Dexamethasone kinetics in depressed patients before and after clinical response

Demographics, assessment and management of pain in the elderly

The prevalence of pain increases with each decade of life. Pain in the elderly is distinctly different from pain experienced by younger individuals. Cancer is a leading cause of pain; however, other conditions that cause pain such as facet joint arthritis (causing low back pain), polymyalgia rheumatica, Paget's disease, neuropathies, peripheral vascular disease and coronary disease most commonly occur in patients over the age of 50 years. Poorly controlled pain in the elderly leads to cognitive failure, depression and mood disturbance and reduces activities of daily living. Barriers to pain management include a sense of fatalism, denial, the desire to be 'the good patient', geographical barriers and financial limitations. Aging causes physiological changes that alter the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of analgesics, narrowing their therapeutic index and increasing the risk of toxicity and drug-drug interactions. CNS changes lead to an increased risk of delirium. Assessment among the verbal but cognitively impaired elderly is satisfactorily accomplished with the help of unidimensional and multidimensional pain scales. A comprehensive physical examination and pain history is essential, as well as a review of cognitive function and activities of daily living. The goal of pain management among the elderly is improvement in pain and optimisation of activities of daily living, not complete eradication of pain nor the lowest possible drug dosages. Most successful management strategies combine pharmacological and nonpharmacological (home remedies, massage, topical agents, heat and cold packs and informal cognitive strategies) therapies. A basic principle of the pharmacological approach in the elderly is to start analgesics at low dosages and titrate slowly. The WHO's three-step guideline to pain management should guide prescribing. Opioid choices necessitate an understanding of pharmacology to ensure safe administration in end-organ failure and avoidance of drug interactions. Adjuvant analgesics are used to reduce opioid adverse effects or improve poorly controlled pain. Adjuvant analgesics (NSAIDs, tricyclic antidepressants and antiepileptic drugs) are initiated prior to opioids for nociceptive and neuropathic pain. Preferred adjuvants for nociceptive pain are short-acting paracetamol (acetaminophen), NSAIDs, cyclo-oxygenase-2 inhibitors and corticosteroids (short-term). Preferred drugs for neuropathic pain include desipramine, nortriptyline, gabapentin and valproic acid. Drugs to avoid are pentazocine, pethidine (meperidine), dextropropoxyphene and opioids that are both an agonist and antagonist, ketorolac, indomethacin, piroxicam, mefenamic acid, amitriptyline and doxepin. The type of pain, and renal and hepatic function, alter the preferred adjuvant and opioid choices. Selection of the appropriate analgesics is also influenced by versatility, polypharmacy, severity and type of pain, drug availability, associated symptoms and cost.

Personality pathology, depression and HPA axis functioning

Hypothalamic pituitary adrenal (HPA) axis functioning, as measured by the dexamethasone suppression test (DST), has been extensively investigated in major depressive disorder (MDD). Evaluating DST response in MDD patients while simultaneously considering clinically relevant personality disorders may further clarify the contribution of both personality pathology and HPA axis function to depressive symptoms. The present study measured personality pathology by administering the revised version of the Millon Clinical Multiaxial Inventory (MCMI-II) in a sample of 25 patients diagnosed with MDD. Analyses revealed that suppressors (n = 19) scored significantly higher than non-suppressors (n = 6) on six of the 13 MCMI-II personality disorder scales: Avoidant, Schizoid, Self-Defeating, Passive-Aggressive, Schizotypal and Borderline. Increased personality pathology was associated with normal suppression of cortisol following the DST. This suggests that suppression of the DST may be associated with depressive states linked with personality pathology while the more biologically based depression is associated with abnormal HPA pathophysiology. Copyright 2001 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Dexamethasone metabolism in dexamethasone suppression test suppressors and nonsuppressors

BACKGROUND

Variable dexamethasone kinetics is a possible confound in the dexamethasone suppression test. Modifications to include dexamethasone plasma levels and specific dexamethasone "windows" have been proposed. Our study aims to validate our proposed dexamethasone windows in an independent sample of 121 subjects.

METHODS

We performed dexamethasone suppression tests in 162 subjects with mixed psychiatric diagnoses. Dexamethasone levels and beta-phase half-life of dexamethasone were computed for suppressors and nonsuppressors.

RESULTS

Dexamethasone levels were lower in nonsuppressors than in suppressors. Dexamethasone levels correlated inversely with cortisol levels in the total sample, but were nonsignificant or weakly associated in those samples restricted to the windows. The beta-phase half-life of dexamethasone was shorter in nonsuppressors. The dexamethasone windows were validated at 3:00 PM and 10:00 PM. We propose 4.0 ng/mL as a revised upper limit of the 8:00 AM dexamethasone window.

CONCLUSIONS

The plasma dexamethasone level is confirmed as a confound in the dexamethasone suppression test through more rapid dexamethasone clearance in nonsuppressors. Application of dexamethasone windows will reduce this source of test variance.

Plasma dexamethasone concentration and cortisol response during manic episodes

BACKGROUND

Despite the widespread study of the dexamethasone suppression test (DST) in patients diagnosed with major depression, it has been less well studied during manic and mixed states of bipolar disorder.

METHODS

Cortisol response to the administration of 1 mg of dexamethasone was studied in 44 patients diagnosed bipolar disorder, manic (n = 37) or mixed (n = 7). Dexamethasone levels and cortisol responses were compared between these groups. Four patients initially meeting criteria for bipolar disorder, mixed, and 7 patients initially meeting criteria for bipolar disorder, manic, all of whom were characterized as DST nonsuppressors, were retested after remission.

RESULTS

Dexamethasone levels were lower and cortisol levels higher in those patients diagnosed bipolar disorder, mixed. An inverse correlation was found between log-transformed dexamethasone levels and log-transformed cortisol levels at 3 PM (r = -.619, p < or = .001) and 10 PM (r = -.501, p < or = .001). In those subjects retested after remission, dexamethasone levels were higher and cortisol levels lower than during the manic and mixed states.

CONCLUSIONS

Disturbances in the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis are observed frequently during mixed states of bipolar disorder, but are also not uncommon in purely manic episodes. These changes appear to be state dependent and revert with treatment.

Pharmacokinetics of dexamethasone and its relationship to dexamethasone suppression test outcome in depressed patients and healthy control subjects

The pharmacokinetics of dexamethasone (DEX) were studied in 9 drug-free melancholically depressed patients and 10 healthy control subjects matched by sex and age. Each subject received 1 mg of DEX administered orally and by the (i.v.) route at 11:00 PM and serial blood samples were collected over the next 17 hours until 4:00 PM. There were no significant differences between the diagnostic groups and DEX bioavailability, peak plasma level, time to maximum concentration, or in elimination half-life after oral administration. Bioavailability estimates indicated that DEX absorption was incomplete and variable mean = 61%, SD = 14) in controls as well as depressed patients. In both groups there was a wide interindividual variability in plasma DEX levels following both oral and i.v. routes of administration. This variability could not be reliably predicted by differences in age, sex, or weight between subjects. The factors that accounted for most the variability in 4:00 PM plasma DEX levels after oral administration were clearance, bioavailability, and time to reach maximum concentration. Plasma DEX levels were lower in 3 depressed nonsuppressors compared to 3 matched controls who suppressed. No single pharmacokinetic factor was shown to be responsible for the lower DEX levels in the depressed nonsuppressors. These results indicate that plasma DEX levels need to be measured in each individual during the DST procedure so that this information may be taken into consideration when interpreting DST results.

Clinical, magnetic resonance imaging and endocrinological differences between delusional and non-delusional depression in the elderly

OBJECTIVE

To investigate neuroradiological, endocrinological and clinical differences between delusional and non-delusional depression.

DESIGN

A cross-sectional study of depressed subjects.

SETTING

Melbourne, Australia.

PARTICIPANTS

Sixty-one subjects (inpatients) over the age of 55 meeting DSM-III-R criteria for major depression of whom 22 had delusional subtype of depression.

MEASURES

Clinical assessment, including documentation of vascular risk factors. Cognitive assessment by the Cambridge Cognitive Examination (CAMCOG). Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans were performed on a 0.3 Tesla scanner with temporal lobe atrophy, periventricular lesions (PVL) and deep white matter lesions (DWML) rated visually on 4-point scales. A standard 1 mg dexamethasone suppression test (DST) was performed.

RESULTS

Subjects with delusional depression had significantly more vascular risk factors than those without delusions. There were no differences in measures of temporal lobe atrophy, PVL, DST results or cognitive test scores, though there was a non-significant trend for DWML to be more prevalent in those with delusions. Delusional depression was associated with a shorter duration of history and more frequent treatment with ECT.

CONCLUSIONS

The increase in vascular risk factors and trend towards greater DWML on MRI suggests an organic contribution to delusional depression in the elderly. In contrast to some previous reports, we found no differences in cortical MRI appearance or neuroendocrine measures between groups.

Depressive psychomotor disturbance, cortisol, and dexamethasone

We examine the dexamethasone suppression test as a biological correlate of melancholia as defined by the CORE system, a scale for rating objective signs of psychomotor disturbance. Postdexamethasone cortisol concentrations and rates of nonsuppression were higher in CORE, Newcastle, and DSM-III-R defined melancholic groups. These differences, however, were no longer significant after partialling out the combined effects of age, dexamethasone, and basal cortisol concentrations. There was a significant correlation between the CORE (but not the Newcastle) scale and 8:00 AM postdexamethasone cortisol levels, which persisted after partialling out those same three covariates. Dexamethasone concentrations themselves were lower in CORE- and Newcastle-defined melancholics, though these were no longer significant after covarying for cortisol concentrations. Dexamethasone levels were also significantly inversely correlated with CORE and Newcastle scales. A significant correlation between CORE (but not Newcastle) scores and dexamethasone levels at 4:00 PM persisted after partialling out the effects of age and cortisol. These findings indicate an intriguing relationship between the CORE system as a dimensional construct for rating psychomotor disturbance, and both postdexamethasone cortisol and dexamethasone concentrations.

Clinical and magnetic resonance imaging correlates of hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis function in depression and Alzheimer's disease

BACKGROUND

An age-related dysregulation of the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis is well recognised in animals, but still remains controversial in humans. There is increasing interest that raised corticosteroid levels, due to activation of the HPA axis, may cause both depressive symptoms and cognitive impairments. Steroid effects on cognition may be via the hippocampus, a major site of corticosteroid action and an important structure involved in learning and memory.

METHOD

To investigate this further, we examined the relationship between the dexamethasone suppression test, cognitive function, depressive symptoms and hippocampal atrophy on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in 32 normal controls, 49 subjects with NINCDS/ADRDA Alzheimer's disease and 51 patients with DSM-III-R Major Depression.

RESULTS

Controlling for differences in dexamethasone concentrations, post-dexamethasone cortisol levels were related to advancing age in controls and depressed subjects. However, among subjects with Alzheimer's disease, post-dexamethasone cortisol levels were independently associated with both minor depressive symptoms and hippocampal atrophy on MRI.

CONCLUSION

An association between advancing age and increased HPA axis dysregulation is supported for controls and depressed subjects. In Alzheimer's disease, HPA axis changes were associated with depressive symptoms and hippocampal atrophy. Longitudinal studies are now needed to determine the causal direction of these associations.

Enhanced adrenal sensitivity to adrenocorticotrophic hormone (ACTH) is evidence of HPA axis hyperactivity in Alzheimer's disease

Adrenal sensitivity was assessed in 16 non-depressed patients with NINCDS/ADRDA Alzheimer's disease (AD) and 18 control subjects by measuring cortisol response to low dose (0.05 microgram/kg i.v.) exogenous adrenocorticotrophic hormone (ACTH). Controlling for sex and medication, both peak cortisol level (peak-baseline) and area under cortisol response curve (AUC above baseline) were significantly greater in AD subjects. This shows that HPA axis hyperactivity, as demonstrated by enhanced adrenal sensitivity to ACTH, occurs in AD. Similar findings have been reported to occur in depression. Among AD subjects, AUC cortisol response correlated with current age (r = 0.70, P = 0.001) and age at onset of dementia (r = 0.73, P = 0.001) and an inverse correlation was seen between cortisol AUC and cognitive test (CAMCOG) score (r = -0.51, P = 0.044). Our findings suggest that HPA axis hyperactivity in AD is associated with advancing age and cognitive dysfunction. Such changes may be cause, or consequence, of neuronal loss.

The function of the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis in Alzheimer's disease. Response to insulin hypoglycaemia

BACKGROUND

To investigate an association between HPA axis dysfunction, depression and cognitive impairment, we assessed subjects with mild Alzheimer's disease (AD).

METHOD

Sixteen non-depressed subjects with AD according to NINCDS/ADRDA criteria and 18 normal controls underwent the insulin hypoglycaemia (IH) test and the dexamethasone suppression test (DST).

RESULTS

The AD subjects showed a blunted response of adrenocorticotrophic hormone (ACTH) to IH compared with controls (P = 0.019). ACTH response (area under curve) correlated with a score for cognitive ability (CAMCOG) (r = 0.64, P < 0.01). AD subjects had a shorter time to peak cortisol level than controls (P = 0.004), although total cortisol response was normal.

CONCLUSIONS

The AD subjects show evidence of adrenal hyper-responsiveness and normal immediate (rate-sensitive) glucocorticoid feedback. An association between HPA axis dysfunction and organic brain pathology in AD subjects may be mediated by cell loss in the hippocampus.

Cortisol suppression by dexamethasone in the healthy elderly: effects of age, dexamethasone levels, and cognitive function

The effects of age, cognitive function (measured by Cambridge cognitive examination (CAM-COG) score); and dexamethasone (DEX) levels on the dexamethasone suppression test were studied in 33 healthy older subjects (age 51-96). Three subjects (9.1%) were nonsuppressors and were older and had lower CAMCOG scores than the 30 suppressors. Significant correlations were observed between natural log-transformed postdexamethasone cortisol (LNCOR) levels and age (r = 0.40) and CAMCOG score (r = -0.45). Multiple regression analysis was used to investigate the relationship between LNCOR, age, DEX levels, and CAMCOG score. Age and DEX combined explained 41% of the variance in LNCOR values, whereas CAMCOG score and DEX levels explained 44% variance. As age and CAMCOG were highly correlated (r = -0.72), both together did not significantly improve the fit of regression equation (47% variance explained). These findings suggest an association between advancing age, impaired glucocorticoid feedback, and cognitive dysfunction in healthy human subjects. Although any causal connection remains to be demonstrated, results would be consistent with the "glucocorticoid cascade" hypothesis of human aging.

Modeling the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of dexamethasone in depressed patients

Changes in time course effected by cortisol suppression and the relationship of these changes to the plasma dexamethasone concentration of suppressor and non-suppressor patients are described in this report on a combined pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic model. Thirteen depressed patients (8 suppressors and 5 non-suppressors) received an intravenous dose (1.5 mg) of dexamethasone. The drug-induced effect changes are found to lag behind, in time, the plasma drug level changes. To accurately relate the temporal relationship of effect changes to plasma dexamethasone levels, a pharmacodynamic model (sigmoid-Emax) was combined with a pharmacokinetic model that incorporated an effect compartment. The magnitude of the time-lag was quantified by the half-time of equilibration between concentrations in the hypothetical effect compartment and the plasma dexamethasone levels (t1/2keo). The t1/2keo of the nonsuppressing group was about 50% of that of the suppressing group, indicating that for a given plasma level the onset and termination of effect for the nonsuppressing group is about two times more rapid than for the suppressing group. Moreover, the model can estimate the effect-site concentration that causes one-half of the maximal predicted effect (EC50), a measure of an individual's sensitivity to dexamethasone. The receptor sensitivity (as determined from the EC50 ratio) of the suppressing group was about twice that of the nonsuppressing group.