The role of platelet glycoprotein IIIa polymorphism in the high prevalence of in vitro aspirin resistance in patients with intracoronary stent restenosis

High on-aspirin treatment platelet reactivity and restenosis after percutaneous coronary intervention: results of the Intracoronary Stenting and Antithrombotic Regimen-ASpirin and Platelet Inhibition (ISAR-ASPI) Registry

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to assess the association between high on-aspirin treatment platelet reactivity (HAPR) and the subsequent risk of restenosis after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with predominantly drug-eluting stents.

BACKGROUND

The association between HAPR and subsequent risk of restenosis after PCI is unclear.

METHODS

This study included 4839 patients undergoing PCI (02/2007-12/2011) in the setting of the Intracoronary Stenting and Antithrombotic Regimen-ASpirin and Platelet Inhibition (ISAR-ASPI) registry. Platelet function was assessed with impedance aggregometry using the multi-plate analyzer immediately before PCI and after intravenous administration of aspirin (500 mg). The primary outcome was clinical restenosis, defined as target lesion revascularization at 1 year. Secondary outcomes included binary angiographic restenosis and late lumen loss at 6- to 8-month angiography.

RESULTS

The upper quintile cut-off of platelet reactivity measurements (191 AU × min) was used to categorize patients into a group with HAPR (platelet reactivity > 191 AU × min; n = 952) and a group without HAPR (platelet reactivity ≤ 191 AU × min; n = 3887). The primary outcome occurred in 94 patients in the HAPR group and 405 patients without HAPR (cumulative incidence, 9.9% and 10.4%; HR = 0.96, 95% CI 0.77-1.19; P = 0.70). Follow-up angiography was performed in 73.2% of patients. There was no difference in binary restenosis (15.2% vs. 14.9%; P = 0.79) or late lumen loss (0.32 ± 0.57 vs. 0.32 ± 0.59 mm; P = 0.93) between patients with HAPR versus those without HAPR.

CONCLUSIONS

This study did not find an association between HAPR, measured at the time of PCI, and clinical restenosis at 1 year after PCI.

Prevalence of CYP2C19 and ITGB3 polymorphisms among Bangladeshi patients who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention

INTRODUCTION

Antithrombotic agents are the basic therapeutic option for patients with arterial thrombosis who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). In Bangladesh, aspirin and clopidogrel are frequently prescribed as antithrombotics or platelet inhibitors. Studies reported the genetic polymorphisms of CYP2C19*2, CYP2C19*17, and ITGB3 cause an alteration of the pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic profile of aspirin and clopidogrel. Therefore, we aimed to assess the prevalence of CYP2C19*2, CYP2C19*17, and ITGB3 polymorphisms among Bangladeshi patients with cardiovascular disease (CVD) who underwent PCI.

METHODS

Here we assessed a total of 1,000 CVD patients (male 782 and female 218) who underwent PCI and were treated with clopidogrel and/or aspirin. We performed genotyping of patients treated with clopidogrel and aspirin by polymerase chain reaction-restriction fragment length polymorphism (PCR-RFLP) and tetra-primer amplification refractory mutation system PCR (T-ARMS-PCR) methods. The PCR products of clopidogrel-treated patients were screened with agarose gel electrophoresis and then digested with SmaI and NsiI-HF for CYP2C19*2 and CYP2C19*17, respectively. We genotyped aspirin-treated patients with T-ARMS-PCR for missense rs5918 (PlA1/A1) polymorphism of the ITGB3 gene. Then we ran the digested PCR products on 2% agarose gel electrophoresis to detect the mentioned polymorphisms.

RESULTS

Among the clopidogrel-treated patients, we observed 64.1% polymorphism (hetero + mutant) of CYP2C19*2 (loss-of-function allele) and 22.7% (hetero + mutant) of CYP2C19*17 (gain-of-function allele). On the other hand, among the aspirin-treated patients, polymorphisms of ITGB3 were 84.1% homozygous (PlA1/A1), 15.6% heterozygous (PlA1/A2), and 0.3% mutant homozygous.

CONCLUSION

In the present study, we observed a high prevalence of genetic polymorphisms of CYP2C19 and ITGB3 genes. Therefore, we recommend genotyping of CVD patients before prescribing clopidogrel or aspirin to prevent coagulation. Based on the genotyping study, the adjustment of doses or alternative generics might require to avoid therapeutic failure or toxicity in some cases.

Association among PlA1/A2 gene polymorphism, laboratory aspirin resistance and clinical outcomes in patients with coronary artery disease: An updated meta-analysis

The aim of this study was to investigate the association among the PlA1/A2 gene polymorphism, laboratory aspirin resistance and adverse clinical outcomes in coronary artery disease (CAD) patients who were on aspirin maintainance therapy. A comprehensive literature search was performed and 35 eligible clinical trials including 19025 CAD patients were recruited. Adverse clinical outcomes involving all-cause death, non-fatal myocardial infarction (MI), ischemic stroke and target vessel revascularization (TVR) were analyzed. The definition of aspirin resistance in each study was accepted. Meta-analysis was performed using the Review Manager 5.3.5 System. In CAD patients, the PlA2 gene carriers had similar incidence of laboratory aspirin resistance compared to those with PlA1/A1 genotype [29.7% vs 28.3%, OR = 0.94 (95% CI 0.63 to 1.40, P = 0.74)], and there were no significant differences in the adverse clinical outcomes between the PlA2 carriers and the PlA1/A1 genotype patients. However, the laboratory aspirin non-responders had higher risks of death [7.9% vs. 2.5%, OR = 2.42 (95% CI 1.86 to 3.15, P < 0.00001)] and TVR [4.5% vs. 1.7%, OR = 2.20 (95% CI 1.19 to 4.08, P = 0.01)] compared to the responders. In aspirin-treated CAD patients, the laboratory aspirin resistance predicts all-cause death and TVR. However, the PlA1/A2 gene polymorphism predicts neither the laboratory aspirin response nor the clinical outcomes.

The prognostic utility of tests of platelet function for the detection of 'aspirin resistance' in patients with established cardiovascular or cerebrovascular disease: a systematic review and economic evaluation

BACKGROUND

The use of aspirin is well established for secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease. However, a proportion of patients suffer repeat cardiovascular events despite being prescribed aspirin treatment. It is uncertain whether or not this is due to an inherent inability of aspirin to sufficiently modify platelet activity. This report aims to investigate whether or not insufficient platelet function inhibition by aspirin ('aspirin resistance'), as defined using platelet function tests (PFTs), is linked to the occurrence of adverse clinical outcomes, and further, whether or not patients at risk of future adverse clinical events can be identified through PFTs.

OBJECTIVES

To review systematically the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness evidence regarding the association between PFT designation of 'aspirin resistance' and the risk of adverse clinical outcome(s) in patients prescribed aspirin therapy. To undertake exploratory model-based cost-effectiveness analysis on the use of PFTs.

DATA SOURCES

Bibliographic databases (e.g. MEDLINE from inception and EMBASE from 1980), conference proceedings and ongoing trial registries up to April 2012.

METHODS

Standard systematic review methods were used for identifying clinical and cost studies. A risk-of-bias assessment tool was adapted from checklists for prognostic and diagnostic studies. (Un)adjusted odds and hazard ratios for the association between 'aspirin resistance', for different PFTs, and clinical outcomes are presented; however, heterogeneity between studies precluded pooling of results. A speculative economic model of a PFT and change of therapy strategy was developed.

RESULTS

One hundred and eight relevant studies using a variety of PFTs, 58 in patients on aspirin monotherapy, were analysed in detail. Results indicated that some PFTs may have some prognostic utility, i.e. a trend for more clinical events to be associated with groups classified as 'aspirin resistant'. Methodological and clinical heterogeneity prevented a quantitative summary of prognostic effect. Study-level effect sizes were generally small and absolute outcome risk was not substantially different between 'aspirin resistant' and 'aspirin sensitive' designations. No studies on the cost-effectiveness of PFTs for 'aspirin resistance' were identified. Based on assumptions of PFTs being able to accurately identify patients at high risk of clinical events and such patients benefiting from treatment modification, the economic model found that a test-treat strategy was likely to be cost-effective. However, neither assumption is currently evidence based.

LIMITATIONS

Poor or incomplete reporting of studies suggests a potentially large volume of inaccessible data. Analyses were confined to studies on patients prescribed aspirin as sole antiplatelet therapy at the time of PFT. Clinical and methodological heterogeneity across studies precluded meta-analysis. Given the lack of robust data the economic modelling was speculative.

CONCLUSIONS

Although evidence indicates that some PFTs may have some prognostic value, methodological and clinical heterogeneity between studies and different approaches to analyses create confusion and inconsistency in prognostic results, and prevented a quantitative summary of their prognostic effect. Protocol-driven and adequately powered primary studies are needed, using standardised methods of measurements to evaluate the prognostic ability of each test in the same population(s), and ideally presenting individual patient data. For any PFT to inform individual risk prediction, it will likely need to be considered in combination with other prognostic factors, within a prognostic model.

STUDY REGISTRATION

This study is registered as PROSPERO 2012:CRD42012002151.

FUNDING

The National Institute for Health Research Health Technology Assessment programme.

The Effect of Xuefuzhuyu Oral Liquid on Aspirin Resistance and Its Association with rs5911, rs5787, and rs3842788 Gene Polymorphisms

Aspirin should be continued indefinitely in patients after interventional therapy, but 10% to 40% of patients experience recurrent vascular events despite adequate aspirin therapy, a condition known as aspirin resistance (AR). Xuefuzhuyu oral liquid, derived from the classic recipe Xuefuzhuyu decoction, has been well documented to inhibit platelet aggregation and to improve hemorheology. The aims of this study were to investigate the effects of Xuefuzhuyu oral liquid on AR in patients with chronic stable angina after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and the possible genetic markers related to the drug response. 43 patients diagnosed as having aspirin resistance or semi-resistance were randomly divided into control and treatment groups after screening 207 stable CHD patients. Platelet aggregation rate was determined using turbidimetry. Three single nucleotide polymorphisms in COX-1 (rs5787, rs3842788) and GP IIb (rs5911) were genotyped in whole blood samples using ABI PRISM 7900 HT Fast Real-Time instrument and ABI PRISM 3730 DNA Sequencer. The results showed that Xuefuzhuyu oral liquid could effectively improve blood stasis syndrome and AR by inhibiting ADP-induced platelet aggregation and that patients with the rs5911 genetic variant exhibited better drug response upon treatment with Xuefuzhuyu oral liquid, which suggests Xuefuzhuyu oral liquid as a new possible drug for the prevention of AR.

Effect of acetylsalicylic acid on platelet activation and oxidative profile in a set of Brazilian patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus

Type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM2) is a metabolic disorder associated with hyperactivation of platelets, increased formation of platelet microparticles (PMPs) and oxidative stress that are related to cardiovascular complications. Acetylsalicylic acid (ASA) is an antiplatelet agent used in the prevention of atherothrombosis. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of ASA by means of platelet activation and oxidative profile. We collected blood samples of 81 patients with DM2 before and during ASA treatment. These samples were analyzed to determine the levels of 2,3-dinor thromboxane-B2 (2,3-dinor-TXB2), PMPs, thiobarbituric acid reactive species (TBARS) and 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide (MTT). Moreover, the relationship between the levels of 2,3-dinor-TXB2 with some clinical and laboratory variables such as glycated hemoglobin, platelet count, D dimer, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol and glycoprotein IIb/IIIa and cyclooxygenase-1 polymorphisms was evaluated. ASA intake did not change the levels of PMP, TBARS and MTT. Although a significant decrease in the levels of 2,3 dinorTXB2 (P < 0.001) in patients under ASA has been observed, an equal and satisfactory response to this drug was not found. However, the presence of PIA2 allele in GPIIIa gene may be associated with a better response to ASA intake in these patients, whereas other clinical and laboratory variables showed no association with this drug use. These findings are consistent with previous reports in the literature that patients with DM2 do not benefit in an equal way from the use of ASA for primary prevention of atherothrombotic events.

The PlA1/A2 polymorphism of glycoprotein IIIa in relation to efficacy of antiplatelet drugs: a systematic review and meta-analysis

AIM

The PlA1/A2 polymorphism of glycoprotein IIIa (GPIIIa) has been associated with both antiplatelet drug resistance and increased cardiovascular events. The aim of this study was to conduct the first meta-analysis investigating the association between carriage of the PlA2 allele and resistance to currently licensed antiplatelet drugs.

METHODS

Electronic databases (MEDLINE and EMBASE) were searched for all articles evaluating genetic polymorphisms of GPIIIa. For studies where antiplatelet resistance was measured using validated techniques, pooled odds ratios (ORs) were calculated using fixed effects and random effects models.

RESULTS

Sixteen studies were eligible for statistical analysis and included 1650 PlA1 homozygous subjects and 668 carriers of the PlA2 allele. For carriers of the PlA2 allele, OR 0.924 (n = 2318; 95% CI 0.743, 1.151; P = 0.481) was observed for resistance to any antiplatelet drug, OR 0.862 (n = 2085; 95% CI 0.685, 1.086; P = 0.208) for resistance to aspirin and OR 1.429 (n = 233; 95% CI 0.791, 2.582; P = 0.237) for resistance to clopidogrel. In the aspirin cohort, sub-group analysis revealed no statistical association in either healthy subjects or those with cardiovascular disease. PlA2 carriage was marginally associated with aspirin sensitivity using the fixed effects model when identified by the PFA-100 assay (n = 1151; OR 0.743, 95% CI 0.558, 0.989; P = 0.041) but with significant heterogeneity (I(2) = 55%; P = 0.002). Significance was lost with analysis using a random effects model.

CONCLUSIONS

The totality of published data does not support an association between carriage of the PlA2 allele and antiplatelet drug resistance. Significant heterogeneity indicates the need for larger studies using validated and standardized assays.

The PlA1/A2 polymorphism of glycoprotein IIIa as a risk factor for myocardial infarction: a meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

The PlA2 polymorphism of glycoprotein IIIa (GPIIIa) has been previously identified as being associated with myocardial infarction (MI), but whether this represents a true association is entirely unclear due to differences in findings from different studies. We performed a meta-analysis to evaluate whether this polymorphism is a risk factor for MI.

METHODS

Electronic databases (MEDLINE and EMBASE) were searched for all articles evaluating genetic polymorphisms of GPIIIa. For studies where acute coronary events were recorded in association with genetic analysis, pooled odds ratios (ORs) were calculated using fixed-effects and random-effects models. The primary outcome measure was MI, and a secondary analysis was also performed for acute coronary syndromes (ACS) more generally.

FINDINGS

57 studies were eligible for statistical analysis and included 17,911 cases and 24,584 controls. Carriage of the PlA2 allele was significantly associated with MI (n = 40,692; OR 1.077, 95% CI 1.024-1.132; p = 0.004) but with significant publication bias (p = 0.040). The degree of association with MI increased with decreasing age of subjects (≤45 years old: n = 9,547; OR 1.205, 95% CI 1.067-1.360; p = 0.003) and with adjustment of data for conventional cardiovascular risk factors (n = 12,001; OR 1.240, 95% CI 1.117-1.376; p<0.001). There was a low probability of publication bias for these subgroup analyses (all p<0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

The presence of significant publication bias makes it unclear whether the association between carriage of the PlA2 allele and MI is true for the total population studied. However for younger subjects, the relative absence of conventional cardiovascular risk factors results in a significant association between carriage of the PlA2 allele and MI.

The association of four common polymorphisms from four candidate genes (COX-1, COX-2, ITGA2B, ITGA2) with aspirin insensitivity: a meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

Evidence is mounting suggesting that a strong genetic component underlies aspirin insensitivity. To generate more information, we aimed to evaluate the association of four common polymorphisms (rs3842787, rs20417, rs201184269, rs1126643) from four candidate genes (COX-1, COX-2, ITGA2B, ITGA2) with aspirin insensitivity via a meta-analysis.

METHODS AND RESULTS

In total, there were 4 (353/595), 6 (344/698), 10 (588/878) and 7 (209/676) articles (patients/controls) qualified for rs3842787, rs20417, rs20118426 and rs1126643, respectively. The data were extracted in duplicate and analyzed by STATA software (Version 11.2). The risk estimate was expressed as odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (95% CI). Analyses of the full data set indicated significant associations of rs20417 (OR; 95% CI; P: 1.86; 1.44-2.41; <0.0005) and rs1126643 (2.37; 1.44-3.89; 0.001) with aspirin insensitivity under allelic model. In subgroup analyses, the risk estimate for rs1126643 was greatly potentiated among patients with aspirin semi-resistance relative to those with aspirin resistance, especially under dominant model (aspirin semi-resistance: 5.44; 1.42-20.83; 0.013 versus aspirin resistance: 1.96; 1.07-3.6; 0.03). Further grouping articles by ethnicity observed a stronger prediction of all, but rs20417, examined polymorphisms for aspirin insensitivity in Chinese than in Caucasians. Finally, meta-regression analyses observed that the differences in percentage of coronary artery disease (P = 0.034) and averaged platelet numbers (P = 0.012) between two groups explained a large part of heterogeneity for rs20417 and rs1126643, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Our findings provide strong evidence that COX-2 and ITGA2 genetic defects might increase the risk of having aspirin insensitivity, especially for aspirin semi-resistance and in Chinese populations.

Clinical consequences of aspirin and clopidogrel resistance: an overview

The aim of this review is to introduce the concept of personalized medicine in secondary stroke prevention with antiplatelet medication. In the last years, many studies have been conducted regarding aspirin resistance and genotyping of clopidogrel metabolism. A review of the currently published data on this issue emphasizes the importance of focusing on the individualizing approach in antiplatelet therapy to achieve maximal therapeutic beneficial effect. However, many authors suggest that, before new information from ongoing trials become available, good clinical practice should dictate the use of low dose of aspirin that was shown to be effective in the prevention of stroke and death in patients with ischemic cerebrovascular disease, because higher doses do not have significantly better efficacy than lower doses in secondary stroke prevention, but lower-dose aspirin is associated with less side effects. On the other hand, many factors are associated with clopidogrel resistance, and recent genetic studies showed that the CYP2C19*2 genotype (loss-of-function allele) is related to poor metabolism of clopidogrel, but larger studies are needed to definitively confirm or rule out the clinical significance of this genetic effect. The aim of personalized approach in secondary stroke prevention is to take the most appropriate medicine in the right dose in accordance with the clinical condition of the patient and associated risk factors.

Antiplatelet drugs: mechanisms and risks of bleeding following cardiac operations

Preoperative antiplatelet drug use is common in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). The impact of these drugs on bleeding and blood transfusion varies. We hypothesize that review of available evidence regarding drug-related bleeding risk, underlying mechanisms of platelet dysfunction, and variations in patient response to antiplatelet drugs will aid surgeons as they assess preoperative risk and attempt to limit perioperative bleeding. The purpose of this review is to (1) examine the role that antiplatelet drugs play in excessive postoperative blood transfusion, (2) identify possible mechanisms to explain patient response to antiplatelet drugs, and (3) formulate a strategy to limit excessive blood product usage in these patients. We reviewed available published evidence regarding bleeding risk in patients taking preoperative antiplatelet drugs. In addition, we summarized our previous research into mechanisms of antiplatelet drug-related platelet dysfunction. Aspirin users have a slight but significant increase in blood product usage after CABG (0.5 U of nonautologous blood per treated patient). Platelet adenosine diphosphate (ADP) receptor inhibitors are more potent antiplatelet drugs than aspirin but have a half-life similar to aspirin, around 5 to 10 days. The American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology and the Society of Thoracic Surgeons guidelines recommend discontinuation, if possible, of ADP inhibitors 5 to 7 days before operation because of excessive bleeding risk, whereas aspirin should be continued during the entire perioperative period in most patients. Individual variability in response to aspirin and other antiplatelet drugs is common with both hyper- and hyporesponsiveness seen in 5 to 25% of patients. Use of preoperative antiplatelet drugs is a risk factor for increased perioperative bleeding and blood transfusion. Point-of-care tests can identify patients at high risk for perioperative bleeding and blood transfusion, although these tests have limitations. Available evidence suggests that multiple blood conservation techniques benefit high-risk patients taking antiplatelet drugs before operation. Guidelines for patients who take aspirin and/or thienopyridines before cardiac procedures include some or all of the following: (1) preoperative identification of high-risk patients using point-of-care testing; (2) withdrawal of aspirin or other antiplatelet drugs for a few days and delay of operation in patients at high risk for bleeding if clinical circumstances permit; (3) selective perioperative use of evidence-based blood conservation interventions (e.g., short-course erythropoietin, off-pump procedures, and use of intraoperative blood conservation techniques), especially in high-risk patients; and (4) platelet transfusions if clinical bleeding occurs.

Aspirin Resistance: Clinical Significance and Genetic Polymorphism

OBJECTIVE: To determine the prevalence, clinical implications and underlying mechanism of aspirin resistance in Chinese patients. METHODS: Platelet aggregation was determined by light transmission aggregometry (LTA) using four different inducers. Patients were divided into aspirin-resistant (AR), aspirin semi responder (ASR) and aspirin-sensitive (AS) groups, according to their LTA results. Aspirin resistance was assessed by thromboelastography (TEG, with arachidonic acid [AA] or adenosine diphosphate as inducers), serum/urinary 11-dehydrothromboxane B2 (11-DH-TXB2) assay, platelet function analyser-100 assay and P-selectin assay. Polymorphisms in the prostaglandin endoperoxide synthase 1 ( PTGS1) gene (A842G, C50T, C22T, G128A, C644A and C714A), the PTGS2 gene (G765C) and the integrin β3 ( ITGB3) gene (C196T) were examined. RESULTS: The study included 360 aspirin-treated patients and 314 healthy controls. AS patients had significantly lower levels of 11-DH-TXB2 than AR and ASR patients, and significantly lower levels of P-selectin than AR patients. TEG-AA was more sensitive, specific and consistent than P-selectin in detecting aspirin resistance. The frequency of the PTGS2 G765C mutation was significantly higher in the AR/ASR groups versus the AS group. CONCLUSIONS: TEG-AA was more sensitive, specific and consistent than the P-selectin assay for detecting aspirin resistance, and the PTGS2 G765C mutation may be related to aspirin resistance.

Urinary 11-dehydro thromboxane B₂ levels in type 2 diabetic patients before and during aspirin intake

BACKGROUND

Diabetic patients commonly present an increased risk for cardiovascular events, for which aspirin is the most frequently used medication for primary prevention. Urinary 11-dehydro thromboxane (11-dhTXB₂) concentrations assess the effect of aspirin on platelets and identify patients who are at risk of cardiovascular events. The present study investigated whether or not type 2 diabetic patients who took a daily dose of 100mg of aspirin had a significant reduction in urinary 11-dhTXB₂ concentrations and whether these results were associated with clinical and laboratory variables.

METHODS

Eighty-one type 2 diabetic patients were enrolled in the study. Laboratory tests included the determination of lipidic profile, glycated hemoglobin, platelets count, molecular analysis for both GPIIbIIIa and COX-1 polymorphisms, and urinary 11-dhTXB₂.

RESULTS

Patients' median value for urinary 11-dhTXB₂ before aspirin intake was 179 pg/mg of creatinine. After 15days taking aspirin, the patients presented median of 51 pg/mg of creatinine, thus revealing a significant difference between medians (p=0.00). A reduction of 95% in urinary 11-dhTXB₂ concentrations could only be identified in 4 patients (5%). A BMI of ≥ 26 presented a significant association with a reduction of urinary 11-dhTXB₂ concentrations (p=0.010), as shown by the multiple logistic regression model. Other clinical and laboratory variables showed no association.

CONCLUSIONS

Regardless of the mechanisms related to aspirin non-responsiveness, most patients enrolled in the present study also presented a reduced or minimal response to low-dose aspirin therapy, thereby indicating a clear variability related to aspirin effectiveness. Moreover, BMI appears to be independently associated to the reduction of urinary 11-dhTXB₂ concentrations in type 2 diabetic patients taking aspirin.

Aspirin resistance: Fact or fiction? A point of view

Aspirin is a wonder drug that has been used for well over 100 years for its analgesic and antipyretic effects. For the past three decades, it has increasingly been used for the prevention of primary and secondary cardiovascular events. Lately, it has been suggested that a significant number of individuals taking aspirin have become resistant to this drug. The phenomenon of "aspirin resistance" is based on the observation of clinical events in some patients taking aspirin, and/or a diminished platelet aggregation inhibitory response to aspirin therapy. Unfortunately, laboratory assays used to monitor the efficacy of aspirin are far from accurate and the results are not reproducible. Furthermore, results of different platelet function tests are often not congruent. In addition, platelet aggregation studies show marked inter-individual and intra-individual variability. Patients with coronary heart disease take many drugs that interfere with the effect of aspirin on platelet aggregation. Besides inhibiting formation of thromboxane A(2) from arachidonic acid, aspirin has a host of platelet-independent effects that complement its platelet inhibitory effects. Laboratory assays designed to measure platelet function do not take into account these pleiotropic effects of aspirin. In our view, use of the term "aspirin resistance" based on inadequate knowledge of imperfect laboratory tests does a disservice to physicians and patients.

The GPIIIa PlA polymorphism and the platelet hyperactivity in Tunisian patients with stable coronary artery disease treated with aspirin

BACKGROUND

Various genetic polymorphisms have been proposed to explain the persistent platelet hyperactivity (HPR) under aspirin treatment. PlA polymorphism of platelet GPIIIa receptor has been largely studied. However, its influence on platelet sensitivity to aspirin remains controversial.

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this prospective study is to investigate whether this PlA polymorphism is associated with a greater prevalence of HPR in stable coronary artery disease patients Material and Methods: 188 stable coronary artery disease patients were included. Platelet aspirin inhibitory effect was determined with PFA-100 using Collagen/Epinephrine closure time (CEPI-CT). A CEPI-CT<160sec was defining the HPR status. GPIIIa PlA polymorphism was established using polymerase chain reaction and classical restriction fragments length polymorphism.

RESULTS

The observed frequencies of different genotypes were not different from those predicted by the Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium: PlA1/lA1 (55.3%), PlA1/PlA2 (39.4%) and PlA2/PlA2 (5.3%). HPR patients with inadequate aspirin inhibition were significantly more often homozygous PlA1/A1 (65.4% vs. 47.7%, p=0.015). After multivariate analysis, PlA1/A1 genotype was the only independent risk factor for persistent HPR (OR: 2.07; 95% CI [1.14 to 3.76; p=0.016).

CONCLUSION

In CAD patients receiving daily low dose of aspirin, there is a significant and independent association between the expression of GPIIIa PlA1 allele and the occurrence of persistent HPR detected with PFA-100.

Impact of genetic polymorphisms on platelet function and aspirin resistance

Genetic polymorphisms may affect platelets' responses to the antiplatelet therapy. Our aim was to determine the role of genetic polymorphisms on aspirin resistance in patients with coronary heart disease (CHD). A total of 126 consecutive patients (35-85 years old, 32% women) with chronic stable CHD was enrolled in the study. Platelet function assays were realized by the platelet function analyzer (PFA)-100 with collagen and epinephrine (Col/Epi) and collagen and adenosine diphosphate (Col/ADP) cartridges. Aspirin resistance was defined as having a closure time of less than 186 s with Col/Epi cartridges despite regular aspirin therapy. Factor V, prothrombin, factor XIII, beta-fibrinogen, plasminogen activator inhibitor I (PAI-1), glycoprotein IIIa, methylene tetrahydrofolate reductase, ACE and ApoB gene polymorphisms were determined by three consecutive steps: isolation and amplification of DNA and reverse hybridization. We determined that 30 patients (23.8%) had aspirin resistance by the PFA-100. Mean closure time measured with the Col/ADP cartridges was 74 +/- 12 s (51-104 s). Ten of the 30 patients with aspirin resistance were women (33.3%). Genetic polymorphisms were determined in 30 aspirin-resistant and 17 aspirin-sensitive patients. No statistically significant relationship was determined between aspirin resistance and the genetic panel. In our study we did not determine a significant relationship between the aspirin resistance and factor V, prothrombin, factor XIII, beta-fibrinogen, PAI-1, glycoprotein IIIa, methylene tetrahydrofolate reductase, ACE and ApoB gene polymorphisms.

Antiplatelet Resistance—Does it Exist and how to Measure it?

Aspirin and clopidogrel are the most commonly used antiplatelet agents in patients with coronary artery disease. The existence of resistance to these agents has been a controversial issue and new drugs are being developed to overcome this problem. Laboratory tests, which can identify resistance and correlate this with clinical outcome, are being studied in order to identify patients at risk of future thrombotic events. We discuss the evidence for the existence of antiplatelet resistance—both in the laboratory and in the clinical setting. So far, platelet aggregometry has been considered the gold standard test, but is very operator dependant, time consuming, and has shown little correlation with other available tests of antiplatelet resistance. We discuss the available tests of platelet function, their limitations, and evidence for their use. A simple, rapid, near-patient test, which is affordable and useful in the clinical (not just laboratory) setting, could allow risk stratification of patients and individualization of antiplatelet medication to improve outcome.

Aspirin resistance in coronary artery disease is correlated to elevated markers for oxidative stress but not to the expression of cyclooxygenase (COX) 1/2, a novel COX-1 polymorphism or the PlA1/2polymorphism

Aspirin resistance (AR) is estimated to be present in 5-75% of patients and is related to increased cardiovascular mortality. However, the underlying mechanisms are mostly unknown. In the present study, AR was detected in 14 out of 55 patients (25%) with coronary artery disease. The presence of concomitant anti-inflammatory drugs did not affect AR. Plasma levels of thromboxane B(2) as well as the markers for oxidative stress and known platelet activators 8-isoprostane and lipid peroxidation products were significantly higher in aspirin-resistant individuals (349.3 pg/ml, 53.9 pg/ml, and 538 micromol/l) compared to controls (113.7 pg/ml, 10.3 pg/ml, and 32.2 micromol/l; P < 0.05, respectively). Platelet cyclooxygenase-1 (COX-1) and COX-2 mRNA and protein expression were without significant differences between the two groups. DNA sequencing detected a novel platelet COX-1 single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) resulting in amino acid exchange at position 8 (Arg8/Trp8). The wild-type as well as the heterozygous and homozygous SNP were present in both patient groups without significant differences. The aspirin binding (Arg120) and acetylation site (Ser529) were unaffected in the samples tested. Neither was AR related to the platelet integrin PlA(1)/A(2) polymorphism. In conclusion, AR appears to be unrelated to differences in platelet COX-1 and COX-2 expression or to a novel platelet COX-1 SNP and the PlA(1)/A(2) SNP. However, a correlation exists to elevated eicosanoids generated by oxidative stress indicating COX-1-independent pathways for the generation of platelet activating molecules represent a potential cause for AR.

Aspirin resistance: focus on clinical endpoints

INTRODUCTION

Via its antiplatelet effect, aspirin reduces the odds of an arterial thrombotic event in high-risk patients by approximately 25%. However, 10% to 20% of patients with an arterial thrombotic event who are treated with aspirin have a recurrent arterial thrombotic event during long-term follow-up. Nevertheless, the effectiveness of aspirin has been questioned by the emergence of the concept of aspirin resistance, which has been introduced as an explanation of the fact that a considerable proportion of patients treated with aspirin exhibit normal platelet function.

OBJECTIVES AND METHODS

We systematically reviewed all available evidence till March 2008 on prevalence of aspirin resistance and its association with clinical outcome. We also collected articles showing the possible way of treatment.

CONCLUSION

Analyzing the data of different laboratory methods aspirin resistance seems to be associated with poor clinical outcome, although currently no standardized or widely accepted definition of aspirin resistance exists. The widely used laboratory methods might not be comparable with each other; therefore, specific treatment recommendations for patients who exhibit high platelet reactivity during aspirin therapy or who have poor platelet inhibition by aspirin are not established.

Aspirin resistance: disparities and clinical implications

Abstract Aspirin is one of the most widely prescribed drugs for the prevention of thrombosis in patients with vascular disease. Yet, aspirin is unable to prevent thrombosis in all patients. The term "aspirin resistance" has been used to broadly define the failure of aspirin to prevent a thrombotic event. Whether this is directly related to aspirin itself through biochemical aspirin resistance or treatment failure, or if it is because of aspirin's inability to overcome the thrombogenic aspects of the disease process itself, has not been elucidated. This can have dramatic clinical implications for a variety of vascular disease subsets and is cause for concern, considering the high prevalence of aspirin use for both primary and secondary prevention. Disparities exist in the rates of aspirin resistance among certain patient populations, such as women, patients with diabetes mellitus, and those with heart failure, and across clinical conditions, such as cardiovascular and cerebrovascular disease. Clinical trial data from studies observing resistance have revealed that regardless of study size, dose of aspirin, control for drug interactions and adherence, or assay used to measure platelet function, aspirin resistance is associated with an increased risk for adverse events. Although the evidence is mounting, there has yet to be a consensus on the appropriate clinical response to aspirin resistance.

The role of aspirin in cardiovascular prevention: implications of aspirin resistance

Aspirin is well recognized as an effective antiplatelet drug for secondary prevention in subjects at high risk of cardiovascular events. However, most patients receiving long-term aspirin therapy still remain at substantial risk of thrombotic events due to insufficient inhibition of platelets, specifically via the thromboxane A2 pathway. Although the exact prevalence is unknown, estimates suggest that between 5.5% and 60% of patients using this drug may exhibit a degree of "aspirin resistance," depending upon the definition used and parameters measured. To date, only a limited number of clinical studies have convincingly investigated the importance of aspirin resistance. Of these, few are of a sufficient scale, well designed, and prospective, with aspirin used at standard doses. Also, most studies do not sufficiently address the issue of noncompliance to aspirin as a frequent, yet easily preventable cause of resistance to this antiplatelet drug. This review article provides a comprehensive overview of aspirin resistance, discussing its definition, prevalence, diagnosis, and therapeutic approaches. Moreover, the clinical implications of aspirin resistance are explored in various cardiovascular disease states, including diabetes mellitus, hypertension, heart failure, and other similar disorders where platelet reactivity is enhanced.

Aspirin resistance: biological and clinical implications

Cardiovascular events are the leading causes of mortality and morbidity in the United States. This development has prompted the rise of aspirin therapy in the prevention of atherothrombotic events. However, not all patients benefit to the same extent from aspirin therapy and many continue experiencing atherothrombotic complications. Researchers have labeled this phenomenon aspirin resistance, and despite drawing much attention from both researchers and lay people the cause remains unknown. Much needs to be clarified and standardized regarding the phenomenon of aspirin resistance, including the prevalence, definition, appropriate measurement methods, mechanisms, and, most important, linking low response to aspirin with worsened clinical outcomes.

Pharmacogenomics of platelet responsiveness to aspirin

Aspirin is the most widely used drug in the world for cardiovascular protection. Aspirin's ability to suppress platelet function varies widely among individuals and lesser suppression of platelet function is associated with increased risk of myocardial infarction, stroke and cardiovascular death. Platelet response to aspirin is a complex phenotype involving multiple genes and molecular pathways. Aspirin response phenotypes can be categorized as directly or indirectly related to cyclooxygenase-1 (COX-1) activity, with phenotypic variation indirectly related to COX-1 being much more prominent. Recent data indicate that variability in platelet response to aspirin is genetically determined, but the specific gene variants that contribute to phenotypic variation are not known. An understanding of the relationship between genotype, aspirin response phenotype and clinical outcome will help to bring about a personalized approach to antiplatelet therapy that maximizes antithrombotic benefit whilst minimizing bleeding risk for individual patients.

Pharmacogenetics of aspirin resistance: a comprehensive systematic review

AIMS

The aim was to perform a systematic review of all candidate gene association studies in aspirin resistance.

METHODS

Electronic databases were searched up until 1 December 2007 for all studies investigating any candidate gene for aspirin resistance in humans. Aspirin resistance was required to have been measured by a standardized laboratory technique to be included in the analysis.

RESULTS

Within 31 studies, 50 polymorphisms in 11 genes were investigated in 2834 subjects. The PlA1/A2 polymorphism in the GPIIIa platelet receptor was the most frequently investigated, with 19 studies in 1389 subjects. The PlA1/A2 variant was significantly associated with aspirin resistance when measured in healthy subjects [odds ratio (OR) 2.36, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.24, 4.49; P = 0.009]. Combining genetic data from all studies (comprising both healthy subjects and those with cardiovascular disease) reduced the observed effect size (OR 1.14, 95% CI 0.84, 1.54; P = 0.40). Moreover, the observed effect of PlA1/A2 genotype varied depending on the methodology used for determining aspirin sensitivity/resistance. No significant association was found with aspirin resistance in four other investigated polymorphisms in the COX-1, GPla, P2Y1 or P2Y12 genes.

CONCLUSIONS

Our data support a genetic association between the PlA1/A2 molecular variant and aspirin resistance in healthy subjects, with the effect diminishing in the presence of cardiovascular disease. The laboratory methodology used influences the detection of aspirin resistance. However, as heterogeneity was significant and our results are based on a limited number of studies, further studies are required to confirm our findings.

Use of the PFA-100 closure time to predict cardiovascular events in aspirin-treated cardiovascular patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

PFA-100 is a point-of-care assay that evaluates platelet reactivity in high-shear-stress conditions by measuring the closure time (CT) of a membrane aperture. When determined with a collagen/epinephrine cartridge (CEPI), the CT is usually prolonged by aspirin. Studies of the predictive value of a short PFA-100CT(CEPI) for ischemic events in aspirin-treated patients have given variable results.

OBJECTIVES

To conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis of studies on the clinical predictive value of a short PFA-100CT(CEPI) in aspirin-treated cardiovascular patients.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Relevant studies were identified by scanning electronic databases. Studies were selected if they included aspirin-treated patients with symptomatic atherosclerosis, measured the PFA-100CT(CEPI), used a CT cut-off value to define aspirin 'responders' and 'non-responders', and reported ischemic events.

RESULTS

We selected seven non-prospective studies (1466 patients) and eight prospective studies (1227 patients). In non-prospective studies, the PFA-100CT(CEPI) was performed after the ischemic clinical endpoint, and a publication bias was identified. In prospective studies, the global odds ratio (OR) for the recurrence of an ischemic event in 'aspirin non-responders' relative to 'aspirin responders' was 2.1 [95% confidence interval (CI) 1.4-3.4, P < 0.001]. Pooled analysis with a random effect model revealed no heterogeneity (Q Cochran P = 0.36 and I(2) = 9.4%).

CONCLUSIONS

A short PFA-100CT(CEPI) is associated with increased recurrence of ischemic events in aspirin-treated cardiovascular patients. This finding needs to be confirmed in stable ischemic patients, and the PFA-100CT(CEPI) cut-off needs to be refined in these patients.

Effect of high dose statin therapy on platelet function; statins reduce aspirin-resistant platelet aggregation in patients with coronary heart disease

BACKGROUND

Current evidence supports the preventive role of statins on platelet aggregation in patients with coronary heart disease.

AIM

Our aim was to determine the effects of aggressive statin therapy on platelet function in patients with coronary heart disease.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A total of 178 consecutive patients (37-68 years old, 35.9% women) with stable coronary artery disease (CAD) was enrolled in the study. Platelet function assays were realized by the Platelet Function Analyzer (PFA)-100 with collagen and epinephrine (Col/Epi) and collagen and ADP (Col/ADP) cartridges. Aspirin resistance was defined as having a closure time (CT) of <186 s with Col/Epi cartridges despite regular aspirin therapy. A statin therapy protocol applied to the patients with aspirin resistance for 3 months.

RESULTS

We determined that 20 (11.2%) of patients had aspirin resistance by the PFA-100. Mean closure time measured with the Col/ADP cartridges was 83 +/- 18 s (53-162 s). Of the patients 12 were not on a statin therapy and eight were taking 10 mg daily atorvastatin. After 3 months of 40 mg daily atorvastatin therapy 13 subjects with aspirin resistance became aspirin sensitive by PFA-100 (P < 0.0001). There was also a significant decrease in total and LDL cholesterol levels and an increase in HDL cholesterol at the third month of statin therapy (P < 0.0001 for all).

CONCLUSION

Statin therapy reduced the in vitro aspirin resistance in 65% of the patients after a therapy of 3 months. Further studies are needed to elucidate the mechanism of statins' effects on platelet reactivity.

Aspirin-resistant platelet aggregation in a cohort of patients with coronary heart disease

Aspirin resistance could be defined as thrombotic and embolic cardiovascular events despite regular aspirin therapy. The study aimed to determine the profile and prevalence of aspirin resistance in coronary artery disease patients. We evaluated the prevalence of aspirin resistance in a cohort of 505 patients with the diagnosis of coronary artery disease taking 80-300 mg regular aspirin daily. Platelet functions were analyzed by the Platelet Function Analyzer (PFA)-100 with collagen and epinephrine cartridges and collagen and ADP cartridges. A closure time of 186 s or less with the collagen and epinephrine cartridge was defined as aspirin resistance. Of the patients, 118 (23.4%) were aspirin resistant by the PFA-100. Aspirin-resistant patients were more likely to be older than aspirin-sensitive patients (P = 0.024). No statistically significant differences between the aspirin-resistant and aspirin-sensitive individuals were present in gender, major risk factors of coronary artery disease, number and localization of involved coronary vessels, serum lipid levels, and blood counts. According to the high prevalence of coronary heart disease, many people are affected by aspirin resistance, which may play a role in adverse cardiovascular events. Monitoring of platelet function in patients with coronary heart disease may support the optimization of antiplatelet therapy with additional and/or alternative agents.

Frequency of genetic polymorphisms of COX1, GPIIIa and P2Y1 in a Chinese population and association with attenuated response to aspirin

Background: Aspirin is a frequently prescribed drug for primary and secondary prevention of myocardial infarction, stroke and cardiovascular death. However, aspirin resistance may affect up to 45% of the population. Little is known on the role of genetic factors that contribute to resistance or augmented response to aspirin in different human populations. Methods: In a large sample of nonsmoker, medication-free healthy volunteers from mainland China (n = 323; age: 22.1 ± 2.0 years) (mean ± standard deviation), we determined the frequency of polymorphisms in cyclooxygenase 1 (COX1) (A-842G and C50T), glycoprotein IIIa (GPIIIa) (PLA1/A2) and purinergic receptor P2Y (P2Y1) (C893T and A1622G) genes. These candidate genes were chosen on the basis of their impact on platelet physiology and aspirin mode of action. A four panel P2Y1 genotype-stratified sample of healthy volunteers (n = 24 in total), identified from the large study sample above, prospectively received a 100 mg daily oral dose of aspirin for 7 days. We measured changes in platelet aggregation before and after aspirin treatment. As a comparison reference group, 6 out of 24 subjects in the prospective aspirin trial had the P2Y1 CT893/AG1622 genotype that displays a low frequency (<7%) in the Chinese population. Results: COX1 A-842G, C50T and GPIIIa PLA1/A2 genetic polymorphisms were not observed in our sample from mainland China. Allele frequencies of P2Y1 893T and 1622G were 3.5 and 30.6%, respectively. The heterozygosity for the P2Y1 A1622G polymorphism observed in the present study was different to Caucasians; Chinese displayed a higher allele frequency for the 1622G allele. After aspirin treatment, the net decrease in arachidonic acid-induced platelet aggregation was significantly larger in the P2Y1 CT893/AG1622 genotype panel (83.4 ± 3.7%, net reduction by aspirin expressed as percentage of baseline) compared with CC893/GG1622 (68.2 ± 13.5%), CC893/AG1622 (68.9  ± 9.6%) and CC893/AA1622 (65.1 ± 9.1%) genotypic groups (p = 0.012, 0.025 and 0.004, respectively; statistical power = 77%). There was no significant difference in antiplatelet effect of aspirin among the CC893/GG1622, CC893/AG1622 and CC893/AA1622 genotypes (p > 0.05). Conclusions: The COX1 A-842G, C50T and GPIIIa PLA1/A2 polymorphisms are rare in Chinese. In contrast to previous studies in Caucasian populations, these candidate functional polymorphisms are unlikely to be significant contributors to aspirin pharmacodynamics in Chinese persons. Importantly, the presence of the P2Y1 893CC genotype appears to confer an attenuated antiplatelet effect during aspirin treatment in healthy Chinese volunteers. These data collectively underscore the importance of population-to-population variability in clinical pharmacogenetics research and provide a basis for further long-term studies of aspirin response and P2Y1 genetic variation in patients with cardiovascular risk.

Clinical relevance of aspirin resistance in patients with stable coronary artery disease: a prospective follow-up study (PROSPECTAR)

Aspirin resistance may increase the risk of major adverse cardiac events (MACE) more than threefold in patients with stable coronary artery disease (CAD). This study aimed to determine the prevalence of aspirin resistance in patients with stable CAD, the role of aspirin resistance on outcome in the follow-up, and the effect of clopidogrel therapy in MACE prevention in aspirin-resistant individuals. We detected the prevalence of aspirin resistance in 234 patients with stable CAD. Platelet function was determined by PFA-100 with collagen and/or epinephrine and collagen and/or ADP cartridges. The mean follow-up time was 20.6 +/- 6.9 months. The primary endpoints of the study were occurrence of myocardial infarction, unstable angina, stroke and cardiac death. Of patients, 22.2% (n = 52) were aspirin resistant by PFA-100. During follow-up, MACE occurred in eight patients (15.4%) with aspirin resistance and in 20 patients (11.0%) with aspirin-sensitive platelet aggregation (P = 0.269). MACE increased in aspirin-resistant patients after termination of clopidogrel therapy. Eleven patients experienced MACE after cessation of clopidogrel therapy (P < 0.001). The MACE risk in patients with stable CAD having detected aspirin resistance was similar compared with patients having aspirin-sensitive platelet aggregation by PFA-100. The MACE prevalence increased during follow-up, however, just after cessation of clopidogrel therapy.

Prevalence of persistent platelet reactivity despite use of aspirin: a systematic review

BACKGROUND

The absolute risk of recurrences among patients using aspirin for prevention of cardiovascular events remains high. Persistent platelet reactivity despite aspirin therapy might explain this in part. Reported prevalences of this so-called aspirin resistance vary widely, between 0% and 57%.

OBJECTIVES

The aim of the study was to systematically review all available evidence on prevalence of aspirin resistance and to study determinants of reported prevalence.

METHODS

Using a predefined search strategy, we searched electronic databases MEDLINE, EMBASE, CENTRAL, and Web of Science. To be included in our analysis, articles had to contain a laboratory definition of aspirin resistance, use aspirin as secondary prevention, and report associated prevalence.

RESULTS

We included 34 full-text articles and 8 meeting abstracts. The mean prevalence of aspirin resistance was 24% (95% CI 20%-28%). After adjustment for differences in definition, used dosage, and population, a statistically significant higher prevalence was found in studies with aspirin dosage < or =100 mg compared with > or =300 mg (36% [95% CI 28%-43%] vs 19% [95% CI 11%-26%], P < .0001). Studies measuring platelet aggregation using light aggregometry with arachidonic acid as an agonist had a pooled unadjusted prevalence of 6% (95% CI 0%-12%). In studies using point-of-care platelet function-analyzing devices, the unadjusted prevalence was significantly higher, at 26% (95% CI 21%-31%).

CONCLUSIONS

Prevalences widely differ between studies reporting on aspirin resistance. Both aspirin dosage and the method of defining aspirin resistance strongly influence estimated prevalence, which explains found heterogeneity among studies. On average, it appears that about 1 in 4 individuals may express biochemically defined aspirin resistance.

A review of aspirin resistance; definition, possible mechanisms, detection with platelet function tests, and its clinical outcomes

Aspirin (acetylsalicylic acid) is one of the main therapeutics in prevention of thrombo-embolic vascular events. Its efficiency is proved in the prevention of cardiovascular events. However, antiplatelet effect of aspirin is not absolute in all patients and some patients experience thrombo-embolic events despite aspirin. These patients are clinically called as aspirin resistant or aspirin non-responders. Globally, a lot of people are affected by aspirin resistance according to the high prevalence of athero-thrombotic vascular diseases. A prevalence of 5.5-45% in patients with various cardiovascular disease by different laboratory methods has been reported for aspirin resistance. Clinical outcome of aspirin resistance has been demonstrated in patients with different vascular diseases. Detection of platelet function in patients treated with aspirin may be necessary in the prediction of clinical outcome. Point of care methods, which have correlated results with the standard light transmittance aggregometry may be appropriate choices in the detection of platelets' response to antiplatelet therapy. Adequate additional therapies may reduce atherothrombotic risks and major cardiovascular events rate in aspirin resistant subjects. None of the current researches advised the cessation of aspirin therapy. There is need to investigate the efficacy of additional adenosine diphosphate receptor antagonists or newer antiplatelet agents in aspirin resistant subjects. The intent of this paper is to review the literature discussing possible mechanisms, determination techniques, and clinical effects of aspirin resistance.

The role of aspirin resistance on outcome in patients with acute coronary syndrome and the effect of clopidogrel therapy in the prevention of major cardiovascular events

BACKGROUND

Aspirin resistance may increase up to more then threefold the risk of major cardiovascular events (MACE) in patients with stable coronary artery disease.

AIM

The aim of our study was to determine; the prevalence of aspirin resistance in patients with acute coronary syndromes, the role of aspirin resistance on outcome in the follow-up and the effect of clopidogrel therapy in the prevention of MACE in aspirin resistant subjects.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

We detected the prevelance of aspirin resistance in 105 patients with acute coronary syndrome. Platelet functions were analyzed in Platelet Function Analyzer (PFA)-100 (Dade Behring, Germany) with collagen and/or epinephrine (Col/Epi) and collagen and/or ADP (Col/ADP) cartridges. Primary end points of the study were myocardial infarction, unstable angina, cardiac death.

RESULTS

19% (n = 20) of patients were aspirin resistant by PFA-100. In the follow-up, MACE occured in 9 patients (45%) with aspirin resistance and in 10 patients (11.7%) with aspirin sensitive platelet aggregation (p = 0.001). Multivariate analysis showed that aspirin resistance was an independant predictor of MACE. The prevalence of MACE in patients who were on clopidogrel treatment for 12 months were lower compared to those who were on a clopidogrel treatment for the first six months (p = 0.040).

CONCLUSIONS

We determined that the MACE risk in patients with acute coronary syndromes having detected aspirin resistance, was higher at statistically significant levels compared to patients having aspirin sensitive platelet aggregation. Our results showed that aspirin resistance, was an independant predictor of MACE in patients with acute coronary syndrome.

Aspirin resistance: is this term meaningful?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To review data for and against the existence of 'aspirin resistance', a term coined to indicate aspirin-treated patients having ex-vivo tests of platelet activation insensitive to aspirin treatment and recurrence of cardiovascular disease.

RECENT FINDINGS

'Aspirin resistance' defined by ex-vivo tests of platelet activation yielded values ranging from 21 to 78%, indicating that such tests do not provide a useful measurement. In long-term aspirin-treated patients, studies demonstrated small but functionally relevant platelet thromboxane A2 formation that was responsible for an enhanced platelet activation in response to platelet agonist. These studies, however, did not fully exclude that aspirin compliance may be implicated in such phenomena. Two trials performed in patients with coronary artery disease demonstrated that laboratory evidence of aspirin resistance was no longer detectable when aspirin compliance was accurately monitored.

SUMMARY

Given the multifactorial nature of atherothrombosis, recurrence of cardiovascular events in aspirin-treated patients does not necessarily suggest 'drug failure'. A cause-effect relationship between platelet insensitivity to aspirin and cardiovascular recurrence has not been defined overall because aspirin compliance has been scarcely considered. Until this information is taken into account, the existence of 'clinical resistance' to aspirin should be reconsidered.

Aspirin resistance: truth or dare

Acetylsalicylic acid, or aspirin (ASA), is widely used in patients with cardiovascular disease to prevent acute ischemic events. However, platelet response to ASA is not equal in all individuals, and a high variability in the prevalence of ASA resistance is reported in the literature (0.4-83%). Actually, ASA resistance is poorly understood; this stems from the fact that its definition is unclear, its presence can be evaluated by a number of assays that are not equivalent, and its prevalence may vary widely based on the population studied. This article (1) exposes the difficulties in defining ASA resistance; (2) discusses the mechanisms by which ASA resistance may occur; (3) presents the characteristics that may put patients at greater risk of exhibiting ASA resistance; and (4) discusses the clinical impact of ASA resistance in patients requiring chronic therapy.

Biological effects of aspirin and clopidogrel in a randomized cross-over study in 96 healthy volunteers

BACKGROUND

Some data suggest that biological 'resistance' to aspirin or clopidogrel may influence clinical outcome.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to evaluate the relationship between aspirin and clopidogrel responsiveness in healthy subjects.

METHODS

Ninety-six healthy subjects were randomly assigned to receive a 1-week course of aspirin 100 mg day(-1) followed by a 1-week course of clopidogrel (300 mg on day 1, then 75 mg day(-1)), or the reverse sequence, separated by a 2-week wash-out period. The drug effects were assessed by means of serum TxB2 assay, platelet aggregation tests, and the PFA -100 and Ultegra RPFA -Verify Now methods.

RESULTS

Only one subject had true aspirin resistance, defined as a serum TxB2 level > 80 pg microL(-1) at the end of aspirin administration and confirmed by platelet incubation with aspirin. PFA-100 values were normal in 29% of the subjects after aspirin intake, despite a drastic reduction in TxB2 production; these subjects were considered to have aspirin pseudo-resistance. Clopidogrel responsiveness was not related to aspirin pseudo-resistance. Selected polymorphisms of platelet receptor genes were not associated with either aspirin or clopidogrel responsiveness.

CONCLUSIONS

In healthy subjects, true aspirin resistance is rare and aspirin pseudo-resistance is not related to clopidogrel responsiveness.