Methamphetamine use and technology-mediated psychosocial interventions: A mini-review

Levels of engagement among office-based opioid treatment (OBOT) patients with concurrent methamphetamine use

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Recent increases in methamphetamine use among people seeking treatment for opioid use disorder (OUD) has created significant demand for effective approaches to support this clinical population. This study assessed the extent to which office-based opioid treatment (OBOT) patients, who were diagnosed with methamphetamine use disorder (MUD), engaged with providers.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis was conducted of adult patients (n = 470) seeking treatment for OUD who attended at least one visit between March 2020 and March 2023 at a rural regional OBOT provider. Approximately one quarter (28.7%) of patients were diagnosed with MUD in addition to receiving an OUD diagnosis. Bivariate methods and multivariate negative binomial regression models were estimated to examine the associations between clinical measures and the numbers of office visits, peer visits, and telehealth visits.

RESULTS

Regression results indicated patients who met criteria for MUD in addition to OUD attended a higher rate of peer visits (incidence rate ratio [IRR] = 2.63, p = .036) when compared to patients who did not meet criteria for MUD. In contrast, patients with MUD and OUD diagnoses displayed significantly lower (IRR = 0.68, p < .001) engagement rates through fewer office visits relative to those who did not meet MUD criteria.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS

Patients seeking treatment for OUD who meet criteria for MUD are more likely to engage through peer support specialists rather than office visits.

SCIENTIFIC SIGNIFICANCE

This study demonstrates the ways patients who meet criteria for OUD and MUD engage with providers to receive treatment.

Novel therapeutics in development for the treatment of stimulant-use disorder

Misuse and accidental overdoses attributed to stimulants are escalating rapidly. These stimulants include methamphetamine, cocaine, amphetamine, ecstasy-type drugs, and prescription stimulants such as methylphenidate. Unlike opioids and alcohol, there are no therapies approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) to treat stimulant-use disorder. The high rate of relapse among this population highlights the insufficiency of current treatment options, which are limited to abstinence support programs and behavioral modification therapies. Here, we briefly outline recent regulatory actions taken by FDA to help support the development of new stimulant use disorder treatments and highlight several new therapeutics in the clinical development pipeline.

The ASAM/AAAP Clinical Practice Guideline on the Management of Stimulant Use Disorder

The American Society of Addiction Medicine/American Academy of Addiction Psychiatry (ASAM/AAAP) Clinical Practice Guideline on the Management of Stimulant Use Disorder provides guidance on evidence-based strategies for the treatment of stimulant use disorders (StUDs), stimulant intoxication, and stimulant withdrawal, as well as secondary and tertiary prevention of harms associated with stimulant use. The Clinical Guideline Committee (CGC) comprised experts from ASAM and AAAP representing a range of clinical settings and patient populations. The guideline was developed following modified GRADE methodology. The process included a systematic literature review as well as several targeted supplemental searches. The CGC utilized Evidence to Decision tables to review available evidence and rate the strength of each recommendation. The clinical practice guideline was revised based on external stakeholder review. Key takeaways included: Contingency management represents the current standard of care for treatment of StUDs; Pharmacotherapies may be utilized off-label to treat StUDs; Acute stimulant intoxication can result in life-threatening complications that should be addressed in an appropriate level of care; Secondary and tertiary prevention strategies should be used to reduce harms related to risky stimulant use.

Prevalence of methamphetamine use among gay, bisexual and other men who have sex with men: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

International efforts have reduced the availability of methamphetamine precursors, but its distribution and use continue to rise. Methamphetamine use can lead to short- and long-term adverse effects, including addiction, physical and psychosocial health problems, socioeconomic troubles, incarceration, overdose, and death. Gay, bisexual, and other men who have sex with men (MSM) have been shown to have an elevated prevalence of methamphetamine use.

METHODS

We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to estimate the prevalence of methamphetamine use among MSM. We searched electronic databases, such as PubMed, for peer-reviewed literature published between 2011 and 2022. Data on methamphetamine use were extracted, including study features, location, study design, sampling method, recruitment period, specific MSM subgroups, prevalence period, and demographics. Employing a random-effects model, we computed the pooled prevalence of methamphetamine use among MSM across two prevalence periods: recent use (i.e., one month, three months, six months, one year) and lifetime use.

RESULTS

The systematic review included 56 studies with a total of 25,953 MSM who use methamphetamine. Most studies were conducted in Europe, with the highest prevalence reported in the United Kingdom. The studies primarily used cross-sectional or cohort study designs with convenience sampling. The pooled prevalence rates across recent use (i.e., past month, past three months, past six months, and past year) was 15% (95% CI [11-19%]). Additionally, we pooled lifetime use, which was 23% (95% CI [9-38%]). High heterogeneity (I2 > 99%) was observed, indicating significant variation.

CONCLUSION

This systematic review and meta-analysis provide a pooled prevalence of methamphetamine use among MSM. The analysis accounts for study design, prevalence period, specific MSM subgroups, and geographical areas to estimate methamphetamine use in diverse settings and populations. The review highlights the need for targeted interventions and harm reduction strategies focused on prevention, education, healthcare access, and stakeholder collaboration to address the multifaceted challenges of methamphetamine use among MSM.

A systematic review of digital interventions for smoking cessation in patients with serious mental illness

Tobacco smoking is highly prevalent among patients with serious mental illness (SMI), with known deleterious consequences. Smoking cessation is therefore a prioritary public health challenge in SMI. In recent years, several smoking cessation digital interventions have been developed for non-clinical populations. However, their impact in patients with SMI remains uncertain. We conducted a systematic review to describe and evaluate effectiveness, acceptability, adherence, usability and safety of digital interventions for smoking cessation in patients with SMI. PubMed/MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, Web of Science, PsychINFO and the Cochrane Tobacco Addiction Group Specialized Register were searched. Studies matching inclusion criteria were included and their information systematically extracted by independent investigators. Thirteen articles were included, which reported data on nine different digital interventions. Intervention theoretical approaches ranged from mobile contingency management to mindfulness. Outcome measures varied widely between studies. The highest abstinence rates were found for mSMART MIND (7-day point-prevalent abstinence: 16-40%). Let's Talk About Quitting Smoking reported greater acceptability ratings, although this was not evaluated with standardized measures. Regarding usability, Learn to Quit showed the highest System Usability Scale scores [mean (s.d.) 85.2 (15.5)]. Adverse events were rare and not systematically reported. Overall, the quality of the studies was fair to good. Digitally delivered health interventions for smoking cessation show promise for improving outcomes for patients with SMI, but lack of availability remains a concern. Larger trials with harmonized assessment measures are needed to generate more definitive evidence and specific recommendations.

Demonstration of an app-delivered digital therapeutic program for methamphetamine use disorder

This study assessed the feasibility and utility of a digital, all-virtual program designed for treatment of methamphetamine use disorder (MUD). Forty-nine adults with moderate- to severe-level MUD (per DSM-5 criteria) commenced the 8-week intervention. All aspects of the program were delivered via smartphone-based app. Intervention components included counseling (cognitive behavioral therapy in group and individual sessions), app-based therapeutic tasks, remote biological drug testing, medical oversight by psychiatrists/nurse practitioners, and contingency management procedures (including rewards for methamphetamine-free saliva drug tests, accomplishing tasks, and engaging in assigned activities). Of the 49 participants who commenced treatment, 27 participants (55%) completed the program. Repeated-measures mixed-model analyses show that participants were more likely to test negative for meth use from week 1 to week 8 (OR = 1.57, 95% CI [1.28, 1.97]; p = 0.034). Well-being and social functioning improved among the majority of participants. These results demonstrate the utility of the all-virtual, digital therapeutic program and its ability to help individuals with MUD to reduce or cease methamphetamine use. The program was efficiently implemented and was well received by participants and clinical personnel, indicating its ability to deliver comprehensive, effective care and to retain the difficult-to-engage population of persons with MUD. Of the 27 completers, 16 responded to a 1-month follow-up survey and reported no meth use in the month since completing the program.

Proof-of-concept trial of Goal Management Training+ to improve executive functions and treatment outcomes in methamphetamine use disorder

BACKGROUND

Deficits in executive function are common in methamphetamine use disorder (MUD), likely contributing to difficulties in sustained treatment success. Cognitive remediation interventions are designed to treat such deficits but have not been adapted to the needs of people with MUD. This study presents a proof-of-concept trial to evaluate a new cognitive remediation program for MUD, Goal Management Training⁺ (GMT⁺).

METHODS

This was a cluster-randomised crossover trial comparing GMT⁺ with a psychoeducation-based control (Brain Health Workshop; BHW). GMT⁺ is a therapist-administered group-based cognitive remediation for executive dysfunction comprising four 90-minute weekly sessions and daily journal activities. BHW is a lifestyle psychoeducation program matched to GMT⁺ for therapist involvement, format, and duration. Participants (n = 36; GMT n = 17; BHW n = 19) were recruited from therapeutic communities in Victoria, Australia. Primary outcomes included intervention acceptability, feasibility, and improvements in self-reported executive function. Secondary outcomes included cognitive tests of executive function, severity of methamphetamine dependence, craving, and quality of life. We performed mixed linear modelling and calculated Hedges' g effect sizes.

RESULTS

GMT⁺ participant ratings and program retention indicated high acceptability. There was no difference between GMT⁺ and BHW on self-reported executive function (g = 0.06). Cognitive tasks suggested benefits of GMT⁺ on information gathering (g = 0.88) and delay-discounting (g = 0.80). Severity of methamphetamine dependence decreased more in GMT⁺ (g = 1.47).

CONCLUSIONS

GMT⁺ was well-accepted but did not improve self-reported executive functioning. Secondary outcomes suggested GMT⁺ was beneficial for objective cognitive performance and severity of dependence.

Associations between psychosocial risk factors, and changes in substance dependence and psychosocial functioning, during engagement with digital cognitive behavioral therapy for methamphetamine use: use of 'Breaking Free from Substance Abuse' by incarcerated people during the COVID-19 pandemic

BACKGROUND

Methamphetamine use can be associated with involvement with correctional services and incarceration. Traditionally, treatments for methamphetamine use have been delivered in-person - however, lockdowns initiated during the COVID-19 pandemic significantly reduced access to such in-person support in prisons. Therefore, in May 2020 a digital cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) program for substance use disorders - 'Breaking Free from Substance Abuse' - was made available across prisons in Ohio in order to meet this treatment gap. This represents the first time this digital CBT intervention has been made widely available to incarcerated people residing in prisons or jails in the United States (US). This was a within-subjects study using data from 2187 Ohio prison residents who engaged with this digital CBT program to address their methamphetamine use.

RESULTS

Participants reported multiple psychosocial risk factors, including moderate to severe substance dependence, depression and anxiety; interpersonal conflict; aggressive behavior; paranoia; and difficulties with work, education and accommodation. Significant reductions in substance dependence, depression/anxiety and biopsychosocial impairment, and improvements in quality of life, were identified in the sample. Risk factors were associated with less positive outcomes, specifically interpersonal conflict and poor mental health. Completion of specific components of the program were associated with more positive outcomes - a dose response was also identified.

CONCLUSIONS

Digital CBT can be delivered in secure US correctional settings and may help to fill unmet needs for in-person treatment. Specifically, this digital CBT program may support incarcerated individuals to address methamphetamine use, with outcomes being associated with psychosocial risk factors and program engagement.

The current evidence for substance use disorder apps

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

New mHealth (smartphone) apps for substance use disorders (SUD) are emerging at an accelerated rate, with consumer choice typically guided by app-store user ratings rather than their effectiveness. The expansive reach, low-cost and accessibility of mHealth apps have driven their popularity and appeal as alternatives to traditional treatment; as such, rigorously establishing their effectiveness is of paramount importance.

RECENT FINDINGS

Several systematic reviews conclude that the evidence-base for mHealth SUD apps is weak, inconclusive and hampered by substantial heterogeneity in study designs. However, there have been a number of interesting and novel developments in this area in recent years, which have not been synthesised to date.

SUMMARY

Most mHealth apps deliver either multiple-component behaviour change techniques, discrete psychological interventions or cognitive training interventions, or are designed to act as adjuncts to facilitate the delivery of clinical or continuing care. There are promising signals of their feasibility, acceptability and preliminary effectiveness in numerous open-label pilot studies of mHealth apps targeting alcohol and smoking. However, only a handful of sufficiently-powered, well-designed randomised controlled trials have been conducted to date with mixed findings. Furthermore, there has been limited recent attention on mHealth apps aiming to improve outcomes for individuals using other drugs.