studies, the most potent growth factor for basophils remains interleukin (IL)-3, followed by granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor and IL-5. These cytokines also act on mature basophils through specific receptors, thereby mediating adhesion, migration, and releasability. Other molecules regulating basophil function are chemokines such as IL-8 or eotaxin and IL-33. Especially IL-33 has been described as a novel basophil regulator. All cytokines act on basophils via specific receptors and signal transduction pathways. The present article provides a summary of our knowledge on cytokine regulation of basophils and receptor expression, with emphasis on most recent developments in the field.

SUMMARY

Basophil regulation by cytokines in health and disease may be a more complex process than has been considered previously. Some of the affected cytokine cascades, receptors, and signal transduction molecules may serve as targets of therapy in 'basophil activation disorders' in the future.

Human basophils secrete IL-3: evidence of autocrine priming for phenotypic and functional responses in allergic disease

Although IL-3 is commonly recognized for its growth factor-like activity, in vitro studies have long demonstrated a unique capacity for this cytokine to also augment the proinflammatory properties and phenotype of human basophils. In particular, basophils secrete mediators that are hallmarks in allergic disease, including vasoactive amines (e.g., histamine), lipid metabolites (e.g., leukotriene C(4)), and cytokines (e.g., IL-4/IL-13), which are all markedly enhanced with IL-3 pretreatment. This priming phenomenon is observed in response to both IgE-dependent and IgE-independent stimulation. Additionally, IL-3 directly activates basophils for IL-13 secretion and enhanced CD69 expression, two markers that are elevated in allergic subjects. Lymphocytes are commonly thought to be the source of the IL-3 that primes for these basophil responses. However, we demonstrate herein for the first time that basophils themselves rapidly produce IL-3 (within 4 h) in response to IgE-dependent activation. More importantly, our findings definitively show that basophils rapidly bind and utilize the IL-3 they produce, as evidenced by functional and phenotypic activity that is inhibited in the presence of neutralizing anti-IL-3 receptor (CD123) Abs. We predict that autocrine IL-3 activity resulting from low-level IgE/FcepsilonRI cross-linking by specific allergen represents an important mechanism behind the hyperreactive nature of basophils that has long been observed in allergic disease.

Asthma

Asthma has been recognized as a disease since the earliest times. In the Corpus Hippocraticum, Hippocrates used the term “ασθμα” to indicate any form of breathing difficulty manifesting itself by panting. Aretaeus of Cappadocia, a well-known Greek physician (second century A.D.), is credited with providing the first detailed description of an asthma attack [13], and to Celsus it was a disease with wheezing and noisy, violent breathing. In the history of Rome, we find many members of the Julio-Claudian family affected with probable atopic respiratory disorders: Caesar Augustus suffered from bronchoconstriction, seasonal rhinitis as well as a highly pruritic skin disease. Claudius suffered from rhinoconjunctivitis and Britannicus was allergic to horse dander [529]. Maimonides (1136–1204) warned that to neglect treatment of asthma could prove fatal, whereas until the 19th century, European scholars defined it as “nervous asthma,” a term that was given to mean a defect of conductivity of the ninth pair of cranial nerves.

What is anaphylaxis?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

In the century since the discovery of anaphylaxis, research has yet to identify the mechanisms that cause a localized allergic response to become rapidly generalized, and particularly why only some sensitized individuals develop the clinical reaction on exposure. The possible components and steps in the process (proven and hypothetical) are reviewed with respect to their variation and regulation and their potential for therapeutic intervention.

RECENT FINDINGS

Studies of insect sting allergy have revealed some of the gaps in our understanding, the relatively poor predictive value of our diagnostic tests, and more recently the early evidence for 'priming' of basophils and mast cells as a precursor or predictor of clinical reactivity. Recent literature has elucidated some of the products and regulatory pathways of the cells involved in the initiation of the anaphylactic response, the role of neurologic pathways, and the possible 'on-off switches' at the level of the immunoglobulin E receptors and their related signaling pathways.

SUMMARY

This review incorporates old and new observations that may be related to the puzzling characteristics of anaphylaxis. Recognizing the gaps in our understanding helps to identify many areas that require further study and presents promising targets for future treatment and prevention of anaphylaxis.

Are basophil histamine release and high affinity IgE receptor expression involved in asymptomatic skin sensitization?

BACKGROUND

Immunoglobulin (Ig)E-sensitized persons with positive skin prick test, but no allergy symptoms, are classified as being asymptomatic skin sensitized (AS). The allergic type 1 disease is dependant on IgE binding to the high affinity IgE-receptor (FcepsilonRI) expressed on basophils and mast cells. However, a relationship between the AS status and FcepsilonRI has not been investigated. We aimed to characterize basophils from AS by looking at histamine release (HR) (sensitivity and reactivity) and the FcepsilonRI molecule, and compare it with nonatopic (NA) or allergic (A) persons.

METHODS

Blood was obtained from NA (n = 14), grass and/or birch A persons (n = 17) and mono-sensitized grass or birch pollen AS (n = 12). The basophil sensitivity and reactivity were examined by anti-IgE triggered HR. Surface expression of FcepsilonRI and IgE were measured by flow cytometry, FcepsilonRIalpha protein was identified using a radioimmunoassay and Western blot. mRNA coding for the classic FcepsilonRIbeta-chain and the truncated form (FcepsilonRIbetaT) were determined by real-time PCR.

RESULTS

The AS group was less reactive than NA or A persons when triggered by anti-IgE and had a significant higher number of nonresponders. However, there was no difference in sensitivity among the three groups and furthermore; the groups did not vary in FcepsilonRI- and IgE-surface expression, FcepsilonRIalpha-protein level or beta/betaT ratio.

CONCLUSION

Basophils from AS persons are less reactive and include more nonresponders than basophils from NA and A persons, but do not differ regarding the FcepsilonRI molecule.

Allergen-specific conventional immunotherapy decreases immunoglobulin E-mediated basophil histamine releasability

BACKGROUND

Allergen-specific immunotherapy has proven to be clinically effective in the treatment of patients with atopic asthma; however, the mechanisms are still unclear. Several noted immunological changes include an increase of the allergen-specific IgG antibody, a reduction in the allergen-specific IgE antibody subsequent to transient increase, an allergen-specific T cell shift in cytokine production from Th2 to Th1, and a decrease in quantity and activity of basophils and mast cells.

OBJECTIVE

To analyse the changes of basophil histamine release in response to IgE-mediated and non-IgE-mediated stimuli before and after conventional house-dust mite immunotherapy in children who suffer from atopic asthma.

METHODS

Fourteen Dermatophagoides farinae (Df) sensitive asthmatic children with conventional immunotherapy were examined. Basophil histamine releasability was measured 0 months (just before immunotherapy), 4 months and 9 months after immunotherapy. Basophils were stimulated with Df and goat anti-human IgE antibody as IgE-mediated stimuli; and formyl-Met-Leu-Phe (fMLP) and calcium ionophore A23187 as non-IgE-mediated stimuli. Accordingly, the asthma symptom score was used to assess clinical outcome and the skin test reactivity to Df was measured.

RESULTS

In contrast to pre-immunotherapy activity, 4 and 9 months after immunotherapy there were significant decreases in histamine release by Df and by anti-IgE antibody. The histamine release by fMLP and by calcium ionophore showed no significant changes after immunotherapy. Histamine release by Df demonstrated significant correlation to that by anti-IgE antibody and by fMLP, yet there was no observable correlation between histamine release by Df and by calcium ionophore. The asthma symptom score decreased significantly 4 and 9 months after immunotherapy and showed significant correlation with histamine release by Df. The skin test reactivity (allergen/histamine ratio) remained constant 4 months after immunotherapy, but decreased significantly 9 months after immunotherapy.

CONCLUSION

Basophils have the potential to play an important role in the early clinical improvement of conventional immunotherapy in children with atopic asthma, which may be a result of the decreased IgE-mediated histamine releasability during immunotherapy.

Association of the Src homology 2 domain-containing inositol 5' phosphatase (SHIP) to releasability in human basophils

During the study of the biology of the Human recombinant Histamine Releasing Factor (HrHRF), we uncovered a hyperreleasable phenotype of basophils from HrHRF-responder donors. Basophils from these donors released histamne to HrHRF, IL-3 and D(2)O. While there has been a significant amount of work elucidating signal transduction events in human basophils, the reason for this hyperreleasable phenotype remained illusive. A clue to the releasability of these highly allergic, asthmatic HrHRF-responder donor basophils was demonstrated in studies using SHIP knockout mice. Bone marrow-derived mast cells from the SHIP knockout mice demonstrated hyperreleasability to stimuli through the IgE receptor and alteration of subsequent signal transduction events. We have demonstrated a highly significant negative correlation between the amount of SHIP protein per cell equivalent and maximum histamine release to HrHRF. These results provide a clue to the hyperreleasable phenotype and implicate SHIP as an additional regulator of secretion in human basophils.

Src homology 2 domain-containing inositol 5' phosphatase is negatively associated with histamine release to human recombinant histamine-releasing factor in human basophils

BACKGROUND

The human recombinant histamine-releasing factor (HrHRF) acts as a complete stimulus for histamine release and IL-4 secretion from a subpopulation of highly allergic donor basophils, termed IgE(+) basophils. Additionally, IgE(+) basophils release histamine to other secretogues, IL-3, and deuterium oxide. We hypothesized that IgE(+) basophils were hyperreleasable.

OBJECTIVE

Deficiencies in early signal transduction events associated with Fc(epsilon)RI lead to a nonreleasable phenotype, whereas the Src homology 2 domain--containing inositol 5' phosphatase (SHIP) knockout mice have hyperreleasable mast cells. The purpose of this study was to ascertain whether a difference in intracellular signaling molecules could explain the hyperreleasable phenotype of human IgE(+) basophils.

METHODS

Basophils were purified by means of double Percoll gradients and negative selection with magnetic beads. Cell lysates were Western blotted for the tyrosine kinases Lyn and Syk and the phosphatase SHIP. Additionally, histamine release to HrHRF was performed in addition to real-time RT-PCR to investigate mRNA for SHIP.

RESULTS

We show a striking negative correlation between the amount of SHIP protein per cell equivalent, but not Lyn or Syk, and maximum histamine release to HrHRF. This deficiency of SHIP was observed in basophils, but not lymphocytes or monocytes, of these IgE(+) donors. Additionally, levels of mRNA for SHIP did not differ between IgE(+) and IgE(-) donor basophils, which is consistent with a posttranscriptional mechanism of protein regulation. SHIP and phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase reciprocally regulate phosphatidylinositol (3,4,5) triphosphate levels. We also demonstrated that Ly294002, the phosphatidylinositol 3 kinase inhibitor, prevented HrHRF-induced histamine release in IgE(+) donor basophils.

CONCLUSION

Taken together, these data suggest that the hyperreleasability of IgE(+) donors is associated with low levels of SHIP and implicate SHIP as an additional regulator of secretion in human basophils.

Differential mediator release from basophils of allergic and non-allergic asthmatic patients after stimulation with anti-IgE and C5a

The differentiation between allergic and non-allergic asthma is a common and important challenge for the clinician. Until now, no in vitro diagnostic characteristics have been described to distinguish between these types. To examine the diagnostic value of a basophil stimulation test, we compared anti-IgE- and C5a-induced mediator release from peripheral blood leucocytes in different types of bronchial asthma. Peripheral blood leucocytes (PBL) from 10 aspirin-sensitive asthmatics (ASA), 12 non-allergic asthmatics without aspirin intolerance (NAA), seven allergic asthmatics (AA), and nine healthy controls were prepared by dextran sedimentation. After priming with interleukin-3 (IL-3) PBL were stimulated with anti-IgE and C5a, and the release of histamine (HR) and sulfidoleukotrienes (LTR) in the supernatant was compared. Additionally, purified leucocyte fractions were studied to determine the cellular source of mediator release. Upon stimulation with anti-IgE LTR was slightly, but not significantly, lower in ASA and NAA compared to AA and controls. In contrast, C5a-triggered LTR was significantly higher in ASA (14.4 +/- 12.88 pg/105 cells) and NAA (22.9 +/- 22.61 pg/105 cells) than in AA (9.6 +/- 3.29 pg/105 cells) and controls (7.5 +/- 7.19 pg/105 cells) (P < 0.05). This difference between ASA and NAA vs. AA and controls was even more pronounced when determining the quotient C5a-/anti-IgE-induced LTR (P < 0.001). At an optimal cut-off point of 1.0, calculated by relative operating characteristics (ROC) analysis, the positive predictive value for a donor to belong to ASA or NAA was 0.94. No significant differences could be found in HR between the asthmatic patient groups and healthy controls in either condition. As cellular source of LTR and HR the basophil could be determined. Determination of anti-IgE- and C5a-induced LTR from basophils allows us to discriminate between allergic and non-allergic asthmatic patients. For diagnostic purposes the quotient C5a-/anti-IgE-induced LTR is more significant than considering a single parameter. ASA cannot be distinguished from NAA.

Systemic activation of basophils and eosinophils: markers and consequences

Basophils and eosinophils are important effector cells in human allergic diseases; they play a significant role in promoting allergic inflammation through the release of proinflammatory mediators (such as histamine, leukotriene C(4), major basic protein, eosinophil cationic protein, IL-4, and IL-13, among others). Notably, in allergic subjects, these cells exist in higher numbers and in a more activated state compared with nonatopic control subjects. Evidence for the greater activation state includes increased expression of intracellular and surface markers and hyperreleasability of allergy mediators. We have been interested in the phenotypic markers of effector-cell activation for many years. There is considerable overlap among activation markers, and few activation markers have been found that define a unique phenotype that is quantifiable in the assessment of the presence and severity of allergic disease. This review summarizes the existing evidence for systemic activation of human basophils and eosinophils in allergic diseases. The potential mechanisms responsible for functional and morphologic alterations in these effector cells and the specificity and utility of surface markers in the assessment of allergic disease activity or severity are also discussed.

Allergen-specific immunotherapy in birch- and grass-pollen-allergic rhinitis. II. Side-effects

BACKGROUND

Allergen-specific immunotherapy (IT) involves the risk of side-effects. Different side-effect profiles have been reported for different allergens, and it would be of great benefit to be able more precisely to predict patient- and allergen-related risk factors.

METHODS

Fifty-two patients with rhinoconjunctivitis and allergy to birch as well as grass pollen participated in a 3-year IT study, with a baseline year followed by 2 years of treatment. During the first treatment year, the patients received double-blinded IT with either birch (Betula verrucosa) or grass (Phleum pratense) pollen extracts adsorbed to aluminum hydroxide. The following year, the other allergen extract was added. Assessment of systemic reactions (SRs) was performed, and related to patient pretreatment parameters such as seasonal symptoms and medication requirement, skin prick test (SPT), conjunctival provocation test (CPT), nasal provocation test (NPT), total and specific IgE, basophil histamine release (HR), eosinophil count (EOS), eosinophil cationic protein (ECP), and eosinophil protein X (EPX).

RESULTS

In total, 44 and 47 patients started IT with birch- and grass-pollen extracts, respectively. All SRs occurred during the dose-increase phase. No life-threatening SRs were observed. There were a higher number of patients with SRs during IT with grass pollen than IT with birch pollen, 21 vs five patients (P<0.001), with SRs to 3.3% of grass-pollen injections compared to 0.7% of birch-pollen injections (P<0.0001). The SRs of birch-pollen IT were mild, consisting of rhinoconjunctivitis and oral-pharyngeal itching, whereas asthma and urticaria episodes were observed in the grass-pollen IT. No difference was found in sensitivity to birch and grass, when measured by SPT, CPT, NPT, specific IgE, or HR, and no difference was found in age, duration of allergic symptoms, prevalence of asthma, mean seasonal birch/grass symptom score, eye-drop use, or antihistamine or prednisolone intake between the group with and without subsequent SRs to IT. No difference was found in EOS, serum ECP, or EPX, between the group with and without subsequent SRs to IT.

CONCLUSIONS

IT with grass-pollen extract seems to be associated with a higher number and more severe SRs than birch-pollen IT. Neither demographic data nor diagnostic tests of allergy such as specific IgE, HR, SPT, CPT, and NPT could identify the patients with subsequent SRs.

A new method for histamine release from purified peripheral blood basophils using monoclonal antibody-coated magnetic beads

A new method for evaluating histamine release from purified basophils was developed. Basophil-containing leukocytes were directly purified from a small amount of peripheral blood using monoclonal antibody BA312-coated magnetic beads. The purified basophils still rosetted to magnetic beads maintained a normal response to anti-IgE and to dust mite allergen in comparison with the conventional method using washed leukocytes. This methodology facilitates the purification of basophils, anti-IgE- and allergen-induced histamine release, and subsequent histamine determination within only 3 h. The released histamine was analyzed by an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) with a characteristic detection profile. Since all steps were performed in 96-well microplates, many clinical samples could be analyzed at the same time, permitting easy applications in routine laboratories.

Basophil histamine release, IgE, eosinophil counts, ECP, and EPX are related to the severity of symptoms in seasonal allergic rhinitis

BACKGROUND

Serum specific IgE, basophil histamine release, and blood eosinophil parameters are associated with allergic rhinitis, but investigations of the relationship to the severity of allergic symptoms are few and conflicting. Our study aimed to investigate the seasonal changes in the following laboratory tests: specific IgE, basophil histamine release, eosinophil counts, and serum and plasma eosinophil cationic protein (ECP) and eosinophil protein X (EPX), and to analyze, in detail, the relationship of each individual test to the severity of symptoms in rhinitis patients allergic to both birch and grass pollen.

METHODS

The above tests were performed on blood samples obtained from 49 allergic rhinitis patients during the birch-pollen season, during the grass-pollen season, and after the seasons. Symptom-medication diaries were filled in during both pollen seasons. We used partial least square (PLS) analysis to establish an optimal statistical link between the symptom score and medication and the laboratory tests, in an investigator-independent way.

RESULTS

Increases in specific IgE, basophil histamine release, eosinophil counts, serum ECP and EPX, and plasma EPX were observed from the birch-pollen season to the grass-pollen season, followed by a decrease from the grass-pollen season to after the pollen seasons, except for the specific IgE. No seasonal changes in plasma ECP and total IgE were seen. The PLS analysis found a relationship between symptom score and medication and the aggregate laboratory tests (F-test value 40.2, correlation 0.34 for the cumulative relation). However, the variation in laboratory tests could explain only half of the total variation in symptoms and less than a quarter of the total variation in medication. The symptom score and, to a minor degree, medication were especially correlated with the basophil histamine-release results, with a decreasing relevance of specific IgE, eosinophil counts, total IgE, serum and plasma EPX, and serum ECP. Plasma ECP was not related to the symptom score and medication.

CONCLUSIONS

A significant relationship between the severity of allergic rhinitis and various allergic inflammatory markers was found but could account for only a minor part of the variation in the patients' evaluation of their disease.