Screening of 24 pesticides by Salmonella/microsome assay: mutagenicity of benazolin, metoxuron and paraoxon

A core in vitro genotoxicity battery comprising the Ames test plus the in vitro micronucleus test is sufficient to detect rodent carcinogens and in vivo genotoxins

In vitro genotoxicity testing needs to include tests in both bacterial and mammalian cells, and be able to detect gene mutations, chromosomal damage and aneuploidy. This may be achieved by a combination of the Ames test (detects gene mutations) and the in vitro micronucleus test (MNvit), since the latter detects both chromosomal aberrations and aneuploidy. In this paper we therefore present an analysis of an existing database of rodent carcinogens and a new database of in vivo genotoxins in terms of the in vitro genotoxicity tests needed to detect their in vivo activity. Published in vitro data from at least one test system (most were from the Ames test) were available for 557 carcinogens and 405 in vivo genotoxins. Because there are fewer publications on the MNvit than for other mammalian cell tests, and because the concordance between the MNvit and the in vitro chromosomal aberration (CAvit) test is so high for clastogenic activity, positive results in the CAvit test were taken as indicative of a positive result in the MNvit where there were no, or only inadequate data for the latter. Also, because Hprt and Tk loci both detect gene-mutation activity, a positive Hprt test was taken as indicative of a mouse-lymphoma Tk assay (MLA)-positive, where there were no data for the latter. Almost all of the 962 rodent carcinogens and in vivo genotoxins were detected by an in vitro battery comprising Ames+MNvit. An additional 11 carcinogens and six in vivo genotoxins would apparently be detected by the MLA, but many of these had not been tested in the MNvit or CAvit tests. Only four chemicals emerge as potentially being more readily detected in MLA than in Ames+MNvit--benzyl acetate, toluene, morphine and thiabendazole--and none of these are convincing cases to argue for the inclusion of the MLA in addition to Ames+MNvit. Thus, there is no convincing evidence that any genotoxic rodent carcinogens or in vivo genotoxins would remain undetected in an in vitro test battery consisting of Ames+MNvit.

Human health risk assessment of endosulfan. I: Toxicology and hazard identification

Endosulfan is persistent in the environment and toxic to wildlife. Legal mandates necessitate that a risk assessments be performed for endosulfan by the California Department of Pesticide Regulation (CDPR) and the United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). This hazard identification (hazard ID) compared critical no-observed effect levels (NOEL) for acute, subchronic and chronic exposure intervals between the agencies. NOELs were discussed in light of their application to numerous exposure scenarios (occupational, general population and dietary). Only the acute oral NOELs differed between CDPR (0.7 mg/kg/day) and USEPA (1.5 mg/kg/day). Pregnant rabbits were considered by CDPR to be more responsive to low gavage doses of endosulfan than non-pregnant female or male rats in the acute study selected by USEPA. NOELs for other exposure routes and durations were similar between agencies. CDPR and USEPA concurred that a Food Quality Protection Act (FQPA, 1996) Safety Factor is not needed after evaluating all studies including a Developmental Neurotoxicity study. The SF was reduced to 1x. NOELs generated from this hazard ID will be used to calculate the Margins of Exposure for all scenarios and subsequently the risk characterization for endosulfan.

The cytology and biochemistry of pesticide microbiology

Widespread use of pesticides has no doubt benefited human beings in one way or another. However, their side effects on various organisms, including nontarget organisms, are largely overlooked. In the recent past, several studies have been done to assess the effects of pesticides on nontarget organisms, including microorganisms. Although pesticide effects on growth parameters of microorganisms have been extensively reviewed, little attention has been paid regarding their cytological and biochemical aspects. Therefore, the present work is mainly concerned with the cytological and biochemical aspects of pesticide microbiology. The effects of pesticides on photosynthesis, respiration, proteins, and nucleic acids are reviewed. Attention is also paid to their effects on cell morphology and morphogenesis and their effect on cell constituents.

Detection of point-mutation mutagens in Aspergillus nidulans: comparison of methionine suppressors and arginine resistance induction by fungicides

In the present study we describe the effect of 4 fungicides on the induction of point mutations in strains biA1 methG1 (induction of methionine suppressors) and 118 (induction of arginine resistance) of Aspergillus nidulans. Captan, which was used as a known mutagen, Daconil 2787 and Dithane M-45 were effective in inducing these mutations, whereas the fungicide Cercobin caused no significant increase in the induction frequency of the point mutations selected. Actually, a decrease in the frequency of methionine suppressors was observed in relation to those occurring spontaneously. However, this effect could not be considered antimutagenic because the revertants were more sensitive to the fungicide than the biA1 methG1 strain. Although the induction of methionine suppressors was more convenient because it permits the visualization of several morphological types, the 118 strain system also proved to be effective in detecting point-mutation induction.