1
|
Hamam O, Gudenkauf J, Moustafa R, Cho A, Montes D, Sharara M, Moustafa A, Radmard M, Nabi M, Chen K, Sepehri S, Shin C, Mazumdar I, Kim M, Mohseni A, Malhotra A, Romero J, Yedavalli V. Hypoperfusion Intensity Ratio as an Indirect Imaging Surrogate in Patients With Anterior Circulation Large-Vessel Occlusion and Association of Baseline Characteristics With Poor Collateral Status. J Am Heart Assoc 2024; 13:e030897. [PMID: 39158547 DOI: 10.1161/jaha.123.030897] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/07/2023] [Accepted: 11/15/2023] [Indexed: 08/20/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Collateral status (CS) plays a crucial role in infarct growth rate, risk of postthrombectomy hemorrhage, and overall clinical outcomes in patients with acute ischemic stroke (AIS) secondary to anterior circulation large-vessel occlusions (LVOs). Hypoperfusion intensity ratio has been previously validated as an indirect noninvasive pretreatment imaging biomarker of CS. In addition to imaging, derangements in admission laboratory findings can also influence outcomes in patients with AIS-LVO. Therefore, our study aims to assess the relationship between admission laboratory findings, baseline characteristics, and CS, as assessed by hypoperfusion intensity ratio in patients with AIS-LVO. METHODS AND RESULTS In this retrospective study, consecutive patients presenting with AIS secondary to anterior circulation LVO who underwent pretreatment computed tomography perfusion were included. The computed tomography perfusion data processed by RAPID (Ischema View, Menlo Park, CA) generated the hypoperfusion intensity ratio. Binary logistic regression models were used to assess the relationship between patients' baseline characteristics, admission laboratory findings, and poor CS. A total of 221 consecutive patients with AIS-LVO between January 2017 and September 2022 were included in our study (mean±SD age, 67.0±15.8 years; 119 men [53.8%]). Multivariable logistic regression showed that patients with AIS caused by cardioembolic and cryptogenic causes (adjusted odds ratio [OR], 2.67; 95% CI, 1.20-5.97; P=0.016), those who presented with admission National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score ≥12 (adjusted OR, 3.12; 95% CI, 1.61-6.04; P=0.001), and male patients (adjusted OR, 2.06; 95% CI, 1.13-3.77; P=0.018) were associated with poor CS. CONCLUSIONS Stroke caused by cardioembolic or cryptogenic causes, admission National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score of ≥12, and male sex were associated with poor CS, as defined by hypoperfusion intensity ratio in the patients with AIS-LVO.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Omar Hamam
- Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital Harvard Medical School Boston MA
| | - Julie Gudenkauf
- Department of Radiology and Radiological Science Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine Baltimore MD
| | - Rawan Moustafa
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine Robert Wood Johnson Medical School New Brunswick NJ
- School of Arts and Sciences Rutgers University-Newark Newark NJ
| | - Andrew Cho
- Department of Radiology and Radiological Science Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine Baltimore MD
| | - Daniel Montes
- Radiology Resident University of Colorado, Anschutz Medical Campus Aurora CO
| | | | - Abdallah Moustafa
- Department of Radiology and Radiological Science Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine Baltimore MD
| | - Mahla Radmard
- Department of Radiology and Radiological Science Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine Baltimore MD
| | - Mehreen Nabi
- Department of Radiology and Radiological Science Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine Baltimore MD
| | - Kevin Chen
- Department of Radiology and Radiological Science Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine Baltimore MD
| | - Sadra Sepehri
- Department of Radiology and Radiological Science Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine Baltimore MD
| | | | - Ishan Mazumdar
- Department of Radiology and Radiological Science Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine Baltimore MD
| | - Minsoo Kim
- Department of Radiology and Radiological Science Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine Baltimore MD
| | - Alireza Mohseni
- Department of Radiology and Radiological Science Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine Baltimore MD
| | | | - Javier Romero
- Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital Harvard Medical School Boston MA
| | - Vivek Yedavalli
- Department of Radiology and Radiological Science Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine Baltimore MD
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Espinosa EVP, Matute EM, Sosa Guzmán DM, Khasawneh FT. The Polypill: A New Alternative in the Prevention and Treatment of Cardiovascular Disease. J Clin Med 2024; 13:3179. [PMID: 38892892 PMCID: PMC11172978 DOI: 10.3390/jcm13113179] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/18/2024] [Revised: 04/26/2024] [Accepted: 04/27/2024] [Indexed: 06/21/2024] Open
Abstract
Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is the primary cause of death and disability worldwide. Although age-standardized CVD mortality rates decreased globally by 14.5% between 2006 and 2016, the burden of CVD remains disproportionately higher in low- and middle-income countries compared to high-income countries. Even though proven, effective approaches based on multiple-drug intake aimed at the prevention and treatment of CVD are currently available, poor adherence, early discontinuation of treatment, and suboptimal daily execution of the prescribed therapeutic regimes give rise to shortfalls in drug exposure, leading to high variability in the responses to the prescribed medications. Wald and Law, in their landmark paper published in BMJ 2003, hypothesized that the use of a fixed-dose combination of statins, β-blockers, angiotensin receptor blockers, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, and aspirin (classic Polypill composition) may increase adherence and decrease CVD by up to 80% when prescribed as primary prevention or in substitution of traditional protocols. Since then, many clinical trials have tested this hypothesis, with comparable results. This review aims to describe the available clinical trials performed to assess the impact of fixed-dose combinations on adherence, cost-effectiveness, and the risk factors critical to the onset of CVD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Enma V. Páez Espinosa
- Department of Clinical Laboratory, School of Medicine, Pontifical Catholic University of Ecuador, Quito 170143, Ecuador;
- Center for Research on Health in Latin America (CISeAL), Pontifical Catholic University of Ecuador, Quito 170143, Ecuador
| | - Eugenia Mato Matute
- Department of Endocrinology and Nutrition, Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau, 08041 Barcelona, Spain;
- Networking Research Centre of Bioengineering, Biomaterials and Nanomedicine (CIBER-BBN), C/Monforte de Lemos 3-5, 28029 Madrid, Spain
| | - Delia M. Sosa Guzmán
- Department of Clinical Laboratory, School of Medicine, Pontifical Catholic University of Ecuador, Quito 170143, Ecuador;
| | - Fadi T. Khasawneh
- Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Rangel School of Pharmacy, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77843, USA;
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Huang H, Meng F, Qi Y, Yan X, Qi J, Wu Y, Lin Y, Chen X, He F. Association of hypertension and depression with mortality: an exploratory study with interaction and mediation models. BMC Public Health 2024; 24:1068. [PMID: 38632586 PMCID: PMC11022319 DOI: 10.1186/s12889-024-18548-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/01/2023] [Accepted: 04/08/2024] [Indexed: 04/19/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The association of hypertension and depression with mortality has not been fully understood. We aimed to explore the possible independent or joint association of hypertension and depression with mortality. Their interaction effects on mortality and possible mediating role were also investigated. METHODS Associations of hypertension, depression, and their interaction with all-cause and cardiovascular disease (CVD) mortality were evaluated using multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression models. The mediation analysis was conducted with a Sobel test. RESULTS A total of 35152 participants were included in the final analysis. Hypertension and depression were independently associated with increased risk of all-cause and CVD mortality. The co-existence of hypertension and depression resulted in a 1.7-fold [95% confidence interval (CI): 1.3-2.1] increase in all-cause mortality and a 2.3-fold (95% CI: 1.4-3.7) increase in CVD mortality compared to those with neither of them. Hypertension and depression showed no significant multiplicative (P for interaction, 0.587) and additive interaction (P for relative excess risk of interaction, 0.243; P for Interaction on additive scale, 0.654) on all-cause mortality, as well as on CVD mortality. Depression did not mediate the relationship between hypertension and all-cause (Z=1.704, P=0.088) and CVD mortality (Z=1.547, P=0.122). Hypertension did not mediate the relationship between all-cause and CVD mortality as well. CONCLUSION Hypertension and depression were related to all-cause and CVD mortality independently and the co-existence of them increased the risk of mortality. However, there is no interaction effect of them on mortality, and hypertension or depression did not mediate the association of each other with mortality.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Huanhuan Huang
- Beijing Key Laboratory of Mental Disorders, National Clinical Research Center for Mental Disorders & National Center for Mental Disorders, Beijing Anding Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, 100088, China
- Advanced Innovation Center for Human Brain Protection, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
| | - Fanchao Meng
- Beijing Key Laboratory of Mental Disorders, National Clinical Research Center for Mental Disorders & National Center for Mental Disorders, Beijing Anding Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, 100088, China
- Advanced Innovation Center for Human Brain Protection, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
| | - Yanjie Qi
- Beijing Key Laboratory of Mental Disorders, National Clinical Research Center for Mental Disorders & National Center for Mental Disorders, Beijing Anding Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, 100088, China
- Advanced Innovation Center for Human Brain Protection, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
| | - Xiuping Yan
- Beijing Key Laboratory of Mental Disorders, National Clinical Research Center for Mental Disorders & National Center for Mental Disorders, Beijing Anding Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, 100088, China
- Advanced Innovation Center for Human Brain Protection, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
| | - Junhui Qi
- Beijing Key Laboratory of Mental Disorders, National Clinical Research Center for Mental Disorders & National Center for Mental Disorders, Beijing Anding Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, 100088, China
- Advanced Innovation Center for Human Brain Protection, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
| | - Yuanzhen Wu
- Beijing Key Laboratory of Mental Disorders, National Clinical Research Center for Mental Disorders & National Center for Mental Disorders, Beijing Anding Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, 100088, China
- Advanced Innovation Center for Human Brain Protection, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
| | | | - Xu Chen
- Beijing Key Laboratory of Mental Disorders, National Clinical Research Center for Mental Disorders & National Center for Mental Disorders, Beijing Anding Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, 100088, China.
- Advanced Innovation Center for Human Brain Protection, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
| | - Fan He
- Beijing Key Laboratory of Mental Disorders, National Clinical Research Center for Mental Disorders & National Center for Mental Disorders, Beijing Anding Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, 100088, China.
- Advanced Innovation Center for Human Brain Protection, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Gobezie MY, Hassen M, Tesfaye NA, Solomon T, Demessie MB, Fentie Wendie T, Tadesse G, Kassa TD, Berhe FT. Prevalence of uncontrolled hypertension and contributing factors in Ethiopia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Front Cardiovasc Med 2024; 11:1335823. [PMID: 38660480 PMCID: PMC11040565 DOI: 10.3389/fcvm.2024.1335823] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/09/2023] [Accepted: 03/25/2024] [Indexed: 04/26/2024] Open
Abstract
Background Uncontrolled hypertension (HTN) is a major risk factor for cardiovascular and cerebrovascular disease. The prevalence of HTN in the Ethiopian adult population is almost 20%.This study aimed to determine the prevalence of uncontrolled HTN and its contributing factors among patients with HTN in Ethiopia undergoing treatment. Methods Electronic bibliographic databases such as PubMed, Google Scholar, Hinari (Research4Life), Embase, and Scopus were searched for original records in the English language that assessed HTN control in Ethiopia and were available before 29 June 2023. The data were extracted using a format prepared in Microsoft Excel and exported to the software STATA 17.0 for analysis. The study protocol was registered at PROSPERO with the reference number CRD42023440121. Results A total of 26 studies with 9,046 patients with HTN were included in the systematic review and meta-analysis, of which 11 studies were used to assess factors contributing to uncontrolled blood pressure (BP) in patients in Ethiopia. The estimated prevalence of uncontrolled HTN in the population of Ethiopia is 51% [95% confidence interval (CI), 42%-60%]. The subgroup analysis, based on the assessment tools, region, and follow-up period, revealed that the prevalence of uncontrolled BP was highest following the guidelines of the American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology (AHA/ACC) (89%; 95% CI: 87%-91%) and in Addis Ababa (58%; 95% CI: 40%-76%), and the lowest proportion of uncontrolled BP was in the 3-month follow-up period (34%; 95% CI: 29%-39%). The presence of diabetes mellitus showed the highest impact (pooled odds ratio: 5.19; CI: 1.41-19.11) for uncontrolled HTN. The univariate meta-regression method confirmed that the sample size, year of publication, and subgroups were not sources of heterogeneity in the pooled estimates. Egger's regression test did not indicate the presence of publication bias. Conclusion More than half of the hypertensive patients in Ethiopia have uncontrolled BP. Diabetes mellitus, advanced age, male sex, and the presence of comorbidities are among the factors contributing to uncontrolled HTN in Ethiopia. The concerned bodies working in this area should implement interventional strategies and recommendations that might be helpful in achieving optimal BP in hypertensive patients. Systematic Review Registration https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?ID=CRD42023440121, PROSPERO (CRD42023440121).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mengistie Yirsaw Gobezie
- Department of Clinical Pharmacy, School of Pharmacy, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, Wollo University, Dessie, Ethiopia
| | - Minimize Hassen
- Department of Clinical Pharmacy, School of Pharmacy, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, Wollo University, Dessie, Ethiopia
| | - Nuhamin Alemayehu Tesfaye
- Department of Clinical Pharmacy, School of Pharmacy, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, Wollo University, Dessie, Ethiopia
| | - Tewodros Solomon
- Department of Clinical Pharmacy, School of Pharmacy, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, Wollo University, Dessie, Ethiopia
| | - Mulat Belete Demessie
- Department of Clinical Pharmacy, School of Pharmacy, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, Wollo University, Dessie, Ethiopia
| | - Teklehaimanot Fentie Wendie
- Department of Clinical Pharmacy, School of Pharmacy, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, Wollo University, Dessie, Ethiopia
| | - Getachew Tadesse
- Department of Statistics, College of Natural Sciences, Wollo University, Dessie, Ethiopia
| | - Tesfaye Dessale Kassa
- Department of Clinical Pharmacy, College of Health Sciences, Mekelle University, Mekelle, Ethiopia
| | - Fentaw Tadese Berhe
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, Wollo University, Dessie, Ethiopia
- Public Health & Economics Modeling Group, School of Medicine & Dentistry, Griffith University, Gold Coast, QLD, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Shantsila E, Lip GYH, Shantsila A, Kurpas D, Beevers G, Gill PS, Williams NH. Antihypertensive treatment in people of very old age with frailty: time for a paradigm shift? J Hypertens 2023; 41:1502-1510. [PMID: 37432893 DOI: 10.1097/hjh.0000000000003495] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 07/13/2023]
Abstract
The optimal management of hypertension in individuals aged 80 years or older with frailty remains uncertain due to multiple gaps in evidence. Complex health issues, polypharmacy, and limited physiological reserve make responding to antihypertensive treatments unpredictable. Patients in this age group may have limited life expectancy, so their quality of life should be prioritized when making treatment decisions. Further research is needed to identify which patients would benefit from more relaxed blood pressure targets and which antihypertensive medications are preferable or should be avoided. A paradigm shift is required in attitudes towards treatment, placing equal emphasis on deprescribing and prescribing when optimizing care. This review discusses the current evidence on managing hypertension in individuals aged 80 years or older with frailty, but further research is essential to address the gaps in knowledge and improve the care of this population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eduard Shantsila
- Department of Primary Care and Mental Health, University of Liverpool
- Liverpool Centre for Cardiovascular Science, University of Liverpool, Liverpool John Moores University and Liverpool Heart & Chest Hospital, Liverpool, UK
| | - Gregory Y H Lip
- Liverpool Centre for Cardiovascular Science, University of Liverpool, Liverpool John Moores University and Liverpool Heart & Chest Hospital, Liverpool, UK
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Aalborg University, Denmark
| | - Alena Shantsila
- Liverpool Centre for Cardiovascular Science, University of Liverpool, Liverpool John Moores University and Liverpool Heart & Chest Hospital, Liverpool, UK
| | - Donata Kurpas
- Health Sciences Faculty, Wrocław Medical University, Wrocław, Poland
- Primary Care and Risk Factor Management Section, European Association of Preventative Cardiology, European Heart House, Les Templiers, Sophia Antipolis
- International Advisory Board of EURIPA (WONCA) - France
- International Foundation for Integrated Care (IFIC), Schiphol Airport, The Netherlands
| | - Gareth Beevers
- University of Birmingham, Department of Medicine, City Hospital, Birmingham
| | - Paramjit S Gill
- Academic Unit of Primary Care Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick Coventry, UK
| | - Nefyn H Williams
- Department of Primary Care and Mental Health, University of Liverpool
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Rivasi G, Matteucci G, Ungar A. Antihypertensive treatment targets in older adults: an unsolved dilemma. Eur J Prev Cardiol 2023; 30:1015-1016. [PMID: 37235732 DOI: 10.1093/eurjpc/zwad182] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/21/2023] [Accepted: 05/24/2023] [Indexed: 05/28/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Giulia Rivasi
- Hypertension Clinic, Division of Geriatric and Intensive Care Medicine, Careggi Hospital and University of Florence, Largo Brambilla 3, Florence 50139, Italy
| | - Giulia Matteucci
- Hypertension Clinic, Division of Geriatric and Intensive Care Medicine, Careggi Hospital and University of Florence, Largo Brambilla 3, Florence 50139, Italy
| | - Andrea Ungar
- Hypertension Clinic, Division of Geriatric and Intensive Care Medicine, Careggi Hospital and University of Florence, Largo Brambilla 3, Florence 50139, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Park SM, Lee SY, Jung MH, Youn JC, Kim D, Cho JY, Cho DH, Hyun J, Cho HJ, Park SM, Choi JO, Chung WJ, Kang SM, Yoo BS. Korean Society of Heart Failure Guidelines for the Management of Heart Failure: Management of the Underlying Etiologies and Comorbidities of Heart Failure. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HEART FAILURE 2023; 5:127-145. [PMID: 37554691 PMCID: PMC10406556 DOI: 10.36628/ijhf.2023.0016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/20/2023] [Revised: 07/01/2023] [Accepted: 07/11/2023] [Indexed: 08/10/2023]
Abstract
Most patients with heart failure (HF) have multiple comorbidities, which impact their quality of life, aggravate HF, and increase mortality. Cardiovascular comorbidities include systemic and pulmonary hypertension, ischemic and valvular heart diseases, and atrial fibrillation. Non-cardiovascular comorbidities include diabetes mellitus (DM), chronic kidney and pulmonary diseases, iron deficiency and anemia, and sleep apnea. In patients with HF with hypertension and left ventricular hypertrophy, renin-angiotensin system inhibitors combined with calcium channel blockers and/or diuretics is an effective treatment regimen. Measurement of pulmonary vascular resistance via right heart catheterization is recommended for patients with HF considered suitable for implantation of mechanical circulatory support devices or as heart transplantation candidates. Coronary angiography remains the gold standard for the diagnosis and reperfusion in patients with HF and angina pectoris refractory to antianginal medications. In patients with HF and atrial fibrillation, long-term anticoagulants are recommended according to the CHA2DS2-VASc scores. Valvular heart diseases should be treated medically and/or surgically. In patients with HF and DM, metformin is relatively safer; thiazolidinediones cause fluid retention and should be avoided in patients with HF and dyspnea. In renal insufficiency, both volume status and cardiac performance are important for therapy guidance. In patients with HF and pulmonary disease, beta-blockers are underused, which may be related to increased mortality. In patients with HF and anemia, iron supplementation can help improve symptoms. In obstructive sleep apnea, continuous positive airway pressure therapy helps avoid severe nocturnal hypoxia. Appropriate management of comorbidities is important for improving clinical outcomes in patients with HF.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sang Min Park
- Division of Cardiology, Nowon Eulji Medical Center, Eulji University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Soo Youn Lee
- Department of Cardiology, Cardiovascular Center, Incheon Sejong Hospital, Incheon, Korea
| | - Mi-Hyang Jung
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul St. Mary’s Hospital, Catholic Research Institute for Intractable Cardiovascular Disease, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea
| | - Jong-Chan Youn
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul St. Mary’s Hospital, Catholic Research Institute for Intractable Cardiovascular Disease, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea
| | - Darae Kim
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Heart Vascular Stroke Institute, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Jae Yeong Cho
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Chonnam National University Medical School, Gwangju, Korea
| | - Dong-Hyuk Cho
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Korea University Anam Hospital, Korea University Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Junho Hyun
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Hyun-Jai Cho
- Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea
| | - Seong-Mi Park
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Korea University Anam Hospital, Korea University Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Jin-Oh Choi
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Heart Vascular Stroke Institute, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Wook-Jin Chung
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Gil Medical Center, Gachon University College of Medicine, Incheon, Korea
| | - Seok-Min Kang
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Byung-Su Yoo
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Yonsei University Wonju College of Medicine, Wonju, Korea
| | | |
Collapse
|
8
|
Park SM, Lee SY, Jung MH, Youn JC, Kim D, Cho JY, Cho DH, Hyun J, Cho HJ, Park SM, Choi JO, Chung WJ, Kang SM, Yoo BS. Korean Society of Heart Failure Guidelines for the Management of Heart Failure: Management of the Underlying Etiologies and Comorbidities of Heart Failure. Korean Circ J 2023; 53:425-451. [PMID: 37525389 PMCID: PMC10406530 DOI: 10.4070/kcj.2023.0114] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/20/2023] [Revised: 07/01/2023] [Accepted: 07/11/2023] [Indexed: 08/02/2023] Open
Abstract
Most patients with heart failure (HF) have multiple comorbidities, which impact their quality of life, aggravate HF, and increase mortality. Cardiovascular comorbidities include systemic and pulmonary hypertension, ischemic and valvular heart diseases, and atrial fibrillation. Non-cardiovascular comorbidities include diabetes mellitus (DM), chronic kidney and pulmonary diseases, iron deficiency and anemia, and sleep apnea. In patients with HF with hypertension and left ventricular hypertrophy, renin-angiotensin system inhibitors combined with calcium channel blockers and/or diuretics is an effective treatment regimen. Measurement of pulmonary vascular resistance via right heart catheterization is recommended for patients with HF considered suitable for implantation of mechanical circulatory support devices or as heart transplantation candidates. Coronary angiography remains the gold standard for the diagnosis and reperfusion in patients with HF and angina pectoris refractory to antianginal medications. In patients with HF and atrial fibrillation, long-term anticoagulants are recommended according to the CHA2DS2-VASc scores. Valvular heart diseases should be treated medically and/or surgically. In patients with HF and DM, metformin is relatively safer; thiazolidinediones cause fluid retention and should be avoided in patients with HF and dyspnea. In renal insufficiency, both volume status and cardiac performance are important for therapy guidance. In patients with HF and pulmonary disease, beta-blockers are underused, which may be related to increased mortality. In patients with HF and anemia, iron supplementation can help improve symptoms. In obstructive sleep apnea, continuous positive airway pressure therapy helps avoid severe nocturnal hypoxia. Appropriate management of comorbidities is important for improving clinical outcomes in patients with HF.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sang Min Park
- Division of Cardiology, Nowon Eulji Medical Center, Eulji University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Soo Youn Lee
- Department of Cardiology, Cardiovascular Center, Incheon Sejong Hospital, Incheon, Korea
| | - Mi-Hyang Jung
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, Catholic Research Institute for Intractable Cardiovascular Disease, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea
| | - Jong-Chan Youn
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, Catholic Research Institute for Intractable Cardiovascular Disease, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea
| | - Darae Kim
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Heart Vascular Stroke Institute, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Jae Yeong Cho
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Chonnam National University Medical School, Gwangju, Korea
| | - Dong-Hyuk Cho
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Korea University Anam Hospital, Korea University Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Junho Hyun
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Hyun-Jai Cho
- Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea
| | - Seong-Mi Park
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Korea University Anam Hospital, Korea University Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Jin-Oh Choi
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Heart Vascular Stroke Institute, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Wook-Jin Chung
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Gil Medical Center, Gachon University College of Medicine, Incheon, Korea
| | - Seok-Min Kang
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Byung-Su Yoo
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Yonsei University Wonju College of Medicine, Wonju, Korea.
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Delgardo M, Rabin G, Tudor T, Tang AJ, Reeves G, Connolly ES. Monitoring risk and preventing ischemic stroke in the very old. Expert Rev Neurother 2023; 23:791-801. [PMID: 37540092 DOI: 10.1080/14737175.2023.2244674] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/29/2023] [Revised: 07/28/2023] [Accepted: 08/01/2023] [Indexed: 08/05/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Stroke is a significant cause of death, and the leading cause of severe long-term disability for individuals over 80 (the very old), yet few studies of such risk factors for ischemic stroke, or the known mitigation techniques, in this population, and the evidence base regarding risk modification strategies in this susceptible population can be inconsistent and incomplete. This article examines current guidelines and evidence regarding medical management, lifestyle changes, and psychosocial interactions that can contribute to the primary and secondary prevention of ischemic stroke in the very old. AREAS COVERED The authors conducted a literature search for ischemic stroke prevention and risk assessment in the elderly via PubMed. Furthermore, they describe current strategies for monitoring risk and preventing ischemic stroke in the elderly population. EXPERT OPINION Ischemic stroke poses a significant health risk to the elderly, with prevention relying on managing modifiable risk factors such as hypertension, atrial fibrillation, diabetes, and high cholesterol, as well as promoting healthy lifestyle choices like quitting smoking, regular physical activity and a heart-healthy diet. Healthcare providers must adopt a multifaceted approach, addressing individual and population-level factors while remaining vigilant in monitoring and managing risk factors to reduce the incidence and impact of stroke in older adults.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mychael Delgardo
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Grant Rabin
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Thilan Tudor
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Anthony J Tang
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Geoffrey Reeves
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - E Sander Connolly
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Lauder L, Mahfoud F, Azizi M, Bhatt DL, Ewen S, Kario K, Parati G, Rossignol P, Schlaich MP, Teo KK, Townsend RR, Tsioufis C, Weber MA, Weber T, Böhm M. Hypertension management in patients with cardiovascular comorbidities. Eur Heart J 2022:6808663. [DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehac395] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/04/2022] [Revised: 06/23/2022] [Accepted: 07/08/2022] [Indexed: 11/09/2022] Open
Abstract
Abstract
Arterial hypertension is a leading cause of death globally. Due to ageing, the rising incidence of obesity, and socioeconomic and environmental changes, its incidence increases worldwide. Hypertension commonly coexists with Type 2 diabetes, obesity, dyslipidaemia, sedentary lifestyle, and smoking leading to risk amplification. Blood pressure lowering by lifestyle modifications and antihypertensive drugs reduce cardiovascular (CV) morbidity and mortality. Guidelines recommend dual- and triple-combination therapies using renin–angiotensin system blockers, calcium channel blockers, and/or a diuretic. Comorbidities often complicate management. New drugs such as angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitors, sodium–glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors, glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists, and non-steroidal mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists improve CV and renal outcomes. Catheter-based renal denervation could offer an alternative treatment option in comorbid hypertension associated with increased sympathetic nerve activity. This review summarises the latest clinical evidence for managing hypertension with CV comorbidities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lucas Lauder
- Klinik für Innere Medizin III, Universitätsklinikum des Saarlandes, Saarland University , Kirrberger Str. 1, 66421 Homburg , Germany
| | - Felix Mahfoud
- Klinik für Innere Medizin III, Universitätsklinikum des Saarlandes, Saarland University , Kirrberger Str. 1, 66421 Homburg , Germany
| | - Michel Azizi
- Université Paris Cité, INSERM CIC1418 , F-75015 Paris , France
- AP-HP, Hôpital Européen Georges-Pompidou, Hypertension Department, DMU CARTE , F-75015 Paris , France
- FCRIN INI-CRCT , Nancy , France
| | - Deepak L Bhatt
- Brigham and Women’s Hospital Heart and Vascular Center, Harvard Medical School , Boston, MA , USA
| | - Sebastian Ewen
- Klinik für Innere Medizin III, Universitätsklinikum des Saarlandes, Saarland University , Kirrberger Str. 1, 66421 Homburg , Germany
| | - Kazuomi Kario
- Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Medicine, Jichi Medical University School of Medicine , Tochigi , Japan
| | - Gianfranco Parati
- Department of Medicine and Surgery, Cardiology Unit, University of Milano-Bicocca and Istituto Auxologico Italiano, IRCCS , Milan , Italy
| | - Patrick Rossignol
- FCRIN INI-CRCT , Nancy , France
- Université de Lorraine, INSERM, Centre d'Investigations Cliniques - Plurithématique 14-33 and INSERM U1116 , Nancy , France
- CHRU de Nancy , Nancy , France
| | - Markus P Schlaich
- Dobney Hypertension Centre, Medical School—Royal Perth Hospital Unit, Medical Research Foundation, The University of Western Australia , Perth, WA , Australia
- Departments of Cardiology and Nephrology, Royal Perth Hospital , Perth, WA , Australia
| | - Koon K Teo
- Population Health Research Institute, McMaster University , Hamilton, ON , Canada
| | - Raymond R Townsend
- Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania , Philadelphia, PA , USA
| | - Costas Tsioufis
- National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 1st Cardiology Clinic, Hippocratio Hospital , Athens , Greece
| | | | - Thomas Weber
- Department of Cardiology, Klinikum Wels-Grieskirchen , Wels , Austria
| | - Michael Böhm
- Klinik für Innere Medizin III, Universitätsklinikum des Saarlandes, Saarland University , Kirrberger Str. 1, 66421 Homburg , Germany
- Cape Heart Institute (CHI), Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Cape Town , Cape Town , South Africa
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Mao Y, Ge S, Qi S, Tian QB. Benefits and risks of antihypertensive medication in adults with different systolic blood pressure: A meta-analysis from the perspective of the number needed to treat. Front Cardiovasc Med 2022; 9:986502. [PMID: 36337902 PMCID: PMC9626501 DOI: 10.3389/fcvm.2022.986502] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/05/2022] [Accepted: 10/03/2022] [Indexed: 12/03/2022] Open
Abstract
Background The blood pressure (BP) threshold for initial pharmacological treatment remains controversial. The number needed to treat (NNT) is a significant indicator. This study aimed to explore the benefits and risks of antihypertensive medications in participants with different systolic BPs (SBPs), and cardiovascular disease status from the perspective of the NNT. Methods We conducted a meta-analysis of 52 randomized placebo-controlled trials. The data were extracted from published articles and pooled to calculate NNTs. The participants were divided into five groups, based on the mean SBP at entry (120–129.9, 130–139.9, 140–159.9, 160–179.9, and ≥180 mmHg). Furthermore, we stratified patients into those with and without cardiovascular disease. The primary outcomes were the major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs), and adverse events (AEs) leading to discontinuation. Results Antihypertensive medications were not associated with MACEs, however, it increased AEs, when the SBP was <140 mmHg. For participants with cardiovascular disease or at a high risk of heart failure and stroke, antihypertensive treatment reduced MACEs when SBP was ≥130 mmHg. Despite this, only 2–4 subjects had reduced MACEs per 100 patients receiving antihypertensive medications for 3.50 years. The number of individuals who needed to treat to avoid MACEs declined with an increased cardiovascular risk. Conclusion Pharmacological treatment could be activated when SBP reaches 140 mmHg. For people with cardiovascular disease or at a higher risk of stroke and heart failure, 130 mmHg may be a better therapeutic threshold. It could be more cost-effective to prioritize antihypertensive medications for people with a high risk of developing cardiovascular disease.
Collapse
|
12
|
Kumar V, Agarwal S, Saboo B, Makkar B. RSSDI Guidelines for the management of hypertension in patients with diabetes mellitus. Int J Diabetes Dev Ctries 2022; 42:576-605. [PMID: 36536953 PMCID: PMC9750845 DOI: 10.1007/s13410-022-01143-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/20/2022] [Accepted: 11/01/2022] [Indexed: 12/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Hypertension and diabetes mellitus (DM) are two of the leading lifestyle diseases in the Indian and South Asian populations that often co-exist due to overlapping pathophysiological factors. Obesity, insulin resistance, inflammation, and oxidative stress are thought to be some common pathways. Up to 50% of hypertensive cases in India are diagnosed with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), which defines the need for a comprehensive guideline for managing hypertension in diabetic patients. These RSSDI guidelines have been formulated based on consultation with expert endocrinologists in India and Southeast Asia, acknowledging the needs of the Indian population. Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring and office and home-based blood pressure (BP) monitoring are recommended for the early analysis of risks. Cardiovascular risks, end-organ damage, and renal disorders are the primary complications associated with diabetic hypertension that needs to be managed with the help of non-pharmacological and pharmacological interventions. The non-pharmacological interventions include the nutrition education of the patient to reduce the intake of salt, sodium, and trans fats and increase the consumption of nuts, fresh fruits, vegetables, and potassium-rich foods. It is also recommended to initiate 50 to 60 min of exercise three to four times a week since physical activity has shown to be more beneficial for hypertension control in Indian patients than dietary modulation. For the pharmacological management of hypertension in patients with T2DM, angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARBs) are recommended as the first line of therapy, demonstrating their superiority over other antihypertensive agents such as ACEi. However, most of the global hypertension guidelines recommend initiation with combination therapy to achieve better BP control in most patients and to reduce the risk of adverse events. For combination therapy, calcium channel blockers (CCBs) are recommended to be administered along with ARBs instead of beta-blockers or diuretics to avoid the risk of cardiovascular events and hyperglycaemia. Among the CCBs, novel molecules (e.g. cilnidipine) are recommended in combination with ARBs for better cardiovascular and reno-protection in diabetic hypertensive patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vasanth Kumar
- Apollo Hospitals, Hyderabad, India
- President. RSSDI, Prune, India
| | - Sanjay Agarwal
- Aegle Clinic-Diabetes Care, Pune, India
- Department of Medicine and Diabetes, Ruby Hall Clinic, Pune, India
- Secretary-General, RSSDI, Pune, India
| | - Banshi Saboo
- Immediate Past-President, RSSDI, Pune, India
- Dia-Care Hormone Clinic, Ahmedabad, India
| | - Brij Makkar
- President-Elect, RSSDI, Prune, India
- Dr Makkar’s Diabetes & Obesity Centre, A-5B/122, Paschim Vihar, New Delhi, 110063 India
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Razo C, Welgan CA, Johnson CO, McLaughlin SA, Iannucci V, Rodgers A, Wang N, LeGrand KE, Sorensen RJD, He J, Zheng P, Aravkin AY, Hay SI, Murray CJL, Roth GA. Effects of elevated systolic blood pressure on ischemic heart disease: a Burden of Proof study. Nat Med 2022; 28:2056-2065. [PMID: 36216934 PMCID: PMC9556328 DOI: 10.1038/s41591-022-01974-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 14.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/03/2022] [Accepted: 07/27/2022] [Indexed: 12/28/2022]
Abstract
High systolic blood pressure (SBP) is a major risk factor for ischemic heart disease (IHD), the leading cause of death worldwide. Using data from published observational studies and controlled trials, we estimated the mean SBP-IHD dose-response function and burden of proof risk function (BPRF), and we calculated a risk outcome score (ROS) and corresponding star rating (one to five). We found a very strong, significant harmful effect of SBP on IHD, with a mean risk-relative to that at 100 mm Hg SBP-of 1.39 (95% uncertainty interval including between-study heterogeneity 1.34-1.44) at 120 mm Hg, 1.81 (1.70-1.93) at 130 mm Hg and 4.48 (3.81-5.26) at 165 mm Hg. The conservative BPRF measure indicated that SBP exposure between 107.5 and 165.0 mm Hg raised risk by 101.36% on average, yielding a ROS of 0.70 and star rating of five. Our analysis shows that IHD risk was already increasing at 120 mm Hg SBP, rising steadily up to 165 mm Hg and increasing less steeply above that point. Our study endorses the need to prioritize and strengthen strategies for screening, to raise awareness of the need for timely diagnosis and treatment of hypertension and to increase the resources allocated for understanding primordial prevention of elevated blood pressure.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christian Razo
- Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
- Department of Health Metrics Sciences, School of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
| | | | - Catherine O Johnson
- Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Susan A McLaughlin
- Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Vincent Iannucci
- Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Anthony Rodgers
- The George Institute for Global Health, The University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Nelson Wang
- The George Institute for Global Health, The University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Kate E LeGrand
- Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Reed J D Sorensen
- Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Jiawei He
- Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Peng Zheng
- Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
- Department of Health Metrics Sciences, School of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Aleksandr Y Aravkin
- Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
- Department of Health Metrics Sciences, School of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
- Department of Applied Mathematics, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Simon I Hay
- Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
- Department of Health Metrics Sciences, School of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Christopher J L Murray
- Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
- Department of Health Metrics Sciences, School of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Gregory A Roth
- Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
- Department of Health Metrics Sciences, School of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
- Division of Cardiology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Lee DH, Lee JH, Kim SY, Lee HY, Choi JY, Hong Y, Park SK, Ryu DR, Yang DH, Hwang SJ, Choi JH, Kim KH, Lee SH, Joo SJ, Park JH, Kim SH, Kim HL, Kim KI, Cho MC. Optimal blood pressure target in the elderly: rationale and design of the HOW to Optimize eLDerly systolic Blood Pressure (HOWOLD-BP) trial. Korean J Intern Med 2022; 37:1070-1081. [PMID: 35859277 PMCID: PMC9449210 DOI: 10.3904/kjim.2022.067] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/18/2022] [Accepted: 04/15/2022] [Indexed: 11/27/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND/AIMS The optimal systolic blood pressure (SBP) goal for elderly patients with hypertension, especially to reduce cardiovascular disease (CVD) incidence and improve outcome, is unclear. This study aimed to evaluate the beneficial effects of intensive treatment for hypertension on the incidence of CVD in elderly Korean patients. METHODS The HOW to Optimize eLDerly systolic Blood Pressure (HOWOLD-BP) trial is a multicenter, parallel-design, open-label, randomized controlled trial designed to evaluate whether intensive treatment (SBP ≤ 130 mmHg) will provide more benefits in lowering the incidence and mortality associated with CVD than standard treatment (SBP ≤ 140 mmHg) in elderly patients with hypertension aged ≥ 65 years. For this study, eleven university hospitals in Korea will enroll approximately 3,176 elderly patients with hypertension between 2019 and 2022. Patients will be requested to visit the clinic every 4 months for the first year and every 6 months thereafter for 36 months. Parameters, including clinic and home blood pressure, anthropometric and laboratory findings, and frailty assessments, will be collected according to the standardized protocol. The primary outcome is a composite of CVD (acute coronary syndrome, stroke, and heart failure) incidence and cardiovascular deaths. RESULTS As of December 2021, 1,655 participants had been enrolled in the study, including 831 patients in the standard group and 824 patients in the intensive group. CONCLUSION The HOWOLD-BP trial is the first study performed in Korea to evaluate the beneficial effects of intensive blood pressure treatment on CVD in elderly patients with hypertension. The results of this study will help clarify the appropriate target SBP for this population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dong-Hwa Lee
- Department of Internal Medicine, Chungbuk National University College of Medicine, Cheongju,
Korea
| | - Ju-Hee Lee
- Department of Internal Medicine, Chungbuk National University College of Medicine, Cheongju,
Korea
- Department of Cardiology and Cardiocerebrovascular Center, Chungbuk National University Hospital, Cheongju,
Korea
| | - So Young Kim
- Department of Cardiology and Cardiocerebrovascular Center, Chungbuk National University Hospital, Cheongju,
Korea
| | - Hae-Young Lee
- Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul,
Korea
- Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul,
Korea
| | - Jung-Yeon Choi
- Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam,
Korea
| | - Youjin Hong
- Department of Preventive Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul,
Korea
- Cancer Research Institute, Seoul National University, Seoul,
Korea
| | - Sue K. Park
- Department of Preventive Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul,
Korea
- Cancer Research Institute, Seoul National University, Seoul,
Korea
- Integrated Major in Innovative Medical Science, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul,
Korea
| | - Dong Ryeol Ryu
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Kangwon National University Hospital, Kangwon National University School of Medicine, Chuncheon,
Korea
| | - Dong Heon Yang
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Kyungpook National University Hospital, Daegu,
Korea
| | - Seok-Jae Hwang
- Department of Internal Medicine, Gyeongsang National University Hospital, Gyeongsang National University College of Medicine, Jinju,
Korea
| | - Jung Hyun Choi
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Medical Research Institute, Pusan National University Hospital, Busan,
Korea
| | - Kye Hun Kim
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Chonnam National University Hospital, Gwangju,
Korea
| | - Sun Hwa Lee
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Jeonbuk National University Hospital, Jeonbuk National University Medical School, Jeonju,
Korea
| | - Seung Jae Joo
- Department of Cardiology, Jeju National University Hospital, Jeju,
Korea
| | - Jae-Hyeong Park
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Chungnam National University Hospital, Chungnam National University College of Medicine, Daejeon,
Korea
| | - Sang-Hyun Kim
- Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul,
Korea
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul Metropolitan Government Seoul National University Boramae Medical Center, Seoul,
Korea
| | - Hack-Lyong Kim
- Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul,
Korea
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul Metropolitan Government Seoul National University Boramae Medical Center, Seoul,
Korea
| | - Kwang-il Kim
- Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul,
Korea
- Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam,
Korea
| | - Myeong-Chan Cho
- Department of Internal Medicine, Chungbuk National University College of Medicine, Cheongju,
Korea
- Department of Cardiology and Cardiocerebrovascular Center, Chungbuk National University Hospital, Cheongju,
Korea
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Current and Emerging Classes of Pharmacological Agents for the Management of Hypertension. Am J Cardiovasc Drugs 2022; 22:271-285. [PMID: 34878631 PMCID: PMC8651502 DOI: 10.1007/s40256-021-00510-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 10/24/2021] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
Cardiovascular disease accounts for more than 17 million deaths globally every year, of which complications of hypertension account for 9.4 million deaths worldwide. Early detection and management of hypertension can prevent costly interventions, including dialysis and cardiac surgery. Non-pharmacological approaches for managing hypertension commonly involve lifestyle modification, including exercise and dietary regulations such as reducing salt and fluid intake; however, a majority of patients will eventually require antihypertensive medications. In 2020, the International Society of Hypertension published worldwide guidelines in its efforts to reduce the global prevalence of raised blood pressure (BP) in adults aged 18 years or over. Currently, several classes of medications are used to control hypertension, either as mono- or combination therapy depending on the disease severity. These drug classes include those that target the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) and adrenergic receptors, calcium channel blockers, diuretics and vasodilators. While some of these classes of medications have shown significant benefits in controlling BP and reducing cardiovascular mortality, the prevalence of hypertension remains high. Significant efforts have been made in developing new classes of drugs that lower BP; these medications exert their therapeutic benefits through different pathways and mechanism of actions. With several of these emerging classes in phase III clinical trials, it is hoped that the discovery of these novel therapeutic avenues will aid in reducing the global burden of hypertension.
Collapse
|
16
|
Management of hypertension in patients with diabetic kidney disease: Summary of the Joint Association of British Clinical Diabetologists and UK Kidney Association (ABCD-UKKA) Guideline 2021. Kidney Int Rep 2022; 7:681-687. [PMID: 35497783 PMCID: PMC9039464 DOI: 10.1016/j.ekir.2022.01.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/16/2021] [Revised: 12/31/2021] [Accepted: 01/03/2022] [Indexed: 01/10/2023] Open
Abstract
Diabetic kidney disease (DKD) accounts for >40% cases of chronic kidney disease (CKD) globally. Hypertension is a major risk factor for progression of DKD and the high incidence of cardiovascular disease and mortality in these people. Meticulous management of hypertension is therefore crucial to slow down the progression of DKD and reduce cardiovascular risk. Randomized controlled trial evidence differs in type 1 and type 2 diabetes and in different stages of DKD in terms of target blood pressure (BP). Renin-angiotensin blocking agents reduce progression of DKD and cardiovascular events in both type 1 and type 2 diabetes, albeit differently according to the stage of CKD. There is emerging evidence for the benefit of sodium glucose cotransporter 2, nonsteroidal selective mineralocorticoid antagonists, and endothelin-A receptor antagonists in slowing progression and reducing cardiovascular events in DKD. This UK guideline, developed jointly by diabetologists and nephrologists, has reviewed all available current evidence regarding the management of hypertension in DKD to produce a set of comprehensive individualized recommendations for BP control and the use of antihypertensive agents according to age, type of diabetes, and stage of CKD (https://ukkidney.org/sites/renal.org/files/Management-of-hypertension-and-RAAS-blockade-in-adults-with-DKD.pdf). A succinct summary of the guideline, including an infographic, is presented here.
Collapse
|
17
|
Tharmaratnam D, Karayiannis CC, Collyer TA, Arima H, McClure LA, Chalmers J, Anderson CS, Benavente OR, White CL, Algra A, Moran C, Phan TG, Wang WC, Srikanth V. Is Blood Pressure Lowering in the Very Elderly With Previous Stroke Associated With a Higher Risk of Adverse Events? J Am Heart Assoc 2021; 10:e022240. [PMID: 34913363 PMCID: PMC9075242 DOI: 10.1161/jaha.121.022240] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/02/2023]
Abstract
Background We investigated whether blood pressure lowering for secondary prevention is associated with a reduction in recurrent stroke risk and/or a higher risk of adverse events in very elderly compared with younger trial participants. Methods and Results This is a random effects meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials of blood pressure lowering for secondary stroke prevention to evaluate age-stratified (<80, ≥80 years) risk of adverse events. Ovid-MEDLINE was searched for trials between 1970 and 2020. Summary-level data were acquired including outcomes of stroke, cardiovascular events, mortality, and adverse events. Seven trials were included comprising 38 596 participants, of whom 2336 (6.1%) were aged ≥80 years. There was an overall reduction in stroke risk in the intervention group compared with controls (risk ratio [RR], 0.90 [95% CI, 0.80, 0.98], I2=49%), and the magnitude of risk reduction did not differ by age subgroup (<80, ≥80 years). There was no increase in the risk of hypotensive symptoms in the intervention group for patients aged <80 years (RR, 1.19 [95% CI, 0.99], 1.44, I2=0%), but there was an increased risk in those ≥80 years (RR, 2.17 [95% CI, 1.22], 3.86, I2=0%). No increase was observed in the risk of falls, syncope, study withdrawal, or falls in either age subgroup. Conclusions Very elderly people in secondary prevention trials of blood pressure lowering have an increased risk of hypotensive symptoms, but with no statistical increase in the risk of falls, syncope, or mortality. However, evidence is lacking for frail elderly with multiple comorbidities who may be more vulnerable to adverse effects of blood pressure lowering.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Damien Tharmaratnam
- Department of Medicine Peninsula Health Melbourne Australia.,Peninsula Clinical School Central Clinical School Faculty of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences Monash University Melbourne Australia.,Stroke and Ageing Research Group, Medicine School of Clinical Sciences Monash Medical Centre Monash University Melbourne Australia
| | - Christopher C Karayiannis
- Department of Medicine Peninsula Health Melbourne Australia.,Peninsula Clinical School Central Clinical School Faculty of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences Monash University Melbourne Australia.,Stroke and Ageing Research Group, Medicine School of Clinical Sciences Monash Medical Centre Monash University Melbourne Australia
| | - Taya A Collyer
- Peninsula Clinical School Central Clinical School Faculty of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences Monash University Melbourne Australia
| | - Hisatomi Arima
- Faculty of Medicine The George Institute for Global HealthUniversity of New South Wales Camperdown New South Wales Australia.,Department of Preventive Medicine and Public Health Faculty of Medicine Fukuoka University Fukuoka Japan
| | - Leslie A McClure
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics Dornsife School of Public Health Drexel University Philadelphia PA
| | - John Chalmers
- Faculty of Medicine The George Institute for Global HealthUniversity of New South Wales Camperdown New South Wales Australia
| | - Craig S Anderson
- Faculty of Medicine The George Institute for Global HealthUniversity of New South Wales Camperdown New South Wales Australia
| | - Oscar R Benavente
- Division of Neurology Department of Medicine Brain Research Center University of British Columbia Vancouver British Columbia Canada
| | - Carole L White
- School of Nursing University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio TX
| | - Ale Algra
- Department of Neurology and Neurosurgery UMC Utrecht Brain Center, and Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care University Medical Center Utrecht and Utrecht University Utrecht The Netherlands
| | - Chris Moran
- Department of Medicine Peninsula Health Melbourne Australia.,Peninsula Clinical School Central Clinical School Faculty of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences Monash University Melbourne Australia.,Department of Aged Care The Alfred Melbourne Australia.,Geriatric Medicine Unit Peninsula Health Melbourne Australia
| | - Thanh G Phan
- Stroke Unit Department of Neurosciences Monash Health Melbourne Australia.,Stroke and Ageing Research Group, Medicine School of Clinical Sciences Monash Medical Centre Monash University Melbourne Australia
| | - Wei C Wang
- Department of Medicine Peninsula Health Melbourne Australia.,Peninsula Clinical School Central Clinical School Faculty of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences Monash University Melbourne Australia
| | - Velandai Srikanth
- Department of Medicine Peninsula Health Melbourne Australia.,Peninsula Clinical School Central Clinical School Faculty of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences Monash University Melbourne Australia.,Stroke Unit Department of Neurosciences Monash Health Melbourne Australia.,Stroke and Ageing Research Group, Medicine School of Clinical Sciences Monash Medical Centre Monash University Melbourne Australia.,Geriatric Medicine Unit Peninsula Health Melbourne Australia
| | | |
Collapse
|
18
|
O'Fee K, Deych E, Ciani O, Brown DL. Assessment of Nonfatal Myocardial Infarction as a Surrogate for All-Cause and Cardiovascular Mortality in Treatment or Prevention of Coronary Artery Disease: A Meta-analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials. JAMA Intern Med 2021; 181:1575-1587. [PMID: 34694318 PMCID: PMC8546625 DOI: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2021.5726] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
IMPORTANCE Although nonfatal myocardial infarction (MI) is associated with an increased risk of mortality, evidence validating nonfatal MI as a surrogate end point for all-cause or cardiovascular (CV) mortality is lacking. OBJECTIVE To examine whether nonfatal MI may be a surrogate for all-cause or CV mortality in patients with or at risk for coronary artery disease. DATA SOURCES In this meta-analysis, PubMed was searched from inception until December 31, 2020, for randomized clinical trials of interventions to treat or prevent coronary artery disease reporting mortality and nonfatal MI published in 3 leading journals. STUDY SELECTION Randomized clinical trials including at least 1000 patients with 24 months of follow-up. DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS Trial-level correlations between nonfatal MI and all-cause or CV mortality were assessed for surrogacy using the coefficient of determination (R2). The criterion for surrogacy was set at 0.8. Subgroup analyses based on study subject (primary prevention, secondary prevention, mixed primary and secondary prevention, and revascularization), era of trial (before 2000, 2000-2009, and 2010 and after), and follow-up duration (2.0-3.9, 4.0-5.9, and ≥6.0 years) were performed. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES All-cause or CV mortality and nonfatal MI. RESULTS A total of 144 articles randomizing 1 211 897 patients met the criteria for inclusion. Nonfatal MI did not meet the threshold for surrogacy for all-cause (R2 = 0.02; 95% CI, 0.00-0.08) or CV (R2 = 0.11; 95% CI, 0.02-0.27) mortality. Nonfatal MI was not a surrogate for all-cause mortality in primary (R2 = 0.01; 95% CI, 0.001-0.26), secondary (R2 = 0.03; 95% CI, 0.00-0.20), mixed primary and secondary prevention (R2 = 0.001; 95% CI, 0.00-0.08), or revascularization trials (R2 = 0.21; 95% CI, 0.002-0.50). For trials enrolling patients before 2000 (R2 = 0.22; 95% CI, 0.08-0.36), between 2000 and 2009 (R2 = 0.02; 95% CI, 0.00-0.17), and from 2010 and after (R2 = 0.01; 95% CI, 0.00-0.09), nonfatal MI was not a surrogate for all-cause mortality. Nonfatal MI was not a surrogate for all-cause mortality in randomized clinical trials with 2.0 to 3.9 (R2 = 0.004; 95% CI, 0.00-0.08), 4.0 to 5.9 (R2 = 0.06; 95% CI, 0.001-0.16), or 6.0 or more years of follow-up (R2 = 0.30; 95% CI, 0.01-0.55). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE The findings of this meta-analysis do not appear to establish nonfatal MI as a surrogate for all-cause or CV mortality in randomized clinical trials of interventions to treat or prevent coronary artery disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kevin O'Fee
- Department of Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine in St Louis, St Louis, Missouri
| | - Elena Deych
- Department of Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine in St Louis, St Louis, Missouri.,Cardiovascular Division, Washington University School of Medicine in St Louis, St Louis, Missouri
| | - Oriana Ciani
- Center for Research in Health and Social Care Management, SDA Bocconi, Milan, Italy.,University of Exeter College of Medicine and Health, Exeter, United Kingdom
| | - David L Brown
- Department of Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine in St Louis, St Louis, Missouri.,Cardiovascular Division, Washington University School of Medicine in St Louis, St Louis, Missouri
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Guide de Pratique Clinique. Prise en charge de l’hypertension artérielle chez l’adulte en Tunisie. LA TUNISIE MÉDICALE 2021. [PMCID: PMC9003593] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Abstract
Ce document a été réalisé dans le cadre d'une collaboration entre l'Instance Nationale de l’Évaluation et de l'Accréditation en Santé (INEAS), la Société Tunisienne de Cardiologie et de Chirurgie Cardiovasculaire (STCCCV) et la Caisse Nationale d’Assurance Maladie (CNAM).
Collapse
|
20
|
Lipid Monitoring After Initiation of Lipid-Lowering Therapies: Return of Performance Measures? Curr Cardiol Rep 2021; 23:116. [PMID: 34269897 DOI: 10.1007/s11886-021-01545-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 03/28/2021] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW The 2015 American College of Cardiology (ACC)/American Heart Association (AHA) Focused Update of Secondary Prevention Lipid Performance Measures removed low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) assessment as a performance measure. This review discusses the evidence supporting the importance of lipid monitoring in the secondary prevention of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD). RECENT FINDINGS The 2018 AHA/ACC Multisociety cholesterol guideline (as did the 2013 guideline) recommends a lipid panel after initiating lipid-lowering therapy to monitor adherence and medication efficacy. The 2018 guideline also recommends adding nonstatin therapy in very-high-risk ASCVD patients with LDL-C ≥70 mg/dL despite maximally tolerated statin therapy. The removal of LDL-C monitoring as a performance measure is not consistent with the 2018 cholesterol guidelines. Given the importance of monitoring lipid-lowering medication efficacy and adherence and optimally reducing LDL-C in very-high-risk patients with additional evidence-based nonstatin therapy, LDL-C assessment after initiating lipid-lowering therapy should be reinstated as a performance measure for patients with ASCVD.
Collapse
|
21
|
Impact of stroke work on the ability of left ventricular mass to account for pressure effects on function in a community with prevalent systemic flow-dependent hypertension. J Hypertens 2021; 39:2092-2102. [PMID: 34232159 DOI: 10.1097/hjh.0000000000002896] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
AIMS To determine whether the confounding influence of stroke work on left ventricular mass (LVM) limits the ability of LVM to detect hypertensive LV dysfunction in systemic flow-dependent hypertension. METHODS In a community with prevalent systemic flow-dependent hypertension (n = 709), arterial haemodynamics, LVM and LV function were determined using central arterial pressure, aortic velocity and diameter measurements in the outflow tract, and echocardiography with tissue Doppler imaging. RESULTS In multivariate models, stroke work showed markedly stronger relations with LVM index (LVMI) than blood pressure load [central arterial SBP (SBPc), backward wave pressure (Pb), 24-h SBP] (P < 0.0001 for comparisons). In contrast, although SBPc, Pb, and 24-h SBP were inversely associated with myocardial tissue shortening (s') and lengthening (e') velocity, stroke work was not. With adjustments for stroke work, positive relationships between SBPc, Pb, or 24-h SBP and LVMI were eliminated (P = 0.20 to P = 0.89), but strong relations between BP and s', e' or E/e' (P = 0.009 to P < 0.0001) remained. In mediation analysis, stroke work fully accounted for BP effects on LVMI, but explained none of the effects of BP on LV function. Hence LVMI accounted for little of the impact of BP load on LV function. Although LVMI beyond stroke work (inappropriate LVM) improved on relations between LVMI and s', it failed to improve on relations with e' or E/e' and contributed little beyond LVMI to the impact of BP on LV function. CONCLUSION In systemic flow-dependent hypertension, the impact of stroke work markedly limits the ability of LVM to account for adverse effects of hypertension on LV function.
Collapse
|
22
|
|
23
|
Cunningham EL, Todd SA, Passmore P, Bullock R, McGuinness B. Pharmacological treatment of hypertension in people without prior cerebrovascular disease for the prevention of cognitive impairment and dementia. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2021; 5:CD004034. [PMID: 34028812 PMCID: PMC8142793 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd004034.pub4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/08/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND This is an update of a Cochrane Review first published in 2006 (McGuinness 2006), and previously updated in 2009 (McGuinness 2009). Hypertension is a risk factor for dementia. Observational studies suggest antihypertensive treatment is associated with lower incidences of cognitive impairment and dementia. There is already clear evidence to support the treatment of hypertension after stroke. OBJECTIVES To assess whether pharmacological treatment of hypertension can prevent cognitive impairment or dementia in people who have no history of cerebrovascular disease. SEARCH METHODS We searched the Specialised Register of the Cochrane Dementia and Cognitive Improvement Group, CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, three other databases, as well as many trials registries and grey literature sources, most recently on 7 July 2020. SELECTION CRITERIA We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) in which pharmacological interventions to treat hypertension were given for at least 12 months. We excluded trials of pharmacological interventions to lower blood pressure in non-hypertensive participants. We also excluded trials conducted solely in people with stroke. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS Two authors independently assessed trial quality and extracted data. We contacted study authors for additional information. We collected information regarding incidence of dementia, cognitive decline, change in blood pressure, adverse effects and quality of life. We assessed the certainty of evidence using GRADE. MAIN RESULTS We included 12 studies, totaling 30,412 participants, in this review. Eight studies compared active treatment with placebo. Of the four non-placebo-controlled studies, two compared intensive versus standard blood pressure reduction. The two final included studies compared different classes of antihypertensive drug. Study durations varied from one to five years. The combined result of four placebo-controlled trials that reported incident dementia indicated no evidence of a difference in the risk of dementia between the antihypertensive treatment group and the placebo group (236/7767 versus 259/7660, odds ratio (OR) 0.89, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.72 to 1.09; very low certainty evidence, downgraded due to study limitations and indirectness). The combined results from five placebo-controlled trials that reported change in Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) may indicate a modest benefit from antihypertensive treatment (mean difference (MD) 0.20, 95% CI 0.10 to 0.29; very low certainty evidence, downgraded due to study limitations, indirectness and imprecision). The certainty of evidence for both cognitive outcomes was downgraded on the basis of study limitations and indirectness. Study durations were too short, overall, to expect a significant difference in dementia rates between groups. Dementia and cognitive decline were secondary outcomes for most studies. Additional sources of bias include: the use of antihypertensive medication by the placebo group in the placebo-controlled trials; failure to reach recruitment targets; and early termination of studies on safety grounds. Meta-analysis of the placebo-controlled trials reporting results found a mean change in systolic blood pressure of -9.25 mmHg (95% CI -9.73, -8.78) between treatment (n = 8973) and placebo (n = 8820) groups, and a mean change in diastolic blood pressure of -2.47 mmHg (95% CI -2.70, -2.24) between treatment (n = 7700) and placebo (n = 7509) groups (both low certainty evidence downgraded on the basis of study limitations and inconsistency). Three trials - SHEP 1991, LOMIR MCT IL 1996 and MRC 1996 - reported more withdrawals due to adverse events in active treatment groups than placebo groups. Participants on active treatment in Syst Eur 1998 were less likely to discontinue treatment due to side effects, and participants on active treatment in HYVET 2008 reported fewer 'serious adverse events' than in the placebo group. There was no evidence of a difference in withdrawals rates between groups in SCOPE 2003, and results were unclear for Perez Stable 2000 and Zhang 2018. Heterogeneity precluded meta-analysis. Five of the placebo-controlled trials provided quality of life (QOL) data. Heterogeneity again precluded meta-analysis. SHEP 1991, Syst Eur 1998 and HYVET 2008 reported no evidence of a difference in QOL measures between active treatment and placebo groups over time. The SCOPE 2003 sub-study (Degl'Innocenti 2004) showed a smaller drop in QOL measures in the active treatment compared to the placebo group. LOMIR MCT IL 1996 reported an improvement in a QOL measure at twelve months in one active treatment group and deterioration in another. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS High certainty randomised controlled trial evidence regarding the effect of hypertension treatment on dementia and cognitive decline does not yet exist. The studies included in this review provide low certainty evidence (downgraded primarily due to study limitations and indirectness) that pharmacological treatment of hypertension, in people without prior cerebrovascular disease, leads to less cognitive decline compared to controls. This difference is below the level considered clinically significant. The studies included in this review also provide very low certainty evidence that pharmacological treatment of hypertension, in people without prior cerebrovascular disease, prevents dementia.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Stephen A Todd
- Care of the Elderly Medicine, Western Health and Social Care Trust, Londonderry, UK
| | - Peter Passmore
- Centre for Public Health, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, UK
| | - Roger Bullock
- Kingshill Research Centre, Victoria Hospital, Swindon, UK
| | | |
Collapse
|
24
|
Beta blockers still relevant. COR ET VASA 2021. [DOI: 10.33678/cor.2021.032] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/21/2022]
|
25
|
Ungar A, Rivasi G, Coscarelli A, Boccanelli A, Marchionni N, Alboni P, Baldasseroni S, Bo M, Palazzo G, Rozzini R, Terrosu P, Vetta F, Zito G, Desideri G. Hypertension in older persons: why one size does not fit all. Minerva Med 2021; 113:616-625. [PMID: 33832215 DOI: 10.23736/s0026-4806.21.07502-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/08/2022]
Abstract
Over recent years, managing hypertension in older people has gained increasing attention, with particular reference to very old, frailer individuals. In these patients, hypertension treatment may be challenging due to a higher risk of hypotension-related adverse events which commonly overlaps with a higher cardiovascular risk. Additionally, frailer older adults rarely satisfy inclusion criteria of randomized clinical trials, which determines a substantial lack of scientific data. Although limited, available evidence suggests that the association between blood pressure and adverse outcomes significantly varies at advanced age according to frailty status. In particular, the negative prognostic impact of hypertension seems to attenuate or even revert in individuals with older biological age, e.g. patients with disability, cognitive impairment, and poor physical performance. Consequently, one size doesn't fit all and personalized treatment strategies are needed, customized to individuals' frailty and functional status. Similar to other cardiovascular diseases, hypertension management in older people should be characterized by a geriatric approach based on biological rather than chronological age and a geriatric comprehensive evaluation including frailty assessment is required to provide the most appropriate treatment, tailored to patients' prognosis and health care goals. This review illustrates the importance of a patient-centered geriatric approach to hypertension management in older people with the final purpose to promote a wider implementation of frailty assessment in routine practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrea Ungar
- Department of Geriatric and Intensive Care Medicine, Hypertension Clinic, Careggi Hospital and University of Florence, Florence, Italy - .,SICGe Società Italiana di Cardiologia Geriatrica, Florence, Italy -
| | - Giulia Rivasi
- Department of Geriatric and Intensive Care Medicine, Hypertension Clinic, Careggi Hospital and University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Antonio Coscarelli
- Department of Geriatric and Intensive Care Medicine, Hypertension Clinic, Careggi Hospital and University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | | | | | - Paolo Alboni
- SICGe Società Italiana di Cardiologia Geriatrica, Florence, Italy
| | | | - Mario Bo
- SICGe Società Italiana di Cardiologia Geriatrica, Florence, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Palazzo
- SICGe Società Italiana di Cardiologia Geriatrica, Florence, Italy
| | - Renzo Rozzini
- SICGe Società Italiana di Cardiologia Geriatrica, Florence, Italy
| | | | - Francesco Vetta
- SICGe Società Italiana di Cardiologia Geriatrica, Florence, Italy
| | - Giovanni Zito
- SICGe Società Italiana di Cardiologia Geriatrica, Florence, Italy
| | - Giovambattista Desideri
- SICGe Società Italiana di Cardiologia Geriatrica, Florence, Italy.,Department of Life, Health and Environmental Sciences, University of L'Aquila, L'Aquila, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Baran R, Grimm D, Infanger M, Wehland M. The Effect of Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Therapy on Obstructive Sleep Apnea-Related Hypertension. Int J Mol Sci 2021; 22:2300. [PMID: 33669062 PMCID: PMC7956605 DOI: 10.3390/ijms22052300] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/02/2021] [Revised: 02/18/2021] [Accepted: 02/21/2021] [Indexed: 01/02/2023] Open
Abstract
Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is a common disease, with approximately 3-7% of men and 2-5% of women worldwide suffering from symptomatic OSA. If OSA is left untreated, hypoxia, microarousals and increased chemoreceptor stimulation can lead to complications like hypertension (HT). Continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) is the most common treatment for OSA, and it works by generating airway patency, which will counteract the apnea or hypopnea. More than one billion people in the world suffer from HT, and the usual treatment is pharmacological with antihypertensive medication (AHM). The focus of this review will be to investigate whether the CPAP therapy for OSA affects HT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ronni Baran
- Department of Biomedicine, Aarhus University, 8000 Aarhus, Denmark;
| | - Daniela Grimm
- Department of Biomedicine, Aarhus University, 8000 Aarhus, Denmark;
- Department for Microgravity Research and Translational Regenerative Medicine, Otto-von-Guericke University, D-39106 Magdeburg, Germany;
| | - Manfred Infanger
- Department for Microgravity Research and Translational Regenerative Medicine, Otto-von-Guericke University, D-39106 Magdeburg, Germany;
| | - Markus Wehland
- Department for Microgravity Research and Translational Regenerative Medicine, Otto-von-Guericke University, D-39106 Magdeburg, Germany;
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Abstract
Hypertension management is challenging in frail older adults. The balance between treatment risks and benefits may be difficult to achieve due to an increased vulnerability to treatment-related adverse events, and limited evidence is available to support clinical decisions. The effects of frailty on blood pressure are unclear, as well as its impact on antihypertensive treatment benefits. Appropriate blood pressure targets in frail patients are debated and the frailty measure which best inform clinical decisions in hypertensive patients has yet to be identified. Therefore, hypertension management in frail older adults still represents a 'gap in evidence'. Knowledge of currently available literature is a fundamental prerequisite to develop future research and may help to implement frailty assessment and improve hypertension management in this vulnerable population. Given these premises, we present a narrative review illustrating the most relevant issues that are a matter of debate and that should be addressed in future studies.
Collapse
|
28
|
Martínez-Linares JM. Updates in Hypertension Studies According to the Main Clinical Trials: A Review of the Past 45 Years about Pharmaceutical Intervention Effects. NURSING REPORTS 2020; 10:2-14. [PMID: 34968259 PMCID: PMC8608083 DOI: 10.3390/nursrep10010002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/25/2020] [Revised: 09/01/2020] [Accepted: 09/04/2020] [Indexed: 06/14/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND High blood pressure remains one of the most important risk factors for cardiovascular disease. Although there is no consensus, all the clinical practice guidelines agree on the need to reduce blood pressure levels to minimize the risks. There are many clinical trials conducted to try to find the best pharmacotherapy to achieve this goal. The aim was to compare the main international randomized clinical trials on hypertension in people older than 50 years. METHODS Literature qualitative review of randomized clinical trials selected from PubMed and UpToDate in people older than 50 years, from 1985 until 2020. The clinical trials conducted during this period show variability in the drugs used, the inclusion criteria for blood pressure figures, and the consideration or not of other vascular risk factors (smoking, obesity, lipid disorders, diabetes, and physical inactivity). RESULTS Of the 8334 articles found, 19 of them fulfilled the inclusion and exclusion criteria that involved 202,638 people. The main findings of each investigation were grouped as follows: incidence of non-cardiovascular death, death of cardiovascular origin, coronary heart disease, cerebrovascular disease, renal failure, and hypertensive retinopathy. In all patients, blood pressure figures were reduced, although this did not always lead to statistically significant differences in morbidity and/or mortality risk reduction. Twelve of them found risk reduction as an effect of reduced blood pressure. CONCLUSIONS Randomized clinical trials conducted on hypertension in people older than 50 years of age show variability in the inclusion criteria. Variability in the antihypertensive drugs used was observed in this population. Blood pressure figures were reduced in all cases, although without statistically significant differences in morbidity and/or mortality risk reduction.
Collapse
|
29
|
Abstract
Vascular aging leads to arterial hypertension, which is the leading cause of cardiovascular mortality and morbidity in older adults. Blood pressure reduction is effective in reducing the cardiovascular risk and is safe in ambulatory older adults. It is important to note that blood pressure control in this group of patients is challenging because of comorbidities, polypharmacy, and frailty. Choice of pharmacotherapy is not simple and should be individualized.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ozlem Bilen
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Nanette K Wenger
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA.,Emory Heart and Vascular Center, Atlanta, GA, USA.,Emory Women's Heart Center, Atlanta, GA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Bugiardini R, Yoon J, Kedev S, Stankovic G, Vasiljevic Z, Miličić D, Manfrini O, van der Schaar M, Gale CP, Badimon L, Cenko E. Prior Beta-Blocker Therapy for Hypertension and Sex-Based Differences in Heart Failure Among Patients With Incident Coronary Heart Disease. Hypertension 2020; 76:819-826. [PMID: 32654558 DOI: 10.1161/hypertensionaha.120.15323] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
The usefulness of β-blockers has been questioned for patients who have hypertension without a prior manifestation of coronary heart disease or heart failure. In addition, sex-based differences in the efficacy of β-blockers for prevention of heart failure during acute myocardial ischemia have never been evaluated. We explored whether the effect of β-blocker therapy varied according to the sex among patients with hypertension who have no prior history of cardiovascular disease. Data were drawn from the ISACS (International Survey of Acute Coronary Syndromes)-Archives. The study population consisted of 13 764 patients presenting with acute coronary syndromes. There were 2590 patients in whom hypertension was treated previously with β-blocker (954 women and 1636 men). Primary outcome measure was the incidence of heart failure according to Killip class classification. Subsidiary analyses were conducted to estimate the association between heart failure and all-cause mortality at 30 days. Outcome rates were assessed using the inverse probability of treatment weighting and logistic regression models. Estimates were compared by test of interaction on the log scale. Among patients taking β-blockers before admission, there was an absolute difference of 4.6% between women and men in the rate of heart failure (Killip ≥2) at hospital presentation (21.3% versus 16.7%; relative risk ratio, 1.35 [95% CI, 1.10-1.65]). On the opposite, the rate of heart failure was approximately similar among women and men who did not receive β-blockers (17.2% versus 16.1%; relative risk ratio, 1.09 [95% CI, 0.97-1.21]). The test of interaction identified a significant (P=0.034) association between sex and β-blocker therapy. Heart failure was predictive of mortality at 30-day either in women (odds ratio, 7.54 [95% CI, 5.78-9.83]) or men (odds ratio, 9.62 [95% CI, 7.67-12.07]). In conclusion, β-blockers use may be an acute precipitant of heart failure in new-onset coronary heart disease among women, but not men. Heart failure increases the risk of death. Registration URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT04008173.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Raffaele Bugiardini
- From the Department of Experimental, Diagnostic and Specialty Medicine, University of Bologna, Italy (R.B., O.M., E.C.)
| | - Jinsung Yoon
- Electrical Engineering Department, University of California, UCLA, Los Angeles (J.Y.)
| | - Sasko Kedev
- University Clinic of Cardiology, Medical Faculty, University "Ss. Cyril and Methodius," Skopje, Macedonia (S.K.)
| | - Goran Stankovic
- Department of Cardiology, Clinical Center of Serbia, and Faculty of Medicine, University of Belgrade (G.S.), University of Belgrade, Serbia
| | | | - Davor Miličić
- Department for Cardiovascular Diseases, University Hospital Center Zagreb, University of Zagreb, Croatia (D.M.)
| | - Olivia Manfrini
- From the Department of Experimental, Diagnostic and Specialty Medicine, University of Bologna, Italy (R.B., O.M., E.C.)
| | | | - Chris P Gale
- Leeds Institute of Cardiovascular and Metabolic Medicine, University of Leeds, United Kingdom (C.P.G.)
| | - Lina Badimon
- Cardiovascular Research Institute (ICCC), CiberCV-Institute Carlos III, IIB-Sant Pau, Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau, Autonomous University of Barcelona, Spain (L.B.)
| | - Edina Cenko
- From the Department of Experimental, Diagnostic and Specialty Medicine, University of Bologna, Italy (R.B., O.M., E.C.)
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Blood pressure control in older adults with hypertension: A systematic review with meta-analysis and meta-regression. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL CARDIOLOGY HYPERTENSION 2020; 6:100040. [PMID: 33447766 PMCID: PMC7803055 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijchy.2020.100040] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/10/2020] [Revised: 06/15/2020] [Accepted: 06/25/2020] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
Background Managing blood pressure reduces CVD risk, but optimal treatment thresholds remain unclear as it is a balancing act to avoid hypotension-related adverse events. Objectives This systematic review, meta-analysis and meta-regression evaluated the benefits of intensive BP treatment in hypertensive older adults. Methods We systematically searched PubMed, MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library of Controlled Trials until January 31, 2020. Studies comparing different BP treatments/targets and/or active BP against placebo treatment, with a minimum 12 months follow-up, were included. Risk ratios (RR) and 95% CIs were calculated using a random effects model. The primary outcome was RR of major cardiovascular events (MCEs); secondary outcomes included myocardial infarction (MI), stroke, heart failure (HF), cardiovascular (CV) mortality, and all-cause mortality. Results We included 16 studies totaling 65,890 hypertensive participants (average age 69.4 years) with a follow-up period from 1.8 to 4.9 years. Intensive BP treatment significantly reduced the relative risk of MCEs by 26% (RR:0.74, 95%CI 0.64–0.86, p = 0.000; I2 = 79.71%). RR of MI significantly reduced by 13% (RR:0.87, 95%CI 0.76–1.00, p = 0.052; I2 = 0.00%), stroke by 28% (RR:0.72, 95%CI 0.64–0.82, p = 0.000; I2 = 32.45%), HF by 47% (RR:0.53, 95% CI 0.43–0.66, p = 0.000; I2 = 1.23%), and CV mortality by 24% (RR:0.76, 95%CI 0.66–0.89, p = 0.000; I2 = 39.74%). All-cause mortality reduced by 17% (RR:0.83, 95%CI 0.73–0.93, p = 0.001; I2 = 53.09%). Of the participants - 61% reached BP targets and 5% withdrew; with 1 hypotension-related event per 780 people treated. Conclusions Lower BP treatment targets are optimal for CV protection, effective, well-tolerated and safe, and support the latest hypertension guidelines. Question: What is the optimal blood pressure target in older adults with hypertension? Findings: Intensive blood pressure treatment reduces RR of MCEs and all-cause mortality; it is well tolerated and safe. Meaning: Systolic BP targets of <130 mmHg are optimal for cardiovascular protection & support the ACC/AHA hypertension guidelines.
Collapse
|
32
|
Angeli F, Verdecchia P, Masnaghetti S, Vaudo G, Reboldi G. Treatment strategies for isolated systolic hypertension in elderly patients. Expert Opin Pharmacother 2020; 21:1713-1723. [PMID: 32584617 DOI: 10.1080/14656566.2020.1781092] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/24/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Hypertension is a major and modifiable risk factor for cardiovascular disease. Its prevalence is rising as the result of population aging. Isolated systolic hypertension mostly occurs in older patients accounting for up to 80% of cases. AREAS COVERED The authors systematically review published studies to appraise the scientific and clinical evidence supporting the role of blood pressure control in elderly patients with isolated systolic hypertension, and to assess the influence of different drug treatment regimens on outcomes. EXPERT OPINION Antihypertensive treatment of isolated systolic hypertension significantly reduces the risk of morbidity and mortality in elderly patients. Thiazide diuretics and dihydropyridine calcium-channel blockers are the primary compounds used in randomized clinical trials. These drugs can be considered as first-line agents for the management of isolated systolic hypertension. Free or fixed combination therapy with angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors or angiotensin receptor blockers and calcium-channel blockers or thiazide-like diuretics should also be considered, particularly when compelling indications such as coronary artery disease, chronic kidney disease, diabetes, and congestive heart failure coexist. There is also hot scientific debate on the optimal blood pressure target to be achieved in elderly patients with isolated systolic hypertension, but current recommendations are scarcely supported by evidence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fabio Angeli
- Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Insubria , Varese, Italy.,Department of Medicine and Cardiopulmonary Rehabilitation, Maugeri Care and Research Institutes, IRCCS Tradate , Varese, Italy
| | - Paolo Verdecchia
- Fondazione Umbra Cuore e Ipertensione-ONLUS and Division of Cardiology, Hospital S. Maria Della Misericordia , Perugia, Italy
| | - Sergio Masnaghetti
- Department of Medicine and Cardiopulmonary Rehabilitation, Maugeri Care and Research Institutes, IRCCS Tradate , Varese, Italy
| | - Gaetano Vaudo
- Department of Medicine, University of Perugia , Perugia, Italy
| | | |
Collapse
|
33
|
Birudaraju D, Cherukuri L, Budoff M. Update on Hypertension and Adaptations for Treatment. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2020. [DOI: 10.38206/130103] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022]
Abstract
Hypertension (HTN) affects 46% of the US adult population and plays a major role in cardiovascular disease (CVD). Approximately, there were 90,098 deaths in 2017 primarily attributed to high blood pressure (BP). Recent guidelines recommend screening all adults for HTN. Management of elevated BP substantially reduces the risk of heart failure, stroke, and myocardial infarction. Recommended lifestyle modifications include weight loss for overweight or obese patients, regular exercise, the dietary approached to stop hypertension (DASH) diet, reduced dietary sodium intake, and reduced alcohol intake. Most HTN patients will need at least 2 drugs to control BP. Current guidelines from the ACC and AHA state that a BP level goal of < 130/80mmHg for adults with confirmed HTN and without additional markers of increased atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) risk may be acceptable.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Matthew Budoff
- Lundquist Institute for Biomedical Innovation at Harbor-UCLA
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Management of hypertension in the very old: an intensive reduction of blood pressure should be achieved in most patients. J Hum Hypertens 2020; 34:551-556. [PMID: 32398768 DOI: 10.1038/s41371-020-0345-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/14/2020] [Revised: 03/23/2020] [Accepted: 04/24/2020] [Indexed: 01/03/2023]
Abstract
There is large evidence that treatment of hypertension significantly reduces the risk of morbidity and mortality in the elderly. Although it is generally accepted that the benefit of antihypertensive treatment is largely explained by the reduction in systolic blood pressure, the optimal blood pressure target in elderly patients is still a topic of debate. Unfortunately, the clinical trials which demonstrated the benefit of antihypertensive treatment in old and very old patients with hypertension included relatively fit patients since frail patients were generally excluded. Available data suggest that when treating older adults, and especially frail older hypertensive adults, extra caution is appropriate in the setting of significant adverse events. Nonetheless, recent observations demonstrated a similar benefit from a more intensive compared with a less intensive blood pressure lowering in both fit and frail older adults. Of note, the rate of serious adverse events appears not dissimilar in the two treatment strategies, and not associated to frailty. Taken together, these findings support the concept that an intensive therapeutic strategy appears reasonable even in elderly hypertensive patients, particularly when the treatment is well tolerated.
Collapse
|
35
|
Management of hypertension in the very old: aggressive reduction of blood pressure is harmful in most patients. J Hum Hypertens 2020; 34:557-559. [PMID: 32376997 DOI: 10.1038/s41371-020-0346-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/17/2020] [Revised: 03/03/2020] [Accepted: 04/24/2020] [Indexed: 11/08/2022]
Abstract
Arterial hypertension is particularly prevalent in the elderly and treatment is required according to the literature. Treatment in subjects between 65 and 80 years of age resembles by characteristics and results that obtained in younger population. The treatment of arterial hypertension in the very elderly differs in a relevant percentage of them. It is quite similar in those with a good physical fitness with or without cardiovascular disease. A series of factors as the presence of real sustained hypertension, orthostatic hypotension, frailty and disability, and the boundary of safety recommended by international recent guidelines analysed here are relevant to characterize a clearly elevated risk of complications in the remaining very elderly patients.
Collapse
|
36
|
Effects of blood pressure lowering on cardiovascular events, in the context of regression to the mean: a systematic review of randomized trials. J Hypertens 2020; 37:16-23. [PMID: 30499920 DOI: 10.1097/hjh.0000000000001994] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To assess the clinical relevance of regression to the mean for clinical trials and clinical practice. METHODS MEDLINE was searched until February 2018 for randomized trials of BP lowering with over 1000 patient-years follow-up per group. We estimated baseline mean BP, follow-up mean (usual) BP amongst patients grouped by 10 mmHg strata of baseline BP, and assessed effects of BP lowering on coronary heart disease (CHD) and stroke according to these BP levels. RESULTS Eighty-six trials (349 488 participants), with mean follow-up of 3.7 years, were included. Most mean BP change was because of regression to the mean rather than treatment. At high baseline BP levels, even after rigorous hypertension diagnosis, downwards regression to the mean caused much of the fall in BP. At low baseline BP levels, upwards regression to the mean increased BP levels, even in treatment groups. Overall, a BP reduction of 6/3 mmHg lowered CHD by 14% (95% CI 11-17%) and stroke by 18% (15-22%), and these treatment effects occurred at follow-up BP levels much closer to the mean than baseline BP levels. In particular, more evidence was available in the SBP 130-139 mmHg range than any other range. Benefits were apparent in numerous high-risk patient groups with baseline mean SBP less than 140 mmHg. CONCLUSION Clinical practice should focus less on pretreatment BP levels, which rarely predict future untreated BP levels or rule out capacity to benefit from BP lowering in high cardiovascular risk patients. Instead, focus should be on prompt, empirical treatment to maintain lower BP for those with high BP and/or high risk.
Collapse
|
37
|
Webb AJS. Progression of Arterial Stiffness is Associated With Midlife Diastolic Blood Pressure and Transition to Late-Life Hypertensive Phenotypes. J Am Heart Assoc 2020; 9:e014547. [PMID: 31902329 PMCID: PMC6988142 DOI: 10.1161/jaha.119.014547] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
Background Hypertension‐associated cardiovascular events are particularly associated with elevated systolic blood pressure (SBP) in late life, yet long‐term interactions between SBP, diastolic BP (DBP) and arterial stiffness in development of late‐life hypertensive phenotypes remain unclear. Methods and Results In the UK Biobank, we determined associations between arterial stiffness index (ASI), SBP, DBP, and their progression, and transition from normotension (<140/90 mm Hg) to hypertension or elevated ASI (>10 m/s). Associations were determined by general linear and logistic regression, adjusted for cardiovascular risk factors and variability of measurements across follow‐ups. Mean values of baseline SBP, DBP, and ASI were determined stratified by deciles of age, blood pressure, and ASI, with CIs determined by bootstrapping. In 169 742 participants at baseline, ASI was more strongly associated with DBP than SBP, before and after adjustment for risk factors (β: SBP, −0.01 [P<0.001]; DBP, 0.06 [P<0.001]), while DBP was more strongly associated with progression of ASI (n=13 761; β: SBP, 0.013 [P=0.01]; DBP, 0.038 [P<0.001]). Baseline ASI was associated with increasing SBP during follow‐up (β=0.02, P<0.001) but not DBP (β=0.0004, P=0.39), but was associated with a younger age of transition from rising to falling DBP (highest versus lowest quartile: 51.2; 95% CI, 49.9–52.3 versus 60.4; 95% CI, 59.6–61.3 [P<0.001]). ASI predicted the development of isolated systolic hypertension (odds ratio, 1.30; 95% CI, 1.22–1.39), particularly after adjustment for measurement variability (odds ratio, 2.29). Conclusions Midlife DBP was the strongest predictor of progression of arterial stiffness, while arterial stiffness was associated with earlier transition to a falling DBP. Prevention of long‐term harms associated with arterial stiffness may require more intensive control of midlife DBP.
Collapse
|
38
|
Going Beyond the Guidelines in Individualising the Use of Antihypertensive Drugs in Older Patients. Drugs Aging 2019; 36:675-685. [PMID: 31175614 DOI: 10.1007/s40266-019-00683-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/05/2023]
Abstract
Hypertension is commonly diagnosed in older patients, with increasing cardiovascular (CV) risk as systolic blood pressure (BP) increases. Maximising CV risk reduction must be reconciled with minimising the risk of treatment-related harms and burden, especially among frail, multi-morbid and older old patients who have been excluded from most randomised trials. Contemporary clinical guidelines, based on such trials, differ in their recommendations as to threshold levels warranting treatment with antihypertensive drugs (AHDs) and target levels that should be achieved. In optimising AHD prescribing in older patients, we propose the following decision framework: decide therapeutic goals in accordance with patient characteristics and preferences; estimate absolute CV risk; measure and profile BP accurately in ways that account for lability in BP levels and minimise error in BP measurement; determine threshold and target BP levels likely to confer net benefit, taking into account age, co-morbidities, frailty and cognitive function; and consider situations that warrant AHD deprescribing on the basis of potential current or future harm. In applying this framework to older persons, and based on a review of relevant randomised trials and observational studies, individuals most likely to benefit from treating systolic BP to no less than 130 mmHg are those of any age who are fit and have high baseline systolic BP (≥ 160 mmHg); high CV risk, i.e. established CV disease or risk of CV events exceeding 20% at 10 years; previous stroke or transient ischaemic attack; heart failure; and stage 3-4 chronic kidney disease with proteinuria. Individuals most likely to be harmed from treating BP to target systolic < 140 mmHg are those who have no CV disease and aged over 80 years; moderate to severe frailty, cognitive impairment or functional limitations; labile BP and/or history of orthostatic hypotension, syncope and falls; or life expectancy < 12 months. Treatment should never be so intense as to reduce diastolic BP to < 60 mmHg in any older person. At a time when guidelines are calling for less conservative management of hypertension in all age groups, we contend that a more temperate approach, such as that offered here and based on the totality of available evidence, may assist in maximising net benefit in older patients.
Collapse
|
39
|
Treatment of hypertension in old patients without previous cardiovascular disease. J Hypertens 2019; 37:2269-2279. [DOI: 10.1097/hjh.0000000000002163] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
|
40
|
MacLaughlin EJ, Ernst ME. From Clinical Trials to Bedside: the Use of Antihypertensives in Aged Individuals. Part 1: Evaluation and Evidence of Treatment Benefit. Curr Hypertens Rep 2019; 21:82. [PMID: 31599361 DOI: 10.1007/s11906-019-0987-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Use of antihypertensives in older adults can be complicated by the potential for undesired effects on comorbidities, adverse effects of the drugs, and overall medication burden. The purpose of this two-part review is to discuss contemporary issues encountered in the management of hypertension in aged individuals, with a particular focus on the individualization of treatment. In part 1, we discuss the evaluation of the aged hypertensive patient and review the clinical trial evidence for treatment benefit of hypertension in the elderly. RECENT FINDINGS Elderly patients with suspected hypertension need careful evaluation of their blood pressure, as errors in measurement technique, inaccurate devices, or overreliance on office blood pressure readings may lead to under- or over-treatment, thereby increasing risks of adverse medication effects and/or cardiovascular events. Epidemiologic evidence in older adults suggests a link between low blood pressure and increased mortality. However, key prospective hypertension trials such as HYVET and SPRINT, which were focused in mostly healthy, community-dwelling elderly cohorts, have unequivocally demonstrated benefits of lowering blood pressure in reducing cardiovascular events in the very elderly. Recent evidence also suggests benefit in reducing the risks of cognitive impairment. Hypertension is a major modifiable risk factor and the benefits of treatment in lowering cardiovascular events are realized for most individuals, even at advanced ages.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eric J MacLaughlin
- Department of Pharmacy Practice, Jerry H. Hodge School of Pharmacy, Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center, Amarillo, TX, USA
| | - Michael E Ernst
- Department of Pharmacy Practice and Science, College of Pharmacy; and, Department of Family Medicine, Carver College of Medicine, The University of Iowa, 01291-A PFP, 200 Hawkins Dr, Iowa City, IA, 52242, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Martínez-Milla J, Raposeiras-Roubín S, Pascual-Figal DA, Ibáñez B. Papel de los bloqueadores beta en la enfermedad cardiovascular en 2019. Rev Esp Cardiol 2019. [DOI: 10.1016/j.recesp.2019.02.024] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
|
42
|
Dimmitt SB, Stampfer HG, Martin JH, Ferner RE. Efficacy and toxicity of antihypertensive pharmacotherapy relative to effective dose 50. Br J Clin Pharmacol 2019; 85:2218-2227. [PMID: 31219198 DOI: 10.1111/bcp.14033] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/04/2019] [Revised: 05/31/2019] [Accepted: 06/03/2019] [Indexed: 01/09/2023] Open
Abstract
Antihypertensive drugs have usually been approved at doses near the top of their respective dose-response curves. Efficacy plateaus but adverse drug reactions (ADRs), such as falls, cerebral or renal ischaemia, increase as dose is increased, especially in older patients with comorbidities. ADRs reduce adherence and may be difficult to ascertain reliably. Higher doses have generally not been shown to reduce total mortality, which provides a summary of efficacy and safety. Weight loss and other lifestyle measures are essential and may be sufficient treatment in many young and low risk patients. Most antihypertensive drug lower systolic blood pressure by around 10 mmHg, which reduces stroke and heart failure by about a quarter. Clinical trials have not been designed to demonstrate specific blood pressure treatment thresholds and targets, which are mostly extrapolated from epidemiology. Mean population oral effective dose 50 may be the most appropriate dose at which to commence antihypertensive drugs. The dose can then be titrated up if greater efficacy is demonstrated, or lowered if ADRs develop. Lower dose combination therapy may best balance benefit and harms with fewer ADRs and additive, potentially synergistic, efficacy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Simon B Dimmitt
- Division of Internal Medicine, Medical School, University of Western Australia, Crawley, Western Australia, Australia.,University of Newcastle School of Medicine and Public Health, Callaghan, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Hans G Stampfer
- Division of Psychiatry, Medical School, University of Western Australia, Crawley, Western Australia, Australia
| | - Jennifer H Martin
- University of Newcastle School of Medicine and Public Health, Callaghan, New South Wales, Australia.,Department of Medicine, Hunter New England Local Health District, Newcastle, Australia
| | - Robin E Ferner
- West Midlands Centre for Adverse Drug Reactions, City Hospital, Birmingham, UK.,Institute of Clinical Sciences, University of Birmingham, UK
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Martínez-Milla J, Raposeiras-Roubín S, Pascual-Figal DA, Ibáñez B. Role of Beta-blockers in Cardiovascular Disease in 2019. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2019; 72:844-852. [PMID: 31402328 DOI: 10.1016/j.rec.2019.04.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/20/2019] [Accepted: 04/24/2019] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
Beta-blockers are the cornerstone of treatment for various cardiovascular conditions. Although their effects have classically been considered to be driven by their antagonistic and competitive action on beta-adrenergic receptors, nowadays it is known that their effect goes beyond that of mere competition with catecholamines on these receptors. Beta-blockers were discovered as antianginal drugs in the 1960s and are currently widely used in heart failure, arrhythmias, and ischemic heart disease. In this article, we review the evidence for the beneficial effects of beta-blockers in these conditions, as well as the current recommendations in clinical practice guidelines for their use. Surprisingly, despite having been prescribed for more than 4 decades, new, previously unnoticed mechanisms of action on cellular compartments are still being discovered, which continues to open up new horizons for their use. All in all, beta-blockers are one of the most fascinating drug groups in our therapeutic armamentarium.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Juan Martínez-Milla
- Centro Nacional de Investigaciones Cardiovasculares (CNIC), Madrid, Spain; Servicio de Cardiología, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria de la Fundación Jiménez Díaz (IIS-FJD), Madrid, Spain
| | | | - Domingo A Pascual-Figal
- Centro Nacional de Investigaciones Cardiovasculares (CNIC), Madrid, Spain; Servicio de Cardiología, Hospital Clínico Universitario Virgen de la Arrixaca, Instituto Murciano de Investigación Biosanitaria (IMIB-Arrixaca), Universidad de Murcia, El Palmar, Murcia, Spain; Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Enfermedades Cardiovasculares (CIBERCV), Madrid, Spain
| | - Borja Ibáñez
- Centro Nacional de Investigaciones Cardiovasculares (CNIC), Madrid, Spain; Servicio de Cardiología, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria de la Fundación Jiménez Díaz (IIS-FJD), Madrid, Spain; Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Enfermedades Cardiovasculares (CIBERCV), Madrid, Spain.
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Ouellet GM, McAvay G, Murphy TE, Tinetti ME. Treatment of Hypertension in Complex Older Adults: How Many Medications Are Needed? Gerontol Geriatr Med 2019; 5:2333721419856436. [PMID: 31245434 PMCID: PMC6580710 DOI: 10.1177/2333721419856436] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/12/2019] [Revised: 05/17/2019] [Accepted: 05/21/2019] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: Many older adults with hypertension receive multiple
antihypertensives. It is unclear whether treatment with several antihypertensive
classes results in greater cardiovascular benefits than fewer antihypertensive
classes. Objectives: We investigated (a) the longitudinal
associations between treatment with ≥ 3 versus 1-2 classes and death and major
adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) and (b) whether these associations varied
by the presence of mobility disability. Methods: We included 6,011
treated hypertensive adults ≥65 from the Medical Expenditure Panel Survey
(MEPS), a nationally representative community sample. Times to MACE and death
were compared between those receiving ≥3 versus 1-2 classes using multivariable
proportional hazards regression. We used inverse probability of treatment
weighting to account for indication and contraindication bias.
Results: There were no significant differences in the risk of
mortality (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.96, p = .769) or MACE (HR =
1.10, p = .574) between the exposure groups, and there were no
significant exposure × mobility disability interactions.
Discussion: We found no benefit of ≥3 versus 1-2
antihypertensive classes in reducing mortality and cardiovascular events in a
representative cohort of older adults, raising concern about the added benefit
of additional antihypertensives in the real world.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gregory M Ouellet
- Section of Geriatrics, Department of Internal Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Gail McAvay
- Section of Geriatrics, Department of Internal Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Terrence E Murphy
- Section of Geriatrics, Department of Internal Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Mary E Tinetti
- Section of Geriatrics, Department of Internal Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Blood pressure lowering medication initiation and fracture risk: a SWAN pharmacoepidemiology study. Arch Osteoporos 2019; 14:73. [PMID: 31254147 DOI: 10.1007/s11657-019-0618-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/20/2018] [Accepted: 06/17/2019] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]
Abstract
UNLABELLED We examined the fracture risk after initiation of blood pressure-lowering drugs compared with initiation of antidepressants. Multivariable regression models demonstrated an increased risk of fracture among women initiating a blood pressure-lowering medication (HR 1.73, 95% CI 1.02-2.95). This is likely related to an increased risk of falls. PURPOSE Initiation of blood pressure-lowering drugs has been associated with fractures in several studies, presumably due to an increase in the risk of falls. However, these studies used self-controlled designs without active comparators. We examined the risk of fractures after initiation of blood pressure lowering drugs compared with initiation of antidepressants. METHODS Women participants in the Study of Women Across the Nation (SWAN) were potentially eligible if they initiated blood pressure-lowering or antidepressant drugs during follow-up. To reduce the risk of confounding, we estimated a propensity score that included potential confounders including age, menopausal status, osteoporosis, and osteoporosis medication use. The propensity score was used to match subjects in both groups and we then constructed multivariable logistic regression models comparing the risk of any fracture. Sensitivity analyses assessed a limited range of fractures less likely related to trauma. RESULTS Among the 3302 potentially eligible women participating in the SWAN cohort, we were able to propensity-score match 289 women who initiated a blood pressure-lowering medication with 289 who initiated an antidepressant. Multivariable logistic regression models demonstrated an increased risk of fracture among women initiating a blood pressure lowering medication (OR 1.74, 95% CI 1.02-2.95). After excluding fractures of the digits and face, the results were similar (OR 1.57, 95% CI 0.88-2.81). CONCLUSIONS There was evidence of an increased risk in fractures among women initiating blood pressure-lowering medications compared to those initiating antidepressants. This is likely related to an increased risk of falling.
Collapse
|
46
|
Effects of blood pressure-lowering treatment on cardiovascular outcomes and mortality: 14 - effects of different classes of antihypertensive drugs in older and younger patients: overview and meta-analysis. J Hypertens 2019; 36:1637-1647. [PMID: 29847487 DOI: 10.1097/hjh.0000000000001777] [Citation(s) in RCA: 52] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES The five major classes of blood pressure (BP)-lowering drugs have all been shown to significantly reduce the risk of major cardiovascular events when compared with placebo, and when directly (head-to-head) compared, no significant differences in their overall effectiveness have been detected, except for minor differences in cause-specific events. It is unknown, however, whether age-related differences exist and if some classes of drugs are differently effective in older or younger individuals. This clinically relevant question has been the object of a systematic search and meta-analysis of all available data. METHODS Two databases we had previously identified [72 placebo-controlled BP-lowering randomized clinical trials (RCTs) in 260 210 individuals and 50 RCTs head-to-head comparing treatments with BP-lowering drugs of different classes in 247 006 individuals) were searched for separately reported data on patients older or younger than 65 years, and the data were further stratified according to the class of drug [diuretics, beta-blockers, calcium antagonists, angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors, angiotensin receptor blockers] compared with placebo or with other drug classes. Seven fatal and nonfatal outcomes were considered for benefits. Adverse events were investigated as permanent treatment discontinuations for adverse events. Risk ratios and absolute risk changes were calculated by a random effects model. Effects at older and younger ages were compared by heterogeneity test. RESULTS We identified 20 placebo-controlled RCTs on 55 645 older individuals and 21 on 99 621 younger individuals, and 21 head-to-head drug comparison RCTs on 94 228 older individuals and 27 on 100 232 younger individuals (for a total of 349 726 individuals). When compared with placebo, all five classes of BP-lowering drugs significantly reduced the risk of major cardiovascular events or stroke, with no significant difference between older and younger patients. However, in head-to-head comparisons, no significant difference was found between older and younger patients in the effects of diuretics, calcium antagonists, ACE inhibitors and angiotensin receptor blockers on all cardiovascular outcomes, whereas beta-blockers revealed an age-dependent effectiveness, being equally effective as the other agents at an age below 65 years, but less effective at an older age. CONCLUSION Most BP-lowering classes are equally effective in preventing risk of fatal and nonfatal cardiovascular events both in older and younger patients, whereas beta-blockers, though being equally effective as the other agents in patients younger than 65, loose some of their effectiveness at an older age.
Collapse
|
47
|
Effects of blood pressure-lowering treatment on cardiovascular outcomes and mortality: 13 - benefits and adverse events in older and younger patients with hypertension: overview, meta-analyses and meta-regression analyses of randomized trials. J Hypertens 2019; 36:1622-1636. [PMID: 29847485 DOI: 10.1097/hjh.0000000000001787] [Citation(s) in RCA: 33] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND There is overwhelming evidence that blood pressure (BP)-lowering treatment can reduce cardiovascular outcomes also in the elderly, but some important aspects influencing medical practice are controversial as sufficient evidence has not been provided by single randomized controlled trials (RCTs), whereas evidence may result from a systematic search and meta-analysis of all available data. OBJECTIVES The following clinically relevant issues concerning the effects of BP lowering in older and younger individuals have been investigated: differences in benefits; the oldest and the youngest age range for which evidence of BP-lowering effects is available; the SBP level at which BP-lowering treatment should be initiated; the SBP and DBP levels treatment should be aimed at; differences in treatment burdens and harms. METHODS A database we previously identified of 72 BP-lowering RCTs in 260 210 patients was searched for separately reported data on older and younger individuals [cutoffs of 65 (primary analyses), 70, 75, 80, 60 and 55 years). The data were further stratified according to the levels of baseline (untreated) BP, and of on-treatment achieved SBP or DBP. Seven fatal and nonfatal outcomes were considered for benefits. Burdens and harms were investigated as permanent treatment discontinuations for adverse events, and hypotension/syncope. Risk ratios and absolute risk changes were calculated by a random effects model. Effects at older and younger ages were compared by heterogeneity test. RESULTS Thirty-two RCTs provided data on 96 549 patients older than 65 years, and 31 RCTs on 114 009 patients younger than 65 years. All cardiovascular outcomes were significantly reduced by treatment both in older and younger individuals, without significant age-dependent differences in relative risk reduction but with significantly higher absolute risk reductions in older individuals. The extreme age ranges for which evidence of significant benefits of treatment were available was greater than 80 and less than 55 years. Only one RCT provided data on benefits of BP-lowering at age greater than 65 when treatment was initiated at SBP values in the grade 1 range, but more consistent evidence was provided when age was greater than 60 years. Both in patients older and younger than 65 years, significant reductions of cardiovascular outcomes were found at on-treatment SBP less than 140 mmHg and DBP less than 80 mmHg. There was no evidence that treatment discontinuations for adverse events or hypotension/syncope were more frequent at age greater than 65. CONCLUSION Antihypertensive treatment should be recommended to all individuals with elevated BP, independent of age. The prudent recommendation to initiate treatment at SBP values 140-159 mmHg is supported at older age defined as greater than 60 years. SBP and DBP values lower than 140 mmHg and, respectively, 80 mmHg can be aimed at with incremental benefits without disproportionate burdens until age 80 years, above which available evidence is for benefits at on-treatment SBP 140-149 mmHg.
Collapse
|
48
|
Musini VM, Tejani AM, Bassett K, Puil L, Wright JM. Pharmacotherapy for hypertension in adults 60 years or older. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2019; 6:CD000028. [PMID: 31167038 PMCID: PMC6550717 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd000028.pub3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/13/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND This is the second substantive update of this review. It was originally published in 1998 and was previously updated in 2009. Elevated blood pressure (known as 'hypertension') increases with age - most rapidly over age 60. Systolic hypertension is more strongly associated with cardiovascular disease than is diastolic hypertension, and it occurs more commonly in older people. It is important to know the benefits and harms of antihypertensive treatment for hypertension in this age group, as well as separately for people 60 to 79 years old and people 80 years or older. OBJECTIVES Primary objective• To quantify the effects of antihypertensive drug treatment as compared with placebo or no treatment on all-cause mortality in people 60 years and older with mild to moderate systolic or diastolic hypertensionSecondary objectives• To quantify the effects of antihypertensive drug treatment as compared with placebo or no treatment on cardiovascular-specific morbidity and mortality in people 60 years and older with mild to moderate systolic or diastolic hypertension• To quantify the rate of withdrawal due to adverse effects of antihypertensive drug treatment as compared with placebo or no treatment in people 60 years and older with mild to moderate systolic or diastolic hypertension SEARCH METHODS: The Cochrane Hypertension Information Specialist searched the following databases for randomised controlled trials up to 24 November 2017: the Cochrane Hypertension Specialised Register, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), MEDLINE Ovid (from 1946), Embase (from 1974), the World Health Organization International Clinical Trials Registry Platform, and ClinicalTrials.gov. We contacted authors of relevant papers regarding further published and unpublished work. SELECTION CRITERIA Randomised controlled trials of at least one year's duration comparing antihypertensive drug therapy versus placebo or no treatment and providing morbidity and mortality data for adult patients (≥ 60 years old) with hypertension defined as blood pressure greater than 140/90 mmHg. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS Outcomes assessed were all-cause mortality; cardiovascular morbidity and mortality; cerebrovascular morbidity and mortality; coronary heart disease morbidity and mortality; and withdrawal due to adverse effects. We modified the definition of cardiovascular mortality and morbidity to exclude transient ischaemic attacks when possible. MAIN RESULTS This update includes one additional trial (MRC-TMH 1985). Sixteen trials (N = 26,795) in healthy ambulatory adults 60 years or older (mean age 73.4 years) from western industrialised countries with moderate to severe systolic and/or diastolic hypertension (average 182/95 mmHg) met the inclusion criteria. Most of these trials evaluated first-line thiazide diuretic therapy for a mean treatment duration of 3.8 years.Antihypertensive drug treatment reduced all-cause mortality (high-certainty evidence; 11% with control vs 10.0% with treatment; risk ratio (RR) 0.91, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.85 to 0.97; cardiovascular morbidity and mortality (moderate-certainty evidence; 13.6% with control vs 9.8% with treatment; RR 0.72, 95% CI 0.68 to 0.77; cerebrovascular mortality and morbidity (moderate-certainty evidence; 5.2% with control vs 3.4% with treatment; RR 0.66, 95% CI 0.59 to 0.74; and coronary heart disease mortality and morbidity (moderate-certainty evidence; 4.8% with control vs 3.7% with treatment; RR 0.78, 95% CI 0.69 to 0.88. Withdrawals due to adverse effects were increased with treatment (low-certainty evidence; 5.4% with control vs 15.7% with treatment; RR 2.91, 95% CI 2.56 to 3.30. In the three trials restricted to persons with isolated systolic hypertension, reported benefits were similar.This comprehensive systematic review provides additional evidence that the reduction in mortality observed was due mostly to reduction in the 60- to 79-year-old patient subgroup (high-certainty evidence; RR 0.86, 95% CI 0.79 to 0.95). Although cardiovascular mortality and morbidity was significantly reduced in both subgroups 60 to 79 years old (moderate-certainty evidence; RR 0.71, 95% CI 0.65 to 0.77) and 80 years or older (moderate-certainty evidence; RR 0.75, 95% CI 0.65 to 0.87), the magnitude of absolute risk reduction was probably higher among 60- to 79-year-old patients (3.8% vs 2.9%). The reduction in cardiovascular mortality and morbidity was primarily due to a reduction in cerebrovascular mortality and morbidity. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS Treating healthy adults 60 years or older with moderate to severe systolic and/or diastolic hypertension with antihypertensive drug therapy reduced all-cause mortality, cardiovascular mortality and morbidity, cerebrovascular mortality and morbidity, and coronary heart disease mortality and morbidity. Most evidence of benefit pertains to a primary prevention population using a thiazide as first-line treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vijaya M Musini
- University of British ColumbiaDepartment of Anesthesiology, Pharmacology and Therapeutics2176 Health Science MallVancouverBCCanadaV6T 1Z3
| | - Aaron M Tejani
- University of British ColumbiaTherapeutics Initiative2176 Health Sciences MallVancouverBCCanadaV6T 1Z3
| | - Ken Bassett
- University of British ColumbiaDepartment of Anesthesiology, Pharmacology and Therapeutics2176 Health Science MallVancouverBCCanadaV6T 1Z3
| | - Lorri Puil
- University of British ColumbiaDepartment of Anesthesiology, Pharmacology and Therapeutics, Faculty of Medicine2176 Health Sciences MallVancouverBCCanadaV6T 1Z3
| | - James M Wright
- University of British ColumbiaDepartment of Anesthesiology, Pharmacology and Therapeutics2176 Health Science MallVancouverBCCanadaV6T 1Z3
| | | |
Collapse
|
49
|
Alsarah A, Alsara O, Bachauwa G. Hypertension Management in the Elderly: What is the Optimal Target Blood Pressure? Heart Views 2019; 20:11-16. [PMID: 31143381 PMCID: PMC6524422 DOI: 10.4103/heartviews.heartviews_28_18] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/02/2022] Open
Abstract
Hypertension is a common disease in the elderly associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Due to the complexity of this population, the optimal target of blood pressure (BP) control is still controversial. In this article, we conduct a literature review of trials published in English in the last 10 years which were specifically designed to study the efficacy and safety of various BP targets in patients who are 70 years or older. Using these criteria, we found that the benefits in the positive studies were demonstrated even with a minimal BP control (systolic BP [SBP] <150 mmHg) and continued to be reported for a SBP <120 mmHg. On the other hand, keeping SBP <140 mmHg seemed to be safely achieved in elderly patients. Although the safety of lowering SBP to <120 mmHg is debated, Systolic Blood Pressure Intervention Trial study has shown no increased risk of falls, fractures, or kidney failure in elderly patients with SBP lower than this threshold. While the recent guidelines recommended to keep BP <130/80 mmHg in the elderly, more individualized approach should be considered to achieve this goal in order to avoid undesirable complications. Furthermore, further studies are required to evaluate BP target in very old patients or those with multiple comorbidities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ahmad Alsarah
- Department of Geriatric Medicine and Internal Medicine, Hurley Medical Center, Michigan State University, Flint, MI, USA
| | - Osama Alsara
- Department of Cardiovascular Diseases, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA
| | - Ghassan Bachauwa
- Department of Geriatric Medicine and Internal Medicine, Hurley Medical Center, Michigan State University, Flint, MI, USA
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Murad MH, Larrea-Mantilla L, Haddad A, Spencer-Bonilla G, Serrano V, Rodriguez-Gutierrez R, Alvarez-Villalobos N, Benkhadra K, Gionfriddo MR, Prokop LJ, Brito JP, Ponce OJ. Antihypertensive Agents in Older Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2019; 104:1575-1584. [PMID: 30903690 DOI: 10.1210/jc.2019-00197] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/25/2019] [Accepted: 01/25/2019] [Indexed: 02/13/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND This systematic review summarizes the benefits of treating blood pressure (BP) in individuals 65 years and older. METHODS We included randomized trials that evaluated BP-lowering medications or BP targets in individuals 65 years and older. Trials were selected and appraised by pairs of independent reviewers. RESULTS We included 19 trials (42,134 patients). In individuals 65 years or older, antihypertensive therapy was associated with a reduction in all-cause mortality [relative risk: 0.88 (95% CI: 0.81 to 0.94); high certainty evidence; mean follow-up 31 months], cardiovascular mortality, myocardial infarction, heart failure, stroke, and chronic kidney disease. Individuals 75 years or older had a significant reduction in the risk of all-cause and cardiovascular mortality, stroke, and heart failure. Strict systolic BP targets (<120 mm Hg and <130 mm Hg) were associated with a significant reduction in the risk of all-cause and cardiovascular mortality and heart failure, whereas more liberal systolic targets (<150 mm Hg and <160 mm Hg) were associated with lower risk of heart failure and stroke. Older adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM) had lower risk of chronic kidney disease without a significant reduction in other outcomes. However, there was no significant difference in estimates (i.e., interaction) between those with and without DM. CONCLUSIONS Individuals aged 65 years and older or 75 years and older who receive antihypertensive therapy have statistically significant reduction in the risk of all-cause and cardiovascular mortality, heart failure, and stroke. There was no statistically significant difference in estimates between those with and without DM.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Abdullah Haddad
- Evidence-Based Practice Center, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
- Section of Cardiology, Temple University-Lewis Katz School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | | | - Valentina Serrano
- Evidence-Based Practice Center, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
- Department of Nutrition, Diabetes and Metabolism, Escuela de Medicina, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago, Chile
| | - Rene Rodriguez-Gutierrez
- Evidence-Based Practice Center, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
- Plataforma INVEST Medicina UANL-KER Unit (KER Unit México), Subdireccion de Investigacion, Universidad Autónoma de Nuevo León, Monterrey, Nuevo Leon, México
| | - Neri Alvarez-Villalobos
- Evidence-Based Practice Center, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
- Plataforma INVEST Medicina UANL-KER Unit (KER Unit México), Subdireccion de Investigacion, Universidad Autónoma de Nuevo León, Monterrey, Nuevo Leon, México
| | - Khaled Benkhadra
- Evidence-Based Practice Center, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Michael R Gionfriddo
- Center for Pharmacy Innovation and Outcomes, Geisinger Health System, Forty Fort, Pennsylvania
| | - Larry J Prokop
- Evidence-Based Practice Center, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Juan P Brito
- Evidence-Based Practice Center, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
- Division of Endocrinology, Diabetes, Metabolism, Nutrition, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Oscar J Ponce
- Evidence-Based Practice Center, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
- Unidad de Conocimiento y Evidencia (CONEVID), Universidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia, Lima, Peru
| |
Collapse
|