Secretin immunoreactivity in rat and pig brain

Gut peptide regulation of food intake - evidence for the modulation of hedonic feeding

The number of people living with obesity has tripled worldwide since 1975 with serious implications for public health, as obesity is linked to a significantly higher chance of early death from associated comorbidities (metabolic syndrome, type 2 diabetes, cardiovascular disease and cancer). As obesity is a consequence of food intake exceeding the demands of energy expenditure, efforts are being made to better understand the homeostatic and hedonic mechanisms governing food intake. Gastrointestinal peptides are secreted from enteroendocrine cells in response to nutrient and energy intake, and modulate food intake either via afferent nerves, including the vagus nerve, or directly within the central nervous system, predominantly gaining access at circumventricular organs. Enteroendocrine hormones modulate homeostatic control centres at hypothalamic nuclei and the dorso-vagal complex. Additional roles of these peptides in modulating hedonic food intake and/or preference via the neural systems of reward are starting to be elucidated, with both peripheral and central peptide sources potentially contributing to central receptor activation. Pharmacological interventions and gastric bypass surgery for the treatment of type 2 diabetes and obesity elevate enteroendocrine hormone levels and also alter food preference. Hence, understanding of the hedonic mechanisms mediated by gut peptide action could advance development of potential therapeutic strategies for the treatment of obesity and its comorbidities.

Distribution and Functional Implication of Secretin in Multiple Brain Regions

Secretin is a polypeptide hormone initially identified for its gastrointestinal functions. However, emerging evidences show wide distribution of secretin and secretin receptor across various brain regions from cerebral cortex, hippocampus, hypothalamus to cerebellum. In this mini review, we will firstly describe the region-specific expression pattern of secretin and secretin receptor in the brain, followed by a summary of central physiological and neurological functions mediated by secretin. Using genetic manipulation and pharmaceutical approaches, one can elucidate the role of secretin in mediating various neurological functions from simple behaviors, such as water and food intake, to more complex functions including emotion, motor, and learning or memory. At last, current weakness and future perspectives of secretin in the central nervous system will be discussed, aiming to provide the potency of using secretin or its analog for treating various neurological disorders.

Secretin, at the hub of water-salt homeostasis

Water and salt metabolism are tightly regulated processes. Maintaining this milieu intérieur within narrow limits is critical for normal physiological processes to take place. Disturbances to this balance can result in disease and even death. Some of the better-characterized regulators of water and salt homeostasis include angiotensin II, aldosterone, arginine vasopressin, and oxytocin. Although secretin (SCT) was first described >100 years ago, little is known about the role of this classic gastrointestinal hormone in the maintenance of water-salt homeostasis. In recent years, increasing body of evidence suggested that SCT and its receptor play important roles in the central nervous system and kidney to ensure that the mammalian extracellular fluid osmolarity is kept within a healthy range. In this review, we focus on recent advances in our understanding of the molecular, cellular, and network mechanisms by which SCT and its receptor mediate the control of osmotic homeostasis. Implications of hormonal cross talk and receptor-receptor interaction are highlighted.

The physiological roles of secretin and its receptor

Secretin is secreted by S cells in the small intestine and affects the function of a number of organ systems. Secretin receptors (SR) are expressed in the basolateral domain of several cell types. In addition to regulating the secretion of a number of epithelia (e.g., in the pancreas and biliary epithelium in the liver), secretin exerts trophic effects in several cell types. In this article, we will provide a comprehensive review on the multiple roles of secretin and SR signaling in the regulation of epithelial functions in various organ systems with particular emphasis in the liver. We will discuss the role of secretin and its receptor in health and biliary disease pathogenesis. Finally, we propose future areas of research for the further evaluation of the secretin/secretin receptor axis in liver pathophysiology.

The central mechanisms of secretin in regulating multiple behaviors

Secretin (SCT) was firstly discovered as a gut peptide hormone in stimulating pancreatic secretion, while its novel neuropeptide role has drawn substantial research interests in recent years. SCT and its receptor (SCTR) are widely expressed in different brain regions, where they exert multiple cellular functions including neurotransmission, gene expression regulation, neurogenesis, and neural protection. As all these neural functions ultimately can affect behaviors, it is hypothesized that SCT controls multiple behavioral paradigms. Current findings support this hypothesis as SCT-SCTR axis participates in modulating social interaction, spatial learning, water and food intake, motor coordination, and motor learning behaviors. This mini-review focuses on various aspects of SCT and SCTR in hippocampus, hypothalamus, and cerebellum including distribution profiles, cellular functions, and behavioral phenotypes to elucidate the link between cellular mechanisms and behavioral control.

Metabolic effects of secretin

Secretin (Sct), traditionally a gastrointestinal hormone backed by a century long research, is now beginning to be recognized also as a neuroactive peptide. Substantiation by recent evidence on the functional role of Sct in various regions of the brain, especially on its potential neurosecretion from the posterior pituitary, has revealed Sct's physiological actions in regulating water homeostasis. Recent advances in understanding the functional roles of central and peripheral Sct has been made possible by the development of Sct and Sct receptor (SctR) knockout animal models which have led to novel approaches in research on the physiology of this brain-gut peptide. While research on the role of Sct in appetite regulation and fatty acid metabolism has been initiated recently, its role in glucose homeostasis is unclear. This review focuses mainly on the metabolic role of Sct by discussing data from the last century and recent discoveries, with emphasis on the need for revisiting and elucidating the role of Sct in metabolism and energy homeostasis.

Distribution of secretin receptors in the rat central nervous system: an in situ hybridization study

Secretin shows a wide distribution in the brain. Functional significance of central secretin is stressed since it has been associated with autism and schizophrenia. The presence of the secretin receptor was previously demonstrated in the brain by different methods. Neurons in the cerebellum, hypothalamic paraventricular and supraoptic nuclei, and in the vascular organ of lamina terminalis were shown to express secretin receptor mRNA by using in situ hybridization with digoxigenin-labeled probe. In this work, we used a very sensitive radioactive in situ hybridization technique and systematically mapped the expression of secretin receptor mRNA in the brain. The densest labeling was observed in the nucleus of solitary tract and in the laterodorsal thalamic nucleus, where decreasing number of receptors was seen in the vascular organ of lamina terminalis, and the lateral habenular complex, and then in the supraoptic nucleus. Only a few scattered labeled cells were observed in the median frontal gyrus, entorhinal cortex, hypothalamic paraventricular nucleus, perifornical region, lateral hypothalamic area, head of the caudate nucleus, spinal trigeminal nucleus, and cerebellum. Secretin receptor mRNA showed a far wider distribution than was known before, suggesting a more significant functional relevance than thought earlier.

Intranasal application of secretin, similarly to intracerebroventricular administration, influences the motor behavior of mice probably through specific receptors

Secretin and its receptors show wide distribution in the central nervous system. It was demonstrated previously that intravenous (i.v.) and intracerebroventricular (i.c.v.) application of secretin influenced the behavior of rat, mouse, and human. In our previous experiment, we used a special animal model, Japanese waltzing mice (JWM). These animals run around without stopping (the ambulation distance is very limited) and they do not bother with their environment. The i.c.v. secretin attenuated this hyperactive repetitive movement. In the present work, the effect of i.c.v. and intranasal (i.n.) application of secretin was compared. We have also looked for the presence of secretin receptors in the brain structures related to motor functions. Two micrograms of i.c.v. secretin improved the horizontal movement of JWM, enhancing the ambulation distance. It was nearly threefold higher in treated than in control animals. The i.n. application of secretin to the left nostril once or twice a day or once for 3 days more effectively enhanced the ambulation distance than i.c.v. administration. When secretin was given twice a day for 3 days it had no effect. Secretin did not improve the explorative behavior (the rearing), of JWM. With the use of in situ hybridization, we have found very dense secretin receptor labeling in the cerebellum. In the primary motor cortex and in the striatum, only a few labeled cells were seen. It was supposed that secretin exerted its effect through specific receptors, mainly present in the cerebellum.

Intravenous secretin for autism spectrum disorders (ASD)

BACKGROUND

In 1998 secretin, a gastrointestinal hormone, was suggested as an effective treatment for autism spectrum disorders (ASD) based on anecdotal evidence.

OBJECTIVES

To assess whether intravenous secretin improves the core features of ASD, other aspects of behaviour or function such as self-injurious behaviour, and the quality of life of affected individuals and their carers. We also assessed whether secretin causes harm. This is an updated version of our review of this topic originally published in 2005.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched CENTRAL (2010 Issue 1), MEDLINE (1950 to January 2010) , EMBASE (1980 to 2010 Week 2), PsycINFO (1806 to 2010 Week 2), CINAHL (1938 to January 2010), ERIC (1966 to January 2010), Sociological Abstracts (1952 to January 2010). Sociofile and HealthStar were searched in March 2005 when this review was first published, but were not available for this update. Records were limited to studies published since 1998 as this is when secretin was first proposed as a possible treatment for ASD. We searched reference lists of trials and reviews; we also contacted experts and trialists to find unpublished studies.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised controlled trials of intravenous secretin compared to a placebo treatment in children or adults diagnosed with ASD, where at least one standardised outcome measure was reported.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Sixteen studies met the inclusion criteria but for two of these, conducted by Repligen, the only available multisite data were reported in press releases. All outcome data from the other 14 trials were continuous. Where trials used cross-over designs, we conducted analysis on results from the first treatment phase. Where mean change from baseline was reported, we used this in preference to post-treatment scores for meta-analyses or forest plots. Meta-analysis was able to be attempted for only one outcome (Childhood Autism Rating Scale). Insufficient data were available to conduct sensitivity or subgroup analyses to assess the impact of study quality, clinical differences in the intervention or clinically relevant differences between groups, such as age or presence of gastrointestinal symptoms.

MAIN RESULTS

Over 900 children were recruited for the secretin trials. Twenty-five established standardised outcome measures were reported to assess core features of ASD, communication, behaviour, visuospatial skills, affect and adverse events. One standardised measure of global impression was also used. No more than four studies used any one outcome measure similarly. When duration from the start of the intervention to outcome assessment was known, outcomes were reported at between three and six weeks. Meta-analysis of data was not possible but there is now consistency of findings, with RCTs of the efficacy of secretin in autism not showing improvements for core features of ASD.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

There is no evidence that single or multiple dose intravenous secretin is effective and as such currently it should not be recommended or administered as a treatment for ASD. Further experimental assessment of secretin's effectiveness for ASD can only be justified if there is new high-quality and replicated scientific evidence that either finds that secretin has a role in neurotransmission in a way that could benefit all children with ASD or identifies important subgroups of children with ASD who could benefit from secretin because of a proven link between the action of secretin and the known cause of their ASD, or the type of problems they are experiencing.

Central and peripheral administration of secretin inhibits food intake in mice through the activation of the melanocortin system

Secretin (Sct) is released into the circulation postprandially from the duodenal S-cells. The major functions of Sct originated from the gastrointestinal system are to delay gastric emptying, stimulate fluid secretion from pancreas and liver, and hence optimize the digestion process. In recent years, Sct and its receptor (Sctr) have been identified in discrete nuclei of the hypothalamus, including the paraventricular nucleus (PVN) and the arcuate nucleus (Arc). These nuclei are the primary brain sites that are engaged in regulating body energy homeostasis, thus providing anatomical evidence to support a functional role of Sct in appetite control. In this study, the effect of Sct on feeding behavior was investigated using wild-type (wt), Sct(-/-), and secretin receptor-deficient (Sctr(-/-)) mice. We found that both central and peripheral administration of Sct could induce Fos expression in the PVN and Arc, suggesting the activation of hypothalamic feeding centers by this peptide. Consistent with this notion, Sct was found to increase thyrotropin-releasing hormone and melanocortin-4 receptor (Mc4r) transcripts in the PVN, and augment proopiomelanocortin, but reduces agouti-related protein mRNA expression in the Arc. Injection of Sct was able to suppress food intake in wt mice, but not in Sctr(-/-) mice, and that this effect was abolished upon pretreatment with SHU9119, an antagonist for Mc4r. In summary, our data suggest for the first time that Sct is an anorectic peptide, and that this function is mediated by the melanocortin system.

Secretin attenuates the hereditary repetitive hyperactive movements in a mouse model

It was previously demonstrated that secretin influenced the behavior of rats investigated by open-field test. In the present experiment, we have compared the effect of intracerebroventricular administration of 2 μg of secretin on the behavior of CFLP white and Japanese waltzing mice. These latter animals exhibit stereotypic circular movements. The effect of secretin on the horizontal (ambulation) and vertical movements (rearing and jumping) was investigated in open-field test. The ambulation time and distance were shorter, and the number of rearing and jumping were much lower in Japanese waltzing mice than in CFLP white mice during 30 min-experimental period. In white mice, 2 μg of secretin had no effect on the above-mentioned parameters; however, in Japanese waltzing mice, secretin enhanced the ambulation time and distance to the level of CFLP white mice, but did not influence the rearing and jumping. On the basis of the results, it was concluded that intracerebroventricularly administered secretin attenuated the stereotypic (circulating) movement and improved the horizontal movement indicated by the normalization of the ambulation time and distance; however, it did not influence the explorative behavior (rearing and jumping) in our special animal model.

Secretin mRNA in the subdivision of primary sensory neurons in the trigeminal ganglion of rats

The primary sensory neurons use glutamate as a major neurotransmitter. Several neuropeptides are also found in these neurons. In our laboratory we demonstrated secretin-like immunoreactivity in primary sensory neurons of several species including human, rat and cat. In the present experiment utilizing in situ hybridization, we have demonstrated for the first time that secretin is not only immunostained but is also expressed in the primary sensory neurons of the trigeminal ganglion of male rats. In intact rats, secretin mRNA was not observed; we had to use intracerebroventricular colchicine administration to induce the expression of secretin. Secretin was expressed in about 5% of the cells in all the three subdivisions of the trigeminal ganglion. The secretin-synthetizing cells were large and medium sized, and their mean diameter was about 50 μm. When we compared the percentage and the size of secretin to that of calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP), substance-P (SP) and vasoactive intestinal polypeptide (VIP) cells, it was found that CGRP, SP and VIP are present in about 15-20% of the cells and their mean diameter is about 20-25 μm. The morphometric data indicate that secretin is present in a subdivision of neurons that is different from the subdivision of the CGRP, SP and VIP cells. It is suggested that secretin may modulate the function of the primary neurotransmitter.

Multiple actions of secretin in the human body

The discovery of secretin initiated the field of endocrinology. Over the past century, multiple gastrointestinal functions of secretin have been extensively studied, and it was discovered that the principal function of this peptide in the gastrointestinal system is to facilitate digestion and to provide protection. In view of the late identification of secretin and the secretin receptor in various tissues, including the central nervous system, the pleiotropic functions of secretin have more recently been an area of intense focus. Secretin is a classical hormone, and recent studies clearly showed secretin's involvement in neural and neuroendocrine pathways, although the neuroactivity and neural regulation of its release are yet to be elucidated. This chapter reviews our current understanding of the pleiotropic actions of secretin with a special focus on the hormonal and neural interdependent pathways that mediate these actions.

Intravenous secretin for autism spectrum disorder

BACKGROUND

Secretin is a gastro-intestinal hormone which has been presented as an effective treatment for autism based on anecdotal evidence.

OBJECTIVES

To determine if intravenous secretin:1. improves the core features of autism (social interaction, communication and behaviour problems); 2. improves the non-core aspects of behaviour or function such as self injurious behaviour;3. improves the quality of life of affected individuals and their carers; 4. has short term and long term effects on outcome; 5. causes harm.

SEARCH STRATEGY

Results of electronic searches of CENTRAL, MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsycINFO, CINAHL, ERIC, HealthStar and Sociofile (1998 - March 2005) were independently examined by two authors. Reference lists of trials and reviews were searched; experts and trialists were contacted to find unpublished studies.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised controlled trials of intravenous secretin comparing secretin with a placebo treatment in children or adults diagnosed with autism spectrum disorders, where at least one standardised outcome measure was reported.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Fourteen studies met inclusion criteria. All outcome data were continuous. Where trials used cross-over designs, analysis was conducted on results from first treatment phase, allowing combined analysis with parallel design trials. Where standardised assessment tools generated scores as outcome measures, comparisons were made between means of these scores. Where baseline means were reported, differences between treatment and control were determined to assess possible bias. Where mean change from baseline was reported, this was used in preference to post-treatment scores for meta-analyses or forest plots. As meta-analysis was possible for only one outcome (Childhood Autism Rating Scale), it was impossible to use sensitivity or subgroup analyses to assess impact of study quality, clinical differences in the intervention, or clinically relevant differences between groups, such as age or presence of gastrointestinal symptoms.

MAIN RESULTS

Twenty-five established standardised outcome measures were reported to assess core features of autism, communication, behaviour, visio-spatial skills, affect and adverse events within fourteen included studies. No more than four studies used any one outcome measure similarly. Outcomes were reported between three and six weeks. RCTs of efficacy of secretin in autism have not shown improvements for core features of autism.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

There is no evidence that single or multiple dose intravenous secretin is effective and as such it should not currently be recommended or administered as a treatment for autism. Further experimental assessment of secretin's effectiveness for autism can only be justified if methodological problems of existing research can be overcome.

Partial reversal of phencyclidine-induced impairment of prepulse inhibition by secretin

BACKGROUND

Secretin is a "gut-brain" peptide whose neural function is as yet poorly understood. Several clinical studies have reported modestly increased social interaction in autistic children following intravenous secretin administration. Very recently secretin also was administered to schizophrenic patients and found to increase social interaction in some individuals.

METHODS

In light of this finding, we assessed the ability of secretin to reverse phencyclidine- (PCP) induced impairment in prepulse inhibition (PPI), a leading animal model of sensorimotor gating deficits in schizophrenia.

RESULTS

Similar to atypical antipsychotics, secretin (1, 3, 10, 30, and 100 microg/kg) partially and dose-dependently reversed the PCP-induced deficit in PPI without significantly affecting baseline startle when administered intraperitoneally (IP) 10 minutes following IP administration of PCP (3 mg/kg).

CONCLUSIONS

This finding may be relevant to observations of antipsychotic efficacy of secretin in schizophrenic patients as well as our previous report that systemically administered secretin is capable of modulating conditioned fear, even at quite low doses.

Secretin and autism: a basic morphological study about the distribution of secretin in the nervous system

For the first time, the relationship between secretin and autism has been demonstrated by one of us. Intravenous administration of secretin in autistic children caused a fivefold higher pancreaticobiliary fluid secretion than in healthy ones and, at least in some of the patients, better mental functions were reported after the secretin test. Because the precise localization of secretin in the brain is still not completely known, the abovementioned observation led us to map secretin immunoreactivity in the nervous system of several mammalian species. In the present work, the distribution of secretin immunoreactivity in cat and human nervous systems was compared with that of rats using an immunohistochemical approach. Secretin immunoreactivity was observed in the following brain structures of both humans and in colchicine-treated rats: (1) Purkinje cells in the cerebellar cortex; (2) central cerebellar nuclei; (3) pyramidal cells in the motor cortex; and (4) primary sensory neurons. Additionally, secretin immnoreactive cells were observed in the human hippocampus and amygdala and in third-order sensory neurons of the rat auditory system. In cats, secretin was only observed in the spinal ganglia. Our findings support the view that secretin is not only a gastrointestinal peptide but that it is also a neuropeptide. Its presence or the lack of its presence may have a role in the development of behavioral disorders.

Secretin: hypothalamic distribution and hypothesized neuroregulatory role in autism

1. This study aims (1) to determine whether secretin is synthesized centrally, specifically by the HPA axis and (2) to discuss, on the basis of the findings in this and previous studies, secretin's possible neuroregulatory role in autism. 2. An immunocytochemical technique with single-cell resolution was performed in 12 age/weight-matched male rats pretreated with stereotaxic microinjection of colchicine (0.6 microg/kg) or vehicle into the lateral ventricle. Following 2-day survival, rats were anesthetized and perfused for immunocytochemistry. Brain segments were blocked and alternate frozen 30-microm sections incubated in rabbit antibodies against secretin, vasoactive intestinal peptide, glucagon, or pituitary-adenylate-cyclase-activating peptide. Adjacent sections were processed for Nissl stain. Preadsorption studies were performed with members of the secretin peptide family to demonstrate primary antibody specificity. 3. Specificity of secretin immunoreactivity (ir) was verified by clear-cut preadsorption control data and relatively high concentrations and distinct topographic localization of secretin ir to paraventricular/supraoptic and intercalated hypothalamic nuclei. Secretin levels were upregulated by colchicine, an exemplar of homeostatic stressors, as compared with low constitutive expression in untreated rats. 4. This study provides the first direct immunocytochemical demonstration of secretinergic immunoreactivity in the forebrain and offers evidence that the hypothalamus, like the gut, is capable of synthesizing secretin. Secretin's dual expression by gut and brain secretin cells, as well as its overlapping central distribution with other stress-adaptation neurohormones, especially oxytocin, indicates that it is stress-sensitive. A neuroregulatory relationship between the peripheral and central stress response systems is suggested, as is a dual role for secretin in conditioning both of those stress-adaptation systems. Colchicine-induced upregulation of secretin indicates that secretin may be synthesized on demand in response to stress, a possible mechanism of action that may underlie secretin's role in autism.

Children with autistic spectrum disorders. I: comparison of placebo and single dose of human synthetic secretin

AIMS

To examine the effect of a single dose of human synthetic secretin (HSS) on behaviour and communication in children with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) using an objective measure of communication and social reciprocity and standardised rating scales.

METHODS

Randomised, crossover, double blind, and placebo controlled trial of a single intravenous dose of human synthetic secretin (HSS) 2 CU/kg. The 62 subjects (3-8 years) were assigned to group 1 (saline placebo/HSS) or group 2 (HSS/saline placebo). Diagnosis was confirmed by ADI-R (Autism Diagnostic Interview-Revised) algorithm. Severity of symptoms was rated using the CARS (Childhood Autism Rating Scale). Outcome measures included Communication and Symbolic Behavior Scale (CSBS), Ritvo Real-life Rating Scale, weekly Global Rating Scale (GBRS) by parents and teachers, and daily log of gastrointestinal symptoms. The communication subscale of the CSBS, specifying communication function, reciprocity, and social-affective signalling was videotaped and scored by a blinded, trained observer.

RESULTS

Sixty one children completed the study. After randomisation, there were no significant differences in gender, race, age, and parent and teacher GBRS and Ritvo Scale between the two groups. Compared with placebo, secretin treatment was not associated with significant improvement of CSBS standard scores from baseline to 2 or 4 weeks post-infusion. Five children showed clinical improvement in standard scores: two after HSS and three after placebo. There were no significant changes in gastrointestinal symptoms after HSS or saline placebo.

CONCLUSIONS

A single dose of intravenous human secretin is not effective in changing behaviour and communication in children with ASD when compared to placebo.

What may be the anatomical basis that secretin can improve the mental functions in autism?

Autism was first described and characterized as a behavioral disorder more than 50 years ago. The major abnormality in the central nervous system is a cerebellar atrophy. The characteristic histological sign is a striking loss or abnormal development in the Purkinje cell count. Abnormalities were also found in the limbic system, in the parietal and frontal cortex, and in the brain stem. The relation between secretin and autism was observed 3 years ago. Clinical observations by Horváth et al. [J. Assoc. Acad. Minor. Physicians 9 (1998) 9] supposed a defect in the role of secretin and its receptors in autism. The aim of the present work was to study the precise localization of secretin immunoreactivity in the nervous system using an immunohistochemical approach. No secretin immunoreactivity was observed in the forebrain structures. In the brain stem, secretin immunoreactivity was observed in the mesencephalic nucleus of the trigeminal nerve, in the superior olivary nucleus, and in scattered cells of the reticular formation. The most intensive secretin immunoreactivity was observed in the Purkinje cells of the whole cerebellum and in some of the neurons of the central cerebellar nuclei. Secretin immunoreactivity was also observed in a subpopulation of neurons in the primary sensory ganglia. This work is the first immunohistochemical demonstration of secretin-immunoreactive elements in the brain stem and in primary sensory ganglia.

Secretin, glucagon, gastric inhibitory polypeptide, parathyroid hormone, and related peptides in the regulation of the hypothalamus- pituitary-adrenal axis

Secretin, glucagon, gastric inhibitory polypeptide (GIP), and parathyroid hormone (PTH) belong, together with vasoactive intestinal peptide (VIP) and pituitary adenylate cyclase (AC)-activating polypeptide, to a family of peptides (the VIP-secretin-glucagon family), which also includes growth hormone-releasing hormone and exendins. All the members of this peptide family possess a remarkable amino-acid sequence homology, and bind to G-protein-coupled receptors, whose signaling mechanism primarily involves AC/protein kinase A and phospholipase C/protein kinase C cascades. VIP and pituitary AC-activating polypeptide play a role in the regulation of the hypothalamus-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis, and in this review we survey findings that also other members of the VIP-secretin-glucagon family may have the same function. Secretin and secretin receptors are expressed in the hypothalamus and pituitary gland, and secretin inhibits adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH) release. No evidence is available for the presence of secretin receptors in adrenal glands, but secretin selectively depresses the glucocorticoid response to ACTH of dispersed zona fasciculata-reticularis (ZF/R) cells. Glucagon and glucagon-like peptide-1 are contained in the hypothalamus, and all the components of the HPA axis are provided with glucagon and glucagons-like-1 receptors. These peptides exert a short-term inhibitory effect on stress-induced pituitary ACTH release and depress the ZF/R cell response to ACTH by inhibiting the AC/protein kinase A cascade; they also stimulate hypothalamic arginine-vasopressin release. GIP receptors are present in the ZF/R of the normal adrenals, and are particularly abundant in some types of adrenocortical adenomas and hyperplasias. GIP, through the activation of the AC/protein kinase A cascade, evokes a sizeable glucocorticoid secretagogue effect, leading to the identification of a food/GIP-dependent Cushing's syndrome. PTH and PTH-related protein are expressed in the hypothalamus and pituitary gland, and PTH and PTH-related protein receptors in all the components of the HPA axis. Both peptides enhance ACTH and arginine-vasopressin release, as well as stimulate aldosterone and glucocorticoid secretion of dispersed zona glomerulosa and ZF/R cells, respectively. The involvement of growth hormone-releasing hormone and exendins in the functional regulation of the HPA axis has not yet been extensively investigated.

Intracerebroventricular secretin enhances pancreatic volume and bicarbonate response in rats

BACKGROUND

Although secretin has been found within the brain, its central role in pancreatic exocrine function has not been previously addressed. The hypothesis that intracerebroventricular secretin enhances pancreatic volume and bicarbonate output at doses that have no effect when given intravenously was tested.

METHODS

Sprague-Dawley rats had a cannula stereotactically placed into the left lateral cerebral ventricle 24 hours before study. At laparotomy the bile and pancreatic ducts were separately cannulated and excluded for tared collections and bicarbonate assay.

RESULTS

Increasing doses of intracerebroventricular secretin (0.005, 0.05, and 0.5 microgram/1.0 microliter) induced a significant dose-related increase in bicarbonate output (2.95, 3.32, and 4.02 microEq/30 min, respectively) above basal (2.62 microEq/30 min) compared with control or intracerebroventricular saline treated animals. Pancreatic volume increased to 59.7 microliters at the lowest intracerebroventricular dose and increased (p < 0.025) to 65.8 microliters at the 0.05 intracerebroventricular secretin dose when compared with basal (59.4 microliters). To show that this was not a systemic effect of secretin, intravenous infusion of secretin at 0.005 and 0.05 microgram/kg/hr failed to stimulate either volume or bicarbonate output compared with that observed with intracerebroventricular secretin over the same dose range.

CONCLUSIONS

These observations indicate that intracerebroventricular secretin stimulates pancreatic volume and bicarbonate output and suggest that central secretin may play a role in the regulation of exocrine pancreatic secretion.

Effects of secretin on acute and chronic effects of morphine

The effects of intracerebroventricularly (ICV) administered secretin on the analgesic, tolerance-inducing, and dependence-inducing actions of morphine were investigated, in adult, male CFLP mice. Secretin administered doses ICV did not itself affect pain sensitivity in a heat-radiant tail flick test. However, it depressed the acute nociceptive effect of a single subcutaneous (SC) dose of morphine (4 mg/kg) after ICV (1 or 10 ng/animal) secretin administration. A dose of 10 ng secretin facilitated the development of acute morphine tolerance. On the other hand, none of the doses applied had any influence on chronic morphine tolerance, where animals were implanted SC with a morphine- containing pellet and the pain sensitivity was measured 3 days later. Morphine withdrawal signs were also evaluated by injecting naloxone. In a 100-ng dose, secretin increased the latency of the withdrawal jumping response; the peptide did not modify the other abstinence signs. These data suggest that central secretin administration can modify the analgesic effect of morphine.

Localization of vasoactive intestinal peptide- and peptide histidine isoleucine amide-like immunoreactivities in the rat superior cervical ganglion and its nerve trunks

Electrical stimulation of the preganglionic cervical sympathetic trunk causes an increase in dopa synthesis in the postganglionic neurons in the superior cervical ganglion (SCG). This transsynaptic biochemical effect can be blocked only partially by cholinergic antagonists, suggesting the involvement of a noncholinergic preganglionic sympathetic neurotransmitter(s). A survey of a large number of possible candidates for this neurotransmitter revealed that, in addition to cholinergic agonists, only a small group of peptides (all members of the secretin-glucagon family) stimulated dopa synthesis in the SCG. The effective peptides included vasoactive intestinal peptide (VIP), peptide histidine isoleucine amide (PHI), and secretin. Consequently we looked for the presence of immunoreactivities for these three peptides in the SCG. VIP- and PHI-like immunoreactive fibers were found in the SCG and in its major pre- and postganglionic nerve trunks. The distributions of the two immunoreactivities were very similar. Immunoreactive fibers were seen both singly and in bundles. In some instances, fibers were found apposed to neuronal cell bodies in the ganglion, and occasionally dense plexuses of fibers were found surrounding the neurons. In addition, punctate immunoreactive profiles were found apposed to the neurons in what appeared to be terminal fields. A small number of immunoreactive neuronal cell bodies were also seen in the ganglion. In a few instances, it was possible to establish, in serial sections, that the same cell body was immunostained with both VIP and PHI antisera. No secretin like-immunoreactive fibers or cells were observed. The presence of VIP-like and PHI-like-immunoreactive fibers in the cervical sympathetic trunk and in the SCG strengthens the possibility that these peptides, or a related molecule(s), serve as preganglionic neurotransmitters in this ganglion.

The regional distribution of receptors for vasoactive intestinal polypeptide (VIP) in the rat central nervous system

The regional distribution of receptors for vasoactive intestinal polypeptide (VIP) was studied in the rat central nervous system (CNS). The specific binding was highest in cerebral cortex, limbic forebrain and cerebellum, whereas moderate to low binding was found in hypothalamus, thalamus, brainstem and pituitary. The lowest binding was observed in pons and spinal cord. Scatchard analysis showed curvilinear plots with upward concavity, which was interpreted as two classes of binding sites. The Kd values were similar in all regions and calculated as 2.4 and 62 nmol/liter, respectively. The variations of specific [125I]VIP binding were due to differences in the total amount of receptors and were in the range of 1.7-8.6 pmol per mg protein. The regional distribution of VIP receptors was parallel with the occurrence of VIP-containing nerve terminals with exceptions of cerebellum, olfactory areas and nucleus caudatus, where a greater number of receptors than expected from the VIP content was found. In these regions, VIP may interact with receptors for a different, but homologous neuropeptide. In conclusion, the regional distribution of VIP receptors in CNS gives further evidence for the role of VIP as a central neurotransmitter.

Secretin modulation of behavioral and physiological functions in the rat

The effect of secretin on behavioral and physiological functions in the rat was investigated. Secretin injected intracerebroventricularly (ICV) significantly increased defecation and decreased novel-object approaches in rats. The peptide showed no significant effects on stereotypic behavior (gnawing, grooming and rearing), open-field locomotor activity however was significantly decreased, an effect that was probably due to a decreased propensity for the rats to initiate locomotor responses. In addition, secretin showed significant effects on respiration rate in anesthetized rats. When the peptide was injected in the lateral ventricle a decrease in respiration rate occurred, but when the brain was perfused from the lateral ventricle to the cisterna magna increases in respiration rate occurred. These data, combined with the facts that secretin and secretin receptors have been identified in the brain indicate that secretin may play a neurotransmitter or neuroregulator role in the central nervous system.

Secretin in the rat hypothalamo-pituitary system: localization, identification and characterization

Secretin-like immunoreactivity (SLI) has been identified and characterized in the pituitary of the rat. The concentration in the neurointermediate lobe is about 45 fold higher than the concentration of SLI observed in the anterior lobe. Transections of the pituitary stalk of the rat caused a significant depletion of SLI in the neurointermediate lobe without affecting the content in the anterior lobe. In view of the relatively high concentration of SLI reported to occur in the hypothalamus, it appears that there may be a secretinergic pathway between the brain and the neurointermediate lobe of the pituitary.