Activation of trigeminal brain-stem nociceptive neurons by dural artery stimulation

Migraine headache pathophysiology

In both episodic and chronic migraine, headache is the most disabling symptom that requires medical care. The migraine headache is the most well-studied symptom of migraine pathophysiology. The trigeminal system and the central processing of sensory information transmitted by the trigeminal system are of considerable importance in the pathophysiology of migraine headache. Glutamate is the main neurotransmitter that drives activation of the ascending trigeminal and trigeminothalamic pathways. The neuropeptide, calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) that is released by the trigeminal system, plays a crucial role in the neurobiology of headache. Peripheral and central sensitizations associated with trigeminal sensory processing are neurobiologic states that contribute to both the development of headache during a migraine attack and the maintenance of chronic migraine.

CGRP and PACAP-38 play an important role in diagnosing pediatric migraine

Background

An increasing number of studies have suggested that the important role of vasoactive peptides, such as pituitary adenylate cyclase-activating polypeptide-38 (PACAP-38) and calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP), in the pathophysiology of migraine seems undeniable in adults, but studies in pediatric migraine patients remain scarce. We prospectively investigated CGRP and PACAP-38 plasma levels in children with migraine during ictal and interictal periods and compared the results between migraine patients with aura and without aura. We were the first to explore the diagnostic value of a combination of CGRP and PACAP-38.

Methods

Seventy-six migraine patients aged 4–18 years and seventy-seven age-matched healthy children were included in the study. Plasma vasoactive peptides were measured using the enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). Differences and correlations of groups were analyzed using the independent samples t-test, analysis of variance (ANOVA), Mann-Whitney U test, and multiple linear regression. We also performed logistic regression and receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) analyses to evaluate the diagnostic value of CGRP and PACAP-38 in pediatric migraine.

Results

PACAP-38 and CGRP levels in migraine patients during the ictal and interictal periods were higher than those in controls (p < 0.001). PACAP-38 and CGRP levels in migraine patients with aura and without aura were higher than those in controls (p < 0.001). PACAP-38 and CGRP were independent risk factors in diagnosing pediatric migraine (adjusted OR (PACAP-38) =1.331, 95% CI: 1.177–1.506, p < 0.001; adjusted OR (CGRP) = 1.113, 95% CI: 1.064–1.165, p < 0.001). Area Under Curve (AUC) comparison: Combination (0.926) > CGRP (0.869) > PACAP-38 (0.867).

Conclusions

Our study found almost the same changes in CGRP and PACAP levels in pediatric migraine, suggesting that CGRP and PACAP-38 may work together to play an integral role in pediatric migraine. Higher CGRP levels were found in the ictal phase than in the interictal phase and with aura group than without aura group, indicating that CGRP may take part in the formation of pain and aura. Moreover, ROC and logistic regression analyses suggested that CGRP and PACAP-38 are good indicators to diagnose pediatric migraine, and the combination of CGRP and PACAP-38 was valuable in diagnosing pediatric migraine and differentiating pediatric migraine from non-migraine headaches.

Trial registration

The study has been registered at the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (ChiCTR2100043157).

A new era for migraine: The role of calcitonin gene-related peptide in the trigeminovascular system

There is a huge improvement in our understanding of migraine pathophysiology in the past decades. The activation of the trigeminovascular system has been proved to play a key role in migraine. Calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) and CGRP receptors are widely distributed in the trigeminovascular system. The CGRP is expressed on the C-fibers, and the CGRP receptors are distributed on the A-δ fibers of the trigeminal ganglion and nerves. Further studies found elevated serum CGRP level during migraine attacks, and infusion of CGRP can trigger migraine-like attacks, provide more direct evidence of the link between CGRP and migraine attack. Based on these findings, several treatment options have been designed for migraine treatment, including CGRP receptor antagonists (gepants) and monoclonal antibodies targeting CGRP or CGRP receptors. The clinical trials show both gepants and monoclonal antibodies are effective for migraine treatment. In this section, we describe the roles of the trigeminovascular system in migraine, the discovery of CGRP, and the CGRP signaling pathway.

Signaling Interaction between Facial and Meningeal Inputs of the Trigeminal System Mediates Peripheral Neurostimulation Analgesia in a Rat Model of Migraine

Peripheral neurostimulation within the trigeminal nerve territory has been used for pain alleviation during migraine attacks, but the mechanistic basis of this non-invasive intervention is still poorly understood. In this study, we investigated the therapeutic role of peripheral stimulation of the trigeminal nerve, which provides homosegmental innervation to intracranial structures, by assessing analgesic effects in a nitroglycerin (NTG)-induced rat model of migraine. As a result of neurogenic inflammatory responses in the trigeminal nervous system, plasma protein extravasation was induced in facial skin by applying noxious stimulation to the dura mater. Noxious chemical stimulation of the dura mater led to protein extravasation in facial cutaneous tissues and caused mechanical sensitivity. Trigeminal ganglion (TG) neurons were double-labeled via retrograde tracing to detect bifurcated axons. Extracellular recordings of wide dynamic range (WDR) neurons in the spinal trigeminal nucleus caudalis (Sp5C) demonstrated the convergence and interaction of inputs from facial tissues and the dura mater. Peripheral neurostimulation of homotopic facial tissues represented segmental pain inhibition on cephalic cutaneous allodynia in the migraine model. The results indicated that facial territories and intracranial structures were directly connected with each other through bifurcated double-labeled neurons in the TG and through second-order WDR neurons. Homotopic stimulation at the C-fiber intensity threshold resulted in much stronger inhibition of analgesia than the same intensity of heterotopic stimulation. These results provide novel evidence for the neurological bases through which peripheral neurostimulation may be effective in treating migraine in clinical practice.

CGRP and the Trigeminal System in Migraine

OBJECTIVE

The goal of this narrative review is to provide an overview of migraine pathophysiology, with an emphasis on the role of calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) within the context of the trigeminovascular system.

BACKGROUND

Migraine is a prevalent and disabling neurological disease that is characterized in part by intense, throbbing, and unilateral headaches. Despite recent advances in understanding its pathophysiology, migraine still represents an unmet medical need, as it is often underrecognized and undertreated. Although CGRP has been known to play a pivotal role in migraine for the last 2 decades, this has now received more interest spurred by the early clinical successes of drugs that block CGRP signaling in the trigeminovascular system.

DESIGN

This narrative review presents an update on the role of CGRP within the trigeminovascular system. PubMed searches were used to find recent (ie, 2016 to November 2018) published articles presenting new study results. Review articles are also included not as primary references but to bring these to the attention of the reader. Original research is referenced in describing the core of the narrative, and review articles are used to support ancillary points.

RESULTS

The trigeminal ganglion neurons provide the connection between the periphery, stemming from the interface between the primary afferent fibers of the trigeminal ganglion and the meningeal vasculature and the central terminals in the trigeminal nucleus caudalis. The neuropeptide CGRP is abundant in trigeminal ganglion neurons, and is released from the peripheral nerve and central nerve terminals as well as being secreted within the trigeminal ganglion. Release of CGRP from the peripheral terminals initiates a cascade of events that include increased synthesis of nitric oxide and sensitization of the trigeminal nerves. Secreted CGRP in the trigeminal ganglion interacts with adjacent neurons and satellite glial cells to perpetuate peripheral sensitization, and can drive central sensitization of the second-order neurons. A shift in central sensitization from activity-dependent to activity-independent central sensitization may indicate a mechanism driving the progression of episodic migraine to chronic migraine. The pathophysiology of cluster headache is much more obscure than that of migraine, but emerging evidence suggests that it may also involve hypersensitivity of the trigeminovascular system. Ongoing clinical studies with therapies targeted at CGRP will provide additional, valuable insights into the pathophysiology of this disorder.

CONCLUSIONS

CGRP plays an essential role in the pathophysiology of migraine. Treatments that interfere with the functioning of CGRP in the peripheral trigeminal system are effective against migraine. Blocking sensitization of the trigeminal nerve by attenuating CGRP activity in the periphery may be sufficient to block a migraine attack. Additionally, the potential exists that this therapeutic strategy may also alleviate cluster headache as well.

Vascular Contributions to Migraine: Time to Revisit?

Migraine is one of the most prevalent and disabling neurovascular disorders worldwide. However, despite the increase in awareness and research, the understanding of migraine pathophysiology and treatment options remain limited. For centuries, migraine was considered to be a vascular disorder. In fact, the throbbing, pulsating quality of the headache is thought to be caused by mechanical changes in vessels. Moreover, the most successful migraine treatments act on the vasculature and induction of migraine can be accomplished with vasoactive agents. However, over the past 20 years, the emphasis has shifted to the neural imbalances associated with migraine, and vascular changes have generally been viewed as an epiphenomenon that is neither sufficient nor necessary to induce migraine. With the clinical success of peripherally-acting antibodies that target calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) and its receptor for preventing migraine, this neurocentric view warrants a critical re-evaluation. This review will highlight the likely importance of the vasculature in migraine.

Cranial dural permeability of inflammatory nociceptive mediators: Potential implications for animal models of migraine

Background Application of inflammatory mediators to the cranial dura has been used as a method to activate and sensitize neurons in the meningeal sensory pathway in preclinical behavioral studies of headache mechanisms. However, the relatively high concentrations and volumes used in these studies raise the question of whether the applied agents might pass through the dura to act directly on central neurons, thus bypassing the dural afferent pathway. Methods We used a radiolabeling approach to quantify the meningeal permeability of two of the inflammatory mediators, 5-HT and PGE2, when applied to the cranial dura as part of an inflammatory mixture used in preclinical headache models. Results Both agents could be detected in samples taken four hours after dural application in the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) and, in measurements made only for PGE2, in the central nervous system (CNS) as well. Based on our measurements, we made estimates of the CSF and CNS levels that would be attained with the higher concentrations and volumes of 5HT and PGE2 that were exogenously applied in previous pre-clinical headache studies. These estimated levels were comparable to or larger than normal endogenous levels, potentially large enough to have physiological effects. Conclusions The finding that the cranial meninges are permeable to the two tested inflammatory mediators PGE2 and 5-HT raises some uncertainty about whether the behavioral changes observed in prior pre-clinical headache studies with these as well as other agents can be attributed entirely to the activation of dural nociceptors, particularly when the agents are applied at concentrations several orders of magnitude above physiological levels.

Different processing of meningeal and cutaneous pain information in the spinal trigeminal nucleus caudalis

Introduction

Within superficial trigeminal nucleus caudalis (Sp5C) (laminae I/II), meningeal primary afferents project exclusively to lamina I, whereas nociceptive cutaneous ones distribute in both lamina I and outer lamina II. Whether such a relative absence of meningeal inputs to lamina II represents a fundamental difference from cutaneous pathways in the central processing of sensory information is still unknown.

Methods

We recorded extracellular field potentials in the superficial Sp5C of anesthetised rats evoked by electrically stimulating the dura mater, to selectively assess the synaptic transmission between meningeal primary afferents and second-order Sp5C neurons, the first synapse in trigeminovascular pathways. We tested the effect of systemic morphine and local glycinergic and GABAAergic disinhibition.

Results

Meningeal stimulation evokes two negative field potentials in superficial Sp5C. The conduction velocities of the activated primary afferents are within the Aδ- and C-fibre ranges. Systemic morphine specifically suppresses meningeal C-fibre-evoked field potentials, and this effect is reversed by systemic naloxone. Segmental glycinergic or GABAAergic disinhibition strongly potentiates meningeal C-fibre-evoked field potentials but not Aδ-fibre ones. Interestingly, the same segmental disinhibition conversely potentiates cutaneous Aδ-fibre-evoked field potentials and suppresses C-fibre ones.

Conclusion

These findings reveal that the different anatomical organization of meningeal and cutaneous inputs into superficial Sp5C is associated with a different central processing of meningeal and cutaneous pain information within Sp5C. Moreover, they suggest that the potentiation upon local disinhibition of the first synapse in trigeminovascular pathways may contribute to the generation of headache pain.

What is the evidence for the use of corticosteroids in migraine?

Corticosteroids are widely prescribed for the management of migraine attacks. The earliest clinical studies examining the efficacy of corticosteroid monotherapy for managing migraine attacks date back to 1952. Since then, 26 heterogeneous clinical studies and four meta-analyses have been conducted to assess the efficacy of corticosteroids in either aborting acute migraine attacks, prolonged migraine attacks or recurrent headaches. Most of these (86 %) studies employed different comparator arms with corticosteroids monotherapy administration while some studies (14 %) evaluated adjunctive corticosteroid therapy. The majority of these clinical studies revealed the superior efficacy of corticosteroids as mono- or adjunctive-therapy both for recurrent and acute migraine attacks, while the remaining showed non-inferior efficacy. Different forms of oral and parenteral corticosteroids in either single-dose or short-tapering schedules are prescribed; there are clinical studies supporting the efficacy of both methods. Corticosteroids can be administered safely up to six times annually. Corticosteroids are also useful in managing patients who frequent emergency departments with "medication-seeking behavior." Migraine patients with refractory headaches, history of recurrent headaches, severe baseline disability, and status migrainosus were found to have the most beneficial response from corticosteroid therapy.

The place of corticosteroids in migraine attack management: A 65-year systematic review with pooled analysis and critical appraisal

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Headaches recur in up to 87% of migraine patients visiting the emergency department (ED), making ED recidivism a management challenge. We aimed herein to determine the role of corticosteroids in the acute management of migraine in the ED and outpatient care.

METHODS

Advanced search strategies employing PubMed/MEDLINE, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library databases inclusive of a relevant gray literature search was employed for Clinical Studies and Systematic Reviews by combining the terms "migraine" and "corticosteroids" spanning all previous years since the production of synthetic corticosteroids ca. 1950 until August 30, 2014. Methods were in accordance with MOOSE guidelines.

RESULTS

Twenty-five studies (n = 3989, median age 37.5 years, interquartile range or IQR 35-41 years; median male:female ratio 1:4.23, IQR 1:2.1-6.14; 52% ED-based, 56% randomized-controlled) and four systematic reviews were included. International Classification of Headache Disorders criteria were applied in 64%. Nineteen studies (76%) indicated observed outcome differences favoring benefits of corticosteroids, while six (24%) studies indicated non-inferior outcomes for corticosteroids. Median absolute risk reduction was 30% (range 6%-48.2%), and 11% (6%-48.6%) for 24-, and 72-hour headache recurrence, respectively. Parenteral dexamethasone was the most commonly (56%) administered steroid, at a median single dose of 10 mg (range 4-24 mg). All meta-analyses revealed efficacy of adjuvant corticosteroids to various abortive medications-indicating generalizability. Adverse effects were tolerable. Higher disability, status migrainosus, incomplete pain relief, and previous history of headache recurrence predicted outcome favorability.

CONCLUSIONS

Our literature review suggests that with corticosteroid treatment, recurrent headaches become milder than pretreated headaches and later respond to nonsteroidal therapy. Single-dose intravenous dexamethasone is a reasonable option for managing resistant, severe, or prolonged migraine attacks.

Role of the Extracranial Arteries in Migraine Headache: A Review

The pain of the migraine headache is often so debilitating that it severely compromises quality of life. The vascular component of the trigeminovascular system has been implicated in the pain mechanism. There is, however, debate as to whether the pain originates in the intracranial or extracranial vasculature or in both. In this article, evidence is presented to suggest that the extracranial arteries are the source of the pain in some migraine sufferers.

The dura and migraine

This article concerns the possible role of dural changes in migraine pain. The hypothesis that changes in the dura are important in migraine pain has become widely accepted among migraine scientists. A critical examination of the evidence for and against dural involvement in migraine pain shows that in spite of the extensive research that has been carried out on dural physiology and pathophysiology, there is no hard evidence that dural changes actually occur in humans during a migraine. On the contrary, the available evidence appears to indicate that it is unlikely that dural changes are part of the migraine pain process.

Sensitization of the trigeminovascular pathway: perspective and implications to migraine pathophysiology

Migraine headache is commonly associated with signs of exaggerated intracranial and extracranial mechanical sensitivities. Patients exhibiting signs of intracranial hypersensitivity testify that their headache throbs and that mundane physical activities that increase intracranial pressure (such as bending over or coughing) intensify the pain. Patients exhibiting signs of extracranial hypersensitivity testify that during migraine their facial skin hurts in response to otherwise innocuous activities such as combing, shaving, letting water run over their face in the shower, or wearing glasses or earrings (termed here cephalic cutaneous allodynia). Such patients often testify that during migraine their bodily skin is hypersensitive and that wearing tight cloth, bracelets, rings, necklaces and socks or using a heavy blanket can be uncomfortable and/or painful (termed her extracephalic cutaneous allodynia). This review summarizes the evidence that support the view that activation of the trigeminovascular pathway contribute to the headache phase of a migraine attack, that the development of throbbing in the initial phase of migraine is mediated by sensitization of peripheral trigeminovascular neurons that innervate the meninges, that the development of cephalic allodynia is propelled by sensitization of second-order trigeminovascular neurons in the spinal trigeminal nucleus which receive converging sensory input from the meninges as well as from the scalp and facial skin, and that the development of extracephalic allodynia is mediated by sensitization of third-order trigeminovascular neurons in the posterior thalamic nuclei which receive converging sensory input from the meninges, facial and body skin.

Towards a reliable animal model of migraine

The pharmaceutical industry shows a decreasing interest in the development of drugs for migraine. One of the reasons for this could be the lack of reliable animal models for studying the effect of acute and prophylactic migraine drugs.

The infusion of glyceryl trinitrate (GTN) is the best validated and most studied human migraine model. Several attempts have been made to transfer this model to animals. The different variants of this model are discussed as well as other recent models.

Effect of cortical spreading depression on basal and evoked traffic in the trigeminovascular sensory system

AIM

To use an animal model to test whether migraine pain arises peripherally or centrally.

METHODS

We monitored the spontaneous and evoked activity of second-order trigeminovascular neurons in rats to test whether traffic increased following a potential migraine trigger (cortical spreading depression, CSD) and by what mechanism any such change was mediated.

RESULTS

Neurons (n = 33) responded to stimulation of the dura mater and facial skin with A-δ latencies. They were spontaneously active with a discharge rate of 6.1 ± 6.4 discharges s(-1). Injection of 10 µg lignocaine into the trigeminal ganglion produced a fully reversible reduction of the spontaneous discharge rate of neurons. Neuronal discharge rate returned to normal by 90 min. Lignocaine reduced the evoked responses of neurons to dural stimulation to 37% and to facial skin stimulation to 53% of control. Induction of CSD by cortical injection of KCl increased the spontaneous discharge rate of neurons from 2.9 to 16.3 discharges s(-1) at 20 min post CSD. Injection of 10 µg lignocaine into the trigeminal ganglion at this time failed to arrest or reverse this increase. Injection of lignocaine prior to the initiation of CSD failed to prevent the subsequent development of CSD-induced increases in discharge rates.

CONCLUSIONS

These results suggest that there is a continuous baseline traffic in primary trigeminovascular fibres and that CSD does not act to increase this traffic by a peripheral action alone - rather, it must produce some of its effect by a mechanism intrinsic to the central nervous system. Thus the pain of migraine may not always be the result of peripheral sensory stimulation, but may also arise by a central mechanism.

The biological basis of headache

This article covers the remarkable recent decades as clinicians and scientists have grappled with understanding headache. It is a challenge to understand how a 'normal' brain can become dysfunctional, incapacitating an individual, and then become 'normal' again. Does the answer lie in the anatomy, electrical pathways, the chemistry or a combination? How do the pieces fit together? The components are analyzed in this article. Animal models have provided potential answers. However, these processes have never been proven in man. The dynamic imaging of pain and headache is rapidly evolving and providing new insights and directions of research.

The lack of peripheral pathology in migraine headache

This article reviews the baffling problem of the pathophysiology behind a peripheral genesis of migraine pain--or more particularly the baffling problem of its absence. I examine a number of pathophysiological states and the effector mechanisms for these states and find most of them very plausible and that they are all supported by abundant evidence. However, this evidence is mostly indirect; to date the occurrence of any of the presumed pathological states has not been convincingly demonstrated. Furthermore, there is little evidence of increased trigeminal sensory traffic into the central nervous system during a migraine attack. The article also examines a number of observations and experimental programs used to bolster a theory of peripheral pathology and suggests reasons why they may in fact not bolster it. I suggest that a pathology, if one exists, may be in the brain and even that it may not be a pathology at all. Migraine headache might just happen because of random noise in an exquisitely sensitive and complex network. The article suggests an experimental program to resolve these issues.

Tracing neural connections to pain pathways with relevance to primary headaches

Background: Symptoms associated with primary headaches are linked to cranial vascular activity and to the central nervous system (CNS).

Review: The central projections of sensory nerves from three cranial vessels are described in order to further understand pain mechanisms involved in primary headaches. Tracers that label small and large calibre primary afferent fibres revealed similar distributions for the central terminations of sensory nerves in the superficial temporal artery, superior sagittal sinus and middle meningeal artery. The sensory nerve fibres from the vessels pass through both the trigeminal and rostral cervical spinal nerves and terminate in the ventrolateral part of the C1-C3 dorsal horns and the caudal and interpolar divisions of the spinal trigeminal nucleus. The C-fibre terminations were located mainly in the superficial layers (Rexed laminae I and II), and the Aδ-fibres terminated in the deep layers (laminae III and IV). The rostral projections from the ventrolateral C1-C2 dorsal horn revealed terminations in the medial and lateral parabrachial nuclei, the cuneiform nucleus, the periaqueductal gray, the deep mesencephalic nucleus, the thalamic posterior nuclear group and its triangular part, and the thalamic ventral posteromedial nucleus. The terminations in the pons and midbrain were predominately bilateral, whereas those in the thalamus were confined to the contralateral side.

Conclusions: The observations, done in rats with the understanding that similar trigeminovascular organization exists in man, reveal vascular projections into the brainstem and some aspects of the central regions putatively involved in the central processing of noxious craniovascular signals.

Animal models of headache: from bedside to bench and back to bedside

In recent years bench-based studies have greatly enhanced our understanding of headache pathophysiology, while facilitating the development of new headache medicines. At present, established animal models of headache utilize activation of pain-producing cranial structures, which for a complex syndrome, such as migraine, leaves many dimensions of the syndrome unstudied. The focus on modeling the central nociceptive mechanisms and the complexity of sensory phenomena that accompany migraine may offer new approaches for the development of new therapeutics. Given the complexity of the primary headaches, multiple approaches and techniques need to be employed. As an example, recently a model for trigeminal autonomic cephalalgias has been tested successfully, while by contrast, a satisfactory model of tension-type headache has been elusive. Moreover, although useful in many regards, migraine models are yet to provide a more complete picture of the disorder.

The effects of the TRPV1 receptor antagonist SB-705498 on trigeminovascular sensitisation and neurotransmission

This report examines the effect of the transient receptor potential vanilloid 1 receptor antagonist SB-705498 on neurotransmission and inflammation-induced sensitisation in the trigeminovascular sensory system. A single-neuron electrophysiological animal model for neurovascular head pain was used to evaluate dural and facial noxious inputs and the effects of SB-705498 administered by intravenous (i.v.) injection. Electrical and mechanical stimulation of the dura mater and the facial skin activated second-order neurons in the trigeminal nucleus caudalis of cats, with A-delta latencies. Intravenous injection of SB-705498 (2 mg kg(-1)) produced a slowly developing and long-lasting suppression of responses to dural and skin stimulation. Maximum suppression occurred by 1 h and reached 41% for dura and 24% for skin. Intravenous injection of drug vehicle did not produce significant suppression of responses to stimulation of either dura or skin. Intravenous injection of SB-705498 produced a brief and small rise in blood pressure and dural blood flow, which both returned to normal before suppression of the responses to stimulation became manifest. Application of "inflammatory soup" to the dura mater produced a pronounced increase in dural blood flow and induced a slowly developing increase in the responses of neurons to both electrical and mechanical stimulations of their facial and dural receptive fields. This sensitisation reached a maximum in 60-90 min, at which time responses had risen to approximately twice that of control levels seen before the application of inflammatory soup. Intravenous injection of SB-705498 subsequent to the development of sensitisation produced a slowly developing, prolonged and statistically significant reversal of the sensitisation induced by inflammatory soup. Maximum reversal of sensitisation to electrical stimulation occurred by 150-180 min, when responses had fallen to, or below, control levels. At 70-85 min following injection of SB-705498, the responses of previously sensitised neurons to mechanical stimulation of dura mater and facial receptive field had also returned to near control levels. SB-705498 was also able to prevent the development of sensitisation; application of inflammatory soup to the dura mater induced a slowly developing increase in the responses of neurons to electrical stimulation of the skin and dura mater in cats which had received an i.v. injection of vehicle for SB-705498 but not in cats which had received the active drug. Blood levels of SB-705498 were maximal immediately following i.v. injection and declined over the following 2 h. Significant brain levels of SB-705498 were maintained for up to 9 h. These results suggest that SB-705498 may be an effective suppressant and reversal agent of the sensitisation to sensory input which follows inflammation in the trigeminovascular sensory distribution but may not be particularly useful in blocking primary pain processes such as migraine headache. SB-705498 could thus potentially prevent, modify or reverse the cutaneous trigeminal allodynia seen in certain migraine conditions, especially "transformed" migraine.

Opiate-induced persistent pronociceptive trigeminal neural adaptations: potential relevance to opiate-induced medication overuse headache

Medication overuse headache (MOH) is a challenging, debilitating disorder that develops from the frequent use of medications taken for the treatment of migraine headache pain. MOH affects an estimated 3-5% of the general population. The mechanisms underlying the development of MOH remain unknown. Opiates are one of the major classes of medications used for the treatment of migraine at least in some countries, including the USA. Although the effects of repeated opiate use for headache are unknown, it is possible that opiate use may contribute to increased frequency and occurrence of such headaches. Recent preclinical studies exploring the neuroadaptive changes following sustained exposure to morphine may give some insights into possible causes of MOH. Peripherally, these changes include increased expression of calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) in trigeminal primary afferent neurons. Centrally, they include increased excitatory neurotransmission at the level of the dorsal horn and nucleus caudalis. Critically, these neuroadaptive changes persist for long periods of time and the evoked release of CGRP is enhanced following morphine pretreatment. Stimuli known to elicit migraine, such as nitric oxide donors or stress, produce hyperalgesia in morphine- but not in saline-pretreated rats even long after the discontinuation of the opiate. CGRP plays a prominent role in initiating vasodilation of the intracranial blood vessels and subsequent headache. Furthermore, studies have demonstrated increased excitability of the nociceptive pathway in migraine sufferers, and CGRP receptor antagonists have been shown to be efficacious in migraine pain. Thus, such persistent neuroadaptive changes may be relevant to the processes that promote MOH.

Migraine: where and how does the pain originate?

Migraine is a complex neurological disease with a genetic background. Headache is the most prominent and clinically important symptom of migraine but its origin is still enigmatic. Numerous clinical, histochemical, electrophysiological, molecular and genetical approaches form a puzzle of findings that slowly takes shape. The generation of primary headaches like migraine pain seems to be the consequence of multiple pathophysiological changes in meningeal tissues, the trigeminal ganglion, trigeminal brainstem nuclei and descending inhibitory systems, based on specific characteristics of the trigeminovascular system. This contribution reviews the current discussion of where and how the migraine pain may originate and outlines the experimental work to answer these questions.

Central nervous system networks involved in the processing of meningeal and cutaneous inputs from the ophthalmic branch of the trigeminal nerve in the rat

This study analysed the organization of central nervous system networks involved in the processing of meningeal inputs in the male, Sprague-Dawley rat. We injected the anterograde tracer, biotin dextran, into areas of the medullary trigeminal nucleus caudalis (Sp5C), which receive inputs from the ophthalmic division of the trigeminal nerve. Double-labelling immunohistochemical studies were then performed to compare calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) or serotonin 1D (5HT1(D)) receptor distributions in the areas innervated by Sp5C neurons. Dense, topographically organized intratrigeminal connections were observed. Sp5C neurons projected to the commissural subnucleus of the solitary tract, A5 cell group region/superior salivatory nucleus, lateral periaqueductal grey matter, inferior colliculus and parabrachial nuclei. Trigeminothalamic afferents were restricted to the posterior group and ventroposteromedial thalamic nuclei. Some of these areas are also immunoreactive for 5HT1(D) and CGRP and thus remain potential central targets of triptan molecules and other antimigraine drugs.

The influence of gender and sex steroids on craniofacial nociception

Several pain conditions localized to the craniofacial region show a remarkable sex-related difference in their prevalence. These conditions include temporomandibular disorders and burning mouth syndrome as well as tension-type, migraine, and cluster headaches. The mechanisms that underlie sex-related differences in the prevalence of these craniofacial pain conditions remain obscure and likely involve both physiological and psychosocial factors. In terms of physiological factors relevant to the development of headache, direct evidence of sex-related differences in the properties of dural afferent fibers or durally activated second-order trigeminal sensory neurons has yet to be provided. There is, however, evidence for sex-related differences in the response properties of afferent fibers and second-order trigeminal sensory neurons that convey nociceptive input from other craniofacial tissues associated with sex-related differences in chronic pain conditions, such as those that innervate the masseter muscle and temporomandibular joint. Further, modulation of craniofacial nociceptive input by opioidergic receptor mechanisms appears to be dependent on biological sex. Research into mechanisms that may contribute to sex-related differences in trigeminal nociceptive processing has primarily focused on effect of the female sex hormone estrogen, which appears to alter the excitability of trigeminal afferent fibers and sensory neurons to noxious stimulation of craniofacial tissues. This article discusses current knowledge of potential physiological mechanisms that could contribute to sex-related differences in certain craniofacial pain conditions.

Modulation of nociceptive dural input to the trigeminal nucleus caudalis via activation of the orexin 1 receptor in the rat

Migraine pathophysiology is thought to involve the trigeminal innervation of the dura mater and intracranial blood vessels. Electrical stimulation of dural blood vessels is painful in humans and causes activation of neurons in the caudal-most portion of the trigeminal nucleus in experimental animals. The hypothalamic neuropeptides orexin A and B are selectively synthesized in the lateral and posterior hypothalamus, and recent findings have implicated their involvement in nociceptive processing. To evaluate the potential for orexin receptor modulation of trigeminovascular nociceptive afferents, we examined the effects of intravenous orexin A and B on responses of neurons in the trigeminal nucleus caudalis. To dissect the receptor pharmacology of responses to stimulation we utilized the novel orexin 1 receptor (OX(1)R) antagonist N-(2-methyl-6-benzoxazolyl)-N''-1,5-naphthyridin-4-yl urea (SB-334867). Orexin A 30 microg/kg (F(1.9,9.8) = 21.93, P < 0.001) and 50 microg/kg (F(3.2,16.4) = 3.28, P < 0.045) inhibited the A-fibre responses to dural electrical stimulation over 60 min. Maximum inhibition was achieved at 25 min for both 30 microg/kg (t(5) = 19.83, n = 6, P < 0.001) and 50 microg/kg (t(5) = 7.74, n = 6, P < 0.001). The response with orexin A 30 microg/kg was reversed by pretreatment with the OX(1)R antagonist SB-334867 (F(3.5,17.5) = 0.49, P = 0.73), which had no effect when given alone. Orexin B and control vehicle administration had no significant effect on trigeminal neuronal firing. The current study demonstrates that orexin A is able to inhibit A-fibre responses to dural electrical stimulation via activation of the OX(1)R.

Donitriptan, but not sumatriptan, inhibits capsaicin-induced canine external carotid vasodilatation via 5-HT1B rather than 5-HT1D receptors

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

It has been suggested that during a migraine attack capsaicin-sensitive trigeminal sensory nerves release calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP), resulting in cranial vasodilatation and central nociception; hence, trigeminal inhibition may prevent this vasodilatation and abort migraine headache. This study investigated the effects of the agonists sumatriptan (5-HT(1B/1D) water-soluble), donitriptan (5-HT(1B/1D) lipid-soluble), PNU-142633 (5-HT(1D) water-soluble) and PNU-109291 (5-HT(1D) lipid-soluble) on vasodilator responses to capsaicin, alpha-CGRP and acetylcholine in dog external carotid artery.

EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH

59 vagosympathectomized dogs were anaesthetized with sodium pentobarbitone. Blood pressure and heart rate were recorded with a pressure transducer, connected to a cannula inserted into a femoral artery. A precalibrated flow probe was placed around the common carotid artery, with ligation of the internal carotid and occipital branches, and connected to an ultrasonic flowmeter. The thyroid artery was cannulated for infusion of agonists.

KEY RESULTS

Intracarotid infusions of capsaicin, alpha-CGRP and acetylcholine dose-dependently increased blood flow through the carotid artery. These responses remained unaffected after intravenous (i.v.) infusions of sumatriptan, PNU-142633, PNU-109291 or physiological saline; in contrast, donitriptan significantly attenuated the vasodilator responses to capsaicin, but not those to alpha-CGRP or acetylcholine. Only sumatriptan and donitriptan dose-dependently decreased the carotid blood flow. Interestingly, i.v. administration of the antagonist, SB224289 (5-HT(1B)), but not of BRL15572 (5-HT(1D)), abolished the inhibition by donitriptan.

CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS

Our results suggest that the inhibition produced by donitriptan of capsaicin-induced external carotid vasodilatation is mainly mediated by 5-HT(1B), rather than 5-HT(1D), receptors, probably by a central mechanism.

Response Properties of Dural Nociceptors in Relation to Headache

Single-unit electrophysiological recording studies have examined the activity of sensory neurons in the trigeminal ganglion that innervate the intracranial meninges to better understand their possible role in headache. A key question is whether the meningeal sensory neurons are similar to nociceptive neurons in other tissues or, alternatively, whether they have unique properties that might be of significance for headache pathogenesis and drug therapy. Such studies have indeed found that the intracranial dura is innervated by neurons that exhibit properties characteristic of nociceptors in other tissues, including chemosensitivity and sensitization. This sensitization, consisting of an enhanced responsiveness to mechanical stimuli, might be relevant to symptoms that are characteristic of certain headaches that indicate the presence of an exaggerated intracranial mechanosensitivity. Studies that examined whether the anti-migraine agent sumatriptan might inhibit this sensitization (in addition to its well-known inhibition of neurotransmitter release) found that it had no inhibitory effect but rather produced a calcium-dependent discharge, which might account for the initial worsening of headache that can follow sumatriptan administration. In studies that examined the effects of vasodilator agents, nitroprusside produced mixed effects on mechanosensitivity, whereas calciton gene-related peptide (CGRP) had no effect on either spontaneous or mechanically evoked discharge. These results call into question the role of vasodilation in headache and suggest that the role of CGRP in headache may be through its action as a central neurotransmitter rather than through vasodilation and activation of meningeal nociceptors. In general, studies of meningeal sensory neurons have not found evidence of unique properties that distinguish them from nociceptive neurons in other tissues. Ultimately the distinctive clinical characteristics of headache may prove to be related not so much to any differences in the intrinsic molecular or cellular properties of the meningeal sensory neurons but rather to the distinctive properties of the tissue that they innervate.

Central projections of sensory innervation of the rat superior sagittal sinus

The central projections of the rat superior sagittal sinus (SSS) sensory innervation were studied by transganglionic tract tracing techniques. Cholera toxin subunit b (CTb) or wheat germ agglutinin-horseradish peroxidase conjugate (WGA-HRP) was applied on the overlying dura of the SSS and labeled terminations in the brainstem and cervical spinal cord were examined under the light microscope. Labeled cell bodies were seen bilaterally in the trigeminal ganglia and in the C2 dorsal root ganglia following both CTb and WGA-HRP applications. In the brainstem, labeled terminations were mainly found in the caudal and interpolar parts of the spinal trigeminal nucleus. In the CTb cases, terminations were also found in the dorsolateral part of the cuneate nucleus. In the spinal cord, labeled terminations were primarily located in the most ventrolateral part of the C1-C3 spinal dorsal horns on both sides. WGA-HRP labeled terminations were mainly located in laminae I and II, whereas CTb-labeled terminations located in laminae III and IV. These results indicate that the sensory information from the SSS is transmitted through both trigeminal and cervical spinal nerve branches to a primary sensory nervous center that extends from the C3 dorsal horn until to the interpolar part of the spinal trigeminal nucleus.

Preclinical neuropharmacology of naratriptan

The basic CNS neuropharmacology of naratriptan is reviewed here. Naratriptan is a second-generation triptan antimigraine drug, developed at a time when CNS activity was thought not to be relevant to its therapeutic effect in migraine. It was, however, developed to be a more lipid-soluble, more readily absorbed and less readily metabolized variant on preexisting triptans and these variations conferred on it a higher CNS profile. Naratriptan is a 5-HT(1B/1D) receptor agonist with a highly selective action on migraine pain and nausea, without significant effect on other pain or even other trigeminal pain. Probable sites of therapeutic action of naratriptan include any or all of: the cranial vasculature; the peripheral terminations of trigeminovascular sensory nerves; the first-order synapses of the trigeminovascular sensory system; the descending pain control system; and the nuclei of the thalamus. Naratriptan may prevent painful dilatation of intracranial vessels or reverse such painful dilatation. Naratriptan can prevent the release of sensory peptides and inhibit painful neurogenic vasodilatation of intracranial blood vessels. At the first order synapse of the trigeminal sensory system, naratriptan can selectively suppress neurotransmission from sensory fibers from dural and vascular tissue, while sparing transmission from other trigeminal fibers, probably through inhibition of neuropeptide transmitter release. In the periaqueductal gray matter and in the nucleus raphe magnus, naratriptan selectively activates inhibitory neurons which project to the trigeminal nucleus and spinal cord and which exert inhibitory influences on trigeminovascular sensory input. Naratriptan has also a therapeutic effect on the nausea of migraine, possibly exerting its action at the level of the nucleus tractus solitarius via the same mechanisms by which it inhibits trigeminovascular nociceptive input. The incidence of naratriptan-induced adverse effects in the CNS is low and it is not an analgesic for pain other than that of vascular headache. In patients receiving selective serotonin uptake inhibitors (SSRIs) naratriptan may cause serotonin syndrome-like behavioral side effects. The mechanism of action involved in the production of behavioral and other CNS side effects of naratriptan is unknown.

Axon diameters and intradural trajectories of the dural innervation in the rat

Neurophysiological studies have characterized the sensory responses of primary afferent nociceptors that innervate the intracranial dura. The present study used anatomical methods to examine in greater detail the axonal trajectories within the dura, as well as the axonal size distribution of the dural innervation. Immunostaining for CGRP in dural wholemounts revealed a network of fibers extending across the entire dura, with an especially dense plexus running along the borders of the transverse and superior sagittal sinuses. The plexus along the caudal border of the transverse sinus partially overlapped the dural area that shows the greatest density of mast cells. Visualization of axon bundles by DiI application in formalin-fixed tissue revealed two separate systems of fibers in the dura that could be distinguished by the orientation of their trajectories: one that runs parallel to the middle meningeal artery (MMA), and another with a more or less orthogonal orientation that runs rostromedially from the transverse sinus across the MMA. Axons traversed large distances across the dura, but the majority of the branching and arborization was usually concentrated in the distal part of the trajectory. In separate animals, measurement of myelinated axon diameters with electron microscopy showed that approximately one-third of the myelinated axons in the nerves supplying the dura (nervus spinosus and tentorial nerves) could be classified as A-beta, since they were comparable in size to the majority of axons in the trochlear nerve and the upper end of the size range in the trigeminal nerve (i.e., > 5 microm).

Decreased habituation of the R2 component of the blink reflex in migraine patients

OBJECTIVE

Activation of the trigemino-vascular system as well as of brainstem trigeminal nuclei are thought to play an important role in migraine. The aim of this study was to investigate the habituation phenomenon of the blink reflex in 30 headache-free migraine patients and 30 control subjects.

METHODS

An electromyographic device with a specific habituation test program was used to elicit and record blink reflex responses on both the right and left sides, and to randomly repeat the stimulations at different time intervals in order to induce habituation.

RESULTS

Whereas the R1 and R2 latencies, amplitudes and areas in the basal assessment were similar in patients and control subjects, the blink reflex habituation responses were markedly reduced in migraine patients who had a migraine attack within 72 h after testing (group A). In these patients, the differences between the R2 areas, obtained when stimuli were delivered at subsequent time intervals ranging between 10-5, 5-4, 4-3 and 3-2 s, were statistically different (P<0.001) from those of the patients who had a migraine attack after a longer time interval (group B) and control subjects.

CONCLUSIONS

Our data suggest that the brainstem pathways involved in the blink reflex may be activated in the premonitory phase of migraine attacks, probably through mechanisms that involve dopaminergic function.

Mechanical response properties of A and C primary afferent neurons innervating the rat intracranial dura

The intracranial dura receives a small-fiber sensory innervation from the trigeminal ganglion that is thought to be involved in some types of headaches, including migraine. Mechanical response properties of dural afferent neurons were examined to investigate variation across the population in the properties of threshold, slope, adaptation, and incidence of mechanosensitivity. Dural afferent neurons were recorded in the trigeminal ganglion of urethan-anesthetized rats and were identified by their constant-latency response to dural shock. Neurons were classified as fast A (>5 m/s), slow A (5 >or= conduction velocity (CV) >or= 1.5 m/s), or C (<1.5 m/s), based on response latency to dural shock. Mechanical receptive fields were identified by stroking or indenting the outer surface of the dura. Stimulus-response curves were obtained from responses to 2-s constant-force indenting stimuli of graded intensities delivered to the dural receptive field with a servo force-controlled mechanical stimulator. The slow A population had the highest percentage of mechanosensitive units (97%) as well as the highest slopes and the lowest thresholds. Thus by all three criteria, the slow As had the highest mechanosensitivity. Conversely, the fast A population had the lowest mechanosensitivity in that it had the lowest percentage of mechanosensitive units (66%), the lowest slopes, and the highest thresholds. The C population was intermediate with respect to all three properties but was much more similar to the slow As than to the fast As. All three fiber classes showed a negative correlation between slope and threshold. The majority of neurons showed a slowly adapting response to a maintained 2-s stimulus. Adapting neurons could be subdivided based on whether the fitted exponential curve decayed to zero or to a nonzero plateau; the latter group contained the most sensitive neurons in that they had the lowest thresholds and highest slopes. Nonadapting neurons generally had lower initial firing rates than adapting neurons. Fast A neurons exhibited greater and more rapid adaptation than slow A and C neurons. Neurons with the lowest slopes, regardless of CV, had relatively rapid adaptation. The more slowly conducting portion of the C population was distinguished from the other C neurons by a number of properties: more mechanically insensitive neurons, higher thresholds, and more nonadapting neurons. These differences in mechanical response properties may be related in part to differences in membrane currents involved in impulse generation that have been described in subpopulations of dorsal root ganglion cells.

Suppression by eletriptan of the activation of trigeminovascular sensory neurons by glyceryl trinitrate

The effect of intracarotid arterial infusions of glyceryl trinitrate (GTN), a substance known to precipitate vascular headache, on the spontaneous activity of trigeminal neurons with craniovascular input was studied in cats. Cats were anaesthetised with alpha-chloralose, immobilised and artificially ventilated. The superior sagittal sinus (SSS) was isolated and stimulated electrically. Facial receptive fields (RF) were also stimulated. Single neurons were recorded from the trigeminal nucleus caudalis with a metal microelectrode equipped with six glass barrels for microiontophoresis. Infusions of GTN were administered via a catheter inserted retrogradely into the common carotid artery through the lingual artery. Infusions of GTN (mean rate 19+/-7, range 5-100 microg kg(-1) min(-1), in a volume of 2 ml min(-1)) increased the spontaneous discharge rate of second-order neurons which received dural and facial sensory input to 429+/-80% of control. Iontophoretic application of the 5-HT(1B/1D) receptor agonist eletriptan (50 nA) at the peak of the response decreased the discharge rate of neurons towards pre-GTN control levels. In the presence of continuous iontophoretic application of the 5-HT(1B/1D) receptor antagonist GR127935, the decrease in discharge rate caused by eletriptan was antagonised. We conclude (1) that GTN activates craniovascular sensory pathways at a site at, or peripheral to, the second-order neuron and that such an action may account for at least the acute-onset headache induced by GTN and (2) that the antimigraine agent eletriptan is able to selectively suppress noxious sensory information from the dura, induced by GTN, via an action at 5-HT(1B/1D) receptors.

The role of 5-HT1B and 5-HT1D receptors in the selective inhibitory effect of naratriptan on trigeminovascular neurons

The importance of 5-HT(1B) and 5-HT(1D) receptors in the actions of the anti-migraine drug naratriptan was investigated using the relatively selective 5-HT(1) receptor ligands SB224289 and BRL15572. Electrical stimulation of the superior sagittal sinus (SSS) in cats activated neurones in the trigeminal nucleus caudalis. Facial receptive fields (RF) were also electrically stimulated to activate the same neurones. Responses of these neurones to SSS stimulation were suppressed by iontophoretic application of naratriptan (5-50 nA). There were two distinct populations of neurones in the nucleus--those in deeper laminae in which the responses to SSS and RF stimulation were equally suppressed by naratriptan ('non-selective') and more superficial neurones in which only the SSS responses were suppressed by naratriptan ('selective'). Concurrent micro-iontophoretic application (50 nA) of the 5-HT(1D) antagonist BRL15572 antagonised the suppression by naratriptan of the response of 'selective' cells to SSS stimulation. Iontophoretic application of SB224289 (50 nA), a 5-HT(1B) antagonist, antagonised the suppression by naratriptan of responses of 'non-selective' cells to RF stimulation and, to a lesser extent, also antagonised the suppression of responses to SSS stimulation. Intravenous administration of SB224289 antagonised the suppression only of RF responses of "non-selective" neurons by naratriptan and intravenous administration of BRL15572 antagonised the suppression only of SSS responses of "selective" neurons by naratriptan. These results suggest that the response of nucleus caudalis neurons to stimulation of the sagittal sinus can be modulated by both 5-HT(1B) and 5-HT(1D) receptor activation, with the 5-HT(1D) receptors perhaps playing a greater role. The response to RF stimulation is more influenced by 5-HT(1B) receptor modulation with 5-HT(1D) receptors being less important. Therefore, this suggests that selective 5-HT(1D) agonists may be able to target the neuronal population, which is selectively involved in the transmission of dural inputs. We conclude that the central terminals of trigeminal primary afferent fibres contain 5-HT(1B) and 5-HT(1D) receptors. Primary afferents from the dura mater may predominantly express 5-HT(1D) receptors, while facial afferents may predominantly express 5-HT(1B) receptors. Activation of 5-HT(1D) receptors in particular may be important in the anti-migraine effect of naratriptan.

Catecholaminergic and acetylcholine esterase containing nerves of cranial and spinal dura mater in humans and rodents

The innervation of cranial and spinal dura mater in humans and rodents was studied by examining several dural zones (vascular, perivascular, intervascular) in different regions. Characterization and distribution of dural acetylcholinesterase-positive nerve fibers, catecholaminergic nerve fibers, and mast cells are analyzed and discussed. The results of chemical and surgical sympathectomy as well as the relationships between catecholaminergic nerve fibers and mast cells are studied. Our results are discussed in the light of possible implications in the physiopathology of dural algic syndromes including cephalalgia and spinal pain.

Meningeal nociception: electrophysiological studies related to headache and referred pain

Headaches, which are usually referred to characteristic sites of the skull, are believed to involve meningeal nociceptors located in the dura mater encephali. Animal experiments show that these meningeal nociceptors are polymodal and usually highly sensitive to mechanical stimulation. These properties are also characteristic for the second order neurons in the spinal trigeminal nucleus, most of which receive convergent input from facial receptive sites. Sensitization of primary and secondary neurons by chemical irritants to mechanical stimuli may be an important mechanism in the generation of headaches. The convergent input from extracranial structures, which seems to be differentially organized in rodents and man, may explain the typical features of referred headache. Targets for analgesics used in the therapy of headaches (non-steroidal antiinflammatory drugs, 5-HT(1) receptor agonists) are probably meningeal nociceptors and different sites of the central trigeminal nociceptive and antinociceptive pathways.

Physiology of meningeal innervation: aspects and consequences of chemosensitivity of meningeal nociceptors

Up to now, the cause of most types of headaches is unknown. Why headache starts or why it fades away during hours or a few days is still a mystery. This phenomenon makes headache unique compared to other pain states. For long it has been known that during headache sensory structures in the meninges are activated. But it was not until the last two decades that scientists investigated the physiology of the sensory innervation of the meninges. Animal models and in vitro preparations have been developed to get access to the meninges and to determine the response properties of meningeal afferents. Although animals hardly can tell their pain, blood pressure measurements and observations of behaviour in two models of headache suggest that such animal models are valid and may add remarkable information to our understanding of human headache. Since chemicals and endogenous inflammatory mediators may alter sensory thresholds and responsiveness of neurons, they are putative key molecules in triggering pathophysiological sensory processing. This review briefly summarizes what is known about the chemosensitivity of meningeal innervation.

Activation of trigeminovascular neurons by glyceryl trinitrate

The effect of intra-carotid arterial infusions of glyceryl trinitrate (GTN), a substance known to precipitate headache, including migraine, upon the spontaneous activity of trigeminal neurons with craniovascular input was studied in cats. Second-order craniovascular neurons which received sensory input from the superior sagittal sinus were recorded in the trigeminal nucleus caudalis. Infusions of GTN were administered via a catheter inserted retrogradely into the common carotid artery through the lingual artery. Infusions of GTN (100 microg kg(-1) min(-1) in a volume of 2 ml min(-1)) increased the mean basal discharge rate of all second-order neurons to 239+/-47% of control. GTN produced a fall in mean blood pressure, but there was no correlation between this fall and the changes in discharge rate. GTN infusions sensitised neurons to the effects of electrical stimulation of the superior sagittal sinus, but not to subsequent GTN infusions. Infusions of similar volumes of vehicle did not alter the discharge rate of neurons. We conclude that GTN activates craniovascular sensory pathways at a site at, or peripheral to, the second-order neuron and that such an action may account for at least the acute-onset headache induced by GTN.

The pharmacology of headache

Headache is a common problem which besets most of us at some time or the other. The pharmacology of headache is complex in an overall sense but can be understood in terms of the anatomy and physiology of the pain-producing structures. Migraine can be used as a template to understand the activation of nociceptive systems in the head and thus their neurotransmitter mediation and modulation. In recent years, the role of serotonin (5-HT) in headache pharmacology has been unravelled in the context of both understanding its role in the nociceptive systems related to headache and by exploiting its 5-HT1 receptor subtypes in headache therapeutics. The pharmacology of the head pain systems, as they are known and as they might evolve, are explored in the context of both, the anatomy and physiology of trigeminovascular nociception and in the context of clinical questions, such as those of efficacy, headache recurrence and adverse events.

Glutamatergic transmission in the trigeminal nucleus assessed with local blood flow

Stimulation of the superior sagittal sinus in humans is pain-producing and in experimental animals leads to excitation of neurons in the caudal trigeminal nucleus and dorsal horns of the C(1/)C(2) cervical spinal cord: the trigeminocervical complex. Neuronal excitation is generally associated with an increase in local blood flow due to flow/metabolism coupling and we have used local blood flow in the trigeminocervical complex to examine the role of N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA)-mediated transmission in these neurons. Cats were anaesthetised with alpha-chloralose (60 mg/kg, ip; supplements 20 mg/kg iv) after surgical preparation under halothane (0.5-3%). Animals were paralysed with gallamine triethiodide to prevent possible movement artefact distorting the laser Doppler signals. The superior sagittal sinus was isolated for electrical stimulation (150 V; 250 microsec duration; 0.5, 1, 2, 5, 10 and 20 Hz) and the dorsal surface of the spinal cord exposed at the C(2) level. Blood flow was recorded from the region over the trigeminocervical complex by careful placement of a laser Doppler flow probe. Flow was recorded continuously by an online collection programme and NMDA-mediated transmission modulated by intravenous administration of MK-801 (0.4, 1 and 4 mg/kg, iv) at the stimulation frequency of 5 Hz. Stimulation of the superior sagittal sinus produced a stimulus-locked, frequency-dependent increase in blood flow in the region of the trigeminocervical complex. The mean maximum response was 39+/-4% at 20 Hz. MK-801 had no effect on the resting flow signal but markedly attenuated the SSS-evoked response in a dose-dependent manner. The mean maximum response after 4 mg/kg MK-801 was 13+/-2%. NMDA-mediated transmission is likely to be involved in nociceptive trigeminovascular transmission within the trigeminocervical complex and offers a possible target for both acute and preventative treatment of migraine.

5-HT(1A) and 5-HT(1B/1D) receptors are involved in the modulation of the trigeminovascular system of the cat: a microiontophoretic study

Electrical stimulation of the superior sagittal sinus in the cat activated neurones in the trigeminal nucleus caudalis. The mean latency of these responses (10.1 ms) was consistent with activation of Adelta-fibres. Microiontophoretic ejection of either the selective serotonin(1A) (5-HT(1A)) agonist (+)8-OH-DPAT or the 5-HT(1B/1D) agonist alniditan resulted in the reversible suppression of the response to superior sagittal sinus stimulation of 29/46 and 18/20 trigeminal neurones, respectively. The response to sagittal sinus stimulation was suppressed by 39+/-5% (n=46) by (+)8-OH-DPAT and 65+/-5% (n=20) by alniditan. Microiontophoretic ejection of the selective 5-HT(1A) receptor antagonist WAY-100635 significantly antagonised the effect of (+)8-OH-DPAT (effect reduced by 30%, P<0.05). The ejection of GR-127935, a selective 5-HT(1B/1D), antagonist, significantly antagonised the effect of alniditan (effect reduced by 52%, P<0.02). In eight neurones the response to convergent facial receptive field stimulation was also tested in the presence of alniditan. Only 4/8 receptive field responses were suppressed by alniditan (compared to 8/8 sagittal sinus responses) and alniditan had significantly less quantitative effect on the response to receptive field stimulation than on the response to sagittal sinus stimulation in the same neurones (mean reduction 36+/-14% and 66+/-8%, respectively, P<0.05). These results suggest that pharmacological modulation of the trigeminovascular system can occur at the first central synapse and that, in addition to 5-HT(1B/1D) receptors, 5-HT(1A) receptors may be involved in the modulation of sensory neurotransmission in the trigeminovascular system.

Simultaneous depletion of neurokinin A, substance P and calcitonin gene-related peptide from the caudal trigeminal nucleus of the rat during electrical stimulation of the trigeminal ganglion

The central terminals of the primary sensory trigeminal ganglion (TG) neurons projecting into the caudal trigeminal nucleus (CTN) of the rat exhibit neurokinin A (NKA)-, substance P (SP)-, and calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP)-immunoreactivities (IRs). We stimulated the TG in the rat to induce some of the alterations which might occur during migraine (neurogenic inflammation). Under a stereotaxic apparatus and by means of a bipolar electrode, one-side TG of the animals were electrically stimulated (7.5 Hz, 5 ms, 0.8-1. 4 mA) with square pulses for 5 min. Then, using immunohistochemical methods, the lower medulla of each rat was studied for NKA-, SP- and CGRP-IRs. Light microscopic examination of brain-stem sequencial sections revealed a simultaneous decrease in the immunoreactivities of all neuropeptides (NKA, SP and CGRP) in the CTN ipsilateral to TG stimulation in comparison with the other (not stimulated) side CTN. It is suggested that this decrease in immunoreactivity would be due to the co-release of neuropeptides following noxious stimuli and that NKA, SP and CGRP might therefore act as co-transmitters or co-modulators at the first central synapses of the trigeminal sensory pathway.

Effect of cortical spreading depression on activity of trigeminovascular sensory neurons

The effect of cortical spreading depression, a proposed initiating event for migraine pain, on cortical blood flow (laser Doppler method) and on the spontaneous firing rate and stimulus-evoked responses of trigemino-cervical neurons with craniovascular input was studied in 17 neurons in 8 cats anesthetized with chloralose. Cortical spreading depression, induced via cortical pinprick injury, produced an initial wave of cortical hyperemia (243+/-57% of control) and a later and smaller phase of oligemia (96+/-4% of control). Neither the basal discharge rate (6.7+/-1.7 sec(-1)) nor the evoked responses to electrical stimulation of the superior sagittal sinus (4.1+/-0.8 discharges per stimulus) of upper cervical spinal cord neurons was altered over periods of up to 2 h following one, two, or three waves of spreading cortical depression. We conclude that a small number of episodes of cortical spreading depression is not capable of activating C2 cervical spinal cord craniovascular sensory neurons in the cat.

Fos expression in the trigeminocervical complex of the cat after stimulation of the superior sagittal sinus is reduced by L-NAME

Primary neurovascular headaches, such as migraine and cluster headache probably involve activation of trigeminovascular pain structures projecting to the trigeminocervical complex of neurons in the caudal brain stem and upper cervical spinal cord. It has recently been demonstrated that blockade of the synthesis of nitric oxide (NO) by an NO synthesis inhibitor can abort acute migraine attacks and thus it is of interest to determine whether there is an influence of NO generation on trigeminocervical neurons. Cats were anaesthetised with alpha-chloralose (60 mg/kg, i.t.). supplemental 20 mg/kg, intravenously (i.v.)) and halothane for surgery (0.5-3% by inhalation). A circular midline craniotomy was performed to isolate the superior sagittal sinus (SSS) for electrical stimulation (0.3 Hz, 150 V, 250 micros duration for 2 h). Two groups were compared, one stimulated after administration of vehicle and the other stimulated after administration of N(G)-nitro-L-arginine methylester (L-NAME: 100 mg/kg, i.v.). After stimulation of the SSS Fos immunoreactivity was observed in lamina I/IIo of the trigeminal nucleus caudalis and dorsal horns of C1 and C2 to a median total of 136 cells (range 122-146). After L-NAME treatment Fos expression was significantly reduced to 40 cells (24-54; P < 0.02). In conclusion, inhibition of NO synthesis L-NAME markedly reduces Fos expression in the trigeminocervical complex of the cat. These data taken together with the clinical observations of the effect of NO synthesis blockade in migraine suggest a role for NO generation in mediating nociceptive transmission in acute migraine.

Response properties of trigeminal brain stem neurons with input from dura mater encephali in the rat

The responsiveness of trigeminal brain stem neurons to selective local mechanical and chemical stimulation of the cranial dura mater was examined in a preparation in the rat. The dura mater encephali was exposed and its surface stimulated with electrical pulses through bipolar electrodes. Extracellular recordings were made from neurons in the subnucleus caudalis of the spinal trigeminal nucleus. Single neurons driven by meningeal input were identified by their responses to electrical stimulation and to probing their receptive fields on the dura. Facial receptive fields were defined mechanically. Chemical stimuli (a combination of inflammatory mediators, bradykinin, prostaglandin E2, serotonin, capsaicin and acidic Tyrode's solution) were applied topically to the dura and by injection through a catheter into the superior sagittal sinus. All neurons with input from the parietal dura mater had convergent input from the facial skin, with preponderance of the periorbital region. Proportions of units were activated by the combination of inflammatory mediators (55%), bradykinin (64.5%), acidic Tyrode's solution (64.1%) and capsaicin (78.6%). We conclude that, among the chemical mediators of inflammation, bradykinin and low pH are the most effective chemical stimuli in activating meningeal nociceptors. These stimuli may be important during meningeal inflammatory processes that lead to the generation of headaches.

Stimulation of the middle meningeal artery leads to Fos expression in the trigeminocervical nucleus: a comparative study of monkey and cat

The pain of a migraine attack is often described as unilateral, with a throbbing or pulsating quality. The middle meningeal artery (MMA) is the largest artery supplying the dura mater, is paired, and pain-producing in humans. This artery, or its branches, and other large intracranial extracerebral vessels have been implicated in the pathophysiology of migraine by theories suggesting neurogenic inflammation or cranial vasodilatation, or both, as explanations for the pain of migraine. Having previously studied in detail the distribution of the second order neurons that are involved in the transmission of nociceptive signals from intracranial venous sinuses, we sought to compare the distribution of second order neurons from a pain-producing intracranial artery in both monkey and cat. By electrically stimulating the middle meningeal artery in these species and using immunohistochemical detection of the proto-oncogene Fos as a marker of neuronal activation, we have mapped the sites of the central trigeminal neurons which may be involved in transmission of nociception from intracranial extracerebral arteries. Ten cats and 3 monkeys were anaesthetised with alpha-chloralose and the middle meningeal artery was isolated following a temporal craniotomy. The animals were maintained under stable anaesthesia for 24 h to allow Fos expression due to the initial surgery to dissipate. Following the rest period, the vessel was carefully lifted onto hook electrodes, and then left alone in control animals (cat n = 3), or stimulated (cat n = 6, monkey n = 3). Stimulation of the left middle meningeal artery evoked Fos expression in the trigeminocervical nucleus, consisting of the dorsal horn of the caudal medulla and upper 2 divisions of the cervical spinal cord, on both the ipsilateral and contralateral sides. Cats had larger amounts of Fos expressed on the ipsilateral than on the contralateral side. Fos expression in the caudal nucleus tractus solitarius and its caudal extension in lamina X of the spinal cord was seen bilaterally in response to middle meningeal artery stimulation. This study demonstrates a comparable anatomical distribution of Fos activation between cat and monkey and, when compared with previous studies, between this arterial structure and the superior sagittal sinus. These data add to the overall picture of the trigeminovascular innervation of the intracranial pain-producing vessels showing marked anatomical overlap which is consistent with the often poorly localised pain of migraine.