A Canadian multicentre placebo-controlled study of a fixed dose of brofaromine, a reversible selective MAO-A inhibitor, in the treatment of major depression

A Chinese adaptation of six items, self-report Hamilton Depression Scale: Factor structure and psychometric properties

OBJECTIVES

The objective of this research was to verify the psychometric characteristics of the Chinese Adaptation of self-report HAMD-6.

METHODS

Outpatients and inpatients who met the DSM-5 criterion for major depressive disorder (MDD) were evaluated by the Chinese self-report HAMD-6, seventeen items of Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAMD-17), Patient Health Questionnaire Depression Scale (PHQ-9) and Improved Clinical Global Impression Scale (iCGI-S). The internal consistency reliability, retest reliability, criterion validity and construct validity of the Chinese self-report HAMD-6 were tested. Pearson correlation coefficient was used to assess the correlativity between the total score and the item scores. By drawing the Receiver Operating Characteristics (ROC) curve, the best cut-off value, sensitivity and specificity of Chinese Adaptation self-report HAMD-6 were obtained.

RESULTS

Cronbach's alpha coefficient of the Chinese self-report HAMD-6 was 0.91, and the intra-group correlation coefficient (ICC) of retest reliability was 0.81(P < 0.01). The Spearman correlation coefficients of the Chinese self-report HAMD-6, Chinese clinician version of HAMD-6, PHQ-9 and HAMD-17 were 0.86, 0.81 and 0.86, respectively (all P < 0.01). Results of the confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) supported a unidimensional construct. In addition, HAMD-17 ≤ 7 and iCGI-S= 1 were taken as the remission criteria for depression disorder, and the ROC curves of the Chinese self-report HAMD-6 were plotted with a cut-off value of 3/4, the specificity and sensitivity were 0.85/0.92 and 0.96/0.93 respectively.

CONCLUSION

These results suggested that the abbreviated Chinese self-report HAMD-6 has good reliability and validity among the Chinese population. This study suggested that the remission cut-off value of the scale is 3/4.

The Hamilton Rating Scales for Depression: A Critical Review of Clinimetric Properties of Different Versions

The format of the original Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HAM-D) was unstructured: only general instructions were provided for rating individual items. Over the years, a number of modified versions of the HAM-D have been proposed. They differ not only in the number of items, but also in modalities of administration. Structured versions, including item definitions, anchor points and semi-structured or structured interview questions, were developed. This comprehensive review was conducted to examine the clinimetric properties of the different versions of the HAM-D. The aim was to identify the HAM-D versions that best display the clinimetric properties of reliability, validity, and sensitivity to change. The search was conducted on MEDLINE, Scopus, Web of Science, and PubMed, and yielded a total of 35,473 citations, but only the most representative studies were included. The structured versions of the HAM-D were found to display the highest inter-rater and test-retest reliability. The Clinical Interview for Depression and the 6-item HAM-D showed the highest sensitivity in differentiating active treatment from placebo. The findings indicate that the HAM-D is a valid and sensitive clinimetric index, which should not be discarded in view of obsolete and not clinically relevant psychometric criteria. The HAM-D, however, requires an informed use: unstructured forms should be avoided and the type of HAM-D version that is selected should be specified in the registration of the study protocol and in the methods of the trial.

A Systematic Review of the Clinimetric Properties of the 6-Item Version of the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAM-D6)

BACKGROUND

In a study aimed at identifying the items carrying information regarding the global severity of depression, the 6-item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAM-D6) was derived from the original 17-item version of the scale (HAM-D17). Since then, the HAM-D6 has been used in a wide range of clinical studies. We now provide a systematic review of the clinimetric properties of HAM-D6 in comparison with those of HAM-D17 and the Montgomery Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS).

METHODS

We conducted a systematic search of the literature in PubMed, PsycInfo, and EMBASE databases in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guideline. Studies reporting data on the clinimetric validity of the HAM-D6 and either the HAM-D17 or MADRS in non-psychotic unipolar or bipolar depression were included in the synthesis.

RESULTS

The search identified 681 unique records, of which 51 articles met the inclusion criteria. According to the published literature, HAM-D6 has proven to be superior to both HAM-D17 and MADRS in terms of scalability (each item contains unique information regarding syndrome severity), transferability (scalability is constant over time and irrespective of sex, age, and depressive subtypes), and responsiveness (sensitivity to change in severity during treatment).

CONCLUSIONS

According to the published literature, the clinimetric properties of HAM-D6 are superior to those of both the HAM-D17 and MADRS. Since the validity of HAM-D6 has been demonstrated in both research and clinical practice, using the scale more consistently would facilitate translation of results from one setting to the other.

Effectiveness and safety of baclofen for maintenance of alcohol abstinence in alcohol-dependent patients with liver cirrhosis: randomised, double-blind controlled study

BACKGROUND

Intervention to achieve alcohol abstinence represents the most effective treatment for alcohol-dependent patients with liver cirrhosis; however, anticraving drugs might worsen liver disease. We aimed to investigate the effectiveness and safety of baclofen in achieving and maintaining alcohol abstinence in patients with liver cirrhosis.

METHODS

Between October, 2003, and November, 2006, 148 alcohol-dependent patients with liver cirrhosis were referred to the Institute of Internal Medicine, Rome, Italy. 84 were randomly allocated either oral baclofen or placebo for 12 weeks. Primary outcome was proportion of patients achieving and maintaining alcohol abstinence. Measures of this outcome were total alcohol abstinence and cumulative abstinence duration, which were assessed at outpatient visits. Relapse was defined as alcohol intake of more than four drinks per day or overall consumption of 14 or more drinks per week over a period of at least 4 weeks. Analysis was by intention to treat. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00525252.

FINDINGS

Of 42 patients allocated baclofen, 30 (71%) achieved and maintained abstinence compared with 12 (29%) of 42 assigned placebo (odds ratio 6.3 [95% CI 2.4-16.1]; p=0.0001). The number of dropouts (termination of treatment) did not differ between the baclofen (6/42 [14%]) and placebo (13/42 [31%]) groups (p=0.12). Cumulative abstinence duration was about twofold higher in patients allocated baclofen than in those assigned placebo (mean 62.8 [SE 5.4] vs 30.8 [5.5] days; p=0.001). No hepatic side-effects were recorded.

INTERPRETATION

Baclofen is effective at promoting alcohol abstinence in alcohol-dependent patients with liver cirrhosis. The drug is well tolerated and could have an important role in treatment of these individuals.

Associations of a regulatory polymorphism of monoamine oxidase-A gene promoter (MAOA-uVNTR) with symptoms of depression and sleep quality

OBJECTIVE

To examine the relationships among the variable number of tandem repeats in the monoamine oxidase-A linked polymorphic region allelic variation (MAOA-uVNTR) and the symptoms of depression and sleep quality. The monoamine oxidase-A (MAOA) gene, which plays a vital role in degradation of neurotransmitters such as serotonin, norepinephrine, and dopamine, contains a polymorphism in its promoter region (MAOA-uVNTR) that affects transcriptional efficiency. MAOA-uVNTR genotype has been associated with both psychological and physical measures.

METHODS

The sample consisted of 74 males enrolled in a case/control study of caregivers for relatives with dementia. Age- and race-adjusted linear regression models were used to examine the association between low versus high MAOA-uVNTR activity alleles, symptoms of depression (Center for Epidemiological Studies of Depression), and sleep quality ratings (Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index).

RESULTS

MAOA-uVNTR alleles associated with less transcriptional activity were related to increased symptoms of depression (p < .04; Cohen's d = 0.52) and poorer sleep quality (p < .04; Cohen's d = 0.31).

CONCLUSIONS

Individuals with less active MAOA-uVNTR alleles may be at increased risk for depressive symptoms and poor sleep.

Brofaromine versus imipramine in in-patients with major depression--a controlled trial

Brofaromine is a selective and reversible inhibitor of monoamine oxidase A. The efficacy and safety of this compound as compared with tricyclic antidepressants, classical monoamine oxidase inhibitors and placebo has been demonstrated in several clinical trials. The present 6-week, double-blind, randomized trial compared brofaromine with imipramine in in-patients with major depression. Brofaromine was as effective as imipramine in the treatment of major depression, but exhibited a different side-effect profile, in particular lacking the anticholinergic and certain cardiovascular side-effects of the tricyclic imipramine, but more likely to induce sleep disturbances. In this study, in-patients were examined, since the majority of controlled clinical trials on depressed patients conducted so far have focused on the evaluation of out-patients. If one assumes that a different degree of severity of depression exists between these two patient groups, then the results of those trials conducted on out-patients cannot readily be transferred to in-patients.

Antidepressant treatment of depression: a metaanalysis

OBJECTIVE

To carry out a metaanalysis of antidepressant studies to calculate the effect sizes for antidepressant effect in depressive disorder.

METHOD

A metaanalysis of all antidepressant studies that included an active comparison drug as well as placebo was used to calculate the effect size. Articles were selected from a MEDLINE search for the period January 1966 to June 1995. Forty-nine studies were included in the metaanalysis.

RESULTS

The effect sizes for antidepressant treatment are moderately larger than for placebo. A larger effect size was observed in studies where objective diagnostic criteria for depression were used.

CONCLUSIONS

We conclude that the superior efficacy of antidepressants over placebo can be demonstrated.

Definition and epidemiology of treatment-resistant depression

Our results suggest that between 29% and 46% of depressed patients fail to respond fully with antidepressant treatment of adequate dose and duration. In particular, although partial response appears to occur in 12% to 15% of the depressed patients studied, nonresponse is observed in 19% to 34% of this population. The prevalence of treatment-resistant depression derived from studies using ITT analysis is likely to be an overestimate of the actual occurrence of the phenomenon, as these rates also reflect the outcome of patients who were treated inadequately or were intolerant to the treatment. On the other hand, data derived from studies using completer analysis are likely to generate under-estimates of the prevalence of this phenomenon, as patients may have dropped out before completion of the study due to lack of efficacy. One could, therefore, guess that the actual rates of treatment resistance in the clinical population of depressed patients probably lie between these two types of estimates. From an epidemiologic point of view, because the prevalence of depression has been estimated to vary from 2.6% to 5.5% in men and from 6.0% to 11.8% in women, one must conclude that treatment-resistant depression is a very common clinical problem that is likely to affect more than one third of depressed patients. In summary, treatment-resistant depression patients can be defined as those who fail to respond to standard doses (i.e., significantly superior to placebo in double-blind studies) of antidepressants administered continuously for at least 6 weeks. Additional requirements of this operational definition are an accurate diagnosis of depressive disorder, patient compliance with the treatment, the use of valid outcome measures, and therapeutic range of antidepressant blood levels for the tricyclic antidepressants. Finally, symptomatic improvement that is equal or greater than 25% and less than 50% qualifies as partial response, and less than 25% symptomatic improvement is complete nonresponse.

Brofaromine--a review of its pharmacological properties and therapeutic use

The antidepressant activity of monoamine oxidase inhibitors has been well established for 30 years. Nevertheless, this group of compounds was handled with great care, mainly because of the interaction potential with tyramine-containing foodstuff. With the discovery of reversible and selective inhibitors of monoamine oxidase type A a renaissance of these compounds has begun. In this paper one of these new substances--brofaromine--will be described in detail. Biochemical and pharmacological aspects will be reviewed, showing that brofaromine is a selective and reversible inhibitor of monoamine oxidase type A with additional serotonin reuptake inhibiting properties. Both mechanisms of action may synergize in the antidepressant effect of the compound. The main results of clinical trials in depression and other indication areas will also be covered. Special attention will be put on the side effect profile.

Social phobia: the clinical efficacy and tolerability of the monoamine oxidase -A and serotonin uptake inhibitor brofaromine. A double-blind placebo-controlled study

Seventy-seven patients with a primary diagnosis of social phobia (DSM-III-R) were randomized to treatment with the reversible and selective monoamine oxidase type A inhibitor brofaromine (n = 37) or placebo (n = 40) for 12 weeks in a double-blind trial. A fixed dose of 150 mg/day or a matching placebo was given after a 2-week dose titration phase. Patients with additional diagnoses of simple phobia, generalized anxiety disorder, dysthymia or major depressive disorder currently in remission were accepted. Patients with other Axis I mental disorders were excluded. In the brofaromine group, 78% of the patients scored much or very much improved on the Clinical Global Impression scale compared with 23% in the placebo group. The anxiety and avoidance scores on the Liebowitz Social Anxiety Scale (LSAS) were significantly reduced in favor of brofaromine. The clinical effects were not significantly correlated with the plasma concentration of brofaromine. After 12 weeks the brofaromine group scored significantly lower than the placebo group on a core depression part of the Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale. After 12 weeks of treatment the brofaromine group had significantly higher total scores on the LSAS than an age- and gender-matched group of healthy controls. The brofaromine group improved further during 9-month follow-up treatment period, whereas 60% of the placebo responders who continued long-term treatment relapsed. The most common side effects in the brofaromine group were sleep disturbances, dry mouth and nausea.