Attenuation of the anorectic effects of glucagon, cholecystokinin, and bombesin by the amylin receptor antagonist CGRP(8-37)

Amylin and Calcitonin: Potential Therapeutic Strategies to Reduce Body Weight and Liver Fat

The hormones amylin and calcitonin interact with receptors within the same family to exert their effects on the human organism. Calcitonin, derived from thyroid C cells, is known for its inhibitory effect on osteoclasts. Calcitonin of mammalian origin promotes insulin sensitivity, while the more potent calcitonin extracted from salmon additionally inhibits gastric emptying, promotes gallbladder relaxation, increases energy expenditure and induces satiety as well as weight loss. Amylin, derived from pancreatic beta cells, regulates plasma glucose by delaying gastric emptying after meal ingestion, and modulates glucagon secretion and central satiety signals in the brain. Thus, both hormones seem to have metabolic effects of relevance in the context of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) and other metabolic diseases. In rats, studies with dual amylin and calcitonin receptor agonists have demonstrated robust body weight loss, improved glucose tolerance and a decreased deposition of fat in liver tissue beyond what is observed after a body weight loss. The translational aspects of these preclinical data currently remain unknown. Here, we describe the physiology, pathophysiology, and pharmacological effects of amylin and calcitonin and review preclinical and clinical findings alluding to the future potential of amylin and calcitonin-based drugs for the treatment of obesity and NAFLD.

Gut hormones such as amylin and GLP-1 in the control of eating and energy expenditure

The control of meal size is the best studied aspect of the control of energy balance, and manipulation of this system constitutes a promising target to treat obesity. A major part of this control system is based on gastrointestinal hormones such as glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) or amylin, which are released in response to a meal and which limit the size of an ongoing meal. Both amylin and GLP-1 have also been shown to increase energy expenditure in experimental rodents, but mechanistically we know much less how this effect may be mediated, which brain sites may be involved, and what the physiological relevance of these findings may be. Most studies indicate that the effect of peripheral amylin is centrally mediated via the area postrema, but other brain areas, such as the ventral tegmental area, may also be involved. GLP-1's effect on eating seems to be mainly mediated by vagal afferents projecting to the caudal hindbrain. Chronic exposure to amylin, GLP-1 or their analogs decrease food intake and body weight gain. Next to the induction of satiation, amylin may also constitute an adiposity signal and in fact interact with the adiposity signal leptin. Amylin analogs are under clinical consideration for their effect to reduce food intake and body weight in humans, and similar to rodents, amylin analogs seem to be particularly active when combined with leptin analogs.

Endogenous VMH amylin signaling is required for full leptin signaling and protection from diet-induced obesity

Amylin enhances arcuate (ARC) and ventromedial (VMN) hypothalamic nuclei leptin signaling and synergistically reduces food intake and body weight in selectively bred diet-induced obese (DIO) rats. Since DIO (125)I-amylin dorsomedial nucleus-dorsomedial VMN binding was reduced, we postulated that this contributed to DIO ventromedial hypothalamus (VMH) leptin resistance, and that impairing VMH (ARC + VMN) calcitonin receptor (CTR)-mediated signaling by injecting adeno-associated virus (AAV) expressing a short hairpin portion of the CTR mRNA would predispose diet-resistant (DR) rats to obesity on high-fat (45%) diet (HFD). Depleting VMH CTR by 80-90% in 4-wk-old male DR rats reduced their ARC and VMN (125)I-labeled leptin binding by 57 and 51%, respectively, and VMN leptin-induced phospho-signal transducer and activator of transcription 3-positive neurons by 59% vs. AAV control rats. After 6 wk on chow, VMH CTR-depleted DR rats ate and gained the equivalent amount of food and weight but had 18% heavier fat pads (relative to carcass weight), 144% higher leptin levels, and were insulin resistant compared with control AAV DR rats. After 6 wk more on HFD, VMH CTR-depleted DR rats ate the same amount but gained 28% more weight, had 60% more carcass fat, 254% higher leptin levels, and 132% higher insulin areas under the curve during an oral glucose tolerance test than control DR rats. Therefore, impairing endogenous VMH CTR-mediated signaling reduced leptin signaling and caused DR rats to become more obese and insulin resistant, both on chow and HFD. These results suggest that endogenous VMH amylin signaling is required for full leptin signaling and protection from HFD-induced obesity.

Amylin activates distributed CNS nuclei to control energy balance

Amylin is a pancreas-derived neuropeptide that acts in the central nervous system (CNS) to reduce food intake. Much of the literature describing the anorectic effects of amylin are focused on amylin's actions in the area postrema, a hindbrain circumventricular structure. Although the area postrema is certainly an important site that mediates the intake-suppressive effects of amylin, several pieces of evidence indicate that amylin may also promote negative energy balance through action in additional CNS nuclei, including hypothalamic and mesolimbic structures. Therefore, this review highlights the distributed neural network mediating the feeding effects of amylin signaling with special attention being devoted to the recent discovery that the ventral tegmental area is physiologically relevant for amylin-mediated control of feeding. The production of amylin by alternative, extra-pancreatic sources and its potential relevance to food intake regulation is also considered. Finally, the utility of amylin and amylin-like compounds as a component of combination pharmacotherapies for the treatment of obesity is discussed.

The interaction of amylin with other hormones in the control of eating

Twenty years of research established amylin as an important control of energy homeostasis. Amylin controls nutrient and energy fluxes by reducing energy intake, by modulating nutrient utilization via an inhibition of postprandial glucagon secretion and by increasing energy disposal via a prevention of compensatory decreases of energy expenditure in weight reduced individuals. Like many other gastrointestinal hormones, amylin is secreted in response to meals and it reduces eating by promoting meal-ending satiation. Not surprisingly, amylin interacts with many of these hormones to control eating. These interactions seem to occur at different levels because amylin seems to mediate the eating inhibitory effect of some of these gastrointestinal hormones, and the combination of some of these hormones seems to lead to a stronger reduction in eating than single hormones alone. Amylin's effect on eating is thought to be mediated by a stimulation of specific amylin receptors in the area postrema. Secondary brain sites that were defined to mediate amylin action - and hence potential additional sites of interaction with other hormones - include the nucleus of the solitary tract, the lateral parabrachial nucleus, the lateral hypothalamic area and other hypothalamic nuclei. The focus of this review is to summarize the current knowledge of amylin interactions in the control of eating. In most cases, these interactions have only been studied at a descriptive rather than a mechanistic level and despite the clear knowledge on primary sites of amylin action, the interaction sites between amylin and other hormones are often unknown.

The anorexigenic effect of cholecystokinin octapeptide in a goldfish model is mediated by the vagal afferent and subsequently through the melanocortin- and corticotropin-releasing hormone-signaling pathways

We have been extensively investigating the mechanisms by which neuropeptides regulate feeding behavior by using a goldfish (Carassius auratus) model. In this species, the anorexigenic action of melanocortin peptide is centrally mediated via the corticotropin-releasing hormone (CRH)/CRH receptor neuronal system, whereas sulfated cholecystokinin octapeptide (CCK-8s) is involved in the appetite regulation as a peripheral anorexigenic factor. The aim of the present study was to identify the mechanism of the anorexigenic effect of peripherally injected CCK-8s, which has not yet been identified in goldfish. Co-administration of capsaicin, a neurotoxin that destroys primary sensory afferents, at 100 nmol/g BW, blocked the anorexigenic action of intraperitoneally injected CCK-8s (100 pmol/g BW), whereas the anorexigenic action of intracerebroventricularly injected CCK-8s (5 pmol/g BW) was not blocked by co-administration of capsaicin. Pre-treatment with a specific CRH receptor antagonist, α-helical CRH((9-41)), attenuated the anorexigenic action of CCK-8s. The expression level of CRH mRNA in the diencephalic tissue of the CCK-8s-injected group was not changed, but the level of proopiomelanocortin mRNA was significantly increased at 1h after treatment. Therefore, we have identified for the first time that the reduction of appetite induced by peripherally injected CCK-8s in goldfish appears to be mediated by the vagal afferent and subsequently through the melanocortin- and corticotropin-releasing hormone-signaling pathways.

Pancreatic signals controlling food intake; insulin, glucagon and amylin

The control of food intake and body weight by the brain relies upon the detection and integration of signals reflecting energy stores and fluxes, and their interaction with many different inputs related to food palatability and gastrointestinal handling as well as social, emotional, circadian, habitual and other situational factors. This review focuses upon the role of hormones secreted by the endocrine pancreas: hormones, which individually and collectively influence food intake, with an emphasis upon insulin, glucagon and amylin. Insulin and amylin are co-secreted by B-cells and provide a signal that reflects both circulating energy in the form of glucose and stored energy in the form of visceral adipose tissue. Insulin acts directly at the liver to suppress the synthesis and secretion of glucose, and some plasma insulin is transported into the brain and especially the mediobasal hypothalamus where it elicits a net catabolic response, particularly reduced food intake and loss of body weight. Amylin reduces meal size by stimulating neurons in the hindbrain, and there is evidence that amylin additionally functions as an adiposity signal controlling body weight as well as meal size. Glucagon is secreted from A-cells and increases glucose secretion from the liver. Glucagon acts in the liver to reduce meal size, the signal being relayed to the brain via the vagus nerves. To summarize, hormones of the endocrine pancreas are collectively at the crossroads of many aspects of energy homeostasis. Glucagon and amylin act in the short term to reduce meal size, and insulin sensitizes the brain to short-term meal-generated satiety signals; and insulin and perhaps amylin as well act over longer intervals to modulate the amount of fat maintained and defended by the brain. Hormones of the endocrine pancreas interact with receptors at many points along the gut-brain axis, from the liver to the sensory vagus nerve to the hindbrain to the hypothalamus; and their signals are conveyed both neurally and humorally. Finally, their actions include gastrointestinal and metabolic as well as behavioural effects.

Effects of amylin on feeding of goldfish: Interactions with CCK

In mammals, amylin (AMY) is a peptide that is secreted from the pancreas in response to a meal. AMY inhibits food intake and may also contribute to the anorectic effects of the brain-gut peptide cholecystokinin (CCK). In this study, we assessed the role of AMY in the regulation of food intake in goldfish (Carassius auratus) and its interactions with CCK. Fish were injected intraperitoneally (i.p.) with mammalian AMY and intracerebroventricularly (i.c.v.) with mammalian AMY, alone or in combination with the sulfated octapeptide CCK-8S. We also assessed the effects of i.c.v. injections of AC187, an amylin receptor antagonist on the central actions of both AMY and CCK-8S, as well as the effects of i.c.v. injections of proglumide, a CCK receptor antagonist, on the central effects of AMY. AMY injected i.p. at 100 ng/g but not 25 or 50 ng/g or i.c.v. at 10 ng/g but not 1 ng/g significantly decreased food intake as compared to saline-treated fish. Fish co-treated i.c.v. with AMY at 1 ng/g and CCK-8S at 1 ng/g had a food intake lower than that of control fish and fish treated with either 1 ng/g CCK-8S or 1 ng/g AMY, suggesting a synergy between the two systems. Whereas low i.c.v. doses of AC187 (30 ng/g) had no effect, moderate doses (50 ng/g) induced an increase in food intake, indicating a role of endogenous AMY in satiety in goldfish. Blocking central amylin receptors with i.c.v. AC187 (30 ng/g) resulted in an inhibition of both i.c.v. AMY- and CCK-induced reduction in feeding. Blocking central CCK receptors with i.c.v. proglumide (25 ng/g) resulted in an inhibition of both i.c.v. CCK-induced and AMY-induced decrease in food intake. Our results show for the first time in fish that AMY is a potent anorexigenic factor and that its actions are interdependent with those of CCK.

Inhibition of food intake

Over 100 publications, principally from five groups, describe an effect of amylin and amylin analogs in inhibition of food intake in animals and humans. The major groups contributing to this area are those of the following: Chance and Balasubramaniam (Balasubramaniam et al., 1991a,b; Chance et al., 1991a,b, 1992a,b, 1993). Morley, Flood, and Edwards (Edwards and Morley, 1992; Flood and Morley, 1992; Macintosh et al., 2000; Morley and Flood, 1991, 1994; Morley et al., 1992, 1993, 1994, 1995, 1996, 1997). Lutz, Geary, and others (Barth et al., 2003; Del Prete et al., 2002; Lutz et al., 1994, 1995a,b, 1996a,b, 1997a,b, 1998a,b,c, 2000a,b, 2001a,b,c, 2003; Mollet et al., 2001, 2003a,b, 2004; Riediger et al., 2002, 2004; Rushing et al., 2000a,b, 2001, 2002). Workers at Amylin Pharmaceuticals Inc., or their collaborators (Bhavsar et al., 1995, 1996, 1997a, 1998; Birkemo et al., 1995; Chapman et al., 2004a,b; Edwards et al., 1998; Feinle et al., 2002; Mack et al., 2003; Riediger et al., 1999; Roth et al., 2004; Watkins et al., 1996; Weyer et al., 2004; Young, 1997; Young and Bhavsar, 1996). Arnelo, Reidelberger, and others (Arnelo et al., 1996a,b, 1997a,b, 1998, 2000; Fruin et al., 1997; Granqvist et al., 1997; Reidelberger et al., 2001, 2002, 2004). The magnitude of amylin inhibition of food intake, and its potency for this effect when delivered peripherally, suggests a physiological role in satiogenesis. Increases in food intake following disruption of amylin signal-signaling (e.g., with amylin receptor blockade, or with amylin gene knock-out mice) further support a role of endogenous amylin to tonically restrict nutrient intake. In addition, synergies with other endogenous satiety agents may be present, and convey greater physiological importance than is conveyed by single signals. The anorectic effect of amylin is consistent with a classic amylin pharmacology. The anorectic effect of peripheral amylin appears principally due to a direct action at the area postrema/nucleus tractus solitarius, and is not merely a consequence of gastric fullness, for example. Circulating amylin appears to physiologically inhibit secretion of ghrelin, an orexigenic peptide from the stomach. In contrast to the actions of many other anorexigens, amylin appears to stimulate drinking. This disposgenic effect is likely mediated via amylin-sensitive neurones in the subfornical organ, a circumventricular structure, that like the area postrema does not present a blood-brain barrier. Amylin's dipsogenic effect may explain prandial drinking, which has heretofore been regarded as a learned behavior.

Amylin receptor blockade stimulates food intake in rats

Amylin is postulated to act as a hormonal signal from the pancreas to the brain to inhibit food intake and regulate energy reserves. Amylin potently reduces food intake, body weight, and adiposity when administered systemically or into the brain. Whether selective blockade of endogenous amylin action increases food intake and adiposity remains to be clearly established. In the present study, the amylin receptor antagonist acetyl-[Asn(30), Tyr(32)] sCT-(8-32) (AC187) was used to assess whether action of endogenous amylin is essential for normal satiation to occur. Non-food-deprived rats received a 3- to 4-h intravenous infusion of AC187 (60-2,000 pmol.kg(-1).min(-1)), either alone or coadministered with a 3-h intravenous infusion of amylin (2.5 or 5 pmol.kg(-1).min(-1)) or a 2-h intragastric infusion of an elemental liquid diet (4 kcal/h). Infusions began just before dark onset. Food intake and meal patterns during the first 4 h of the dark period were determined from continuous computer recordings of changes in food bowl weight. Amylin inhibited food intake by approximately 50%, and AC187 attenuated this response by approximately 50%. AC187 dose-dependently stimulated food intake (maximal increases from 76 to 171%), whether administered alone or with an intragastric infusion of liquid diet. Amylin reduced mean meal size and meal frequency, AC187 attenuated these responses, and AC187 administration alone increased mean meal size and meal frequency. These results support the hypothesis that endogenous amylin plays an essential role in reducing meal size and increasing the postmeal interval of satiety.

Endogenous amylin contributes to the anorectic effects of cholecystokinin and bombesin

Previous studies indicated that amylin contributes to the anorectic effects of cholecystokinin (CCK) and bombesin (BBS), possibly by enhancing the release of pancreatic amylin or by modulating their anorectic actions within the central nervous system (CNS). To elucidate the interaction between amylin and CCK or BBS, respectively, we investigated the influence of an IP injection of CCK or BBS on feeding in amylin-deficient mice (IAPP(-/-)). The anorectic effects of CCK and BBS were nearly abolished in IAPP(-/-) mice compared to wildtype (WT) mice (e.g. 20 microg/kg CCK, 1-h food intake: WT/NaCl 0.53 +/- 0.03 g; WT/CCK 0.16 +/- 0.03 g (P < 0.001); IAPP(-/-)/NaCl 0.49 +/- 0.05 g; IAPP(-/-)/CCK 0.39 +/- 0.04 g). Acute amylin replacement restored the anorectic effect of CCK in IAPP(-/-) mice. To find out whether CCK or BBS enhance the feeding-induced release of pancreatic amylin, we injected rats with CCK-8 (0.5-50 microg/kg) or BBS (5 microg/kg) and measured plasma amylin levels after injections. Neither CCK nor BBS increased the plasma amylin level in rats. We suggest that the mediation of the anorectic effects of CCK and BBS by amylin is not dependent on a CCK- or BBS-induced release of pancreatic amylin, but may rather be due to a modulation of their effects by amylin within the CNS.

Effects of peptides on animal and human behavior: a review of studies published in the first twenty years of the journal Peptides

This review catalogs effects of peptides on various aspects of animal and human behavior as published in the journal Peptides in its first twenty years. Topics covered include: activity levels, addiction behavior, ingestive behaviors, learning and memory-based behaviors, nociceptive behaviors, social and sexual behavior, and stereotyped and other behaviors. There are separate tables for these behaviors and a short introduction for each section.

Dopamine D2 receptors mediate amylin's acute satiety effect

The anorectic effect of the pancreatic peptide amylin has been established in numerous studies. Here, we investigated the influence of a pretreatment with dopamine (DA) D1- and D2-receptor antagonists on the anorectic effect of intraperitoneally injected amylin in rats fed a medium-fat (18% fat) diet. In 24-h food-deprived rats, pretreatment with the DA D2-receptor antagonist raclopride [100 μg/kg (0.2 μmol/kg) ip] significantly attenuated amylin's (5 μg/kg ip) anorectic effect, whereas raclopride alone had no effect on food intake [i.e., food intakes 1 h after injection were ( n = 12): NaCl/NaCl 7.3 ± 0.5 g; NaCl/amylin 3.9 ± 0.6; raclopride/NaCl 7.7 ± 0.7; raclopride/amylin 5.6 ± 0.7]. Pretreatment with another DA D2 receptor antagonist, sulpiride [50 mg/kg (154 μmol/kg) ip], similarly reduced amylin's satiety effect, whereas pretreatment with the DA D1-receptor antagonist SCH-23390 [10 μg/kg (0.03 μmol/kg) ip] did not influence amylin's effect. SCH-23390, however, completely blocked the anorexia induced by d-amphetamine (0.3 mg/kg ip). These results suggest that, under the present feeding conditions, the dopaminergic system mediates part of amylin's inhibitory effect on feeding in rats when administered intraperitoneally. This seems to involve DA D2 receptors but not D1 receptors.

Attenuation of the anorectic effects of cholecystokinin and bombesin by the specific amylin antagonist AC 253

Previous studies provided evidence for an interaction between the satiety effects of cholecystokinin (CCK), bombesin (BBS), and amylin. Amylin released in response to CCK (or BBS) was supposed to mediate part of CCK's (or BBS's) anorectic effect since the amylin and calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) antagonist CGRP 8-37 attenuated their anorectic action. Due to the low specificity of CGRP 8-37 for amylin vs. CGRP binding sites, the aim of the present study was to test whether the specific amylin antagonist AC 253 also influenced the anorectic effects of CCK and BBS. Injections took place at dark onset in 24-h food-deprived rats. At a dose that attenuated the anorectic effect of amylin (5 microg/kg), the amylin antagonist AC 253 (500 microg/kg) significantly attenuated the anorectic effects of CCK and BBS (0.5 microg/kg). It can therefore be concluded that amylin, rather than CGRP, mediates part of the anorectic effects of CCK and BBS.

Amylin receptors mediate the anorectic action of salmon calcitonin (sCT)

The teleost salmon calcitonin (sCT), but not mammalian CT, shows similar biologic actions in the skeletal muscle as amylin and calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP). The peptides have also been shown to reduce food intake in rams. Because sCT, but not amylin, binds irreversibly to amylin binding sites, the aim of the present study was to compare the anorectic potency of both peptides. To determine whether sCT reduces food intake through interaction with amylin binding sites, we also tested whether appropriate antagonists (CORP 8-37, AC 187) attenuate the anorectic effect of sCT. Finally, we wanted to know whether rat calcitonin (rCT) and sCT reduce food intake to the same extent. Peptides were injected intraperitoneally at dark onset in 24 h food-deprived rats. At doses of 5 or 0.5 microg/kg, the anorectic effect of sCT was more potent and lasted much longer (e.g. 5 microg/kg: sCT > 10 h; amylin approx. 2 h) than that of amylin. Both CORP 8-37 and AC 187 (10 microg/kg) markedly reduced the anorectic action of sCT (0.5 microg/kg). In contrast to sCT, rCT (0.5 microg/kg) had no effect on food intake. It is concluded that sCT s anorectic effect is partly mediated by amylin receptors. Irreversible binding of sCT to amylin receptors may lead to a stronger and prolonged effect in comparison to amylin due to a sustained activation of the binding sites. Similar to other actions of CTs, the anorectic potency of sCT in rats was higher than that of mammalian (rat) CT. This agrees with binding profiles of amylin, sCT, and rCT at amylin binding sites as observed in in vitro studies.

Short- and long-periods of neonatal maternal separation differentially affect anxiety and feeding in adult rats: gender-dependent effects

Environmental manipulations during early development can induce permanent alterations in hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) and behavioral responses to stressors. However, little is known about the impact of early life experiences on appetitive responses. The present investigation assessed the effects of brief handling/separation or protracted separation from the dams, on feeding and anxiety responses during development. During the first 3 weeks post-partum, Sprague-Dawley rat pups were exposed daily to either brief (15 min) handling/isolation (H), a more protracted (3 h) period of maternal separation (MS), or were not handled (NH). When tested on the elevated plus-maze (at 5-6 weeks) H groups displayed less anxiety than NH gender-matched controls. Surprisingly, so did the MS females. At weaning (Day 22), the MS rats weighed significantly less than both the H and NH animals; the difference between the H and MS was more robust and persisted throughout the experiment (D 62). The H animals of both genders, and the females of the MS group, consumed more of the palatable 'snack' than their NH counterparts. The feeding suppressant response to the various satiety peptides (bombesin, cholecystokinin, and amylin) was not affected by the early life experience, with exception of cholecystokinin (CCK) effects, which were more pronounced in H and MS males. These results suggest that early life events may contribute to anxiety and/or ingestive disorders such as anorexia nervosa, bulimia and obesity.

Effects of peptides: a cross-listing of peptides and their central actions published in the journal Peptides from 1994 through 1998

Effects of peptides on the central nervous system are presented in two ways so as to provide a cross-listing. In the first table, the peptides are listed alphabetically. In the second table, the central nervous system effects are arranged alphabetically. No longer can there be any doubt that peptides affect the central nervous system, sometimes in several ways.

Anorectic effect of amylin is not transmitted by capsaicin-sensitive nerve fibers

Abdominal vagal and splanchnic afferents play an important role in the control of food intake in that they transmit various satiety signals to the central nervous system. Inasmuch as previous studies have shown that the anorectic effect of intraperitoneally injected amylin was not abolished by subdiaphragmatic vagotomy, the aim of the present study was to elucidate the role of splanchnic afferents in mediating amylin's anorectic effect after intraperitoneal injection. Rats were pretreated intraperitoneally with the neurotoxin capsaicin, which destroys primary sensory (vagal and splanchnic) afferents. Sham-treated rats served as control. Capsaicin-pretreatment had no influence on the anorectic effects of amylin (5 microg/kg) and the related peptide, calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP; 5 microg/kg), in 24-h food-deprived rats. Abolition of cholecystokinin's (3 microg/kg) anorectic effect agrees with previous studies and confirmed the effectiveness of the capsaicin pretreatment. In conclusion, the anorectic effects of intraperitoneally injected amylin and CGRP are not mediated by capsaicin-sensitive primary sensory neurons. Both anorectic peptides are, therefore, most likely to act within the central nervous system. Previous studies suggest that the relevant receptors might be located in neurons of the area postrema-nucleus of the solitary tract region.

Calcitonin gene-related peptide and spinal afferents partly mediate postoperative colonic ileus in the rat

BACKGROUND

Calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) is a widely distributed neuropeptide contained in intrinsic and extrinsic neurons of the gastrointestinal wall that has been shown to be released by noxious stimulation, to be involved in nociception, to inhibit gastrointestinal motility, and to partly mediate postoperative gastric ileus. We hypothesized that abdominal surgery-induced release of CGRP might inhibit postoperative colonic motility and food intake.

METHODS

Colonic transit, stool pellet number, stool pellet weight, and food intake were measured for 48 hours after induction of postoperative ileus in rats. CGRP was immunoneutralized by preoperative injection of CGRP monoclonal antibody, or visceral afferent nerve fibers containing CGRP were functionally ablated by topical capsaicin treatment of the vagus nerves or of the celiac/superior mesenteric ganglia before abdominal surgery.

RESULTS

Abdominal surgery increased colonic transit time and decreased 24-hour cumulative stool pellet number, stool pellet weight, and food intake. CGRP immunoneutralization reversed postoperative inhibition of colonic transit, 24-hour cumulative stool pellet number, stool pellet weight, and food intake by 77%, 82%, 80%, and 52%, respectively. Whereas ablation of vagal afferent nerve fibers had no effect, spinal afferent nerve fiber ablation reversed postoperative inhibition of 24-hour cumulative stool pellet number, stool pellet weight, and food intake by 41%, 38%, and 19%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

CGRP and spinal afferent nerve fibers partly mediate postoperative colonic ileus and inhibition of food intake in the rat. By the magnitude of reversal of postoperative ileus, CGRP seems to be an important mediator of postoperative colonic ileus. Our results for the first time show involvement of a neuropeptide and spinal afferents in the mediation of postoperative colonic ileus and postoperative inhibition of food intake in rats.

Behaviorally specific inhibition of sham feeding by amylin

To further characterize amylin's inhibitory action on feeding, we examined the effects of intraperitoneal injections of amylin on sham feeding of sucrose in food-deprived male rats with chronic gastric cannulas. Thirty and 100 microg/kg amylin reduced sham feeding, but did not terminate it or elicit the behavioral sequence of satiety. Real feeding of sucrose, but not sham feeding, was reduced after injection of 10 microg/kg amylin. Amylin's inhibitory effect on sham feeding appeared behaviorally specific because neither 30 nor 100 microg/kg amylin affected sham drinking of water in thirsty rats and because no abnormal behaviors occurred. We conclude that amylin has a behaviorally specific satiating effect on sucrose sham feeding that is insufficient to elicit satiety in absence of gastric or postgastric food stimulation.

Rats maintained on high-fat diets exhibit reduced satiety in response to CCK and bombesin

Rats maintained on high-fat diets often exhibit increased food intake and weight gain. We hypothesized that high-fat diets might result in reduced sensitivity to hormonal signals responsible for terminating food intake--satiety signals. The intestinal hormone cholecystokinin (CCK) and the gastrointestinal neuropeptide, bombesin (BBS) both have been proposed as satiety signals. To determine whether maintenance on high-fat diets alters sensitivity to satiating effects of CCK and bombesin (BBS), rats were maintained on a low fat diet (LF), a high-fat diet that was isocaloric with the low-fat diet (HF), or one of two hypercaloric high-fat diets (HF-1, HF-2) that differed from HF and LF in fat, fiber, and total caloric content. CCK and bombesin reduced food intake significantly less in rats maintained on high-fat diets, compared to those on the low fat diet. Neither high caloric intake, which was associated with increased body weight gain on the two hypercaloric diets, nor fiber content of the diet accounted for the reduced response of HF rats to CCK. Rather, reduced sensitivity to CCK was related only to the high proportion of calories taken as fat. We also determined whether reduced CCK sensitivity was due to the maintenance on a particular diet or to the diet eaten during a CCK test. After CCK, rats maintained on LF reduced food intake more (49%) than rats maintained on HF (22%), regardless of whether they ate HF or LF during the CCK test itself. These findings indicate that maintenance of rats on high-fat diets reduces sensitivity to some peptide satiety signals. Reduced sensitivity to satiety signals might contribute to overeating and obesity often observed when rats are maintained on high-fat diets.

Lesion of the area postrema/nucleus of the solitary tract (AP/NTS) attenuates the anorectic effects of amylin and calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) in rats

The area postrema/nucleus of the solitary tract (AP/NTS) region plays an important role in the control of food intake since it receives peripheral satiety signals via splanchnic and vagal afferents. Due to the lack of the blood brain barrier in this region, blood borne signals can directly be monitored in the AP/NTS. Furthermore, receptors for anorectic peptides such as amylin or calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) have been found in the AP/NTS. It was therefore the aim of the present study to investigate the role of the AP/NTS region in mediating the anorectic effects of these peptides. Thermal ablation of the AP/NTS resulted in a significant reduction of the anorectic effects of IP injected amylin (5 microg/kg) and CGRP (5 microg/kg) in food deprived rats. The anorectic actions of CCK and BBS were also reduced by the AP/NTS lesion which agrees with previous studies. We conclude that the AP/NTS region is an important brain site for mediating the anorectic effects of amylin and CGRP. It remains to be clarified whether this effect is due to amylin and CGRP action on receptors within the AP/NTS region or peripheral receptors on afferent nerves projecting to the AP/NTS.

Comparison of Fos induced in rat brain by GLP-1 and amylin

The patterns of Fos-like immunoreactivity (Fos-ir) in rat brain were compared following treatment of rats with two anorectic 'gut' peptides. Central administration of GLP-1 produced dose-related increases in Fos-ir in the area postrema (AP) and caudal nucleus of the solitary tract (cNTS) as well as strong activation in the lateral parabrachial nucleus (LPBE), hypothalamic paraventricular nucleus (PVN), bed nucleus of the stria terminalis (BNST) and central nucleus of the amygdala (CeA). At centrally-active doses, peripheral administration of GLP-1 did not induce Fos-ir in brain. In contrast, peripheral administration of amylin produced strong Fos-ir in the AP and cNTS, as well as the BNST and CeA, but not in the PVN. The common activation of the LPB-BNST-CeA by these and other previously-studied anorectics suggest this is an important circuit involved in satiety.

Evidence for a physiological role of central calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) receptors in the control of food intake in rats

In the present study, we investigated the role of central calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) and amylin receptors in mediating the anorectic effects of CGRP and amylin in rats chronically cannulated in the lateral brain ventricle. Intracerebroventricular (ICV) injection of the CGRP and amylin receptor antagonist CGRP(8-37) failed to influence the anorectic effects of peripherally injected CGRP and amylin. CGRP(8-37) alone, however, increased food intake in food deprived rats when administered 2 h before food presentation. Under the same experimental conditions, the more specific amylin receptor antagonists amylin(8-37) or AC 187 did not affect food intake. We therefore conclude, that CGRP is a physiological regulator of food intake within the central nervous system, acting at central CGRP receptors. Peripheral receptors, however, are likely to mediate the anorectic effects of peripherally administered amylin and CGRP.

Different influence of CGRP (8-37), an amylin and CGRP antagonist, on the anorectic effects of cholecystokinin and bombesin in diabetic and normal rats

Because previous studies had suggested that the anorectic effects of cholecystokinin (CCK) and bombesin (BBS) depend partly on the release of amylin or calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP), we investigated the influence of the amylin and CGRP receptor antagonist CGRP (8-37) on the anorectic effects of CCK and BBS in streptozotocin (STZ)-diabetic and nondiabetic rats. STZ-diabetic rats had significantly lower plasma amylin and insulin concentrations than nondiabetic control rats. Amylin (5 micrograms/kg or 2.5 micrograms/rat) injected IP at dark onset after 24-h food deprivation elicited an anorectic effect of similar extent in STZ-diabetic and control rats. Under similar conditions, CCK (0.25 and 2 micrograms/kg) and BBS (5 micrograms/kg) reduced food intake in both STZ-diabetic and nondiabetic rats. These effects were markedly attenuated by CGRP (8-37) (10 micrograms/kg) in non-diabetics but not in STZ-diabetic rats. It is concluded that part of the anorectic effects of CCK and BBS depend on the release of amylin from pancreatic B-cells.

The physiology and brain mechanisms of feeding

This article is designed as an introduction to the major theoretical models in the field of regulation of eating behavior, and a selective review of relevant neurobiological data. We first critically consider the paradigm of homeostasis as it relates to body energy content, and argue that additional theoretical constructs will be needed to account for the complexity of eating behavior in both nonhumans and humans. We then summarize some of the methods available to the neuroscientist in this area, and address some of their limitations. We review treatments and potential mechanisms that increase food intake, including deprivation, antimetabolites, norepinephrine, and several peptides including neuropeptide Y. We next review treatments that decrease food intake, including a variety of humoral, gastrointestinal, and pancreatic factors, as well as examine central pathways of satiety. This includes a discussion of leptin and other potential anorectic agents. We conclude with a discussion of human obesity and anorexias, and prospects for pharmacotherapy of eating disorders. We emphasize throughout that most regions of the human brain probably make some contribution to feeding behavior, and so a focus on any one area of transmitter/hormone is an unrealistic approach both in basic and applied areas.

The histaminergic, but not the serotoninergic, system mediates amylin's anorectic effect

In the present study, we investigated the influence of blockade of the serotoninergic and histaminergic neurotransmitter system on the anorectic effect of IP-injected amylin in rats. In 12- or 24-h food-deprived rats, blockade of central and peripheral serotonin (5-HT) receptors with the 5-HT1 and 5-HT2 receptor antagonist metergoline (0.5 or 0.05 mg/kg, IP, respectively) did not seem to influence the anorectic effect of IP injected amylin (1 microgram/kg). Similarly, inhibition of 5-HT synthesis and release with the 5-HT1A receptor agonist (+/-)-8-hydroxy-2-(di-n-propylamino)tetralin hydrobromide (200 micrograms/kg, IP) did not diminish amylin's (5 micrograms/kg, IP) anorectic effect in 24-h food-deprived rats whereas that of CCK (3 micrograms/kg, IP) was blocked under comparable conditions. Pretreatment of rats with the histamine H3 receptor agonists R-alpha-methylhistamine (MH: 3 mg/kg, IP) and Imerit (3 mg/kg, IP), which block transmission in the histaminergic system by inhibiting release of endogenous histamine, attenuated amylin's (1 microgram/kg) anorectic effect in 24-h food-deprived rats. These results suggest that the histaminergic system in involved in transduction of IP amylin's inhibitory effect on feeding in rats. In contrast, the serotoninergic system does not seem to be involved in mediating amylin's anorectic effect.