HCV confirmatory testing of blood donors

Evaluation of five hepatitis C virus screening tests and two supplemental assays: performance when testing sera from sexually transmitted diseases clinic attendees in the USA

The performances of five screening tests (recombinant peptide-based first and second generation tests from Abbott and Ortho, and a synthetic peptide-based test from Biochem Immunosystems) and two supplemental tests: recombinant peptide- based, Abbott neutralization test and Chiron second generation recombinant immunoblot assay (RIBA 2), were evaluated for their ability to detect hepatitis C virus (HCV) antibodies in a population of 276 individuals attending a sexually transmitted diseases (STD) clinic in the USA. Although the five screening tests produced a variable number (35-62) of repeatedly reactive samples, only 13% (36/276) were classified as true positives by the supplemental tests. Thirty-four of the 36 were reactive by all screening tests and 32 of the true positives were reactive by both supplemental tests, while 2 did not neutralize but were reactive in the RIBA 2 test. Of the remaining 2 of the true positives which were discordant by several of the screening assays, 1 was confirmed by both supplemental assays but the other required a chemiluminescent enhancement technique to show positivity in RIBA 2. The sensitivities of the first and second generation Abbott and Ortho tests ranged from 97% to 100% and that of the Biochem test was 94%. The specificities of these tests ranged from 89.2% to 99.6%. The second generation Ortho test presented 9.4% (26/276) false positives. The use of second generation Ortho as a screening test would lead to an excessive number of confirmatory false positives. the positive predictive values of the screening tests ranged from 58.1% to 97.1%. Although the synthetic peptide based Biochem test exhibited the best overall indices, the presence of 2 false negative results would prevent its use as a singular screening test. Nevertheless its high specificity may lend itself to be used as a second screening test before confirmatory testing with RIBA 2.

Advances in the molecular diagnosis of hepatitis C and their clinical implications

Serologic assays for diagnosis of hepatitis C infection may yield indeterminate results despite improvements in sensitivity and specificity through second- and third-generation assays. Direct detection of hepatitis C virus (HCV) RNA based on qualitative reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction or transcription-mediated amplification allows diagnosis in the early stages of acute infection and in patients unable to mount an antibody response. Quantitative HCV RNA assays are useful for selecting appropriate antiviral therapies, but until recently they have lacked comparability between tests. More sensitive qualitative assays should be used for determining duration of treatment or recognizing a sustained virologic response to therapy. Hepatitis C virus genotyping can be performed from a limited sequence analysis of the viral genome by using various techniques. Although newer genotyping methods are relatively practicable and are satisfactory for the discrimination of the majority of genotypes, discrimination between subtypes can be challenging. Serologic typing of HCV lacks sensitivity and specificity compared with molecular-based techniques. Recent advances in serologic assays and nucleic acid detection techniques allow physicians to make accurate diagnoses, and these assays serve as important tools in treatment planning.

Advances in the molecular diagnosis of hepatitis C and their clinical implications

Serologic assays for diagnosis of hepatitis C infection may yield indeterminate results despite improvements in sensitivity and specificity through second- and third-generation assays. Direct detection of hepatitis C virus (HCV) RNA based on qualitative reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction or transcription-mediated amplification allows diagnosis in the early stages of acute infection and in patients unable to mount an antibody response. Quantitative HCV RNA assays are useful for selecting appropriate antiviral therapies, but until recently they have lacked comparability between tests. More sensitive qualitative assays should be used for determining duration of treatment or recognizing a sustained virologic response to therapy. Hepatitis C virus genotyping can be performed from a limited sequence analysis of the viral genome by using various techniques. Although newer genotyping methods are relatively practicable and are satisfactory for the discrimination of the majority of genotypes, discrimination between subtypes can be challenging. Serologic typing of HCV lacks sensitivity and specificity compared with molecular-based techniques. Recent advances in serologic assays and nucleic acid detection techniques allow physicians to make accurate diagnoses, and these assays serve as important tools in treatment planning.

Performance of second- and third-generation RIBAs for confirmation of third-generation HCV EIA-reactive blood donations. Retrovirus Epidemiology Donor Study

BACKGROUND

Licensure of an enhanced HCV screening assay (HCV 3.0 EIA) without concurrent licensure of a complementary supplemental assay (i.e., RIBA HCV 3.0 strip immunoblot assay [RIBA-3]) decoupled screening and supplemental testing. In March 1998, the FDA Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research (CBER) recommended the use of RIBA-3 on RIBA HCV 2.0 strip immunoblot assay (RIBA-2)-indeterminate units screened with HCV EIA 3.0.

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

The sensitivity of RIBA-2 and RIBA-3 was compared in tests on HCV 3.0 EIA-repeatably reactive (RR) units identified immediately after the implementation of HCV 3.0 EIA screening. Two protocols were evaluated: parallel testing of HCV 3.0 EIA-RR units by RIBA-2 and RIBA-3 and reflex testing of HCV 3.0 EIA-RR and RIBA-3-confirmed-positive units by RIBA-2. All specimens with discordant RIBA-2 and RIBA-3 results and a representative sampling with concordant RIBA results were tested by PCR.

RESULTS

In the parallel testing protocol, 99,777 donations were screened, with 245 HCV 3.0 EIA-RR specimens included in the study. Of 166 RIBA-2-positive samples, 165 tested positive in RIBA-3 (1 sample reacted to the control superoxide dismutase antigen in RIBA-3). Thirty-two (74%) of 43 RIBA-2-indeterminate specimens and 4 (11%) of 36 RIBA-2-negative specimens tested positive in RIBA-3. HCV RNA was identified in 5 (16%) of 32 RIBA-2-indeterminate/RIBA-3-positive donations, as well as in 26 (70%) of 37 concordant RIBA-2/RIBA-3-positive donations. In the reflex testing protocol, 292,459 donations were screened, with 709 HCV 3.0 EIA-RR specimens included in the study. RIBA-3 testing yielded 517 (73%) positive specimens, of which 50 (9.7%) tested indeterminate and 15 (2.9%) tested negative in RIBA-2. Among the RIBA-discordant specimens, 10 (20%) RIBA-2-indeterminate specimens and 1 (7%) RIBA-2-negative specimens tested positive in PCR; in comparison, 60 (77%) of 78 concordant RIBA-2/RIBA-3-positive units tested positive in PCR.

CONCLUSIONS

RIBA-3 is significantly more sensitive than RIBA-2 in testing of HCV 3.0 EIA-screened donations. During the review process of this manuscript, the FDA licensed the RIBA-3 test.

Failure to find an association between hepatitis C virus and thyroid autoimmunity

A high frequency of hepatitis C antibodies has been reported from France in patients with autoimmune thyroiditis. Two cases of Hashimoto's thyroiditis in association with chronic active hepatitis and hepatitis C infection have also been reported. We have examined this potential association in 46 patients with autoimmune hypothyroidism and found that 16 apparently had hepatitis C antibodies in one of the two commercially available enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISA), but all patients were negative in a confirmatory commercially available recombinant immunoblot assay (RIBA-3) indicating that none of the patients were truly positive for hepatitis C antibodies. We also tested sera from 111 patients with proven hepatitis C infection and found no increased prevalence of thyroid autoantibodies. These results suggest that hepatitis C infection is not a risk factor for the development of thyroid autoimmunity in the United Kingdom.

Indeterminate results of the second-generation hepatitis C virus (HCV) recombinant immunoblot assay: significance of high-level c22-3 reactivity and influence of HCV genotypes

A second-generation recombinant immunoblot assay (RIBA 2.0) is used in the United States to confirm infection with hepatitis C virus (HCV) in samples that are anti-HCV (enzyme immunoassay) positive. In some cases, indeterminate results of RIBA 2.0, which are defined as reactivity to a single antigen species or reactivity limited to two proteins derived from the same coding region of the HCV genome, are encountered. This study was performed to establish the significance of indeterminate RIBA 2.0 results in relation to HCV RNA detection, high positivity for the c22-3 band, and the HCV genotype as determined by direct DNA sequencing. Ninety-six samples with indeterminate RIBA 2.0 results were studied. HCV RNA was detected in 21 of 34 (62%) samples with high reactivity to c22-3 and in 8 of 62 (13%) samples with low reactivity to c22-3. The HCV genotype distribution in samples that were RIBA 2.0 indeterminate and HCV RNA positive was significantly different from that in samples of a control group with positive results for both the RIBA 2.0 and HCV PCR. These results suggest that highly positive c22-3 samples are likely to be associated with HCV viremia and that infection with less common HCV genotypes is more commonly associated with indeterminate RIBA 2.0 results.

Nucleotide sequences of the hepatitis C virus core region in patients without anti-core antibody

Second-generation assays for detection of hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection that include reactivity of antibodies to core, NS3, NS4 are used because of their high sensitivity. Among these antibodies, anti-core antibody seems to be the most sensitive. However, there are some patients without anti-core antibodies, although HCV RNA is detectable by reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction and branched DNA assay. The mechanism for the absence of anti-core antibody on its own is unclear. We therefore determined the nucleotide and deduced amino acid sequences of the core region obtained from two anti-core antibody-negative patients with HCV RNA (genotype 1b) and compared them with those of four anti-core antibody-positive patients and a previously reported sequence. Amino acids spanning 1-47, which seemed to exist in major B cell epitopes, were found to be completely conserved among these patients. Furthermore, the predictive binding motif to HLA DR4 (a.a 81-90) was completely conserved in both of the anti-core antibody-negative patients. There were various mutations in the residual amino acids spanning 49-108, but specific mutations could not be found in anti-core antibody-negative patients. These data indicate that the absence of anti-core antibody in two patients is not due to the presence of some formerly unknown viral variants, but due to a possible defect in the host's immune system.

Capture and RT-PCR of hepatitis C virus RNA with safety primers

The principle and practice of the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) has had a major impact on medical research. This is a powerful method but it does have its limitations, especially for clinical diagnostic work. We describe some improvements of hepatitis C virus (HCV) amplification such as simplification of specimen preparation, elimination of false negative reactions influenced by point mutations, and fluorimetric detection. The aim of the method is to make the procedure as easy and as inexpensive as possible for routine laboratories and for blood screening. After rapid chemical denaturation of the clinical specimen with guanidine thiocyanate and simultaneous hybridization of biotinylated primers to template HCV RNA, the product was fixed to streptavidin-coated magnetic beads and potential inhibitors were removed in easy washing steps. To eliminate the influence of point mutations within the primer binding sites, primer sets with different lengths at their 3'-end were developed for capture, reverse transcription, and amplification of genomic fragments by PCR. Positive results were identified by fluorescence staining. The low cost of the method allows the quantitation of templates by testing of dilution series as is common in microbiological laboratories.

HIV and infections of similar transmission patterns in a drug injectors community of Santos, Brazil

To study the prevalence of HIV and infections with related transmission patterns, we interviewed and obtained blood samples from 220 injecting drug users (IDUs), sampled by snowballing, from the city of Santos in the state of São Paulo, Brazil, where the estimated number of IDUs (10,000) comprises approximately 2% of the entire population. Seroprevalence of HIV, hepatitis B and C, syphilis, and HTLV (1 and 2) was assessed and compared with that in 197 blood donors from the same city, matched for age and gender. Risk behavior related to HIV was assessed by a standard questionnaire applied to the IDU sample. Univariate and multivariate analyses of the risk factors were performed. Seroprevalences found were 62% for HIV, 75% for HCV, 75% for HBV, 34% for syphilis, and 25% for HTLV (1 and 2) among IDUs, which compare with 0.0%, 2%, 23%, 12%, and 1% for blood donors, respectively. The risk for parenterally transmitted infections in this IDU community was higher than that for sexually transmitted infections (odds ratio for syphilis, 3.57; hepatitis B, 10.0; and hepatitis C, 100). The results of the mutivariate risk analysis showed that daily rate of ID use >5 times/day (OR = 6.73), not changing behavior to avoid AIDS (OR= 3.28), ID use >15 days/month (OR = 2.72), and ID use in the last 2 months (OR = 2.23) were the risk behaviors significantly associated with HIV infection.

Clinical evaluation of a single reaction, diagnostic polymerase chain reaction assay for the detection of hepatitis C virus RNA

BACKGROUND/AIMS

In the past few years the detection of HCV-RNA by polymerase chain reaction has become a well-established diagnostic tool for patients with chronic hepatitis C. However, the lack of reproducible results between laboratories and the relatively high proportion of false-positive results, has indicated the need for a standardized and reliable polymerase chain reaction assay. In the present study we have analyzed the performance of a commercial, HCV-RNA polymerase chain reaction assay based on a single, combined reverse transcription and amplification reaction and on the use of Uracil-N-glycosilase to prevent carry-over contamination (Amplicor HCV, Roche Molecular Systems).

METHODS

In this assay the amplification products are detected in microwell plates using biotinylated primer and the HRP avidin colorimetric system. Serum samples collected from 446 patients, including 181 with chronic active hepatitis C, 50 with autoimmune chronic hepatitis, 117 in hemodialysis, 30 asymptomatic carriers of anti-HCV and 68 with indeterminate serology (RIBA indeterminate results), as well as from 121 controls were tested with the commercial, single-step assay and with nested polymerase chain reaction. Both techniques use primers located within the 5' non-coding region of the HCV genome.

RESULTS

In all cases a good concordance was observed between the commercial, single-step assay and nested polymerase chain reaction which, for patients with chronic active hepatitis, showed a sensitivity and specificity of 100% and 99.3% for the former and of 98.8% and 100% for the latter, when compared to clinical diagnosis taken as the gold standard. Most of the 11 discordant samples were seen in the group of RIBA-indeterminate cases and in patients with chronic active hepatitis C. Further analysis of these cases, based on repeat testing and clinical data showed that 64% and 36% of the discrepancies were due, respectively, to nested polymerase chain reaction and Amplicor inconsistent reactions. In hemodialyzed patients, patients with autoimmune hepatitis and asymptomatic carriers of anti-HCV, both assays produced results which were consistent with the clinical diagnosis. In the former group, polymerase chain reaction was able to identify the presence of active viral replication in some antibody negative samples.

CONCLUSIONS

Taken together, these results indicate that the commercial, single-step polymerase chain reaction assay has the same clinical sensitivity and specificity as nested polymerase chain reaction and that, because of its simplified procedures and fast turn-around time, it may be a valuable test for routine diagnostic applications.

Viral serology and detection

Viral detection is an important part of clinical hepatology. For many years practical clinical tests have been serological but recently newer molecular techniques have become available for virus detection, although these have yet to become routine and some, such as PCR of viral nucleic acid in blood or tissue are not yet consistently reliable. Serology remains the mainstay at present for routine diagnosis. Hepatitis A testing in clinical practice is entirely serological, the IgM response representing acute infection and the IgG response immunity, although more sophisticated molecular techniques have been applied experimentally. A second agent of epidemic enteral hepatitis, the hepatitis E virus, has recently been cloned and sequenced and serological tests for this virus are available, although experience in their use is necessarily limited and a commercial IgM assay has yet to be produced. Serological tests for the hepatitis B virus are well developed. The IgM anticore response differentiates acute infection from chronic, the latter being characterized by the persistence of hepatitis B surface antigen for over six months. Chronic carriers are at risk of liver damage and this risk is best assessed by the amount of viral DNA circulating, which can be determined using a hybridization assay. More sensitive techniques such as the branched chain DNA assay or PCR can detect lower levels of viral DNA but their clinical relevance remains to be established. The hepatitis D virus is defective and relies on hepatitis B to replicate. Serology for antibody and antigen is well established although PCR for circulating viral genome may come to supplant hepatic viral antigen as a test for hepatitis D replication. For hepatitis C serology is feasible only for antibodies, not antigens; although early tests were prone both to false positives and false negatives, current versions are more reliable. PCR has been much used for detection of hepatitis C RNA in blood and tissues and a bDNA assay is now commercially available. Cytomegalovirus detection is confounded by the problem of distinguishing asymptomatic viral replication from disease. Serology is helpful, especially in primary infections, but viral culture is a widely used method. PCR (especially quantitative modifications) or the pp65 antigenaemia assay are experimental approaches which may prove specific enough for general use.

The specificity of anti-HCV supplementary assays

A total of 920 samples from blood donors screened as anti-HCV negative by two third-generation screening assays (Ortho Diagnostics v3.0 and Murex Diagnostics VK48) were tested by two supplementary anti-HCV assays, RIBA III (Ortho Diagnostics) and Western blot (Murex Diagnostics VK68). Six (0.65%) of the samples gave scorable bands by RIBA III and 5 (0.54%) by Western blot. Only single-band reactivity was seen and there was no consensus reactivity between the two assays. Single-band reactivity in supplementary assays, especially in samples from low-risk populations, needs to be interpreted with care before being taken as indication of genuine previous or current HCV infection.

Hepatitis C-related chronic liver disease among asymptomatic blood donors in the north west of England

In the first 19 months of screening, the North Western Regional Transfusion Centre (RTC) tested 224,000 consecutive blood donors for antibody to hepatitis C virus (anti-HCV) by second generation enzyme immunoassay (EIA). Of these, 366 repeatedly reactive samples were referred for confirmatory testing at Manchester Public Health Laboratory (PHL). There, the initial EIA was repeated, together with two further EIAs. All the referred samples were subjected to a confirmatory line immunoblot (RIBA-II). Reverse transcription followed by the polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR), in order to detect viral RNA, was performed on selected samples. Among the donors, 61 accepted offers for medical review and were assessed for risk factors, clinical findings and results of standard liver function tests. Of these donors, 53 proceeded to liver biopsy. The overall prevalence of confirmed positive donors was 0.04%. Main risk factors identified included intravenous drug abuse in 31 (51%) donors and prior blood transfusion in 12 (20%) but a risk factor was not apparent in 11 (18%). Viraemia, detected by RT-PCR, could be predicted with a high degree of accuracy by means of the readily available and simpler screening and confirmatory tests (EIA and RIBA-II). Established chronic hepatitis was demonstrated in 90% of the liver biopsies. A trend towards worsening histological findings accompanied increasing concentrations of serum transaminase. Even so, many donors with normal transaminase values had abnormal biopsies including those showing chronic active hepatitis (CAH). These findings indicate that a substantial proportion of previously unrecognised asymptomatic persons with established chronic liver disease exists among North Western blood donors.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Current status of the molecular genetics of hepatitis C virus and its utilization in the diagnosis of infection

BACKGROUND

Since the discovery of hepatitis C virus (HCV) as a major cause of non-A non-B hepatitis, advances have been made in our understanding of the molecular biology of HCV and its relatedness to the flaviviruses and pestiviruses. The use of molecular techniques to construct an antibody assay has enabled the accumulation of information concerning the natural history and pathogenesis of HCV infection.

OBJECTIVES

The objective was to review the literature to March 1994 on the structure, function and genetics of HCV and to correlate these findings with approaches to diagnosis that have contributed to our understanding of HCV infections.

STUDY DESIGN

We reviewed the virological and medical literature from 1988 to March of 1994 with a focus on the stated objectives.

RESULTS

Although the structure of HCV has been well-defined, our knowledge of the function of all the genes of HCV is incomplete. Structural core and envelope proteins as well as enzymes have been described. The 5' end of the polypeptide is most conserved. Genotyping of isolates varies according to the part of the gene examined. Several genotypes exist and tend to predominate in global populations. Antibodies to the various proteins can be measured by EIA assays and positive specimens often require confirmatory testing. Uniquely sensitive nucleic acid detection systems for RNA amplified by PCR have enabled a better understanding of the natural history, epidemiology and responses to treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

Well-designed studies for the detection of nucleic acid, antibodies and antigens using a variety of viral gene products will provide even more information about HCV infections and help lead to treatment and prevention.

HCV antibodies in Hungarian blood donations. Experiences collected by ELISA tests, immunoblot assays and polymerase chain reaction and protocols for donor management

Routine screening of Hungarian blood donors for anti-HCV commenced in the second half of 1992. Before this, five available anti-HCV ELISA kits were compared in pilot studies. In the first series, 831 random donor samples were tested by one of the tests and the 12 (1.4%) reactives found were retested by the other four. Six of the reactives were positive in all ELISA. In the second series, 325 samples from donors with elevated transaminase levels were tested by all five kits. Forty-four were found to be reactive by one or more of the tests and 32 (10%) were positive in all five assays. Samples concordantly reactive in the ELISA were positive in second or third generation recombinant immunoblot assay (RIBA 2 or RIBA 3); those that gave discordant results were indeterminate or negative. Eleven concordantly reactive samples from the second series were HCV RNA positive by polymerase chain reaction (PCR). In the first period of screening with Abbott ELISA 2 a repeat-reactivity rate of 0.98% was observed in 171,106 samples tested. Reactives were retested for supplementary testing by Wellcozyme anti-HCV. Donors reactive in both tests and strongly reactive (ELISA ratio (ER) = optical density/cut off > or = 2.5) in either of them were permanently deferred. Those negative in the supplementary ELISA or weakly reactive (1.0 < or = ER < 2.5) in both tests were subjected to RIBA 2. On the basis of RIBA, positive donors were permanently deferred, indeterminates were excluded for 1 year and negatives were readmitted. In 1992, 1,347 supplementary tests were completed; 824 (61%) of the respective donors were permanently deferred, 218 (16%) were deferred for 1 year and 305 (23%) were readmitted.

Third-generation hepatitis C virus tests in asymptomatic anti-HCV-positive blood donors

This study evaluated the performance of third-generation anti-HCV assays in blood donors who were positive by second-generation anti-HCV, and assessed any possible relationship between antibody patterns, HCV replication and liver damage. Fifty-two second-generation enzyme immunoassay-positive asymptomatic Italian blood donors were retested for anti-HCV by third-generation enzyme immunoassay and recombinant immunoblot assay (Ortho third-generation enzyme immunoassay, third-generation recombinant immunoblot assay), utilising recombinant C33c and NS5 and synthetic peptide C100 and C22 antigens, and for HCV-RNA by "nested" polymerase chain reaction with 5' region primers. Alanine aminotransferases were tested monthly for 6 months. Two out of 52 second-generation enzyme immunoassay-positive donors were third-generation enzyme immunoassay, third-generation recombinant immunoblot assay and HCV-RNA negative. Among 50 third-generation enzyme immunoassay-positive cases, two had a third-generation enzyme immunoassay optical density < or = 1: one was third-generation recombinant immunoblot assay and HCV-RNA negative, and the other was third-generation recombinant immunoblot assay "indeterminate" and HCV-RNA-positive. The remaining 48 cases had third-generation enzyme immunoassay optical density > 1: six were third-generation recombinant immunoblot assay negative (one HCV-RNA+ve), eight "indeterminate" (two HCV-RNA+ve) and 34 positive (22 HCV-RNA+ve). All "indeterminate" subjects reacted only to C22. HCV-RNA was positive in 22/34 cases with positive third-generation recombinant immunoblot assay (two or more Ags), 3/9 "indeterminate" and 1/11 negative. Alanine amino-transferases were abnormal in 13 cases with positive third-generation recombinant immunoblot assay, one was "indeterminate" and three were negative.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Hepatitis C virus transmission by intravenous immunoglobulin

The polymerase chain reaction was used to detect hepatitis C virus infection in patients who had previously been reported to have developed non-A, non-B hepatitis after intravenous immunoglobulin infusion. Of the 33 patients with intravenous immunoglobulin associated non-A, non-B hepatitis studied, HCV RNA could be detected in 15 out of 17 patients (88%) who were HCV RNA negative prior to the development of non-A, non-B hepatitis after implicated intravenous immunoglobulin batches. Similarly, eight out of nine patients (89%) in whom no sample was available for polymerase chain reaction testing prior to intravenous immunoglobulin therapy, had detectable HCV RNA after intravenous immunoglobulin therapy with intravenous immunoglobulin batches implicated in non-A, non-B hepatitis transmission. Two of the three intravenous immunoglobulin preparations implicated in non-A, non-B hepatitis transmissions that were available for polymerase chain reaction testing also had detectable HCV RNA, confirming that hepatitis C virus is the implicated virus in intravenous immunoglobulin-associated non-A, non-B hepatitis.

Isotype-specific immune response to a single hepatitis C virus core epitope defined by a human monoclonal antibody: diagnostic value and correlation to PCR

In this study we tested the seroreactivity of 223 selected anti-HCV-reactive blood donors to the human B-cell epitope N-VYLLPR-C (C34-39) of the hepatitis C virus core antigen. The epitope was recently identified and characterized by the human monoclonal IgG antibody Ul/F10 and is located within the amino acid residues 34-39 of the aminoterminal core region. The blood donor sera were selected from anti-HCV ELISA (Ortho, 2nd generation)-reactive samples. Sixty-seven of these sera were further reactive in RIBA (Ortho, 2nd generation). According to their RIBA pattern, these samples were divided into four groups. Samples in the first group (n = 18) reacted to all four recombinant HCV antigens. The samples of the second (n = 9) and third group (n = 8) reacted to c22-3/c33c and c22-3/c100-3, respectively. Sera from group 4 (n = 32) showed a RIBA indeterminate pattern with reactivity only to c22-3. All 223 samples were analyzed for anti-C34-39 antibodies by ELISA, and the 67 RIBA-reactive samples were additionally tested for the presence of HCV RNA by RT/PCR. In groups 1 and 2, over 80% of the samples showed anti-C34-39 reactivity which was restricted to the IgG1 isotype. In contrast, in groups 3 and 4, antibodies to the epitope C34-39 were detected in less than 10% of the samples. Interestingly, the anti-C34-39 response correlates with the presence of HCV RNA; 95.5% of the samples had coincident results in all subgroups. None of the RIBA-negative sera showed a specific seroreaction to the C34-39 peptide.

The polymerase chain reaction and hepatitis C virus diagnosis

In the absence of tissue culture, electron microscopy or assays for viral antigen, the direct detection of hepatitis C virus (HCV) is by necessity dependent upon nucleic acid hybridisation methods. Of the available methods, amplification of HCV cDNA by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) commends itself by virtue of its extreme sensitivity and its consequent ability to detect the very low levels of HCV-RNA that are present in many clinical samples. In this review the development and evolution of PCR techniques for HCV detection are described and a number of clinical applications are considered in detail. The applications include diagnosis of acute infection during the seronegative window period prior to the appearance of HCV antibodies, and diagnosis of HCV infection in the immunosuppressed. PCR also enables identification of the chronic viraemic carrier state and it permits accurate monitoring of the antiviral effects of drugs such as interferon. Confirmation of the specificity of HCV antibody assays and detection of HCV contamination of blood donations and blood products are other important areas in which PCR techniques have proved invaluable. In addition, PCR-based techniques underlie an increasing number of molecular epidemiological and genotyping studies and they are providing insights into the details of HCV cellular tropism and replication. A number of logistic problems and operational difficulties are also discussed. Despite these limitations it is concluded that PCR will continue to make significant contributions to both clinical practice and to our understanding of the basic biology of HCV infection.

Transmission of hepatitis C virus by organ transplantation in the United Kingdom

This study employed a second-generation anti-HCV ELISA, and a second-generation recombinant immunoblot assay and hepatitis C virus RNA detection by polymerase chain reaction to investigate the anti-HCV prevalence in 554 British organ donors and the transmission of hepatitis C virus to heart, liver and kidney recipients between 1984 and 1991. Serum samples from six (1.08%) donors were reactive in the second-generation anti-HCV ELISA and four (67%) of these gave positive or indeterminate results in the recombinant immunoblot assay-2. Of the 15 recipients of these organs from hepatitis C virus-confirmed positive/indeterminate donors, 14 (93%) acquired hepatitis C virus infection and seven (47%) had evidence of hepatitis C virus-related liver disease after transplantation and no evidence of blood transfusion-related transmission. Only six of the 15 (40%) recipients had detectable anti-HCV after transplantation, while 12 of 14 (86%) patients tested had hepatitis C virus RNA in their serum detectable by "nested" polymerase chain reaction. These data indicate a very high rate of transmission with a major risk of the development of liver disease. We believe our study supports the testing of all British organ donors for anti-HCV and that organs from anti-HCV-positive patients should not be transplanted unless the recipient has life-threatening disease and there is a donor shortage, when their use may be justified. Since there are time constraints on organ donor testing, which may frequently be done on call during unsocial hours, we would recommend second-generation ELISA as the current screening test of choice.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Clinical significance of hepatitis C antibodies in blood donors

The clinical significance of hepatitis C antibodies (anti-HCV) in a healthy population was studied by liver function tests and liver biopsies. The patient population consisted of 195 (96.1%) of the 203 blood donors found to be either anti-HCV positive or indeterminate by a recombinant immunoblot assay (RIBA) during the first year of anti-HCV screening of 307,606 donors in Finland using a first generation enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Alanine aminotransferase (ALT) levels in 67 donors reacting positively and in 128 reacting indeterminately by a second generation RIBA (RIBA-4) were monitored to evaluate the prevalence of liver damage. Serum N-terminal type III procollagen (PIIINP) concentrations were measured in all donors who fulfilled our criterion for possible hepatitis C (ALT values over two times the normal upper limit on two occasions or over five times the normal upper limit on one occasion) and in 23 randomly selected RIBA-4 positive donors without ALT abnormalities (control group). Two (1.6%) of the RIBA-4 indeterminate donors had ALT values compatible with possible hepatitis C (negative by polymerase chain reaction) whereas there were 25 (37.3%) such individuals among the RIBA-4 positive donors (P < 0.0005). Twenty (80%) of the latter 25 RIBA-4 positive donors with possible hepatitis C consented to liver biopsy. Of these 20 donors, 11 (55.0%) were found to have chronic persistent hepatitis, four (20.0%) mild, three (15.0%) moderate, and two (10.0%) severe chronic active hepatitis.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Significance of highly positive c22-3 "indeterminate" second-generation hepatitis C virus (HCV) recombinant immunoblot assay (RIBA) and resolution by third-generation HCV RIBA

Second-generation recombinant immunoblot assay (RIBA) is widely used for the validation of anti-hepatitis C virus (HCV) antibody detection. The aims of this work were (i) to determine, in terms of liver disease and HCV replication, the significance of a peculiar "indeterminate" second-generation RIBA pattern characterized by the presence of high titers of antibodies directed to c22-3, a protein bearing core epitopes and (ii) to determine whether a more advanced version of the same strip assay, namely a third-generation RIBA, may solve the problem of such indeterminate patterns. Sixty patients for which c22-3 indeterminate second-generation RIBAs were highly positive were studied. Forty-two of them (70%) were immunocompromised. Serum transaminases were increased in 46 cases (77%), and HCV RNA was detected by PCR in 50 cases (83%). Third-generation RIBA remained highly positive c22 indeterminate for 9 patients (15%) but was positive for 51 (85%), mostly because of increased sensitivity for the detection of both anti-c100 and anti-c33c antibodies. These results suggest that third-generation RIBA may achieve resolution of most of these cases but that highly positive c22 indeterminate third-generation RIBA may persist when used with some patients with very low titers of anti-HCV nonstructural protein antibodies.

Low risk of sexual transmission of hepatitis C virus in Somalia

The prevalence in Somalia of antibody to hepatitis C virus (anti-HCV) was determined in a survey of 236 female prostitutes, 80 sexually transmitted disease (STD) clinic patients, 79 male soldiers, and 43 tuberculosis patients. Of 98 (22%) serum samples repeatedly anti-HCV reactive by first and second generation enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay kits, only 8 (1.8%) were anti-HCV positive by immunoblot assay (RIBA-2). Anti-HCV seropositivity by immunoblot assay was not associated with any risk group or with positive syphilis serology (found in 18% of subjects) or antibody to human immunodeficiency virus 1 (in 1.4% of subjects). These data indicate that sexual transmission of hepatitis C virus is not common in Somalia among sexually active populations, including female prostitutes and other groups at high risk of STDs and the acquired immune deficiency syndrome.

Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis and hepatitis C virus infection

A possible role for hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection in the pathogenesis of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) has recently been suggested on the basis of an unusually high seroprevalence rate of anti-HCV in such patients from Japan. In an attempt to confirm these findings, we tested sera from 62 patients with IPF by two second-generation anti-HCV ELISAs. Only one serum was reactive. Serum from this patient gave an indeterminate result when tested by four-antigen RIBA (c22 band only), and it was negative for the presence of HCV RNA when tested by the reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction assay. HCV infection is thus no more prevalent in patients with IPF from the UK than in the general population.

[Correlation between hepatitis C virus (HVC) RNA and anti-HVC antibodies in a hemodialysis population]

Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) was applied to detect HCV-RNA in 75 hemodialyzed patients. Anti-HCV status was determined by ELISA-2 and by RIBA-2 for reactive samples by ELISA. ALT levels were monthly determined during the year preceding the end of the study. For 60 patients, anti-HCV serology was known since 1989 and 39 of them were tested for the presence of HCV-RNA at least four times during the 2 preceding years. The 9 patients who were negative for anti-HCV antibodies were negative by PCR. Of the 7 patients with an indeterminate profile by RIBA-2, 3 were positive by PCR: 1/1 with C-33c band only and 2/6 with C22-3 band only. Of the 59 patients reactive by RlBA-2, 57 were HCV-RNA positive. Of the 2 HCV-RNA negative patients, one had been PCR positive before interferon therapy. Of the 38 patients without acute hepatitis tested by PCR on 5 successive samples, all the specimens of 11 and 23 patients were HCV-RNA negative and HCV-RNA positive respectively. In 4 patients, a transient viremia was observed. The group of HCV-RNA positive patients had mean ALT levels greater than those who were negative. A correlation was established between HCV infection and both the time on dialysis and the number of blood transfusions. A high concordance (97%) was observed between antibodies to HCV and HCV-RNA.

Second generation hepatitis C virus assays: performance when testing African sera

Sera were collected from 426 volunteers in Uganda at high and low risk for acquisition of hepatitis C virus (HCV). All samples were tested by the Ortho HCV second generation ELISA (S1) and by the INNOTEST HCV Ab second generation enzyme immunoassay, (S2), (Innogenetics, Antwerpen, Belgium). Sera that were repeatedly reactive by either screening assay were further tested by each of two different HCV supplemental/confirmatory assays: a second generation recombinant immunoblot assay (RIBA, Ortho Diagnostics), (C1), and a line immunoassay (INNO-LIA HCV-Ab, Innogenetics), (C2). In these populations there were 16 true positives, 351 true negatives, and 59 indeterminate results. Fifty-nine point four percent (253/426) of the samples were repeatedly reactive by the S1 test, while only 2.6% (11/426) were repeatedly reactive by S2. Test S1 produced a high false positive rate, a low positive predictive value, a specificity of 49.3%, and had a sensitivity of 100%. In contrast, the S2 screening assay had much higher specificity (98.8%), but lacked in sensitivity (31.3%). This poor sensitivity of S2 was based almost exclusively on the fact that the C2 supplemental test classified 9 samples as confirmed positive when the homologous screening assay classified these samples as negative; several of these were not confirmed when using a new generation INNO-LIA. Both the screening tests S1 and S2, and the supplemental assays C1 and C2 exhibited a significant degree of discordance, and neither of the screening tests alone would be adequate for use in these populations.

Also with a restrictive transfusion policy, screening with second-generation anti-hepatitis C virus enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay would have reduced post-transfusion hepatitis C after open-heart surgery

The incidence of post-transfusion hepatitis non-A, non-B (PTH-NANB) was prospectively assessed among open-heart surgery patients from the southeast region of Sweden before the introduction of antihepatitis C virus (HCV) blood donor screening. Blood samples for alanine aminotransferase analysis were drawn before and 2, 3, and 4 months after transfusion. Surgery was performed in four centres. Of 190 transfused and followed-up patients 2 (1.1%) contracted PTH-NANB, both operated on at the centre with significantly fewer transfusions than the other centres. One patient had antibodies to HCV detected by first-generation (C100-3) and later by second-generation anti-HCV enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA-2) and by positive second-generation recombinant immunoblot assay (4-RIBA). The other patient, although negative by first-generation anti-HCV ELISA, was positive by second-generation ELISA and by 4-RIBA. Both patients were hepatitis C-viremic by polymerase chain reaction (PCR). All the six donors implicated in the two hepatitis cases were first-generation anti-HCV-negative, but two, one for each patient, were positive by second-generation anti-HCV ELISA. This finding was confirmed by positive 4-RIBA in only 1 donor, the other being 'indeterminate'. However, in both donors hepatitis C viremia was found by PCR. This study shows that the second-generation anti-HCV ELISA will further reduce the risk for PTH-NANB/C and draws attention to the problem of evaluation of confirmatory tests.

Second-generation hepatitis C Elisa antibody tests confirmed by the four-antigen recombinant immunoblot assay correlate well with hepatitis C viremia and chronic liver disease in Swedish blood donors

Seventy-three Swedish blood donors (52 men, 21 women; median age 36 years) repeatedly reactive for hepatitis C antibodies (anti-HCV C-100-3) were tested with a second-generation (2nd-gen) anti-HCV Elisa and a 4-band recombinant immunoblot assay (RIBA 2). These results were correlated to serum alanine aminotransferase (S-ALAT), liver morphology and viremia as detected by 'nested' polymerase chain reaction (PCR) based on primers from a 5'-noncoding sequence of the HCV genome. Thirty-five of 46 (76%) donors with positive 2nd-gen Elisa tests confirmed by RIBA 2 were PCR positive whereof 27 had histological findings compatible with chronic persistent hepatitis (CPH) and 7 had chronic active hepatitis (CAH). Ten of 56 (18%) 2nd-gen Elisa-positive donors were RIBA 2 negative (or indeterminate) and none of these had chronic hepatitis nor were PCR positive. Seventeen of 73 (23%) donors were 1st-gen Elisa positive but 2nd-gen Elisa negative. All of these were PCR negative and only 1 (6%) had chronic hepatitis (CPH). An elevated S-ALAT level (reference < 0.7 mu kat/l) was found in 26 2nd-gen Elisa and RIBA 2-positive donors of which 18 had CPH and 7 had CAH and all 25 were PCR positive. A normal S-ALAT level was found in 9 of 34 (26%) donors with chronic hepatitis (all had CPH) and positive PCR. We have found that blood donors with positive 2nd-gen anti-HCV Elisa tests confirmed by RIBA-2 and especially with a concomitant elevated S-ALAT are highly likely to be viremic as demonstrated by PCR and to have chronic hepatitis.

Prevalence and significance of hepatitis C virus (HCV) viremia in HCV antibody-positive subjects from various populations

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection is currently assessed by detection of antibodies to HCV with immunoassays. However, in the absence of an in vitro system to isolate the virus, or an immunoassay to identify HCV antigen in blood, an ongoing acute or chronic HCV infection can be diagnosed only by detection of HCV RNA by polymerase chain reaction. We used a reverse transcription-nested polymerase chain reaction to detect an HCV 5' noncoding viral RNA sequence in serum specimens collected from anti-HCV-positive individuals belonging to different risk groups and compared the results with those obtained with a prototype recombinant immunoblot assay (Chiron HCV SIA prototype recombinant immunoblot assay [RIBA]) containing four different viral peptides (c22, c33c, c100, and NS5). The prevalence of HCV viremia ranged from 25.9% in HCV antibody-positive blood donors to 92% in HCV antibody-positive hemophiliacs. Elevated alanine aminotransferase values in HCV antibody-positive patients were clearly associated with viremia. Ninety-six percent of HCV RNA-positive patients reacted to two viral antigens or more, compared with only 64% of HCV RNA-negative patients. Contrary to previous reports, HCV viremia was not associated with either the presence or the absence of a particular antibody specificity. The newly introduced NS5 peptide did not improve the sensitivity or specificity of the RIBA. Although 20% of the patients in our study whose sera reacted to all of the antigens were HCV RNA negative, the positive predictive value of a RIBA considered positive by the manufacturer (two or more bands), was rather high (78%) and may allow suspicion of viremia in EIA2 enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay-positive patients.

Detection of hepatitis C virus by polym erase chain reaction in haemodialysed patients in relationship to anti-HCV status

HCV RNA was determined by the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) in 41 haemodialysed patients with a known anti-HCV status (ELISA and RIBA-2) and a monthly alanine aminotransferase (ALT) level determination. No histological examination of the liver tissue was available. Four samples from each patient were collected at 6 month intervals for 18 months. Seven patients negative for anti-HCV during the entire follow-up gave negative PCR results on the four samples. Two patients who were anti-HCV-negative upon entry into the study seroconverted to HCV during follow-up. HCV RNA was detected during the acute phase of hepatitis. HCV RNA was no longer detectable after antiviral therapy was administered to one patient. Out of 27 anti-HCV-positive patients, 24 had persistent viraemia, 2 had transient viraemia (1 sample PCR-negative and 3 samples PCR-positive) and 1 was PCR-negative on the 4 samples. Thirteen of the 26 viraemic patients had a normal ALT level during the preceding 3 years. Three patients with a C22-3 band alone by RIBA-2 were negative by PCR, whereas two patients with a C33-c band alone were PCR-positive on the four samples. These results suggest that HCV viraemia was strongly associated with anti-HCV in haemodialysed patients with or without biological hepatitis.

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) RNA among anti-HCV-positive blood donors and their recipients

Seven of 24 blood donors positive in Ortho's first-generation antibody to hepatitis C virus (anti-HCV) test (EIA-1) were also positive in Ortho's second-generation test (EIA-2). All 7 had at least two anti-HCV positive recipients, whereas only 1 of the 17 EIA-2-negative donors had an anti-HCV-positive recipient. This recipient was a multitransfused patient with von Willebrand's disease. Five of the 7 EIA-2-positive donors had detectable HCV RNA. We traced and tested 38 of the still living blood recipients from the 7 EIA-2-positive donors. Twenty-eight of these were EIA-2 positive and 22 were HCV-PCR positive. One patient with Waldenstroem's hypergammaglobulinemia was EIA-2 negative but HCV-PCR positive. All the EIA-2-positive sera showed reactivity in Ortho's recombinant immunoblot assay (RIBA-2), but 5 of the 28 recipients and 1 of the donors reacted with only one band (RIBA-2 indeterminate). Among 32 recipients who probably had received EIA-2-positive blood, 29 (91%) had markers of an HCV infection. Twenty-two (75%) of the HCV-infected recipients had detectable HCV RNA more than 6 months after transfusion and hence were chronic HCV carriers.

An algorithm for confirming screen reactivity in blood donors in enzyme immunoassays for antibodies to hepatitis C virus

Three commercial second generation enzyme immunoassays (EIA) and a second generation immunoblot assay (RIBA-II) for detecting antibodies to hepatitis C virus (HCV) were evaluated in a study of confirmatory testing using sera referred by six Regional Blood Transfusion Centres (RTC). Of a total of 490 samples, 203 were negative in the same EIA as that used by the RTC and of these 162 were negative in all three EIAs. The RIBA-II immunoblot test was performed on all samples and 359 were negative, 69 were indeterminate and 62 reactive. We found a close relationship between RIBA-II reactivity, the reactivity of a sample in all three EIAs and the mean of the test/cut-off ratios of all three EIAs performed on that sample. When this was evaluated by PCR for HCV RNA, we found an association between the mean test/cut-off ratio and the probability that an immunoblot reactive or indeterminate sample was PCR positive. A mean ratio of greater than 5.0 in a RIBA-II reactive sample was associated with a 100% probability (16/16 tested) of being PCR positive. These observations should be extended by testing RIBA-II negative samples by PCR so that simplified algorithms for anti-HCV testing can be developed.

Hepatitis C virus confirmation in blood donor screening

A combination of different enzyme immunoassays (EIAs) was used for the serological confirmation of sera that were positive in a hepatitis C virus (HCV) second-generation screening EIA. Different reaction patterns were related with the probability of the HCV-carrier state as determined by polymerase chain reaction (PCR). Five hundred and eight sera of volunteer blood donors were send for confirmation and at first reexamined with both Abbott and Ortho second-generation screening EIA. A group of 195 sera, positive in both assays, was further evaluated by the Abbott Supplemental Assay, the Monolisa anti-HCV and an EIA with only the amino terminal part of the nucleocapsid protein as antigen. In addition PCR on the 5'-noncoding region of the viral genome was performed. We observed that 75 of the 78 PCR-positive sera were found in a group of 89 sera that were strongly positive in the four EIAs used. Moreover all but 1 PCR-positive sera were reactive against the nucleocapsid protein of the virus. Hence we concluded that a genuine antibody response to the nucleocapsid protein is highly suggestive for the HCV-carrier state.

Polymerase chain reaction and transfusion microbiology

Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) involves alternate denaturing and re-annealing of DNA in test samples in the presence of appropriate oligonucleotide primers complementary to opposite strands of the target DNA together with a heat-stable DNA polymerase, Mg2+ and the four nucleotide triphosphates. DNA target segments can be 'amplified' ten-millionfold by 25-35 such cycles. Even greater amplification (approximately 10(12)-fold) with enhanced specificity can be obtained by a second set of amplification cycles using a further pair of 'nested' primers sited within the DNA sequence defined by the original primers. PCR can be applied to the study of the whole range of transfusion-transmitted infections, both plasma and cell associated; RNA viruses can be analyzed if a DNA copy is made from the viral RNA by treatment with reverse transcriptase. In a transfusion context, the retroviruses (HIV-1, HIV-2, HTLV-I, HTLV-II), HCV and HBV have been the viruses most intensively subjected to PCR analysis. The advantages of PCR in this context include its ability to detect virus during the 'window period' or seronegative stages of infections and its value as a marker for viraemia and for the detection of viruses in products made from large pools of plasma. True immunity may also be differentiated from persistent infection in the presence of antibody. Similarly, PCR can overcome problems of diagnosis of acute infection caused by the presence of passively transferred antibody. Detailed strain differentiation is also possible by PCR, in conjunction with sequencing or with the aid of restriction endonucleases.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Detection of hepatitis C virus (HCV) RNA by PCR related to HCV antibodies in serum and liver histology in Swedish blood donors

Serum samples from 103 blood donors or patients with slightly increased serum levels of liver enzymes were tested for antibodies to hepatitis C virus (anti-HCV) using second generation tests and for HCV RNA by the polymerase chain reaction (PCR). PCR was in a nested configuration, using primer pairs from the 5'-nontranslated region. The anti-HCV antibody was found by enzyme linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) in 93 patients. The anti-HCV confirmatory second generation recombinant immunoblot assay (RIBA) was positive in 44, indeterminate in 34 and negative in 25 subjects. Histopathological examination of the liver was carried out in 51 subjects. HCV RNA was detected in serum of 39/41 (95%) RIBA positive patients, and in 7/34 (21%) RIBA indeterminate subjects, but in none of the RIBA negative subjects. All but one of the PCR positive patients with a RIBA indeterminate pattern exhibited the C22 band. HCV RNA was found in the serum of all but one patients with chronic active or persistent hepatitis, but also in one RIBA positive subject with normal liver tissue. These results imply that most patients with antibodies to two or more HCV antigens by RIBA will have a chronic replicative HCV infection associated with viraemia. HCV viraemia can also be present in some patients, who have antibodies to only one HCV antigen particularly the C22 epitope.

Detection of hepatitis C virus infection with recombinant immunoblot assay, synthetic immunoblot assay, and polymerase chain reaction

The newly developed immunoblot assay, RIBA SIA (recombinant and synthetic polypeptide immunoblot assay), Chiron, Calif., was compared with the commercially available second generation recombinant immunoblot assay (RIBA-2) for the detection of antibody to hepatitis C virus (anti-HCV). The two immunoblot tests were also compared with the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) for the detection of HCV RNA. Ninety-one percent of samples reactive by RIBA-2 were positive for anti-HCV by RIBA SIA. A total of 31% of RIBA-2 indeterminate samples became reactive by RIBA SIA, 24% became non-reactive, and 45% remained the same. Samples reactive by RIBA-2 or SIA from different risk groups, were mostly positive (67-100%) by PCR for HCV RNA. All indeterminate samples from hemophiliacs and intravenous drug users were PCR positive. RIBA SIA is more sensitive and specific than RIBA-2 and correlates well with PCR results.

Storage conditions of blood samples and primer selection affect the yield of cDNA polymerase chain reaction products of hepatitis C virus

We have noticed that suboptimal specimen processing and storage conditions may cause false-negative results in the detection of hepatitis C virus (HCV) RNA in plasma or serum. To establish the influence of specimen handling in a serological laboratory on the rate of detection of HCV RNA by the cDNA polymerase chain reaction (cDNA-PCR), we tested routine serum samples and fresh-frozen plasma samples from the same bleeding from confirmed anti-HCV-positive blood donors. When primers from the NS3/NS4 region were used, HCV RNA was detected in fresh-frozen plasma from 67% of the donors, whereas positive results were obtained with only 50% of the serum samples that had been subjected to routine serological procedures. Analysis of the same samples with primers from the highly conserved 5'-terminal region (5'-TR) revealed an HCV RNA detection rate of 92% for both the routine and the fresh-frozen samples. However, the yield of the amplification product in routine samples was strongly reduced compared with that in fresh-frozen plasma. Comparison of both primer sets for cDNA-PCR showed that the 5'-TR primer set was 10- to 100-fold more effective in detecting HCV RNA. We also analyzed the effect of storage of whole EDTA-blood and serum at room temperature and at 4 degrees C on the yield of the amplification product. A rapid decline in detectable HCV RNA of 3 to 4 log units was observed within 14 days when whole blood and serum were stored at room temperature. By contrast, no perceptible reduction in the cDNA-PCR signal was found in freshly prepared serum stored at 4 degrees C.

Risk factors for hepatitis C virus antibody positivity in blood donors in a low-risk country

Demographic variables, sexual risk behavior and prevalence of parenteral risk factors were studied in 305 randomly selected donors seronegative for hepatitis C virus, in 170 randomly selected donors reactive on solely enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA C-100), in 71 consecutive donors reacting indeterminately according to the second-generation recombinant immunoblot assay (RIBA II) and in 46 consecutive donors found to be positive using the RIBA II. Donors who were positive by RIBA II had significantly more often a risk factor, for example use of intravenous drugs or previous blood transfusion, than donors reacting indeterminately (34 out of 46) (73.9%) versus 14 out of 71 (19.7%, p = 0.0000). Donors reacting indeterminately by RIBA II had one of those risk factors significantly more often than seronegative donors (14 out of 71) (19.7%) versus 23 out of 280 (7.8%, p < 0.005). When donors either positive or indeterminate by RIBA II were compared with donors negative for hepatitis C antibodies, the odds ratio for a possible parenteral source of infection was 7.6 (p = 0.0000). Subjects who had received a poor education (odds ratio 0.3, p < 0.001) or who lived in southern Finland (odds ratio 2.3, p < 0.05) were also at higher risk for being positive or indeterminate in RIBA II. First-time donors were also prone to having antibodies according to RIBA II (odds ratio 2.2, p = 0.1), whereas sexual risk behavior, gender, age, occupational class and type of residential area were not risk factors for hepatitis C antibodies in RIBA.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Detection of hepatitis C viraemia in Caucasian patients with hepatocellular carcinoma

Potential risk factors for the development of hepatocellular carcinoma were analysed in 40 Caucasian patients with this malignancy. A higher proportion (14 of 40; 35%) had evidence of hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection than had evidence of either hepatitis B virus (HBV) carriage (17.5%) or alcohol abuse (30%). In all 14 patients whose sera were reactive by HCV ELISA (Ortho second generation test), the presence of antibodies to HCV were confirmed by recombinant immunoblot assay (Ortho RIBA-2). Furthermore, two independent laboratories detected HCV-RNA in 10 of the 14 (71%) anti-HCV positive sera. Two additional sera were shown to contain HCV-RNA when reanalysed by a modified PCR using oligonucleotide primers designed to amplify a shorter fragment of the 5' noncoding region of the genome. Seven of the anti-HCV positive patients also had evidence of prior HBV infection and 2 admitted to alcohol abuse. HCV infection was the only identifiable risk factor in 6 patients. These data confirm the association between HCV infection and hepatocellular carcinoma and suggest that persistent viral replication accompanies tumour development in the majority of patients whose serum contains anti-HCV.