MRI Radiomics for Assessment of Molecular Subtype, Pathological Complete Response, and Residual Cancer Burden in Breast Cancer Patients Treated With Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy

Predicting response of hepatoblastoma primary lesions to neoadjuvant chemotherapy through contrast-enhanced computed tomography radiomics

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the clinical value of contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CECT) radiomics for predicting the response of primary lesions to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in hepatoblastoma.

METHODS

Clinical and CECT imaging data were retrospectively collected from 116 children with hepatoblastoma who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Tumor response was assessed according to the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST). Subsequently, they were randomly stratified into a training cohort and a test cohort in a 7:3 ratio. The clinical model was constructed using univariate and multivariate logistic regression, while the radiomics model was developed based on selected radiomics features employing the support vector machine algorithm. The combined clinical-radiomics model incorporated both clinical and radiomics features.

RESULTS

The area under the curve (AUC) for the clinical, radiomics, and combined models was 0.704 (95% CI: 0.563-0.845), 0.830 (95% CI: 0.704-0.959), and 0.874 (95% CI: 0.768-0.981) in the training cohort, respectively. In the validation cohort, the combined model achieved the highest mean AUC of 0.830 (95% CI 0.616-0.999), with a sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, precision, and f1 score of 72.0%, 81.1%, 78.5%, 57.2%, and 63.5%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

CECT radiomics has the potential to predict primary lesion response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in hepatoblastoma.

Hype or hope? A review of challenges in balancing tumor control and treatment toxicity in breast cancer from the perspective of the radiation oncologist

The aim of this article is to discuss the challenges and new strategies in managing breast cancer patients, with a specific focus on radiation oncology and the importance of balancing oncologic outcomes with quality of life and post-treatment morbidity. A comprehensive literature review was conducted to identify advances in the management of breast cancer, exploring de-escalation strategies, hypofractionation schemes, predictors and tools for reducing toxicity (radiation-induced lymphocyte apoptosis, deep inspiration breath-hold, adaptive radiotherapy), enhancer treatments (hyperthermia, immunotherapy) and innovative diagnostic modalities (PET-MRI, omics). Balancing oncologic outcomes with quality of life and post-treatment morbidity is crucial in the era of personalized medicine. Radiotherapy plays a critical role in the management of breast cancer patients. Large randomized trials are necessary to generalize some practices and cost remains the main obstacle for many innovations that are already applicable.

Multiparametric MR-based feature fusion radiomics combined with ADC maps-based tumor proliferative burden in distinguishing TNBC versus non-TNBC

Objective.To investigate the incremental value of quantitative stratified apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) defined tumor habitats for differentiating triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) from non-TNBC on multiparametric MRI (mpMRI) based feature-fusion radiomics (RFF) model.Approach.466 breast cancer patients (54 TNBC, 412 non-TNBC) who underwent routine breast MRIs in our hospital were retrospectively analyzed. Radiomics features were extracted from whole tumor on T2WI, diffusion-weighted imaging, ADC maps and the 2nd phase of dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI. Four models including the RFFmodel (fused features from all MRI sequences), RADCmodel (ADC radiomics feature), StratifiedADCmodel (tumor habitas defined on stratified ADC parameters) and combinational RFF-StratifiedADCmodel were constructed to distinguish TNBC versus non-TNBC. All cases were randomly divided into a training (n= 337) and test set (n= 129). The four competing models were validated using the area under the curve (AUC), sensitivity, specificity and accuracy.Main results.Both the RFFand StratifiedADCmodels demonstrated good performance in distinguishing TNBC from non-TNBC, with best AUCs of 0.818 and 0.773 in the training and test sets. StratifiedADCmodel revealed significant different tumor habitats (necrosis/cysts habitat, chaotic habitat or proliferative tumor core) between TNBC and non-TNBC with its top three discriminative parameters (p <0.05). The integrated RFF-StratifiedADCmodel demonstrated superior accuracy over the other three models, with higher AUCs of 0.832 and 0.784 in the training and test set, respectively (p <0.05).Significance.The RFF-StratifiedADCmodel through integrating various tumor habitats' information from whole-tumor ADC maps-based StratifiedADCmodel and radiomics information from mpMRI-based RFFmodel, exhibits tremendous promise for identifying TNBC.

Radiomic model based on magnetic resonance imaging for predicting pathological complete response after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer patients

Purpose

To establish a model combining radiomic and clinicopathological factors based on magnetic resonance imaging to predict pathological complete response (pCR) after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer patients.

Method

MRI images and clinicopathologic data of 329 eligible breast cancer patients from the Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University from August 2018 to August 2022 were included in this study. All patients received neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC), and imaging examinations were performed before and after NAC. A total of 329 patients were randomly allocated to a training set and a test set at a ratio of 7:3. We mainly studied the following three types of prediction models: radiomic models, clinical models, and clinical-radiomic models. All models were evaluated using subject operating characteristic curve analysis and area under the curve (AUC), decision curve analysis (DCA) and calibration curves.

Results

The AUCs of the clinical prediction model, independent imaging model and clinical combined imaging model in the training set were 0.864 0.968 and 0.984, and those in the test set were 0.724, 0.754 and 0.877, respectively. According to DCA and calibration curves, the clinical-radiomic model showed good predictive performance in both the training set and the test set, and we found that we had developed a more concise clinical-radiomic nomogram.

Conclusion

We have developed a clinical-radiomic model by integrating radiomic features and clinical factors to predict pCR after NAC in breast cancer patients, thereby contributing to the personalized treatment of patients.

Factors Affecting Pathological Complete Response in Locally Advanced Breast Cancer Cases Receiving Neoadjuvant Therapy: A Comprehensive Literature Review

Determining pathological complete response (pCR) could be an important step in planning individual treatment, hence improving the prognosis in terms of survival. Achieving breast pCR not only improves survival but is also linked to a disease-free axilla, therefore increasing the likelihood of avoiding axillary surgery safely. The current trend in de-escalating axillary management surgically or in applying radiotherapy to the axilla is dependent primarily on breast cancer (BC) patients achieving pCR. Studies have demonstrated that certain characteristics can predict pCR, even though it is still difficult to identify these elements. A review of the literature was carried out to determine these factors and their clinical applications. A search was carried out in the MEDLINE database using PubMed, Google Scholar, and EMBASE. This yielded 1368 studies, of which 60 satisfied the criteria. The studies were categorized according to the subject they dealt with. These parameters included age, race, subtypes, clinicopathological, immunological, imaging, obesity, Ki-67 status, vitamin D, and genetics. These factors, in combination, can be used for specific subtypes to individualize treatment and monitor response to therapy. The predictors of pCR are diverse and should be utilized to personalize patient treatment, ultimately inducing the best outcomes. These determinants can also be employed for monitoring responses to neoadjuvant therapy, thereby adjusting treatment. The development of standardized markers for the diversity of BC subtypes still needs additional future research. These factors must be applied in concert in order to provide optimal results.

A Review of AI-Based Radiomics and Computational Pathology Approaches in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer: Current Applications and Perspectives

Breast cancer is one of the most common and deadly cancers worldwide. Approximately, 20% of all breast cancers are characterized as triple negative (TNBC). TNBC typically is associated with a poorer prognosis relative to other breast cancer subtypes. Due to its aggressiveness and lack of response to hormonal therapy, conventional cytotoxic chemotherapy is the usual treatment; however, this treatment is not always effective, and an important percentage of patients develop recurrence. More recently, immunotherapy has started to be used on some populations with TNBC showing promising results. Unfortunately, immunotherapy is only applicable to a minority of patients and responses in metastatic TNBC have overall been modest in comparison to other cancer types. This situation evidences the need for developing effective biomarkers that help to stratify and personalize patient management. Thanks to recent advances in artificial intelligence (AI), there has been an increasing interest in its use for medical applications aiming at supporting clinical decision making. Several works have used AI in combination with diagnostic medical imaging, more specifically radiology and digitized histopathological tissue samples, aiming to extract disease-specific information that is difficult to quantify by the human eye. These works have demonstrated that analysis of such images in the context of TNBC has great potential for (1) risk-stratifying patients to identify those patients who are more likely to experience disease recurrence or die from the disease and (2) predicting pathologic complete response. In this manuscript, we present an overview on AI and its integration with radiology and histopathological images for developing prognostic and predictive approaches for TNBC. We present state of the art approaches in the literature and discuss the opportunities and challenges with developing AI algorithms regarding further development and clinical deployment, including identifying those patients who may benefit from certain treatments (e.g., adjuvant chemotherapy) from those who may not and thereby should be directed toward other therapies, discovering potential differences between populations, and identifying disease subtypes.

Artificial intelligence in breast imaging: potentials and challenges

Breast cancer, which is the most common type of malignant tumor among humans, is a leading cause of death in females. Standard treatment strategies, including neoadjuvant chemotherapy, surgery, postoperative chemotherapy, targeted therapy, endocrine therapy, and radiotherapy, are tailored for individual patients. Such personalized therapies have tremendously reduced the threat of breast cancer in females. Furthermore, early imaging screening plays an important role in reducing the treatment cycle and improving breast cancer prognosis. The recent innovative revolution in artificial intelligence (AI) has aided radiologists in the early and accurate diagnosis of breast cancer. In this review, we introduce the necessity of incorporating AI into breast imaging and the applications of AI in mammography, ultrasonography, magnetic resonance imaging, and positron emission tomography/computed tomography based on published articles since 1994. Moreover, the challenges of AI in breast imaging are discussed.

Longitudinal dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI radiomic models for early prediction of response to neoadjuvant systemic therapy in triple-negative breast cancer

Early prediction of neoadjuvant systemic therapy (NAST) response for triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) patients could help oncologists select individualized treatment and avoid toxic effects associated with ineffective therapy in patients unlikely to achieve pathologic complete response (pCR). The objective of this study is to evaluate the performance of radiomic features of the peritumoral and tumoral regions from dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI) acquired at different time points of NAST for early treatment response prediction in TNBC. This study included 163 Stage I-III patients with TNBC undergoing NAST as part of a prospective clinical trial (NCT02276443). Peritumoral and tumoral regions of interest were segmented on DCE images at baseline (BL) and after two (C2) and four (C4) cycles of NAST. Ten first-order (FO) radiomic features and 300 gray-level-co-occurrence matrix (GLCM) features were calculated. Area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) and Wilcoxon rank sum test were used to determine the most predictive features. Multivariate logistic regression models were used for performance assessment. Pearson correlation was used to assess intrareader and interreader variability. Seventy-eight patients (48%) had pCR (52 training, 26 testing), and 85 (52%) had non-pCR (57 training, 28 testing). Forty-six radiomic features had AUC at least 0.70, and 13 multivariate models had AUC at least 0.75 for training and testing sets. The Pearson correlation showed significant correlation between readers. In conclusion, Radiomic features from DCE-MRI are useful for differentiating pCR and non-pCR. Similarly, predictive radiomic models based on these features can improve early noninvasive treatment response prediction in TNBC patients undergoing NAST.

Automated Prediction of Early Recurrence in Advanced Sinonasal Squamous Cell Carcinoma With Deep Learning and Multi-parametric MRI-based Radiomics Nomogram

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES

Preoperative prediction of the recurrence risk in patients with advanced sinonasal squamous cell carcinoma (SNSCC) is critical for individualized treatment. To evaluate the predictive ability of radiomics signature (RS) based on deep learning and multiparametric MRI for the risk of 2-year recurrence in advanced SNSCC.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Preoperative MRI datasets were retrospectively collected from 265 SNSCC patients (145 recurrences) who underwent preoperative MRI, including T2-weighted (T2W), contrast-enhanced T1-weighted (T1c) sequences and diffusion-weighted (DW). All patients were divided into 165 training cohort and 70 test cohort. A deep learning segmentation model based on VB-Net was used to segment regions of interest (ROIs) for preoperative MRI and radiomics features were extracted from automatically segmented ROIs. Least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) and logistic regression (LR) were applied for feature selection and radiomics score construction. Combined with meaningful clinicopathological predictors, a nomogram was developed and its performance was evaluated. In addition, X-title software was used to divide patients into high-risk or low-risk early relapse (ER) subgroups. Recurrence-free survival probability (RFS) was assessed for each subgroup.

RESULTS

The radiomics score, T stage, histological grade and Ki-67 predictors were independent predictors. The segmentation models of T2WI, T1c, and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) sequences achieved Dice coefficients of 0.720, 0.727, and 0.756, respectively, in the test cohort. RS-T2, RS-T1c and RS-ADC were derived from single-parameter MRI. RS-Combined (combined with T2WI, T1c, and ADC features) was derived from multiparametric MRI and reached area under curve (AUC) and accuracy of 0.854 (0.749-0.927) and 74.3% (0.624-0.840), respectively, in the test cohort. The calibration curve and decision curve analysis (DCA) illustrate its value in clinical practice. Kaplan-Meier analysis showed that the 2-year RFS rate for low-risk patients was significantly greater than that for high-risk patients in both the training and testing cohorts (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Automated nomograms based on multi-sequence MRI help to predict ER in SNSCC patients preoperatively.

Radiomics Based on DCE-MRI for Predicting Response to Neoadjuvant Therapy in Breast Cancer

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES

To compare the value of radiomics and diameter% based on pre- and early-treatment dynamic enhanced MR (DCE-MRI) of the breast in predicting response to neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) in breast cancer and to construct a tool for early noninvasive prediction of NAT outcomes.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Retrospective analysis of clinical and imaging data of 142 patients with primary invasive breast cancer who underwent DCE-MRI before and after two cycles of NAT at our institution. Enroled patients were randomly assigned in a 7:3 ratio to the training group and the test group. Patients were divided into pathological complete response (pCR) and non-pathological complete response groups based on surgical pathology findings after NAT. The maximum diameter relative regression values (Diameter%) before and after treatment were calculated and the conventional imaging Diameter% model was constructed. Based on pre- and early-NAT DCE-MRI, the optimal features of pre-NAT, early-NAT, and delta radiomics were screened using redundancy analysis, least absolute shrinkage, and selection operator methods to construct the corresponding radiomics model and calculate the Radscores. Indicators that were statistically significant in the univariate analysis of clinical data were further screened by stepwise regression and combined with Radscores to construct the fusion model. All models were evaluated and compared.

RESULTS

In the test set, the area under the curve (AUC) of the delta radiomics model (0.87) was higher than that of the pre-NAT, early-NAT radiomics models (0.57, 0.78) and the Diameter% model (0.83). The fusion model had the best efficacy in predicting pCR after NAT, with AUCs of 0.91 in the training and test sets. And its nomogram plot showed that Radscore of early-NAT radiomics had the greatest weight. In the test set, the fusion model and Delta radiomics model improved the efficacy of predicting pCR by 35.56% and 14.19%, respectively, compared to the Diameter% model (P = 0 and .039). Clinical decision curves showed the highest overall clinical benefit for the fusion model.

CONCLUSION

Radiomics, especially delta and early-NAT radiomics, may be potential biomarkers for early noninvasive prediction of NAT outcomes. And a fusion model constructed from meaningful clinicopathological indicators combined with radiomics can effectively predict NAT response.

Predicting Breast Cancer Subtypes Using Magnetic Resonance Imaging Based Radiomics With Automatic Segmentation

OBJECTIVE

The aim of the study is to demonstrate whether radiomics based on an automatic segmentation method is feasible for predicting molecular subtypes.

METHODS

This retrospective study included 516 patients with confirmed breast cancer. An automatic segmentation-3-dimensional UNet-based Convolutional Neural Networks, trained on our in-house data set-was applied to segment the regions of interest. A set of 1316 radiomics features per region of interest was extracted. Eighteen cross-combination radiomics methods-with 6 feature selection methods and 3 classifiers-were used for model selection. Model classification performance was assessed using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity.

RESULTS

The average dice similarity coefficient value of the automatic segmentation was 0.89. The radiomics models were predictive of 4 molecular subtypes with the best average: AUC = 0.8623, accuracy = 0.6596, sensitivity = 0.6383, and specificity = 0.8775. For luminal versus nonluminal subtypes, AUC = 0.8788 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.8505-0.9071), accuracy = 0.7756, sensitivity = 0.7973, and specificity = 0.7466. For human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-enriched versus non-HER2-enriched subtypes, AUC = 0.8676 (95% CI, 0.8370-0.8982), accuracy = 0.7737, sensitivity = 0.8859, and specificity = 0.7283. For triple-negative breast cancer versus non-triple-negative breast cancer subtypes, AUC = 0.9335 (95% CI, 0.9027-0.9643), accuracy = 0.9110, sensitivity = 0.4444, and specificity = 0.9865.

CONCLUSIONS

Radiomics based on automatic segmentation of magnetic resonance imaging can predict breast cancer of 4 molecular subtypes noninvasively and is potentially applicable in large samples.

Machine learning for predicting breast-conserving surgery candidates after neoadjuvant chemotherapy based on DCE-MRI

Purpose

This study aimed to investigate a machine learning method for predicting breast-conserving surgery (BCS) candidates, from patients who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) by using dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI) obtained before and after NAC.

Materials and methods

This retrospective study included 75 patients who underwent NAC and breast surgery. First, 3,390 features were comprehensively extracted from pre- and post-NAC DCE-MRIs. Then patients were then divided into two groups: type 1, patients with pathologic complete response (pCR) and single lesion shrinkage; type 2, major residual lesion with satellite foci, multifocal residual, stable disease (SD), and progressive disease (PD). The logistic regression (LR) was used to build prediction models to identify the two groups. Prediction performance was assessed using the area under the curve (AUC), accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity.

Results

Radiomics features were significantly related to breast cancer shrinkage after NAC. The combination model achieved an AUC of 0.82, and the pre-NAC model was 0.64, the post-NAC model was 0.70, and the pre-post-NAC model was 0.80. In the combination model, 15 features, including nine wavelet-based features, four Laplacian-of-Gauss (LoG) features, and two original features, were filtered. Among these selected were four features from pre-NAC DCE-MRI, six were from post-NAC DCE-MRI, and five were from pre-post-NAC features.

Conclusion

The model combined with pre- and post-NAC DCE-MRI can effectively predict candidates to undergo BCS and provide AI-based decision support for clinicians with ensured safety. High-order (LoG- and wavelet-based) features play an important role in our machine learning model. The features from pre-post-NAC DCE-MRI had better predictive performance.

Ultrasound-based radiomics model for predicting molecular biomarkers in breast cancer

Background

Breast cancer (BC) is the most common cancer in women and is highly heterogeneous. BC can be classified into four molecular subtypes based on the status of estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) and proliferation marker protein Ki-67. However, they can only be obtained by biopsy or surgery, which is invasive. Radiomics can noninvasively predict molecular expression via extracting the image features. Nevertheless, there is a scarcity of data available regarding the prediction of molecular biomarker expression using ultrasound (US) images in BC.

Objectives

To investigate the prediction performance of US radiomics for the assessment of molecular profiling in BC.

Methods

A total of 342 patients with BC who underwent preoperative US examination between January 2013 and December 2021 were retrospectively included. They were confirmed by pathology and molecular subtype analysis of ER, PR, HER2 and Ki-67. The radiomics features were extracted and four molecular models were constructed through support vector machine (SVM). Pearson correlation coefficient heatmaps are employed to analyze the relationship between selected features and their predictive power on molecular expression. The receiver operating characteristic curve was used for the prediction performance of US radiomics in the assessment of molecular profiling.

Results

359 lesions with 129 ER- and 230 ER+, 163 PR- and 196 PR+, 265 HER2- and 94 HER2+, 114 Ki-67- and 245 Ki-67+ expression were included. 1314 features were extracted from each ultrasound image. And there was a significant difference of some specific radiomics features between the molecule positive and negative groups. Multiple features demonstrated significant association with molecular biomarkers. The area under curves (AUCs) were 0.917, 0.835, 0.771, and 0.896 in the training set, while 0.868, 0.811, 0.722, and 0.706 in the validation set to predict ER, PR, HER2, and Ki-67 expression respectively.

Conclusion

Ultrasound-based radiomics provides a promising method for predicting molecular biomarker expression of ER, PR, HER2, and Ki-67 in BC.

Breast Cancer Surrogate Subtype Classification Using Pretreatment Multi-Phase Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging Radiomics: A Retrospective Single-Center Study

This study aimed to explore the potential of multi-phase dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI) radiomics for classifying breast cancer surrogate subtypes. This retrospective study analyzed 360 breast cancers from 319 patients who underwent pretreatment DCE-MRI between January 2015 and January 2019. The cohort consisted of 33 triple-negative, 26 human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive, 109 luminal A-like, 144 luminal B-like HER2-negative, and 48 luminal B-like HER2-positive lesions. A total of 1781 radiomic features were extracted from manually segmented breast cancers in each DCE-MRI sequence. The model was internally validated and selected using ten times repeated five-fold cross-validation on the primary cohort, with further evaluation using a validation cohort. The most successful models were logistic regression models applied to the third post-contrast subtraction images. These models exhibited the highest area under the curve (AUC) for discriminating between luminal A like vs. others (AUC: 0.78), luminal B-like HER2 negative vs. others (AUC: 0.57), luminal B-like HER2 positive vs. others (AUC: 0.60), HER2 positive vs. others (AUC: 0.81), and triple negative vs. others (AUC: 0.83). In conclusion, the radiomic features extracted from multi-phase DCE-MRI are promising for discriminating between breast cancer subtypes. The best-performing models relied on tissue changes observed during the mid-stage of the imaging process.

Contrast-enhanced computed tomography radiomics in predicting primary site response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in high-risk neuroblastoma

PURPOSE

To explore the clinical value of contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CECT) radiomics in predicting primary site response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in high-risk neuroblastoma.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Seventy patients were retrospectively included and separated into very good partial response (VGPR) group and non-VGPR group according to the changes in primary tumor volume. The clinical features with statistical difference between the two groups were used to construct the clinical models using a logistic regression (LR) algorithm. The radiomics models based on different radiomics features selected by Kruskal-Wallis (KW) test and recursive feature elimination (RFE) were established using support vector machine (SVM) and LR algorithms. The radiomics score (Radscore) and clinical features were integrated into the combined models. Leave-one-out cross-validation (LOOCV) was used to validate the predictive performance of models in the entire dataset.

RESULTS

The optimal clinical model achieved an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.767 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.638, 0.896] and an accuracy of 0.771 after LOOCV. The AUCs of the best KW + SVM, KW + LR, RFE + SVM, and RFE + LR radiomics models were 0.816, 0.826, 0.853, and 0.850, respectively, and the corresponding AUCs after LOOCV were 0.780, 0.785, 0.755, and 0.772, respectively. The AUC and accuracy after LOOCV of the optimal combined model was 0.804 (95% CI: 0.694, 0.915) and 0.814, respectively. The Delong test showed a statistical difference in predictive performance between the optimal clinical and combined models after LOOCV (Z = 2.003, P = 0.045). The decision curve analysis showed that the combined model performs better than the clinical model.

CONCLUSION

The CECT radiomics models have a favorable predictive performance in predicting VGPR of high-risk neuroblastoma to neoadjuvant chemotherapy. When integrating radiomics features and clinical features, the predictive performance of the combined models can be further improved.

How Radiomics Can Improve Breast Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment

Recent technological advances in the field of artificial intelligence hold promise in addressing medical challenges in breast cancer care, such as early diagnosis, cancer subtype determination and molecular profiling, prediction of lymph node metastases, and prognostication of treatment response and probability of recurrence. Radiomics is a quantitative approach to medical imaging, which aims to enhance the existing data available to clinicians by means of advanced mathematical analysis using artificial intelligence. Various published studies from different fields in imaging have highlighted the potential of radiomics to enhance clinical decision making. In this review, we describe the evolution of AI in breast imaging and its frontiers, focusing on handcrafted and deep learning radiomics. We present a typical workflow of a radiomics analysis and a practical "how-to" guide. Finally, we summarize the methodology and implementation of radiomics in breast cancer, based on the most recent scientific literature to help researchers and clinicians gain fundamental knowledge of this emerging technology. Alongside this, we discuss the current limitations of radiomics and challenges of integration into clinical practice with conceptual consistency, data curation, technical reproducibility, adequate accuracy, and clinical translation. The incorporation of radiomics with clinical, histopathological, and genomic information will enable physicians to move forward to a higher level of personalized management of patients with breast cancer.

Building and evaluating an artificial intelligence algorithm: A practical guide for practicing oncologists

The use of machine learning and deep learning has enabled many applications, previously thought of as being impossible. Among all medical fields, cancer care is arguably the most significantly impacted, with precision medicine now truly being a possibility. The effect of these technologies, loosely known as artificial intelligence, is particularly striking in fields involving images (such as radiology and pathology) and fields involving large amounts of data (such as genomics). Practicing oncologists are often confronted with new technologies claiming to predict response to therapy or predict the genomic make-up of patients. Underst-anding these new claims and technologies requires a deep understanding of the field. In this review, we provide an overview of the basis of deep learning. We describe various common tasks and their data requirements so that oncologists could be equipped to start such projects, as well as evaluate algorithms presented to them.

Changes in kinetic heterogeneity of breast cancer via computer-aided diagnosis on MRI predict the pathological response to neoadjuvant systemic therapy

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate whether the computer-aided diagnosis (CAD)-extracted kinetic heterogeneity of breast cancer on MRI and changes therein during treatment were associated with the pathological response to neoadjuvant systemic therapy (NST).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Consecutive patients with invasive breast cancer, who underwent NST followed by surgery between 2014 and 2020, were retrospectively evaluated. Using a commercial CAD system, kinetic features (angiovolume, peak enhancement, delayed enhancement profiles, and kinetic heterogeneity) of breast cancer were assessed with pre- and mid-treatment MRI. Multivariate logistic regression was used to identify the associations between CAD-extracted kinetic features and pathological complete response (pCR).

RESULTS

A total of 130 patients (mean age, 55 years) were included, 37 (28.5%) of whom achieved a pCR. When the pre- and mid-treatment MRI data were compared, the pCR group exhibited greater changes in kinetic heterogeneity (86.14 ± 32.05% vs. 8.50 ± 141.01%, p < 0.001) and angiovolume (95.20 ± 14.29% vs. 19.89 ± 320.16%; p < 0.001) than the non-pCR group. Multivariate regression analysis showed that a large change in kinetic heterogeneity (odds ratio (OR) = 1.030, p < 0.001), age (OR = 0.931, p = 0.005), progesterone receptor negativity (OR = 7.831, p = 0.001), and HER2 positivity (OR = 3.455, p = 0.017) were associated with pCR.

CONCLUSIONS

A greater change in the CAD-extracted kinetic heterogeneity of breast cancer between pre- and mid-treatment MRI was associated with a pCR in patients on NST.

KEY POINTS

A greater change in kinetic heterogeneity was associated with a pathological complete response. Computer-aided diagnosis-extracted kinetic heterogeneity might serve as a quantitative biomarker of therapeutic efficacy.

Potential of the Non-Contrast-Enhanced Chest CT Radiomics to Distinguish Molecular Subtypes of Breast Cancer: A Retrospective Study

Objectives

The molecular subtype plays an important role in breast cancer, which is the main reference to guide treatment and is closely related to prognosis. The objective of this study was to explore the potential of the non-contrast-enhanced chest CT-based radiomics to predict breast cancer molecular subtypes non-invasively.

Methods

A total of 300 breast cancer patients (153 luminal types and 147 non-luminal types) who underwent routine chest CT examination were included in the study, of which 220 cases belonged to the training set and 80 cases to the time-independent test set. Identification of the molecular subtypes is based on immunohistochemical staining of postoperative tissue samples. The region of interest (ROI) of breast masses was delineated on the continuous slices of CT images. Forty-two models to predict the luminal type of breast cancer were established by the combination of six feature screening methods and seven machine learning classifiers; 5-fold cross-validation (cv) was used for internal validation. Finally, the optimal model was selected for external validation on the independent test set. In addition, we also took advantage of SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) values to make explanations of the machine learning model.

Results

During internal validation, the area under the curve (AUC) values for different models ranged from 0.599 to 0.842, and the accuracy ranged from 0.540 to 0.775. Eventually, the LASSO_SVM combination was selected as the final model, which included 9 radiomics features. The AUC, accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity of the model to distinguish luminal from the non-luminal type were 0.842 [95% CI: 0.728−0.957], 0.773, 0.818, and 0.773 in the training set and 0.757 [95% CI: 0.640–0.866], 0.713, 0.767, and 0.676 in the test set.

Conclusion

The radiomics based on chest CT may provide a new idea for the identification of breast cancer molecular subtypes.

A Clinical–Radiomics Model for Predicting Axillary Pathologic Complete Response in Breast Cancer With Axillary Lymph Node Metastases

Purpose

To develop a clinical–radiomics model based on radiomics features extracted from MRI and clinicopathologic factors for predicting the axillary pathologic complete response (apCR) in breast cancer (BC) patients with axillary lymph node (ALN) metastases.

Materials and Methods

The MR images and clinicopathologic data of 248 eligible invasive BC patients at the Peking University First Hospital from January 2013 to December 2020 were included in this study. All patients received neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC), and the presence of ALN metastases was confirmed through cytology pre-NAC. The data from January 2013 to December 2018 were randomly divided into the training and validation sets in a ratio of 7:3, and the data from January 2019 to December 2020 served as the independent testing set. The following three types of prediction models were investigated in this study. 1) A clinical model: the model was built by independently predicting clinicopathologic factors through logistic regression. 2) Radiomics models: we used an automatic segmentation model based on deep learning to segment the axillary areas, visible ALNs, and breast tumors on post-NAC dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI. Radiomics features were then extracted from the region of interest (ROI). Radiomics models were built based on different ROIs or their combination. 3) A clinical–radiomics model: it was built by integrating radiomics signature and independent predictive clinical factors by logistic regression. All models were assessed using a receiver operating characteristic curve analysis and by calculating the area under the curve (AUC).

Results

The clinical model yielded AUC values of 0.759, 0.787, and 0.771 in the training, validation, and testing sets, respectively. The radiomics model based on the combination of MRI features of breast tumors and visible ALNs yielded the best AUC values of 0.894, 0.811, and 0.806 in the training, validation, and testing sets, respectively. The clinical–radiomics model yielded AUC values of 0.924, 0.851, and 0.878 in the training, validation, and testing sets, respectively, for predicting apCR.

Conclusion

We developed a clinical–radiomics model by integrating radiomics signature and clinical factors to predict apCR in BC patients with ALN metastases post-NAC. It may help the clinicians to screen out apCR patients to avoid lymph node dissection.

Radiomic differentiation of breast cancer molecular subtypes using pre-operative breast imaging - A systematic review and meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION

Breast cancer has four distinct molecular subtypes which are discriminated using gene expression profiling following biopsy. Radiogenomics is an emerging field which utilises diagnostic imaging to reveal genomic properties of disease. We aimed to perform a systematic review of the current literature to evaluate the value radiomics in differentiating breast cancers into their molecular subtypes using diagnostic imaging.

METHODS

A systematic review was performed as per PRISMA guidelines. Studies assessing radiomictumour analysis in differentiatingbreast cancer molecular subtypeswere included. Quality was assessed using the radiomics quality score (RQS). Diagnostic sensitivity and specificity of radiomic analyses were included for meta-analysis; Study specific sensitivity and specificity were retrieved and summary ROC analysis were performed to compile pooled sensitivities and specificities.

RESULTS

Forty-one studies were included. Overall, there were 10,090 female patients (mean age of 47.6 ± 11.7 years, range: 21-93) and molecular subtypewas reported in 7,693 of cases, with Luminal A (LABC), Luminal B (LBBC), Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor-2 overexpressing (HER2+), and Triple Negative (TNBC) breast cancers representing 51.3%, 19.9%, 12.3% and 16.3% of tumour respectively. Seven studies provided radiomic analysis to determine molecular subtypes using mammography to differentiateTNBCvs.others (sensitivity: 0.82,specificity:0.79). Thirty-five studies reported on radiomic analysis of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI); LABC versus others(sensitivity:0.78,specificity:0.83),HER2+versusothers(sensitivity:0.87,specificity:0.88), andLBBCversusTNBC (sensitivity: 0.79,specificity:0.88) respectively.

CONCLUSION

Radiomic tumour assessment of contemporary breast imaging provide a novel option in determining breast cancer molecular subtypes. However, amelioration of such techniques are required and genetic expression assessment will remain the gold standard.

Radiomics of MRI for the Prediction of the Pathological Response to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Breast Cancer Patients: A Single Referral Centre Analysis

Simple Summary

Nowadays, the only widely recognized method for evaluating the efficacy of neoadjuvant chemotherapy is the assessment of the pathological response through surgery. However, delivering chemotherapy to not-responders could expose them to unnecessary drug toxicity with delayed access to other potentially effective therapies. Radiomics could be useful in the early detection of resistance to chemotherapy, which is crucial for switching treatment strategy. We determined whether tumor radiomic features extracted from a highly homogeneous database of breast MRI can improve the prediction of response to chemotherapy in patients with breast cancer, in addiction to biological characteristics, potentially avoiding unnecessary treatment.

Abstract

Objectives: We aimed to determine whether radiomic features extracted from a highly homogeneous database of breast MRI could non-invasively predict pathological complete responses (pCR) to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) in patients with breast cancer. Methods: One hundred patients with breast cancer receiving NACT in a single center (01/2017–06/2019) and undergoing breast MRI were retrospectively evaluated. For each patient, radiomic features were extracted within the biopsy-proven tumor on T1-weighted (T1-w) contrast-enhanced MRI performed before NACT. The pCR to NACT was determined based on the final surgical specimen. The association of clinical/biological and radiomic features with response to NACT was evaluated by univariate and multivariable analysis by using random forest and logistic regression. The performances of all models were assessed using the areas under the receiver operating characteristic curves (AUC) with 95% confidence intervals (CI). Results: Eighty-three patients (mean (SD) age, 47.26 (8.6) years) were included. Patients with HER2+, basal-like molecular subtypes and Ki67 ≥ 20% presented a pCR to NACT more frequently; the clinical/biological model’s AUC (95% CI) was 0.81 (0.71–0.90). Using 136 representative radiomics features selected through cluster analysis from the 1037 extracted features, a radiomic score was calculated to predict the response to NACT, with AUC (95% CI): 0.64 (0.51–0.75). After combining the clinical/biological and radiomics models, the AUC (95% CI) was 0.83 (0.73–0.92). Conclusions: MRI-based radiomic features slightly improved the pre-treatment prediction of pCR to NACT, in addiction to biological characteristics. If confirmed on larger cohorts, it could be helpful to identify such patients, to avoid unnecessary treatment.

Performances of Whole Tumor Texture Analysis Based on MRI: Predicting Preoperative T Stage of Rectal Carcinomas

Objective

To determine whether there is a correlation between texture features extracted from high-resolution T2-weighted imaging (HR-T2WI) or apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) maps and the preoperative T stage (stages T1–2 versus T3–4) in rectal carcinomas.

Materials and Methods

One hundred and fifty four patients with rectal carcinomas who underwent preoperative HR-T2WI and diffusion-weighted imaging were enrolled. Patients were divided into training (n = 89) and validation (n = 65) cohorts. 3D Slicer was used to segment the entire volume of interest for whole tumors based on HR-T2WI and ADC maps. The least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) was performed to select feature. The significantly difference was tested by the independent sample t-test and Mann-Whitney U test. The support vector machine (SVM) model was used to develop classification models. The correlation between features and T stage was assessed by Spearman’s correlation analysis. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to identify independent predictors of tumor invasion. The performance of classifiers was evaluated by the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves.

Results

The wavelet HHH NGTDM strength (R_S = -0.364, P < 0.001) from HR-T2WI was an independent predictor of stage T3–4 tumors. The shape maximum 2D diameter column (R_S = 0.431, P < 0.001), log σ = 5.0 mm 3D first-order maximum (R_S = 0.276, P = 0.009), and log σ = 5.0 mm 3D first-order interquartile range (R_S = -0.229, P = 0.032) from ADC maps were independent predictors. In training cohorts, the classification models from HR-T2WI, ADC maps and the combination of two achieved the area under the ROC curves (AUCs) of 0.877, 0.902 and 0.941, with the accuracy of 79.78%, 89.86% and 89.89%, respectively. In validation cohorts, the three models achieved AUCs of 0.845, 0.881 and 0.910, with the accuracy of 78.46%, 83.08% and 87.69%, respectively.

Conclusions

Texture analysis based on ADC maps shows more potential than HR-T2WI in identifying preoperative T stage in rectal carcinomas. The combined application of HR-T2WI and ADC maps may help to improve the accuracy of preoperative diagnosis of rectal cancer invasion.

Radiomics Analysis Based on Automatic Image Segmentation of DCE-MRI for Predicting Triple-Negative and Nontriple-Negative Breast Cancer

PURPOSE

To investigate whether quantitative radiomics features extracted from dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI) could be used to differentiate triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) and nontriple-negative breast cancer (non-TNBC).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This retrospective study included DCE-MRI images of 81 breast cancer patients (44 TNBC and 37 non-TNBC) from August 2018 to October 2019. The MR scans were achieved at a 1.5 T MR scanner. For each patient, the largest tumor mass was selected to analyze. Three-dimensional (3D) images of the regions of interest (ROIs) were automatically segmented on the third DCE phase by a deep learning segmentation model; then, the ROIs were checked and revised by 2 radiologists. DCE-MRI radiomics features were extracted from the 3D tumor volume. The patients were randomly divided into training (N = 57) and test (N = 24) cohorts. The machine learning classifier was built in the training dataset, and 5-fold cross-validation was performed on the training cohort to train and validate. The data of the test cohort were used to investigate the predictive power of the radiomics model in predicting TNBC and non-TNBC. The performance of the model was evaluated by the area under receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity.

RESULTS

The radiomics model based on 15 features got the best performance. The AUC achieved 0.741 for the cross-validation, and 0.867 for the independent testing cohort.

CONCLUSION

The radiomics model based on automatic image segmentation of DCE-MRI can be used to distinguish TNBC and non-TNBC.

Recent Radiomics Advancements in Breast Cancer: Lessons and Pitfalls for the Next Future

Radiomics is an emerging translational field of medicine based on the extraction of high-dimensional data from radiological images, with the purpose to reach reliable models to be applied into clinical practice for the purposes of diagnosis, prognosis and evaluation of disease response to treatment. We aim to provide the basic information on radiomics to radiologists and clinicians who are focused on breast cancer care, encouraging cooperation with scientists to mine data for a better application in clinical practice. We investigate the workflow and clinical application of radiomics in breast cancer care, as well as the outlook and challenges based on recent studies. Currently, radiomics has the potential ability to distinguish between benign and malignant breast lesions, to predict breast cancer’s molecular subtypes, the response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy and the lymph node metastases. Even though radiomics has been used in tumor diagnosis and prognosis, it is still in the research phase and some challenges need to be faced to obtain a clinical translation. In this review, we discuss the current limitations and promises of radiomics for improvement in further research.

Radiomics: A Primer for Breast Radiologists

Radiomics has a long-standing history in breast imaging with computer-aided detection (CAD) for screening mammography developed in the late 20th century. Although conventional CAD had widespread adoption, the clinical benefits for experienced breast radiologists were debatable due to high false-positive marks and subsequent increased recall rates. The dramatic growth in recent years of artificial intelligence-based analysis, including machine learning and deep learning, has provided numerous opportunities for improved modern radiomics work in breast imaging. There has been extensive radiomics work in mammography, digital breast tomosynthesis, MRI, ultrasound, PET-CT, and combined multimodality imaging. Specific radiomics outcomes of interest have been diverse, including CAD, prediction of response to neoadjuvant therapy, lesion classification, and survival, among other outcomes. Additionally, the radiogenomics subfield that correlates radiomics features with genetics has been very proliferative, in parallel with the clinical validation of breast cancer molecular subtypes and gene expression assays. Despite the promise of radiomics, there are important challenges related to image normalization, limited large unbiased data sets, and lack of external validation. Much of the radiomics work to date has been exploratory using single-institution retrospective series for analysis, but several promising lines of investigation have made the leap to clinical practice with commercially available products. As a result, breast radiologists will increasingly be incorporating radiomics-based tools into their daily practice in the near future. Therefore, breast radiologists must have a broad understanding of the scope, applications, and limitations of radiomics work.

MRI-Based Radiomics Analysis for the Pretreatment Prediction of Pathologic Complete Tumor Response to Neoadjuvant Systemic Therapy in Breast Cancer Patients: A Multicenter Study

This retrospective study investigated the value of pretreatment contrast-enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)-based radiomics for the prediction of pathologic complete tumor response to neoadjuvant systemic therapy in breast cancer patients. A total of 292 breast cancer patients, with 320 tumors, who were treated with neo-adjuvant systemic therapy and underwent a pretreatment MRI exam were enrolled. As the data were collected in two different hospitals with five different MRI scanners and varying acquisition protocols, three different strategies to split training and validation datasets were used. Radiomics, clinical, and combined models were developed using random forest classifiers in each strategy. The analysis of radiomics features had no added value in predicting pathologic complete tumor response to neoadjuvant systemic therapy in breast cancer patients compared with the clinical models, nor did the combined models perform significantly better than the clinical models. Further, the radiomics features selected for the models and their performance differed with and within the different strategies. Due to previous and current work, we tentatively attribute the lack of improvement in clinical models following the addition of radiomics to the effects of variations in acquisition and reconstruction parameters. The lack of reproducibility data (i.e., test-retest or similar) meant that this effect could not be analyzed. These results indicate the need for reproducibility studies to preselect reproducible features in order to properly assess the potential of radiomics.

Contrast-Enhanced CT-Based Radiomics Analysis in Predicting Lymphovascular Invasion in Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma

Objectives

To develop a radiomics model based on contrast-enhanced CT (CECT) to predict the lymphovascular invasion (LVI) in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) and provide decision-making support for clinicians.

Patients and Methods

This retrospective study enrolled 334 patients with surgically resected and pathologically confirmed ESCC, including 96 patients with LVI and 238 patients without LVI. All enrolled patients were randomly divided into a training cohort and a testing cohort at a ratio of 7:3, with the training cohort containing 234 patients (68 patients with LVI and 166 without LVI) and the testing cohort containing 100 patients (28 patients with LVI and 72 without LVI). All patients underwent preoperative CECT scans within 2 weeks before operation. Quantitative radiomics features were extracted from CECT images, and the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) method was applied to select radiomics features. Logistic regression (Logistic), support vector machine (SVM), and decision tree (Tree) methods were separately used to establish radiomics models to predict the LVI status in ESCC, and the best model was selected to calculate Radscore, which combined with two clinical CT predictors to build a combined model. The clinical model was also developed by using logistic regression. The receiver characteristic curve (ROC) and decision curve (DCA) analysis were used to evaluate the model performance in predicting the LVI status in ESCC.

Results

In the radiomics model, Sphericity and gray-level non-uniformity (GLNU) were the most significant radiomics features for predicting LVI. In the clinical model, the maximum tumor thickness based on CECT (cThick) in patients with LVI was significantly greater than that in patients without LVI (P<0.001). Patients with LVI had higher clinical N stage based on CECT (cN stage) than patients without LVI (P<0.001). The ROC analysis showed that both the radiomics model (AUC values were 0.847 and 0.826 in the training and testing cohort, respectively) and the combined model (0.876 and 0.867, respectively) performed better than the clinical model (0.775 and 0.798, respectively), with the combined model exhibiting the best performance.

Conclusions

The combined model incorporating radiomics features and clinical CT predictors may potentially predict the LVI status in ESCC and provide support for clinical treatment decisions.