Vasodilator therapy in chronic asymptomatic aortic regurgitation: enalapril versus hydralazine therapy

Aortic Regurgitation: Review of Current Management

ABSTRACT

Aortic regurgitation (AR) is a valvular disease characterized by retrograde blood flow from the aorta to the left ventricle. Various etiologies result in either an acute or chronic clinical presentation of AR and affect the severity of disease progression. Acute AR is a medical emergency caused by sudden increases in left ventricular volume. Immediate surgical intervention, vasoactive agents, and antibiotics are crucial for management. Chronic AR progresses gradually, leading to heart failure symptoms due to left ventricular remodeling. Diagnoses of both acute and chronic AR rely on electrocardiography, chest radiographs, and echocardiography. Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging may be incorporated in chronic AR diagnosis. Medical management of chronic AR aims to control hypertension and delay left ventricular dysfunction. Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, angiotensin receptor blockers, and potentially calcium-channel blockers are recommended for chronic AR. β-Blockers are cautioned against because of their potential negative effects. This article emphasizes the importance of early diagnosis and prompt surgical intervention in AR. This review provides a comprehensive overview of the pathophysiology and clinical manifestations of acute and chronic AR and a medication regimen for treating chronic AR in the adult population.

Diagnosis and Management of Aortic Valvular Disease in the Elderly

Aortic valvular disease, including aortic stenosis and aortic regurgitation, is increasingly common with age. Due to the aging population, more elderly patients are presenting with aortic valve pathology and expectations for prompt diagnosis and efficacious treatment. The current paradigm for aortic valve disease is based on surgical or interventional therapy. In this review, we discuss the approach to diagnosing aortic valvular disease and the different options for treatment based on the most recent evidence.

Predictors of heart failure and all-cause mortality in asymptomatic patients with moderate and severe aortic regurgitation

BACKGROUND

Class I indications for aortic valve replacement (AVR) for severe chronic aortic regurgitation (AR) include AR attributable symptoms or left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction <50%. As noninvasive estimates of elevated LV filling pressures (LVFP's) have been noted to predict heart failure (HF) readmission and all-cause mortality (ACM) in HF patients, we hypothesize that elevated LVFP's may also be independent predictors of HF and ACM in chronic AR.

METHODS

We developed a single center patient database of moderate or greater AR diagnoses between 2003 and 2008 and followed each patient through January 2013. We included patients with >30 days follow-up with interpretable Doppler-echocardiograms. We recorded demographic variables, EuroScore II, incident HF and ACM, and Doppler-echo variables of LV size, systolic and diastolic function.

RESULTS

Patients with severe AR (105 patients) and moderate AR (201 patients) had similar EuroScore II values and similar incident HF and ACM. For the 180 patients who developed HF, effective arterial elastance (aHR = 1.70 (1.01-2.83), p = .041), LV end-diastolic dimension (aHR = 1.83, (1.11-3.03), p = .0176), E/e' (aHR = 3.04, (1.83-5.05), p < .0001), eccentric hypertrophy (EH) (aHR = 2.39, (1.62-5.12), p = .0004), and tricuspid regurgitation (TR) velocity (aHR = 5.75, (3.70-10.36), p < .0001) were independent predictors. For the 118 patients with ACM, EH (aHR = 1.73, (1.02-3.28), p = .0414), systolic blood pressure (aHR = .58, (.33-.95), p = .0301), left atrial volume index (aHR = 1.82, (1.06-3.06), p = .0293), E/e' (aHR = 1.83, (1.07-3.08), p = .0280), and TR velocity (aHR = 4.14, (2.22-6.49), p < .0001) were independent predictors.

CONCLUSIONS

Elevated TR velocity and EH were strong markers of HF and ACM in patients with asymptomatic severe AR and in moderate AR.

l -Arginine Can Enhance the Beneficial Effect of Losartan in Patients with Chronic Aortic Regurgitation and Isolated Systolic Hypertension

Information about the effects of angiotensin II receptor blocker (ARB) therapy on the hemodynamic and cardiac structure in patients with chronic aortic regurgitation (CAR) and isolated systolic hypertension (ISH) is limited. This study planned to test the hypothesis that l -arginine could further enhance the beneficial effect of an ARB, losartan, and provide a favorable effect on the natural history of CAR and ISH. Sixty patients with CAR and ISH were enrolled in a randomized, double-blind trial comparing hemodynamic and ultrasonic change in two treatment arms: losartan +  l -arginine and losartan-only treated groups. Serial echocardiographic and hemodynamic studies were evaluated before and after treatment. Both groups had a significant reduction in systolic blood pressure (SBP) and diastolic blood pressure (DBP), left ventricular end-diastolic volume index (LVEDVI), LV end-systolic volume index (LVESVI), LV mass index (LVMI), and LV mean wall stress after 6- and 12-month treatment ( p <0.01 in all comparisons). Both groups had a significant increase in LV ejection fraction and exercise duration after 6- and 12-month treatment ( p  < 0.01 in all comparisons). Using multivariate linear regression analysis, only losartan +  l -arginine therapy achieved a significantly lower LVESVI (38.89 ± 0.23 mL/m ² ), LVEDVI (102.3 ± 0.3 mL/m ² ), LVMI (107.6 ± 0.3 g/m ² ), SBP (123.5 ± 1.0 mm Hg), and greater exercise duration (7.38 ± 0.02 minutes) than those of the losartan-only treated groups ( p <0.01 in all comparisons). These findings suggest that early co-administrative strategy provides a beneficial approach to favorably influence the natural history of CAR.

Aortic Stenosis, Aortic Regurgitation and Arterial Hypertension

BACKGROUND

Hypertension (HT) is an important risk factor for cardiovascular disease and might precipitate pathology of the aortic valve.

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the association of HT with aortic dysfunction (including both aortic regurgitation and stenosis) and the impact of antihypertensive treatment on the natural course of underlying aortic disease.

METHODS

We performed a systematic review of the literature for all relevant articles assessing the correlation between HT and phenotype of aortic disease.

RESULTS

Co-existence of HT with aortic stenosis and aortic regurgitation is highly prevalent in hypertensive patients and predicts a worse prognosis. Certain antihypertensive agents may improve haemodynamic parameters (aortic jet velocity, aortic regurgitation volume) and remodeling of the left ventricle, but there is no strong evidence of benefit regarding clinical outcomes. Renin-angiotensin system inhibitors, among other vasodilators, are well-tolerated in aortic stenosis.

CONCLUSION

Several lines of evidence support a detrimental association between HT and aortic valve disease. Therefore, HT should be promptly treated in aortic valvulopathy. Despite conventional wisdom, specific vasodilators can be used with caution in aortic stenosis.

Effects of the loss of estrogen on the heart's hypertrophic response to chronic left ventricle volume overload in rats

Aortic valve regurgitation (AR) can result in heart failure from chronic overloading of the left ventricle (LV). Little is known of the role of estrogens in the LV responses to this condition. The aim of the study was to compare LV remodeling in female rats with severe AR in absence of estrogens by ovariectomy (Ovx). In a first study, we investigated over 6 months the development of hypertrophy in four groups of female Wistar rats: AR or sham-operated (sham) and Ovx or not. Ovx reduced normal heart growth. As expected, volume overload (VO) from AR resulted in significant LV dilation (42% and 32% increase LV end-diastolic diameter in intact and Ovx groups vs. their respective sham group; p < 0.0001). LV weight was also significantly and similarly increased in both AR groups (non-Ovx and Ovx). Increase in stroke volume or cardiac output and loss of systolic function were similar between AR intact and AR Ovx groups compared to sham. We then investigated what were the effects of 17beta-estradiol (E2; 0.03 mg/kg/day) treatment on the parameters studied in Ovx rats. Ovx reduced uterus weight by 85% and E2 treatment restored up to 65% of the normal weight. E2 also helped normalize heart size to normal values. On the other hand, it did not influence the extent of the hypertrophic response to AR. In fact, E2 treatment further reduced LV hypertrophy in AR Ovx rats (41% over Sham Ovx + E2). Systolic and diastolic functions parameters in AR Ovx + E2 were similar to intact AR animals. Ovx in sham rats had a significant effect on the LV gene expression of several hypertrophy markers. Atrial natriuretic peptide (Nppa) gene expression was reduced by Ovx in sham-operated females whereas brain natriuretic peptide (Nppb) expression was increased. Alpha (Myh6) and beta (Myh7) myosin heavy chain genes were also significantly modulated by Ovx in sham females. In AR rats, LV expression of both Nppa and Nppb genes were increased as expected. Ovx further increased it of AR rats for Nppa and did the opposite for Nppb. Interestingly, AR in Ovx rats had only minimal effects on Myh6 and Myh7 genes whereas they were modulated as expected for intact AR animals. In summary, loss of estrogens by Ovx in AR rats was not accompanied by a worsening of hypertrophy or cardiac function. Normal cardiac growth was reduced by Ovx in sham females but not the hypertrophic response to AR. On the other hand, Ovx had important effects on LV gene expression both in sham and AR female rats.

Cardiac Therapeutics in Horses

Many cardiac therapeutics lack significant evidence of benefit in the horse, and in many cases their use is based on extrapolation of evidence from other species. In recent years there has been a push to develop a better understanding of both the pharmacodynamics and pharmacokinetics of these drugs. Recent data have described the use of antiarrhythmic agents including sotalol, flecainide, and amiodarone. Data about the use of ACE inhibitors in the management of congestive heart failure are encouraging and support their use in certain cases, wheras evidence for other medicines, such as pimobendan, remain speculative.

Current Management of Patients with Severe Aortic Regurgitation

OPINION STATEMENT

Chronic aortic regurgitation can result from various congenital and acquired anomalies and can be associated with proximal aortic disease. As the number of aortic valve procedures is growing, the incidence of post-procedural regurgitation also increases with associated morbidity. Typical evolution is characterized by a clinically silent phase of variable duration followed by a rather rapid decline with high incidence of adverse events. A challenge remains to find the optimal timing for an intervention: Patients are exposed to unnecessary surgical risks if treated prematurely, but peri- and post-operative prognosis is worse when the intervention is performed too late. Clinical evaluation and serial imaging tests can optimize the timing for intervention. Clinical follow-up should try to elucidate associated symptoms, with quantitative measurement of functional capacity as needed. Serial imaging examinations are required to identify sub-clinical left ventricular dysfunction or severe dilatation that should prompt a surgery. At least in selected cases, newer imaging modalities (MRI, 3D echocardiography) and/or biomarkers can help for the management of these patients, and more research is needed to determine if their systematic use can be beneficial. Medical treatment with vasodilators and anti-remodeling drugs can be helpful in some patients but should not replace or delay aortic valve surgery when indicated. Most patients will eventually be treated with surgical aortic valve replacement. Although possible in selected cases, transcatheter aortic valve replacement is not commonly used for patients with pure aortic regurgitation. For patients with prior aortic valve replacement and aortic regurgitation (paravalvular or intravalvular), emerging percutaneous approaches can be considered when available, especially for those at high surgical risk.

Aortic and Mitral Valve Disease and Left Ventricular Dysfunction in Children

OBJECTIVES

In this review, we will discuss aortic stenosis, aortic regurgitation, mitral regurgitation, and mitral stenosis. We will review the etiology, anatomy, pathophysiology, presentation, and treatment of aortic and mitral valve disease. Age and lesion specific treatments are outlined based on the severity of valve disease with an aim at long-term preservation of left ventricular function.

DATA SOURCE

MEDLINE and PubMed.

CONCLUSIONS

Mitral and aortic valve disease leads to unique hemodynamic burdens that can impact left ventricular function, quality of life, and longevity. The primary challenge in the management of mitral and aortic valve disease is to apply appropriate medical management and identify that point in time at which the surgery is necessary. Although guidelines have been established for the management of aortic and mitral valve disease in adults, the challenges of early presentation, maintenance of growth potential, and apparent increased tolerance of hemodynamic burden in children makes decision making challenging.

Drug Therapy for Heart Valve Diseases

Valvular heart diseases (VHDs) are progressive. When not caused by acute comorbidities they are generally characterized by long asymptomatic phases during which hemodynamic severity may progress leading to morbidity and mortality. Treatment depends on VHD type and severity but when severe and symptomatic, usually involves mechanical intervention. Asymptomatic patients, and those who lack objective descriptors associated with high risk, are closely observed clinically with optimization of associated cardiovascular risk factors until surgical indications develop. Though often prescribed based on theory, no rigorous evidence supports pharmacological therapy in most chronic situations though drugs may be appropriate in acute valvular diseases, or as a bridge to surgery in severely decompensated patients. Herein, we examine evidence supporting drug use for chronic VHDs.

Aortic valvular heart disease: Is there a place for angiotensin-converting-enzyme inhibitors?

Aortic valve disease (AVD) is the most common form of valvular heart disease in the western world. The only proven therapy for severe AVD is open aortic valve replacement, with trans-catheter aortic valve implantation emerging as a promising modality to treat severe aortic stenosis in a selected group of patients. AVD has a long asymptomatic phase with symptoms occurring late in the disease and once symptoms develop, prognosis is poor. There is a growing appreciation that aortic valvular heart disease incorporates a disease process that extends beyond the valve itself leading to an aortic valvular 'heart' disease. The renin-angiotensin system is known to modulate adverse left ventricular remodeling and myocardial fibrosis, which could be caused by increased load caused by the AVD. In this review, the authors explore evidence that suggest that drugs that target the renin-angiotensin system may have a potential therapeutic role in AVD.

Myocardial migration by fibroblast progenitor cells is blood pressure dependent in a model of angII myocardial fibrosis

Activation of the renin-angiotensin system (RAS) is thought to promote myocardial fibrosis. However, it is unclear whether this physiological fibrotic response results from chronic hemodynamic stress or from direct cellular signaling. Male C57B/6 mice were randomly assigned to receive angiotensin II (AngII) (2.0 μg kg(-1) min(-1)), AngII+hydralazine (6.9 μg kg(-1) min(-1)) or saline (control) via osmotic pumps for 7 days. Blood pressure was measured via noninvasive plethysmography. Hearts were harvested and processed for analysis. Cellular infiltration and collagen deposition were analyzed using histological staining. Molecular mediators were assessed using quantitative RT-PCR. As previously described, animals that received AngII developed hypertension and multifocal cellular infiltration by SMA(+)/CD133(+) fibroblast progenitors followed by collagen deposition. The coadministration of hydralazine with AngII completely inhibited the hypertensive effects of AngII (P0.01) and resulted in minimal cellular infiltration and minimal collagen deposition. These findings were in the context of persistent RAS activation, which was evidenced by elevation in serum aldosterone levels in animals that received AngII or AngII+hydralazine compared with animals that received saline. At the molecular level, infusion of AngII resulted in the significant upregulation of profibrotic factors (connective tissue growth factor-7.8±0.7 fold), proinflammatory mediators (TNFα-4.6±0.8 fold; IL-1β-6.4±2.6 fold) and chemokines (CCL2-3.8±1.0 fold; CXCL12-3.2±0.4 fold), which were inhibited when hydralazine was also infused. We provide evidence that myocardial infiltration by fibroblast progenitor cells secondary to AngII and the resultant fibrosis can be prevented by the addition of hydralazine. Furthermore, the beneficial effects of hydralazine were observed while maintaining RAS activation, suggesting that the mechanism of fibrosis is blood pressure dependent.

Medical treatment of asymptomatic chronic aortic regurgitation

Chronic aortic regurgitation results in left ventricular (LV) dilation, increased LV work and, eventually, a decline in LV function and heart failure. An important question is whether pharmacological therapy could preserve LV function and delay the need for aortic valve replacement. Vasodilators have a number of theoretical advantages. By lowering blood pressure, they reduce the regurgitant volume and decrease LV afterload. This article summarizes the clinical studies that have evaluated vasodilators in asymptomatic patients with chronic aortic regurgitation. Some studies suggest favorable effects on LV function and clinical outcomes, but results are inconsistent, making it difficult to draw definite conclusions. In general, studies have been too small to reliably evaluate the overall benefits and risks of this treatment, and in several studies there was no significant difference in measured blood pressure by treatment allocation. For these reasons, decisions on whether vasodilators are indicated in individual patients must currently be based on clinical judgment alone.

Valvular heart disease: diagnosis and management

Valvular heart disease (VHD) encompasses a number of common cardiovascular conditions that account for 10% to 20% of all cardiac surgical procedures in the United States. A better understanding of the natural history coupled with the major advances in diagnostic imaging, interventional cardiology, and surgical approaches have resulted in accurate diagnosis and appropriate selection of patients for therapeutic interventions. A thorough understanding of the various valvular disorders is important to aid in the management of patients with VHD. Appropriate work-up for patients with VHD includes a thorough history for evaluation of causes and symptoms, accurate assessment of the severity of the valvular abnormality by examination, appropriate diagnostic testing, and accurate quantification of the severity of valve dysfunction and therapeutic interventions, if necessary. It is also important to understand the role of the therapeutic interventions vs the natural history of the disease in the assessment of outcomes. Prophylaxis for infective endocarditis is no longer recommended unless the patient has a history of endocarditis or a prosthetic valve.

Preoperative systolic strain rate predicts postoperative left ventricular dysfunction in patients with chronic aortic regurgitation

BACKGROUND

The best predictor for postoperative left ventricular (LV) systolic dysfunction in patients with chronic aortic regurgitation is still a matter of debate. The aim of this study was to assess the clinical significance of preoperative systolic radial strain rate (Ssr) derived from tissue Doppler echocardiography as a predictor of postoperative LV systolic dysfunction in patients with chronic aortic regurgitation.

METHODS AND RESULTS

In 52 patients (mean age, 58 years; 13 women) with isolated chronic aortic regurgitation, we performed standard and tissue Doppler echocardiography before and after operation, obtained echocardiographic parameters such as LV dimensions and LV ejection fraction, and measured Ssr in 4 walls of the LV. Linear regression analysis determined correlations between preoperative parameters and postoperative LV ejection fraction. Receiver-operating characteristic curve analysis assessed the optimal cutoff values of parameters that predicted postoperative LV systolic dysfunction (ejection fraction <50%). The operation caused significant decreases in LV dimensions and volumes and significant increases in Ssr (1.94+/-0.64 to 2.39+/-0.83 per second; P<0.001) and ejection fraction (53.0+/-8.7 to 59.0+/-8.8%; P<0.001). Multiple regression analysis demonstrated that averaged Ssr was the only independent predictor of postoperative LV systolic dysfunction among the covariates examined (P<0.001). Using receiver-operating characteristic curve analysis, averaged Ssr yielded the greatest area under the curve among preoperative parameters (0.80) and was indicated to be a good predictor of postoperative LV dysfunction, with 90.9% sensitivity and 73.2% specificity (cutoff value, 1.82 per second).

CONCLUSIONS

Measurement of preoperative averaged Ssr is useful in predicting postoperative LV systolic dysfunction and optimizing surgical timing in patients with isolated chronic aortic regurgitation.

Valvular regurgitation and stenosis: when is surgery required?

Valvular heart disease is a growing public health problem, with an increasing prevalence due to an ageing population. Despite advances, the medical management of symptomatic valvular heart diseases remains suboptimal, necessitating surgical correction. The challenge remains in identifying an asymptomatic or mildly symptomatic patient who will benefit from timely surgery before irreversible changes in cardiac function have occurred. The potential risks of surgery versus watchful expectancy require careful decision-making. This review is a focused update on the existing guidelines and identifies the knowledge gaps and avenues of future research in the management of patients with valvular heart diseases.

Effectiveness of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors in pediatric patients with mid to severe aortic valve regurgitation

The long-term benefit of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors in pediatric patients with aortic valve regurgitation is under consideration. Eighteen patients with mid to severe aortic valve regurgitation were retrospectively evaluated. Echocardiographic parameters (left ventricular end-diastolic diameter, shortening fraction, left ventricular posterior wall thickness, and grade of aortic valve regurgitation) were analyzed before and during therapy with angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors. Data are given as standard deviation scores (Z-scores) derived from body surface-adjusted normal values. Median (interquartile range) age at start of therapy was 8.4 (5.4 to 10.0) years, and total follow-up 2.3 (0.9 to 5.4) years. Left ventricular end-diastolic diameter increased from 3.6 (2.3 to 4.5) to 3.7 (2.4 to 4.8), and left ventricular posterior wall diameter decreased from 1.9 (1.1 to 3.0) to 1.1 (0.5 to 2.3). Grade of aortic valve regurgitation increased from 3.5 (2.3 to 4.0) to 4.0 (2.0 to 4.0), and shortening fraction decreased from 39% (34% to 43%) to 37% (34% to 42%). No significant effect of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors on left ventricular dimensions or function was found in our population of patients with mid to severe aortic valve regurgitation. Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors may not alter left ventricular overload in pediatric patients with aortic valve regurgitation.

Contemporary management of pediatric heart failure

The spectrum of causes of pediatric heart failure is broad and differs significantly from that seen in most adult patients. Left-to-right shunts and outflow obstruction lesions are responsible for a large number of pediatric cases of heart failure. Most of these are now treated successfully with surgery or catheter intervention. Medical therapy is the mainstay of care for myocardial disorders with diuretics, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, beta-blockade and cardiac glycosides. There are few prospective trials of these agents in a pediatric population, but extrapolated data support their use in children. In addition to medical therapy, interventions such as automatic implantable cardioverter defibrillators and resynchronization therapy have become increasingly common in pediatric heart disease, as well as in adult patients with congenital heart disease.

Vasodilator therapy in patients with aortic insufficiency: a systematic review

BACKGROUND

The use of vasodilators to improve long-term outcomes in asymptomatic patients with chronic aortic insufficiency (AI) is controversial.

METHODS

We reviewed MEDLINE, PREMEDLINE, Current Contents, and Cochrane databases to identify relevant clinical trials on asymptomatic patients with chronic AI of at least moderate severity. We included those studies that involved long-term vasodilator therapy (including hydralazine, calcium-channel blockers, and angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors) and assessed either hemodynamic and structural parameters or clinical outcomes. Data on patient demographics, study protocols, and outcomes were abstracted.

RESULTS

Ten studies with 544 asymptomatic patients with chronic AI were identified. Treatment duration with vasodilators ranged from 12 weeks to 7 years. Of these, 8 studies compared vasodilators with placebo or no therapy, with 5 demonstrating improvements in at least 1 hemodynamic or structural parameter with vasodilators and 3 showing little or no apparent benefit. The remaining 2 studies directly compared outcomes between 2 different vasodilators. Both of these studies demonstrated greater improvements in hemodynamic and structural parameters with angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors compared with hydralazine and nifedipine. Clinical outcomes were primarily reported in only 2 of the 10 studies. Although one study suggested that the use of vasodilators slowed the rate of progression to surgery for aortic valve replacement, another showed no difference.

CONCLUSIONS

Vasodilators inconsistently improve hemodynamic and structural parameters in asymptomatic patients with chronic AI. In addition, the impact of vasodilators on clinical outcomes is largely uncertain and requires further study.

Are vasodilators still indicated in the treatment of severe aortic regurgitation?

Aortic regurgitation (AR) is a valve disease that causes severe complications and reduces life expectancy. Surgical correction is required in the late stages of the disease. In less advanced forms, treatment with vasodilators is a consideration. The available evidence suggests that this type of treatment has a favorable effect on the consequences of AR, particularly left ventricular remodeling. However, the impact of vasodilators on clinical endpoints complicating the course of AR remains in doubt. The limited evidence supporting or opposing the utilization of vasodilators in AR hinders drawing firm conclusions and emphasizes the process of individualized interpretation of the clinical presentation of patients with the disease.

Genetic Disruption of Angiotensin II Type 1a Receptor Improves Long-Term Survival of Mice With Chronic Severe Aortic Regurgitation

BACKGROUND

Aortic regurgitation (AR) causes left ventricular (LV) volume overload, leading to progressive LV dilatation and dysfunction. In the present study it was examined whether blockade of angiotensin II type 1 receptor (AT1) could improve survival in cases of chronic severe AR.

METHODS AND RESULTS

AR was induced by puncturing the aortic valves of wild-type (WT) and AT1a knockout (KO) mice. Mice that survived for 4 weeks after the operation were deemed to be a model of chronic severe AR and were followed up for 50 weeks (WT, n=29; KO, n=31). Baseline measurements made 4 weeks after surgery showed similar LV cavity and function in both genotypes. These conditions progressively worsened in both genotypes, but 16 weeks after baseline, KO mice showed significantly less LV dilatation, hypertrophy and interstitial fibrosis than WT mice. Cardiac mRNA expression of B-type natriuretic peptide and type I collagen was lower in KO than WT mice. The 50-week mortality rate was significantly lower among KO (45.2%) than WT (86.2%) mice, and postmortem findings indicated that the lower mortality was attributable to a lower incidence of congestive heart failure.

CONCLUSIONS

In cases of chronic severe AR, blockade of AT1 attenuates the progression of LV dilatation, hypertrophy and fibrosis, thereby mitigating heart failure and improving long-term survival.

Role of vasodilators in regurgitant valve disease

Vasodilator therapy is designed to reduce regurgitant volume and improve left ventricular function. Acute administration reduces vascular resistance and decreases regurgitant volume and left ventricular filling pressure. These effects may be clinically useful in acute regurgitations, but less consistent results have been reported in long-term therapy. In chronic mitral functional regurgitation, vasodilator therapy has proved to have clinical or prognostic benefit only when heart failure or poor ventricular function is present. The indication of vasodilator treatment in aortic regurgitation has raised significant controversy. Several studies with small series have shown beneficial effects on regurgitant volume, ejection fraction, and mass of the left ventricle. Nevertheless, in the only two randomized long-term follow-up studies, results differed completely. In our experience, both nifedipine and enalapril failed to reduce the need for valvular surgery or show benefits in echocardiographic parameters. Vasodilator therapy would be indicated only in patients with severe aortic regurgitation and systemic hypertension, or when surgery is contraindicated.

Long-term vasodilator therapy in patients with severe aortic regurgitation

BACKGROUND

Vasodilator therapy can reduce the left ventricular volume and mass and improve left ventricular performance in patients with aortic regurgitation. Accordingly, it has been suggested that such therapy may reduce or delay the need for aortic-valve replacement.

METHODS

We randomly assigned 95 patients with asymptomatic severe aortic regurgitation and normal left ventricular function to receive open-label nifedipine (20 mg every 12 hours), open-label enalapril (20 mg per day), or no treatment (control group) to identify the possible beneficial effects of vasodilator therapy on left ventricular function and the need for aortic-valve replacement.

RESULTS

After a mean of seven years of follow-up, the rate of aortic-valve replacement was similar among the groups: 39 percent in the control group, 50 percent in the enalapril group, and 41 percent in the nifedipine group (P=0.62). In addition, there were no significant differences among the groups in aortic regurgitant volume, left ventricular size, left ventricular mass, mean wall stress, or ejection fraction. One year after valve replacement, the left ventricular end-diastolic diameter and end-systolic diameter had decreased to a similar degree among the patients who underwent surgery in each of the three groups, and all the patients had a normal ejection fraction.

CONCLUSIONS

Long-term vasodilator therapy with nifedipine or enalapril did not reduce or delay the need for aortic-valve replacement in patients with asymptomatic severe aortic regurgitation and normal left ventricular systolic function. Furthermore, such therapy did not reduce the aortic regurgitant volume, decrease the size of the left ventricle, or improve left ventricular function.

Valvular Heart Disease

Aortic regurgitation (AR) is characterized by diastolic reflux of blood from the aorta into the left ventricle (LV). Acute AR typically causes severe pulmonary edema and hypotension and is a surgical emergency. Chronic severe AR causes combined LV volume and pressure overload. It is accompanied by systolic hypertension and wide pulse pressure, which account for peripheral physical findings, such as bounding pulses. The afterload excess caused by systolic hypertension leads to progressive LV dilation and systolic dysfunction. The most important diagnostic test for AR is echocardiography. It provides the ability to determine the cause of AR and to assess the severity of AR and its effect on LV size, function, and hemodynamics. Many patients with chronic severe AR may remain clinically compensated for years with normal LV function and no symptoms. These patients do not require surgery but can be followed carefully for the onset of symptoms or LV dilation/dysfunction. Surgery should be considered before the LV ejection fraction falls below 55% or the LV end-diastolic dimension reaches 55 mm. Symptomatic patients should undergo surgery unless there are excessive comorbidities or other contraindications. The primary role of medical therapy with vasodilators is to delay the need for surgery in asymptomatic patients with normal LV function or to treat patients in whom surgery is not an option. The goal of vasodilator therapy is to achieve a significant decrease in systolic arterial pressure. Future therapies may focus on molecular mechanisms to prevent adverse LV remodeling and fibrosis.

Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor captopril prevents volume overload cardiomyopathy in experimental chronic aortic valve regurgitation

The efficacy of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs) in the treatment of chronic aortic regurgitation (AR) is not well established and remains controversial. The mechanisms by which ACEIs may protect against left-ventricular (LV) volume overload are not well understood, and clinical trials performed until now have yielded conflicting results. This study was therefore performed to assess the effectiveness of two different doses of the ACEI captopril in a rat model of chronic AR. We compared the effects of a 6-month low-dose (LD) (25 mg/kg) or higher dose (HD) (75 mg/kg) treatment with captopril on LV function and hypertrophy in Wistar rats with severe AR. Untreated animals developed LV eccentric hypertrophy and systolic dysfunction. LD treatment did not prevent hypertrophy and provided modest protection against systolic dysfunction. HD treatment preserved LV systolic function and dimensions and tended to slow hypertrophy. The cardiac index remained high and similar among all AR groups, treated or not. Tissue renin-angiotensin system (RAS) analysis revealed that ACE activity was increased in the LVs of AR animals and that only HD treatment significantly decreased angiotensin II receptor mRNA levels. Fibronectin expression was increased in the LV or AR animals, but HD treatment almost completely reversed this increase. The ACE inhibitor captopril was effective at high doses in this model of severe AR. These effects might be related to the modulation of tissue RAS and the control of fibrosis.

Aortic insufficiency: defining the role of pharmacotherapy

Major advances in the diagnostic, evaluation, and particularly surgical treatment of aortic regurgitation (AR) have redefined the role of medical treatment. In acute AR, aortic valve replacement (AVR) is the only life-saving treatment. Medical treatment may improve the hemodynamic state temporarily before surgery. Rationale of medical treatment in chronic AR is based on the natural history and pathophysiology of the disease. The primary goal is to optimize the time of the AVR. If there is any symptom and/or left ventricular (LV) dysfunction, early AVR is required. Vasodilators should only be considered as a short-term treatment before surgery if there is evidence of severe heart failure or as a long-term treatment if AVR is contraindicated because of cardiac or noncardiac factors. In asymptomatic patients with severe chronic AR and normal LV function (even if the left ventricle is moderately dilated), vasodilators may prolong the compensated phase of chronic AR, although proof of their efficacy in delaying AVR is limited. Nifedipine is the best evidence-based treatment in this indication. ACE inhibitors are particularly useful for hypertensive patients with AR. beta-Adrenoceptor antagonists (beta-blockers) may be indicated to slow the rate of aortic dilatation and delay the need for surgery in patients with AR associated with aortic root disease. Furthermore, they may improve cardiac performance by reducing cardiac volume and LV mass in patients with impaired LV function after AVR for AR.