Identification of effector-activating residues of Gs alpha

A Novel Maternally Inherited GNAS Variant in a Family With Hyperphagia and Obesity: 3 Cases

GNAS variants were recently described in 1% of patients not known to have pseudohypoparathyroidism/inactivating PTH/PTHrP signalling disorder 2 in the UK Genetics of Obesity Study. We describe a new missense GNAS variant, c.791A > C, p.(Asp264Thr), in a family with obesity, hyperphagia and mild PTH resistance. A 6-year-old female (body mass index +4.3 SD score [SDS], height +1.9 SDS) presented with hyperphagia and obesity from age 3 years. She had subtle brachydactyly, macrocephaly, and mildly delayed development. The 12-year-old brother (height +2.1 SDS, body mass index +2.9 SDS) had hyperphagia, obesity, mildly delayed development, and autism. He had subtle brachydactyly, as did the affected mother. We assessed the functional effect of the mutant, measuring cAMP production in cells transfected with wild type and mutant GNAS after ligand stimulation. Cells with the mutant GNAS showed impaired cAMP generation through melanocortin receptor 4, GH releasing hormone receptor, and PTH receptor. These cases demonstrate the clinical heterogeneity of monogenic disease, suggesting a need to test for PHP1A in children with obesity even without classical signs of PHP1A.

Inhibition of adenylyl cyclase by GTPase-deficient Gαi is mechanistically different from that mediated by receptor-activated Gαi

Signal transduction through G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) has been a major focus in cell biology for decades. Numerous disorders are associated with GPCRs that utilize Gi proteins to inhibit adenylyl cyclase (AC) as well as regulate other effectors. Several early studies have successfully defined the AC-interacting domains of several members of Gαi by measuring the loss of activity upon homologous replacements of putative regions of constitutive active Gαi mutants. However, whether such findings can indeed be translated into the context of a receptor-activated Gαi have not been rigorously verified. To address this issue, an array of known and new chimeric mutations was introduced into GTPase-deficient Q204L (QL) and R178C (RC) mutants of Gαi1, followed by examinations on their ability to inhibit AC. Surprisingly, most chimeras failed to abolish the constitutive activity brought on by the QL mutation, while some were able to eliminate the inhibitory activity of RC mutants. Receptor-mediated inhibition of AC was similarly observed in the same chimeric constructs harbouring the pertussis toxin (PTX)-resistant C351I mutation. Moreover, RC-bearing loss-of-function chimeras appeared to be hyper-deactivated by endogenous RGS protein. Molecular docking revealed a potential interaction between AC and the α3/β5 loop of Gαi1. Subsequent cAMP assays support a cooperative action of the α3/β5 loop, the α4 helix, and the α4/β6 loop in mediating AC inhibition by Gαi1-i3. Our results unveiled a notable functional divergence between constitutively active mutants and receptor-activated Gαi1 to inhibit AC, and identified a previously unknown AC-interacting domain of Gαi subunits. These results collectively provide valuable insights on the mechanism of AC inhibition in the cellular environment.

Structures of Ric-8B in complex with Gα protein folding clients reveal isoform specificity mechanisms

Mammalian Ric-8 proteins act as chaperones to regulate the cellular abundance of heterotrimeric G protein α subunits. The Ric-8A isoform chaperones Gαi/o, Gα12/13, and Gαq/11 subunits, while Ric-8B acts on Gαs/olf subunits. Here, we determined cryoelectron microscopy (cryo-EM) structures of Ric-8B in complex with Gαs and Gαolf, revealing isoform differences in the relative positioning and contacts between the C-terminal α5 helix of Gα within the concave pocket formed by Ric-8 α-helical repeat elements. Despite the overall architectural similarity with our earlier structures of Ric-8A complexed to Gαq and Gαi1, Ric-8B distinctly accommodates an extended loop found only in Gαs/olf proteins. The structures, along with results from Ric-8 protein thermal stability assays and cell-based Gαolf folding assays, support a requirement for the Gα C-terminal region for binding specificity, and highlight that multiple structural elements impart specificity for Ric-8/G protein binding.

New Structural Perspectives in G Protein-Coupled Receptor-Mediated Src Family Kinase Activation

Src family kinases (SFKs) are key regulators of cell proliferation, differentiation, and survival. The expression of these non-receptor tyrosine kinases is strongly correlated with cancer development and tumor progression. Thus, this family of proteins serves as an attractive drug target. The activation of SFKs can occur via multiple signaling pathways, yet many of them are poorly understood. Here, we summarize the current knowledge on G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR)-mediated regulation of SFKs, which is of considerable interest because GPCRs are among the most widely used pharmaceutical targets. This type of activation can occur through a direct interaction between the two proteins or be allosterically regulated by arrestins and G proteins. We postulate that a rearrangement of binding motifs within the active conformation of arrestin-3 mediates Src regulation by comparison of available crystal structures. Therefore, we hypothesize a potentially different activation mechanism compared to arrestin-2. Furthermore, we discuss the probable direct regulation of SFK by GPCRs and investigate the intracellular domains of exemplary GPCRs with conserved polyproline binding motifs that might serve as scaffolding domains to allow such a direct interaction. Large intracellular domains in GPCRs are often understudied and, in general, not much is known of their contribution to different signaling pathways. The suggested direct interaction between a GPCR and a SFK could allow for a potential immediate allosteric regulation of SFKs by GPCRs and thereby unravel a novel mechanism of SFK signaling. This overview will help to identify new GPCR-SFK interactions, which could serve to explain biological functions or be used to modulate downstream effectors.

Structure of the Visual Signaling Complex between Transducin and Phosphodiesterase 6

Heterotrimeric G proteins communicate signals from activated G protein-coupled receptors to downstream effector proteins. In the phototransduction pathway responsible for vertebrate vision, the G protein-effector complex is composed of the GTP-bound transducin α subunit (Gα_T·GTP) and the cyclic GMP (cGMP) phosphodiesterase 6 (PDE6), which stimulates cGMP hydrolysis, leading to hyperpolarization of the photoreceptor cell. Here we report a cryo-electron microscopy (cryoEM) structure of PDE6 complexed to GTP-bound Gα_T. The structure reveals two Gα_T·GTP subunits engaging the PDE6 hetero-tetramer at both the PDE6 catalytic core and the PDEγ subunits, driving extensive rearrangements to relieve all inhibitory constraints on enzyme catalysis. Analysis of the conformational ensemble in the cryoEM data highlights the dynamic nature of the contacts between the two Gα_T·GTP subunits and PDE6 that supports an alternating-site catalytic mechanism.

Divergent C-terminal motifs in Gα12 and Gα13 provide distinct mechanisms of effector binding and SRF activation

The G12/13 subfamily of heterotrimeric guanine nucleotide binding proteins comprises the α subunits Gα12 and Gα13, which transduce signals for cell growth, cytoskeletal rearrangements, and oncogenic transformation. In an increasing range of cancers, overexpressed Gα12 or Gα13 are implicated in aberrant cell proliferation and/or metastatic invasion. Although Gα12 and Gα13 bind non-redundant sets of effector proteins and participate in unique signalling pathways, the structural features responsible for functional differences between these α subunits are largely unknown. Invertebrates encode a single G12/13 homolog that participates in cytoskeletal changes yet appears to lack signalling to SRF (serum response factor), a transcriptional activator stimulated by mammalian Gα12 and Gα13 to promote growth and tumorigenesis. Our previous studies identified an evolutionarily divergent region in Gα12 for which replacement by homologous sequence from Drosophila melanogaster abolished SRF signalling, whereas the same invertebrate substitution was fully tolerated in Gα13 [Montgomery et al. (2014) Mol. Pharmacol. 85: 586]. These findings prompted our current approach of evolution-guided mutagenesis to identify fine structural features of Gα12 and Gα13 that underlie their respective SRF activation mechanisms. Our results identified two motifs flanking the α4 helix that play a key role in Gα12 signalling to SRF. We found the region encompassing these motifs to provide an interacting surface for multiple Gα12-specific target proteins that fail to bind Gα13. Adjacent to this divergent region, a highly-conserved domain was vital for SRF activation by both Gα12 and Gα13. However, dissection of this domain using invertebrate substitutions revealed different signalling mechanisms in these α subunits and identified Gα13-specific determinants of binding Rho-specific guanine nucleotide exchange factors. Furthermore, invertebrate substitutions in the C-terminal, α5 helical region were selectively disruptive to Gα12 signalling. Taken together, our results identify key structural features near the C-terminus that evolved after the divergence of Gα12 and Gα13, and should aid the development of agents to selectively manipulate signalling by individual α subunits of the G12/13 subfamily.

Rules of Engagement: GPCRs and G Proteins

G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) are a key drug target class. They account for over one-third of current pharmaceuticals, and both drugs that inhibit and promote receptor function are important therapeutically; in some cases, the same GPCR can be targeted with agonists and inhibitors, depending upon disease context. There have been major breakthroughs in understanding GPCR structure and drug binding through advances in X-ray crystallography, and membrane protein stabilization. Nonetheless, these structures have predominately been of inactive receptors bound to inhibitors. Efforts to capture structures of fully active GPCRs, in particular those in complex with the canonical, physiological transducer G protein, have been limited via this approach. Very recently, advances in cryo-electron microscopy have provided access to agonist:GPCR:G protein complex structures. These promise to revolutionize our understanding of GPCR:G protein engagement and provide insight into mechanisms of efficacy and coupling selectivity and how these might be controlled by biased agonists. Here we review what we have currently learned from the new GPCR:Gs and GPCR:Gi/o complex structures.

Gain-of-function screen of α-transducin identifies an essential phenylalanine residue necessary for full effector activation

Two regions on the α subunits of heterotrimeric GTP-binding proteins (G-proteins), the Switch II/α2 helix (which changes conformation upon GDP-GTP exchange) and the α3 helix, have been shown to contain the binding sites for their effector proteins. However, how the binding of Gα subunits to their effector proteins is translated into the stimulation of effector activity is still poorly understood. Here, we took advantage of a reconstituted rhodopsin-coupled phototransduction system to address this question and identified a distinct surface and an essential residue on the α subunit of the G-protein transducin (α_T) that is necessary to fully activate its effector enzyme, the cGMP phosphodiesterase (PDE). We started with a chimeric G-protein α subunit (α_T*) comprising residues mainly from α_T and a short stretch of residues from the G_i1 α subunit (α_i1), which only weakly stimulates PDE activity. We then reinstated the α_T residues by systematically replacing the corresponding α_i1 residues within α_T* with the aim of fully restoring PDE stimulatory activity. These experiments revealed that the αG/α4 loop and a phenylalanine residue at position 283 are essential for conferring the α_T* subunit with full PDE stimulatory capability. We further demonstrated that this same region and amino acid within the α subunit of the G_s protein (α_s) are necessary for full adenylyl cyclase activation. These findings highlight the importance of the αG/α4 loop and of an essential phenylalanine residue within this region on Gα subunits α_T and α_s as being pivotal for their selective and optimal stimulation of effector activity.

Phase-plate cryo-EM structure of a biased agonist-bound human GLP-1 receptor-Gs complex

The class B glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) G protein-coupled receptor is a major target for the treatment of type 2 diabetes and obesity. Endogenous and mimetic GLP-1 peptides exhibit biased agonism-a difference in functional selectivity-that may provide improved therapeutic outcomes. Here we describe the structure of the human GLP-1 receptor in complex with the G protein-biased peptide exendin-P5 and a Gα_s heterotrimer, determined at a global resolution of 3.3 Å. At the extracellular surface, the organization of extracellular loop 3 and proximal transmembrane segments differs between our exendin-P5-bound structure and previous GLP-1-bound GLP-1 receptor structure. At the intracellular face, there was a six-degree difference in the angle of the Gαs-α5 helix engagement between structures, which was propagated across the G protein heterotrimer. In addition, the structures differed in the rate and extent of conformational reorganization of the Gα_s protein. Our structure provides insights into the molecular basis of biased agonism.

Dissecting Cell-Fate Determination Through Integrated Mathematical Modeling of the ERK/MAPK Signaling Pathway

The past three decades have witnessed an enormous progress in the elucidation of the ERK/MAPK signaling pathway and its involvement in various cellular processes. Because of its importance and complex wiring, the ERK pathway has been an intensive subject for mathematical modeling, which facilitates the unraveling of key dynamic properties and behaviors of the pathway. Recently, however, it became evident that the pathway does not act in isolation but closely interacts with many other pathways to coordinate various cellular outcomes under different pathophysiological contexts. This has led to an increasing number of integrated, large-scale models that link the ERK pathway to other functionally important pathways. In this chapter, we first discuss the essential steps in model development and notable models of the ERK pathway. We then use three examples of integrated, multipathway models to investigate how crosstalk of ERK signaling with other pathways regulates cell-fate decision-making in various physiological and disease contexts. Specifically, we focus on ERK interactions with the phosphoinositide-3 kinase (PI3K), c-Jun N-terminal kinase (JNK), and β-adrenergic receptor (β-AR) signaling pathways. We conclude that integrated modeling in combination with wet-lab experimentation have been and will be instrumental in gaining an in-depth understanding of ERK signaling in multiple biological contexts.

An intact helical domain is required for Gα14 to stimulate phospholipase Cβ

Background

Stimulation of phospholipase Cβ (PLCβ) by the activated α-subunit of G_q (Gα_q) constitutes a major signaling pathway for cellular regulation, and structural studies have recently revealed the molecular interactions between PLCβ and Gα_q. Yet, most of the PLCβ-interacting residues identified on Gα_q are not unique to members of the Gα_q family. Molecular modeling predicts that the core PLCβ-interacting residues located on the switch regions of Gα_q are similarly positioned in Gα_z which does not stimulate PLCβ. Using wild-type and constitutively active chimeras constructed between Gα_z and Gα₁₄, a member of the Gα_q family, we examined if the PLCβ-interacting residues identified in Gα_q are indeed essential.

Results

Four chimeras with the core PLCβ-interacting residues composed of Gα_z sequences were capable of binding PLCβ2 and stimulating the formation of inositol trisphosphate. Surprisingly, all chimeras with a Gα_z N-terminal half failed to functionally associate with PLCβ2, despite the fact that many of them contained the core PLCβ-interacting residues from Gα₁₄. Further analyses revealed that the non-PLCβ2 interacting chimeras were capable of interacting with other effector molecules such as adenylyl cyclase and tetratricopeptide repeat 1, indicating that they could adopt a GTP-bound active conformation.

Conclusion

Collectively, our study suggests that the previously identified PLCβ-interacting residues are insufficient to ensure productive interaction of Gα₁₄ with PLCβ, while an intact N-terminal half of Gα₁₄ is apparently required for PLCβ interaction.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12900-015-0043-3) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

The extreme C-terminal region of Gαs differentially couples to the luteinizing hormone and beta2-adrenergic receptors

The mechanisms of G protein coupling to G protein-coupled receptors (GPCR) share general characteristics but may exhibit specific interactions unique for each GPCR/G protein partnership. The extreme C terminus (CT) of G protein α-subunits has been shown to be important for association with GPCR. Hypothesizing that the extreme CT of Gα(s) is an essential component of the molecular landscape of the GPCR, human LH receptor (LHR), and β(2)-adrenergic receptor (β(2)-AR), a model cell system was created for the expression and manipulation of Gα(s) subunits in LHR(+) s49 ck cells that lack endogenous Gα(s). On the basis of studies involving truncations, mutations, and chain extensions of Gα(s), the CT was found to be necessary for LHR and β(2)-AR signaling. Some general similarities were found for the responses of the two receptors, but significant differences were also noted. Computational modeling was performed with a combination of comparative modeling, molecular dynamics simulations, and rigid body docking. The resulting models, focused on the Gα(s) CT, are supported by the experimental observations and are characterized by the interaction of the four extreme CT amino acid residues of Gα(s) with residues in LHR and β(2)-AR helix 3, (including R of the DRY motif), helix 6, and intracellular loop 2. This portion of Gα(s) recognizes the same regions of the two GPCR, although with differences in the details of selected interactions. The predicted longer cytosolic extensions of helices 5 and 6 of β(2)-AR are expected to contribute significantly to differences in Gα(s) recognition by the two receptors.

Comparative genomics uncovers novel structural and functional features of the heterotrimeric GTPase signaling system

Though the heterotrimeric G-proteins signaling system is one of the best studied in eukaryotes, its provenance and its prevalence outside of model eukaryotes remains poorly understood. We utilized the wealth of sequence data from recently sequenced eukaryotic genomes to uncover robust G-protein signaling systems in several poorly studied eukaryotic lineages such as the parabasalids, heteroloboseans and stramenopiles. This indicated that the Gα subunit is likely to have separated from the ARF-like GTPases prior to the last eukaryotic common ancestor. We systematically identified the structure and sequence features associated with this divergence and found that most of the neomorphic positions in Gα form a ring of residues centered on the nucleotide binding site, several of which are likely to be critical for interactions with the RGS domain for its GAP function. We also present evidence that in some of the potentially early branching eukaryotic lineages, like Trichomonas, Gα is likely to function independently of the Gβγ subunits. We were able to identify previously unknown Gγ subunits in Naegleria, suggesting that the trimeric version was already present by the time of the divergence of the heteroloboseans from the remaining eukaryotes. Evolution of Gα subunits is dominated by several independent lineage-specific expansions (LSEs). In most of these cases there are concomitant, independent LSEs of RGS proteins along with an extraordinary diversification of their domain architectures. The diversity of RGS domains from Naegleria in particular, which has the largest complement of Gα and RGS proteins for any eukaryote, provides new insights into RGS function and evolution. We uncovered a new class of soluble ligand receptors of bacterial origin with RGS domains and an extraordinary diversity of membrane-linked, redox-associated, adhesion-dependent and small molecule-induced G-protein signaling networks that evolved in early-branching eukaryotes, independently of parallel systems in animals. Furthermore, this newly characterized diversity of RGS domains helps in defining their ancestral conserved interfaces with Gα and also those interfaces that are prone to extensive lineage-specific diversification and are thereby responsible for selectivity in Gα-RGS interactions. Several mushrooms show LSEs of Gαs but not of RGS proteins pointing to the probable differentiation of Gαs in conjunction with mating-type diversity. When combined with the characterization of the 7TM receptors (GPCRs), it becomes apparent that, through much of eukaryotic evolution, cells contained both 7TM receptors that acted as GEFs and those as GAPs (with C-terminal RGS domains) for Gαs. Only in some lineages like animals and stramenopiles the 7TM receptors were restricted to GEF only roles, probably due to selection imposed by the rate-constants of the Gαs that underwent lineage-specific expansion in them. In the alveolate lineage the 7TM receptors occur independently of heterotrimeric G-proteins, suggesting the prevalence of G-protein-independent signaling in these organisms.

Evolution of a signaling nexus constrained by protein interfaces and conformational States

Heterotrimeric G proteins act as the physical nexus between numerous receptors that respond to extracellular signals and proteins that drive the cytoplasmic response. The Gα subunit of the G protein, in particular, is highly constrained due to its many interactions with proteins that control or react to its conformational state. Various organisms contain differing sets of Gα-interacting proteins, clearly indicating that shifts in sequence and associated Gα functionality were acquired over time. These numerous interactions constrained much of Gα evolution; yet Gα has diversified, through poorly understood processes, into several functionally specialized classes, each with a unique set of interacting proteins. Applying a synthetic sequence-based approach to mammalian Gα subunits, we established a set of seventy-five evolutionarily important class-distinctive residues, sites where a single Gα class is differentiated from the three other classes. We tested the hypothesis that shifts at these sites are important for class-specific functionality. Importantly, we mapped known and well-studied class-specific functionalities from all four mammalian classes to sixteen of our class-distinctive sites, validating the hypothesis. Our results show how unique functionality can evolve through the recruitment of residues that were ancestrally functional. We also studied acquisition of functionalities by following these evolutionarily important sites in non-mammalian organisms. Our results suggest that many class-distinctive sites were established early on in eukaryotic diversification and were critical for the establishment of new Gα classes, whereas others arose in punctuated bursts throughout metazoan evolution. These Gα class-distinctive residues are rational targets for future structural and functional studies.

Mutations on the Switch III region and the alpha3 helix of Galpha16 differentially affect receptor coupling and regulation of downstream effectors

Background

Gα₁₆ can activate phospholipase Cβ (PLCβ) directly like Gα_q. It also couples to tetratricopeptide repeat 1 (TPR1) which is linked to Ras activation. It is unknown whether PLCβ and TPR1 interact with the same regions on Gα₁₆. Previous studies on Gα_q have defined two minimal clusters of amino acids that are essential for the coupling to PLCβ. Cognate residues in Gα₁₆ might also be essential for interacting with PLCβ, and possibly contribute to TPR1 interaction and other signaling events.

Results

Alanine mutations were introduced to the two amino acid clusters (246–248 and 259–260) in the switch III region and α3 helix of Gα₁₆. Regulations of PLCβ and STAT3 were partially weakened by each cluster mutant. A mutant harboring mutations at both clusters generally produced stronger suppressions. Activation of Jun N-terminal kinase (JNK) by Gα₁₆ was completely abolished by mutating either clusters. Contrastingly, phosphorylations of extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK) and nuclear factor κB (NF-κB) were not significantly affected by these mutations. The interactions between the mutants and PLCβ2 and TPR1 were also reduced in co-immunoprecipitation assays. Coupling between G₁₆ and different categories of receptors was impaired by the mutations, with the effect of switch III mutations being more pronounced than those in the α3 helix. Mutations of both clusters almost completely abolished the receptor coupling and prevent receptor-induced Gβγ release.

Conclusion

The integrity of the switch III region and α3 helix of Gα₁₆ is critical for the activation of PLCβ, STAT3, and JNK but not ERK or NF-κB. Binding of Gα₁₆ to PLCβ2 or TPR1 was reduced by the mutations of either cluster. The same region could also differentially affect the effectiveness of receptor coupling to G₁₆. The studied region was shown to bear multiple functionally important roles of G₁₆.

Structural basis of effector regulation and signal termination in heterotrimeric Galpha proteins

This chapter addresses, from a molecular structural perspective gained from examination of x-ray crystallographic and biochemical data, the mechanisms by which GTP-bound Galpha subunits of heterotrimeric G proteins recognize and regulate effectors. The mechanism of GTP hydrolysis by Galpha and rate acceleration by GAPs are also considered. The effector recognition site in all Galpha homologues is formed almost entirely of the residues extending from the C-terminal half of alpha2 (Switch II) together with the alpha3 helix and its junction with the beta5 strand. Effector binding does not induce substantial changes in the structure of Galpha*GTP. Effectors are structurally diverse. Different effectors may recognize distinct subsets of effector-binding residues of the same Galpha protein. Specificity may also be conferred by differences in the main chain conformation of effector-binding regions of Galpha subunits. Several Galpha regulatory mechanisms are operative. In the regulation of GMP phospodiesterase, Galphat sequesters an inhibitory subunit. Galphas is an allosteric activator and inhibitor of adenylyl cyclase, and Galphai is an allosteric inhibitor. Galphaq does not appear to regulate GRK, but is rather sequestered by it. GTP hydrolysis terminates the signaling state of Galpha. The binding energy of GTP that is used to stabilize the Galpha:effector complex is dissipated in this reaction. Chemical steps of GTP hydrolysis, specifically, formation of a dissociative transition state, is rate limiting in Ras, a model G protein GTPase, even in the presence of a GAP; however, the energy of enzyme reorganization to produce a catalytically active conformation appears to be substantial. It is possible that the collapse of the switch regions, associated with Galpha deactivation, also encounters a kinetic barrier, and is coupled to product (Pi) release or an event preceding formation of the GDP*Pi complex. Evidence for a catalytic intermediate, possibly metaphosphate, is discussed. Galpha GAPs, whether exogenous proteins or effector-linked domains, bind to a discrete locus of Galpha that is composed of Switch I and the N-terminus of Switch II. This site is immediately adjacent to, but does not substantially overlap, the Galpha effector binding site. Interactions of effectors and exogenous GAPs with Galpha proteins can be synergistic or antagonistic, mediated by allosteric interactions among the three molecules. Unlike GAPs for small GTPases, Galpha GAPs supply no catalytic residues, but rather appear to reduce the activation energy for catalytic activation of the Galpha catalytic site.

Structure of the p115RhoGEF rgRGS domain–Gα13/i1 chimera complex suggests convergent evolution of a GTPase activator

p115RhoGEF, a guanine nucleotide exchange factor (GEF) for Rho GTPase, is also a GTPase-activating protein (GAP) for G12 and G13 heterotrimeric Galpha subunits. The GAP function of p115RhoGEF resides within the N-terminal region of p115RhoGEF (the rgRGS domain), which includes a module that is structurally similar to RGS (regulators of G-protein signaling) domains. We present here the crystal structure of the rgRGS domain of p115RhoGEF in complex with a chimera of Galpha13 and Galphai1. Two distinct surfaces of rgRGS interact with Galpha. The N-terminal betaN-alphaN hairpin of rgRGS, rather than its RGS module, forms intimate contacts with the catalytic site of Galpha. The interface between the RGS module of rgRGS and Galpha is similar to that of a Galpha-effector complex, suggesting a role for the rgRGS domain in the stimulation of the GEF activity of p115RhoGEF by Galpha13.

Using molecular tools to dissect the role of Galphas in sensitization of AC1

Short-term activation of Galpha(i/o)-coupled receptors inhibits adenylyl cyclase, whereas persistent activation of Galpha(i/o)-coupled receptors results in a compensatory sensitization of adenylyl cyclase activity after subsequent activation by Galpha(s) or forskolin. Several indirect observations have suggested the involvement of increased Galpha(s)-adenylyl cyclase interactions in the expression of sensitization; however, evidence supporting a direct role for Galpha(s) has not been well established. In the present report, we used two genetic approaches to further examine the role of Galpha(s) in heterologous sensitization of Ca(2+)-sensitive type 1 adenylyl cyclase (AC1). In the first approach, we constructed Galpha(s)-insensitive mutants of AC1 (F293L and Y973S) that retained sensitivity to Ca2+ and forskolin activation. Persistent (2 h) activation of the D2 dopamine receptor resulted in a significant augmentation of basal or Ca(2+)- and forskolin-stimulated AC1 activity; however, sensitization of Galpha(s)-insensitive mutants of AC1 was markedly reduced compared with wild-type AC1. In the second strategy, we examined the requirement of an intact receptor-Galpha(s) signaling pathway for the expression of sensitization using dominant-negative Galpha(s) mutants (alpha3beta5 G226A/A366S or alpha3beta5 G226A/E268A/A366S) to disrupt D1 dopamine receptor activation of recombinant AC1. D1 dopamine receptor-Galpha(s) signaling was attenuated in the presence of alpha3beta5 G226A/A366S or alpha3beta5 G226A/E268A/A366S, but D2 agonist-induced sensitization of Ca(2+)-stimulated AC1 activity was not altered. Together, the present findings directly support the hypothesis that the expression of sensitization of AC1 involves Galpha(s)-adenylyl cyclase interactions.

Dominant-negative inhibition of pheromone receptor signaling by a single point mutation in the G protein alpha subunit

In yeast, two different constitutive mutants of the G protein alpha subunit have been reported. Gpa1(Q323L) cannot hydrolyze GTP and permanently activates the pheromone response pathway. Gpa1(N388D) was also proposed to lack GTPase activity, yet it has an inhibitory effect on pheromone responsiveness. We have characterized this inhibitory mutant (designated Galpha(ND)) and found that it binds GTP, interacts with G protein betagamma subunits, and exhibits full GTPase activity in vitro. Although pheromone leads to dissociation of the receptor from wild-type G protein, the same treatment promotes stable association of the receptor with Galpha(ND). We conclude that agonist binding to the receptor promotes the formation of a nondissociable complex with Galpha(ND), and in this manner prevents activation of the endogenous wild-type G protein. Dominant-negative mutants may be useful in matching specific receptors and their cognate G proteins and in determining mechanisms of G protein signaling specificity.

G alpha 13-mediated transformation and apoptosis are permissively dependent on basal ERK activity

We previously reported that the alpha-subunit of heterotrimeric G13 protein induces either mitogenesis and neoplastic transformation or apoptosis in a cell-dependent manner. Here, we analyzed which signaling pathways are required for G alpha 13-induced mitogenesis or apoptosis using a novel mutant of G alpha 13. We have identified that in human cell line LoVo, the mutation encoding substitution of Arg260 to stop codon in mRNA of G alpha 13 subunit produced a mutant protein (G alpha 13-T) that lacks a COOH terminus and is endogenously expressed in LoVo cells as a polypeptide of 30 kDa. We found that G alpha 13-T lost its ability to promote proliferation and transformation but retained its ability to induce apoptosis. We found that full-length G alpha 13 could stimulate Elk1 transcription factor, whereas truncated G alpha 13 lost this ability. G alpha 13-dependent stimulation of Elk1 was inhibited by dominant-negative extracellular signal-regulated kinase (MEK) but not by dominant-negative MEKK1. Similarly, MEK inhibitor PD-98059 blocked G alpha 13-induced Elk1 stimulation, whereas JNK inhibitor SB-203580 was ineffective. In Rat-1 fibroblasts, G alpha 13-induced cell proliferation and foci formation were also inhibited by dominant-negative MEK and PD-98059 but not by dominant-negative MEKK1 and SB-203580. Whereas G alpha 13-T alone did not induce transformation, coexpression with constitutively active MEK partially restored its ability to transform Rat-1 cells. Importantly, full-length but not G alpha 13-T could stimulate Src kinase activity. Moreover, G alpha 13-dependent stimulation of Elk1, cell proliferation, and foci formation were inhibited by tyrosine kinase inhibitor, genistein, or by dominant-negative Src kinase, suggesting the involvement of a Src-dependent pathway in the G alpha 13-mediated cell proliferation and transformation. Importantly, truncated G alpha 13 retained its ability to stimulate apoptosis signal-regulated kinase ASK1 and c-Jun terminal kinase, JNK. Interestingly, the apoptosis induced by G alpha 13-T was inhibited by dominant-negative ASK1 or by SB-203580.

Differential coupling of the extreme C-terminus of G protein alpha subunits to the G protein-coupled melatonin receptors

Melatonin receptors interact with pertussis toxin-sensitive G proteins to inhibit adenylate cyclase. However, the G protein coupling profiles of melatonin receptor subtypes have not been fully characterised and alternative G protein coupling is evident. The five C-terminal residues of Galpha subunits confer coupling specificity to G protein-coupled receptors. This report outlines the use of Galphas chimaeras to alter the signal output of human melatonin receptors and investigate their interaction with the C-termini of Galpha subunits. The Galphas portion of the chimaeras confers the ability to activate adenylate cyclase leading to cyclic AMP production. Co-transfection of HEK293 cells expressing MT(1) or MT(2) melatonin receptors with Galphas chimaeras and a cyclic AMP activated luciferase construct provided a convenient and sensitive assay system for identification of receptor recognition of Galpha C-termini. Luciferase assay sensitivity was compared with measurement of cyclic AMP elevations by radioimmunoassay. Differential interactions of the melatonin receptor subtypes with Galpha chimaeras were observed. Temporal and kinetic parameters of cyclic AMP responses measured by cyclic AMP radioimmunoassay varied depending on the Galphas chimaeras coupled. Recognition of the C-terminal five amino acids of the Galpha subunit is a requisite for coupling to a receptor, but it is not the sole determinant.

A highly effective dominant negative alpha s construct containing mutations that affect distinct functions inhibits multiple Gs-coupled receptor signaling pathways

To investigate the subcellular organization of receptor-G protein signaling pathways, a robust dominant negative alpha(s) mutant containing substitutions that alter distinct functions was produced and tested for its effects on G(s)-coupled receptor activity in HEK-293 cells. Mutations in the alpha3beta5 loop region, which increase receptor affinity, decrease receptor-mediated activation, and impair activation of adenylyl cyclase, were combined with G226A, which increases affinity for betagamma, and A366S, which decreases affinity for GDP. This triple alpha(s) mutant can inhibit signaling to G(s) from the luteinizing hormone receptor by 97% and from the calcitonin receptor by 100%. In addition, this alpha(s) mutant blocks all signaling from the calcitonin receptor to G(q). These results lead to two conclusions about receptor-G protein signaling. First, individual receptors have access to multiple types of G proteins in HEK-293 cell membranes. Second, different G protein alpha subunits can compete with each other for binding to the same receptor. This dominant negative alpha(s) construct will be useful for determining interrelationships among distinct receptor-G protein interactions in a wide variety of cells and tissues.

Conformational analysis of the GTP-binding protein MxA using limited proteolysis

Guanosine triphosphate (GTP)-binding proteins are known to function as molecular switches that cycle between GTP-bound and guanosine diphosphate (GDP)-bound states. Switching is achieved by the fact that G-proteins in the GTP-bound conformation can interact with a certain set of effector molecules while they interact with a different set of partners in their GDP-bound conformation. The antiviral properties of the interferon-induced MxA protein are critically dependent on the ability of MxA to bind GTP. Using limited proteolysis we analyzed the conformations of the MxA protein under nucleotide-free, GDP-bound, and GTP-bound conditions. We find that whereas the conformations of nucleotide-free MxA and GDP-bound MxA are essentially similar, GTP-binding causes a dramatic change in the conformation of MxA.

Activation mechanism of Gi and Go by reactive oxygen species

Reactive oxygen species are proposed to work as intracellular mediators. One of their target proteins is the alpha subunit of heterotrimeric GTP-binding proteins (Galpha(i) and Galpha(o)), leading to activation. H(2)O(2) is one of the reactive oxygen species and activates purified Galpha(i2). However, the activation requires the presence of Fe(2+), suggesting that H(2)O(2) is converted to more reactive species such as c*OH. The analysis with mass spectrometry shows that seven cysteine residues (Cys(66), Cys(112), Cys(140), Cys(255), Cys(287), Cys(326), and Cys(352)) of Galpha(i2) are modified by the treatment with *OH. Among these cysteine residues, Cys(66), Cys(112), Cys(140), Cys(255), and Cys(352) are not involved in *OH-induced activation of Galpha(i2). Although the modification of Cys(287) but not Cys(326) is required for subunit dissociation, the modification of both Cys(287) and Cys(326) is necessary for the activation of Galpha(i2) as determined by pertussis toxin-catalyzed ADP-ribosylation, conformation-dependent change of trypsin digestion pattern or guanosine 5'-3-O-(thio)triphosphate binding. Wild type Galpha(i2) but not Cys(287)- or Cys(326)-substituted mutants are activated by UV light, singlet oxygen, superoxide anion, and nitric oxide, indicating that these oxidative stresses activate Galpha(i2) by the mechanism similar to *OH-induced activation. Because Cys(287) exists only in G(i) family, this study explains the selective activation of G(i)/G(o) by oxidative stresses.

Suramin affects coupling of rhodopsin to transducin

Suramin, a polysulfonated naphthylurea, is under investigation for the treatment of several cancers. It interferes with signal transduction through G(s), G(i), and G(o), but structural and kinetic aspects of the molecular mechanism are not well understood. Here, we have investigated the influence of suramin on coupling of bovine rhodopsin to G(t), where G-protein activation and receptor structure can be monitored by spectroscopic in vitro assays. G(t) fluorescence changes in response to rhodopsin-catalyzed nucleotide exchange reveal that suramin inhibits G(t) activation by slowing down the rate of complex formation between metarhodopsin-II and G(t). The metarhodopsin-I/-II photoproduct equilibrium, GTPase activity, and nucleotide uptake by G(t) are unaffected. Attenuated total reflection Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy shows that the structure of rhodopsin, metarhodopsin-II, and the metarhodopsin-II G(t) complex is also not altered. Instead, suramin dissociates G(t) from disk membranes in the dark, whereas metarhodopsin-II G(t) complexes are stable. Förster resonance energy transfer suggests a suramin-binding site near Trp(207) on the G(t alpha) subunit (K(d) approximately 0.5 microM). The kinetic analyses and the structural data are consistent with a specific perturbation by suramin of the membrane attachment site on G(t alpha). Disruption of membrane anchoring may contribute to some of the effects of suramin exerted on other G-proteins.

The signal transfer regions of G alpha(s)

The crystal structure of soluble functional fragments of adenylyl cyclase complexed with G alpha(s) and forskolin, shows three regions of G alpha(s) in direct contact with adenylyl cyclase. The functions of these three regions are not known. We tested synthetic peptides encoding these regions of G alpha(s) on the activities of full-length adenylyl cyclases 2 and 6. A peptide encoding the Switch II region (amino acids 222-247) stimulated both adenylyl cyclases 2- to 3-fold. Forskolin synergized the stimulation. Addition of peptides in the presence of activated G alpha(s) partially inhibited G alpha(s) stimulation. Corresponding Switch II region peptides from G alpha(q) and G alpha(i) did not stimulate adenylyl cyclase. A peptide encoding the Switch I region (amino acids 199-216) also stimulated AC2 and AC6. The stimulatory effects of the two peptides at saturating concentrations were non-additive. A peptide encoding the third contact region (amino acids 268-286) located in the alpha 3-beta 5 region, inhibits basal, forskolin, and G alpha(s)-stimulated enzymatic activities. Since this region in G alpha(s) interacts with both the central cytoplasmic loop and C-terminal tail of adenylyl cyclases this peptide may be involved in blocking interactions between these two domains. These functional data in conjunction with the available structural information suggest that G alpha(s) activation of adenylyl cyclase is a complex event where the alpha 3-beta 5 loop of G alpha(s) may bring together the central cytoplasmic loop and C-terminal tail of adenylyl cyclase thus allowing the Switch I and Switch II regions to function as signal transfer regions to activate adenylyl cyclase.

Endocrine manifestations of stimulatory G protein alpha-subunit mutations and the role of genomic imprinting

The heterotrimeric G protein G(s) couples hormone receptors (as well as other receptors) to the effector enzyme adenylyl cyclase and is therefore required for hormone-stimulated intracellular cAMP generation. Receptors activate G(s) by promoting exchange of GTP for GDP on the G(s) alpha-subunit (G(s)alpha) while an intrinsic GTPase activity of G(s)alpha that hydrolyzes bound GTP to GDP leads to deactivation. Mutations of specific G(s)alpha residues (Arg(201) or Gln(227)) that are critical for the GTPase reaction lead to constitutive activation of G(s)-coupled signaling pathways, and such somatic mutations are found in endocrine tumors, fibrous dysplasia of bone, and the McCune-Albright syndrome. Conversely, heterozygous loss-of-function mutations may lead to Albright hereditary osteodystrophy (AHO), a disease characterized by short stature, obesity, brachydactyly, sc ossifications, and mental deficits. Similar mutations are also associated with progressive osseous heteroplasia. Interestingly, paternal transmission of GNAS1 mutations leads to the AHO phenotype alone (pseudopseudohypoparathyroidism), while maternal transmission leads to AHO plus resistance to several hormones (e.g., PTH, TSH) that activate G(s) in their target tissues (pseudohypoparathyroidism type IA). Studies in G(s)alpha knockout mice demonstrate that G(s)alpha is imprinted in a tissue-specific manner, being expressed primarily from the maternal allele in some tissues (e.g., renal proximal tubule, the major site of renal PTH action), while being biallelically expressed in most other tissues. Disrupting mutations in the maternal allele lead to loss of G(s)alpha expression in proximal tubules and therefore loss of PTH action in the kidney, while mutations in the paternal allele have little effect on G(s)alpha expression or PTH action. G(s)alpha has recently been shown to be also imprinted in human pituitary glands. The G(s)alpha gene GNAS1 (as well as its murine ortholog Gnas) has at least four alternative promoters and first exons, leading to the production of alternative gene products including G(s)alpha, XLalphas (a novel G(s)alpha isoform that is expressed only from the paternal allele), and NESP55 (a chromogranin-like protein that is expressed only from the maternal allele). A fourth alternative promoter and first exon (exon 1A) located approximately 2.5 kb upstream of the G(s)alpha promoter is normally methylated on the maternal allele and transcriptionally active on the paternal allele. In patients with isolated renal resistance to PTH (pseudohypoparathyroidism type IB), the exon 1A promoter region has a paternal-specific imprinting pattern on both alleles (unmethylated, transcriptionally active), suggesting that this region is critical for the tissue-specific imprinting of G(s)alpha. The GNAS1 imprinting defect in pseudohypoparathyroidism type IB is predicted to decrease G(s)alpha expression in renal proximal tubules. Studies in G(s)alpha knockout mice also demonstrate that this gene is critical in the regulation of lipid and glucose metabolism.

Binding of G alpha(o) N terminus is responsible for the voltage-resistant inhibition of alpha(1A) (P/Q-type, Ca(v)2.1) Ca(2+) channels

G-protein-mediated inhibition of presynaptic voltage-dependent Ca(2+) channels is comprised of voltage-dependent and -resistant components. The former is caused by a direct interaction of Ca(2+) channel alpha(1) subunits with G beta gamma, whereas the latter has not been characterized well. Here, we show that the N terminus of G alpha(o) is critical for the interaction with the C terminus of the alpha(1A) channel subunit, and that the binding induces the voltage-resistant inhibition. An alpha(1A) C-terminal peptide, an antiserum raised against G alpha(o) N terminus, and a G alpha(o) N-terminal peptide all attenuated the voltage-resistant inhibition of alpha(1A) currents. Furthermore, the N terminus of G alpha(o) bound to the C terminus of alpha(1A) in vitro, which was prevented either by the alpha(1A) channel C-terminal or G alpha(o) N-terminal peptide. Although the C-terminal domain of the alpha(1B) channel showed similar ability in the binding with G alpha(o) N terminus, the above mentioned treatments were ineffective in the alpha(1B) channel current. These findings demonstrate that the voltage-resistant inhibition of the P/Q-type, alpha(1A) channel is caused by the interaction between the C-terminal domain of Ca(2+) channel alpha(1A) subunit and the N-terminal region of G alpha(o).

Mutant G protein alpha subunit activated by Gbeta gamma: a model for receptor activation?

How receptors catalyze exchange of GTP for GDP bound to the Galpha subunit of trimeric G proteins is not known. One proposal is that the receptor uses the G protein's betagamma heterodimer as a lever, tilting it to pull open the guanine nucleotide binding pocket of Galpha. To test this possibility, we designed a mutant Galpha that would bind to betagamma in the tilted conformation. To do so, we excised a helical turn (four residues) from the N-terminal region of alpha(s), the alpha subunit of G(S), the stimulatory regulator of adenylyl cyclase. In the presence, but not in the absence, of transiently expressed beta(1) and gamma(2), this mutant (alpha(s)Delta), markedly stimulated cAMP accumulation. This effect depended on the ability of the coexpressed beta protein to interact normally with the lip of the nucleotide binding pocket of alpha(s)Delta. We substituted alanine for an aspartate in beta(1) that binds to a lysine (K206) in the lip of the alpha subunit's nucleotide binding pocket. Coexpressed with alpha(s)Delta and gamma(2), this mutant, beta(1)-D228A, elevated cAMP much less than did beta(1)-wild type; it did bind to alpha(s)Delta normally, however, as indicated by its unimpaired ability to target alpha(s)Delta to the plasma membrane. We conclude that betagamma can activate alpha(s) and that this effect probably involves both a tilt of betagamma relative to alpha(s) and interaction of beta with the lip of the nucleotide binding pocket. We speculate that receptors use a similar mechanism to activate trimeric G proteins.

Molecular biological approaches to unravel adenylyl cyclase signaling and function

Signal transduction through the cell membrane requires the participation of one or more plasma membrane proteins. For many transmembrane signaling events adenylyl cyclases (ACs) are the final effector enzymes which integrate and interpret divergent signals from different pathways. The enzymatic activity of adenylyl cyclases is stimulated or inhibited in response to the activation of a large number of receptors in virtually all cells of the human body. To date, ten different mammalian isoforms of adenylyl cyclase (AC) have been cloned and characterized. Each isoform has its own distinct tissue distribution and regulatory properties, providing possibilities for different cells to respond diversely to similar stimuli. The product of the enzymatic reaction catalyzed by ACs, cyclic AMP (cAMP) has been shown to play a crucial role for a variety of fundamental physiological cell functions ranging from cell growth and differentiation, to transcriptional regulation and apoptosis. In the past, investigations into the regulatory mechanisms of ACs were limited by difficulties associated with their purification and the availability of the proteins in any significant amount. Moreover, nearly every cell expresses several AC isoforms. Therefore, it was difficult to perform biochemical characterization of the different AC isoforms and nearly impossible to assess the physiological roles of the individual isoforms in intact cells, tissue or organisms. Recently, however, different molecular biological approaches have permitted several breakthroughs in the study of ACs. Recombinant technologies have allowed biochemical analysis of adenylyl cyclases in-vitro and the development of transgenic animals as well as knock-out mice have yielded new insights in the physiological role of some AC isoforms. In this review, we will focus mainly on the most novel approaches and concepts, which have delineated the mechanisms regulating AC and unravelled novel functions for this enzyme.

The amino terminus of Galpha(z) is required for receptor recognition, whereas its alpha4/beta6 loop is essential for inhibition of adenylyl cyclase

G(z) couples to most of the known G(i)-linked receptors and its alpha subunit (Galpha(z)) inhibits adenylyl cyclases as efficiently as Galpha(i) subtypes. A series of chimeric Galpha subunits with different portions of Galpha(z) and Galpha(t1) (a regulator of cGMP phosphodiesterase) were constructed to study the essential structural elements of Galpha(z) that determine receptor coupling and effector interaction. The receptor-mediated functions of the chimeras were assessed in two aspects: 1) stimulation of type 2 adenylyl cyclase through the release of betagamma subunits from the chimeras, and 2) inhibition of isoproterenol-stimulated adenylyl cyclase by the chimeric Galpha subunits. The results suggested that the presence of both termini of Galpha(z) were critical for coupling to delta-opioid receptor, with the N-terminal region being more important. Moreover, a stretch of amino acids (295-319) corresponding to the alpha4/beta6 loop was identified as one of the adenylyl cyclase inhibitory domains of Galpha(z).

Site-directed mutagenesis of the magB gene affects growth and development in Magnaporthe grisea

G protein signaling is commonly involved in regulating growth and differentiation of eukaryotic cells. We previously identified MAGB, encoding a Galpha subunit, from Magnaporthe grisea, and disruption of MAGB led to defects in a number of cellular responses, including appressorium formation, conidiation, sexual development, mycelial growth, and surface sensing. In this study, site-directed mutagenesis was used to further dissect the pleiotropic effects controlled by MAGB. Conversion of glycine 42 to arginine was predicted to abolish GTPase activity, which in turn would constitutively activate G protein signaling in magB(G42R). This dominant mutation caused autolysis of aged colonies, misscheduled melanization, reduction in both sexual and asexual reproduction, and reduced virulence. Furthermore, magB(G42R) mutants were able to produce appressoria on both hydrophobic and hydrophilic surfaces, although development on the hydrophilic surface was delayed. A second dominant mutation, magB(G203R) (glycine 203 converted to arginine), was expected to block dissociation of the Gbetagamma from the Galpha subunit, thus producing a constitutively inactive G protein complex. This mutation did not cause drastic phenotypic changes in the wild-type genetic background, other than increased sensitivity to repression of conidiation by osmotic stress. However, magB(G203R) is able to complement phenotypic defects in magB mutants. Comparative analyses of the phenotypical effects of different magB mutations are consistent with the involvement of the Gbetagamma subunit in the signaling pathways regulating cellular development in M. grisea.

Src tyrosine kinase is a novel direct effector of G proteins

Heterotrimeric G proteins transduce signals from cell surface receptors to modulate the activity of cellular effectors. Src, the product of the first characterized proto-oncogene and the first identified protein tyrosine kinase, plays a critical role in the signal transduction of G protein-coupled receptors. However, the mechanism of biochemical regulation of Src by G proteins is not known. Here we demonstrate that Galphas and Galphai, but neither Galphaq, Galpha12 nor Gbetay, directly stimulate the kinase activity of downregulated c-Src. Galphas and Galphai similarly modulate Hck, another member of Src-family tyrosine kinases. Galphas and Galphai bind to the catalytic domain and change the conformation of Src, leading to increased accessibility of the active site to substrates. These data demonstrate that the Src family tyrosine kinases are direct effectors of G proteins.

A region containing a proline-rich motif targets sG(i2) to the golgi apparatus

The central function of heterotrimeric GTP-binding proteins (G proteins) is the transduction of extracellular signals, via membrane receptors, leading to the activation of intracellular effectors. In addition to being associated with the plasma membrane, the alpha subunits of some of these proteins have also been localized in intracellular compartments. The mRNA of the G-protein inhibitory alpha subunit 2 (G(alphai2)) encodes two proteins, G(alphai2) and sG(i2), by an alternative splicing mechanism. sG(i2) differs from G(alphai2) in the C-terminal region and localizes in the Golgi in contrast to the plasma membrane localization of G(alphai2). In this paper we show that the sequence specific to sG(i2) can direct the Golgi localization of other G(alphai) subunits, but not of the stimulatory subunit G(alphas) or of a secreted protein. This indicates that, in addition to the sG(i2) C-terminus, sequences located elsewhere in the protein are required to determine the Golgi localization. Inside the sG(i2) C-terminal region we have identified a 14-amino-acid proline-rich motif which specifies the Golgi localization. Finally, we show that the sG(i2) subunit, once activated, leaves the Golgi to be localized in the endoplasmic reticulum.

Interaction with Gbetagamma is required for membrane targeting and palmitoylation of Galpha(s) and Galpha(q)

Peripheral membrane proteins utilize a variety of mechanisms to attach tightly, and often reversibly, to cellular membranes. The covalent lipid modifications, myristoylation and palmitoylation, are critical for plasma membrane localization of heterotrimeric G protein alpha subunits. For alpha(s) and alpha(q), two subunits that are palmitoylated but not myristoylated, we examined the importance of interacting with the G protein betagamma dimer for their proper plasma membrane localization and palmitoylation. Conserved alpha subunit N-terminal amino acids predicted to mediate binding to betagamma were mutated to create a series of betagamma binding region mutants expressed in HEK293 cells. These alpha(s) and alpha(q) mutants were found in soluble rather than particulate fractions, and they no longer localized to plasma membranes as demonstrated by immunofluorescence microscopy. The mutations also inhibited incorporation of radiolabeled palmitate into the proteins and abrogated their signaling ability. Additional alpha(q) mutants, which contain these mutations but are modified by both myristate and palmitate, retained their localization to plasma membranes and ability to undergo palmitoylation. These findings identify binding to betagamma as a critical membrane attachment signal for alpha(s) and alpha(q) and as a prerequisite for their palmitoylation, while myristoylation can restore membrane localization and palmitoylation of betagamma binding-deficient alpha(q) subunits.

N-Myristoylation and betagamma play roles beyond anchorage in the palmitoylation of the G protein alpha(o) subunit

Many of the alpha subunits of heterotrimeric GTP-binding regulatory proteins (G proteins) are palmitoylated, a modification proposed to play a key role in the stable anchorage of the subunits to the plasma membrane. Palmitoylation of alpha subunits from the G(i) family is preceded by N-myristoylation, which alone or together with betagamma probably supports a reversible interaction of the alpha subunit with membrane as a prerequisite to the eventual incorporation of palmitate. Previous studies have not addressed, however, the question of whether membrane association alone, carried out through N-myristoylation, interaction with betagamma, or other events, is sufficient for palmitoylation. We report here for alpha(o) that it is not. We found that N-myristoylation is required for palmitoylation at least in part because it supports events subsequent to membrane attachment. Mutants of alpha(o) designed to target the subunit to membrane without an N-myristoyl group are unable to be palmitoylated as evaluated by incorporation of [(3)H]palmitate. Mutants of alpha(o) unable to interact normally with betagamma yet still attach to membrane demonstrate that betagamma, in contrast, is not required for palmitoylation. betagamma becomes necessary, however, when the N-myristoyl group is absent. Our results suggest that N-myristoylation and betagamma, while almost certainly relevant to the reversible interaction of alpha(o) with membrane, also play at least partly overlapping, post-anchorage roles in palmitoylation.

G(s)alpha repression of adipogenesis via Syk

G(s)alpha regulates the differentiation of 3T3-L1 mouse embryonic fibroblasts to adipocytes, a process termed adipogenesis. Inducers of adipogenesis lead to a loss of G(s)alpha and derepress differentiation to adipocytes. The broad spectrum tyrosine kinase inhibitor genistein is shown to block induction of adipogenesis, suggesting an early role of tyrosine phosphorylation in adipogenesis. Staining of phosphotyrosine identified prominent staining of a approximately 70-kDa protein, hypothesized to be the tyrosine kinase Syk. Reverse transcription and polymerase chain reaction amplification established the expression of Syk mRNA in these embryonic fibroblasts. Immunoprecipitations with Syk-specific antibodies demonstrated the presence of Syk in fibroblasts and a rapid increase in the amount of phospho-Syk, peaking at 24 h post induction. Clones constitutively expressing G(s)alpha, which can no longer be induced to differentiate, no longer display increased phospho-Syk levels in response to inducers. The linkage between G(s)alpha and Syk was probed by immunoprecipitations revealing association of Syk with G(s)alpha in the absence of induction. Upon induction of adipogenesis, G(s)alpha levels decline and phospho-Syk levels as well as Syk kinase activity increase. Expression of wild-type Syk both potentiates the ability of inducers to act as well as induces adipogenesis itself. Expression of the kinase-deficient Syk had no such effects on adipogenesis. These data provide a new insight into the control of adipogenesis, suggesting that G(s)alpha represses adipogenesis via Syk. Treatment with the inducers promotes a decline in G(s)alpha, increases in levels of phospho-Syk, and adipogenesis.

Crystal structure of ERA: a GTPase-dependent cell cycle regulator containing an RNA binding motif

ERA forms a unique family of GTPase. It is widely conserved and essential in bacteria. ERA functions in cell cycle control by coupling cell division with growth rate. ERA homologues also are found in eukaryotes. Here we report the crystal structure of ERA from Escherichia coli. The structure has been determined at 2.4-A resolution. It reveals a two-domain arrangement of the molecule: an N-terminal domain that resembles p21 Ras and a C-terminal domain that is unique. Structure-based topological search of the C domain fails to reveal any meaningful match, although sequence analysis suggests that it contains a KH domain. KH domains are RNA binding motifs that usually occur in tandem repeats and exhibit low sequence similarity except for the well-conserved segment VIGxxGxxIK. We have identified a betaalphaalphabeta fold that contains the VIGxxGxxIK sequence and is shared by the C domain of ERA and the KH domain. We propose that this betaalphaalphabeta fold is the RNA binding motif, the minimum structural requirement for RNA binding. ERA dimerizes in crystal. The dimer formation involves a significantly distorted switch II region, which may shed light on how ERA protein regulates downstream events.

Structural basis of activation and GTP hydrolysis in Rab proteins

BACKGROUND

Rab proteins comprise a large family of GTPases that regulate vesicle trafficking. Despite conservation of critical residues involved in nucleotide binding and hydrolysis, Rab proteins exhibit low sequence identity with other GTPases, and the structural basis for Rab function remains poorly characterized.

RESULTS

The 2. 0 A crystal structure of GppNHp-bound Rab3A reveals the structural determinants that stabilize the active conformation and regulate GTPase activity. The active conformation is stabilized by extensive hydrophobic contacts between the switch I and switch II regions. Serine residues in the phosphate-binding loop (P loop) and switch I region mediate unexpected interactions with the gamma phosphate of GTP that have not been observed in previous GTPase structures. Residues implicated in the interaction with effectors and regulatory factors map to a common face of the protein. The electrostatic potential at the surface of Rab3A indicates a non-uniform distribution of charged and nonpolar residues.

CONCLUSIONS

The major structural determinants of the active conformation involve residues that are conserved throughout the Rab family, indicating a common mode of activation. Novel interactions with the gamma phosphate impose stereochemical constraints on the mechanism of GTP hydrolysis and provide a structural explanation for the large variation of GTPase activity within the Rab family. An asymmetric distribution of charged and nonpolar residues suggests a plausible orientation with respect to vesicle membranes, positioning predominantly hydrophobic surfaces for interaction with membrane-associated effectors and regulatory factors. Thus, the structure of Rab3A establishes a framework for understanding the molecular mechanisms underlying the function of Rab GTPases.

Chimaeric G alpha proteins: their potential use in drug discovery

Approaches that allow ligand occupancy of a wide range of G protein-coupled receptors to be converted into robust assays amenable to relatively high-throughput analysis are ideal for screening for novel ligands at this class of receptor. Many attempts have been made to design universal ligand-screening systems such that any GPCR can be screened using a common assay end-point. Manipulation of the G protein within the assay system offers the possibility of achieving this. To better understand the domains involved in the interactions between G protein-coupled receptors, G proteins and effector polypeptides and the fine details of these contacts, a wide range of chimaeric G protein alpha subunits have been produced. Graeme Milligan and Stephen Rees discuss the information generated by such studies and the ways in which such chimaeric G proteins can be integrated into assay systems for drug discovery.

Structural basis of Rab effector specificity: crystal structure of the small G protein Rab3A complexed with the effector domain of rabphilin-3A

The small G protein Rab3A plays an important role in the regulation of neurotransmitter release. The crystal structure of activated Rab3A/GTP/Mg2+ bound to the effector domain of rabphilin-3A was solved to 2.6 A resolution. Rabphilin-3A contacts Rab3A in two distinct areas. The first interface involves the Rab3A switch I and switch II regions, which are sensitive to the nucleotide-binding state of Rab3A. The second interface consists of a deep pocket in Rab3A that interacts with a SGAWFF structural element of rabphilin-3A. Sequence and structure analysis, and biochemical data suggest that this pocket, or Rab complementarity-determining region (RabCDR), establishes a specific interaction between each Rab protein and its effectors. RabCDRs could be major determinants of effector specificity during vesicle trafficking and fusion.

G protein regulation of adenylate cyclase

Adenylate cyclase integrates positive and negative signals that act through G protein-coupled cell-surface receptors with other extracellular stimuli to finely regulate levels of cAMP within the cell. Recently, the structures of the cyclase catalytic core complexed with the plant diterpene forskolin, and a cyclase-forskolin complex bound to an activated form of the stimulatory G protein subunit Gs alpha have been solved by X-ray crystallography. These structures provide a wealth of detail about how different signals could converge at the core cyclase domains to regulate catalysis. In this article, William Simonds reviews recent advances in the molecular and structural biology of this key regulatory enzyme, which provide new insight into its ability to integrate multiple signals in diverse cellular contexts.

The C2 cytosolic loop of adenylyl cyclase interacts with the activated form of G alpha s

Using the yeast two-hybrid system, we studied the physical interaction between the complete C1 and C2 cytosolic domains of Xenopus laevis type 9 (xl9C1, xl9C2) and the C2 domain of rat type 6 (r6C2) adenylyl cyclase (AC). Heterodimerization between xl9C1 and xl9C2 and homodimerization between C2 (but not C1) domains was observed. Interaction between C2 and human G alpha s (hG alpha s) was also detected and was dependent on G alpha s activation. In contrast X. laevis G alpha s (xlG alpha s), which is 92% identical to hG alpha s, was unable to interact with any of the three AC cytosolic domains tested, corroborating previous findings that showed no effector activation. Through the construction of chimeras, we demonstrated that the amino-terminal half of xlG alpha s was responsible for the lack of interaction with AC. Chimeras between mouse G alpha i2 and G alpha s (N-mG alpha i2/C-G alpha s), that have previously shown to activate AC to a higher extent than wild-type G alpha s, also interacted with the C2 cytosolic domain and with a higher affinity. Interestingly, N-mG alpha i2/C-xlG alpha s chimera was not only able to interact with C2 but also with the C1 cytosolic domain.